Revision as of 04:08, 1 July 2019 edit175.145.217.144 (talk) →Fortification← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:10, 12 December 2024 edit undoBongan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,711 edits →Bengal Sultanate: typo | ||
(734 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|none}} <!-- "none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see ] --> | |||
{{expert needed|1=Architecture|date=July 2018}} | |||
{{Use Indian English|date=July 2018}} | {{Use Indian English|date=July 2018}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date= |
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}} | ||
{{multiple image | |||
], the most famous building of ] in India.]] | |||
| perrow = 1 | |||
] in Tamil Nadu is largest temple complex in India.]] | |||
| total_width = 240 | |||
] of architecture.]] | |||
| caption_align = centre | |||
| align = right | |||
| image_style = border:none; | |||
| image2 = India Meenakshi Temple.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Tamil architecture of ] | |||
| image3 = Patwon ki Haveli Jaisalmer.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Patwon ki Haveli, Jaisalmer. Rows of sandstone haveli in Rajasthan. | |||
| image1 = Ellora, tempio kailasanatha (grotta 16), 750-775 dc ca., tempio di shiva visto dalla terrazza del gopuram, lato dx (sud) 01.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ], ] is an example of Indian rock-cut architecture. | |||
| image4 = Taj Mahal, Agra, India edit2.jpg | |||
| caption4 = The ], Agra is the epitome of Mughal architecture. | |||
| image5 = Dalhousie square.jpg | |||
| caption5 = ], built during British Raj period, is an example of the fusion of Indian and ]. | |||
|image6 =Padmanabhaswamy Temple Gopuram.jpg | |||
|caption6 = Padmanabhaswamy Temple in ], ] | |||
| footer = | |||
}} | |||
'''Indian architecture''' is rooted in the ], ], and ] of ]. Among several architectural styles and traditions, the best-known include the many varieties of ] and ], especially ], ], ], and ]. Early Indian architecture was made from wood, which did not survive due to rotting and instability in the structures. Instead, the earliest existing architecture are made with ], including many ], ], and ] temples. | |||
{{Culture of India}} | |||
The '''architecture of ]''' is rooted in its ], ] and ]. Indian architecture progressed with time and assimilated the many influences that came as a result of India's global discourse with other regions of the world throughout its two millennia-old past. The architectural methods practiced in India are a result of examination and implementation of its established building traditions and outside cultural interactions.<ref name=rjadhav>See Raj Jadhav, pp. 7–13 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Among a number of architectural styles and traditions, the contrasting ] and ] are the best known. Both of these, but especially the former, have a number of regional styles within them. | |||
Hindu temple architecture is |
The Hindu temple architecture is divided into the ] of ] and the ] style of ], with other regional styles. Housing styles also vary between regions, depending on climate. | ||
The first major ] kingdom in India was the ], which led to the development of ], combining Indian and Islamic features. The rule of the ], when ] evolved, is regarded as the zenith of Indo-Islamic architecture, with the ] being the high point of their contribution. | The first major ]ic kingdom in India was the ], which led to the development of ], combining Indian and Islamic features. The rule of the ], when ] evolved, is regarded as the zenith of Indo-Islamic architecture, with the ] being the high point of their contribution. Indo-Islamic architecture influenced the ] and ] styles as well. | ||
During the ], European styles including ], ], and ] became prevalent across India. The amalgamation of Indo-Islamic and European styles led to a new style, known as the ] style. After independence, modernist ideas spread among Indian architects as a way of progressing from the colonial culture. ] |
During the ], European styles including ], ], and ] became prevalent across India. The amalgamation of Indo-Islamic and European styles led to a new style, known as the ] style. After ], ] ideas spread among Indian architects as a way of progressing from the colonial culture. ] - who designed the city of ] - influenced a generation of architects towards modernism in the 20th century. The ] further bolstered the urban architecture of India as the country became more integrated with the world's economy. Traditional '']'' remains influential in India's architecture in the contemporary era.<ref name=rjadhav>See Raj Jadhav, pp. 7–13 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> | ||
== |
==Neolithic period== | ||
In South India, the ] began in 6500 BCE and lasted till around 1400 BCE when the ] transition period began. The South Indian neolithic period is characterized by ash mounds from 2500 BCE in the region of ], which later expanded into ]. {{Citation needed|date=November 2022}} | |||
{{Multiple image | |||
| align = | |||
Neolithic settlements have been found in the northwest (]), east (] and ]), south (], ], and ]), and the northeastern frontier (]) of India. | |||
| direction = | |||
| total_width = 400 | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = left | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header = Neolithic Structures | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| image4 = Megalithic Monument-KARKABHAT-CHHATTISGARH-DSC001.jpg | |||
| caption4 = Megalithic monument in Karkabhat megalithic burial site near ] | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Kadanassery 036.JPG | |||
| caption3 = Stone Umbrellas shaped Megalithic burials of Stone Age are situated in ] | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Stone circle at Junapani, Nagpur.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Stone circle at Junapani, Nagpur | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Mallachandram-Krishnagiri-Tamilnadu-india (41).JPG | |||
| caption1 = Megalithic Dolmens in Mallachandram, Tamil Nadu | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 330 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
The earliest clear evidence of the megalithic urn burials, discovered at various places in Tamil Nadu, date back to 1000 BCE. The most notable megalithic urn was discovered in ], {{convert|24|km}} from ], where archaeologists from the ] unearthed 12 urns containing human skulls, skeletons and bones, husks, grains of charred rice and Neolithic celts, confirming the presence of the Neolithic period 2800 years ago. | |||
The unearthed local and foreign antiquities (of art, architecture, customs, and rituals) depicted by the engravings on pottery and other artifacts, indicate that the prehistoric people of the ] established contact with ] and South ], and had links to the ] and ]. | |||
Megalithic burial sites have been found scattered all over the subcontinent. The Neolithic period lasted up until 3300 BCE, overlapping with the following ] (Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age) period. One of the earliest Neolithic sites in India is Lahuradewa in the Middle Ganga region and Jhusi near the confluence of the ] and ] rivers, both dating to around the 7th millennium BCE. | |||
==Indus Valley Civilization (2600 BCE – 1900 BCE)== | |||
{{Main|Ancient Indian architecture|Harappan architecture}} | |||
The ] covered a large area around and beyond the ] basin in the late ]. In its mature phase, from about 2600 to 1900 BCE, the civilization developed several cities marked by great uniformity within and between sites, including ], ], and the ] ]. | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| total_width = 300 | |||
| image1 = Dholavira Layout.jpg | | image1 = Dholavira Layout.jpg | ||
| alt1 = |
| alt1 = | ||
| caption1 = Layout of ] | | caption1 = Layout of ] | ||
| image2 = Kalibangan. |
| image2 = Kalibangan-en.svg | ||
| caption2 = |
| caption2 = Layout of ] | ||
| alt2 = | |||
| header = Planning of Indus valley civilization cities | | header = Planning of Indus valley civilization cities | ||
| image3 = The drainage system at Lothal 2.JPG | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image4 = Kalibangan pre-Harappan structures.jpg | |||
| caption4 = Kalibangan pre-Harappan structures | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| caption3 = The drainage system at ] | |||
}} | }} | ||
The ] (3300 BCE–1300 BCE) covered a large area around the ] basin and beyond. In its mature phase, from c. 2600–1900 BCE, it produced several cities marked by great uniformity within and between sites, including ], ], and the ] ]. The civic and ] and engineering aspects of these are remarkable, but the design of the buildings is "of a startling utilitarian character". There are ], drains, water-courses and tanks, but neither palaces nor temples have been identified, though cities have a central raised and fortified "citadel".<ref>Rowland, 31–34, 32 quoted; Harle, 15–18</ref> Mohenjo-daro has wells which may be the predecessors of the ].<ref name=L&B2/> As many as 700 wells have been discovered in just one section of the city, leading scholars to believe that 'cylindrical brick lined wells' were invented by the Indus Valley Civilization.<ref name=L&B2>Livingstone & Beach, 19</ref> | |||
The civic and ] and the engineering of these cities are deemed remarkable, but the building designs are "of a startling utilitarian character". There are ], drains, water-courses and tanks, but neither palaces nor temples have been identified, though cities have a central raised and fortified "citadel".<ref>Rowland, 31–34, 32 quoted; Harle, 15–18</ref> Mohenjo-daro has wells which may be the predecessors of the ].<ref name=L&B2/> As many as 700 wells have been discovered in just one section of the city, leading scholars to believe that 'cylindrical brick lined wells' were invented by the Indus Valley Civilization.<ref name=L&B2>Livingstone & Beach, 19</ref> | |||
The architectural decoration is extremely minimal, though there are "narrow pointed niches" inside some buildings. Most of the art found is in miniature forms like seals, and mainly in ], but there are a very few larger sculptures of figures. In most sites fired mud-brick (not sun-baked as in ]) is used exclusively as the building material, but a few such as ] are in stone. Most houses have two stories, and very uniform sizes and plans. The large cities declined relatively quickly, for unknown reasons, leaving a less sophisticated village culture behind.<ref>Rowland, 31–34, 33 quoted; Harle, 15–18</ref> | |||
Architectural decoration is extremely minimal, though there are "narrow pointed niches" inside some buildings. Most of the art found is in miniature forms like seals, and mainly in ], but there are very few larger sculptures of figures. In most sites, fired mud-brick (not sun-baked as in ]) is used exclusively as the building material, but a few sites, such as ], are in stone. Most houses have two storeys, and uniform sizes and plans. The large cities declined relatively quickly, for unknown reasons, so a less sophisticated village culture was left behind.<ref>Rowland, 31–34, 33 quoted; Harle, 15–18</ref> | |||
'''Late Harappan period''' | |||
After collapse of |
After the collapse of the Mature Harappan Period, some cities still remained urban and inhabited. Sites like ] in Gujarat, Kudwala (38.1 ha) in Cholistan, and ] (20 Ha) in Maharashtra are considered urban. ] (2000–1000 BC), developed a fortification wall with bastions in its ] period (1400–1000 BC), and had public buildings, such as an elliptical temple and an apsidal temple. It also shows evidence of planning in the layout of rectangular houses, and streets or lanes, and planned streets. The area had risen to 50 hectares in with a population of 10,000 people. A {{convert|580|m|adj=on}} long protection wall dated 1500 BCE was found at Bet Dwarka which was believed to be damaged and submerged following a sea storm.<ref>U. Singh (2008), pp. 181, 223</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KOJ8aT3xYPoC&q=daimabad+elliptical+temple&pg=PA94|title=The City and the Country in Early India: A Study of Malwa|last=Basant|first=P. K.|date=2012|publisher=Primus Books|isbn=9789380607153|language=en}}</ref> | ||
File:DHOLAVIRA SITE (36).jpg|Dholavira ruins | |||
File:DHOLAVIRA SITE (24).jpg|stepped reservoir | |||
File:Dholavira-1.jpg|North Gate | |||
File:The drainage system at Lothal 2.JPG|drainage system | |||
File:Dock at lothal.JPG|The dock, with a canal opening to allow water to flow into the river, thereby maintaining a stable water level. | |||
File:Lothal - bathroom structure.jpg|Lothal - bathroom structure | |||
File:Lothal - Gujarat, India (5933608331).jpg|Archaeological feature | |||
</gallery> | |||
==600 BCE—250 CE== | |||
== Ancient period (1025 BCE–320 BCE) == | |||
{{Further|Ancient Indian architecture|Buddhist architecture|Indian rock-cut architecture}} | |||
] fort walls from Period I with burnt brick revetment, 1025-700 BC, ] culture. Weeping holes at the base can be clearly observed.]] | |||
{{multiple image | |||
=== Kausambi === | |||
| align = right | |||
] fortification with square bastions]] | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
'''fortification''' | |||
| image1 = Conjectural_reconstruction_of_the_main_gate_of_Kusinagara_circa_500_BCE_adapted_from_a_relief_at_Sanchi.jpg | |||
| width1 = 200 | |||
| caption1 = Conjectural reconstruction of the main gate of ] circa 500 BCE adapted from a relief at Sanchi | |||
| image2 = City of Kushinagar in the 5th century BCE according to a 1st century BCE frieze in Sanchi Stupa 1 Southern Gate.jpg | |||
| width2 = 210 | |||
| caption2 = City of Kushinagar in the 5th century BCE according to a 1st century BCE frieze in Sanchi Stupa 1 Southern Gate | |||
| total_width = 400 | |||
}} | |||
Indian architecture after the Indus Valley Civilization around the ], from 322 to 185 BCE, most likely used wood or recycled brick. Much of the remains discovered from this period onwards are of ], predominantly Buddhist. | |||
The construction of Buddhist monastic buildings began before the death of the ], around 400 BCE.<ref>Though a variety of dates are proposed, some 80 of so years earlier.</ref> This first generation of monasteries only survive in floor-plans, notably the ] in ]. | |||
Archaeological excavations have revealed ] fortifications from the end of second millennium BC.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Fortified Cities of Ancient India: A Comparative Study|last=Schlingloff|first=Dieter|publisher=Anthem Press|year=2014|isbn=1783083492|location=|pages=67 According to GR Sharma's monograph, rampart was built and provided with brick revetment between 1025 and 955 BC}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian archaeology a review: 1957-58|last=Sharma|first=G. R|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=47-48 In the earliest Period, I, the defences consisted of a mud wall with a burnt brick revetment on the exterior, the latter being available to a height of 42 ft. 5 in. and comprising one hundred and fiftyfour courses of bricks (pl. LX). The first thirty courses from the bottom showed a batter of about 15 deg from the vertical and the upper courses 40 deg, the bricks being laid throughout in the English bond. Up to the first thirty courses the revetment was also covered by a 2- to 1/2-in. thick mud plaster. At a height of about 6 ft. from th bottom there were a number of holes, perhaps weep-holes, situated 6 ft. apart from each other. On the bases of the associated pottery , coins and terracottas the beginnings of the different periods of the defenses maybe dated as follows; Period I, 700 B.C, Period II, 500 B.C; Period III, 300 B.C, Period IV, 50 B.C; and Period V, A. D. 150}}</ref> | |||
Important features of the period's architecture include, walled and moated cities with large gates and multi-storied buildings, wooden ] arches for roofs, and further structures above solid storeys. The reliefs of ], dated to the 1st centuries BCE-CE, denote places such as ] or ] as splendid walled cities, as in the ] or ]. These views of ancient Indian cities are relied on for the understanding of ancient Indian urban architecture.<ref>Rowland, 60</ref> | |||
'''Palace''' | |||
In the case of the Mauryan capital ] (near ]), we have Greek accounts, and that of ]; ] (a visitor around 300 BCE) mentions 564 towers and 64 gates in the city walls. Modern excavations have uncovered a "massive palisade of teak beams held together with iron ]s".<ref>Rowland, 60–63 60 quoted</ref> A huge '']''-like hall with eighty sandstone columns shows clear influence from contemporary ] Persia.<ref>Rowland, 63–65</ref> The single massive sandstone ] shows clear ] features, reaching India via Persia.<ref>Rowland, 72; Harle 22–24</ref> The famous ]s show great sophistication, and a variety of influences in their details. In both these cases a now-vanished Indian predecessor tradition in wood is likely.<ref>Rowland, 65–72; Harle 24</ref> | |||
Stone palace predating the Mauryan periods have been discovered from the ruins of Kausambi. The dressed stones of the palace were set in fine lime and coated with a thick layer of plaster, the entire architecture resembled a fortress with its own walls and towers. The palace had few rooms, each room was provided with three shelves and a central hall with steps leading to the tower. The architecture was constructed in three phases and is dated from 8th century BC to 2nd century BC. Discovery of this stone palace discredits the theory of foreign influence behind the rise of Indian stone architecture during ] or ] period. | |||
{{multiple image | |||
A technique of architecture applied here was using dressed stones as facing for a wall made of rubble core, this represents the apogee of indian architecture in ancient period.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A Review 1960-61|last=A.|first=Ghosh|publisher=Archaeological Survey of India|year=1961|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=33-35}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=JU2sCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA21&dq=kausambi+stone+palace&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0u_f-3LjiAhWIYo8KHf2OAc44ChDoAQhSMAk#v=onepage&q=kausambi%20stone%20palace&f=false|title=Cities in South Asia|last=Bates|first=Crispin|last2=Mio|first2=Minoru|date=2015-05-22|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9781317565130|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A Review 1961-62|last=A.|first=Ghosh|publisher=Archaeological Survey of India|year=1964|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=50-52}}</ref><gallery widths="200" heights="200" mode="packed-overlay" caption="Kausambi palace architecture technique applied in later periods"> | |||
| title = Post-Maha-Janapadas Architecture | |||
File:Kausambi palace 6th century BC.png|Kausambi palace dressed stone wall facing 6th century BC | |||
| align = right | |||
File:Kausambi palace 6th century BC 2.png|Kausambi palace dressed stone wall facing 6th century BC, phase II another view | |||
| image1 = Sanchi2.jpg | |||
File:General View of Shingardar Stupa - From Eastern Side.JPG|dressed stone masonry on rubble wall was first evidenced in Kausambi palace in 6th century BC here is an example of similar technique applied to Shingardar Stupa, ], ], 1st-2nd century AD | |||
| total_width = 400 | |||
File:Alai Minar, Qutb complex.jpg|unfinished Alai minar's rubble core displays the same technique of construction used in Kausambi palace, the unfinished tower lacks sandstone facing | |||
| caption1 = The Great Stupa at ] (4th–1st century BCE). The dome-shaped stupa was used in India as a commemorative monument associated with storing sacred relics. | |||
File:Qutub Minar danibaba4.jpg|stone facing of Qutub minar employing same architectural technique used thousands of years ago in Kausambi palace | |||
| image2 = 028 Temple built by Asoka at Bodh-Gaya (33796704621).jpg | |||
</gallery>] | |||
| caption2 = The ] built by Asoka at ]. Relief from ], 1st century CE | |||
}} | |||
Such a tradition is extremely clear in the case of the earliest-known examples of ], the state-sponsored ] in ], personally dedicated by ] circa 250 BCE. The entrance of the ] there has a sculpted doorway that clearly copies a wooden style in stone, which is a recurrent feature of rock-cut caves for some time. These artificial caves exhibit an amazing level of technical proficiency, the extremely hard ] rock being cut in geometrical fashion and given the ], also found on sculpture.<ref>Harle, 24; Rowland, 64–65</ref><ref name="BA97">Buddhist Architecture, Le Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 97–99</ref> Later rock-cut ]s, occupied by monastic communities, survive, mostly in Western India, and in ] the floor-plans of brick-built equivalents survive. The elaborately decorated facades and "chaitya halls" of many rock-cut sites are believed to reflect vanished free-standing buildings elsewhere. | |||
The Buddhist ], a dome shaped monument, was used in India as a commemorative monument associated with storing sacred relics.<ref name=Ency>Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''Pagoda''.</ref> The stupa architecture was adopted in ] and ], where it became prominent as a ] monument used for enshrining sacred relics.<ref name=Ency/> ]s—consisting of posts, crossbars, and a coping—became a feature of safety surrounding a stupa.<ref name=Chandra>Chandra (2008)</ref> Temples—build on elliptical, circular, quadrilateral, or apsidal plans—were constructed using brick and timber.<ref name=Chandra/> The Indian gateway arches, the '']'', reached East Asia with the spread of Buddhism.<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''torii''</ref> Some scholars hold that '']'' derives from the torana gates at the Buddhist historic site of ] (3rd century BCE – 11th century CE).<ref name=Jaanus>{{Cite web|url=http://www.aisf.or.jp/~jaanus/|title=:: JAANUS :: Terminology of Japanese Architecture & Art History|website=Aisf.or.jp|access-date=3 December 2021|archive-date=5 September 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190905033355/http://www.aisf.or.jp/~jaanus/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
'''Ghositarama monastery''' | |||
Rock-cut ]s in India date from 200 to 400 CE.<ref name=L&B/> Subsequently, the construction of wells at Dhank (550–625 CE) and stepped ponds at ] (850–950 CE) took place.<ref name=L&B>Livingston & Beach, xxiii</ref> Cave temples became prominent throughout western India, incorporating various unique features to give rise to cave architecture in places such as the caves at ] and ].<ref name=Chandra/> | |||
Buddhist scripture attributes this very old monastic site to the time of the Buddha which has been backed by archaeology, founded by a banker named Ghosita. The site has been located near Kosambi and identified by inscriptions. Archaeology suggests continuous occupation down to the sixth century when it was likely destroyed in the Hun invasion. Xuanzang found it an unoccupied ruin.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=zQmsAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA229&dq=Ghositarama+monastery&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixk66WvL3iAhWC6nMBHSw_DAwQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=Ghositarama%20monastery&f=false|title=Along the Path: The Meditator's Companion to the Buddha's Land|last=Goldberg|first=Kory|last2=Decary|first2=Michelle|date=2012-06-26|publisher=Pariyatti|isbn=9781928706564|language=en}}</ref> | |||
A very important development, the emergence of the ] or temple tower, is today best evidenced by the Buddhist ]. This was already several centuries old when the first very vertical structure replaced an Ashokan original, apparently around 150–200 CE. The current brick-built tower, probably a good deal larger, dates to the ] period, in the 5th or 6th centuries.<ref>Huu, 242</ref> | |||
==Gupta architecture== | |||
] is a Vishnu Hindu temple built during the early 6th century, near the end of the Gupta period.]] | |||
The Gupta period chiefly represented a hiatus in ]; the first wave of construction was completed before the empire was assembled, and the second wave began in the late 5th century, after its end. For example, an early group of the ] was crafted by 220 CE and a later group was made around 460 CE.<ref>Ajanta chronology is still under discussion, but this is the view of Spink, accepted by many.</ref> Nonetheless, most of the first surviving free-standing structures in India are accredited to the Gupta period, in particular, the beginnings of ]. As ] writes, "Under the Guptas, India was quick to join the rest of the medieval world in a passion for housing precious objects in stylized architectural frameworks",<ref>], ''Steps to Water: The Ancient Stepwells of India'', (Photographs by Morna Livingston), p. 25, 2002, Princeton Architectural Press, {{ISBN|1568983247}}, 9781568983240, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230603192521/https://books.google.com/books?id=KoVCliqcmIIC&pg=PA25 |date=3 June 2023 }}</ref> the "precious objects" primarily suggesting the icons of gods. | |||
The caves at ], including ] and ] (respectively Buddhist, Hindu, mixed, and Jain) were produced under other <!-- "other" - which exactly? --> dynasties in Central India. Ellora was made after the Gupta period, yet they primarily reflect the monumentality and balance of Guptan style. The Ajanta Caves contain the most significant and mature survivals of painting and the periods, mainly in palace paintings.{{sfn|Harle|1994|pp=118–22, 123–26, 129–35}} The Hindu ] record connections with the dynasty and its ministers,{{sfn|Harle|1994|pp=92–97}} and the ] at ], one of the earliest to survive, showcases important sculpture.<ref>Harle, 113–114; see also site entries in Michell (1990)</ref> | |||
North Indian Hindu temples that have survived after the 5th century ] in ] include those at ] (early 5th century),<ref>Michell (1990), 192</ref> ] Temple 17 (similar, but respectively Hindu and Buddhist), Deogarh, ] (465),<ref name=meister370>Michael Meister (1987), Hindu Temple, in ''The Encyclopedia of Religion'', editor: Mircea Eliade, Volume 14, Macmillan, {{ISBN|0-02-909850-5}}, page 370</ref> ], the largest Gupta brick temple to survive,<ref>Michell (1990), 157; Michell (1988), 96</ref> <!-- ] (c. 525), where exactly??? --> and ] (600–625). ] in ] (c. 550 or later) is an oddity, with no surviving close comparator.<ref>Harle, 111–113, 136–138; Michell (1988), 90, 96–98; see also site entries in Michell (1990)</ref> | |||
There are a number of broad models of Guptan-style temples, however, the most common plan exemplifies small but massively built stone ] buildings with a sanctuary and a columned porch, apparent at Tigawa and Sanchi Temple 17 and continued today. Both temples have flat roofs over the sanctuary, which would become uncommon by about the 8th century, as seen in the design of the ], Bhitargaon, Deogarh and Gop, with high superstructures of different shapes.<ref>Harle, 111–113; Michell (1988), 94–98</ref> The ] further demonstrates the continuance of free-standing ]-hall temples with barrel roofs, with many smaller wooden examples.<ref>Harle, 175</ref> | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="180"> | |||
File:Sanchi temple 17.jpg|A ] ] ] temple at ] beside the Apsidal hall with ] foundation. An example of ] from the 5th century. | |||
File:Tigowa 1999 Kankali-Devi-Tempel.jpg|The Hindu ] Temple from the early 5th century. | |||
File:Mahabodhitemple.jpg|The current structure of the ] dates to the Gupta era in the 5th century. It marks the location where the Buddha is said to have attained enlightenment. | |||
File:Vishnu temple mandapa at Eran, Madhya Pradesh.jpg|Vishnu temple in ] from the 5th-6th century. | |||
File:KITLV 87946 - Unknown - Pataini temple in British India - 1897.tif|alt=Pataini temple is a Jain temple built during the Gupta period, 5th century.|] is a Jain temple built during the Gupta period in the 5th century.<ref>{{cite book | last=Cunningham | first=Alexander | author-link=Alexander Cunningham | title=Report of a Tour in the Central Provinces in 1873-74 and 1874-75 | volume=9 | series=Archaeological Survey of India | publisher=Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing | year=1879 | url={{Google books|X88OAAAAQAAJ|page=31|keywords=|text=|plainurl=yes}} | page=31}}</ref> | |||
File:Kakandi.jpg|Relief of ] ] ] on the ], erected by a person named Madra during the reign of ] in 461.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sharma |first1=Tej Ram |title=Personal and Geographic Names in Gupta Inscriptions |date=1978 |page=93 |url=https://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/book_archive/196174216674_10151812362491675.pdf |access-date=7 September 2023 |archive-date=23 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223224759/https://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/book_archive/196174216674_10151812362491675.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
File:Eran Budhagupta pillar built circa 476–495 CE.jpg|The ] pillar at Eran (c.476–495) | |||
</gallery> | |||
==Temple architecture== | |||
{{Main|Hindu temple architecture}} | |||
] of the ], Tamil Nadu, 700–728 showing the typical ] form of tower.|left]] | |||
Whereas the visible stylistic forms of the temple vary greatly and have a complicated development,<ref name="Rowland, 275-276">Rowland, 275–276</ref> the basic elements of a ] remain the same across all periods and styles. The most essential feature is the inner sanctuary, the '']'' or "womb-chamber", where the primary '']'' of a deity is housed in. Around this chamber are other structures and buildings, at times covering several acres. On the exterior, the garbhagriha is crowned by a tower-like '']'', also called the '']'' in the south.<ref>Michell, Chapter 4; confusingly, in South India ''shikhara'' means only the top section of the ''vimana''.</ref> The temple may include an ] for ''parikrama'' (]), one or more ]s or congregation halls, and sometimes an ] antechamber and porch between the garbhagriha and mandapa. | |||
===Mahajanapadas=== | |||
{{multiple image | {{multiple image | ||
| align |
| align = right | ||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| image1 = Conjectural_reconstruction_of_the_main_gate_of_Kusinagara_circa_500_BCE_adapted_from_a_relief_at_Sanchi.jpg | |||
| header = Temple architectural styles | |||
| width1 = 200 | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| caption1 = <center>Conjectural reconstruction of the main gate of ] c. 500 BCE adapted from a relief at Sanchi.</center> | |||
| image3 = Lord Lingaraj Temple With all minar temples.jpg | |||
| image2 = City of Kushinagar in the 5th century BCE according to a 1st century BCE frieze in Sanchi Stupa 1 Southern Gate.jpg | |||
| caption3 = ], Kalinga Style | |||
| width2 = 210 | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption2 = <center>City of Kushinagar in the 5th century BCE according to a 1st century BCE frieze in Sanchi Stupa 1 Southern Gate.</center> | |||
| image2 = Thanjavur - Brihadisvara Temple (37).jpg | |||
| caption2 = ], Dravida Style | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Kandariya temple.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ], Nagara Style | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| image4 = Nageshswara Temple , Mosale.jpg | |||
| caption4 = Nageshswara Temple, Vesara Style | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 300 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
| Image 4 = Lord Lingaraj Temple With all minar temples.jpg | |||
}} | }} | ||
], old city walls 6th century BCE]] | |||
From the time of the ] (600 BCE–320 BCE), walled and moated cities with large gates and multi-storied buildings which consistently used arched windows and doors and made an intense use of wooden architecture, are important features of the architecture during this period.<ref name=Chandra/> The reliefs of ], dated to the 1st centuries BCE–CE, show cities such as ] or ] as splendid walled cities during the time of the ] (6th century BCE), as in the ] or ]. These views of ancient Indian cities have been relied on for the understanding of ancient Indian urban architecture. Archaeologically, this period corresponds in part to the ] culture.<ref>J.M. Kenoyer (2006), "Cultures and Societies of the Indus Tradition. In Historical Roots" in ''the Making of ‘the Aryan’'', R. Thapar (ed.), pp. 21–49. New Delhi, National Book Trust.</ref> Geopolitically, the ] started to ] from c, 518 BCE.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Roy |first1=Kaushik |title=Military Manpower, Armies and Warfare in South Asia |date=2015 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9781317321279 |page=27 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GpNECgAAQBAJ&pg=PT27 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Kulke |first1=Hermann |last2=Rothermund |first2=Dietmar |title=A History of India |date=2016 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9781317242123 |page=110 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xYelDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT110 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
Larger temples may include more shrines or buildings, either connected together or detached, with smaller temples in the compound.<ref>These are the usual terms, but there are many variants or different ones in the many Indian languages, ancient and modern.</ref> The entire temple compound is usually enclosed by a wall, and at times, raised on a ] ('']''). Large areas of the structure are often decorated with carving, including figurative images of deities and other religious figures. | |||
] of ], ] Stupa 1, Northern Gateway.]] | |||
Various types of individual housing of the time of the ] (c. 563/480 or c. 483/400 BCE), resembling huts with ]-decorated doors, are also described in the reliefs of ]. Particularly, the ] at ], shows the three favourite residences of the Buddha: the Gandhakuti, the Kosambakuti and the Karorikuti, with the throne of the Buddha in the front of each. The Jetavana garden was presented to the Buddha by the rich banker ], who purchased it for as many gold pieces as would cover the surface of the ground. Hence, the foreground of the relief is shown covered with ancient Indian coins (]s), just as it is in the ] at ].<ref name="Marshall 58">John Marshall, A Guide to Sanchi, 1918 (Public Domain text)</ref> Although the reliefs of Sanchi are dated to the 1st centuries BCE–CE, portraying scene taking place during the time of the Buddha, four centuries before, they are considered an important indication of building traditions in these early times.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Brown |first1=Percy |title=Indian Architecture (Buddhist And Hindu) |date=1959 |pages=3–5 |url=https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.54756#page/n21/mode/2up/search/sanchi}}</ref> | |||
By the 7th century CE, most key features of the Hindu temple were established in theoretical texts on temple architecture and building methods.<ref name=michellharle335/> Three styles of temple were identified: '']'', '']'' and ''].'' The styles were sometimes mixed, and not yet associated with specific regions in India.<ref name="Rowland, 275-276"/> For example, in ], the group of 7th and 8th-century temples at ] famously mixes forms later associated with both north and south,<ref>Rowland, 277–280</ref> as does that at ], which still includes ] ]-type plans.<ref>Rowland, 220–223</ref> | |||
'''Pataliputra Voussoir Arch''' | |||
] | |||
''Nagara'' commonly refers to North Indian temple styles, most easily recognised by a high and curving ''shikhara'' over the sanctuary. ''Dravida'' or Dravidian architecture is the broad South Indian style, possessing a lower superstructure over the sanctuary. Instead, the structure has a straight profile, rising in a series of terraces to form a decorated pyramid. Today, this is often dwarfed in larger temples by the far larger ] outer gateways, a much later development.<ref>Rowland, 276</ref> The ancient term vesara is also used to describe a temple style with characteristics of both the northern and southern traditions. These attributes come from the ] and other fairly central parts of India. Although disagreement stands on the exact period and styles that vesara represents, the term is mainly assigned to the northern tradition, but are regarded as a kind of northern ''dravida'' by others.<ref>] for example uses "Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa" for styles others call "vesara". See his ''Indian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation: the Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa Tradition, 7th to 13th Centuries'', 1995, Abhinav Publications, New Delhi, {{ISBN|8170173124}}, 9788170173120, </ref> | |||
===Nagara architecture=== | |||
A granite stone fragment of an arch discovered by ] from ], Pataliputra has been analysed as a pre Mauryan ] period keystone fragment of a trefoil arch of gateway with mason's marks of three archaic Brahmi letters inscribed on it which probably decorated a ]. <ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.20579|title=Proceedinds And Transactions Of The Second Oriental Conference (1923)|last=The Calcutta University|date=1923}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.35494|title=Annual Report Of The Archaeological Survey Of India 1921-22|last=Spooner|first=Brainerd|date=1924}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.41145|title=Memoirs of the archaeological survey of India no.30|last=Chandra|first=Ramaprasad|date=1927}}</ref> The wedge shaped stone with indentation has mauryan polish on two sides and was suspended vertically. | |||
====Early==== | |||
Excluding earlier structures in timber-based architecture, hardly any remains of Nagara Hindu temples exist from before the ] in the 4th century CE. The ] ] are among the most important early sites.<ref>Harle (1994), 87–100; Michell (1988), 18</ref> The earliest preserved Hindu temples are simple cell-like stone temples, some rock-cut and others structural, as at ].<ref name=meister254>{{cite journal |last=Meister |first=Michael W. |date=1988–1989 |title=Prāsāda as Palace: Kūṭina Origins of the Nāgara Temple |journal=Artibus Asiae |volume=49 |issue=3–4 |pages=254–256 |doi=10.2307/3250039 |jstor=3250039}}</ref> By the 6th or 7th century, these evolved into high ] stone superstructures. However, there is inscriptional evidence, such as the ancient Gangadhara inscription from around 424, that towering temples predated the 6th or 7th century, and they were made from more perishable material. These temples have not survived.<ref name=meister254/><ref name=meister370/> | |||
] shows a tall curving shikhara crowned by a large amalaka and is an example of the early Pala style. It is similar to contemporaneous temples of Odisha.]] | |||
===Religious architecture=== | |||
Early North Indian temples that have survived after the 5th century ] in ] include, ], ] (465 CE),<ref name=meister370/> ] (c. 525), ] (600–625 CE); ], and ] (7th-century CE).<ref name=meister280>{{cite journal |last=Meister |first=Michael W. |date=1988–1989 |title=Prāsāda as Palace: Kūṭina Origins of the Nāgara Temple |journal=Artibus Asiae |volume=49 |issue=3–4 |pages=254–280 |doi=10.2307/3250039 |jstor=3250039}}</ref> | |||
{{further|Buddhist architecture}} | |||
;Buddhist caves | |||
During the time of the ] (c. 563/480 or c. 483/400 BCE), Buddhist monks were also in the habit of using natural caves, such as the ], southwest from ], ].<ref name="Gwynne2017"/><ref>{{cite book|author=Jules Barthélemy Saint-Hilaire|title=The Buddha and His Religion|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tGhLAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA376|year=1914|publisher=Trübner |pages=376–377}}</ref> Many believe it to be the site in which Buddha spent some time before his death,<ref>, Maha-Parinibbana Sutta, Last Days of the Buddha, Buddhist Publication Society</ref> and where the ] was held after the ] died (]).<ref name="Gwynne2017">{{cite book|author=Paul Gwynne|title=World Religions in Practice: A Comparative Introduction|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sU8nDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA51|date=30 May 2017|publisher=Wiley|isbn=978-1-118-97228-1|pages=51–52}}</ref><ref name="Jain1991p66">{{cite book|author=Kailash Chand Jain|title=Lord Mahāvīra and His Times|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8-TxcO9dfrcC&pg=PA66|year=1991|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-0805-8|page=66}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Chakrabartia|first=Dilip K|title=Rājagriha: An early historic site in East India|journal=World Archaeology|date=1976|volume=7|issue=3|pages=261–268|doi=10.1080/00438243.1976.9979639}}</ref> The ] himself had also used the ] for meditation, starting a tradition of using caves, natural or man-made, as religious retreats, that would last for over a millennium.<ref name="BA97">Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 97–99</ref> | |||
Pre-7th century CE South Indian style stone temples have not survived. However, early South Indian temples that have survived, though in ruins, include the diverse styles ], from the 7th and 8th centuries. According to Meister, the Mahabalipuram temples are "monolithic models of a variety of formal structures all of which already can be said to typify a developed "Tamil Architecture" (South Indian) order". They suggest a tradition and a knowledge base existing in South India by the time of the early Chalukya and Pallava era when these were built. Other examples are found in ] and ].<ref name=meister280/><ref>Michael W. Meister and M.A. Dhaky (1983), ''South India: Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture'', Vol. I, Part I, Princeton University Press, {{ISBN|978-0691784021}}, pages 30–53</ref> | |||
] monastery. Oblong communal hall (remains), 6th century BCE.]] | |||
;Monasteries | |||
From between about the 7th and 13th centuries a large number of temples and their ruins have survived (though far fewer than once existed). Many regional styles developed, very often following political divisions, as large temples were typically built with royal patronage. In the north, ] from the 11th century onwards reduced the building of temples, and saw the loss of many existing ones.<ref name=michellharle335/> The south also witnessed Hindu-Muslim conflict that affected the temples, but the region was relatively less affected than the north.<ref>{{harvnb|Michell|1995|pp=9–10}}: "The era under consideration opens with an unprecedented calamity for Southern India: the invasion of the region at the turn of the fourteenth century by Malik Kafur, general of Alauddin, Sultan of Delhi. Malik Kafur's forces brought to an abrupt end all of the indigenous ruling houses of Southern India, not one of which was able to withstand the assault or outlive the conquest. Virtually every city of importance in the Kannada, Telugu and Tamil zones succumbed to the raids of Malik Kafur; forts were destroyed, palaces dismantled and temple sanctuaries wrecked in the search for treasure. In order to consolidate the rapidly won gains of this pillage, Malik Kafur established himself in 1323 at Madurai (Madura) in the southernmost part of the Tamil zone, former capital of the Pandyas who were dislodged by the Delhi forces. Madurai thereupon became the capital of the Ma'bar (Malabar) province of the ]."</ref> In the late 14th century, the Hindu ] came to power and controlled much of South India. During this period, the distinctive very tall ] gatehouse actually a late development, from the 12th century or later, typically added to older large temples.<ref name=michellharle335>Michell (1988), 18, 50–54, 89, 149–155; Harle (1994), 335</ref> | |||
The first monasteries, such as the ] and '''Ghositarama monastery''' in ] and ] respectively, were built from the time of the ], in the 6th or 5th centuries BCE.<ref name=BA48>{{cite book |last1=Le |first1=Huu Phuoc |title=Buddhist Architecture |date=2010 |publisher=Grafikol |isbn=9780984404308 |pages=48–49 |url=https://books.google.fr/books?id=9jb364g4BvoC&pg=PA48 |language=en}}</ref><ref name=PM178>"The rubble-built building complex of Jivakamravana at Rajgir probably represents one of the earliest monasteries of India dating from the Buddha's time." in {{cite book |last1=Mishra |first1=Phanikanta |last2=Mishra |first2=Vijayakanta |title=Researches in Indian archaeology, art, architecture, culture and religion: Vijayakanta Mishra commemoration volume |date=1995 |publisher=Sundeep Prakashan |isbn=9788185067803 |page=178 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nN1tAAAAMAAJ |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Tadgell |first1=Christopher |title=The East: Buddhists, Hindus and the Sons of Heaven |date=2015 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9781136753831 |page=498 |url=https://books.google.com/?id=NTbbCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT48 |language=en}}</ref> The initial Jivakarama monastery was formed of two long parallel and oblong halls, large dormitories where the monks could eat and sleep, in conformity with the original regulations of the ], without any private cells.<ref name=BA48/> Other halls were then constructed, mostly long, oblong building as well, which remind of the construction of several of the ].<ref name=BA48/><ref>{{cite book |last1=Handa |first1=O. C. |last2=Hāṇḍā |first2=Omacanda |title=Buddhist Art & Antiquities of Himachal Pradesh, Upto 8th Century A.D. |date=1994 |publisher=Indus Publishing |isbn=9788185182995 |page=162 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6Cqgb9pL3L4C&pg=PA162 |language=en}}</ref> The ] is said to have been treated once in the monastery, after having been injured by ].<ref name=BA48/><ref>{{cite book |title=Monuments of Bihar |date=2011 |publisher=Department of Art, Culture & Youth, Government of Bihar |pages=Jivakarama vihara entry |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B1cdp3hsUXgC |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The recently constructed Ram Mandir in Ayodhya is constructed as per the Nagara style. | |||
] are some of the earliest surviving stupas.]] | |||
;Stupas | |||
Religious buildings in the form of the Buddhist ], a dome shaped monument, started to be used in India as commemorative monuments associated with storing sacred relics of the Buddha.<ref name=Ency>Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''Pagoda''.</ref> The relics of the Buddha were spread between eight stupas, in ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="BAStupa"/> The ] stupa also seems to have been one of the first to be built.<ref name="BAStupa"/> ]s—consisting of posts, crossbars, and a coping—became a feature of safety surrounding a stupa.<ref name=Chandra/> The Buddha had left instructions about how to pay hommage to the stupas: "And whoever lays wreaths or puts sweet perfumes and colours there with a devout heart, will reap benefits for a long time".<ref name="BA143">Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, p. 143</ref> This practice would lead to the decoration of the stupas with stone sculptures of flower garlands in the Classical period.<ref name="BA143"/> | |||
====Later==== | |||
'''temples''' | |||
] temples showed increased elevation of the wall and elaborate spire by the 10th century.<ref name="eb-niarch">Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''North Indian temple architecture''.</ref> On the shikara, the oldest form, called ], with wide shallow projections running up the sides, developed alternative forms with many smaller "spirelets" ('']''). Two varieties of these are called ], where the sub-spires extend vertically, and '']'', where individual sub-spires are arrayed in rows and columns. | |||
]'' (5 ''ratha'') plan of subsidiary shrines of Brahmeswara Temple]] | |||
Richly decorated temples—including the ]—were constructed in ].<ref name=eb-niarch/> Examples include the ] at ] in ], ] at ] in Odisha, ] at ] in ]. Indian traders brought Indian architecture to ] through various ].<ref>Michell (1977), Chapter 8</ref> | |||
Styles called '']'' include the early ], ], and finally ]. Other regional styles include those of ], ] and other Himalayan areas, ], ], and ]. | |||
elliptical Hindu temples with ] from Nagari, ] and ] near ] have been dated to 4th century BC or 350-300 BC.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Khare|first=M. D.|date=1975|title=THE HELIODORUS PILLAR—A FRESH APPRAISAL, BY JOHN IRWIN ( AARP—ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY RESEARCH PAPERS—DECEMBER 1974 ) A REJOINDER|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44138838|journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress|volume=36|pages=92–97|issn=2249-1937}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.108207|title=Gupta Art Vol.ii|last=Agrawala|first=Vasudeva S.|date=1977}}</ref>. | |||
] is the distinctive building style developed under the rule of the ] in the region historically known as ''Karnata'', today's ], India, between the 11th and the 14th centuries.<ref>] (2008), . 2009-10-31.</ref> Large and small temples built during this era remain as examples of the Hoysala architectural style, including the ] at ], the ] at ], and the ] at ]. Other examples of fine Hoysala craftmanship are the temples at ], ], and ]. Study of the Hoysala architectural style has revealed a negligible Indo-Aryan influence while the impact of Southern Indian style is more distinct.<ref name="distinct">See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's ''A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present'', p. 134.</ref> A feature of Hoysala temple architecture is its attention to detail and skilled craftsmanship. The temples of Belur and Halebidu are proposed ] ].<ref name="heritage">{{Cite web|url=http://www.hindu.com/2004/07/25/stories/2004072501490300.htm|title=The Hindu : Karnataka / Hassan News : Belur to be proposed as World Heritage site|date=22 October 2004|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041022053319/http://www.hindu.com/2004/07/25/stories/2004072501490300.htm |accessdate=4 April 2023|archive-date=22 October 2004 }}</ref> Approximately 100 Hoysala temples survive today.<ref>Foekema, 16</ref> | |||
==Classical period (320 BCE–550 CE)== | |||
===Monumental stone architecture=== | |||
{{further|Pataliputra|Pillars of Ashoka|Mauryan polish}} | |||
], discovered at the ] site of Pataliputra, c. 4th–3rd BCE.]] | |||
The next wave of building, appears with the start of the ] (320 BCE–550 CE) and the rise of the ]. The capital city of ] was an urban marvel described by the Greek ambassador ]. Remains of monumental stone architecture can be seen through numerous artifacts recovered from ], such as the ]. This cross-fertilization between different art streams converging on the subcontinent produced new forms that, while retaining the essence of the past, succeeded in the integrating selected elements of the new influences. | |||
==== Temples of Khajuraho ==== | |||
] at ], 250 BCE.]] | |||
{{Main|Khajuraho Group of Monuments#Arts and sculpture}} | |||
The Indian emperor ] (rule: 273–232 BCE) established the ] throughout his realm, generally next to Buddhist stupas. According to Buddhist tradition, Ashoka recovered the relics of the Buddha from the earlier stupas (except from the ]), and erected 84.000 stupas to distribute the relics across India. In effect, many stupas are thought to date originally from the time of Ashoka, such as ] or ], where he also erected pillars with his inscriptions, and possibly ], ] or ] in ].<ref name="BAStupa">Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 140–174</ref> | |||
], part of the ]]] | |||
The Khajuraho Temples are a group of Hindu and Jain temples located in the town of Khajuraho, in the ] of Madhya Pradesh, India. The temples were built between 950 and 1050 by the ].<ref name=":2b" /> | |||
Ashoka also built the initial ] in ] around the ], including masterpieces such as the ] ("Vajrasana"). He is also said to have established a chain of hospitals throughout the Mauryan empire by 230 BCE.<ref name=P&S>Piercey & Scarborough (2008)</ref> One of the ] reads: "Everywhere King Piyadasi (Ashoka) erected two kinds of hospitals, hospitals for people and hospitals for animals. Where there were no healing herbs for people and animals, he ordered that they be bought and planted."<ref name=finger12>See Stanley Finger (2001), ''Origins of Neuroscience: A History of Explorations Into Brain Function'', Oxford University Press, p. 12, {{ISBN|0-19-514694-8}}.</ref> Indian art and culture has absorbed extraneous impacts by varying degrees and is much richer for this exposure. | |||
Khajuraho is home to 25 sandstone temples in total, although only 20 remain mostly intact. The beautiful carvings on these temples, which show themes from Hindu mythology as well as other facets of everyday life in ancient India, are well-known.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bajpai |first=K.D |title=Khajuraho temples: History and significance |publisher=Aryan Books International. |year=2012}}</ref> Both Hindu and Jain architectural influences may be seen in their design. The temples are split into three groups: the Western group, the Eastern group, and the Southern group. The Western group has the greatest popularity and draws the most tourists.<ref name=":2b">{{Cite book |last=Desai |first=Devangana |title=Khajuraho: The Art of Love |publisher=Mapin Publishing Pvt. Ltd |year=2005 |isbn=978-1890206628}}</ref> | |||
Fortified cities with stūpas, '']s'', and temples were constructed during the ] (c. 321–185 BCE).<ref name=Chandra>Chandra (2008)</ref> Architectural creations of the Mauryan period, such as the city of ], the ], are outstanding in their achievements, and often compare favourably with the rest of the world at that time. Commenting on Mauryan sculpture, ] once wrote about the "extraordinary precision and accuracy which characterizes all Mauryan works, and which has never, we venture to say, been surpassed even by the finest workmanship on Athenian buildings".<ref></ref><ref>Annual report 1906–07 p. 89</ref> | |||
The Khajuraho Temples were declared a ] in 1986, and they continue to be a popular tourist attraction in India. According to UNESCO, the Khajuraho Temples "are a masterpiece of Indian art, with their unique architecture and stunning sculptures.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Centre |first=UNESCO World Heritage |title=Khajuraho Group of Monuments |url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/240/ |access-date=2023-02-26 |website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre |language=en |archive-date=29 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231029205311/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/240 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:Mauryan Hall pillar.jpg|Mauryan polished stone pillar from ]. | |||
===Dravidian style=== | |||
File:Sarnath capital.jpg|] of the ] ]. 250 BCE. | |||
{{Main|Dravidian architecture}} | |||
File:Plinth of Nandan garh Stupa Champaran.jpg|cruciform star shaped stupa ] | |||
{{multiple image | |||
File:Kumhrar Maurya level ASIEC 1912-1913.jpg|Plan of the 80-columns pillared hall | |||
File:Soghaura inscription.jpg|temple depicted on Soghaura copper plate 3rd century BC | |||
</gallery>{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | | align = right | ||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| image1 = Lomas_Rishi_entrance.jpg | |||
| header = Dravidian architectural elements | |||
| width1 = 199 | |||
| alt6 = | |||
| caption1 = <center>The famous carved door of ], one of the ], dated to approximately 250 BCE, displaying the first known ] ]s.</center> | |||
| image6 = 1834 sketch of elements in Hindu temple architecture, four storey vimana.jpg | |||
| image2 = Sudama cave mirror-polished walls.jpg | |||
| caption6 = A vimana with mandapam elements (Dravidian architecture) | |||
| width2 = 190 | |||
| alt5 = | |||
| caption2 = <center>The quasi-perfect walls of the ] were dug into the hard rock and polished to a mirror effect c. 250 BCE, date of the inscriptions of ].<ref name = "NL">Ashoka in Ancient India by Nayanjot Lahiri </ref></center> | |||
| image5 = 1834 sketch of prastaras, entablature elements in Hindu temple architecture.jpg | |||
| caption5 = Entablature elements | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| image4 = 1834 sketch of athisthana, base elements in Hindu temple architecture.jpg | |||
| caption4 = Athisthana architectural elements of a Hindu temple | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = 1834 sketch of pillar elements in Hindu temple architecture, 03.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Pillar elements (shared by Nagara and Dravidian) | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = 1834 sketch of elements in Hindu temple architecture, two storey gopura.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Two storey gopura (Dravidian architecture) | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = 1834 sketch of elements in Hindu temple architecture, single storey gopura.jpg | |||
| caption1 = Single storey gopura (Dravidian architecture) | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 200 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | }} | ||
Dravidian style ''or'' the '''South Indian temple style''' is an architectural idiom in ] that emerged in the southern part of the Indian subcontinent or ] and in Sri Lanka, reaching its final form by the sixteenth century. It is seen in ]s, and the most distinctive difference from north Indian styles is the use of a shorter and more pyramidal tower over the ] or sanctuary called a ], where the north has taller towers, usually bending inwards as they rise, called ]s. However, for modern visitors to larger temples the dominating feature is the high ] or gatehouse at the edge of the compound; large temples have several, dwarfing the vimana; these are a much more recent development. There are numerous other distinct features such as the ''dwarapalakas'' – twin guardians at the main entrance and the inner sanctum of the temple and ''goshtams'' – deities carved in niches on the outer side walls of the ]. | |||
=== Rock-cut caves === | |||
{{further|Indian rock-cut architecture}}Around the same time ] began to develop, starting with the already highly sophisticated and state-sponsored ] in ], personally dedicated by ] c. 250 BCE.<ref name="Chandra" /> These artificial caves exhibit an amazing level of technical proficiency, the extremely hard ] rock being cut in geometrical fashion and polished to a mirror-like finish.<ref name="BA97" /> | |||
''Mayamata'' and ''Manasara shilpa'' texts estimated to be in circulation by 5th to 7th century, is a guidebook on Dravidian style of ] design, construction, sculpture and joinery technique.<ref name=stellakramrisch76>Stella Kramrisch (1976), The Hindu Temple Volume 1 & 2, {{ISBN|81-208-0223-3}}</ref><ref>Tillotson, G. H. R. (1997). Svastika Mansion: A Silpa-Sastra in the 1930s. South Asian Studies, 13(1), pp 87–97</ref> ''Isanasivagurudeva paddhati'' is another text from the 9th century describing the art of building in India in south and central India.<ref name=stellakramrisch76/><ref>Ganapati Sastri (1920), Īśānaśivagurudeva paddhati, Trivandrum Sanskrit Series, {{OCLC|71801033}}</ref> | |||
Probably owing to the 2nd century BCE fall of the ] and the subsequent persecutions of Buddhism under ], it is thought that many Buddhists relocated to the ] under the protection of the ], thus shifting the cave-building effort to western India: an enormous effort at creating religious caves (usually Buddhist or Jain) continued there until the 2nd century CE, culminating with the ] or the ].<ref name="BA97"/> These caves generally followed an ] plan with a ] in the back for the ]s, and a rectangular plan with surrounding cells for the ]s.<ref name="BA97"/> Numerous donors provided the | |||
From 300 BCE – 300 CE, the greatest accomplishments of the kingdoms of the ], ] and the ] included brick shrines to deities ], ], ] and ]. Several of these have been unearthed near ], ] and ], and the construction plans of these sites of worship were shared to some detail in various poems of ]. | |||
funds for the building of these caves and left donatory inscriptions, including laity, members of the clergy, government officials, and even foreigners such as '']'' (]) representing about 8 per cent of all inscriptions.<ref>Buddhist architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, </ref> | |||
The ], particularly the ''rathas'', became a model for south Indian temples.<ref name=Brit>{{Cite web|url= http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/apac/photocoll/t/019pho0000472s1u00027000.html|title= The Rathas, monolithic |access-date= 23 October 2012|publisher= Online Gallery of British Library|archive-date= 4 March 2016|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160304220049/http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/apac/photocoll/t/019pho0000472s1u00027000.html|url-status= live}}</ref> Architectural features, particularly the sculptures, were widely adopted in ].<ref name=Unesco>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/249/|title=Group of Monuments at Mahabalipuram|access-date=23 October 2012|publisher=UNESCO.org|archive-date=15 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200415074333/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/249/|url-status=live}}</ref> Descendants of the sculptors of the shrines are artisans in contemporary Mahabalipuram.<ref name="BruynBain2010">{{cite book|first1=Pippa de |last1=Bruyn|first2=Keith |last2=Bain|first3=David |last3=Allardice|author4=Shonar Joshi|title=Frommer's India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qG-9cwHOcCIC&pg=PA333|access-date=7 February 2013|date=18 February 2010|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-0-470-64580-2|pages=333–}}</ref> | |||
The construction of caves would wane after the 2nd century CE, possibly due to the rise of ] Buddhism and the associated intense architectural and artistic production in ] and ].<ref name="BA97"/> The building of rock-cut caves would revive briefly in the 5th century CE, with the magnificent achievements of ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/242/|title=Ajanta Caves|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-12}}</ref> and ], before finally subsiding as ] replaced ] in the sub-continent, and stand-alone temples became more prevalent.<ref name=Chandra/><ref name="BA97"/> | |||
{{multiple image | |||
Rock-cut architecture also developed with the apparition of ]s in India, dating from 200–400 CE.<ref name=L&B/> Subsequently, the construction of wells at Dhank (550–625 CE) and stepped ponds at ] (850–950 CE) took place.<ref name=L&B>Livingston & Beach, xxiii</ref> | |||
| align = left | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header =South Indian Temples | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| image4 = MEENAKSHI TEMPLE- WEST TOWER.jpg | |||
| caption4 = ] | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Airavatesvara Temple Chariot.jpg | |||
| caption3 = ] | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = View of Bhutanatha temple in Badami during monsoon.jpg | |||
| caption2 = ] | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Krishna Pushkarani - Hampi Ruins.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ] | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 330 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
The Badami ] also called the Early Chalukyas, ruled from ], Karnataka in the period 543–753 and spawned the ] style called ]. The finest examples of their art are seen in ], ] and ] in northern Karnataka. Over 150 temples remain in the ] basin. | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:Udaygiri Stone Caves.JPG|] cave monastery in ] (2nd century BCE). | |||
File:Chitharal jain temple1.jpg|], 1st century BCE | |||
File:Karla caves Chaitya.jpg|The Great Chaitya in the ], ], c. 120 CE. | |||
File:010 Cave 3, Exterior (33156264563).jpg|Gautamiputra vihara at ] built in the 2nd century CE by the ]. | |||
File:Cave 26, Ajanta.jpg|The ] are 30 ] Buddhist cave monument built under the Vakatakas, c. 5th century CE. | |||
File:Pitalkhora caves.png|Pitalkhora caves Dvarapalas 2nd century BC | |||
</gallery> | |||
The Rashtrakuta contributions to art and architecture are reflected in the splendid rock-cut shrines at Ellora and Elephanta, situated in present-day ]. It is said that they altogether constructed 34 rock-cut shrines, but most extensive and sumptuous of them all is the Kailasanatha temple at ]. The temple is a splendid achievement of Dravidian art. The walls of the temple have marvellous sculptures from ] including ], ] and ] while the ceilings have paintings. These projects spread into South India from the ]. The architectural style used was partly Dravidian. They do not contain any of the '']s'' common to the ''Nagara'' style and were built on the same lines as the Virupaksha temple at ] in Karnataka.<ref name="Dravidian">{{cite web|title=Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent, 20 September 1996|url=http://www.indoarch.org/|author=Takeo Kamiya|publisher=Gerard da Cunha-Architecture Autonomous, Bardez, Goa, India|access-date=2006-11-10|archive-date=2 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150502190211/http://www.indoarch.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Decorated stupas=== | |||
{{further|Stupa}} | |||
Stupas were soon to be richly decorated with sculptural reliefs, following the first attempts at ] (125 BCE). Full-fledged sculptural decorations and scenes of the life of the Buddha would soon follow at ] (115 BCE), ] (60 BCE), ] (125–60 BCE), again at ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/524/|title=Buddhist Monuments at Sanchi|last=Centre|first=UNESCO World Heritage|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> for the elevation of the ]s (1st century BCE/CE) and then ] (1st–2nd century CE).<ref name="BA149">Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 149- –150</ref> The decorative embellishment of stupas also had a considerable development in the northwest in the area of ], with decorated stupas such as the ] ("monumentalized" with ] decorative elements from the 2nd century BCE)<ref>"De l'Indus a l'Oxus: archaeologie de l'Asie Centrale", Pierfrancesco Callieri, p212: "The diffusion, from the second century BCE, of Hellenistic influences in the architecture of ] is also attested by the archaeological searches at the sanctuary of ], which saw its stupa "monumentalized" at that exact time by basal elements and decorative alcoves derived from ]".</ref> or the ] (2nd century CE). Stupa architecture was adopted in ] and ], where it became prominent as a ] monument used for enshrining sacred relics.<ref name=Ency/> The Indian gateway arches, the '']'', reached East Asia with the spread of Buddhism.<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''torii''</ref> Some scholars hold that '']'' derives from the torana gates at the Buddhist historic site of ] (3rd century BCE – 11th century CE).<ref name=Jaanus></ref> | |||
] of the period (1336–1565) was a notable building style evolved by the ] that ruled most of ] from their capital at ] on the banks of the ] in present-day ].<ref>See ] in Sūryanātha Kāmat's ''A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present'', p. 132.</ref> The architecture of the temples built during the reign of the Vijayanagara empire had elements of political authority.<ref>See Carla Sinopoli, ''Echoes of Empire: Vijayanagara and Historical Memory, Vijayanagara as Historical Memory'', p. 26.</ref> This resulted in the creation of a distinctive imperial style of architecture which featured prominently not only in temples but also in administrative structures across the ].<ref>See Carla Sinopoli, ''The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India, C. 1350–1650'', p. 209.</ref> The Vijayanagara style is a combination of the ], ], ] and ] styles which evolved earlier in the centuries when these empires ruled and is characterised by a return to the simplistic and serene art of the past.<ref name="blossom">See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's ''A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present'', p. 182.</ref> The South Indian temple consists essentially of a square-chambered sanctuary topped by a superstructure, tower, or spire and an attached pillared porch or hall (maṇḍapa or maṇṭapam), enclosed by a peristyle of cells within a rectangular court. The external walls of the temple are segmented by pilasters and carry niches housing sculpture. The superstructure or tower above the sanctuary is of the kūṭina type and consists of an arrangement of gradually receding stories in a pyramidal shape. Each story is delineated by a parapet of miniature shrines, square at the corners and rectangular with barrel-vault roofs at the centre. | |||
<gallery widths="200" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:Sanchi Stupa number 2 KSP 3660.jpg|], the earliest known stupa with important displays of decorative reliefs, c. 125 BCE.<ref name="Bell 15">Didactic Narration: Jataka Iconography in Dunhuang with a Catalogue of Jataka Representations in China, Alexander Peter Bell, LIT Verlag Münster, 2000 </ref> | |||
File:East Gateway and Railings Bharhut Stupa.jpg|East Gateway and Railings of ] ]. Sculptured railings: 115 BCE, ]: 75 BCE.<ref name="BA149" /> | |||
File:Sanchi1 N-MP-220.jpg|The Great Stupa at ].<ref name="Alī Jāvīd p.50">World Heritage Monuments and Related Edifices in India, Volume 1 p. 50 by Alī Jāvīd, Tabassum Javeed, Algora Publishing, New York </ref> Decorated ] built from the 1st century BCE to the 1st century CE.<ref name="BA149" /> | |||
File:Amaravati Stupa relief at Museum.jpg|Amaravati Stupa relief | |||
</gallery> | |||
The ], ], and ] are examples of Kakatiya architecture.{{Sfn|Haig|1907|p=65-87}} | |||
===Stand-alone temples=== | |||
Temples—built on elliptical, circular, quadrilateral, or apsidal plans—were initially constructed using brick and timber.<ref name=Chandra/> Some temples of timber with ] may have preceded them, but none remain to this day.<ref name=BA233/> | |||
===Vesara Architecture=== | |||
;{{Multiple image | |||
The style adopted in the region that today lies in the modern states of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh (Deccan) which served in its geographical position as buffer between north and south, that architectural style has mix of both the Nagara and Dravidian temple styles.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Khamesra|first=Manish|date=2021-01-19|title=Ghumakkar Insights: A Gavaksh to the Ancient Indian Temple Architecture|url=https://www.ghumakkar.com/a-gavaksh-to-the-ancient-north-indian-temple-architecture/|access-date=2021-07-15|website=Ghumakkar – Inspiring travel experiences.|language=en-US|archive-date=15 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210715110258/https://www.ghumakkar.com/a-gavaksh-to-the-ancient-north-indian-temple-architecture/|url-status=live}}</ref> While some scholars consider the buildings in this region as being distinctly either nagara or dravida, a hybridised style that seems to have become popular after the mid-seventh century, is known in some ancient texts as vesara. In the southern part of the Deccan, i.e., in the region of Karnataka is where some of the most experimental hybrid styles of vesara architecture are to be found. | |||
| align = | |||
| direction = | |||
| total_width = | |||
| image1 = Sannati_Dome_temple.jpg | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = Domed temple from Sannati 1st-2nd century AD | |||
| image2 = A Vihara of Buddhism in Swat KPK Pakistan.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Gumbatona Vihara, Gandhara, 1st-2nd century AD | |||
| header = Domed Buddhist temple 1st-2nd century AD | |||
}}Circular dome temples | |||
Some of the earliest free-standing temples may have been of a circular type, as the ] in ], ], formed of a central ] surrounded by a circular colonnade and an enclosing wall.<ref name=BA233/> It was built during the time of Ashoka, and near it were found two of Ashoka's ].<ref name=BA233>Le Huu Phuoc, 2009, pp. 233–237</ref> ] also built the ] in ] c. 250 BCE, also a circular structure, in order to protect the ] under which the ] had found enlightenment. Representations of this early temple structure are found ] sculpted on the railing of the stupa at ], as well as in ].<ref>"Sowing the Seeds of the Lotus: A Journey to the Great Pilgrimage Sites of Buddhism, Part I" by John C. Huntington. ''Orientations'', November 1985 p. 61</ref> From that period the ] remains, an almost intact slab of ] decorated with reliefs, which Ashoka had established at the foot of the ].<ref name="Huu Phuoc">Buddhist Architecture, Huu Phuoc Le, Grafikol, 2010 </ref><ref name="Ching">A Global History of Architecture, Francis D. K. Ching, Mark M. Jarzombek, Vikramaditya Prakash, John Wiley & Sons, 2017 p. 570ff</ref> These circular-type temples were also found in later rock-hewn caves such as ] or ].<ref name=BA233/> | |||
{{multiple image | |||
<gallery widths="200" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
| align = right | |||
File:Remnants of Stupa.jpg|Remains of the circular ], c. 250 BCE. A stupa was located in the center. | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
File:Bharhut circular Temple.jpg|Relief of a circular temple, ], c. 100 BCE. | |||
| header = Vesara style | |||
File:Shiva temple with trident standard Audumbara State Punjab 1st century BCE.jpg|] dedicated to ] depicted in a coin from the 1st century BCE. | |||
| alt4 = | |||
File:Andhra pradesh, santuario a più piani, da ghantasala, 90-110 ca..JPG|Relief of a multi-storied temple, 2nd century CE, ] Stupa.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Hardy|first1=Adam|title=Indian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation : the Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa Tradition, 7th to 13th Centuries|date=1995|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=9788170173120|page=39|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aU0hCAS2-08C&pg=PA41|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Le|first1=Huu Phuoc|title=Buddhist Architecture|date=2010|publisher=Grafikol|isbn=9780984404308|page=238|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9jb364g4BvoC&pg=PA238|language=en}}</ref> | |||
| image4 = Lad Khan temple, Aihole, Karnataka.jpg | |||
File:Karttikeya shrine with anteloppe in a coin of Yaudheyas Punjab 2nd century CE.jpg|Karttikeya shrine with anteloppe in a coin of Yaudheyas Punjab 2nd century CE | |||
| caption4 = Lad Khan temple is one of the oldest Hindu temples. | |||
File:Satavahana dome temple.png|Dome temple from Satavahana relief 1st-2nd century AD | |||
| alt3 = | |||
File:Dome temple Sannati stupa relief.png|dome temple Sannati stupa relief 1st-2nd century AD | |||
| image3 = Vesara.jpg | |||
File:Amaravathi Dome temple relief.png|Amaravathi Dome temple relief 1st-2nd century AD | |||
| caption3 = Pattadakkal Temple, Karnataka | |||
</gallery> | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Ellora Cave 16 si0308.jpg | |||
| caption2 = ] | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = N-KA-D41 Ambigergudi Aihole.jpg | |||
| caption1 = Durga temple at Aihole showing Chaitya style | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 330 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
An important temple is Papnath temple, dedicated to Lord Shiva. The temple is one of the best early examples of the South Indian tradition. By contrast other eastern Chalukyan Temples, like the ], five kilometres from ], and the Swarga Brahma temple at Alampur show a greater assimilation of northern styles from Odisha and Rajasthan. At the same time the ] is unique having an even earlier style of an apsidal shrine which is reminiscent of ] and is surrounded by a veranda of a later kind, with a shikhara that is stylistically like a nagara one. The ] at ] in Karnataka seems to be inspired by the wooden-roofed temples of the hills, except that it is constructed out of stone.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/kefa106.pdf|title=TEMPLE ARCHITECTURE AND SCULPTURE|website=ncert.nic.in|access-date=3 December 2021|archive-date=24 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220124094749/https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/kefa106.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
;Apsidal temples | |||
Another early free-standing temple in India, this time ] in shape, appears to be ] at ], which is also dated to the 3rd century BCE.<ref name="BA147">Buddhist Architecture, Lee Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, p. 147</ref> It was an ] temple built of timber on top of a high rectangular stone platform, 26.52x14x3.35 metres, with two flights of stairs to the east and the west. The temple was burnt down sometime in the 2nd century BCE.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Abram |first1=David |last2=(Firm) |first2=Rough Guides |title=The Rough Guide to India |date=2003 |publisher=Rough Guides |isbn=9781843530893 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kAMik_6LbwUC&pg=PA393 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Marshall |first1=John |title=Guide to Sanchi |date=1955 |url=https://archive.org/stream/in.gov.ignca.4365/4365#page/n153/mode/2up}}</ref> This type of apsidal structure was also adopted for most of the cave temple (]s), as in the 3rd century BCE ] and most caves thereafter, with side, and then frontal, entrances.<ref name=BA233/> A freestanding apsidal temple remains to this day, although in a modified form, in the ] in ].<ref name=BA>{{cite book |last1=Le |first1=Huu Phuoc |title=Buddhist Architecture |date=2010 |publisher=Grafikol |isbn=9780984404308 |page=237 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9jb364g4BvoC&pg=PA237 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
Historians agree that the ''vesara'' style originated in what is today Karnataka. According to some, the style was started by the ] of Badami (500-753AD) whose Early Chalukya or ] built temples in a style that mixed some features of the ''nagara'' and the ''dravida'' styles, for example using both the northern ] and southern ] type of superstructure over the sanctum in different temples of similar date, as at ]. However, Adam Hardy and others regard this style as essentially a form of Dravida. This style was further refined by the ] of ] (750-983AD) in sites such as ]. | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:IA Temple 40 Sanchi.jpg|Illustration of Temple 40 at ], dated to the 3rd century BCE.<ref name="BA147" /> | |||
Though there is clearly a good deal of continuity with the Badami or Early Chalukya style,<ref>Michell, 149</ref> other writers only date the start of Vesara to the later ] of ] (983–1195 AD),<ref>Harle, 254</ref> in sites such as ], ], ], and ],<ref>Harle, 256–261</ref> and continued by the ] (1000–1330 AD). | |||
File:Trivikram Temple Ter 1.jpg|] at ]: an early Buddhist apsidal temple, in front of which was later added an Hindu square ]. | |||
File:Amvar Chejerla Kapoteswara temple in guntur district.jpg|] apsidal temple, also later converted to Hinduism. | |||
The Hoysala temples at ], ]u and ] are leading examples of the Vesara style.<ref>Harle, 261–263</ref> These temples are now proposed as a UNESCO world heritage site. | |||
==Jain architecture== | |||
]]] | |||
], ], before 862]] | |||
{{Main|Jain temple}} | |||
{{Further|Māru-Gurjara architecture}} | |||
Jain temple architecture is generally close to Hindu temple architecture, and in ancient times Buddhist religious architecture. Normally the same builders and carvers worked for all religions, and regional and period styles are generally similar. The basic layout of a Hindu and most Jain temples has consisted of a small ] or sanctuary for the main ] or ]s, over which the high superstructure rises, then one or more larger ] halls. | |||
The earliest survivals of Jain architecture are part of the ] tradition, initially shared with Buddhism, and by the end of the classical period with Hinduism. Very often numbers of rock-cut Jain temples and monasteries share a site with those of the other religions, as at ], ], Ellora, ], ], and ]. The ] are a late site, which contains temples of all three religions, as the earlier Buddhist ones give way to later Hindu excavations. | |||
There is considerable similarity between the styles of the different religions, but often the Jains placed large figures of one or more of the 24 ]s in the open air rather than inside the shrine. These statues later began to be very large, normally standing nude figures in the '']'' meditation position (which is similar to standing ]). Examples include the ] and the ], with groups of statues, and a number of single figures including the 12th-century ], and the modern ] and, largest of all at {{convert|108|ft|m|abbr=off|sp=us}} tall, the ]. | |||
The main buildings of the largest Dilwara temples are surrounded by "cloister" screens of ''devakulikā'' shrines, and are fairly plain on the outer walls of these; in the case of the Vimal Vasahi this screen was a later addition, around the time of the second temple.<ref>Michell (1990), 274–276; Harle, 226–227</ref> Surrounding the main temple with a curtain of shrines was to become a distinctive feature of the Jain temples of West India, still employed in some modern temples.<ref>Harle, 228</ref> | |||
Mostly funded by private individuals or groups, and catering to a smaller population, Jain temples tend to be at the small or middle end of the range of sizes, but at pilgrimage sites they may cluster in large groups – there are altogether several hundred at Palitana, tightly packed within several high-walled compounds called "tuks" or "tonks".<ref>"Temple-cities"; see also Mitchell (1990) by sites</ref> Temple charitable trusts, such as the very large ], founded in the 17th century and now maintaining 1,200 temples, play a very important role in funding temple building and maintenance. | |||
===Māru-Gurjara architecture=== | |||
{{Main|Māru-Gurjara architecture}} | |||
]]] | |||
Regional differences in Hindu temples are largely reflected in Jain ones, except that Māru-Gurjara architecture or the "Solanki style" has become to some extent a pan-Indian, indeed pan-global Jain style. This is a particular temple style from ] and ] (both regions with a strong Jain presence) that originated in both Hindu and Jain temples around 1000, but became enduringly popular with Jain patrons, spreading to other parts of India and the global Jain ] of the last century. It has remained in use, in somewhat modified form, to the present day, indeed also becoming popular again for some Hindu temples in the last century. The style is seen in the groups of pilgrimage temples at ] on ], ], ] and ].<ref>Hegewald</ref> | |||
Interiors are more lavishly decorated, with elaborate carving on most surfaces. In particular, Jain temples often have small low domes carved on the inside with a highly intricate rosette design. Another distinctive feature is "flying" arch-like elements between pillars, touching the horizontal beam above in the centre, and elaborately carved. These have no structural function, and are purely decorative. The style developed large pillared halls, many open at the sides, with Jain temples often having one closed and two pillared halls in sequence on the main axis leading to the shrine. | |||
The Māru-Gurjara style did not represent a radical break with earlier styles. The previous styles in north-west India, and the group of Jain temples of Khajuraho, forming part of the famous Khajuraho Group of Monuments are very largely in the same style as their Hindu companions, which were mostly built between 950 and 1050. They share many features with the Māru-Gurjara style: high plinths with many decorated bands on the walls, lavish figurative and decorative carving, balconies looking out on multiple sides, ceiling rosettes, and others, but at Khajuraho the great height of the shikharas is given more emphasis. There are similarities with the contemporary Hoysala architecture from much further south. In both of these styles architecture is treated sculpturally. | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200"> | |||
File:Ranakpur (2155232277).jpg|Detailed carving of elephant, ] | |||
File:RaniKiVav-Patan-Gujarat JM21.jpg|] | |||
File:Somanath mandir (cropped).jpg|] | |||
File:Adalaj stepwell01.JPG|] | |||
File:Taranga Temple 2017.jpg|] | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
==Indo-Islamic architecture== | |||
;Truncated pyramidal temples | |||
], built in the 16th century by the ]]] | |||
{{Main|Indo-Islamic architecture}}The Indo-Islamic architecture began under ] in Indian subcontinent around the 7th century AD. Many of these styles are also influence by regional Indian architecture. It also Replace Indian Trabeate style with Arcuate style. Turks and Persians, who inherited wealth of various design from ] and ], shaped and influenced the architecture. | |||
Islamic buildings initially adapted the skills of a workforce trained in earlier Indian traditions to their own designs. Unlike most of the ], where ] tended to predominate, India had highly skilled builders well used to producing stone ] of extremely high quality. Alongside the architecture developed in Delhi and prominent centres of Mughal culture such as ], ] and ], a variety of regional styles developed in regional kingdoms like the ], ], ], ] and ]. Following the collapse of the Mughal Empire, regional nawabs such as in ], ] and ] continued to commission and patronize the construction of Mughal-commissioned architecture in the ]s. | |||
=== Sultanate === | |||
] developed in the independent sultanates formed when the Tughlaq empire weakened in the mid-14th century, and lasted until most were absorbed into the Mughal Empire in the 16th century. Apart from the sultanates of the Deccan Plateau, Gujarat, Bengal, and Kashmir, the architecture of the ] and ] also left some significant buildings.<ref>Harle, 428–432</ref> | |||
==== Delhi Sultanate ==== | |||
]]] | |||
The start of the ] in 1206 under ] introduced a large Islamic state to India, using Central Asian styles.<ref>Harle, 423–424</ref> The important ] in Delhi was begun under ], by 1199, and continued under Qutb al-Din Aibak and later sultans. The ], now a ruin, was the first structure. Like other early Islamic buildings it re-used elements such as columns from destroyed Hindu and ] temples, including one on the same site whose platform was reused. The arches were ] in the traditional Indian way.<ref>Yale, 164–165; Harle, 423–424; Blair & Bloom, 149</ref> ], a minaret twice the size of ] was commissioned by ] but never completed. Other examples include the ] and ]. | |||
]]] | |||
Another very early mosque, begun in the 1190s, is the ] in ], ], built for the same Delhi rulers, again with corbelled arches and domes. Here Hindu temple columns (and possibly some new ones) are piled up in threes to achieve extra height. Both mosques had large detached screens with pointed corbelled arches added in front of them, probably under Iltutmish a couple of decades later. | |||
At Ajmer the smaller screen arches are tentatively cusped, for the first time in India.<ref>Blair & Bloom, 149–150; Harle, 425</ref> By around 1300 true domes and arches with ]s were being built; the ruined ] (d. 1287) in Delhi may be the earliest survival.<ref>Harle, 425</ref> The ] gatehouse at the Qutb complex, from 1311, still shows a cautious approach to the new technology, with very thick walls and a shallow dome, only visible from a certain distance or height. Bold contrasting colours of masonry, with red ] and white ], introduce what was to become a common feature of Indo-Islamic architecture, substituting for the polychrome tiles used in Persia and Central Asia. The pointed arches come together slightly at their base, giving a mild ] effect, and their internal edges are not cusped but lined with conventionalized "spearhead" projections, possibly representing ] buds. ], stone ] screens, are introduced here; they already had been long used in temples.<ref>Blair & Bloom, 151</ref> | |||
By the time of Tughlaqs Islamic architecture in India had adopted some features of earlier Indian architecture, such as the use of a high ],<ref>Blair & Bloom, 149</ref> and often ] around its edges, as well as columns and brackets and ] halls.<ref>Blair & Bloom, 156</ref> After the death of Firoz the Tughlaqs declined, and the following Delhi dynasties were weak. Most of the monumental buildings constructed were tombs, although the impressive ] (adorned with fountains, '']'' gardens, ponds, tombs and mosques) were constructed by the late Lodi dynasty. The architecture of other regional Muslim states was often more impressive.<ref>Harle, 426; Blair & Bloom, 156</ref> | |||
==== Deccan Sultanates ==== | |||
Dawood Shah of Bahamani Sultanate ruled for very short amount of time in 1378 but invented a new style of tomb, comprising two similar, domed structures on a single basement, a style not seen anywhere outside ]. ] who died in 1422 copied the double-chambered style but made his tomb much simpler. The black basalt door jambs reminiscent of temple pillars, the recessed arches bearing stucco floral work, arches bearing stucco floral work, and the ] borne on brackets that resemble those found in temples all become common features in later Bahmani architecture. Rangin Mahal in ], built by ] in the 1500s. While the beautiful tile mosaics on some of its walls and the luminescent mother-of-pearl inlays on black basalt are Persian in style, its carved wooden pillars and brackets are clearly derived from local residential architecture.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-07-27|title=Alluring Bahmani architecture|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/spectrum/spectrum-top-stories/alluring-bahmani-architecture-749973.html|access-date=2021-07-16|website=Deccan Herald|language=en|archive-date=9 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709190630/https://www.deccanherald.com/spectrum/spectrum-top-stories/alluring-bahmani-architecture-749973.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
]]] | |||
The main architectural activities for the ] rulers were building garden tombs. The tomb of Ali Barid Shah (1577) is the most notable monument in ].{{sfn|Yazdani|1947|p=152}} The tomb consists of a lofty domed chamber, open on four sides, located in the middle of a Persian four-square garden. The ''Rangin Mahal'' in Bidar, built during the reign of Ali Barid Shah, is a complete and exquisitely decorated courtly structure. Other important monuments in Bidar from this period are the tomb of Qasim II and the Kali Masjid.<ref name="michell_77">Michell, George & Mark Zebrowski. Architecture and Art of the Deccan Sultanates (The New Cambridge History of India Vol. I:7), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, {{ISBN|0-521-56321-6}}, p. 14 & pp. 77–80.</ref> | |||
] | |||
Amongst the major architectural works in the ], one of the earliest is the unfinished ], which was begun by Ali Adil Shah I in 1576. It has an arcaded prayer hall, with fine aisles, and has an impressive dome supported by massive piers. One of the most impressive monuments built during the reign of ] was the ] which was originally planned as a tomb for queen Taj Sultana, but was later converted into the tomb for Ibrahim Adil Shah II and his family. This complex, completed in 1626, consists of a paired tomb and mosque. | |||
Notable buildings of the ] and ] in the Deccan include the ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="michell_77" />{{Sfn|Haig|1907|p=209-216}}The greatest monument in Bijapur is the ], the mausoleum of Muhammad Adil Shah, which was completed in 1656, and whose hemispherical dome measures {{convert|44|m}} across. | |||
One of the earliest architectural achievements of the Qutb Shahi dynasty is the ], which is now in ruins. In the 16th century, ] decided to shift the capital to ], {{convert|8|km}} east of Golconda. Here, he constructed the most original monument in the Deccan, the ], in the heart of the new city.<ref name=":0" /> This monument, completed in 1591, has four minarets, each {{convert|56|m}}. | |||
==== Bengal Sultanate ==== | |||
The style of the ] mostly used brick, with characteristic features being indigenous Bengali elements, such as curved roofs, corner towers and complex ] ornamentation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Architecture |title=Architecture |website=Banglapedia |access-date=30 December 2017 |archive-date=16 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116231638/http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Architecture |url-status=live }}</ref> which were with blended. One feature in the sultanate was the relative absence of minarets.<ref name="Hasan, Perween 2007 p. 23-27">Hasan, Perween (2007). Sultans and Mosques: The Early Muslim Architecture of Bangladesh. United Kingdom: I.B. Tauris. p. 23–27. {{ISBN|1-84511-381-0}}.</ref> Many small and medium-sized medieval mosques, with multiple domes and artistic ] ]s, were constructed throughout the region.<ref name="Hasan, Perween 2007 p. 23-27" />] at ]]]These features are also seen in the ] (around 1500), which is in stone, unusually for Bengal, but shares the style and mixes domes and a curving "paddy" roof based on village house roofs made of vegetable thatch. Such roofs feature even more strongly in later ], with types of style such as the ], ], and ].<ref>Hasan, 23–25</ref> For larger mosques, Bengali architects multiplied the numbers of domes, with a nine-domed formula (three rows of three) being one option, surviving in four examples, all 15th or 16th century and now in Bangladesh,<ref>Hasan, 41–44</ref> although there were others with larger numbers of domes.<ref>Hasan, 44–49</ref> | |||
] hall of the ]]] | |||
The largest mosque in the Indian subcontinent was the 14th century ]. Built of stone demolished from temples, it featured a monumental ribbed barrel vault over the central nave, the first such giant vault used anywhere in the subcontinent. The mosque was modelled on the imperial ] style of Persia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bengal|title=BENGAL – Encyclopaedia Iranica|website=Iranicaonline.org|access-date=30 December 2017|archive-date=3 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180103102347/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bengal|url-status=live}}</ref> The Sultanate style flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. A provincial style influenced by North India evolved in Mughal Bengal during the 17th and 18th centuries. The Mughals also copied the Bengali ] roof tradition for mausoleums{{which|date=June 2020}} in North India.<ref>Petersen, Andrew (2002). Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. Routledge. pp. 33–35. {{ISBN|1-134-61366-0}}.</ref> | |||
Although the description in ], the ancient capital, shows mainly Persian culture in courts, we find one of the first attempts at fusing together the Islamic and Bengali style of architecture under ] who ruled then. Under ] emerged the 'Bengal' style of mosques. With Jalaludin's reign we see the beginnings of a trend of Muslim ruling dynasty that grounded itself in local culture rather than seeking legitimacy from Delhi or Mecca. Upon his return to Delhi from his first Bengal expedition, Firoz Shah Tughlaq built Kotla Mosque, which bear a striking resemblance to the Bengal style. | |||
==== Kashmir ==== | |||
] ]] | |||
By 1339, Shams-ud-din Shah Mir of the ] established a sultanate encompassing the ] (consisting of modern-day ], ], ], ], and ]), allowing for the gradual Islamization of the region and the hybridization of Persianate culture and architecture with the indigenous Buddhist styles of Kashmir. In the capital at ] in modern Indian-administered Kashmir, ] constructed the ], a large wooden congregational mosque that incorporates elements two cultures, that is, it has been erected in Persian style but its minar is topped with umbrella-shaped finial, which is in similitude with Buddhist pagoda structure, as well as the wooden ]h mosque. Also in Srinagar are the ] and the Tomb of Zain-ul-Abidin. Two 14th-century wooden mosques in ] are the ] in ] (1370) and the ] in ]. Both have stone-built cores with elaborately carved wooden exterior galleries, at Amburiq on two levels, in an adaptation of traditional local styles. | |||
==== Gujarat sultanate ==== | |||
{{multiple image | {{multiple image | ||
| align = right | | align = right | ||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| image1 = Kumrahar Mahabodhi plaque.jpg | |||
| header = Gujarat Sultanate | |||
| width1 = | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| caption1 = <center>The Mahabodhi Temple in 150–200 CE.</center> | |||
| |
| image4 = Saher ki Masjid.jpg | ||
| caption4 = Saher ki Masjid | |||
| width2 = | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| caption2 = <center>The ]: a stepped pyramid with round stupa on top.<ref name=BA238/></center> | |||
| image3 = Jama Masjid11.jpg | |||
| direction = | |||
| caption3 = Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad | |||
| width = | |||
| |
| alt2 = | ||
| image2 = Jaali at Sarkhej Roza.JPG | |||
| caption2 = Jaali work at ] | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Champaner - Jami Masjid, Gujarat.jpg | |||
| caption1 = Jami Masjid, Champaner | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 330 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | }} | ||
Under the ], independent between 1407 and 1543, Gujarat was a prosperous regional sultanate under the rule of the ], who built lavishly, particularly in the capital, ], in its distinctive style of Indo-Islamic architecture. The sultanate commissioned mosques such as the ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and Pattharwali Masjid, as well as structures such as ], ] and the ] in Ahmedabad. | |||
It is thought that the temple in the shape of a truncated pyramid was derived from the design of the stepped stupas which had developed in Gandhara.<ref name=BA238/> The ] in ] is one such example, adapting the Gandharan design of a succession of steps with niches containing Buddha images, alternating with Greco-Roman pillars, as seen in the stupas of ].<ref name=BA238>Le Huu Phuoc, Buddhist Architecture, pp. 238–248</ref> The structure is crowned by the shape of an hemispherical stupa topped by ]s, forming a logical elongation of the stepped Gandharan stupas.<ref name=BA238/> | |||
The distinctive Indo-Islamic architecture style of Gujarat drew micro-architectural elements from earlier ] and employed them in ], roofs, doors, minarets and facades. In the 15th century, the Indo-Islamic style of Gujarat is especially notable for its inventive and elegant use of ]s. They are often in pairs flanking the main entrance, mostly rather thin and with elaborate carving at least at the lower levels. Some designs push out balconies at intervals up the shaft; the most extreme version of this was in the lost upper parts of the so-called "shaking minarets" at the ], which fell down in ]. This carving draws on the traditional skills of local stone-carvers, previously exercised on Hindu temples in the Māru-Gurjara and other local styles. | |||
Although the current structure of the Mahabdhodi Temple dates to the ] period (5th century CE), the "Plaque of Mahabhodi Temple", discovered in ] and dated to 150–200 CE based on its dated ] inscriptions and combined finds of ] coins, suggests that the pyramidal structure already existed in the 2nd century CE.<ref name=BA238/> This is confirmed by archaeological excavations in Bodh Gaya.<ref name=BA238/> | |||
Indo-Islamic architecture style of Gujarat presages many of the architectural elements later found in ], including ornate '']s'' and minarets, '']'' (perforated screens carved in stone), and '']s'' (pavilions topped with ]s). | |||
This truncated pyramid design also marked the evolution from the ] stupa dedicated to the cult of relics, to the ] temple with multiple images of the Buddha and Bodhisattvas.<ref name=BA238/> This design was very influential in the development of later ]s.<ref>Le Huu Phuoc, Buddhist Architecture, p. 234</ref> | |||
The ], the 16th century capital of Gujarat Sultanate, documents the early Islamic and pre-] city that has remained without any change. | |||
;Square prostyle temples | |||
] ] ] Buddhist temple of ] appearance at ] (Temple 17) (5th century CE).<ref name="books.google.com"/>]] | |||
The ] later also built Buddhist stand-alone ] (following the great cave temples of ]), such as Temple 17 at ], dating to the early ] period (5th century CE). It consists of a flat roofed square sanctum with a portico and four pillars. From an architectural perspective, this is a ] ] temple of ] appearance .<ref name="books.google.com"></ref> The interior and three sides of the exterior are plain and undecorated but the front and the pillars are elegantly carved,<ref name="books.google.com"/> not unlike the 2nd century rock-cut cave temples of the ]. ] and ] universities, housing thousands of teachers and students, flourished between the 4th–8th centuries.<ref name=Mukerji-eb>Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''education, history of''.</ref> | |||
=== |
=== Mughal Empire === | ||
{{Main|Mughal architecture}} | |||
] in ]; Shunga period, 2nd-1st BCE]] | |||
The most famous Indo-Islamic style is ]. Mughal art and architecture, a characteristic Indo-Islamic-Persian style flourished on the Indian subcontinent during the Mughal empire (1526–1857). This new style combined elements of Islamic art and architecture, which had been introduced to India during the Delhi Sultanate (1192–1398) and had produced great monuments such as the Qutb Minar, with features of Persian art and architecture. Its most prominent examples are the series of imperial ], which started with the pivotal ], but is best known for the ]. | |||
Archaeological excavation conducted by ] (ASI) at ] revealed a palace with its foundations going back to 8th century BCE until 2nd century CE; and built in six phases. The last phase dated to 1st - 2nd century CE, featured an extensive structure which was divided into three blocks and enclosed two galleries. There was a central hall in the central block and presumably used as an audience hall surrounded by rooms which served as a residential place for the ruler. The entire structure was constructed using bricks and stones and two layers of lime were plastered on it. The palace had a vast network of underground chambers also called ] by Kautilya in his Arthashastra,<ref>{{Cite book|title=Age Of The Nandas And Mauryas|last=Shastri|first=K.A|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=339}}</ref> and the superstructure and the galleries were made on the principle of true arch. The four-centered pointed arch was used to span narrow passageways and segmental arch for wider areas. The superstructure of the central and eastern block was examined to have formed part of a dome that adorned the building. The entire galleries and superstructure were found collapsed under 5 cm thick layer of ash which indicates destruction of the palace through conflagration.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A review 1961-62|last=Gosh|first=A.|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=1964|isbn=|location=New Dehli|pages=50–52}}</ref> | |||
{{multiple image | |||
A palace architecture has also been uncovered at ].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=4gBSWyLTSzkC&pg=PA18&dq=nagarjunakonda+palace&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFkeaTpbziAhURiXAKHTypDXQQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=nagarjunakonda%20palace&f=false|title=Nagarjunakonda A Cultural Study|last=Murthy|first=K. Krishna|date=1977|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|language=en}}</ref><gallery widths="200" heights="200"> | |||
| align = right | |||
File:Four centered pointed arch, Kausambi.png|] 1st-2nd century AD, Kausambi Palace | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
File:Kausambi Gothic arches 1st-2nd century AD.png|Kausambi palace vaulted underground chambers | |||
| header = Mughal elements | |||
</gallery> | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| image4 = Tomb of Nisar Begum at Khusro Bagh Allahabad.jpg | |||
| caption4 = Bulbous domes on Tomb of Nisar Begum at Khusro Bagh | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Agra-Itmad ud Daulah mausoleum-South doorway and jalis-20131019.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Pachin Kari or Pietra Dura on Tomb of I'timād-ud-Daulah | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Darwaza-I-Rauza, Taj Mahal Complex, Agra, Uttar Pradesh.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Darwaza-I-Rauza, Taj Mahal Complex, showing large vaulted gateways with delicate ornamentation and minarets with cupolas | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Salim Chisti's Tomb, Fatehpur Sikri, Uttar Pradesh, India.JPG | |||
| caption1 = The ] and jali latticed screens is famed as one of the finest examples of Mughal architecture in India. | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 350 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
It is known for features including monumental buildings with large, bulbous onion domes, surrounded by ], and delicate ornamentation work, including ] decorative work and '']''-latticed screens. Pietra dura or ‘Parchinkari’ rose to prominence under patronage of Emperors specially under Shah Jahan. Originating from Italy, it found its way to Mughal courts via trade route. It adapted to its present distinct feature of floral art by the hands of local artisans and Persian influence. | |||
=== Theater and stadium === | |||
] constructed a stadium and a theater at ] in the 2nd century AD. The theater has a small quadrangular open area enclosed on all four sides by stepped stands which are made of bricks and cladded with limestone <ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=SyxOHOCVcVkC&pg=PA237&lpg=PA237&dq=Nagarjunakonda+AMPHITHEATRE&source=bl&ots=j9r2fH4Uqv&sig=UXZzVedngVlDsNfpR31kYAMniKw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjvrr6jt6PfAhXML48KHToMAFoQ6AEwEXoECAUQAQ#v=onepage&q=Nagarjunakonda%20AMPHITHEATRE&f=false|title=History of Indian Theatre|last=Varadpande|first=Manohar Laxman|date=1987|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=9788170172215|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com.my/books?id=JYuJWxLv-U0C&pg=PA91&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false|title=Ancient Indian And Indo-Greek Theatre|last=Varadpande|first=M. L.|date=1981|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=9788170171478|language=en}}</ref>. | |||
Mughals brought in Persian style into Indian Architecture. The character and structure of Mughal buildings displayed a uniform character and structure. Some of the main features of the Mughal architecture are mentioned below. | |||
An oblong shaped stadium dating form the same era consisted of an arena which was enclosed on all four sides by flight of steps with each step measuring two feet wide and a pavilion which was situated on the west end. At the top of the arena there was a en eleven feet wide platform. The area of arena was 309 X 259 feet and 15 feet deep. Entire construction was done using burnt brick. | |||
# Large halls | |||
{{Multiple image | |||
# Very large vaulted gateways | |||
| align = | |||
# Delicate ornamentation | |||
| direction = | |||
# Bulbous domes | |||
| total_width = 400 | |||
# Slender Minarets with cupolas at the 4 corners | |||
| image1 = Entrance to the Badami Fort.jpg | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = Entrance to the Badami Fort | |||
| image2 = Badami Northern Fort Entrance.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Badami Northern Fort Entrance | |||
}} | |||
The ] at ] (1565–74) and the walled city of ] (1569–74)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/255/|title=Fatehpur Sikri|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|access-date=2019-03-12|archive-date=15 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220215162920/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/255/|url-status=live}}</ref> are among the architectural achievements of this time—as is the ], built as a tomb for Queen ] by ] (1628–58).<ref name="eb-mughalarch">Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''Mughal architecture''.</ref> Employing the double dome, the recessed archway, the depiction of any animal or human—an essential part of the Indian tradition—was ]. | |||
=== Fortification === | |||
] | |||
Nalrajar Garh fortification wall ruins dating back to 5th century AD are probably the only standing fortification ruins from ] which are located in a dense jungle in North Bengal near Indo-Bhutan border. A prominent feature of its fortification walls are two parabolic arches.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian archaeology: A review 1966-67|last=M. N|first=Deshpande|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|year=1975|isbn=|location=Calcutta|pages=45-46}}</ref> Many fortified cities like Nalrajar Garh, ] had risen in ] owing to trade activities with south eastern China. | |||
Mughal architecture reached its zenith during the reign of the emperor Shah Jahan (1628–58), its crowning achievement being the magnificent Taj Mahal. This period is marked by a fresh emergence in India of Persian features that had been seen earlier in the tomb of Humayun. The use of the double dome, a recessed archway inside a rectangular fronton, and parklike surroundings are all typical of this period. Symmetry and balance between the parts of a building were always stressed, while the delicacy of detail in Shah Jahan decorative work has seldom been surpassed. | |||
] or Pulakeshi fort from ] era date back to the 6th century AD<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/143024/11/11_chapter%204-1.pdf|title=EARLY FORTIFICATION: AIHOLE, BADAMI, PATTADAKAL, MAHAKUTA AND ALAMPUR|last=|first=|date=|website=|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=}}</ref> | |||
The Taj Mahal does contain tilework of plant ornaments.<ref name="rjadhav" /> The ] during the Mughal Period, with its rulers being of Turco-Mongol origin, has shown a notable blend of Indian style combined with the ]. Taj Mahal in Agra, India is one of the wonders of the world.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/252/|title=Taj Mahal|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|access-date=2019-02-28|archive-date=12 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210112161441/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/252|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===End of the Classical period=== | |||
This period ends with the destructive invasions of the ] in the 6th century CE. During the rule of the Hunnic king ], over a thousand Buddhist monasteries throughout Gandhara are said to have been destroyed.<ref name=kurt>{{cite book|last1=Behrendt|first1=Kurt A.|title=Handbuch der Orientalistik|date=2004|publisher=BRILL|isbn=9789004135956}}</ref> The Chinese pilgrim ], writing in 630 CE, explained that Mihirakula ordered the destruction of ] and the expulsion of monks.<ref name="Neelis">Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks by Jason Neelis </ref> He reported that Buddhism had drastically declined, and that most of the monasteries were deserted and left in ruins.<ref>The Spread of Buddhism by Ann Heirman, Stephan Peter Bumbacher </ref> | |||
] are gardens built by the Mughals in the ]. This style was influenced by ]. They are built in the ] structure, which is a quadrilateral garden layout based on the ] mentioned in the ]. This style is intended to create a representation of an earthly utopia in which humans co-exist in perfect harmony with all elements of nature. | |||
Although only spanning a few decades, the invasions had long-term effects on India, and in a sense brought an end to ].<ref name="Eraly">The First Spring: The Golden Age of India by Abraham Eraly </ref> Soon after the invasions, the ], already weakened by these invasions and the rise of local rulers, ended as well.<ref>Ancient Indian History and Civilization by Sailendra Nath Sen </ref> Following the invasions, northern India was left in disarray, with numerous smaller Indian powers emerging after the crumbling of the Guptas.<ref>A Comprehensive History Of Ancient India </ref> | |||
The quadrilateral garden is divided by walkways or flowing water into four smaller parts. Significant use of rectilinear layouts are made within the walled enclosures. Some of the typical features include pools, fountains and canals inside the gardens.<gallery widths="180" heights="120" class="center"> | |||
==Early Middle Ages (550 CE–1200 CE)== | |||
File:Safdarjung Tomb Delhi, India.jpg|] is built in the late ] for Nawab ]. The tomb is described as the "last flicker in the lamp of Mughal architecture". | |||
{{main|Hindu architecture|Hindu temple architecture}} | |||
File:I'timād-ud-Daulah, Agra.jpg|] is a ] mausoleum in ]. It is noticeable for the first use of pietra dura technique. The tomb is often regarded as a draft of the ]. | |||
], the largest ] ] temple.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/243/|title=Ellora Caves|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref>]]]n temple architecture—visible as a distinct tradition during the 7th century CE.<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''South Indian temple architecture''.</ref> | |||
File:Shalimar Bagh 1.jpg|] is a ] in ], linked through a channel to the northeast of ]. The Bagh is considered the high point of Mughal ]. | |||
''Māru-Gurjara'' temple architecture originated somewhere in the 6th century in and around areas of Rajasthan. Māru-Gurjara Architecture shows the deep understanding of structures and refined skills of Rajasthani craftsmen of the bygone era. Māru-Gurjara Architecture has two prominent styles ''Maha-Maru'' and ''Maru-Gurjara''. According to ''M. A. Dhaky'', ''Maha-Maru'' style developed primarily in Marudesa, ], ''Surasena'' and parts of ''Uparamala'' whereas ''Maru-Gurjara'' originated in Medapata, Gurjaradesa-Arbuda, Gurjaradesa-Anarta and some areas of Gujarat.<ref>The sculpture of early medieval Rajasthan By Cynthia Packert Atherton</ref> Scholars such as George Michell, M.A. Dhaky, Michael W. Meister and U.S. Moorti believe that ''Māru-Gurjara Temple Architecture'' is entirely ''Western Indian'' architecture and is quite different from the North Indian Temple architecture.<ref>Beginnings of Medieval Idiom c. A.D. 900–1000 by George Michell</ref> There is a connecting link between ''Māru-Gurjara Architecture'' and ] Temple Architecture. In both of these styles architecture is treated sculpturally.<ref>The legacy of G.S. Ghurye: a centennial festschrift By Govind Sadashiv Ghurye, A. R. Momin, p. 205</ref> Regional styles include ], ], ], ], and ]. | |||
File:Akbar's Tomb -Agra -Uttar Pradesh -IMG 2116.jpg|] was built with red sandstone by his ] and ] in 1605 to 1618. | |||
], Gujarat, 11th century]] | |||
File:Humayun's tomb by Shagil Kannur 4.jpg|], ], the first fully developed Mughal imperial tomb, 1569–70 CE<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/232/|title=Humayun's Tomb, Delhi|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190228192141/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/232/|archive-date=2019-02-28|url-status=live|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref> | |||
The South Indian temple consists essentially of a square-chambered sanctuary topped by a superstructure, tower, or spire and an attached pillared porch or hall (maṇḍapa or maṇṭapam), enclosed by a peristyle of cells within a rectangular court. The external walls of the temple are segmented by pilasters and carry niches housing sculpture. The superstructure or tower above the sanctuary is of the kūṭina type and consists of an arrangement of gradually receding stories in a pyramidal shape. Each story is delineated by a parapet of miniature shrines, square at the corners and rectangular with barrel-vault roofs at the centre. | |||
</gallery> | |||
== Regional styles == | |||
] temples showed increased elevation of the wall and elaborate spire by the 10th century.<ref name=eb-niarch>Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''North Indian temple architecture''.</ref> Richly decorated temples—including the complex at ]—were constructed in ].<ref name=eb-niarch/> Indian traders brought Indian architecture to ] through various ].<ref name=moffett>Moffett ''et al.'', 75</ref> Grandeur of ], beautiful ], delicate carvings, high ], gopuras and extensive courtyards were the features of temple ] in India. Examples include the ] at ] in ], ] at ] in Odisha, ] at ] in ]. | |||
=== Rajput Architecture === | |||
{{Main|Rajput architecture}} | |||
{{See also|Architecture of Rajasthan}}{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header = Rajput elements | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| image4 = Chandra Mahal, City Palace, Jaipur, 20191218 0953 9046.jpg | |||
| caption4 = Chandra Mahal showcasing fusion of Rajput and Mughal styles | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Amer Fort Entrance.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Pietra Dura and Jaali works on Amer Fort Entrance | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Profusely painted interiors of palatial quarters.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Profusely painted interiors ] | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Hawa Mahal Located in Jaipur.jpg | |||
| caption1 = Jharokha windows of ] | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 330 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
| image5 = Salim Singh ki Haveli 06.jpg | |||
| image6 = Udaipur, Ahar, cenotaphs (9710634777).jpg | |||
| caption5 = Salim Singh ki Haveli | |||
| caption6 = Chhatris in Udaipur | |||
}} | |||
Rajput Architecture represents different types of buildings, which may broadly be classed either as secular or religious. The secular buildings are of various scales. These include temples, forts, stepwells, gardens, and palaces. The forts were specially built for defense and military purposes due to the ]. | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:Shore temple, mahabalipuram.jpg|The rock-cut ] of the ], 700–728 CE.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/239/|title=Group of Monuments at Pattadakal|last=Centre|first=UNESCO World Heritage|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> | |||
File:Nalanda University India ruins.jpg|The ruins of ] at ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1502/|title=Archaeological Site of Nalanda Mahavihara at Nalanda, Bihar|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> | |||
File:Khajuraho - Kandariya Mahadeo Temple.jpg|The ] at the ] in the ] style architecture, a ] ]. | |||
File:Teli ka mandir fort Gwalior - panoramio - Gyanendrasinghchauha… (1).jpg|] is an 8th/9th century Hindu Temple built by the Pratihara emperor ].<ref name="Bajpai2006">{{cite book|author=K. D. Bajpai|title=History of Gopāchala|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q3KcwLKuRnYC&pg=PA31|year=2006|publisher=Bharatiya Jnanpith|isbn=978-81-263-1155-2|page=31}}</ref> | |||
File:Galaganatha Temple, Pattadakal, Karnataka.jpg|Galaganatha Temple at ] is an example of ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/239/|title=Group of Monuments at Pattadakal|last=Centre|first=UNESCO World Heritage|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> | |||
File:Martand Sun Temple Central shrine (6133772365).jpg|] Central shrine, dedicated to the deity ]. | |||
File:PURI JAGANATHA TEMPLE, PURI, ORISSA, INDIA, ASIA.jpg|] at ], one of ]: the four main spiritual centers of Hinduism. | |||
File:Big Temple-Temple.jpg|The granite ] of ] in ] was completed in 1010 CE by ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/250/|title=Great Living Chola Temples|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-12}}</ref> | |||
File:Rani ki vav1.jpg|] is a ], built by the ], located in ]. | |||
File:Deogarh, UP. Jain temple complex.jpg|Wall of ], ] | |||
File:Moat in Daulatabad Fort.JPG|Devagiri fort, built by Yadav dynasty in 12th century, according to ] was the most impregnable fort he had ever seen | |||
File:Hierarchy (8029464059).jpg|Jaisalmir ] 12th century CE | |||
File:Oriental memoirs - selected and abridged from a series of familiar letters written during seventeen years residence in India - including observations on parts of Africa and South America, and a (14781483241).jpg|Hira gate Dabhoi fort 12th century AD | |||
</gallery> | |||
] architecture and painting is claimed to have influenced indigenous Rajput styles of art and architecture.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Kossak|first1=Steven|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=orBAYzCRJhIC&q=Rajput+architecture+was+influenced+by+Islamic+architecture&pg=PA7|title=The Art of South and Southeast Asia: A Resource for Educators|last2=Watts|first2=Edith Whitney|date=2001|publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art|isbn=9780870999925|language=en|access-date=5 November 2020|archive-date=14 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314135449/https://books.google.com/books?id=orBAYzCRJhIC&q=Rajput+architecture+was+influenced+by+Islamic+architecture&pg=PA7|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== Ancient Indian arches === | |||
Indian architecture has utilized mix of false and true arches in its architecture | |||
The ] (], ], ], ], ], ]), a group of six forts built by various Rajput kingdoms and principalities during the medieval period are among the best examples of Rajput Architecture. The ensemble is also a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Other forts include the ] and ]. | |||
==== Corbel arches ==== | |||
Corbel arches in India date from ] which used corbel arch to construct drains and have been evidenced at Mohenjo daro, Harappa, and Dholavira.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=hdeSBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA28&dq=corbel+arch+mohenjo+daro#v=onepage&q=corbel%20arch%20mohenjo%20daro&f=false|title=Across the Pacific: From Ancient Asia to Precolombian America|last=Lemoy|first=Christian|date=2011|publisher=Christian Lemoy|isbn=9781599425825|language=en}}</ref> | |||
Most of the population of Rajasthan is ], and there has historically been a ]; this mixture is reflected in the many temples of the region. ], or "Solaṅkī style" is a distinctive style that began in Rajasthan and neighbouring ] around the 11th century, and has been revived and taken to other parts of India and the world by both Hindus and Jains. This represents the main contribution of the region to ]. The ] of ] built between the 11th and 13th centuries CE are the best-known examples of the style. The ] architecture greatly influenced indigenous Rajput styles of art and architecture.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Steven|first1=Kossak|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=orBAYzCRJhIC&q=Rajput+architecture+was+influenced+by+Islamic+architecture&pg=PA7|title=The Art of South and Southeast Asia: A Resource for Educators|last2=Watts|first2=Edith Whitney|publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art|year=2001|isbn=9780870999925|access-date=5 November 2020|archive-date=14 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314135449/https://books.google.com/books?id=orBAYzCRJhIC&q=Rajput+architecture+was+influenced+by+Islamic+architecture&pg=PA7|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The oldest arches surviving in Indian architecture are the ] or "] arches" found in ancient rock-cut architecture, and agreed to be copied from versions in wood which have all perished. These often terminate a whole ceiling with a semi-circular top; wooden roofs made in this way can be seen in carved depictions of cities and palaces. A number of small early constructed temples have such roofs, using ]led construction, as well as an ] plan; the ] at ] is an example. The arch shape survived into constructed Indian architecture, not as an opening in a wall but as a blind niche projection from a wall, that bears only its own weight. In this form it became a very common and important decorative motif on Hindu temples.<ref>Rowland, 44-45, 64-65, 113, 218-219; Harle, 48, 175</ref> | |||
The "fundamental architectural principle of the constructed Hindu temple is always formulated in the trabeate order", that is to say using ] systems with vertical and horizontal members.<ref>Michell, 82</ref> According to George Michell: "Never was the principle of the arch with radiating components, such as voussoirs and keystones, employed in Hindu structures, either in India or in other parts of Asia. It was not so much that Hindu architects were ignorant of these techniques, but rather that conformance to tradition and adherence to precedents were firm cultural attitudes".<ref>Michell, 84</ref> Harle describes the true arch as "not unknown, but almost never employed by Hindu builders",<ref>Harle, 530, note 3 to chapter 30. See also 489, note 10</ref> and its use as "rare, but widely dispersed".<ref>Harle, 493, note 5</ref> | |||
Some architectural style innovated and influenced by Rajasthani architectural styles are:- | |||
==== Arch ==== | |||
# Ornated buildings or Havelis | |||
The 19th century archaeologist ], head of the ], at first believed that due to the total absence of arches in Hindu temples, they were alien to Indian architecture, but several pre-Islamic examples bear testimony to their existence, as explained by him in the following manner:<ref>{{Cite book|title=Mahâbodhi, or the great Buddhist temple under the Bodhi tree at Buddha-Gaya|last=Cunningham|first=Alexander|publisher=W. H. Allen|year=1892|isbn=|location=London|pages=85}}</ref> | |||
# ]s | |||
{{Quote|text=Formerly it was the settled belief of all European enquirers that the ancient Hindus were ignorant of the Arch. This belief no doubt arose from the total absence of arches in any of the Hindu Temples. Thirty years ago I shared this belief with Mr. Fergusson, when I argued that the presence of arches in the great Buddhist Temple at Buddha Gaya proved that the building could not have been erected before the Muhammadan conquest. But during my late employment in the Archeological Survey of India several buildings of undoubted antiquity were discovered in which both vaults and arches formed part of the original construction.|sign=]|source=Mahâbodhi, or the great Buddhist temple under the Bodhi tree at Buddha-Gaya, 1892}} Archaeological evidences indicate that wedge shaped bricks and construction of wells in the Indus valley civilization and although no true arches have been discovered as of yet, these bricks would have been suitable in the construction of true arches.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=SzS6CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA58&dq=indus+valley+civilization+wells+true+arch#v=onepage&q=indus%20valley%20civilization%20wells%20true%20arch&f=false|title=The Indus: Lost Civilizations|last=Robinson|first=Andrew|date=2015-11-15|publisher=Reaktion Books|isbn=9781780235417|language=en}}</ref> True arch in India dates from ] period from 5th century BC. Arch fragment discovered by archaeologist ] from an arch with ] inscribed on it,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.20579/page/n109|title=Proceedinds And Transactions Of The Second Oriental Conference (1923)|last=|first=|date=1923|isbn=|location=|pages=86|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=The Calcutta Review Vol.10, No.1-3(april-june)1924|last=|first=|year=1924|isbn=|location=|pages=140}}</ref> or 1st - 2nd century CE when it first appeared in ] palace architecture from ] period.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dubey|first=Lal Mani|date=1978|title=SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE VESARA SCHOOL OF HINDU ARCHITECTURE|journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress|volume=39|pages=1000–1006|issn=2249-1937|jstor=44139449}}</ref> Arches present at ] temples at ], ] and ] temples from ] period and Hindu temple of ] bear testimony to the use arches in the Hindu temple architecture.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=1N95DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA4&dq=amb+temple+true+arch#v=onepage&q=amb%20temple%20true%20arch&f=false|title=Temples of the Indus: Studies in the Hindu Architecture of Ancient Pakistan|last=Meister|first=Michael W.|date=2010-07-26|publisher=BRILL|isbn=9789004190115|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/apac/photocoll/f/019pho000001003u00466000.html|title=Front view of a ruined temple, with sculptured slabs in foreground, Deo Baranark|last=Wright|first=Colin|website=www.bl.uk|access-date=2019-04-23}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/92037/_http___www_bl_uk_onlinegallery_onlineex_apac_photocoll_g_zoomify58580_html.html|title=General view of ruined temple at Deo Baranark|website=Europeana Collections|language=en|access-date=2019-04-23}}</ref> | |||
# Delicate ornamentation | |||
# ] | |||
# Stepwell or ] | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = left | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header = Rajput Forts | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Amber Palace 013.jpg | |||
| caption3 = ] | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Neemrana-Fort-Palace-Hills-Alwar-Rajasthan.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Neemrana Fort | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Jodhpur, Rajasthan - India (17933517794).jpg | |||
| caption1 = Jodhpur Fort | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 350 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
| image5 = Chittorgarh fort.JPG | |||
| caption5 = ] | |||
}} | |||
In Hindi, the "Chhatri" refers to a canopy or umbrella. Chhatris are the elevated pavilions with dome shaped porches. The Chhatris are used as a symbol to portray the fundamentals of admiration and pride in its style of architecture. | |||
Although Alexander Cunningham has persisted in the notion that the Buddhist ]'s pointed arch was added later during a Burmese restoration, given its predominant use in Islamic architecture, scholars such as Huu Phuoc Le have contested this assumption based on analysis that relieving arches could not have been added without destroying the entire temple structure, which is dated to 6th-7th century CE. Hence the pointed and relieving arches much have formed part of the original building dating from the pre-Islamic periods in proper.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Buddhist Architecture|last=Le|first=Huu Phuoc|publisher=Grafikol|year=2010|isbn=978-0984404308|location=USA|pages=246–247}}</ref><ref>Rowland, 163-164</ref> Moreover, pointed arches vaulted entrances have been noted in Bhitargaon temple and Kausambi Palace architecture as well.<ref name=":2" /><ref>{{Cite book|title=District Gazetteers Of The United Provinces Of Agra And Oudh Cawnpore Vol Xix|last=|first=|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=190}}</ref><gallery mode="packed" caption="Variety of Arches in Pre Islamic periods"> | |||
File:Bilot Fort Temple - Stone work 2.jpg|], ], ], 7th-9th century CE | |||
File:Kumrahar Mahabodhi plaque.jpg|], ], 1st-2nd century CE | |||
File:KITLV 88083 - Unknown - Mahabodhi stupa in the temple complex at the Buddhagaya Lilajan River in British India - 1897.tif|] ], 6th-7th century CE, Late-Gupta period | |||
File:Gupt kalin mandir bhitargaon.jpg|Semicircular arch, Bhitargaon temple, 4th-5th century CE | |||
File:AMB Temples, three temples inside fort small temple inside.jpg|Cinquefoil arches at Amb 7th-9th century CE, Hindu Shahi dynasty | |||
File:Gwalior, Teli-ka-Mandir 1 (1999).jpg|Teli ka mandir gate with particular Rajput style arch 8th century CE | |||
File:Gate of Teki Mandir, Gwalior Fort.jpg|Teli ka mandir gate with multifoil arch 8th century CE | |||
</gallery> | |||
A Jharokha is a kind of suspended enclosed gallery. A significant purposes it served was to allow women to witness the events and society outside the palace life without being noticed. This eventually lead to ], adapted by Mughals, which allowed essential and direct communication between the emperors or kings and the general public. | |||
=== Fortification === | |||
Evidence indicates that the construction of fortification walls at Dehli applied nearly the same principle at ] and ] as was the tradition during pre Islamic Rajput periods. Excavation of Lal Kot beneath the ] revealed ruins which was constructed using similar method as in the post Islamic and ].<gallery mode="packed" widths="200" heights="200" caption="Fortification of pre Islamic Lal Kot and Agra Fort of Mughal era"> | |||
File:Lal kot.png|] fortification walls were constructed using rubble core with dressed stone outer casing | |||
File:Lal kott.png|Lal Kot fort bastions | |||
File:Agra-Fort-10-Mauern-2018-gje.jpg|] used the same technique for fortification walls | |||
</gallery> | |||
The ] city of ] was formed in 1727 by Kacchwaha Rajput ruler ], and is "a unique example of traditional Hindu ]",<ref name="Michell1990">Michell, George (1990), ''The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu'', 1990, Penguin Books, pg −288-301 {{ISBN|0140081445}}</ref> following the precepts set out in much Hindu texts. Subsequently, the ], ], ], ] and ] were also built. ] also has several palaces, including the ], now a museum, built in the 18th century. | |||
==Late Middle Ages (1100 CE–1526 CE)== | |||
{{further|Indo-Islamic architecture|Hoysala architecture|Vijayanagara architecture}} | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:Sun Temple Main Structure, Konark, Orissa.jpg|] at ], ], built by Emperor ] (1238–1264 CE) of the ], it is now a ]. | |||
File:Warangal fort.jpg|] (Warangal Gate) built by the ] in ruins.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5889/|title=The Glorious Kakatiya Temples and Gateways|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> | |||
File:Le temple de Chennakesava (Somanathapura, Inde) (14465165685).jpg|] is a model example of the ]. | |||
File:View of the Virupaksha temple gopura from Hemakuta hill 2.JPG|Virupaksha temple, ''Raya Gopura'' (main tower over entrance gate) at ]. | |||
File:Elephant baluster at entrance into Buchesvara temple in Korvangala.jpg|Elephant balustrades in the ]. | |||
File:Chennakeshava Temple at Aralaguppe(stellate shrine wall).JPG|Stellate plan of the shrine in ]. | |||
File:BelurChennakeshavaTempel.jpg|Kesava temple at the ] has been an active temple since its founding. | |||
File:Krishna Pushkarani - Hampi Ruins.jpg|Vijayanagara marketplace at ], along with the sacred tank located on the side of Krishna temple. | |||
File:The Stone Chariot,Hampi.jpg|Stone ] in Vitthala Temple at Hampi. | |||
</gallery> | |||
Rajput architecture continued well into the 20th and 21st centuries, as the rulers of the ]s of ] commissioned vast palaces and other buildings, such as the ], ], and ]. These usually incorporated European styles as well, a practice which eventually led to the ] | |||
=== Hoysala architecture === | |||
Hoysala architecture is the distinctive building style developed under the rule of the ] in the region historically known as ''Karnata'', today's ], India, between the 11th and the 14th centuries.<ref>] (2008), . 2009-10-31.</ref> Large and small temples built during this era remain as examples of the Hoysala architectural style, including the ] at ], the ] at ], and the ] at ]. Other examples of fine Hoysala craftmanship are the temples at ], ], and ]. Study of the Hoysala architectural style has revealed a negligible Indo-Aryan influence while the impact of Southern Indian style is more distinct.<ref name="distinct">See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's ''A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present'', p. 134.</ref> A feature of Hoysala temple architecture is its attention to detail and skilled craftsmanship. The temples of Belur and Halebidu are proposed ] ].<ref name="heritage"></ref> Approximately 100 Hoysala temples survive today.<ref>Foekema, 16</ref> | |||
=== |
=== Sikh Architecture === | ||
{{Main|Sikh architecture}} | |||
] from the top of the southern ], looking north. The temple was rebuilt by the Vijayanagar Empire and an example of ].|alt=aerial image of a temple campus.]] | |||
] in Amritsar]] | |||
Vijayanagara Architecture of the period (1336–1565 CE) was a notable building style evolved by the ] that ruled most of ] from their capital at ] on the banks of the ] in present-day ].<ref>See ] in Sūryanātha Kāmat's ''A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present'', p. 132.</ref> The architecture of the temples built during the reign of the Vijayanagara empire had elements of political authority.<ref>See Carla Sinopoli, ''Echoes of Empire: Vijayanagara and Historical Memory, Vijayanagara as Historical Memory'', p. 26.</ref> This resulted in the creation of a distinctive imperial style of architecture which featured prominently not only in temples but also in administrative structures across the ].<ref>See Carla Sinopoli, ''The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India, C. 1350–1650'', p. 209.</ref> The Vijayanagara style is a combination of the ], ], ] and ] styles which evolved earlier in the centuries when these empires ruled and is characterised by a return to the simplistic and serene art of the past.<ref name="blossom">See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's ''A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present'', p. 182.</ref> | |||
] is heavily influenced by ] and ] styles. The ], ]es, in-lay work, and multi-foil arches, are Mughal influences, more specially from ]'s period, whereas '']'', oriel windows, bracket supported eaves at the string-course, and ornamented friezes are derived from elements of ]. Apart from religious buildings, Sikh architecture includes secular ], ''bungas'' (residential places), palaces, and colleges. | |||
====Gurudwara==== | |||
=== Early Indo-Islamic architecture === | |||
The religious structure is called '']'' (a place where the Guru dwells). The word ''gurdwara'' is a compound of ''guru'' (guide or master) and ''dwara'' (gateway or seat). The ] in Amritsar and ] are examples. | |||
The earliest examples of ] were constructed during this period by the ]s, most famously the ], which was designated a ] in 1993. The complex consists of ], a brick minaret commissioned by ], as well as other monuments built by successive Delhi Sultans.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/233|title=Qutb Minar and its Monuments, Delhi|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=18 July 2018}}</ref> ], a minaret twice the size of ] was commissioned by ] but never completed. Other examples include the ] and ]. | |||
] is a 17th-century nine-storeyed Gurudwara in Amritsar.]] | |||
== Early Modern period (1500 CE–1858 CE) == | |||
Gurdwara buildings do not have to conform to any set architectural design. The only established requirements are: the installation of the Granth Sahib under a canopy or in a canopied seat, usually on a platform higher than the specific floor on which the devotees sit, and a tall Sikh pennant flag atop the building. | |||
===Rajput architecture=== | |||
the ] architecture and painting influenced indigenous Rajput styles of art and architecture.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=orBAYzCRJhIC&pg=PA7&dq=Rajput+architecture+was+influenced+by+Islamic+architecture#v=onepage&q=Rajput%20architecture%20was%20influenced%20by%20Islamic%20architecture&f=false|title=The Art of South and Southeast Asia: A Resource for Educators|last=Kossak|first=Steven|last2=Watts|first2=Edith Whitney|date=2001|publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art|isbn=9780870999925|language=en}}</ref> | |||
Rajput Architecture represents different types of buildings, which may broadly be classed either as secular or religious. The secular buildings are of various scales. These include temples, forts, stepwells, gardens, and palaces. The forts were specially built for defense and military purposes due to the ]. | |||
In the 21st century, more and more gurdwaras (especially within India) have been following the Harimandir Sahib pattern, a synthesis of Indo-Islamic and Sikh architecture. Most of them have square halls, stand on a higher plinth, have entrances on all four sides, and have square or octagonal domed sanctums usually in the middle. During recent decades, to meet the requirements of larger gatherings, bigger and better ventilated assembly halls, with the sanctum at one end, have become accepted style. The location of the sanctum, more often than not, is such as to allow space for circumambulation. Sometimes, to augment the space, verandahs are built to skirt the hall. A popular model for the dome is the ribbed lotus, topped by an ornamental pinnacle. Arched copings, kiosks and solid domelets are used for exterior decorations. | |||
Rajput Architecture continued well into the 20th and 21st centuries, as the rulers of the ] of ] commissioned vast palaces and other buildings, such as the ], ], and ]. These usually incorporated European styles as well, a practice which eventually led to the ]. | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:Walls of Kumbhalgarh.jpg|Built during the course of the 15th century by ], the walls of the fort of ] extend over 38 km, claimed to be the second-longest continuous wall after the ]. | |||
File:Temple de Shanthinath.jpg|] is an imposing victory monument located within ]. | |||
File:Amber Fort (आमेर का किला ).jpg|] is known for its artistic ] style elements.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/247/|title=Hill Forts of Rajasthan|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-12}}</ref> | |||
File:Udaipur City Palace.jpg|] was constructed by ] after shifting his capital to ] due to Muslim invasion. | |||
File:Pritam niwas with.jpg|''Chandramahal'' in ], built by ] Rajputs. | |||
File:Mehrangarh Fort.jpg|The ] at ] was built by ] in 1459 CE. | |||
File:Chaumukha Jain temple at Ranakpur in Aravalli range near Udaipur Rajasthan India.jpg|] was built in the 15th century with the support of the Rajput state of ]. | |||
File:Chaturbhuj Temple, Orchha.jpg|] dedicated to ] was the tallest structure in the Indian subcontinent from 1558 CE to 1970 CE. | |||
File:Laxmi Niwas Palace.jpg|], was built in ] style, was commissioned by the Maharaja of ]. | |||
</gallery> | |||
=== Maratha Architecture === | |||
===Buddhist architecture=== | |||
] palace fort in ]]] | |||
{{further|Buddhist architecture}} | |||
The ] from 17th to 19th Centuries, emerged after the Maratha's victory over the ] in the ], Prominent buildings such as the ] and ] in ] are examples. The decorative features of the mansions were “pointed arches, heavy carved stone brackets, narrow balconies projecting on rows of such brackets, domical shallow ceilings resting on a variety of squinches, the chief being the interwoven type”. | |||
Buddhist architecture developed in the ]. Three types of structures are associated with the ] of ]: monasteries (]s), places to venerate relics (]s), and shrines or prayer halls (]s, also called ''chaitya grihas''), which later came to be called temples in some places. The initial function of a stupa was the veneration and safe-guarding of the relics of ]. The earliest surviving example of a stupa is in ] (]). In accordance with changes in religious practice, stupas were gradually incorporated into chaitya-grihas (prayer halls). These are exemplified by the complexes of the ] and the ] (]). The ] at ] in ] is another well-known example. The ] is an evolution of the Indian stupa. | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:Ladakh Monastery.jpg|] is the largest ] in ], built in the 1500s. | |||
File:Tawang Monastery (Tibetan Buddhist).jpg|] in ], was built in the 1600s, is the largest monastery in India and second largest in the world after the ] in ], ]. | |||
File:Vikramjit-Kakati-Rumtek.jpg|] in ] was built under the direction of ] in the mid-1700s.<ref>Achary Tsultsem Gyatso; Mullard, Saul & Tsewang Paljor (Transl.): A Short Biography of Four Tibetan Lamas and Their Activities in Sikkim, in: Bulletin of Tibetology Nr. 49, 2/2005, p. 57.</ref> | |||
</gallery> | |||
Many ] were rebuilt by the Marathas after being destroyed by invading Islamic forces. Some examples are the ], ], ], ] temples. The ] were also rebuilt under Maratha patronage, including the ] and ]. | |||
==== Mughal Empire ==== | |||
{{Further|Mughal architecture}} | |||
], ], the first fully developed Mughal imperial tomb, 1569–70 CE.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/232/|title=Humayun's Tomb, Delhi|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190228192141/http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/232/|archive-date=2019-02-28|dead-url=no|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref>]] | |||
The most famous Indo-Islamic style is ]. Its most prominent examples are the series of imperial ], which started with the pivotal ], but is best known for the ]. It is known for features including monumental buildings surrounded by ], and delicate ornamentation work, including ] decorative work and '']''-latticed screens. | |||
] was the main residence of the ] for nearly 200 years, until 1856.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/express-sunday-eye/whose-fort-is-it-anyway-red-fort-controversy-5200389/|title=Whose fort is it anyway|last1=Mukherjee|first1=Anisha|date=3 June 2018|publisher=The Indian Express}}</ref>]] | |||
The ] at ] (1565–74) and the walled city of ] (1569–74)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/255/|title=Fatehpur Sikri|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-12}}</ref> are among the architectural achievements of this time—as is the ], built as a tomb for Queen ] by ] (1628–58).<ref name="eb-mughalarch">Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), ''Mughal architecture''.</ref> Employing the double dome, the recessed archway, the depiction of any animal or human—an essential part of the Indian tradition—was ]. The Taj Mahal does contain tilework of plant ornaments.<ref name="rjadhav" /> The ] during the Mughal Period, with its rulers being of Turco-Mongol origin, has shown a notable blend of Indian style combined with the ]. Taj Mahal in Agra, India is one of the wonders of the world.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/252/|title=Taj Mahal|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref> | |||
The Maratha structures used both the local architectural style and the Maratha's own distinct corinthian columns style. Because of the constant turmoil and protracted wars with Mughals, ]s, ], and other forces, very little documentation of these efforts remain. Nevertheless, studies of these structures show that the main architectural elements were made from brick, wood, mortar and stone. Wood was most used element as it is easily and cheaply available in ] and ]. The Historian ] wrote about enchanting beauty of ] wooden ], ] and ] However very few of these survived due to wars with ] and comparatively short life of wooden structures than stone and marble structures. Forts were the main focus of Maratha architecture, decorated with ]-style pointed arches and elaborate woodwork. | |||
==== Regional styles ==== | |||
The ] and ] in the Southern regions of the Indian subcontinent developed the Indo-Islamic architectural styles of the Deccan. The notable examples are ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="michell_77">Michell, George & Mark Zebrowski. Architecture and Art of the Deccan Sultanates (The New Cambridge History of India Vol. I:7), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, {{ISBN|0-521-56321-6}}, p. 14 & pp. 77–80.</ref> | |||
Herman Goetz writes about their architectural style in his work ‘Five Thousand Years of Indian Art’: “The ] temples generally provided with a huge lampstand (deepmala), The wood work they used to decorate their palaces and other civil buildings was intricate and minute. Maratha art could have developed and attained a distinctive character but it was not possible because of the turbulent times of ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.preservearticles.com/notes/short-notes-on-architecture-of-marathas/14139|title=Short notes on Architecture of Marathas|date=29 October 2011|accessdate=4 April 2023}}</ref> | |||
Within the ], the ] region developed a distinct regional style under the independent Bengal Sultanate. It incorporated influences from Persia, Byzantium and North India,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Architecture|title=Architecture - Banglapedia|website=En.banglapedia.org|accessdate=30 December 2017}}</ref> which were with blended indigenous Bengali elements, such as curved roofs, corner towers and complex ] ornamentation. One feature in the sultanate was the relative absence of minarets.<ref name="Hasan, Perween 2007 p. 23-27">Hasan, Perween (2007). Sultans and Mosques:The Early Muslim Architecture of Bangladesh. United Kingdom: I.B. Tauris. p. 23–27. {{ISBN|1-84511-381-0}}.</ref> Many small and medium-sized medieval mosques, with multiple domes and artistic ] ]s, were constructed throughout the region.<ref name="Hasan, Perween 2007 p. 23-27"/> The grand mosque of Bengal was the 14th century ], the largest mosque in the Indian subcontinent. Built of stone demolished from temples, it featured a monumental ribbed barrel vault over the central nave, the first such giant vault used anywhere in the subcontinent. The mosque was modeled on the imperial ] style of Persia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bengal|title=BENGAL – Encyclopaedia Iranica|website=Iranicaonline.org|accessdate=30 December 2017}}</ref> The Sultanate style flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. A provincial style influenced by North India evolved in Mughal Bengal during the 17th and 18th centuries. The Mughals also copied the Bengali ] roof tradition for mausoleums in North India.<ref>Petersen, Andrew (2002). Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. Routledge. pp. 33–35. {{ISBN|1-134-61366-0}}.</ref> | |||
=== Dzong Architecture === | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
{{Main|Dzong architecture}} | |||
File:Fatehput Sikiri Buland Darwaza gate 2010.jpg|] was built by ] to commemorate his victory over the ]. | |||
Dzongs are a type of fortified monastery with a distinctive architecture that are found mainly in Tibet, Bhutan and North and Northeastern part of India. The architecture is massive in style with towering exterior walls surrounding a complex of courtyards, temples, administrative offices, and monks' accommodation.], ]|left]]'''Distinctive features include:''' | |||
File:Taj Mahal (Edited).jpeg|The ] | |||
* High inward sloping walls of brick and stone painted white with few or no windows in the lower sections of the wall | |||
File:GolGumbaz2.jpg|] built by the ] in Deccani style, the world's 2nd largest pre-modern dome.{{#tag:ref|After the Byzantine ].|group=note}} | |||
* Use of a surrounding red ochre stripe near the top of the walls, sometimes punctuated by large gold circles | |||
File:Charminar-Pride of Hyderabad.jpg|] at Old City in ], legend has it that it was built by ] to commemorate the end of a plague that ravaged the city. | |||
* Use of unique style flared roofs atop interior temples | |||
File:Malda ~ Adina Mosque 5.JPG|], the largest mosque of ]. | |||
* Massive entry doors made of wood and iron | |||
* Interior courtyards and temples brightly colored in Buddhist-themed art ] such as the ] or ] | |||
By tradition, dzongs are constructed without the use of architectural plans. Instead construction proceeds under the direction of a high lama who establishes each dimension by means of spiritual inspiration. Dzongs comprise heavy masonry walls surrounding one or more courtyards. The main functional spaces are usually arranged in two separate areas: the administrative offices; and the religious functions – including temples and monks' accommodation. This division between administrative and religious functions reflects the idealized ] between the religious and administrative branches of government. | |||
This accommodation is arranged along the inside of the outer walls and often as a separate stone tower located centrally within the courtyard, housing the main temple, that can be used as an inner defensible citadel. The roofs are massively constructed in hardwood and bamboo, highly decorated at the eaves, and are constructed traditionally without the use of nails. They are open at the eaves to provide a ventilated storage area. They were traditionally finished with timber shingles weighted down with stones | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="140" class="center"> | |||
File:The 9 Stupas.jpg|Stupas in Thikse Monastery | |||
File:Ralong Monastry (36).jpg|], Sikkim | |||
File:Tawang Monastery3.JPG|], ] | |||
File:Tawang Monastery assembly hall.jpg|Tawang Monastery assembly hall | |||
File:Devoting oneself to the path of god.jpg|Prayer hall at the ], a Tibetan settlement in Karnataka | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
=== |
=== Bengal Architecture === | ||
{{Main|Architecture of Bengal}} | |||
{{multiple image | |||
] | |||
| align = right | |||
The '''architecture of Bengal''', which comprises the modern country of ] and the ] of ], ], and ] in ], has a long and rich history, blending indigenous elements from the ], with influences from different parts of the world. Bengali architecture includes ancient urban architecture, religious architecture, rural ], colonial ]s and ]s, and modern urban styles.<ref name="Amit">{{citation |url=http://www.aishee.org/essays/classification.php |title=Classification of Terracotta Temples |author=Amit Guha |access-date=30 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160131235044/http://www.aishee.org/essays/classification.php |archive-date=31 January 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
| image1 = Shaniwarwada gate.JPG | |||
| width1 = 200 | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = ] palace fort in ], it was the seat of the Peshwa rulers of the Maratha Empire until 1818. | |||
| image2 = Thanjavur Maratha Palace Darbar Hall.jpg | |||
| width2 = 200 | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption2 = ] is the official residence of the Bhonsle family. | |||
| footer = | |||
}} | |||
The Marathas ruled over much of the ] from the mid-17th to the early 19th centuries.<ref name="XWiACEwPR8C p.16"></ref> Their religious activity took full shape and soon the skylines of Maharashtrian towns were dominated by rising temple spires. Old forms returned with this 'renewal' of Hindu architecture, infused by the Sultanate and later the Mughal traditions. The architecture of Maratha period was planned with courtyards suited to tropical climates. The Maratha Architecture is known for its simplicity, visible logic and austere aesthetic, made rich by beautiful detailing, rhythm, and repetition. The aisles and arcades, punctured by delicate niches, doors, and windows create space in which the articulation of open, semi-open and covered areas is effortless and enchanting. The materials used during those times for construction were thin bricks, lime mortar, lime plaster, wooden columns, stone bases, basalt stone flooring and brick pavements | |||
Ancient Bengali architecture reached its pinnacle during the ] (750–1120); this was Bengali-based and the last Buddhist imperial power in the Indian subcontinent. Most patronage was of Buddhist ]s, temples and ]s. Pala architecture influenced Tibetan and Southeast Asian architecture.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}} The most famous monument built by the Pala emperors was the ], now a ]. Historians believe ] was a model for the architects of ] in Cambodia. | |||
Maharashtra is famous for its caves and rock-cut architectures. It is said that the varieties found in Maharashtra are wider than the caves and rock-cut architectures found in the rock-cut areas of Egypt, Assyria, Persia, and Greece. The Buddhist monks first started these caves in the 2nd century BC, in search of serene and peaceful environment for meditation, and they found these caves on the hillsides. | |||
'''Distinctive architectural elements are:-''' | |||
===Sikh architecture=== | |||
* '''Deul Temple''' - Originally influenced by Kalinga style, they were main temple style during 6th-10th century. It was the style of ] and ] of Bengal, where the temple lacks the usual ] beside the main shrine, and the main unit consists only of the shrine and a '']'' (shikhara) above it. It was revived in the 16th to 19th century. The later representatives of this style were generally smaller and included features influenced by Islamic architecture. | |||
* '''Chala Temple''' - ] or Hut style temples were influenced by the vernacular architecture or rural Bengal. Thatched rooftops of the houses were either in form of ''do-chala'' type which has only two hanging roof tips on each side of a roof divided in the middle by a ridge or '']'' type, the two roof halves are fused into one unit and have a dome-like shape. The ''char-chala'' temples started coming up around the 17th century and profoundly adopted by Mughal and later the Rajput in their architectural styles. | |||
* '''Ratna Temple''' - The curved roof of the temple is surmounted by one or more towers or pinnacles called ''ratna'' (jewel). The '']'' style came up in the 15th-16th century. It was basically a mix of chala and deul architecture where small deul, or in some case domes, were used on the centre or corners of the chala (char chala) roof. | |||
* '''Dalan Temple''' - With the comings of European colonists, a new form of temple style took place. Generally used by ] or elite Bengalis, Dalan style became prominent in the 19th century. The flat-roofed (dalan) temples was easier to build and had incorporated many European elements, specially the arches. In the long run, this style lost its special identity as religious architecture and got mixed up with domestic architecture. | |||
{{multiple image | {{multiple image | ||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 350 | |||
| caption_align = centre | |||
| align = right | | align = right | ||
| image_style = border:none; | |||
| image1 = Sarovar and the Golden Temple.jpg | |||
| image1 = Rasmancha Bishnupur (38294403222).jpg | |||
| width1 = 200 | |||
| caption1 = Pyramidal shaped structure over ] | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image2 = Jor Bangla Temple Arches Bishnupur.JPG | |||
| caption1 = ] is culturally the most significant place of worship for the ]. | |||
| caption2 = Terracota work at a temple of Jor Bangla | |||
| image2 = Akal takhat amritsar.jpg | |||
| image4 = Jorbangla Bishnupur WB From left Side.jpg | |||
| width2 = 200 | |||
| caption4 = Jorbangla (Douchala style) Temple | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image6 = Hangseswari Temple, Bansberia.jpg | |||
| caption2 = ] is one of five ] (seats of power) of the Sikhs. | |||
| caption6 = ], Ratna Temple | |||
| footer = | |||
| footer = | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| image3 = Pakbirra Jain Shrine of Purulia 03 (cropped).jpg | |||
| image5 = Madan Mohan Temple of Cooch Behar Town at Cooch Behar district in West Bengal 03.jpg | |||
| caption5 = Flat roofed dalan with dome, Madan Mohan Temple | |||
| caption3 = Pakbirra Jain Shrine, Deul Temple | |||
| header = Distinct Bengali Temple Style | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{further|Sikh architecture}} | |||
Sikh Architecture is a style of architecture that is characterized by values of ]ness, exquisite intricacy, austere beauty and logical flowing lines. Due to its ] style, it is constantly evolving into many newly developing branches with new ] styles. Although Sikh architecture was initially developed within ] its style has been used in many non-religious buildings due to its beauty. 300 years ago, Sikh architecture was distinguished for its many curves and straight lines; ] and the Sri ] (]) are prime examples. | |||
Deuls are located in the numerous rivers crisscrossed by stone-free alluvial and bush landscape of the southern ] in the ]n state of ]. | |||
Sikh architecture is heavily influenced by ] and ] styles of architecture. The use of ], ], multi-foil arches, paired pilasters, in-lay work, are of Mughal origin while '']'', oriel windows and ornamented friezes, are a Rajput influence.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927230013/http://www.sikhspectrum.com/022004/architecture_art.htm|title=An outline of Sikh architecture|last=Bhatti|first=S. S.|date=2007-09-27|website=sikhspectrum.com|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-01-02}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
Most temples surviving in reasonable condition date from about the 17th century onwards, after temple building revived; it had stopped after the Muslim conquest in the 13th century. The roofing style of Bengali ] is unique and closely related to the paddy roofed traditional building style of rural Bengal. The "extensive improvisation within a local architectural idiom" which the temples exhibit is often ascribed to a local shortage of expert ] priests to provide the rather rigid guidance as to correct forms that governed temple architecture elsewhere. In the same way the terracotta reliefs often depict secular subjects in a very lively fashion. | |||
In larger, and later, temples, small towers rise up from the centre or corners of the curving roof. These are straight-sided, often with conical roofs. They have little resemblance to a typical north Indian ] temple tower. The ] ("five towers") and ] ("nine towers") styles are varieties of this type. | |||
==European colonial architecture== | |||
The ] style is a notable architectural export of Bengal. The corner towers of Bengali religious buildings were replicated in medieval Southeast Asia. ], suitable for the very heavy rains, were adopted into a distinct local style of ], and used decoratively elsewhere in north India in ].<ref name="Petersen2002">{{cite book |author=Andrew Petersen |year=2002 |title=Dictionary of Islamic Architecture |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9A-EAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA34 |publisher=Routledge |page=34 |isbn=978-1-134-61365-6}}</ref> | |||
Structures like ], built by King Bir Hambir, has an unusual elongated pyramidical tower, surrounded by hut-shaped turrets, which were very typical of Bengali roof structures of the time. Madan Mohan Temple was built in the ''ekaratna'' style, surmounted by a pinnacle along with carvings on the walls depicting scenes from the ], ] and the ]. Temples like ], features the Navratna style of roof. | |||
Bengal is not rich in good stone for building, and traditional Bengali architecture mostly uses brick and wood, often reflecting the styles of the wood, bamboo and thatch styles of local ] for houses. Decorative carved or ] plaques of ] (the same material as the brick) are a special feature. The brick is extremely durable and disused ancient buildings were often used as a convenient source of materials by local people, often being stripped to their foundations over the centuries. | |||
== European colonial architecture == | |||
As with the Mughals, under European colonial rule, architecture became an emblem of power, designed to endorse the occupying power. Numerous European countries invaded India and created architectural styles reflective of their ancestral and adopted homes. The European colonizers created architecture that symbolized their mission of conquest, dedicated to the state or religion.{{sfn|Thapar|2004|p=122}} | As with the Mughals, under European colonial rule, architecture became an emblem of power, designed to endorse the occupying power. Numerous European countries invaded India and created architectural styles reflective of their ancestral and adopted homes. The European colonizers created architecture that symbolized their mission of conquest, dedicated to the state or religion.{{sfn|Thapar|2004|p=122}} | ||
The British, French, Dutch and the Portuguese were the main European powers that |
The British, French, Dutch and the Portuguese were the main European powers that established ].{{sfn|Nilsson|1968|p=9}}<ref name="Asian Trade">{{cite web|title=(Brief) History of European – Asian trade|url=http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~vaucher/Genealogy/Documents/Asia/EuropeanExploration.html#england|work=European Exploration|access-date=14 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111017155402/http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~vaucher/Genealogy/Documents/Asia/EuropeanExploration.html#england|archive-date=17 October 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
===British Colonial Era: |
=== British Colonial Era: 1757–1947 === | ||
==== Indo-Saracenic ==== | |||
{{Further|Indo-Saracenic Revival architecture}} | |||
{{multiple image | {{multiple image | ||
| header = ] | | header = ] | ||
| image1 = Rashtrapati Bhavan flank perspective1.jpg | | image1 = Rashtrapati Bhavan flank perspective1.jpg | ||
| caption1 = The ] was built for the |
| caption1 = The Viceroy's House (now ]) was built for the ]. It now serves as the official residence of the ]. | ||
| image2 = India Gate in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg | | image2 = India Gate in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg | ||
| caption2 = ] is a memorial to 70,000 soldiers of the ] who died in the First World War | | caption2 = The War Memorial Arch (now ]) is a memorial to 70,000 soldiers of the ] who died in the First World War. | ||
| image3 = Indian Ministry of Defence-1.jpg | | image3 = Indian Ministry of Defence-1.jpg | ||
| caption3 = The ] is located in the North Block. | | caption3 = The ] is located in the North Block. | ||
| align = |
| align = | ||
| direction = |
| direction = | ||
| width = |
| width = | ||
| perrow = 2 | | perrow = 2 | ||
| total_width = |
| total_width = 290 | ||
| caption_align = center | | caption_align = center | ||
| header_align = center | | header_align = center | ||
| footer_align = center | | footer_align = center | ||
| footer = ],designed by ], houses all key government buildings of India. | | footer = ], designed by ], houses all key government buildings of India. | ||
| image4 = New Delhi government block 03-2016 img3.jpg | | image4 = New Delhi government block 03-2016 img3.jpg | ||
| caption4 = ] |
| caption4 = The Council House, built for the ], is now ], and houses the ]. | ||
}} | }} | ||
The British arrived in 1615 and over the centuries, gradually overthrew the ] and ] empires and other small independent kingdoms. Britain was present in India for over three hundred years and their legacy still remains through some building and infrastructure that exist in their former colonies.{{sfn|Jaffar|1936|p=230}} The major cities colonized during this period were Madras, Calcutta, Bombay, Delhi, Agra, Bankipore, Karachi, Nagpur, Bhopal and Hyderabad,{{sfn|Tadgell|1990|p=14}}<ref name="Asian Trade" /> which saw the rise of ]. ] at ] designed by ] in the ] style and built in the late 19th century.|alt=|left]]Black Town described in 1855 as "the minor streets, occupied by the natives are numerous, irregular and of various dimensions. Many of them are extremely narrow and ill-ventilated ... a hallow square, the rooms opening into a courtyard in the centre."{{sfn|Evenson|1989|p=2}} Garden houses were originally used as weekend houses for recreational use by the upper class British. Nonetheless, the garden house became ideal a full-time dwelling, deserting the fort in the 19th Century.{{sfn|Evenson|1989|p=6}} | |||
Britain's legacy and heritage in the ] remains among others in buildings and infrastructure. The major cities during the period of British rule were ], ], ], ], Agra, ], Bankipore, Karachi, Nagpur, Bhopal& ],{{sfn|Tadgell|1990|p=14}}<ref name="Asian Trade" /> which saw the rise of ]. | |||
], (then known as Bombay) has some of the most prominent examples of British colonial architecture. This included the ] (], ], ], ], ]), ] (], ], ]) and ] (], ]).<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1480/|title=Victorian Gothic and Art Deco Ensembles of Mumbai|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180828023451/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1480/|archive-date=2018-08-28|dead-url=no|access-date=2019-01-02}}</ref> | |||
{{multiple image | |||
Calcutta – Madras and Calcutta were similarly bordered by water and division of Indian in the north and British in the south. An Englishwoman noted in 1750 "the banks of the river are as one may say absolutely studded with elegant mansions called here as at Madras, garden houses." Esplanade-row is fronts the fort with lined palaces.{{sfn|Evenson|1989|p=20}}<ref name="Dutta">{{cite journal|last=Dutta|first=Arindam|title=Representing Calcutta: Modernity, Nationalism and the Colonial Uncanny|journal=Journal of Architectural Education|date=29 March 2010|volume=63|issue=2|pages=167–169|doi=10.1111/j.1531-314X.2010.01082.x}}</ref> Indian villages in these areas consisted of clay and straw houses which later transformed into the metropolis of brick and stone.{{sfn|Nilsson|1968|pp=66–67}}] buildings are a prime example of ], designed by JW Brassington under the guidance of British architect ].|alt=]] | |||
| align = left | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| header = ] | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| image4 = Victoria Memorial Kolkata at night.jpg | |||
| caption4 = The ] in Calcutta is the most effective symbolism of British Empire. | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Chhatrapati_Shivaji_Terminus_%28Victoria_Terminus%29.jpg | |||
| caption3 = The ] (previously Victoria Terminus) in Mumbai, 1878–88, is a mixture of ], Gothic and Indian elements. | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Rashtrapati Niwas, Shimla.jpg | |||
| caption2 = The Viceregal Lodge, now ], in ] designed by ] in the ] style and built in the late 19th century. | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Chennai_High_Court.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ] buildings are a prime example of ], designed by JW Brassington under guidance of British architect ]. | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 200 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
Black Town described in 1855 as "the minor streets, occupied by the natives are numerous, irregular and of various dimensions. Many of them are extremely narrow and ill-ventilated ... a hallow square, the rooms opening into a courtyard in the centre."{{sfn|Evenson|1989|p=2}} Garden houses were originally used as weekend houses for recreational use by the upper class British. Nonetheless, the garden house became ideal a full-time dwelling, deserting the fort in the 19th Century.{{sfn|Evenson|1989|p=6}} | |||
==== Indo-Saracenic ==== | |||
{{further|Indo-Saracenic Revival architecture}}] evolved by combining Indian architectural features with European styles. ] and ] were pioneers in this style. | |||
] has some of the most prominent examples of British colonial architecture. This included the ] (], ], ], ], ]), ] (], ], ]) and ] (], ]).<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1480/|title=Victorian Gothic and Art Deco Ensembles of Mumbai|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180828023451/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1480/|archive-date=2018-08-28|url-status=live|access-date=2019-01-02}}</ref> | |||
The ] in Calcutta is the most effective symbolism of British Empire, built as a monument in tribute to Queen Victoria's reign. The plan of the building consists of one large central part covered with a larger dome. Colonnades separate the two chambers. Each corner holds a smaller dome and is floored with marble plinth. The memorial stands on 26 hectares of garden surrounded by reflective pools.{{sfn|Thapar|2004|p=129}} | |||
Madras and Calcutta were similarly bordered by water and division of Indian in the north and British in the south. An Englishwoman noted in 1750 "the banks of the river are as one may say absolutely studded with elegant mansions called here as at Madras, garden houses." Esplanade-row is fronts the fort with lined palaces.{{sfn|Evenson|1989|p=20}}<ref name="Dutta">{{cite journal|last=Dutta|first=Arindam|title=Representing Calcutta: Modernity, Nationalism and the Colonial Uncanny|journal=Journal of Architectural Education|date=29 March 2010|volume=63|issue=2|pages=167–169|doi=10.1111/j.1531-314X.2010.01082.x|s2cid=143881493}}</ref> Indian villages in these areas consisted of clay and straw houses which later transformed into the metropolis of brick and stone.{{sfn|Nilsson|1968|pp=66–67}}The ] in the city, designed by ], is said to be the first Indo-Saracenic building in India. Since then, many of the colonial-era buildings in the city were designed in this style of architecture, which is most apparent around the ] built in 1640. Most of these were designed by English architects Robert Fellowes Chisholm and Henry Irwin. The best examples of this style include the Madras High Court (built in 1892), Southern Railway headquarters, Ripon Building, Government Museum, Senate House of the University of Madras, Amir Mahal, Bharat Insurance Building, Victoria Public Hall and the College of Engineering. The Triumph of Labour, also known as the Labour statue, at the Marina Beach is an important landmark of Madras.] ] evolved by combining Indian architectural features with European styles. ] and ] were pioneers in this style. The ] in Calcutta is the most effective symbolism of British Empire, built as a monument in tribute to Queen Victoria's reign. The plan of the building consists of one large central part covered with a larger dome. Colonnades separate the two chambers. Each corner holds a smaller dome and is floored with marble plinth. The memorial stands on 26 hectares of garden surrounded by reflective pools.{{sfn|Thapar|2004|p=129}} | |||
The period of British rule saw wealthy Bengali families (especially ]) employing European firms to design houses and palaces. The Indo-Saracenic movement was strongly prevalent in the region. While most rural estates featured an elegant country house, the cities of Calcutta had widespread 19th and early 20th century urban architecture, comparable to London, Sydney or Auckland. Art deco influences began in Calcutta in the 1930s. | |||
==== Romanesque-Italianate ==== | |||
The Italianate architectural style was popularised in early Victorian Britain and subsequently became an attractive form ] in the later parts of the 19th century. The main characteristics of this style include imposing cornice structures, prominent cornice and corbels, Roman arches, arch headed or pedimented windows, flat or ‘hip’ roof, and windows with distinctive moulded caps. The one outstanding building in this class was the East Indian Railway Head Offices at Calcutta built in 1884.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Monuments of Modern India: The first half century of railways architecture – Heritage Directorate, Indian Railways|url=https://artsandculture.google.com/exhibit/monuments-of-modern-india-the-first-half-century-of-railways-architecture/QgLCjuErJgqXLw|access-date=2021-03-31|website=Google Arts & Culture|language=en|archive-date=22 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220122124303/https://artsandculture.google.com/exhibit/monuments-of-modern-india-the-first-half-century-of-railways-architecture/QgLCjuErJgqXLw|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==== Neoclassical ==== | ==== Neoclassical ==== | ||
Examples of ] |
Neoclassical buildings are characterized by their magnificence of scale, the prominent use of columns, the use of geometric forms and symmetry, predominantly blank walls and the triangular pediment. Some large private houses were built in and around ] by wealthy merchants. Examples of ] in Indian public buildings include the ] (1798) and ] (1893) in Hyderabad, ] in Madras (1821),{{sfn|Thapar|2004|p=125}} ] (1803) and ] (1844) in Kolkata, and ] (1935) in Bangalore. | ||
{{multiple image | |||
==== Art Deco ==== | |||
| align = right | |||
The ] movement of the early 20th century quickly spread to large parts of the world. The ], founded in Bombay in 1929, played a prominent role in propagating the movement. The ], ] and buildings along the ] in Mumbai are prime examples.<ref name=":0" /><gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
File:Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (Victoria Terminus).jpg|The Victoria Terminus (now ]) in Mumbai, designed in the ] style by ] in the late 19th century.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/945/|title=Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (formerly Victoria Terminus)|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190228192234/http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/945/|archive-date=2019-02-28|dead-url=no|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref> | |||
| header_align = center | |||
File:Victoria by nabarun.jpg|The ] in ] was designed by ], and built between 1906 and 1921. It was inspired by the ]. | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
File:Mumbai 03-2016 31 Gateway of India.jpg|] was a monument erected in 1911 to commemorate the landing of ] and ]. It was designed by ] in the ] style. | |||
| total_width = 320 | |||
File:Falaknuma Palace 01.jpg|The ] in ], built between 1884 and 1893 in the ] style, was a residence of the ]. | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
File:UmaidBhawan Exterior 1.jpg|The ] at ], built between 1929 and 1942 is one of the largest royal palaces in the world. It was designed by ] in a blend of ] and traditional Rajasthani styles. | |||
| alt1 = | |||
</gallery> | |||
| image1 = Samriddhi Bhavan - River Hooghly 2012-10-23 1265.JPG | |||
| caption1 = Samriddhi Bhavan, ](right), Secretariat(left) on River Hooghly | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = National Library, Calcutta 2007.jpg | |||
| caption2 = ] | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Falaknuma Palace (23256520932).jpg | |||
| caption3 = ], Hyderabad | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| caption4 = Mumbai University | |||
| image4 = Mumbai 03-2016 37 University.jpg | |||
| header = Neoclassicism | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
=== Art Deco === | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| total_width = 320 | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Esplanade-Mansion-side-view-Kolkata.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ] | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Eros Cinema (6676751065).jpg | |||
| caption2 = ] | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Mumbai_03-2016_44_Marine_Drive.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Art Deco style apartments in Marine Drive, Mumbai | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| alt5 = | |||
| caption5 = Parrys Corner, Chennai | |||
| image5 = Parrys Corner, Chennai, India.jpg | |||
| header = Art Deco | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
The ] movement of the early 20th century quickly spread to large parts of the world. The ], founded in Bombay in 1929, played a prominent role in propagating the movement. Guided by their desire to emulate the west, the Indian architects were fascinated by the industrial modernity that Art Deco offered. The western elites were the first to experiment with the technologically advanced facets of Art Deco, and architects began the process of transformation by the early 1930s. | |||
Mumbai has the world's second-largest collection of Art Deco structures, after Miami.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Chandrashekhar|first=Vaishnavi|date=2019-10-21|title=Discovering Mumbai's Art Deco Treasures|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/21/travel/mumbai-art-deco.html|access-date=2021-03-31|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=24 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210124024408/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/21/travel/mumbai-art-deco.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The ], ] and buildings along the ] in Mumbai are prime examples.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
In Kolkata, the sole example of the ], which preceded Art Deco, is the Esplanade Mansions opposite the Raj Bhavan, built in 1910. | |||
=== Assam-type === | |||
Assam-type architecture is found in ] and ]. The houses constructed using this style are generally termed as ''Assam-type'' houses, consisting usually one or more ]s. The houses are built to be ], and are made from materials ranging from ] and bamboo to steel and concrete. | |||
Assam Type houses are a type of designs developed by the colonial British administration in Assam after the massive ]. British engineers modified the traditional Assamese houses made from mud-plastered ] walls and thatched roofs to make Assam Type houses with wood, reed, mud plaster and hay after studying the climate and topography of the entire region. | |||
Buildings are constructed on both flat and sloped ]s. On flat grounds, the buildings are typically rectangular or ''L or C'' layout. On other surfaces, such as ]s, they are usually rectangular in shape, accessed via the hillside. The roof is typically erected by high ]s to overcome heavy rainfall in the region, where ]s are usually ], ]ed with ]. With high ]s and ] ]s, the floorings are either wooden or concrete with ], ] or ] surfacing with ]. | |||
=== Other Colonial Powers === | |||
Among the other European colonies were ] and ]. The ], ] & ] in Bombay are remnants of Portuguese colonial rule. The ], an ensemble of seven churches built by the Portuguese in Goa are a ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/234/|title=Churches and Convents of Goa|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190104191222/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/234|archive-date=2019-01-04|url-status=live|access-date=2019-01-02}}</ref> | |||
The Portuguese were among the first European traders to discover the sea route to India as early as 1498. The first Portuguese encounter with the subcontinent was on 20 May 1498 AD, when ] reached ] on the coast of the ]. | |||
The settlements along the ] — a branch of the Ganges — attracted maritime traders from as many European nations, turning that part of Bengal into a little Europe. The Portuguese set up post at ], the Danish at ], the Dutch at ] and the French at ]. A British military base came up in Barrackpore. Thus influencing neighbouring regions' architecture to create a distinct indo-colonial architecture.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Fort Feringhee|url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/west-bengal/fort-feringhee/cid/1723256|access-date=2021-03-31|work=The Telegraph|archive-date=7 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210307220408/https://www.telegraphindia.com/west-bengal/fort-feringhee/cid/1723256|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The history of Pondicherry is recorded only after the arrival of Dutch, Portuguese, British and French traders. In 1674 the ] set up a trading centre at Pondicherry and this outpost eventually became the administrative centre of ]. The city has many colonial buildings, churches, temples and statues which, combined with the town planning and French style avenues in the old part of town, still preserve much of the colonial ambiance. | |||
=== Other Colonial powers === | |||
The ] had ], including ] and ]. The ], ], and ] in Mumbai are remnants of Portuguese Colonial rule. The ], an ensemble of seven churches built by the Portuguese in Goa are a ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/234/|title=Churches and Convents of Goa|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190104191222/http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/234|archive-date=2019-01-04|dead-url=no|access-date=2019-01-02}}</ref> | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="160"> | |||
==Republic of India (1947 CE–present)== | |||
File:The Chandannagar Strand Ghat.jpg|The Chandannagar Strand Ghat, reminiscences of a ], ] | |||
{{further|List of World Heritage Sites in India|Category:Architecture of India}} | |||
File:Fort Dansborg.JPG|], built by the 17th century Danish admiral ], reminiscences of ], ], Tamil Nadu | |||
<gallery widths="180" heights="200" class="center"> | |||
File:Tomb of susanna anna maria2.jpg|Tomb of Susanna Anna Maria, reminiscences of ], ], West Bengal | |||
File:Palace of Assembly Chandigarh 2006.jpg|], a part of the ] at ] designed by ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1321/|title=The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190301021805/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1321/|archive-date=2019-03-01|dead-url=no|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref> | |||
File:St. Francis Church at Velha Goa.jpg|Church Of St Francis Of Assisi, reminiscent of ], ] | |||
File:Deekshabhoomi - panoramio.jpg|], completed in 1956 and is the largest ] in Asia.<ref>{{cite news|last=Bhagwat|first=Ramu|title=Ambedkar memorial set up at Deekshabhoomi|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2001-12-19/mumbai/27228796_1_dr-ambedkar-narayanan-smarak-samiti|accessdate=1 July 2013|newspaper=Times of India|date=19 December 2001}}</ref> | |||
File:French Quarter, Pondicherry (16) (37466068276).jpg|French Quarter, Pondicherry. The city became the chief ]. | |||
File:LotusDelhi.jpg|], completed in 1986 and one of the largest ] in the world.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5921/|title=Bahá'í House of Worship at New Delhi|last=|first=|date=|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209123808/https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5921/|archive-date=2019-02-09|dead-url=no|access-date=2019-03-12}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Mukerji|first=Arjun|last2=Sanghamitra|first2=Basu|title=A Search for Post-Modernism in Indian Architecture|url=https://www.academia.edu/8859069|journal=Abacus|language=en}}</ref> | |||
File:Akshardham angled.jpg|], completed in 2005 and one of the largest ] in the world. | |||
File:Golden Pagoda in Arunachal Pradesh (photo - Jim Ankan Deka).jpg|], completed in 2010 and one of the notable ] in India. | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
==India after independence (1947 onwards)== | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = left | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| total_width = 200 | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Secretariat Chandigarh.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ], ] | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Indian Institute of Technology Delhi.jpg | |||
| caption2 = ], J. K. Choudhury | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Stateman House New Delhi.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Stateman House, New Delhi, ] and ] | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| image4 = Reserve Bank of India (RBI) building, September 2011.jpg | |||
| caption4 = Reserve Bank of India (RBI) building Kolkata, Sir Rajen Mookherjee | |||
| alt5 = | |||
| header = Brutalism | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
In recent times there has been a movement of population from rural areas to urban centres of industry, leading to price rise in property in various cities of India.<ref name=rjadhav1>See Raj Jadhav, p. 11 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Urban housing in India balances space constrictions and is aimed to serve the working class.<ref name=Gast77>Gast, 77</ref> Growing awareness of ecology has influenced architecture in India during modern times.<ref name=Gast119>Gast, 119</ref> | In recent times there has been a movement of population from rural areas to urban centres of industry, leading to price rise in property in various cities of India.<ref name=rjadhav1>See Raj Jadhav, p. 11 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Urban housing in India balances space constrictions and is aimed to serve the working class.<ref name=Gast77>Gast, 77</ref> Growing awareness of ecology has influenced architecture in India during modern times.<ref name=Gast119>Gast, 119</ref> | ||
Climate responsive architecture has long been a feature of India's architecture but has been losing its significance as of late.<ref name="rjadhav2" /> Indian architecture reflects its various socio-cultural sensibilities which vary from region to region.<ref name="rjadhav2">See Raj Jadhav, 13 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Certain areas are traditionally held to be belonging to women.<ref name="rjadhav2" /> Villages in India have features such as courtyards, loggias, terraces and balconies.<ref name="Gast77" /> ], ], and ]—of Indian origin—highlight the assimilation of Indian textiles in global interior design.<ref name="eb-savage">Savage 2008</ref> ]s, which are skylights-cum-ventilators, are a common feature in Indian homes, especially in ].<ref name="ref10zayiq">{{Citation | title=India remembered | author=Thomas George Percival Spear|author-link = Percival Spear|author2 = Margaret Spear | publisher=Orient Longman, 1981 | isbn=978-0-86131-265-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6vEtAAAAMAAJ | quote=''... The bungalow was a typical north Indian one, with a large central room lit only by skylights (roshandans) and a number of others opening out from them ...''| year=1981}}</ref><ref name="ref25xegoc">{{Citation | title=Mansions at dusk: the havelis of old Delhi | author=Pavan K. Varma, Sondeep Shankar | publisher=Spantech Publishers, 1992 | isbn=978-81-85215-14-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jCBuAAAAMAAJ | quote=''... Thirdly, while obviating direct sunlight, it had to allow some light and air to enter through overhead roshandans ...''| year=1992 }}</ref>] ]]]At the time of independence in 1947, India had only about 300 trained architects in a population of what was then 330 million, and only one training institution, the ]. Thus the first generation of Indian architects were educated abroad. | |||
] at Delhi, designed by ], and completed in 1972, was considered one of the finest examples of ] architecture in India.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.archdaily.com/874154/the-demolition-of-delhis-hall-of-nations-reveals-indias-broken-attitude-to-architectural-heritage|title=The Demolition of Delhi's Hall of Nations Reveals India's Broken Attitude to Architectural Heritage|last=;Langar|first=Suneet Zishan|date=2017-06-23|website=ArchDaily|language=en-US|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> However, despite several protests, it was demolished in 2017. It's demolition was considered a tragedy among the architectural community.]] | |||
Climate responsive architecture has long been a feature of India's architecture but has been losing its significance as of late.<ref name="rjadhav2" /> Indian architecture reflects its various socio-cultural sensibilities which vary from region to region.<ref name="rjadhav2">See Raj Jadhav, 13 in ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India''.</ref> Certain areas are traditionally held to be belonging to women.<ref name="rjadhav2" /> Villages in India have features such as courtyards, loggias, terraces and balconies.<ref name="Gast77" /> ], ], and ]—of Indian origin—highlight the assimilation of Indian textiles in global interior design.<ref name="eb-savage">Savage 2008</ref> ]s, which are skylights-cum-ventilators, are a common feature in Indian homes, especially in ].<ref name="ref10zayiq">{{Citation | title=India remembered | author=Thomas George Percival Spear|authorlink = Percival Spear|author2 = Margaret Spear | publisher=Orient Longman, 1981 | isbn=978-0-86131-265-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6vEtAAAAMAAJ | quote=''... The bungalow was a typical north Indian one, with a large central room lit only by skylights (roshandans) and a number of others opening out from them ...''| year=1981}}</ref><ref name="ref25xegoc">{{Citation | title=Mansions at dusk: the havelis of old Delhi | author=Pavan K. Varma, Sondeep Shankar | publisher=Spantech Publishers, 1992 | isbn=978-81-85215-14-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jCBuAAAAMAAJ | quote=''... Thirdly, while obviating direct sunlight, it had to allow some light and air to enter through overhead roshandans ...''| year=1992 }}</ref> | |||
Some early architects were traditionalists, such as ], whose design for the ] imitated the ]-] buildings down to the last detail, and B.R. Manickam, who designed the ] in Bangalore revived the ]. | |||
=== 20th century === | |||
At the time of independence in 1947, India had only about 300 trained architects in a population of what was then 330 million, and only one training institution, the ]. Thus the first generation of Indian architects were educated abroad. | |||
] designed by ], and completed in 1961.]] | |||
Some early architects were traditionalists, such as ], whose design for the ] imitated the ]-] buildings down to the last detail, and B.R. Manickam, who designed the ] in Bangalore reminiscent of ]. | |||
In 1950, French architect ], a pioneer of ], was commissioned by ] to design the city of ]. His plan called for residential, commercial and industrial areas, along with parks and |
In 1950, French architect ], a pioneer of ], was commissioned by ] to design the city of ]. His plan called for residential, commercial and industrial areas, along with parks and transportation infrastructure. In the middle was the ], a complex of three government buildings – the ], the ], and ].<ref name="whc.unesco.org">{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1321/|title=The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190301021805/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1321/|archive-date=2019-03-01|url-status=live|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref> He also designed the ] at ]. Corbusier inspired the next generation of architects in India to work with modern, rather than revivalist styles.<ref name=":1" /> | ||
Economic liberalisation and consequent prosperity enabled more radical new styles to be tried along with a sense to compete with modern and western architectural standards. | |||
Other prominent examples of modernist architecture in India include ] by ] (1961), ] by ] (1961), ] by ] (1963), ] by ] (1973), ] by ] (1986), and ] (1992) and ] (1996) by ].<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Mukerji|first=Arjun|last2=Sanghamitra|first2=Basu|title=A Search for Post-Modernism in Indian Architecture|url=https://www.academia.edu/8859069|journal=Abacus|language=en}}</ref> | |||
Other prominent examples of modernist architecture in India include ] by ] (1961), ] by ] (1961), ] by ] (1963), ] by ] (1973), ] by ] (1986), and ] (1992) and ] (1996) by ].<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last1=Mukerji|first1=Arjun|last2=Sanghamitra|first2=Basu|title=A Search for Post-Modernism in Indian Architecture|url=https://www.academia.edu/8859069|journal=Abacus|date=January 2011|language=en}}</ref> | |||
=== 21st century === | |||
Skyscrapers built in the ] are becoming increasingly common in cities. This includes ] (2019) and ] (2010) by ]. Other projects of the 21st century include ] by ] (2015). | Skyscrapers built in the ] are becoming increasingly common in cities. This includes ] (2019) and ] (2010) by ]. Other projects of the 21st century include ] by ] (2015). | ||
Notable ongoing projects in India include the city of ], ], ], ], and ]. | Notable ongoing projects in India include the city of ], ], ], ], and ]. | ||
==Landscape Architecture== | |||
== Gallery == | |||
{{Further|Mughal gardens}} | |||
<gallery widths="180px" heights="200px" class="center"> | |||
] | |||
File:Sripuram Temple Full View.jpg|] at ] is gilded with 1500 kg of pure gold. | |||
] visiting a bamboo garden in ]]] | |||
File:Dakshineswar.jpg|] is famous for its association with ]. | |||
File:Palitana.jpg|] temples on Shantrunjaya hill which has more than 900 temples.<ref></ref> | |||
There is less archaeological evidence of early gardens elsewhere in India but the ancient Hindu sacred books give a remarkably detailed account of gardens in Ancient India. | |||
File:Delwada.jpg|] are famous for their use of ] and intricate marble carvings. | |||
File:A Buddhist temple at Sarnath.jpg|Maha-Bodhi Mulagandhakuti Buddhist Temple at ]. | |||
During Mauryan Era, palaces took a central role and with it came the gardens. The Hindu scriptures (shastras) set down a code for the orientation and organization of buildings in relation to compass points, hills, water and plants. No physical form survived but rock carvings like in Ajanta Caves or in Stupas shows an existence of airy structures with timber columns. Those illustrations show vegetation alongside the platform and columns. Emperor Ashoka's inscriptions mention the establishment of botanical gardens for planting medicinal herbs, plants, and trees. They contained pools of water, were laid in grid patterns, and normally had '']'' pavilions with them. | |||
File:GlobalVipasanaPagoda.JPG|] is a ] Dome Hall with a capacity to seat 8,000 Vipassana meditators, largest such meditation hall in the world, near ], North-west of ], ]. | |||
File:Front view of Gurudwara Bangla Sahib, Delhi.jpg|] is one of the most prominent Sikh ]. | |||
Hindu and Buddhist temple sites, from ancient times, have emphasized on 'Sacred Grooves' or medical gardens. Hindu and Buddhist Temples like in ] and Chinese Buddhist pilgrim ] mentions accounts of ] where "azure pool winds around the monasteries, adorned with the full-blown cups of the blue lotus; the dazzling red flowers of the lovely kanaka hang here and there, and outside groves of mango trees offer the inhabitants their dense and protective shade." | |||
File:Fateh Burj , Banda Singh Baahadur memorial ,Chapadchidi, Punjab ,India.jpg|] is dedicated to the establishment of the Sikh ] and is the tallest ] in ]. | |||
File:Mecca Masjid front view, Hyderabad.JPG|] is one of the largest and oldest mosque in South India. | |||
], a twelfth century text giving details on garden design, asserts that it should include rocks and raised mounds of summits, manicured with plants and trees of diverse varieties, artificial ponds, and flowing brooks. It describes the arrangement, the soils, the seeds, the distance between types of plants and trees, the methods of preparing manure, proper fertilizing and maintaining the garden, which plants and trees are best planted first, when to plant others, watering, signs of overwatering and underwatering, weeds, means of protecting the garden, and other details. | |||
File:Rang Ghar Sibsagar.jpg|], built by ] in ]'s capital ], is one of the earliest pavilions of outdoor stadia in the Indian subcontinent. | |||
]]] | |||
Early Islamic dynasties, like of Delhi Sultanates, never showed interests on gardens with an exception of ]. Mughals along with the Hindu Rajputs ushered a new era of Garden architecture. Concepts like ''Charbagh'' (four gardens) came from Persia. In the Charbagh at the Taj Mahal, each of the four parts contains sixteen flower beds. | |||
Fountain and running water was a key feature of Mughal garden design. Water-lifting devices like geared ] (''saqiya)'' were used for irrigation and to feed the water-courses at ] in Delhi, ] in Sikandra and Fatehpur Sikhri, the Lotus Garden of Babur at Dholpur and the ] in Srinagar. | |||
Royal canals were built from rivers to channel water to Delhi and Fatehpur Sikhri. The fountains and water-chutes of Mughal gardens represented the resurrection and regrowth of life, as well as to represent the cool, mountainous streams of Central Asia and Afghanistan that Babur was famously fond of. | |||
<gallery widths="140" heights="180" class="center"> | |||
File:Nishat Bagh (14362717638).jpg|] | |||
File:Glasshouse and fountain at lalbagh.jpg|], Bengaluru | |||
File:View of the Mughal Garden of Rashtrapati Bhavan in March 1962.jpg|View of the Mughal Garden of Rashtrapati Bhavan | |||
File:Waterfall at Rock Garden, Chandigarh.jpg|Waterfall at ] | |||
File:Char Bagh Garden.jpg|Char Bagh Garden, Rajasthan | |||
File:Athpula aka Khairpur ka Pul, Lodi Gardens, New Delhi.jpg|The ''Athpula'' (eight piers) bridge in ] | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
== Arches == | |||
Indian architecture has utilized both false and ]es in its architecture, but structural arches have been essentially absent from Hindu temple architecture at all periods. | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| header = Arch styles in Indian Architecture | |||
| caption4 = Victorian Gothic arches in Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, Mumbai | |||
| image4 = Chhatrapati shivaji terminus, esterno 03.jpg | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| caption3 = Post and lintel construction (Trabeate style) of Airavatesvara Temple, India | |||
| image3 = "A depiction of World Heritage Monument Airavatesvara Temple".JPG | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption1 = Dropped keystone, King Edward VII Arch, Victoria Memorial | |||
| image1 = Victoria Memorial, King Edward VII Arch, Kolkata, India.jpg | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 330 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
| image2 = Qutb complex ag39.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Corbel arches in ], Delhi | |||
| caption = 1, Dropped keystone, King Edward VII Arch, Victoria Memorial | |||
}} | |||
=== Corbel arches === | |||
Corbel arches in India date from ] which used corbel arch to construct drains and have been evidenced at Mohenjo daro, Harappa, and Dholavira.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hdeSBQAAQBAJ&q=corbel+arch+mohenjo+daro&pg=PA28|title=Across the Pacific: From Ancient Asia to Precolombian America|last=Lemoy|first=Christian|date=2011|publisher=Christian Lemoy|isbn=9781599425825|language=en}}</ref> | |||
The oldest arches surviving in Indian architecture are the ] or "] arches" found in ancient rock-cut architecture, and agreed to be copied from versions in wood which have all perished. These often terminate a whole ceiling with a semi-circular top; wooden roofs made in this way can be seen in carved depictions of cities and palaces. A number of small early constructed temples have such roofs, using ]led construction, as well as an ] plan; the ] at ] is an example. The arch shape survived into constructed Indian architecture, not as an opening in a wall but as a ] projection from a wall, that bears only its own weight. In this form it became a very common and important decorative motif on Hindu temples.<ref>Rowland, 44–45, 64–65, 113, 218–219; Harle, 48, 175</ref> | |||
The "fundamental architectural principle of the constructed Hindu temple is always formulated in the trabeate order", that is to say using ] systems with vertical and horizontal members.<ref>Michell, 82</ref> According to George Michell: "Never was the principle of the arch with radiating components, such as voussoirs and keystones, employed in Hindu structures, either in India or in other parts of Asia. It was not so much that Hindu architects were ignorant of these techniques, but rather that conformance to tradition and adherence to precedents were firm cultural attitudes".<ref>Michell, 84</ref> Harle describes the true arch as "not unknown, but almost never employed by Hindu builders",<ref>Harle, 530, note 3 to chapter 30. See also 489, note 10</ref> and its use as "rare, but widely dispersed".<ref>Harle, 493, note 5</ref> | |||
] | |||
=== True Arch === | |||
The 19th century archaeologist ], head of the ], at first believed that due to the total absence of arches in Hindu temples, they were alien to Indian architecture, but several pre-Islamic examples bear testimony to their existence, as explained by him in the following manner:<ref>{{Cite book|title=Mahâbodhi, or the great Buddhist temple under the Bodhi tree at Buddha-Gaya|last=Cunningham|first=Alexander|publisher=W. H. Allen|year=1892|location=London|pages=85}}</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote|text=Formerly it was the settled belief of all European enquirers that the ancient Hindus were ignorant of the Arch. This belief no doubt arose from the total absence of arches in any of the Hindu Temples. Thirty years ago I shared this belief with Mr. Fergusson, when I argued that the presence of arches in the great Buddhist Temple at Buddha Gaya proved that the building could not have been erected before the Muhammadan conquest. But during my late employment in the Archeological Survey of India several buildings of undoubted antiquity were discovered in which both vaults and arches formed part of the original construction.|sign=]|source=Mahâbodhi, or the great Buddhist temple under the Bodhi tree at Buddha-Gaya, 1892}} Archaeological evidences indicate that wedge shaped bricks and construction of wells in the Indus valley civilization and although no true arches have been discovered as of yet, these bricks would have been suitable in the construction of true arches.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SzS6CwAAQBAJ&q=indus+valley+civilization+wells+true+arch&pg=PA58|title=The Indus: Lost Civilizations|last=Robinson|first=Andrew|date=2015-11-15|publisher=Reaktion Books|isbn=9781780235417|language=en}}</ref> True arch in India dates from ] period from the 5th century BC. Arch fragment discovered by archaeologist ] from an arch with ] inscribed on it,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.20579/page/n109|title=Proceedinds And Transactions Of The Second Oriental Conference (1923)|date=1923|pages=86|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=The Calcutta Review Vol.10, No.1-3(april-june)1924|year=1924|pages=140}}</ref> or 1st - 2nd century CE when it first appeared in ] palace architecture from ] period.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dubey|first=Lal Mani|title=Some Observations on the Vesara School of Hindu Architecture|date=1978|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44139449|journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress|volume=39|pages=1000–1006|jstor=44139449|issn=2249-1937|access-date=12 June 2021|archive-date=12 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210612072821/https://www.jstor.org/stable/44139449|url-status=live}}</ref> Arches present at ] temples at ], ] and ] temples from ] period and Hindu temple of ] bear testimony to the use arches in the Hindu temple architecture.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1N95DwAAQBAJ&q=amb+temple+true+arch&pg=PA4|title=Temples of the Indus: Studies in the Hindu Architecture of Ancient Pakistan|last=Meister|first=Michael W.|date=2010-07-26|publisher=BRILL|isbn=9789004190115|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/apac/photocoll/f/019pho000001003u00466000.html|title=Front view of a ruined temple, with sculptured slabs in foreground, Deo Baranark|last=Wright|first=Colin|website=Bl.uk|access-date=2019-04-23|archive-date=25 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225010021/http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/apac/photocoll/f/019pho000001003u00466000.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/92037/_http___www_bl_uk_onlinegallery_onlineex_apac_photocoll_g_zoomify58580_html.html|title=General view of ruined temple at Deo Baranark|website=Europeana Collections|language=en|access-date=2019-04-23}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
Although Alexander Cunningham has persisted in the notion that the Buddhist ]'s pointed arch was added later during a Burmese restoration, given its predominant use in Islamic architecture, scholars such as Huu Phuoc Le have contested this assumption based on analysis that relieving arches could not have been added without destroying the entire temple structure, which is dated to 6th–7th century CE. Hence the pointed and relieving arches much have formed part of the original building dating from the pre-Islamic periods in proper.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Buddhist Architecture|last=Le|first=Huu Phuoc|publisher=Grafikol|year=2010|isbn=978-0984404308|location=USA|pages=246–247}}</ref><ref>Rowland, 163-164</ref> Moreover, pointed arches vaulted entrances have been noted in Bhitargaon temple and Kausambi Palace architecture as well.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/241/|title=Group of Monuments at Hampi|website=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190214052910/https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/241/|archive-date=2019-02-14|access-date=2019-10-27}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=District Gazetteers Of The United Provinces Of Agra And Oudh Cawnpore Vol Xix|pages=190}}</ref> | |||
=== Trabeate style === | |||
Trabeate style is one of the main style of architecture of that time | |||
* Lintel use in this style. | |||
* shikar also prevail in this. | |||
* No use of minar. | |||
* Material sand stone. | |||
=== Arcuate style === | |||
Arcuate style is also one of the main style for architecture. | |||
* In this lintel is replaced by arch. | |||
* There is also use of dome. | |||
* Concept of minar is also there. | |||
* Material, brick, lime and mortar used for making of dome (Wood was primarily not used because of the geography).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.focuscivil.online/introduction-of-medieval-period-architecture/|title=Introduction of Medieval Period Architecture|website=focuscivil.online|access-date=9 April 2021|archive-date=4 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211204074534/https://www.focuscivil.online/introduction-of-medieval-period-architecture/|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
=== Torana === | |||
], ], Madhya Pradesh]] | |||
'''Torana''', also referred to as '''vandanamalikas''',<ref name=tor10>Parul Pandya Dhar (2010): ''The Torana in Indian and Southeast Asian Architecture''. New Delhi: D K Printworld. {{ISBN|978-8124605349}}.</ref> is a free-standing ornamental or arched gateway for ceremonial purposes seen in the ], ] and ] architecture of the ], ] and parts of ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.oxfordartonline.com/view/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.001.0001/oao-9781884446054-e-7000085631|title=Toraṇa {{!}} Grove Art|year=2003|language=en|doi=10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T085631|access-date=2018-08-08|last1=Hardy|first1=Adam|isbn=978-1-884446-05-4|archive-date=13 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220113014230/https://www.oxfordartonline.com/view/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.001.0001/oao-9781884446054-e-7000085631|url-status=live}}</ref> Chinese ] gateways, Japanese ] gateways,<ref name=tor4>{{cite book |author=Albert Henry Longhurst |title=The Story of the Stūpa |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gs1sFlMGy2AC&pg=PA17 |year=1992 |publisher=Asian Educational Services |isbn=978-81-206-0160-4 |page=17 |access-date=12 June 2021 |archive-date=22 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231022223518/https://books.google.com/books?id=gs1sFlMGy2AC&pg=PA17#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=tor5>{{cite book|title=China's old dwellings|author=Ronald G. Knapp|publisher=]|year=2000|page=85|isbn=0-8248-2214-5}}</ref><ref name=tor6>{{cite book|title=Frommer's China|author1=Simon Foster |author2=Jen Lin-Liu |author3=Sharon Owyang |author4=Sherisse Pham |author5=Beth Reiber |author6=Lee Wing-sze |publisher=]|year=2010|page=435|isbn=978-0-470-52658-3}}</ref> Korean ] gateways, and Thai ]<ref name="scheid">{{cite web|url=http://www.univie.ac.at/rel_jap/bauten/anm_torii.htm#aussershinto|title=Religion in Japan|last=Scheid|first=Bernhard|work=Torii|publisher=University of Vienna|language=German|access-date=12 February 2010|archive-date=28 August 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100828213102/http://www.univie.ac.at/rel_jap/bauten/anm_torii.htm#aussershinto|url-status=live}}</ref> were derived from the Indian ''torana''. | |||
Torana is considered sacred and honorific gateway in ] and ] religious sites.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/torana|title=torana | Indian temple gateway|website=Britannica.com|access-date=3 December 2021|archive-date=13 October 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231013142840/https://www.britannica.com/topic/torana|url-status=live}}</ref> It is built with a projecting cross-piece resting on two uprights or posts. Mostly made of ] or ], and the cross-piece is generally of three bars placed one on the top of the other; both cross-piece and posts are usually sculpted. | |||
Toranas are associated with Buddhist ]s like the '']'' in ], as well as with Jain and Hindu structures, and also with several secular structures. Symbolic toranas can also be made of flowers and even leaves and hung over the doors and at entrances, particularly in Western and Southern India. They are believed to bring good fortune and signify auspicious and festive occasions. They can also serve didactic and narrative purposes or be erected to mark the victory of a king.<ref>Parul Pandya Dhar, (2010). ''The Torana in Indian and Southeast Asian Architecture,'' (New Delhi: D K Printworld,).</ref> | |||
During ] of ] it is a tradition to erect electrically illuminated colorful Vesak toranas in public places. These decorations are temporary installations which remain in public display for couple of weeks starting from the day of ]. | |||
{{gallery | |||
|title=Hindu, Buddhist and Jain toranas | |||
|width=180 | |||
|height=120 | |||
|File:North_Gateway_-_Rear_Side_-_Stupa_1_-_Sanchi_Hill_2013-02-21_4480-4481.JPG|Rear side of North Torana of Stupa-1 at ] Hill, 3rd century BCE to 1st century BCE, India | |||
|5=File:Dola Mandap.jpg|6=A photo of Torana taken in 1890 of 10th century ], India|7=File:Muktesvara deula.jpg|8=Torana of the 10th century ], India.|9=File:Warangal_fort.jpg|10=Torana from the 12th century ], at ], India|11=File:Door to ancient time.jpg|12=Torana in Sas-Bahu Temple, Udaipur|13=File:Temples at Jaisalmer Fort -Jaisalmer -Rajasthan -Seal Sum 04.jpg|14=12th century Torana at ]}} | |||
=== Gavaksha === | |||
A Gavaksha or chandrashala are often used to describe the motif centred on an ogee, circular or horseshoe arch that decorates many examples of Indian rock-cut architecture and later Indian structural temples and other buildings. It is called a chaitya arch when used on the facade of a chaitya hall, around the single large window. In later forms it develops well beyond this type, and becomes a very flexible unit.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Glossary of Asian Art|url=http://www.art-and-archaeology.com/asianartglossary.html#chandrashala|access-date=2021-07-15|website=Art-and-archaeology.com|archive-date=16 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161116051840/http://www.art-and-archaeology.com/asianartglossary.html#chandrashala|url-status=live}}</ref> Gavāksha is a Sanskrit word which means "bulls or cows eye". In Hindu temples, their role is envisioned as symbolically radiating the light and splendour of the central icon in its sanctum.<ref>Elgood (2000), 103</ref> Alternatively, they are described as providing a window for the deity to gaze out into the world. Like the whole of the classic chaitya, the form originated in the shape of the wooden thatched roofs of buildings, none of which have survived; the earliest version replicating such roofs in stone is at the entrance to the non-Buddhist Lomas Rishi Cave, one of the man-made Barabar Caves in Bihar. | |||
== Influence on neighbouring Asian countries == | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| caption2 = Prasat Bayon (Jayagiri Brahma Palace), Cambodia | |||
| header = Influence on Southeast Asia | |||
| caption4 = Trimurti Prambanan temple, Yogyakarta, Indonesia | |||
| image4 = Prambanan Complex 1.jpg | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| caption3 = "The serenity of the stone faces" occupying many towers, Bayon, Cambodia | |||
| image3 = Das Lächeln von Angkor.jpg | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image2 = Bayon (I).jpg | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption1 = Hòa Lai Towers in Ninh Thuận province, Vietnam | |||
| image1 = Tháp Hòa Lai, Ninh Thuận.JPG | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 200 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}}{{Blockquote|To know Indian art in India alone is to know but half its story. To apprehend it to the full, we must follow it in the wake of Buddhism, to central Asia, China, and Japan; we much watch it assuming new forms and breaking new forms and breaking into new beauties as it spreads over Tibet and Burma, and Siam; we must gaze in awe at the unexampled grandeur of its creations in Cambodia and Java. In each of these countries, Indian art encounters a different racial genius, a different local environment, and under their modifying influence it takes on a different garb.|text=To know Indian art in India alone is to know but half its story. To apprehend it to the full, we must follow it in the wake of Buddhism, to central Asia, China, and Japan; we much watch it assuming new forms and breaking new forms and breaking into new beauties as it spreads over Tibet and Burma, and Siam; we must gaze in awe at the unexampled grandeur of its creations in Cambodia and Java. In each of these countries, Indian art encounters a different racial genius, a different local environment, and under their modifying influence it takes on a different garb.|sign=]}} | |||
=== Influence on Southeast Asia === | |||
{{See also | History of Indian influence on Southeast Asia }} | |||
Southeast Asia was under Indian sphere of cultural influence starting around 290 BC until around the 15th century, when Hindu-Buddhist influence was absorbed by local politics. Kingdoms in the southeast coast of the Indian Subcontinent had established trade, cultural and political relations with Southeast Asian kingdoms in Burma, Thailand, Indonesia, Malay Peninsula, Philippines, Cambodia and ]. This led to Indianisation and Sanskritisation of Southeast Asia within Indosphere, Southeast Asian polities were the Indianised Hindu-Buddhist Mandala. | |||
==== Vietnam ==== | |||
{{See also | Art of Champa }} | |||
] near ]]] | |||
The profile of the 13th-century ] near ] includes all the buildings typical of a Cham temple. From left to right one can see the ''gopura'', the saddle-shaped ''kosagrha'', and ''mandapa'' attached to the ''kalan'' tower. | |||
Between the 6th and the 16th century, the Kingdom of ] flourished in present-day central and southern ]. Unlike the Javanese that mostly used volcanic ] stone for their temples, and ] of ] which mostly employed grey ]s to construct their religious buildings, the ] built their temples from reddish ]s. The most important remaining sites of Cham bricks temple architecture include ] near ], ] near ], and ] near Phan Rang.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}} | |||
Typically, a Cham temple complex consisted of several different kinds of buildings. They are ''kalan'', a brick sanctuary, typically in the form of a tower with ''garbahgriha'' used to host the murti of deity. A ''mandapa'' is an entry hallway connected with a sanctuary. A ''kosagrha'' or "fire-house" is a temple construction typically with a saddle-shaped roof, used to house the valuables belonging to the deity or to cook for the deity. The ''gopura'' was a gate-tower leading into a walled temple complex. These building types are typical for Hindu temples in general; the classification is valid not only for the architecture of Champa, but also for other architectural traditions of Greater India. | |||
==== Indonesia ==== | |||
{{Further|Candi of Indonesia|Indonesian architecture|Balinese temple}} | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = left | |||
| header = Prambanan, an example of Indonesian temple architecture | |||
| image1 = Candi Shiva, Prambanan 1068.jpg | |||
| image2 = Prambanan Cross Section Shiva.svg | |||
| image3 = Prambanan Temple Compound Map en.svg | |||
| image4 = Prambanan Plain en.svg | |||
| direction = | |||
| width = | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| total_width = 300 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
| footer = ] temple (Shivagrha) of Central Java, an example of the 9th century Indonesian Javanese Hindu temple architecture with mandala layout and prasad tower crowned with stylized ratna-vajra. | |||
}} | |||
Temples are called '']'' ({{IPA-all|tʃandi|pron}}) in ], whether it is Buddhist or Hindu. A Candi refers to a structure based on the Indian type of single-celled shrine, with a pyramidal tower above it (] in ]), and a portico for entrance,<ref name="ReferenceA">Philip Rawson: The Art of Southeast Asia</ref> mostly built between the 7th to 15th centuries.<ref name="ReferenceA"/><ref>{{harvp|Soekmono|1995|p=1}}</ref> In Hindu ], a ''candi'' shrine can be found within a '']'' compound. The best example of Indonesian Javanese Hindu temple architecture is the 9th century ] (Shivagrha) temple compound, located in Central Java, near ]. This largest Hindu temple in Indonesia has three main prasad towers, dedicated to ] gods. Shiva temple, the largest main temple is towering to 47 metre-high (154 ft). | |||
The term "candi" itself is believed was derived from '']'', one of the manifestations of the goddess ] as the goddess of death.<ref>{{cite book | last =Soekmono | first =Dr R.| title =Pengantar Sejarah Kebudayaan Indonesia 2 | publisher =Penerbit Kanisius | year =1973 | location =Yogyakarta, Indonesia| pages =81 | url = | doi = | isbn = 978-979-413-290-6}}</ref> | |||
==== Cambodia ==== | |||
{{Further|Khmer architecture}} | |||
]]] | |||
Khmer empire's (present day Cambodia) great capital, ] ({{langx|km|អង្គរ}}, "Capital City", derived from Sanskrit "nagara"), contains some of the most important and the most magnificent example of Khmer temple architecture. The classic style of Angkorian temple is demonstrated by the 12th century ].The main superstructure of typical Khmer temple is a towering ''prasat'' called '']'' which houses the ''garbhagriha'' inner chamber, where the ''murti'' of Vishnu or Shiva, or a ''lingam'' resides. Khmer temples were typically enclosed by a concentric series of walls, with the central sanctuary in the middle; this arrangement represented the mountain ranges surrounding ], the mythical home of the gods. Enclosures are the spaces between these walls, and between the innermost wall and the temple itself. The walls defining the enclosures of Khmer temples are frequently lined by galleries, while passage through the walls is by way of gopuras located at the cardinal points. The main entrance usually adorned with elevated causeway with cruciform terrace.<ref>Glaize, ''Monuments of the Angkor Group'', p.27.</ref> | |||
==== Thailand ==== | |||
Thailand was heavily influenced by the culture and religions of India, starting with the Kingdom of ] around the first century until the ]. ]s such as the ], the ] and Malay states of the Malay Peninsula and ] ruled the region. | |||
], an example of Thai style prang]] | |||
Thailand under Khmer rule saw inclusion of Indian Hindu temple influenced Khmer architectural style. The Khmer prangs resembled north Indian temples' ] and rekha (temple towers) elements. The early 10th century and the late 12th century prangs in Thailand were influenced by the Khmer architects of the great temple complexes of ] and ]. | |||
After the ] collapsed, the Thai building masters of the ] adapted the Prang form. The Thai temple falls into one of two broad categories: the '']''-style solid temple and the '']''-style. The prangs can also be found in various forms in Sukhothai, Lopburi, Bangkok (]). Sizes may vary, but usually the prangs measure between {{convert|15|and|40|m}} in height, and resemble a towering corn-cob like structure. They extended and developed it. The building material was no more separate small sandstone blocks, instead the Thais built the Prang in brick or laterite covered with ]. And the cella could be reached only by stairs. An example for this is the Prang of the ] in ]. Later developments of the Prang suggested the cella only. The entrance door became a niche, in which was placed the ], which had originally taken the central position inside. For reasons of symmetry the niche was repeated on all four sides. On its pinnacle was a ], the "weapon of ]". | |||
==== Malaysia ==== | |||
Indo-Saracenic architecture was a ] style mostly used by British architects in India in the later 19th century, especially in public and government buildings in the ], and the palaces of rulers of the ]s. It drew stylistic and decorative elements from native ], especially ]. The basic layout and structure of the buildings tended to be close to that used in contemporary buildings in other revivalist styles, such as ] and ], with specific Indian features and decoration added. | |||
], showcasing elements of Indo-Saracenic style]] | |||
According to ], a leading scholar of the style, "the Indo-Saracenic, with its imagined past turned to the purposes of British colonialism, took shape outside India most fully only in Malaya". | |||
In Malaysia, due to British colonial influence and the migration of Muslims from India, many Mughal architectural elements in the design of mosques were incorporated. ] was a predominantly Muslim society, where there was hardly any recent tradition of building in brick or stone, with even mosques and the palaces of the local rulers built in the abundant local ]s. ] was a 19th-century foundation, only a small settlement when the British decided to make it the capital of their new ] in 1895, and needed a number of large public buildings. The British decided to use the Islamic style they were used to from India, despite it having little relationship to existing local architectural styles. | |||
==== Myanmar ==== | |||
Much of Myanmar's architecture is tied to ancient Indian culture, and can be traced to the country's earliest known inhabitants.<ref name="worldbook">{{Cite book|title=Myanmar|publisher=World Book Inc.|year=2016|location=Chicago|chapter=Art}}</ref> The ] and Pyu people were the first two influential groups to migrate to Myanmar, and the first ] adherents of ].<ref name="worldbook"/> ], one of the first Pyu centres, contains urbanesque foundations which include a monastery and ]-like structures. These Pyu stupas, the first Indian foundations in Myanmar, were built from 200 BC to 100 CE and were sometimes used for burial. | |||
] | |||
During ], the Pyu-style stupas were transformed into monuments reminiscent of alms bowls or gourd-shaped ]s, unbaked ], tapered and rising roofs, Buddha niches, polylobed ]es and ornamental doorways influenced by Bengali ] and its monuments. The ] (finished in 1090), one of the first temples erected in ], was influenced by Indian architecture.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ananda Pahto Temple, Bagan, Myanmar|url=http://www.orientalarchitecture.com/sid/513/myanmar/bagan/ananda-pahto-temple|website=Orientalarchitecture.com|access-date=1 August 2021|archive-date=20 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201020112758/https://www.orientalarchitecture.com/sid/513/myanmar/bagan/ananda-pahto-temple|url-status=live}}</ref> Architectural features of the temple include brick vaulted halls, Buddha statues, tapered roofs and the absence of ]. | |||
] | |||
Pala influence and spread of Buddhism in Myanmar also brought in terracotta tiles from Bengal. The terracotta plaques at Pagan are made with well kneaded and fired clay but all the plaques are glazed with green colour. | |||
Another example of these cultural influences include the Ananda Temple in Bagan built in the 11th century AD under the ruling of ]. At these times, Buddhist and ] monks travelled to Burma from Bengal and discussed commonalities about the beauty of the temples of their region. Therefore, the king heard the monks and decided to build a temple with these western inspirations. Although, the Ananda Temple display its eastern origins, the western features remain obvious and demonstrate its uniqueness.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Cultural Selection: Bengali Artistic Influences in Southeast Asia {{!}} Silk Roads Programme|url=https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/content/cultural-selection-bengali-artistic-influences-southeast-asia|access-date=2021-08-01|website=en.unesco.org|archive-date=1 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210801095319/https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/content/cultural-selection-bengali-artistic-influences-southeast-asia|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Influence in East Asia=== | |||
==== Torii, Paifang, Hongsalmun, Sao Ching Cha ==== | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| total_width = 350 | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Kyoto Schrein Fushimi-Inari-taisha Torii 35.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ] path leading to ] | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Paifang - Chengdu, China - DSC05275.jpg | |||
| caption2 = ] in ], China | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Hongsalmun (홍살문) of Heolleung Royal Tomb (헌능).jpg | |||
| caption3 = ] of ] | |||
| alt4 = | |||
| caption4 = ] and ] | |||
| image4 = 018-Sao Ching Cha.jpg | |||
| header = Torana Derivatives | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
Ancient Indian ''torana'' sacred gateway architecture has influenced gateway architecture across Asia, specially where ]; Chinese ] gateways,<ref>Joseph Needham, Science and Civilization in China, Vol 4 part 3, p137-138</ref> Japanese torii gateways,<ref name="tor42">{{cite book|author=Albert Henry Longhurst|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gs1sFlMGy2AC&pg=PA17|title=The Story of the Stūpa|publisher=Asian Educational Services|year=1992|isbn=978-81-206-0160-4|page=17|access-date=12 June 2021|archive-date=22 October 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231022223518/https://books.google.com/books?id=gs1sFlMGy2AC&pg=PA17#v=onepage&q&f=false|url-status=live}}</ref> Korean ] gateways,<ref name="tor7">{{cite book|author=A.H. Longhurst|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gs1sFlMGy2AC&pg=PA17|title=Story Of The Stupa|publisher=Asian Educational Services|year=1995|isbn=978-81-206-0160-4|pages=17–|access-date=12 June 2021|archive-date=22 October 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231022223518/https://books.google.com/books?id=gs1sFlMGy2AC&pg=PA17#v=onepage&q&f=false|url-status=live}}</ref> and ] in Thailand<ref name="scheid2">{{cite web|last=Scheid|first=Bernhard|title=Religion in Japan|url=http://www.univie.ac.at/rel_jap/bauten/anm_torii.htm#aussershinto|access-date=12 February 2010|work=Torii|publisher=University of Vienna|language=de|archive-date=28 August 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100828213102/http://www.univie.ac.at/rel_jap/bauten/anm_torii.htm#aussershinto|url-status=live}}</ref> have been derived from the Indian ''torana''. The functions of all are similar, but they generally differ based on their respective architectural styles.<ref name="tor62">{{cite book|author1=Simon Foster|title=Frommer's China|author2=Jen Lin-Liu|author3=Sharon Owyang|author4=Sherisse Pham|author5=Beth Reiber|author6=Lee Wing-sze|publisher=]|year=2010|isbn=978-0-470-52658-3|page=435}}</ref> | |||
The ''torii'', a gateway erected on the approach to every Shinto shrine, may be derived from ] '']''. While the Indian term denotes a gateway, the Japanese characters can be translated as "bird perch".<ref>Shôzô Yamaguchi, Frederic De Garis and Atsuharu Sakai, 1964, We Japanese: Miyanushita, Hakone, Fujiya Hotel, Page 200.</ref> The function of a ''torii'' is to mark the entrance to a sacred space. For this reason, the road leading to a Shinto shrine ('']'') is almost always straddled by one or more ''torii'', which are therefore the easiest way to distinguish a shrine from a Buddhist temple. | |||
''Hongsalmun'' literally means ‘gate with red arrows’, referring to the set of pointed spikes on its top. In the past, spikes in between columns did not exist. The color is said to be red because of the belief that the color repels ghosts.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Koehler|first=Ben Jackson and Robert|title=Korean Architecture: Breathing with Nature|publisher=Seoul Selection|year=2015|isbn=978-1-62412-047-3|language=en}}</ref> The gate is composed of 2 round poles set vertically and 2 transverse bars.<ref name="hongsal">{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/illustratedguide0000unse_j0p0/page/186|title=An Illustrated Guide to Korean Culture - 233 traditional key words|publisher=Hakgojae Publishing Co|year=2002|isbn=9788985846981|location=Seoul|pages=186–87|url-access=registration}}</ref> These pillars are usually over {{convert|9|m}} in height.<ref name=":02">{{Cite book|last=Choi|first=Wan Gee|title=The Traditional Education of Korea|publisher=Ewha Womans University Press|year=2006|isbn=978-89-7300-675-5|language=en}}</ref> There is no roof and door-gate. In the middle top gate, the symbol of the ] and the ] image are placed.<ref name="hongsal" /> | |||
A ''paifang'', also known as a ''pailou'', is a traditional style of ] ] or gateway structure derived from the ] temple-gate in ], has taken on traditional Chinese architectural characteristics such as multi-tiered roofs, various supporting posts, and archway-shapes of traditional gates and towers. | |||
== Foreign Influence on Indian Architecture == | |||
=== Hellenistic influence === | |||
{{See also | Hellenistic influence on Indian art }} | |||
The ] under ] were limited in time (327–326 BCE) and in extent, but they had extensive long term effects as Greeks settled for centuries at the doorstep of India. After these events, the Greeks (described as ] or ] in Indian sources from the Greek "]") were able to maintain a structured presence at the door of India for about three centuries, through the ] and the ], down to the time of the ], which ended sometimes in the 1st century CE. | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| total_width = 350 | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Pataliputra capital, Bihar Museum, Patna, 3rd century BCE.jpg | |||
| caption1 = Pataliputra capital | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Bharhut pillar capital.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Bharhut pillar capital | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Drawing of Allahabad pillar capital abacus frieze.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Drawing of Allahabad pillar capital flame palmette | |||
| header = Hellenistic influence | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
During that time, the city of ], capital of the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom and the cities of ], were founded in what is now Pakistan on the Greek ] grid plan, and ], now located in Pakistan 10 km from the border with India, interacted heavily with the Indian subcontinent. It is considered that Ai-Khanoum and Sirkap may have been primary actors in transmitting Western artistic influence to India, for example in the creation of the quasi-Ionic ] or the floral friezes of the ]. Numerous Greek ambassadors, such as ], ] and ], stayed at the Mauryan court in Pataliputra. | |||
During the Maurya period (c. 321–185 BCE), and especially during the time of Emperor ] (c.268–232 BCE), Hellenistic influence seems to have played a role in the establishment of Indian monumental stone architecture. Excavations in the ancient palace of ] have brought to light Hellenistic sculptural works, and Hellenistic influence appear in the ] at about the same period. | |||
During that period, several instance of artistic influence are known, particular in the area of monumental stone sculpture and statuary, an area with no known precedents in India. The main period of stone architectural creation seems to correspond to the period of Ashoka's reign. Before that, Indians had a tradition of wooden architecture, remains of wooden palisades were discovered at archaeological sites in ], confirmed the Classical accounts. | |||
The first examples of stone architecture were also found in the palace compound of Pataliputra, with the distinctly Hellenistic ] and a pillared hall using polished-stone columns. The other remarkable example of monumental stone architecture is that of the ], themselves displaying Hellenistic influence. There is also very early stone architecture in the palace at ], including true arches used in the underground chambers, from the last phase of the palace in the 1st or 2nd century CE.<ref>Gosh, A. (1964). ''Indian Archaeology: A review 1961-62'', New Delhi, Archaeological survey of India, pp. 50–52, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417031955/http://nmma.nic.in/nmma/nmma_doc/Indian%20Archaeology%20Review/Indian%20Archaeology%201961-62%20A%20Review.pdf |date=17 April 2021 }}; Harle, 43</ref> | |||
==== Pataliputra capital ==== | |||
The ] is a monumental rectangular ] with ]s and ] designs, that was discovered in the palace ruins of the ancient ] capital city of ] (modern ], northeastern India). It is dated to the 3rd century BCE. It is, together with the ] one of the first known examples of Indian stone architecture, as no Indian stone monuments or sculptures are known from before that period. It is also one of the first archaeological clues suggesting Hellenistic influence on the arts of India, in this case sculptural palatial art. | |||
==== Pillars of Ashoka ==== | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = left | |||
| total_width = 280 | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| image1 = N-BR-39 Ashokan Pillar Vaishali (8).jpg | |||
| width1 = 350 | |||
| caption1 = ] in ] | |||
| image2 = Naxos Sphinx with humans for size.jpg | |||
| width2 = 131 | |||
| caption2 = ] at ] | |||
}}The ] were built during the reign of the ] ] c. 250 BCE. They were new attempts at mastering stone architecture, as no Indian stone monuments or sculptures are known from before that period. | |||
There are altogether seven remaining capitals, five with lions, one with an elephant and one with a ] bull. One of them, the four lions of ], has become the ]. | |||
The animal capitals are composed of a ] base, with an ] decorated with floral, symbolic or animal designs, topped by the realistic depiction of an animal, thought to each represent a traditional direction in India. Greek columns of the 6th century BCE such as the ], a {{convert|12.5|m|adj=on}} Ionic column crowned by a sitting animal in the religious centre of ], may have been an inspiration for the pillars of Ashoka. | |||
===== Flame palmette ===== | |||
The ], central decorative element of the Pataliputra pillar is considered as a purely Greek motif. The first appearance of "flame palmettes" goes back to the stand-alone floral ] of the ] (447–432 BCE), and slightly later at the ]. | |||
Flame palmettes were then introduced into friezes of floral motifs in replacement of the regular palmette. Flame palmettes are used extensively in India floral friezes, starting with the floral friezes on the capitals of the pillar of Ashoka, and they are likely to have originated with Greek or Near Eastern art. A monumental flame palmette can be seen on the top of the ] gateway at ]. | |||
=== Persian influence === | |||
==== Achaemenid influence ==== | |||
{{See also|Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley}}{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| total_width = 330 | |||
| perrow = 2 | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Colonne persepolis muze iran bastan teheran.jpg | |||
| caption1 = Achaemenid capital in Persepolis | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Achaemenid_capital_Persepolis.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Highly polished ], ] | |||
| header = Achaemenid Derivatives | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
| footer = ] influence like stone polishing and dual-headed capital from conquest by Persians and Greeks | |||
| image3 = Sculptures near Teli Mandir, Gwalior Fort.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Lion capital in Vardhana | |||
| image4 = Sarnath capital.jpg | |||
| caption4 = ] from ] | |||
| border = center | |||
}} | |||
] from ].The ] conquered and governed the territories of the North-western regions of the ], from the 6th to 4th centuries BCE. The conquest occurred in two phases. The first invasion was conducted around 535 BCE by ], who founded the Achaemenid Empire.{{sfn|Sen|1999|pages=116–117}} Cyrus annexed the regions west of the ], which formed the eastern border of his empire. Following the death of Cyrus, ] established his dynasty and began to reconquer former provinces and further expand the extent of the empire. Around 518 BCE Darius crossed the Himalayas into India to initiate a second period of conquest by annexing regions up to the ] in ].<ref>{{Cite book|last=André-Salvini|first=Béatrice|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kJnaKu9DdNEC|title=Forgotten Empire: The World of Ancient Persia|date=2005|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0-520-24731-4|language=en}}</ref> Each invasion brought in new style and soon started to influence the art and architectural styles in India. | |||
Various Indian artefacts tend to suggest some Perso-Hellenistic artistic influence in India, mainly felt during the time of the ].{{sfn|Sen|1999|pages=116–117}} | |||
The ] palace with its pillared hall shows decorative influences of the Achaemenid palaces and Persepolis and may have used the help of foreign craftsmen.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402144452/http://jsr.usb.ac.ir/article_1659_265.html|date=2 April 2015}}. In: Journal of Subcontinent Researches. Article 8, Volume 6, Issue 19, Summer 2014, Page 149-174.</ref>{{sfn|Sen|1999|pages=116–117}} Mauryan rulers may have even imported craftsmen from abroad to build royal monuments.<ref>{{cite book|title=Monuments, Power and Poverty in India: From Ashoka to the Raj|author1=A. S. Bhalla|author2=I.B. Tauris|date=2015|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=emATBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA18 |page= 18|publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=9781784530877}}</ref> This may be the result of the formative influence of craftsmen employed from Persia following the disintegration of the Achaemenid Empire after the conquests of Alexander the Great.<ref name="auto1">"The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE-200 CE" Robin Coningham, Ruth Young Cambridge University Press, 31 aout 2015, p.414 </ref><ref>]</ref> | |||
The renowned ], especially used in the ], may also have been a technique imported from the Achaemenid Empire.{{sfn|Sen|1999|pages=116–117}} | |||
==== Rock cut architecture ==== | |||
The similarity of the 4th century BCE ]n barrel-vaulted tombs, such as the ], in the western part of the Achaemenid Empire, with the Indian architectural design of the ] (starting at least a century later from circa 250 BCE, with the ] caves in the ]), suggests that the designs of the Lycian rock-cut tombs travelled to India along the trade routes across the Achaemenid Empire.<ref name="GHA">{{cite book|last1=Ching|first1=Francis D.K|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SPqKDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT707|title=A Global History of Architecture|last2=Jarzombek|first2=Mark M.|last3=Prakash|first3=Vikramaditya|date=2017|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=9781118981603|page=707|language=en|author-link1=Frank Ching|author-link2=Mark Jarzombek}}</ref><ref name="HI" /> | |||
Early on, ], in his ''" Illustrated Handbook of Architecture"'', while describing the very progressive evolution from wooden architecture to stone architecture in various ancient civilizations, has commented that "In India, the form and construction of the older Buddhist temples resemble so singularly these examples in Lycia".<ref name="IHA">{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_JNbMexY8iWcC|title=The Illustrated Handbook of Architecture Being a Concise and Popular Account of the Different Styles of Architecture Prevailing in All Ages and All Countries by James Fergusson|date=1859|publisher=J. Murray|page=|language=en}}</ref> The structural similarities, down to many architectural details, with the ]-type Indian Buddhist temple designs, such as the "same pointed form of roof, with a ridge", are further developed in ''The cave temples of India''.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Fergusson|first1=James|url=https://archive.org/details/cavetemplesofind00ferguoft|title=The cave temples of India|last2=Burgess|first2=James|date=1880|publisher=London : Allen|page=}}</ref> The Lycian tombs, dated to the 4th century BCE, are either free-standing or rock-cut barrel-vaulted sarcophagi, placed on a high base, with architectural features carved in stone to imitate wooden structures. There are ] to the free-standing structures and decorated with reliefs.<ref>M. Caygill, The British Museum A-Z companion (London, The British Museum Press, 1999)</ref><ref>E. Slatter, Xanthus: travels and discovery (London, Rubicon Press, 1994)</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Smith|first1=A. H. (Arthur Hamilton)|url=https://archive.org/details/catalogueofsculp02britiala|title=A catalogue of sculpture in the Department of Greek and Roman antiquities, British museum|date=1892–1904|publisher=London : Printed by order of the Trustees|pages=–64}}</ref> Fergusson went on to suggest an "Indian connection", and some form of cultural transfer across the ].<ref name="HI">{{cite book|last1=Fergusson|first1=James|url=https://archive.org/details/anhistoricalinq00ferggoog|title=An historical inquiry into the true principles of beauty in art, more especially with reference to architecture|date=1849|publisher=London, Longmans, Brown, Green, and Longmans|pages=–320}}</ref> The ancient transfer of Lycian designs for rock-cut monuments to India is considered as "quite probable".<ref name="GHA"/> | |||
===== Masarh Lion ===== | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| header_align = center | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| total_width = 330 | |||
| perrow = 3 | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| image1 = Masarh lion sculpture.jpg | |||
| caption1 = Masarh lion sculpture | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| image2 = Lion-shaped weight-Sb 2718-P5280901-gradient.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Achaemenid lion | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| image3 = Lion of Menecrates at the Corfu Museum.jpg | |||
| caption3 = Lion of Menecrates, Greece | |||
| header = Perso-Hellenistic influence | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
}} | |||
The sculpture of the ], found near the Maurya capital of ], raises the question of the Achaemenid and Greek influence on the art of the ], and on the western origins of stone carving in India. The lion is carved in ], like the ], and its finish is polished, a feature of the ].<ref name="Gupta 88">Page 88: "There is one fragmentary lion head from Masarh, Distt. Bhojpur, Bihar. It is carved out of Chunar sandstone and it also bears the typical Mauryan polish. But it is undoubtedly based on the Achaemenian idiom. The tubular or wick-like whiskers and highly decorated neck with long locks of the mane with one series arranged like sea waves is somewhat non-Indian in approach. But, to be exact, we have an example of a lion from a sculptural frieze from Persepolis of 5th century BCE in which it is overpowering a bull which may be compared with the Masarh lion."... Page 122: "This particular example of a foreign model gets added support from the male heads of foreigners from Patna city and Sarnath since they also prove beyond doubt that a section of the elite in the Gangetic Basin was of foreign origin. However, as noted earlier, this is an example of the late Mauryan period since this is not the type adopted in any Ashoka pillar. We are, therefore, visualizing a historical situation in India in which the West Asian influence on Indian art was felt more in the late Mauryan than in the early Mauryan period. The term West Asia in this context stands for Iran and Afghanistan, where the Sakas and Pahlavas had their basecamps for eastward movement. The prelude to future inroads of the Indo-Bactrians in India had after all started in the second century B.C."... in {{cite book|last1=Gupta|first1=Swarajya Prakash|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0lDqAAAAMAAJ|title=The Roots of Indian Art: A Detailed Study of the Formative Period of Indian Art and Architecture, Third and Second Centuries B.C., Mauryan and Late Mauryan|year=1980|publisher=B.R. Publishing Corporation|isbn=978-0-391-02172-3|pages=88, 122|language=en|author-link=Swaraj Prakash Gupta}}. Also {{cite journal|last1=Kumar|first1=Vinay (Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Faculty Member)|date=2015|title=West Asian Influence on Lion Motifs in Mauryan Art|url=https://www.academia.edu/10709971|journal=Heritage and Us|language=en|issue=4|page=14|access-date=16 August 2021|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414181022/https://www.academia.edu/10709971|url-status=live}}</ref> According to ], the sculptural style is unquestionably ].<ref name="Gupta 88" /> This is particularly the case for the well-ordered tubular representation of whiskers (]s) and the geometrical representation of inflated veins flush with the entire face.<ref name="Gupta 88" /> The mane, on the other hand, with tufts of hair represented in wavelets, is rather naturalistic.<ref name="Gupta 88" /> Very similar examples are however known in Greece and ].<ref name="Gupta 88" /> It is possible that this sculpture was made by an Achaemenid or Greek sculptor in India and either remained without effect, or was the Indian imitation of a Greek or Achaemenid model, somewhere between the fifth century BCE and the first century BCE, although it is generally dated from the time of the ], around the 3rd century BCE.<ref name="Gupta 88" /> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Portal|Architecture|India}} | |||
{{colbegin}} | |||
* {{Portal inline|size=tiny|Architecture of India}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
{{colend}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{commons category|Architecture of India}} | |||
;Other Indian Art and Architecture forms | |||
{{-}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{Reflist |
{{Reflist}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Indian culture}} | |||
* Chandra, Pramod (2008), ''South Asian arts'', Encyclopædia Britannica. | |||
{{Indian art}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Evenson|first=Norma|title=The Indian Metropolis|year=1989|publisher=Yale University press|location=New Haven and London|isbn=978-0-300-04333-4|ref=harv}} | |||
* Blair, S. S., & Bloom, J. M. (1996), ''The art and architecture of Islam 1250-1800'', Yale University Press. | |||
* Chandra, Pramod (2008), "South Asian arts", ''Encyclopædia Britannica'' | |||
* {{cite book|last=Evenson|first=Norma|title=The Indian Metropolis|year=1989|publisher=Yale University press|location=New Haven and London|isbn=978-0-300-04333-4}} | |||
* Foekema, Gerard (1996), ''A Complete Guide to Hoysaḷa Temples'', Abhinav Publications, {{ISBN|81-7017-345-0}}. | * Foekema, Gerard (1996), ''A Complete Guide to Hoysaḷa Temples'', Abhinav Publications, {{ISBN|81-7017-345-0}}. | ||
* Gast, Klaus-Peter (2007), ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India'', Birkhäuser, {{ISBN|978-3-7643-7754-0}}. | * Gast, Klaus-Peter (2007), ''Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India'', Birkhäuser, {{ISBN|978-3-7643-7754-0}}. | ||
*Harle |
* {{cite book | last =Harle | first =J.C. | author-link = | title =The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent |series=Pelican History of Art | edition =2nd | year =1994 | publisher =Yale University Press | location = | isbn =0300062176 }} | ||
* {{Cite book|last=Haig|first=Thomas Wolseley|url=https://en.wikisource.org/Historic_Landmarks_of_the_Deccan|title=Historic Landmarks of the Deccan|publisher=The Pioneer Press|year=1907|location=Allahabad|author-link=Wolseley Haig}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Jaffar|first=S.M|title=The Mughal Empire From Babar To Aurangzeb|year=1936|publisher=Muhammad Sadiq Khan |location=Peshawar City|id=OU_1 60252|ref=harv}} | |||
* {{Cite journal|last=Hegewald|first=Julia A. B.|title=The International Jaina Style? Māru-Gurjara Temples Under the Solaṅkīs, throughout India and in the Diaspora|url=https://quod.lib.umich.edu/a/ars/13441566.0045.005?view=text;rgn=main|journal=Ars Orientalis|volume=45|doi=10.3998/ars.13441566.0045.005|issn=2328-1286|year=2011|issue=20191029|doi-access=free}} | |||
*], ''India, a History'', 2000, HarperCollins, {{ISBN|0002557177}} | |||
* Le Huu Phuoc, ''Buddhist Architecture'', 2009, Grafikol | |||
* Lach, Donald F. (1993), ''Asia in the Making of Europe (vol. 2)'', University of Chicago Press, {{ISBN|0-226-46730-9}}. | |||
* Lee Huu Phuoc, ''Buddhist Architecture'', 2009, Grafikol | |||
* Livingston, Morna & Beach, Milo (2002), ''Steps to Water: The Ancient Stepwells of India'', Princeton Architectural Press, {{ISBN|1-56898-324-7}}. | * Livingston, Morna & Beach, Milo (2002), ''Steps to Water: The Ancient Stepwells of India'', Princeton Architectural Press, {{ISBN|1-56898-324-7}}. | ||
* Michell, George, (1977) ''The Hindu Temple: An Introduction to its Meaning and Forms'', 1977, University of Chicago Press, {{ISBN|978-0-226-53230-1}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Mankekar|first=Kamla|title=Temples of Goa|year=2004|publisher=Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of Ind|location=India|pages=|isbn=978-81-2301161-5|ref=harv|author-link=Kamla Mankekar}} | |||
*Michell, George |
* Michell, George (1990), ''The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu'', 1990, Penguin Books, {{ISBN|0140081445}} | ||
* {{cite book|last=Michell|first=George |title=Architecture and Art of Southern India: Vijayanagara and the Successor States 1350–1750|year=1995|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-44110-0}} | |||
* Moffett, Marion; Fazio, Michael W.; Wodehouse Lawrence (2003), ''A World History of Architecture'', McGraw-Hill Professional, {{ISBN|0-07-141751-6}}. | |||
*{{cite book|last=Nilsson|first=Sten|title=European Architecture in India 1750–1850|year=1968|publisher=Faber and Faber|location=London|isbn=978-0-571-08225-4 |
* {{cite book|last=Nilsson|first=Sten|title=European Architecture in India 1750–1850|year=1968|publisher=Faber and Faber|location=London|isbn=978-0-571-08225-4}} | ||
* Piercey, W. Douglas & Scarborough, Harold (2008), ''hospital'', Encyclopædia Britannica. | * Piercey, W. Douglas & Scarborough, Harold (2008), ''hospital'', Encyclopædia Britannica. | ||
* Possehl, Gregory L. (1996), "Mehrgarh", ''Oxford Companion to Archaeology'' edited by Brian Fagan, Oxford University Press. | * Possehl, Gregory L. (1996), "Mehrgarh", ''Oxford Companion to Archaeology'' edited by Brian Fagan, Oxford University Press. | ||
*Rowland, Benjamin, ''The Art and Architecture of India: Buddhist, Hindu, Jain'', 1967 (3rd edn.), Pelican History of Art, Penguin, {{ISBN|0140561021}} | * Rowland, Benjamin, ''The Art and Architecture of India: Buddhist, Hindu, Jain'', 1967 (3rd edn.), Pelican History of Art, Penguin, {{ISBN|0140561021}} | ||
* Savage, George (2008), ''interior design'', Encyclopædia Britannica. | * Savage, George (2008), ''interior design'', Encyclopædia Britannica. | ||
* {{Cite book |last=Sen |first=Sailendra Nath |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/133102415 |title=Ancient Indian history and civilization |date=1999 |publisher=New Age International |isbn=81-224-1198-3 |edition=2 |location=New Delhi |oclc=133102415}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Tadgell|first=Christopher|title=The history of architecture in India : from the dawn of civilization to the end of the Raj|year=1990|publisher=Architecture Design and Technology Press|location=London|isbn=978-1-85454-350-9|ref=harv}} | |||
* {{cite book|last= |
* {{cite book|last=Tadgell|first=Christopher|title=The history of architecture in India : from the dawn of civilization to the end of the Raj|year=1990|publisher=Architecture Design and Technology Press|location=London|isbn=978-1-85454-350-9}} | ||
* {{cite book|last=Thapar|first=Bindia|title=Introduction to Indian Architecture|year=2004|publisher=Periplus Editions|location=Singapore|isbn=978-0-7946-0011-2}} | |||
* Rodda & Ubertini (2004), ''The Basis of Civilization-Water Science?'', International Association of Hydrological Science, {{ISBN|1-901502-57-0}}. | * Rodda & Ubertini (2004), ''The Basis of Civilization-Water Science?'', International Association of Hydrological Science, {{ISBN|1-901502-57-0}}. | ||
* Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003), ''The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India, C. 1350–1650'', Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|0-521-82613-6}}. | * Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003), ''The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India, C. 1350–1650'', Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|0-521-82613-6}}. | ||
* Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003), "Echoes of Empire: Vijayanagara and Historical Memory, Vijayanagara as Historical Memory", ''Archaeologies of memory'' edited by Ruth M. Van Dyke & Susan E. Alcock, Blackwell Publishing, {{ISBN|0-631-23585-X}}. | * Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003), "Echoes of Empire: Vijayanagara and Historical Memory, Vijayanagara as Historical Memory", ''Archaeologies of memory'' edited by Ruth M. Van Dyke & Susan E. Alcock, Blackwell Publishing, {{ISBN|0-631-23585-X}}. | ||
* Singh, Vijay P. & Yadava, R. N. (2003), ''Water Resources System Operation: Proceedings of the International Conference on Water and Environment'', Allied Publishers, {{ISBN|81-7764-548-X}}. | * Singh, Vijay P. & Yadava, R. N. (2003), ''Water Resources System Operation: Proceedings of the International Conference on Water and Environment'', Allied Publishers, {{ISBN|81-7764-548-X}}. | ||
* {{cite book |last=Soekmono |author-link=Soekmono |first=R.|editor=Jan Fontein|editor-link=Jan Fontein| title= The Javanese Candi: Function and Meaning, Volume 17 from Studies in Asian Art and Archaeology, Vol 17| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7cd2Ha7fT90C |publisher=E.J. BRILL | year=1995 |location=Leiden |isbn=9789004102156 }} | |||
* Teresi, Dick (2002), ''Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science—from the Babylonians to the Maya'', Simon & Schuster, {{ISBN|0-684-83718-8}}. | |||
*Vastu-Silpa Kosha, Encyclopedia of Hindu Temple architecture and Vastu/S.K.Ramachandara Rao, Delhi, Devine Books, (Lala Murari Lal Chharia Oriental series) {{ISBN|978-93-81218-51-8}} (Set) | * Vastu-Silpa Kosha, Encyclopedia of Hindu Temple architecture and Vastu/S.K.Ramachandara Rao, Delhi, Devine Books, (Lala Murari Lal Chharia Oriental series) {{ISBN|978-93-81218-51-8}} (Set) | ||
* {{cite book |title=Bidar, Its History and Monuments |last=Yazdani |first=Ghulam |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w6xpQpOCtzAC |date=1947 }} | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
* {{cite book|last=Havell|first=E.B.| |
* {{cite book|last=Havell|first=E.B.|author-link=E. B. Havell|title=Indian Architecture, its psychology, structure, and history from the first Muhammadan invasion to the present day|url=https://archive.org/stream/indianarchitectu00haveuoft#page/n9/mode/2up|year=1913|publisher=J. Murray, London }} | ||
* {{cite book|last=Coomaraswamy|first=Ananda K.| |
* {{cite book|last=Coomaraswamy|first=Ananda K.|author-link=Ananda K. Coomaraswamy|title=Viśvakarmā; examples of Indian architecture, sculpture, painting, handicraft|url=https://archive.org/stream/cu31924022942993#page/n3/mode/2up|year=1914|publisher=London}} | ||
* {{cite book|last=Havell|first=E. B.| |
* {{cite book|last=Havell|first=E. B.|author-link=E. B. Havell|title=The Ancient and Medieval Architecture of India: a study of Indo-Aryan civilisation|url=https://archive.org/stream/cu31924011010109#page/n9/mode/2up|year=1915|publisher=John Murray, London}} | ||
* ]; Cruickshank, Dan, , Architectural Press, 20th edition, 1996 (first published 1896). {{ISBN|0-7506-2267-9}}. Cf. Part Four, Chapter 26. | * ]; Cruickshank, Dan, , Architectural Press, 20th edition, 1996 (first published 1896). {{ISBN|0-7506-2267-9}}. Cf. Part Four, Chapter 26. | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* {{Commons category-inline}} | |||
* | * | ||
{{reflist|group=note|2}} | |||
{{Reflist|group=note|2}} | |||
{{Architecture of India}} | {{Architecture of India}} | ||
{{Asia in topic|Architecture of}} | {{Asia in topic|Architecture of}} | ||
{{India topics}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Architecture Of |
{{DEFAULTSORT:India, Architecture Of}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 22:10, 12 December 2024
Kailash Temple, Ellora Caves is an example of Indian rock-cut architecture.Tamil architecture of Meenakshi TemplePatwon ki Haveli, Jaisalmer. Rows of sandstone haveli in Rajasthan.The Taj Mahal, Agra is the epitome of Mughal architecture.Dalhousie Square, built during British Raj period, is an example of the fusion of Indian and Renaissance architecture.Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
Indian architecture is rooted in the history, culture, and religion of India. Among several architectural styles and traditions, the best-known include the many varieties of Hindu temple architecture and Indo-Islamic architecture, especially Rajput architecture, Mughal architecture, South Indian architecture, and Indo-Saracenic architecture. Early Indian architecture was made from wood, which did not survive due to rotting and instability in the structures. Instead, the earliest existing architecture are made with Indian rock-cut architecture, including many Buddhist, Hindu, and Jain temples.
The Hindu temple architecture is divided into the Dravidian style of southern India and the Nagara style of northern India, with other regional styles. Housing styles also vary between regions, depending on climate.
The first major Islamic kingdom in India was the Delhi Sultanate, which led to the development of Indo-Islamic architecture, combining Indian and Islamic features. The rule of the Mughal Empire, when Mughal architecture evolved, is regarded as the zenith of Indo-Islamic architecture, with the Taj Mahal being the high point of their contribution. Indo-Islamic architecture influenced the Rajput and Sikh styles as well.
During the British colonial period, European styles including Neoclassical, Gothic Revival, and Baroque became prevalent across India. The amalgamation of Indo-Islamic and European styles led to a new style, known as the Indo-Saracenic style. After India's independence, modernist ideas spread among Indian architects as a way of progressing from the colonial culture. Le Corbusier - who designed the city of Chandigarh - influenced a generation of architects towards modernism in the 20th century. The economic reforms of 1991 further bolstered the urban architecture of India as the country became more integrated with the world's economy. Traditional Vastu Shastra remains influential in India's architecture in the contemporary era.
Neolithic period
In South India, the Neolithic began in 6500 BCE and lasted till around 1400 BCE when the Megalithic transition period began. The South Indian neolithic period is characterized by ash mounds from 2500 BCE in the region of Karnataka, which later expanded into Tamil Nadu.
Neolithic settlements have been found in the northwest (Kashmir), east (Bihar and Odisha), south (Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Andhra Pradesh), and the northeastern frontier (Meghalaya) of India.
Neolithic StructuresMegalithic Dolmens in Mallachandram, Tamil NaduStone circle at Junapani, NagpurStone Umbrellas shaped Megalithic burials of Stone Age are situated in Ariyannur, KeralaMegalithic monument in Karkabhat megalithic burial site near Balod, ChhattisgarhThe earliest clear evidence of the megalithic urn burials, discovered at various places in Tamil Nadu, date back to 1000 BCE. The most notable megalithic urn was discovered in Adichanallur, 24 kilometres (15 mi) from Tirunelveli, where archaeologists from the Archaeological Survey of India unearthed 12 urns containing human skulls, skeletons and bones, husks, grains of charred rice and Neolithic celts, confirming the presence of the Neolithic period 2800 years ago.
The unearthed local and foreign antiquities (of art, architecture, customs, and rituals) depicted by the engravings on pottery and other artifacts, indicate that the prehistoric people of the Burzahom established contact with Central Asia and South West Asia, and had links to the Gangetic plains and peninsular India.
Megalithic burial sites have been found scattered all over the subcontinent. The Neolithic period lasted up until 3300 BCE, overlapping with the following Early Harappan (Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age) period. One of the earliest Neolithic sites in India is Lahuradewa in the Middle Ganga region and Jhusi near the confluence of the Ganga and Yamuna rivers, both dating to around the 7th millennium BCE.
Indus Valley Civilization (2600 BCE – 1900 BCE)
Main articles: Ancient Indian architecture and Harappan architectureThe Indus Valley civilization covered a large area around and beyond the Indus River basin in the late Bronze Age of India. In its mature phase, from about 2600 to 1900 BCE, the civilization developed several cities marked by great uniformity within and between sites, including Harappa, Lothal, and the UNESCO World Heritage Site Mohenjo-daro.
Planning of Indus valley civilization citiesLayout of DholaviraLayout of KalibanganThe drainage system at LothalKalibangan pre-Harappan structuresThe civic and town planning and the engineering of these cities are deemed remarkable, but the building designs are "of a startling utilitarian character". There are granaries, drains, water-courses and tanks, but neither palaces nor temples have been identified, though cities have a central raised and fortified "citadel". Mohenjo-daro has wells which may be the predecessors of the stepwell. As many as 700 wells have been discovered in just one section of the city, leading scholars to believe that 'cylindrical brick lined wells' were invented by the Indus Valley Civilization.
Architectural decoration is extremely minimal, though there are "narrow pointed niches" inside some buildings. Most of the art found is in miniature forms like seals, and mainly in terracotta, but there are very few larger sculptures of figures. In most sites, fired mud-brick (not sun-baked as in Mesopotamia) is used exclusively as the building material, but a few sites, such as Dholavira, are in stone. Most houses have two storeys, and uniform sizes and plans. The large cities declined relatively quickly, for unknown reasons, so a less sophisticated village culture was left behind.
After the collapse of the Mature Harappan Period, some cities still remained urban and inhabited. Sites like Bet Dwarka in Gujarat, Kudwala (38.1 ha) in Cholistan, and Daimabad (20 Ha) in Maharashtra are considered urban. Daimabad (2000–1000 BC), developed a fortification wall with bastions in its Jorwe culture period (1400–1000 BC), and had public buildings, such as an elliptical temple and an apsidal temple. It also shows evidence of planning in the layout of rectangular houses, and streets or lanes, and planned streets. The area had risen to 50 hectares in with a population of 10,000 people. A 580-metre (1,900 ft) long protection wall dated 1500 BCE was found at Bet Dwarka which was believed to be damaged and submerged following a sea storm.
600 BCE—250 CE
Further information: Ancient Indian architecture, Buddhist architecture, and Indian rock-cut architecture Conjectural reconstruction of the main gate of Kushinagar circa 500 BCE adapted from a relief at SanchiCity of Kushinagar in the 5th century BCE according to a 1st century BCE frieze in Sanchi Stupa 1 Southern GateIndian architecture after the Indus Valley Civilization around the Maurya Empire, from 322 to 185 BCE, most likely used wood or recycled brick. Much of the remains discovered from this period onwards are of Indian rock-cut architecture, predominantly Buddhist.
The construction of Buddhist monastic buildings began before the death of the Buddha, around 400 BCE. This first generation of monasteries only survive in floor-plans, notably the Jivakarama vihara in Bihar.
Important features of the period's architecture include, walled and moated cities with large gates and multi-storied buildings, wooden chaitya arches for roofs, and further structures above solid storeys. The reliefs of Sanchi, dated to the 1st centuries BCE-CE, denote places such as Kushinagar or Rajagriha as splendid walled cities, as in the Royal cortege leaving Rajagriha or War over the Buddha's relics. These views of ancient Indian cities are relied on for the understanding of ancient Indian urban architecture.
In the case of the Mauryan capital Pataliputra (near Patna), we have Greek accounts, and that of Faxian; Megasthenes (a visitor around 300 BCE) mentions 564 towers and 64 gates in the city walls. Modern excavations have uncovered a "massive palisade of teak beams held together with iron dowels". A huge apadana-like hall with eighty sandstone columns shows clear influence from contemporary Achaemenid Persia. The single massive sandstone Pataliputra capital shows clear Hellenistic features, reaching India via Persia. The famous Ashoka columns show great sophistication, and a variety of influences in their details. In both these cases a now-vanished Indian predecessor tradition in wood is likely.
Post-Maha-Janapadas ArchitectureThe Great Stupa at Sanchi (4th–1st century BCE). The dome-shaped stupa was used in India as a commemorative monument associated with storing sacred relics.The Mahabodhi Temple built by Asoka at Bodh Gaya. Relief from Sanchi, 1st century CESuch a tradition is extremely clear in the case of the earliest-known examples of rock-cut architecture, the state-sponsored Barabar caves in Bihar, personally dedicated by Ashoka circa 250 BCE. The entrance of the Lomas Rishi Cave there has a sculpted doorway that clearly copies a wooden style in stone, which is a recurrent feature of rock-cut caves for some time. These artificial caves exhibit an amazing level of technical proficiency, the extremely hard granite rock being cut in geometrical fashion and given the Mauryan polish, also found on sculpture. Later rock-cut viharas, occupied by monastic communities, survive, mostly in Western India, and in Bengal the floor-plans of brick-built equivalents survive. The elaborately decorated facades and "chaitya halls" of many rock-cut sites are believed to reflect vanished free-standing buildings elsewhere.
The Buddhist stupa, a dome shaped monument, was used in India as a commemorative monument associated with storing sacred relics. The stupa architecture was adopted in Southeast and East Asia, where it became prominent as a Buddhist monument used for enshrining sacred relics. Guard rails—consisting of posts, crossbars, and a coping—became a feature of safety surrounding a stupa. Temples—build on elliptical, circular, quadrilateral, or apsidal plans—were constructed using brick and timber. The Indian gateway arches, the torana, reached East Asia with the spread of Buddhism. Some scholars hold that torii derives from the torana gates at the Buddhist historic site of Sanchi (3rd century BCE – 11th century CE).
Rock-cut stepwells in India date from 200 to 400 CE. Subsequently, the construction of wells at Dhank (550–625 CE) and stepped ponds at Bhinmal (850–950 CE) took place. Cave temples became prominent throughout western India, incorporating various unique features to give rise to cave architecture in places such as the caves at Ajanta and Ellora.
A very important development, the emergence of the shikara or temple tower, is today best evidenced by the Buddhist Mahabodhi Temple. This was already several centuries old when the first very vertical structure replaced an Ashokan original, apparently around 150–200 CE. The current brick-built tower, probably a good deal larger, dates to the Gupta period, in the 5th or 6th centuries.
Gupta architecture
The Gupta period chiefly represented a hiatus in Indian rock-cut architecture; the first wave of construction was completed before the empire was assembled, and the second wave began in the late 5th century, after its end. For example, an early group of the Ajanta Caves was crafted by 220 CE and a later group was made around 460 CE. Nonetheless, most of the first surviving free-standing structures in India are accredited to the Gupta period, in particular, the beginnings of Hindu temple architecture. As Milo Beach writes, "Under the Guptas, India was quick to join the rest of the medieval world in a passion for housing precious objects in stylized architectural frameworks", the "precious objects" primarily suggesting the icons of gods.
The caves at Ajanta, including Elephanta and Ellora (respectively Buddhist, Hindu, mixed, and Jain) were produced under other dynasties in Central India. Ellora was made after the Gupta period, yet they primarily reflect the monumentality and balance of Guptan style. The Ajanta Caves contain the most significant and mature survivals of painting and the periods, mainly in palace paintings. The Hindu Udayagiri Caves record connections with the dynasty and its ministers, and the Dashavatara Temple at Deogarh, one of the earliest to survive, showcases important sculpture.
North Indian Hindu temples that have survived after the 5th century Udayagiri Caves in Madhya Pradesh include those at Tigawa (early 5th century), Sanchi Temple 17 (similar, but respectively Hindu and Buddhist), Deogarh, Parvati Temple, Nachna (465), Bhitargaon, the largest Gupta brick temple to survive, and Lakshman Brick Temple, Sirpur (600–625). Gop Temple in Gujarat (c. 550 or later) is an oddity, with no surviving close comparator.
There are a number of broad models of Guptan-style temples, however, the most common plan exemplifies small but massively built stone prostyle buildings with a sanctuary and a columned porch, apparent at Tigawa and Sanchi Temple 17 and continued today. Both temples have flat roofs over the sanctuary, which would become uncommon by about the 8th century, as seen in the design of the Mahabodhi Temple, Bhitargaon, Deogarh and Gop, with high superstructures of different shapes. The Chejarla Kapoteswara temple further demonstrates the continuance of free-standing chaitya-hall temples with barrel roofs, with many smaller wooden examples.
- A tetrastyle prostyle Gupta period temple at Sanchi beside the Apsidal hall with Maurya foundation. An example of Buddhist architecture from the 5th century.
- The Hindu Tigawa Temple from the early 5th century.
- The current structure of the Mahabodhi Temple dates to the Gupta era in the 5th century. It marks the location where the Buddha is said to have attained enlightenment.
- Vishnu temple in Eran from the 5th-6th century.
- Pataini temple is a Jain temple built during the Gupta period in the 5th century.
- Relief of Jain tirthankara Parshvanatha on the Kahaum pillar, erected by a person named Madra during the reign of Skandagupta in 461.
- The Buddhagupta pillar at Eran (c.476–495)
Temple architecture
Main article: Hindu temple architectureWhereas the visible stylistic forms of the temple vary greatly and have a complicated development, the basic elements of a Hindu temple remain the same across all periods and styles. The most essential feature is the inner sanctuary, the garbhagriha or "womb-chamber", where the primary murti of a deity is housed in. Around this chamber are other structures and buildings, at times covering several acres. On the exterior, the garbhagriha is crowned by a tower-like shikhara, also called the vimana in the south. The temple may include an ambulatory for parikrama (circumambulation), one or more mandapas or congregation halls, and sometimes an antarala antechamber and porch between the garbhagriha and mandapa.
Temple architectural stylesKandariya Mahadeva Temple, Nagara StyleBrihadisvara Temple, Dravida StyleLingaraja Temple, Kalinga StyleNageshswara Temple, Vesara StyleLarger temples may include more shrines or buildings, either connected together or detached, with smaller temples in the compound. The entire temple compound is usually enclosed by a wall, and at times, raised on a plinth (adhiṣṭhāna). Large areas of the structure are often decorated with carving, including figurative images of deities and other religious figures.
By the 7th century CE, most key features of the Hindu temple were established in theoretical texts on temple architecture and building methods. Three styles of temple were identified: nagara, dravida and vesara. The styles were sometimes mixed, and not yet associated with specific regions in India. For example, in Karnataka, the group of 7th and 8th-century temples at Pattadakal famously mixes forms later associated with both north and south, as does that at Aihole, which still includes apsidal chaitya hall-type plans.
Nagara commonly refers to North Indian temple styles, most easily recognised by a high and curving shikhara over the sanctuary. Dravida or Dravidian architecture is the broad South Indian style, possessing a lower superstructure over the sanctuary. Instead, the structure has a straight profile, rising in a series of terraces to form a decorated pyramid. Today, this is often dwarfed in larger temples by the far larger gopuram outer gateways, a much later development. The ancient term vesara is also used to describe a temple style with characteristics of both the northern and southern traditions. These attributes come from the Deccan and other fairly central parts of India. Although disagreement stands on the exact period and styles that vesara represents, the term is mainly assigned to the northern tradition, but are regarded as a kind of northern dravida by others.
Nagara architecture
Early
Excluding earlier structures in timber-based architecture, hardly any remains of Nagara Hindu temples exist from before the Gupta dynasty in the 4th century CE. The rock-cut Udayagiri Caves are among the most important early sites. The earliest preserved Hindu temples are simple cell-like stone temples, some rock-cut and others structural, as at Sanchi. By the 6th or 7th century, these evolved into high shikhara stone superstructures. However, there is inscriptional evidence, such as the ancient Gangadhara inscription from around 424, that towering temples predated the 6th or 7th century, and they were made from more perishable material. These temples have not survived.
Early North Indian temples that have survived after the 5th century Udayagiri Caves in Madhya Pradesh include, Deogarh, Parvati Temple, Nachna (465 CE), Lalitpur District (c. 525), Lakshman Brick Temple, Sirpur (600–625 CE); Rajiv Lochan temple, and Rajim (7th-century CE).
Pre-7th century CE South Indian style stone temples have not survived. However, early South Indian temples that have survived, though in ruins, include the diverse styles at Mahabalipuram, from the 7th and 8th centuries. According to Meister, the Mahabalipuram temples are "monolithic models of a variety of formal structures all of which already can be said to typify a developed "Tamil Architecture" (South Indian) order". They suggest a tradition and a knowledge base existing in South India by the time of the early Chalukya and Pallava era when these were built. Other examples are found in Aihole and Pattadakal.
From between about the 7th and 13th centuries a large number of temples and their ruins have survived (though far fewer than once existed). Many regional styles developed, very often following political divisions, as large temples were typically built with royal patronage. In the north, Muslim invasions from the 11th century onwards reduced the building of temples, and saw the loss of many existing ones. The south also witnessed Hindu-Muslim conflict that affected the temples, but the region was relatively less affected than the north. In the late 14th century, the Hindu Vijayanagara Empire came to power and controlled much of South India. During this period, the distinctive very tall gopuram gatehouse actually a late development, from the 12th century or later, typically added to older large temples.
The recently constructed Ram Mandir in Ayodhya is constructed as per the Nagara style.
Later
North Indian temples showed increased elevation of the wall and elaborate spire by the 10th century. On the shikara, the oldest form, called latina, with wide shallow projections running up the sides, developed alternative forms with many smaller "spirelets" (urushringa). Two varieties of these are called sekhari, where the sub-spires extend vertically, and bhumija, where individual sub-spires are arrayed in rows and columns.
Richly decorated temples—including the complex at Khajuraho—were constructed in Central India. Examples include the Lingaraja Temple at Bhubaneshwar in Odisha, Sun Temple at Konark in Odisha, Brihadeeswarar Temple at Thanjavur in Tamil Nadu. Indian traders brought Indian architecture to South East Asia through various trade routes.
Styles called vesara include the early Badami Chalukya Architecture, Western Chalukya architecture, and finally Hoysala architecture. Other regional styles include those of Bengal, Kashmir and other Himalayan areas, Karnataka, Kalinga architecture, and Māru-Gurjara architecture.
Hoysala architecture is the distinctive building style developed under the rule of the Hoysala Empire in the region historically known as Karnata, today's Karnataka, India, between the 11th and the 14th centuries. Large and small temples built during this era remain as examples of the Hoysala architectural style, including the Chennakesava Temple at Belur, the Hoysaleswara temple at Halebidu, and the Kesava Temple at Somanathapura. Other examples of fine Hoysala craftmanship are the temples at Belavadi, Amrithapura, and Nuggehalli. Study of the Hoysala architectural style has revealed a negligible Indo-Aryan influence while the impact of Southern Indian style is more distinct. A feature of Hoysala temple architecture is its attention to detail and skilled craftsmanship. The temples of Belur and Halebidu are proposed UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Approximately 100 Hoysala temples survive today.
Temples of Khajuraho
Main article: Khajuraho Group of Monuments § Arts and sculptureThe Khajuraho Temples are a group of Hindu and Jain temples located in the town of Khajuraho, in the Chhatarpur District of Madhya Pradesh, India. The temples were built between 950 and 1050 by the Chandela dynasty.
Khajuraho is home to 25 sandstone temples in total, although only 20 remain mostly intact. The beautiful carvings on these temples, which show themes from Hindu mythology as well as other facets of everyday life in ancient India, are well-known. Both Hindu and Jain architectural influences may be seen in their design. The temples are split into three groups: the Western group, the Eastern group, and the Southern group. The Western group has the greatest popularity and draws the most tourists.
The Khajuraho Temples were declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1986, and they continue to be a popular tourist attraction in India. According to UNESCO, the Khajuraho Temples "are a masterpiece of Indian art, with their unique architecture and stunning sculptures.
Dravidian style
Main article: Dravidian architecture Dravidian architectural elementsSingle storey gopura (Dravidian architecture)Two storey gopura (Dravidian architecture)Pillar elements (shared by Nagara and Dravidian)Athisthana architectural elements of a Hindu templeEntablature elementsA vimana with mandapam elements (Dravidian architecture)Dravidian style or the South Indian temple style is an architectural idiom in Hindu temple architecture that emerged in the southern part of the Indian subcontinent or South India and in Sri Lanka, reaching its final form by the sixteenth century. It is seen in Hindu temples, and the most distinctive difference from north Indian styles is the use of a shorter and more pyramidal tower over the garbhagriha or sanctuary called a vimana, where the north has taller towers, usually bending inwards as they rise, called shikharas. However, for modern visitors to larger temples the dominating feature is the high gopura or gatehouse at the edge of the compound; large temples have several, dwarfing the vimana; these are a much more recent development. There are numerous other distinct features such as the dwarapalakas – twin guardians at the main entrance and the inner sanctum of the temple and goshtams – deities carved in niches on the outer side walls of the garbhagriha.
Mayamata and Manasara shilpa texts estimated to be in circulation by 5th to 7th century, is a guidebook on Dravidian style of Vastu Shastra design, construction, sculpture and joinery technique. Isanasivagurudeva paddhati is another text from the 9th century describing the art of building in India in south and central India.
From 300 BCE – 300 CE, the greatest accomplishments of the kingdoms of the early Chola, Chera and the Pandyan kingdoms included brick shrines to deities Kartikeya, Shiva, Amman and Vishnu. Several of these have been unearthed near Adichanallur, Kaveripoompuharpattinam and Mahabalipuram, and the construction plans of these sites of worship were shared to some detail in various poems of Sangam literature.
The architecture of the rock-cut temples, particularly the rathas, became a model for south Indian temples. Architectural features, particularly the sculptures, were widely adopted in South India. Descendants of the sculptors of the shrines are artisans in contemporary Mahabalipuram.
South Indian TemplesVijayanagara EmpireBadami ChalukyaChola thalassocracyPandya DynastyThe Badami Chalukyas also called the Early Chalukyas, ruled from Badami, Karnataka in the period 543–753 and spawned the Vesara style called Badami Chalukya Architecture. The finest examples of their art are seen in Pattadakal, Aihole and Badami in northern Karnataka. Over 150 temples remain in the Malaprabha basin.
The Rashtrakuta contributions to art and architecture are reflected in the splendid rock-cut shrines at Ellora and Elephanta, situated in present-day Maharashtra. It is said that they altogether constructed 34 rock-cut shrines, but most extensive and sumptuous of them all is the Kailasanatha temple at Ellora. The temple is a splendid achievement of Dravidian art. The walls of the temple have marvellous sculptures from Hindu mythology including Ravana, Shiva and Parvathi while the ceilings have paintings. These projects spread into South India from the Deccan. The architectural style used was partly Dravidian. They do not contain any of the shikharas common to the Nagara style and were built on the same lines as the Virupaksha temple at Pattadakal in Karnataka.
Vijayanagara architecture of the period (1336–1565) was a notable building style evolved by the Vijayanagar empire that ruled most of South India from their capital at Vijayanagara on the banks of the Tungabhadra River in present-day Karnataka. The architecture of the temples built during the reign of the Vijayanagara empire had elements of political authority. This resulted in the creation of a distinctive imperial style of architecture which featured prominently not only in temples but also in administrative structures across the deccan. The Vijayanagara style is a combination of the Chalukya, Hoysala, Pandya and Chola styles which evolved earlier in the centuries when these empires ruled and is characterised by a return to the simplistic and serene art of the past. The South Indian temple consists essentially of a square-chambered sanctuary topped by a superstructure, tower, or spire and an attached pillared porch or hall (maṇḍapa or maṇṭapam), enclosed by a peristyle of cells within a rectangular court. The external walls of the temple are segmented by pilasters and carry niches housing sculpture. The superstructure or tower above the sanctuary is of the kūṭina type and consists of an arrangement of gradually receding stories in a pyramidal shape. Each story is delineated by a parapet of miniature shrines, square at the corners and rectangular with barrel-vault roofs at the centre.
The Warangal Fort, Thousand Pillar Temple, and Ramappa Temple are examples of Kakatiya architecture.
Vesara Architecture
The style adopted in the region that today lies in the modern states of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh (Deccan) which served in its geographical position as buffer between north and south, that architectural style has mix of both the Nagara and Dravidian temple styles. While some scholars consider the buildings in this region as being distinctly either nagara or dravida, a hybridised style that seems to have become popular after the mid-seventh century, is known in some ancient texts as vesara. In the southern part of the Deccan, i.e., in the region of Karnataka is where some of the most experimental hybrid styles of vesara architecture are to be found.
Vesara styleDurga temple at Aihole showing Chaitya styleKailasa Temple, ElloraPattadakkal Temple, KarnatakaLad Khan temple is one of the oldest Hindu temples.An important temple is Papnath temple, dedicated to Lord Shiva. The temple is one of the best early examples of the South Indian tradition. By contrast other eastern Chalukyan Temples, like the Mahakuta, five kilometres from Badami, and the Swarga Brahma temple at Alampur show a greater assimilation of northern styles from Odisha and Rajasthan. At the same time the Durga temple at Aihole is unique having an even earlier style of an apsidal shrine which is reminiscent of Buddhist chaitya halls and is surrounded by a veranda of a later kind, with a shikhara that is stylistically like a nagara one. The Lad Khan temple at Aihole in Karnataka seems to be inspired by the wooden-roofed temples of the hills, except that it is constructed out of stone.
Historians agree that the vesara style originated in what is today Karnataka. According to some, the style was started by the Chalukyas of Badami (500-753AD) whose Early Chalukya or Badami Chalukya architecture built temples in a style that mixed some features of the nagara and the dravida styles, for example using both the northern shikhara and southern vimana type of superstructure over the sanctum in different temples of similar date, as at Pattadakal. However, Adam Hardy and others regard this style as essentially a form of Dravida. This style was further refined by the Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta (750-983AD) in sites such as Ellora.
Though there is clearly a good deal of continuity with the Badami or Early Chalukya style, other writers only date the start of Vesara to the later Western Chalukyas of Kalyani (983–1195 AD), in sites such as Lakkundi, Dambal, Itagi, and Gadag, and continued by the Hoysala empire (1000–1330 AD).
The Hoysala temples at Belur, Halebidu and Somanathapura are leading examples of the Vesara style. These temples are now proposed as a UNESCO world heritage site.
Jain architecture
Main article: Jain temple Further information: Māru-Gurjara architectureJain temple architecture is generally close to Hindu temple architecture, and in ancient times Buddhist religious architecture. Normally the same builders and carvers worked for all religions, and regional and period styles are generally similar. The basic layout of a Hindu and most Jain temples has consisted of a small garbhagriha or sanctuary for the main murti or cult images, over which the high superstructure rises, then one or more larger mandapa halls.
The earliest survivals of Jain architecture are part of the Indian rock-cut architecture tradition, initially shared with Buddhism, and by the end of the classical period with Hinduism. Very often numbers of rock-cut Jain temples and monasteries share a site with those of the other religions, as at Udayagiri, Bava Pyara, Ellora, Aihole, Badami, and Kalugumalai. The Ellora Caves are a late site, which contains temples of all three religions, as the earlier Buddhist ones give way to later Hindu excavations.
There is considerable similarity between the styles of the different religions, but often the Jains placed large figures of one or more of the 24 tirthankaras in the open air rather than inside the shrine. These statues later began to be very large, normally standing nude figures in the kayotsarga meditation position (which is similar to standing at attention). Examples include the Gopachal rock cut Jain monuments and the Siddhachal Caves, with groups of statues, and a number of single figures including the 12th-century Gommateshwara statue, and the modern Statue of Vasupujya and, largest of all at 108 feet (33 meters) tall, the Statue of Ahimsa.
The main buildings of the largest Dilwara temples are surrounded by "cloister" screens of devakulikā shrines, and are fairly plain on the outer walls of these; in the case of the Vimal Vasahi this screen was a later addition, around the time of the second temple. Surrounding the main temple with a curtain of shrines was to become a distinctive feature of the Jain temples of West India, still employed in some modern temples.
Mostly funded by private individuals or groups, and catering to a smaller population, Jain temples tend to be at the small or middle end of the range of sizes, but at pilgrimage sites they may cluster in large groups – there are altogether several hundred at Palitana, tightly packed within several high-walled compounds called "tuks" or "tonks". Temple charitable trusts, such as the very large Anandji Kalyanji Trust, founded in the 17th century and now maintaining 1,200 temples, play a very important role in funding temple building and maintenance.
Māru-Gurjara architecture
Main article: Māru-Gurjara architectureRegional differences in Hindu temples are largely reflected in Jain ones, except that Māru-Gurjara architecture or the "Solanki style" has become to some extent a pan-Indian, indeed pan-global Jain style. This is a particular temple style from Gujarat and Rajasthan (both regions with a strong Jain presence) that originated in both Hindu and Jain temples around 1000, but became enduringly popular with Jain patrons, spreading to other parts of India and the global Jain diaspora of the last century. It has remained in use, in somewhat modified form, to the present day, indeed also becoming popular again for some Hindu temples in the last century. The style is seen in the groups of pilgrimage temples at Dilwara on Mount Abu, Taranga, Girnar and Palitana.
Interiors are more lavishly decorated, with elaborate carving on most surfaces. In particular, Jain temples often have small low domes carved on the inside with a highly intricate rosette design. Another distinctive feature is "flying" arch-like elements between pillars, touching the horizontal beam above in the centre, and elaborately carved. These have no structural function, and are purely decorative. The style developed large pillared halls, many open at the sides, with Jain temples often having one closed and two pillared halls in sequence on the main axis leading to the shrine.
The Māru-Gurjara style did not represent a radical break with earlier styles. The previous styles in north-west India, and the group of Jain temples of Khajuraho, forming part of the famous Khajuraho Group of Monuments are very largely in the same style as their Hindu companions, which were mostly built between 950 and 1050. They share many features with the Māru-Gurjara style: high plinths with many decorated bands on the walls, lavish figurative and decorative carving, balconies looking out on multiple sides, ceiling rosettes, and others, but at Khajuraho the great height of the shikharas is given more emphasis. There are similarities with the contemporary Hoysala architecture from much further south. In both of these styles architecture is treated sculpturally.
- Detailed carving of elephant, Ranakpur Jain Temple
- Rani Ki Vav, Gujarat
- Somanath Temple
- Adalaj stepwell
- Taranga Jain Temple, Gujarat
Indo-Islamic architecture
Main article: Indo-Islamic architectureThe Indo-Islamic architecture began under influence of Islam in Indian subcontinent around the 7th century AD. Many of these styles are also influence by regional Indian architecture. It also Replace Indian Trabeate style with Arcuate style. Turks and Persians, who inherited wealth of various design from Sassanian and Byzantine empire, shaped and influenced the architecture.
Islamic buildings initially adapted the skills of a workforce trained in earlier Indian traditions to their own designs. Unlike most of the Islamic world, where brick tended to predominate, India had highly skilled builders well used to producing stone masonry of extremely high quality. Alongside the architecture developed in Delhi and prominent centres of Mughal culture such as Agra, Lahore and Allahabad, a variety of regional styles developed in regional kingdoms like the Bengal, Gujarat, Deccan, Jaunpur and Kashmir Sultanates. Following the collapse of the Mughal Empire, regional nawabs such as in Lucknow, Hyderabad and Mysore continued to commission and patronize the construction of Mughal-commissioned architecture in the princely states.
Sultanate
Significant regional styles developed in the independent sultanates formed when the Tughlaq empire weakened in the mid-14th century, and lasted until most were absorbed into the Mughal Empire in the 16th century. Apart from the sultanates of the Deccan Plateau, Gujarat, Bengal, and Kashmir, the architecture of the Malwa and Jaunpur sultanates also left some significant buildings.
Delhi Sultanate
The start of the Delhi Sultanate in 1206 under Qutb al-Din Aibak introduced a large Islamic state to India, using Central Asian styles. The important Qutb Complex in Delhi was begun under Muhammad of Ghor, by 1199, and continued under Qutb al-Din Aibak and later sultans. The Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque, now a ruin, was the first structure. Like other early Islamic buildings it re-used elements such as columns from destroyed Hindu and Jain temples, including one on the same site whose platform was reused. The arches were corbelled in the traditional Indian way. Alai Minar, a minaret twice the size of Qutb Minar was commissioned by Alauddin Khilji but never completed. Other examples include the Tughlaqabad Fort and Hauz Khas Complex.
Another very early mosque, begun in the 1190s, is the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra in Ajmer, Rajasthan, built for the same Delhi rulers, again with corbelled arches and domes. Here Hindu temple columns (and possibly some new ones) are piled up in threes to achieve extra height. Both mosques had large detached screens with pointed corbelled arches added in front of them, probably under Iltutmish a couple of decades later.
At Ajmer the smaller screen arches are tentatively cusped, for the first time in India. By around 1300 true domes and arches with voussoirs were being built; the ruined Tomb of Balban (d. 1287) in Delhi may be the earliest survival. The Alai Darwaza gatehouse at the Qutb complex, from 1311, still shows a cautious approach to the new technology, with very thick walls and a shallow dome, only visible from a certain distance or height. Bold contrasting colours of masonry, with red sandstone and white marble, introduce what was to become a common feature of Indo-Islamic architecture, substituting for the polychrome tiles used in Persia and Central Asia. The pointed arches come together slightly at their base, giving a mild horseshoe arch effect, and their internal edges are not cusped but lined with conventionalized "spearhead" projections, possibly representing lotus buds. Jali, stone openwork screens, are introduced here; they already had been long used in temples.
By the time of Tughlaqs Islamic architecture in India had adopted some features of earlier Indian architecture, such as the use of a high plinth, and often mouldings around its edges, as well as columns and brackets and hypostyle halls. After the death of Firoz the Tughlaqs declined, and the following Delhi dynasties were weak. Most of the monumental buildings constructed were tombs, although the impressive Lodi Gardens in Delhi (adorned with fountains, charbagh gardens, ponds, tombs and mosques) were constructed by the late Lodi dynasty. The architecture of other regional Muslim states was often more impressive.
Deccan Sultanates
Dawood Shah of Bahamani Sultanate ruled for very short amount of time in 1378 but invented a new style of tomb, comprising two similar, domed structures on a single basement, a style not seen anywhere outside Kalaburagi. Firuz Shah who died in 1422 copied the double-chambered style but made his tomb much simpler. The black basalt door jambs reminiscent of temple pillars, the recessed arches bearing stucco floral work, arches bearing stucco floral work, and the chajjas borne on brackets that resemble those found in temples all become common features in later Bahmani architecture. Rangin Mahal in Bidar Fort, built by Ali Barid Shah in the 1500s. While the beautiful tile mosaics on some of its walls and the luminescent mother-of-pearl inlays on black basalt are Persian in style, its carved wooden pillars and brackets are clearly derived from local residential architecture.
The main architectural activities for the Barid Shahi rulers were building garden tombs. The tomb of Ali Barid Shah (1577) is the most notable monument in Bidar. The tomb consists of a lofty domed chamber, open on four sides, located in the middle of a Persian four-square garden. The Rangin Mahal in Bidar, built during the reign of Ali Barid Shah, is a complete and exquisitely decorated courtly structure. Other important monuments in Bidar from this period are the tomb of Qasim II and the Kali Masjid.
Amongst the major architectural works in the Bijapur Sultanate, one of the earliest is the unfinished Jami Masjid, which was begun by Ali Adil Shah I in 1576. It has an arcaded prayer hall, with fine aisles, and has an impressive dome supported by massive piers. One of the most impressive monuments built during the reign of Ibrahim II was the Ibrahim Rouza which was originally planned as a tomb for queen Taj Sultana, but was later converted into the tomb for Ibrahim Adil Shah II and his family. This complex, completed in 1626, consists of a paired tomb and mosque.
Notable buildings of the Bahmani and Deccan sultanates in the Deccan include the Charminar, Mecca Masjid, Qutb Shahi tombs, Madrasa Mahmud Gawan and Gol Gumbaz.The greatest monument in Bijapur is the Gol Gumbaz, the mausoleum of Muhammad Adil Shah, which was completed in 1656, and whose hemispherical dome measures 44 metres (144 ft) across.
One of the earliest architectural achievements of the Qutb Shahi dynasty is the fortified city of Golconda, which is now in ruins. In the 16th century, Muhammad Quli Qutb Shah decided to shift the capital to Hyderabad, 8 kilometres (5.0 mi) east of Golconda. Here, he constructed the most original monument in the Deccan, the Charminar, in the heart of the new city. This monument, completed in 1591, has four minarets, each 56 metres (184 ft).
Bengal Sultanate
The style of the Bengal Sultanate mostly used brick, with characteristic features being indigenous Bengali elements, such as curved roofs, corner towers and complex terracotta ornamentation. which were with blended. One feature in the sultanate was the relative absence of minarets. Many small and medium-sized medieval mosques, with multiple domes and artistic niche mihrabs, were constructed throughout the region.
These features are also seen in the Choto Sona Mosque (around 1500), which is in stone, unusually for Bengal, but shares the style and mixes domes and a curving "paddy" roof based on village house roofs made of vegetable thatch. Such roofs feature even more strongly in later Bengal Hindu temple architecture, with types of style such as the do-chala, Jor-bangla Style, and char-chala. For larger mosques, Bengali architects multiplied the numbers of domes, with a nine-domed formula (three rows of three) being one option, surviving in four examples, all 15th or 16th century and now in Bangladesh, although there were others with larger numbers of domes.
The largest mosque in the Indian subcontinent was the 14th century Adina Mosque. Built of stone demolished from temples, it featured a monumental ribbed barrel vault over the central nave, the first such giant vault used anywhere in the subcontinent. The mosque was modelled on the imperial Sassanian style of Persia. The Sultanate style flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. A provincial style influenced by North India evolved in Mughal Bengal during the 17th and 18th centuries. The Mughals also copied the Bengali do-chala roof tradition for mausoleums in North India.
Although the description in Pandua, the ancient capital, shows mainly Persian culture in courts, we find one of the first attempts at fusing together the Islamic and Bengali style of architecture under Ilyas Shahi dynasty who ruled then. Under Jalaludin emerged the 'Bengal' style of mosques. With Jalaludin's reign we see the beginnings of a trend of Muslim ruling dynasty that grounded itself in local culture rather than seeking legitimacy from Delhi or Mecca. Upon his return to Delhi from his first Bengal expedition, Firoz Shah Tughlaq built Kotla Mosque, which bear a striking resemblance to the Bengal style.
Kashmir
By 1339, Shams-ud-din Shah Mir of the Shah Mir dynasty established a sultanate encompassing the region of Kashmir (consisting of modern-day Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, and Aksai Chin), allowing for the gradual Islamization of the region and the hybridization of Persianate culture and architecture with the indigenous Buddhist styles of Kashmir. In the capital at Srinagar in modern Indian-administered Kashmir, Sikandar Shah Mir constructed the Jamia Masjid, a large wooden congregational mosque that incorporates elements two cultures, that is, it has been erected in Persian style but its minar is topped with umbrella-shaped finial, which is in similitude with Buddhist pagoda structure, as well as the wooden Khanqah-e-Moulah mosque. Also in Srinagar are the Aali Masjid and the Tomb of Zain-ul-Abidin. Two 14th-century wooden mosques in Gilgit-Baltistan are the Chaqchan Mosque in Khaplu (1370) and the Amburiq Mosque in Shigar. Both have stone-built cores with elaborately carved wooden exterior galleries, at Amburiq on two levels, in an adaptation of traditional local styles.
Gujarat sultanate
Gujarat SultanateJami Masjid, ChampanerJaali work at Sarkhej RozaJama Masjid, AhmedabadSaher ki MasjidUnder the Gujarat Sultanate, independent between 1407 and 1543, Gujarat was a prosperous regional sultanate under the rule of the Muzaffarid dynasty, who built lavishly, particularly in the capital, Ahmedabad, in its distinctive style of Indo-Islamic architecture. The sultanate commissioned mosques such as the Jami Masjid of Ahmedabad, Jama Masjid at Champaner, Jami Masjid at Khambhat, Qutbuddin Mosque, Rani Rupamati Mosque, Sarkhej Roza, Sidi Bashir Mosque, Kevada Mosque, Sidi Sayyed Mosque, Nagina Mosque and Pattharwali Masjid, as well as structures such as Teen Darwaza, Bhadra Fort and the Dada Harir Stepwell in Ahmedabad.
The distinctive Indo-Islamic architecture style of Gujarat drew micro-architectural elements from earlier Maru-Gurjara architecture and employed them in mihrab, roofs, doors, minarets and facades. In the 15th century, the Indo-Islamic style of Gujarat is especially notable for its inventive and elegant use of minarets. They are often in pairs flanking the main entrance, mostly rather thin and with elaborate carving at least at the lower levels. Some designs push out balconies at intervals up the shaft; the most extreme version of this was in the lost upper parts of the so-called "shaking minarets" at the Jama Mosque, Ahmedabad, which fell down in an earthquake in 1819. This carving draws on the traditional skills of local stone-carvers, previously exercised on Hindu temples in the Māru-Gurjara and other local styles.
Indo-Islamic architecture style of Gujarat presages many of the architectural elements later found in Mughal architecture, including ornate mihrabs and minarets, jali (perforated screens carved in stone), and chattris (pavilions topped with cupolas).
The Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park, the 16th century capital of Gujarat Sultanate, documents the early Islamic and pre-Mughal city that has remained without any change.
Mughal Empire
Main article: Mughal architectureThe most famous Indo-Islamic style is Mughal architecture. Mughal art and architecture, a characteristic Indo-Islamic-Persian style flourished on the Indian subcontinent during the Mughal empire (1526–1857). This new style combined elements of Islamic art and architecture, which had been introduced to India during the Delhi Sultanate (1192–1398) and had produced great monuments such as the Qutb Minar, with features of Persian art and architecture. Its most prominent examples are the series of imperial mausolea, which started with the pivotal Tomb of Humayun, but is best known for the Taj Mahal.
Mughal elementsThe Tomb of Salim Chishti and jali latticed screens is famed as one of the finest examples of Mughal architecture in India.Darwaza-I-Rauza, Taj Mahal Complex, showing large vaulted gateways with delicate ornamentation and minarets with cupolasPachin Kari or Pietra Dura on Tomb of I'timād-ud-DaulahBulbous domes on Tomb of Nisar Begum at Khusro BaghIt is known for features including monumental buildings with large, bulbous onion domes, surrounded by gardens on all four sides, and delicate ornamentation work, including pachin kari decorative work and jali-latticed screens. Pietra dura or ‘Parchinkari’ rose to prominence under patronage of Emperors specially under Shah Jahan. Originating from Italy, it found its way to Mughal courts via trade route. It adapted to its present distinct feature of floral art by the hands of local artisans and Persian influence.
Mughals brought in Persian style into Indian Architecture. The character and structure of Mughal buildings displayed a uniform character and structure. Some of the main features of the Mughal architecture are mentioned below.
- Large halls
- Very large vaulted gateways
- Delicate ornamentation
- Bulbous domes
- Slender Minarets with cupolas at the 4 corners
The Red Fort at Agra (1565–74) and the walled city of Fatehpur Sikri (1569–74) are among the architectural achievements of this time—as is the Taj Mahal, built as a tomb for Queen Mumtaz Mahal by Shah Jahan (1628–58). Employing the double dome, the recessed archway, the depiction of any animal or human—an essential part of the Indian tradition—was forbidden in places of worship under Islam.
Mughal architecture reached its zenith during the reign of the emperor Shah Jahan (1628–58), its crowning achievement being the magnificent Taj Mahal. This period is marked by a fresh emergence in India of Persian features that had been seen earlier in the tomb of Humayun. The use of the double dome, a recessed archway inside a rectangular fronton, and parklike surroundings are all typical of this period. Symmetry and balance between the parts of a building were always stressed, while the delicacy of detail in Shah Jahan decorative work has seldom been surpassed.
The Taj Mahal does contain tilework of plant ornaments. The architecture during the Mughal Period, with its rulers being of Turco-Mongol origin, has shown a notable blend of Indian style combined with the Islamic. Taj Mahal in Agra, India is one of the wonders of the world.
Mughal gardens are gardens built by the Mughals in the Islamic style. This style was influenced by Persian gardens. They are built in the char bagh structure, which is a quadrilateral garden layout based on the four gardens of Paradise mentioned in the Qur'an. This style is intended to create a representation of an earthly utopia in which humans co-exist in perfect harmony with all elements of nature.
The quadrilateral garden is divided by walkways or flowing water into four smaller parts. Significant use of rectilinear layouts are made within the walled enclosures. Some of the typical features include pools, fountains and canals inside the gardens.
- Safdarjung's Tomb is built in the late Mughal style for Nawab Safdarjung. The tomb is described as the "last flicker in the lamp of Mughal architecture".
- Tomb of I'timād-ud-Daulah is a Mughal mausoleum in Agra. It is noticeable for the first use of pietra dura technique. The tomb is often regarded as a draft of the Taj Mahal.
- Shalimar Bagh is a Mughal garden in Srinagar, linked through a channel to the northeast of Dal Lake. The Bagh is considered the high point of Mughal horticulture.
- Akbar's Tomb, Agra was built with red sandstone by his son and grandson in 1605 to 1618.
- Humayun's Tomb, Delhi, the first fully developed Mughal imperial tomb, 1569–70 CE
Regional styles
Rajput Architecture
Main article: Rajput architecture See also: Architecture of RajasthanRajput elementsJharokha windows of Hawa MahalProfusely painted interiors Jal MahalPietra Dura and Jaali works on Amer Fort EntranceChandra Mahal showcasing fusion of Rajput and Mughal stylesSalim Singh ki HaveliChhatris in UdaipurRajput Architecture represents different types of buildings, which may broadly be classed either as secular or religious. The secular buildings are of various scales. These include temples, forts, stepwells, gardens, and palaces. The forts were specially built for defense and military purposes due to the Islamic invasions.
Mughal architecture and painting is claimed to have influenced indigenous Rajput styles of art and architecture.
The Hill Forts of Rajasthan (Amer, Chittor, Gagron, Jaisalmer, Kumbhalgarh, Ranthambore), a group of six forts built by various Rajput kingdoms and principalities during the medieval period are among the best examples of Rajput Architecture. The ensemble is also a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Other forts include the Mehrangarh Fort and Jaigarh Fort.
Most of the population of Rajasthan is Hindu, and there has historically been a considerable Jain minority; this mixture is reflected in the many temples of the region. Māru-Gurjara architecture, or "Solaṅkī style" is a distinctive style that began in Rajasthan and neighbouring Gujarat around the 11th century, and has been revived and taken to other parts of India and the world by both Hindus and Jains. This represents the main contribution of the region to Hindu temple architecture. The Dilwara Jain Temples of Mount Abu built between the 11th and 13th centuries CE are the best-known examples of the style. The Mughal architecture greatly influenced indigenous Rajput styles of art and architecture.
Some architectural style innovated and influenced by Rajasthani architectural styles are:-
Rajput FortsJodhpur FortNeemrana FortAmer FortChittorgarh FortIn Hindi, the "Chhatri" refers to a canopy or umbrella. Chhatris are the elevated pavilions with dome shaped porches. The Chhatris are used as a symbol to portray the fundamentals of admiration and pride in its style of architecture.
A Jharokha is a kind of suspended enclosed gallery. A significant purposes it served was to allow women to witness the events and society outside the palace life without being noticed. This eventually lead to Jharokha Darshan, adapted by Mughals, which allowed essential and direct communication between the emperors or kings and the general public.
The walled city of Jaipur was formed in 1727 by Kacchwaha Rajput ruler Jai Singh II, and is "a unique example of traditional Hindu town planning", following the precepts set out in much Hindu texts. Subsequently, the City Palace, Hawa Mahal, Rambagh Palace, Jal Mahal and Albert Hall Museum were also built. Udaipur also has several palaces, including the Bagore-ki-Haveli, now a museum, built in the 18th century.
Rajput architecture continued well into the 20th and 21st centuries, as the rulers of the princely states of British India commissioned vast palaces and other buildings, such as the Albert Hall Museum, Lalgarh Palace, and Umaid Bhawan Palace. These usually incorporated European styles as well, a practice which eventually led to the Indo-Saracenic style
Sikh Architecture
Main article: Sikh architectureSikh architecture is heavily influenced by Mughal and Islamic styles. The onion dome, frescoes, in-lay work, and multi-foil arches, are Mughal influences, more specially from Shah Jahan's period, whereas chattris, oriel windows, bracket supported eaves at the string-course, and ornamented friezes are derived from elements of Rajput architecture. Apart from religious buildings, Sikh architecture includes secular forts, bungas (residential places), palaces, and colleges.
Gurudwara
The religious structure is called gurdwara (a place where the Guru dwells). The word gurdwara is a compound of guru (guide or master) and dwara (gateway or seat). The Golden Temple in Amritsar and Hazur Sahib are examples.
Gurdwara buildings do not have to conform to any set architectural design. The only established requirements are: the installation of the Granth Sahib under a canopy or in a canopied seat, usually on a platform higher than the specific floor on which the devotees sit, and a tall Sikh pennant flag atop the building.
In the 21st century, more and more gurdwaras (especially within India) have been following the Harimandir Sahib pattern, a synthesis of Indo-Islamic and Sikh architecture. Most of them have square halls, stand on a higher plinth, have entrances on all four sides, and have square or octagonal domed sanctums usually in the middle. During recent decades, to meet the requirements of larger gatherings, bigger and better ventilated assembly halls, with the sanctum at one end, have become accepted style. The location of the sanctum, more often than not, is such as to allow space for circumambulation. Sometimes, to augment the space, verandahs are built to skirt the hall. A popular model for the dome is the ribbed lotus, topped by an ornamental pinnacle. Arched copings, kiosks and solid domelets are used for exterior decorations.
Maratha Architecture
The Maratha Rule from 17th to 19th Centuries, emerged after the Maratha's victory over the Mughal Empire in the Maratha-Mughal Wars, Prominent buildings such as the Shaniwar Wada and Lal Mahal in Pune are examples. The decorative features of the mansions were “pointed arches, heavy carved stone brackets, narrow balconies projecting on rows of such brackets, domical shallow ceilings resting on a variety of squinches, the chief being the interwoven type”.
Many jyotirlinga temples were rebuilt by the Marathas after being destroyed by invading Islamic forces. Some examples are the Kashi Vishwanath, Mahakaleshwar, Trimbakeshwar, Grishneshwar temples. The ghats of Varanasi were also rebuilt under Maratha patronage, including the Dashashwamedh Ghat and Scindia Ghat.
The Maratha structures used both the local architectural style and the Maratha's own distinct corinthian columns style. Because of the constant turmoil and protracted wars with Mughals, Nawabs, Afghans, and other forces, very little documentation of these efforts remain. Nevertheless, studies of these structures show that the main architectural elements were made from brick, wood, mortar and stone. Wood was most used element as it is easily and cheaply available in Maharashtra and Karnataka. The Historian Khafi Khan wrote about enchanting beauty of 16th Century wooden Palaces, temples and Forts However very few of these survived due to wars with Mughal Empire and comparatively short life of wooden structures than stone and marble structures. Forts were the main focus of Maratha architecture, decorated with Deccan-style pointed arches and elaborate woodwork.
Herman Goetz writes about their architectural style in his work ‘Five Thousand Years of Indian Art’: “The Maratha temples generally provided with a huge lampstand (deepmala), The wood work they used to decorate their palaces and other civil buildings was intricate and minute. Maratha art could have developed and attained a distinctive character but it was not possible because of the turbulent times of Medieval India.
Dzong Architecture
Main article: Dzong architectureDzongs are a type of fortified monastery with a distinctive architecture that are found mainly in Tibet, Bhutan and North and Northeastern part of India. The architecture is massive in style with towering exterior walls surrounding a complex of courtyards, temples, administrative offices, and monks' accommodation.
Distinctive features include:
- High inward sloping walls of brick and stone painted white with few or no windows in the lower sections of the wall
- Use of a surrounding red ochre stripe near the top of the walls, sometimes punctuated by large gold circles
- Use of unique style flared roofs atop interior temples
- Massive entry doors made of wood and iron
- Interior courtyards and temples brightly colored in Buddhist-themed art motifs such as the ashtamangala or swastika
By tradition, dzongs are constructed without the use of architectural plans. Instead construction proceeds under the direction of a high lama who establishes each dimension by means of spiritual inspiration. Dzongs comprise heavy masonry walls surrounding one or more courtyards. The main functional spaces are usually arranged in two separate areas: the administrative offices; and the religious functions – including temples and monks' accommodation. This division between administrative and religious functions reflects the idealized duality of power between the religious and administrative branches of government.
This accommodation is arranged along the inside of the outer walls and often as a separate stone tower located centrally within the courtyard, housing the main temple, that can be used as an inner defensible citadel. The roofs are massively constructed in hardwood and bamboo, highly decorated at the eaves, and are constructed traditionally without the use of nails. They are open at the eaves to provide a ventilated storage area. They were traditionally finished with timber shingles weighted down with stones
- Stupas in Thikse Monastery
- Ralang Monastery, Sikkim
- Tawang Monastery, Arunachal Pradesh
- Tawang Monastery assembly hall
- Prayer hall at the Golden Temple in Bylakuppe, a Tibetan settlement in Karnataka
Bengal Architecture
Main article: Architecture of BengalThe architecture of Bengal, which comprises the modern country of Bangladesh and the Indian states of West Bengal, Tripura, and Barak Valley in Assam, has a long and rich history, blending indigenous elements from the Indian subcontinent, with influences from different parts of the world. Bengali architecture includes ancient urban architecture, religious architecture, rural vernacular architecture, colonial townhouses and country houses, and modern urban styles.
Ancient Bengali architecture reached its pinnacle during the Pala Empire (750–1120); this was Bengali-based and the last Buddhist imperial power in the Indian subcontinent. Most patronage was of Buddhist viharas, temples and stupas. Pala architecture influenced Tibetan and Southeast Asian architecture. The most famous monument built by the Pala emperors was the Grand Vihara of Somapura, now a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Historians believe Somapura was a model for the architects of Angkor Wat in Cambodia.
Distinctive architectural elements are:-
- Deul Temple - Originally influenced by Kalinga style, they were main temple style during 6th-10th century. It was the style of Jain and Hindu temple architecture of Bengal, where the temple lacks the usual mandapa beside the main shrine, and the main unit consists only of the shrine and a deul (shikhara) above it. It was revived in the 16th to 19th century. The later representatives of this style were generally smaller and included features influenced by Islamic architecture.
- Chala Temple - Chala style or Hut style temples were influenced by the vernacular architecture or rural Bengal. Thatched rooftops of the houses were either in form of do-chala type which has only two hanging roof tips on each side of a roof divided in the middle by a ridge or char-chala type, the two roof halves are fused into one unit and have a dome-like shape. The char-chala temples started coming up around the 17th century and profoundly adopted by Mughal and later the Rajput in their architectural styles.
- Ratna Temple - The curved roof of the temple is surmounted by one or more towers or pinnacles called ratna (jewel). The ratna style came up in the 15th-16th century. It was basically a mix of chala and deul architecture where small deul, or in some case domes, were used on the centre or corners of the chala (char chala) roof.
- Dalan Temple - With the comings of European colonists, a new form of temple style took place. Generally used by Zamindars or elite Bengalis, Dalan style became prominent in the 19th century. The flat-roofed (dalan) temples was easier to build and had incorporated many European elements, specially the arches. In the long run, this style lost its special identity as religious architecture and got mixed up with domestic architecture.
Deuls are located in the numerous rivers crisscrossed by stone-free alluvial and bush landscape of the southern Sundarbans settlements in the Indian state of West Bengal.
Most temples surviving in reasonable condition date from about the 17th century onwards, after temple building revived; it had stopped after the Muslim conquest in the 13th century. The roofing style of Bengali Hindu temple architecture is unique and closely related to the paddy roofed traditional building style of rural Bengal. The "extensive improvisation within a local architectural idiom" which the temples exhibit is often ascribed to a local shortage of expert Brahmin priests to provide the rather rigid guidance as to correct forms that governed temple architecture elsewhere. In the same way the terracotta reliefs often depict secular subjects in a very lively fashion.
In larger, and later, temples, small towers rise up from the centre or corners of the curving roof. These are straight-sided, often with conical roofs. They have little resemblance to a typical north Indian shikara temple tower. The pancharatna ("five towers") and navaratna ("nine towers") styles are varieties of this type.
The bungalow style is a notable architectural export of Bengal. The corner towers of Bengali religious buildings were replicated in medieval Southeast Asia. Bengali curved roofs, suitable for the very heavy rains, were adopted into a distinct local style of Indo-Islamic architecture, and used decoratively elsewhere in north India in Mughal architecture.
Structures like Rasmancha, built by King Bir Hambir, has an unusual elongated pyramidical tower, surrounded by hut-shaped turrets, which were very typical of Bengali roof structures of the time. Madan Mohan Temple was built in the ekaratna style, surmounted by a pinnacle along with carvings on the walls depicting scenes from the Ramayana, Mahabharata and the Puranas. Temples like Dakshineswar Kali Temple, features the Navratna style of roof.
Bengal is not rich in good stone for building, and traditional Bengali architecture mostly uses brick and wood, often reflecting the styles of the wood, bamboo and thatch styles of local vernacular architecture for houses. Decorative carved or moulded plaques of terracotta (the same material as the brick) are a special feature. The brick is extremely durable and disused ancient buildings were often used as a convenient source of materials by local people, often being stripped to their foundations over the centuries.
European colonial architecture
As with the Mughals, under European colonial rule, architecture became an emblem of power, designed to endorse the occupying power. Numerous European countries invaded India and created architectural styles reflective of their ancestral and adopted homes. The European colonizers created architecture that symbolized their mission of conquest, dedicated to the state or religion.
The British, French, Dutch and the Portuguese were the main European powers that established colonies in India.
British Colonial Era: 1757–1947
Indo-Saracenic
Further information: Indo-Saracenic Revival architecture Lutyens' DelhiThe Viceroy's House (now Rashtrapati Bhavan) was built for the Viceroy of India. It now serves as the official residence of the President of India.The War Memorial Arch (now India Gate) is a memorial to 70,000 soldiers of the British Indian Army who died in the First World War.The Secretariat Building is located in the North Block.The Council House, built for the Imperial Legislative Council, is now Sansad Bhawan, and houses the Parliament of India.Lutyens' Delhi, designed by Edwin Lutyens, houses all key government buildings of India.Britain's legacy and heritage in the Indian subcontinent remains among others in buildings and infrastructure. The major cities during the period of British rule were Madras (Chennai), Calcutta, Bombay (Mumbai), New Delhi, Agra, Bangalore, Bankipore, Karachi, Nagpur, Bhopal& Hyderabad, which saw the rise of Indo-Saracenic Revival architecture.
Indo-Saracenic Revival architectureMadras High Court buildings are a prime example of Indo-Saracenic architecture, designed by JW Brassington under guidance of British architect Henry Irwin.The Viceregal Lodge, now Rashtrapati Niwas, in Shimla designed by Henry Irwin in the Jacobethan style and built in the late 19th century.The Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus (previously Victoria Terminus) in Mumbai, 1878–88, is a mixture of Romanesque, Gothic and Indian elements.The Victoria Memorial in Calcutta is the most effective symbolism of British Empire.Black Town described in 1855 as "the minor streets, occupied by the natives are numerous, irregular and of various dimensions. Many of them are extremely narrow and ill-ventilated ... a hallow square, the rooms opening into a courtyard in the centre." Garden houses were originally used as weekend houses for recreational use by the upper class British. Nonetheless, the garden house became ideal a full-time dwelling, deserting the fort in the 19th Century.
Mumbai (Bombay) has some of the most prominent examples of British colonial architecture. This included the gothic revival (Victoria terminus, University of Bombay, Rajabai Clock Tower, Bombay High Court, BMC Building), Indo-Saracenic (Prince of Wales Museum, Gateway of India, Taj Mahal Palace Hotel) and Art Deco (Eros Cinema, New India Assurance Building).
Madras and Calcutta were similarly bordered by water and division of Indian in the north and British in the south. An Englishwoman noted in 1750 "the banks of the river are as one may say absolutely studded with elegant mansions called here as at Madras, garden houses." Esplanade-row is fronts the fort with lined palaces. Indian villages in these areas consisted of clay and straw houses which later transformed into the metropolis of brick and stone.The Chepauk Palace in the city, designed by Paul Benfield, is said to be the first Indo-Saracenic building in India. Since then, many of the colonial-era buildings in the city were designed in this style of architecture, which is most apparent around the Fort St George built in 1640. Most of these were designed by English architects Robert Fellowes Chisholm and Henry Irwin. The best examples of this style include the Madras High Court (built in 1892), Southern Railway headquarters, Ripon Building, Government Museum, Senate House of the University of Madras, Amir Mahal, Bharat Insurance Building, Victoria Public Hall and the College of Engineering. The Triumph of Labour, also known as the Labour statue, at the Marina Beach is an important landmark of Madras.
Indo-Saracenic architecture evolved by combining Indian architectural features with European styles. Vincent Esch and George Wittet were pioneers in this style. The Victoria Memorial in Calcutta is the most effective symbolism of British Empire, built as a monument in tribute to Queen Victoria's reign. The plan of the building consists of one large central part covered with a larger dome. Colonnades separate the two chambers. Each corner holds a smaller dome and is floored with marble plinth. The memorial stands on 26 hectares of garden surrounded by reflective pools.
The period of British rule saw wealthy Bengali families (especially zamindar estates) employing European firms to design houses and palaces. The Indo-Saracenic movement was strongly prevalent in the region. While most rural estates featured an elegant country house, the cities of Calcutta had widespread 19th and early 20th century urban architecture, comparable to London, Sydney or Auckland. Art deco influences began in Calcutta in the 1930s.
Romanesque-Italianate
The Italianate architectural style was popularised in early Victorian Britain and subsequently became an attractive form adopted in India in the later parts of the 19th century. The main characteristics of this style include imposing cornice structures, prominent cornice and corbels, Roman arches, arch headed or pedimented windows, flat or ‘hip’ roof, and windows with distinctive moulded caps. The one outstanding building in this class was the East Indian Railway Head Offices at Calcutta built in 1884.
Neoclassical
Neoclassical buildings are characterized by their magnificence of scale, the prominent use of columns, the use of geometric forms and symmetry, predominantly blank walls and the triangular pediment. Some large private houses were built in and around Kolkata by wealthy merchants. Examples of Neoclassical architecture in Indian public buildings include the British Residency, Hyderabad (1798) and Falaknuma Palace (1893) in Hyderabad, St Andrews Church in Madras (1821), Raj Bhawan (1803) and Metcalfe Hall (1844) in Kolkata, and Bangalore Town Hall (1935) in Bangalore.
NeoclassicismSamriddhi Bhavan, High Court(right), Secretariat(left) on River HooghlyNational library of India, KolkataFalaknuma Palace, HyderabadMumbai UniversityArt Deco
Art DecoEsplanade Mansions, KolkataEros Cinema, MumbaiArt Deco style apartments in Marine Drive, MumbaiParrys Corner, ChennaiThe Art Deco movement of the early 20th century quickly spread to large parts of the world. The Indian Institute of Architects, founded in Bombay in 1929, played a prominent role in propagating the movement. Guided by their desire to emulate the west, the Indian architects were fascinated by the industrial modernity that Art Deco offered. The western elites were the first to experiment with the technologically advanced facets of Art Deco, and architects began the process of transformation by the early 1930s.
Mumbai has the world's second-largest collection of Art Deco structures, after Miami. The New India Assurance Building, Eros Cinema and buildings along the Marine Drive in Mumbai are prime examples.
In Kolkata, the sole example of the Art Nouveau style, which preceded Art Deco, is the Esplanade Mansions opposite the Raj Bhavan, built in 1910.
Assam-type
Assam-type architecture is found in Assam and Sylhet region. The houses constructed using this style are generally termed as Assam-type houses, consisting usually one or more storeys. The houses are built to be earthquake proof, and are made from materials ranging from wood and bamboo to steel and concrete.
Assam Type houses are a type of designs developed by the colonial British administration in Assam after the massive earthquake of 1897. British engineers modified the traditional Assamese houses made from mud-plastered bamboo walls and thatched roofs to make Assam Type houses with wood, reed, mud plaster and hay after studying the climate and topography of the entire region.
Buildings are constructed on both flat and sloped terrains. On flat grounds, the buildings are typically rectangular or L or C layout. On other surfaces, such as highlands, they are usually rectangular in shape, accessed via the hillside. The roof is typically erected by high gables to overcome heavy rainfall in the region, where walls are usually timber-framed, plastered with cement. With high ceilings and well-ventilated rooms, the floorings are either wooden or concrete with tiled, mosaic or stone surfacing with stilts.
Other Colonial Powers
Among the other European colonies were Portuguese Goa and Damaon and Portuguese Bombay and Bassein. The Madh Fort, St. John the Baptist Church & Castella de Aguada in Bombay are remnants of Portuguese colonial rule. The Churches and convents of Goa, an ensemble of seven churches built by the Portuguese in Goa are a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
The Portuguese were among the first European traders to discover the sea route to India as early as 1498. The first Portuguese encounter with the subcontinent was on 20 May 1498 AD, when Vasco da Gama reached Calicut on the coast of the Malabar region.
The settlements along the Hooghly river — a branch of the Ganges — attracted maritime traders from as many European nations, turning that part of Bengal into a little Europe. The Portuguese set up post at Bandel, the Danish at Serampore, the Dutch at Chinsurah and the French at Chandernagore. A British military base came up in Barrackpore. Thus influencing neighbouring regions' architecture to create a distinct indo-colonial architecture.
The history of Pondicherry is recorded only after the arrival of Dutch, Portuguese, British and French traders. In 1674 the French East India Company set up a trading centre at Pondicherry and this outpost eventually became the administrative centre of French settlements in India. The city has many colonial buildings, churches, temples and statues which, combined with the town planning and French style avenues in the old part of town, still preserve much of the colonial ambiance.
- The Chandannagar Strand Ghat, reminiscences of a French colony, Chandannagar, West Bengal
- Fort Dansborg, built by the 17th century Danish admiral Ove Gjedde, reminiscences of Danish India, Tharangambadi, Tamil Nadu
- Tomb of Susanna Anna Maria, reminiscences of Dutch India, Chinsurah, West Bengal
- Church Of St Francis Of Assisi, reminiscent of Portuguese India, Goa
- French Quarter, Pondicherry. The city became the chief French settlement in India.
India after independence (1947 onwards)
BrutalismSecretariat Building, Chandigarh, Le CorbusierIIT Delhi, J. K. ChoudhuryStateman House, New Delhi, Sir Edwin Lutyens and Sir Herbert BakerReserve Bank of India (RBI) building Kolkata, Sir Rajen MookherjeeIn recent times there has been a movement of population from rural areas to urban centres of industry, leading to price rise in property in various cities of India. Urban housing in India balances space constrictions and is aimed to serve the working class. Growing awareness of ecology has influenced architecture in India during modern times.
Climate responsive architecture has long been a feature of India's architecture but has been losing its significance as of late. Indian architecture reflects its various socio-cultural sensibilities which vary from region to region. Certain areas are traditionally held to be belonging to women. Villages in India have features such as courtyards, loggias, terraces and balconies. Calico, chintz, and palampore—of Indian origin—highlight the assimilation of Indian textiles in global interior design. Roshandans, which are skylights-cum-ventilators, are a common feature in Indian homes, especially in North India.
At the time of independence in 1947, India had only about 300 trained architects in a population of what was then 330 million, and only one training institution, the Indian Institute of Architects. Thus the first generation of Indian architects were educated abroad.
Some early architects were traditionalists, such as Ganesh Deolalikar, whose design for the Supreme Court imitated the Lutyens-Baker buildings down to the last detail, and B.R. Manickam, who designed the Vidhana Soudha in Bangalore revived the Dravidian architecture.
In 1950, French architect Le Corbusier, a pioneer of modernist architecture, was commissioned by Jawaharlal Nehru to design the city of Chandigarh. His plan called for residential, commercial and industrial areas, along with parks and transportation infrastructure. In the middle was the capitol, a complex of three government buildings – the Palace of Assembly, the High Court, and the Secretariat. He also designed the Sanskar Kendra at Ahmedabad. Corbusier inspired the next generation of architects in India to work with modern, rather than revivalist styles.
Economic liberalisation and consequent prosperity enabled more radical new styles to be tried along with a sense to compete with modern and western architectural standards.
Other prominent examples of modernist architecture in India include IIM Ahmedabad by Louis Kahn (1961), IIT Delhi by Jugal Kishore Chodhury (1961), IIT Kanpur by Achyut Kanvinde (1963), IIM Bangalore by B. V. Doshi (1973), Lotus Temple by Fariborz Sahba (1986), and Jawahar Kala Kendra (1992) and Vidhan Bhawan Bhopal (1996) by Charles Correa.
Skyscrapers built in the international style are becoming increasingly common in cities. This includes The 42 (2019) and The Imperial (2010) by Hafeez Contractor. Other projects of the 21st century include IIT Hyderabad by Christopher Benninger (2015).
Notable ongoing projects in India include the city of Amaravati, Kolkata Museum of Modern Art, Sardar Patel Stadium, World One, and Navi Mumbai Airport.
Landscape Architecture
Further information: Mughal gardensThere is less archaeological evidence of early gardens elsewhere in India but the ancient Hindu sacred books give a remarkably detailed account of gardens in Ancient India.
During Mauryan Era, palaces took a central role and with it came the gardens. The Hindu scriptures (shastras) set down a code for the orientation and organization of buildings in relation to compass points, hills, water and plants. No physical form survived but rock carvings like in Ajanta Caves or in Stupas shows an existence of airy structures with timber columns. Those illustrations show vegetation alongside the platform and columns. Emperor Ashoka's inscriptions mention the establishment of botanical gardens for planting medicinal herbs, plants, and trees. They contained pools of water, were laid in grid patterns, and normally had chattri pavilions with them.
Hindu and Buddhist temple sites, from ancient times, have emphasized on 'Sacred Grooves' or medical gardens. Hindu and Buddhist Temples like in Mahabodhi and Chinese Buddhist pilgrim Xuanzang mentions accounts of Nalanda where "azure pool winds around the monasteries, adorned with the full-blown cups of the blue lotus; the dazzling red flowers of the lovely kanaka hang here and there, and outside groves of mango trees offer the inhabitants their dense and protective shade."
Manasollasa, a twelfth century text giving details on garden design, asserts that it should include rocks and raised mounds of summits, manicured with plants and trees of diverse varieties, artificial ponds, and flowing brooks. It describes the arrangement, the soils, the seeds, the distance between types of plants and trees, the methods of preparing manure, proper fertilizing and maintaining the garden, which plants and trees are best planted first, when to plant others, watering, signs of overwatering and underwatering, weeds, means of protecting the garden, and other details.
Early Islamic dynasties, like of Delhi Sultanates, never showed interests on gardens with an exception of Lodhi Dynasty. Mughals along with the Hindu Rajputs ushered a new era of Garden architecture. Concepts like Charbagh (four gardens) came from Persia. In the Charbagh at the Taj Mahal, each of the four parts contains sixteen flower beds.
Fountain and running water was a key feature of Mughal garden design. Water-lifting devices like geared Persian wheels (saqiya) were used for irrigation and to feed the water-courses at Humayun's Tomb in Delhi, Akbar's Gardens in Sikandra and Fatehpur Sikhri, the Lotus Garden of Babur at Dholpur and the Shalimar Bagh in Srinagar.
Royal canals were built from rivers to channel water to Delhi and Fatehpur Sikhri. The fountains and water-chutes of Mughal gardens represented the resurrection and regrowth of life, as well as to represent the cool, mountainous streams of Central Asia and Afghanistan that Babur was famously fond of.
- Nishat Bagh, Srinagar
- Lal Bagh, Bengaluru
- View of the Mughal Garden of Rashtrapati Bhavan
- Waterfall at Rock Garden, Chandigarh
- Char Bagh Garden, Rajasthan
- The Athpula (eight piers) bridge in Lodi gardens
Arches
Indian architecture has utilized both false and true arches in its architecture, but structural arches have been essentially absent from Hindu temple architecture at all periods.
Arch styles in Indian ArchitectureDropped keystone, King Edward VII Arch, Victoria MemorialCorbel arches in Qutb Minar complex, DelhiPost and lintel construction (Trabeate style) of Airavatesvara Temple, IndiaVictorian Gothic arches in Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, MumbaiCorbel arches
Corbel arches in India date from Indus Valley civilisation which used corbel arch to construct drains and have been evidenced at Mohenjo daro, Harappa, and Dholavira.
The oldest arches surviving in Indian architecture are the gavaksha or "chaitya arches" found in ancient rock-cut architecture, and agreed to be copied from versions in wood which have all perished. These often terminate a whole ceiling with a semi-circular top; wooden roofs made in this way can be seen in carved depictions of cities and palaces. A number of small early constructed temples have such roofs, using corbelled construction, as well as an apsidal plan; the Trivikrama Temple at Ter, Maharashtra is an example. The arch shape survived into constructed Indian architecture, not as an opening in a wall but as a blind niche projection from a wall, that bears only its own weight. In this form it became a very common and important decorative motif on Hindu temples.
The "fundamental architectural principle of the constructed Hindu temple is always formulated in the trabeate order", that is to say using post and lintel systems with vertical and horizontal members. According to George Michell: "Never was the principle of the arch with radiating components, such as voussoirs and keystones, employed in Hindu structures, either in India or in other parts of Asia. It was not so much that Hindu architects were ignorant of these techniques, but rather that conformance to tradition and adherence to precedents were firm cultural attitudes". Harle describes the true arch as "not unknown, but almost never employed by Hindu builders", and its use as "rare, but widely dispersed".
True Arch
The 19th century archaeologist Alexander Cunningham, head of the Archaeological Survey of India, at first believed that due to the total absence of arches in Hindu temples, they were alien to Indian architecture, but several pre-Islamic examples bear testimony to their existence, as explained by him in the following manner:
Formerly it was the settled belief of all European enquirers that the ancient Hindus were ignorant of the Arch. This belief no doubt arose from the total absence of arches in any of the Hindu Temples. Thirty years ago I shared this belief with Mr. Fergusson, when I argued that the presence of arches in the great Buddhist Temple at Buddha Gaya proved that the building could not have been erected before the Muhammadan conquest. But during my late employment in the Archeological Survey of India several buildings of undoubted antiquity were discovered in which both vaults and arches formed part of the original construction.
— Alexander Cunningham, Mahâbodhi, or the great Buddhist temple under the Bodhi tree at Buddha-Gaya, 1892
Archaeological evidences indicate that wedge shaped bricks and construction of wells in the Indus valley civilization and although no true arches have been discovered as of yet, these bricks would have been suitable in the construction of true arches. True arch in India dates from pre Mauryan Nanda period from the 5th century BC. Arch fragment discovered by archaeologist K. P. Jayaswal from an arch with Brahmi inscribed on it, or 1st - 2nd century CE when it first appeared in Kausambi palace architecture from Kushana period. Arches present at Vishnu temples at Deo Baranark, Amb and Kafir Kot temples from Hindu Shahi period and Hindu temple of Bhitargaon bear testimony to the use arches in the Hindu temple architecture.
Although Alexander Cunningham has persisted in the notion that the Buddhist Mahabodhi Temple's pointed arch was added later during a Burmese restoration, given its predominant use in Islamic architecture, scholars such as Huu Phuoc Le have contested this assumption based on analysis that relieving arches could not have been added without destroying the entire temple structure, which is dated to 6th–7th century CE. Hence the pointed and relieving arches much have formed part of the original building dating from the pre-Islamic periods in proper. Moreover, pointed arches vaulted entrances have been noted in Bhitargaon temple and Kausambi Palace architecture as well.
Trabeate style
Trabeate style is one of the main style of architecture of that time
- Lintel use in this style.
- shikar also prevail in this.
- No use of minar.
- Material sand stone.
Arcuate style
Arcuate style is also one of the main style for architecture.
- In this lintel is replaced by arch.
- There is also use of dome.
- Concept of minar is also there.
- Material, brick, lime and mortar used for making of dome (Wood was primarily not used because of the geography).
Torana
Torana, also referred to as vandanamalikas, is a free-standing ornamental or arched gateway for ceremonial purposes seen in the Hindu, Buddhist and Jain architecture of the Indian subcontinent, Southeast Asia and parts of East Asia. Chinese paifang gateways, Japanese torii gateways, Korean Hongsalmun gateways, and Thai Sao Ching Cha were derived from the Indian torana.
Torana is considered sacred and honorific gateway in Hindu and Buddhist religious sites. It is built with a projecting cross-piece resting on two uprights or posts. Mostly made of wood or stone, and the cross-piece is generally of three bars placed one on the top of the other; both cross-piece and posts are usually sculpted.
Toranas are associated with Buddhist stupas like the Great Stupa in Sanchi, as well as with Jain and Hindu structures, and also with several secular structures. Symbolic toranas can also be made of flowers and even leaves and hung over the doors and at entrances, particularly in Western and Southern India. They are believed to bring good fortune and signify auspicious and festive occasions. They can also serve didactic and narrative purposes or be erected to mark the victory of a king.
During Vesak festival of Sri Lanka it is a tradition to erect electrically illuminated colorful Vesak toranas in public places. These decorations are temporary installations which remain in public display for couple of weeks starting from the day of Vesak.
Hindu, Buddhist and Jain toranas- Rear side of North Torana of Stupa-1 at Sanchi Hill, 3rd century BCE to 1st century BCE, India
- A photo of Torana taken in 1890 of 10th century Jagannath Temple, Puri, India
- Torana of the 10th century Muktesvara deula, India.
- Torana from the 12th century Kakatiya dynasty, at Warangal Fort, India
- Torana in Sas-Bahu Temple, Udaipur
- 12th century Torana at Parshvanatha temple, Jaisalmer Fort
Gavaksha
A Gavaksha or chandrashala are often used to describe the motif centred on an ogee, circular or horseshoe arch that decorates many examples of Indian rock-cut architecture and later Indian structural temples and other buildings. It is called a chaitya arch when used on the facade of a chaitya hall, around the single large window. In later forms it develops well beyond this type, and becomes a very flexible unit. Gavāksha is a Sanskrit word which means "bulls or cows eye". In Hindu temples, their role is envisioned as symbolically radiating the light and splendour of the central icon in its sanctum. Alternatively, they are described as providing a window for the deity to gaze out into the world. Like the whole of the classic chaitya, the form originated in the shape of the wooden thatched roofs of buildings, none of which have survived; the earliest version replicating such roofs in stone is at the entrance to the non-Buddhist Lomas Rishi Cave, one of the man-made Barabar Caves in Bihar.
Influence on neighbouring Asian countries
Influence on Southeast AsiaHòa Lai Towers in Ninh Thuận province, VietnamPrasat Bayon (Jayagiri Brahma Palace), Cambodia"The serenity of the stone faces" occupying many towers, Bayon, CambodiaTrimurti Prambanan temple, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaTo know Indian art in India alone is to know but half its story. To apprehend it to the full, we must follow it in the wake of Buddhism, to central Asia, China, and Japan; we much watch it assuming new forms and breaking new forms and breaking into new beauties as it spreads over Tibet and Burma, and Siam; we must gaze in awe at the unexampled grandeur of its creations in Cambodia and Java. In each of these countries, Indian art encounters a different racial genius, a different local environment, and under their modifying influence it takes on a different garb.
— Sir John Marshall, Director-General of the Archaeological Survey of India
Influence on Southeast Asia
See also: History of Indian influence on Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia was under Indian sphere of cultural influence starting around 290 BC until around the 15th century, when Hindu-Buddhist influence was absorbed by local politics. Kingdoms in the southeast coast of the Indian Subcontinent had established trade, cultural and political relations with Southeast Asian kingdoms in Burma, Thailand, Indonesia, Malay Peninsula, Philippines, Cambodia and Champa. This led to Indianisation and Sanskritisation of Southeast Asia within Indosphere, Southeast Asian polities were the Indianised Hindu-Buddhist Mandala.
Vietnam
See also: Art of ChampaThe profile of the 13th-century Po Klong Garai Temple near Phan Rang includes all the buildings typical of a Cham temple. From left to right one can see the gopura, the saddle-shaped kosagrha, and mandapa attached to the kalan tower.
Between the 6th and the 16th century, the Kingdom of Champa flourished in present-day central and southern Vietnam. Unlike the Javanese that mostly used volcanic andesite stone for their temples, and Khmer of Angkor which mostly employed grey sandstones to construct their religious buildings, the Cham built their temples from reddish bricks. The most important remaining sites of Cham bricks temple architecture include Mỹ Sơn near Da Nang, Po Nagar near Nha Trang, and Po Klong Garai near Phan Rang.
Typically, a Cham temple complex consisted of several different kinds of buildings. They are kalan, a brick sanctuary, typically in the form of a tower with garbahgriha used to host the murti of deity. A mandapa is an entry hallway connected with a sanctuary. A kosagrha or "fire-house" is a temple construction typically with a saddle-shaped roof, used to house the valuables belonging to the deity or to cook for the deity. The gopura was a gate-tower leading into a walled temple complex. These building types are typical for Hindu temples in general; the classification is valid not only for the architecture of Champa, but also for other architectural traditions of Greater India.
Indonesia
Further information: Candi of Indonesia, Indonesian architecture, and Balinese temple Prambanan, an example of Indonesian temple architecturePrambanan temple (Shivagrha) of Central Java, an example of the 9th century Indonesian Javanese Hindu temple architecture with mandala layout and prasad tower crowned with stylized ratna-vajra.Temples are called candi (pronounced [tʃandi]) in Indonesia, whether it is Buddhist or Hindu. A Candi refers to a structure based on the Indian type of single-celled shrine, with a pyramidal tower above it (Meru tower in Bali), and a portico for entrance, mostly built between the 7th to 15th centuries. In Hindu Balinese architecture, a candi shrine can be found within a pura compound. The best example of Indonesian Javanese Hindu temple architecture is the 9th century Prambanan (Shivagrha) temple compound, located in Central Java, near Yogyakarta. This largest Hindu temple in Indonesia has three main prasad towers, dedicated to Trimurti gods. Shiva temple, the largest main temple is towering to 47 metre-high (154 ft). The term "candi" itself is believed was derived from Candika, one of the manifestations of the goddess Durga as the goddess of death.
Cambodia
Further information: Khmer architectureKhmer empire's (present day Cambodia) great capital, Angkor (Khmer: អង្គរ, "Capital City", derived from Sanskrit "nagara"), contains some of the most important and the most magnificent example of Khmer temple architecture. The classic style of Angkorian temple is demonstrated by the 12th century Angkor Wat.The main superstructure of typical Khmer temple is a towering prasat called prang which houses the garbhagriha inner chamber, where the murti of Vishnu or Shiva, or a lingam resides. Khmer temples were typically enclosed by a concentric series of walls, with the central sanctuary in the middle; this arrangement represented the mountain ranges surrounding Mount Meru, the mythical home of the gods. Enclosures are the spaces between these walls, and between the innermost wall and the temple itself. The walls defining the enclosures of Khmer temples are frequently lined by galleries, while passage through the walls is by way of gopuras located at the cardinal points. The main entrance usually adorned with elevated causeway with cruciform terrace.
Thailand
Thailand was heavily influenced by the culture and religions of India, starting with the Kingdom of Funan around the first century until the Khmer Empire. Indianised kingdoms such as the Mon, the Khmer Empire and Malay states of the Malay Peninsula and Sumatra ruled the region.
Thailand under Khmer rule saw inclusion of Indian Hindu temple influenced Khmer architectural style. The Khmer prangs resembled north Indian temples' shikhara and rekha (temple towers) elements. The early 10th century and the late 12th century prangs in Thailand were influenced by the Khmer architects of the great temple complexes of Angkor Wat and Angkor Thom. After the Khmer Empire collapsed, the Thai building masters of the Sukhothai Kingdom adapted the Prang form. The Thai temple falls into one of two broad categories: the stupa-style solid temple and the prang-style. The prangs can also be found in various forms in Sukhothai, Lopburi, Bangkok (Wat Arun). Sizes may vary, but usually the prangs measure between 15 and 40 metres (49 and 131 ft) in height, and resemble a towering corn-cob like structure. They extended and developed it. The building material was no more separate small sandstone blocks, instead the Thais built the Prang in brick or laterite covered with stucco. And the cella could be reached only by stairs. An example for this is the Prang of the Wat Mahathat in Phitsanulok. Later developments of the Prang suggested the cella only. The entrance door became a niche, in which was placed the Buddharupa (Buddha statue), which had originally taken the central position inside. For reasons of symmetry the niche was repeated on all four sides. On its pinnacle was a Trishul, the "weapon of Indra".
Malaysia
Indo-Saracenic architecture was a revivalist architectural style mostly used by British architects in India in the later 19th century, especially in public and government buildings in the British Raj, and the palaces of rulers of the princely states. It drew stylistic and decorative elements from native Indo-Islamic architecture, especially Mughal architecture. The basic layout and structure of the buildings tended to be close to that used in contemporary buildings in other revivalist styles, such as Gothic revival and Neo-Classical, with specific Indian features and decoration added.
According to Thomas R. Metcalf, a leading scholar of the style, "the Indo-Saracenic, with its imagined past turned to the purposes of British colonialism, took shape outside India most fully only in Malaya".
In Malaysia, due to British colonial influence and the migration of Muslims from India, many Mughal architectural elements in the design of mosques were incorporated. British Malaya was a predominantly Muslim society, where there was hardly any recent tradition of building in brick or stone, with even mosques and the palaces of the local rulers built in the abundant local hardwoods. Kuala Lumpur was a 19th-century foundation, only a small settlement when the British decided to make it the capital of their new Federated Malay States in 1895, and needed a number of large public buildings. The British decided to use the Islamic style they were used to from India, despite it having little relationship to existing local architectural styles.
Myanmar
Much of Myanmar's architecture is tied to ancient Indian culture, and can be traced to the country's earliest known inhabitants. The Mon and Pyu people were the first two influential groups to migrate to Myanmar, and the first Indo-Chinese adherents of Theravada Buddhism. Beikthano, one of the first Pyu centres, contains urbanesque foundations which include a monastery and stupa-like structures. These Pyu stupas, the first Indian foundations in Myanmar, were built from 200 BC to 100 CE and were sometimes used for burial.
During Pagan period, the Pyu-style stupas were transformed into monuments reminiscent of alms bowls or gourd-shaped domes, unbaked brick, tapered and rising roofs, Buddha niches, polylobed arches and ornamental doorways influenced by Bengali Pala Empire and its monuments. The Ananda Temple (finished in 1090), one of the first temples erected in Bagan, was influenced by Indian architecture. Architectural features of the temple include brick vaulted halls, Buddha statues, tapered roofs and the absence of terraces.
Pala influence and spread of Buddhism in Myanmar also brought in terracotta tiles from Bengal. The terracotta plaques at Pagan are made with well kneaded and fired clay but all the plaques are glazed with green colour.
Another example of these cultural influences include the Ananda Temple in Bagan built in the 11th century AD under the ruling of King Kyansittha. At these times, Buddhist and Vaisnava monks travelled to Burma from Bengal and discussed commonalities about the beauty of the temples of their region. Therefore, the king heard the monks and decided to build a temple with these western inspirations. Although, the Ananda Temple display its eastern origins, the western features remain obvious and demonstrate its uniqueness.
Influence in East Asia
Torii, Paifang, Hongsalmun, Sao Ching Cha
Torana DerivativesTorii path leading to Fushimi Inari-taishaPaifang in Chengdu, ChinaHongsalmun of Heolleung Royal TombGiant Swing and Wat SuthatAncient Indian torana sacred gateway architecture has influenced gateway architecture across Asia, specially where Buddhism was transmitted from India; Chinese paifang gateways, Japanese torii gateways, Korean Hongsalmun gateways, and Sao Ching Cha in Thailand have been derived from the Indian torana. The functions of all are similar, but they generally differ based on their respective architectural styles.
The torii, a gateway erected on the approach to every Shinto shrine, may be derived from the Indian word torana. While the Indian term denotes a gateway, the Japanese characters can be translated as "bird perch". The function of a torii is to mark the entrance to a sacred space. For this reason, the road leading to a Shinto shrine (sandō) is almost always straddled by one or more torii, which are therefore the easiest way to distinguish a shrine from a Buddhist temple.
Hongsalmun literally means ‘gate with red arrows’, referring to the set of pointed spikes on its top. In the past, spikes in between columns did not exist. The color is said to be red because of the belief that the color repels ghosts. The gate is composed of 2 round poles set vertically and 2 transverse bars. These pillars are usually over 9 metres (30 ft) in height. There is no roof and door-gate. In the middle top gate, the symbol of the trisula and the taegeuk image are placed.
A paifang, also known as a pailou, is a traditional style of Chinese architectural arch or gateway structure derived from the torana temple-gate in ancient India, has taken on traditional Chinese architectural characteristics such as multi-tiered roofs, various supporting posts, and archway-shapes of traditional gates and towers.
Foreign Influence on Indian Architecture
Hellenistic influence
See also: Hellenistic influence on Indian artThe Greek conquests in India under Alexander the Great were limited in time (327–326 BCE) and in extent, but they had extensive long term effects as Greeks settled for centuries at the doorstep of India. After these events, the Greeks (described as Yona or Yavana in Indian sources from the Greek "Ionian") were able to maintain a structured presence at the door of India for about three centuries, through the Seleucid Empire and the Greco-Bactrian kingdom, down to the time of the Indo-Greek kingdoms, which ended sometimes in the 1st century CE.
Hellenistic influencePataliputra capitalBharhut pillar capitalDrawing of Allahabad pillar capital flame palmetteDuring that time, the city of Ai-Khanoum, capital of the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom and the cities of Sirkap, were founded in what is now Pakistan on the Greek Hippodamian grid plan, and Sagala, now located in Pakistan 10 km from the border with India, interacted heavily with the Indian subcontinent. It is considered that Ai-Khanoum and Sirkap may have been primary actors in transmitting Western artistic influence to India, for example in the creation of the quasi-Ionic Pataliputra capital or the floral friezes of the Pillars of Ashoka. Numerous Greek ambassadors, such as Megasthenes, Deimachus and Dionysius, stayed at the Mauryan court in Pataliputra.
During the Maurya period (c. 321–185 BCE), and especially during the time of Emperor Ashoka (c.268–232 BCE), Hellenistic influence seems to have played a role in the establishment of Indian monumental stone architecture. Excavations in the ancient palace of Pataliputra have brought to light Hellenistic sculptural works, and Hellenistic influence appear in the Pillars of Ashoka at about the same period.
During that period, several instance of artistic influence are known, particular in the area of monumental stone sculpture and statuary, an area with no known precedents in India. The main period of stone architectural creation seems to correspond to the period of Ashoka's reign. Before that, Indians had a tradition of wooden architecture, remains of wooden palisades were discovered at archaeological sites in Pataliputra, confirmed the Classical accounts.
The first examples of stone architecture were also found in the palace compound of Pataliputra, with the distinctly Hellenistic Pataliputra capital and a pillared hall using polished-stone columns. The other remarkable example of monumental stone architecture is that of the Pillars of Ashoka, themselves displaying Hellenistic influence. There is also very early stone architecture in the palace at Kosambi, including true arches used in the underground chambers, from the last phase of the palace in the 1st or 2nd century CE.
Pataliputra capital
The Pataliputra capital is a monumental rectangular capital with volutes and Classical designs, that was discovered in the palace ruins of the ancient Mauryan Empire capital city of Pataliputra (modern Patna, northeastern India). It is dated to the 3rd century BCE. It is, together with the Pillars of Ashoka one of the first known examples of Indian stone architecture, as no Indian stone monuments or sculptures are known from before that period. It is also one of the first archaeological clues suggesting Hellenistic influence on the arts of India, in this case sculptural palatial art.
Pillars of Ashoka
Ashokan Pillar in VaishaliSphinx of Naxos at DelphiThe Pillars of Ashoka were built during the reign of the Maurya Empire Ashoka c. 250 BCE. They were new attempts at mastering stone architecture, as no Indian stone monuments or sculptures are known from before that period.
There are altogether seven remaining capitals, five with lions, one with an elephant and one with a zebu bull. One of them, the four lions of Sarnath, has become the State Emblem of India.
The animal capitals are composed of a lotiform base, with an abacus decorated with floral, symbolic or animal designs, topped by the realistic depiction of an animal, thought to each represent a traditional direction in India. Greek columns of the 6th century BCE such as the Sphinx of Naxos, a 12.5-metre (41 ft) Ionic column crowned by a sitting animal in the religious centre of Delphi, may have been an inspiration for the pillars of Ashoka.
Flame palmette
The flame palmette, central decorative element of the Pataliputra pillar is considered as a purely Greek motif. The first appearance of "flame palmettes" goes back to the stand-alone floral akroteria of the Parthenon (447–432 BCE), and slightly later at the Temple of Athena Nike.
Flame palmettes were then introduced into friezes of floral motifs in replacement of the regular palmette. Flame palmettes are used extensively in India floral friezes, starting with the floral friezes on the capitals of the pillar of Ashoka, and they are likely to have originated with Greek or Near Eastern art. A monumental flame palmette can be seen on the top of the Sunga gateway at Bharhut.
Persian influence
Achaemenid influence
See also: Achaemenid conquest of the Indus ValleyAchaemenid DerivativesAchaemenid capital in PersepolisHighly polished Achaemenid load-bearing column, PersepolisLion capital in VardhanaLion Capital of Ashoka from SarnathAchaemenid influence like stone polishing and dual-headed capital from conquest by Persians and GreeksLion Capital of Ashoka from Sarnath.The Achaemenid conquered and governed the territories of the North-western regions of the Indian subcontinent, from the 6th to 4th centuries BCE. The conquest occurred in two phases. The first invasion was conducted around 535 BCE by Cyrus the Great, who founded the Achaemenid Empire. Cyrus annexed the regions west of the Indus River, which formed the eastern border of his empire. Following the death of Cyrus, Darius the Great established his dynasty and began to reconquer former provinces and further expand the extent of the empire. Around 518 BCE Darius crossed the Himalayas into India to initiate a second period of conquest by annexing regions up to the Jhelum River in Punjab. Each invasion brought in new style and soon started to influence the art and architectural styles in India.
Various Indian artefacts tend to suggest some Perso-Hellenistic artistic influence in India, mainly felt during the time of the Mauryan Empire.
The Pataliputra palace with its pillared hall shows decorative influences of the Achaemenid palaces and Persepolis and may have used the help of foreign craftsmen. Mauryan rulers may have even imported craftsmen from abroad to build royal monuments. This may be the result of the formative influence of craftsmen employed from Persia following the disintegration of the Achaemenid Empire after the conquests of Alexander the Great.
The renowned Mauryan polish, especially used in the Pillars of Ashoka, may also have been a technique imported from the Achaemenid Empire.
Rock cut architecture
The similarity of the 4th century BCE Lycian barrel-vaulted tombs, such as the tomb of Payava, in the western part of the Achaemenid Empire, with the Indian architectural design of the Chaitya (starting at least a century later from circa 250 BCE, with the Lomas Rishi caves in the Barabar caves group), suggests that the designs of the Lycian rock-cut tombs travelled to India along the trade routes across the Achaemenid Empire.
Early on, James Fergusson, in his " Illustrated Handbook of Architecture", while describing the very progressive evolution from wooden architecture to stone architecture in various ancient civilizations, has commented that "In India, the form and construction of the older Buddhist temples resemble so singularly these examples in Lycia". The structural similarities, down to many architectural details, with the Chaitya-type Indian Buddhist temple designs, such as the "same pointed form of roof, with a ridge", are further developed in The cave temples of India. The Lycian tombs, dated to the 4th century BCE, are either free-standing or rock-cut barrel-vaulted sarcophagi, placed on a high base, with architectural features carved in stone to imitate wooden structures. There are numerous rock-cut equivalents to the free-standing structures and decorated with reliefs. Fergusson went on to suggest an "Indian connection", and some form of cultural transfer across the Achaemenid Empire. The ancient transfer of Lycian designs for rock-cut monuments to India is considered as "quite probable".
Masarh Lion
Perso-Hellenistic influenceMasarh lion sculptureAchaemenid lionLion of Menecrates, GreeceThe sculpture of the Masarh lion, found near the Maurya capital of Pataliputra, raises the question of the Achaemenid and Greek influence on the art of the Maurya Empire, and on the western origins of stone carving in India. The lion is carved in Chunar sandstone, like the Pillars of Ashoka, and its finish is polished, a feature of the Maurya sculpture. According to S.P. Gupta, the sculptural style is unquestionably Achaemenid. This is particularly the case for the well-ordered tubular representation of whiskers (vibrissas) and the geometrical representation of inflated veins flush with the entire face. The mane, on the other hand, with tufts of hair represented in wavelets, is rather naturalistic. Very similar examples are however known in Greece and Persepolis. It is possible that this sculpture was made by an Achaemenid or Greek sculptor in India and either remained without effect, or was the Indian imitation of a Greek or Achaemenid model, somewhere between the fifth century BCE and the first century BCE, although it is generally dated from the time of the Maurya Empire, around the 3rd century BCE.
See also
- Architecture of Karnataka
- Architecture of Kerala
- Architecture of Tamil Nadu
- Badami cave temples
- Hemadpanthi
- Indian vernacular architecture
- Kalinga Architecture
- List of Indian architects
- Meitei architecture
- Rajasthani architecture
- Temples of North Karnataka
- Other Indian Art and Architecture forms
- Indian art
- Indo-Greek art
- Art of Mathura
- Gupta art
- Mauryan art
- Kushan art
- Hoysala architecture
- Vijayanagara architecture
- Greco-Buddhist art
- Chola art and architecture
- Pallava art and architecture
- Badami Chalukya architecture
Notes
- ^ See Raj Jadhav, pp. 7–13 in Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India.
- Rowland, 31–34, 32 quoted; Harle, 15–18
- ^ Livingstone & Beach, 19
- Rowland, 31–34, 33 quoted; Harle, 15–18
- U. Singh (2008), pp. 181, 223
- Basant, P. K. (2012). The City and the Country in Early India: A Study of Malwa. Primus Books. ISBN 9789380607153.
- Though a variety of dates are proposed, some 80 of so years earlier.
- Rowland, 60
- Rowland, 60–63 60 quoted
- Rowland, 63–65
- Rowland, 72; Harle 22–24
- Rowland, 65–72; Harle 24
- Harle, 24; Rowland, 64–65
- Buddhist Architecture, Le Huu Phuoc, Grafikol 2009, pp. 97–99
- ^ Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), Pagoda.
- ^ Chandra (2008)
- Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), torii
- ":: JAANUS :: Terminology of Japanese Architecture & Art History". Aisf.or.jp. Archived from the original on 5 September 2019. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
- ^ Livingston & Beach, xxiii
- Huu, 242
- Ajanta chronology is still under discussion, but this is the view of Spink, accepted by many.
- Beach, Milo, Steps to Water: The Ancient Stepwells of India, (Photographs by Morna Livingston), p. 25, 2002, Princeton Architectural Press, ISBN 1568983247, 9781568983240, google books Archived 3 June 2023 at the Wayback Machine
- Harle 1994, pp. 118–22, 123–26, 129–35.
- Harle 1994, pp. 92–97.
- Harle, 113–114; see also site entries in Michell (1990)
- Michell (1990), 192
- ^ Michael Meister (1987), Hindu Temple, in The Encyclopedia of Religion, editor: Mircea Eliade, Volume 14, Macmillan, ISBN 0-02-909850-5, page 370
- Michell (1990), 157; Michell (1988), 96
- Harle, 111–113, 136–138; Michell (1988), 90, 96–98; see also site entries in Michell (1990)
- Harle, 111–113; Michell (1988), 94–98
- Harle, 175
- Cunningham, Alexander (1879). Report of a Tour in the Central Provinces in 1873-74 and 1874-75. Archaeological Survey of India. Vol. 9. Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing. p. 31.
- Sharma, Tej Ram (1978). Personal and Geographic Names in Gupta Inscriptions (PDF). p. 93. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
- ^ Rowland, 275–276
- Michell, Chapter 4; confusingly, in South India shikhara means only the top section of the vimana.
- These are the usual terms, but there are many variants or different ones in the many Indian languages, ancient and modern.
- ^ Michell (1988), 18, 50–54, 89, 149–155; Harle (1994), 335
- Rowland, 277–280
- Rowland, 220–223
- Rowland, 276
- Adam Hardy for example uses "Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa" for styles others call "vesara". See his Indian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation: the Karṇāṭa Drāviḍa Tradition, 7th to 13th Centuries, 1995, Abhinav Publications, New Delhi, ISBN 8170173124, 9788170173120, google books
- Harle (1994), 87–100; Michell (1988), 18
- ^ Meister, Michael W. (1988–1989). "Prāsāda as Palace: Kūṭina Origins of the Nāgara Temple". Artibus Asiae. 49 (3–4): 254–256. doi:10.2307/3250039. JSTOR 3250039.
- ^ Meister, Michael W. (1988–1989). "Prāsāda as Palace: Kūṭina Origins of the Nāgara Temple". Artibus Asiae. 49 (3–4): 254–280. doi:10.2307/3250039. JSTOR 3250039.
- Michael W. Meister and M.A. Dhaky (1983), South India: Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture, Vol. I, Part I, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0691784021, pages 30–53
- Michell 1995, pp. 9–10: "The era under consideration opens with an unprecedented calamity for Southern India: the invasion of the region at the turn of the fourteenth century by Malik Kafur, general of Alauddin, Sultan of Delhi. Malik Kafur's forces brought to an abrupt end all of the indigenous ruling houses of Southern India, not one of which was able to withstand the assault or outlive the conquest. Virtually every city of importance in the Kannada, Telugu and Tamil zones succumbed to the raids of Malik Kafur; forts were destroyed, palaces dismantled and temple sanctuaries wrecked in the search for treasure. In order to consolidate the rapidly won gains of this pillage, Malik Kafur established himself in 1323 at Madurai (Madura) in the southernmost part of the Tamil zone, former capital of the Pandyas who were dislodged by the Delhi forces. Madurai thereupon became the capital of the Ma'bar (Malabar) province of the Delhi empire."
- ^ Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), North Indian temple architecture.
- Michell (1977), Chapter 8
- MSN Encarta (2008), Hoysala_Dynasty. Archived 2009-10-31.
- See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present, p. 134.
- "The Hindu : Karnataka / Hassan News : Belur to be proposed as World Heritage site". 22 October 2004. Archived from the original on 22 October 2004. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
- Foekema, 16
- ^ Desai, Devangana (2005). Khajuraho: The Art of Love. Mapin Publishing Pvt. Ltd. ISBN 978-1890206628.
- Bajpai, K.D (2012). Khajuraho temples: History and significance. Aryan Books International.
- Centre, UNESCO World Heritage. "Khajuraho Group of Monuments". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 29 October 2023. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
- ^ Stella Kramrisch (1976), The Hindu Temple Volume 1 & 2, ISBN 81-208-0223-3
- Tillotson, G. H. R. (1997). Svastika Mansion: A Silpa-Sastra in the 1930s. South Asian Studies, 13(1), pp 87–97
- Ganapati Sastri (1920), Īśānaśivagurudeva paddhati, Trivandrum Sanskrit Series, OCLC 71801033
- "The Rathas, monolithic [Mamallapuram]". Online Gallery of British Library. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 23 October 2012.
- "Group of Monuments at Mahabalipuram". UNESCO.org. Archived from the original on 15 April 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2012.
- Bruyn, Pippa de; Bain, Keith; Allardice, David; Shonar Joshi (18 February 2010). Frommer's India. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 333–. ISBN 978-0-470-64580-2. Retrieved 7 February 2013.
- Takeo Kamiya. "Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent, 20 September 1996". Gerard da Cunha-Architecture Autonomous, Bardez, Goa, India. Archived from the original on 2 May 2015. Retrieved 10 November 2006.
- See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present, p. 132.
- See Carla Sinopoli, Echoes of Empire: Vijayanagara and Historical Memory, Vijayanagara as Historical Memory, p. 26.
- See Carla Sinopoli, The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India, C. 1350–1650, p. 209.
- See Percy Brown in Sūryanātha Kāmat's A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present, p. 182.
- Haig 1907, p. 65-87.
- Khamesra, Manish (19 January 2021). "Ghumakkar Insights: A Gavaksh to the Ancient Indian Temple Architecture". Ghumakkar – Inspiring travel experiences. Archived from the original on 15 July 2021. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
- "TEMPLE ARCHITECTURE AND SCULPTURE" (PDF). ncert.nic.in. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 January 2022. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
- Michell, 149
- Harle, 254
- Harle, 256–261
- Harle, 261–263
- Michell (1990), 274–276; Harle, 226–227
- Harle, 228
- "Temple-cities"; see also Mitchell (1990) by sites
- Hegewald
- Harle, 428–432
- Harle, 423–424
- Yale, 164–165; Harle, 423–424; Blair & Bloom, 149
- Blair & Bloom, 149–150; Harle, 425
- Harle, 425
- Blair & Bloom, 151
- Blair & Bloom, 149
- Blair & Bloom, 156
- Harle, 426; Blair & Bloom, 156
- "Alluring Bahmani architecture". Deccan Herald. 27 July 2019. Archived from the original on 9 July 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
- Yazdani 1947, p. 152.
- ^ Michell, George & Mark Zebrowski. Architecture and Art of the Deccan Sultanates (The New Cambridge History of India Vol. I:7), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, ISBN 0-521-56321-6, p. 14 & pp. 77–80.
- Haig 1907, p. 209-216.
- ^ "Victorian Gothic and Art Deco Ensembles of Mumbai". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 28 August 2018. Retrieved 2 January 2019.
- "Architecture". Banglapedia. Archived from the original on 16 November 2020. Retrieved 30 December 2017.
- ^ Hasan, Perween (2007). Sultans and Mosques: The Early Muslim Architecture of Bangladesh. United Kingdom: I.B. Tauris. p. 23–27. ISBN 1-84511-381-0.
- Hasan, 23–25
- Hasan, 41–44
- Hasan, 44–49
- "BENGAL – Encyclopaedia Iranica". Iranicaonline.org. Archived from the original on 3 January 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2017.
- Petersen, Andrew (2002). Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. Routledge. pp. 33–35. ISBN 1-134-61366-0.
- "Fatehpur Sikri". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
- Encyclopædia Britannica (2008), Mughal architecture.
- "Taj Mahal". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- "Humayun's Tomb, Delhi". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 28 February 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- Kossak, Steven; Watts, Edith Whitney (2001). The Art of South and Southeast Asia: A Resource for Educators. Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 9780870999925. Archived from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
- Steven, Kossak; Watts, Edith Whitney (2001). The Art of South and Southeast Asia: A Resource for Educators. Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 9780870999925. Archived from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
- Michell, George (1990), The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu, 1990, Penguin Books, pg −288-301 ISBN 0140081445
- "Short notes on Architecture of Marathas". 29 October 2011. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
- Amit Guha, Classification of Terracotta Temples, archived from the original on 31 January 2016, retrieved 30 January 2016
- Andrew Petersen (2002). Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. Routledge. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-134-61365-6.
- Thapar 2004, p. 122.
- Nilsson 1968, p. 9.
- ^ "(Brief) History of European – Asian trade". European Exploration. Archived from the original on 17 October 2011. Retrieved 14 October 2011.
- Tadgell 1990, p. 14.
- Evenson 1989, p. 2.
- Evenson 1989, p. 6.
- Evenson 1989, p. 20.
- Dutta, Arindam (29 March 2010). "Representing Calcutta: Modernity, Nationalism and the Colonial Uncanny". Journal of Architectural Education. 63 (2): 167–169. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2010.01082.x. S2CID 143881493.
- Nilsson 1968, pp. 66–67.
- Thapar 2004, p. 129.
- "Monuments of Modern India: The first half century of railways architecture – Heritage Directorate, Indian Railways". Google Arts & Culture. Archived from the original on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- Thapar 2004, p. 125.
- Chandrashekhar, Vaishnavi (21 October 2019). "Discovering Mumbai's Art Deco Treasures". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 24 January 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- "Churches and Convents of Goa". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 4 January 2019. Retrieved 2 January 2019.
- "Fort Feringhee". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- See Raj Jadhav, p. 11 in Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India.
- ^ Gast, 77
- Gast, 119
- ^ See Raj Jadhav, 13 in Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India.
- Savage 2008
- Thomas George Percival Spear; Margaret Spear (1981), India remembered, Orient Longman, 1981, ISBN 978-0-86131-265-8,
... The bungalow was a typical north Indian one, with a large central room lit only by skylights (roshandans) and a number of others opening out from them ...
- Pavan K. Varma, Sondeep Shankar (1992), Mansions at dusk: the havelis of old Delhi, Spantech Publishers, 1992, ISBN 978-81-85215-14-3,
... Thirdly, while obviating direct sunlight, it had to allow some light and air to enter through overhead roshandans ...
- "The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 1 March 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- ^ Mukerji, Arjun; Sanghamitra, Basu (January 2011). "A Search for Post-Modernism in Indian Architecture". Abacus.
- Lemoy, Christian (2011). Across the Pacific: From Ancient Asia to Precolombian America. Christian Lemoy. ISBN 9781599425825.
- Rowland, 44–45, 64–65, 113, 218–219; Harle, 48, 175
- Michell, 82
- Michell, 84
- Harle, 530, note 3 to chapter 30. See also 489, note 10
- Harle, 493, note 5
- Cunningham, Alexander (1892). Mahâbodhi, or the great Buddhist temple under the Bodhi tree at Buddha-Gaya. London: W. H. Allen. p. 85.
- Robinson, Andrew (15 November 2015). The Indus: Lost Civilizations. Reaktion Books. ISBN 9781780235417.
- Proceedinds And Transactions Of The Second Oriental Conference (1923). 1923. p. 86.
- The Calcutta Review Vol.10, No.1-3(april-june)1924. 1924. p. 140.
- Dubey, Lal Mani (1978). "Some Observations on the Vesara School of Hindu Architecture". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 39: 1000–1006. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44139449. Archived from the original on 12 June 2021. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
- Meister, Michael W. (26 July 2010). Temples of the Indus: Studies in the Hindu Architecture of Ancient Pakistan. BRILL. ISBN 9789004190115.
- Wright, Colin. "Front view of a ruined temple, with sculptured slabs in foreground, Deo Baranark". Bl.uk. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2019.
- "General view of ruined temple at Deo Baranark". Europeana Collections. Retrieved 23 April 2019.
- Le, Huu Phuoc (2010). Buddhist Architecture. USA: Grafikol. pp. 246–247. ISBN 978-0984404308.
- Rowland, 163-164
- "Group of Monuments at Hampi". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 14 February 2019. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- District Gazetteers Of The United Provinces Of Agra And Oudh Cawnpore Vol Xix. p. 190.
- "Introduction of Medieval Period Architecture". focuscivil.online. Archived from the original on 4 December 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
- Parul Pandya Dhar (2010): The Torana in Indian and Southeast Asian Architecture. New Delhi: D K Printworld. ISBN 978-8124605349.
- Hardy, Adam (2003). "Toraṇa | Grove Art". doi:10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T085631. ISBN 978-1-884446-05-4. Archived from the original on 13 January 2022. Retrieved 8 August 2018.
- Albert Henry Longhurst (1992). The Story of the Stūpa. Asian Educational Services. p. 17. ISBN 978-81-206-0160-4. Archived from the original on 22 October 2023. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
- Ronald G. Knapp (2000). China's old dwellings. University of Hawaii Press. p. 85. ISBN 0-8248-2214-5.
- Simon Foster; Jen Lin-Liu; Sharon Owyang; Sherisse Pham; Beth Reiber; Lee Wing-sze (2010). Frommer's China. Frommers. p. 435. ISBN 978-0-470-52658-3.
- Scheid, Bernhard. "Religion in Japan". Torii (in German). University of Vienna. Archived from the original on 28 August 2010. Retrieved 12 February 2010.
- "torana | Indian temple gateway". Britannica.com. Archived from the original on 13 October 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
- Parul Pandya Dhar, (2010). The Torana in Indian and Southeast Asian Architecture, (New Delhi: D K Printworld,).
- "Glossary of Asian Art". Art-and-archaeology.com. Archived from the original on 16 November 2016. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
- Elgood (2000), 103
- ^ Philip Rawson: The Art of Southeast Asia
- Soekmono (1995), p. 1
- Soekmono, Dr R. (1973). Pengantar Sejarah Kebudayaan Indonesia 2. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Penerbit Kanisius. p. 81. ISBN 978-979-413-290-6.
- Glaize, Monuments of the Angkor Group, p.27.
- ^ "Art". Myanmar. Chicago: World Book Inc. 2016.
- "Ananda Pahto Temple, Bagan, Myanmar". Orientalarchitecture.com. Archived from the original on 20 October 2020. Retrieved 1 August 2021.
- "Cultural Selection: Bengali Artistic Influences in Southeast Asia | Silk Roads Programme". en.unesco.org. Archived from the original on 1 August 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2021.
- Joseph Needham, Science and Civilization in China, Vol 4 part 3, p137-138
- Albert Henry Longhurst (1992). The Story of the Stūpa. Asian Educational Services. p. 17. ISBN 978-81-206-0160-4. Archived from the original on 22 October 2023. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
- A.H. Longhurst (1995). Story Of The Stupa. Asian Educational Services. pp. 17–. ISBN 978-81-206-0160-4. Archived from the original on 22 October 2023. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
- Scheid, Bernhard. "Religion in Japan". Torii (in German). University of Vienna. Archived from the original on 28 August 2010. Retrieved 12 February 2010.
- Simon Foster; Jen Lin-Liu; Sharon Owyang; Sherisse Pham; Beth Reiber; Lee Wing-sze (2010). Frommer's China. Frommers. p. 435. ISBN 978-0-470-52658-3.
- Shôzô Yamaguchi, Frederic De Garis and Atsuharu Sakai, 1964, We Japanese: Miyanushita, Hakone, Fujiya Hotel, Page 200.
- Koehler, Ben Jackson and Robert (2015). Korean Architecture: Breathing with Nature. Seoul Selection. ISBN 978-1-62412-047-3.
- ^ An Illustrated Guide to Korean Culture - 233 traditional key words. Seoul: Hakgojae Publishing Co. 2002. pp. 186–87. ISBN 9788985846981.
- Choi, Wan Gee (2006). The Traditional Education of Korea. Ewha Womans University Press. ISBN 978-89-7300-675-5.
- Gosh, A. (1964). Indian Archaeology: A review 1961-62, New Delhi, Archaeological survey of India, pp. 50–52, PDF Archived 17 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine; Harle, 43
- ^ Sen 1999, pp. 116–117.
- André-Salvini, Béatrice (2005). Forgotten Empire: The World of Ancient Persia. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24731-4.
- The Analysis of Indian Muria Empire affected from Achaemenid's architecture art Archived 2 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine. In: Journal of Subcontinent Researches. Article 8, Volume 6, Issue 19, Summer 2014, Page 149-174.
- A. S. Bhalla; I.B. Tauris (2015). Monuments, Power and Poverty in India: From Ashoka to the Raj. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 18. ISBN 9781784530877.
- "The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE-200 CE" Robin Coningham, Ruth Young Cambridge University Press, 31 aout 2015, p.414
- Report on the excavations at Pātaliputra (Patna); the Palibothra of the Greeks by Waddell, L. A. (Laurence Austine)
- ^ Ching, Francis D.K; Jarzombek, Mark M.; Prakash, Vikramaditya (2017). A Global History of Architecture. John Wiley & Sons. p. 707. ISBN 9781118981603.
- ^ Fergusson, James (1849). An historical inquiry into the true principles of beauty in art, more especially with reference to architecture. London, Longmans, Brown, Green, and Longmans. pp. 316–320.
- The Illustrated Handbook of Architecture Being a Concise and Popular Account of the Different Styles of Architecture Prevailing in All Ages and All Countries by James Fergusson. J. Murray. 1859. p. 212.
- Fergusson, James; Burgess, James (1880). The cave temples of India. London : Allen. p. 120.
- M. Caygill, The British Museum A-Z companion (London, The British Museum Press, 1999)
- E. Slatter, Xanthus: travels and discovery (London, Rubicon Press, 1994)
- Smith, A. H. (Arthur Hamilton) (1892–1904). A catalogue of sculpture in the Department of Greek and Roman antiquities, British museum. London : Printed by order of the Trustees. pp. 46–64.
- ^ Page 88: "There is one fragmentary lion head from Masarh, Distt. Bhojpur, Bihar. It is carved out of Chunar sandstone and it also bears the typical Mauryan polish. But it is undoubtedly based on the Achaemenian idiom. The tubular or wick-like whiskers and highly decorated neck with long locks of the mane with one series arranged like sea waves is somewhat non-Indian in approach. But, to be exact, we have an example of a lion from a sculptural frieze from Persepolis of 5th century BCE in which it is overpowering a bull which may be compared with the Masarh lion."... Page 122: "This particular example of a foreign model gets added support from the male heads of foreigners from Patna city and Sarnath since they also prove beyond doubt that a section of the elite in the Gangetic Basin was of foreign origin. However, as noted earlier, this is an example of the late Mauryan period since this is not the type adopted in any Ashoka pillar. We are, therefore, visualizing a historical situation in India in which the West Asian influence on Indian art was felt more in the late Mauryan than in the early Mauryan period. The term West Asia in this context stands for Iran and Afghanistan, where the Sakas and Pahlavas had their basecamps for eastward movement. The prelude to future inroads of the Indo-Bactrians in India had after all started in the second century B.C."... in Gupta, Swarajya Prakash (1980). The Roots of Indian Art: A Detailed Study of the Formative Period of Indian Art and Architecture, Third and Second Centuries B.C., Mauryan and Late Mauryan. B.R. Publishing Corporation. pp. 88, 122. ISBN 978-0-391-02172-3.. Also Kumar, Vinay (Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Faculty Member) (2015). "West Asian Influence on Lion Motifs in Mauryan Art". Heritage and Us (4): 14. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
References
Part of a series on the |
Culture of India |
---|
Society |
Arts and literature |
Others |
Symbols |
Organizations |
Art forms of India |
---|
Religions |
Periods |
Techniques |
Locations |
See also |
- Blair, S. S., & Bloom, J. M. (1996), The art and architecture of Islam 1250-1800, Yale University Press.
- Chandra, Pramod (2008), "South Asian arts", Encyclopædia Britannica
- Evenson, Norma (1989). The Indian Metropolis. New Haven and London: Yale University press. ISBN 978-0-300-04333-4.
- Foekema, Gerard (1996), A Complete Guide to Hoysaḷa Temples, Abhinav Publications, ISBN 81-7017-345-0.
- Gast, Klaus-Peter (2007), Modern Traditions: Contemporary Architecture in India, Birkhäuser, ISBN 978-3-7643-7754-0.
- Harle, J.C. (1994). The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent. Pelican History of Art (2nd ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 0300062176.
- Haig, Thomas Wolseley (1907). Historic Landmarks of the Deccan. Allahabad: The Pioneer Press.
- Hegewald, Julia A. B. (2011). "The International Jaina Style? Māru-Gurjara Temples Under the Solaṅkīs, throughout India and in the Diaspora". Ars Orientalis. 45 (20191029). doi:10.3998/ars.13441566.0045.005. ISSN 2328-1286.
- Le Huu Phuoc, Buddhist Architecture, 2009, Grafikol
- Livingston, Morna & Beach, Milo (2002), Steps to Water: The Ancient Stepwells of India, Princeton Architectural Press, ISBN 1-56898-324-7.
- Michell, George, (1977) The Hindu Temple: An Introduction to its Meaning and Forms, 1977, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-53230-1
- Michell, George (1990), The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu, 1990, Penguin Books, ISBN 0140081445
- Michell, George (1995). Architecture and Art of Southern India: Vijayanagara and the Successor States 1350–1750. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44110-0.
- Nilsson, Sten (1968). European Architecture in India 1750–1850. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-08225-4.
- Piercey, W. Douglas & Scarborough, Harold (2008), hospital, Encyclopædia Britannica.
- Possehl, Gregory L. (1996), "Mehrgarh", Oxford Companion to Archaeology edited by Brian Fagan, Oxford University Press.
- Rowland, Benjamin, The Art and Architecture of India: Buddhist, Hindu, Jain, 1967 (3rd edn.), Pelican History of Art, Penguin, ISBN 0140561021
- Savage, George (2008), interior design, Encyclopædia Britannica.
- Sen, Sailendra Nath (1999). Ancient Indian history and civilization (2 ed.). New Delhi: New Age International. ISBN 81-224-1198-3. OCLC 133102415.
- Tadgell, Christopher (1990). The history of architecture in India : from the dawn of civilization to the end of the Raj. London: Architecture Design and Technology Press. ISBN 978-1-85454-350-9.
- Thapar, Bindia (2004). Introduction to Indian Architecture. Singapore: Periplus Editions. ISBN 978-0-7946-0011-2.
- Rodda & Ubertini (2004), The Basis of Civilization-Water Science?, International Association of Hydrological Science, ISBN 1-901502-57-0.
- Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003), The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India, C. 1350–1650, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-82613-6.
- Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003), "Echoes of Empire: Vijayanagara and Historical Memory, Vijayanagara as Historical Memory", Archaeologies of memory edited by Ruth M. Van Dyke & Susan E. Alcock, Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 0-631-23585-X.
- Singh, Vijay P. & Yadava, R. N. (2003), Water Resources System Operation: Proceedings of the International Conference on Water and Environment, Allied Publishers, ISBN 81-7764-548-X.
- Soekmono, R. (1995). Jan Fontein (ed.). The Javanese Candi: Function and Meaning, Volume 17 from Studies in Asian Art and Archaeology, Vol 17. Leiden: E.J. BRILL. ISBN 9789004102156.
- Vastu-Silpa Kosha, Encyclopedia of Hindu Temple architecture and Vastu/S.K.Ramachandara Rao, Delhi, Devine Books, (Lala Murari Lal Chharia Oriental series) ISBN 978-93-81218-51-8 (Set)
- Yazdani, Ghulam (1947). Bidar, Its History and Monuments.
Further reading
- Havell, E.B. (1913). Indian Architecture, its psychology, structure, and history from the first Muhammadan invasion to the present day. J. Murray, London.
- Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. (1914). Viśvakarmā; examples of Indian architecture, sculpture, painting, handicraft. London.
- Havell, E. B. (1915). The Ancient and Medieval Architecture of India: a study of Indo-Aryan civilisation. John Murray, London.
- Fletcher, Banister; Cruickshank, Dan, Sir Banister Fletcher's a History of Architecture, Architectural Press, 20th edition, 1996 (first published 1896). ISBN 0-7506-2267-9. Cf. Part Four, Chapter 26.
External links
- Media related to Architecture of India at Wikimedia Commons
- Kamiya, Taeko, The Architecture of India.
Architecture of India | |
---|---|
Types | |
By state | |
By city | |