User talk:ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ/Archive 1

< User talk:ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ

{{talkarchive}} ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 13:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)WB:SOAP - read that before complaining if i report some material from peoples user pages, please.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 23:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ. Welcome to Misplaced Pages! This is a website where everyone is welcomed to pitch in their own knowledge to just about anything in the world's most up-to-date encyclopedia.

The quick links to Misplaced Pages are on the left side of every page. Here're some links that you should take time reading them (don't worry, they're short and very easy to understand)

If you need help, simply go to Misplaced Pages:Questions or ask on my talk page. Last thing, don't forget to sign your name when you do edits on a talk page. Signing a page is as easy as typing four tildes (~~~~). I hope that your experience in Misplaced Pages will be a memorable one.
OhanaUnited 04:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

table

hello, look here: Help:Table. Blueshirts (talk) 07:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Blanking Talk Page Archives

Look, whether you think something is wrong or not, you don't just blank pages, especially not archived ones. Report it at WP:ANI if you must, but don't just blank it. --Alinnisawest(talk) 23:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Remove on Gun Powder Ma user page

Hello, I had revert your edit over Gun Powder Ma user page. Please don't removed material on user page. Thanks Anpersonalaccount (talk) 12:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't do this again, ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ. This was clearly against WP rules, which you might want to read carefully for a change. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

you also might want to read wp rules carefully for a change, which says NO SOAPBOXING including userpages........ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 18:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Radical and stroke order

Hey, I had seen your impressive Chinese radical at the user page! You might get interested in stroke order as well, one which I found. But please don't removed material on user page. Thanks Anpersonalaccount (talk) 12:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

my Unblock requests

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked supposedly because my account is ONLY for nationalistic provocations, first of all, this account is NOT ONLY for nationalistic provocations, i have made constructive edits, look in my contributions, and the supposedly "nationalist provacations" were all removals of soapboxing which is agaist wikipedia rules. i suspect i was blocked because the admin has a real bad problem with chinese people......

Decline reason:

Your comments here and below assure me that you do not intend to improve your behavior and politely discuss issues with other editors. Please see WP:NPA. — Hersfold 02:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

oh yeah and this is to the admin who blocked me. i suspect you saq my edit on another users talk page saying something about taiwan is a province. IT IS OFFICIALLY a province designated by the ROC WHICH RULES TAIWAN. and all my other edits were removal of propaganda, sopaboxing etc, and if you go to the bottom of my contributions i HAVE MADE CONSTRUCTIVE EDITSㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 02:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

funny how that admin claimed this account was made for NATIIONALISTIC provocations, when i have made construtive edits to articles like dynasty about egyptian and irish ruling dynasties........ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 02:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

same reason as above, and about my behavior... strange thing since it wasnt my behavior that got me suspended, i am trying to politely discuss this, i am just stating my reason why the admin blocked me and im not being rude here, since it is true, and outright lie that this account is only for nationalistic provocation, look in my contributions.

Decline reason:

Your edits got you blocked. Calling the blocking admin a liar does not help in the least. I don't see any indication that you intend to edit constructively — Ѕandahl 03:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

so far i have not seen any of my edits reverted, i was following the rules, and about this account being one use, again, look at the bottom of my contributionsㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 02:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

same reason as the other one, and about the admin above saying my edits got me blocked, it said on the blocking thing that this was a ONE USE ACCOUNT. if you look in my contributions, at the bottom i have made constructive edits. I DONT see how this is a one use account. i also request the admin who sees this has a talk with me.

Decline reason:

Making some constructive contributions doesn't entitle you to use your account for disruptive nationalist behavior. As I contacted the blocking admin about your edits, I will only agree to unblock you if you stop disrupting Misplaced Pages by removing pro-Tibet messages on other peoples' user and user talk pages and if you don't use Misplaced Pages in the future to push an anti-Tibet point of view. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 13:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

i have made edits that have nothing to do with china. this account is NOT one use.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 13:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

okay, i will stop targeting pro tibetan people, and trying to remove anti china stuff, but soapboxing is really against the rules. im not justifying my actions in the previoius sentence, but this account was not one use.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

and since your continuing to block me please change the indefinite block tag from one use account to blocked because of disruptive editing, the one use accusation is incorrect.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 14:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

also i know exclusive targeting of pro tibetan user pages is wrong, but soapboxing is against the rules.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 14:18, 13 August 2008(UTC)

"Making some constructive contributions doesn't entitle you to use your account for disruptive nationalist behavior." thats not what the blocking reason said. what i was trying to do was proving that the reason for blocking was incorrect, it said i was one use, i didnt say that making constructive contributions entitle me to anything. that meant the reason he wrote down for blocking was wrong, not the block itself.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

im not trying to be rude by copying your quote.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 14:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

WB:SOAP says no opinions pieces or propaganda on user and talk pages. im not justifying me edits, im conplaining about other peoples edits.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 14:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Blnguyen had a valid rationale, albeit it wasn't entirely accurate (your account wasn't only used for disruption). However, it's a minor point in my opinion. Don't unilaterally remove stuff from other people's userpages. Instead, ask them politely if they would remove it. You do realize that there's a lot of politicized stuff on userpages nowadays. There's many people with pro-Obama, pro-McCain, pro-CPC userboxes. You are now unblocked. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Satan

Thank you for your recent comment regarding your perceived religious discussion on Talk:Stalin, I replaced the reference to Satan with an analogous evil personality for your chinese censorship viewing pleasure. Bugguyak (talk) 11:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

i have not even stated whether i support the PROC or ROC yet you jump to conclusions. comparing satan to a human being is totally wrong, considering the fact that we do not know satan's personality, whether he is evil, or just the absence of good, just as darkness is the abcense of light, and coldness the absence of heat. and its not chinese cencorship, i dont like it when religious people feel the need to butt their heads into an argument. and btw hitler was a christian, and stalin studying to become a priest.....ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

and it is also clear that the killings, mass murder, and genocide that stalin, hitler, and god ordered in the old testament of the bible, were deliberate and intentional, while all deaths resulting from mao were a result of failed economic policy.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 15:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

and in case you didnt notice, the script used for my account name is NOT USED IN COMMUNIST CHINa, IT IS USED BY ROC.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 15:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC) {{talkarchive}}