Revision as of 09:11, 28 December 2016 editDePiep (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users294,285 edits Category:Lists of isotopes by element← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:25, 9 December 2022 edit undoDouble sharp (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,042 edits may as well, enough content to copy overTag: Removed redirectNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Nuclides with atomic number of 119 but with different mass numbers}} | |||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
] (<sub>119</sub>Uue) has not yet been synthesised, so all data would be theoretical and a ] cannot be given. Like all ]s, it would have no ]s. | |||
{{R to section}} | |||
⚫ | ] | ||
== List of isotopes == | |||
No isotopes of ununennium are known. | |||
==Nucleosynthesis== | |||
===Target-projectile combinations leading to Z=119 compound nuclei=== | |||
The below table contains various combinations of targets and projectiles that could be used to form compound nuclei with Z=119. | |||
{| class="wikitable" ; style="text-align:center;" border = "1" ; | |||
! Target !! Projectile !! CN !! Attempt result | |||
|- | |||
! <sup>208</sup>Pb | |||
|<sup>87</sup>Rb || <sup>295</sup>Uue || {{unk|Reaction yet to be attempted}} | |||
|- | |||
! <sup>209</sup>Bi | |||
|<sup>86</sup>Kr || <sup>295</sup>Uue || {{unk|Reaction yet to be attempted}} | |||
|- | |||
! <sup>238</sup>U | |||
|<sup>59</sup>Co ||<sup>297</sup>Uue || {{unk|Reaction yet to be attempted}} | |||
|- | |||
! <sup>248</sup>Cm | |||
|<sup>51</sup>V ||<sup>299</sup>Uue || {{maybe|Reaction being attempted}} | |||
|- | |||
! <sup>250</sup>Cm | |||
|<sup>51</sup>V ||<sup>301</sup>Uue || {{unk|Reaction yet to be attempted}} | |||
|- | |||
! <sup>249</sup>Bk | |||
|<sup>50</sup>Ti ||<sup>299</sup>Uue || {{No|Failure to date}} | |||
|- | |||
! <sup>254</sup>Es | |||
|<sup>48</sup>Ca ||<sup>302</sup>Og || {{No|Failure to date}} | |||
|} | |||
===Cold fusion=== | |||
Following the claimed synthesis of <sup>293</sup>Og in 1999 at the ] from <sup>208</sup>Pb and <sup>86</sup>Kr, the analogous reactions <sup>209</sup>Bi + <sup>86</sup>Kr and <sup>208</sup>Pb + <sup>87</sup>Rb were proposed for the synthesis of element 119 and its then-unknown alpha decay ], elements ], ], and ].{{sfn|Hoffman|Ghiorso|Seaborg |2000|p=431}} The retraction of these results in 2001<ref>{{cite news|url=http://enews.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/118-retraction.html |publisher=Berkeley Lab|author=Public Affairs Department|title=Results of element 118 experiment retracted |date=21 July 2001|access-date=18 January 2008|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080129191344/http://enews.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/118-retraction.html |archive-date=29 January 2008}}</ref> and more recent calculations on the cross sections for "cold" fusion reactions cast doubt on this possibility; for example, a maximum yield of 2 ] is predicted for the production of <sup>294</sup>Uue in the former reaction.<ref name="RIB">{{cite journal|last=Loveland|first=W.|title=Synthesis of transactinide nuclei using radioactive beams |journal=Physical Review C|volume=76|issue=1|at=014612|year=2007 |bibcode=2007PhRvC..76a4612L |url=http://oregonstate.edu/dept/nchem/menu/RNB.pdf|doi=10.1103/PhysRevC.76.014612}}</ref> Radioactive ion beams may provide an alternative method utilizing a ] or ] target, and may enable the production of more neutron-rich isotopes should they become available at required intensities.<ref name="RIB" /> | |||
===Hot fusion=== | |||
====<sup>248</sup>Cm(<sup>51</sup>V,''x''n)<sup>299-''x''</sup>Uue==== | |||
