 | This article contains promotional content. Please help improve it by removing promotional language and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic text written from a neutral point of view. (January 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
A cam engine is a reciprocating engine where instead of the conventional crankshaft, the pistons deliver their force to a cam that is then caused to rotate. The output work of the engine is driven by this cam.
A variation of the cam engine, the swashplate engine (also the closely related wobble-plate engine), was briefly popular.
Cam engines are generally thought of as internal combustion engines, although they have also been used as hydraulic and pneumatic motors. Hydraulic motors, particularly the swashplate form, are widely and successfully used. Internal combustion engines, though, remain almost unknown.
Historical Background
The history of cam engines is connected to the development of engines, especially in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Engineers and inventors explored different mechanical designs to improve engine performance. One of the earliest recorded cam engine concepts dates back to the 19th century, during the industrial revolution.
In 1862, a French engineer named Alphonse Beau de Rochas, who is credited with the four-stroke engine, also explored using cams in engines. His work laid the foundation for later developments in internal combustion engines. Another notable figure is Felix Wankel, the German engineer known for inventing the Wankel rotary engine. Wankel's work on unconventional engine designs included experiments with cam-based mechanisms, although his rotary engine became more prominent.
In the early 20th century, there were many patents filed for different cam engine designs. These designs were especially important for aviation and industrial applications. During World War I and World War II, there was a lot of interest in alternative engine designs. These designs could offer advantages in power-to-weight ratios, durability, and fuel efficiency. However, cam engines never became widely used. This was mainly due to the complexity of their design and the durability issues with the cam and follower mechanisms.
Mechanical Design
The mechanical design of a cam engine is different from the conventional crankshaft-driven internal combustion engines. The engine's design uses a cam mechanism instead of a crankshaft. This introduces unique challenges and opportunities for optimizing performance.
Cam Mechanism
The cam mechanism is at the heart of the cam engine. This mechanism plays a crucial role. It converts the linear motion of the pistons into rotational motion. This task is traditionally handled by a crankshaft in conventional engines. The cam is a rotating or sliding component. It is part of a mechanical linkage. The cam imparts a desired motion to a follower by direct contact. In the context of a cam engine, the cam is typically designed as a rotating disk or cylinder. It has a specially shaped profile. This profile interacts with the pistons. The cam's profile is carefully engineered. It controls the timing and movement of the pistons. The pistons reciprocate within the engine's cylinders. As the cam rotates, its profile pushes against a cam follower. The cam follower rides on the cam surface. This causes the follower to move up and down. This movement is transmitted to the pistons. This makes the pistons reciprocate. The cam's shape determines the piston's stroke length, timing, and speed. These factors directly influence the engine's performance characteristics. In a cam engine, the cam is connected to a drive mechanism, usually a shaft. This shaft rotates the cam at a specific speed. The rotation of the cam is synchronized with the engine's combustion cycle. This ensures that the pistons are in the correct position to use the energy from the combustion process. The careful design and synchronization of the cam mechanism are crucial for the efficient operation of the engine. Any deviation can lead to performance issues or mechanical failure.
Types of Cam Designs
The design of the cam profile is very important for a cam engine. The cam profile directly affects the engine's performance, such as torque, power output, and efficiency. There are several types of cam designs, each with its unique advantages and challenges:
- Flat Cams:
Design: Flat cams, also called plate cams, have a flat surface. The edge of the surface is contoured. The contour of the edge determines the motion of the cam follower. This, in turn, determines the motion of the piston.
Performance Impact: Flat cams are easy to design and manufacture. This makes them a popular choice for early cam engine experiments. However, they have limitations. They cannot produce complex motion profiles. This can restrict the engine's efficiency and power output.
2. Cylindrical Cams
3. Conical Cams
Design: Conical cams have a tapered, cone-shaped surface that interacts with the cam follower. The varying radius of the cone influences the motion of the follower. This allows for creating intricate motion profiles.
Performance Impact: Conical cams can generate highly specialized motion profiles. These profiles can optimize the engine's performance for specific applications. However, the complexity of their design and the precision required in manufacturing can make them challenging to implement in practice.
4. Barrel Cams
Design: Barrel cams have a barrel-shaped surface, which is a variation of cylindrical cams. The cam follower moves along a track or groove on the curved surface. This converts the rotational motion into linear motion.
Performance Impact: Barrel cams can provide a high degree of control over the piston's motion, similar to cylindrical cams. Their design allows for the creation of motion profiles that can enhance the engine's torque output at specific points in the cycle.
Operation
Operating cycle
Some cam engines are two-stroke engines, rather than four-stroke. In a two-stroke engine, the forces on the piston act uniformly downwards, throughout the cycle. In a four-stroke engine, these forces reverse cyclically: In the induction phase, the piston is forced upwards, against the reduced induction depression. The simple cam mechanism only works with a force in one direction. In the first Michel engines, the cam had two surfaces, a main surface on which the pistons worked when running and another ring inside this that gave a desmodromic action to constrain the piston position during engine startup.
Usually, only one cam is required, even for multiple cylinders. Most cam engines were thus opposed twin or radial engines. An early version of the Michel engine was a rotary engine, a form of radial engine where the cylinders rotate around a fixed crank.
