Misplaced Pages

User talk:Irtapil: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:17, 21 November 2023 editIskandar323 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits ARBPIA notice: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 00:23, 23 November 2023 edit undoOrgullomoore (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,243 edits Request to Self-Revert: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit →
Line 1,124: Line 1,124:


(].) --] (]) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) (].) --] (]) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

== Request to Self-Revert ==

Dear Irtapil: I believe you ran afoul of the ] with . The one-revert rule prohibits more than one revert per 24 hours. A revert is defined as any edit that "undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part." undid . undid . It is customary to permit a person who runs afoul of the one-revert rule to self-correct. Please do so by self-reverting . --<span style="font-family: 'Brush Script MT', cursive;">]</span> (<span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em; font-size: 80%; border-bottom: 3px double">]</span>) 00:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:23, 23 November 2023

Hi, I use a lot of Misplaced Pages sites in languages i'm not fluent in, let me know what i can helpfully do to give back to those communities?

messages

Fonts (Basmala)

archived

archived 2020-03-20

"Arial" is a commercial font which is only available on a limited range of systems, so what you did is probably not as helpful as you thought it would be... AnonMoos (talk) 16:18, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

@AnonMoos: I am aware Arial is a commercial font, but it is more likely to be already installed on a reader's computer than any of the free fonts which contain the applicable characters. Most people won't want to install a new font to read a small detail on a page, free or not, and if they don't have Arial font, won't it just default to something else?
Which systems don't include Arial? Linux? That's surely a far smaller number of readers than the people who would already have a free font installed that contains characters like dotless ba. Irtapil (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Also probably many mobile systems, to start with... AnonMoos (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
@AnonMoos: this is what it looked like before i changed the font:

screen cap to show display error

it seems likely not everyone was seeing that, or it would be fixed already, and the people who see the same error seem more likely to also be windows users, or have the same glitchy font that comes ahead of Arial in the queue? Irtapil (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

the lang-ar had a less streaky option Template:Lang-ar, but it was illegibly small, in a table you can increase font size, but in line with text that's not a winner. {{script|Arab|﷽}} ﷽‎ gives the same error. Irtapil (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/Template:Script/Arabic "Amiri (appears feathery on Windows; errors with combining shadda with kasra and in Rohingya )" ﷽ {{font|font=amiri|﷽}} that font looks fine in other programs, just goes weird for that character in chrome.

i'm still not sure what you mean by "not as helpful as you thought it would be" ... how helpg=ful did you think i thought it'd be? Irtapil (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

It's finicky appearance-hacking that only works for some people. and so is not a general-purpose solution to the problem. AnonMoos (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

@AnonMoos: what would your idealised solution be then? do you actually have a better idea or are you just complaining that my quick fix for a small problem isn't perfect?

As far as i gather the effect of forcing Arial font displays Arial if it is present then if it's not installed it goes back to whatever it would have displayed without that setting? so it possibly helps a lot of viewers, and has no effect for others? The "feathering" mention on the help page sounds like it is likely to be just a windows thing, and Arial comes with windows, so it likely solved it for everyone who has the problem.

The problem seemed likely to be restricted to that particular obscure character, a generalised solution (e.g. editing the template font list) would likely create WAY more problems than it solved.

i could work out the offending font - Amiri - and uninstall it from my own computer, but that solves it for only ONE user, and Amiri displays other characters fine, without streaking into the toolbars.

what proportion of users would actually not have Arial? i do wonder if some people might have Arial without the full character set? but if they don't have the Arabic characters from Arial the chances of them having a specific Arabic font are even lower.

you say Arial only works for some people, but is there any stable and extensive Arabic font they are more likely to have installed? i didn't just pick the most common font in general, i picked the font with the most extensive Arabic charachar set, out of the fonts likely to be installed on an English speakers computer. the SIL fonts would work too, but they are way less common than Arial. do you actually have a better idea? if you want to add a list of all of the fonts other than Amiri to the formatting on that one character, just go do it rather than complaining that i didn't. i even worked out which don't was causing the problem, if you want to add a solution for the tiny proportion of people who don't have serial, just go do it. but they likely weren't even getting the same glitch, so it's a bit pointless.

Irtapil (talk) 01:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

old {{script|Arab|﷽}} ﷽‎

new {{font|font=arial|{{lang|ar|﷽}}}} ﷽

no lang tag {{font|font=arial|﷽}}}} ﷽

no lang tag amiri {{font|font=amiri|﷽}}}} ﷽

Irtapil (talk) 02:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

those all display identically on my android, so, the solution does nothing, but there was also no problem to solve. if you want a solution that applies to people who do not have the problem, then that's a fairly eccentric approach...

if you actually do have a better idea i am keen to hear it. i often use arial because pages use have obscure characters, and some fonts will have these but not connect them properly, so they look completely different. i add the appropriate lang tag lang

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rasm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lateef (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

fonts

check-markThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

is this the right way to do a list of fonts for characters that aren't displaying properly in the default? Template:Lang-ar {{lang-ar|{{font|font=tahoma,amiri,arial|size=175%| ◌ٔ  }}}} Irtapil (talk) 08:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

No. I'm not quite sure what you are trying to do here, but the {{font}} template's |font= parameter must be a single font, not a list. This works:
Template:Lang-ar {{lang-ar|{{font|font=tahoma|size=175%| ◌ٔ }}}}
If you want to have three fonts, you'll need three copies of the template, one for each of the fonts. Huon (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thank you @Huon:, sorry i didn't quite explain my intention well, i meant it to show in any of the fonts on that list, not all of them. I've seen it done somewhere before, with formatting table cells, i'm not sure if it works in font template. Irtapil (talk) 22:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
I don't think there's an easy way to format something as "pick the one of these three fonts that works best". If it's possible at all, you'd probably need some rather fancy HTML. Huon (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)


template glitch more ggggggg

check-markThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

what's going on here? i moved the table to another page (my user page) and it didn't keep doing it.

