Misplaced Pages

Junius Ho: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:06, 3 September 2022 editStormandfury (talk | contribs)303 edits Opposition to Occupy Central with Love and Peace: restore relevant information that was not appropriately removed by a banned editor← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:59, 10 December 2024 edit undoCRau080 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,375 edits Opposition to Occupy Central with Love and Peace: bluelinking nameTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(40 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
| honorific-prefix = ] ] | honorific-prefix = ] ]
| name = Junius Ho Kwan-yiu | name = Junius Ho Kwan-yiu
| honorific-suffix = ] | honorific-suffix = ] ]
| native_name = {{nobold|{{lang|zh-hant|何君堯}}}} | native_name = {{nobold|{{lang|zh-hant|何君堯}}}}
| image = JuniusHo20180425 (cropped).jpg | image = JuniusHo20180425 (cropped).jpg
Line 33: Line 33:
| party = | party =
| residence = ], New Territories | residence = ], New Territories
| alma_mater = ]
| occupation = Solicitor<br />politician | occupation = Solicitor<br />politician
| spouse = Cecilia Chan | spouse = Cecilia Chan
| children = 3 | children = 3
| website = {{URL|www.juniusho.com}} | website = {{URL|www.juniusho.com}}
| education = ] (])<br />]
}} }}
{{Chinese|order=ts|t=何君堯|s=何君尧|j=ho4 gwan1 jiu4|p=Hé Jūnyáo}} {{Chinese
| order = ts
| t = 何君堯
| s = 何君尧
| j = ho4 gwan1 jiu4
| p = Hé Jūnyáo
}}
'''Junius Ho Kwan-yiu''' {{post-nominal|country=HKG|JP}} ({{zh|t=何君堯}}; born 4 June 1962) is a Hong Kong lawyer and politician who currently serves as a member of ]. He is a former president of the ] and chairman of the ] and served as an elected member of the ] from 2015 to 2019. '''Junius Ho Kwan-yiu''' {{post-nominal|country=HKG|JP}} ({{zh|t=何君堯}}; born 4 June 1962) is a Hong Kong lawyer and politician who currently serves as a member in the ]. A prominent ] and anti-gay rights figure in Hong Kong’s political landscape, he formerly served as president of the ], chairman of the ] and as an elected member of the ] from 2015 to 2019.


== Early life == == Early life and education ==
Ho came from a family of village leaders. He grew up in the old site of ] ({{zh|良田村}}) in Tuen Mun. He is a 32nd-generation descendant of his ] clan, which can be traced back to the 10th century.<ref name="strife">{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Kang-chung |title=University of strife: Lingnan's new council member Junius Ho Kwan-yiu never far from controversy |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1869220/university-strife-lingnans-new-council-member |work=South China Morning Post |date=19 October 2015 |access-date=23 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190723124549/https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1869220/university-strife-lingnans-new-council-member |archive-date=23 July 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> Ho came from a family of village leaders. He grew up in the old site of ] ({{zh|良田村}}) in Tuen Mun. He is a 32nd-generation descendant of his ] clan, which can be traced back to the 10th century.<ref name="strife">{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Kang-chung |title=University of strife: Lingnan's new council member Junius Ho Kwan-yiu never far from controversy |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1869220/university-strife-lingnans-new-council-member |work=South China Morning Post |date=19 October 2015 |access-date=23 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190723124549/https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1869220/university-strife-lingnans-new-council-member |archive-date=23 July 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref>


Line 48: Line 54:


== Legal career == == Legal career ==
After gaining his qualifications he was admitted as a solicitor in Hong Kong in 1988 and similarly admitted in Singapore, and ] in 1995 and 1997.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=SRA {{!}} Person details {{!}} Solicitors Regulation Authority|url=http://archive.today/aX0jG|date=2 May 2020|website=archive.vn|access-date=28 May 2020|archive-date=21 May 2020|archive-url=https://archive.today/20200521044624/https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/register/person/?firstName=Kwan&lastName=Ho&sraNumber=204585|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=hklawsoc851324> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120801113918/http://www.hklawsoc.org.hk/pub_e/memberlawlist/member.asp?id=851324 |date=1 August 2012 }} – The Law Society of Hong Kong</ref> He is the senior partner of a law firm in Hong Kong and a principal representative of a law firm in Guangzhou. His major practice field is civil litigation, specialising in shareholders' disputes and family disputes. He was appointed a ] in 2003.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/members/yr16-20/hky.htm|title=Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region – Members' Biographies ::Dr Hon Junius HO Kwan-yiu, JP|publisher=Government of Hong Kong|access-date=25 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190425075750/https://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/members/yr16-20/hky.htm|archive-date=25 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> After gaining his qualifications he was admitted as a solicitor in Hong Kong in 1988 and similarly admitted in Singapore, and ] in 1995 and 1997.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=SRA {{!}} Person details {{!}} Solicitors Regulation Authority|url=https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/register/person/?firstName=Kwan&lastName=Ho&sraNumber=204585|date=2 May 2020|website=archive.vn|access-date=28 May 2020|archive-date=21 May 2020|archive-url=https://archive.today/20200521044624/https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/register/person/?firstName=Kwan&lastName=Ho&sraNumber=204585|url-status=bot: unknown}}</ref><ref name=hklawsoc851324> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120801113918/http://www.hklawsoc.org.hk/pub_e/memberlawlist/member.asp?id=851324 |date=1 August 2012 }} – The Law Society of Hong Kong</ref> He is the senior partner of a law firm in Hong Kong and a principal representative of a law firm in Guangzhou. His major practice field is civil litigation, specialising in shareholders' disputes and family disputes. He was appointed a ] in 2003.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/members/yr16-20/hky.htm|title=Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region – Members' Biographies ::Dr Hon Junius HO Kwan-yiu, JP|publisher=Government of Hong Kong|access-date=25 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190425075750/https://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/members/yr16-20/hky.htm|archive-date=25 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>


He became the vice-president of the Law Society of Hong Kong in June 2005 and was elected president for a one-year term in May 2011, after which he has served as a council member.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120911051522/http://www.hklawsoc.org.hk/pub_e/about/member |date=11 September 2012 }} – The Law Society of Hong Kong</ref> He became the vice-president of the Law Society of Hong Kong in June 2005 and was elected president for a one-year term in May 2011, after which he has served as a council member.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120911051522/http://www.hklawsoc.org.hk/pub_e/about/member |date=11 September 2012 }} – The Law Society of Hong Kong</ref>
Line 73: Line 79:


In December 2021, ] reported that Ho's voting power in the ] was approximately 7,215 times more than that of an ordinary citizen, as he was a member of the ] and thus could vote for the 40 Legislative Council members elected by the ]; an individual voter in the ] functional constituency; a representative of Ho K.C. & Fong Solicitors & Notaries which was a corporate voter in the ] functional constituency; as well as being a regular voter in his geographical constituency, ].<ref>{{Cite web|last=FactWire|date=2021-12-15|title=Factwire: 41 privileged voters have 7,200 times greater power than a regular Hong Kong voter following election revamp|url=https://hongkongfp.com/2021/12/16/factwire-41-privileged-voters-have-7200-times-greater-power-than-a-regular-hong-kong-voter-following-election-revamp/|access-date=2021-12-16|website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP|language=en-GB}}</ref> In December 2021, ] reported that Ho's voting power in the ] was approximately 7,215 times more than that of an ordinary citizen, as he was a member of the ] and thus could vote for the 40 Legislative Council members elected by the ]; an individual voter in the ] functional constituency; a representative of Ho K.C. & Fong Solicitors & Notaries which was a corporate voter in the ] functional constituency; as well as being a regular voter in his geographical constituency, ].<ref>{{Cite web|last=FactWire|date=2021-12-15|title=Factwire: 41 privileged voters have 7,200 times greater power than a regular Hong Kong voter following election revamp|url=https://hongkongfp.com/2021/12/16/factwire-41-privileged-voters-have-7200-times-greater-power-than-a-regular-hong-kong-voter-following-election-revamp/|access-date=2021-12-16|website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP|language=en-GB}}</ref>

In November 2023, ] refuted Ho's claims that the Security Bureau was making too nice of a prison.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-11-13 |title=Hong Kong security chief hits out at critics of plan to redevelop detention centre |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3241344/hong-kong-security-chief-hits-out-critics-spreading-false-information-making-fuss-over-plan |access-date=2023-11-13 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref> Later, an SCMP editorial re-affirmed Tang's comments and said that the prison's upgrades were necessary.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-11-18 |title=Opinion: Hong Kong’s Lai Chi Kok prisoners are entitled to respect |url=https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3241988/hong-kongs-lai-chi-kok-prisoners-are-entitled-respect |access-date=2023-11-18 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref>


===Victim of Tuen Mun knife attack=== ===Victim of Tuen Mun knife attack===
Line 78: Line 86:


== Political views == == Political views ==
{{Neoconservatism in China|Politicians}}

=== Opposition to same-sex marriage and LGBTQ+ === === Opposition to same-sex marriage and LGBTQ+ ===
Ho has made several controversial statements regarding issues related to the ]. In late April 2017, following a lawsuit on government benefits for civil workers who are in a same-sex relationship, Ho said that the legalization of ] in Hong Kong would lead to the acceptance of ] and ].<ref name="homophobia">{{cite news|date=29 April 2017|script-title=zh:何君堯:准同性婚姻 恐演變容許人獸交|language=zh-hk|trans-title=Junius Ho: Legalize same-sex marriage would lead to Zoophilia|work=]|url=http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20170430/00176_022.html|url-status=live|access-date=30 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170506074256/http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20170430/00176_022.html|archive-date=6 May 2017}}</ref> Ho's remarks were criticized by other ] members.<ref name="homophobia" /> For instance, ], an openly gay then-member of LegCo, strongly condemned Ho's comments.<ref name="homophobia" /> Ho has made several controversial statements regarding issues related to the ]. In late April 2017, following a lawsuit on government benefits for civil workers who are in a same-sex relationship, Ho said that the legalization of ] in Hong Kong would lead to the acceptance of ] and ].<ref name="homophobia">{{cite news|date=29 April 2017|script-title=zh:何君堯:准同性婚姻 恐演變容許人獸交|language=zh-hk|trans-title=Junius Ho: Legalize same-sex marriage would lead to Zoophilia|work=]|url=http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20170430/00176_022.html|url-status=live|access-date=30 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170506074256/http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20170430/00176_022.html|archive-date=6 May 2017}}</ref> Ho's remarks were criticized by other ] members.<ref name="homophobia" /> For instance, ], an openly gay then-member of LegCo, strongly condemned Ho's comments.<ref name="homophobia" />
Line 84: Line 92:
In May 2017, Ho said that a ruling granting marriage benefits to a gay civil servant could lead to "chaos in society" and co-signed a petition asking the government to appeal the decision.<ref name="chaos">{{cite news|last1=Ng|first1=Ellie|date=24 May 2017|title='Protect family values': Hong Kong gov't urged to appeal ruling on marriage benefits for gay couple|work=Hong Kong Free Press|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/05/24/protect-family-values-hong-kong-govt-urged-appeal-ruling-marriage-benefits-gay-couple/|url-status=live|access-date=10 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170612163205/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/05/24/protect-family-values-hong-kong-govt-urged-appeal-ruling-marriage-benefits-gay-couple/|archive-date=12 June 2017}}</ref> In April 2018, Ho became the only legislator to vote against the appointments of foreign judges ] and ] to the ] over their support of same-sex rights, claiming the two opposed traditional family values.<ref name=scmp_2143767>{{cite news|date=28 April 2018|title=Pro-Beijing lawmakers voice concerns over foreign judges' support for gay rights|newspaper=South China Morning Post|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2143767/pro-beijing-lawmakers-speak-out-against-two-female-foreign|url-status=live|access-date=28 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180429093003/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2143767/pro-beijing-lawmakers-speak-out-against-two-female-foreign|archive-date=29 April 2018}}</ref> In May 2017, Ho said that a ruling granting marriage benefits to a gay civil servant could lead to "chaos in society" and co-signed a petition asking the government to appeal the decision.<ref name="chaos">{{cite news|last1=Ng|first1=Ellie|date=24 May 2017|title='Protect family values': Hong Kong gov't urged to appeal ruling on marriage benefits for gay couple|work=Hong Kong Free Press|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/05/24/protect-family-values-hong-kong-govt-urged-appeal-ruling-marriage-benefits-gay-couple/|url-status=live|access-date=10 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170612163205/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/05/24/protect-family-values-hong-kong-govt-urged-appeal-ruling-marriage-benefits-gay-couple/|archive-date=12 June 2017}}</ref> In April 2018, Ho became the only legislator to vote against the appointments of foreign judges ] and ] to the ] over their support of same-sex rights, claiming the two opposed traditional family values.<ref name=scmp_2143767>{{cite news|date=28 April 2018|title=Pro-Beijing lawmakers voice concerns over foreign judges' support for gay rights|newspaper=South China Morning Post|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2143767/pro-beijing-lawmakers-speak-out-against-two-female-foreign|url-status=live|access-date=28 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180429093003/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2143767/pro-beijing-lawmakers-speak-out-against-two-female-foreign|archive-date=29 April 2018}}</ref>


In June 2021, commenting of Hong Kong's hosting of the ], Ho said that that people 'should not let gays sideline '"natural people"'.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Don't let gays sideline 'natural people': Junius Ho - RTHK |url=https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1595970-20210615.htm? |access-date=2022-05-12 |website=news.rthk.hk |language=en-gb}}</ref> He also called the Games “disgraceful”, saying any revenue generated from the event would be “dirty money”. He followed up with further homophobic remarks, saying: “It is your business what you do in your own room, but if you go out and do it in public, it’s disgraceful”.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-06-10 |title='It's disgraceful... I don't want dirty money' - Hong Kong lawmakers urge gov't not to support 2022 Gay Games |url=https://hongkongfp.com/2021/06/10/its-disgraceful-i-dont-want-dirty-money-hong-kong-lawmakers-urge-govt-not-to-support-2022-gay-games/ |access-date=2022-05-12 |website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP |language=en-GB}}</ref> In June 2021, commenting of Hong Kong's hosting of the ], Ho said that people 'should not let gays sideline '"natural people"'.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Don't let gays sideline 'natural people': Junius Ho - RTHK |url=https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1595970-20210615.htm? |access-date=2022-05-12 |website=news.rthk.hk |language=en-gb}}</ref> He also called the Games “disgraceful”, saying any revenue generated from the event would be “dirty money”. He followed up with further homophobic remarks, saying: “It is your business what you do in your own room, but if you go out and do it in public, it’s disgraceful”.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-06-10 |title='It's disgraceful... I don't want dirty money' - Hong Kong lawmakers urge gov't not to support 2022 Gay Games |url=https://hongkongfp.com/2021/06/10/its-disgraceful-i-dont-want-dirty-money-hong-kong-lawmakers-urge-govt-not-to-support-2022-gay-games/ |access-date=2022-05-12 |website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP |language=en-GB}}</ref>


In February 2022, Ho again criticized same-sex marriage, this time saying it could breach the national security law.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Standard|first=The|title=Policy against LGBT discrimination involve national security: Junius Ho|url=https://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news/section/4/187007/Policy-against-LGBT-discrimination-involve-national-security:-Junius-Ho|access-date=2022-02-13|website=The Standard|language=en}}</ref> Ho, in January 2022, similarly brought up the national security law to attack those advocating the "living with Covid" strategy.<ref name=":5" /> In February 2022, Ho again criticized same-sex marriage, this time saying it could breach the national security law.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Standard|first=The|title=Policy against LGBT discrimination involve national security: Junius Ho|url=https://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news/section/4/187007/Policy-against-LGBT-discrimination-involve-national-security:-Junius-Ho|access-date=2022-02-13|website=The Standard|language=en}}</ref> Ho, in January 2022, similarly brought up the national security law to attack those advocating the "living with Covid" strategy.<ref name=":5" />

In April 2023, Ho protested against the Gay Games and said "We must think from the perspective of national security and prevent people from using the Gay Games to once again destroy Hong Kong."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Leung |first=Hillary |date=2023-04-25 |title=Hong Kong lawmaker's petition opposing Gay Games is prejudiced, activist says |url=https://hongkongfp.com/2023/04/26/hong-kong-lawmakers-petition-opposing-gay-games-is-prejudiced-activist-says/ |access-date=2023-04-26 |website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP |language=en-GB}}</ref>


===Tiananmen Square memorialization motion=== ===Tiananmen Square memorialization motion===
Line 94: Line 104:
Ho was a leading critic of legal scholar ]'s ] which suggested a full-scale occupation protest in the form of civil disobedience to press the Beijing government to make concessions on ]. He set up an anti-Occupy group called "Protect Central" which he said would resist the Occupy campaign.<ref>{{cite news |title=Newly founded group vows to 'protect' Central |newspaper=China Daily |date=24 September 2014 |url=http://www.chinadailyasia.com/hknews/2014-09/24/content_15169861.html |access-date=30 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150130113217/http://www.chinadailyasia.com/hknews/2014-09/24/content_15169861.html |archive-date=30 January 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> Ho was a leading critic of legal scholar ]'s ] which suggested a full-scale occupation protest in the form of civil disobedience to press the Beijing government to make concessions on ]. He set up an anti-Occupy group called "Protect Central" which he said would resist the Occupy campaign.<ref>{{cite news |title=Newly founded group vows to 'protect' Central |newspaper=China Daily |date=24 September 2014 |url=http://www.chinadailyasia.com/hknews/2014-09/24/content_15169861.html |access-date=30 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150130113217/http://www.chinadailyasia.com/hknews/2014-09/24/content_15169861.html |archive-date=30 January 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref>