Advantages
- Perfect balance, a crank system is impossible to dynamically balance, because one cannot attenuate a reciprocal force or action with a rotary reaction or force.
- A more ideal combustion dynamic, a look at a PV diagram of the "ideal IC engine" and one will find that the combustion event ideally should be a more-or-less "constant volume event".
The short dwell time that a crank produces does not provide a more-or-less constant volume for the combustion event to take place in. A crank system reaches significant mechanical advantage at 6° before TDC; it then reaches maximum advantage at 45° to 50°. This limits the burn time to less than 60°. Also, the quickly descending piston lowers the pressure ahead of the flame front, reducing the burn time. This means less time to burn under lower pressure. This dynamic is why in all crank engines a significant amount of the fuel is burned not above the piston, where its power can be extracted, but in the catalytic converter, which only produces heat.
A modern cam can be manufactured with computer numerical control (CNC) technology so as to have a delayed mechanical advantage.
Other advantages of modern cam engines include:
- Ideal piston dynamics
- Lower internal friction
- Cleaner exhaust
- Lower fuel consumption
- Longer life
- More power per kilogram
- Compact, modular design permits better vehicle design
- Fewer parts, cost less to make
After extensive testing by the United States government, the Fairchild Model 447-C radial-cam engine had the distinction of receiving the very first Department of Commerce Approved Type Certificate. At a time when aircraft crank engine had a life of 30 to 50 hours, the Model 447-C was far more robust than any other aircraft engine then in production. However, in this pre-CNC age it had a very poor cam profile, which meant it shook too severely for the wood propellers and the wood, wire, and cloth airframes of the time.
One advantage is that the bearing surface area can be larger than for a crankshaft. In the early days of bearing material development, the reduced bearing pressure this allowed could give better reliability. A relatively successful swashplate cam engine was developed by the bearing expert George Michell, who also developed the slipper-pad thrust block.
The Michel engine (no relation) began with roller cam followers, but switched during development to plain bearing followers.
Unlike a crankshaft, a cam may easily have more than one throw per rotation. This allows more than one piston stroke per revolution. For aircraft use, this was an alternative to using a propeller speed reduction unit: high engine speed for an improved power-to-weight ratio, combined with a slower propeller speed for an efficient propeller. In practice, the cam engine design weighed less than the combination of a conventional engine and gearbox.
Swashplate and wobble plate engines
The only internal combustion cam engines that have been remotely successful were the swashplate engines. These were almost all axial engines, where the cylinders are arranged parallel to the engine axis, in one or two rings. The purpose of such engines was usually to achieve this axial or "barrel" layout, making an engine with a very compact frontal area. There were plans at one time to use barrel engines as aircraft engines, with their reduced frontal area allowing a smaller fuselage and lower drag.
A similar engine to the swashplate engine is the wobble plate engine, also known as nutator or Z-crank drive. This uses a bearing that purely nutates, rather than also rotating as for the swashplate. The wobble plate is separated from the output shaft by a rotary bearing. Wobble plate engines are thus not cam engines.
Pistonless rotary engines
Most piston-less engines relying on cams, such as the Rand cam engine, use the cam mechanism to control the motion of sealing vanes. Combustion pressure against these vanes causes a vane carrier, separate from the cam, to rotate. In the Rand engine, the camshaft moves the vanes so that they have a varying length exposed and so enclose a combustion chamber of varying volume as the engine rotates. The work done in rotating the engine to cause this expansion is the thermodynamic work done by the engine and what causes the engine to rotate.
References
- "Cam engines". Douglas Self. 2022-07-15. Retrieved 2024-01-16.
- ^ "Axial Internal-Combustion Engines". Douglas Self. 2022-02-15. Retrieved 2024-01-16.
- "Alphonse Beau de Rochas | Steam Engine Design, Automobile Engines & Internal Combustion | Britannica".
- "Wankel Rotary Engine: Diagram, Parts, Working, Uses [PDF]". 23 October 2021.
- "Mastering Camshaft Design for Optimal Engine Performance". 11 July 2023.
- Abbasimoshaei, Alireza; Kern, Thorsten A. (2023). "Cams". Machine Dynamics. pp. 169–196. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-6010-1_5. ISBN 978-981-99-6009-5.
- "Flat Plate Cam /Linear Cam".
- "Conical Cam".
- "The Cylindrical Cam".
- NACA 462, p. 5.
- "Ideal Otto Cycle". Archived from the original on 2021-11-05. Retrieved 2014-10-28.
- "Fairchild (Ranger)". Retrieved 2024-01-16.
- NACA 462, pp. 2–4.
- NACA 462, pp. 5–7, 15.
- US 1603969, Hermann, Michel, "Two-stroke-cycle internal combustion engine", published 1926-10-19, assigned to Centra Handels- & Industrie A-G
- "Rotary Principle". Reg Technologies Inc. Archived from the original on 2015-01-25. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
Bibliography
- Comments on Crankless Engine Types (Report). NACA Technical Memorandum. Vol. 462. Washington, D.C.: NACA. May 1928.