To me the image looks like a case of too many templates. There is a hard limit for the number of templates transcluded on one page, and if you exceed that limit, any further templates just don't work any more. A little more context would be helpful her: Where did the table come from, what's the diff of the edit you are asking about, and what is "it" that the table didn't keep doing? Huon (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thankyou @Huon: a hard limit would explain it. is there somewhere i can get more info on that? it was from the urdu alphabet page, but i removed it now. Irtapil (talk) 22:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
There is Help:Template#Expand limits and Misplaced Pages:Template limits. Apparently what's limited is not the number but the ultimate size. Huon (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
@Huon: size in what sense? would this mean switching from templates to an alternative, like style formatting in tables, doesn't help? Irtapil (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I'm not an expert, but the pages linked above say that something called "Post-expand include size" is the measure that's limited. I'd read that as "the amount of text and/or code that is put into the page through the template". For example, {{red|Hello world!}} is turned into <span style="color: red;">Hello world!</span> - that's 45 characters, so it counts for 45 bytes against the maximum post-expand include size of 2,048,000 bytes. You could put that template some 50,000 times on a page. If a template generates not just 45 bytes but, say, 1000, then you can have it 2,048 times. Note that non-Latin characters may take more than one byte each. Style formatting in the tables isn't expanded and thus doesn't count against the limit at all, so that may indeed serve as an alternative if possible. Huon (talk) 22:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages font policy and tagging

Sorry for belated reply, but the official Misplaced Pages policy governing font-face specification is here: Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Text formatting#Font family

Also, you can specify a list of fonts (with the last on the list as the fallback default) in HTML code, but I'm not sure how or if this carries over into Misplaced Pages templates. See this example from further down on the linked page: AnonMoos (talk) 14:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
<span style="font-family:Gentium Plus, Charis SIL, Doulos SIL, serif">

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from Arabic diacritics into Rasm. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: are you a human? am i in trouble? how fix edit summary after the fact? Irtapil (talk) 19:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

I already fixed it by adding an edit summary after the fact. Like this. Most people don't know about this rule. You are not in trouble.— Diannaa (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
@Diannaa: thanks Irtapil (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
@Diannaa: do i need to do this when coping stuff to and or from my user page and sandbox? e.g.
  • If i copy draft material from my sand box do i need to use the copy template or something? I imagine this would be useful for avoiding accusations of plagiarism? is {{copied}} the right template to use?
  • I copied an old version of the Phoenician_alphabet to my user page, is the link to the relevant edit / version sufficient and appropriate attribution? (it contained some poorly referenced material, which was not well attributed enough for the article, but which i found interesting and wanted to look into later.)
  • I have several old or alternate version of content from various articles i'm working on. I presume when copying from a Misplaced Pages article to my own page, a link to the page is sufficient? My user page doesn't need i be encyclopedia quality? if i include these in an article after working on them separately, do i use the {{copied}} template? do you have any pointers for how to use that in this situation, e.g. what info to include?
cheers Irtapil (talk) 04:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
p.s. @Diannaa: how do i add an edit summary to an existing edit if and when i forget to do it before i hit "publish". Your link didn't really explain how to add it. Irtapil (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Please provide attribution each time you copy within Misplaced Pages, unless you are the sole author of the text being copied. If you forget to do it at the time you do the edit, you can add the attribution later, by making a small but useful edit and giving the required attribution in your edit summary. Here is an example.— Diannaa (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks @Diannaa: Sorry, i'm not sure if i'm understanding.
  • To add edit notes to a page's history i need to make an additional edit and add notes when i publish that edit? I can't add or change notes for an old edit?
  • Given there's an exception for "unless you are the sole author of the text being copied", that means i don't need to add the copy template if i am just copying something i composed on my user page or sandbox page?
  • is there a way to avoid accusations of plagiarism if into an article i paste a large section of text or a table that i composed in my sandbox? i was composing things on the article pages, hoping someone would jump in and collaborate (and i guess just because it seemed simplest). But i left one page in a bit of a messy unfinished state for a few days and i think that might be what attracted a massive rollback. So i'm currently working on a version of that in my sandbox, but this seems to create different problems.
Irtapil (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
No, you cannot add or change the edit summary for an edit you already dld.
You don't need to include attribution if you copy your own prose from your sandbox into an article.
I don't know which messy work of yours someone removed or why. What reason did they give in their edit summary? — Diannaa (talk) 13:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

The edit summaries:

  • "Reverted to revision 930263664: I'm sorry but Misplaced Pages pages are not sandboxes for anyone to expertiment with their rudimentary knowledge of a topic. Please take to the talk page and gain consensus for your edits (TW)"
  • Repeating the above revert after I undid it: "Reverted to revision 930263664: I am sorry you cannot make these major unencyclopedia edits without previous discussion on the talk page and the garnering of a consensus; per WP:BRD you made the edits, I have reverted them, now you need to discuss them on the talk page first. They seem to be copied from somewhere. They are not in any summary style of Misplaced Pages (TW)"
  • Then found another article I was working on. "Reverted to revision 953613498.: You cannot do these huge opaque data dumps clearly copied from somewhere in longstanding pages. You don't have the ability to explain what you have done in English. It is only tables and more tables. The articles become unreadable (TW)"
I don't understand Why they can't scroll post tables the way I scroll paragraphs. Irtapil (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Re:Urdu alphabet

