| Revision as of 17:09, 5 December 2004 editCimon Avaro (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,802 edits I can try to see what I can do to ease teh tension← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:18, 7 December 2024 edit undoTkorrovi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,655 edits This is just baselessTag: Manual revert | ||
| (44 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''<center></ |
'''<div class="center"></div>'''<br> | ||
| '''<center>It is now {{CURRENTTIME}} on {{CURRENTDAYNAME}}, {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}} Wikitime</ |
'''<div class="center">It is now {{CURRENTTIME}} on {{CURRENTDAYNAME}}, {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}} Wikitime</div>''' | ||
| ] | |||
| ==page size== | |||
| == World Citizen userbox, {{]}} == | |||
| Read ]. Pages are to be kept under 32 KB, except in special cases, such as ]. ] 15:33, Apr 18, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I noticed the message saying you're a World Citizen, I would like to invite you to add {{]}} to your user page if you wish to proclaim it in a more effective way, and this template will also add you automatically to the '']'' category. :) --] 23:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Do you agree to be in ai interested list I am making? == | |||
| :Don't know where it is written, many pages are more than 32K, like artificial intelligence talk page (42K), and I didn't see nowhere splitting talk pages to archives. The text you mentioned only recommends splitting pages to sections, not archives. BTW the page is not accessible now. ] 16:06, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there<br> | |||
| == Isolation of artificial consciousness == | |||
| I am making an ai interested people list so we interact better and help improving the work we are doing.<br> | |||
| Do you agree to be part of this ? ] (]) 13:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I have nothing against.] (]) 21:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Until some consensus it agreed and the bit at the top of the artificial consciousness page is removed, i.e. the disputed objectivity of the article, it might be better to direct wikipedia readers to a straightforward exposition of the various experts in the field and a list of related topics in an article that cites its sources in every instance, rather than expressing unattributable opinions. I notice that Paul has already started copying some of his stuff from AC to the synthesised consciousness page, which I'm not particularly in favour of, as there's no need to duplicate what's already written. My intro on the simulated consciousness talk page attempted to make the distinction that the AC page is more about the philosophical aspects of what constitutes AC (and I'd have thought a good direction to go in here on the AC page is to explain Aleksander's theory in this respect, which I think you had started to do. I don't understand Aleksander's theories , so you'd be doing me a good turn if tou could explain them to the lay person), whereas the synthesised consciousness page is about practical implementations, e.g. Kismet, etc, which you didn't want included under AC. The synthetic consciousness page is new and therefore it is useful to draw readers' attention to it, which is why I diverted some of the links. You have now included both links, which seems fine, though it might be helpful perhaps to have a disambiguity page to highlight the different foci of the separate pages. ] 16:09, 4 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == user talk == | |||
| To enumerate the points above: | |||
| *Paul is copying stuff from AC to synthetic consciousness - which I disagree with. Perhaps you will support me in this. The focus of the two articles is at present different, which is OK in wikipedia terms, provided we make clear the distinction, hence my idea of a disambiguity page. What do you think? | |||
| *Igor Aleksander's theoretical paper on artificial consciousness, which he explicitly calls artificial consciousness, could do with some explanation. He mentions emotional aspects and the point about prediction, which we discussed some while ago. Are you going to cover his arguments under Artificial consciousness, or should I put a link to ] on the synthetic consciousness page? | |||
| *You objected to my reference to Kismet on the AC page on the grounds that emotion was a psychological rather than AC topic. Nevertheless, Kitmet gives a close approximation to the type of test to which a machine consciousness implementation might be assessed. Whether it passes the test or not is aonther question. But it's at least a first step, which is why I want to cover it under synthetic consciousness. Any objections to that? | |||
| ] 16:55, 4 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| thank you for your offer to discuss AI off forum / off wikipedia .. i would love to discuss AI with anyone who has an open mind about the subject .. but your comment on my user talk page seems a bit dismissive and i wish to respond to that here (golden rule). just because researchers in AI have not developed truly AI - does not imply that they knew what they were doing for all that time. perhaps they were looking in an inappropriate area or perhaps they focused on inappropriate models or perhaps they made inappropriate assumptions. i believe when you dismiss me the way you do on my user talk page, you do not fully understand and appreciate my model which can be found at: if you truly read and understood my model, i believe you would not be so quick to dismiss it. many years of self-critical contemplation "went into" that model. just because i am not of "the elite" does not make my statements invalid or worthless. just because i don't have a string of letters following my name - does not make my ideas childish or immature. my approach is based on the systems approach which is typically underutilized, underestimated, and misunderstood. so before you criticize my model, read it - read more about the systems approach. then - after you are fully informed - freely criticize. but your casual remark on my user page begged this response. if you delete it, i will put it back. the world should see how narrowminded you truly are. ps - there is rather new thing called canonizer.com; if you have a "stand" about a thing - like consciousness, you should state your case there. much better than debating things on user pages which no one reads...] (]) 03:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| To summarise the above, there are three questions: | |||
| :1) To stop Paul wrecking the synthetic consciousness page and duplicating material that is already on the artificial consciousness page. | |||
| :2) To give good encyclopedic coverage of Igor Aleksander's work | |||
| :3) To decide whether the emotional components of a machine consciousness implementation should be on the AC or on the syhthetic consciousness page. | |||
| == Whoops! == | |||
| 1, 2, 3: clear enough? | |||
| Great . Must have been ]. ] (]) 23:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You used the argument that you started the artificial consciousness page and hence that that gave you some rights of proprietorial control of it. I don't think this is quite the spirit of wikipedia, but nevertheless you would no doubt grant me the same grace in that I started the synthetic consciousness page. We might at some stage merge the two, or at least delete one of them. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You mention that there is no link to artificial consciousness from synthetic consciousness. But what about vice versa? ] 16:55, 4 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Hi -- I see that you reverted a set of edits on the basis that "Too large part of the original article was deleted during the editing ...". I think you might have misperceived -- nothing at all was actually deleted. I have no strong opinion about the validity of the edits, but the editor seems to be competent, so I'm not happy to see his first edits met this way. Regards, ] (]) 16:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Paul had nothing to do with me starting the synthetic consciousness page. I just found the arguing on the AC talk page too distracting to build a good encyclopedia article. It is good practice from time to time to do a re-write, because there is a natural entropy in wikipedia with different people coming in in an unstructured way and resulting in articles that lose their focus. There is even a special namespace message {msg:inuse} to indicate that a rewrite is in progress. In this instance I thought it better to start again afresh and take a slightly different tack, i.e. to dwell on machine implementations of consciousness, leading to ideas about what the practical uses of stynthesised consciousness might be, along the lines that I have been discussing on the AC talk page. | |||
| == Your account will be renamed == | |||
| Paul decided to come along and debate matters like the relevance of Leibniz's law to assessment of any implementation, and I hope this will be constructive, but you have seen what he is like! Are you saying you ''']''' Paul back arguing with you on the AC talk page? I'd have thought you would be grateful that I was distracting him elsewhere so you could get on with building a good encyclopedic article on the theoretical aspects of artificial consciousness and give some in-depth coverage of the proponents with whom you are familiar, eg. Aleksander, ''et al.'', while I dwell on the engineering aspects, which I find more interesting and easier to grasp. ] 17:53, 4 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr"> | |||
| == Who supports whom == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See ] for more information. | |||
| I try not to make direct public criticism of anyone, and everything written here is in the public domain. Therefore I am neither going to support nor arraign Paul for his behaviour. I have, however, just given a reference on the AC talk page to Aleksander's notion of consciousness involving prediction, which you can construe if you like as me supporting you rather than Paul, thought it is just intended to take the discussion forward. In an academic context such as in the preparation of an encyclopedia, where all we are after is truth and certainty, it is a distraction to discuss one's own feelings or the motivations of others. I have already written that I don't think you are a troll, and made welcoming noises when you complained that no one was being welcoming. But writing here is occurring at a level of abstraction that is a step removed from personal encounters. I should much enjoy meeting you if you were to visit London, or if I travelled to Estonia, and I'm sure we could have a good laugh together as well as having a lively discussion about AC, etc.. It is far better to stick to the topic at hand here, though. Rather than complaining about how others treat you personally (which, as I've indicated is not so because of the detachment that one should apply in this medium) it is better to argue about the nature of artificial consciousness and make expositions of what leading thinkers have to say about the topic. You will get a lot further if you back your arguments up with references (always). Then people won't try to refute you, except perhaps to clarify what you mean. I think that is the crux of the problem actually. Your incomplete grasp of English leads me to puzzle about much of what you write, in order to determine what you are on about. I have made what I considered gentle criticism of your English, in the hope that you would take that on board. It was not intended as hypercriticism. As I've already shown, confusion in the usage of ''what'' and ''that'' can lead to differences in meaning, so that there can arise a discrepancy between what you mean and what you put. That is problematic, and the example I chose is not the only one. Since you are evidently sensitive about this issue I have not pursued it. But if I were attempting to write in Estonian (a language that I know not at all), and I made mistakes, then I would definitely not resent any criticism that others made about my usage, no matter how hypercritical, because I would see that as a path towards excellence. | |||
| As for pretending to be your friend, I am trying to keep the peace, in order that we can make progress. (The fact that I take time to write this surely speaks for itself.) The dialogues on the AC talk page are, I think, viewed as entertainment by other wikipedians, but things have recently been getting out of hand, and we had lost sight of what the article should be about and making no real progress at all. I am hoping to move things on. There was a suggestion recently (not from Paul) that the AC page should be deleted. What is wrong now with having a little competition? You burnish the AC page, and I will attempt to develop the synthetic consciousness page. Then we can hold a poll to see which page other wikipedians think should be kept. ] 10:16, 5 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tkorrovi. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tkorrovi~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can ]. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit ] to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed. | |||
| Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in. | |||
| "I find the mediation necessary..." | |||
| :Ok, in that case, I suggest you request it officially at ]. I was suggesting that you should enter mediation, but unfortunately, I won't be able to be the mediator as I am already involved in a case which is quite time consuming. There is a list of mediators at ]. Do you have a preference for who mediates? I believe Anthere is currently too busy, and BCorr is involved in a different case but the others are available as far as I know. If you could let someone know who would like to mediate, they can contact ] about it. ] and ] are the current chairs of the committee, so you could contact either of them about it. ]] 22:08, May 11, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Sorry for the inconvenience. | |||
| == Months of work == | |||
| Yours,<br />]<br />Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation | |||
| I agree that there is a great deal of material, as evidenced by your Google search. These are some names of researchers hat come up again and agan and there are various universities, e.g. Birmingham, that seem to publish more material than others. It would be interesting and, I think, useful to get some kind of overview of the field, perhaps by a simple statistical analysis of results of Google searches. I don't think the scale of the task should deter us, however, unless you are looking for a 'quick fix'. My concern, over a longer term project, is, as I mentioned, that we keep sight of a vision, namely to build an article that might one day be featured on Misplaced Pages's main page for a day. If you are in agreement with my classification, we might start to collate the research material, read it, and extract the summaries/overview to make a good article. The classification scheme I proposed was essentially: | |||
| </div> 03:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * a) material that provides the background (perhaps covering the philosophical debate) | |||
| <!-- SUL finalisation notification --> | |||
| * b) early attempts (which may have failed or only go partly toward the ultimate objective), and I think criticisms of the early AI research have a bearing on this, highlighting the difficulties encountered by early implementations | |||
| * c) current research topics and achievements, leading to predictions about future possibilities. ] 10:41, 15 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I note that you took out the link to http://mind.sourceforge.net/conscius.html from the AC page. My feeling is that it's generally not helpful to remove links, unless they are clearly patent nonsense. The sourceforge resource is generally useful, so I'd suggest putting that link back, but perhaps with a qualifier suggesting that it may not be mainstream, i.e. category b) above. ] 10:41, 15 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Welcome back == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691963760 --> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| ] 20:10, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Tkorrovi. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| == Artificial consciousness article == | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I re-read the stuff in there whaich hadn't been altered since May this year, and then read the contribution of our anonymous contributor. I must say that he is clear, concise and, I think, knowledgeable and right in the points he makes. I am not into having edit wars, but I agree with his notion of moving the original artificial consciousness stuff to Strong AI, and representing the AC stuff in the way that he now proposes. It moves us all forward. Don't you agree? ] 10:52, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Mediation == | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/2&oldid=750798221 --> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| You asked on my talkpage, whether I would like to mediate the matter of the ] article? I can try to help you and those who agree to the mediation; but it is as yet unclear who the other parties are that you would like mediation with, and whether they are willing to participate. -- ] 07:04, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Tkorrovi. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| == I can try to see what I can do to ease teh tension == | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Ok. Well, that is a bit more explicit. I'll | |||
| definitely look into it. -- ] 17:09, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/2&oldid=750798221 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Tkorrovi. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=813413898 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 7 December 2024
Leave a Message
World Citizen userbox, {{User:1ne/Userboxes/User world}}
Hi, I noticed the message saying you're a World Citizen, I would like to invite you to add {{User:1ne/Userboxes/User world}} to your user page if you wish to proclaim it in a more effective way, and this template will also add you automatically to the Wikipedians with World Citizenship category. :) --Mistress Selina Kyle 23:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Do you agree to be in ai interested list I am making?
Hi there
I am making an ai interested people list so we interact better and help improving the work we are doing.
Do you agree to be part of this list ? Raffethefirst (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- I have nothing against.Tkorrovi (talk) 21:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
user talk
thank you for your offer to discuss AI off forum / off wikipedia .. i would love to discuss AI with anyone who has an open mind about the subject .. but your comment on my user talk page seems a bit dismissive and i wish to respond to that here (golden rule). just because researchers in AI have not developed truly AI - does not imply that they knew what they were doing for all that time. perhaps they were looking in an inappropriate area or perhaps they focused on inappropriate models or perhaps they made inappropriate assumptions. i believe when you dismiss me the way you do on my user talk page, you do not fully understand and appreciate my model which can be found at: if you truly read and understood my model, i believe you would not be so quick to dismiss it. many years of self-critical contemplation "went into" that model. just because i am not of "the elite" does not make my statements invalid or worthless. just because i don't have a string of letters following my name - does not make my ideas childish or immature. my approach is based on the systems approach which is typically underutilized, underestimated, and misunderstood. so before you criticize my model, read it - read more about the systems approach. then - after you are fully informed - freely criticize. but your casual remark on my user page begged this response. if you delete it, i will put it back. the world should see how narrowminded you truly are. ps - there is rather new thing called canonizer.com; if you have a "stand" about a thing - like consciousness, you should state your case there. much better than debating things on user pages which no one reads...&Delta (talk) 03:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Whoops!
Great embarassment. Must have been tabs rearranging themselves. Paradoctor (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Artificial consciousness
Hi -- I see that you reverted a set of edits on the basis that "Too large part of the original article was deleted during the editing ...". I think you might have misperceived -- nothing at all was actually deleted. I have no strong opinion about the validity of the edits, but the editor seems to be competent, so I'm not happy to see his first edits met this way. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tkorrovi. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tkorrovi~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
03:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tkorrovi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tkorrovi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Tkorrovi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)