Misplaced Pages

This article is about territorial disputes of the People's Republic of China (PRC). A territorial dispute is a disagreement over the possession or control of land between two or more political entities. Many of China's territorial disputes result from the historical consequences of colonialism in Asia and the lack of clear historical boundary demarcations. Many of these disputes are almost identical to those that the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taipei, also known as Taiwan, has with other countries. Therefore, many of the subsequent resolved disputes made by the PRC after 1949 with other governments may not be recognized by the ROC.

Current disputes

Many of China's territorial disputes result from the historical consequences of colonialism in Asia and the lack of clear historical boundary demarcations.

China's claims to disputed maritime territories date from prior to the founding of the People's Republic of China.

Bhutan

Bhutan has long had strong cultural, historical, religious and economic connections to Tibet. Bhutan's border with Tibet has never been officially recognized, much less demarcated. The Republic of China based in Taiwan officially maintains a territorial claim on parts of Bhutan to this day. The territorial claim was maintained by the People's Republic of China after the Chinese Communist Party took control of mainland China in the Chinese Civil War.

The 1959 Tibetan Rebellion and the 14th Dalai Lama's arrival in neighboring India made the security of Bhutan's border with China a necessity for Bhutan. An estimated 6,000 Tibetans fled to Bhutan and were granted asylum, although Bhutan subsequently closed its border to China, fearing more refugees to come. In July 1959, along with the occupation of Tibet, the Chinese People's Liberation Army occupied several Bhutanese exclaves in western Tibet which were under Bhutanese administration for more than 300 years and had been given to Bhutan by Ngawang Namgyal in the 17th century. These included Darchen, Labrang Monastery, Gartok and several smaller monasteries and villages near Mount Kailas.

In 1983, the Chinese Foreign Minister Wu Xueqian and Bhutanese Foreign Minister Dawa Tsering held talks on establishing bilateral relations in New York. In 1984, China and Bhutan began annual, direct talks over the border dispute. In 1998, China and Bhutan signed a bilateral agreement for maintaining peace on the border. In the agreement, China affirmed its respect for Bhutan's sovereignty and territorial integrity and both sides sought to build ties based on the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence. However, China's building of roads on what Bhutan asserts to be Bhutanese territory, allegedly in violation of the 1998 agreement, has provoked tensions. In 2002, however, China presented what it claimed to be 'evidence', asserting its ownership of disputed tracts of land; after negotiations, an interim agreement was reached.

On 11 August 2016 Bhutan Foreign Minister Damcho Dorji visited Beijing, capital of China, for the 24th round of boundary talks with Chinese Vice President Li Yuanchao. Both sides made comments to show their readiness to strengthen co-operations in various fields and hope of settling the boundary issues. In 2024, The New York Times reported that, according to satellite imagery, China had constructed villages inside of disputed territory within Bhutan. Chinese individuals, called "border guardians," received annual subsidies to relocate to newly built villages and paid to conduct border patrols.

India

China and India have various territorial disputes. There was one historical attempt to set a proposed boundary, the McMahon Line, by Great Britain during the 1913-1914 Simla Convention. The Republic of China rejected the proposed boundary. The unresolved dispute over the boundary became contentious after India gained its independence and the People's Republic of China was established. The disputed borders are complicated by the lack of administrative presence in the disputed areas, which are remote.

India claims Aksai Chin, which is administered by China. During the 1950s, the People's Republic of China built a 1,200 km (750 mi) road connecting Xinjiang and western Tibet, of which 179 km (112 mi) ran south of the Johnson Line through the Aksai Chin region claimed by India. Aksai Chin was easily accessible to the Chinese, but was more difficult for the Indians on the other side of the Karakorams to reach. The Indians did not learn of the existence of the road until 1957, which was confirmed when the road was shown in Chinese maps published in 1958.

The Depsang Plains are located on the border of the Indian union territory of Ladakh and the disputed zone of Aksai Chin. The People's Liberation Army occupied most of the plains during its 1962 war with India, while India controls the western portion of the plains. The dispute remains unresolved.

Arunachal Pradesh is a state of India created on 20 January 1972, located in the far northeast. It borders the states of Assam and Nagaland to the south, and shares international borders with Burma in the east, Bhutan in the west, and China in the north. The majority of the territory is claimed by China, by whom it is called South Tibet. The northern border of Arunachal Pradesh reflects the McMahon Line, a line demarcated by the 1914 Simla Convention between the United Kingdom and the Tibetan government. The Simla Convention was never accepted by the Chinese government, and it was also considered invalid by Tibetans due to unmet conditions specified in the treaty. The boundary was not broadly enforced by the Indian government until 1950. Currently, this territory is administered by India.

Japan

China and Japan have a territorial dispute over a group of uninhabited islands known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan, the Diaoyu Islands in the People's Republic of China (PRC), and Tiaoyutai Islands in the Republic of China (ROC or Taiwan). Aside from a 1945 to 1972 period of administration by the United States as part of the Ryukyu Islands, the archipelago has been controlled by Japan since 1895. According to Lee Seokwoo, the People's Republic of China (PRC) started taking up the question of sovereignty over the islands in the latter half of 1970 when evidence relating to the existence of oil reserves surfaced. The ROC also claims the islands. The territory is close to key shipping lanes and rich fishing grounds, and there may be oil reserves in the area.

Japan argues that it surveyed the islands in the late 19th century and found them to be terra nullius (Latin: land belonging to no one); subsequently, China acquiesced to Japanese sovereignty until the 1970s. The PRC and the ROC argue that documentary evidence prior to the First Sino-Japanese War indicates Chinese possession and that the territory is accordingly a Japanese seizure that should be returned as the rest of Imperial Japan's conquests were returned in 1945.

The islands are included within the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan, meaning that a defense of the islands by Japan would require the United States to come to Japan's aid.

In September 2012, the Japanese government purchased three of the disputed islands from their private owner, prompting large-scale protests in China. As of early February 2013, the situation has been regarded as "the most serious for Sino-Japanese relations in the post-war period in terms of the risk of militarized conflict."

Taiwan

The PRC claims the de jure administration of Taiwan Province, as well as mainland-nearby islands of Kinmen and Matsu Islands, currently controlled by the Republic of China (ROC). However, despite the diplomatic stalemate between the governments in Beijing and Taipei, both governments agree on many of the same territorial disputes, namely the Senkaku Islands and the 9-dash line, or the eleven-dash line in the case of the ROC.

Vietnam

China and Vietnam have an ongoing territorial dispute over the Paracel Islands. The islands are claimed by Vietnam but administered by China.

South China Sea

The PRC and ROC claimed sovereignty over an area surrounding shoals and islands in the South China Sea, as well as a historical right over the area within the nine-dash line. In 1932, China sent a Note Verbale to France, declaring that China's southernmost territory was the Paracels. In 1933, when France occupied six features in the Spratlys, China did not protest as it recognized the year before that its southernmost territory was limited to the Paracels.

In the 1970s, the discovery of the potential for petroleum resources in the South China Sea prompted an increase in occupation activity by claimants. From 1971 to 1973, the Philippines began occupying five features and South Vietnam began occupying six. Concerned that its claims would be weakened by the activity of other claimants, China increased its physical presence in the area. It conducted surveys around the Paracels and the People's Liberation Army Navy built a harbor and wharf on Wood Island (in the Paracels) in 1971.

In 1974, China and South Vietnam fought the Battle of the Paracel Islands. China took a defensive posture, directing its forces "not to fire the first shot; fight back when attacked". The battle was relatively brief and China defeated South Vietnam. China moved quickly to consolidate its position in the area and has maintained control of the Paracel Islands since.

