| Part of a series on |
| Atonement in Christianity |
|---|
.JPG) |
Theories
|
|
Ransom (Patristic) |
|
Christus Victor (20th century) |
|
Recapitulation
|
|
Satisfaction (Scholastic / Anselmian) |
|
Penal substitution (Scholastic / Reformed / Arminian) |
|
Governmental
|
|
Moral influence (Mixed) |
|
Moral example (Socinian) |
|
|
|
Types |
|
Limited (Scholastic / Reformed) |
|
Unlimited (Amyraldism / Arminianism / Protestantism) |
|
See also |
| Christian universalism |
Unlimited atonement (sometimes called general atonement or universal atonement) is a doctrine in Protestant Christianity that states Jesus died as a propitiation for the benefit of all humans without exception. It is normally associated with Amyraldism (four-point Calvinism), as well as Arminianism and other non-Calvinist tradition. It is a doctrine distinct from other elements of the Calvinist acronym TULIP and is contrary to the Calvinist doctrine of limited atonement.
A doctrinal issue that divides Christians is the question of the extent of the atonement. This question typically goes as follows: "Did Christ bear the sins of the elect alone on the cross, or did his death expiate the sins of all human beings?" Those who take this view read scriptures such as John 3:16; 1 Timothy 2:6; 4:10; Hebrews 2:9; 1 John 2:2 to say that the Bible teaches unlimited atonement.
Historical background
Further information: History of the Calvinist–Arminian debate| The Five Articles of Remonstrance |
|---|
|
|
| Conditional election |
| Unlimited atonement |
| Total depravity |
| Prevenient grace |
| Conditional preservation |
|
|
In response to the Remonstrants' Five articles of Remonstrance, the Synod of Dort published the Canons of Dort which included limited atonement.
One of the stronger, more vocal proponents of unlimited atonement was Methodist leader John Wesley. George Whitefield opposed the view. The namesake of the Calvinist systematic theological viewpoint, John Calvin, seemingly expressed an unlimited atonement position in several passages from his published Commentaries.
Doctrine
The terms unlimited, universal, and general are somewhat of a misnomer and have been adopted primarily to distinguish this doctrine from a Calvinist understanding of limited atonement. More accurately, the call of the Gospel is universal and there are no limits on who can believe through faith, but the legal payment is still regarded as limited only to those that respond through faith in Jesus. Thus, it is not the same as the doctrine of universal salvation, which holds that all souls will ultimately be reconciled to God, irrespective of faith.
The following statements regarding what it states and what it does not state are subject to close scrutiny of which many distinguished theologians on both sides of this issue disagree.
- What it states
- The purpose of the atonement was universal—Jesus died on behalf of all people, not just the elect.
- The atonement makes a way for all to respond to the Gospel call—Part of the effect of the atonement is the restoration of the ability to respond to God's call of salvation (see Prevenient grace).
- Salvation is available for all—The doctrine of unlimited atonement rejects the predeterminism associated with Calvinism and states that every human has the opportunity to accept Jesus through faith.
- The atonement legally pays for the sins of those who believe on Jesus—Only those who believe on Jesus are forgiven—only the believers' sins are paid
- What it does not state
- Jesus paid the penalty for those who deny faith in Him, and His death was a substitutionary atonement for those who deny Him—Though the term unlimited atonement can easily give the incorrect assumption that Jesus' payment encompassed all people, unlimited atonement maintains a limit on the legal effect. Jesus' death was indeed an offer of a substitutionary atonement to all, but this offer was resistible; though salvation is offered to all, not all are saved.
Amyraldism (commonly called "four-point Calvinism" holds to a view of Unlimited atonement that is very similar but not synonymous with the traditional Arminian understanding) teaches that God has provided Christ's atonement for all alike, but seeing that none would believe on their own, he then elects those whom he will bring to faith in Christ, thereby preserving the Calvinist doctrine of the unconditional election of individuals.
Unlimited atonement has a number of important points in common with traditional formulations of limited atonement. Both positions affirm that:
- The call of salvation can genuinely be made universally
- Jesus paid the penalty only for those who have faith in Him
- Jesus' death was a substitutionary atonement only for those who accept Him
Biblical passages
All quotes from the NKJV unless otherwise noted, emphasis added:
Scriptures used in support of unlimited atonement
These are Scriptures commonly used by those who support Unlimited atonement:
- John 1:29—"The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world."
- John 3:14–18—"And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life. For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved. He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God."
- John 3:16—"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life."
- Romans 3:23–24—"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus"
- Romans 5:18—"Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men."
- 2 Corinthians 5:14–15—"For the love of Christ compels us, because we judge thus: that if One died for all, then all died; and He died for all, that those who live should live no longer for themselves, but for Him who died for them and rose again."
- 2 Corinthians 5:19—"n Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation."
- 1 Timothy 1:15—"Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners—of whom I am the worst."
- 1 Timothy 2:3–6—For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time."
- 1 Timothy 4:10—"For to this end we both labor and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe."
- Titus 2:11—"For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people."
- Hebrews 2:9—"But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone."
- 2 Peter 2:1—"They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them." This appears to indicate that Christ "bought" some who are not among the elect.
- 2 Peter 3:9—"The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."
- 1 John 2:2—"And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world."
- 1 John 4:14—"And we have seen and we testify that the Father has sent His Son as the world’s Savior."
Scriptures used to criticize unlimited atonement
These are Scriptures commonly used by those who deny Unlimited atonement:
- John 10:2–5,11,14–15"—But he who enters by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the doorkeeper opens, and the sheep hear his voice; and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. And when he brings out his own sheep, he goes before them; and the sheep follow him, for they know his voice. Yet they will by no means follow a stranger, but will flee from him, for they do not know the voice of strangers...I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep...I am the good shepherd; and I know My sheep, and am known by My own. As the Father knows Me, even so I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep." This is usually reconciled by pointing out that Jesus died for everyone in theory, but He did it particularly for those who would follow Him.
- John 17:9—"...I do not pray for the world but for those whom You have given Me, for they are Yours." This is usually reconciled by claiming that this does not refer to the atonement itself.
- Acts 20:28—"Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood." This again is often reconciled by saying that Christ's death is only effective for those who come to the church, even though it is potentially effective for all.
- Romans 8:33–34—"Who shall bring a charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies. Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us." Attempts to reconcile this may point to the fact that in the unlimited view, Christ still only intercedes for those who follow Him.
- Ephesians 5:25—"Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her." This is usually reconciled by saying that He did it particularly for those who would follow Him, although it was potentially effective for all.
- John 3:16—"“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." This clearly shows that only those who believe in Jesus will receive eternal life, which essentially limits the atonement to those who belief.
See also
- Atonement in Christianity
- Conditional election
- Unconditional election
- Prevenient grace
- Universal reconciliation
References
- Walsh, J.D. (1993). "Wesley Vs. Whitefield". Christian History. No. 38. Christian History Institute.
- Paul Hartog, A Word for the World: Calvin on the Extent of the Atonement (Schaumburg: Regular Baptist Press, 2009).
- ^ "Calvinism: Limited Atonement". WELS Topical Q&A. Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Archived from the original on 2 January 2008. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
- ^ "Justification / Salvation". WELS Topical Q&A. Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Archived from the original on 2 January 2008. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
Romans 3:23-24, 5:9, 18 are other passages that lead us to say that it is most appropriate and accurate to say that universal justification is a finished fact. God has forgiven the sins of the whole world whether people believe it or not. He has done more than "made forgiveness possible." All this is for the sake of the perfect substitutionary work of Jesus Christ.
- "Justification / Salvation". WELS Topical Q&A. Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Archived from the original on 2 January 2008. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
In 2 Corinthians 5:19 we are told that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting their sins against them. And, he has committed to us the message of reconciliation. Here the forgiveness of the world's sins (not counting the sins against them because of Christ's work) is declared to be a past and present reality to be announced and appreciated.
Further reading
- Allen, David (2016). The Extent of the Atonement: A Historical and Critical Review. Nashville: B&H Academic.
- Baxter, Richard. Universal Redemption of Mankind. Printed in London, 1694)
- Forster, Roger (2000). God's Strategy in Human History. Wipf & Stock Publishers.
- Hartog, Paul, A Word for the World: Calvin on the Extent of the Atonement (Schaumburg: Regular Baptist Press, 2009).
- Klein, William W. (1990). The New Chosen People. A Corporate View of Election. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
- Lightner, Robert P. The Death Christ Died—A Biblical Case For Unlimited Atonement. (Revised Edition, 1998) .
- Morrison, James. The Extent of the Atonement. (London: Hamilton, Adams & Co., 1882)
- Picirilli, Robert (2002). Grace, Faith, Free Will: Contrasting Views of Salvation. Nashville: Randall House.
- Pinson, J. Matthew (2002). Four Views on Eternal Security. Grand Rapids: Harper Collins.
- Shank, Robert Elect in the Son (Bethany House Publishers, 1989) ISBN 1-55661-092-0
- Wesley, John Predestination Calmly Considered (variety of publications)
- Wiley, H. Orton (1940). Christian theology (3 volumes). Kansas City, MO: Beacon Hill Press.
External links
- Pro
- WELS Topical Q&A: Doctrine - Justification/Salvation by Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
- "Father, Whose Everlasting Love" by Charles Wesley
- Sermon #128: "Free Grace" by John Wesley
- The Case for Unlimited Atonement by Ron Rhodes
- The Death Christ Died: A Case for Unlimited Atonement by Robert Lightner
- Unlimited Atonement Historically & Biblically Supported
- The Scope of the Atonement in the Early Church Fathers by Christopher Bounds
- Con
- Articles on Definite Atonement at Monergism.com
- "For Whom Did Christ Die?", part 3, chapter 8 of Charles Hodge's Systematic Theology.
- "Limited Atonement", a series of articles by Ra McLaughlin
- "Limited Atonement", chapter 12 from The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination by Loraine Boettner
- The Death of Death in the Death of Christ by John Owen (ISBN 0-85151-382-4)
| Arminianism | ||
|---|---|---|
| Background |  | |
| Documents | ||
| Doctrine | ||
| Historical theologians | ||
| Modern theologians | ||
| Movements | ||