Revision as of 17:18, 28 August 2024 edit172.58.183.228 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Reverted review edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:33, 21 December 2024 edit undo109.61.193.208 (talk)No edit summary | ||
(34 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{basic forms of government|expanded=Oligarchy}} | {{basic forms of government|expanded=Oligarchy}} | ||
'''Oligarchy''' ({{etymology|grc|''{{Wikt-lang|grc|ὀλιγαρχία}}'' ({{grc-transl|ὀλιγαρχία}})|rule by few}}; {{etymology||''{{Wikt-lang|grc|ὀλίγος}}'' ({{grc-transl|ὀλίγος}})|few||''{{Wikt-lang|grc|ἄρχω}}'' ({{grc-transl|ἄρχω}})|to rule, command}})<ref>, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, ''A Greek–English Lexicon'', on Perseus Digital Library</ref><ref>, Liddell/Scott.</ref><ref>. Liddell/Scott.</ref> is a |
'''Oligarchy''' ({{etymology|grc|''{{Wikt-lang|grc|ὀλιγαρχία}}'' ({{grc-transl|ὀλιγαρχία}})|rule by few}}; {{etymology||''{{Wikt-lang|grc|ὀλίγος}}'' ({{grc-transl|ὀλίγος}})|few||''{{Wikt-lang|grc|ἄρχω}}'' ({{grc-transl|ἄρχω}})|to rule, command}})<ref>, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, ''A Greek–English Lexicon'', on Perseus Digital Library</ref><ref>, Liddell/Scott.</ref><ref>. Liddell/Scott.</ref> is a form of ] in which ] rests with a small number of people. These people may or may not be distinguished by one or several characteristics, such as ], ], ], ], or ], ], ], or ] control. | ||
Throughout |
Throughout history, power structures considered to be oligarchies have often been viewed as coercive, relying on public obedience or oppression to exist. ] pioneered the use of the term as meaning rule by the rich, contrasting it with ], arguing that oligarchy was the perverted form of aristocracy.<ref>Winters (2011) pp. 26–28. "Aristotle writes that 'oligarchy is when men of property have the government in their hands... wherever men rule by reason of their wealth, whether they be few or many, that is an oligarchy, and where the poor rule, that is a democracy'."</ref> | ||
== |
== Types == | ||
=== Minority rule === | |||
{{Main|Minoritarianism}} | {{Main|Minoritarianism}} | ||
The |
The consolidation of power by a dominant religious or ethnic minority can be considered a form of oligarchy.<ref name=Minority1>{{cite book |last1=Coleman |first1=James |last2=Rosberg |first2=Carl |title=Political Parties and National Integration in Tropical Africa |url=https://archive.org/details/politicalparties0000cole |url-access=registration |date=1966 |pages= |publisher=] |location=Los Angeles |isbn=978-0520002531}}</ref> Examples include South Africa during ], Liberia under ], the ]{{Citation needed|reason=How?|date=November 2024}}, and ]. In these cases, oligarchic rule was often tied to the legacy of colonialism.<ref name=Minority1/> | ||
In the early 20th century, ] expanded on this idea in his ] He argued that even democracies, like all large organizations, tend to become oligarchic due to the necessity of dividing labor, which ultimately results in a ruling class focused on maintaining its power. | |||
⚫ | == |
||
A business group might be defined as an oligarchy if it satisfies all of the following conditions: | |||
⚫ | * |
||
⚫ | * |
||
⚫ | * |
||
== |
=== Putative oligarchies === | ||
{{Main| Business oligarch }} | |||
⚫ | ] |
||
Business groups may be considered oligarchies if they meet the following criteria: | |||
⚫ | == |
||
⚫ | * They are the largest private owners in the country. | ||
⚫ | ] and ] have described Colombia, Indonesia, Russia, Singapore |
||
⚫ | * They possess sufficient political power to influence their own interests. | ||
⚫ | * The owners control multiple businesses, coordinating activities across sectors.<ref name="Chern2018">{{cite journal |last1=Chernenko |first1=Demid |title=Capital structure and oligarch ownership |journal=Economic Change and Restructuring |date=2018 |pages=383–411 |doi=10.1007/S10644-018-9226-9 |volume=52 |issue=4 |s2cid=56232563 |url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83641/1/MPRA_paper_83641.pdf}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | === Intellectual oligarchies === | ||
⚫ | ] coined the concept of an intellectual oligarchy in his play '']'' (1907). In the play, Shaw criticizes the control of society by intellectual elites and expresses a desire for the empowerment of the common people:<ref>Shaw, Bernard und Baziyan, Vitaly. 2-in-1: English-German. Major Barbara & Major in Barbara. New York, 2020, {{ISBN|979-8692881076}}</ref><blockquote>I now want to give the common man weapons against the intellectual man. I love the common people. I want to arm them against the lawyer, the doctor, the priest, the literary man, the professor, the artist, and the politician, who, once in authority, is the most dangerous, disastrous, and tyrannical of all the fools, rascals, and impostors. I want a democratic power strong enough to force the intellectual oligarchy to use its genius for the general good or else perish.</blockquote> | ||
⚫ | ==Countries perceived as oligarchies== | ||
⚫ | ] and ] have described Colombia, Indonesia, Russia, Singapore and the United States as oligarchies.<ref name="winters2009">{{Cite journal |last1=Winters |first1=Jeffrey |authorlink1=Jeffrey A. Winters |last2=Page |first2=Benjamin |authorlink2=Benjamin Page |publication-date=December 2009 |title=Oligarchy in the United States? |journal=Perspectives on Politics |year=2009 |volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=731–751 |doi=10.1017/S1537592709991770 |s2cid=144432999 |access-date=2022-03-12 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231898807 |quote=the concept of oligarchy can be fruitfully applied not only to places like Singapore, Colombia, Russia, and Indonesia, but also to the contemporary United States.}}</ref> | ||
=== The Philippines === | === The Philippines === | ||
{{Main|Monopolies in the Philippines (1965–1986)}} | {{Main|Monopolies in the Philippines (1965–1986)}} | ||
During the ] of |
During the ] from 1965 to 1986, several monopolies arose in the Philippines, primarily linked to the ] and their close associates. Analysts have described this period, and even subsequent decades, as an era of oligarchy in the Philippines.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hutchcroft |first=Paul D. |date=April 1991 |title=Oligarchs and Cronies in the Philippine State the Politics of Patrimonial Plunder |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/abs/oligarchs-and-cronies-in-the-philippine-state-the-politics-of-patrimonial-plunder/ED0D256E6AA60C7FE702B4068CCAE06D |journal=World Politics |language=en |volume=43 |issue=3 |pages=414–450 |doi=10.2307/2010401 |jstor=2010401 |s2cid=154855272 |issn=1086-3338}}</ref><ref>{{Cite SSRN |last=Mendoza |first=Ronald U. |last2=Bulaong |first2=Oscar Jr. |last3=Mendoza |first3=Gabrielle Ann S. |date=1 February 2022 |title=Cronyism, Oligarchy and Governance in the Philippines: 1970s vs 2020s |ssrn=4032259 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Quimpo |first=Nathan Gilbert |title=Can the Philippines' wild oligarchy be tamed? |date=2015 |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315674735-30/philippines-wild-oligarchy-tamed-nathan-gilbert-quimpo |work=Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Democratization |pages=347–362 |publisher=Routledge |doi=10.4324/9781315674735-30 |isbn=978-1-315-67473-5 |access-date=2022-05-15}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=Explainer: The oligarchy in the Philippines is more than just one family or firm |url=https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/07/19/2028001/explainer-oligarchy-more-just-one-family-or-firm |access-date=2022-05-15 |website=Philstar.com}}</ref> | ||
President ], |
President ], elected in 2016, promised to dismantle the oligarchy during his presidency.<ref>{{Cite web |author=Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos |title=Duterte takes pride in dismantling oligarchy |url=https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1134133 |access-date=2022-05-15 |work=] |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> However, corporate oligarchy persisted throughout his tenure. While Duterte criticized prominent tycoons such as the ] and ], corporate figures allied with Duterte, including ] of ], benefitted during his administration.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cnnphilippines.com/business/2022/6/29/Businesses-under-Duterte-administration-Who-gained-got-hurt.html |title=Businesses under Duterte administration: Who gained, who got hurt? |last=Esmael |first=Lisbet |date=June 29, 2022 |website=CNN Philippines |access-date=Sep 19, 2023 |archive-date=28 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230928210716/https://www.cnnphilippines.com/business/2022/6/29/Businesses-under-Duterte-administration-Who-gained-got-hurt.html |url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
===Russian Federation=== | === Russian Federation === | ||
{{ |
{{Main|Russian oligarchs}} | ||
⚫ | Since the ] in 1991 and the subsequent ] of state-owned assets, a class of Russian oligarchs emerged. These oligarchs gained control of significant portions of the economy, especially in the energy, metals, and natural resources sectors.<ref>{{cite book |last=Scheidel |first=Walter |author-link=Walter Scheidel |title=The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century |publisher=] |year=2017 |isbn=978-0691165028 |pages= & }}</ref> Many of these individuals maintained close ties with government officials, particularly the ], leading some to characterize modern Russia as an oligarchy intertwined with the state.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Russian oligarchs: What are they and how have they changed over time? |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60731864 |access-date=2023-09-28 |website=BBC}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | Since ] and the ] of |
||
=== Iran === | === Iran === | ||
{{Main|Khomeinism|Velayat-e-faqih}} | {{Main|Khomeinism|Velayat-e-faqih}} | ||
The |
The ], established after the 1979 ], is sometimes described as a clerical oligarchy. Its ruling system, known as '']'' (Governance of the Jurist), places power in the hands of a small group of high-ranking ] clerics, led by the ]. This group holds significant influence over the country's legislative, military, and economic affairs, and critics argue that this system concentrates power in a religious elite, marginalizing other voices within society.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kazemzadeh |first=Masoud |title=Iran's Foreign Policy: Elite Factionalism, Ideology, the Nuclear Weapons Program, and the United States |publisher=Routledge |year=2020 |isbn=978-0-367-49545-9 |location=New York |pages=1–19}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Amuzager |first=Jahangir |title=The Islamic Republic of Iran: Reflections on an Emerging Economy |publisher=Routledge |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-85743-748-5 |location=New York |pages=48–50, 88–89}}</ref> | ||
===Ukraine=== | === Ukraine === | ||
{{ |
{{Main|Ukrainian oligarchs}} | ||
Since Ukraine's independence in 1991, a powerful class of business elites, known as ], has played a significant role in the country's politics and economy. These oligarchs gained control of state assets during the rapid privatization that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union.<ref name=Chern2018>{{cite journal |last1=Chernenko |first1=Demid |title=Capital structure and oligarch ownership |journal=Economic Change and Restructuring |date=2018 |pages=383–411 |doi=10.1007/S10644-018-9226-9 |volume=52 |issue=4 |s2cid=56232563 |url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83641/1/MPRA_paper_83641.pdf}}</ref> By 2021, Ukraine passed a law aimed at curbing oligarchic influence on politics and the economy.<ref>{{cite web |title=Zelensky's battle against oligarchs: What does the new law mean? |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/23/ukraine-passes-controversial-anti-oligarch-bill |website=Al Jazeera |access-date=2023-09-28}}</ref> | |||
The Ukrainian oligarchs are a group of ]s that quickly appeared on the economic and political scene of Ukraine after its independence in 1991. Overall there are 35 oligarchic groups.<ref name=Chern2018 /> | |||
⚫ | === United States === | ||
On 23 September 2021 the Ukrainian government released law No. 1780-ІХ which is primarily focused on protecting national interest and limiting the oligarchs' impact on democracy in Ukraine. | |||
⚫ | {{Further|Income inequality in the United States#Democracy and society|Politics of the United States#Oligarchy}} | ||
⚫ | ]'', ] as giant money bags looming over ]]] | ||
⚫ | Several commentators and scholars have suggested that the United States demonstrates characteristics of an oligarchy, particularly in relation to the concentration of wealth and political influence among a small elite,<ref name="Kroll 2010-12-02">{{cite news |first=Andy |last=Kroll |title=The New American Oligarchy |date=2 December 2010 |publisher=] |url=http://archive.truthout.org/andy-kroll-the-new-american-oligarchy65597 |work=TomDispatch |access-date=17 August 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120122032008/http://archive.truthout.org/andy-kroll-the-new-american-oligarchy65597 |archive-date=22 January 2012 |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.tnr.com/article/magazine/books-and-arts/106430/money-politics-inequality-power-one-percent-move-on-effect |title=America on the Brink of Oligarchy |magazine=The New Republic |date=24 August 2012 |last1=Starr |first1=Paul}}</ref><ref name="TAI 11-12/2011"> {{cite journal |title=Oligarchy and Democracy |url=http://www.the-american-interest.com/articles/2011/09/28/oligarchy-and-democracy/ |journal=] |date=November–December 2011 |orig-year=28 September 2011 |first=Jeffrey A. |last=Winters |volume=7 |issue=2 |access-date=17 August 2012}}</ref><ref name="NYT-19980719">{{cite news |last=Herbert |first=Bob |author-link=Bob Herbert |title=The Donor Class |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/19/opinion/in-america-the-donor-class.html |date=19 July 1998 |work=] |access-date=10 March 2016}}</ref><ref name="NYT-20151010">{{cite news |last1=Confessore |first1=Nicholas |last2=Cohen |first2=Sarah |last3=Yourish |first3=Karen |title=The Families Funding the 2016 Presidential Election |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/11/us/politics/2016-presidential-election-super-pac-donors.html |date=10 October 2015 |work=] |access-date=10 March 2016}}</ref> as exemplified by the list of top (political party) donors.<ref name="NYT-20151010-el">{{cite news |last1=Lichtblau |first1=Eric |last2=Confessore |first2=Nicholas |title=From Fracking to Finance, a Torrent of Campaign Cash – Top Donors List |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/11/us/politics/wealthy-families-presidential-candidates.html#donors-list |date=10 October 2015 |work=] |access-date=11 March 2016}}</ref><ref name="CS-20141226">{{cite news |last=McCutcheon |first=Chuck |title=Why the 'donor class' matters, especially in the GOP presidential scrum |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2014/1226/Why-the-donor-class-matters-especially-in-the-GOP-presidential-scrum |date=26 December 2014 |work="] |access-date=10 March 2016}}</ref><ref>] (2014). ''].'' ]. {{ISBN|067443000X}} p. 514</ref> | ||
Economist ] argued that the rise of an American financial oligarchy became particularly prominent following the 2008 financial crisis.<ref name="TA Johnson 2009-05">{{cite journal |title=The Quiet Coup |journal=The Atlantic |date=May 2009 |first=Simon |last=Johnson |author-link=Simon Johnson (economist) |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/05/the-quiet-coup/307364/?single_page=true |access-date=17 August 2012}}</ref> This financial elite has been described as wielding significant power over both the economy and political decisions. | |||
⚫ | ===United States=== | ||
Former President ] in 2015 characterized the United States as an "oligarchy with unlimited political bribery" following the 2010 '']'' Supreme Court decision, which removed limits on donations to political campaigns.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Kreps |first=Daniel |date=2015-07-31 |title=Jimmy Carter: America Is Now an 'Oligarchy' |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jimmy-carter-u-s-is-an-oligarchy-with-unlimited-political-bribery-63262/ |access-date=2024-07-14 |magazine=Rolling Stone |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | {{ |
||
⚫ | ]'', ] as giant money bags looming over ] |
||
In 2014, a study by political scientists ] of ] and ] of ] argued that the United States' political system does not primarily reflect the preferences of its average citizens. Their analysis of policy outcomes between 1981 and 2002 suggested that wealthy individuals and business groups held substantial influence over political decisions, often sidelining the majority of Americans.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens |last1=Gilens |first1=Martin |last2=Page |first2=Benjamin I. |journal=] |date=2014 |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=564–581 |doi=10.1017/S1537592714001595 |doi-access=free}}</ref> While the United States maintains democratic features such as regular elections, freedom of speech, and widespread suffrage, the study noted that policy decisions are disproportionately influenced by economic elites.<ref>Prokop, A. (18 April 2014) ''Vox''</ref> | |||
Some contemporary authors have characterized conditions in the United States in the 21st century as oligarchic in nature.<ref name="Kroll 2010-12-02">{{cite news |first=Andy |last=Kroll |title=The New American Oligarchy |date=2 December 2010 |publisher=] |url=http://archive.truthout.org/andy-kroll-the-new-american-oligarchy65597 |work=TomDispatch |access-date=17 August 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120122032008/http://archive.truthout.org/andy-kroll-the-new-american-oligarchy65597 |archive-date=22 January 2012 |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.tnr.com/article/magazine/books-and-arts/106430/money-politics-inequality-power-one-percent-move-on-effect |title=America on the Brink of Oligarchy |magazine=The New Republic |date=24 August 2012 |last1=Starr |first1=Paul}}</ref> ] wrote in 2009 that "the reemergence of an American financial oligarchy is quite recent", a structure which he delineated as being the "most advanced" in the world.<ref name="TA Johnson 2009-05">{{cite journal |title=The Quiet Coup |journal=The Atlantic |date=May 2009 |first=Simon |last=Johnson |author-link=Simon Johnson (economist) |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/05/the-quiet-coup/307364/?single_page=true |access-date=17 August 2012}}</ref> ] wrote that "oligarchy and democracy operate within a single system, and American politics is a daily display of their interplay."<ref name="TAI 11-12/2011"> {{cite journal |title=Oligarchy and Democracy |url=http://www.the-american-interest.com/articles/2011/09/28/oligarchy-and-democracy/ |journal=] |date=November–December 2011 |orig-year=28 September 2011 |first=Jeffrey A. |last=Winters |volume=7 |issue=2 |access-date=17 August 2012}}</ref> The top 1% of the U.S. population by wealth in 2007 had a larger share of total income than at any time since 1928.<ref name="CBPP-20140524">{{cite journal |title=Tax Data Show Richest 1 Percent Took a Hit in 2008, But Income Remained Highly Concentrated at the Top. Recent Gains of Bottom 90 Percent Wiped Out |url=http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3309 |journal=Center on Budget and Policy Priorities |date=25 May 2011 |access-date=30 May 2014}}</ref> In 2011, according to ] and others, the top 400 wealthiest Americans "have more wealth than half of all Americans combined."<ref name="PF-20110311">{{cite news |last1=Kertscher |first1=Tom |last2=Borowski |first2=Greg |title=The Truth-O-Meter Says: '''True''' – Michael Moore says 400 Americans have more wealth than half of all Americans combined |url=http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2011/mar/10/michael-moore/michael-moore-says-400-americans-have-more-wealth-/ |date=10 March 2011 |work=] |access-date=11 August 2013}}</ref><ref name="HP-20110306">{{cite news |last=Moore |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Moore |title=America Is Not Broke |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/america-is-not-broke_b_832006.html |date=6 March 2011 |work=] |access-date=11 August 2013}}</ref><ref name="MM-20110307">{{cite web |last=Moore |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Moore |title=The Forbes 400 vs. Everybody Else |url=http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/must-read/forbes-400-vs-everybody-else |date=7 March 2011 |work=michaelmoore.com |url-status=dead |archive-date=9 March 2011 |access-date=2014-08-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110309211959/http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/must-read/forbes-400-vs-everybody-else}}</ref><ref name="CNN-20100922">{{cite news |last=Pepitone |first=Julianne |title=Forbes 400: The super-rich get richer |url=https://money.cnn.com/2010/09/22/news/companies/forbes_400/index.htm |date=22 September 2010 |work=] |access-date=11 August 2013}}</ref> | |||
However, the study received criticism from other scholars, who argued that the influence of average citizens should not be discounted and that the conclusions about oligarchic tendencies were overstated.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Testing Inferences about American Politics: A Review of the "Oligarchy" Result |journal=Research & Politics |date=1 October 2015 |issn=2053-1680 |pages=2053168015608896 |volume=2 |issue=4 |doi=10.1177/2053168015608896 |language=en |first=Omar S. |last=Bashir |doi-access=free}}</ref> Gilens and Page defended their research, reiterating that while they do not label the United States an outright oligarchy, they found substantial evidence of economic elites dominating certain areas of policy-making.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Gilens |first1=Martin |last2=Page |first2=Benjamin I. |date=2021-12-07 |title=Critics argued with our analysis of U.S. political inequality. Here are 5 ways they're wrong. |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/23/critics-challenge-our-portrait-of-americas-political-inequality-heres-5-ways-they-are-wrong/ |access-date=2024-07-14 |newspaper=Washington Post |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | |||
French economist ] states in his 2013 book, ''],'' that "the risk of a drift towards oligarchy is real and gives little reason for optimism about where the United States is headed."<ref>] (2014). ''].'' ]. {{ISBN|067443000X}} p. 514</ref> | |||
A 2014 study by political scientists Martin Gilens of ] and ] of ] stated that "majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts."<ref>{{cite journal |title=Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens |last1=Gilens |first1=Martin |last2=Page |first2=Benjamin I. |name-list-style=amp |journal=] |date=2014 |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=564–581 |doi=10.1017/S1537592714001595 |doi-access=free}}</ref> The study analyzed nearly 1,800 policies enacted by the US government between 1981 and 2002 and compared them to the expressed preferences of the American public as opposed to wealthy Americans and large special interest groups.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.businessinsider.com/major-study-finds-that-the-us-is-an-oligarchy-2014-4 |title=Major Study Finds The US Is An Oligarchy |website=businessinsider.com}}</ref> It found that wealthy individuals and organizations representing business interests have substantial political influence, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little to none. The study did concede that "Americans do enjoy many features central to democratic governance, such as ], ] and ], and a widespread (]) ]." Gilens and Page do not characterize the US as an "oligarchy" per se; however, they do apply the concept of "civil oligarchy" as used by ] with respect to the US. Winters has posited a comparative theory of "oligarchy" in which the wealthiest citizens—even in a "civil oligarchy" like the United States—dominate policy concerning crucial issues of wealth- and income protection.<ref>Gilens & Page (2014) p. 6</ref> | |||
Gilens says that average citizens only get what they want if wealthy Americans and business-oriented interest groups also want it; and that when a policy favored by the majority of the American public is implemented, it is usually because the economic elites did not oppose it.<ref>Prokop, A. (18 April 2014) ''Vox''</ref> Other studies have criticized the Page and Gilens study.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Testing Inferences about American Politics: A Review of the "Oligarchy" Result |journal=Research & Politics |date=1 October 2015 |issn=2053-1680 |pages=2053168015608896 |volume=2 |issue=4 |doi=10.1177/2053168015608896 |language=en |first=Omar S. |last=Bashir |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |title=Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation |journal=Perspectives on Politics |date=1 December 2015 |issn=1541-0986 |pages=1053–1064 |volume=13 |issue=4 |doi=10.1017/S1537592715002315 |first=Peter K. |last=Enns |s2cid=14664012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |title=Reconsidering the Middle: A Reply to Martin Gilens |journal=Perspectives on Politics |date=1 December 2015 |issn=1541-0986 |pages=1072–1074 |volume=13 |issue=4 |doi=10.1017/S1537592715002339 |first=Peter K. |last=Enns |s2cid=148467972}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Matthews |first=Dylan |date=9 May 2016 |title=Remember that study saying America is an oligarchy? 3 rebuttals say it's wrong. |url=https://www.vox.com/2016/5/9/11502464/gilens-page-oligarchy-study |access-date=2021-11-10 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> Page and Gilens have defended their study from criticism.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Gilens |first1=Martin |last2=Page |first2=Benjamin I. |name-list-style=amp |date=2021-12-07 |title=Critics argued with our analysis of U.S. political inequality. Here are 5 ways they're wrong. |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/23/critics-challenge-our-portrait-of-americas-political-inequality-heres-5-ways-they-are-wrong/ |access-date=2024-07-14 |newspaper=Washington Post |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref> | |||
In a 2015 interview, former President ] stated that the United States is now "an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery" due to the '']'' ruling which effectively removed limits on donations to political candidates.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Kreps |first=Daniel |date=2015-07-31 |title=Jimmy Carter: America Is Now an 'Oligarchy' |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jimmy-carter-u-s-is-an-oligarchy-with-unlimited-political-bribery-63262/ |access-date=2024-07-14 |magazine=Rolling Stone |language=en-US}}</ref> ] spent a record $2 billion trying to influence the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last1=McLannahan |first1=Ben |last2=Jopson |first2=Barney |name-list-style=amp |title=Wall Street spends record $2bn on US election lobbying {{!}} Financial Times {{!}} Ghostarchive |url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/rZsEz |access-date=2024-07-14 |website=ghostarchive.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Bukhari |first=Jeff |title=Wall Street Spent $2 Billion Trying to Influence the 2016 Election |url=https://fortune.com/2017/03/08/wall-street-2016-election-spending/ |access-date=2024-07-14 |website=Fortune |language=en}}</ref> | |||
===China=== | |||
The United States-based ] online encyclopedia considers China to be an oligarchy.<ref>{{cite web |title=Oligarchy |url=https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/oligarchy |website=education.nationalgeographic.org |publisher=National Geographic |access-date=21 July 2023 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{Portal|Politics}} | {{Portal|Politics}} | ||
{{div col|colwidth=22em}} | {{div col|colwidth=22em}} | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] |
Latest revision as of 12:33, 21 December 2024
Form of government with small ruling class Not to be confused with Oligopoly, a type of market structure which is controlled by a small number of firms.
Part of the Politics series | ||||||||
Basic forms of government | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
List of forms · List of countries | ||||||||
Source of power
|
||||||||
Power ideology
|
||||||||
Power structure |
||||||||
Related |
||||||||
Politics portal | ||||||||
Oligarchy (from Ancient Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía) 'rule by few'; from ὀλίγος (olígos) 'few' and ἄρχω (árkhō) 'to rule, command') is a form of government in which power rests with a small number of people. These people may or may not be distinguished by one or several characteristics, such as nobility, fame, wealth, education, or corporate, religious, political, or military control.
Throughout history, power structures considered to be oligarchies have often been viewed as coercive, relying on public obedience or oppression to exist. Aristotle pioneered the use of the term as meaning rule by the rich, contrasting it with aristocracy, arguing that oligarchy was the perverted form of aristocracy.
Types
Minority rule
Main article: MinoritarianismThe consolidation of power by a dominant religious or ethnic minority can be considered a form of oligarchy. Examples include South Africa during apartheid, Liberia under Americo-Liberians, the Sultanate of Zanzibar, and Rhodesia. In these cases, oligarchic rule was often tied to the legacy of colonialism.
In the early 20th century, Robert Michels expanded on this idea in his Iron Law of Oligarchy He argued that even democracies, like all large organizations, tend to become oligarchic due to the necessity of dividing labor, which ultimately results in a ruling class focused on maintaining its power.
Putative oligarchies
Main article: Business oligarchBusiness groups may be considered oligarchies if they meet the following criteria:
- They are the largest private owners in the country.
- They possess sufficient political power to influence their own interests.
- The owners control multiple businesses, coordinating activities across sectors.
Intellectual oligarchies
George Bernard Shaw coined the concept of an intellectual oligarchy in his play Major Barbara (1907). In the play, Shaw criticizes the control of society by intellectual elites and expresses a desire for the empowerment of the common people:
I now want to give the common man weapons against the intellectual man. I love the common people. I want to arm them against the lawyer, the doctor, the priest, the literary man, the professor, the artist, and the politician, who, once in authority, is the most dangerous, disastrous, and tyrannical of all the fools, rascals, and impostors. I want a democratic power strong enough to force the intellectual oligarchy to use its genius for the general good or else perish.
Countries perceived as oligarchies
Jeffrey A. Winters and Benjamin I. Page have described Colombia, Indonesia, Russia, Singapore and the United States as oligarchies.
The Philippines
Main article: Monopolies in the Philippines (1965–1986)During the presidency of Ferdinand Marcos from 1965 to 1986, several monopolies arose in the Philippines, primarily linked to the Marcos family and their close associates. Analysts have described this period, and even subsequent decades, as an era of oligarchy in the Philippines.
President Rodrigo Duterte, elected in 2016, promised to dismantle the oligarchy during his presidency. However, corporate oligarchy persisted throughout his tenure. While Duterte criticized prominent tycoons such as the Ayalas and Manny Pangilinan, corporate figures allied with Duterte, including Dennis Uy of Udenna Corporation, benefitted during his administration.
Russian Federation
Main article: Russian oligarchsSince the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the subsequent privatization of state-owned assets, a class of Russian oligarchs emerged. These oligarchs gained control of significant portions of the economy, especially in the energy, metals, and natural resources sectors. Many of these individuals maintained close ties with government officials, particularly the president, leading some to characterize modern Russia as an oligarchy intertwined with the state.
Iran
Main articles: Khomeinism and Velayat-e-faqihThe Islamic Republic of Iran, established after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, is sometimes described as a clerical oligarchy. Its ruling system, known as Velayat-e-Faqih (Governance of the Jurist), places power in the hands of a small group of high-ranking Shia clerics, led by the Supreme Leader. This group holds significant influence over the country's legislative, military, and economic affairs, and critics argue that this system concentrates power in a religious elite, marginalizing other voices within society.
Ukraine
Main article: Ukrainian oligarchsSince Ukraine's independence in 1991, a powerful class of business elites, known as Ukrainian oligarchs, has played a significant role in the country's politics and economy. These oligarchs gained control of state assets during the rapid privatization that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union. By 2021, Ukraine passed a law aimed at curbing oligarchic influence on politics and the economy.
United States
Further information: Income inequality in the United States § Democracy and society, and Politics of the United States § OligarchySeveral commentators and scholars have suggested that the United States demonstrates characteristics of an oligarchy, particularly in relation to the concentration of wealth and political influence among a small elite, as exemplified by the list of top (political party) donors.
Economist Simon Johnson argued that the rise of an American financial oligarchy became particularly prominent following the 2008 financial crisis. This financial elite has been described as wielding significant power over both the economy and political decisions. Former President Jimmy Carter in 2015 characterized the United States as an "oligarchy with unlimited political bribery" following the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision, which removed limits on donations to political campaigns.
In 2014, a study by political scientists Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin Page of Northwestern University argued that the United States' political system does not primarily reflect the preferences of its average citizens. Their analysis of policy outcomes between 1981 and 2002 suggested that wealthy individuals and business groups held substantial influence over political decisions, often sidelining the majority of Americans. While the United States maintains democratic features such as regular elections, freedom of speech, and widespread suffrage, the study noted that policy decisions are disproportionately influenced by economic elites.
However, the study received criticism from other scholars, who argued that the influence of average citizens should not be discounted and that the conclusions about oligarchic tendencies were overstated. Gilens and Page defended their research, reiterating that while they do not label the United States an outright oligarchy, they found substantial evidence of economic elites dominating certain areas of policy-making.
See also
- Aristocracy
- Business oligarch
- Cacique democracy
- Despotism
- Dictatorship
- Inverted totalitarianism
- Iron law of oligarchy
- Kleptocracy
- Meritocracy
- Military dictatorship
- Minoritarianism
- Nepotism
- Netocracy
- Oligopoly
- Oligarchical collectivism
- Parasitism
- Plutocracy
- Political family
- Power behind the throne
- The Power Elite (1956 book by C. Wright Mills)
- Polyarchy
- Stratocracy
- Synarchism
- Theocracy
- Timocracy
References
- "ὀλίγος", Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek–English Lexicon, on Perseus Digital Library
- "ἄρχω", Liddell/Scott.
- "ὀλιγαρχία". Liddell/Scott.
- Winters (2011) pp. 26–28. "Aristotle writes that 'oligarchy is when men of property have the government in their hands... wherever men rule by reason of their wealth, whether they be few or many, that is an oligarchy, and where the poor rule, that is a democracy'."
- ^ Coleman, James; Rosberg, Carl (1966). Political Parties and National Integration in Tropical Africa. Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 681–683. ISBN 978-0520002531.
- ^ Chernenko, Demid (2018). "Capital structure and oligarch ownership" (PDF). Economic Change and Restructuring. 52 (4): 383–411. doi:10.1007/S10644-018-9226-9. S2CID 56232563.
- Shaw, Bernard und Baziyan, Vitaly. 2-in-1: English-German. Major Barbara & Major in Barbara. New York, 2020, ISBN 979-8692881076
- Winters, Jeffrey; Page, Benjamin (2009). "Oligarchy in the United States?". Perspectives on Politics. 7 (4) (published December 2009): 731–751. doi:10.1017/S1537592709991770. S2CID 144432999. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
the concept of oligarchy can be fruitfully applied not only to places like Singapore, Colombia, Russia, and Indonesia, but also to the contemporary United States.
- Hutchcroft, Paul D. (April 1991). "Oligarchs and Cronies in the Philippine State the Politics of Patrimonial Plunder". World Politics. 43 (3): 414–450. doi:10.2307/2010401. ISSN 1086-3338. JSTOR 2010401. S2CID 154855272.
- Mendoza, Ronald U.; Bulaong, Oscar Jr.; Mendoza, Gabrielle Ann S. (1 February 2022). "Cronyism, Oligarchy and Governance in the Philippines: 1970s vs 2020s". SSRN 4032259.
- Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert (2015), "Can the Philippines' wild oligarchy be tamed?", Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Democratization, Routledge, pp. 347–362, doi:10.4324/9781315674735-30, ISBN 978-1-315-67473-5, retrieved 15 May 2022
- ^ "Explainer: The oligarchy in the Philippines is more than just one family or firm". Philstar.com. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
- Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos. "Duterte takes pride in dismantling oligarchy". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved 15 May 2022.
- Esmael, Lisbet (29 June 2022). "Businesses under Duterte administration: Who gained, who got hurt?". CNN Philippines. Archived from the original on 28 September 2023. Retrieved 19 September 2023.
- Scheidel, Walter (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press. pp. 51 & 222–223. ISBN 978-0691165028.
- "Russian oligarchs: What are they and how have they changed over time?". BBC. Retrieved 28 September 2023.
- Kazemzadeh, Masoud (2020). Iran's Foreign Policy: Elite Factionalism, Ideology, the Nuclear Weapons Program, and the United States. New York: Routledge. pp. 1–19. ISBN 978-0-367-49545-9.
- Amuzager, Jahangir (2014). The Islamic Republic of Iran: Reflections on an Emerging Economy. New York: Routledge. pp. 48–50, 88–89. ISBN 978-1-85743-748-5.
- "Zelensky's battle against oligarchs: What does the new law mean?". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 28 September 2023.
- Kroll, Andy (2 December 2010). "The New American Oligarchy". TomDispatch. Truthout. Archived from the original on 22 January 2012. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- Starr, Paul (24 August 2012). "America on the Brink of Oligarchy". The New Republic.
- Winters, Jeffrey A. (November–December 2011) . "Oligarchy and Democracy". The American Interest. 7 (2). Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- Herbert, Bob (19 July 1998). "The Donor Class". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
- Confessore, Nicholas; Cohen, Sarah; Yourish, Karen (10 October 2015). "The Families Funding the 2016 Presidential Election". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
- Lichtblau, Eric; Confessore, Nicholas (10 October 2015). "From Fracking to Finance, a Torrent of Campaign Cash – Top Donors List". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
- McCutcheon, Chuck (26 December 2014). "Why the 'donor class' matters, especially in the GOP presidential scrum". "The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
- Piketty, Thomas (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Belknap Press. ISBN 067443000X p. 514
- Johnson, Simon (May 2009). "The Quiet Coup". The Atlantic. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- Kreps, Daniel (31 July 2015). "Jimmy Carter: America Is Now an 'Oligarchy'". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 14 July 2024.
- Gilens, Martin; Page, Benjamin I. (2014). "Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens". Perspectives on Politics. 12 (3): 564–581. doi:10.1017/S1537592714001595.
- Prokop, A. (18 April 2014) "The new study about oligarchy that's blowing up the Internet, explained" Vox
- Bashir, Omar S. (1 October 2015). "Testing Inferences about American Politics: A Review of the "Oligarchy" Result". Research & Politics. 2 (4): 2053168015608896. doi:10.1177/2053168015608896. ISSN 2053-1680.
- Gilens, Martin; Page, Benjamin I. (7 December 2021). "Critics argued with our analysis of U.S. political inequality. Here are 5 ways they're wrong". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 14 July 2024.
Further reading
- Aslund, Anders (2005), "Comparative Oligarchy: Russia, Ukraine and the United States", CASE Network Studies and Analyses No. 296 (PDF), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1441910, S2CID 153769623
- Gordon, Daniel (2010). "Hiring Law Professors: Breaking the Back of an American Plutocratic Oligarchy". Widener Law Journal. 19: 1–29. SSRN 1412783.
- Hollingsworth, Mark; Lansley, Stewart (2010). Londongrad: From Russia with Cash: The Inside Story of the Oligarchs. Fourth Estate. ISBN 978-0007356379.
- Hudson, Michael (2023). The Collapse of Antiquity: Greece and Rome as Civilization's Oligarchic Turning Point. Islet. ISBN 978-3949546129.
- J. M. Moore, ed. (1986). Aristotle and Xenophon on democracy and oligarchy. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520029095.
- Ostwald, M. (2000), Oligarchia: The Development of a Constitutional Form in Ancient Greece (Historia Einzelschirften; 144). Stuttgart: Steiner, ISBN 3515076808.
- Ramseyer, J. Mark; Rosenbluth, Frances McCall (1998). The Politics of Oligarchy: Institutional Choice in Imperial Japan. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521636490.
- Tabachnick, David; Koivukoski, Toivu (2012). On Oligarchy: Ancient Lessons for Global Politics. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-1442661165.
- Whibley, Leonard (1896). Greek oligarchies, their character and organisations. G. P. Putnam's Sons.
- Winters, Jeffrey A. (2011). Oligarchy. Northwestern University, Illinois: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1107005280.
External links
- Media related to Oligarchies at Wikimedia Commons
Political philosophy | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terms | |||||||||||
Government | |||||||||||
Ideologies |
| ||||||||||
Concepts |
| ||||||||||
Philosophers |
| ||||||||||
Works |
| ||||||||||
Related |
| ||||||||||
Authoritarian and totalitarian forms of government | |
---|---|
Forms | |
Ideologies | |
See also |