Misplaced Pages

Kargil War: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:05, 17 July 2008 view sourceBetterusername (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,213 editsm ta← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:42, 28 December 2024 view source Extorc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,565 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1999 India–Pakistan conflict}}
{{Warbox
{{Redirect|Operation Vijay (1999)|the 1961 Indian operation|Annexation of Goa}}
|conflict=Kargil War
{{pp-semi-indef}}
|partof=the ]

|campaign=
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}
|image=]
{{EngvarB|date=July 2016}}
|caption=An Indian ] 155 mm ] ] being repositioned for aiming at Pakistani positions during the war.
{{Infobox military conflict
|date=May-July 1999
| conflict = Kargil War
|place=] district, ]
| partof = the ] and the ]
|casus=Pakistani troops and Kashmir militants infiltrate into the Indian side of ] and take over vital peaks in Kargil.
| campaign =
|territory='']''
| image = ]
|result=India regains possession of Kargil
| caption = Indian soldiers after capturing a hill from Pakistani forces during the Kargil War
|combatant1={{flag|India}}
| date = 3 May – 26 July 1999<br />({{Age in months, weeks and days|1999-05-03|1999-07-26}})
|combatant2={{flag|Pakistan}},<br />Kashmiri ]ists, <br />Islamic militants ("Foreign Fighters")
| place = ], ] (now ]), India
|commander1=
| cause = Pakistani troops cross the ] into ] and seize strategic mountain peaks within the ]
|commander2=
| territory = '']''
|strength1=30,000
| result = Indian victory<!--The result is borne out by a number of high-quality reliable sources, and represents the consensus formed on the talk page of this article. Some of the sources are as follows.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Praagh |first1=David Van |title=The Greater Game: India's Race with Destiny and China |date=2003 |publisher=McGill-Queen's Press |isbn=9780773526396 |page=253 |quote=By then, India had won decisively in the mountains of Kashmir.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=MacDonald |first1=Myra |title=Defeat is an Orphan: How Pakistan Lost the Great South Asian War |date=2017 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-1-84904-858-3 |pages=27, 53, 64, 66 |quote=p. 27: It was not so much that India won the Great South Asian War but that Pakistan lost it.{{pb}}p. 53: The story of the Kargil War—Pakistan's biggest defeat by India since 1971—is one that goes to the heart of why it lost the Great South Asian War.{{pb}}p. 64: Afterwards, Musharraf and his supporters would claim that Pakistan won the war militarily and lost it diplomatically. In reality, the military and diplomatic tides turned against Pakistan in tandem.{{pb}}p. 66: For all its bravado, Pakistan had failed to secure even one inch of land.{{pb}} Less than a year after declaring itself a nuclear-armed power, Pakistan had been humiliated diplomatically and militarily.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=Lavoy |editor1-first=Peter René |title=Asymmetric Warfare in South Asia: The Causes and Consequences of the Kargil Conflict |date=2009 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-76721-7 |page=180 |quote=The false optimism of the architects of the Kargil intrusion, colored by the illusion of a cheap victory, was not only the main driver of the operation, and hence the crisis, it also was the cause of Pakistan's most damaging military defeat since the loss of East Pakistan in December 1971.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Dettman |first1=Paul R. |title=India Changes Course: Golden Jubilee to Millennium |date=2001 |publisher=Greenwood |isbn=978-0-275-97308-7 |pages=130, 131, 140, 177 |quote=p. 130: the BJP could go to the people as the party that had undergirded India's victory over Pakistan in the Kargil 'war'.{{pb}}p. 131: Another of India's institutions that had benefited from India's victory in the Kargil war was its military establishment.{{pb}}p. 140: He went on to take credit for the conduct of a 'war' effort that had led to a diplomatic as well as a military victory.{{pb}}p. 177: For India, Vajpayee had led the military and diplomatic effort that had won the Kargil 'war'. For the world, he had done so while keeping India's armed forces on their own side of the LOC in Kashmir and he had prevented the outbreak of a multi-front general war with Pakistan.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Perkovich |first1=George |title=India's Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation |date=2002 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-23210-5 |page=479 |quote=The Kargil war ended as had previous wars, with an Indian victory.}}</ref> -->
|strength2=5,000
*India regains possession of ]
|casualties1='''Indian Official Figures:'''<br />527 killed,<ref>, </ref><ref></ref><ref name="rollofhonor"> from the Official Indian Army Website.</ref> <br /> 1,363 wounded<ref></ref><br /> 1 POW
| combatant1 = {{flag|India}}
|casualties2='''Pakistani Estimates:'''{{fn|(II)}}<br />357-4000 killed<ref name="Indianexpress"> Indian Express news report</ref><ref name="Hindu Sharif"></ref><br />(Pakistan troops)<br />665+ soldiers wounded<ref name="Indianexpress" /><br />
| combatant2 = {{flag|Pakistan}}
8 ].<ref name="tribpow"></ref>
| commander1 = ]<br>
}}
]<br>
]
| commander2 = ]<br>
]<br>
]
| strength1 = 30,000
| strength2 = 5,000
| casualties1 = '''Indian official figures:'''
* 527 killed<ref name=pib>{{cite web|last=Chakraborty|first=A.&nbsp;K.|date=21 July 2000|title=Kargil War Brings into Sharp Focus India's Commitment to Peace|url=https://archive.pib.gov.in/archive/ArchiveSecondPhase/FEATURE/2000-FEATURES%20SERVICE%20JAN%20DEC/PDF/FEA-2000-07-21_201.pdf|publisher=], Government of India|access-date=26 July 2022|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220726061145/https://archive.pib.gov.in/archive/ArchiveSecondPhase/FEATURE/2000-FEATURES%20SERVICE%20JAN%20DEC/PDF/FEA-2000-07-21_201.pdf|archive-date=26 July 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://164.100.24.208/lsq/quest.asp?qref=51302 |first=George |last=Fernandes |author-link=George Fernandes |id=Starred Question No 160 |title=Soldiers Killed in Kargil War |website=Parliamentary Questions, Lok Sabha |publisher=] |date=28 November 2002 |access-date=20 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202045832/http://164.100.24.208/lsq/quest.asp?qref=51302<!--Can't find this question on the modern website (should be 13th Lok Sabha session XI)-->|archive-date=2 December 2008|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref name="rollofhonor">{{cite web|url=http://www.indianarmy.nic.in/martyrs/home.jsp?operation=28&hidrecord=10&FormBugs_Page=1#Form|title=Complete Roll of Honour of Indian Army's Killed in Action during Op Vijay|work=Indian Army|publisher=|access-date=20 May 2009 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071222013826/http://www.indianarmy.nic.in/martyrs/home.jsp?operation=28&hidrecord=10&FormBugs_Page=1#Form |archive-date = 22 December 2007}}</ref>
* 1,363 wounded<ref>{{cite web| url=http://164.100.24.219/rsq/quest.asp?qref=3798 |id=Unstarred Question No 793 |first=George |last=Fernandes |author-link=George Fernandes |title=Soldiers Killed During Indo Pak Wars |date=8 December 1999 |website=Parliamentary Questions, Lok Sabha |publisher=] |access-date=20 May 2009 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080216231524/http://164.100.24.219/rsq/quest.asp?qref=3798 |archive-date = 16 February 2008}}</ref>
* 1 ]
* 1 ] shot down
* 1 ] shot down
* 1 ] shot down

'''Pakistani claims:'''
* 1,600 (per Musharraf)<ref>{{cite news|title=Musharraf claims Kargil was a big success militarily for Pakistan|url=http://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/2013/Feb/1/musharraf-claims-kargil-was-a-big-success-militarily-for-pak-46.asp|date=1 February 2013|access-date=6 April 2013|newspaper=Greater Kashmir|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130529140050/http://greaterkashmir.com/news/2013/Feb/1/musharraf-claims-kargil-was-a-big-success-militarily-for-pak-46.asp|archive-date=29 May 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
| casualties2 = '''Independent figures:'''
*400–4000 killed<ref name="bbcfigures">{{cite web |last1=Khan |first1=M. Ilyas |title=Kargil: The forgotten victims of the world's highest war |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49101016 |website=BBC News |access-date=22 March 2021 |date=26 July 2019 |archive-date=17 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210217224208/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49101016 |url-status=live }}</ref>
*700 killed (] estimate)<ref name="700killed">{{cite news |title=Kargil probe body had sought Musharraf's court martial |url=https://www.thenews.com.pk/archive/print/410307-kargil-probe-body-had-sought-musharraf%E2%80%99s-court-martial |work=The News International |agency=AFP |access-date=22 March 2021 |date=13 January 2013 |archive-date=27 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227103550/https://www.thenews.com.pk/archive/print/410307-kargil-probe-body-had-sought-musharraf%E2%80%99s-court-martial |url-status=dead }}</ref>

'''Pakistani figures:'''
* 2,700–4,000 killed (per Sharif)<ref name="Tavares2006">{{cite book |last1=Tavares |first1=Rodrigo |title=Understanding Regional Peace and Security |date=2006 |publisher=Göteborg University |isbn=978-9187380679 |page=297 |quote=the US State Department quoted the Pakistani military casualties at 700, but according to the then PM Nawaz Sharif (quoted in Gulf News, February 2002), the entire Northern Light Infantry of Pakistan was wiped out during the conflict claiming 2,700 lives.}}</ref><ref name="Hindu Sharif">{{cite news|title=Over 4,000 soldiers killed in Kargil: Sharif|url=http://hindu.com/thehindu/2003/08/17/stories/2003081702900800.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031003114303/http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/2003/08/17/stories/2003081702900800.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=3 October 2003|newspaper=] |access-date=17 January 2013}}</ref>
* 453 killed (per the ])<ref>{{cite news|title=Pak quietly names 453 men killed in Kargil war |website=Rediff News |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-pak-quietly-names-453-men-killed-in-kargil-war/20101118.htm|access-date=6 April 2013|date=18 November 2010|archive-date=27 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627173200/http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-pak-quietly-names-453-men-killed-in-kargil-war/20101118.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="NDTV Shuhada's Corner">{{cite web| url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/pakistan-army-admits-to-kargil-martyrs-67190| title=Pakistan Army admits to Kargil martyrs| work=]| publisher=| access-date=19 November 2010| archive-date=21 November 2010| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101121130055/http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/pakistan-army-admits-to-kargil-martyrs-67190| url-status=live}}</ref>
* 3,000 killed (] White Paper)<ref name="700killed"/>
* 357 killed and 665+ wounded (per Musharraf)<ref name="indianexpress.com">{{cite news |url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/musharraf-now-has-paks-kargil-toll-357/14208/ |title=Musharraf now has Pak's Kargil toll: 357 |last1= |first1= |last2= |first2= |date=7 October 2006 |work= |newspaper=Indian Express |access-date=2 February 2013 |archive-date=18 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121218014539/http://www.indianexpress.com/news/musharraf-now-has-paks-kargil-toll-357/14208/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="700killed"/>
* 8 POWs<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99aug15/nation.htm#9| title=Tribune Report on Pakistani POWs| newspaper=The Tribune| access-date=20 May 2009| archive-date=18 January 2012| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118031055/http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99aug15/nation.htm#9| url-status=live}}</ref>

'''Indian claims:'''
* 737–1,200 killed (at least 249 bodies recovered in Indian territory)<ref>{{cite book |last1=Malik |first1=V. P. |title=Kargil: From Surprise to Victory |date=2006 |publisher=HarperCollins |isbn=9788172236359 |page=342 |quote=According to our intelligence estimates, their Army suffered over 737 casualties, primarily due to our artillery fire.}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Pubby |first1=Manu |title=Kargil: Pak suffered most casualties at Batalik |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/web/kargil-pak-suffered-most-casualties-at-batalik/lite/ |access-date=27 June 2018 |work=The Indian Express |date=19 November 2010 |quote=Indian records say a total of 249 bodies of Pakistani soldiers were recovered during the battle but estimates of total enemy casualties is put around 1000–1200. |archive-date=27 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627180505/https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/web/kargil-pak-suffered-most-casualties-at-batalik/lite/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kanwal |first1=Gurmeet |title=Pakistan's Strategic Blunder at Kargil |journal=CLAWS Journal |date=2009 |page=72 |url=http://www.claws.in/images/journals_doc/1400824835Gurmeet%20Kanwal%20CJ%20SSummer%202009.pdf |access-date=27 June 2018 |quote=The army recovered 249 dead bodies of Pakistani regular soldiers from the area of operations in Kargil; 244 dead bodies were buried as per military norms with religious rites; five bodies were accepted by Pakistan and taken back |archive-date=18 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190818124051/https://www.claws.in/images/journals_doc/1400824835Gurmeet%20Kanwal%20CJ%20SSummer%202009.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="700killed"/>
* 1000+ wounded<ref>{{cite news |title=How artillery changed the tide of the Kargil war |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/how-artillery-changed-the-tide-of-the-kargil-war/articleshow/48216559.cms |access-date=27 June 2018 |work=The Economic Times |date=25 July 2017 |archive-date=27 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627202012/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/how-artillery-changed-the-tide-of-the-kargil-war/articleshow/48216559.cms |url-status=live }}</ref>
| campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Kargil War}}
{{Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars}} {{Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars}}
}}
The '''Kargil War''', also known as the '''Kargil conflict''',{{ref|fn_(I)|}} was fought between ] and ] from May to July 1999 in the ] of ] (erstwhile ]) and elsewhere along the ] (LoC). In India, the conflict is also referred to as '''Operation Vijay''' ({{langx|sa|विजय}}, {{Literal translation|Victory}}), which was the codename of the Indian military operation in the region.<ref>It is also sometimes referred to as '''Operation Vijay Kargil''' so as to distinguish it from ], the 1961 operation by the ] that led to the capture of Goa, Daman and Diu and Anjidiv Islands.</ref> The ] acted jointly with the ] to flush out the ] and paramilitary troops from vacated Indian positions along the LoC,<ref name="indianairforce.nic.in">{{cite web |url=http://indianairforce.nic.in/content/op-safed-sagar |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210806002413/http://indianairforce.nic.in/content/op-safed-sagar |archive-date=2021-08-06 |title= Op Safed Sagar: Understanding Air Operations in Kargil |publisher=Indian Air Force<!--Author and date not stated-->}}</ref> in what was designated as ] ({{langx|hi|ऑपरेशन सफेद सागर}}, {{Literal translation|White Sea}}).


The conflict was triggered by the infiltration of Pakistani troops—disguised as ]—into strategic positions on the Indian side of the LoC,<ref name="Qadir" /><ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Musharraf |first=Pervez |title=In the Line of Fire: A Memoir |title-link=In the Line of Fire: A Memoir |publisher=Free Press |year=2006 |isbn=0-7432-8344-9 |pages=90–91 |language=en |author-link=Pervez Musharraf}}</ref> which serves as the ''de facto'' border between the two countries in the ]. During its initial stages, Pakistan blamed the fighting entirely on independent Kashmiri insurgents, but documents left behind by casualties and later statements by Pakistan's ] and ] showed the involvement of Pakistani paramilitary forces,<ref>{{cite book | title=Battle Ready | publisher=Grosset & Dunlap | year=2004 | isbn=0-399-15176-1 |first=Tom |last=Clancy |author1-link=Tom Clancy<!--yes, this is non-fiction--> |first2=Tony |last2=Zinni |author2-link=Anthony Zinni |first3=Tony |last3=Koltz |author3-link=Tony Koltz }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/as-spell-binding-as-the-guns-of-navarone/475330/|title=Pak commander blows the lid on Islamabad's Kargil plot |first=Manu |last=Pubby |work=The Indian Express |date=12 June 2009|access-date=13 June 2009|archive-date=20 January 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110120034522/http://www.indianexpress.com/news/as-spell-binding-as-the-guns-of-navarone/475330|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/Sharif-admits-he-lsquolet-downrsquo-Vajpayee-on-Kargil-conflict/article14832565.ece|title=Sharif admits he let down Vajpayee on Kargil conflict|agency=]|date=10 September 2007|access-date=3 January 2017|location=Chennai, India|work=The Hindu|archive-date=30 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200430160236/https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/Sharif-admits-he-lsquolet-downrsquo-Vajpayee-on-Kargil-conflict/article14832565.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> led by ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Nawaz |first=Shuja |title=Crossed Swords: Pakistan, Its Army, and the Wars Within |page=420 |year=2007}}</ref> The Indian Army, later supported by the Indian Air Force, recaptured a majority of the positions on the Indian side of the LoC; facing international diplomatic opposition, Pakistani forces withdrew from all remaining Indian positions along the LoC.
The '''Kargil War''', also known as the '''Kargil conflict''',{{fn|(I)}} was an ] between ] and ] that took place between May and July 1999 in the ] district of ]. The cause of the war was the infiltration of Pakistani soldiers and Kashmiri ]s into positions on the Indian side of the ], which serves as the '']'' border between the two states. During and directly after the war, Pakistan blamed the fighting entirely on independent Kashmiri insurgents, but documents left behind by ] and later statements by Pakistan's ] and ] showed involvement of Pakistani paramilitary forces. The ], supported by the ], attacked the Pakistani positions and, with international ] support, eventually forced a Pakistani withdrawal across the Line of Control (LoC).