The 2012 Scarborough Shoal fishing dispute and resulting standoff between China and the Philippines prompted the Philippines to initiate the South China Sea Arbitration in 2013. China declined to participate in the arbitration and stated that it would not accept any arbitration result. As part of its grounds for nonparticipation and nonacceptance, China cited the fact that China is a signatory to the 2006 UNCLOS exclusion clause which removes sovereignty and boundary delimitations issues from arbitration procedures. Because China did not participate, the arbitrators based their view of the Chinese position on China's 2014 white paper and letters sent to the tribunal from China's ambassador to the Netherlands. In 2016, the nine-dash line created by China was declared as invalid by the South China Sea Arbitration ruling.

A 2013 survey of Chinese adults found that respondents who sourced their information about the dispute from traditional mass media (which are more subject to state regulation) were less supportive of the idea that China should adopt hardline policies in the South China Sea. The researchers who conducted the survey concluded that China's state-media coverage of the dispute was "more of a dampener than a driver of nationalistic policy preference."

Resolved disputes

China was generally generous in resolving disputes with its southwest neighbors. According to academic Swaran Singh, China's generosity was likely motivated by the security concern of reducing foreign support for disgruntled groups within China's southwest border.

In Central Asia, the newly independent states following the dissolution of the Soviet Union inherited the border disagreements with China, which had themselves been inherited from Tsarist Russia and the Qing dynasty. China negotiated bilaterally to resolve its borders with these conflicts. Ultimately, China obtained significantly less Central Asian territory than what it had originally claimed. Resolution of these disputes on territorial terms generally favorable to the Central Asian countries created goodwill for China, avoided conflict, and also resulted in recognition that the czarist era borders were imposed unjustly on China.

Kazakhstan

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Kazakhstan became an independent country, and around 2,420 square kilometers of land was disputed with China. A border treaty between the two nations was signed in Almaty on April 26, 1994, and ratified by the Kazakh president on June 15, 1995. China received around 22% of the total disputed territory, and Kazakhstan received the remaining 78%.

Kyrgyzstan

When Kyrgyzstan became independent in 1991 after the Soviet Union's dissolution, it inherited a section of the USSR-China frontier. The two countries delimited their border in 1996. Formal demarcation was hampered by opposition to the border treaty by the Kyrgyz opposition, centred on Azimbek Beknazarov, as part of a wider movement against the ex-President Askar Akayev culminating in the Tulip Revolution. The border agreement was finalized in 2009, with China giving up part of the Khan Tengri Peak while Kyrgyzstan ceded the Uzengi-Kush, a mountainous area located south of the Issyk Kul region.

Laos

Laos obtained a partial independence from France in 1949, around the time when the People's Republic of China was established after defeating the nationalist government in the Chinese Civil War. The boundary then became one between two sovereign independent states. The border was re-surveyed and demarcated in April 1992.

Mongolia

The People's Republic of China established diplomatic relations with Mongolia on October 16, 1949, and both nations signed a border treaty in 1962. With the Sino-Soviet split, Mongolia aligned itself with the Soviet Union and asked for the deployment of Soviet forces, leading to security concerns in China. As a result, bilateral ties remained tense until 1984, when a high-level Chinese delegation visited Mongolia and both nations began to survey and demarcate their borders. Mongolian General Secretary Jambyn Batmönkh, during a meeting with President Kim Il sung while on a state visit to Pyongyang in November 1986 states that "renewing the development of Sino-Mongolian relations is important for our two countries’ people's common interest". In 1986, a series of agreements to bolster trade and establish transport and air links was signed.

Myanmar

The boundary area between China and Burma (Myanmar) is inhabited by non-Han and non-Burmese peoples, and has been traditionally kept as a buffer region between the various Chinese and Burmese empires. During the 19th century the British, based in India, began occupying Myanmar (then referred to as Burma), gradually incorporating it into British India. Their advance close to lands traditionally claimed by China pushed the two sides into negotiating a boundary treaty in 1894, which covered the southern half of the boundary as far north as the vicinity of Myitkyina, exclusive of the Wa States. Sections of this border were demarcated and marked on the ground from 1897 to 1900. In 1941 a border running through the Wa States area was agreed upon following on-the-ground surveys conducted in the 1930s, though no agreement on the northern stretch was reached, with China claiming much of what is now northern Myanmar. Meanwhile, Burma was separated from India and became a separate colony in 1937, gaining full independence in 1948.

During the Second World War the Burma Road was constructed across the border as an Allied supply line to Chinese forces fighting Japan. Additionally in 1941, following Japan's invasion of Burma, parts of Burma were ceded to Siam as the Saharat Thai Doem territory, thereby giving China a common border with Thailand, however these areas were returned to Burma in 1946 following Japan's defeat.

Discussions between Burma and China over the border began in 1954, with China keen to control the area more effectively as it was being used as a base by Kuomintang troops. On 28 January 1960 a treaty was signed which delimited most of the border, which was later completed with a full delimitation treaty signed on 1 October 1960, with both sides ceding small areas along the border. The two sides then demarcated the border on the ground in the following year.

Since then relations between the two states have remained largely cordial, though the border region has at times been volatile owing to the ongoing insurgencies in Myanmar's Kachin and Shan states. In recent years several towns along the border, such as Mong La, Ruili and Muse, have become centers of gambling, prostitution and drug smuggling.

Nepal

Several treaties were negotiated between Nepal and Tibet (Qing China) in the 18th and 19th centuries, however they were often vague or contradictory. After the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the Chinese and Nepalese governments signed three border agreements in 1960, 1961 and 1963. A Joint Commission was created to define and demarcate the border.

Nepali opposition claims Nepal and China have an ongoing border dispute over the territory along the Himalayan border. However, both of the current governments of China and Nepal deny the accusation.

North Korea

China and North Korea share a 1,416 km long land border that corresponds almost entirely to the course of the Yalu and Tumen rivers. The two countries signed a border treaty in 1962 to resolve their un-demarcated land border. China received 40% of the disputed crater lake on Paektu Mountain (known as Changbai Mountain in China), while North Korea held the remaining land.

Pakistan

A solution to the two countries' border dispute was negotiated in 1950s. The Sino-Pakistan Agreement (also known as the Sino-Pakistan Frontier Agreement and Sino-Pak Boundary Agreement) is a 1963 document between the governments of Pakistan and China establishing the border between those countries. It resulted in Pakistan ceding 5,300 km (2,050 sq mi) to China and China ceding over 1,900 km (750 sq mi) to Pakistan.

Russia

In 1991, China and USSR signed the 1991 Sino-Soviet Border Agreement, which intended to start the process of resolving the border disputes held in abeyance since the 1960s. However, just a few months later the USSR was dissolved, and four former Soviet republics — Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan — inherited various sections of the former Sino–Soviet border.

It took more than a decade for Russia and China to fully resolve the border issues and to demarcate the border. On May 29, 1994, during Russian Prime Minister Chernomyrdin's visit to Beijing, an "Agreement on the Sino-Russian Border Management System intended to facilitate border trade and hinder criminal activity" was signed. On September 3, a demarcation agreement was signed for the short (55 kilometres (34 mi)) western section of the binational border; the demarcation of this section was completed in 1998.

The last unresolved territorial issue between the two countries was settled by the 2004 Complementary Agreement between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation on the Eastern Section of the China–Russia Boundary. Pursuant to that agreement, Russia transferred to China a part of Abagaitu Islet, the entire Yinlong (Tarabarov) Island, about half of Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island, and some adjacent river islets. The transfer has been ratified by both the Chinese National People's Congress and the Russian State Duma in 2005, thus ending the decades-long border dispute. The official transfer ceremony was held on-site on October 14, 2008. However, in China Standard Map Edition 2023, Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island has been speculated by some journalists to be asserted as Chinese territory by China.

Tajikistan

China had a longstanding territorial claim on about 28,430 square kilometers (10.977 square miles) of Tajik territory since 1884, which was taken from the then Qing dynasty by unequal treaties.

In 2011, as part of a boundary agreement, China officially relinquished its claim on 96% of the total disputed territory, while Tajikistan ceded around 4% - about 1,137 square km (439 square miles) – to China. However, this treaty is not recognized by the Republic of China (ROC) government based in Taipei, and they continue to claim the territory (among others) as reflected in official government maps.

See also

• Chinese salami slicing strategy
• Debt trap diplomacy
• East China Sea EEZ disputes
  • Territorial disputes of Japan
• Foreign relations of China
• Territorial changes of the People's Republic of China
• Borders of China
• Map of National Shame
• Today Hong Kong, Tomorrow Taiwan, Day After Tomorrow Okinawa

References

1. ^ Horton, Chris (8 July 2019). "Taiwan's Status Is a Geopolitical Absurdity". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 16 June 2024. Retrieved 27 November 2021.
2. ^ Wang, Frances Yaping (2024). The Art of State Persuasion: China's Strategic Use of Media in Interstate Disputes. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197757505.001.0001. ISBN 9780197757512.
3. Ma, Xinru; Kang, David C. (2024). Beyond Power Transitions: The Lessons of East Asian History and the Future of U.S.-China Relations. Columbia Studies in International Order and Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-55597-5.
4. ^ Savada, Andrea Matles (September 1991). Nepal and Bhutan : country studies. Library of Congress. pp. 330–333. ISBN 0844407771. Retrieved 2008-05-30.
5. ^ Balaji, Mohan (Jan 12, 2008). "In Bhutan, China and India collide". Asia Times Online. Archived from the original on May 9, 2008. Retrieved 30 May 2008.
6. ^ M Shamsur Rabb Khan (8 April 2008). "Elections in the Himalayan Kingdom: New Dawn of India-Bhutan Relations". Institute of Peace & Conflict Studies. Archived from the original on 5 March 2022. Retrieved 29 May 2008.
7. ^ Bhutan: a land frozen in time Archived 2010-11-11 at archive.today (9 February 1998). BBC. Accessed 30 May 2008.
8. "Economic and political relations between Bhutan and the neighbouring countries pp-168" (PDF). Institute of developing economies Japan external trade organisation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 December 2020. Retrieved 29 June 2020.
9. Ranade, Jayadeva (16 July 2017). "A Treacherous Faultline". The Pioneer. Archived from the original on 27 June 2020. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
10. K. Warikoo (2019). Himalayan Frontiers of India: Historical, Geo-Political and Strategic Perspectives. Routledge. p. 240. ISBN 9781134032945. Archived from the original on 2024-08-13. Retrieved 2021-12-21.
11. Arpi, Claude (16 July 2016). "Little Bhutan in Tibet". The Statesman. Archived from the original on 26 June 2020. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
12. "Ladakhi and Bhutanese Enclaves in Tibet" (PDF). John Bray. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-12-02. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
13. ^ Bhutan-China relations (5 July 2004). BhutanNewsOnline.com. Accessed 30 May 2008.
14. India and the upcoming Druk democracy Archived 13 January 2008 at the Wayback Machine (May 2007). HimalMag.com. Accessed 30 May 2008.
15. ^ Bhutan Gazette (7 June 2007). BhutanGazette. Accessed 30 May 2008.
16. "China hopes to forge diplomatic ties with Bhutan". Xinhua News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
17. ^ Xiao, Muyi; Chang, Agnes (2024-08-10). "China's Great Wall of Villages". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2024-08-10. Retrieved 2024-08-10.
18. ^ Maxwell, Neville (1970). India's China War. New York: Pantheon. ISBN 978-0224618878.
19. China's Decision for War with India in 1962 by John W. Garver Archived 26 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine
20. Manoj Joshi (2013-05-07). "Making sense of the Depsang incursion". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 2021-03-24. Retrieved 2014-03-15.
21. "Khurshid to visit China on May 9, no date for flag meet". Hindustan Times. 2013-04-25. Archived from the original on April 25, 2013. Retrieved 2014-03-15.
22. "Let's shake hands: 20 days on, China withdraws troops from Ladakh : India, News – India Today". Indiatoday.intoday.in. 2013-05-05. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2014-03-15.
23. ^ "CIA World Factbook – China". 6 June 2023. Archived from the original on 13 February 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
24. Tsering Shakya (1999). The Dragon in the Land of Snows: A History of Modern Tibet Since 1947. Columbia University Press. pp. 279–. ISBN 978-0-231-11814-9.
25. Guo, Rongxing (2006). Territorial Disputes and Resource Management: A Global Handbook. Nova Publishers. p. 51. ISBN 9781600214455. Archived from the original on 2024-08-13. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
26. Shurtleff, William; Aoyagi, Akiko (2010). History of Soybeans and Soyfoods in South Asia / Indian Subcontinent (1656–2010): Extensively Annotated Bibliography and Sourcebook (illustrated ed.). Soyinfo Center. p. 952. ISBN 9781928914310. Archived from the original on 2024-08-13. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
27. Ogura, Junko (14 October 2010). "Japanese party urges Google to drop Chinese name for disputed islands". US: CNN. Archived from the original on 4 October 2012.
28. Kristof, Nicholas (10 September 2010). "Look Out for the Diaoyu Islands". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 20 October 2012. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
29. JOHN W. FINNEY Special to The New York Times (11 November 1971). "SENATE ENDORSES OKINAWA TREATY – Votes 84 to 6 for Island's Return to Japan – Rioters There Kill a Policeman Senate, in 84 to 6 Vote, Approves the Treaty Returning Okinawa to Japan – Front Page". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 July 2018. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
30. Lee, Seokwoo et al. (2002). Territorial disputes among Japan, Taiwan and China concerning the Senkaku Islands, pp. 11–12., p. 11, at Google Books
31. "Q&A: China-Japan islands row" Archived 10 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine BBC News 11 September 2012
32. "U.S. says Senkaku Islands fall within scope of Japan-U.S. security treaty". Kyodo News. Archived from the original on 15 July 2012. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
33. "Viewpoints: How serious are China-Japan tensions?". BBC. 8 February 2013. Archived from the original on 28 November 2013. Retrieved 16 November 2013.
34. Wu 2013, p. 79(at History of the U-shaped line) sfn error: no target: CITEREFWu2013 (help)
35. "The South China Sea conflict in a nutshell". japantimes. 10 June 2015. Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
36. ^ TøNnesson, Stein (February 2006). "The South China Sea in the Age of European Decline". Modern Asian Studies. 40 (1): 1–57. doi:10.1017/S0026749X06001727. ISSN 0026-749X.
37. ^ Hayton, Bill (2018-05-16). "China's Claim to the Spratly Islands is Just a Mistake". Center for International Maritime Security. Archived from the original on 2024-06-18. Retrieved 2024-06-19.
38. ^ Chemillier-Gendreau, Monique; Sutcliffe, H.L.; McDonald, M. (2000-01-01). "Annex 10". Sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Brill | Nijhoff. doi:10.1163/9789004479425_008. ISBN 978-90-411-1381-8.
39. "Cases | PCA-CPA". Archived from the original on 2020-12-23. Retrieved 2024-06-18.
40. "China's 'nine-dash line, historic rights' invalid – tribunal". 12 July 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-07-13. Retrieved 2024-06-18.
41. ^ Singh, Swaran (2016). "China Engages its Southwest Neighbors". The new great game : China and South and Central Asia in the era of reform. Thomas Fingar. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p. 163. ISBN 978-0-8047-9764-1. OCLC 939553543.
42. Peyrouse, Sebastien (2016). "China and Central Asia". The new great game : China and South and Central Asia in the era of reform. Thomas Fingar. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p. 218. ISBN 978-0-8047-9764-1. OCLC 939553543.
43. ^ Peyrouse, Sebastien (2016). "China and Central Asia". The new great game : China and South and Central Asia in the era of reform. Thomas Fingar. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p. 233. ISBN 978-0-8047-9764-1. OCLC 939553543.
44. ^ Fravel, M. Taylor (2005-10-01). "Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China's Compromises in Territorial Disputes". International Security. 30 (2): 46–83. doi:10.1162/016228805775124534. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 56347789. Archived from the original on 2017-01-29. Retrieved 2020-08-08.
45. See the text of the "Agreement between the Republic of Kazakhstan and the People's Republic of China on the Kazakhstan-China international border, signed in Almaty on Aprel 26, 1994" in О ратификации Соглашения между Республикой Казахстан и Китайской Народной Республикой о казахстанско-китайской государственной границе. Указ Президента Республики Казахстан от 15 июня 1995 г. N 2331 Archived 2013-10-05 at the Wayback Machine. The border shown on Google Maps follows the description in the treaty; specifically, border point 38 described in the text is at the border line's crossing with the Terekty River (铁列克提河; Tiělièkètí Hé) can be seen at 45°37′00″N 82°15′30″E / 45.61667°N 82.25833°E / 45.61667; 82.25833. The 1969-era Soviet claim in the area can be seen on the period's topo maps, e.g. border point No. 40 on this map Archived 2013-10-01 at the Wayback Machine.
46. 中华人民共和国和吉尔吉斯共和国关于中吉国界的协定  [China-Kyrgyzstan Border Agreement] (in Chinese). 1996-07-04 – via Wikisource.
47. Kyrgyzstan, China end common border demarcation, 14 July 2009, archived from the original on 23 September 2018, retrieved 5 August 2021
48. "Laos – Encyclopædia Britannica Overview". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 5 May 2013. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
49. St John, Ronald Bruce (1998). The Land Boundaries of Indochina: Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. IBRU. ISBN 978-1-897643-32-7.
50. ^ "China-Mongolia Boundary" (PDF). International Boundary Study (173). The Geographer, Bureau of Intelligence and Research: 2–6. August 1984. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-16. Retrieved 2008-06-16.
51. ^ "Mongolia-China relations". Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 2017-08-01. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
52. "Wilson Center Digital Archive". Archived from the original on 2023-01-20. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
53. "International Boundary Study No. 42 – Burma-China Boundary" (PDF). US DOS. 30 November 1964. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
54. "Burma Road – Britannica Online Encyclopedia". Archived from the original on 2008-11-18. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
55. Donald M. Seekins, Historical Dictionary of Burma (Myanmar), p. 251
56. ""A Forgotten Invasion: Thailand in Shan State, 1941–45"". Archived from the original on 2014-09-03. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
57. "More fighting feared as thousands flee Burma". Bangkok Post. Agence France-Presse. 27 August 2009. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
58. "Myanmar says Chinese tip-off led to border clash". Associated Press. 10 September 2009. Retrieved 11 September 2009.
59. Asia Times Online, Virtual gambling in Myanmar's drug country, Michael Black and Roland Fields, Aug 26, 2006
60. "Asia Times Online :: south-east Asia news – Virtual gambling in Myanmar's drug country". Atimes.com. 2006-08-26. Archived from the original on 2006-10-19. Retrieved 2012-11-29.
61. "Strategic Programme Framework: Union of Myanmar 2004–2007" (PDF). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-04-22. Retrieved 2009-01-01.
62. Office of the Geographer (30 May 1965). "China – Nepal Boundary" (PDF). Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 August 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
63. Sharma, Gopal; Crossley, Gabriel (3 November 2020). "China, Nepal deny Nepali opposition's landgrab accusations". Reuters. Archived from the original on 5 August 2021. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
64. Fravel, M. Taylor (2005-10-01). "Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China's Compromises in Territorial Disputes". International Security. 30 (2): 46–83. doi:10.1162/016228805775124534. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 56347789.
65. "Signing with the Red Chinese". Time (magazine). 15 March 1963. Archived from the original on 22 December 2008. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
66. NOORANI, A.G. (Jan 14, 2012). "Map fetish". Vol. 29, no. 1. Frontline. Archived from the original on 24 January 2020. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
67. Ahmed, Ishtiaq (1998), State, Nation and Ethnicity in Contemporary South Asia, A&C Black, p. 148, ISBN 978-1-85567-578-0, archived from the original on 2024-08-13, retrieved 2021-08-05: "As a friendly gesture some territory in the northern areas was surrendered to China and a treaty was signed which stated that there were no border disputes between the two countries."
68. Chen, Qimao, "Sino-Russian relations after the break-up of the Soviet Union", in Chufrin, Gennady (ed.), Russia and Asia: the Emerging Security Agenda (PDF), pp. 288–291, archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-05-19, retrieved 2015-07-15
69. Дополнительное Соглашение Между Российской Федерацией И Китайской Народной Республикой О Российско-Китайской Государственной Границе На Ее Восточной Части (Заключено В Г. Пекине 14.10.2004), January 2015, archived from the original on 2011-08-12, retrieved 2015-07-15. October 14, 2004 (in Russian)
70. "The cockerel's cropped crest". The Economist. 26 July 2008. Archived from the original on 29 August 2009. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
71. "Analysis: China's new map a timed move to reassert its territorial claims, flex muscles ahead of regional summits". CNA. Archived from the original on 2023-09-06. Retrieved 2023-09-06.
72. "Tajikistan Cedes Disputed Land to China". Jamestown. The Jamestown Foundation. 24 January 2011. Archived from the original on 7 November 2019. Retrieved 5 August 2021.
73. Fravel, M. Taylor (2005-10-01). "Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China's Compromises in Territorial Disputes". International Security. 30 (2): 46–83. doi:10.1162/016228805775124534. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 56347789. Archived from the original on 2020-12-20. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
74. "Tajikistan cedes land to China". BBC News. 13 January 2011. Archived from the original on 6 December 2018. Retrieved 5 August 2021.

v t e Foreign relations of China
Bilateral relations Africa Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Djibouti Egypt Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Ivory Coast Kenya Lesotho Liberia Libya Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Morocco Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda São Tomé and Príncipe Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia South Africa South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Americas Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Bahamas Barbados Bolivia Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador Grenada Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Nicaragua Panama Peru Suriname Trinidad and Tobago United States Uruguay Venezuela Asia Afghanistan Armenia Azerbaijan Bangladesh Bhutan Brunei Cambodia East Timor Georgia India Indonesia Iran Iraq Israel Japan history Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Laos Lebanon Malaysia Maldives Mongolia Myanmar Nepal North Korea History Pakistan Palestine Philippines Qatar Saudi Arabia Singapore South Korea History Sri Lanka Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Thailand Turkey Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Vietnam Northern Domination Yemen Europe Albania Austria Belarus Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Kosovo Lithuania Luxembourg Moldova Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia San Marino Serbia Slovakia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom Vatican City Oceania Australia Fiji Kiribati Micronesia Nauru New Zealand Niue Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu Former states Soviet Union Yugoslavia
Multilateral relations BCIM Economic Corridor BIMSTEC Africa Arab League BRICS Caribbean China–Japan–South Korea European Union Latin America Oceania Third World United Nations Arctic policy of China China and the Antarctic
Diplomacy Central Foreign Affairs Commission (General Secretary) Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Foreign Minister) Diplomatic missions of China / in China Belt and Road Initiative China's peaceful rise Chinese Century Confucius Institute Dates of diplomatic recognition Foreign policy of China Foreign Relations Law Foreign relations of Hong Kong Nine-dash line Panda diplomacy Political status of Taiwan Chinese unification Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Stadium diplomacy String of Pearls Major historical splits Soviet Albania Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Treaties Theater diplomacy Wolf warrior diplomacy Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy

• Territorial disputes of China