Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:15, 24 January 2007

The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This page or section may contain link spam masquerading as content. Spam on Misplaced Pages consists of external links mainly intended to promote a website. If you are familiar with the content of the external links, please help by removing promotional links in accordance with Misplaced Pages:External links.

Rights
Theoretical distinctions
Claim rights and liberty rights Individual and group rights Natural rights and legal rights Negative and positive rights
Human rights
Civil and political Economic, social and cultural Three generations
Rights by beneficiary
Accused Animals Autistic Children Consumers Creditors Deaf Disabled Elders Family Farmers Fetuses Humans Indigenous Intersex Kings LGBT Transgender Men Minorities Parents Fathers Mothers Patients Peasants Plants Prisoners Robots States Students Victims Women Workers Youth
Other groups of rights
Assembly Association Asylum Civil liberties Clothing Development Digital Education Fair trial Food Free migration Health Healthy environment Housing Linguistic Movement Property Repair Reproductive Rest and leisure Security Self defense Self-determination of people Sexuality Speech Water and sanitation
v t e

Men's rights is a stream in the men's movement. It is closely related to the fathers' rights movement and began as a recognisable movement in the 1960s, largely as an outgrowth of men's divorce societies. (The earliest organization which has been documented is the United States Divorce Reform, founded in Sacramento, California, by Ruben Kidd and George Partis in 1960.) Its professed aim is to promote the health and well-being of all men and boys, as part of a general human rights, civil rights, or equal rights agenda. It is frequently concerned with wellness, economic fairness, and family law. There is no single unifying manifesto or organization which can claim to speak for the entire movement and the term is often used in various, even conflicting, ways.

Related streams of the men's movement are in particular:

• Fathers' rights focus on the relationship between fathers and their children and in particular family law.
• Masculism provides a counterpart to feminism and argues against legal constructs, reforms, or entitlements which deny men equal rights under the law on the basis of gender; there are conservative "traditionalist", "liberal", and libertarian strands.

Ancillary streams of the men's movement are

• Men's liberation an attempt to apply the principle of women's liberation to the issues facing men.
• The "mythopoetic men's movement", interested in self-help and psychological archetypes.

History

The legal concept of rights is a complex one, with concepts of divine right, individual rights, natural rights and social rights beyond the scope of this article, which is primarily concerned with the legal standing, legal, civil and human rights of boys and men.

In the West the concept of rights developed, becoming increasingly egalitarian. Legal standing and human rights extended to other groups, to encompass all adult males, and women and children. but even today the laws of each country vary as to the de facto status of poor men, children, women and slaves, as reflected in civil, criminal and family law.

Prior to 1995 the men's movement was predominantly a reactive and disorganized movement that received little attention or recognition. The American Coalition for Fathers and Children was founded in 1995 by mature activists such as Stuart A. Miller, and Dianna Thompson. ACFC founded the shared-parenting movement and organized the largest protests in the history of the men's movement, the largest held in over 225 cities around the world on father's day, 2001 in the "Bridges for Children" campaign.

The majority of the men's movement now holds that no-fault divorce is a human rights violation of men's natural right to be a parent, an unconstitutional removal of men's natural right to be a part of the family and legitimate members of society, and an unconstitutional violation of children's natural right to be raised by both parents unless a parent is found unfit.

Since 2002, some leading men's advocates say that the men's movement is, in fact, the "legitimate marriage movement". The movement has been gaining political acceptance by fighting for strengthening the heterosexual marriage contract and opposing same-sex marriage.

Structure

Like most social movements, those concerned with men's rights comprise a wide variety of individuals and organizations, both united and divided in various ways on specific issues including the mistreatment of men in the media, the abortion debate, family law and false rape allegations. Some groups are formally organized or incorporated, and some are fairly casual alliances or essentially the work of a few individuals.