The team at RIKEN in ], Japan began bombarding ]-248 targets with a ]-51 beam in June 2018<ref name="ball19">{{cite journal |last=Ball |first=P. |title=Extreme chemistry: experiments at the edge of the periodic table |date=2019 |journal=Nature |volume=565 |issue=7741 |pages=552–555 |issn=1476-4687 |doi=10.1038/d41586-019-00285-9|pmid=30700884 |bibcode=2019Natur.565..552B |s2cid=59524524 |doi-access=free |url=https://www.nature.com/magazine-assets/d41586-019-00285-9/d41586-019-00285-9.pdf |quote="We started the search for element 119 last June," says RIKEN researcher Hideto En'yo. "It will certainly take a long time — years and years — so we will continue the same experiment intermittently for 100 or more days per year, until we or somebody else discovers it."}}</ref> to search for element 119. Curium was chosen as a target, rather than heavier berkelium or ], as these heavier targets are difficult to prepare.<ref name="sakai">{{cite web |url=http://www0.mi.infn.it/~colo/slides_27_2_19/2019-2_Milano-WS_sakai.pdf |title=Search for a New Element at RIKEN Nishina Center |last=Sakai |first=Hideyuki |date=27 February 2019 |website=infn.it |access-date=17 December 2019}}</ref> The reduced asymmetry of the reaction is expected to approximately halve the cross section, requiring a sensitivity "on the order of at least 30 fb".<ref name="search" /> The <sup>248</sup>Cm targets were provided by ]. RIKEN developed a high-intensity vanadium beam.<ref name=usprogram/> The experiment began at a cyclotron while RIKEN upgraded its linear accelerators; the upgrade was completed in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nishina.riken.jp/about/greeting_e.html|title = Greeting | RIKEN Nishina Center|quote=With the completion of the upgrade of the linear accelerator and BigRIPS at the beginning of 2020, the RNC aims to synthesize new elements from element 119 and beyond.|date=1 April 2020|first=Hiroyoshi|last=Sakurai}}</ref> Bombardment may be continued with both machines until the first event is observed; the experiment is currently running intermittently for at least 100 days per year.<ref name="ball19" /><ref name="sakai" /> The RIKEN team's efforts are being financed by the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://eic.rsc.org/feature/the-hunt-is-on/3008580.article |title=The hunt is on |last1=Chapman |first1=Kit |last2=Turner |first2=Kristy |date=13 February 2018 |website=Education in Chemistry |publisher=Royal Society of Chemistry |access-date=28 June 2019 |quote=The hunt for element 113 was almost abandoned because of lack of resources, but this time Japan’s emperor is bankrolling Riken’s efforts to extend the periodic table to its eighth row.}}</ref> | |||
:{{nuclide|curium|248}} + {{nuclide|vanadium|51}} → {{nuclide|ununennium|299}}* → no atoms yet | |||
The produced isotopes of ununennium are expected to undergo two alpha decays to known isotopes of ] (<sup>288</sup>Mc and <sup>287</sup>Mc respectively), which would anchor them to a known sequence of five further alpha decays and corroborate their production. In 2022, the optimal reaction energy for synthesis of ununennium in this reaction was experimentally estimated as {{val|234.8|1.8|u=MeV}} at RIKEN.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Tanaka |first1=Masaomi |last2=Brionnet |first2=Pierre |last3=Du |first3=Miting |last4=Ezold |first4=Julie |last5=Felker |first5=Kevin |last6=Gall |first6=Benoît J. P. |first7=Shintaro |last7=Go |first8=Robert K. |last8=Grzywacz |first9=Hiromitsu |last9=Haba |first10=Kouichi |last10=Hagino |first11=Susan |last11=Hogle |first12=Satoshi |last12=Ishizawa |first13=Daiya |last13=Kaji |first14=Sota |last14=Kimura |first15=Thomas T. |last15=King |first16=Yukiko |last16=Komori |first17=Raiden K. |last17=Lemon |first18=Milan G. |last18=Leonard |first19=Kouji |last19=Morimoto |first20=Kosuke |last20=Morita |first21=Daisuke |last21=Nagae |first22=Natsuki |last22=Naito |first23=Toshitaka |last23=Niwase |first24=Bertis C. |last24=Rasco |first25=James B. |last25=Roberto |first26=Krzysztof P. |last26=Rykaczewski |first27=Satoshi |last27=Sakaguchi |first28=Hideyuki |last28=Sakai |first29=Yudai |last29=Shigekawa |first30=Daniel W. |last30=Stracener |first31=Shelley |last31=VanCleve |first32=Yang |last32=Wang |first33=Kouhei |last33=Washiyama |first34=Takuya |last34=Yokokita |display-authors=3 |date=2022 |title=Probing Optimal Reaction Energy for Synthesis of Element 119 from <sup>51</sup>V+<sup>248</sup>Cm Reaction with Quasielastic Barrier Distribution Measurement |url=https://journals.jps.jp/doi/full/10.7566/JPSJ.91.084201 |journal=Journal of the Physical Society of Japan |volume=91 |pages=042081-1–11 |doi=10.7566/JPSJ.91.084201 |access-date=11 September 2022}}</ref> The cross section is probably below 10 fb.<ref name=usprogram>{{cite web |url=https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1896856 |title=The Status and Ambitions of the US Heavy Element Program |first1=J. |last1=Gates |first2=J. |last2=Pore |first3=H. |last3=Crawford |first4=D. |last4=Shaughnessy |first5=M. A. |last5=Stoyer |date=25 October 2022 |website=osti.gov |publisher= |access-date=13 November 2022 |doi=10.2172/1896856 |quote=}}</ref> | |||