Dear User:Irtapil, thank you for your message on my talk page. I understand that you put a lot of work into editing the Urdu alphabet article. I glanced at your version and although I do not see anything that stands out as problematic, perhaps User:Fowler&fowler does. I would recommend waiting for him to respond there and see what he has to say before you consider reverting, although the choice is ultimately yours. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam 06:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. @Anupam: Sorry i didn't see this till after my most recent message on your page. I can see bits F&F might have objected to, i got interrupted while working on the page and thus there were a few messy/unfinished tables sitting there for a few days. I want to try and fix these issues, so there's something optimal to discuss. But while i was working on that F&F repeated the reversion to the much shorter and poorly references version from 6 months ago (not Misplaced Pages quality because large sections of it were based on a small number of sources). By "the choice is ultimately yours" do you mean it would not be unreasonable to undo the reversion and keep working on it? I nearly did that, but i know "edit wars" are very much frowned upon. Is there a right place to save and work on an alternate version for discussion? Irtapil (talk) 06:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Elsewhere they say content being there for 3 weeks counts as reason for it to stay, but the stuff that was in the Urdu Alphabet page much longer, and cintributed to by about 20 other editors, doesn't qualify? Irtapil (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Ethnologue

Hi Irtapil, here's a workaround that might be of interest for you. Ethnologue's primary links haven't changed, so you can actually look at older versions via the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. So current links are behind a hard paywall, e.g. Urdu. But if you go before Oct 2019 here, you will have full access to older versions (occasionally there is a soft paywall, so you just have to click around a bit until you an unlocked view). Language family pages are still free.Austronesier (talk) 17:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Is the paywall new? Are the pages linked prominently supposed to be the free summaries? should i point it out if i come across paywalled things in an infobox? Irtapil (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
The soft paywall (5 views per month) was introduced c. 2 yrs ago, the hard paywall with the outlandish subscription prices end of last year. AFAIK all pages evoked by infobox parameter "ref" are now hidden behind a hard paywall for IPs from industrialized coutries. So they are accessible for some readers, for many others not. A few editors already talked about it, but we ended up with a "wait-and-see" attitude.
Paywalled sources are not per se tabu, in fact WP is against WP:FUTONBIAS, but Ethnologue is actually meant as an auxilliary source, so the paywall really brings the promiment position of Ethnologue into a questionable position. The Ethnologue reference can certainly remain there but not as a primary index. I hope more editors will join the discussion in the project talk page. –Austronesier (talk) 17:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, non free sources have their place, hence my suggestion being adding another rather than replacing them. A big part of the point of Misplaced Pages is to make the i formation in difficult to access resources, accessible to a wider audience. Irtapil (talk) 17:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Why "futon"? what's the furniture connection? (i double checked the page you linked and there's no explanation, the sock puppet page had a photo of an actual sock puppet LOL.) Is it an acronym or a reference to "couch surfing"?
I suppose i may as well ask a general question while i'm at it, Where can i find good quality freely available linguistic sources? is there a "PubMed Central for linguistics"?
Irtapil (talk) 17:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Formatting on talk pages

Please learn how to format the first message of a new section. On the first level, paragraphs are separated by empty lines. It goes like this:

Comment 1. Paragraph 1.
Comment 1. Paragraph 2. ~~~~
:Comment 2. Paragraph 1.
:Comment 2. Paragraph 2. ~~~~
::Comment 3. Paragraph 1.
::Comment 3. Paragraph 2. ~~~~

Nardog (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

@Nardog: why do you care do much? Irtapil (talk) 12:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Because attribution is essential. If you don't get indentation and signatures right, people wouldn't be able to know who said what. And that would be detrimental to the purpose of a talk page, which is not only to discuss content and policy but to provide record of what was discussed and how decisions were made for others to see. Nardog (talk) 00:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
ah, now i'm confused, i thought you were objecting to me indenting first post, but that doesn't make attribution ambiguous. so what were you objecting to? Irtapil (talk) 12:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Of course it does. Indentation indicates subordination. If you're not replying you shouldn't indent. Nardog (talk) 07:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation support request

Hi,

While working on article Islamic advice literature I realized that word 'Qisas' is appearing in different meaning at Qisas Al-Anbiya it comes as story/anecdote telling (alternative spelling Kissa). And in article named Qisas seems to come as revenge. Need support in creating proper disambiguation page and links so reader do not end up in unexpected pages.

Of course article Islamic advice literature too needs support in update and expansion since lot of scholarly references are available in books and google scholar too.

Thanks in advance and greetings

Bookku (talk) 08:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Bookku: sorry, i'm not very knowledgeable about this. But i'll see if i can find you some links of where to find the answers. Irtapil (talk) 11:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Ways to ask general questions about editing Misplaced Pages:
specific places for help with that question:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Islam
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Redirect#How_to_make_a_redirect
https://en.wikipedia.org/Help:Disambiguation
Irtapil (talk) 11:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
30 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Informal romanizations of Cyrillic (talk) Add sources
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Khowar alphabet (talk) Add sources
4,363 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Sanskrit (talk) Add sources
418 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Languages of Asia (talk) Add sources
48 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Alay (talk) Add sources
46 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Gyaru-moji (talk) Add sources
23 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Persian Inscriptions on Indian Monuments (talk) Cleanup
78 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ho language (talk) Cleanup
87 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sylheti Nagri (talk) Cleanup
68 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Martian language (talk) Expand
420 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Romanization (talk) Expand
9,115 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Mahabharata (talk) Expand
132 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Algerian Arabic (talk) Unencyclopaedic
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Miguxês (talk) Unencyclopaedic
91 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Denglisch (talk) Unencyclopaedic
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Ktav Ashuri (talk) Merge
167 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Arabic calligraphy (talk) Merge
362 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Near-open front unrounded vowel (talk) Merge
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Modern Indian Language (talk) Wikify
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Peter Benjamin Graham (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA 2017 Ebrahim Raisi presidential campaign (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Baba Shah Esfahani (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Goharshad Ghazvini (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Hassan Mourad (talk) Orphan
34 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Kurdish coffee (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Že (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Asperula crassula (talk) Stub
531 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Eighth Schedule to the Constitution of India (talk) Stub
35 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Warang Citi (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Mary International Airport (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Indiyaa in Meitei script 2020-05-30 09-07.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Indiyaa in Meitei script 2020-05-30 09-07.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Misplaced Pages can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot 23:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User Mtei