Men's rights leaders tend to strongly oppose attempts of pro-feminist gay men's organizations to represent themselves as "Men's Rights" activists. While the goals of these two movements might appear similar, the membership does not intermix. The moral and political goals are substantially different and should not be misconstrued as being connected.

Although the vast majority of men's rights leaders and activists are men, there are a many women, including those in significant positions within the movement. For example, Sue Price in the Australian Men's Rights Agency has been at the forefront of activism there. Naomi Penner was a women's rights activist in the 1960s who later helped to create the National Coalition of Free Men in America in 1981. B.N. Saraswati founded one of the earliest Men's right group in India. Dianna Thompson, the first Executive Director of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children founded the Second Wives Crusade, which gained popularity very quickly, and later became part of the True Equality Network operated by Terri Lynn Tersak. Self-labeled feminists, such as Wendy McElroy, regularly advocate for men's rights.

Men's rights advocates are not a uniform group: they include both singularly religious and atheistic individuals, as well as those from the left, right, and center of politics and every echelon of society. The majority of those who participate in the men's rights movement do so because they believe that society discriminates against men on a number of levels, particularly in social policy, state and federal funding, criminal, civil, and family law. Most supporters of men's rights are from Western nations. Significantly however the Men's right movement caught strength in India with Purush Hakka Sanraskhshan Samsta, of "Save Indian Family".

Issues

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Men's rights movement" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2006) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Within the larger context of human rights, men's rights advocates are concerned with many of the same general issues as proponents of women's rights, only with special attention to the role of men and boys as victims and participants.

Family

Family law is one area of keen interest among men's groups. Fathers' rights advocates draw attention to what they believe is a systematic bias against men in child custody matters and against husbands in divorce cases.

Employment

Employment law is another area of concern, with such problems as unequal treatment around parental leave, retirement age, and pension entitlements. They also assert sexual harassment policies are de facto directed against the male style of inappropriate sexual behaviour in the workplace, while ignoring the female style of inappropriate behaviour in the workplace. Others assert that many sexual harassment laws restrict men's basic freedoms, and cause men to be constantly on edge. They express anger towards the fact that a man telling a joke or simply referring to a co-worker by a nickname is grounds for dismissal or lawsuits.

Media bias

Another issue of concern is the perceived anti-male bias in the media. Men's rights activists claim that men are portrayed unfairly on television, radio and in newspapers and magazines. They claim that not only does the media not pay serious attention to men's rights issues but that men are portrayed in a negative light compared to women, particularly in advertising.

Health

Other issue areas addressed by the men's rights movement includes male military conscription, male circumcision, the failure to address male victims of domestic abuse and the disparity in the spending on men and women in the healthcare system generally.

Violence

Domestic violence is a key, emotional issue for both men's rights advocates and their opponents. Advocates cite government statistics that show that in 15% to 38% of the cases of intimate partner violence the victim is male. They argue that the real number is likely to be higher, since male victims are significantly less likely to report abuse than female victims, due to social stigmatisation. They also assert that the percentage of shelters for battered men should make up a respective percentage of all shelters. The National Coalition of Free Men has sued several women's shelters with the goal of allowing battered men and their children to be admitted and to receive assistance from shelters.

Procreation rights

In the United States the abortion debate is another emotionally charged issue, with some groups asserting that treating such a decision as an individual one only for the mother is unfair, while others assert that men can always choose to use more active forms of birth control such as vasectomy or condoms if they so chose. However, men's rights activists claim that it is also the responsibility of the woman to use birth control. Organizations such as Choice for Men argue that abortion and legal abandonment of newborns give women the unilateral right to choose or not choose parenthood after conception. They point to the Fourteenth Amendment's prohibition of state legislatures from making and applying laws unequally, and that while men cannot physically abort, a notarized document filed with a local court would serve the same purpose as abortion or abandonment. A contention of the men's rights movement is that women have this choice to walk-away from the emotional and financial responsibility of a child whereas men do not. This perceived bias in the law is often characterised as burdening men with responsibilities yet granting them no rights.

Social security

In some societies there is legislated discrimination against males in provision of social security. In Australia, for example, a woman over 50 years of age may obtain a Widow Allowance approximately equal to a pension if, after turning 40, she becomes widowed, divorced, or merely separated from a spouse (who may be a de facto spouse). She must have "no recent workforce experience", but she can easily qualify for this well after the loss of her partner by going through a period of underemployment. There is no similar allowance for men. Some of these discriminatory arrangements (including also women's earlier qualification for Age Pension, etc.) are gradually being removed, under Australian legislation.

Treatment of refugees

In Australian immigration policy a distinction is regularly made between women and children (often treated erroneously as equivalent to "family groups") and single men. The details are subject to current debate and recently failed legislation (August 2006) in the Australian Parliament. But for example in one famous recent case, the Minister for Immigration, Senator Amanda Vanstone, determined as follows concerning Papuan asylum seekers (all forty-three of whom have since been accorded status as refugees): "The single men on the boat would be sent to an immigration detention centre, but families would not be split up and would be housed in facilities in the community". The discriminatory treatment of single women (routinely assumed to be members of some family) and single men evident in such a practice is rarely examined in the Australian media.

Criticism

As with many social movements, some of the strongest criticisms of men's groups comes from other groups and activists. Feminists or pro-feminist men criticize a perceived ignorance of sexism, male privilege and power. They also allege that men's rights advocates spend much of their time fighting women's rights rather than working positively for all men. Some men's rights advocates respond that they are not ignorant of such issues, but dispute the methodology of many findings or assert there is a cause for gaps other than sexism. Critics counter that men's rights advocates are guilty of the same faulty-methodology and substituting sexism for logic they claim to bemoan of other groups.

Pro-feminist critics such as Michael Flood of the Australian pro-feminist men's organization XYonline paint that the men's rights movement as the most extreme part of the broader men's movement . According to this view, most men's rights advocates have joined the movement as the result of negative personal experience during a divorce or custody battle. Many advocates do not dispute this claim, but argue that this is due to the fact that many men do not realize legal discrimination until after they have experienced it themselves.

In general, all movements claim to address issues of concern to men and to remove institutional and societal discrimination against males. Some argue that feminism was originally an egalitarian ideology and that it has strayed from the goal of gender equality and begun to support the discrimination and abuse of males. Some, like Darren Blacksmith and Chris Key, however, condemn the entire history of the women's rights movement. The men's movement, as a whole, seeks equal rights for all people. The men's rights movement is often equated with the masculist movement, but these terms have never been homogeneous, well-defined, or stable over time, so the relationship or synonymy remains unclear.

Wages

A classic example is equal pay for women and the supposed "wage gap." Strong research and statistical evidence suggests that this is not sexism, but reflect that men are either required, or are more willing and/or able, to work in dangerous conditions, staying in a field longer (thus becoming more experienced employees), being more likely to relocate for higher pay, and numerous other factors. Critics of feminism point out that the methodology used by feminists to gather their wage gap information was flawed. Lenore Wietzman's study, (the one most often cited by feminist books for wage gap information), simply compared the aggregate reported earnings of men in the US to that of women. This ignores the professions chosen and the number of hours worked, as well as unclaimed income such as unclaimed day care and tips from jobs like waiting on tables. Warren Farrell's book Why Men Earn More identified many reasons why he believes men earn more money than women. When accounting for all of these factors using the same data Weitzman used in her report, the wage gap was less than 2 cents on the dollar.

Feminists and other critics, however, point to statistics that demonstrate dangerous and physically demanding attributes do not amount to higher pay and therefore it cannot account for a gap in pay. Feminists like social-psychologist Carol Tavris also say the wage gap for the same work is narrowing, but labels the solutions put forth as sexist as the suggestions to close the gap falls entirely at the feet of women, that they have to live their lives on men's terms which marginalizes and trivializes the experience of women; she holds that this is unfair because it ignores issues men do not face, such as pregnancy. She contends that when such issues are taken into consideration it is frowned upon as "special treatment" or used to justify the mentality that women are inferior to men because it is not something men experience.

Violence

Critics also accuse men's right advocates of ignoring, trivializing, and/or defending male violence. In response, some men's rights advocates say they "don't disagree that some men rape", but state that some figures put out claiming that 1 in 4 or 1 in 3 women are raped are exaggerated, or that feminists beliefs such as "every man is a potential rapist" are inherently sexist. They also suggest that women can be as violent as men in intimate partner relations, often citing Dr Martin Fiebert's bibliography and Straus/Gelles findings.

Michael Flood is a critic that accuses men’s rights advocates of deliberately using free-flowing numbers as if they take into account the context in which violence happens (for example neglecting to consider scenarios that occur when violence against a man by a woman is in self-defense or an attempt to leave an emotionally abusive, potentially violent situation), of using ‘violence’ and ‘abuse’ interchangeably without defining either, and of ignoring the unreliability of the Conflict Tactics Scales and surveys in general.. Critics cite Gelles (co-creator of the CTS cited by men's rights advocates) himself of how the findings are misrepresented by men's rights advocates: "In the majority of these cases, the women act in response to physical or psychological provocations or threats. Most use violence as a defensive reaction to violence.", "the statistics are likely to be misused by misogynists and apologists for male violence" and accuse men's rights activists of failing to factor in rape, distinguish between homosexual and heterosexual couples, or stalking and murder that occurs after a couple has split up which is almost exclusively perpetrated by men (and fear of which contributes to why women often won't leave an abuser). They suggest those factors contribute to why what men's rights advocates allege and other numbers demonstrating instances of domestic violence do not reconcile.

Further critics cite statistics suggesting that of reported assaults by a partner, men are more likely to call the police, press charges, and keep them than women (Schwartz, 1987; Rouse et.al; 1988; Kincaid; 1982). More still the National Institute of Justice Report on Intimate Violence states that: Men living with male intimate partners experience more intimate partner violence than do men who live with female intimate partners. Approximately 23 percent of the men who had lived with a man as a couple reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a male cohabitant, while 7.4 percent of the men who had married or lived with a woman as a couple reported such violence by a wife or female cohabitant. These findings, combined with those presented in the previous bullet, provide further evidence that intimate partner violence is perpetrated primarily by men, whether against male or female intimates.

Critics accuse men's rights advocates of defending male abuse, often by alleging it is justified due to a perceived "unfairness" men face, and even rallying behind abusers. For example, a spokesman for The Men’s Confraternity, after a Perth man gassed to death his three children and himself in 1998 after his visitation was shortened by Family Court, voiced (perpetrator was) probably a decent, hard-working man who was pushed too far by the Family Court. Critics allege men's rights advocates pre-emptively accuse women who allege abuse from men of lying and scheming. Critics also claim, in regards to abuse women and children allege against men, alarmist exaggeration of false accusations by men's rights advocates and voice they then do not apply the same standards to the numbers of male (by female) victims men's rights activists claim exist. Michael Flood has contended this does existing male victims of domestic abuse a disservice.

See also

• Antifeminism
• Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them
• List of family separation research articles
• List of men's rights organizations
• Marriage strike
• Masculinity
• Masculism
• Men in Skirts
• Mythopoetic
• Paternal rights and abortion
• Parental leave
• Pro-feminism
• Feminism
• Radical Feminism
• Feminazi
• Radical Faeries, Gay men's movement begun in 1970's with Harry Hay
• Seduction community
• Shared parenting
• Father's Rights

Significant writers

• Bettina Arndt columnist in the The Age, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
• Stephen Baskerville Ph.D.
• David R. Usher
• Michael Green
• Warren Farrell
• Henry Makaw Ph.D.
• Marc H. Rudov
• Christina Hoff Sommers
• Glenn Sacks US broadcaster and columnist
• Howard Schwartz
• Bill Wishart

References

1. http://www.choiceformen.com
2. http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/payments/qual_how_wid.htm
3. "Vanstone refuses to return Papuans", Sydney Morning Herald, 26 January 2006
4. http://www.xyonline.net/Respondingtomen.shtml
5. http://www.cooltools4men.com/
6. http://www.mens-rights.net/commentary/chriskey/index.htm
7. http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/1999/Oct/wk1/art02.htm
8. http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm/
9. http://www.xyonline.net/husbandbattering.shtml
10. Long Island Newsday op-ed 2/22/94
11. cited in Orman, 1998
12. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/vbi.htm
13. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/vrithed.htm

• Save the Males by Richard Doyle, 2006
• The Myth of Male Power by Warren Farrell, 1993.
• Women Can’t Hear what Men Don’t Say: The myths that divide couples and poison love by Warren Farrell, 1999.
• The War against Boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men by Christina Hoff-Sommers, 2000.
• Who Stole Feminism: How women have betrayed women by Christina Hoff-Sommers, 1994.
• Spreading Misandry: The teaching of contempt for men in popular culture by Paul Nathanson and Katherine K. Young, 2001.
• The Legal Subjection of Men by Ernest Belfort Bax, 1908.
• The Fraud of Feminism by Ernest Belfort Bax, 1914.
• The Hazards of Being Male: Surviving the Myth of Masculine Privilege by Herb Goldberg, 1987.
• Refusing to be a Man: Essays on Sex and Justice by John Stoltenberg, 1989.
• Iron John: A Book About Men by Robert Bly, 1990.
• Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man by Susan Faludi, 1999.
• Men Freeing Men: Exploding the myth of the traditional male by Francis Baumli, 1985.
• Flood, Michael: Backlash: Angry men's movements in: Rossi, Staceay E.: The Battle and Backlash rage on. 2004, XLibris Corp., ISBN 1-4134-5934-X, S. 261-287
• Flood, Michael: Men's movements in: XY magazine, vol. 6. 1996
• The Man's No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth by Marc H. Rudov, 2004.

External links

This page or section may contain link spam masquerading as content. Spam on Misplaced Pages consists of external links mainly intended to promote a website. If you are familiar with the content of the external links, please help by removing promotional links in accordance with Misplaced Pages:External links.

Men's issues

• Men, Maleness, and Equality - TVOntario (Video): (Segment 2)
• What are Men's Issues? (PDF document)
• National Coalition of Free Men
• Rohner, Ronald P. & Veneziano, Robert, The Importance of Father Love: History and Contemporary Evidence in Review of General Psychology, Volume 5(4), December 2001, p 382–405
• Men's Rights Agency Australia
• Parity UK
• The Male Affirmative Resource Network
• Mensactivism.org
• Men's rights commentary
• MaleDepression.com
• Stop Abuse for Everyone
• Men's Health Network

Family issues

• Fathers & Families (FAF)
• The American Coalition of Fathers and Children (ACFC)
• American Psychological Association
• Choice for men - Paternity suit reform
• DadsRights.org: Divorce, Custody, Child Support, and Other Resources for Single Fathers
• Parents For Protest -- Bob Geldof leads movement in UK (two videos: marriage and divorce)
• Dump Your Wife NOW! Blog - A blog united with the men's movement. Thought provoking original articles on men's liberation, masculism, as well as articles taking aim at radical feminism.
• National Congress for Fathers and Children
• Domestic Violence against Men
• Fathers for Life
• Desertion Survivors - Support/Advice for Deserted Partners in Relationships

Further reading

• Save the Males by Richard Doyle

• Articles lacking sources from September 2006
• Men
• Men's rights