====<sup>249</sup>Bk(<sup>50</sup>Ti,''x''n)<sup>299-''x''</sup>Uue==== | |||
From April to September 2012, an attempt to synthesize the isotopes <sup>295</sup>Uue and <sup>296</sup>Uue was made by bombarding a target of ]-249 with ]-50 at the ] in ], Germany.<ref name="economist">, ], May 12, 2012.</ref><ref name="Khuyagbaatar">{{Cite journal |last=DÜLLMANN |first=CHRISTOPH E. |year=2013 |title=SUPERHEAVY ELEMENT RESEARCH AT TASCA AT GSI |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814525435_0029 |journal=Fission and Properties of Neutron-Rich Nuclei |publisher=WORLD SCIENTIFIC |doi=10.1142/9789814525435_0029 |access-date=21 March 2022}}</ref> This reaction between <sup>249</sup>Bk and <sup>50</sup>Ti was predicted to be the most favorable practical reaction for formation of ununennium,<ref name="Khuyagbaatar" /> as it is rather asymmetrical,{{sfn|Zagrebaev|Karpov|Greiner|2013}} though also somewhat cold.<ref name="Yakushev">http://asrc.jaea.go.jp/soshiki/gr/chiba_gr/workshop3/&Yakushev.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> (The reaction between <sup>254</sup>Es and <sup>48</sup>Ca would be superior, but preparing milligram quantities of <sup>254</sup>Es for a target is difficult.){{sfn|Zagrebaev|Karpov|Greiner|2013}} Moreover, as berkelium-249 decays to ]-249 (the next element) with a short half-life of 327 days, this allowed elements 119 and 120 to be searched for simultaneously.<ref name="search">{{cite journal |last1=Khuyagbaatar |first1=J. |last2=Yakushev |first2=A. |last3=Düllmann |first3=Ch. E. |display-authors=etal |date=2020 |title=Search for elements 119 and 120 |url=https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/73027/2/khuyagbaatarym0812.pdf |journal=Physical Review C |volume=102 |issue=6 |at=064602 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevC.102.064602 |bibcode=2020PhRvC.102f4602K |s2cid=229401931 |access-date=25 January 2021}}</ref> Nevertheless, the necessary change from the "silver bullet" <sup>48</sup>Ca to <sup>50</sup>Ti divides the expected yield of ununennium by about twenty, as the yield is strongly dependent on the asymmetry of the fusion reaction.{{sfn|Zagrebaev|Karpov|Greiner|2013}} Due to the predicted short half-lives, the GSI team used new "fast" electronics capable of registering decay events within microseconds.<ref name="Khuyagbaatar" />{{sfn|Zagrebaev|Karpov|Greiner|2013}} | |||
:{{nuclide|Bk|249}} + {{nuclide|Ti|50}} → {{nuclide|Uue|299}}* → no atoms | |||
:{{nuclide|Cf|249}} + {{nuclide|Ti|50}} → {{nuclide|Ubn|299}}* → no atoms | |||
Neither element 119 nor element 120 was observed. This implied a limiting cross-section of 65 fb for producing element 119 in these reactions, and 200 fb for element 120.<ref name="Yakushev"/><ref name="search"/> The predicted actual cross section for producing element 119 in this reaction is around 40 fb, which is at the limits of current technology.{{sfn|Zagrebaev|Karpov|Greiner|2013}} (The record lowest cross section of an experimentally successful reaction is 30 fb for the reaction between <sup>209</sup>Bi and <sup>70</sup>Zn producing ].){{sfn|Zagrebaev|Karpov|Greiner|2013}} The experiment was originally planned to continue to November 2012,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www-win.gsi.de/tasca12/program/contributions/TASCA12_Duellmann.pdf|title=Search for element 119: Christoph E. Düllmann for the ''TASCA E119'' collaboration|access-date=2015-09-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304094201/https://www-win.gsi.de/tasca12/program/contributions/TASCA12_Duellmann.pdf|archive-date=2016-03-04|url-status=dead}}</ref> but was stopped early to make use of the <sup>249</sup>Bk target to confirm the synthesis of ] (thus changing the projectiles to <sup>48</sup>Ca).<ref name="Yakushev" /> | |||
The team at the ] in ], Russia, planned to attempt this reaction.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jinr.ru/posts/scientists-will-begin-experiments-on-the-synthesis-of-element-119-in-2019/ |title=Scientists will begin experiments on the synthesis of element 119 in 2019 |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=28 September 2016 |website=www.jinr.ru |publisher=JINR |access-date=31 March 2017 |quote=“The discovery of elements 115, 117 and 118 is an accomplished fact; they were placed in the periodic table, though still unnamed and will be confirmed only at the end of the year. The D.I.Mendeleev Periodic Table is not infinite. In 2019, scientists will begin the synthesis of elements 119 and 120 which are the first in the 8th period,” said S.N. Dmitriev.}}</ref><ref>{{cite conference |url=http://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2016/26/epjconf-NS160-08001.pdf |title=Status and perspectives of the Dubna superheavy element factory |last1=Dmitriev |first1=Sergey |last2=Itkis |first2=Mikhail |last3=Oganessian |first3=Yuri |date=2016 |conference=Nobel Symposium NS160 – Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements |doi=10.1051/epjconf/201613108001|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Oganessian">{{Cite news|url=https://www.chemistryworld.com/what-it-takes-to-make-a-new-element/1017677.article |title=What it takes to make a new element|newspaper=Chemistry World|access-date=2016-12-03}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=http://cyclotron.tamu.edu/she2015/assets/pdfs/presentations/Roberto_SHE_2015_TAMU.pdf |title=Actinide Targets for Super-Heavy Element Research |last=Roberto |first=J. B. |date=31 March 2015 |website=cyclotron.tamu.edu |publisher=Texas A & M University |access-date=28 April 2017}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGVkkVMgvOg | archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211118/kGVkkVMgvOg| archive-date=2021-11-18 | url-status=live|title=The Discovery of Element 113 |last=Morita |first=Kōsuke |date=5 February 2016 |website=YouTube |access-date=28 April 2017}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="Morimoto2016">{{cite conference |title=The discovery of element 113 at RIKEN |last=Morimoto |first=Kouji |date=2016 |conference=26th International Nuclear Physics Conference |url=http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/cssm/workshops/inpc2016/talks/Morimoto_Mon_HallL_0930.pdf |access-date=14 May 2017}}</ref> Currently, beams heavier than <sup>48</sup>Ca have not been used at the JINR, but they are actively being developed.<ref name=usprogram/> | |||
== References == | |||
* Isotope masses from: | |||
**{{cite journal |author=M. Wang |author2=G. Audi |author3=A. H. Wapstra |author4=F. G. Kondev |author5=M. MacCormick |author6=X. Xu|year=2012 |title=The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. |url=http://amdc.in2p3.fr/masstables/Ame2012/Ame2012b-v2.pdf |journal=Chinese Physics C |volume=36 |issue= 12 |pages=1603–2014 |doi=10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/003|bibcode = 2012ChPhC..36....3M |display-authors=etal}} | |||
**{{NUBASE 2003}} | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
{{Navbox element isotopes}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
⚫ | ] |
Revision as of 14:25, 9 December 2022
Nuclides with atomic number of 119 but with different mass numbersUnunennium (119Uue) has not yet been synthesised, so all data would be theoretical and a standard atomic weight cannot be given. Like all synthetic elements, it would have no stable isotopes.
List of isotopes
No isotopes of ununennium are known.
Nucleosynthesis
Target-projectile combinations leading to Z=119 compound nuclei
The below table contains various combinations of targets and projectiles that could be used to form compound nuclei with Z=119.
Target | Projectile | CN | Attempt result |
---|---|---|---|
Pb | Rb | Uue | Reaction yet to be attempted |
Bi | Kr | Uue | Reaction yet to be attempted |
U | Co | Uue | Reaction yet to be attempted |
Cm | V | Uue | Reaction being attempted |
Cm | V | Uue | Reaction yet to be attempted |
Bk | Ti | Uue | Failure to date |
Es | Ca | Og | Failure to date |
Cold fusion
Following the claimed synthesis of Og in 1999 at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory from Pb and Kr, the analogous reactions Bi + Kr and Pb + Rb were proposed for the synthesis of element 119 and its then-unknown alpha decay daughters, elements 117, 115, and 113. The retraction of these results in 2001 and more recent calculations on the cross sections for "cold" fusion reactions cast doubt on this possibility; for example, a maximum yield of 2 fb is predicted for the production of Uue in the former reaction. Radioactive ion beams may provide an alternative method utilizing a lead or bismuth target, and may enable the production of more neutron-rich isotopes should they become available at required intensities.
Hot fusion
Cm(V,xn)Uue
The team at RIKEN in Wakō, Japan began bombarding curium-248 targets with a vanadium-51 beam in June 2018 to search for element 119. Curium was chosen as a target, rather than heavier berkelium or californium, as these heavier targets are difficult to prepare. The reduced asymmetry of the reaction is expected to approximately halve the cross section, requiring a sensitivity "on the order of at least 30 fb". The Cm targets were provided by Oak Ridge National Laboratory. RIKEN developed a high-intensity vanadium beam. The experiment began at a cyclotron while RIKEN upgraded its linear accelerators; the upgrade was completed in 2020. Bombardment may be continued with both machines until the first event is observed; the experiment is currently running intermittently for at least 100 days per year. The RIKEN team's efforts are being financed by the Emperor of Japan.
96Cm
+
23V
→
119Uue
* → no atoms yet
The produced isotopes of ununennium are expected to undergo two alpha decays to known isotopes of moscovium (Mc and Mc respectively), which would anchor them to a known sequence of five further alpha decays and corroborate their production. In 2022, the optimal reaction energy for synthesis of ununennium in this reaction was experimentally estimated as 234.8±1.8 MeV at RIKEN. The cross section is probably below 10 fb.
Bk(Ti,xn)Uue
From April to September 2012, an attempt to synthesize the isotopes Uue and Uue was made by bombarding a target of berkelium-249 with titanium-50 at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany. This reaction between Bk and Ti was predicted to be the most favorable practical reaction for formation of ununennium, as it is rather asymmetrical, though also somewhat cold. (The reaction between Es and Ca would be superior, but preparing milligram quantities of Es for a target is difficult.) Moreover, as berkelium-249 decays to californium-249 (the next element) with a short half-life of 327 days, this allowed elements 119 and 120 to be searched for simultaneously. Nevertheless, the necessary change from the "silver bullet" Ca to Ti divides the expected yield of ununennium by about twenty, as the yield is strongly dependent on the asymmetry of the fusion reaction. Due to the predicted short half-lives, the GSI team used new "fast" electronics capable of registering decay events within microseconds.
97Bk
+
22Ti
→
119Uue
* → no atoms
98Cf
+
22Ti
→
120Ubn
* → no atoms
Neither element 119 nor element 120 was observed. This implied a limiting cross-section of 65 fb for producing element 119 in these reactions, and 200 fb for element 120. The predicted actual cross section for producing element 119 in this reaction is around 40 fb, which is at the limits of current technology. (The record lowest cross section of an experimentally successful reaction is 30 fb for the reaction between Bi and Zn producing nihonium.) The experiment was originally planned to continue to November 2012, but was stopped early to make use of the Bk target to confirm the synthesis of tennessine (thus changing the projectiles to Ca).
The team at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia, planned to attempt this reaction. Currently, beams heavier than Ca have not been used at the JINR, but they are actively being developed.
References
- Isotope masses from:
- M. Wang; G. Audi; A. H. Wapstra; F. G. Kondev; M. MacCormick; X. Xu; et al. (2012). "The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references" (PDF). Chinese Physics C. 36 (12): 1603–2014. Bibcode:2012ChPhC..36....3M. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/003.
- Audi, Georges; Bersillon, Olivier; Blachot, Jean; Wapstra, Aaldert Hendrik (2003), "The NUBASE evaluation of nuclear and decay properties", Nuclear Physics A, 729: 3–128, Bibcode:2003NuPhA.729....3A, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.001
- Hoffman, Ghiorso & Seaborg 2000, p. 431. sfn error: no target: CITEREFHoffmanGhiorsoSeaborg2000 (help)
- Public Affairs Department (21 July 2001). "Results of element 118 experiment retracted". Berkeley Lab. Archived from the original on 29 January 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2008.
- ^ Loveland, W. (2007). "Synthesis of transactinide nuclei using radioactive beams" (PDF). Physical Review C. 76 (1). 014612. Bibcode:2007PhRvC..76a4612L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.014612.
- ^ Ball, P. (2019). "Extreme chemistry: experiments at the edge of the periodic table" (PDF). Nature. 565 (7741): 552–555. Bibcode:2019Natur.565..552B. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00285-9. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 30700884. S2CID 59524524.
We started the search for element 119 last June," says RIKEN researcher Hideto En'yo. "It will certainly take a long time — years and years — so we will continue the same experiment intermittently for 100 or more days per year, until we or somebody else discovers it.
- ^ Sakai, Hideyuki (27 February 2019). "Search for a New Element at RIKEN Nishina Center" (PDF). infn.it. Retrieved 17 December 2019.
- ^ Khuyagbaatar, J.; Yakushev, A.; Düllmann, Ch. E.; et al. (2020). "Search for elements 119 and 120" (PDF). Physical Review C. 102 (6). 064602. Bibcode:2020PhRvC.102f4602K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.064602. S2CID 229401931. Retrieved 25 January 2021.
- ^ Gates, J.; Pore, J.; Crawford, H.; Shaughnessy, D.; Stoyer, M. A. (25 October 2022). "The Status and Ambitions of the US Heavy Element Program". osti.gov. doi:10.2172/1896856. Retrieved 13 November 2022.
- Sakurai, Hiroyoshi (1 April 2020). "Greeting | RIKEN Nishina Center".
With the completion of the upgrade of the linear accelerator and BigRIPS at the beginning of 2020, the RNC aims to synthesize new elements from element 119 and beyond.
- Chapman, Kit; Turner, Kristy (13 February 2018). "The hunt is on". Education in Chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
The hunt for element 113 was almost abandoned because of lack of resources, but this time Japan's emperor is bankrolling Riken's efforts to extend the periodic table to its eighth row.
- Tanaka, Masaomi; Brionnet, Pierre; Du, Miting; et al. (2022). "Probing Optimal Reaction Energy for Synthesis of Element 119 from V+Cm Reaction with Quasielastic Barrier Distribution Measurement". Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 91: 042081-1–11. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.91.084201. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
- Modern alchemy: Turning a line, The Economist, May 12, 2012.
- ^ DÜLLMANN, CHRISTOPH E. (2013). "SUPERHEAVY ELEMENT RESEARCH AT TASCA AT GSI". Fission and Properties of Neutron-Rich Nuclei. WORLD SCIENTIFIC. doi:10.1142/9789814525435_0029. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
- ^ Zagrebaev, Karpov & Greiner 2013. sfn error: no target: CITEREFZagrebaevKarpovGreiner2013 (help)
- ^ http://asrc.jaea.go.jp/soshiki/gr/chiba_gr/workshop3/&Yakushev.pdf
- "Search for element 119: Christoph E. Düllmann for the TASCA E119 collaboration" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2015-09-15.
- "Scientists will begin experiments on the synthesis of element 119 in 2019". www.jinr.ru. JINR. 28 September 2016. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
"The discovery of elements 115, 117 and 118 is an accomplished fact; they were placed in the periodic table, though still unnamed and will be confirmed only at the end of the year. The D.I.Mendeleev Periodic Table is not infinite. In 2019, scientists will begin the synthesis of elements 119 and 120 which are the first in the 8th period," said S.N. Dmitriev.
- Dmitriev, Sergey; Itkis, Mikhail; Oganessian, Yuri (2016). Status and perspectives of the Dubna superheavy element factory (PDF). Nobel Symposium NS160 – Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201613108001.
- "What it takes to make a new element". Chemistry World. Retrieved 2016-12-03.
- Roberto, J. B. (31 March 2015). "Actinide Targets for Super-Heavy Element Research" (PDF). cyclotron.tamu.edu. Texas A & M University. Retrieved 28 April 2017.
- Morita, Kōsuke (5 February 2016). "The Discovery of Element 113". YouTube. Archived from the original on 2021-11-18. Retrieved 28 April 2017.
- Morimoto, Kouji (2016). The discovery of element 113 at RIKEN (PDF). 26th International Nuclear Physics Conference. Retrieved 14 May 2017.