A tag has been placed on Category:User Mtei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 03:42, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

if you

are capable of your user page overload - you should get the fact the burklemore hasnt edited for a while - you need to get a sense of asking questions of editors who havent edited for a while might not just answer (or who knows maybe they will) JarrahTree 14:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Hi. I'm not sure what you're talking about? can you link the page this refers to, please? Irtapil (talk) 12:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Burklemore1&oldid=962345798
user pages and talk pages of other users are usually for their discretion -adding a label like that is
(a) a problem in that it is up to an editor if they so choose - it is not for others to attribute such items
(b) the editor hasnt edited for a while and may have left wikipedia without saying so
(c) the australian biota project has some very dedicated editors who carry on regardless, if you choose to create such an item, wp:AGF and a slight matter of courtesy could involve actually letting the participants know of the tag... JarrahTree 01:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
@JarrahTree: I still don't know what you are referring to. Aus biota is a start, i thought you were talking about Kashmiri language.
What did i do? (I can't tell if it sounds like the things i was intending to do, or something i might have done accidentally.)
'do i need to fix it? or just do it differently next time?
what does "could involve actually letting the participants know of the tag" mean? let them know where? how? i put a user box on the project page, isn't the project page the place to let people know about it?
are you even talking about the userbox?
'what does "user page overload" mean?'
Irtapil (talk) 21:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
@JarrahTree: you seem to be talking about a message i left on somebody else's talk page? (@Burklemore:) but why do you object? what are you saying i should have done differently? you put stuff on my talk page, that seems to be the way they're supposed to be used?
why does it matter if they've left?
Irtapil (talk) 21:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
"a slight matter of courtesy could involve actually letting the participants know of the tag" but they get notified of things i put on their talk page? Irtapil (talk) 21:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Meitei Mayek script

A tag has been placed on Category:Meitei Mayek script requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 10:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Urdu alphabet, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Persian, Alif and Naskh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User Mtei

A tag has been placed on Category:User Mtei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 14:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Meitei Mayek script

A tag has been placed on Category:Meitei Mayek script requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 14:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


Rasm

Hiya Irtapil. Thanks for your fine work at Rasm. Do you know how to do/pass a picture in the right hand corner? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

@JorgeLaArdilla: It depends what you want it in the corner of (table, section, or whole page)?
To align an image to the right you add "right" between two pipes "|" like this
]
If you want the picture in the top right of a section you put that between the heading and the text of the section. Any text following that line of code will go to the left of the image (if the reader's screen is wide enough).
Which image do you want in which corner? (and which page, if you don't mean Rasm?)
Irtapil (talk) 06:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)


Ali Mahmoud Al Suleiman

Hi how are you ? can you help us with this article Stay safe Regards Mevlut Bin Omar (talk) 18:53, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


sorry @Mevlut Bin Omar: it seems i'm too late, the article has already been deleted. But i don't know who that is, so it's unlikely i could have helped. Irtapil (talk) 12:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)


Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Urdu alphabet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hindustani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Chris Watson

There is no requirement that each sentence have an inline citation. I agree that having a bunch of citations at the end of a paragraph makes it hard to distinguish individual sources, but that does not mean that the prior sentences are unsourced. Tagging them doesn't help anything. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ivar the Boneful: reminder Misplaced Pages:Edit_warring#The_three-revert_rule
Irtapil (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
@Ivar the Boneful: did you even look at the third edit you reverted? i wasn't using the citation needed template, i found something more specific. Irtapil (talk) 22:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


what is going on with this image?

{{help me|why does this image distort it when i try to add an updated cropped version?}}


the image file i was trying to crop


  • i tried to crop an image and it distorted weirdly.
  • i tried again and the new version looked wrong but the previous version looked ok.
  • i reverted to the previous version and that looked wrong, but… see screencap below.
see highlighting
Hm, I took a look and was unable to duplicate the error! The image does not appear distorted to me no matter which version I'm looking at. This might be something local to your computer. I'll leave the help me box up for now since I don't know what might be causing it. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
I can second being unable to reproduce what's in your screenshot—that's pretty weird. My only guess is that your browser is doing something funky, so you could either try restarting it or viewing the image on another one. Double checking it myself, the current revision seems to look good regarding the white border.

If you're curious to know an alternative way to crop an image, then you can look into CropTool, which is a gadget for Wikimedia Commons (note you can also just use its website). Let me know if you have any further questions, and happy editing! Perryprog (talk) 00:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


SuggestBot

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Mari Abad (talk) Add sources
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Ng (Arabic letter) (talk) Add sources
690 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Persian alphabet (talk) Add sources
1,973 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Mustelidae (talk) Add sources
385 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C African French (talk) Add sources
770 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Australian Government (talk) Add sources
154 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA North–South divide in Taiwan (talk) Cleanup
74 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Phonological history of English close front vowels (talk) Cleanup
1,136 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Gender inequality (talk) Cleanup
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Quid (encyclopedia) (talk) Expand
1,409 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic (talk) Expand
45,633 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B COVID-19 pandemic (talk) Expand
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Urdu in Aurangabad (talk) Unencyclopaedic
81 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Donkey vote (talk) Unencyclopaedic
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Washuk District (talk) Unencyclopaedic
29,794 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Coronavirus disease 2019 (talk) Merge
116 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Western religions (talk) Merge
4,214 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Latin script (talk) Merge
58 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Vampires in popular culture (talk) Wikify
65 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Migration to Xinjiang (talk) Wikify
131 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Phonological history of English consonant clusters (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C The SARS Network (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Anna-Lise Williamson (talk) Orphan
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Colonial roots of gender inequality in Africa (talk) Orphan
30 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Annie Raja (talk) Stub
66 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Polecat–ferret hybrid (talk) Stub
209 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Semantic Scholar (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ningbo East railway station (talk) Stub
178 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Mogens Jensen (politician) (talk) Stub
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


AfD for deaths due to COVID-19 and related RfC

Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further. Lugnuts 17:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


Taiwan has an RFC

Taiwan has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. STSC (talk) 02:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


Archiving on Taiwan

Hello Irtapil. I reverted one of your edits on Talk:Taiwan. Actually, it the discussion was already archived. As the page has a lot of frequent discussions, the bot also archives frequently (60 days). However, it is best to avoid reinstating old discussions. I would suggest you start a new discussion and link to the older one to provide a context.--DreamLinker (talk) 17:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@DreamLinker: but someone on that talk page got angry at me for starting a new discussion on an old topic, like you just suggested? Irtapil (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


"Island" in Masri

@Nehme1499 and HitomiAkane: This refers partly to a topic from User_talk:HitomiAkane/Archive_1, but it seemed more appropriate to put it on my own talk page? You were talking about some inaccurate transliterations in arz: and i think I've possibly found another, but i know hardly any Arabic so i don't know weather it actually is inaccurate. This looks like a problem, but i'm way out of my depth, so tagging @Nehme1499: who spotted a similar problem and seemed to come up with a decent plan to repair it. There are a huge number of articles in arz.wikipedia.org that use the Arabic spelling Template:Lang-ar for the English word "island" in the title, or the body. All of these pages (or at least the dozen or so i checked) had the same author arz:مستخدم:HitomiAkane and no other human editors. This struck me as weird, because that is one of the very few words i know in Arabic, and the article on Islands in general is under that title arz:جزيره in Egyptian wiki. The transliteration was often in place names, but even in place names things like Island (or Lake or Mountain) get translated, with fairly rare exceptions Loch Ness vs Lake Geneva. The transliterstion of island also uses the Arabic dotted ya ي unicode character, whereas the spelling of the name of Masri Wiki uses the ی terminally undotted Farsi version of Ya. There are no matches to this spelling with the ی undotted Ya. I'm not sure how i could go about finding a suitable speaker of the dialect to give an informed second opinion? I got the impression user:Nehme1499 speaks Lebanese? Irtapil (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for pinging me. The issue is that in Lebanese we strictly use characters in exactly the same way they are used in Arabic (so without the terminal ی, or the use of other characters like ڤ present in the farsi alphabet). So, I don't have in-depth knowledge of writing systems in Arabic dialects that don't strictly follow the Arabic alphabet. For me, what should be done is simple: if the title is a "given name", like Grand Island, then Island should be transliterated into ايسلاند. If island is used to indicate the geographical entity, like Quinchao Island, then we should use جزيره (or whatever the correct word for "island" is in Egyptian Arabic). Nehme1499 18:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks @Nehme1499:
Do you know where i could find an appropriate person to talk to? or a right place to mention it?
The different unicode character thing mostly just indicated to me that all of the usages of that spelling were the same user with the same keyboard (without having to check the edit history for all of the pages).
A few were names of football clubs and i've noticed from Bayern Munich "Fußball-Club Bayern München" that which words get translated in that can be a bit weird (Bayern is the German name for Bavaria, but in German Munich is München). Are there any football clubs with Island in the name that might be on there with multiple editors to compare?
Irtapil (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I don't really know of Egyptian wikipedia editors. Maybe you can try asking at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Egypt, though it doesn't seem to be super active. I've found this football club called Canvey Island F.C.; the Farsi wiki (rightly) uses ایسلند. Nehme1499 19:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

User_arz-N

@Irtapil: Thank you for pinging me, First of all, and as @Nehme1499: mentioned, it was inaccurate transliterations for the word (Island) in those articles, I'll try to fix them all as soon as possible, the second issue that Masri Wiki uses the ی terminally undotted Ya as all Egyptian write it that way, in addition to another set of characters explained here to expand our options when translating, thank you all, HitomiAkane (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

article translation request ru: Альянс врачей

check-markThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Is there a standard way to request translations? or is sunshine responding to this able to do this?

I'm looking for someone to translate an article from Russian Misplaced Pages that does not seem to have an article in English Misplaced Pages, ru: Альянс врачей. They an organisation being mentioned in recent news about Alexey Navalny. There's no information about them in English Misplaced Pages but there is extensive article in Russian Misplaced Pages. I can't find any mention of them in English Misplaced Pages using that specific Russian name "Альянс врачей", or a literal translation "Alliance of Doctors".

Irtapil (talk) 08:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Irtapil - Please have a look at the procedures at WP:TRANSLATETOHERE . CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll try Misplaced Pages:Translators_available#Russian-to-English. Irtapil (talk) 00:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


Draft: == article translation request ] ==

I found you on the list: Misplaced Pages:Translators_available#Russian-to-English.

I'm looking for someone to translate an article from Russian Misplaced Pages that does not seem to have an article in English Misplaced Pages, ru: Альянс врачей. They an organisation being mentioned in recent news about Alexey Navalny. There's no information about them in English Misplaced Pages but there is extensive article in Russian Misplaced Pages. I can't find any mention of them in English Misplaced Pages using that specific Russian name "Альянс врачей", or a literal translation "Alliance of Doctors".

Irtapil (talk) 00:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


Thanks for the pointer! I've read the ru article and it comes across as a political outpost of the said organisation or their vocal supporters. While it was an interesting read for me due to my interest in the ongoing political developments around Navalny, in the spirit of the WP:Soapbox I am not sure that verbatim translation into the en space is the right way to go, unless it becomes notable with the same level of detalisation in the English language media. BACbKA (talk) 17:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
@BACbKA: Thanks for having a look. I agree a direct translation is not ideal if the original is a bit skewed. Now that someone has started a stub we can build on it from English language sources. I've definitely heard of them elsewhere now that i know who they are. Irtapil (talk) 10:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Article

I've started the basics, Alliance of Doctors, will add more later. Brandmeister 18:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. It's strange it wasn't there already. Irtapil (talk) 15:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at 1978 smallpox in the United Kingdom shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your repeated moving the article to Last confirmed death from smallpox is against consensus on the Talk page. I suggest you move it back before you get blocked DeCausa (talk) 18:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

@DeCausa: it wasn't 24 hours, they were a week apart.

Did you read what I posted above? “Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.” There’s no excuse for moving the article a third time clearly against consensus. DeCausa (talk) 20:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
@DeCausa: two people isn't a consensus any more than it's an outbreak! wiki is a frustrating stagnant mess. The default is always on the side of stagnation. Irtapil (talk) 20:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
That’s right, you got it. WP:CONSENSUS means the status quo stays until there’s a consensus to change. One person’s “stagnation” is another’s “opinionated editor who knows better than everyone else and everyone would see that if only they weren’t so dumb and blinkered”. I don’t think Misplaced Pages will catch on. DeCausa (talk)
@DeCausa: but they end up fairly biased, especially for articles with not much activity. because the first snd often only people to show up are the original authors, who obviously like it now it was. or for very active articles it ends up a pointless doom spiral of endless debate, which is way more reading than the references i used for the edit. I tried looking up tiawan for some quick background, that mess is so stuck that i think i'd learn more from a britanica CD ROM. Irtapil (talk) 07:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
@DeCausa: whereas the president of Afghanistan's page had the local translation of his name as something obscene about a donkey in Dari, and it had been there for months. this website is a mess. Irtapil (talk) 07:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
ha...I’ve been on WP for 10 years and the one thing I’ve learned is that everything that could be said about WP has already been said. WP:NOTPERFECT, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. DeCausa (talk) 08:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Graham Beards (talk) 18:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


ughmf et m

2001:8004:2778:2757:B189:7FA4:7045:D87A (talk) 07:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Irtapil (talk) 07:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

2001:8004:2778:2757:E488:800C:1124:D29C (talk) 07:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

what on earth was this? Irtapil (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)


You've got mail

Hello, Irtapil. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Asdiapod (talk) 01:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


Commons - Notification about possible deletion

re Commons - Notification about possible deletion

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko and Minorax:

WHY!?

that discussion page gives no reason except a link to the general policy.

also, why didn't i get a notification on wiki main page? i only saw this now, and it's obviously too late now!

Irtapil (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Please check your notification settings. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: that only answers one of the questions. Irtapil (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko and Minorax: why were these deleted? none of the linked info was informative, it was all general guidelines, and i came see which apply to all these images because they've already been deleted. Irtapil (talk) 06:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
maybe I'll try {{help me}} … Irtapil (talk) 06:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

wiki commons & notifications

i previously tried asking specific users (see section above) .

I've split this into two separate {{help me}} questions, because it seems likely someone will have time or knowledge to help with one but not the other.

deletions from wiki commons

{{help me}}

Please read deletion request to find out reason for deletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: i did! it just listed the files and linked the generic policy. it didn't say which applied. if i missed something, please paste a quote? Irtapil (talk) 22:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

notifications from other wikis

{{help me}}

For example, I see notification about this discussion in Alerts, so cross-wiki notifications works at least for me. Please explore Notification section in Special:Preferences. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: i hasn't even asked the question yet. Irtapil (talk) 22:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Taiwan Talk

@Irtapil: Hello, just wondering whether it's good to go ahead & finalize our wording in this discussion or whether you're still on the fence or plan on proposing changes. WikiwiLimeli (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

@WikiwiLimeli: Sorry, i didn't read this until today. I thought that issue was already resolved? Is this why the maritime borders version is back? I'm very sure it's best to avoid the "maritime borders" reference in the lead, there are simpler ways to describe it. What was left ambiguous in the discussion? Irtapil (talk) 03:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

No worries. I thought we had consensus as well, but Horse Eye's Back kept reverting and , claiming there wasn't consensus. I wasn't sure why, so I pinged everyone again just on the safe side. Horse added a reply very late to that thread, which you might have noticed as well. WikiwiLimeli (talk) 08:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
@WikiwiLimeli: Does anybody other than the Horse Eye disagree? if not, we have a consensus and he disagrees with it, a consensus doesn't have to be unanimous?
Does anybody know why he is so obsessed with that article? He seems either not very well informed, or extremely biased, but i can't even quite worth out what his bias is? "Shared Maritime Borders" seem like a bizarre thing to bring up in the intro for a country that has heated disputes about every one of those borders.
Bizarrely the article on the Geography of Taiwan makes no mention of borders…
Irtapil (talk) 02:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
HorseEyesBack is probably the only one disagreeing, as usual. WikiwiLimeli (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
actually, has he made an identical revert three times? @Kkevinn6: @CentreLeftRight: or maybe just twice? i think @CentreLeftRight: was making a minor correction to the compromise version that seemed to fit most people's input. Irtapil (talk) 03:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
That's not my edit. Author of that change is on the right, not left. CentreLeftRight 03:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
@CentreLeftRight: well Horse eye definitely didn't add it, i think it was added in a previous edit but you made edits to other bits in between? Irtapil (talk) 12:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Oh, I misunderstood. To be clear though, I have no position on the matter regarding the exact wording used in the article Taiwan that you are discussing here. All the best, CentreLeftRight 23:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

CDP University Park, Florida?

Hi there, I have a question. Is University Park any longer a CDP? As far as I can see, there is no Census data for 2020. Has the place merged with another one for Census purposes? Thank you in advance for your reply. Regards, Dionysos1988 (talk) 13:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC) ut::

@Dionysos1988: i have no idea, i think you might have the wrong user? Irtapil (talk) 06:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment April 2022 Newsletter

Hi! Welcome to the April newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our first regular newsletter and has plenty of exciting announcements. You have received this because you added yourself as a participant to the project, but will only receive future newsletters if you sign up for the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to do so.

April Drive: The month-long April Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of financial markets. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here!

New layout: The layout of the WikiProject has been greatly improved, with a navigation bar being added to the top of every page and separate pages for assessment and edit requests, templates, resources, and news. Come take a look!

Signing up for the newsletter: To sign up for future newsletters about upcoming drives, recent promotions, and other miscellaneous topics, add yourself to the list at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Mailing list. You will then receive them in your talk page regularly.

Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. A. C. SantacruzPlease ping me! 22:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment May 2022 Newsletter

Hi! Welcome to the May newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our second regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe.

April Drive finished: The month-long April Content-creation Drive has now concluded. Our first content drive was a great start for what will be a regular feature of our Wikiproject. We will be doing them every other month, so there's none for May, but I look forward to seeing you sign up for the June edition. The drive's target was to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of financial markets. Awards were given to those who participated.

June Drive topic for discussion: We're currently brainstorming topics for our June Content-creation Drive. Join the discussion here.

Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Real Estate Bank of Arkansas was created and nominated by Hog Farm and Ranchlander National Bank was created and nominated by Sammi Brie. They're currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to them! UBS has been nominated for a Good article reassessment. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination.

Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — Ixtal Join WP:FINANCE! 10:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Uninastaliq template

Hello,

I wanted to notify you of a couple things relating the template you created Template:Uninastaliq (which is very helpful).

I updated the documentation to note that it is widely used for Punjabi in the Perso-Arabic script rather than occasionally (important since the Noto Nastaliq font includes Punjabi-specific characters).

I also wanted to ask if you would be OK with me moving the Uninastaliq template into Template:Nastaliq, and changing Template:Uninastaliq to an alias/redirect to Nastaliq. I think this would be uncontroversial as it would improve script support across the board without having to update every instance of Nastaliq to Uninastaliq. --Middle river exports (talk) 10:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

@Middle river exports what would the impact of the move be? Irtapil (talk) 12:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
There are currently nearly 12,200 transclusions of Template:Nastaliq. The move would update all of these to prefer Noto Nastaliq Urdu over some of the older legacy fonts and the Microsoft system font. Many users are likely also just in the habit of typing the nastaliq template, unaware that a better option exists (this is what I was doing until I saw your template). --Middle river exports (talk) 12:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
I have decided to merge these templates. In looking at the characters on Saraiki alphabet, ٻ looks invisible with Jameel Noori, but looks fine with uninastaliq fallback list ٻ. I would say that is reason enough to merge. Middle river exports (talk) 22:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
I've noticed the original template seems somewhat over used, for languages that don't use Nastaliq, like Sindhi. I think the problem might be that in Hindi and Urdu the word "Nastaliq" is often used to refer to all scripts that aren't Devanagari or the Latin script? possibility combined with people using mobile devices that don't display it as a Nastaliq font. I'm not sure what to do about this other than change it to an appropriate {{lang}} template whenever i see it? Irtapil (talk) 06:28, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
@Middle river exports: thanks, that sounds like a good idea. Irtapil (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


why was my ip address blocked?

Hello Irtapil. You used the {{Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead, or reply to them here using the {{Reply to}} template. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Misplaced Pages's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

an edit i made before i liked in tonight was reverted, but was clearly "good faith"? so a block seems a bit much? Irtapil (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

it seems to be part of a huge range 2001:8004:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 blocked by User:Guerillero - can't you make that a bit more specific? Irtapil (talk) 17:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

i also asked about it on their page User_talk:Guerillero#why_was_my_ip_address_blocked? Irtapil (talk) 17:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Do not use personal labels on live articles

Live articles are not personal editing spaces. If you want to do some editing with labels to help you out, copy-and-paste the article or some of its sections to your sandbox. This should be obvious but the reason why you shouldn't do that is for the time between your edits, everyone reading the live article will be seeing a WIP message from one editor. Yue🌙 20:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Soviet–Afghan War. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 23:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@Loafiewa: I'M USING MY SAND BOX NOW. I moved the whole table there like you said. I presume i paste it back after?
I was trying to make a minor edit to the table, i added a subheading so i could edit the table by itself. You removed that while i was working on it.
I'm not "experimenting" or vandalising I'm trying to make constructive edits to make the table more readable and you are making it much harder than it needs to be. Irtapil (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Loafiewa is not the same person as me, and I said copy-and-paste, not cut-and-paste. If you don't want your good faith edits to be mistaken for test edits and vandalism, just remember that live article spaces are public, so if you're planning to do major work on one that takes a lot of time, just copy a replica to your private sandbox first and paste the results to the live article afterwards. Obviously if you remove large chunks of a live article or leave a personal comment on it, people are going to be confused and think it's vandalism. Yue🌙 06:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
@Yue possibly i got confused by two people saying similar things. Irtapil (talk) 04:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
@Yue
I put the note on the public page because I had mentioned something on the talk page and then tried to make the change myself. I didn't want to cause version conflicts if someone else tried to make the same change at the same time. Then the revert while I was working on it caused exactly that problem.
Then I tried a less messy subheading so I could still edit the table without loading the whole article, but that hopefully looked less untidy to readers, again reverted before I could finish.
Eventually I just gave up. I wanted to make a fairly simple improvement to the the clarity of the table, making the most relevant information most visible, but every attempt was abruptly obstructed.
When I look something up on Misplaced Pages and the information is unclear or incomplete I always try to fix it and improve it for the next person, but I always end up feeling frustrated, depressed, and completely worthless.
I'm beginning to think I should switch to reading Britanica. Articles here end up years out of date, or biased by a few obsessive editors, because even uncontroversial constructive edits get reverted by default pending "consensus" so unless someone has the time and stamima to stay and fight, their contributions just get scraped. That's not what happened this time as such, but it's the same obstructive frustration.
I guess copying the WHOLE article to my sand box might solve some of the reverts in progress problem? maybe the platform needs a convenient and obvious button for that? it would be more welcoming than it appearing as a comment on the revert for my 3rd attempt.
but I am sure someone will find a new way to make me feel worthless, frustrated, and unwelcome? Irtapil (talk) 05:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
It's not that complicated and you've been reading way too much into this for the past two weeks: Your original edit was reverted because you removed the entire infobox and then put a personal note on a publicly accessible article. You did the equivalent of unilaterally closing a bathroom stall and leaving a note that you are in the process of fixing it, but doing no such work for hours and taking the toilet paper with you. This behaviour would invoke the same response on any other public encyclopedia.
I shouldn't have to explain why you shouldn't treat a publicly accessible article like a personal sandbox, but it seems by our fourth correspondence you still do not seem to understand common etiquette (in general, not on Misplaced Pages specifically) or what the very simple reason was.
If you don't want to cause edit conflicts, just use the "In use" maintenance tag, but your edits in between shouldn't be hours apart. If they are, you should consider using the "Under construction" template, but then other editors would also be encouraged by the maintenance tag to help with the reconstruction.
Don't take these kind of messages so personally; if you think someone else interpreted site policy incorrectly, just say so instead of asking them why they did it, because the answer is almost always the same as your modus operandi: to improve Misplaced Pages. Yue🌙 06:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Removing the entire infobox was NOT by original edit! that was my frustrated third-ish attempt.
First, while i was editing, I put a short message on the page that said i was currently editing it. Someone instantly removed the message! and lost what i was working on because they removed the message while i was in the process of editing!
I just wanted to make a list slightly more legible, it would have taken minutes!
But it takes hours, because me not using the exact correct decorative template to say I'd be editing this article for the next few minutes, meant someone did exactly the opposite of what the nite was these for, and then the save glitches, and i lost the attempt to fix the silly dot point and… and that's how moving a couple of dot points takes hours … and then weeks of discussion.
Maybe I shouldn't snap at you so harshly, it's not just you, it's the whole website, any attempt to do anything is a soul crushingly frustrating experience that hurts more than any of the social media with a worse reputation for impacts on self esteem.
But the public bathroom analogy was a bit offensive, it made it hard to read too.
Irtapil (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

ARBPIA notice

Information icon You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Is this automatic or pasted from somewhere? Why is it suddenly appearing now? Irtapil (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
It's a templated message from T:DSA to ensure editors are aware. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
But what triggers it? I've been editing pages on this topic for weeks.
- Is it just something you pasted manually?
- Were the other pages i edited new and not on the topic list yet?
- Is it which pages I edited or the types of edits?
- Is it because i reverted something?
- What would have happened if I reverted your revert before I saw this?
(Sorry I'm not good at paragraphing)
Also, sorry I've not addressed some of the other messages yet, I'll get to it soon.
Irtapil (talk) 05:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
@Irtapil: It's manual, and yes, when editors are new to a CT topic area and start reverting things, that's generally when another editors in that CT topic area might post this. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Sorry I reverted your edit. I feel i owe you an explanation because your edit note looked upset? I tried to avoid reverting because I know it can be painfully frustrating. But after starting the discussion, I worried that - if the community decided to reverse it - reversal might be very difficult without discarding subsequent edits. On reflection it should be easy enough to put the table back together, or restore any prose that got removed, and at a glance none of the removed prose seems worth debating. I just wanted to explain why i did it in that order. But a question for future reference, so I don't clash with anyone else… I thought the usual process is to keep the old version until after people have discussed it? That's what usually happens when people disagree with my edits, so I thought it was standard? But it would be good if it's not, because "revert by default" makes editing feel futile sometimes. What is the process supposed to be? Irtapil (talk) 07:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
The stability of existing content is inherently less of a concern when dealing with extremely recent and new content, where the concept of an 'old version' isn't really applicable. It's natural for new content to get shuffled around by editors. One obvious, but unwritten behavioural rule of thumb, however, is that if an editor has put a lot of effort into a complex edit or series of edits, they are more likely to revert another editor that comes along and undoes that work. It's human nature. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Missing signature

FYI, you didn't sign here. Feel free to delete this message. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Fixed now. Sorry i get mixed up because some ways to reply now seem to do that automatically but others still don't. Irtapil (talk) 14:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of engagements during the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Request to Self-Revert

Dear Irtapil: I believe you ran afoul of the one-revert rule with this edit. The one-revert rule prohibits more than one revert per 24 hours. A revert is defined as any edit that "undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part." This edit undid this action. This edit undid this action. It is customary to permit a person who runs afoul of the one-revert rule to self-correct. Please do so by self-reverting this edit. --Orgullomoore (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)