In August 2017, Ho called for the removal of Tai, who was then facing charges of inciting others to incite public nuisance, from working at the ] (HKU). Vice-Chancellor Peter Mathieson and council chairman Arthur Li rejected the call. Ho submitted a petition, appearing to have the support of over 80,000, urging the university to investigate Tai and organised a rally on 17 September calling for his removal.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=95487&sid=4 |title=Junius Ho seeks to block Benny Tai from HKU |website=The Standard |date=21 August 2017 |access-date=7 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907081515/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=95487&sid=4 |archive-date=7 September 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/07/lawmaker-threatens-protests-legal-action-unless-hku-investigates-pro-democracy-professor-benny-tai/ |title=Lawmaker threatens protests and legal action unless HKU investigates pro-democracy professor Benny Tai |first=Kris |last=Cheng |date=7 September 2017 |access-date=7 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907034958/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/07/lawmaker-threatens-protests-legal-action-unless-hku-investigates-pro-democracy-professor-benny-tai/ |archive-date=7 September 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/18/hundreds-attend-protest-hong-kong-independence-urge-sacking-pro-democracy-hku-scholar-benny-tai/|title=Hundreds attend protest against Hong Kong independence, urge sacking of pro-democracy HKU scholar Benny Tai|first=Karen|last=Cheung|date=18 September 2017|access-date=18 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918075542/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/18/hundreds-attend-protest-hong-kong-independence-urge-sacking-pro-democracy-hku-scholar-benny-tai/|archive-date=18 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Ho acknowledged that the number of people digitally signing the petition was unverifiable.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170907/20145185 |script-title=zh:何君堯認8萬人聯署或篤數 |website=Apple Daily |language=zh |date=7 September 2019 |title=Archived copy |access-date=19 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909035845/http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170907/20145185 |archive-date=9 September 2017 |url-status=live }}{{in lang|zh-hk}}</ref> As to the legality of the rally, ] pointed out that the ] may have been violated.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.post852.com/229560/%e4%bd%95%e5%90%9b%e5%a0%af%e6%96%a5%e8%bf%bd%e5%95%8f%e6%ae%ba%e7%84%a1%e8%b5%a6%e8%ab%96%e3%80%8c%e5%a4%9a%e9%a4%98%ef%bc%8c%e8%ac%9b%e7%b4%b0%e5%be%ae%e5%98%a2%e3%80%8d%e3%80%80%e6%88%b4%e8%80%80/ |script-title=zh:何君堯斥追問殺無赦論「多餘,講細微嘢」 戴耀廷指違《公安條例》促警執法 |first=852郵報 |last=https://Www.post852.com |date=18 September 2017 |website=852郵報 |title=Archived copy |access-date=22 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190722231225/https://www.post852.com/229560/%e4%bd%95%e5%90%9b%e5%a0%af%e6%96%a5%e8%bf%bd%e5%95%8f%e6%ae%ba%e7%84%a1%e8%b5%a6%e8%ab%96%e3%80%8c%e5%a4%9a%e9%a4%98%ef%bc%8c%e8%ac%9b%e7%b4%b0%e5%be%ae%e5%98%a2%e3%80%8d%e3%80%80%e6%88%b4%e8%80%80/ |archive-date=22 July 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> In August 2017, Ho called for the removal of Tai, who was then facing charges of inciting others to incite public nuisance, from working at the ] (HKU). Vice-chancellor ] and council chairman Arthur Li rejected the call. Ho submitted a petition, appearing to have the support of over 80,000, urging the university to investigate Tai and organised a rally on 17 September calling for his removal.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=95487&sid=4 |title=Junius Ho seeks to block Benny Tai from HKU |website=The Standard |date=21 August 2017 |access-date=7 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907081515/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=95487&sid=4 |archive-date=7 September 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/07/lawmaker-threatens-protests-legal-action-unless-hku-investigates-pro-democracy-professor-benny-tai/ |title=Lawmaker threatens protests and legal action unless HKU investigates pro-democracy professor Benny Tai |first=Kris |last=Cheng |date=7 September 2017 |access-date=7 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907034958/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/07/lawmaker-threatens-protests-legal-action-unless-hku-investigates-pro-democracy-professor-benny-tai/ |archive-date=7 September 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/18/hundreds-attend-protest-hong-kong-independence-urge-sacking-pro-democracy-hku-scholar-benny-tai/|title=Hundreds attend protest against Hong Kong independence, urge sacking of pro-democracy HKU scholar Benny Tai|first=Karen|last=Cheung|date=18 September 2017|access-date=18 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918075542/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/18/hundreds-attend-protest-hong-kong-independence-urge-sacking-pro-democracy-hku-scholar-benny-tai/|archive-date=18 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Ho acknowledged that the number of people digitally signing the petition was unverifiable.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170907/20145185 |script-title=zh:何君堯認8萬人聯署或篤數 |website=Apple Daily |language=zh |date=7 September 2019 |access-date=19 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909035845/http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170907/20145185 |archive-date=9 September 2017 |url-status=live }}{{in lang|zh-hk}}</ref> As to the legality of the rally, ] pointed out that the ] may have been violated.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.post852.com/229560/%e4%bd%95%e5%90%9b%e5%a0%af%e6%96%a5%e8%bf%bd%e5%95%8f%e6%ae%ba%e7%84%a1%e8%b5%a6%e8%ab%96%e3%80%8c%e5%a4%9a%e9%a4%98%ef%bc%8c%e8%ac%9b%e7%b4%b0%e5%be%ae%e5%98%a2%e3%80%8d%e3%80%80%e6%88%b4%e8%80%80/ |script-title=zh:何君堯斥追問殺無赦論「多餘,講細微嘢」 戴耀廷指違《公安條例》促警執法 |first=852郵報 |last=https://Www.post852.com |date=18 September 2017 |website=852郵報 |access-date=22 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190722231225/https://www.post852.com/229560/%e4%bd%95%e5%90%9b%e5%a0%af%e6%96%a5%e8%bf%bd%e5%95%8f%e6%ae%ba%e7%84%a1%e8%b5%a6%e8%ab%96%e3%80%8c%e5%a4%9a%e9%a4%98%ef%bc%8c%e8%ac%9b%e7%b4%b0%e5%be%ae%e5%98%a2%e3%80%8d%e3%80%80%e6%88%b4%e8%80%80/ |archive-date=22 July 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref>


In September 2017, Ho said supporters of ] ought to be "killed mercilessly". He made the comment at a rally which he organised to demand that the ] fire Benny Tai. He stated that it was "not a big deal to kill pigs or dogs", and also appeared on a ] programme, where he said of pro-independence activists, "Why shouldn't these people be killed?" In response to backlash over these remarks, Ho said "If we’re talking about Hong Kong independence, that means war. What's wrong with killing enemies in a war?"<ref name="sept18hkfp">{{cite news|last1=Cheung|first1=Karen|title=Pro-Beijing legislator Junius Ho's call for death of independence activists may have broken law, says ExCo member|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/18/pro-beijing-legislator-junius-hos-call-death-independence-activists-may-broken-law-says-exco-member/|work=Hong Kong Free Press|date=18 September 2017|access-date=18 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918081046/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/18/pro-beijing-legislator-junius-hos-call-death-independence-activists-may-broken-law-says-exco-member/|archive-date=18 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> In September 2017, Ho said supporters of ] ought to be "killed mercilessly". He made the comment at a rally which he organised to demand that HKU fire Benny Tai. He stated that it was "not a big deal to kill pigs or dogs", and also appeared on a ] programme, where he said of pro-independence activists, "Why shouldn't these people be killed?" In response to backlash over these remarks, Ho said "If we’re talking about Hong Kong independence, that means war. What's wrong with killing enemies in a war?"<ref name="sept18hkfp">{{cite news|last1=Cheung|first1=Karen|title=Pro-Beijing legislator Junius Ho's call for death of independence activists may have broken law, says ExCo member|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/18/pro-beijing-legislator-junius-hos-call-death-independence-activists-may-broken-law-says-exco-member/|work=Hong Kong Free Press|date=18 September 2017|access-date=18 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918081046/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/18/pro-beijing-legislator-junius-hos-call-death-independence-activists-may-broken-law-says-exco-member/|archive-date=18 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>
Ho's remarks were condemned by figures on all sides of the political spectrum.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=Foreign Policy|title=Hong Kongers Break Beijing's Delusions of Victory|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/25/hong-kong-election-beijing-media-delusions-victory/|last=Palmer|first=James|date=25 November 2019|access-date=27 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191127171954/https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/25/hong-kong-election-beijing-media-delusions-victory/|archive-date=27 November 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> ] ] said that Ho's comments may have violated the ]. Chief executive ] alluded to Ho's comments when she stated on 19 September that "unacceptably cruel, insulting and intimidating comments" had no place in a civilised society.<ref name="deplores">{{cite news|title=Carrie Lam deplores 'cruel, insulting, intimidating' remarks on kill threat|url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=96920&story_id=96920&d_str=20170919&sid=4|work=The Standard|date=19 September 2017|access-date=19 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170921013509/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=96920&story_id=96920&d_str=20170919&sid=4|archive-date=21 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> ] member ] called Ho's remarks "stupid", and continued, "It will do our country no good to have stupid 'patriots', including possibly quite a few hired to become 'patriots'."<ref name="unhealthy">{{cite news|last1=Kao|first1=Ernest|title='Unhealthy and stupid' calls to kill advocates of Hong Kong independence criticised by city's leader|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2111821/ha-ha-ha-call-police-idiots-junius-ho-hits-back-over-calls|work=South China Morning Post|date=19 September 2017|access-date=19 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170919054739/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2111821/ha-ha-ha-call-police-idiots-junius-ho-hits-back-over-calls|archive-date=19 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The 22 lawmakers from the ] issued a joint statement condemning Ho's remarks, which read in part: "Ho, as a legislator and lawyer, expressed hate speech involving murder at a public event, crossing the bottom lines of free speech and morality and severely breaching professional conduct."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2111718/pan-democrats-blast-junius-ho-saying-independence-activists|title=Pan-democrats blast Junius Ho for saying activists should be 'killed'|date=18 September 2017|accessdate=22 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171103190527/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2111718/pan-democrats-blast-junius-ho-saying-independence-activists|archive-date=3 November 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Ho's remarks were condemned by figures on all sides of the political spectrum.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=Foreign Policy|title=Hong Kongers Break Beijing's Delusions of Victory|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/25/hong-kong-election-beijing-media-delusions-victory/|last=Palmer|first=James|date=25 November 2019|access-date=27 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191127171954/https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/25/hong-kong-election-beijing-media-delusions-victory/|archive-date=27 November 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> ] ] said that Ho's comments may have violated the ]. Chief executive ] alluded to Ho's comments when she stated on 19 September that "unacceptably cruel, insulting and intimidating comments" had no place in a civilised society.<ref name="deplores">{{cite news|title=Carrie Lam deplores 'cruel, insulting, intimidating' remarks on kill threat|url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=96920&story_id=96920&d_str=20170919&sid=4|work=The Standard|date=19 September 2017|access-date=19 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170921013509/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=96920&story_id=96920&d_str=20170919&sid=4|archive-date=21 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> ] member ] called Ho's remarks "stupid", and continued, "It will do our country no good to have stupid 'patriots', including possibly quite a few hired to become 'patriots'."<ref name="unhealthy">{{cite news|last1=Kao|first1=Ernest|title='Unhealthy and stupid' calls to kill advocates of Hong Kong independence criticised by city's leader|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2111821/ha-ha-ha-call-police-idiots-junius-ho-hits-back-over-calls|work=South China Morning Post|date=19 September 2017|access-date=19 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170919054739/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2111821/ha-ha-ha-call-police-idiots-junius-ho-hits-back-over-calls|archive-date=19 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The 22 lawmakers from the ] issued a joint statement condemning Ho's remarks, which read in part: "Ho, as a legislator and lawyer, expressed hate speech involving murder at a public event, crossing the bottom lines of free speech and morality and severely breaching professional conduct."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2111718/pan-democrats-blast-junius-ho-saying-independence-activists|title=Pan-democrats blast Junius Ho for saying activists should be 'killed'|date=18 September 2017|accessdate=22 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171103190527/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/2111718/pan-democrats-blast-junius-ho-saying-independence-activists|archive-date=3 November 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>


Line 106: Line 116:
=== COVID-19 === === COVID-19 ===
In January 2022, Ho claimed that people advocating "living with Covid" could be in breach of the National Security Law.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web|last=Standard|first=The|title='Living with Covid' strategy may breach national security: Junius Ho|url=https://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news/section/4/186611/%27Living-with-Covid%27-strategy-may-breach-national-security|access-date=2022-01-30|website=The Standard|language=en}}</ref> One day later, the government shortly responded that Ho's statement was not true.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Standard|first=The|title=Discussing zero-infection policy not against national security law: HK gov|url=https://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news/section/4/186629/Discussing-zero-infection-policy-not-against-national-security-law:-HK-gov|access-date=2022-01-30|website=The Standard|language=en}}</ref> In January 2022, Ho claimed that people advocating "living with Covid" could be in breach of the National Security Law.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web|last=Standard|first=The|title='Living with Covid' strategy may breach national security: Junius Ho|url=https://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news/section/4/186611/%27Living-with-Covid%27-strategy-may-breach-national-security|access-date=2022-01-30|website=The Standard|language=en}}</ref> One day later, the government shortly responded that Ho's statement was not true.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Standard|first=The|title=Discussing zero-infection policy not against national security law: HK gov|url=https://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news/section/4/186629/Discussing-zero-infection-policy-not-against-national-security-law:-HK-gov|access-date=2022-01-30|website=The Standard|language=en}}</ref>

=== Glory to Hong Kong ===
In November 2022, after ] was played after a rugby match, Ho said that the Hong Kong Rugby team "let their country be insulted" and should be disbanded.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ho |first=Kelly |date=2022-11-14 |title=National security police should investigate anthem error at rugby match, Hong Kong lawmakers say |url=https://hongkongfp.com/2022/11/14/national-security-police-should-investigate-anthem-error-at-rugby-match-hong-kong-lawmakers-say/ |access-date=2022-11-15 |website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP |language=en-GB}}</ref>


==Controversies== ==Controversies==
=== conflicts of interest accusations === === Conflicts of interest accusations ===
On 25 April 2018, it was reported that Ho's family business holds the ownership of 120,000 square feet of farmland southwest of the Fanling Golf Course. Ho had previously voted against a motion to request the government to seize the golf course for housing redevelopment, but did not declare any potential conflict of interests. Ho responded that the motion did not impact his family business and therefore reporting his interests was not required.<ref name=hk01_182420>{{Cite web|last=邱靖汶|first=陳信熙, 陳潤南|date=26 April 2018|title=【何君堯涉漏報】深夜發聲明稱不涉利益衝突 未交代離岸公司權益|url=https://www.hk01.com/01偵查/182420/何君堯涉漏報-深夜發聲明稱不涉利益衝突-未交代離岸公司權益|website=香港01}}</ref> On 2 May 2018, lawmaker, ], filed a complaint to the legislative committee accusing Ho of failing to declare two properties that is associated to his family's company, Profit Trade Investment Ltd and other subsidiaries. One of which was an apartment located at Sham Shui Po that was allegedly sold at four times its estimated value. Wan alleged that there could potentially be a conflict of interest if related issues come up in the legislative council.<ref name=hongkongfp_20180509_democrat>{{Cite web|date=9 May 2018|title=Democrat files complaint accusing legislator Junius Ho of failing to declare interest in two properties|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/05/09/democrat-files-complaint-accusing-legislator-junius-ho-failing-declare-interest-two-properties/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191107085219/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/05/09/democrat-files-complaint-accusing-legislator-junius-ho-failing-declare-interest-two-properties/|archive-date=7 November 2019|access-date=7 November 2019|website=Hong Kong Free Press}}</ref> On 5 May 2018, Ho admitted that Profit Trade had ownership of his family assets, but maintained that the company does not involve any conflict of interest in the Legislative Council and therefore such interests need not to be disclosed.<ref name=hk01_179780>{{Cite web|date=2 May 2018|title=【獨家】妻獲恒基2000萬收樓 何君堯疑漏報離岸公司:不再回應|url=https://www.hk01.com/01偵查/179780/獨家-妻獲恒基2000萬收樓-何君堯疑漏報離岸公司-不再回應|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627144926/https://www.hk01.com/01%E5%81%B5%E6%9F%A5/179780/%E7%8D%A8%E5%AE%B6-%E5%A6%BB%E7%8D%B2%E6%81%92%E5%9F%BA2000%E8%90%AC%E6%94%B6%E6%A8%93-%E4%BD%95%E5%90%9B%E5%A0%AF%E7%96%91%E6%BC%8F%E5%A0%B1%E9%9B%A2%E5%B2%B8%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8-%E4%B8%8D%E5%86%8D%E5%9B%9E%E6%87%89|archive-date=27 June 2018|access-date=12 May 2020|website=香港01}}</ref> On 25 April 2018, it was reported that Ho's family business holds the ownership of 120,000 square feet of farmland southwest of the Fanling Golf Course. Ho had previously voted against a motion to request the government to seize the golf course for housing redevelopment, but did not declare any potential conflict of interests. Ho responded that the motion did not impact his family business and therefore reporting his interests was not required.<ref name=hk01_182420>{{Cite web|last=邱靖汶|first=陳信熙, 陳潤南|date=26 April 2018|title=【何君堯涉漏報】深夜發聲明稱不涉利益衝突 未交代離岸公司權益|url=https://www.hk01.com/01偵查/182420/何君堯涉漏報-深夜發聲明稱不涉利益衝突-未交代離岸公司權益|website=香港01}}</ref> On 2 May 2018, lawmaker, ], filed a complaint to the legislative committee accusing Ho of failing to declare two properties that is associated to his family's company, Profit Trade Investment Ltd and other subsidiaries. One of which was an apartment located at Sham Shui Po that was allegedly sold at four times its estimated value. Wan alleged that there could potentially be a conflict of interest if related issues come up in the legislative council.<ref name=hongkongfp_20180509_democrat>{{Cite web|date=9 May 2018|title=Democrat files complaint accusing legislator Junius Ho of failing to declare interest in two properties|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/05/09/democrat-files-complaint-accusing-legislator-junius-ho-failing-declare-interest-two-properties/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191107085219/https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/05/09/democrat-files-complaint-accusing-legislator-junius-ho-failing-declare-interest-two-properties/|archive-date=7 November 2019|access-date=7 November 2019|website=Hong Kong Free Press}}</ref> On 5 May 2018, Ho admitted that Profit Trade had ownership of his family assets, but maintained that the company does not involve any conflict of interest in the Legislative Council and therefore such interests need not to be disclosed.<ref name=hk01_179780>{{Cite web|date=2 May 2018|title=【獨家】妻獲恒基2000萬收樓 何君堯疑漏報離岸公司:不再回應|url=https://www.hk01.com/01偵查/179780/獨家-妻獲恒基2000萬收樓-何君堯疑漏報離岸公司-不再回應|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627144926/https://www.hk01.com/01%E5%81%B5%E6%9F%A5/179780/%E7%8D%A8%E5%AE%B6-%E5%A6%BB%E7%8D%B2%E6%81%92%E5%9F%BA2000%E8%90%AC%E6%94%B6%E6%A8%93-%E4%BD%95%E5%90%9B%E5%A0%AF%E7%96%91%E6%BC%8F%E5%A0%B1%E9%9B%A2%E5%B2%B8%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8-%E4%B8%8D%E5%86%8D%E5%9B%9E%E6%87%89|archive-date=27 June 2018|access-date=12 May 2020|website=香港01}}</ref>


Line 127: Line 140:
In January 2021, Ho blamed the ] on ] and likened its students to ] members, stating "What I see from this picture - I thought Al-Qaeda changed its registered office to CUHK."<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-01-20|title=Hong Kong pro-Beijing lawmakers blast Chinese University over 'black violence' on campus|url=https://hongkongfp.com/2021/01/20/hong-kong-pro-beijing-lawmakers-blast-chinese-university-over-black-violence-on-campus/|access-date=2021-01-20|website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP|language=en-GB|archive-date=20 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210120053334/https://hongkongfp.com/2021/01/20/hong-kong-pro-beijing-lawmakers-blast-chinese-university-over-black-violence-on-campus/|url-status=live}}</ref> In January 2021, Ho blamed the ] on ] and likened its students to ] members, stating "What I see from this picture - I thought Al-Qaeda changed its registered office to CUHK."<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-01-20|title=Hong Kong pro-Beijing lawmakers blast Chinese University over 'black violence' on campus|url=https://hongkongfp.com/2021/01/20/hong-kong-pro-beijing-lawmakers-blast-chinese-university-over-black-violence-on-campus/|access-date=2021-01-20|website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP|language=en-GB|archive-date=20 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210120053334/https://hongkongfp.com/2021/01/20/hong-kong-pro-beijing-lawmakers-blast-chinese-university-over-black-violence-on-campus/|url-status=live}}</ref>


=== Birthday party === === Covid-19 restrictions from Birthday party ===
On 5 January 2022, ] announced new warnings and restrictions against social gathering due to potential ] outbreaks.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|date=2022-01-05|title=Bars, gyms to close, 6pm restaurant curfew as Hong Kong ramps up Omicron battle|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/health-environment/article/3162190/coronavirus-hong-kongs-fifth-wave-has-already|access-date=2022-01-07|website=South China Morning Post|language=en}}</ref> One day later, it was discovered that Ho attended a birthday party hosted by Witman Hung Wai-man, with 222 guests.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1628558-20220112.htm | title=衞生防護中心最新發現洪為民宴會人數為222人 - RTHK }}</ref><ref></ref><ref name=":02">{{Cite web|date=2022-01-07|title=All 170 guests of Covid-19 scandal-hit birthday party sent to quarantine|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3162476/coronavirus-19-hong-kong-lawmakers-attended-birthday-party|access-date=2022-01-07|website=South China Morning Post|language=en}}</ref> At least one guest tested positive with COVID-19, causing all guests to be quarantined.<ref name=":02" /> Ho later claimed that the real issue was not the party, but the government's policy of allowing aircrew from Cathay Pacific to quarantine at home.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web|date=2022-01-08|title=Pro-Beijing camp closes ranks over birthday party scandal, blames Cathay|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3162621/omicron-pro-beijing-camp-closes-ranks-over-birthday-party|access-date=2022-01-08|website=South China Morning Post|language=en}}</ref> Ho also claimed that he was a victim of the incident, saying "We are the victims of the policy", and also said that nobody could have predicted the risk of coronavirus exposure from the event, despite earlier warnings from the government to not gather in large groups.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":3" /> Ho also said he was "illegally detained" at the quarantine center, and that Carrie Lam should resign.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Cheng|first=Selina|date=2022-01-09|title=Covid-19: Hong Kong officials to see out quarantine at home after false alarm, as expert urges tougher anti-epidemic measures|url=https://hongkongfp.com/2022/01/10/covid-19-hong-kong-officials-released-from-quarantine-after-false-alarm-as-expert-urges-tougher-anti-epidemic-measures/|access-date=2022-01-10|website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP|language=en-GB}}</ref> On 5 January 2022, ] announced new warnings and restrictions against social gathering due to potential ] outbreaks.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|date=2022-01-05|title=Bars, gyms to close, 6pm restaurant curfew as Hong Kong ramps up Omicron battle|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/health-environment/article/3162190/coronavirus-hong-kongs-fifth-wave-has-already|access-date=2022-01-07|website=South China Morning Post|language=en}}</ref> One day later, it was discovered that Ho attended a ], with 222 guests.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1628558-20220112.htm | title=衞生防護中心最新發現洪為民宴會人數為222人 - RTHK }}</ref><ref></ref><ref name=":02">{{Cite web|date=2022-01-07|title=All 170 guests of Covid-19 scandal-hit birthday party sent to quarantine|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3162476/coronavirus-19-hong-kong-lawmakers-attended-birthday-party|access-date=2022-01-07|website=South China Morning Post|language=en}}</ref> At least one guest tested positive with COVID-19, causing all guests to be quarantined.<ref name=":02" /> Ho later claimed that the real issue was not the party, but the government's policy of allowing aircrew from Cathay Pacific to quarantine at home.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web|date=2022-01-08|title=Pro-Beijing camp closes ranks over birthday party scandal, blames Cathay|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3162621/omicron-pro-beijing-camp-closes-ranks-over-birthday-party|access-date=2022-01-08|website=South China Morning Post|language=en}}</ref> Ho also claimed that he was a victim of the incident, saying "We are the victims of the policy", and also said that nobody could have predicted the risk of coronavirus exposure from the event, despite earlier warnings from the government to not gather in large groups.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":3" /> Ho also said he was "illegally detained" at the quarantine center, and that Carrie Lam should resign.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Cheng|first=Selina|date=2022-01-09|title=Covid-19: Hong Kong officials to see out quarantine at home after false alarm, as expert urges tougher anti-epidemic measures|url=https://hongkongfp.com/2022/01/10/covid-19-hong-kong-officials-released-from-quarantine-after-false-alarm-as-expert-urges-tougher-anti-epidemic-measures/|access-date=2022-01-10|website=Hong Kong Free Press HKFP|language=en-GB}}</ref>


== Current positions == == Current positions ==
Line 190: Line 203:
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
Line 203: Line 215:
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 23:59, 10 December 2024

Hong Kong politician

In this Hong Kong name, the surname is Ho. In accordance with Hong Kong custom, the Western-style name is Junius Ho and the Chinese-style name is Ho Kwan-yiu.
The Honourable Dr.Junius Ho Kwan-yiuJP BBS
何君堯
Ho in April 2018
Member of the Legislative Council
Incumbent
Assumed office
1 January 2022
Preceded byConstituency created
ConstituencyElection Committee
In office
1 October 2016 – 31 December 2021
Preceded byAlbert Chan
Succeeded byConstituency abolished
ConstituencyNew Territories West
Member of the Tuen Mun District Council
In office
1 January 2016 – 31 December 2019
Preceded byAlbert Ho
Succeeded byLo Chun-yu
ConstituencyLok Tsui
Personal details
Born (1962-06-04) 4 June 1962 (age 62)
Tuen Mun, British Hong Kong
NationalityHong Kong Chinese
SpouseCecilia Chan
Children3
Residence(s)Ngau Tam Mei, New Territories
EducationChelmer Institute of Higher Education (LLB)
University of Hong Kong
OccupationSolicitor
politician
Websitewww.juniusho.com
Junius Ho
Traditional Chinese何君堯
Simplified Chinese何君尧
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinHé Jūnyáo
Yue: Cantonese
Jyutpingho4 gwan1 jiu4

Junius Ho Kwan-yiu JP (Chinese: 何君堯; born 4 June 1962) is a Hong Kong lawyer and politician who currently serves as a member in the Hong Kong Legislative Council. A prominent radical pro-Beijing and anti-gay rights figure in Hong Kong’s political landscape, he formerly served as president of the Law Society of Hong Kong, chairman of the Tuen Mun Rural Committee and as an elected member of the Tuen Mun District Council from 2015 to 2019.

Early life and education

Ho came from a family of village leaders. He grew up in the old site of Leung Tin Village (Chinese: 良田村) in Tuen Mun. He is a 32nd-generation descendant of his Hakka clan, which can be traced back to the 10th century.

Ho attended Queen's College Hong Kong from 1975 to 1979, after which he went to the United Kingdom, where he enrolled at Chelmer Institute of Higher Education and obtained his bachelor of laws degree in 1984. Ho joined a post-graduate programme at the University of Hong Kong in 1984 and obtained his mandatory practising qualification, the postgraduate certificate in laws (PCLL) in 1986.

Legal career

After gaining his qualifications he was admitted as a solicitor in Hong Kong in 1988 and similarly admitted in Singapore, and England and Wales in 1995 and 1997. He is the senior partner of a law firm in Hong Kong and a principal representative of a law firm in Guangzhou. His major practice field is civil litigation, specialising in shareholders' disputes and family disputes. He was appointed a China-Appointed Attesting Officer in 2003.

He became the vice-president of the Law Society of Hong Kong in June 2005 and was elected president for a one-year term in May 2011, after which he has served as a council member.

In 2017, his legal qualifications in England and Wales, and Singapore was disputed, and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) was contacted regarding this matter. It was reported that the individual by the name of "Junius Kwan-Yiu Ho" does not appear to be on the SRA's records. The dispute, however, was later clarified, for a member by the name of "Kwan Yiu Ho" does appear to be on SRA's records.

Honorary awards

Anglia Ruskin University

In 2011, Junius Ho was bestowed with an Honorary Doctor of Laws by Anglia Ruskin University, with the university describing him as an "outstanding ambassador". After the 2019 Yuen Long attack, an online petition via Change.org was launched urging Anglia Ruskin University to reconsider the honorary award, and the university was notified after the petition reached 500 signatures on 25 July 2019. On 26 October, Lord Alton of Liverpool published a letter addressed to the vice-chancellor of Anglia Ruskin University, requesting the university to consider removing Ho's honorary doctorate, citing alleged examples of "misogyny", "extremism" and "racism". On 28 October 2019, at the urging of activist Luke de Pulford Anglia Ruskin University withdrew Ho's honorary degree following an investigation, with a statement from the university noting, "Mr Ho's conduct since he was honoured has caused increasing concern."

China University of Political Science and Law

On 6 December 2019, Ho received an honorary law doctorate at the China University of Political Science and Law for his "outstanding contribution and achievements in the legal sector".

Political career

Ho first contested a Legislative Council election in 2008, running against Civic Party's Margaret Ng in the Legal functional constituency. He was defeated, receiving 1,286 votes, about 34 percent of the vote.

Ho was elected as Chairman of Tuen Mun Rural Committee in 2011, ousting the long-time chairman and most powerful rural leader Lau Wong-fat, chairman of the Heung Yee Kuk. In that capacity, he became an ex officio member of the Tuen Mun District Council. He served as the rural committee chairman until 2015. He was a candidate in the Legislative Council election in New Territories West in September 2012, where he received 10,805 votes, about two per cent of total vote share and was not elected.

Ho was appointed to Lingnan University council by Chief Executive of Hong Kong Leung Chun-ying in October 2015. Students staged a protest against the appointment over fears of political interference in university governance.

In the 2015 District Council elections, Junius Ho defeated Albert Ho of the Democratic Party in the latter's long-held Lok Tsui seat in a six-way contest by a narrow margin of 277 votes, as the pro-democracy votes were split between Albert Ho and Cheng Chung-tai of Civic Passion. Ho ran again in the 2016 Legislative Council election for the New Territories West. During the election, Ho's supporters were allegedly involved in the withdrawal of candidacy of Liberal Party candidate Ken Chow Wing-kan. Chow claimed he had been intimidated after receiving threats made against him. On the following day, Ho identified that some of the threats were made by one of his volunteers that had helped him for about one or two months; but Ho defended him by stating that the volunteer only wanted to be angry for him. Ho was elected with 35,657 votes, winning the last of nine seats in the constituency.

In May 2017, pro-democracy lawyer Kevin Yam published an article urging solicitors not to vote for Junius Ho in the election for the governing council of the Law Society of Hong Kong. Ho sued for defamation but failed to be re-elected, securing only 572 of 8,148 votes, coming last. In the 2019 District Council elections, Ho with 2,626 votes lost his seat to his rival Lo Chun-yu who had 1,213 more votes.

In December 2021, Hong Kong Free Press reported that Ho's voting power in the 2021 Hong Kong legislative election was approximately 7,215 times more than that of an ordinary citizen, as he was a member of the Election Committee and thus could vote for the 40 Legislative Council members elected by the Election Committee constituency; an individual voter in the Heung Yee Kuk functional constituency; a representative of Ho K.C. & Fong Solicitors & Notaries which was a corporate voter in the Commercial (First) functional constituency; as well as being a regular voter in his geographical constituency, New Territories North.

In November 2023, Chris Tang refuted Ho's claims that the Security Bureau was making too nice of a prison. Later, an SCMP editorial re-affirmed Tang's comments and said that the prison's upgrades were necessary.

Victim of Tuen Mun knife attack

On 6 November 2019, in preparation for the 2019 Hong Kong local elections, Junius Ho ran a campaign event in Tuen Mun. He was approached by a man posing as a supporter, who attacked him with a 33-centimetre-long knife that left him bleeding in the chest. The attacker was shortly subdued. Ho was briefly hospitalized.

Political views

Part of a series on
Neoauthoritarianism
in China
Ideologies
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Politicians

Mainland China


Hong Kong (pro-Beijing)


Macau (pro-Beijing)


Republic of China (Taiwan, pro-Beijing)

Extant parties

Mainland China


Hong Kong (pro-Beijing)


Macau (pro-Beijing)


Republic of China (Taiwan, pro-Beijing)

Historical parties

Hong Kong (pro-Beijing)

Alliances
Literature
Organisations
Media

Mainland China


Hong Kong (pro-Beijing)

Related ideologies
Related topics

Opposition to same-sex marriage and LGBTQ+

Ho has made several controversial statements regarding issues related to the LGBT community. In late April 2017, following a lawsuit on government benefits for civil workers who are in a same-sex relationship, Ho said that the legalization of same-sex marriage in Hong Kong would lead to the acceptance of bestiality and incest. Ho's remarks were criticized by other LegCo members. For instance, Raymond Chan, an openly gay then-member of LegCo, strongly condemned Ho's comments.

In May 2017, Ho said that a ruling granting marriage benefits to a gay civil servant could lead to "chaos in society" and co-signed a petition asking the government to appeal the decision. In April 2018, Ho became the only legislator to vote against the appointments of foreign judges Brenda Hale and Beverley McLachlin to the Court of Final Appeal over their support of same-sex rights, claiming the two opposed traditional family values.

In June 2021, commenting of Hong Kong's hosting of the Gay Games, Ho said that people 'should not let gays sideline '"natural people"'. He also called the Games “disgraceful”, saying any revenue generated from the event would be “dirty money”. He followed up with further homophobic remarks, saying: “It is your business what you do in your own room, but if you go out and do it in public, it’s disgraceful”.

In February 2022, Ho again criticized same-sex marriage, this time saying it could breach the national security law. Ho, in January 2022, similarly brought up the national security law to attack those advocating the "living with Covid" strategy.

In April 2023, Ho protested against the Gay Games and said "We must think from the perspective of national security and prevent people from using the Gay Games to once again destroy Hong Kong."

Tiananmen Square memorialization motion

In June 2017, Junius Ho became the only pro-establishment lawmaker to vote in favour of a motion to memorialize the 4 June 1989 massacre of Tiananmen Square protestors at the Legislative Council. He expressed sympathy for the Chinese students before the People's Liberation Army crackdown. However, Ho also criticized pro-democracy legislators for describing the government of mainland China as 'cold-blooded'. Eddie Chu criticized Ho's position as unclear and absurd, and compared him to Yuan Mu, a Chinese politician who in an interview with Tom Brokaw in 1989 claimed that there were no casualties during the crackdown in Tiananmen Square.

Opposition to Occupy Central with Love and Peace

Ho was a leading critic of legal scholar Benny Tai's Occupy Central with Love and Peace which suggested a full-scale occupation protest in the form of civil disobedience to press the Beijing government to make concessions on electoral reform. He set up an anti-Occupy group called "Protect Central" which he said would resist the Occupy campaign.

In August 2017, Ho called for the removal of Tai, who was then facing charges of inciting others to incite public nuisance, from working at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). Vice-chancellor Peter Mathieson and council chairman Arthur Li rejected the call. Ho submitted a petition, appearing to have the support of over 80,000, urging the university to investigate Tai and organised a rally on 17 September calling for his removal. Ho acknowledged that the number of people digitally signing the petition was unverifiable. As to the legality of the rally, Ronny Tong Ka-wah pointed out that the Public Order Ordinance may have been violated.

In September 2017, Ho said supporters of Hong Kong independence ought to be "killed mercilessly". He made the comment at a rally which he organised to demand that HKU fire Benny Tai. He stated that it was "not a big deal to kill pigs or dogs", and also appeared on a Commercial Radio programme, where he said of pro-independence activists, "Why shouldn't these people be killed?" In response to backlash over these remarks, Ho said "If we’re talking about Hong Kong independence, that means war. What's wrong with killing enemies in a war?" Ho's remarks were condemned by figures on all sides of the political spectrum. Senior Counsel Ronny Tong said that Ho's comments may have violated the Public Order Ordinance. Chief executive Carrie Lam alluded to Ho's comments when she stated on 19 September that "unacceptably cruel, insulting and intimidating comments" had no place in a civilised society. Executive Council member Regina Ip called Ho's remarks "stupid", and continued, "It will do our country no good to have stupid 'patriots', including possibly quite a few hired to become 'patriots'." The 22 lawmakers from the pro-democracy camp issued a joint statement condemning Ho's remarks, which read in part: "Ho, as a legislator and lawyer, expressed hate speech involving murder at a public event, crossing the bottom lines of free speech and morality and severely breaching professional conduct."

Ho maintained that he was expressing his contempt at the pro-independence movement, and said that the journalists should not take his words out of context.

Sanctions

In February 2021, Ho asked the Hong Kong government to order banks to re-open bank accounts of those sanctioned under United States Executive Order 13936, even though doing so would cause banks to risk losing their licenses and ability to process US Dollars.

COVID-19

In January 2022, Ho claimed that people advocating "living with Covid" could be in breach of the National Security Law. One day later, the government shortly responded that Ho's statement was not true.

Glory to Hong Kong

In November 2022, after Glory to Hong Kong was played after a rugby match, Ho said that the Hong Kong Rugby team "let their country be insulted" and should be disbanded.

Controversies

Conflicts of interest accusations

On 25 April 2018, it was reported that Ho's family business holds the ownership of 120,000 square feet of farmland southwest of the Fanling Golf Course. Ho had previously voted against a motion to request the government to seize the golf course for housing redevelopment, but did not declare any potential conflict of interests. Ho responded that the motion did not impact his family business and therefore reporting his interests was not required. On 2 May 2018, lawmaker, Andrew Wan, filed a complaint to the legislative committee accusing Ho of failing to declare two properties that is associated to his family's company, Profit Trade Investment Ltd and other subsidiaries. One of which was an apartment located at Sham Shui Po that was allegedly sold at four times its estimated value. Wan alleged that there could potentially be a conflict of interest if related issues come up in the legislative council. On 5 May 2018, Ho admitted that Profit Trade had ownership of his family assets, but maintained that the company does not involve any conflict of interest in the Legislative Council and therefore such interests need not to be disclosed.

Involvement in Yuen Long attack

See also: 2019 Yuen Long attack

Prior to the 2019 Yuen Long attack, Ho was filmed supporting and congratulating a group of white-clad men. When confronted about his alleged involvement in the Yuen Long Attack, Ho claimed that he was simply there greeting some of his supporters, and said it was normal because he lives in Yuen Long. After the incident, Ho said that the white-clad men were only "defending their home and people". On 22 July 2019 Ho's constituency shopfront in Tsuen Wan was turned into a Lennon Wall before being ransacked later in the day. Ho's Tuen Mun office also attracted protests on the following day.

In response to Ho's alleged involvement, over 2,300 teachers, alumni and students from Ho's alma mater Queen's College participated in a signature campaign condemning Ho. They urged LegCo members to impeach Ho, and requested Queen's College Old Boys' Association to suspend his membership. Similarly, Lingnan University students have started a petition calling for Ho to be removed from the institution's governing council. An online petition requesting that the United States bar Ho and his family from entering the U.S. or acquiring U.S. citizenship achieved over 100,000 signatures.

On 23 July 2019, Ho appeared on an RTHK televised forum alongside fellow New Territories West constituency representative Eddie Chu. Ho said he did not regret shaking hands with the attackers. He called the victims of the Yuen Long attacks "rioters" and claimed they had instigated the violence. He said the mobs were mere "Yuen Long residents" seeking to "protect their homeland". After Chu stated that protesters could not remain calm if the government continued to ignore their requests (e.g. to formally withdraw the extradition bill), Ho called Chu a "scum" who "did not deserve to be a lawmaker" while storming off stage, ending the interview.

Later, when Ho's parents' graves were vandalized, Ho accused Chu and his supporters for the damage. In one of Ho's video postings on social media, it was reported that Ho warned Chu in Cantonese that he has two paths to choose from. One of which is "a path of being alive, (and the other) is a path of not being alive." Chu dismissed the threat and stated that it was merely Ho's style of talking. Chu, however, added that it was also a way for Ho to lead his supporters into believing that he was culpable for the damage to Ho's parents' tomb.

Insults

During a 2019 Legislative Council meeting, Ho made a remark directed toward fellow Legislative Council member Claudia Mo, stating that she is used to "eating foreign sausage". Mo, who is married to English journalist Philip Bowring, later told the council that the comment amounts to racism and sexual harassment. Ho refused to apologise and was expelled from the meeting.

Attacks on CUHK

In January 2021, Ho blamed the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests on CUHK and likened its students to Al-Queda members, stating "What I see from this picture - I thought Al-Qaeda changed its registered office to CUHK."

Covid-19 restrictions from Birthday party

On 5 January 2022, Carrie Lam announced new warnings and restrictions against social gathering due to potential COVID-19 outbreaks. One day later, it was discovered that Ho attended a birthday party hosted by Witman Hung Wai-man, with 222 guests. At least one guest tested positive with COVID-19, causing all guests to be quarantined. Ho later claimed that the real issue was not the party, but the government's policy of allowing aircrew from Cathay Pacific to quarantine at home. Ho also claimed that he was a victim of the incident, saying "We are the victims of the policy", and also said that nobody could have predicted the risk of coronavirus exposure from the event, despite earlier warnings from the government to not gather in large groups. Ho also said he was "illegally detained" at the quarantine center, and that Carrie Lam should resign.

Current positions

  • Advisory board member of Yan Oi Tong (1997 to present)
  • Indigenous Inhabitant Representative of Leung Tin Tsuen

Honours and awards

Personal life

He owns two horses, Alex Flyer (天祿) and Hong Kong Bet (青山之寶) that race at The Hong Kong Jockey Club. The graves of Ho's parents were vandalized during the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests, which is believed to be due to his association with the Yuen Long attacks, though the identity of the perpetrators remains unknown.

On 31 August 2022, Ho tested positive for COVID-19.

See also

References

  1. ^ Ng, Kang-chung (19 October 2015). "University of strife: Lingnan's new council member Junius Ho Kwan-yiu never far from controversy". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 23 July 2019. Retrieved 23 July 2019.
  2. ^ "SRA | Person details | Solicitors Regulation Authority". archive.vn. 2 May 2020. Archived from the original on 21 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  3. Law List Archived 1 August 2012 at archive.today – The Law Society of Hong Kong
  4. "Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region – Members' Biographies ::Dr Hon Junius HO Kwan-yiu, JP". Government of Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 25 April 2019. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  5. Council Members Archived 11 September 2012 at archive.today – The Law Society of Hong Kong
  6. "Pro-Beijing lawmaker Junius Ho rebuts claims he is not 'solicitor in England and Wales'". Hong Kong Free Press. 22 September 2017. Archived from the original on 25 September 2017. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
  7. "K. C. HO & FONG, Solicitors & Notaries". kcho-fong.com. Archived from the original on 20 August 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  8. "Junius Ho – ARU". aru.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  9. "【抗暴之戰】英議員去信大學 促褫奪何君堯名譽博士學位". Apple Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 27 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  10. "UK rights group rep tells Junius Ho the bad news". The Standard (Hong Kong). 25 November 2021. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 29 January 2021.
  11. "Junius Ho stripped of honorary law doctorate". RTHK. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  12. ^ "Pro-Beijing lawmaker Junius Ho receives honorary degree from Chinese university after UK degree withdrawn". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 6 December 2019.
  13. "Appendix X" (PDF). Report on the 2008 Legislative Council Election. Electoral Affairs Commission. 4 December 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2019.
  14. "LegCo Election results: New Territories West". Government of Hong Kong. 9 September 2012. Archived from the original on 13 September 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2013.
  15. Cheng, Kris (9 October 2015). "Chief Executive appoints pro-Beijing figures as Lingnan University Council members". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 25 November 2015. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
  16. Cheng, Kris (11 November 2015). "LingnanU Council member storms out of forum, says students swore, insulted his wife". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 25 November 2015. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
  17. "'Umbrella soldiers' win eight seats as veteran politicians suffer surprise defeat". Hong Kong Free Press. 23 November 2015. Archived from the original on 25 November 2015. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
  18. "Hong Kong's Legco candidate Ken Chow urged to come clean on 'threats'". South China Morning Post. 26 August 2016. Archived from the original on 22 July 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2019.
  19. "周永勤離港前接受訪問:威脅來自「更高層次」 遠比黑勢力和中聯辦強大|誰選立法會?|端聞|端傳媒 Initium Media". Archived from the original on 20 October 2019. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  20. "Lawmaker Junius Ho loses Law Society election, comes last in the race". Hong Kong Free Press. 26 May 2017. Archived from the original on 29 April 2018. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
  21. "2019 District Councils Election – Election Results (Tuen Mun)". Government of Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 28 November 2019. Retrieved 25 November 2019.
  22. FactWire (15 December 2021). "Factwire: 41 privileged voters have 7,200 times greater power than a regular Hong Kong voter following election revamp". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  23. "Hong Kong security chief hits out at critics of plan to redevelop detention centre". South China Morning Post. 13 November 2023. Retrieved 13 November 2023.
  24. "Opinion: Hong Kong's Lai Chi Kok prisoners are entitled to respect". South China Morning Post. 18 November 2023. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
  25. "Man in court over attempted murder of Junius Ho". RTHK. 8 November 2019. Archived from the original on 13 December 2019. Retrieved 13 May 2020.
  26. "Video: Pro-Beijing Hong Kong lawmaker Junius Ho attacked in Tuen Mun". Hong Kong Free Press. 6 November 2019. Archived from the original on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 7 November 2019.
  27. "Pro-Beijing Lawmaker Stabbed in Hong Kong". The New York Times. 6 November 2019. Archived from the original on 7 November 2019.
  28. "Pro-Beijing Hong Kong lawmaker Junius Ho stabbed while campaigning". The Straits Times. 6 November 2019. Archived from the original on 7 November 2019. Retrieved 7 November 2019.
  29. ^ 何君堯:准同性婚姻 恐演變容許人獸交 [Junius Ho: Legalize same-sex marriage would lead to Zoophilia]. Oriental Daily News (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). 29 April 2017. Archived from the original on 6 May 2017. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  30. Ng, Ellie (24 May 2017). "'Protect family values': Hong Kong gov't urged to appeal ruling on marriage benefits for gay couple". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 12 June 2017. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  31. "Pro-Beijing lawmakers voice concerns over foreign judges' support for gay rights". South China Morning Post. 28 April 2018. Archived from the original on 29 April 2018. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
  32. "Don't let gays sideline 'natural people': Junius Ho - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  33. "'It's disgraceful... I don't want dirty money' - Hong Kong lawmakers urge gov't not to support 2022 Gay Games". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 10 June 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  34. Standard, The. "Policy against LGBT discrimination involve national security: Junius Ho". The Standard. Retrieved 13 February 2022.
  35. ^ Standard, The. "'Living with Covid' strategy may breach national security: Junius Ho". The Standard. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
  36. Leung, Hillary (25 April 2023). "Hong Kong lawmaker's petition opposing Gay Games is prejudiced, activist says". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
  37. Tong, Elson (8 June 2017). "Video: In surprise move, pro-Beijing lawmaker Junius Ho votes to 'never forget June 4' Tiananmen massacre". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 18 September 2017. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
  38. 「毋忘六四」議案被否決 朱凱廸炮轟何君堯發言質素堪比袁木 Archived 6 November 2019 at the Wayback Machine HK01. 3 April 2019.(in Chinese)
  39. "Newly founded group vows to 'protect' Central". China Daily. 24 September 2014. Archived from the original on 30 January 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2015.
  40. "Junius Ho seeks to block Benny Tai from HKU". The Standard. 21 August 2017. Archived from the original on 7 September 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  41. Cheng, Kris (7 September 2017). "Lawmaker threatens protests and legal action unless HKU investigates pro-democracy professor Benny Tai". Archived from the original on 7 September 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  42. Cheung, Karen (18 September 2017). "Hundreds attend protest against Hong Kong independence, urge sacking of pro-democracy HKU scholar Benny Tai". Archived from the original on 18 September 2017. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
  43. 何君堯認8萬人聯署或篤數. Apple Daily (in Chinese). 7 September 2019. Archived from the original on 9 September 2017. Retrieved 19 September 2017.(in Chinese)
  44. https://Www.post852.com, 852郵報 (18 September 2017). 何君堯斥追問殺無赦論「多餘,講細微嘢」 戴耀廷指違《公安條例》促警執法. 852郵報. Archived from the original on 22 July 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2019. {{cite web}}: External link in |last= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  45. ^ Cheung, Karen (18 September 2017). "Pro-Beijing legislator Junius Ho's call for death of independence activists may have broken law, says ExCo member". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 18 September 2017. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
  46. Palmer, James (25 November 2019). "Hong Kongers Break Beijing's Delusions of Victory". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 27 November 2019. Retrieved 27 November 2019.
  47. "Carrie Lam deplores 'cruel, insulting, intimidating' remarks on kill threat". The Standard. 19 September 2017. Archived from the original on 21 September 2017. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
  48. Kao, Ernest (19 September 2017). "'Unhealthy and stupid' calls to kill advocates of Hong Kong independence criticised by city's leader". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 19 September 2017. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
  49. "Pan-democrats blast Junius Ho for saying activists should be 'killed'". 18 September 2017. Archived from the original on 3 November 2017. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
  50. "Order banks to reopen sanctioned officials' accounts, Beijing loyalist Junius Ho tells minister | Apple Daily". Apple Daily 蘋果日報 (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Archived from the original on 4 February 2021. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
  51. Standard, The. "Discussing zero-infection policy not against national security law: HK gov". The Standard. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
  52. Ho, Kelly (14 November 2022). "National security police should investigate anthem error at rugby match, Hong Kong lawmakers say". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 15 November 2022.
  53. 邱靖汶, 陳信熙, 陳潤南 (26 April 2018). "【何君堯涉漏報】深夜發聲明稱不涉利益衝突 未交代離岸公司權益". 香港01.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. "Democrat files complaint accusing legislator Junius Ho of failing to declare interest in two properties". Hong Kong Free Press. 9 May 2018. Archived from the original on 7 November 2019. Retrieved 7 November 2019.
  55. "【獨家】妻獲恒基2000萬收樓 何君堯疑漏報離岸公司:不再回應". 香港01. 2 May 2018. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  56. "【無警時份】何君堯向元朗白衣人鼓掌豎拇指:你哋係我嘅英雄". Apple Daily. 22 July 2019. Archived from the original on 21 July 2019. Retrieved 21 July 2019.
  57. ^ "Yuen Long attackers were defending their home, says lawmaker". South China Morning Post. 2 July 2019. Archived from the original on 22 July 2019. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
  58. Creery, Jennifer (22 July 2019). "Video: Office of Hong Kong pro-Beijing lawmaker Junius Ho trashed as dozens protest response to Yuen Long attacks". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 22 July 2019. Retrieved 23 July 2019.
  59. ^ Chan, Holmes (23 July 2019). "Pro-Beijing lawmaker Junius Ho calls for protest ban, blames democrats for violence, storms out of TV show". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 23 July 2019. Retrieved 23 July 2019.
  60. "Junius Ho accused of supporting Yuen Long mob". The Standard. 22 July 2019. Archived from the original on 12 October 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2019.
  61. "Under fire Junius Ho loses it in debate over Yuen Long brutality". The Standard. 23 July 2019. Archived from the original on 23 July 2019. Retrieved 23 July 2019.
  62. "Pro-China legislator threatens colleague backing other side". The Straits Times. 25 July 2019. Archived from the original on 31 July 2019. Retrieved 31 July 2019.
  63. Standard. "Eddie Chu shrugs off threat, says Junius Ho trying to incite violence". The Standard. Archived from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 31 July 2019.
  64. Kitching, Chris (17 October 2019). "Hong Kong politician says rival lawmaker married to Brit 'eats foreign sausage'". The Mirror. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  65. "Legco panel kicks out Junius Ho over crude remark". RTHK. 15 October 2019. Archived from the original on 29 October 2019. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  66. "Hong Kong pro-Beijing lawmakers blast Chinese University over 'black violence' on campus". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 20 January 2021. Archived from the original on 20 January 2021. Retrieved 20 January 2021.
  67. ^ "Bars, gyms to close, 6pm restaurant curfew as Hong Kong ramps up Omicron battle". South China Morning Post. 5 January 2022. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
  68. "衞生防護中心最新發現洪為民宴會人數為222人 - RTHK".
  69. Hong Kong Finds New Suspected Covid Case at Official’s Scandal-Hit Birthday Party
  70. ^ "All 170 guests of Covid-19 scandal-hit birthday party sent to quarantine". South China Morning Post. 7 January 2022. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
  71. ^ "Pro-Beijing camp closes ranks over birthday party scandal, blames Cathay". South China Morning Post. 8 January 2022. Retrieved 8 January 2022.
  72. Cheng, Selina (9 January 2022). "Covid-19: Hong Kong officials to see out quarantine at home after false alarm, as expert urges tougher anti-epidemic measures". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
  73. 仁愛堂 :: 諮議局. yot.org.hk. Archived from the original on 24 November 2015. Retrieved 8 June 2012.
  74. "2019 Village Representative Election: Results for IIR Elections". Government of Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 30 October 2019. Retrieved 6 December 2019.
  75. "Persons appointed under Section 3(1)(a) of the Justices of the Peace Ordinance (Cap. 510)". Government of Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 21 August 2019. Retrieved 6 December 2019.
  76. "Alex Flyer – Horses – Horse Racing – The Hong Kong Jockey Club". racing.hkjc.com. Archived from the original on 5 November 2019. Retrieved 1 November 2019.
  77. "Hong Kong Bet – Horses – Horse Racing – The Hong Kong Jockey Club". racing.hkjc.com. Archived from the original on 5 November 2019. Retrieved 1 November 2019.
  78. "Hong Kong protest hate figure Junius Ho's parents' graves vandalised amid extradition bill anger". South China Morning Post. 23 July 2019. Archived from the original on 23 July 2019. Retrieved 7 November 2019.
  79. 何君堯先父母墓碑遭破壞 墓碑寫粗口字句. hket. 23 July 2019. Archived from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 6 November 2019.(in Chinese)
  80. James Griffiths (24 July 2019). "Hong Kong lawmaker says opponents walking 'path of not being alive'". CNN. Archived from the original on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 9 November 2019.
  81. Standard, The. "Pandemic could end middle of next year". The Standard. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
Legal offices
Preceded byHuen Wong President of Law Society of Hong Kong
2011–2012
Succeeded byDieter Yih
Political offices
Preceded byAlbert Ho Member of Tuen Mun District Council
Representative for Lok Tsui
2016–2019
Succeeded byLo Chun-yu
Legislative Council of Hong Kong
Preceded byAlbert Chan Member of Legislative Council
Representative for New Territories West
2016–2021
Constituency abolished
New constituency Member of Legislative Council
Representative for Election Committee
2022–present
Incumbent
Order of precedence
Preceded byJimmy Ng
Member of the Legislative Council
Hong Kong order of precedence
Member of the Legislative Council
Succeeded byHo Kai-ming
Member of the Legislative Council
Current members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong
President: Andrew Leung (BPA)
DAB (19)
BPA (8)
FTU (6)
NPP (6)
Liberal (4)
FEW (2)
FLU (2)
Roundtable (1)
PP (1)
KWND (1)
NPHK (1)
NCF (1)
TS (1)
Pro-Beijing
independents (35)
7th Legislative Council of Hong Kong

]

Categories: