Misplaced Pages

U.S. Army universal camouflage trials

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from U.S. Army trial patterns) U.S. Army program to find universally effective camouflage
Final variant of Desert All-Over Brush

The U.S. Army universal camouflage trials took place from 2002 to 2004 with the goal of creating a single pattern that would provide adequate concealment in all environments. Four different patterns in a total of 13 variations were tested during the evaluation: three woodland patterns, three desert, three urban, three desert/urban, and one multi-environment pattern. The Universal Camouflage Pattern was eventually adopted despite not having been part of the test. Brigadier General James Moran, the Director of PEO-Soldier, overrode the testing data and directed the adoption of this untested pattern of camouflage.

Development

Six patterns were originally developed in early 2002 and reviewed for effectiveness, with three of the six designs being rejected due to limited effectiveness. The final three patterns were evaluated at the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Center, and four color schemes were created for each pattern. The woodland patterns consisted of tan, green, brown and black; the desert patterns comprised tan, dark tan, khaki and brown; the urban patterns included tan, light gray, medium gray and black, and the desert/urban patterns contained tan, dark tan, light gray and brown. A common ground shade, tan, was selected for all patterns to allow individual equipment to be interchangeable if more than one color scheme were adopted. The patterns were All-Over Brush, Shadowline, Track, and Scorpion, co-developed with contractor Crye Precision. The goal was to develop a single pattern that would perform well in all terrains.

Patterns

All-Over Brush

All-Over Brush pattern

All-Over Brush consisted of swirls of colors similar to patches of grass and brush. In a poll from the Army Times in 2002, All-Over Brush was voted the most popular pattern in the woodland, desert, and urban schemes. The urban and desert/urban schemes were eliminated in the first phase of testing, with woodland being eliminated during the second phase of testing. Desert All-Over Brush made it through phase three and four in a modified, more all-environment friendly form.

Shadowline

Shadowline pattern

The Shadowline pattern sported horizontal lines with slashes. All four color combinations were eliminated during the first phase of testing.

Track

Track pattern

The Track pattern featured vertical lines with small, irregular marks present throughout. All four color combinations made it to phase two of testing, with a modified woodland pattern and modified urban pattern making it through phases three and four.

Scorpion

Scorpion was developed in conjunction with defense contractor Crye Precision. The pattern consists of six colors with an irregular spread throughout, and was designed to be effective in multiple environments. Following the trials, Crye began producing a slightly altered version for the commercial market as MultiCam.

Pattern testing

Testing occurred in four different phases between August 2002 and March 2004 at Fort Benning, Fort Irwin, Fort Lewis, Fort Polk and the Yakima Training Center. A total of 15 evaluations took place. Trained soldiers rated the patterns based on blending, brightness, contrast and detection. Phase one consisted of only side-by-side daytime testing at distances up to 180 meters (590 ft) with patterns printed by an inkjet printer. Eleven candidates were selected and production printed for phase two of testing, which contained both day and nighttime evaluations at distances no greater than 120 meters (390 ft). Patterns were tested separately in phase two. The modified Desert All-Over Brush, Woodland Track, Urban Track and Scorpion were evaluated in phases three and four. During phase four of testing, the selected patterns were printed on Future Force Warrior ensembles and evaluated from four different angles against woodland, desert and urban backgrounds.

Testing phase changes

Phase I (Inkjet Printed)

All-Over Brush

  • Woodland Woodland
  • Desert Desert
  • Urban Urban
  • Desert/Urban Desert/Urban

Track

  • Woodland Woodland
  • Desert Desert
  • Urban Urban
  • Desert/Urban Desert/Urban

Shadowline

(No Officially Released Swatches)

Phase II (Production Printed)

All-Over Brush

  • Woodland Woodland
  • Desert Desert

Track

  • Woodland Woodland
  • Desert Desert
  • Urban Urban
  • Desert/Urban Desert/Urban

Phase III (Mods)

All-Over Brush

  • Desert (Mod) Desert (Mod)

Track

  • Woodland (Mod) Woodland (Mod)
  • Light Urban (Mod) Light Urban (Mod)
  • Dark Urban (Mod) Dark Urban (Mod)

Phase IV (FFW System Level)

All-Over Brush

  • Desert Desert

Track

  • Woodland (Mod) Woodland (Mod)
  • Urban Urban

Adoption of OCP

Main article: Operational Camouflage Pattern

The Operational Camouflage Pattern, a modified version of the Scorpion pattern from the original trials, has been selected as the new pattern. It has been authorized for wear since 1 July 2015. The Universal Camouflage Pattern was authorized until 1 October 2019.

See also

References

  1. ^ Dugas, A.; Zupkofska, K. J.; DiChiara, A.; Kramer, F. M. (December 2004). "Universal Camouflage for the Future Warrior" (PDF). Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, Natick Soldier Center. ADA433081. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2009.
  2. ^ "dugas.ppt as .PDF" (PDF). Mil-spec Monkey. US Army Natick Soldier Center. 15 December 2004. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 December 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2024.
  3. ^ "dugas.ppt". Defence Technical Information Center. US Army Natick Soldier Center. 15 December 2004. Archived from the original on 11 August 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2009.
  4. German, Erik. "$5B Camo Snafu". The Daily. Retrieved 2024-06-19.
  5. "Army News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq". Army Times. Retrieved 30 October 2007.
  6. Kolesar, Samuel (9 April 2011). "Modern Combat Uniforms of the USA II". On War. Archived from the original on 1 September 2013. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
  7. Mortlock, Robert F. (3 July 2018). "Operational Camouflage Pattern Case Study" (PDF). Acquisition Research Program Sponsored Report Series. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943. p. 31. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 April 2022. Retrieved 15 June 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  8. "Operational Camouflage Pattern Army Combat Uniforms available July 1" (Rev. 26 October 2015 & Original). WASHINGTON: The United States Army. 1 June 2015. Archived from the original on 5 June 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
  9. "Operational Camouflage Pattern Army Combat Uniforms available July 1" (PDF) (Rev. 26 October 2015 Only). WASHINGTON. 1 July 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2020. Retrieved 19 June 2024.

External links

Categories: