Misplaced Pages

🥒🥒🥒💦💦💦💦🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑😍😍😍😍😍😍😍🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🥒🥒🥒💦💦💦💦💦🦶🏼🦶🏼🦶🏼🦶🏼🦶🏼

December 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hephthalite–Gokturk raids of 614–616, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

I give sources about that rebellion, how it is vandalism? وقت الصلاة (talk) 23:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

You added a poorly formatted citation. Also, this article is well sourced and this topic has been discussed to death. At this rate meatpuppetry is starting to look like a strong possibility. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

poorly formated information? Yeah Edourad Chavannes وقت الصلاة (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

I dont care if it's wrong, but according to that article, hephtalites and kushans asked Gokturks for reinforcement and Gokturks Reached rayy and isfahan and defeated Datoyean, and they returned to their camp. Later sassanians defeated Hephthalites and Kushans, and killed their king hand to hand. So that edit is right وقت الصلاة (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hephthalite–Gokturk raids of 614–616. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Paramandyr (talk) 23:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

YOU ARE THE ONE THAT EDIT WARRING وقت الصلاة (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

One more trolling comment like this;"You may hate Turkish people.. but this not change the fact.", and I'll contact an Admin. --Paramandyr (talk) 23:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Your article saying gokturks defeated datoyean, later they retreated then Hephthalites and kushans defeated by sassanids so its right وقت الصلاة (talk) 23:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

The article indicates the Gokturks retreated, leaving their allies. Therefore, the Gokturks removed themselves from the raid, becoming a non-factor, while the Hephthalites and Kushans still made up the raiding party. The fact you don't like that is irrelevant. Your puerile personal attack is also evidence of your inability to address the issue neutrally. --Paramandyr (talk) 23:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Show me where i do personal attack, article saying "RAIDS" means its have different stages. وقت الصلاة (talk) 23:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

"Incursions" "Smbat quickly reorganized" وقت الصلاة (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

• "Show me where i do personal attack"

Accusing another editor of being a racist is a personal attack. "You may hate Turkish people.."

• ""RAIDS" means its have different stages."

Uh, raids on Ray and Isfahan. Since these two cities aren't located right next to each other, clearly it would be more than one raid. The sources clearly state the groups were together before the Gokturks retreated. Clearly, you can not edit that article neutrally. Done here. --Paramandyr (talk) 23:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Rayy and Isfahan are close to eachother. "After Plundering region returned to its camp later smbat quickly reorganized" means It's have different stages.

If you Look the userpage of "HistoryofIran" you can clearly see she is obsessed with turkish people. وقت الصلاة (talk) 00:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC)