Misplaced Pages

Unidentified flying object: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:19, 26 September 2008 view sourceSMC (talk | contribs)Rollbackers13,585 editsm Reverted edits by 146.186.40.100 to last version by Kaiwhakahaere (HG)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:57, 25 November 2024 view source IronCobaltNickel (talk | contribs)118 editsm 20th century and after: corrected spelling of "series"Tag: Visual edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Airborne, submerged, and transmedium phenomena considered unusual and unidentified}}
{{redirect|UFO}}
{{Mergefrom|Identified flying object|date=June 2008}} {{Redirect|UFO|other uses|Unidentified flying object (disambiguation)|and|UFO (disambiguation)}}
{{Distinguish|Flying saucer}}
{{articleissues|cleanup=June 2008|original research=June 2008|primarysources=June 2008|refimprove=June 2008}}
{{pp|small=yes}}
{{pp-move}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2023}}
{{More citations needed|date=April 2024}}
], January 2015]]


An '''unidentified flying object''' ('''UFO'''), or '''unidentified anomalous phenomenon''' ('''UAP'''),{{efn|group=lower-alpha|Also known as an '''unidentified aerial phenomenon'''.<ref>{{Cite web |title=UAP FAQs – NASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Study Frequently Asked Questions |url=https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/ |access-date=January 30, 2024 |website=] |language=en}}</ref>}} is any perceived airborne, submerged or transmedium phenomenon that cannot be immediately identified or explained.<ref>{{Cite web |title=50 U.S. Code § 3373 – Establishment of All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3373 |access-date=2024-03-21 |website=LII / Legal Information Institute |language=en |archive-date=May 20, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240520125549/https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3373 |url-status=live }}</ref> Upon investigation, most UFOs are ] as known objects or atmospheric phenomena, while a small number remain unexplained.
An '''Unidentified Flying Object''', or '''UFO''', is the popular term for any aerial phenomenon that cannot immediately be identified. Some definitions, such as the one used by the USAF, define a UFO as an object unable to be identified after scrutiny, while other definitions define an object as being a UFO from the time it is first reported as being unidentified, even though most subsequently become IFOs, Identified Flying Objects.


While unusual sightings have been reported in the sky throughout history, UFOs became culturally prominent after ], escalating during the ]. Studies and investigations into UFO reports conducted by governments (such as ] in the United States and ] in the ]), as well as by organisations and individuals have occurred over the years without confirmation of the fantastical claims of small but vocal groups of ] who favour unconventional or ] hypotheses, often claiming that UFOs are evidence of ], ], ]s, ] or ]. After decades of promotion of such ideas by believers and in popular media, ] has not been forthcoming. Scientists and skeptic organizations such as the ] have provided prosaic explanations for UFOs, namely that they are caused by natural phenomena, human technology, delusions, and hoaxes. Beliefs surrounding UFOs have inspired parts of ] even as social scientists have identified the ongoing interest and storytelling surrounding UFOs as a modern example of ] and ] understandable with ].
Reports of unidentified aerial phenomena date back to ], but modern reports and the first official investigations began during ] with sightings of so-called ]s by ] ] crews, and in 1946 with widespread sightings of ]an "]". UFO reports became even more common after the first widely publicized ] UFO sighting, by private pilot ] in mid 1947. Hundreds of thousands {{fact| date=August 2008}} of UFO reports have since been made worldwide.


The ] currently has two entities dedicated to UFO data collection and analysis: ] and the ].
Since its introduction the term has become heavily associated with flying saucers and ], though an object may be classified as a UFO independently of opinion as to its origins. Most military and civilian UFO investigations concluded that the majority of objects can be ] either directly, or by applying ].<ref>{{cite book

|title=The Cosmos: Astronomy in the New Millennium
{{TOC limit|4}}
|author=Pasachoff, Jay M and Alex Filippenko

|year=2004
==Terminology==
|publisher=Brooks/Cole div. of Thomson Learning Inc.

|isbn=053439550
During the late 1940s and through the 1950s, UFOs were often called "]s" or "flying discs" based on reporting of the ].<ref>{{cite web|date=October 9, 2015|title=HOME > VISIT > MUSEUM EXHIBITS > FACT SHEETS > DISPLAY Avro Canada VZ-9AV Avrocar|url=https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/195801/avro-canada-vz-9av-avrocar/|work=www.nationalmuseum.af.mil ]|access-date=June 22, 2021|archive-date=May 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518072042/https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/article/195801/avro-canada-vz-9av-avrocar/|url-status=live}}</ref> "Unidentified flying object" (UFO) has been in-use since 1947.<ref name="MW-2023" /> The acronym, "UFO" was coined by Captain ], for the USAF. He wrote, "Obviously the term 'flying saucer' is misleading when applied to objects of every conceivable shape and performance. For this reason the military prefers the more general, if less colorful, name: unidentified flying objects. UFO".<ref>], Chapter 1: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927014715/http://www.nicap.org/rufo/rufo-01.htm |date=September 27, 2013 }}</ref> The term UFO became widespread during the 1950s, at first in technical literature, but later in popular use.<ref name="NYT-20170424">{{cite news |last=Blumenthal |first=Ralph |title=People Are Seeing U.F.O.s Everywhere, and This Book Proves It |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/24/science/ufo-sightings-book.html |date=April 24, 2017 |work=] |access-date=April 24, 2017 |archive-date=November 25, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201125031952/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/24/science/ufo-sightings-book.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="AMZ-20170324">{{cite book |last1=Costa |first1=Cheryl |last2=Costa |first2=Linda Miller |title=UFO Sightings Desk Reference: United States of America 2001–2015 |date=2017 |publisher=Dragon Lady Media, LLC |isbn=978-1544219233 }}</ref> Unidentified aerial phenomena" (UAP) first appeared in the late 1960s. UAP has seen increasing usage in the 21st century due to negative cultural associations with "UFO".<ref name="MW-2023">{{cite web |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/words-were-watching-uap |title=Words We're Watching: What does 'UAP' mean? |website=Merriam-Webster |access-date=26 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230417203105/https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/words-were-watching-uap |archive-date=17 April 2023}}</ref> UAP is sometimes expanded as "unidentified anomalous phenomenon".<ref name="Hanks2022">{{cite web |author=Micah Hanks |url=https://thedebrief.org/the-pentagon-just-revealed-the-new-name-of-its-uap-investigative-office/ |title=The Pentagon Just Revealed the New Name of Its UAP Investigative Office |publisher=The Debrief |date=July 21, 2022 |access-date=July 24, 2022 |archive-date=July 24, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220724094335/https://thedebrief.org/the-pentagon-just-revealed-the-new-name-of-its-uap-investigative-office/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Furfaro2022">{{cite web |author= Emily Furfaro |url= https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-announces-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-study-team-members |title= NASA Announces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team Members |publisher= NASA |date= October 21, 2022 |access-date=December 23, 2022 |archive-date=December 23, 2022 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20221223015354/https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-announces-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-study-team-members/ |url-status= live |quote=Editor's Note: This article was updated on December 22, 2022 to reflect an expanded terminology for 'UAP,' going from unidentified aerial phenomena to unidentified anomalous phenomena.}}</ref>
|pages=428-430

}}</ref>
While technically a ''UFO'' refers to any unidentified flying object, in modern popular culture the term UFO has generally become synonymous with ].<ref>], Chapter: "The Zeitgeist of the UFO Phenomenon" by Armando Simón</ref>The term "extra-terrestrial vehicle" (ETV) is sometimes used to separate this explanation of UFOs from totally earthbound explanations.<ref>{{Citation
| last1 = Giere
| first1 = Ronald N.
| last2 = Bickle
| first2 = John
| last3 = Mauldin
| first3 = Robert F.
| title = Understanding Scientific Reasoning
| publisher = ]
| date = 2006
| edition = 5th
| page = 99
| isbn = 0-15-506326-X
| oclc = 61369793
| lccn = 2005922853}}</ref>

==Identification==

{{Main|Identification studies of UFOs}}
], a type of mirage in which objects located ''below'' the astronomical ] appear to be hovering in the sky just above the horizon, may be responsible for some UFO sightings.<ref name="Official UFO Investigations in France: the GEPAN/SEPRA Project">], Appendix 4: "Electromagnetic-Wave Ducting" by V. R. Eshleman</ref>|thumb]]

Studies show that after careful investigation, the majority of UFOs can be identified as ordinary objects or phenomena. The ] for the USAF used the following categories: "Balloon; Astronomical; Aircraft; Light phenomenon; Birds, Clouds, dust, etc.; Insufficient information; Psychological manifestations; Unknown; and Other".<ref>{{cite report |publisher=United States Air Force |title=Project Blue Book Special Report 14: Analysis of Reports of Unidentified Aerial Objects |url=https://www.academia.edu/49680297 |page=10 |date=5 May 1955}} </ref> The most commonly found identified sources of UFO reports are:
* Balloons (], ], ]s, large ]s, and ]s)<ref name="Ezzy-2024" /><ref name="Starwalk"/><ref name="Carey-2010"/>
* Astronomical objects (], ]s, ], and the ])<ref name="Ezzy-2024"/><ref name="Carey-2010"/><ref name="Blackrock-2024"/>
* Aircraft (including ], ], and ] aircraft as well as such peculiarities as ], ] and other ]es, ], the ], re-entering ] including ], ]s, and various ]s often popularly termed "drones")<ref name="Ezzy-2024">{{cite magazine |last1=Ezzy |first1=Pearson |title=16 things commonly mistaken for UFOs |url=https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/things-mistaken-for-ufos |magazine=Sky at Night Magazine |publisher=BBC |access-date=14 September 2024 |language=en |date=June 3, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Starwalk">{{cite news |title=Relax, It's Not Aliens: Man-Made Objects Mistaken for UFOs |url=https://starwalk.space/en/infographics/ufo-sightings-real-objects |access-date=14 September 2024 |work=Star Walk |date=February 12, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Carey-2010"/>
* Light phenomena (]s, ], ]s, ], ]s, ]s, ], ]s and other ground lights, etc.)<ref name="Ezzy-2024" /><ref>{{cite news |last1=Hahn |first1=Jason |title=Christmas Lights Are Likely Source of Multiple UFO Reports in Wisconsin (But Not Everyone's Convinced) |url=https://people.com/human-interest/ufo-sighting-wisconsin-apparently-solved-christmas-lights/ |access-date=14 September 2024 |work=People |date=21 December 2022 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Blackrock-2024">{{cite web |title=How To Identify A UFO |url=https://www.bco.ie/how-to-identify-a-ufo/ |website=MTU Blackrock Castle |access-date=14 September 2024 |date=15 August 2022}}</ref>
* Other atmospheric objects and phenomena (birds, ], ]s, ])<ref name="Ezzy-2024"/><ref name="Carey-2010">{{cite news |last1=Carey |first1=Bjorn |last2=Melina |first2=Remy |title=7 Things Most Often Mistaken for UFOs |url=https://www.livescience.com/32849-7-ways-to-generate-a-great-space-hoax.html |access-date=14 September 2024 |work=Live Science |date=10 November 2010 |language=en}}</ref>
* Psychological effects (], ] and ], ], ]s, and ]s)<ref>{{cite report |title=Aid to Identification of Flying Objects |url=https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/Aids_to_identification_of_flying_objects_0.pdf |publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office |author=United States Air Force |date=1968}}</ref>
* Hoaxes<ref>{{cite web |last1=Wright |first1=Aaron |title='The truth is out there': UFO group debunks hoaxes in hopes of finding the real thing |url=https://www.kens5.com/article/features/the-truth-is-out-there-ufo-group-debunks-hoaxes-in-hopes-of-finding-the-real-thing/273-610080916 |website=kens5.com |access-date=14 September 2024 |date=31 October 2018}}</ref><ref name="Carey-2010"/><ref>{{cite news |title=The Great Morris County UFO Hoax |url=https://weirdnj.com/stories/unexplained-phenomena/nj-ufo-hoax/ |access-date=14 September 2024}}</ref>

] from a ] rocket launch|thumb]]

An individual 1979 study by CUFOS researcher ] found, as did other investigations, that fewer than one percent of cases he investigated were hoaxes and most sightings were actually honest misidentifications of prosaic phenomena. Hendry attributed most of these to inexperience or misperception.<ref>]</ref> Astronomer ] rejected the hypothesis that UFOs are extraterrestrial spacecraft and responded to the "onslaught of credulous coverage" in books, films and entertainment by teaching his students to apply critical thinking to such claims, advising them that "being a good scientist is not unlike being a good detective". According to Fraknoi, UFO reports "might at first seem mysterious", but "the more you investigate, the more likely you are to find that there is LESS to these stories than meets the eye".<ref name=Fraknoi>], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210526194646/http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2010ASPC..431..514F%7C%E2%80%98%E2%80%99Science |date=May 26, 2021 }}. Proceedings of a conference held September 12–16, 2009 in Millbrae, California. Edited by Jonathan Barnes, Denise A. Smith, Michael G. Gibbs, and James G. Manning., p. 514, August 2010</ref>


==History== ==History==
{{Ufo}}
], ] the skies over ], ] were reportedly filled with a multitude of objects. Woodcut from 1566 by ].]]
===Early history before the 20th century===
{{More citations|section|date=January 2024}}
People have always observed the sky and have sometimes seen what, to some, appeared to be unusual sights including phenomena as varied as ]s, bright ], one or more of the ], ], and atmospheric ] such as ] and ]s.{{Citation needed|reason=secondary sources needed connecting any of this to UFO history|date=August 2023}} One particularly famous example is ]: first recorded by Chinese astronomers in 240 BC and possibly as early as 467 BC as a strange and unknown "guest light" in the sky.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.wired.com/2011/03/0330ancient-chinese-see-halleys-comet/|title= March 30, 240 B.C.: Comet Cometh to Cathay|author= |date= March 30, 2011|publisher= Wired|accessdate= June 23, 2024|archive-date= February 13, 2021|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210213020656/https://www.wired.com/2011/03/0330ancient-chinese-see-halleys-comet/|url-status= live}}</ref> As a bright comet that visits the inner solar system every 76 years, it was often identified as a unique isolated event in ancient historical documents whose authors were unaware that it was a repeating phenomenon.{{Citation needed|reason=missing source for facts or claim|date=August 2023}} Such accounts in history often were treated as ] portents, ]s, or other religious ]s.{{Citation needed|reason=source needed for claim and for connection to UFO history|date=August 2023}} While UFO enthusiasts have sometimes commented on the narrative similarities between certain religious symbols in medieval paintings and UFO reports,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/16589 |title=Do UFOs Exist in the History of Arts? |last=Giordano |first=Daniela |date=November 13, 2006 |work=American Chronicle |publisher=Ultio, LLC |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120819213933/http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/16589 |archive-date=August 19, 2012 |access-date=September 6, 2013}}</ref> the canonical and symbolic character of such images is documented by art historians placing more conventional religious interpretations on such images.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Cuoghi |first=Diego |date=2004 |title=The Art of Imagining UFOs |journal=] |volume=11 |issue=1 |publisher=] |url=http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/archives/vol11n01.html |access-date=September 6, 2013 |archive-date=October 3, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121003170149/http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/archives/vol11n01.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


Some examples of pre-contemporary reports about unusual aerial phenomena include:
Unusual aerial observations have been reported throughout history. Some were undoubtedly astronomical in nature: ]s, bright ]s, one or more of the five planets which can be seen with the naked eye, planetary conjunctions, or atmospheric ] such as ] and ]s. An example is ], which was recorded first by Chinese astronomers in 240 B.C. and possibly as early as 467 B.C.
* ] was a ] writer who is believed to have lived in the middle of the fourth century AD. The only work associated with his name is the ''Liber de prodigiis'' (Book of Prodigies), completely extracted from an epitome, or abridgment, written by ]; ''De prodigiis'' was constructed as an account of the wonders and portents that occurred in ] between 249 and 12 BCE. An aspect of Obsequens' work that has inspired excitement in some UFO enthusiasts is that he makes reference to things moving through the sky. The descriptions provided bear resemblance to observations of ]. Obsequens was also writing some 400 years after the events he described, thus the text is not an eyewitness account. No corroboration with those amazing sights of old with contemporary observations was mentioned in that work.<ref>Julio Obsecuente, ''Libro de los Prodigios (restituido a su integridad, en beneficio de la Historia, por Conrado Licóstenes)'', ed. Ana Moure Casas (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 1990)</ref><ref>Giulio Ossequente, ''Il Libro dei prodigi'', ed. Solas Boncompagni (Rome: Edizioni Mediterranee, 1992)</ref>
* ] (1031–1095), a ] government ] and prolific polymath inventor, wrote a vivid passage in his '']'' (1088) about an unidentified flying object. He recorded the testimony of eyewitnesses in 11th-century ] and ] (especially in the city of ]), who stated that a flying object with opening doors would shine a blinding light from its interior (from an object shaped like a pearl) that would cast shadows from trees for ten ] in radius, and was able to take off at tremendous speeds.<ref>Dong, Paul. (2000). ''China's Major Mysteries: Paranormal Phenomena and the Unexplained in the People's Republic''. San Francisco: China Books and Periodicals, Inc. {{ISBN|0-8351-2676-5}}. pp 69–71.</ref> ]
* A woodcut by Hans Glaser that appeared in a broadsheet in 1561 has been featured in popular culture as the ] and connected to various ] claims.<ref name="Vallee">{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XINLC2ubHqwC&pg=PT71 | title=Wonders in the Sky: Unexplained Aerial Objects from Antiquity to Modern Times | publisher=Tarcher |author1=Vallee, Jacques |author2=Aubeck, Chris | year=2010 | isbn=978-1585428205}}</ref> Skeptic and debunker ] argues that the woodcut is "a secondhand depiction of a particularly gaudy sundog", a known ].<ref name=Colavito-121212>{{cite web | url=http://www.jasoncolavito.com/1/post/2012/12/the-ufo-battle-over-nuremburg.html | title=The UFO Battle over Nuremburg | website=jasoncolavito.com | date=December 12, 2012 | access-date=July 12, 2013 | first=Jason | last=Colavito | author-link=Jason Colavito | archive-date=December 20, 2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121220012851/http://www.jasoncolavito.com/1/post/2012/12/the-ufo-battle-over-nuremburg.html | url-status=live }}</ref> A similar report comes from ] and, indeed, in the 15th and 16th centuries, many leaflets wrote of "miracles" and "sky spectacles" which bear resemblance to natural phenomena which were only more fully characterized after the scientific revolution.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Borchert |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rPRTzgEACAAJ |title=The book of miracles: Facsimile of the Augsburg manuscript from the Collection of Mickey Cartin |date=2013 |publisher=Taschen |isbn=978-3-8365-4285-2 |language=de |access-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-date=July 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230730031603/https://books.google.com/books?id=rPRTzgEACAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* On January 25, 1878, the ''] Daily News'' printed an article in which John Martin, a local farmer, had reported seeing a large, dark, circular object resembling a balloon flying "at wonderful speed". Martin, according to the newspaper account, said it appeared to be about the size of a saucer from his perspective, one of the first uses of the word "saucer" in association with a UFO. At the time, ] was becoming an increasingly popular and sophisticated endeavor, and the first controlled-flights of such devices were occurring around that time.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/17732 |title=Before the Wright Brothers ... There Were UFOs |last=Booth |first=B J |work=American Chronicle |publisher=Ultio, LLC |date=December 8, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120819213938/http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/17732 |archive-date=August 19, 2012 |access-date=September 6, 2013}}</ref>
{{multiple image
| perrow = 2
| align = left
| total_width = 340
| header = UFO-like alleged sightings before the 20th century
| image1 = Himmelserscheinung über Nürnberg vom 14. April 1561.jpg
| caption1 = ] as printed in an illustrated news notice.
| image2 = Mystery airship SFCall Nov 22 1896.jpg
| caption2 = November 22, 1896 illustration of a "]" published in '']''
| image3 = Mystery airship SFCall Nov 29 1896.jpg
| caption3 = November 29, 1896 illustration of another "]" published in '']''
| image4 = Mystery airship The Saint Paul Globe (Minn) April 13 1897.jpg
| caption4 = "]" illustrated in '']'', April 13, 1897
}}
* From November 1896 to April 1897, United States newspapers carried numerous reports of "]s" that are reminiscent of modern UFO waves.{{sfn|Cohen|1981|p=1}} Scores of people even reported talking to the pilots. Some people feared that ] had created an artificial star that could fly around the country. On April 16, 1897, a letter was found that purported to be an enciphered communication between an airship operator and Edison.{{sfn|Cohen|1981|p=86}} When asked his opinion of such reports, Edison said, "You can take it from me that it is a pure fake."{{sfn|Keel|1996|pp=29–31|ps=, stating date of April 22, 1897}} The coverage of Edison's denial marked the end of major newspaper coverage of the airships in this period.{{sfn|Cohen|1981|p=88}}


===20th century and after===
]. Proponents say this painting depicts UFOs.]]
{{See also|Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government|UFO conspiracy theories}}
Other historical reports seem to defy prosaic explanation, but assessing such accounts is difficult. Whatever their actual cause, such sightings throughout history were often treated as ] portents, ]s, or other religious ]s. Journalist Daniela Giordano says many Medieval-era depictions of unusual aerial objects are difficult to interpret, but claims some depicting airborne saucers and domed-saucer shapes are often strikingly similar to UFO reports from later centuries.<ref> from '']'', 2006-11-13; retrieved 2007-07-27</ref>Art historians, however, explain those objects as religious symbols, often represented in many other paintings of Middle-Age and Renaissance.<ref> {{cite web
|url=http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/archives/vol11n01.html
|title=The Art of Imagining UFOs
|first=Diego
|last=Cuoghi
|work= in ''Skeptic Magazine'' Vol.11, No.1, 2004
|accessdate=
}}</ref>


In the Pacific and European theatres during ], round, glowing fireballs known as "]s" were reported by Allied and Axis pilots. Some explanations for these sightings included ], the planet ], ], and German secret weapons (specifically ]).<ref>{{cite magazine|date=January 15, 1945|title=Foo-Fighter|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,775433,00.html|url-status=dead|magazine=]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080417042038/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,775433,00.html|archive-date=April 17, 2008|access-date=May 16, 2013}}</ref> In 1946, more than 2,000 reports were collected, primarily by the Swedish military, of unidentified aerial objects over the Scandinavian nations, along with isolated reports from France, Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece. The objects were referred to as "Russian hail" (and later as "]") because it was thought the mysterious objects were possibly Russian tests of captured German ] or ] ]s, but most were identified as natural phenomena as meteors.<ref>], p. 63</ref>
] (1031&ndash;1095), a ] government ] and prolific polymath inventor and scholar, wrote a vivid passage in his '']'' (1088) about an unidentified flying object. He recorded the testimony of eyewitnesses in 11th century ] and ] (especially in the city of ]), who stated that a flying object with opening doors would emit a blinding light from its interior (from an object shaped like a pearl) that would cast shadows from trees for ten ] in radius, and was able to take off at tremendous speeds.<ref>Dong, Paul. (2000). ''China's Major Mysteries: Paranormal Phenomena and the Unexplained in the People's Republic''. San Francisco: China Books and Periodicals, Inc. ISBN 0835126765. Pages 69&ndash;71.</ref>
{{multiple image
| perrow = 2
| align = left
| total_width = 380
| image_gap =7
| background color = mintcream
| header = Science fiction depictions of spacecraft similar to ]s before the first widely-reported UFO sighting in 1947
| image1 = The War of the Worlds by Henrique Alvim Corrêa, original graphic 05.jpg
| caption1 =Illustration from 1903 by ] showing the first Martian emerging from a cylinder that had fallen from the sky for an edition of '']'' by H. G. Wells.
| image2 = Le-chevalier-illusion-no-839-conrad.jpg
| caption2 = Cover of French pulp magazine ''Le Chevalier Illusion'' from December 29, 1912 portraying a flying machine spreading a toxic gas among the passengers and crew of a ship below
| image3 = ModernElectrics1912-02.jpg
| caption3 = A "space flyer" depicted on the February 1912 cover of '']'' as an illustration for the science fiction story '']'' by ]
| image4 = Science and Invention Feb 1922 pg912 - War of the Future.jpg
| caption4 = Illustration by ] from February 1922 in ''Science and Invention'' showing ]'s vision of warfare in the future with sea and air craft "controlled and directed" by radio waves


| image5 = Münchhausen Lands On Mars by Hugo Gernsback in Amazing Stories April 1928 page 39.jpg
===Pre-modern reports===
| caption5 = Illustration for a story by ] in pulp ] magazine ''Amazing Stories'' from April 1928 (originally published on 1915 with similar illustrations in '']'')
{{main|List of UFO sightings}}
] in 1870; known as the ].]]
Before the terms "flying saucer" and "UFO" were coined in the late 1940s, there were a number of reports of unidentified aerial phenomena in the West. These reports date from the mid-nineteenth to early twentieth century. They include:


| image6 = Science Wonder Stories Nov 1929 - flying saucer.jpg
* On ], ], The ''] Daily News'' wrote that local farmer John Martin had reported seeing a large, dark, circular flying object resembling a balloon flying "at wonderful speed."<ref></ref>
| caption6 = Depiction of a ] by illustrator ] on the October 1929 issue of ]'s pulp ] magazine '']''
* On ], ], a UFO was observed by ] ] of the ] and some other ]an astronomers. Maunder in '']'' reported "a strange ] visitor" that was "disc-shaped", "]-shaped", "]-shaped", or "just like a ]" ] (as he described it in 1916).
* On ], ], there was a sighting by three crew members on the ] 300 miles west of ], reported by ], later to become ] of the Pacific ]. Schofield wrote of three bright red egg-shaped and circular objects flying in ] that approached beneath the cloud layer, then changed course and "soared" above the clouds, departing directly away from the earth after two to three minutes. The largest had an apparent size of about six suns.
] Observatory, ], UK, who also observed it.]]
* 1916 and 1926: the three oldest known pilot UFO sightings, of 1305 catalogued by . On January 31, 1916, a UK pilot near ] reported a row of lights, like lighted windows on a railway carriage, that rose and disappeared. In January 1926, a pilot reported six "flying manhole covers" between ] and ]. In late September 1926, an airmail pilot over ] was forced to land by a huge, wingless cylindrical object.
* On ] ], while traveling in the ] of ]'s ] region, ] reported that members of his expedition saw "something big and shiny reflecting sun, like a huge oval moving at great speed".
* In both the ]an and ]ese aerial theatres during ], "]" (balls of light and other shapes that followed aircraft) were reported by both ] and ] pilots.<ref></ref>
* On ], ], the U.S. Army detected unidentified aircraft both visually and on radar over the ], ] region. No readily-apparent explanation was offered. The incident later became known as the ], or the ].
* In 1946, there were over 2000 reports of unidentified aircraft in the ]n nations, along with isolated reports from ], ], ] and ], then referred to as "Russian hail", and later as "]", because it was thought that these mysterious objects were ]n tests of captured ] ] or ] ]s. Over 200 were tracked on radar and deemed to be "real physical objects" by the Swedish military.


| image7 = Amazing stories quarterly 1930win.jpg
===The Kenneth Arnold sighting===
| caption7 =Cover of '']'' winter 1930 issue depicting a disc-shaped spacecraft
{{main|Kenneth Arnold#June 24, 1947 UFO sighting}}
]
The post World War II UFO phase in the United States began with a reported sighting by American businessman ] on ], ] while flying his private plane near ], ]. He reported seeing nine brilliantly bright objects flying across the face of Rainier towards nearby ] at "an incredible speed", which he "calculated" as at least 1200 miles per hour by timing their travel between Rainier and Adams.


| image8 = Amazing Stories August 1946 back cover.png
] holding a picture of a drawing of the crescent shaped UFO he saw in 1947.]]
| caption8 = Back cover of '']'' illustrated by ] in August 1946 featuring many disc-shaped spacecraft (published about a year before the flying disc wave of 1947)
}}
Many scholars, especially those arguing for the ], have noted that UFO characteristics reported after the first widely publicized modern sighting by ] in 1947 resembled a host of science fiction tropes from earlier in the century.<ref>Jeffrey J. Kripal, ''Authors of the Impossible: The Paranormal and the Sacred'', University of Chicago Press, 2010, pp. 206–208. {{ISBN?}}</ref><ref>Bertrand Meheust, ''Science Fiction et Soucoupes Volantes'' Mercure de France, 1978</ref><ref>Michel Monnerie, Le Naufrage des Extra-terrestres, Nouvelles Editions Rationalistes, 1979.</ref><ref>Michel Meurger, ''Alien Abduction : L'enlèvement Extraterrestre de la Fiction à la croyance – Scientifictions: la Revue de l'Imaginaire Scientifique; numero 1, volume 1'' Encrage, 1995 (in French) 253pp.</ref><ref>Michel Meurger, "Surgeons from Outside" ''Fortean Studies'' # 3 (1996) pp. 308–321.</ref><ref>Jacques Vallee, ''Dimensions: A Casebook of Alien Contact Contemporary Books'', 1988, p. 167.</ref><ref>Martin S. Kottmeyer, ''Magonia'' #90; November 2005, pp. 3–15. " {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001033541/http://magonia.haaan.com/2010/enginestoppers/ |date=2013-10-01 }}"</ref>


By most accounts, the ] in the US began with a media frenzy surrounding the reports on June 24, 1947, of a civilian pilot named ] who described seeing "a group of bat-like aircraft flying in formation at high speeds" near ] that he said were "moving like a saucer would if skipped across water" which led to headlines about "flying saucers" and "flying discs".<ref>{{cite book |last=Pasulka |first=D.W. |title=American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology |isbn=978-0190692889 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2019 |pages=237 |quote=the standard assumption that the UFO mythos was born in the year 1947}}</ref><ref name=Eghigian4August2021>{{cite web |url=https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/ufos-and-the-boundaries-of-science/ |title=UFOs and the Boundaries of Science |last=Eghigian |first=Greg |date=4 August 2021 |publisher=Boston Review |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230410030607/https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/ufos-and-the-boundaries-of-science/ |archive-date=10 April 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Garber|first=Megan|title=The Man Who Introduced the World to Flying Saucers|newspaper=The Atlantic|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/the-man-who-introduced-the-world-to-flying-saucers/372732/ |access-date=February 2, 2017|archive-date=November 11, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111183726/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/the-man-who-introduced-the-world-to-flying-saucers/372732/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Saturday Night Uforia Audioplex: Edward R. Murrow – The Case ForOf The Flying Saucer (April 7, 1950 broadcast)|url=http://www.saturdaynightuforia.com/audioplex/audioplexhtml/murrowcaseofflyingsaucer.html|access-date=February 2, 2017|website=www.saturdaynightuforia.com|archive-date=July 18, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190718182303/https://www.saturdaynightuforia.com/audioplex/audioplexhtml/murrowcaseofflyingsaucer.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Only weeks after Arnold's story was reported in 1947, ] published a poll asking people in the United States what the "flying saucers" might be. Already, 90% had heard of the new term. However, as reported by historian Greg Eghanian, "a majority either had no idea what they could be or thought that witnesses were mistaken" while "visitors from space were not initially among the options that anyone had in mind, and Gallup didn't even mention if anyone surveyed brought up aliens.<ref name=Eghigian4August2021 /><ref name=Eghigian2017>{{cite web |url=https://www.historians.org/research-and-publications/perspectives-on-history/march-2017/more-human-than-alien-researching-the-history-of-ufos |title=More Human Than Alien: Researvching the History of UFOs |last=Eghigian |first=Greg |date=14 March 2017 |publisher=Perspectives on History |access-date=8 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230621171135/https://www.historians.org/research-and-publications/perspectives-on-history/march-2017/more-human-than-alien-researching-the-history-of-ufos |archive-date=21 June 2023}}</ref><ref name=Eghigian5August2021>{{cite web |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/ufos-uapswhatever-we-call-them-why-do-we-assume-mysterious-flying-objects-are-extraterrestrial-180978374/ |title=UFOs, UAPs – Whatever We Call Them, Why Do We Assume Mysterious Flying Objects Are Extraterrestrial? |last=Eghigian |first=Greg |date=5 August 2021 |publisher=Smithsonian Magazine |access-date=8 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230611013718/https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/ufos-uapswhatever-we-call-them-why-do-we-assume-mysterious-flying-objects-are-extraterrestrial-180978374/ |archive-date=11 June 2023}}</ref>
His sighting subsequently received significant media and public attention. Arnold would later describe what he saw as being "flat like a pie pan" and as flying "like a saucer would if you skipped it across the water" and also said they were and "half-moon shaped, oval in front and convex in the rear. ...they looked like a big flat disk." (One, however, he would describe later as being almost crescent-shaped.) Arnold’s reported descriptions was widely reported upon and gave rise to the terms '''flying saucer''' and '''flying disk'''.<ref>William Yenne, "Flying Saucers," ''Secret Weapons of World War II: The Techno-Military Breakthroughs That Changed History'' (New York: Berkley Books, 2003), 272&ndash;274.</ref> Arnold’s sighting was followed in the next few weeks by hundreds of other reported sightings, mostly in the U.S., but in other countries as well.
Within weeks, reports of flying saucer sightings became a daily occurrence<ref>{{Cite web|title=Flying saucers still evasive 70 years after pilot's report {{!}} The Spokesman-Review|url=https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2017/jun/25/flying-saucers-still-evasive-70-years-after-pilots/|access-date=2021-12-30|website=www.spokesman.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220812160716/https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2017/jun/25/flying-saucers-still-evasive-70-years-after-pilots/|archive-date=12 August 2022}}</ref> with one particularly famous example being the ] in 1947 where remnants of a downed ] were recovered by a farmer and confiscated by military personnel.<ref>{{cite book |last=Olmsted |first=Kathryn S. |date=2009 |title=Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11 |location=Oxford, UK |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=184 |isbn=978-0199753956 |quote=The material recovered near Roswell was consistent with a balloon device and most likely from one of the MOGUL balloons that had not been previously recovered.}}</ref> UFO enthusiasts in the early 1950s started to organize local "saucer clubs" modeled after ] ]s of the 1930s and 1940s, with some growing to national and international prominence within a decade.<ref name=Eghigian4August2021 /> In 1950, three influential books were published—]'s '']'', ]'s ''Behind the Flying Saucers'', and ]'s ''The Riddle of the Flying Saucers''. Each guilelessly proposed that the ] was the correct explanation and that the visits were in response to detonations of ]. These books also introduced Americans to, as Eghanian puts it, "the crusading ] dedicated to breaking the silence over the alien origins of unidentified flying objects".<ref name=Eghigian4August2021 /> Media accounts and speculation ran rampant in the U.S., especially in connection to the ] so that, by 1953, the intelligence officials (]) worried that "genuine incursions" by enemy aircraft "over U.S. territory could be lost in a maelstrom of kooky hallucination" of UFO reports.<ref name="Lewis-Kraus-30-4-21">{{cite magazine|last1=Lewis-Kraus|first1=Gideon|date=April 30, 2021|title=How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously|magazine=The New Yorker magazine|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230623023008/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously|archive-date=23 June 2023}}</ref> A Trendex survey in August 1957, ten years after the Arnold incident, reported that over 25% of the U.S. public "believed unidentified flying objects could be from outer space".<ref name=Eghigian4August2021 /> The cultural phenomenon showed up within some intellectual works such as the 1959 publication of ''Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Sky'' by ], a Swiss psychiatrist and psychoanalyst who founded analytical psychology.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Jung |first1=Carl |translator-last1=Hull |translator-first1=R. F. C. |title=Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies |language=en |publication-place=Broadway House, London |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |publication-date=1959 }}</ref>


Starting in 1947, the U.S. Air Force began to record and investigated UFO reports with ] looking into "more than 250 cases" from 1947 to 1949. It was replaced by ] up through 1951.<ref name=Eghigian19December2017>{{cite web |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/secret-government-program-track-ufos-its-not-first-180967597/ |title=That Secret Government Program to Track UFOs? It's Not the First |last=Eghigian |first=Greg |date=19 December 2017 |publisher=Smithsonian Magazine |access-date=8 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230606110707/https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/secret-government-program-track-ufos-its-not-first-180967597/ |archive-date=6 June 2023 }}</ref> In the third U.S. Air Force program, from March 1952 to its termination in December 1969,<ref>Michael D. Swords; "UFOs, the Military, and the Early Cold War Era", pp. 82–121 in "UFOs and Abductions: Challenging the Borders of Knowledge" David M. Jacobs, editor; 2000, University Press of Kansas, {{ISBN|0700610324}}; p. 103.</ref> "the U.S. Air Force cataloged 12,618 sightings of UFOs as part of what is now known as ]".<ref name="Mathis 6 July 2023">{{cite magazine |last1=Mathis |first1=Joel |date=6 July 2023 |title=What we know from decades of UFO government investigations |url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/ufo-alien-spacecraft-investigation-timeline |magazine=National Geographic |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230708085036/https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/ufo-alien-spacecraft-investigation-timeline |archive-date=8 July 2023}}</ref> In the late 1950s, public pressure mounted for a full declassification of all UFO records, but the CIA played a role in refusing to allow this.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Haines |first1=Gerald K. |date=1997 |title=A Die-Hard Issue: CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947–90 |url=https://www.cia.gov/static/105bd8290b90de13ee136fecc9fe863f/cia-role-study-UFOs.pdf |journal=Studies in Intelligence |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=67–84 |access-date=8 July 2023 |archive-date=February 12, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240212210937/https://www.cia.gov/static/105bd8290b90de13ee136fecc9fe863f/cia-role-study-UFOs.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> This sense was not universal in the CIA, however, as fellow ] official ] wrote that Vice Admiral ], the first director of the CIA, "wanted public disclosure of UFO evidence".<ref>
After reports of the Arnold sighting hit the media, other cases began to be reported in increasing numbers. In one instance a ] crew sighting of nine more disc-like objects over ] on the evening of ]. At the time, this sighting was even more widely reported than Arnold’s and lent considerable credence to Arnold’s report.
{{cite book
|first=Donald E.
|last=Keyhoe
|author-link=Donald E. Keyhoe
|title=Aliens from space; the real story of unidentified flying objects
|edition=
|year=1973
|publisher=]
|location=]
|isbn=0-385-06751-8
|url=https://archive.org/details/aliensfromspacer00keyh
}}</ref> Official U.S. Air Force interest in UFO reports went on hiatus in 1969 after a study by the University of Colorado led by Edward U. Condon and known as the ] concluded "that nothing has come from the study of UFOs in the past 21 years that has added to scientific knowledge" and that further time investigating UFO reports "cannot be justified".<ref name="Mathis 6 July 2023"/>
]'' by ]]]
]'' from October 1957]]
From the 1960s to 1990s, UFOs were part of American popular culture's obsession with the ] and ]. In 1961, the first ] account was sensationalized when ] underwent ] after seeing a UFO and reported ] of their experience that became ever more elaborate as the years went by.<ref>{{Cite news |date=October 23, 2004 |title=Betty Hill, 85, Figure in Alien Abduction Case, Dies |work=] (online) |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/23/us/betty-hill-85-figure-in-alien-abduction-case-dies.html |access-date=January 29, 2020 |archive-date=June 20, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170620020420/http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/23/us/betty-hill-85-figure-in-alien-abduction-case-dies.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In 1966, 5% of Americans reported to Gallup that "they had at some time seen something they thought was a 'flying saucer'", 96% said "they had heard or read about flying saucers", and 46% of these "thought they were 'something real' rather than just people's imagination".<ref>{{cite web |first=Lydia |last=Saad |title=Gallup Vault: Eyewitnesses to Flying Saucers |date=April 12, 2016 |url=https://news.gallup.com/vault/190592/gallup-vault-eyewitnesses-flying-saucers.aspx |access-date=8 July 2023 |publisher=Gallup |archive-date=23 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230523023423/https://news.gallup.com/vault/190592/gallup-vault-eyewitnesses-flying-saucers.aspx |url-status=live}}</ref> Responding to UFO enthusiasm, there have always been consistent yet less popular efforts made at ] many of the claims,<ref name="Eghigian4August2021" /> and at times the media was enlisted including a 1966 TV special, "UFO: Friend, Foe or Fantasy?", in which ] "patiently" explained to viewers that UFOs were fantasy.<ref name="Lewis-Kraus-30-4-21" /> Cronkite enlisted ] and ], who told Cronkite, "To this time, there is no valid scientific proof that we have been visited by spaceships".<ref name="Kloor1">{{cite web |last1=Kloor |first1=Kieth |date=April 3, 2019 |title=UFOs Won't Go Away |url=https://issues.org/ufos-wont-go-away/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108080728/https://issues.org/ufos-wont-go-away/ |archive-date=November 8, 2021 |access-date=November 8, 2021 |website=Issues. Vol. XXXV, No. 3, Spring 2019 |publisher=Arizona State University}}</ref>


Such attempts to disenchant the zeitgeist were not very successful at tamping down the mania. ] notes that the "allure of flying saucers" remained popular with the public into the 1970s, spurring production of such sci-fi films, as '']'' and '']'', which "continued to stoke public fascination". Meanwhile, ] narrated a popular occult and mystery TV series ] while daytime talk shows of ], ], and ] featured interviews with alien abductees and people who credulously reported stories about UFOs .<ref name="Eghigian4August2021" /> In the 1980s and 1990s, UFO stories featured in such pulp "true crime" serials as '']''<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Sparks |first1=Glenn G. |last2=Pellechia |first2=Marianne |last3=Irvine |first3=Chris |date=June 1998 |title=Does television news about UFOs affect viewers' UFO beliefs?: An experimental investigation |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01463379809370102 |journal=Communication Quarterly |language=en |volume=46 |issue=3 |pages=284–294 |doi=10.1080/01463379809370102 |issn=0146-3373 |access-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-date=July 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230709205846/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01463379809370102 |url-status=live }}</ref> while the 33 Volume ] series '']'' which featured UFO stories sold some 700,000 copies.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-09-22 |title=The 1980s Book Series That Literally Claimed It Had To Be Read To Be Believed |url=http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-1980s-book-series-that-literally-claimed-it-had-to-be-read-to-be-believed |access-date=2023-07-09 |website=Atlas Obscura |language=en |archive-date=July 4, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240704110017/https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-1980s-book-series-that-literally-claimed-it-had-to-be-read-to-be-believed |url-status=live }}</ref> Kloor writes that by the late 1990s, "other big UFO subthemes had been prominently introduced into pop culture, such as the abduction phenomenon and ], via best-selling books and, of course, '']''".<ref name="Kloor1" />
American UFO researcher Ted Bloecher, in his comprehensive review of newspaper reports, found a sudden surge upwards in sightings on July 4, peaking on July 6&ndash;8. Bloecher noted that for the next few days most American newspapers were filled with front-page stories of the new "flying saucers" or "flying discs". Reports began to tail off after ], when officials began issuing press statements on the ], {{Fact|date=June 2008}} in which they explained the debris as being that of a weather balloon.


Eghigian notes that, by this point, the UFO problem had become "far more interesting to ponder than to actually solve."<ref name=Eghigian4August2021 /> Interest was particularly fevered in the 1990s with the publicity surrounding the television broadcast of an '']'' video marketed as "real footage" but later admitted to be a staged "re-enactment".<ref name=Time>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,983764-1,00.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091216074850/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,983764-1,00.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 16, 2009|title=Autopsy or Fraud-topsy?|magazine=]|author=Corliss, Richard|author-link=Corliss, Richard|date=November 27, 1995 | access-date=April 23, 2010}}</ref> Eghigian writes that "there had always been outlier abduction reports dating back to the '50s and '60s" but that in the '80s and '90s "the floodgates opened, and with them a new generation of UFO advocates". Leaders among them were the artist ], horror writer ], historian ], and ] psychiatrist ]. They all defended the "veracity of those claiming to have been kidnapped, examined, and experimented upon by beings from another world", writes Eghigian, as "new missionaries who simultaneously played the role of investigator, therapist, and advocate to their vulnerable charges".<ref name="Eghigian4August2021" /> Eghigian says that Mack "signaled both the culmination and end of the headiest days of alien abduction". When Mack began working with and publishing accounts of abductees—or "experiencers", as he called them—in the early 1990s, he brought a sense of legitimacy to "the study of extraterrestrial captivity". By the late 1990s, however, the Harvard Medical School initiated a review of his position which allowed him to retain tenure. However, after this review, as the review board chairman Arnold Relman later put it, Mack was "not taken seriously by his colleagues anymore". Claims of alien abduction have continued, but no other clinicians would continue to speak of them as real in any sense.<ref name="Eghigian4August2021" /> Nonetheless, these ideas persisted in popular opinion. According to a 1996 poll by '']'', 20% of Americans believed that UFOs were more likely to be proof of alien life than to have a natural scientific explanation.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://today.yougov.com/topics/technology/articles-reports/2022/10/04/more-half-americans-believe-aliens-probably-exist |title=A growing share of Americans believe aliens are responsible for UFOs |last=Orth |first=Taylor |date=4 October 2022 |publisher=YouGov PLC (citing 1996 Newsweek poll) |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230531002256/https://today.yougov.com/topics/technology/articles-reports/2022/10/04/more-half-americans-believe-aliens-probably-exist |archive-date=31 May 2023 }}</ref>
Over several years in the 1960s, Bloecher (aided by physicist ]) discovered 853 flying disc sightings that year from 140 newspapers from Canada, Washington D.C, and every U.S. state except Montana.


In December 2017, a new round of media attention started when ''The New York Times'' broke the story of the secret ] that was funded from 2007 to 2012 with $22 million spent on the program.<ref name="NYT-20171216">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html|title=Glowing Auras and 'Black Money': The Pentagon's Mysterious U.F.O. Program|last1=Cooper|first1=Helene|date=December 16, 2017|work=]|access-date=December 16, 2017|last2=Blumenthal|first2=Ralph|last3=Kean|first3=Leslie|archive-date=December 21, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171221235856/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="NYT-20200514">{{cite news |last1=Blumenthal |first1=Ralph |last2=Kean |first2=Leslie |title=Navy Reports Describe Encounters With Unexplained Flying Objects – While some of the encounters have been reported publicly before, the Navy records are an official accounting of the incidents, including descriptions from the pilots of what they saw. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/14/us/politics/navy-ufo-reports.html |date=May 14, 2020 |work=] |access-date=May 15, 2020 |archive-date=May 15, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200515001002/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/14/us/politics/navy-ufo-reports.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Following this story, along with a series of sensationalized ] leaked by members of the program who became convinced that UFOs were genuine mysteries worth investigating, there was an increase in mainstream attention to UFO stories. In July 2021, Harvard astronomer ] announced the creation of his ] which intended to use high-tech astronomical equipment to seek evidence of extraterrestrial artifacts in space and possibly within Earth's atmosphere. This was followed closely by the publication of Loeb's book ''Extraterrestrial'', in which he argued that the first interstellar comet ever observed, ], might be an artificial light sail made by an alien civilization.<ref name="Eghigian4August2021" /> Two government sponsored programs, ] and the ] were charged in part by Congressional fiat to investigate UFO claims more fully,<ref>{{cite web |last1=Bock |first1=Michael |date=23 December 2022 |title=NASA to Set Up Independent Study on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena |url=https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-announces-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-team-members/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230610082955/https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-announces-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-team-members/ |archive-date=10 June 2023 |access-date=23 June 2023 |website=NASA }}</ref><ref>] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230523013816/https://media.defense.gov/2021/Nov/23/2002898596/-1/-1/0/ESTABLISHMENT-OF-THE-AIRBORNE-OBJECT-IDENTIFICATION-AND-MANAGEMENT-SYNCHRONIZATION-GROUP.PDF |date=May 23, 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Vergun |first1=David |date=19 April 2023 |title=DOD Working to Better Understand, Resolve Anomalous Phenomena |url=https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3368109/dod-working-to-better-understand-resolve-anomalous-phenomena/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230613180406/https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3368109/dod-working-to-better-understand-resolve-anomalous-phenomena/ |archive-date=13 June 2023 |access-date=13 June 2023 |website=DOD News }}</ref> adopting the new moniker "unexplained aerial phenomenon" (UAP) to avoid associations with past ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bad-data-not-aliens-may-be-behind-ufo-surge-nasa-team-says/ |title=Bad Data, Not Aliens, May Be behind UFO Surge, NASA Team Says |last=Leonard |first=David |date=9 June 2023 |publisher=Scientific American |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230611131604/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bad-data-not-aliens-may-be-behind-ufo-surge-nasa-team-says/ |archive-date=11 June 2023 }}</ref> On 17 May 2022, members of the ] held ]s with top military officials to discuss military reports of UAPs.<ref>{{USCongRec|2022|D545|date=May 17, 2022}}</ref> It was the first public congressional hearing into UFO sightings in the US in over 50 years. Another Congressional hearing took place on July 26, 2023, featuring the ] of former U.S. Air Force (USAF) officer and intelligence official David Grusch.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Merchant |first=Nomaan |date=26 July 2023 |title=Whistleblower tells Congress the US is concealing 'multi-decade' program that captures UFOs |newspaper=] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/26/ufos-uaps-congress-whistleblower-spy-aliens/01081d9a-2bce-11ee-a948-a5b8a9b62d84_story.html |access-date=27 July 2023 |archive-date=26 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230726223917/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/26/ufos-uaps-congress-whistleblower-spy-aliens/01081d9a-2bce-11ee-a948-a5b8a9b62d84_story.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=De Avila |first=Joseph |date=26 July 2023 |title=UFOs Are a Common Sight, Former Military Official Tells Congress |work=] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-oversight-committee-congress-ufo-hearing-ceeceae6 |archive-date=27 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230727031909/https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-oversight-committee-congress-ufo-hearing-ceeceae6 |url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Cooper |first=Helene |date=26 July 2023 |title=Lawmakers and Former Officials Press for Answers on U.F.O.s |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/26/us/politics/ufo-hearing.html |access-date=27 July 2023 |archive-date=27 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230727033839/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/26/us/politics/ufo-hearing.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
==Ufology==
{{Mainarticle|Ufology}}
] is a ] describing the collective efforts of those who study UFO reports and associated evidence. While not all UFO researchers believe that all UFOs are necessarily extraterrestrial spacecraft, they do believe the area merits research and that the possibility of extraterrestrial spacecraft should be taken seriously.


A Harris Poll in 2009 found that 32% of Americans "believe in UFOs".<ref>{{cite book |last=Pasulka |first=D.W. |title=American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology |isbn=978-0190692889 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2019 |page=7 |quote=the standard assumption that the UFO mythos was born in the year 1947}}</ref> A '']'' study in June 2012 found that 36% of Americans believe UFOs exist and that 10% thought that they had spotted one.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ufos-exist-americans-national-geographic-survey/story?id=16661311 |title=UFOs Exist, Say 36 Percent in National Geographic Survey |last=Harish |first=Alon |date=27 June 2012 |publisher=ABC News |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230609235400/https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ufos-exist-americans-national-geographic-survey/story?id=16661311 |archive-date=9 June 2023 }}</ref> In June 2021 a ] research poll found that 51% in the United States thought that UFOs reported by people in the military were likely to be evidence of intelligent life from beyond the Earth.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/06/30/most-americans-believe-in-intelligent-life-beyond-earth-few-see-ufos-as-a-major-national-security-threat/ |title=Most Americans believe in intelligent life beyond Earth; few see UFOs as a major national security threat |last1=Kennedy |first1=Courtney |last2=Lau |first2=Arnold |date=30 June 2021 |publisher=Pew |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230603161538/https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/06/30/most-americans-believe-in-intelligent-life-beyond-earth-few-see-ufos-as-a-major-national-security-threat/ |archive-date=3 June 2023 }}</ref> In August 2021, ], with a question not specific to military reports, only found that 41% of adults believed some UFOs involve alien spacecraft from other planets. This Gallup poll showed 44% of men and 38% of women believed this. This average of 41% in 2021 was up from 33% in a 2019 Gallup poll with the same question. Gallup further found that college graduates went in 2019 from being the least likely educational group to believe this to being on par in 2021 with adults who have no college education.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://news.gallup.com/poll/353420/larger-minority-says-ufos-alien-spacecraft.aspx |title=Larger Minority in U.S. Says Some UFOs Are Alien Spacecraft |last=Saad |first=Lydia |date=20 August 2021 |publisher=Gallup |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230523014539/https://news.gallup.com/poll/353420/larger-minority-says-ufos-alien-spacecraft.aspx |archive-date=23 May 2023 }}</ref> An October 2022 poll by '']'' only found that 34% of Americans believe that UFOs are likely to involve alien life forms.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://today.yougov.com/topics/technology/articles-reports/2022/10/04/aliens-ufos-yougov-poll-september-9-12-2022 |title=Aliens and UFOs: YouGov Poll: September 9–12, 2022 |last=Linley |first=Sanders |date=4 October 2022 |publisher=YouGov PLC |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230425114950/https://today.yougov.com/topics/technology/articles-reports/2022/10/04/aliens-ufos-yougov-poll-september-9-12-2022 |archive-date=25 April 2023}}</ref>
===Battelle Memorial Institute===
An Air Force study by ] scientists from 1952&ndash;1955 of 3200 USAF cases found 22% were unknowns, and with the best cases, 33% remained unsolved.{{Fact|date=June 2008}} Similarly about 30% of the UFO cases studied by the 1969 USAF ] were deemed unsolved when reviewed by the ] (AIAA).{{Fact|date=June 2008}} The official French government UFO scientific study (]) from 1976 to 2004 listed about 13% of 5800 cases as detailed yet inexplicable (with 46% deemed to have definite or probable explanations and 41% having inadequate information).<ref>, ], February 5, 2003</ref>


Historian Greg Eghigian wrote in August 2021 that "over the last fifty years, the mutual antagonism between paranormal believers and skeptics has largely framed discussion about unidentified flying objects" and that "it often gets personal" with those taking seriously the prospect that UFOs are extraterrestrial in origin dismissing those who consider UFOs to be worth studying as "narrow-minded, biased, obstinate, and cruel" while the skeptics brushed off "devotees" as "naïve, ignorant, gullible, and downright dangerous". Such "mudslinging over convictions is certainly familiar to historians of religion, a domain of human existence marked by deep divisions over interpretations of belief", and science too has found itself engaged increasing amounts of "boundary work" (which is "asserting and reasserting the borders between legitimate and illegitimate scientific research and ideas, between what may and what may not refer to itself as science") with regard to UFO questions. Eghigian points out our current "stark divide did not happen overnight, and its roots lie in the postwar decades, in a series of events that—with their news coverage, grainy images, celebrity crusaders, exasperated skeptics, unsatisfying military statements, and accusations of a government cover-up—foreshadow our present moment".<ref name=Eghigian4August2021 />
===UFO hypotheses===
There are different opinions about the UFO phenomenon. To account for unsolved UFO cases, several hypotheses have been proposed by both proponents and skeptics; a few examples are given below:


UFOs have been taken up by religious studies scholars in various scholarly books.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kripal |first=Jeffrey J. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226453897.001.0001 |title=Authors of the Impossible |date=2010 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |doi=10.7208/chicago/9780226453897.001.0001 |isbn=978-0-226-45387-3 |access-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708214149/https://www.bibliovault.org/BV.landing.epl?ISBN=9780226453866 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Davison |first=Andrew |date=2019-10-02 |title=Astrotheology: Science and Theology Meet Extraterrestrial Life |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2019.1670968 |journal=Theology and Science |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=551–554 |doi=10.1080/14746700.2019.1670968 |s2cid=211965883 |issn=1474-6700 |access-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708214204/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14746700.2019.1670968 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Cusack |first=Carole M. |date=2019 |title=D. W. Pasulka, American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/asrr201910263 |journal=Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=258–259 |doi=10.5840/asrr201910263 |s2cid=213855394 |issn=1946-0538 |access-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708214149/https://www.pdcnet.org/asrr/content/asrr_2019_0010_0002_0258_0259 |url-status=live }}</ref> Jeffrey Kripal, chair of the Department of Religion at ], has said that "both the material and the mental dimensions are incredibly important to get a sense of the full picture".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://news.rice.edu/news/2021/jeffrey-kripal-how-think-about-ufo-phenomenon |title=Jeffrey Kripal on how to think about the UFO phenomenon |last=Shilcutt |first=Katharine |date=30 June 2021 |publisher=Rice University News and Media Relations Team |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230213224448/https://news.rice.edu/news/2021/jeffrey-kripal-how-think-about-ufo-phenomenon |archive-date=13 February 2023}}</ref> As Adrian Horton writes "from '']'' to '']'', '']'' to '']'' to ], ] has for decades provided an engrossing feedback loop for interest in the extraterrestrial: a reflection of our fears and capaciousness, whose ubiquitous popularity has in turn fueled more interest in UFOs as perennially compelling entertainment tropes not to be taken seriously". Horton observes that these "alien movies have generally reflected shifting cultural anxieties, from the existential terror of nuclear war to foreign enslavement to loss of bodily control". American entertainment has explored both "hostile aliens" as well as the "benevolent, world-expanding encounters" seen in films such as ]'s '']'' and '']''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2021/jun/25/how-pop-culture-has-shaped-our-understanding-of-aliens |title=How pop culture has shaped our understanding of alien |last=Shilcutt |first=Adrian |date=25 June 2021 |publisher=Guardian News |access-date=19 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230605002338/https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2021/jun/25/how-pop-culture-has-shaped-our-understanding-of-aliens |archive-date=5 June 2023 }}</ref> In her research on the relationship of media to UFO beliefs, ], a professor of philosophy and religion at the University of North Carolina, says that what is seen on a screen, "if it conforms to certain criteria, is interpreted as real, even if it is not real and even if one knows it is not real" and that "screen images embed themselves in one's brain and memories" in ways that "can determine how one views one's past and even determine one's future behaviors".<ref>{{cite book |last=Pasulka |first=D.W. |title=American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology |isbn=978-0190692889 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2019 |pages=82 |quote=the standard assumption that the UFO mythos was born in the year 1947}}</ref>
{{Disputed-list|date=August 2008}}
===Notable cases and incidents===
{{See also|List of reported UFO sightings}}


====Britain====
'''Among proponents, some of the more common explanations for UFOs are:'''
* The ] was a series of reported sightings of unexplained lights near Rendlesham Forest in Suffolk, England in late December 1980 which became linked with claims of UFO landings.
* The ](ETH): That UFOs are alien spacecraft
* The ]: That UFOs are the results of objects crossing over from other dimensions
* The ]
* The hypothesis that they are ]s or vehicles built in a future time.
* The ]: That UFOs are top secret Russian or American aircraft


====France====
'''Similarly, skeptics usually propose one of the following explanations:'''


The most notable cases of UFO sightings in France include:
* The ]
* the ] in 1965.
* The unknown natural phenomena hypothesis, e.g. ], ]
* the ] in 1981.
* The Meteorological hypothesis&mdash;Peter F Coleman advanced a meteorological theory that many UFOs or unexplained lights are actually instances of visible combustion of a fuel (e.g., natural gas) inside an atmospheric vortex. He has argued his case in his book, ''Great Balls of Fire&ndash;a unified theory''.<ref>Great balls of Fire a unified theory of ball lightning, UFOs, Tunguska and other anomalous lights, Fireshine Press</ref> This vortex fireball theory was first published in ''Weather''<ref>Weather,p 31 1993</ref> and later in the Journal of Scientific Exploration<ref> J.Sci.Expl.,2006,Vol. 20, No.2, 215&ndash;238.</ref>
] Daily Record on July 8, 1947, reporting a UFO case]]
* The ]/]
* The ] hypothesis.
* ]es


====United States====
Other skeptical arguments against UFOs include:
* In the ], Pennsylvania (1965), residents reported seeing an object crash in the area.
* In 1975, ] claimed to be abducted by aliens. The movie '']'' (1993) was based on this event, but greatly embellished the original account.
* The "]" on March 13, 1997


====Famous hoaxes====
Most UFO sightings are transitory events and there is usually no opportunity for the repeat testing called for by the ].{{Fact|date=June 2008}}
{{See also|List of UFO-related hoaxes}}
*] of hypothesis testing, since it is considered less incredible for the explanations to be the result of known scientifically verified phenomena rather than resulting from novel mechanisms (e.g. the ]).
* The ]
* ], over the space of two decades, made various claims about his meetings with telepathic aliens from nearby planets. He claimed photographs of the ] taken by the Soviet lunar probe ] in 1959 were fake, and that there were cities, trees and snow-capped mountains on the far side of the Moon. Among copycats was a shadowy British figure named ].
* Ed Walters, a building contractor, in 1987 allegedly perpetrated a hoax in ]. Walters claimed at first having seen a small UFO flying near his home and took some photographs of the craft. Walters reported and documented a series of UFO sightings over a period of three weeks and took several photographs. These sightings became famous, and are collectively referred to as the ]. Three years later, in 1990, after the Walters family had moved, the new residents discovered a model of a UFO poorly hidden in the attic that bore an undeniable resemblance to the craft in Walters' photographs. Most investigators, like the forensic photo expert William G. Hyzer,<ref>{{cite journal |last=Posner |first=Gary P. |date=July 1992 |title=The Gulf Breeze 'UFOs' |journal=Tampa Bay Sounding |publisher=Tampa Bay Mensa |location=Seminole, FL |access-date=July 13, 2013 |url=http://www.gpposner.com/Gulf_Breeze.html |archive-date=July 3, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703032208/http://www.gpposner.com/Gulf_Breeze.html |url-status=live }}</ref> now consider the sightings to be a hoax.


==Investigations of reports==
===UFO researchers===
{{Mainarticle|List of Ufologists}}


UFOs have been subject to investigations over the years that varied widely in scope and scientific rigor. Governments or independent academics in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, Peru, France, Belgium, Sweden, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Mexico, Spain, and the ] are known to have investigated UFO reports at various times. No official government investigation has ever publicly concluded that UFOs are indisputably real, physical objects, extraterrestrial in origin, or of concern to national defense.
====UFO organizations====
{{Mainarticle|UFO organizations}}


Among the best known government studies are the ghost rockets investigation by the Swedish military (1946–1947), Project Blue Book, previously ] and ], conducted by the USAF from 1947 until 1969, the secret U.S. Army/Air Force ] investigation into ] (1948–1951), the secret USAF Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14<ref>{{cite web|url=https://archive.org/details/ProjectBlueBookSpecialReport14 |title=Project Blue Book Special Report #14 |website=] |publisher=] |access-date=September 7, 2013}}</ref> by the ], and the ]'s 1977 '']'' (Operation Saucer). France has had an ongoing investigation (GEPAN/SEPRA/]) within its space agency ] (CNES) since 1977; the ] has had a similar investigation since 1989.
===Physical evidence===
Besides visual sightings, cases sometimes have indirect physical evidence, including many cases studied by the military and various government agencies of different countries. Indirect physical evidence would be data obtained from afar, such as radar contact and photographs. More direct physical evidence involves physical interactions with the environment at close range&mdash;Hynek's "close encounter" or Vallee's "Type-I" cases&mdash;which include "landing traces," ], and physiological/biological effects.
* ] contact and tracking, sometimes from multiple sites. These are often considered among the best cases since they usually involve trained military personnel and control tower operators, simultaneous visual sightings, and aircraft intercepts. One such recent example were the mass sightings of large, silent, low-flying ]s in 1989 and 1990 over Belgium, tracked by multiple ] radar and jet interceptors, and investigated by Belgium's military (included photographic evidence). Another famous case from 1986 was the ] 1628 case over Alaska investigated by the ].
* Photographic evidence, including still photos, movie film, and video, including some in the ] spectrum (rare).
* Recorded visual ]s
* Recorded ] (]) and ] disturbances (extremely rare)
* Landing physical trace evidence, including ground impressions, burned and/or desiccated soil, burned and broken foliage, magnetic anomalies, increased radiation levels, and metallic traces. See, e.g. ] or the 1964 ]'s ], ] encounter, considered one of the most inexplicable of the USAF ] cases). A well-known example from December 1980 was the ] ] in England. Another less than two weeks later, in January 1981, occurred in Trans-en-Provence and was investigated by ], then France's official government UFO-investigation agency. ] head ] described a classic 1952 CE2 case involving a patch of charred grass roots. Catalogs of several thousand such cases have been compiled, particularly by researcher Ted Phillips.
* Physiological effects on people and animals including temporary paralysis, skin burns and rashes, ]l burns, and symptoms superficially resembling ], such as the ] in 1980. One such case dates back to 1886, a Venezuelan incident reported in ] magazine.
* So-called animal/] cases, that some feel are also part of the UFO phenomenon. Such cases can and have been analyzed using ] techniques.
* Biological effects on plants such as increased or decreased growth, germination effects on seeds, and blown-out stem nodes (usually associated with physical trace cases or ])
* ] (EM) effects, including stalled cars, power black-outs, radio/TV interference, magnetic compass deflections, and aircraft navigation, communication, and engine disruption. A list of over 30 such aircraft EM incidents was compiled by ] scientist Dr. ]. A famous ] over ], recorded in ] and ] classified documents, resulted in communication losses in multiple aircraft and weapons system failure in an ] jet interceptor as it was about to fire a missile on one of the UFOs. This was also a radar/visual case.<ref>Fawcett & Greenwood, 81&ndash;89; Good, 318&ndash;322, 497&ndash;502</ref>
* Remote radiation detection, some noted in ] and ] documents occurring over government nuclear installations at ] and ] in 1950, also reported by ] director Ed Ruppelt in his book.
* Actual hard physical evidence cases, such as 1957, ], Brazil, ] fragments analyzed by the Brazilian government and in the ] and by others. The 1964 Socorro/] incident also left metal traces, analyzed by ].
* Misc: Recorded electromagnetic emissions, such as microwaves detected in the well-known 1957 RB-47 surveillance aircraft case, which was also a visual and radar case; polarization rings observed around a UFO by a scientist, explained by Dr. ] as intense magnetic fields from the UFO causing the ].


===Americas===
These various reported physical evidence cases have been studied by various scientist and engineers, both privately and in official governmental studies (such as ], the ], and the French ]). A comprehensive scientific review of physical evidence cases was carried out by the 1998 Sturrock UFO panel.


==== Brazil (1952–2016) ====
===Reverse engineering===
Attempts have been made to ] the possible ] behind UFOs through analysis of both eyewitness reports and the physical evidence. Examples are former ] and nuclear engineer James McCampbell in his book ''Ufology'',<ref></ref> ]/] engineer ] in his book ''Unconventional Flying Objects'', and German rocketry pioneer ]. Among subjects tackled by McCampbell, Hill, and Oberth was the question of how UFOs can fly at ] speeds without creating a ]. McCampbell's proposed solution of a ] parting the air in front of the craft is currently being researched by Dr. ], Professor of Engineering Physics at the ] as a possible advance in ] flight.<ref></ref> In contrast, Hill and Oberth believed UFOs utilize an as yet unknown ] field to accomplish the same thing as well as no propulsion and protection of occupants from the effects of high acceleration.


], ]]]
==Famous cases==
* ] claims to have an alleged UFO artifact. {{Fact|date=June 2008}}
* The ]
* The ] affair, a decades-long series of detailed letters and documents allegedly from extraterrestrials. The total length of the documents is at least 1000 pages, and some estimate that further undiscovered documents may total nearly 4000 pages. A Jose Luis Jordan Pena came forward in the early nineties claiming responsibility for the phenomenon, and most consider there to be little reason to challenge his claims.<ref></ref>
* ] over the space of two decades made various claims about his meetings with telepathic aliens from nearby planets. He claimed that photographs of the far side of the moon taken by a Soviet orbital probe in 1959 were fake, and that there were cities, trees and snow-capped mountains on the far side of the moon.
* In 1987 ] perpetrated a hoax in ], ]. Walters claimed at first having seen a small UFO flying near his home, and then in a second incident seeing the same UFO and a small alien being standing by his back door after being alerted by his dog. Several photographs were taken of the craft, but none of the being. Three years later, in 1990, after the Walters family had moved, the new residents discovered a model of a UFO poorly hidden in the attic that bore an undeniable resemblance to the craft in Walters' photographs. Various witnesses and detractors came forward after the local ] newspaper printed a story about the discovered model, and some investigators now consider the sightings to be a hoax. In addition, a six-figure television miniseries and book deal were nearly struck with Walters.
* ], A popular writer and confessed hoaxster.<ref>{{cite web
|title=Warren Smith: UFO Investigator"
|url=http://www.middlecoastpublishing.com/ufo/warrenbillysmith.htm
|accessdate=2008-06-15
}}</ref>


On October 31, 2008, the ] began receiving from the Aeronautical Documentation and History Center part of the documentation of the ] regarding the investigation of the appearance of UFOs in ]. Currently, this collection gathers cases between 1952 and 2016.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-10947856|title=Brazil to record UFO sightings|date=August 12, 2010|work=BBC News|access-date=April 1, 2018|archive-date=May 4, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180504151608/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-10947856|url-status=live}}</ref>
==Investigation/Responses==


==== Chile (c. 1968) ====
Some studies show that after investigation, the majority of UFOs are usually identified (see ]). For example, a 1979 study by ], a UFO researcher dedicated to find evidence for extraterrestrial life, found that up to 91.4% of the reports he investigated were either identifiable (91.4%) or could possibly be attributable (7.1%){{Fact|date=June 2008}} to known artificial objects and natural phenomena.<ref>], ''The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and Reporting UFO Sightings'', 1979, Doubleday & Co., ISBN 0-385-14348-6</ref> Hendry's figure for unidentified cases is considerably lower than many official UFO studies such as ] or the ] which found unidentified cases made up 6% and 30% of reports respectively.


In 1968, the ] (previously CEFAA) began receiving case reports of the general public, civil aviators and the ] regarding the sightings or the appearance of UFOs in ], the initial work was an initiative of Sergio Bravo Flores who led the Chilean Committee for the Study of Unidentified Space Phenomena, supported even by the Chilean Scientific Society. Currently, the organization changed its denomination to SEFAA and its a department of the ](Chile) which in turn depends on the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://sefaa.dgac.gob.cl/historia-del-cefaa/|title=Origen de la SEFAA|work=SEFAA|location=]|access-date=July 3, 2022|archive-date=July 4, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220704020202/https://sefaa.dgac.gob.cl/historia-del-cefaa/|url-status=live}}(in spanish)</ref>
UFOs have been subject to various investigations over the years, varying widely in scope and scientific rigor. Governments or independent academics in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Sweden, Brazil, Mexico, Spain, and the Soviet Union are known to have investigated UFO reports at various times.


====Canada (c. 1950)====
Among the best known government studies are ], previously ] and ], conducted by the ] from 1947 until 1969, the secret U.S. Army/Air Force Project Twinkle investigation into ] (1948&ndash;1951), and Brazilian Air Force Operation Saucer (1977). Major civilian UFO groups in the U.S that have conducted extensive investigations were/are ], ], ], and ].


In Canada, the ] has dealt with reports, sightings and investigations of UFOs across Canada. In addition to conducting investigations into ]s in ], it still considers "unsolved" the ] in Manitoba and the ] in Nova Scotia.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/ufo/ |title=Canada's UFOs: The Search for the Unknown |publisher=] |location=Ottawa |type=Virtual museum |access-date=September 8, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160116131034/http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/ufo/ |archive-date=January 16, 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
===American investigations===
Starting ], ] (AAF) intelligence, in cooperation with the ], began a formal investigation into selected sightings with characteristics that could not be immediately rationalized, which included Arnold’s and the United crew’s. The AAF used "all of its scientists" to determine whether or not "such a phenomenon could, in fact, occur".{{Who|date=June 2008}} The research was "being conducted with the thought that the flying objects might be a celestial phenomenon," or that "they might be a foreign body mechanically devised and controlled."<ref> from E. G. Fitch to D.M. Ladd concerning a request by General Schulgen of USAAF intelligence corps Office of Intelligence Requirements for the FBI to help with their investigation of UFO reports. </ref> Three weeks later in a preliminary defense estimate, the air force investigation decided that, "This ‘flying saucer’ situation is not all imaginary or seeing too much in some natural phenomenon. Something is really flying around."<ref>, Sarah Connors and Michael Hall, White Rose Press, Albuquerque, 1998. ''Chapter 4: The Onslaught'' This quotes and summarized the interim report of Lieutenant Colonel George D. Garrett.</ref>


Early Canadian studies included ] (1950–1954) and ] (1952–1954), supported by the ].
A further review by the intelligence and technical divisions of the ] at ] reached the same conclusion, that "the phenomenon is something real and not visionary or fictitious," that there were objects in the shape of a disc, metallic in appearance, and as big as man-made aircraft. They were characterized by "extreme rates of climb maneuverability," general lack of noise, absence of trail, occasional formation flying, and "evasive" behavior "when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar," suggesting a controlled craft. It was thus recommended in late September 1947 that an official Air Force investigation be set up to investigate the phenomenon.


====United States====
This led to the creation of the Air Force’s ]: One of the earliest government studies to come to a secret ETH conclusion, at the end of 1947, which became ] at the end of 1948, and then ] In 1952. In 1948, they wrote a ] to that effect. The ] ordered it destroyed. The existence of this suppressed report was revealed by several insiders who had read it, such as astronomer and USAF consultant Dr. ] and ], the first head of the USAF's ]. (Ruppelt, Chapt. 3)
====Synopsis====
U.S. investigations into UFOs include:
* ], by the ] (AMC) USAF, precursor to Project Grudge, 1948.
* ] investigations by the Finnish, Swedish and British militaries, later the US and Greece, 1946–1947.
* ], USAF from February 1949, succeeded by Project Blue Book, from March 1952.
* Project Twinkle investigation into ], by the U.S. Army/Air Force, briefly, from December 1949.
* The ] (DS&T), study 1952–53.
* ], by USAF Cpt (rtd.), later director of Project Blue Book, 1956.
* The ] by the Battelle Memorial Institute for USAF, 1951–1954
* The ] (APRO), a private research group, 1952–1988.
* The ] was a scientific committee which met in January 1953 to review the Project Blue Book report January 1953
* The ], ''Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs'', in conjunction with NASA's Committee on Long-Range Studies, reported to Congress 1960
* The ], an informal University of Colorado UFO Project funded by the USAF, 1966 to 1968.
* The ] study, a private and internal study, 1968.<ref>]</ref>
* The ] (MUFON), is a US-based, civilian, non-profit, volunteer organization studying reported UFO sightings, May 1969 and continuing.
* The ] (NICAP) is a UFO research group most active in the United States from the 1950s to the 1980 and remains as an informational depository on UFO phenomena.
* The ] (CUFOS), a privately funded UFO research group, 1973 and continuing.
* The ], private investigation arising from the ], 1982.
* The ] which was funded from 2007 to 2012.<ref name="NYT-20171216"/><ref name="NYT-20200514"/>
* The ], a continuing program within the United States ] which was acknowledged in 2017.
* The ''Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group'', the Pentagon, to investigate unidentified objects that may compromise the airspace of the United States, from November 24, 2021, ongoing.<ref name="WP-20211124">{{cite news |last=Demirjian |first=Karoun |title=Pentagon will track unexplained airborne objects through new intelligence group |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/11/24/ufos-pentagon/ |date=November 24, 2021 |newspaper=] |access-date=November 24, 2021 |archive-date=November 25, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211125085817/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/11/24/ufos-pentagon/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


In addition to these, thousands of documents released under ] also indicate that many U.S. intelligence agencies collected (and still collect) information on UFOs. These agencies include the ] (DIA), ],<ref name="AP-20130329">{{cite news|last=Contreras|first=Russell|title=FBI 'flying saucers' NM memo bureau's most viewed|url=http://apnews.excite.com/article/20130329/DA5AVRAG0.html|date=March 29, 2013|agency=]|access-date=April 1, 2013|archive-date=September 27, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927222146/http://apnews.excite.com/article/20130329/DA5AVRAG0.html|url-status=live}}</ref> CIA, ] (NSA), as well as military intelligence agencies of the Army and ], in addition to the Air Force.<ref group="note">Many of these documents are now online at the FOIA websites of these agencies such as the {{cite web |url=http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/ufo.htm |title=FBI FOIA site |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080524114748/http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/ufo.htm |archive-date=May 24, 2008 }}, as well as private websites such as {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110902090822/http://www.theblackvault.com/ |date=September 2, 2011 }}, which has an archive of several thousand U.S. government UFO-related documents from the USAF, Army, CIA, DIA, DOD, and NSA.</ref>
Blue Book closed down in 1970, ending the official Air Force UFO investigations. However, a 1969 USAF document, known as the Bolender memo, plus later government documents revealed that nonpublic U.S. government UFO investigations continued after 1970. The Bollender memo first stated that "reports of unidentified flying objects which could affect national security... are not part of the Blue Book system," indicating that more serious UFO incidents were already handled outside of the public Blue Book investigation. The memo then added, "reports of UFOs which could affect national security would continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedures designed for this purpose."


=====USAAF and FBI response to the 1947 sightings=====
An early U.S. Army study, of which little is known, was called the ] (IPU). In 1987, British UFO researcher ] received a letter confirming the existence of the IPU from the Army Director of Counter-intelligence, in which it was stated, "...the aforementioned Army unit was disestablished during the late 1950s and never reactivated. All records pertaining to this unit were surrendered to the U.S. ] in conjunction with operation BLUEBOOK." The IPU records have never been released.<ref> Good (1988), 484 </ref>
{{Unbalanced section|date=November 2021}}
Following the large U.S. surge in sightings in June and early July 1947, on July 9, 1947, ] (USAAF) intelligence, in cooperation with the FBI,<ref name="AP-20130329" /> began a formal investigation into selected sightings with characteristics that could not be immediately rationalized, such as Kenneth Arnold's. The USAAF used "all of its top scientists" to determine whether "such a phenomenon could, in fact, occur". The research was "being conducted with the thought that the flying objects might be a celestial phenomenon," or that "they might be a foreign body mechanically devised and controlled."<ref>{{cite web |title=Federal Bureau of Investigation FOIA Documents – Unidentified Flying Objects |url=http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25706/25706.txt |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121110121822/http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25706/25706.txt |archive-date=November 10, 2012 |access-date=September 7, 2013 |website=]}} Internal FBI memo from E. G. Fitch to ] concerning a request by General George F. Schulgen, Chief of the Requirements Intelligence Branch of Army Air Corps Intelligence, for the FBI to help with their investigation of UFO reports.</ref> Three weeks later in a preliminary defense estimate, the air force investigation decided that, "This 'flying saucer' situation is not all imaginary or seeing too much in some natural phenomenon. Something is really flying around."<ref>], p. 83</ref>


A further review by the intelligence and technical divisions of the ] at ] reached the same conclusion. It reported that "the phenomenon is something real and not visionary or fictitious," and there were disc-shaped objects, metallic in appearance, as big as man-made aircraft. They were characterized by "extreme rates of climb maneuverability", general lack of noise, absence of a trail, occasional formation flying, and "evasive" behavior "when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar", suggesting a controlled craft. It was therefore recommended in late September 1947 that an official Air Force investigation be set up. It was also recommended that other government agencies should assist in the investigation.<ref group="note">The so-called {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090226081323/http://www.majesticdocuments.com/pdf/twiningopinionamc_23sept47.pdf |date=February 26, 2009 }}, by future USAF Chief of Staff, General ], specifically recommended intelligence cooperation with the Army, Navy, ], the Defense Department's Joint Research and Development Board, Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, ] (NACA), Project ], and the ] (NEPA) project.</ref>
Use of ''UFO'' instead of ''flying saucer'' was first suggested in 1952 by Capt. ], the first director of ], who felt that ''flying saucer'' did not reflect the diversity of the sightings. Ruppelt suggested that ''UFO'' should be pronounced as a word &mdash; ''you-foe''. However it is generally pronounced by forming each letter: ''U.F.O.'' His term was quickly adopted by the Air Force, which also briefly used "UFOB" circa 1954, for Unidentified Flying Object. Ruppelt recounted his experiences with Project Blue Book in his memoir, ''The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects'' (1956), also the first book to use the term.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.nicap.dabsol.co.uk/Rufo.htm
|title=The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
|first=Francis L.
|last=Ridge
|work=National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena
|accessdate=2006-08-19
}}</ref>


=====USAF=====
,<ref>www.foia.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070703-004.pdf</ref> issued in 1954, defined an Unidentified Flying Object (UFOB) as "any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object." The regulation also said UFOBs were to be investigated as a "possible threat to the security of the United States" and "to determine technical aspects involved." As with any then-ongoing investigation, Air Force personnel did not discuss the investigation with the press.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.foia.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070703-004.pdf
|title=Official US Air Force document in pdf format
|accessdate=2007-11-12
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://en.wikisource.org/Transwiki:Air_Force_Regulation_200-2
|title=Wikisource article about Air Force Regulation 200-2
|accessdate=2007-11-12
}}</ref>


====== Projects Sign (1947–1949), Grudge (1948–1951), and Blue Book (1951–1970) ======
Well known American investigations include:
{{main|Project Sign|Project Grudge|Project Blue Book}}
Project Sign's final report, published in early 1949, stated that while some UFOs appeared to represent actual aircraft, there was not enough data to determine their origin.<ref name="Blum1990">Blum, Howard, Out There: The Government's Secret Quest for Extraterrestrials. Simon and Schuster, 1990</ref>


The Air Force's Project Sign was created at the end of 1947, and was one of the earliest government studies to come to a secret extraterrestrial conclusion. In August 1948, Sign investigators wrote a top-secret intelligence estimate to that effect, but the ] ] ordered it destroyed. The existence of this suppressed report was revealed by several insiders who had read it, such as astronomer and USAF consultant J. Allen Hynek and Capt. Edward J. Ruppelt, the first head of the USAF's Project Blue Book.<ref>], Chapter 3: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070906190034/http://www.nicap.org/rufo/rufo-03.htm |date=September 6, 2007 }}</ref>
* ], previously ] and ], conducted by the ] from 1947 until 1969
The secret U.S. Army/Air Force Project Twinkle investigation into ] (1948&ndash;1951).
* ] investigations by the Swedish, U.K., U.S., and Greek militaries (1946&ndash;1947)
* * The secret CIA ] (1953)
* The secret USAF ] by the ] (1951&ndash;1954)
* The ] (1960), commissioned by ]
* The public ] (1966&ndash;1968)
* The private ] (1998)


Another highly classified U.S. study was conducted by the CIA's Office of Scientific Investigation (OS/I) in the latter half of 1952 in response to orders from the ] (NSC). This study concluded UFOs were real physical objects of potential threat to national security. One OS/I memo to the CIA Director (DCI) in December read that "the reports of incidents convince us that there is something going on that must have immediate attention&nbsp;... Sightings of unexplained objects at great altitudes and traveling at high speeds in the vicinity of major U.S. defense installations are of such a nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or any known types of aerial vehicles."<ref name="auto">{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/97unclass/ufo.html |title=CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947–90 |last=Haines |first=Gerald K. |date=1997 |publisher=] |oclc=713270503 |access-date=July 13, 2013 |archive-date=October 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001174318/https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/97unclass/ufo.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>
===Canadian investigation===
] report filed by the ] on Stephen Michalak claimed incident with a UFO.]]
In ], the ] has dealt with reports, sightings and investigations of UFOs across Canada. In addition to conducting investigations into ] in ], it still identifies the ] in ] and the ] in ] as "unsolved".<ref>, a virtual museum exhibition at Library and Archives Canada</ref>


The matter was considered so urgent that OS/I drafted a memorandum from the DCI to the NSC proposing that the NSC establish an investigation of UFOs as a priority project throughout the intelligence and the defense research and development community. It also urged the DCI to establish an external research project of top-level scientists, now known as the Robertson Panel to analyze the problem of UFOs. The OS/I investigation was called off after the Robertson Panel's negative conclusions in January 1953.<ref name="auto"/>
The Canadian studies include ] (1950&ndash;1954) and ] (1952&ndash;1954)


Project Sign was dismantled and became Project Grudge at the end of 1948. Angered by the low quality of investigations by Grudge, the Air Force Director of Intelligence reorganized it as Project Blue Book in late 1951, placing Ruppelt in charge. ], a trained astronomer who served as a scientific advisor for Project Blue Book, was initially skeptical of UFO reports, but eventually came to the conclusion that many of them could not be satisfactorily explained and was highly critical of what he described as "the cavalier disregard by Project Blue Book of the principles of scientific investigation".<ref>], p. 76</ref> Leaving government work, he founded the privately funded ], to whose work he devoted the rest of his life. Other private groups studying the phenomenon include the ], a grassroots organization whose investigator's handbooks go into great detail on the documentation of alleged UFO sightings.
===French investigation===
{{Wikinews2|French Space Agency CNES releases UFO files|Pilots spot 'UFOs' near the Channel Islands}}
In March 2007, the French ] (CNES) ''published'' an archive of UFO sightings and other phenomena online.<ref></ref>


====== USAF Regulation 200-2 (1953–1954) ======
French studies include GEPAN/SEPRA/] (1977&ndash;), within the French space agency ], the longest ongoing government-sponsored investigation, and the private French ] panel (1996&ndash;1999)


],<ref name="AFD-070703-004">{{cite web |url=http://www.foia.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070703-004.pdf |title=AFD-070703-004.pdf |work=Air Force Freedom of Information Act |publisher=United States Air Force |access-date=September 7, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120910051437/http://www.foia.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070703-004.pdf |archive-date=September 10, 2012 }}</ref> issued in 1953 and 1954, defined an Unidentified Flying Object ("UFOB") as "any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object." The regulation also said UFOBs were to be investigated as a "possible threat to the security of the United States" and "to determine technical aspects involved." The regulation went on to say that "it is permissible to inform news media representatives on UFOB's when the object is positively identified as a familiar object" but added: "For those objects which are not explainable, only the fact that ATIC will analyze the data is worthy of release, due to many unknowns involved."<ref name="AFD-070703-004" />
===British investigation===
The UK conducted various investigations into UFO sightings and related stories. The contents of some of these investigations have since been released to the public.


===== Blue Book and the Condon Committee (1968–1970) =====
Eight file collections on UFO sightings, dating from 1978 to 1987, were first released on ], 2008, to the UK National Archives by the ].<ref></ref> Although kept secret from the public for many years, most of the files have low levels of classification and none is classified Top Secret. 200 files are set to be made public by 2012. The files are correspondence from the public sent to government officials, such as the ] and ]. The ] released the files under the ] due to requests from researchers. <ref></ref> These files include, but are not limited to, UFOs over ] and the ] in London.<ref></ref>
{{main|Condon Committee}}


A public research effort conducted by the Condon Committee for the USAF and published as the Condon Report arrived at a negative conclusion in 1968.<ref name="COMETA" /> Blue Book closed down in 1970, using the Condon Committee's negative conclusion as a rationale, thus ending official Air Force UFO investigations. However, a 1969 USAF document, known as the Bolender memo, along with later government documents, revealed that non-public ] UFO investigations continued after 1970. The Bolender memo first stated that "reports of unidentified flying objects that could affect national security&nbsp;... are not part of the Blue Book system," indicating that more serious UFO incidents already were handled outside the public Blue Book investigation. The memo then added, "reports of UFOs which could affect national security would continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedures designed for this purpose."<ref group="note">For example, current USAF general reporting procedures are in {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080618065117/http://www.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/AFI10-206.pdf |date=June 18, 2008 }}. Section 5.7.3 (p. 64) lists sightings of "unidentified flying objects" and "aircraft of unconventional design" as separate categories from potentially hostile but conventional, unidentified aircraft, missiles, surface vessels, or submarines. Additionally, "unidentified objects" detected by missile warning systems, creating a potential risk of nuclear war, are covered by Rule 5E (p.35).</ref>
British investigations include The UK's ]. Its final report, published in 1951, remained secret for over 50 years. The Working Party concluded that all UFO sightings could be explained as misidentifications of ordinary objects or phenomena, optical illusions, psychological delusions or hoaxes. The report stated: ‘We accordingly recommend very strongly that no further investigation of reported mysterious aerial phenomena be undertaken, unless and until some material evidence becomes available’. Another notable investigation was ] (1997&ndash;2000)


In the late 1960s, a chapter on UFOs in the Space Sciences course at the ] gave serious consideration to possible extraterrestrial origins. When word of the curriculum became public, in 1970, the Air Force issued a statement to the effect that the book was outdated and cadets instead were being informed of the ]'s negative conclusion.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cufon.org/cufon/afu.htm |title=Introductory Space Science |website=CUFON.org |publisher=Computer UFO Network (CUFON) |location=West Jacksonville, FL |access-date=May 16, 2013 |archive-date=May 30, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130530172640/http://www.cufon.org/cufon/afu.htm |url-status=live }} Air Force Academy UFO material.</ref>
A secret study of UFOs undertaken for the UK’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) between 1996 and 2000 and was publicly released in 2006. The report is titled "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Defence Region" and was code-named ]. The report confirmed earlier findings that the main causes of UFO sightings are misidentification of man-made and natural objects. The report noted: "No artefacts of unknown or unexplained origin have been reported or handed to the UK authorities, despite thousands of ] reports. There are no ], ] or radiation measurements and little useful video or still ]." It concluded: "There is no evidence that any UAP, seen in the UKADR , are incursions by air-objects of any intelligent (extraterrestrial or foreign) origin, or that they represent any hostile intent." In contrast to the official government position, ], the head of the UK government UFO desk for a number of years, is an advocate of the ETH, based on the inexplicable (to him) cases he reviewed, such as the ] and the so-called .


Controversy surrounded the report, both before and after its release. It has been observed that the report was "harshly criticized by numerous scientists, particularly at the powerful AIAA&nbsp;... recommended moderate, but continuous scientific work on UFOs."<ref name="COMETA" /> In an address to the ], ] said he believed science had failed to mount adequate studies of the problem and criticized the Condon Report and earlier studies by the USAF as scientifically deficient. He also questioned the basis for Condon's conclusions<ref name="default">{{cite conference |first=James E. |last=McDonald |title=Science in Default: Twenty-Two Years of Inadequate UFO Investigations |conference=], 134th Meeting |book-title=UFO's: A Scientific Debate |editor1-last=Sagan |editor1-first=Carl |editor1-link=Carl Sagan |editor2-last=Page |editor2-first=Thornton |url=https://archive.org/details/ufosascientificd0000unse_n5n6 |edition=Reprint |orig-year=Originally published 1972 |date=1974 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=978-0-393-00739-8 |oclc=934695 |lccn=72004572 |access-date=March 30, 2011 |url-access=registration }}</ref> and argued that the reports of UFOs have been "laughed out of scientific court".<ref name="McDonald" /> J. Allen Hynek, an astronomer who worked as a USAF consultant from 1948, sharply criticized the Condon Committee Report and later wrote two nontechnical books that set forth the case for continuing to investigate UFO reports.
===Other===
The Air Force's ] files indicate that approximately 1%<ref></ref> of all unknown reports came from amateur and professional astronomers or other users of telescopes (such as missile trackers or surveyors). In the 1970s, astrophysicist ] conducted two surveys of the ] and ]. About 5% of the members polled indicated that they had had UFO sightings. In 1980, a survey of 1800 members of various amateur astronomer associations by Gert Helb and astronomer ] of the ] (CUFOS) found that 24% responded "yes" to the question "Have you ever observed an object which resisted your most exhaustive efforts at identification?"


Ruppelt recounted his experiences with Project Blue Book, a USAF investigation that preceded Condon's.<ref>]</ref>
Astronomer ], who admitted to six UFO sightings, including three ] supported the Extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) for UFOs and stated he thought scientists who dismissed it without study were being "unscientific." Another astronomer was Dr. ], who had headed the Air Force's investigation into the green fireballs and other UFO phenomena in New Mexico. LaPaz reported two personal sightings, one of a green fireball, the other of an anomalous disc-like object. Even later UFO debunker Dr. ] filed ].


====FOIA release of documents in 1978====
Some studies were neutral in their conclusions, but argued the inexplicable core cases called for continued scientific study. Examples are the Sturrock Panel study of 1998 and the 1970 ] review of the ]. Other private or governmental studies, some secret, have concluded in favor of the ETH, or have had members who disagreed with the official conclusions. The following are examples of such studies and individuals:
According to a 1979 ] report, "records from the C.I.A., the F.B.I. and other Federal agencies" ("about 900 documents—nearly 900 pages of memos, reports and correspondence") obtained in 1978 through the Freedom of Information Act request, indicate that "despite official pronouncements for decades that U.F.O.'s were nothing more than misidentified aerial objects and as such were no cause for alarm ... the phenomenon has aroused much serious behind‐the‐scenes concern" in the US government. In particular, officials were concerned over the "approximately 10%" of UFO sightings which remained unexplained, and whether they might be Soviet aircraft and a threat to national security.<ref name="Huyghe-1979-NYT">{{cite news |last1=Huyghe |first1=Patrick |title=U.F.O. Files: The Untold Story |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/14/archives/ufo-files-the-untold-story.html |access-date=November 9, 2021 |agency=New York Times |date=October 14, 1979 |archive-date=November 9, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211109023957/https://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/14/archives/ufo-files-the-untold-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Officials were concerned about the "risk of false alerts", of "falsely identifying the real as phantom", and of mass hysteria caused by sightings. In 1947, Brigadier General George F. Schulgen of Army Air Corps Intelligence, warned "the first reported sightings might have been by individuals of Communist sympathies with the view to causing hysteria and fear of a secret Russian weapon."<ref name="Huyghe-1979-NYT"/>


===== White House statement of November 2011 =====
* In 1967, Greek physicist Paul Santorini, a ] scientist, publicly stated that a 1947 Greek government investigation that he headed into the European ] of 1946 quickly concluded that they were not missiles. Santorini claimed the investigation was then quashed by military officials from the U.S., who knew them to be extraterrestrial, because there was no defense against the advanced technology and they feared widespread panic should the results become public.<ref> Good (1988), 23 </ref>
In November 2011, the ] released an official response to two petitions asking the U.S. government to acknowledge formally that aliens have visited this planet and to disclose any intentional withholding of government interactions with extraterrestrial beings. According to the response:
]
{{blockquote|The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race...no credible information to suggest that any evidence is being hidden from the public's eye....|Statement by the White House<ref name="WhiteHouse">{{cite web|last=Larson|first=Phil|title=Searching for ET, But No Evidence Yet|url=https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/response/searching-et-no-evidence-yet|date=November 5, 2011|publisher=]|access-date=2013-09-06|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions#!/response/searching-et-no-evidence-yet|archive-date=November 24, 2011|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name="Atkinson">{{cite news |first=Nancy |last=Atkinson |url=http://www.universetoday.com/90717/no-alien-visits-or-ufo-coverups-white-house-says/ |title=No Alien Visits or UFO Coverups, White House Says |date=November 5, 2011 |work=] |location=Courtenay, B.C. |access-date=November 6, 2011 |archive-date=January 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190118163408/https://www.universetoday.com/90717/no-alien-visits-or-ufo-coverups-white-house-says/ |url-status=live }}</ref>}}
* A 1948 Top Secret USAF Europe document (at right) states that Swedish air intelligence informed them that at least some of their investigators into the ghost rockets and flying saucers concluded they had extraterrestrial origins: "...] have been reported by so many sources and from such a variety of places that we are convinced that they cannot be disregarded and must be explained on some basis which is perhaps slightly beyond the scope of our present intelligence thinking. When officers of this Directorate recently visited the Swedish Air Intelligence Service... their answer was that some reliable and fully technically qualified people have reached the conclusion that 'these phenomena are obviously the result of a high technical skill which cannot be credited to any presently known culture on earth.' They are therefore assuming that these objects originate from some previously unknown or unidentified technology, possibly outside the earth."<ref> Document quoted and published in Timothy Good (2007), 106&ndash;107, 115; USAFE Item 14, TT 1524, (Top Secret), 4 November 1948, declassified in 1997, National Archives, Washington D.C. </ref>
* West Germany, in conjunction with other European countries, conducted a secret study from 1951 to 1954, also concluding that UFOs were extraterrestrial. This study was revealed by German rocketry pioneer ], who headed the study and who also made many public statements supporting the ETH in succeeding years. At the study's conclusion in 1954, Oberth declared, "These objects (UFOs) are conceived and directed by intelligent beings of a very high order. They do not originate in our solar system, perhaps not in our galaxy."
* An ] field office letter to the FBI Director, dated January 31, 1949, stated "...the matter of 'Unidentified Aircraft' or 'Unidentified Aerial Phenomena,' otherwise known as 'Flying Discs,' 'Flying Saucers,' and ] ...''is considered Top Secret by Intelligence Officers of both the Army and Air Forces.''" (emphasis included in original).<ref> Good, 267; Maccabee, 75&ndash;76 </ref>
* During the height of the flying saucer "flap" of July 1952, including highly publicized radar/visual and jet intercepts over ], the ] was informed by the Air Force Directorate of Intelligence that they thought the "flying saucers" were either "optical illusions or atmospheric phenomena" but then added that, "some Military officials are seriously considering the possibility of interplanetary ships."
* The ] started their own internal scientific review the following day. Some CIA scientists were also seriously considering the ETH. An early memo from August was very skeptical, but also added, "...as long as a series of reports remains 'unexplainable' (interplanetary aspects and alien origin not being thoroughly excluded from consideration) caution requires that intelligence continue coverage of the subject." A report from later that month was similarly skeptical but nevertheless concluded "...sightings of UFOs reported at ] and ], at a time when the background ] count had risen inexplicably. Here we run out of even 'blue yonder' explanations that might be tenable, and we still are left with numbers of incredible reports from credible observers." A December 1952 memo from the Assistant CIA Director of Scientific Intelligence (O/SI) was much more urgent: "...the reports of incidents convince us that there is something going on that must have immediate attention. Sightings of unexplained objects at great altitudes and traveling at highs speeds in the vicinity of U.S. defense installation are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles." Some of the memos also made it clear that CIA interest in the subject was not to be made public, partly in fear of possible public panic. (Good, 331&ndash;335)
* The CIA organized the January 1953 ] of scientists to debunk the data collected by the Air Force's ]. This included an engineering analysis of UFO maneuvers by Blue Book (including a motion picture film analysis by Naval scientists) that had concluded UFOs were under intelligent control and likely extraterrestrial.<ref> Dolan, 189; Good, 287, 337; Ruppelt, Chapt. 16 </ref>
* Extraterrestrial "believers" within ] including Major Dewey Fournet, in charge of the engineering analysis of UFO motion. Director ] is also thought to have held these views, though expressed in private, not public. Another defector from the official Air Force party line was consultant Dr. ], who started out as a staunch skeptic. After 20 years of investigation, he changed positions and generally supported the ETH. He became the most publicly known UFO advocate scientist in the 1970s and 1980s.
* The first CIA Director, Vice Admiral ], stated in a signed statement to Congress, also reported in the ], ], ], "It is time for the truth to be brought out... Behind the scenes high-ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about the UFOs. However, through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe the unknown flying objects are nonsense... I urge immediate Congressional action to reduce the dangers from secrecy about unidentified flying objects." In 1962, in his letter of resignation from ], he told director ], "I know the UFOs are not U.S. or Soviet devices. All we can do now is wait for some actions by the UFOs."<ref> Good, 347 </ref>
* Although the 1968 ] came to a negative conclusion (written by ]), it is known that many members of the study strongly disagreed with Condon's methods and biases. Most quit the project in disgust or were fired for insubordination. A few became ETH supporters. Perhaps the best known example is Dr. David Saunders, who in his 1968 book ''UFOs? Yes'' lambasted Condon for extreme bias and ignoring or misrepresenting critical evidence. Saunders wrote, "It is clear... that the sightings have been going on for too long to explain in terms of straightforward terrestrial intelligence. It is in this sense that ETI (Extra Terrestrial Intelligence) stands as the `least implausible' explanation of `real UFOs'."
* ], the head of the official French UFO investigation ], wrote a book in 2005 saying that 14% of the 5800 cases studied by SEPRA were utterly inexplicable and extraterrestrial in origin. ], the head of the new official French UFO investigation ] and former head of the French space agency ], echoes Velasco's comments and adds the U.S. is guilty of covering up this information. Again, this isn't the official public posture of SEPRA, CNES, or the French government. (CNES recently placed their 5800 case files on the Internet starting March 2007.)
* The 1999 French ] committee of high-level military analysts/generals and aerospace engineers/scientists declared the ETH was the best hypothesis for the unexplained cases.


The response further noted that efforts, like ] and NASA's '']'' space telescope and ], continue looking for ]. The response noted "odds are pretty high" that there may be life on other planets but "the odds of us making contact with any of them—especially any ]—are extremely small, given the distances involved."<ref name="WhiteHouse"/><ref name="Atkinson"/>
===National Press Club press conference on November 12, 2007===
On ], ], Former ] Governor ] moderated a panel of former high-ranking government, aviation and military officials from seven countries at the ];<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://npc.press.org/calendar/caldbevent.cfm?eventid=14154
|title=National Press Club description of the press conference
|accessdate=2007-11-12
}}</ref> discussing the UFO topic and governmental investigations. The press conference was open for credentialed media and congressional staff only.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUKN1248419720071112?pageNumber=2&sp=true
|title=Reuters news article concerning the press conference
|accessdate=2007-11-12
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.wpbf.com/video/14573588/index.html
|title=ABC News West Palm Beach video file on the press conference
|accessdate=2007-11-12
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/11/09/simington.ufocommentary/index.html?iref=newssearch
|title=CNN article about the press conference
|accessdate=2007-11-12
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7091922.stm
|title=BBC article concerning the press conference
|accessdate=2007-11-13
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.freedomvideo.org/blog/?p=718
|title=Full video taken during the press conference
|accessdate=2008-01-14
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://freedomofinfo.org/media/PRESS_ADVISORY.pdf
|title=PDF document announcing the press conference and giving details.
|accessdate=2007-11-12
|format=PDF}}</ref>


=====ODNI report 2021=====
==UFO categorization==
On June 25, 2021, the ] released a report on UAPs.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gabbatt |first1=Adam |title=It came out of the sky: US releases highly anticipated UFO report |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/25/ufos-us-government-report |work=The Guardian |date=June 25, 2021 |language=en |access-date=June 26, 2021 |archive-date=June 26, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210626025006/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/25/ufos-us-government-report |url-status=live }}</ref> The report found that the UAPTF was unable to identify 143 objects spotted between 2004 and 2021. The report said that 18 of these featured unusual movement patterns or flight characteristics, adding that more analysis was needed to determine if those sightings represented "breakthrough" technology. The report said that "some of these steps are resource-intensive and would require additional investment."<ref name="dni_Preliminary_Assessment">{{cite web |title=Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena |publisher=] |date=June 25, 2021 |access-date=June 25, 2021 |url=https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf |archive-date=July 26, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210726114054/https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> The report did not link the sightings to extraterrestrial life.<ref name="APmerchant">{{cite news |last1=Merchant |first1=Nomaan |title=No ET, no answers: Intel report is inconclusive about UFOs |url=https://apnews.com/article/technology-government-and-politics-f5f24502d97072fd4bef34b6fe36c81d |website=apnews.com |date=June 25, 2021 |agency=Associated Press |access-date=June 25, 2021 |archive-date=June 25, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210625210913/https://apnews.com/article/technology-government-and-politics-f5f24502d97072fd4bef34b6fe36c81d |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Kube |first1=Courtney |last2=Edelman |first2=Adam |title=UFO report: Government can't explain 143 of 144 mysterious flying objects, blames limited data |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/ufo-report-government-can-t-explain-143-144-mysterious-flying-n1272390 |work=NBC News |date=June 25, 2021 |language=en |access-date=June 26, 2021 |archive-date=June 26, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210626023614/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/ufo-report-government-can-t-explain-143-144-mysterious-flying-n1272390 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Some researchers recommend that observations be classified according to the features of the phenomenon or object that are reported or recorded. Typical categories include:
* ], toy-top, or disk-shaped "craft" without visible or audible propulsion. (day and night)
* ]
* Cigar-shaped "craft" with lighted windows (Meteor fireballs are sometimes reported this way, but are very different phenomena).
* Other: chevrons, (equilateral) triangles, crescent, boomerangs, spheres (usually reported to be shining, glowing at night), domes, diamonds, shapeless black masses, eggs, pyramids and cylinders, classic "lights".


====Hynek system==== ====Uruguay (c. 1989)====
Dr. ] developed another system of description, dividing sightings into six categories.<ref></ref><ref></ref>
:It first separates sightings based on proximity, arbitrarily using 500 feet as the cutoff point. It then subdivides these into divisions based on viewing conditions or special features. The three distant sighting categories are:
* Nocturnal Lights (NL): Anomalous lights seen in the night sky.
* Daylight Discs (DD): Any anomalous object, generally but not necessarily "]", seen in the distant daytime sky.
* Radar/Visual cases (RV). Objects seen simultaneously by eye and on radar.


The ] has conducted UFO investigations since 1989 and reportedly analyzed 2,100 cases of which they regard approximately 2% as lacking explanation.<ref>{{cite news |title=Hay aún 40 casos de ovnis sin explicación |first=Daniel |last=Isgleas |url=http://historico.elpais.com.uy/090607/pnacio-421863/nacional/Hay-aun-40-casos-de-ovnis-sin-explicacion/ |work=] |publisher=] |location=Montevideo |date=June 7, 2009 |access-date=September 10, 2013 |language=es |archive-date=November 16, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131116102645/http://historico.elpais.com.uy/090607/pnacio-421863/nacional/Hay-aun-40-casos-de-ovnis-sin-explicacion/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
The distant classification is useful in terms of evidentiary value, with RV cases usually considered to be the highest because of radar corroboration and NL cases the lowest because of the ease in which lights seen at night are often confused with prosaic phenomena such as meteors, bright stars, or airplanes. RV reports are also fewest in number, while NL are largest.


===Europe===
In addition were three "]" (CE) subcategories, again thought to be higher in evidentiary value, because it includes measurable physical effects and the objects seen up close are less likely to be the result of misperception. As in RV cases, these tend to be relatively rare:
* CE1: Strange objects seen nearby but without physical interaction with the environment.
* CE2: A CE1 case but creating physical evidence or causing ] (see below).
* CE3: CE1 or CE2 cases where "occupants" or entities are seen. (Hence the title of ]'s movie, '']'')


==== France (1977–2008) ====
Hynek's CE classification system has since been expanded to include such things as alleged alien abductions (CE4s) and ] phenomena.


In March 2007, the French space agency ] published an archive of UFO sightings and other phenomena online.<ref name="geipan">{{cite web |url=http://www.cnes-geipan.fr/ |title=GEIPAN: Le GEIPAN |work=] (GEIPAN) |publisher=] (CNES) |location=Paris |access-date=May 16, 2013 |archive-date=February 19, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110219094957/http://www.cnes-geipan.fr/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
====Vallee system====
] has devised a UFO classification system which is preferred by many UFO investigators over Hynek's system as it is considerably more descriptive than Hynek's, especially in terms of the reported behavior of UFOs.<ref></ref>


French studies include GEPAN/SEPRA/] within CNES (French space agency), the longest ongoing government-sponsored investigation. About 22% of the 6,000 cases studied remain unexplained.<ref name="GEIPAN statistics summary">{{cite web|url=http://www.cnes.fr/web/CNES-en/5039-a-history-of-uap-research-at-cnes.php|title=A history of UAP research at CNES|publisher=]|access-date=October 6, 2014|archive-date=October 6, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006155415/http://www.cnes.fr/web/CNES-en/5039-a-history-of-uap-research-at-cnes.php|url-status=live}}</ref> The official opinion of GEPAN/SEPRA/GEIPAN has been neutral, stating on their ] page that their mission is fact-finding for the scientific community, not rendering an opinion. They add they can neither prove nor disprove the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH), but their Steering Committee's clear position is that they cannot discard the possibility that some fraction of the very strange 22% of unexplained cases might be due to distant and advanced civilizations.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.geipan.fr/fr/faq-page?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en#n58794|title=Autres Liens|access-date=October 6, 2014|archive-date=August 4, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230804171011/https://www.geipan.fr/fr/faq-page?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en#n58794|url-status=live}}</ref>
'''Type I''' (a, b, c, d): Observation of an unusual object, spherical discoidal, or of another ], on or situated close to the ground (tree height, or lower), which may be associated with traces &ndash; thermal, luminous, or mechanical effects.


Possibly their bias may be indicated by their use of the terms "PAN" (French) or "UAP" (English equivalent) for "Unidentified ''Aerospace'' Phenomenon" (whereas "UAP" is normally used by English organizations stands for "Unidentified ''Aerial'' Phenomenon", a more neutral term). In addition, the three heads of the studies have gone on record in stating that UFOs were real physical flying machines beyond our knowledge or that the best explanation for the most inexplicable cases was an extraterrestrial one.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc2008.htm |title=Official French Gov't UFO study project to resume with new director |date=October 2005 |publisher=ufoevidence.org |location=Seattle |access-date=July 13, 2013 |archive-date=May 2, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502192445/http://ufoevidence.org/documents/doc2008.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1627.htm |title='Yes, UFOs exist': Position statement by SEPRA head, Jean-Jacques Velasco |orig-year=Originally published in '']'' |date=April 18, 2004 |publisher=ufoevidence.org |location=Seattle |access-date=July 13, 2013 |archive-date=April 8, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130408232437/http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1627.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1626.htm |title=Assessment of the UFO phenomenon by GEPAN (1978) |publisher=ufoevidence.org |location=Seattle |access-date=July 13, 2013 |archive-date=April 8, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130408232427/http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1626.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2007, the CNES's own report stated that, at that time, 28% of sightings remained unidentified.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://cnes.fr/en/web/CNES-en/5866-geipan-uap-investigation-unit-opens-its-files.php |title=CNES report, March 26, 2007 |date=April 23, 2015 |access-date=January 8, 2023 |archive-date=January 8, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230108170520/https://cnes.fr/en/web/CNES-en/5866-geipan-uap-investigation-unit-opens-its-files.php |url-status=live }}</ref>
<ol style="list-style-type:lower-alpha">
<li>On or near ground.</li>
<li>Near or over body of water.</li>
<li>Occupants appear to display interest in witnesses by gestures or luminous signals.</li>
<li>Object appears to be "scouting" a terrestrial vehicle.</li>
</ol>


In 2008, Michel Scheller, president of the ] (3AF), created the Sigma Commission. Its purpose was to investigate UFO phenomena worldwide.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x98y3k_ovni-nouvelle-commission-denquete-3_tech |title=Ovni-nouvelle-commission-denquete-3AF-PAN (Partie 1) |website=] |date=May 11, 2009 |publisher=] |location=Paris |access-date=January 11, 2014 |archive-date=January 6, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140106220709/http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x98y3k_ovni-nouvelle-commission-denquete-3_tech |url-status=live }}</ref> A progress report published in May 2010 stated that the central hypothesis proposed by the ] is perfectly credible.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openminds.tv/wp-content/uploads/Rapport_Etape_Com.SIGMA_Juin2010.pdf |title=Rapport d'étape de la Commission Sigma/3AF |date=May 31, 2010 |publisher=] |location=Paris |access-date=January 11, 2014 |archive-date=September 24, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924061130/http://www.openminds.tv/wp-content/uploads/Rapport_Etape_Com.SIGMA_Juin2010.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> In December 2012, the final report of the Sigma Commission was submitted to Scheller. Following the submission of the final report, the Sigma2 Commission is to be formed with a mandate to continue the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.3af.fr/article/en-direct-de-3af/sigma-2 |title=Sigma 2 |last=Dini |first=Luc |date=January 10, 2013 |website=3AF |publisher=Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France |location=Paris |access-date=January 11, 2014 |archive-date=February 13, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140213092211/http://www.3af.fr/article/en-direct-de-3af/sigma-2 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite interview |last=Boudier |first=Alain |interviewer=Alexandre |title=Alexandre – Alain Boudier – Sygma & 3AF |url=http://rim951.fr/?p=2537 |work=RimLive.com |location=Paris |date=June 20, 2013 |access-date=January 11, 2014 |archive-date=July 2, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140702074819/http://rim951.fr/?p=2537 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
'''Type II''' (a, b, c): Observation of an unusual object with vertical cylindrical formation in the sky, associated with a diffuse cloud. This phenomenon has been given various names such as "cloud-cigar" or "cloud-sphere."


==== Italy (1933–2005) ====
<ol style="list-style-type:lower-alpha">
<li>Moving erratically through the sky.</li>
<li>Object is stationary and gives rise to secondary objects (sometimes referred to as "satellite objects").</li>
<li>Object is surrounded by secondary objects.</li>
</ol>


Alleged UFO sightings gradually increased since the war, peaking in 1978 and 2005. The total number of sightings since 1947 are 18,500, of which 90% are identifiable.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ufo.it/ufo1bis.htm?l-l=en|title=And Ufology UFO Italy UFO sightings, not Flying Saucers, Aliens or Extraterrestrials|publisher=Ufo.it|access-date=October 6, 2014|archive-date=October 6, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006163047/http://www.ufo.it/ufo1bis.htm?l-l=en|url-status=live}}</ref>
'''Type III''' (a, b, c, d, e): Observation of an unusual object of spherical, discoidal or elliptical shape, stationary in the sky.


==== United Kingdom (1951–2009) ====
<ol style="list-style-type:lower-alpha">
{{Update section|date=December 2020}}
<li>Hovering between two periods of motion with "falling-leaf" descent, up and down, or ] motion.</li>
The UK's ] published its final report in June 1951, which remained secret for over fifty years. The Working Party concluded that all UFO sightings could be explained as misidentifications of ordinary objects or phenomena, optical illusions, psychological misperceptions/aberrations, or hoaxes. The report stated: "We accordingly recommend very strongly that no further investigation of reported mysterious aerial phenomena be undertaken, unless and until some material evidence becomes available."<ref name="FSWP">{{cite web |url=http://www.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/UK/DEFE44-119.pdf |title=Unidentified Flying Objects |date=June 1951 |website=The Black Vault |publisher=John Greenewald |id=DSI/JTIC Report No. 7 |location=Northridge, CA |access-date=September 16, 2013 |archive-date=June 1, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120601042337/http://www.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/UK/DEFE44-119.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>
<li>Interruption of continuous flight to hover and then continue motion.</li>
<li>Alters appearance while hovering &ndash; e.g., change of luminosity, generation of secondary object, etc.
<li>"Dogfights" or swarming among several objects.</li>
<li>Trajectory abruptly altered during continuous flight to fly slowly above a certain area, circle, or suddenly change course.</li>
</ol>


Eight file collections on UFO sightings, dating from 1978 to 1987, were first released on May 14, 2008, to ] by the ] (MoD).<ref name="nationalarchivesUFO">{{cite web |url=http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ufos/ |title=UFO files |publisher=] |location=Kew |access-date=September 10, 2013 |archive-date=February 24, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110224203714/http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ufos/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Although kept secret from the public for many years, most of the files have low levels of classification and none are classified Top Secret. 200 files are set to be made public by 2012. The files are correspondence from the public sent to the British government and officials, such as the MoD and ]. The MoD released the files under the ] due to requests from researchers.<ref>{{cite news |title=Files released on UFO sightings |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7398108.stm |work=] |publisher=BBC |location=London |date=May 14, 2008 |access-date=May 16, 2013 |archive-date=July 20, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080720115509/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7398108.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> These files include, but are not limited to, UFOs over ] and ] in London.<ref>{{cite news |title=The truth is out there: Britons 'spotted' UFOs, records say |url=http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j0OnawpQKsmDXbJAce-OI5EiUgHQ |agency=] |location=London |date=May 13, 2008 |access-date=May 16, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605221509/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j0OnawpQKsmDXbJAce-OI5EiUgHQ |archive-date=June 5, 2013 }}</ref>
'''Type IV''' (a, b, c, d): Observation of an unusual object in continuous flight.


On October 20, 2008, more UFO files were released. One case released detailed that in 1991 an Alitalia passenger aircraft was approaching ] when the pilots saw what they described as a "]" fly extremely close to the cockpit. The pilots believed a collision was imminent. UFO expert David Clarke says this is one of the most convincing cases for a UFO he has come across.<ref>{{cite news |title=Airliner had near miss with UFO |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7679145.stm |work=BBC News |publisher=BBC |location=London |date=October 20, 2008 |access-date=May 16, 2013 |archive-date=October 23, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081023152515/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7679145.stm |url-status=live }}</ref>
<ol style="list-style-type:lower-alpha">
<li>Continuous flight.</li>
<li>Trajectory affected by nearby conventional aircraft.</li>
<li>Formation flight.</li>
<li>Wavy or zig-zag trajectory.</li>
</ol>


A secret study of UFOs was undertaken for the Ministry of Defence between 1996 and 2000 and was code-named Project Condign. The resulting report, titled "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Defence Region", was publicly released in 2006, but the identity and credentials of whoever constituted Project Condign remains classified. The report confirmed earlier findings that the main causes of UFO sightings are misidentification of man-made and natural objects. The report noted: "No artefacts of unknown or unexplained origin have been reported or handed to the UK authorities, despite thousands of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena reports. There are no ], ] or radiation measurements and little useful video or still ]."<ref name="auto1">{{cite web |url=http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/BA0DA42F-2C56-431E-98F6-19CD45EE7D43/0/uap_vol3_executive_summary_pg2_paras4_and_7.pdf |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121026065214/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/BA0DA42F-2C56-431E-98F6-19CD45EE7D43/0/uap_vol3_executive_summary_pg2_paras4_and_7.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 26, 2012 |title=Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region |volume=3 |author=Defence Intelligence Staff |author-link=Defence Intelligence |date=December 2000 |publisher=The National Archives |location=Kew |page=2 |id=55/2/00 |access-date=September 10, 2013}} See also The National Archives site: for archived documents.</ref>
'''Type V''' (a, b, c): Observation of an unusual object of indistinct appearance, i.e., appearing to be not fully material or solid in structure.


It concluded: "There is no evidence that any UAP, seen in the UKADR , are incursions by air-objects of any intelligent (extraterrestrial or foreign) origin, or that they represent any hostile intent." A little-discussed conclusion of the report was that novel meteorological plasma phenomenon akin to ] are responsible for "the majority, if not all" of otherwise inexplicable sightings, especially reports of ].<ref name="auto1"/>
<ol style="list-style-type:lower-alpha">
<li>Extended apparent diameter, non-point source luminous objects ("fuzzy").</li>
<li>Starlike objects (point source), motionless for extended periods.</li>
<li>Starlike objects rapidly crossing the sky, possibly with peculiar trajectories.</li>
</ol>


On December 1, 2009, the Ministry of Defence quietly closed down its UFO investigations unit. The unit's hotline and email address were suspended by the MoD on that date. The MoD said there was no value in continuing to receive and investigate sightings in a release, stating that "in over fifty years, no UFO report has revealed any evidence of a potential threat to the United Kingdom. The MoD has no specific capability for identifying the nature of such sightings. There is no Defence benefit in such investigation and it would be an inappropriate use of defence resources. Furthermore, responding to reported UFO sightings diverts MoD resources from tasks that are relevant to Defence." '']'' reported that the MoD claimed the closure would save the Ministry around £50,000 a year. The MoD said it would continue to release UFO files to the public through The National Archives.<ref>{{cite news |title=Cost-cutting causes British gov't to shut down UFO investigations |first=Stephanie |last=Dearing |url=http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/283265 |work=Digital Journal |location=Toronto |date=December 5, 2009 |access-date=May 16, 2013 |archive-date=May 15, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130515062510/http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/283265 |url-status=live }}</ref>
'''Source: 1. Jacques and Janine Vallee: ''Challenge To Science: The UFO Enigma,'' LC# 66-25843'''


UFO reports, Parliamentary questions, and letters from members of the public were released on August 5, 2010, to the UK National Archives. "In one letter included in the files, a man alleges Churchill ordered a coverup of a WW II-era UFO encounter involving the Royal Air Force".<ref name="CBS1">{{cite web |last1=Binlot |first1=Ann |title=Winston Churchill Ordered UFO Coverup? |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/winston-churchill-ordered-ufo-coverup/ |website=cbsnews.com |date=August 5, 2010 |publisher=] |access-date=November 10, 2021 |archive-date=November 10, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211110142708/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/winston-churchill-ordered-ufo-coverup/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="nationalarchivesUFO"/>
==Conspiracy theories==
{{main|UFO conspiracy theory}}
UFOs are sometimes an element of elaborate ] in which governments are said to be intentionally covering up the existence of aliens, or sometimes collaborating with them. There are many versions of this story; some are exclusive, while others overlap with various other conspiracy theories.


Reports of UFO sightings continue. According to ''],'' there were 957 reported UFO sightings across the UK between January 2021 and May 2023, with ], ], ], and ] being hotspots.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-24 |title=UFO hotspots revealed as ex Ministry of Defence expert calls for action |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ufo-hotspots-revealed-aliens-b2434354.html |access-date=2023-11-16 |website=The Independent |language=en |archive-date=November 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231104103628/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ufo-hotspots-revealed-aliens-b2434354.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
In the U.S., opinion polls again indicate that a strong majority of people believe the U.S. government is withholding such information. Various notables have also expressed such views. Some examples are astronauts ] and ], Senator ], Vice Admiral ] (the first ] director), ] (former British Chief of Defense Staff and ] head), the 1999 high-level French ] by various French generals and aerospace experts, and ] (former director of the French space agency ], new director of French UFO research organization ]).<ref></ref>


==Studies==
There is also speculation that UFO phenomena are tests of experimental aircraft or advanced weapons.{{Fact|date=June 2008}} In this case UFOs are viewed as failures to retain secrecy, or deliberate attempts at misinformation: to deride the phenomenon so that it can be pursued unhindered. This explanation may or may not feed back into the previous one, where current advanced military technology is considered to be adapted alien technology (''see also: ] and ]'').{{Fact|date=June 2008}}
Critics argue that all UFO evidence is anecdotal<ref name="Demon Haunted">{{cite book |last=Sagan |first=Carl |author-link=Carl Sagan |title=The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark |edition= |date=1995 |publisher=Random House |location=New York |isbn=0-394-53512-X |oclc=779687822 |lccn=95034076 |ref=Sagan 1995|title-link=The Demon-Haunted World }}</ref> and can be explained as prosaic natural phenomena. Defenders of UFO research counter that knowledge of observational data, other than what is reported in the popular media, is limited in the scientific community and further study is needed.<ref name="Revelations" /><ref name="FSS">]</ref> Studies have established that the majority of UFO observations are misidentified conventional objects or natural phenomena—most commonly aircraft, balloons including ]s, satellites, and astronomical objects such as ],<!--No correction needed.--> bright stars and planets. A small percentage are ]es.<ref group="note">For example, the USAF's ] concluded that less than 2% of reported UFOs were "psychological" or hoaxes; ]'s study for CUFOS had less than 1%.</ref>


Fewer than 10% of reported sightings remain unexplained after proper investigation and therefore can be classified as unidentified in the strictest sense. According to ], proponents of the ] (ETH) suggest these unexplained reports are of alien spacecraft, however the ] cannot be excluded; that these reports are simply other more prosaic phenomena that cannot be identified due to lack of complete information or due to the necessary subjectivity of the reports. Novella says that instead of accepting the null hypothesis, UFO enthusiasts tend to engage in ] by offering outlandish, untested explanations for the validity of the ETH, which violate ].<ref>Novella, Steven, et al. ''The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake''. Grand Central Publishing, 2018. pp. 160.</ref>
It has also been suggested by a few paranormal authors that all or most human technology and culture is based on extraterrestrial contact. See also ].


===Scientific===
===Allegations of evidence suppression===
{{Main|Ufology#Research}}
Some also contend regarding physical evidence that it exists abundantly but is swiftly and sometimes clumsily suppressed by governments, aiming to insulate a population they regard as unprepared for the social, theological, and security implications of such evidence. See the ].
Historically, ufology has not been considered credible in mainstream science.<ref name=ufosociology /> The ] has generally deemed that UFO sightings are not worthy of serious investigation except as a cultural artifact.<ref>]</ref><ref name="McDonald">{{cite web |url=http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/JEMcDonald/mcdonald_hcsa_68.pdf |title=Statement on Unidentified Flying Objects: Submitted to the House Committee on Science and Astronautics at July 29, 1968, Symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects, Rayburn Bldg., Washington, D.C., by James E. McDonald |last=McDonald |first=James E. |author-link=James E. McDonald |date=July 29, 1968 |access-date=September 6, 2013 |archive-date=January 5, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190105080523/http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/JEMcDonald/mcdonald_hcsa_68.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="COMETA">{{cite web |url=http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/Cometa.htm |title=COMETA Report |publisher=ufoevidence.org |location=Seattle, WA |access-date=July 13, 2013 |archive-date=November 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191115111528/http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/Cometa.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="McCarthy">]</ref><ref name="Sturrock/Stanford">{{cite web |url=http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/1998/july1/ufostudy71.html |title=UFO study causes media sensation: 7/1/98 |last=Salisbury |first=David F. |date=July 1, 1998 |work=Stanford Report |publisher=] |location=Stanford, CA |access-date=May 16, 2013 |archive-date=April 11, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090411190007/http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/1998/july1/ufostudy71.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Menzel">]</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=UFO studies should be 'legitimate university subject', claims American professor |first=Andrew |last=Hough |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/7584331/UFO-studies-should-be-legitimate-university-subject-claims-American-professor.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/ufo/7584331/UFO-studies-should-be-legitimate-university-subject-claims-American-professor.html |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |work=] |location=London |date=April 13, 2010 |access-date=July 13, 2013}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
] (left) and ]]]
Studies of UFOs rarely appear in mainstream scientific literature. When asked, some scientists and scientific organizations have pointed to the end of official governmental studies in the U.S. in December 1969, following the statement by the government scientist ] that further study of UFOs could not be justified on grounds of scientific advancement.<ref name="COMETA"/><ref>], pp. 306–332</ref>


Nevertheless, on 14 September 2023, NASA reported the appointment, for the first time, of a ] (known earlier as U.F.O.), identified as ], to scientifically, and transparently, study such occurrences.<ref name="NYT-20230914">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=NASA Introduces New U.F.O. Research Director – The role was created in response to the recommendations of a report that found the agency could do more to collect and interpret data on unidentified anomalous phenomena. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/14/science/nasa-ufo-uap-report.html |date=14 September 2023 |work=] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20230914235331/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/14/science/nasa-ufo-uap-report.html |archive-date=14 September 2023 |access-date=15 September 2023 }}</ref>
There have been allegations of suppression of UFO related evidence for many decades. There are also conspiracy theories which claim that physical evidence might have been removed and/or destroyed/suppressed by some governments. (See also ]) Some examples are:
* On ] ], William Rhodes took photos of an unusual object over ], ].<ref></ref> The photos appeared in a Phoenix newspaper and a few other papers. According to documents from Project Bluebook, an Army counter-intelligence (CIC) agent and an FBI agent interviewed Rhodes on ] and convinced him to surrender the negatives. The CIC agent deliberately concealed his true identity, leaving Rhodes to believe both men were from the FBI. Rhodes said he wanted the negatives back, but when he turned them into the FBI the next day, he was informed he wouldn't be getting them back, though Rhodes later tried unsuccessfully.<ref>http://projectbluebook.org/page.aspx?PageCode=NARA-PBB1-913</ref><ref>http://projectbluebook.org/page.aspx?PageCode=NARA-PBB1-920</ref> The photos were extensively analyzed and would eventually show up in some classified Air Force UFO intelligence reports. (Randle, 34&ndash;45, full account)
* A ] ], movie of a "flying disk" over ], ], taken by a Louisville ''Courier-Journal'' photographer, had the USAF Directors of counterintelligence (]) and intelligence discussing in memos how to best obtain the movie and interview the photographer without revealing Air Force interest. One memo suggested the ] be used, then precluded the FBI getting involved. Another memo said "it would be nice if OSI could arrange to secure a copy of the film in some covert manner," but if that wasn't feasible, one of the Air Force scientists might have to negotiate directly with the newspaper.<ref>http://projectbluebook.org/page.aspx?PageCode=NARA-PBB90-218</ref><ref>http://projectbluebook.org/page.aspx?PageCode=NARA-PBB90-219</ref> In a recent interview, the photographer confirmed meeting with military intelligence and still having the film in his possession until then, but refused to say what happened to the film after that.<ref></ref>
* In another 1950 movie incident from Montana, ] filmed some unusual aerial objects and eventually turned the film over to the U.S. Air Force, but insisted that the first part of the film, clearly showing the objects as spinning discs, had been removed when it was returned to him. (Clark, 398)
* During the military investigation of ] in ], UFOs were photographed by a tracking camera over ] on ] ]. The final report in 1951 on the green fireball investigation claimed there was insufficient data to determine anything. However, documents later uncovered by Dr. ] indicate that ] was accomplished. The data reduction and photographs showed four objects about 30 feet in diameter flying in formation at high speed at an altitude of about 30 miles. Maccabee says this result was apparently suppressed from the final report.<ref></ref>
* ] director ] reported that, in 1952, a U.S. Air Force pilot fired his jet's machine guns at a UFO, and that the official report which should have been sent to Blue Book was quashed.<ref></ref>
* ] ] reported suppression of a flying saucer movie filmed in high clarity by two ] range photographers on ] ]. Cooper said he viewed developed negatives of the object, clearly showing a dish-like object with a dome on top and something like holes or ports in the dome. The photographers and another witness, when later interviewed by Dr. ], confirmed the story. Cooper said military authorities then picked up the film and neither he nor the photographers ever heard what happened to it. The incident was also reported in a few newspapers, such as the ]. The official explanation, however, was that the photographers had filmed a weather balloon distorted by hot desert air.<ref></ref>
* On ], ], when ] director ] appeared on CBS television, his statements on UFOs were pre-censored by the Air Force. During the show when Keyhoe tried to depart from the censored script to "reveal something that has never been disclosed before," CBS cut the sound, later stating Keyhoe was about to violate "predetermined security standards" and about to say something he wasn't "authorized to release." What Keyhoe was about to reveal were four publicly unknown military studies concluding UFOs were interplanetary (including the 1948 ] ] and Blue Book's 1952 engineering analysis of UFO motion). (Good, 286&ndash;287; Dolan 293&ndash;295)
* Astronomer ] reported that in 1961 he witnessed the destruction of the tracking tapes of unknown objects orbiting the Earth. (However, Vallee indicated that this didn't happen because of government pressure but because the senior astronomers involved didn't want to deal with the implications.)
* In 1965, Rex Heflin took four ] photos of a hat-shaped object. Two years later (1967), two men posing as ] agents confiscated three prints. Just as mysteriously, the photos were returned to his mailbox in 1993.<ref></ref>
* A ] ] memo directed to all USAF divisions, from USAF Lt. General Hewitt Wheless, Assistant Vice Chief of Staff, stated that unverified information indicated that unknown individuals, impersonating USAF officers and other military personnel, had been harassing civilian UFO witnesses, warning them not to talk, and also confiscating film, referring specifically to the Heflin incident. AFOSI was to be notified if any personnel were to become aware of any other incidents. (Document in Fawcett & Greenwood, 236).
* John Callahan, former Division Chief of the Accidents and Investigations Branch of the ], Washington D.C., also a ] witness, said that following a 1986 encounter of a Japanese airlines 747 with a giant UFO over Alaska, recorded by air and ground radar, the FAA conducted an investigation. Callahan held a briefing a few days later for President Reagan's Scientific Study Group, the FBI, and CIA. After the briefing, one of the CIA agents told everybody they "were never there and this never happened," adding they were fearful of public panic.<ref> http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1324.htm; </ref>
* In 1996, the ] revealed an instance from 1964 where two CIA agents posed as USAF representatives in order to recover a film canister from a ] that had accidentally come down in ]. The event was then publicly dismissed as an unsuccessful ] space experiment.


====Status as a pseudoscience====
==UFOs in popular culture==
{{Excerpt|Ufology|Status as a pseudoscience}}
{{main|UFOs in Fiction}}
UFOs constitute a widespread international ] phenomenon of the last half-century. ]s rank UFOs near the top of lists for subjects of widespread recognition. In 1973, a survey found that 95 percent of the public reported having heard of UFOs, whereas only 92 percent had heard of ] ] in a 1977 poll taken just nine months after he left the ]. (Bullard, 141) A 1996 ] reported that 71 percent of the ] population believed that the ] was covering up information regarding UFOs. A 2002 ] for the ] found similar results, but with more people believing UFOs were extraterrestrial craft. In that latest poll, 56 percent thought UFOs were real craft and 48 percent that aliens had visited the Earth. Again, about 70 percent felt the government was not sharing everything it knew about UFOs or extraterrestrial life.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.scifi.com/ufo/roper/
|title=The Roper Poll
|work=Ufology Resource Center
|publisher=]
|month=September | year=2002
|accessdate=2006-08-19
}}</ref><ref></ref><ref></ref>
Another effect of the flying saucer type of UFO sightings has been Earth-made flying saucer craft in space fiction, for example the Earth-made craft ] in '']'', and the saucer part of the ] in '']''.


], a scientist and ufologist, claimed there were deficiencies in most UFO research, including government studies. He criticized the mythology and cultism often associated with UFO sightings, but despite the challenges, Vallée contended that several hundred professional scientists—a group both he and Hynek termed "the invisible college"—continued to study UFOs quietly on their own time.<ref name="Revelations" />
===Use in film and television===
*See ]


==See also== ====Studies====
UFOs have become a prevalent theme in modern culture,<ref name="Revelations">]</ref> and the social phenomena have been the subject of academic research in sociology and psychology.<ref name=ufosociology>{{cite journal |last=Cross |first=Anne |date=March 2004 |title=The Flexibility of Scientific Rhetoric: A Case Study of UFO Researchers |journal=] |publisher=] |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=3–34 |issn=0162-0436 |doi=10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015542.28438.41|s2cid=144197172 }}</ref>
{|

|-
{{Excerpt|Ufology|Current interest}}
|

* ]
====Sturrock panel categorization====
* ]

* ]
Besides anecdotal visual sightings, reports sometimes include claims of other kinds of evidence, including cases studied by the military and various government agencies of different countries (such as Project Blue Book, the Condon Committee, the French ], and Uruguay's current Air Force study).
* ]

* ]
A comprehensive scientific review of cases where physical evidence was available was carried out by the 1998 Sturrock panel, with specific examples of many of the categories listed below.
* ]
* Radar contact and tracking, sometimes from multiple sites. These have included military personnel and control tower operators, simultaneous visual sightings, and aircraft intercepts. One such example was the ] of large, silent, low-flying black triangles in 1989 and 1990 over Belgium, tracked by ] radar and jet interceptors, and investigated by Belgium's military (included photographic evidence). Another famous case from 1986 was the ] over ] investigated by the ] (FAA).
* ]
* Photographic evidence, including still photos, movie film, and video.
* ]
* Claims of physical trace of landing UFOs, including ground impressions, burned or desiccated soil, burned and broken foliage, magnetic anomalies{{Specify|date=February 2009}}, increased radiation levels, and metallic traces. (See, e.&nbsp;g. Height 611 UFO incident or the 1964 ]'s ] encounter of the USAF Project Blue Book cases.) A well-known example from December 1980 was the USAF Rendlesham Forest incident in England. Another occurred in January 1981 in Trans-en-Provence and was investigated by GEPAN, then France's official government UFO-investigation agency. Project Blue Book head Edward J. Ruppelt described a classic 1952 CE2 case involving a patch of charred grass roots.
* ]
* Physiological effects on people and animals including temporary paralysis, skin burns and rashes, ]l burns, and symptoms superficially resembling ], such as the ] in 1980.
|
* Animal/] cases, which some feel are also part of the UFO phenomenon.
* ]
* Biological effects on plants such as increased or decreased growth, germination effects on seeds, and blown-out stem nodes (usually associated with physical trace cases or ]s)
* ]
* ] (EM) effects. A famous ] over ], recorded in CIA and DIA classified documents, was associated with communication losses in multiple aircraft and weapons system failure in an ] jet interceptor as it was about to fire a missile on one of the UFOs.<ref>Fawcett & Greenwood, 81–89; ], pp. 318–322, 497–502</ref>
* ]
* Apparent remote radiation detection, some noted in FBI and CIA documents occurring over government nuclear installations at ] and ] in 1950, also reported by Project Blue Book director Edward J. Ruppelt in his book.
* ]
* Claimed artifacts of UFOs themselves, such as 1957, ], Brazil, ] fragments analyzed by the ] and in the Condon Report and by others. The 1964 Lonnie Zamora incident also left metal traces, analyzed by NASA.<ref>], pp. 371–373</ref><ref>], pp. 112–154</ref> A more recent example involves a teardrop-shaped object recovered by Bob White and was featured in a television episode of '']''<ref>{{cite episode |title=UFO Relics |series=UFO Hunters |series-link=UFO Hunters |network=] |airdate=May 6, 2009 |season=3 |number=33}}</ref> but was later found to be accumulated waste metal residue from a grinding machine.<ref>Pat Linse, Ean Harrison (2011) {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220429024657/https://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/11-10-12/#feature |date=April 29, 2022 }} Skeptic magazine, Vol 16 No 3</ref>
* ]
* ], possibly explained in some cases as nests from ] or ].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Heaven and hell : a compulsively readable compendium of myth, legend, wisdom, and wit for saints and sinners|date=2004|publisher=Atlantic Monthly Press|author=Faustino, Mara |isbn=0871136961|location=New York|oclc=55596198}}</ref>
* ]

* ]
====Scientific skepticism====
* ]

|
A ] group that has for many years offered critical analyses of UFO claims is the ] (CSI). One example is the response to local beliefs that "extraterrestrial beings" in UFOs were responsible for crop circles appearing in Indonesia, which the government and the ] (LAPAN) described as "man-made". Thomas Djamaluddin, research professor of astronomy and astrophysics at LAPAN stated: "We have come to agree that this 'thing' cannot be scientifically proven. Scientists have put UFOs in the category of ]."<ref name=Krismantari>{{cite news |title=Crop circles provide food for thought |first=Ika |last=Krismantari |url=http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/2/6/focus/7978671&sec=focus |work=] |publisher=Star Publications |location=Petaling Jaya |date=February 6, 2011 |access-date=September 12, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121030122405/http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2011%2F2%2F6%2Ffocus%2F7978671&sec=focus |archive-date=October 30, 2012 }}</ref>
* ]

* ]
===Governmental===
* ]
{{See also|Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government}}
* ]

* ]
]'s 1995 order to the ] to declassify all documents with "historical value" that were at least 25 years old.]]
* ]
UFOs have been the subject of investigations by various governments that have provided extensive records related to the subject. Many of the most involved government-sponsored investigations ended after agencies concluded that there was no benefit to continued investigation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/17/pentagon-admits-running-secret-ufo-investigation-for-five-years|title=Pentagon admits running secret UFO investigation for five years|last=Siddique|first=Haroon|date=December 17, 2017|website=The Guardian|access-date=March 21, 2018|archive-date=April 25, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200425083827/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/17/pentagon-admits-running-secret-ufo-investigation-for-five-years|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/secret-government-program-track-ufos-its-not-first-180967597/|title=That Secret Government Program to Track UFOs? It's Not the First|last=Eghigian|first=Greg|work=Air & Space Magazine|access-date=March 21, 2018|archive-date=March 18, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200318015440/https://www.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/secret-government-program-track-ufos-its-not-first-180967597/|url-status=live}}</ref> These same negative conclusions also have been found in studies that were highly classified for many years, such as the UK's ], ], the U.S. CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel, the U.S. military investigation into the green fireballs from 1948 to 1951, and the Battelle Memorial Institute study for the USAF from 1952 to 1955 (Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14).
* ]

* ]
Some public government reports have acknowledged the possibility of the physical reality of UFOs, but have stopped short of proposing extraterrestrial origins, though not dismissing the possibility entirely. Examples are the Belgian military investigation into ] in 1989–1991 and the 2009 ] study conclusion (see below).
* ]

|
====Claims by military, government, and aviation personnel====
* ]
In 2007, former ] governor ] claimed he had seen "a massive, delta-shaped craft silently navigate over Squaw Peak, a mountain range in Phoenix, Arizona" in 1997.<ref>{{cite news |last=Symington |first=Fife |author-link=Fife Symington |date=November 9, 2007 |title=Symington: I saw a UFO in the Arizona sky |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/11/09/simington.ufocommentary/ |work=] |publisher=] |location=Atlanta, GA |access-date=November 25, 2013 |archive-date=October 20, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020025403/http://edition.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/11/09/simington.ufocommentary/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ]
Apollo 14 astronaut ] claimed he knew of senior government employees who had been involved in "close encounters", and because of this, he has no doubt that aliens have visited Earth.<ref>Mitchell, Edgar (2008), p. 262</ref>
* ]

* ]
In May 2019, ''The New York Times'' reported that American Navy fighter jets had several instances of unidentified instrumentation and tracking data while conducting exercises off the eastern seaboard of the United States from the summer of 2014 to March 2015. The ''Times'' published a cockpit instrument video that appeared to show an object moving at high speed near the ocean surface as it appeared to rotate, and objects that appeared capable of high acceleration, deceleration and maneuverability. In two separate incidents, a pilot reported his cockpit instruments locked onto and tracked objects but he was unable to see them through his helmet camera. In another encounter, flight instruments recorded an image described as a sphere encasing a cube between two jets as they flew about 100 feet apart.<ref name="NYT-20190526">{{cite news |last1=Cooper |first1=Helene |last2=Blumenthal |first2=Ralph |last3=Kean |first3=Leslie |title='Wow, What Is That?' Navy Pilots Report Unexplained Flying Objects |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/26/us/politics/ufo-sightings-navy-pilots.html |date=May 26, 2019 |work=] |access-date=May 27, 2019 |archive-date=February 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200226005917/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/26/us/politics/ufo-sightings-navy-pilots.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The ] on April 27, 2020.<ref name="TheGuardian-20200527">{{cite news |last1=Strauss |first1=Daniel |title=Pentagon releases three UFO videos taken by US navy pilots |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/27/pentagon-releases-three-ufo-videos-taken-by-us-navy-pilots |date=April 28, 2020 |work=] |access-date=May 10, 2020 |archive-date=May 9, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200509210028/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/27/pentagon-releases-three-ufo-videos-taken-by-us-navy-pilots |url-status=live }}</ref> The ] has said there have been "a number of reports of unauthorized and/or unidentified aircraft entering various military-controlled ranges and designated air space in recent years".<ref name="edition.cnn.com">{{cite news |author=Chandelis Duster |title=Defense Department confirms leaked video of unidentified aerial phenomena is real |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/15/politics/unidentified-aerial-phenomena-defense-department/index.html |work=CNN |access-date=April 16, 2021 |archive-date=April 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210416113817/https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/15/politics/unidentified-aerial-phenomena-defense-department/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ]

* ]
In March 2021, news media announced a comprehensive report is to be compiled of UFO events accumulated by the ] over the years.<ref name="WP-20210323">{{cite news |last=Thebault |first=Reis |title=Thanks to Trump-era covid relief bill, a UFO report may soon be public – and it'll be big, ex-official says |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/03/23/ufo-report-covid-bill/ |date=March 23, 2021 |newspaper=] |access-date=March 23, 2021 |archive-date=March 23, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323220342/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/03/23/ufo-report-covid-bill/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ]

* ]
On April 12, 2021, the Pentagon confirmed the authenticity of pictures and videos gathered by the ] (UAPTF), purportedly showing "pyramid shaped objects" hovering above the ] in 2019, off the coast of ], with spokeswoman Susan Gough saying "I can confirm that the referenced photos and videos were taken by Navy personnel. The UAPTF has included these incidents in their ongoing examinations."<ref>{{cite news |title=Pentagon confirms leaked video of UFO 'buzzing' Navy warships is genuine |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/pentagon-ufo-navy-warship-video-b1830418.html |website=The Independent |language=en |date=April 13, 2021 |access-date=April 16, 2021 |archive-date=May 15, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210515152258/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/pentagon-ufo-navy-warship-video-b1830418.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Leaked footage shows UFOs flying around navy vessels |url=https://news.yahoo.com/leaked-footage-shows-uf-os-flying-around-navy-vessels-113812155.html?guccounter=1 |work=in.news.yahoo.com |access-date=April 16, 2021 |archive-date=April 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210416055308/https://news.yahoo.com/leaked-footage-shows-uf-os-flying-around-navy-vessels-113812155.html?guccounter=1 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Pentagon Confirms That Leaked Video Is Part of UFO Investigation |url=https://futurism.com/leaked-video-unidentified-objects-swarming-navy-warship |website=Futurism |date=April 11, 2021 |access-date=April 16, 2021 |archive-date=May 15, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210515133753/https://futurism.com/leaked-video-unidentified-objects-swarming-navy-warship |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="edition.cnn.com"/>
|}

In May 2021, military pilots recalled their related encounters, along with camera and radar support, including one pilot's account noting that such incidents occurred "every day for at least a couple of years", according to an interview broadcast on the news program, '']'' (May 16, 2021).<ref name="WP-20210517">{{cite news |last=Thebault |first=Reis |title=For some Navy pilots, UFO sightings were an ordinary event: 'Every day for at least a couple years' |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/05/17/ufo-sightings-navy-ryan-graves/ |date=May 17, 2021 |newspaper=] |access-date=May 18, 2021 |archive-date=May 18, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518020102/https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/05/17/ufo-sightings-navy-ryan-graves/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=video |title=Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/video/ufo-military-intelligence-video-60-minutes-2021-05-16/ |website=CBS News |access-date=May 19, 2021 |archive-date=May 19, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210519001325/https://www.cbsnews.com/video/ufo-military-intelligence-video-60-minutes-2021-05-16/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Science writer and skeptic ] suggested the image was the result of an optical effect called a ] which can make out of focus light sources appear triangular or pyramidal due to the shape of the aperture of some lenses.<ref>{{cite web|title=Pentagon Confirms That Leaked Video Is Part of UFO Investigation|url=https://futurism.com/leaked-video-unidentified-objects-swarming-navy-warship|website=Futurism|date=April 11, 2021 |access-date=April 16, 2021|archive-date=May 15, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210515133753/https://futurism.com/leaked-video-unidentified-objects-swarming-navy-warship|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="newyorker">{{cite magazine |last1=Lewis-Kraus |first1=Gideon |title=How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously |magazine=The New Yorker |publisher=New Yorker Magazine |access-date=May 25, 2021 |archive-date=June 23, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230623023008/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously |url-status=live }}</ref> In August, 2022, an article by West provided his detailed analysis of the video.<ref>West, Mick, '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240226053113/https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/gimbal-video-genuine-ufo-or-camera-artifact |date=February 26, 2024 }}'', '']'', August 2, 2022</ref>
]]]
On June 25, 2021, U.S. Defense and ] officials released the nine pages ] (Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) on what they know about a series of unidentified flying objects that have been seen by American military pilots in the skies between 2004 and 2021.<ref>{{cite news |title=UFO report: US finds no explanation for sightings |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57619755 |work=BBC News |date=June 25, 2021 |access-date=July 4, 2021 |archive-date=July 6, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210706173047/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57619755 |url-status=live }}</ref> <ref name=":1">{{Cite news |date=2021-06-26 |title=They're real, but are they alien? – key takeaways from the Pentagon report. Whatever the 'unidentified aerial phenomena' are, they are real objects that may pose a national security risk |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/25/ufo-report-key-takeaways-us-government |access-date=2024-03-18 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708214148/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/25/ufo-report-key-takeaways-us-government |url-status=live }}</ref> The document refers to UAP rather than UFO.

The report does not mentions extraterrestrials, but instead warns of the phenomenon's potential threat to national security, which was the primary motive for writing the study. It concludes that the objects found by the US military appear to be real in the majority of the 144 occurrences documented. Only one of the cases described in the study was identified as a balloon.<ref name=":1"/>

"Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors, to include radar, infrared, electro-optical, weapon seekers, and visual observation", according to the report.<ref name=":1"/> The report also stated that "UAP probably lack a single explanation", and proposed five possible categories of explanation: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, US government or industry development technology, foreign craft, and an "Other" category.<ref name="dni">{{cite web|author=<!--Not stated--> |date=25 June 2021 |title=Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena |url=https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210726114054/https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf |archive-date=26 July 2021 |access-date=26 June 2021 |website=]}}</ref>

Commenting on the document, ] Administrator ] said that he did not think we are alone, but the UFO sightings by pilots "may not be extraterrestrial."<ref>{{cite news |title=NASA administrator on UFO report: 'I don't think we are' alone |url=https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/560507-nasa-administrator-on-ufo-report-i-dont-think-we-are-alone |work=] |date=June 28, 2021 |access-date=July 3, 2021 |archive-date=July 3, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210703164701/https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/560507-nasa-administrator-on-ufo-report-i-dont-think-we-are-alone |url-status=live }}</ref>

In December 2021, further official governmental investigations into UAPs and related, along with annual unclassified reports presented to Congress, have been authorized and funded.<ref name="LAT-20211216">{{cite news |last=Guthrie |first=Dillon |title=Op-Ed: OK! It's time to take UFOs seriously |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-12-16/ufos-pentagon-congress-government |date=December 16, 2021 |work=] |access-date=December 16, 2021 |archive-date=December 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211216112423/https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-12-16/ufos-pentagon-congress-government |url-status=live }}</ref> Some have raised concerns about the new investigations.<ref name="NBC-20220108">{{cite news |last=Seitz-Wald |first=Alex |title=Disclosure or deception? New UFO Pentagon office divides believers – The U.S. government hasn't comprehensively studied UFOs in decades—but not all ufologists are excited about a new Pentagon investigative office. |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/disclosure-or-deception-new-ufo-pentagon-office-divides-believers-n1287199 |date=January 8, 2022 |work=] |access-date=January 9, 2022 |archive-date=January 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220108235315/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/disclosure-or-deception-new-ufo-pentagon-office-divides-believers-n1287199 |url-status=live }}</ref>

] ] in 2023 signed the ] into law as part of the ] on December 14, 2023.<ref name="Mizokami Popular Mechanics UAPDA 2023-12-14">{{Cite web|date=2023-12-14|title=A New Law Forces the U.S. Government to Collect UFO Sightings—But Not Release Them to the Public|url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a46105999/uap-disclosure-act|last1=Mizokami|first1=Kyle|access-date=2024-09-13|url-status=live|website=]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231226035458/https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a46105999/uap-disclosure-act/|archive-date=2023-12-26}}</ref> The 64-page amendment defined and codified 22 technical definitions related to UFOs and non-human intelligence under the law.<ref name="Vincent UAPDA Defense Scoop 2023-07-25">{{Cite web|date=2023-07-25|title=Senators aim to set a mandatory timeline and process for agencies to declassify all UAP records|url=https://www.defensescoop.com/2023/07/25/senate-panel-aims-to-set-a-mandatory-timeline-and-process-for-agencies-to-declassify-all-uap-records|last1=Vincent|first1=Brandi|access-date=2024-09-13|url-status=live|website=Defense Scoop|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231208232752/https://defensescoop.com/2023/07/25/senate-panel-aims-to-set-a-mandatory-timeline-and-process-for-agencies-to-declassify-all-uap-records/|archive-date=2023-12-08}}</ref>

==== Conspiracy theories ====

{{See also|UFO conspiracy theory|Steven M. Greer|Men in black| Brookings Report}}
UFOs are sometimes an element of conspiracy theories in which governments are allegedly intentionally "covering up" the existence of aliens by removing physical evidence of their presence or even collaborating with extraterrestrial beings. There are many versions of this story; some are exclusive, while others overlap with various other conspiracy theories.

In the U.S., an opinion poll conducted in 1997 suggested that 80% of Americans believed the U.S. government was withholding such information.<ref>{{cite press release |title=Is the Government Hiding Facts On UFOs & Extraterrestrial Life?; New Roper Poll Reveals that More Than Two-Thirds of Americans Think So |date=October 15, 2002 |publisher=] |location=New York |url=http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Is+the+Government+Hiding+Facts+On+UFOs+%26+Extraterrestrial+Life%3F%3B+New...-a092843602 |access-date=September 12, 2013 |archive-date=December 2, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202230015/http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Is+the+Government+Hiding+Facts+On+UFOs+%26+Extraterrestrial+Life%3F%3B+New...-a092843602 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="cnn97">{{cite news |title=Poll: U.S. hiding knowledge of aliens |url=http://www.cnn.com/US/9706/15/ufo.poll/index.html |work=CNN |publisher=Turner Broadcasting System |location=Atlanta, GA |date=June 15, 1997 |access-date=September 12, 2013 |archive-date=October 17, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017204345/http://www.cnn.com/US/9706/15/ufo.poll/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Various notables have also expressed such views. Some examples are astronauts Gordon Cooper and Edgar Mitchell, Senator ], Vice Admiral ] (the first CIA director), ] (former British Chief of Defense Staff and NATO head), the 1999 French COMETA study by various French generals and aerospace experts, and ] (former director of CNES, new director of French UFO research organization GEIPAN).<ref name="geipan" />

In June 2023, United States Air Force officer and former intelligence official ] claimed that the U.S. federal government has maintained a highly secretive UFO retrieval program since the 1940s and that the government possesses multiple spacecraft of "non-human" origin.<ref name="entin">{{cite web |last=Entin |first=Brian |date=5 June 2023 |title=Military whistleblower claims US has UFO retrieval program |url=https://www.newsnationnow.com/space/military-whistleblowe-us-ufo-retrieval-program/ |access-date=6 June 2023 |website=NewsNation |archive-date=June 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230606144841/https://www.newsnationnow.com/space/military-whistleblowe-us-ufo-retrieval-program/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Wallace |first=Danielle |date=6 June 2023 |title=Military whistleblower goes public with claims US has secret UFO retrieval program: 'Terrestrial arms race' |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/military-whistleblower-public-claims-us-secret-ufo-retrieval-program-terrestrial-arms-race |access-date=6 June 2023 |website=Fox News |archive-date=June 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230606212634/https://www.foxnews.com/politics/military-whistleblower-public-claims-us-secret-ufo-retrieval-program-terrestrial-arms-race |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Coen |first=Susie |date=7 June 2023 |title='Non-human spacecraft' found by US 'for decades' |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/06/07/ufos-made-with-non-human-materials-found-by-us/ |access-date=9 June 2023 |website=The Telegraph |archive-date=June 10, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230610035130/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/06/07/ufos-made-with-non-human-materials-found-by-us/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="gab9">{{cite web |last=Gabbatt |first=Adam |date=9 June 2023 |title=A whistleblower claims the US has alien vehicles. But where's the proof? |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/09/ufo-alien-vehicles-us-whistleblower-evidence-where-is-proof |access-date=9 June 2023 |work=The Guardian |archive-date=June 10, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230610032500/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/09/ufo-alien-vehicles-us-whistleblower-evidence-where-is-proof |url-status=live }}</ref>

===== "Disclosure" advocates =====
In May 2001, a press conference was held at the ] in ], by an organization called the ], featuring twenty persons including retired Air Force and FAA personnel, intelligence officers and an air traffic controller.<ref>{{YouTube|id=K5Mv0_RFEB8|title=2001 National Press Club Event|link=no}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Government is covering up UFO evidence, group says |first=Julia |last=Duin |url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2001/may/11/20010511-022955-2774r/ |newspaper=] |publisher=] |location=Washington, D.C. |date=May 11, 2001 |access-date=September 11, 2013 |archive-date=January 19, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160119203739/http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2001/may/11/20010511-022955-2774r/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=They're Here; UFO Watchers to Reveal Proof That Aliens Have Visited Earth |first=Vicky |last=Spavin |url=http://www.thefreelibrary.com/They%27re+Here%3B+UFO+watchers+to+reveal+proof+that+aliens+have+visited...-a074321804 |work=] |publisher=] |location=Glasgow |date=May 9, 2001 |access-date=March 10, 2013 |archive-date=March 5, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305060038/http://www.thefreelibrary.com/They%27re+Here%3B+UFO+watchers+to+reveal+proof+that+aliens+have+visited...-a074321804 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Group Calls for Disclosure of UFO Info |first1=Katelynn |last1=Raymer |first2=David |last2=Ruppe |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98572 |work=] |date=May 10, 2001 |access-date=March 11, 2013 |archive-date=July 28, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130728235120/http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98572 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=UFO spotters slam 'US cover-up' |first=Rob |last=Watson |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1322432.stm |work=BBC News |publisher=BBC |location=London |date=May 10, 2001 |access-date=September 11, 2013 |archive-date=July 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190723074515/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1322432.stm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Men in Suits See Aliens as Part of Solution, Not Problem |first=Sharon |last=Kehnemui |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/men-in-suits-see-aliens-as-part-of-solution-not-problem |work=FoxNews.com |publisher=Fox Entertainment Group |location=New York |date=May 10, 2001 |access-date=May 10, 2007 |archive-date=August 25, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130825092411/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,24364,00.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Ooo-WEE-ooo Fans Come to D.C. |first=Declan |last=McCullagh |author-link=Declan McCullagh |url=https://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2001/05/43526 |work=] |publisher=] |location=Waltham, MA |date=May 10, 2001 |access-date=May 10, 2007 |archive-date=June 9, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080609085452/http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2001/05/43526 |url-status=live }}</ref> They all gave a brief account of their claims that evidence of UFOs was being suppressed and said they would be willing to testify under oath to a Congressional committee. According to a 2002 report in the ], Disclosure Project founder ] is an "alien theorist" who claims "proof of government coverup" consisting of 120 hours of testimony from various government officials on the topic of UFOs, including astronaut ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Alien theorist offers proof of government coverup |first=Brad |last=Schmidt |url=http://dailyemerald.com/2002/04/25/alien-theorist-offers-proof-of-government-coverup/ |newspaper=] |location=Eugene, OR |date=April 25, 2002 |access-date=December 12, 2012 |archive-date=August 14, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120814040025/http://dailyemerald.com/2002/04/25/alien-theorist-offers-proof-of-government-coverup/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

In 2007, the German UFO conspiracy forum ] was created. The website's name references the concept of disclosure.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last1=Thomas |first1=W. F. |date=12 January 2022 |title=Disclose.tv: Conspiracy Forum Turned Disinformation Factory |url=https://www.logically.ai/articles/disclose.tv-conspiracy-forum-turned-disinformation-factory |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220112153617/https://www.logically.ai/articles/disclose.tv-conspiracy-forum-turned-disinformation-factory |archive-date=12 January 2022 |access-date=2022-10-26 |website=] |language=en |quote=The name "Disclose" references the concept within UFO enthusiast circles of "disclosure," the time when the government will confirm the existence of aliens and release information regarding them.}}</ref>

On September 27, 2010, a group of six former USAF officers and one former enlisted Air Force man held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on the theme "U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects"<ref>{{cite press release |last1=Salas |first1=Robert |last2=Hastings |first2=Robert |title=U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects |date=September 15, 2010 |publisher=] |location=Washington, D.C. |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUS166901+15-Sep-2010+PRN20100915 |access-date=September 11, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110127022656/http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS166901+15-Sep-2010+PRN20100915 |archive-date=January 27, 2011 }} {{YouTube|id=lR3Fhyi14Pw|title="National Press Club: UFOs Tampering with Nukes – Part 1/7"|link=no}}</ref> in which they claimed they had witnessed UFOs hovering near missile sites and even disarming the missiles.

From April 29 to May 3, 2013, the Paradigm Research Group held the "Citizen Hearing on Disclosure" at the National Press Club. The group paid former U.S. Senator ] and former Representatives ], ], ], ], and ] $20,000 each to hear testimony from a panel of researchers which included witnesses from military, agency, and political backgrounds.<ref>{{cite news |title=Ex-Rep. Kilpatrick 'waiting to hear' evidence of space aliens |first=Marisa |last=Schultz |url=http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130429/POLITICS03/304290397 |work=] |publisher=] |date=April 29, 2013 |access-date=September 11, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130531170741/http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130429/POLITICS03/304290397 |archive-date=May 31, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.citizenhearing.org/ |title=Citizen Hearing on Disclosure |website=Citizen Hearing on Disclosure |publisher=Paradigm Research Group |location=Bethesda, MD |access-date=September 11, 2013 |archive-date=September 15, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130915073916/http://www.citizenhearing.org/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

===Fringe===
The void left by the lack of institutional or scientific study has given rise to independent researchers and fringe groups, including the ] (NICAP) in the mid-20th century and, more recently, the ] (MUFON)<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mufon.com/ |title=Mutual UFO Network |website=MUFON.com |publisher=] |location=Cincinnati, OH |access-date=July 13, 2013 |archive-date=December 21, 1997 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19971221203858/http://mufon.com/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and the ] (CUFOS).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cufos.org/org.html |title=Center for UFO Studies |website=CUFOS.org |publisher=] |location=Chicago |access-date=July 13, 2013 |archive-date=October 21, 1997 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19971021071948/http://www.cufos.org/org.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The term "]" is used to describe the collective efforts of those who study reports and associated evidence of unidentified flying objects.<ref>{{cite news |title=UFO Sightings Increase 67 Percent In 3 Years, History Channel Investigates Unexplained Aerial Phenomena |first=Lee |last=Speigel |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/26/ufos-pilots-history-channel_n_935847.html |work=] |publisher=] |date=August 26, 2011 |access-date=July 13, 2013 |archive-date=September 9, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130909064325/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/26/ufos-pilots-history-channel_n_935847.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

===Private===
Some private studies have been neutral in their conclusions but argued that the inexplicable core cases call for continued scientific study. Examples are the Sturrock panel study of 1998 and the 1970 AIAA review of the Condon Report.

=== Religious ===
UFOs have been interpreted by some groups in a religious way, often influenced by the ] tradition. Some Christians have interpreted UFOs as ]ic entities.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Partridge |first=Christopher |date=July 2004 |title=Alien demonology: The Christian roots of the malevolent extraterrestrial in UFO religions and abduction spiritualities |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1016/j.religion.2004.04.014 |journal=Religion |language=en |volume=34 |issue=3 |pages=163–189 |doi=10.1016/j.religion.2004.04.014 |issn=0048-721X |access-date=June 13, 2024 |archive-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708214149/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1016/j.religion.2004.04.014 |url-status=live }}</ref>

===Ufology===

{{Main|Ufology}}
] by RAF Fylingdales, 2004]]

''Ufology'' is a ] describing the collective efforts of those who study UFO reports and associated evidence.

====Researchers====

{{Main|List of ufologists}}

====Sightings====

{{Main|List of reported UFO sightings}}

====Organizations====

{{Main|List of UFO organizations}}

==In popular culture==

{{Main|UFOs in fiction}}
], ]]]

UFOs have constituted a widespread international ] since the 1950s. ] rank UFOs near the top of lists for subjects of widespread recognition. In 1973, a survey found that 95 percent of the public reported having heard of UFOs, whereas only 92 percent had heard of ] ] in a 1977 poll taken just nine months after he left the White House.<ref>], Chapter: "UFOs: Lost in the Myths" by Thomas E. Bullard, p. 141</ref><ref>], Chapter: "UFOs, the Military, and the Early Cold War Era" by ], pp. 82–121</ref>

A 1996 Gallup Poll reported that 71 percent of the United States population believed the U.S. government was covering up information regarding UFOs. A 2002 ] for the ] found similar results, but with more people believing UFOs are extraterrestrial craft. In that latest poll, 56 percent thought UFOs were real craft and 48 percent that aliens had visited the Earth. Again, about 70 percent felt the government was not sharing everything it knew about UFOs or extraterrestrial life.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.scifi.com/ufo/roper/ |title=The Roper Poll |work=Ufology Resource Center |publisher=] |date=September 2002 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060713204836/http://www.scifi.com/ufo/roper/ <!--Bot retrieved archive--> |archive-date=July 13, 2006 |access-date=August 19, 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mufon.com/fastfacts.htm |title=UFO Fast Facts |website=MUFON.com |publisher=Mutual UFO Network, Inc. |location=Cincinnati, OH |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080430100715/http://www.mufon.com/fastfacts.htm |archive-date=April 30, 2008 |access-date=July 13, 2013}}</ref>

Another effect of the flying saucer type of UFO sightings has been Earth-made flying saucer craft in space fiction, for example the United Planets Cruiser ] in '']'' (1956), the '']''<!--No correction needed.--> in '']'', and the saucer section of the ] in '']''. UFOs and ] have been featured ].

The intense secrecy surrounding the secret Nevada base, known as ], has made it the frequent subject of conspiracy theories and a central component of UFO folklore. In July 2019, more than 2 million people replied to a ] which appeared in an anonymous Facebook post.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/storm-area-51-when-where-aliens-military-base-raid-facebook-event-a9005546.html|title=Storm Area 51: Are Alien-hunters Really Planning to 'Raid' the Secret U.S. Military Base?|first=Andrew|last=Griffin|newspaper=The Independent|date=July 17, 2019|access-date=July 3, 2021|archive-date=July 16, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190716140827/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/storm-area-51-when-where-aliens-military-base-raid-facebook-event-a9005546.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Two music festivals in rural Nevada, "AlienStock" and "Storm Area 51 Basecamp", were subsequently organized to capitalize on the popularity of the original Facebook event.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-area51/in-nevada-desert-area-51-raid-lures-festive-ufo-hunters-three-arrested-idUSKBN1W51H6|title=Area 51 raid lures festive UFO hunters to Nevada desert; five arrested|last=Richwine|first=Lisa|date=September 20, 2019|work=Reuters|access-date=July 3, 2021|archive-date=November 23, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201123210209/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-area51/in-nevada-desert-area-51-raid-lures-festive-ufo-hunters-three-arrested-idUSKBN1W51H6|url-status=live}}</ref> 150 people showed up to the Area 51 entrance and attendance at the festivals was 1,500<ref>{{cite news |last1=Baynes |first1=Chris |title=Storm Area 51: Hundreds of people gather at US military base to 'see them aliens' |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/storm-area-51-military-aliens-nevada-rachel-a9114211.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220525/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/storm-area-51-military-aliens-nevada-rachel-a9114211.html |archive-date=May 25, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |newspaper=] |date=September 21, 2019|access-date=September 23, 2019}}</ref>

==Notes==

{{Notelist}}
{{Reflist|group="note"}}


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|2}}


{{Reflist|30em}}
====General====
{{refbegin}}


==Bibliography==
*], "UFOs: Lost in the Myths", pages 141&ndash;191 in "UFOs, the Military, and the Early Cold War Era", pages 82&ndash;121 in "UFOs and Abductions: Challenging the Borders of Knowledge" David M. Jacobs, editor; 2000, University Press of Kansas, ISBN 0-7006-1032-4
===General===
*], ''The UFO Book: Encyclopedia of the Extraterrestrial'', 1998, Visible Ink Press, ISBN 1-57859-029-9. Many classic cases and UFO history provided in great detail; highly documented.
{{refbegin|30em}}
*{{cite journal
* Bullard, Thomas; (2012). ''The Myth and Mystery of UFOs''. Lawrence: University of Kansas. {{ISBN|978-0-7006-1729-6}}.
|author=J. Deardorff, B. Haisch, B. Maccabee, ]
* {{cite book |last=Clark |first=Jerome |author-link=Jerome Clark |title=The UFO Book: Encyclopedia of the Extraterrestrial |date=1998 |publisher=] |location=Detroit, MI |isbn=1-57859-029-9 |oclc=37370629 |lccn=97035767 |ref=Clark |url=https://archive.org/details/ufobookencyclope0000clar }} Many classic cases and UFO history provided in great detail; highly documented.
|title=Inflation-Theory Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitation
* {{cite book |last=Curran |first=Douglas |others=Foreword by ] |title=In Advance of the Landing: Folk Concepts of Outer Space |edition=Revised |orig-year=1st edition originally published 1985; New York: ] |date=2001 |publisher=Abbeville Press |location=New York |isbn=0-7892-0708-7 |oclc=45270419 |lccn=00052589 |ref=Curran}} Non-sensational but fair treatment of contemporary UFO legend and lore in N. America, including the so-called "contactee cults". The author traveled the United States with his camera and tape recorder and directly interviewed many individuals.
|journal=]
* {{cite journal |last1=Deardorff |first1=J. |last2=Haisch |first2=B. |author-link2=Bernard Haisch |last3=Maccabee |first3=B. |author-link3=Bruce Maccabee |last4=Puthoff |first4=H. E. |author-link4=Harold E. Puthoff |date=2005 |title=Inflation-Theory Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitation |journal=] |volume=58 |pages=43–50 |location=London |publisher=] |issn=0007-084X |bibcode=2005JBIS...58...43D |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238693432 |access-date=September 21, 2018 |archive-date=July 8, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240708214153/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238693432_Inflation-Theory_Implications_for_Extraterrestrial_Visitation |url-status=live }}
|year=2005
* {{cite book |last=Friedman |first=Stanton T. |author-link=Stanton T. Friedman |title=Flying Saucers and Science: A Scientist Investigates the Mysteries of UFOs |date=2008 |publisher=New Page Books |location=Franklin Lakes, NJ |isbn=978-1-60163-011-7 |oclc=179812690 |lccn=2008006291 |ref=Friedman 2008}}
|volume=58
* Greer, Steven M.; (2001). ''Disclosure''. Crozer: Crossing Point. {{ISBN|0-9673238-1-9}}.
|pages=43–50
* {{cite book |editor-last=Hall |editor-first=Richard H. |editor-link=Richard H. Hall |title=The UFO Evidence |edition=Reissue |orig-year=Originally published 1964; Washington, D.C.: ] (NICAP) |date=1997 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=0-7607-0627-1 |oclc=39544334 |lccn=64006912 |ref=Hall 1997}} Well-organized, exhaustive summary and analysis of 746 unexplained NICAP cases out of 5000 total cases—a classic.
|url=http://www.ufoskeptic.org/JBIS.pdf
* {{cite book |editor-last=Hall |editor-first=Richard H. |title=UFO Evidence: Volume II, A 30-year Report |year=2001 |publisher=] |location=Lanham, MD |isbn=0-8108-3881-8 |oclc=44391782 |lccn=00055624 |ref=Hall 2001}} Another exhaustive case study, more recent UFO reports.
}}
* {{cite book |last=Hendry |first=Allan |author-link=Allan Hendry |others=Foreword by ] |title=The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and Reporting UFO Sightings |edition= |date=1979 |publisher=] |location=Garden City, NY |isbn=0-385-14348-6 |oclc=4642190 |lccn=78008211 |ref=Hendry}} Skeptical but balanced analysis of 1300 CUFOS UFO cases.
*Curran, Douglas. ''In Advance of the Landing: Folk Concepts of Outer Space''. (revised edition), Abbeville Press, 2001. ISBN 0-7892-0708-7. Non-sensational but fair treatment of contemporary UFO legend and lore in N. America, including the so-called "contactee cults." The author traveled the United States with his camera and tape recorder and directly interviewed many individuals.
* {{cite book |last=Hynek |first=J. Allen |author-link=J. Allen Hynek |title=The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry |url=https://archive.org/details/ufoexperience00jall |url-access=registration |date=1972 |publisher=] |location=Chicago |oclc=341112 |lccn=76183827 |ref=Hynek 1972 }}
*Hall, Richard H., editor. ''The UFO Evidence: Volume 1''. 1964, ], reissued 1997, Barnes & Noble Books, ISBN 0-7607-0627-1. Well-organized, exhaustive summary and analysis of 746 unexplained NICAP cases out of 5000 total cases — a classic.
* {{cite book |last=Hynek |first=J. Allen |others=New foreword by ] |title=The Hynek UFO Report |orig-year=Originally published 1977; New York: ] |date=1997 |publisher=Barnes & Noble Books |location=New York |isbn=0-7607-0429-5 |oclc=3601609 |ref=Hynek 1997}} Analysis of 640 high-quality cases through 1969 by UFO legend Hynek.
*Hall, Richard H. ''The UFO Evidence: A Thirty-Year Report''. Scarecrow Press, 2001. ISBN 0-8108-3881-8. Another exhaustive case study, more recent UFO reports.
* {{cite book |editor-last=Jacobs |editor-first=David M. |editor-link=David M. Jacobs |title=UFOs and Abductions: Challenging the Borders of Knowledge |date=2000 |publisher=] |location=Lawrence |isbn=0-7006-1032-4 |oclc=43615835 |lccn=00028970 |ref=Jacobs |url=https://archive.org/details/ufosabductions00davi }}
*Hendry, Alan. ''The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and Reporting UFO Sightings''. New York: Doubleday & Co., 1979. ISBN 0-385-14348-6. Skeptical but balanced analysis of 1300 ] UFO cases.
* {{cite book |last=Kean |first=Leslie |author-link= Leslie Kean|title=UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go on the Record |date=2010 |publisher= Harmony Books }}
*]. ''The UFO Experience: A scientific inquiry''. Henry Regnery Co., 1972.
* {{cite book |publisher = Éd. Sainte Jeanne d'Arc |isbn = 978-2-9504914-8-0 |last = Kérizo, Alain |title = Les OVNI identifiés: les extraterrestres dans le mystère d'iniquité |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=cOuXGQAACAAJ |location = Villegenon |date = 1997 |oclc = 465784973 |language = fr |access-date = October 21, 2020 |archive-date = July 8, 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240708214149/https://books.google.com/books?id=cOuXGQAACAAJ |url-status = live }} ( {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150412034718/http://www.angelusonline.org/index.php?section=articles&subsection=show_article&article_id=2102 |date=April 12, 2015 }})
*Hynek, J. Allen. ''The Hynek UFO Report''. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1997. ISBN 0-7607-0429-5. Analysis of 640 high-quality cases through 1969 by UFO legend Hynek.
* {{cite book |last=Keyhoe |first=Donald |author-link=Donald Keyhoe |title=The Flying Saucers are Real |url=http://www.nicap.org/fsar/fsar-chapters.htm |access-date=September 6, 2013 |date=1950 |publisher=] |location=New York |oclc=1674240 |lccn=50004886 |ref=Keyhoe 1950 |archive-date=September 6, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130906214600/http://www.nicap.org/fsar/fsar-chapters.htm |url-status=live }}
* Rose, Bill and Buttler, Tony. ''Flying Saucer Aircraft (Secret Projects)''. Leicester, UK: Midland Publishing, 2006. ISBN 1-85780-233-0.
* {{cite book |last=Keyhoe |first=Donald E. |title=Flying Saucers from Outer Space |url=http://www.nicap.org/books/fsos/fsos.htm |access-date=May 16, 2013 |edition= |date=1953 |publisher=] |location=New York |oclc=181368 |lccn=53009588 |ref=Keyhoe 1953 |archive-date=May 14, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130514145116/http://www.nicap.org/books/fsos/fsos.htm |url-status=live }}
*] & Page. Thornton, editors. ''UFOs: A Scientific Debate''. \Cornell University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-7607-0192-2. Pro and con articles by scientists, mostly to the skeptical side.
* {{cite book |last=Latagliata |first=Rosamaria |title=UFO: verità o menzogna? |series=Gli atlanti di Voyager |date=2006 |publisher=Giunti Editore |location=Florence |language=it |isbn=978-88-09-04698-6 |oclc=635701671 |ref=Latagliata}}
*] ''The UFO Verdict: Examining the Evidence'', 1986, ] ISBN 0-87975-338-2
* {{cite book |last=McCarthy |first=Paul E. |title=Politicking and Paradigm Shifting: James E. McDonald and the UFO Case Study |url=http://www.project1947.com/shg/mccarthy/shgintro.html |access-date=July 13, 2013 |type=Thesis/dissertation |edition=Internet |date=1975 |publisher=Sign Historical Group |location=Canterbury, CT |oclc=663722044 |ref=McCarthy 1975 |archive-date=September 10, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120910051428/http://www.project1947.com/shg/mccarthy/shgintro.html |url-status=live }}
*] ''UFO Sightings: The Evidence'', 1998, Prometheus Books, ISBN 1-57392-213-7 (revised edition of ''The UFO Verdict'')
* {{cite book |last1=Menzel |first1=Donald H. |author-link1=Donald Howard Menzel |last2=Taves |first2=Ernest H. |others=Introduction by ] |title=The UFO Enigma: The Definitive Explanation of the UFO Phenomenon |url=https://archive.org/details/ufoenigmadefinit0000menz |url-access=registration |edition= |date=1977 |publisher=Doubleday |location=Garden City, NY |isbn=0-385-03596-9 |oclc=2597609 |lccn=76016255 |ref=Menzel & Taves }}
*] (1999). ''The UFO Enigma: A New Review of the Physical Evidence.'' New York: Warner Books. ISBN 0-446-52565-0
* Mitchell, Edgar; (2008). ''The Way of the Explorer''. Franklin Lakes: Career Press. {{ISBN|978-1-56414-977-0}}.
*, a virtual museum exhibition at Library and Archives Canada
* Office of the Director of National Intelligence (USA); (2021). ''Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena''
* {{cite news
|title=Reasons to Believe (a collection of short articles by nine different authors)
|newspaper=]
|date=April 1, 2018
|pages=25–33}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rose |first1=Bill |last2=Buttler |first2=Tony |title=Flying Saucer Aircraft |series=Secret Projects |date=2004 | publisher=] |location=Hinckley, England |isbn=978-1-85780-233-7 |oclc=99774524 |ref=Rose & Buttler}}
* {{cite book |title=UFO's: A Scientific Debate |editor1-last=Sagan |editor1-first=Carl |editor1-link=Carl Sagan |editor2-last=Page |editor2-first=Thornton |edition=Reprint |orig-year= 1972 |date=1996 |publisher=]<!--No correction needed.--> |location=New York |isbn=978-0-7607-0196-6 |oclc=35840064 |lccn=72004572 |ref=Sagan & Page}}
* {{cite book |last=Scully |first=Frank |author-link=Frank Scully |title=Behind the Flying Saucers |url=https://archive.org/details/behindflyingsauc00scul |url-access=registration |date=1950 |publisher=Henry Holt and Company |location=New York |oclc=1467735 |ref=Scully }}
* {{cite book |last=Sheaffer |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Sheaffer |title=The UFO Verdict: Examining the Evidence |date=1981 |publisher=] |location=Buffalo, NY |isbn=0-87975-146-0 |oclc=7364885 |lccn=80084406 |ref=Scheaffer 1981}}
* {{cite book |last=Sheaffer |first=Robert |title=UFO Sightings: The Evidence |date=1998 |publisher=Prometheus Books |location=Amherst, NY |isbn=1-57392-213-7 |oclc=38738821 |lccn=98006410 |ref=Scheaffer 1998}} Revised edition of ''The UFO Verdict''.
* {{cite book |last=Stanford |first=Ray |title=Socorro 'Saucer' in a Pentagon Pantry |edition=|date=1976 |publisher=Blueapple Books |location=Austin, TX |isbn=0-917092-00-7 |oclc=2524239 |lccn=76013768 |ref=Stanford}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Sturrock |first1=Peter A. |author-link1=Peter A. Sturrock |last2=Holzer |first2=T. E. |last3=Jahn |first3=R. |last4=Pritchard |first4=D. E. |last5=Puthoff |first5=H. E. |last6=Terzian |first6=Y. |last7=Tolbert |first7=C. R. |date=1998 |title=Physical Evidence Related to UFO Reports: The Proceedings of a Workshop Held at the Pocantico Conference Center, Tarrytown, New York, September 29 – October 4, 1997 |journal=] |volume=12 |issue=2 |pages=179–229 |location=Stanford, CA |publisher=] |issn=0892-3310 |access-date=September 8, 2013 |url=http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_12_2_sturrock.pdf |display-authors=3 |ref=Sturrock, et al. 1998 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100107163656/http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_12_2_sturrock.pdf |archive-date=January 7, 2010 }}{{unreliable source?|date=February 2020}} Sturrock panel report on physical evidence.
* {{cite book |last=Sturrock |first=Peter A. |author-link=Peter A. Sturrock |title=The UFO Enigma: A New Review of the Physical Evidence |date=1999 |publisher=Warner Books |location=New York |isbn=0-446-52565-0 |oclc=42645835 |lccn=99066643 |ref=Sturrock 1999 |url=https://archive.org/details/ufoenigma00pete }}
* {{cite book |last=Vallée |first=Jacques |author-link=Jacques Vallée |title=Revelations: Alien Contact and Human Deception |orig-year=Originally published 1991; New York: ] |date=2008 |publisher=] |location=San Antonio, TX |isbn=978-1-933665-30-6 |oclc=225866107 |lccn=91091858 |ref=Vallée 2008 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/revelationsalien0000vall }}
* {{cite book |last=Viberti |first=Pier Giorgio |title=Incontri ravvicinati: Avvistamenti e contatti da mondi lontani |orig-year=Originally published 1997 |series=Atlanti del sapere |date=2010 |publisher=Giunti Editore |location=Florence |language=it |isbn=978-88-09-75032-6 |oclc=800130536 |ref=Viberti 2010}}


===History===
{{refend}}
* {{cite book |last=Clarke |first=David |title=The UFO Files: The Inside Story of Real-Life Sightings |date=2009 |publisher=] |location=Kew |isbn=978-1-905615-50-6 |oclc=316039535 |ref=Clarke|title-link=The UFO Files: The Inside Story of Real-Life Sightings }} Reports from the UK government files.
* {{cite book | last = Cohen | first = Daniel | title = The Great Airship Mystery: A UFO of the 1890s | publisher = Dodd, Mead & Co. | year = 1981 | isbn = 0396079903 }}
* {{cite book |last=Dolan |first=Richard M. |author-link=Richard M. Dolan |title=UFOs and the National Security State: An Unclassified History, Volume One: 1941–1973 |edition=|date=2000 |publisher=Keyhole Publishing Company |location=Rochester, NY |isbn=0-9677995-0-3 |oclc=45546629 |lccn=00691087 |ref=Dolan}} Dolan is a professional historian.
* {{cite book |last1=Downes |first1=Jonathan |last2=Wright |first2=Nigel |title=The Rising of the Moon |edition=Revised |date=2005 |publisher=Xiphos Books |location=Bangor, Northern Ireland |isbn=978-0-9544936-5-3 |oclc=70335856 |ref=Downes & Wright}}
* {{cite book |last1=Fawcett |first1=Lawrence |last2=Greenwood |first2=Barry J. |title=The UFO Cover-up: What the Government Won't Say |others=Foreword by J. Allen Hynek |orig-year=Originally published 1984 as ''Clear Intent''; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: ] |edition=1st Fireside |date=1992 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=0-671-76555-8 |oclc=28384401 |lccn=84009818 |ref=Fawcett & Greenwood 1992}} Many UFO documents.
* {{cite book |last=Good |first=Timothy |others=Foreword by ] |title=Above Top Secret: The Worldwide UFO Cover-Up |url=https://archive.org/details/abovetopsecretwo00good |url-access=registration |edition=1st Quill |date=1988 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=0-688-09202-0 |oclc=707516815 |lccn=88208434 |ref=Good 1988 }} Many UFO documents.
* {{cite book |last=Good |first=Timothy |others=Foreword by Lord Hill-Norton |title=Beyond Top Secret: The Worldwide UFO Security Threat |edition=Fully revised and updated |orig-year=1996 |date=1997 |publisher=] |location=London |isbn=0-330-34928-7 |oclc=38490850 |ref=Good 1997}}
* {{cite book |last=Good |first=Timothy |title=Need to Know: UFOs, the Military, and Intelligence |date=2007 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=978-1-933648-38-5 |oclc=180767460 |ref=Good 2007 |url=https://archive.org/details/needtoknow00good }} Update of ''Above Top Secret'' with new cases and documents
* {{cite book |title=UFO: The Inside Story of the US Government's Search for Alien Life Here―and Out There |year=2023 |first=Garrett M. |last=Graff |publisher=Avid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster |isbn= 978-1982196776}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hall |first1=Michael D. |last2=Connors |first2=Wendy A. |title=Alfred Loedding & the Great Flying Saucer Wave of 1947 |url=http://www.nicap.org/loedding/LoeddingBook.pdf |access-date=September 7, 2013 |date=1998 |publisher=White Rose Press |location=Albuquerque, NM |oclc=41104299 |ref=Hall & Connors |archive-date=March 25, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180325055530/http://www.nicap.org/loedding/LoeddingBook.pdf |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last=Keel |first=John |author-link=John Keel |title=Operation Trojan Horse |url=http://galaksija.com/literatura/jk_oth.pdf |orig-year=Originally published 1970 as ''UFOs: Operation Trojan Horse''; New York: ] |date=1996 |publisher=IllumiNet Press |location=Lilburn, GA |isbn=978-0-9626534-6-9 |oclc=34474485 |lccn=96014564 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130420102608/http://galaksija.com/literatura/jk_oth.pdf |archive-date=April 20, 2013 }}
* {{cite book |last=Kocher |first=George |title=UFOs: What to Do |url=http://www.theblackvault.com/documents/ufoswhattodo.pdf |access-date=September 7, 2013 |date=November 1968 |publisher=] |id=DRU-1571 |ref=Kocher |archive-date=March 19, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130319134955/http://www.theblackvault.com/documents/ufoswhattodo.pdf |url-status=live }} UFO historical review, case studies, review of hypotheses, recommendations.
* {{cite book |last=Maccabee |first=Bruce |author-link=Bruce Maccabee |title=UFO FBI Connection: The Secret History of the Government's Cover-Up |edition= |date=2000 |publisher=] |location=St. Paul, MN |isbn=1-56718-493-6 |oclc=43634902 |lccn=00028277 |ref=Maccabee 2000 |url=https://archive.org/details/ufofbiconnection00phdb }}
* {{cite book |last=Randle |first=Kevin D. |author-link=Kevin D. Randle |title=Project Blue Book Exposed |edition= |date=1997 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=1-56924-746-3 |oclc=37047544 |lccn=97072378 |ref=Randle |url=https://archive.org/details/projectbluebooke00rand }}
* {{cite book |last=Ruppelt |first=Edward J. |author-link=Edward J. Ruppelt |title=The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects |url=http://www.nicap.org/rufo/contents.htm |edition=|date=1956 |publisher=Doubleday & Company, Inc. |location=Garden City, NY |oclc=1941793 |lccn=56005444 |ref=Ruppelt |access-date=August 28, 2004 |archive-date=May 16, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110516214046/http://www.nicap.org/rufo/contents.htm |url-status=live }} A UFO classic by insider Ruppelt, the first head of the USAF Project Blue Book.
* {{cite book |last1=Swords |first1=Michael |author-link1=Michael D. Swords |last2=Powell |first2=Robert |last3=Svahn |first3=Clas |last4=Olmos |first4=Vicente-Juan |last5=Chalker |first5=Bill |author-link5=Bill Chalker |last6=Greenwood |first6=Barry |last7=Thieme |first7=Richard |last8=Aldrich |first8=Jan |last9=Purcell |first9=Steve |title=UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry |date=2012 |publisher=Anomalist Books |location=San Antonio, TX |isbn=978-1-933665-58-0 |oclc=809977863 |display-authors=2 |ref=Swords & Powell |url=https://archive.org/details/UFOsAndGovernment }}
* {{cite book |last=Weinstein |first=Dominique F. |title=Unidentified Aerial Phenomena: Eighty Years of Pilot Sightings |url=http://www.narcap.org/files/narcap_revised_tr-4.pdf |access-date=September 6, 2013 |date=February 2001 |publisher=National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP) |location=Boulder Creek, CA |id=NARCAP TR-04 |ref=Weinstein 2001 |archive-date=June 12, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130612214228/http://www.narcap.org/files/narcap_revised_tr-4.pdf |url-status=live }}


====Skepticism==== ===Psychology===
* {{cite book |editor-last=Haines |editor-first=Richard F. |title=UFO Phenomena and the Behavioral Scientist |date=1979 |publisher=Scarecrow Press |location=Metuchen, NJ |isbn=0-8108-1228-2 |oclc=5008381 |lccn=79014878 |ref=Haines 1979}}
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite book |last=Jung |first=C G |author-link=Carl Jung |title=Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies |others=Translation by R.F.C. Hull |orig-year=Originally published 1958 as ''Ein moderner Mythus: von Dingen, die am Himmel gesehen werden'' |date=1978 |publisher=] |location=Princeton, NJ |isbn=0-691-01822-7 |oclc=4762238 |lccn=78004325 |ref=Jung |url=https://archive.org/details/flyingsaucersmod00jung }}
* {{cite journal |last=Simón |first=Armando |date=February 1976 |title=UFOs: Testing for the existence of Air Force censorship |journal=Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=3–5 |issn=0033-3077 |ref=Simón 1976}}
* {{cite journal |last=Simón |first=Armando |date=1981 |title=A Nonreactive, Quantitative Study of Mass Behavior with Emphasis on the Cinema as Behavior Catalyst |journal=] |volume=48 |issue=3 |pages=775–785 |publisher=Ammons Scientific |issn=0033-2941 |doi=10.2466/pr0.1981.48.3.775 |s2cid=143670471 |ref=Simón 1981}}
* {{cite journal |last=Simón |first=Armando |date=1984 |title=Psychology and UFOs |journal=] |volume=8 |pages=355–367 |location=Amherst, NY |publisher=] |ref=Simón 1984}}


===Technology===
*] (2002). ''Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from Astrology to the Moon Landing "Hoax"''. ], ISBN 0-471-40976-6. (Chapter 20: ''Misidentified Flying Objects: UFOs and Illusions of the Mind and Eye.)
* {{cite journal |last1=Ford |first1=L. H. |last2=Roman |first2=Thomas A. |date=1996 |title=Quantum field theory constrains traversable wormhole geometries |journal=] |volume=53 |issue=10 |pages=5496–5507 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5496 |pmid=10019835 |arxiv=gr-qc/9510071 |bibcode=1996PhRvD..53.5496F |s2cid=18106362 |ref=Ford & Roman| issn=0556-2821 }}
*] "Astronomical Causes of UFOs"
* {{cite book |last=Hill |first=Paul R. |author-link=Paul R. Hill |title=Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific Analysis |date=1995 |publisher=] |location=Charlottesville, VA |isbn=1-57174-027-9 |oclc=34075199 |lccn=97109204 |ref=Hill}} Analysis of UFO technology by pioneering NACA/NASA aerospace engineer.
* ]. (1995). ''Horizons: Exploring the Universe'', ], ISBN 0-534-24889-6 and ISBN 0-534-24890-X. (Appendix A)
* {{cite journal |last=Krasnikov |first=S. |author-link=Serguei Krasnikov |date=2003 |title=The quantum inequalities do not forbid spacetime shortcuts |journal=Physical Review D |volume=67 |issue=10 |page=104013 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104013 |arxiv=gr-qc/0207057 |bibcode=2003PhRvD..67j4013K |s2cid=17498199 |ref=Krasnikov}}
{{refend}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.jumpjet.info/Emergency-Preparedness/Disaster-Mitigation/NBC/Chem/Odors_from_UFOs.pdf |title=Odors from UFOs: Deducing Odorant Chemistry and Causation from Available Data |date=July 2, 2000 |last=Rullán |first=Antonio F. |type=Preliminary paper |access-date=September 13, 2013 |ref=Rullán |archive-date=February 2, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202033812/http://www.jumpjet.info/Emergency-Preparedness/Disaster-Mitigation/NBC/Chem/Odors_from_UFOs.pdf |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last=Sarfatti |first=Jack |author-link=Jack Sarfatti |title=Super Cosmos: Through Struggles to the Stars |date=2006 |publisher=] |location=Indianapolis, IN |isbn=978-1-4184-7662-5 |oclc=70962499 |lccn=2004095148 |ref=Sarfatti}}


====Psychology==== ===Skepticism===
* {{cite book |last=Plait |first=Philip C. |author-link=Phil Plait |others=Illustrations by Tina Cash Walsh |title=Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from Astrology to the Moon Landing "Hoax" |date=2002 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=0-471-40976-6 |oclc=48885221 |lccn=2002277382 |chapter=Misidentified Flying Objects: UFOs and Illusions of the Mind and Eye |ref=Plait|title-link=Bad Astronomy }}
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/astroufo1.html |title=Astronomical Causes of UFOs |last=Ridpath |first=Ian |author-link=Ian Ridpath |publisher=Ian Ridpath |access-date=July 13, 2013}}
*], "Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies" (translated by R.F.C. Hull); 1979, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-01822-7
* {{cite book |last=Seeds |first=Michael |title=Horizons: Exploring the Universe |edition=2nd |orig-year= 1981 |date=1995 |publisher=] |location=Belmont, CA |isbn=0-534-24889-6 |oclc=30156735 |lccn=94013521 |ref=Seeds}}(Appendix A)
{{refend}}
* {{cite book |last=Sheaffer |first=Robert |title=Psychic Vibrations: Skeptical Giggles from the Skeptical Inquirer |url=https://www.createspace.com/3630764 |access-date=July 13, 2013 |edition=2nd |orig-year=2011 |date=2012 |publisher=]<!--No correction needed.--> |location=Charleston, SC |isbn=978-1-4636-0157-7 |ref=Sheaffer 2011 |archive-date=January 16, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130116020703/https://www.createspace.com/3630764 |url-status=dead }}
====Histories====
{{refbegin}}
*], ''UFOs and the National Security State: An Unclassified History, Volume One: 1941&ndash;1973'', 2000, Keyhole Publishing, ISBN 0-9666885-0-3. Dolan is a professional historian.
*Downes, Jonathan ''Rising of the Moon''. 2nd ed. Bangor: Xiphos, 2005.
*Lawrence Fawcett & Barry J. Greenwood, ''The UFO Cover-Up'' (Originally ''Clear Intent''), 1992, Fireside Books (Simon & Schuster), ISBN 0-671-76555-8. Many UFO documents.
*], ''Above Top Secret'', 1988, William Morrow & Co., ISBN 0-688-09202-0. Many UFO documents.
* ], ''Need to Know: UFOs, the Military, and Intelligence'', 2007, Pegasus Books, ISBN 978-1-933648-38-5. Update of ''Above Top Secret'' with new cases and documents
*], ''UFO FBI Connection'', 2000, Llewellyn Publications, ISBN 1-56718-493-6
*], ''Project Blue Book Exposed'', 1997, Marlowe & Company, ISBN 1-56924-746-3
*], ''The Report On Unidentified Flying Objects'', 1956, Doubleday & Co. . A UFO classic by insider Ruppelt, the first head of the USAF ]
*], ''Government Involvement in the UFO Coverup, or earlier title History of UFO Crash/Retrievals", 1988, PEA RESEARCH.<ref>http://pea-research.50megs.com/articles/UFO%20COVERUP.htm</ref>
{{refend}} {{refend}}


====Technology==== ==External links==
{{refbegin}}
*], ''Unconventional Flying Objects: a scientific analysis'', 1995, Hampton Roads Publishing Co., ISBN 1-57174-027-9. Analysis of UFO technology by pioneering ]/] aerospace engineer.
*James M. McCampbell, ''Ufology: A Major Breakthrough in the Scientific Understanding of Unidentified Flying Objects'', 1973, 1976, Celestial Arts, ISBN 0-89087-144-2 . Another analysis by former NASA and nuclear engineer.
*James M. McCampbell, ''Physical effects of UFOs upon people'', 1986, .
*Antonio F. Rullán, ''Odors from UFOs: Deducing Odorant Chemistry and Causation from Available Data'', 2000, .
*Jack Sarfatti, "Super Cosmos", 2005 (Authorhouse)
*{{cite journal
|author=S. Krasnikov
|title=The quantum inequalities do not forbid spacetime shortcuts
|journal=Physical Review D
|year=2003
|volume=67
|pages=104013
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104013 <!--Retrieved from CrossRef by DOI bot-->
}} See also the {{cite web
|title=eprint version
|work=arXiv
|url=http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0207057
}}
*{{cite journal
|author=L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman
|title=Quantum field theory constrains traversable wormhole geometries
|journal=Physical Review D
|year=1996
|pages=5496
|volume=53
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5496 <!--Retrieved from CrossRef by DOI bot-->
}} See also the {{cite web
|title=eprint
|work=arXiv
|url=http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9510071
}}
{{refend}}


{{Sister project links|UFO|voy=UFOs}}
==External links==
<!--========================= {{No more links}} =========================
{{Wikinewshas|related<br>]}}
| PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS IN ADDING MORE LINKS TO THIS ARTICLE. Misplaced Pages |
{{Sisterlinks|UFO}}
| is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising. |
* {{dmoz|Society/Paranormal/UFOs|UFOs}}
| |
| Excessive or inappropriate links WILL BE DELETED. |
| See ] & ] for details. |
| |
| If there are already plentiful links, please propose additions or |
| replacements on this article's discussion page, or submit your link |
| to the relevant category at the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) |
| and link back to that category using the {{dmoz}} template. |
========================= {{No more links}} =========================-->
* from the Government Information Library at the ]
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001174318/https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/97unclass/ufo.html |date=October 1, 2019 }} by Gerald K. Haines, ]
* Declassified CIA documents from the 1940s through the early 1990s.
* from 1997 to 2009 by the ]
* at ]
* , a virtual museum exhibition by the ]
*
* (; )
* (]; ]; May 30, 2021)
* (astronomer ])
* (videos; scientist ])
* (]; July 29, 2021).
* (]; ]; August 2, 2021).
* {{youTube|aSDweUbGBow|Video (92:50): U.S. Congressional Hearing on UFO/UAP (May 17, 2022)}}.

{{UFOs}}
{{Extraterrestrial life}}
{{Conspiracy theories}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Portal bar|Physics|Speculative fiction|Aviation|Weather|}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]


]
{{Link FA|mk}}
{{Link FA|sr}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 15:57, 25 November 2024

Airborne, submerged, and transmedium phenomena considered unusual and unidentified "UFO" redirects here. For other uses, see Unidentified flying object (disambiguation) and UFO (disambiguation). Not to be confused with Flying saucer.

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Unidentified flying object" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
"GIMBAL" Pentagon UFO video, January 2015

An unidentified flying object (UFO), or unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP), is any perceived airborne, submerged or transmedium phenomenon that cannot be immediately identified or explained. Upon investigation, most UFOs are identified as known objects or atmospheric phenomena, while a small number remain unexplained.

While unusual sightings have been reported in the sky throughout history, UFOs became culturally prominent after World War II, escalating during the Space Age. Studies and investigations into UFO reports conducted by governments (such as Project Blue Book in the United States and Project Condign in the United Kingdom), as well as by organisations and individuals have occurred over the years without confirmation of the fantastical claims of small but vocal groups of ufologists who favour unconventional or pseudoscientific hypotheses, often claiming that UFOs are evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, technologically advanced cryptids, demons, interdimensional contact or future time travelers. After decades of promotion of such ideas by believers and in popular media, the kind of evidence required to solidly support such claims has not been forthcoming. Scientists and skeptic organizations such as the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry have provided prosaic explanations for UFOs, namely that they are caused by natural phenomena, human technology, delusions, and hoaxes. Beliefs surrounding UFOs have inspired parts of new religions even as social scientists have identified the ongoing interest and storytelling surrounding UFOs as a modern example of folklore and mythology understandable with psychosocial explanations.

The U.S. government currently has two entities dedicated to UFO data collection and analysis: NASA's UAP independent study team and the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office.

Terminology

During the late 1940s and through the 1950s, UFOs were often called "flying saucers" or "flying discs" based on reporting of the Kenneth Arnold incident. "Unidentified flying object" (UFO) has been in-use since 1947. The acronym, "UFO" was coined by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, for the USAF. He wrote, "Obviously the term 'flying saucer' is misleading when applied to objects of every conceivable shape and performance. For this reason the military prefers the more general, if less colorful, name: unidentified flying objects. UFO". The term UFO became widespread during the 1950s, at first in technical literature, but later in popular use. Unidentified aerial phenomena" (UAP) first appeared in the late 1960s. UAP has seen increasing usage in the 21st century due to negative cultural associations with "UFO". UAP is sometimes expanded as "unidentified anomalous phenomenon".

While technically a UFO refers to any unidentified flying object, in modern popular culture the term UFO has generally become synonymous with alien spacecraft.The term "extra-terrestrial vehicle" (ETV) is sometimes used to separate this explanation of UFOs from totally earthbound explanations.

Identification

Main article: Identification studies of UFOs
A Fata Morgana, a type of mirage in which objects located below the astronomical horizon appear to be hovering in the sky just above the horizon, may be responsible for some UFO sightings.

Studies show that after careful investigation, the majority of UFOs can be identified as ordinary objects or phenomena. The 1952–1955 study for the USAF used the following categories: "Balloon; Astronomical; Aircraft; Light phenomenon; Birds, Clouds, dust, etc.; Insufficient information; Psychological manifestations; Unknown; and Other". The most commonly found identified sources of UFO reports are:

Twilight phenomena from a Falcon 9 rocket launch

An individual 1979 study by CUFOS researcher Allan Hendry found, as did other investigations, that fewer than one percent of cases he investigated were hoaxes and most sightings were actually honest misidentifications of prosaic phenomena. Hendry attributed most of these to inexperience or misperception. Astronomer Andrew Fraknoi rejected the hypothesis that UFOs are extraterrestrial spacecraft and responded to the "onslaught of credulous coverage" in books, films and entertainment by teaching his students to apply critical thinking to such claims, advising them that "being a good scientist is not unlike being a good detective". According to Fraknoi, UFO reports "might at first seem mysterious", but "the more you investigate, the more likely you are to find that there is LESS to these stories than meets the eye".

History

UFOs and ufology
Flying saucer from the National Archives and Records Administration
Notable sightings and hoaxes
Conspiracy theories
Religions
Lists of organizations, sightings, studies, etc.

Early history before the 20th century

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Unidentified flying object" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

People have always observed the sky and have sometimes seen what, to some, appeared to be unusual sights including phenomena as varied as comets, bright meteors, one or more of the five planets that can be readily seen with the naked eye, planetary conjunctions, and atmospheric optical phenomena such as parhelia and lenticular clouds. One particularly famous example is Halley's Comet: first recorded by Chinese astronomers in 240 BC and possibly as early as 467 BC as a strange and unknown "guest light" in the sky. As a bright comet that visits the inner solar system every 76 years, it was often identified as a unique isolated event in ancient historical documents whose authors were unaware that it was a repeating phenomenon. Such accounts in history often were treated as supernatural portents, angels, or other religious omens. While UFO enthusiasts have sometimes commented on the narrative similarities between certain religious symbols in medieval paintings and UFO reports, the canonical and symbolic character of such images is documented by art historians placing more conventional religious interpretations on such images.

Some examples of pre-contemporary reports about unusual aerial phenomena include:

  • Julius Obsequens was a Roman writer who is believed to have lived in the middle of the fourth century AD. The only work associated with his name is the Liber de prodigiis (Book of Prodigies), completely extracted from an epitome, or abridgment, written by Livy; De prodigiis was constructed as an account of the wonders and portents that occurred in Rome between 249 and 12 BCE. An aspect of Obsequens' work that has inspired excitement in some UFO enthusiasts is that he makes reference to things moving through the sky. The descriptions provided bear resemblance to observations of meteor showers. Obsequens was also writing some 400 years after the events he described, thus the text is not an eyewitness account. No corroboration with those amazing sights of old with contemporary observations was mentioned in that work.
  • Shen Kuo (1031–1095), a Song Chinese government scholar-official and prolific polymath inventor, wrote a vivid passage in his Dream Pool Essays (1088) about an unidentified flying object. He recorded the testimony of eyewitnesses in 11th-century Anhui and Jiangsu (especially in the city of Yangzhou), who stated that a flying object with opening doors would shine a blinding light from its interior (from an object shaped like a pearl) that would cast shadows from trees for ten miles in radius, and was able to take off at tremendous speeds.
    The celestial phenomenon over Basel in 1566.
  • A woodcut by Hans Glaser that appeared in a broadsheet in 1561 has been featured in popular culture as the "celestial phenomenon over Nuremberg" and connected to various ancient astronaut claims. Skeptic and debunker Jason Colavito argues that the woodcut is "a secondhand depiction of a particularly gaudy sundog", a known atmospheric optical phenomenon. A similar report comes from 1566 over Basel and, indeed, in the 15th and 16th centuries, many leaflets wrote of "miracles" and "sky spectacles" which bear resemblance to natural phenomena which were only more fully characterized after the scientific revolution.
  • On January 25, 1878, the Denison Daily News printed an article in which John Martin, a local farmer, had reported seeing a large, dark, circular object resembling a balloon flying "at wonderful speed". Martin, according to the newspaper account, said it appeared to be about the size of a saucer from his perspective, one of the first uses of the word "saucer" in association with a UFO. At the time, ballooning was becoming an increasingly popular and sophisticated endeavor, and the first controlled-flights of such devices were occurring around that time.
UFO-like alleged sightings before the 20th century1561 celestial phenomenon over Nuremberg as printed in an illustrated news notice.November 22, 1896 illustration of a "mystery airship" published in The San Francisco CallNovember 29, 1896 illustration of another "mystery airship" published in The San Francisco Call"Mystery airship" illustrated in The St. Paul Globe, April 13, 1897
  • From November 1896 to April 1897, United States newspapers carried numerous reports of "mystery airships" that are reminiscent of modern UFO waves. Scores of people even reported talking to the pilots. Some people feared that Thomas Edison had created an artificial star that could fly around the country. On April 16, 1897, a letter was found that purported to be an enciphered communication between an airship operator and Edison. When asked his opinion of such reports, Edison said, "You can take it from me that it is a pure fake." The coverage of Edison's denial marked the end of major newspaper coverage of the airships in this period.

20th century and after

See also: Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government and UFO conspiracy theories

In the Pacific and European theatres during World War II, round, glowing fireballs known as "foo fighters" were reported by Allied and Axis pilots. Some explanations for these sightings included St. Elmo's fire, the planet Venus, hallucinations from oxygen deprivation, and German secret weapons (specifically rockets). In 1946, more than 2,000 reports were collected, primarily by the Swedish military, of unidentified aerial objects over the Scandinavian nations, along with isolated reports from France, Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece. The objects were referred to as "Russian hail" (and later as "ghost rockets") because it was thought the mysterious objects were possibly Russian tests of captured German V1 or V2 rockets, but most were identified as natural phenomena as meteors.

Science fiction depictions of spacecraft similar to flying saucers before the first widely-reported UFO sighting in 1947Illustration from 1903 by Henrique Alvim Corrêa showing the first Martian emerging from a cylinder that had fallen from the sky for an edition of The War of the Worlds by H. G. Wells.Cover of French pulp magazine Le Chevalier Illusion from December 29, 1912 portraying a flying machine spreading a toxic gas among the passengers and crew of a ship belowA "space flyer" depicted on the February 1912 cover of Modern Electrics as an illustration for the science fiction story Ralph 124C 41+ by Hugo GernsbackIllustration by Frank R. Paul from February 1922 in Science and Invention showing Nikola Tesla's vision of warfare in the future with sea and air craft "controlled and directed" by radio wavesIllustration for a story by Hugo Gernsback in pulp science fiction magazine Amazing Stories from April 1928 (originally published on 1915 with similar illustrations in The Electrical Experimenter)Depiction of a flying saucer by illustrator Frank R. Paul on the October 1929 issue of Hugo Gernsback's pulp science fiction magazine Science Wonder StoriesCover of Amazing Stories winter 1930 issue depicting a disc-shaped spacecraftBack cover of Amazing Stories illustrated by Frank R. Paul in August 1946 featuring many disc-shaped spacecraft (published about a year before the flying disc wave of 1947)

Many scholars, especially those arguing for the psychosocial UFO hypothesis, have noted that UFO characteristics reported after the first widely publicized modern sighting by Kenneth Arnold in 1947 resembled a host of science fiction tropes from earlier in the century.

By most accounts, the popular UFO craze in the US began with a media frenzy surrounding the reports on June 24, 1947, of a civilian pilot named Kenneth Arnold who described seeing "a group of bat-like aircraft flying in formation at high speeds" near Mount Rainier that he said were "moving like a saucer would if skipped across water" which led to headlines about "flying saucers" and "flying discs". Only weeks after Arnold's story was reported in 1947, Gallup published a poll asking people in the United States what the "flying saucers" might be. Already, 90% had heard of the new term. However, as reported by historian Greg Eghanian, "a majority either had no idea what they could be or thought that witnesses were mistaken" while "visitors from space were not initially among the options that anyone had in mind, and Gallup didn't even mention if anyone surveyed brought up aliens. Within weeks, reports of flying saucer sightings became a daily occurrence with one particularly famous example being the Roswell incident in 1947 where remnants of a downed observation balloon were recovered by a farmer and confiscated by military personnel. UFO enthusiasts in the early 1950s started to organize local "saucer clubs" modeled after science fiction fan clubs of the 1930s and 1940s, with some growing to national and international prominence within a decade. In 1950, three influential books were published—Donald Keyhoe's The Flying Saucers Are Real, Frank Scully's Behind the Flying Saucers, and Gerald Heard's The Riddle of the Flying Saucers. Each guilelessly proposed that the extraterrestrial UFO hypothesis was the correct explanation and that the visits were in response to detonations of atomic weapons. These books also introduced Americans to, as Eghanian puts it, "the crusading whistleblower dedicated to breaking the silence over the alien origins of unidentified flying objects". Media accounts and speculation ran rampant in the U.S., especially in connection to the 1952 UFO scare in Washington, D.C. so that, by 1953, the intelligence officials (Robertson Panel) worried that "genuine incursions" by enemy aircraft "over U.S. territory could be lost in a maelstrom of kooky hallucination" of UFO reports. A Trendex survey in August 1957, ten years after the Arnold incident, reported that over 25% of the U.S. public "believed unidentified flying objects could be from outer space". The cultural phenomenon showed up within some intellectual works such as the 1959 publication of Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Sky by Carl Jung, a Swiss psychiatrist and psychoanalyst who founded analytical psychology.

Starting in 1947, the U.S. Air Force began to record and investigated UFO reports with Project Sign looking into "more than 250 cases" from 1947 to 1949. It was replaced by Project Grudge up through 1951. In the third U.S. Air Force program, from March 1952 to its termination in December 1969, "the U.S. Air Force cataloged 12,618 sightings of UFOs as part of what is now known as Project Blue Book". In the late 1950s, public pressure mounted for a full declassification of all UFO records, but the CIA played a role in refusing to allow this. This sense was not universal in the CIA, however, as fellow NICAP official Donald E. Keyhoe wrote that Vice Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, the first director of the CIA, "wanted public disclosure of UFO evidence". Official U.S. Air Force interest in UFO reports went on hiatus in 1969 after a study by the University of Colorado led by Edward U. Condon and known as the Condon Report concluded "that nothing has come from the study of UFOs in the past 21 years that has added to scientific knowledge" and that further time investigating UFO reports "cannot be justified".

Cover of the 1953 book The Flying Saucers Are Real by Donald Keyhoe
Cover of the pulp science fiction magazine Amazing Stories from October 1957

From the 1960s to 1990s, UFOs were part of American popular culture's obsession with the supernatural and paranormal. In 1961, the first alien abduction account was sensationalized when Barney and Betty Hill underwent hypnosis after seeing a UFO and reported recovered memories of their experience that became ever more elaborate as the years went by. In 1966, 5% of Americans reported to Gallup that "they had at some time seen something they thought was a 'flying saucer'", 96% said "they had heard or read about flying saucers", and 46% of these "thought they were 'something real' rather than just people's imagination". Responding to UFO enthusiasm, there have always been consistent yet less popular efforts made at debunking many of the claims, and at times the media was enlisted including a 1966 TV special, "UFO: Friend, Foe or Fantasy?", in which Walter Cronkite "patiently" explained to viewers that UFOs were fantasy. Cronkite enlisted Carl Sagan and J. Allen Hynek, who told Cronkite, "To this time, there is no valid scientific proof that we have been visited by spaceships".

Such attempts to disenchant the zeitgeist were not very successful at tamping down the mania. Keith Kloor notes that the "allure of flying saucers" remained popular with the public into the 1970s, spurring production of such sci-fi films, as Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Alien, which "continued to stoke public fascination". Meanwhile, Leonard Nimoy narrated a popular occult and mystery TV series In Search of... while daytime talk shows of Mike Douglas, Merv Griffin, and Phil Donahue featured interviews with alien abductees and people who credulously reported stories about UFOs . In the 1980s and 1990s, UFO stories featured in such pulp "true crime" serials as Unsolved Mysteries while the 33 Volume Time-Life series Mysteries of the Unknown which featured UFO stories sold some 700,000 copies. Kloor writes that by the late 1990s, "other big UFO subthemes had been prominently introduced into pop culture, such as the abduction phenomenon and government conspiracy narrative, via best-selling books and, of course, The X-Files".

Eghigian notes that, by this point, the UFO problem had become "far more interesting to ponder than to actually solve." Interest was particularly fevered in the 1990s with the publicity surrounding the television broadcast of an Alien autopsy video marketed as "real footage" but later admitted to be a staged "re-enactment". Eghigian writes that "there had always been outlier abduction reports dating back to the '50s and '60s" but that in the '80s and '90s "the floodgates opened, and with them a new generation of UFO advocates". Leaders among them were the artist Budd Hopkins, horror writer Whitley Strieber, historian David Jacobs, and Harvard psychiatrist John Mack. They all defended the "veracity of those claiming to have been kidnapped, examined, and experimented upon by beings from another world", writes Eghigian, as "new missionaries who simultaneously played the role of investigator, therapist, and advocate to their vulnerable charges". Eghigian says that Mack "signaled both the culmination and end of the headiest days of alien abduction". When Mack began working with and publishing accounts of abductees—or "experiencers", as he called them—in the early 1990s, he brought a sense of legitimacy to "the study of extraterrestrial captivity". By the late 1990s, however, the Harvard Medical School initiated a review of his position which allowed him to retain tenure. However, after this review, as the review board chairman Arnold Relman later put it, Mack was "not taken seriously by his colleagues anymore". Claims of alien abduction have continued, but no other clinicians would continue to speak of them as real in any sense. Nonetheless, these ideas persisted in popular opinion. According to a 1996 poll by Newsweek, 20% of Americans believed that UFOs were more likely to be proof of alien life than to have a natural scientific explanation.

In December 2017, a new round of media attention started when The New York Times broke the story of the secret Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program that was funded from 2007 to 2012 with $22 million spent on the program. Following this story, along with a series of sensationalized Pentagon UFO videos leaked by members of the program who became convinced that UFOs were genuine mysteries worth investigating, there was an increase in mainstream attention to UFO stories. In July 2021, Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb announced the creation of his Galileo Project which intended to use high-tech astronomical equipment to seek evidence of extraterrestrial artifacts in space and possibly within Earth's atmosphere. This was followed closely by the publication of Loeb's book Extraterrestrial, in which he argued that the first interstellar comet ever observed, 'Oumuamua, might be an artificial light sail made by an alien civilization. Two government sponsored programs, NASA's UAP independent study team and the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office were charged in part by Congressional fiat to investigate UFO claims more fully, adopting the new moniker "unexplained aerial phenomenon" (UAP) to avoid associations with past sensationalism. On 17 May 2022, members of the United States House Intelligence Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence and Counterproliferation held congressional hearings with top military officials to discuss military reports of UAPs. It was the first public congressional hearing into UFO sightings in the US in over 50 years. Another Congressional hearing took place on July 26, 2023, featuring the whistleblower claims of former U.S. Air Force (USAF) officer and intelligence official David Grusch.

A Harris Poll in 2009 found that 32% of Americans "believe in UFOs". A National Geographic study in June 2012 found that 36% of Americans believe UFOs exist and that 10% thought that they had spotted one. In June 2021 a Pew research poll found that 51% in the United States thought that UFOs reported by people in the military were likely to be evidence of intelligent life from beyond the Earth. In August 2021, Gallup, with a question not specific to military reports, only found that 41% of adults believed some UFOs involve alien spacecraft from other planets. This Gallup poll showed 44% of men and 38% of women believed this. This average of 41% in 2021 was up from 33% in a 2019 Gallup poll with the same question. Gallup further found that college graduates went in 2019 from being the least likely educational group to believe this to being on par in 2021 with adults who have no college education. An October 2022 poll by YouGov only found that 34% of Americans believe that UFOs are likely to involve alien life forms.

Historian Greg Eghigian wrote in August 2021 that "over the last fifty years, the mutual antagonism between paranormal believers and skeptics has largely framed discussion about unidentified flying objects" and that "it often gets personal" with those taking seriously the prospect that UFOs are extraterrestrial in origin dismissing those who consider UFOs to be worth studying as "narrow-minded, biased, obstinate, and cruel" while the skeptics brushed off "devotees" as "naïve, ignorant, gullible, and downright dangerous". Such "mudslinging over convictions is certainly familiar to historians of religion, a domain of human existence marked by deep divisions over interpretations of belief", and science too has found itself engaged increasing amounts of "boundary work" (which is "asserting and reasserting the borders between legitimate and illegitimate scientific research and ideas, between what may and what may not refer to itself as science") with regard to UFO questions. Eghigian points out our current "stark divide did not happen overnight, and its roots lie in the postwar decades, in a series of events that—with their news coverage, grainy images, celebrity crusaders, exasperated skeptics, unsatisfying military statements, and accusations of a government cover-up—foreshadow our present moment".

UFOs have been taken up by religious studies scholars in various scholarly books. Jeffrey Kripal, chair of the Department of Religion at Rice University, has said that "both the material and the mental dimensions are incredibly important to get a sense of the full picture". As Adrian Horton writes "from The X-Files to Men in Black, Close Encounters of the Third Kind to Star Wars to Marvel, Hollywood has for decades provided an engrossing feedback loop for interest in the extraterrestrial: a reflection of our fears and capaciousness, whose ubiquitous popularity has in turn fueled more interest in UFOs as perennially compelling entertainment tropes not to be taken seriously". Horton observes that these "alien movies have generally reflected shifting cultural anxieties, from the existential terror of nuclear war to foreign enslavement to loss of bodily control". American entertainment has explored both "hostile aliens" as well as the "benevolent, world-expanding encounters" seen in films such as Steven Spielberg's Close Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. In her research on the relationship of media to UFO beliefs, Diana Walsh Pasulka, a professor of philosophy and religion at the University of North Carolina, says that what is seen on a screen, "if it conforms to certain criteria, is interpreted as real, even if it is not real and even if one knows it is not real" and that "screen images embed themselves in one's brain and memories" in ways that "can determine how one views one's past and even determine one's future behaviors".

Notable cases and incidents

See also: List of reported UFO sightings

Britain

  • The Rendlesham Forest incident was a series of reported sightings of unexplained lights near Rendlesham Forest in Suffolk, England in late December 1980 which became linked with claims of UFO landings.

France

The most notable cases of UFO sightings in France include:

A Roswell Daily Record on July 8, 1947, reporting a UFO case

United States

Famous hoaxes

See also: List of UFO-related hoaxes
  • The Maury Island incident
  • George Adamski, over the space of two decades, made various claims about his meetings with telepathic aliens from nearby planets. He claimed photographs of the far side of the Moon taken by the Soviet lunar probe Luna 3 in 1959 were fake, and that there were cities, trees and snow-capped mountains on the far side of the Moon. Among copycats was a shadowy British figure named Cedric Allingham.
  • Ed Walters, a building contractor, in 1987 allegedly perpetrated a hoax in Gulf Breeze, Florida. Walters claimed at first having seen a small UFO flying near his home and took some photographs of the craft. Walters reported and documented a series of UFO sightings over a period of three weeks and took several photographs. These sightings became famous, and are collectively referred to as the Gulf Breeze UFO incident. Three years later, in 1990, after the Walters family had moved, the new residents discovered a model of a UFO poorly hidden in the attic that bore an undeniable resemblance to the craft in Walters' photographs. Most investigators, like the forensic photo expert William G. Hyzer, now consider the sightings to be a hoax.

Investigations of reports

UFOs have been subject to investigations over the years that varied widely in scope and scientific rigor. Governments or independent academics in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, Peru, France, Belgium, Sweden, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Mexico, Spain, and the Soviet Union are known to have investigated UFO reports at various times. No official government investigation has ever publicly concluded that UFOs are indisputably real, physical objects, extraterrestrial in origin, or of concern to national defense.

Among the best known government studies are the ghost rockets investigation by the Swedish military (1946–1947), Project Blue Book, previously Project Sign and Project Grudge, conducted by the USAF from 1947 until 1969, the secret U.S. Army/Air Force Project Twinkle investigation into green fireballs (1948–1951), the secret USAF Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14 by the Battelle Memorial Institute, and the Brazilian Air Force's 1977 Operação Prato (Operation Saucer). France has had an ongoing investigation (GEPAN/SEPRA/GEIPAN) within its space agency Centre national d'études spatiales (CNES) since 1977; the government of Uruguay has had a similar investigation since 1989.

Americas

Brazil (1952–2016)

A document about a sighting of a UFO that occurred on December 16, 1977, in the state of Bahia, Brazil

On October 31, 2008, the National Archives of Brazil began receiving from the Aeronautical Documentation and History Center part of the documentation of the Brazilian Air Force regarding the investigation of the appearance of UFOs in Brazil. Currently, this collection gathers cases between 1952 and 2016.

Chile (c. 1968)

In 1968, the SEFAA (previously CEFAA) began receiving case reports of the general public, civil aviators and the Chilean Air Force regarding the sightings or the appearance of UFOs in Chile, the initial work was an initiative of Sergio Bravo Flores who led the Chilean Committee for the Study of Unidentified Space Phenomena, supported even by the Chilean Scientific Society. Currently, the organization changed its denomination to SEFAA and its a department of the DGAC(Chile) which in turn depends on the Chilean Air Force.

Canada (c. 1950)

In Canada, the Department of National Defence has dealt with reports, sightings and investigations of UFOs across Canada. In addition to conducting investigations into crop circles in Duhamel, Alberta, it still considers "unsolved" the Falcon Lake incident in Manitoba and the Shag Harbour UFO incident in Nova Scotia.

Early Canadian studies included Project Magnet (1950–1954) and Project Second Storey (1952–1954), supported by the Defence Research Board.

United States

Synopsis

U.S. investigations into UFOs include:

In addition to these, thousands of documents released under FOIA also indicate that many U.S. intelligence agencies collected (and still collect) information on UFOs. These agencies include the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), FBI, CIA, National Security Agency (NSA), as well as military intelligence agencies of the Army and U.S. Navy, in addition to the Air Force.

USAAF and FBI response to the 1947 sightings
This section may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. Please improve the article or discuss the issue on the talk page. (November 2021)

Following the large U.S. surge in sightings in June and early July 1947, on July 9, 1947, United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) intelligence, in cooperation with the FBI, began a formal investigation into selected sightings with characteristics that could not be immediately rationalized, such as Kenneth Arnold's. The USAAF used "all of its top scientists" to determine whether "such a phenomenon could, in fact, occur". The research was "being conducted with the thought that the flying objects might be a celestial phenomenon," or that "they might be a foreign body mechanically devised and controlled." Three weeks later in a preliminary defense estimate, the air force investigation decided that, "This 'flying saucer' situation is not all imaginary or seeing too much in some natural phenomenon. Something is really flying around."

A further review by the intelligence and technical divisions of the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field reached the same conclusion. It reported that "the phenomenon is something real and not visionary or fictitious," and there were disc-shaped objects, metallic in appearance, as big as man-made aircraft. They were characterized by "extreme rates of climb maneuverability", general lack of noise, absence of a trail, occasional formation flying, and "evasive" behavior "when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar", suggesting a controlled craft. It was therefore recommended in late September 1947 that an official Air Force investigation be set up. It was also recommended that other government agencies should assist in the investigation.

USAF
Projects Sign (1947–1949), Grudge (1948–1951), and Blue Book (1951–1970)
Main articles: Project Sign, Project Grudge, and Project Blue Book

Project Sign's final report, published in early 1949, stated that while some UFOs appeared to represent actual aircraft, there was not enough data to determine their origin.

The Air Force's Project Sign was created at the end of 1947, and was one of the earliest government studies to come to a secret extraterrestrial conclusion. In August 1948, Sign investigators wrote a top-secret intelligence estimate to that effect, but the Air Force Chief of Staff Hoyt Vandenberg ordered it destroyed. The existence of this suppressed report was revealed by several insiders who had read it, such as astronomer and USAF consultant J. Allen Hynek and Capt. Edward J. Ruppelt, the first head of the USAF's Project Blue Book.

Another highly classified U.S. study was conducted by the CIA's Office of Scientific Investigation (OS/I) in the latter half of 1952 in response to orders from the National Security Council (NSC). This study concluded UFOs were real physical objects of potential threat to national security. One OS/I memo to the CIA Director (DCI) in December read that "the reports of incidents convince us that there is something going on that must have immediate attention ... Sightings of unexplained objects at great altitudes and traveling at high speeds in the vicinity of major U.S. defense installations are of such a nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or any known types of aerial vehicles."

The matter was considered so urgent that OS/I drafted a memorandum from the DCI to the NSC proposing that the NSC establish an investigation of UFOs as a priority project throughout the intelligence and the defense research and development community. It also urged the DCI to establish an external research project of top-level scientists, now known as the Robertson Panel to analyze the problem of UFOs. The OS/I investigation was called off after the Robertson Panel's negative conclusions in January 1953.

Project Sign was dismantled and became Project Grudge at the end of 1948. Angered by the low quality of investigations by Grudge, the Air Force Director of Intelligence reorganized it as Project Blue Book in late 1951, placing Ruppelt in charge. J. Allen Hynek, a trained astronomer who served as a scientific advisor for Project Blue Book, was initially skeptical of UFO reports, but eventually came to the conclusion that many of them could not be satisfactorily explained and was highly critical of what he described as "the cavalier disregard by Project Blue Book of the principles of scientific investigation". Leaving government work, he founded the privately funded CUFOS, to whose work he devoted the rest of his life. Other private groups studying the phenomenon include the MUFON, a grassroots organization whose investigator's handbooks go into great detail on the documentation of alleged UFO sightings.

USAF Regulation 200-2 (1953–1954)

Air Force Regulation 200-2, issued in 1953 and 1954, defined an Unidentified Flying Object ("UFOB") as "any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object." The regulation also said UFOBs were to be investigated as a "possible threat to the security of the United States" and "to determine technical aspects involved." The regulation went on to say that "it is permissible to inform news media representatives on UFOB's when the object is positively identified as a familiar object" but added: "For those objects which are not explainable, only the fact that ATIC will analyze the data is worthy of release, due to many unknowns involved."

Blue Book and the Condon Committee (1968–1970)
Main article: Condon Committee

A public research effort conducted by the Condon Committee for the USAF and published as the Condon Report arrived at a negative conclusion in 1968. Blue Book closed down in 1970, using the Condon Committee's negative conclusion as a rationale, thus ending official Air Force UFO investigations. However, a 1969 USAF document, known as the Bolender memo, along with later government documents, revealed that non-public U.S. government UFO investigations continued after 1970. The Bolender memo first stated that "reports of unidentified flying objects that could affect national security ... are not part of the Blue Book system," indicating that more serious UFO incidents already were handled outside the public Blue Book investigation. The memo then added, "reports of UFOs which could affect national security would continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedures designed for this purpose."

In the late 1960s, a chapter on UFOs in the Space Sciences course at the U.S. Air Force Academy gave serious consideration to possible extraterrestrial origins. When word of the curriculum became public, in 1970, the Air Force issued a statement to the effect that the book was outdated and cadets instead were being informed of the Condon Report's negative conclusion.

Controversy surrounded the report, both before and after its release. It has been observed that the report was "harshly criticized by numerous scientists, particularly at the powerful AIAA ... recommended moderate, but continuous scientific work on UFOs." In an address to the AAAS, James E. McDonald said he believed science had failed to mount adequate studies of the problem and criticized the Condon Report and earlier studies by the USAF as scientifically deficient. He also questioned the basis for Condon's conclusions and argued that the reports of UFOs have been "laughed out of scientific court". J. Allen Hynek, an astronomer who worked as a USAF consultant from 1948, sharply criticized the Condon Committee Report and later wrote two nontechnical books that set forth the case for continuing to investigate UFO reports.

Ruppelt recounted his experiences with Project Blue Book, a USAF investigation that preceded Condon's.

FOIA release of documents in 1978

According to a 1979 New York Times report, "records from the C.I.A., the F.B.I. and other Federal agencies" ("about 900 documents—nearly 900 pages of memos, reports and correspondence") obtained in 1978 through the Freedom of Information Act request, indicate that "despite official pronouncements for decades that U.F.O.'s were nothing more than misidentified aerial objects and as such were no cause for alarm ... the phenomenon has aroused much serious behind‐the‐scenes concern" in the US government. In particular, officials were concerned over the "approximately 10%" of UFO sightings which remained unexplained, and whether they might be Soviet aircraft and a threat to national security. Officials were concerned about the "risk of false alerts", of "falsely identifying the real as phantom", and of mass hysteria caused by sightings. In 1947, Brigadier General George F. Schulgen of Army Air Corps Intelligence, warned "the first reported sightings might have been by individuals of Communist sympathies with the view to causing hysteria and fear of a secret Russian weapon."

White House statement of November 2011

In November 2011, the White House released an official response to two petitions asking the U.S. government to acknowledge formally that aliens have visited this planet and to disclose any intentional withholding of government interactions with extraterrestrial beings. According to the response:

The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race...no credible information to suggest that any evidence is being hidden from the public's eye....

— Statement by the White House

The response further noted that efforts, like SETI and NASA's Kepler space telescope and Mars Science Laboratory, continue looking for signs of life. The response noted "odds are pretty high" that there may be life on other planets but "the odds of us making contact with any of them—especially any intelligent ones—are extremely small, given the distances involved."

ODNI report 2021

On June 25, 2021, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a report on UAPs. The report found that the UAPTF was unable to identify 143 objects spotted between 2004 and 2021. The report said that 18 of these featured unusual movement patterns or flight characteristics, adding that more analysis was needed to determine if those sightings represented "breakthrough" technology. The report said that "some of these steps are resource-intensive and would require additional investment." The report did not link the sightings to extraterrestrial life.

Uruguay (c. 1989)

The Uruguayan Air Force has conducted UFO investigations since 1989 and reportedly analyzed 2,100 cases of which they regard approximately 2% as lacking explanation.

Europe

France (1977–2008)

In March 2007, the French space agency CNES published an archive of UFO sightings and other phenomena online.

French studies include GEPAN/SEPRA/GEIPAN within CNES (French space agency), the longest ongoing government-sponsored investigation. About 22% of the 6,000 cases studied remain unexplained. The official opinion of GEPAN/SEPRA/GEIPAN has been neutral, stating on their FAQ page that their mission is fact-finding for the scientific community, not rendering an opinion. They add they can neither prove nor disprove the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH), but their Steering Committee's clear position is that they cannot discard the possibility that some fraction of the very strange 22% of unexplained cases might be due to distant and advanced civilizations.

Possibly their bias may be indicated by their use of the terms "PAN" (French) or "UAP" (English equivalent) for "Unidentified Aerospace Phenomenon" (whereas "UAP" is normally used by English organizations stands for "Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon", a more neutral term). In addition, the three heads of the studies have gone on record in stating that UFOs were real physical flying machines beyond our knowledge or that the best explanation for the most inexplicable cases was an extraterrestrial one. In 2007, the CNES's own report stated that, at that time, 28% of sightings remained unidentified.

In 2008, Michel Scheller, president of the Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France (3AF), created the Sigma Commission. Its purpose was to investigate UFO phenomena worldwide. A progress report published in May 2010 stated that the central hypothesis proposed by the COMETA report is perfectly credible. In December 2012, the final report of the Sigma Commission was submitted to Scheller. Following the submission of the final report, the Sigma2 Commission is to be formed with a mandate to continue the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena.

Italy (1933–2005)

Alleged UFO sightings gradually increased since the war, peaking in 1978 and 2005. The total number of sightings since 1947 are 18,500, of which 90% are identifiable.

United Kingdom (1951–2009)

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (December 2020)

The UK's Flying Saucer Working Party published its final report in June 1951, which remained secret for over fifty years. The Working Party concluded that all UFO sightings could be explained as misidentifications of ordinary objects or phenomena, optical illusions, psychological misperceptions/aberrations, or hoaxes. The report stated: "We accordingly recommend very strongly that no further investigation of reported mysterious aerial phenomena be undertaken, unless and until some material evidence becomes available."

Eight file collections on UFO sightings, dating from 1978 to 1987, were first released on May 14, 2008, to The National Archives by the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Although kept secret from the public for many years, most of the files have low levels of classification and none are classified Top Secret. 200 files are set to be made public by 2012. The files are correspondence from the public sent to the British government and officials, such as the MoD and Margaret Thatcher. The MoD released the files under the Freedom of Information Act due to requests from researchers. These files include, but are not limited to, UFOs over Liverpool and Waterloo Bridge in London.

On October 20, 2008, more UFO files were released. One case released detailed that in 1991 an Alitalia passenger aircraft was approaching London Heathrow Airport when the pilots saw what they described as a "cruise missile" fly extremely close to the cockpit. The pilots believed a collision was imminent. UFO expert David Clarke says this is one of the most convincing cases for a UFO he has come across.

A secret study of UFOs was undertaken for the Ministry of Defence between 1996 and 2000 and was code-named Project Condign. The resulting report, titled "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Defence Region", was publicly released in 2006, but the identity and credentials of whoever constituted Project Condign remains classified. The report confirmed earlier findings that the main causes of UFO sightings are misidentification of man-made and natural objects. The report noted: "No artefacts of unknown or unexplained origin have been reported or handed to the UK authorities, despite thousands of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena reports. There are no SIGINT, ELINT or radiation measurements and little useful video or still IMINT."

It concluded: "There is no evidence that any UAP, seen in the UKADR , are incursions by air-objects of any intelligent (extraterrestrial or foreign) origin, or that they represent any hostile intent." A little-discussed conclusion of the report was that novel meteorological plasma phenomenon akin to ball lightning are responsible for "the majority, if not all" of otherwise inexplicable sightings, especially reports of black triangle UFOs.

On December 1, 2009, the Ministry of Defence quietly closed down its UFO investigations unit. The unit's hotline and email address were suspended by the MoD on that date. The MoD said there was no value in continuing to receive and investigate sightings in a release, stating that "in over fifty years, no UFO report has revealed any evidence of a potential threat to the United Kingdom. The MoD has no specific capability for identifying the nature of such sightings. There is no Defence benefit in such investigation and it would be an inappropriate use of defence resources. Furthermore, responding to reported UFO sightings diverts MoD resources from tasks that are relevant to Defence." The Guardian reported that the MoD claimed the closure would save the Ministry around £50,000 a year. The MoD said it would continue to release UFO files to the public through The National Archives.

UFO reports, Parliamentary questions, and letters from members of the public were released on August 5, 2010, to the UK National Archives. "In one letter included in the files, a man alleges Churchill ordered a coverup of a WW II-era UFO encounter involving the Royal Air Force".

Reports of UFO sightings continue. According to The Independent, there were 957 reported UFO sightings across the UK between January 2021 and May 2023, with Manchester, London, Liverpool, and Glasgow being hotspots.

Studies

Critics argue that all UFO evidence is anecdotal and can be explained as prosaic natural phenomena. Defenders of UFO research counter that knowledge of observational data, other than what is reported in the popular media, is limited in the scientific community and further study is needed. Studies have established that the majority of UFO observations are misidentified conventional objects or natural phenomena—most commonly aircraft, balloons including sky lanterns, satellites, and astronomical objects such as meteors, bright stars and planets. A small percentage are hoaxes.

Fewer than 10% of reported sightings remain unexplained after proper investigation and therefore can be classified as unidentified in the strictest sense. According to Steven Novella, proponents of the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) suggest these unexplained reports are of alien spacecraft, however the null hypothesis cannot be excluded; that these reports are simply other more prosaic phenomena that cannot be identified due to lack of complete information or due to the necessary subjectivity of the reports. Novella says that instead of accepting the null hypothesis, UFO enthusiasts tend to engage in special pleading by offering outlandish, untested explanations for the validity of the ETH, which violate Occam's razor.

Scientific

Main article: Ufology § Research

Historically, ufology has not been considered credible in mainstream science. The scientific community has generally deemed that UFO sightings are not worthy of serious investigation except as a cultural artifact.

Allen Hynek (left) and Jacques Vallée

Studies of UFOs rarely appear in mainstream scientific literature. When asked, some scientists and scientific organizations have pointed to the end of official governmental studies in the U.S. in December 1969, following the statement by the government scientist Edward Condon that further study of UFOs could not be justified on grounds of scientific advancement.

Nevertheless, on 14 September 2023, NASA reported the appointment, for the first time, of a NASA Director of UAP Research (known earlier as U.F.O.), identified as Mark McInerney, to scientifically, and transparently, study such occurrences.

Status as a pseudoscience

This section is an excerpt from Ufology § Status as a pseudoscience.

Despite investigations sponsored by governments and private entities, ufology is not embraced by academia as a scientific field of study, and is instead generally considered a pseudoscience by skeptics and science educators, being often included on lists of topics characterized as pseudoscience as either a partial or total pseudoscience. Pseudoscience is a term that classifies arguments that are claimed to exemplify the methods and principles of science, but do not adhere to an appropriate scientific method, lack supporting evidence, plausibility, falsifiability, or otherwise lack scientific status.

Some writers have identified social factors that contribute to the status of ufology as a pseudoscience, with one study suggesting that "any science doubt surrounding unidentified flying objects and aliens was not primarily due to the ignorance of ufologists about science, but rather a product of the respective research practices of and relations between ufology, the sciences, and government investigative bodies". One study suggests that "the rudimentary standard of science communication attending to the extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) hypothesis for UFOs inhibits public understanding of science, dissuades academic inquiry within the physical and social sciences, and undermines progressive space policy initiatives".

Jacques Vallée, a scientist and ufologist, claimed there were deficiencies in most UFO research, including government studies. He criticized the mythology and cultism often associated with UFO sightings, but despite the challenges, Vallée contended that several hundred professional scientists—a group both he and Hynek termed "the invisible college"—continued to study UFOs quietly on their own time.

Studies

UFOs have become a prevalent theme in modern culture, and the social phenomena have been the subject of academic research in sociology and psychology.

This section is an excerpt from Ufology § Current interest.

In 2021, astronomer Avi Loeb launched The Galileo Project which intends to collect and report scientific evidence of extraterrestrials or extraterrestrial technology on or near Earth via telescopic observations.

In Germany, the University of Würzburg is developing intelligent sensors that can help detect and analyze aerial objects in hopes of applying such technology to UAP.

A 2021 Gallup poll found that belief among Americans in some UFOs being extraterrestrial spacecraft grew between 2019 and 2021 from 33% to 41%. Gallup cited increased coverage in mainstream news and scrutiny from government authorities as a factor in changing attitudes towards UFOs.

In 2022, NASA announced a nine-month study starting in the fall to help establish a road map for investigating UAP – or for reconnaissance of the publicly available data it might use for such research.

In 2023, the RAND Corporation published a study reviewing 101,151 public reports of UAP sightings in the United States from 1998 to 2022. The models used to conduct the analysis showed that reports of UAP sightings were less likely within 30 km of weather stations, 60 km of civilian airports, and in more–densely populated areas, while rural areas tended to have a higher rate of UAP reports. The most consistent and statistically significant finding was that reports of UAP sightings were more likely to occur within 30 km of military operations areas, where routine military training occurs.

Sturrock panel categorization

Besides anecdotal visual sightings, reports sometimes include claims of other kinds of evidence, including cases studied by the military and various government agencies of different countries (such as Project Blue Book, the Condon Committee, the French GEPAN/SEPRA, and Uruguay's current Air Force study).

A comprehensive scientific review of cases where physical evidence was available was carried out by the 1998 Sturrock panel, with specific examples of many of the categories listed below.

  • Radar contact and tracking, sometimes from multiple sites. These have included military personnel and control tower operators, simultaneous visual sightings, and aircraft intercepts. One such example was the mass sightings of large, silent, low-flying black triangles in 1989 and 1990 over Belgium, tracked by NATO radar and jet interceptors, and investigated by Belgium's military (included photographic evidence). Another famous case from 1986 was the Japan Air Lines flight 1628 incident over Alaska investigated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
  • Photographic evidence, including still photos, movie film, and video.
  • Claims of physical trace of landing UFOs, including ground impressions, burned or desiccated soil, burned and broken foliage, magnetic anomalies, increased radiation levels, and metallic traces. (See, e. g. Height 611 UFO incident or the 1964 Lonnie Zamora's Socorro, New Mexico encounter of the USAF Project Blue Book cases.) A well-known example from December 1980 was the USAF Rendlesham Forest incident in England. Another occurred in January 1981 in Trans-en-Provence and was investigated by GEPAN, then France's official government UFO-investigation agency. Project Blue Book head Edward J. Ruppelt described a classic 1952 CE2 case involving a patch of charred grass roots.
  • Physiological effects on people and animals including temporary paralysis, skin burns and rashes, corneal burns, and symptoms superficially resembling radiation poisoning, such as the Cash-Landrum incident in 1980.
  • Animal/cattle mutilation cases, which some feel are also part of the UFO phenomenon.
  • Biological effects on plants such as increased or decreased growth, germination effects on seeds, and blown-out stem nodes (usually associated with physical trace cases or crop circles)
  • Electromagnetic interference (EM) effects. A famous 1976 military case over Tehran, recorded in CIA and DIA classified documents, was associated with communication losses in multiple aircraft and weapons system failure in an F-4 Phantom II jet interceptor as it was about to fire a missile on one of the UFOs.
  • Apparent remote radiation detection, some noted in FBI and CIA documents occurring over government nuclear installations at Los Alamos National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 1950, also reported by Project Blue Book director Edward J. Ruppelt in his book.
  • Claimed artifacts of UFOs themselves, such as 1957, Ubatuba, Brazil, magnesium fragments analyzed by the Brazilian government and in the Condon Report and by others. The 1964 Lonnie Zamora incident also left metal traces, analyzed by NASA. A more recent example involves a teardrop-shaped object recovered by Bob White and was featured in a television episode of UFO Hunters but was later found to be accumulated waste metal residue from a grinding machine.
  • Angel hair and angel grass, possibly explained in some cases as nests from ballooning spiders or chaff.

Scientific skepticism

A scientifically skeptical group that has for many years offered critical analyses of UFO claims is the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI). One example is the response to local beliefs that "extraterrestrial beings" in UFOs were responsible for crop circles appearing in Indonesia, which the government and the National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN) described as "man-made". Thomas Djamaluddin, research professor of astronomy and astrophysics at LAPAN stated: "We have come to agree that this 'thing' cannot be scientifically proven. Scientists have put UFOs in the category of pseudoscience."

Governmental

See also: Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government
UFO drawing, authenticity unknown, attribution and date unspecified. One of hundreds of files resulting from US President Bill Clinton's 1995 order to the CIA to declassify all documents with "historical value" that were at least 25 years old.

UFOs have been the subject of investigations by various governments that have provided extensive records related to the subject. Many of the most involved government-sponsored investigations ended after agencies concluded that there was no benefit to continued investigation. These same negative conclusions also have been found in studies that were highly classified for many years, such as the UK's Flying Saucer Working Party, Project Condign, the U.S. CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel, the U.S. military investigation into the green fireballs from 1948 to 1951, and the Battelle Memorial Institute study for the USAF from 1952 to 1955 (Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14).

Some public government reports have acknowledged the possibility of the physical reality of UFOs, but have stopped short of proposing extraterrestrial origins, though not dismissing the possibility entirely. Examples are the Belgian military investigation into large triangles over their airspace in 1989–1991 and the 2009 Uruguayan Air Force study conclusion (see below).

Claims by military, government, and aviation personnel

In 2007, former Arizona governor Fife Symington claimed he had seen "a massive, delta-shaped craft silently navigate over Squaw Peak, a mountain range in Phoenix, Arizona" in 1997. Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell claimed he knew of senior government employees who had been involved in "close encounters", and because of this, he has no doubt that aliens have visited Earth.

In May 2019, The New York Times reported that American Navy fighter jets had several instances of unidentified instrumentation and tracking data while conducting exercises off the eastern seaboard of the United States from the summer of 2014 to March 2015. The Times published a cockpit instrument video that appeared to show an object moving at high speed near the ocean surface as it appeared to rotate, and objects that appeared capable of high acceleration, deceleration and maneuverability. In two separate incidents, a pilot reported his cockpit instruments locked onto and tracked objects but he was unable to see them through his helmet camera. In another encounter, flight instruments recorded an image described as a sphere encasing a cube between two jets as they flew about 100 feet apart. The Pentagon officially released these videos on April 27, 2020. The United States Navy has said there have been "a number of reports of unauthorized and/or unidentified aircraft entering various military-controlled ranges and designated air space in recent years".

In March 2021, news media announced a comprehensive report is to be compiled of UFO events accumulated by the United States over the years.

On April 12, 2021, the Pentagon confirmed the authenticity of pictures and videos gathered by the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF), purportedly showing "pyramid shaped objects" hovering above the USS Russell in 2019, off the coast of California, with spokeswoman Susan Gough saying "I can confirm that the referenced photos and videos were taken by Navy personnel. The UAPTF has included these incidents in their ongoing examinations."

In May 2021, military pilots recalled their related encounters, along with camera and radar support, including one pilot's account noting that such incidents occurred "every day for at least a couple of years", according to an interview broadcast on the news program, 60 Minutes (May 16, 2021). Science writer and skeptic Mick West suggested the image was the result of an optical effect called a bokeh which can make out of focus light sources appear triangular or pyramidal due to the shape of the aperture of some lenses. In August, 2022, an article by West provided his detailed analysis of the video.

The 2021 Pentagon UFO Report

On June 25, 2021, U.S. Defense and intelligence officials released the nine pages Pentagon UFO Report (Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) on what they know about a series of unidentified flying objects that have been seen by American military pilots in the skies between 2004 and 2021. The document refers to UAP rather than UFO.

The report does not mentions extraterrestrials, but instead warns of the phenomenon's potential threat to national security, which was the primary motive for writing the study. It concludes that the objects found by the US military appear to be real in the majority of the 144 occurrences documented. Only one of the cases described in the study was identified as a balloon.

"Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors, to include radar, infrared, electro-optical, weapon seekers, and visual observation", according to the report. The report also stated that "UAP probably lack a single explanation", and proposed five possible categories of explanation: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, US government or industry development technology, foreign craft, and an "Other" category.

Commenting on the document, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said that he did not think we are alone, but the UFO sightings by pilots "may not be extraterrestrial."

In December 2021, further official governmental investigations into UAPs and related, along with annual unclassified reports presented to Congress, have been authorized and funded. Some have raised concerns about the new investigations.

President of the United States Joe Biden in 2023 signed the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act into law as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 on December 14, 2023. The 64-page amendment defined and codified 22 technical definitions related to UFOs and non-human intelligence under the law.

Conspiracy theories

See also: UFO conspiracy theory, Steven M. Greer, Men in black, and Brookings Report

UFOs are sometimes an element of conspiracy theories in which governments are allegedly intentionally "covering up" the existence of aliens by removing physical evidence of their presence or even collaborating with extraterrestrial beings. There are many versions of this story; some are exclusive, while others overlap with various other conspiracy theories.

In the U.S., an opinion poll conducted in 1997 suggested that 80% of Americans believed the U.S. government was withholding such information. Various notables have also expressed such views. Some examples are astronauts Gordon Cooper and Edgar Mitchell, Senator Barry Goldwater, Vice Admiral Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter (the first CIA director), Lord Hill-Norton (former British Chief of Defense Staff and NATO head), the 1999 French COMETA study by various French generals and aerospace experts, and Yves Sillard (former director of CNES, new director of French UFO research organization GEIPAN).

In June 2023, United States Air Force officer and former intelligence official David Grusch claimed that the U.S. federal government has maintained a highly secretive UFO retrieval program since the 1940s and that the government possesses multiple spacecraft of "non-human" origin.

"Disclosure" advocates

In May 2001, a press conference was held at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., by an organization called the Disclosure Project, featuring twenty persons including retired Air Force and FAA personnel, intelligence officers and an air traffic controller. They all gave a brief account of their claims that evidence of UFOs was being suppressed and said they would be willing to testify under oath to a Congressional committee. According to a 2002 report in the Oregon Daily Emerald, Disclosure Project founder Steven M. Greer is an "alien theorist" who claims "proof of government coverup" consisting of 120 hours of testimony from various government officials on the topic of UFOs, including astronaut Gordon Cooper.

In 2007, the German UFO conspiracy forum Disclose.tv was created. The website's name references the concept of disclosure.

On September 27, 2010, a group of six former USAF officers and one former enlisted Air Force man held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on the theme "U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects" in which they claimed they had witnessed UFOs hovering near missile sites and even disarming the missiles.

From April 29 to May 3, 2013, the Paradigm Research Group held the "Citizen Hearing on Disclosure" at the National Press Club. The group paid former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel and former Representatives Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, Roscoe Bartlett, Merrill Cook, Darlene Hooley, and Lynn Woolsey $20,000 each to hear testimony from a panel of researchers which included witnesses from military, agency, and political backgrounds.

Fringe

The void left by the lack of institutional or scientific study has given rise to independent researchers and fringe groups, including the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) in the mid-20th century and, more recently, the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) and the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS). The term "Ufology" is used to describe the collective efforts of those who study reports and associated evidence of unidentified flying objects.

Private

Some private studies have been neutral in their conclusions but argued that the inexplicable core cases call for continued scientific study. Examples are the Sturrock panel study of 1998 and the 1970 AIAA review of the Condon Report.

Religious

UFOs have been interpreted by some groups in a religious way, often influenced by the Theosophical tradition. Some Christians have interpreted UFOs as demonic entities.

Ufology

Main article: Ufology
Swirling multicolored cloud like object in the sky
A photograph of an unusual atmospheric occurrence observed over Sri Lanka, forwarded to the UK Ministry of Defence by RAF Fylingdales, 2004

Ufology is a neologism describing the collective efforts of those who study UFO reports and associated evidence.

Researchers

Main article: List of ufologists

Sightings

Main article: List of reported UFO sightings

Organizations

Main article: List of UFO organizations

In popular culture

Main article: UFOs in fiction
An UFO monument in Tenjo, Colombia

UFOs have constituted a widespread international cultural phenomenon since the 1950s. Gallup Polls rank UFOs near the top of lists for subjects of widespread recognition. In 1973, a survey found that 95 percent of the public reported having heard of UFOs, whereas only 92 percent had heard of U.S. President Gerald Ford in a 1977 poll taken just nine months after he left the White House.

A 1996 Gallup Poll reported that 71 percent of the United States population believed the U.S. government was covering up information regarding UFOs. A 2002 Roper Poll for the Sci-Fi Channel found similar results, but with more people believing UFOs are extraterrestrial craft. In that latest poll, 56 percent thought UFOs were real craft and 48 percent that aliens had visited the Earth. Again, about 70 percent felt the government was not sharing everything it knew about UFOs or extraterrestrial life.

Another effect of the flying saucer type of UFO sightings has been Earth-made flying saucer craft in space fiction, for example the United Planets Cruiser C57D in Forbidden Planet (1956), the Jupiter 2 in Lost in Space, and the saucer section of the USS Enterprise in Star Trek. UFOs and extraterrestrials have been featured in many movies.

The intense secrecy surrounding the secret Nevada base, known as Area 51, has made it the frequent subject of conspiracy theories and a central component of UFO folklore. In July 2019, more than 2 million people replied to a joke proposal to storm Area 51 which appeared in an anonymous Facebook post. Two music festivals in rural Nevada, "AlienStock" and "Storm Area 51 Basecamp", were subsequently organized to capitalize on the popularity of the original Facebook event. 150 people showed up to the Area 51 entrance and attendance at the festivals was 1,500

Notes

  1. Also known as an unidentified aerial phenomenon.
  1. Many of these documents are now online at the FOIA websites of these agencies such as the "FBI FOIA site". Archived from the original on May 24, 2008., as well as private websites such as The Black Vault Archived September 2, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, which has an archive of several thousand U.S. government UFO-related documents from the USAF, Army, CIA, DIA, DOD, and NSA.
  2. The so-called Twining memo of September 23, 1947 Archived February 26, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, by future USAF Chief of Staff, General Nathan Twining, specifically recommended intelligence cooperation with the Army, Navy, Atomic Energy Commission, the Defense Department's Joint Research and Development Board, Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), Project RAND, and the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project.
  3. For example, current USAF general reporting procedures are in Air Force Instruction (AFI)10-206 Archived June 18, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. Section 5.7.3 (p. 64) lists sightings of "unidentified flying objects" and "aircraft of unconventional design" as separate categories from potentially hostile but conventional, unidentified aircraft, missiles, surface vessels, or submarines. Additionally, "unidentified objects" detected by missile warning systems, creating a potential risk of nuclear war, are covered by Rule 5E (p.35).
  4. For example, the USAF's Project Blue Book concluded that less than 2% of reported UFOs were "psychological" or hoaxes; Allan Hendry's study for CUFOS had less than 1%.

References

  1. "UAP FAQs – NASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Study Frequently Asked Questions". NASA. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
  2. "50 U.S. Code § 3373 – Establishment of All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office". LII / Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on May 20, 2024. Retrieved March 21, 2024.
  3. "HOME > VISIT > MUSEUM EXHIBITS > FACT SHEETS > DISPLAY Avro Canada VZ-9AV Avrocar". www.nationalmuseum.af.mil United States Air Force. October 9, 2015. Archived from the original on May 18, 2021. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  4. ^ "Words We're Watching: What does 'UAP' mean?". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on April 17, 2023. Retrieved June 26, 2023.
  5. Ruppelt 1956, Chapter 1: "Project Blue Book and the UFO Story" Archived September 27, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  6. Blumenthal, Ralph (April 24, 2017). "People Are Seeing U.F.O.s Everywhere, and This Book Proves It". New York Times. Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved April 24, 2017.
  7. Costa, Cheryl; Costa, Linda Miller (2017). UFO Sightings Desk Reference: United States of America 2001–2015. Dragon Lady Media, LLC. ISBN 978-1544219233.
  8. Micah Hanks (July 21, 2022). "The Pentagon Just Revealed the New Name of Its UAP Investigative Office". The Debrief. Archived from the original on July 24, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
  9. Emily Furfaro (October 21, 2022). "NASA Announces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team Members". NASA. Archived from the original on December 23, 2022. Retrieved December 23, 2022. Editor's Note: This article was updated on December 22, 2022 to reflect an expanded terminology for 'UAP,' going from unidentified aerial phenomena to unidentified anomalous phenomena.
  10. Haines 1979, Chapter: "The Zeitgeist of the UFO Phenomenon" by Armando Simón
  11. Giere, Ronald N.; Bickle, John; Mauldin, Robert F. (2006), Understanding Scientific Reasoning (5th ed.), Wadsworth Publishing, p. 99, ISBN 0-15-506326-X, LCCN 2005922853, OCLC 61369793
  12. Sturrock, et al. 1998, Appendix 4: "Electromagnetic-Wave Ducting" by V. R. Eshleman
  13. Project Blue Book Special Report 14: Analysis of Reports of Unidentified Aerial Objects (Report). United States Air Force. May 5, 1955. p. 10. Archive.
  14. ^ Ezzy, Pearson (June 3, 2024). "16 things commonly mistaken for UFOs". Sky at Night Magazine. BBC. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
  15. ^ "Relax, It's Not Aliens: Man-Made Objects Mistaken for UFOs". Star Walk. February 12, 2024. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
  16. ^ Carey, Bjorn; Melina, Remy (November 10, 2010). "7 Things Most Often Mistaken for UFOs". Live Science. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
  17. ^ "How To Identify A UFO". MTU Blackrock Castle. August 15, 2022. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
  18. Hahn, Jason (December 21, 2022). "Christmas Lights Are Likely Source of Multiple UFO Reports in Wisconsin (But Not Everyone's Convinced)". People. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
  19. United States Air Force (1968). Aid to Identification of Flying Objects (PDF) (Report). U.S. Government Printing Office.
  20. Wright, Aaron (October 31, 2018). "'The truth is out there': UFO group debunks hoaxes in hopes of finding the real thing". kens5.com. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
  21. "The Great Morris County UFO Hoax". Retrieved September 14, 2024.
  22. Hendry 1979
  23. Andrew Fraknoi, Science Education and Outreach: Forging a Path to the Future Archived May 26, 2021, at the Wayback Machine. Proceedings of a conference held September 12–16, 2009 in Millbrae, California. Edited by Jonathan Barnes, Denise A. Smith, Michael G. Gibbs, and James G. Manning., p. 514, August 2010
  24. "March 30, 240 B.C.: Comet Cometh to Cathay". Wired. March 30, 2011. Archived from the original on February 13, 2021. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  25. Giordano, Daniela (November 13, 2006). "Do UFOs Exist in the History of Arts?". American Chronicle. Ultio, LLC. Archived from the original on August 19, 2012. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
  26. Cuoghi, Diego (2004). "The Art of Imagining UFOs". Skeptic. 11 (1). The Skeptics Society. Archived from the original on October 3, 2012. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
  27. Julio Obsecuente, Libro de los Prodigios (restituido a su integridad, en beneficio de la Historia, por Conrado Licóstenes), ed. Ana Moure Casas (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 1990)
  28. Giulio Ossequente, Il Libro dei prodigi, ed. Solas Boncompagni (Rome: Edizioni Mediterranee, 1992)
  29. Dong, Paul. (2000). China's Major Mysteries: Paranormal Phenomena and the Unexplained in the People's Republic. San Francisco: China Books and Periodicals, Inc. ISBN 0-8351-2676-5. pp 69–71.
  30. Vallee, Jacques; Aubeck, Chris (2010). Wonders in the Sky: Unexplained Aerial Objects from Antiquity to Modern Times. Tarcher. ISBN 978-1585428205.
  31. Colavito, Jason (December 12, 2012). "The UFO Battle over Nuremburg". jasoncolavito.com. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
  32. Borchert (2013). The book of miracles: Facsimile of the Augsburg manuscript from the Collection of Mickey Cartin (in German). Taschen. ISBN 978-3-8365-4285-2. Archived from the original on July 30, 2023. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
  33. Booth, B J (December 8, 2008). "Before the Wright Brothers ... There Were UFOs". American Chronicle. Ultio, LLC. Archived from the original on August 19, 2012. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
  34. Cohen 1981, p. 1.
  35. Cohen 1981, p. 86.
  36. Keel 1996, pp. 29–31, stating date of April 22, 1897
  37. Cohen 1981, p. 88.
  38. "Foo-Fighter". Time. January 15, 1945. Archived from the original on April 17, 2008. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
  39. Swords & Powell 2012, p. 63
  40. Jeffrey J. Kripal, Authors of the Impossible: The Paranormal and the Sacred, University of Chicago Press, 2010, pp. 206–208.
  41. Bertrand Meheust, Science Fiction et Soucoupes Volantes Mercure de France, 1978
  42. Michel Monnerie, Le Naufrage des Extra-terrestres, Nouvelles Editions Rationalistes, 1979.
  43. Michel Meurger, Alien Abduction : L'enlèvement Extraterrestre de la Fiction à la croyance – Scientifictions: la Revue de l'Imaginaire Scientifique; numero 1, volume 1 Encrage, 1995 (in French) 253pp.
  44. Michel Meurger, "Surgeons from Outside" Fortean Studies # 3 (1996) pp. 308–321.
  45. Jacques Vallee, Dimensions: A Casebook of Alien Contact Contemporary Books, 1988, p. 167.
  46. Martin S. Kottmeyer, Magonia #90; November 2005, pp. 3–15. "Engine Stoppers Archived 2013-10-01 at the Wayback Machine"
  47. Pasulka, D.W. (2019). American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-0190692889. the standard assumption that the UFO mythos was born in the year 1947
  48. ^ Eghigian, Greg (August 4, 2021). "UFOs and the Boundaries of Science". Boston Review. Archived from the original on April 10, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  49. Garber, Megan. "The Man Who Introduced the World to Flying Saucers". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  50. "Saturday Night Uforia Audioplex: Edward R. Murrow – The Case ForOf The Flying Saucer (April 7, 1950 broadcast)". www.saturdaynightuforia.com. Archived from the original on July 18, 2019. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  51. Eghigian, Greg (March 14, 2017). "More Human Than Alien: Researvching the History of UFOs". Perspectives on History. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved July 8, 2023.
  52. Eghigian, Greg (August 5, 2021). "UFOs, UAPs – Whatever We Call Them, Why Do We Assume Mysterious Flying Objects Are Extraterrestrial?". Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved July 8, 2023.
  53. "Flying saucers still evasive 70 years after pilot's report | The Spokesman-Review". www.spokesman.com. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
  54. Olmsted, Kathryn S. (2009). Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 184. ISBN 978-0199753956. The material recovered near Roswell was consistent with a balloon device and most likely from one of the MOGUL balloons that had not been previously recovered.
  55. ^ Lewis-Kraus, Gideon (April 30, 2021). "How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously". The New Yorker magazine. Archived from the original on June 23, 2023.
  56. Jung, Carl (1959). Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies. Translated by Hull, R. F. C. Broadway House, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  57. Eghigian, Greg (December 19, 2017). "That Secret Government Program to Track UFOs? It's Not the First". Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved July 8, 2023.
  58. Michael D. Swords; "UFOs, the Military, and the Early Cold War Era", pp. 82–121 in "UFOs and Abductions: Challenging the Borders of Knowledge" David M. Jacobs, editor; 2000, University Press of Kansas, ISBN 0700610324; p. 103.
  59. ^ Mathis, Joel (July 6, 2023). "What we know from decades of UFO government investigations". National Geographic. Archived from the original on July 8, 2023.
  60. Haines, Gerald K. (1997). "A Die-Hard Issue: CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947–90" (PDF). Studies in Intelligence. 1 (1): 67–84. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 12, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2023.
  61. Keyhoe, Donald E. (1973). Aliens from space; the real story of unidentified flying objects. Garden City, New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-06751-8.
  62. "Betty Hill, 85, Figure in Alien Abduction Case, Dies". The New York Times (online). October 23, 2004. Archived from the original on June 20, 2017. Retrieved January 29, 2020.
  63. Saad, Lydia (April 12, 2016). "Gallup Vault: Eyewitnesses to Flying Saucers". Gallup. Archived from the original on May 23, 2023. Retrieved July 8, 2023.
  64. ^ Kloor, Kieth (April 3, 2019). "UFOs Won't Go Away". Issues. Vol. XXXV, No. 3, Spring 2019. Arizona State University. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
  65. Sparks, Glenn G.; Pellechia, Marianne; Irvine, Chris (June 1998). "Does television news about UFOs affect viewers' UFO beliefs?: An experimental investigation". Communication Quarterly. 46 (3): 284–294. doi:10.1080/01463379809370102. ISSN 0146-3373. Archived from the original on July 9, 2023. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
  66. "The 1980s Book Series That Literally Claimed It Had To Be Read To Be Believed". Atlas Obscura. September 22, 2015. Archived from the original on July 4, 2024. Retrieved July 9, 2023.
  67. Corliss, Richard (November 27, 1995). "Autopsy or Fraud-topsy?". Time. Archived from the original on December 16, 2009. Retrieved April 23, 2010.
  68. Orth, Taylor (October 4, 2022). "A growing share of Americans believe aliens are responsible for UFOs". YouGov PLC (citing 1996 Newsweek poll). Archived from the original on May 31, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  69. ^ Cooper, Helene; Blumenthal, Ralph; Kean, Leslie (December 16, 2017). "Glowing Auras and 'Black Money': The Pentagon's Mysterious U.F.O. Program". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 21, 2017. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  70. ^ Blumenthal, Ralph; Kean, Leslie (May 14, 2020). "Navy Reports Describe Encounters With Unexplained Flying Objects – While some of the encounters have been reported publicly before, the Navy records are an official accounting of the incidents, including descriptions from the pilots of what they saw". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2020. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  71. Bock, Michael (December 23, 2022). "NASA to Set Up Independent Study on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena". NASA. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 23, 2023.
  72. Kathleen Hicks (23 November 2021) Establishment of the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group Archived May 23, 2023, at the Wayback Machine
  73. Vergun, David (April 19, 2023). "DOD Working to Better Understand, Resolve Anomalous Phenomena". DOD News. Archived from the original on June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  74. Leonard, David (June 9, 2023). "Bad Data, Not Aliens, May Be behind UFO Surge, NASA Team Says". Scientific American. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  75. 2022 Congressional Record, Vol. 168, Page D545 (May 17, 2022)
  76. Merchant, Nomaan (July 26, 2023). "Whistleblower tells Congress the US is concealing 'multi-decade' program that captures UFOs". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
  77. De Avila, Joseph (July 26, 2023). "UFOs Are a Common Sight, Former Military Official Tells Congress". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
  78. Cooper, Helene (July 26, 2023). "Lawmakers and Former Officials Press for Answers on U.F.O.s". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
  79. Pasulka, D.W. (2019). American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0190692889. the standard assumption that the UFO mythos was born in the year 1947
  80. Harish, Alon (June 27, 2012). "UFOs Exist, Say 36 Percent in National Geographic Survey". ABC News. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  81. Kennedy, Courtney; Lau, Arnold (June 30, 2021). "Most Americans believe in intelligent life beyond Earth; few see UFOs as a major national security threat". Pew. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  82. Saad, Lydia (August 20, 2021). "Larger Minority in U.S. Says Some UFOs Are Alien Spacecraft". Gallup. Archived from the original on May 23, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  83. Linley, Sanders (October 4, 2022). "Aliens and UFOs: YouGov Poll: September 9–12, 2022". YouGov PLC. Archived from the original on April 25, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  84. Kripal, Jeffrey J. (2010). Authors of the Impossible. University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226453897.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-226-45387-3. Archived from the original on July 8, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
  85. Davison, Andrew (October 2, 2019). "Astrotheology: Science and Theology Meet Extraterrestrial Life". Theology and Science. 17 (4): 551–554. doi:10.1080/14746700.2019.1670968. ISSN 1474-6700. S2CID 211965883. Archived from the original on July 8, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
  86. Cusack, Carole M. (2019). "D. W. Pasulka, American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology". Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review. 10 (2): 258–259. doi:10.5840/asrr201910263. ISSN 1946-0538. S2CID 213855394. Archived from the original on July 8, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
  87. Shilcutt, Katharine (June 30, 2021). "Jeffrey Kripal on how to think about the UFO phenomenon". Rice University News and Media Relations Team. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  88. Shilcutt, Adrian (June 25, 2021). "How pop culture has shaped our understanding of alien". Guardian News. Archived from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  89. Pasulka, D.W. (2019). American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 82. ISBN 978-0190692889. the standard assumption that the UFO mythos was born in the year 1947
  90. Posner, Gary P. (July 1992). "The Gulf Breeze 'UFOs'". Tampa Bay Sounding. Seminole, FL: Tampa Bay Mensa. Archived from the original on July 3, 2013. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  91. "Project Blue Book Special Report #14". Internet Archive. United States Air Force. Retrieved September 7, 2013.
  92. "Brazil to record UFO sightings". BBC News. August 12, 2010. Archived from the original on May 4, 2018. Retrieved April 1, 2018.
  93. "Origen de la SEFAA". SEFAA. Santiago de Chile. Archived from the original on July 4, 2022. Retrieved July 3, 2022.(in spanish)
  94. "Canada's UFOs: The Search for the Unknown" (Virtual museum). Ottawa: Library and Archives Canada. Archived from the original on January 16, 2016. Retrieved September 8, 2013.
  95. Kocher 1968
  96. Demirjian, Karoun (November 24, 2021). "Pentagon will track unexplained airborne objects through new intelligence group". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 25, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2021.
  97. ^ Contreras, Russell (March 29, 2013). "FBI 'flying saucers' NM memo bureau's most viewed". Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 27, 2013. Retrieved April 1, 2013.
  98. "Federal Bureau of Investigation FOIA Documents – Unidentified Flying Objects". Project Gutenberg. Archived from the original on November 10, 2012. Retrieved September 7, 2013. Internal FBI memo from E. G. Fitch to D. M. Ladd concerning a request by General George F. Schulgen, Chief of the Requirements Intelligence Branch of Army Air Corps Intelligence, for the FBI to help with their investigation of UFO reports.
  99. Hall & Connors 1998, p. 83
  100. Blum, Howard, Out There: The Government's Secret Quest for Extraterrestrials. Simon and Schuster, 1990
  101. Ruppelt 1956, Chapter 3: "The Classics" Archived September 6, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  102. ^ Haines, Gerald K. (1997). "CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947–90". Central Intelligence Agency. OCLC 713270503. Archived from the original on October 1, 2019. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  103. Hynek 1972, p. 76
  104. ^ "AFD-070703-004.pdf" (PDF). Air Force Freedom of Information Act. United States Air Force. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2012. Retrieved September 7, 2013.
  105. ^ "COMETA Report". Seattle, WA: ufoevidence.org. Archived from the original on November 15, 2019. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  106. "Introductory Space Science". CUFON.org. West Jacksonville, FL: Computer UFO Network (CUFON). Archived from the original on May 30, 2013. Retrieved May 16, 2013. Air Force Academy UFO material.
  107. McDonald, James E. (1974) . "Science in Default: Twenty-Two Years of Inadequate UFO Investigations". In Sagan, Carl; Page, Thornton (eds.). UFO's: A Scientific Debate. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 134th Meeting (Reprint ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-00739-8. LCCN 72004572. OCLC 934695. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  108. ^ McDonald, James E. (July 29, 1968). "Statement on Unidentified Flying Objects: Submitted to the House Committee on Science and Astronautics at July 29, 1968, Symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects, Rayburn Bldg., Washington, D.C., by James E. McDonald" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on January 5, 2019. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
  109. Ruppelt 1956
  110. ^ Huyghe, Patrick (October 14, 1979). "U.F.O. Files: The Untold Story". The New York Times. New York Times. Archived from the original on November 9, 2021. Retrieved November 9, 2021.
  111. ^ Larson, Phil (November 5, 2011). "Searching for ET, But No Evidence Yet". White House. Archived from the original on November 24, 2011. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
  112. ^ Atkinson, Nancy (November 5, 2011). "No Alien Visits or UFO Coverups, White House Says". Universe Today. Courtenay, B.C. Archived from the original on January 18, 2019. Retrieved November 6, 2011.
  113. Gabbatt, Adam (June 25, 2021). "It came out of the sky: US releases highly anticipated UFO report". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 26, 2021. Retrieved June 26, 2021.
  114. "Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena" (PDF). Office of the Director of National Intelligence. June 25, 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 26, 2021. Retrieved June 25, 2021.
  115. Merchant, Nomaan (June 25, 2021). "No ET, no answers: Intel report is inconclusive about UFOs". apnews.com. Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 25, 2021. Retrieved June 25, 2021.
  116. Kube, Courtney; Edelman, Adam (June 25, 2021). "UFO report: Government can't explain 143 of 144 mysterious flying objects, blames limited data". NBC News. Archived from the original on June 26, 2021. Retrieved June 26, 2021.
  117. Isgleas, Daniel (June 7, 2009). "Hay aún 40 casos de ovnis sin explicación". El País (in Spanish). Montevideo: Teledoce. Archived from the original on November 16, 2013. Retrieved September 10, 2013.
  118. ^ "GEIPAN: Le GEIPAN". Groupe d'Études et d'Informations sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non Identifiés (GEIPAN). Paris: Centre national d'études spatiales (CNES). Archived from the original on February 19, 2011. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
  119. "A history of UAP research at CNES". CNES. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved October 6, 2014.
  120. "Autres Liens". Archived from the original on August 4, 2023. Retrieved October 6, 2014.
  121. "Official French Gov't UFO study project to resume with new director". Seattle: ufoevidence.org. October 2005. Archived from the original on May 2, 2013. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  122. "'Yes, UFOs exist': Position statement by SEPRA head, Jean-Jacques Velasco". Seattle: ufoevidence.org. April 18, 2004 . Archived from the original on April 8, 2013. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  123. "Assessment of the UFO phenomenon by GEPAN (1978)". Seattle: ufoevidence.org. Archived from the original on April 8, 2013. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  124. "CNES report, March 26, 2007". April 23, 2015. Archived from the original on January 8, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2023.
  125. "Ovni-nouvelle-commission-denquete-3AF-PAN (Partie 1)". Dailymotion. Paris: Orange. May 11, 2009. Archived from the original on January 6, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  126. "Rapport d'étape de la Commission Sigma/3AF" (PDF). Paris: Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France. May 31, 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  127. Dini, Luc (January 10, 2013). "Sigma 2". 3AF. Paris: Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France. Archived from the original on February 13, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  128. Boudier, Alain (June 20, 2013). "Alexandre – Alain Boudier – Sygma & 3AF". RimLive.com (Interview). Interviewed by Alexandre. Paris. Archived from the original on July 2, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  129. "And Ufology UFO Italy UFO sightings, not Flying Saucers, Aliens or Extraterrestrials". Ufo.it. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved October 6, 2014.
  130. "Unidentified Flying Objects" (PDF). The Black Vault. Northridge, CA: John Greenewald. June 1951. DSI/JTIC Report No. 7. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 1, 2012. Retrieved September 16, 2013.
  131. ^ "UFO files". Kew: The National Archives. Archived from the original on February 24, 2011. Retrieved September 10, 2013.
  132. "Files released on UFO sightings". BBC News. London: BBC. May 14, 2008. Archived from the original on July 20, 2008. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
  133. "The truth is out there: Britons 'spotted' UFOs, records say". London. AFP. May 13, 2008. Archived from the original on June 5, 2013. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
  134. "Airliner had near miss with UFO". BBC News. London: BBC. October 20, 2008. Archived from the original on October 23, 2008. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
  135. ^ Defence Intelligence Staff (December 2000). "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region" (PDF). Kew: The National Archives. p. 2. 55/2/00. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 26, 2012. Retrieved September 10, 2013. See also The National Archives site: "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) in the UK Air Defence Region" for archived documents.
  136. Dearing, Stephanie (December 5, 2009). "Cost-cutting causes British gov't to shut down UFO investigations". Digital Journal. Toronto. Archived from the original on May 15, 2013. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
  137. Binlot, Ann (August 5, 2010). "Winston Churchill Ordered UFO Coverup?". cbsnews.com. CBS news. Archived from the original on November 10, 2021. Retrieved November 10, 2021.
  138. "UFO hotspots revealed as ex Ministry of Defence expert calls for action". The Independent. October 24, 2023. Archived from the original on November 4, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
  139. Sagan, Carl (1995). The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York: Random House. ISBN 0-394-53512-X. LCCN 95034076. OCLC 779687822.
  140. ^ Vallée 2008
  141. Friedman 2008
  142. Novella, Steven, et al. The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake. Grand Central Publishing, 2018. pp. 160.
  143. ^ Cross, Anne (March 2004). "The Flexibility of Scientific Rhetoric: A Case Study of UFO Researchers". Qualitative Sociology. 27 (1). Springer: 3–34. doi:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015542.28438.41. ISSN 0162-0436. S2CID 144197172.
  144. Sagan & Page 1996
  145. McCarthy 1975
  146. Salisbury, David F. (July 1, 1998). "UFO study causes media sensation: 7/1/98". Stanford Report. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Archived from the original on April 11, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
  147. Menzel & Taves 1977
  148. Hough, Andrew (April 13, 2010). "UFO studies should be 'legitimate university subject', claims American professor". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  149. Swords & Powell 2012, pp. 306–332
  150. Chang, Kenneth (September 14, 2023). "NASA Introduces New U.F.O. Research Director – The role was created in response to the recommendations of a report that found the agency could do more to collect and interpret data on unidentified anomalous phenomena". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 14, 2023. Retrieved September 15, 2023.
  151. Moldwin, Mark (November 2004). "Why SETI IS Science and UFOlogy Is Not: A Space Science Perspective on Boundaries". Skeptical Inquirer. 28 (6): 40–42.
  152. Tuomela, Raimo (1985). Science, action, and reality. Springer. p. 234. ISBN 90-277-2098-3.
  153. Feist, Gregory J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind. Yale University Press. p. 219. ISBN 0-300-11074-X.
  154. Restivo, Sal P. (2005). Science, technology, and society: an encyclopedia. Oxford University Press US. p. 176. ISBN 0-19-514193-8.
  155. Shermer, Michael, ed. (2002). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience (PDF). ABC–CLIO, Inc. ISBN 978-1-57607-653-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 11, 2016. Retrieved December 16, 2013.
  156. ""Beyond Science", on season 8, episode 2". Scientific American Frontiers. Chedd-Angier Production Company. 1997–1998. PBS. Archived from the original on January 1, 2006.
  157. "Scientific American". Archived from the original on October 9, 2009.
  158. Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "The 'Great Moon Hoax': Did Astronauts Land on the Moon?". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved November 2, 2011.
  159. "Statement of the position of the Iowa Academy of Science on Pseudoscience" (PDF). Iowa Academy of Science. July 1986. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 26, 2007.
  160. National Science Foundation (2002). "ch. 7". Science and Engineering Indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. ISBN 978-0-7567-2369-9. Archived from the original on June 16, 2016. Retrieved April 6, 2018. Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... A sizable minority of the public believes in UFOs and that aliens have landed on Earth.
  161. Hansson, Sven Ove (September 3, 2008). "Science and Pseudo-Science". Retrieved May 8, 2010.
  162. Feist (2006), pp. 219–20
  163. ^ Eghigian, Greg (December 6, 2015). "Making UFOs make sense: Ufology, science, and the history of their mutual mistrust". Public Understanding of Science. 26 (5): 612–626. doi:10.1177/0963662515617706. PMID 26644010. S2CID 37769406.
  164. Cooper, Rachel (2009). "Chapter 1: Is psychiatric research scientific?". In Broome, Matthew; Bortolotti, Lisa (eds.). Psychiatry as Cognitive Neuroscience: Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-19-923803-3.
  165. Dodd, Adam (April 27, 2018). "Strategic Ignorance and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence: Critiquing the Discursive Segregation of UFOs from Scientific Inquiry". Astropolitics. 16 (1): 75–95. Bibcode:2018AstPo..16...75D. doi:10.1080/14777622.2018.1433409. ISSN 1477-7622. S2CID 148687469.
  166. Loeb, Avi (September 19, 2021). "Astronomers Should be Willing to Look Closer at Weird Objects in the Sky – The Galileo Project seeks to train telescopes on unidentified aerial phenomena". Scientific American. Retrieved September 19, 2021.
  167. "Galileo Project: scientists to search for signs of extraterrestrial technology". The Guardian. July 27, 2021. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
  168. "Can we find UFOs from above?". The Hill. January 24, 2022. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
  169. Mann, Adam. "Avi Loeb's Galileo Project Will Search for Evidence of Alien Visitation". Scientific American. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
  170. "Public Announcement". projects.iq.harvard.edu. Archived from the original on August 12, 2021. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
  171. "Deutschlandweit einmalig – Ufo-Forschung an der Uni Würzburg". BR24 (in German). September 3, 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
  172. "UAP & SETI – Chair of Computer Science VIII – Aerospace Information Technology". www.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
  173. "Where Science and UAP Meet" (PDF). Retrieved July 4, 2022.
  174. Andresen, Jensine; Torres, Octavio A. Chon (2022). Extraterrestrial Intelligence: Academic and Societal Implications. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5275-7925-5.
  175. "Larger Minority in U.S. Says Some UFOs Are Alien Spacecraft". Gallup.com. August 20, 2021. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
  176. "Nasa UFO study to focus on gathering data, not making conclusions". The Independent. June 10, 2022. Retrieved July 4, 2022.
  177. Hunt, Katie; Strickland, Ashley. "NASA is assembling a team to gather data on unidentifiable events in the sky". CNN. Retrieved July 4, 2022.
  178. Bock, Michael (June 9, 2022). "NASA to Set Up Independent Study on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena". NASA. Archived from the original on July 8, 2022. Retrieved July 4, 2022.
  179. Posard, Marek N.; Gromis, Ashley; Lee, Mary (July 25, 2023). Not the X-Files: Mapping Public Reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Across America (Report). RAND Corporation.
  180. Fawcett & Greenwood, 81–89; Good 1988, pp. 318–322, 497–502
  181. Good 1988, pp. 371–373
  182. Stanford 1976, pp. 112–154
  183. "UFO Relics". UFO Hunters. Season 3. Episode 33. May 6, 2009. History.
  184. Pat Linse, Ean Harrison (2011) Bob White's Great UFO Artifact Mystery – This Solved! Archived April 29, 2022, at the Wayback Machine Skeptic magazine, Vol 16 No 3
  185. Faustino, Mara (2004). Heaven and hell : a compulsively readable compendium of myth, legend, wisdom, and wit for saints and sinners. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press. ISBN 0871136961. OCLC 55596198.
  186. Krismantari, Ika (February 6, 2011). "Crop circles provide food for thought". The Star. Petaling Jaya: Star Publications. Archived from the original on October 30, 2012. Retrieved September 12, 2013.
  187. Siddique, Haroon (December 17, 2017). "Pentagon admits running secret UFO investigation for five years". The Guardian. Archived from the original on April 25, 2020. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  188. Eghigian, Greg. "That Secret Government Program to Track UFOs? It's Not the First". Air & Space Magazine. Archived from the original on March 18, 2020. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  189. Symington, Fife (November 9, 2007). "Symington: I saw a UFO in the Arizona sky". CNN. Atlanta, GA: Turner Broadcasting System. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved November 25, 2013.
  190. Mitchell, Edgar (2008), p. 262
  191. Cooper, Helene; Blumenthal, Ralph; Kean, Leslie (May 26, 2019). "'Wow, What Is That?' Navy Pilots Report Unexplained Flying Objects". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 26, 2020. Retrieved May 27, 2019.
  192. Strauss, Daniel (April 28, 2020). "Pentagon releases three UFO videos taken by US navy pilots". The Guardian. Archived from the original on May 9, 2020. Retrieved May 10, 2020.
  193. ^ Chandelis Duster. "Defense Department confirms leaked video of unidentified aerial phenomena is real". CNN. Archived from the original on April 16, 2021. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  194. Thebault, Reis (March 23, 2021). "Thanks to Trump-era covid relief bill, a UFO report may soon be public – and it'll be big, ex-official says". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
  195. "Pentagon confirms leaked video of UFO 'buzzing' Navy warships is genuine". The Independent. April 13, 2021. Archived from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  196. "Leaked footage shows UFOs flying around navy vessels". in.news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on April 16, 2021. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  197. "Pentagon Confirms That Leaked Video Is Part of UFO Investigation". Futurism. April 11, 2021. Archived from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  198. Thebault, Reis (May 17, 2021). "For some Navy pilots, UFO sightings were an ordinary event: 'Every day for at least a couple years'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 18, 2021. Retrieved May 18, 2021.
  199. video. "Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs". CBS News. Archived from the original on May 19, 2021. Retrieved May 19, 2021.
  200. "Pentagon Confirms That Leaked Video Is Part of UFO Investigation". Futurism. April 11, 2021. Archived from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  201. Lewis-Kraus, Gideon. "How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously". The New Yorker. New Yorker Magazine. Archived from the original on June 23, 2023. Retrieved May 25, 2021.
  202. West, Mick, The Gimbal Video: Genuine UFO or Camera Artifact? Archived February 26, 2024, at the Wayback Machine, Skeptic, August 2, 2022
  203. "UFO report: US finds no explanation for sightings". BBC News. June 25, 2021. Archived from the original on July 6, 2021. Retrieved July 4, 2021.
  204. ^ "They're real, but are they alien? – key takeaways from the Pentagon report. Whatever the 'unidentified aerial phenomena' are, they are real objects that may pose a national security risk". The Guardian. June 26, 2021. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on July 8, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  205. "Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena" (PDF). Office of the Director of National Intelligence. June 25, 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 26, 2021. Retrieved June 26, 2021.
  206. "NASA administrator on UFO report: 'I don't think we are' alone". The Hill. June 28, 2021. Archived from the original on July 3, 2021. Retrieved July 3, 2021.
  207. Guthrie, Dillon (December 16, 2021). "Op-Ed: OK! It's time to take UFOs seriously". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 16, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2021.
  208. Seitz-Wald, Alex (January 8, 2022). "Disclosure or deception? New UFO Pentagon office divides believers – The U.S. government hasn't comprehensively studied UFOs in decades—but not all ufologists are excited about a new Pentagon investigative office". NBC News. Archived from the original on January 8, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
  209. Mizokami, Kyle (December 14, 2023). "A New Law Forces the U.S. Government to Collect UFO Sightings—But Not Release Them to the Public". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
  210. Vincent, Brandi (July 25, 2023). "Senators aim to set a mandatory timeline and process for agencies to declassify all UAP records". Defense Scoop. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
  211. "Is the Government Hiding Facts On UFOs & Extraterrestrial Life?; New Roper Poll Reveals that More Than Two-Thirds of Americans Think So" (Press release). New York: Business Wire. October 15, 2002. Archived from the original on December 2, 2013. Retrieved September 12, 2013.
  212. "Poll: U.S. hiding knowledge of aliens". CNN. Atlanta, GA: Turner Broadcasting System. June 15, 1997. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013. Retrieved September 12, 2013.
  213. Entin, Brian (June 5, 2023). "Military whistleblower claims US has UFO retrieval program". NewsNation. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  214. Wallace, Danielle (June 6, 2023). "Military whistleblower goes public with claims US has secret UFO retrieval program: 'Terrestrial arms race'". Fox News. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  215. Coen, Susie (June 7, 2023). "'Non-human spacecraft' found by US 'for decades'". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  216. Gabbatt, Adam (June 9, 2023). "A whistleblower claims the US has alien vehicles. But where's the proof?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  217. 2001 National Press Club Event on YouTube
  218. Duin, Julia (May 11, 2001). "Government is covering up UFO evidence, group says". The Washington Times. Washington, D.C.: News World Communications. Archived from the original on January 19, 2016. Retrieved September 11, 2013.
  219. Spavin, Vicky (May 9, 2001). "They're Here; UFO Watchers to Reveal Proof That Aliens Have Visited Earth". The Daily Record. Glasgow: Trinity Mirror. Archived from the original on March 5, 2016. Retrieved March 10, 2013.
  220. Raymer, Katelynn; Ruppe, David (May 10, 2001). "Group Calls for Disclosure of UFO Info". ABC News. Archived from the original on July 28, 2013. Retrieved March 11, 2013.
  221. Watson, Rob (May 10, 2001). "UFO spotters slam 'US cover-up'". BBC News. London: BBC. Archived from the original on July 23, 2019. Retrieved September 11, 2013.
  222. Kehnemui, Sharon (May 10, 2001). "Men in Suits See Aliens as Part of Solution, Not Problem". FoxNews.com. New York: Fox Entertainment Group. Archived from the original on August 25, 2013. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  223. McCullagh, Declan (May 10, 2001). "Ooo-WEE-ooo Fans Come to D.C." Wired News. Waltham, MA: Lycos. Archived from the original on June 9, 2008. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  224. Schmidt, Brad (April 25, 2002). "Alien theorist offers proof of government coverup". Oregon Daily Emerald. Eugene, OR. Archived from the original on August 14, 2012. Retrieved December 12, 2012.
  225. Thomas, W. F. (January 12, 2022). "Disclose.tv: Conspiracy Forum Turned Disinformation Factory". Logically. Archived from the original on January 12, 2022. Retrieved October 26, 2022. The name "Disclose" references the concept within UFO enthusiast circles of "disclosure," the time when the government will confirm the existence of aliens and release information regarding them.
  226. Salas, Robert; Hastings, Robert (September 15, 2010). "U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects" (Press release). Washington, D.C.: PR Newswire. Archived from the original on January 27, 2011. Retrieved September 11, 2013. "National Press Club: UFOs Tampering with Nukes – Part 1/7" on YouTube
  227. Schultz, Marisa (April 29, 2013). "Ex-Rep. Kilpatrick 'waiting to hear' evidence of space aliens". The Detroit News. MediaNews Group. Archived from the original on May 31, 2013. Retrieved September 11, 2013.
  228. "Citizen Hearing on Disclosure". Citizen Hearing on Disclosure. Bethesda, MD: Paradigm Research Group. Archived from the original on September 15, 2013. Retrieved September 11, 2013.
  229. "Mutual UFO Network". MUFON.com. Cincinnati, OH: Mutual UFO Network, Inc. Archived from the original on December 21, 1997. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  230. "Center for UFO Studies". CUFOS.org. Chicago: Center for UFO Studies. Archived from the original on October 21, 1997. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  231. Speigel, Lee (August 26, 2011). "UFO Sightings Increase 67 Percent In 3 Years, History Channel Investigates Unexplained Aerial Phenomena". The Huffington Post. AOL. Archived from the original on September 9, 2013. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  232. Partridge, Christopher (July 2004). "Alien demonology: The Christian roots of the malevolent extraterrestrial in UFO religions and abduction spiritualities". Religion. 34 (3): 163–189. doi:10.1016/j.religion.2004.04.014. ISSN 0048-721X. Archived from the original on July 8, 2024. Retrieved June 13, 2024.
  233. Jacobs 2000, Chapter: "UFOs: Lost in the Myths" by Thomas E. Bullard, p. 141
  234. Jacobs 2000, Chapter: "UFOs, the Military, and the Early Cold War Era" by Michael D. Swords, pp. 82–121
  235. "The Roper Poll". Ufology Resource Center. SciFi.com. September 2002. Archived from the original on July 13, 2006. Retrieved August 19, 2006.
  236. "UFO Fast Facts". MUFON.com. Cincinnati, OH: Mutual UFO Network, Inc. Archived from the original on April 30, 2008. Retrieved July 13, 2013.
  237. Griffin, Andrew (July 17, 2019). "Storm Area 51: Are Alien-hunters Really Planning to 'Raid' the Secret U.S. Military Base?". The Independent. Archived from the original on July 16, 2019. Retrieved July 3, 2021.
  238. Richwine, Lisa (September 20, 2019). "Area 51 raid lures festive UFO hunters to Nevada desert; five arrested". Reuters. Archived from the original on November 23, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2021.
  239. Baynes, Chris (September 21, 2019). "Storm Area 51: Hundreds of people gather at US military base to 'see them aliens'". The Independent. Archived from the original on May 25, 2022. Retrieved September 23, 2019.

Bibliography

General

History

Psychology

Technology

Skepticism

External links

UFOs
Claimed sightings
General
Pre-20th century
20th century
21st century
Confirmed hoaxes
Sightings by country
Types of UFOs
Types of alleged
extraterrestrial beings
Studies and timeline
Hypotheses
Conspiracy theories
Involvement
Abduction claims
Other
Culture
Skepticism
Government & Law
Extraterrestrial life
Events and objects
Signals of interest
Misidentified
Stars
Other
Life in the Universe
Planetary
habitability
Space missions
Interstellar
communication
Types of alleged
extraterrestrial beings
Hypotheses
Fermi paradox solutions
Related topics
Conspiracy theories
List of conspiracy theories
Overview
Core topics
Psychology
Astronomy and outer space
UFOs
Hoaxes
Deaths and disappearances
Assassination /
suicide theories
Accidents / disasters
Other cases
Body double hoax
Energy, environment
False flag allegations
Gender and sexuality
Health
Race, religion and/or ethnicity
Antisemitic
Christian / Anti-Christian
Islamophobic
Genocide denial /
Denial of mass killings
Regional
Asia
Americas
(outside the United States)
Middle East / North Africa
Russia
Turkey
Other European
United States
2020 election
Other
Pseudolaw
Satirical
See also
Portals: Categories: