Company type | Consulting firm |
---|---|
Industry | Public relations, Consulting |
Founded | 2010 |
Founder |
|
Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States |
Key people | |
Website | wiki-pr.com (archived) |
Wiki-PR was a consulting firm that marketed the ability to edit Misplaced Pages by "directly edit your page using our network of established Misplaced Pages editors and admins".
It received media attention in 2013 after a sockpuppet investigation resulted in more than 250 Misplaced Pages user accounts being blocked or banned. The Wikimedia Foundation changed its terms of use in the wake of the investigation, requiring anyone paid to edit Misplaced Pages to openly disclose their affiliations. Despite the ban, Status Labs, a firm started in 2012 by Wiki-PR founders Fisher and French, continued to edit clients' Misplaced Pages articles according to former employees. Wiki-PR has been inactive since 2013.
Company
Wiki-PR was created in 2010 by Darius Fisher, its chief operating officer as of 2014, and Jordan French, its chief executive officer as of 2014. Confirmed clients include Priceline and Emad Rahim, and suspected clients include Viacom, among many others. The firm claimed to have Misplaced Pages administrator access enabling it to manage the Misplaced Pages presence of more than 12,000 clients. Wiki-PR has been reported to use "aggressive email marketing" to acquire new customers.
Investigation and company reaction
An investigation of sockpuppet accounts on Misplaced Pages that began in 2012 implicated hundreds of accounts. Wiki-PR's involvement was confirmed after four customers of Wiki-PR spoke anonymously to The Daily Dot journalist Simon Owens, and two others, Priceline.com and Emad Rahim, spoke to Vice journalist Martin Robbins. In addition to violating rules against sockpuppeting, Wiki-PR violated Misplaced Pages rules by citing articles that were planted on business content farms and various other websites that accept contributions from any Internet user as sources for Misplaced Pages entries, creating a false impression of credibility. The same websites were used repeatedly, and their presence in various Misplaced Pages articles aided investigators in identifying articles the company had worked on.
The investigation led to the Misplaced Pages community blocking hundreds of paid Misplaced Pages editing accounts believed to be connected to Wiki-PR that had edited contrary to Misplaced Pages's rules.
In 2014 The New York Times described Wiki-PR's methods:
uses a lot of people, with different identities, to edit pages for paying customers and to manage those pages. The paid sock puppets are ready to pounce on edits that don't adhere to the client's vision.
In The Wall Street Journal, French was quoted as saying that Wiki-PR is a research and writing firm, counseling clients on "how to adhere to Misplaced Pages's rules". French said that its paid work is part of the "fabric" of Misplaced Pages, complementing the work of unpaid volunteers. French acknowledged that Wiki-PR had sometimes made "bad calls" on the notability of articles. He also said that "We do pay hundreds of other editors for their work—they're real people and not sockpuppets." Instead, as was reported by the International Business Times, Wiki-PR had been involved in "meatpuppetry"—a practice in which editors illegitimately encourage other individuals to edit in support of their position—in addition to planting articles online to try to garner better potential notability for its clients.
Misplaced Pages and Wikimedia's reaction
As of October 25, 2013, Wiki-PR, including all of its employees, contractors, and owners, were banned from editing Misplaced Pages. Sue Gardner, executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, stated that the Foundation was "exploring our options". On November 19, 2013, Wikimedia's law firm, Cooley LLP, emailed a cease-and-desist letter to Wiki-PR. French told The Guardian that Wiki-PR "is working with the Wikimedia Foundation and its counsel to sort this out", and hoped to have further information in a week's time. The Wikimedia Foundation acknowledged communicating with Wiki-PR, but the Foundation rejected any implication that they were negotiating with Wiki-PR, saying that if Wiki-PR wanted to continue editing, Wiki-PR must turn to Misplaced Pages's community.
In June 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation updated its terms of use, forbidding undisclosed paid editing and requiring any paid editors to disclose their affiliation. The blog post announcing the change stated that "Undisclosed paid advocacy editing is a black hat practice that can threaten the trust of Wikimedia's volunteers and readers. We have serious concerns about the way that such editing affects the neutrality and reliability of Misplaced Pages." Later in 2014, a number of large PR firms pledged to follow Misplaced Pages's new and existing guidelines.
Notes
- The cease-and-desist letter, titled "C&D letter to WikiPR from Cooley", is here.
References
- "Wiki-PR: Misplaced Pages Writers For Hire". Wiki-PR.com. Archived from the original on June 10, 2021. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
- "Misplaced Pages probe into paid-for 'sockpuppet' entries". BBC News. October 21, 2013. Archived from the original on November 5, 2021. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
- ^ "Leadership". Wiki-PR website. Archived from the original on October 21, 2013. Retrieved January 26, 2014.
- Robbins, Martin (October 18, 2013). "Is the PR Industry Buying Influence Over Misplaced Pages?". Vice. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 15, 2019.
- Mullin, Joe (October 22, 2013). "Misplaced Pages editors, locked in battle with PR firm, delete 250 accounts". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on June 9, 2017. Retrieved June 15, 2017.
- ^ Elder, Jeff (June 16, 2014). "Misplaced Pages Strengthens Rules Against Undisclosed Editing". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on June 18, 2014. Retrieved December 4, 2015.
- ^ Brigham, Geoff (June 14, 2014). "Making a change to our Terms of Use: Requirements for disclosure". Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on September 10, 2015. Retrieved September 14, 2015.
- Levy, Rachael (December 13, 2019). "How the 1% Scrubs Its Image Online". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on December 15, 2019. Retrieved December 15, 2019.
- Neither the Wiki-PR website nor its social media pages have been updated since 2013, and there are no signs of the organisation having been active since.
- ^ Robbins, Martin (October 20, 2013). "Is Misplaced Pages for Sale?". motherboard.vice.com. Archived from the original on October 26, 2013. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
We'll both directly edit your page using our network of established Misplaced Pages editors and admins
- "Wiki-PR". Wiki-PR. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved November 14, 2013. archived November 14, 2013
- ^ Owens, Simon (October 8, 2013). "The battle to destroy Misplaced Pages's biggest sockpuppet army". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on May 25, 2016. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- ^ Robbins, Martin (October 19, 2013). "Is the PR Industry Buying Influence Over Misplaced Pages?". Vice. Archived from the original on March 1, 2014. Retrieved October 19, 2013.
- Stampler, Laura (October 21, 2013). "Misplaced Pages Bans 250 Users for Posting Paid, Promotional Entries". Time. Archived from the original on November 8, 2013. Retrieved November 11, 2013.
- Newman, Judith (January 8, 2014). "Misplaced Pages-Mania: Misplaced Pages, What Does Judith Newman Have to Do to Get a Page?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 23, 2014. Retrieved November 1, 2014.
- Fowler, Geoffrey (October 21, 2013). "Misplaced Pages Probes Suspicious Promotional Articles". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on November 24, 2013. Retrieved November 17, 2013.
- Halleck, Thomas (November 8, 2013). "Misplaced Pages and Paid Edits: Companies Pay Top Dollar to Firms Willing to 'Fix' Their Entries". Archived from the original on January 31, 2016. Retrieved February 17, 2022.
- Burrell, Ian (October 21, 2013). "Misplaced Pages: We have blocked 250 'sock puppets' for biased editing of our pages". The Independent. Archived from the original on September 21, 2017. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
- Fowler, Geoffrey (November 19, 2013). "Wikimedia Steps Up "Sockpuppet" Fight". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
- Halleck, Thomas (November 22, 2013). "Misplaced Pages Sends Paid Editors Cease-And-Desist: Sockpuppet Account Morning277, Not Wiki-PR". International Business Times. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2014.
- Arthur, Charles (November 21, 2013). "Misplaced Pages sends cease-and-desist letter to PR firm offering paid edits to site". The Guardian. Archived from the original on September 10, 2016. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- Burrell, Ian (November 20, 2013). "Misplaced Pages names Texas PR firm over false manipulation of site entries". The Independent. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved February 8, 2014.
- Geigner, Timothy (June 14, 2013). "Group Of Major PR Firms Pledge To Play Nice On Misplaced Pages". Tech Dirt. Archived from the original on August 19, 2014. Retrieved August 16, 2014.
External links
- Official website
- "Extensive network of clandestine paid advocacy exposed", The Signpost, October 9, 2013.
- Is the PR industry Buying Influence Over Misplaced Pages? October 19, 2013 Vice.com
- Is Misplaced Pages for Sale? Archived October 26, 2013, at the Wayback Machine October 19, 2013 Vice.com Motherboard
Conflict-of-interest editing on Misplaced Pages | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Incidents |
| ||||||
Reporting tools | |||||||
Related |