The war is one of the most recent examples of ] ], and posed significant ] problems for the combating sides. This was the first direct ground war between any two countries after they had developed ]. (India and Pakistan both test-detonated ] devices in May 1998, though ] was conducted in 1974.) The conflict led to heightened tension between the two nations and increased defence spending on the part of India. In Pakistan, the aftermath caused instability to the ] and the ], and, on ], ], a '']'' by the military placed army chief ] in power. The Kargil War is the most recent example of ], and as such, posed significant logistical problems for the combatting sides. It also marks one of only two instances of ] between ] (alongside the ]). India had conducted its first successful test ]; Pakistan, which had been developing its nuclear capability in secret since around the same time, conducted its first known tests ], just two weeks after ].


==Location== ==Location==
Before the ] in 1947<!--Please DO NOT remove this year link since it will "will clearly help the reader to understand the topic" as per Manual of Style-->, ] was part of ], a region of many diverse linguistic, ethnic and religious groups, due in part to the many isolated valleys separated by some of the world's highest mountains. The ] (1947–48) resulted in most of the Kargil region remaining an Indian territory;<ref name="Dawn"> ], ], Dawn</ref> then, after Pakistan's defeat in the ], the remaining areas, including strategic military posts, also passed into Indian territory.<ref>{{cite book | author=Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema | title=The Armed Forces of Pakistan | publisher=Allen & Unwin | year=2003 |id=ISBN 1865081191}} Pg 4</ref> Notably, Kargil is the only ] in the ] subdivision that has a ] majority. The town and district of Kargil is in what is now called ]. The town lies on the Line of Control (LOC), the de facto border for the two nations, located 120 km (75 miles) from ], facing the ]. Like other areas in the ], it has a ] climate. Summers are cool with frigid nights, while winters are long and chilly with temperatures often dropping to &minus;40&nbsp;°C (&minus;40&nbsp;°F). A ] connecting Srinagar to ] cuts through Kargil. Before the ] in 1947, Kargil was a ] of ], a sparsely populated region with diverse linguistic, ethnic and religious groups, living in isolated valleys separated by some of the world's highest mountains. The ] concluded with the Line of Control bisecting the Ladakh district, with the ] going to Pakistan (now part of ]).<ref name="Dawn">{{cite news|url=http://www.dawn.com/2006/10/21/ed.htm#4 |first=Javed |last=Hussain |title=Kargil: what might have happened |date=21 October 2006 |newspaper=] |access-date=20 May 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202060619/http://www.dawn.com/2006/10/21/ed.htm |archive-date=2 December 2008 }}</ref> After Pakistan's defeat in the ], the two nations signed the ] promising not to engage in armed conflict with respect to that boundary.<ref>{{cite book | first=Pervaiz Iqbal |last=Cheema | title=The Armed Forces of Pakistan | publisher=Allen & Unwin | year=2003 |isbn=1-86508-119-1|page=4}}</ref>


The town of ] is located {{convert|205|km|mi|abbr=on}} from ], facing the ] across the LOC.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090518031923/http://kargil.nic.in/profile/profile.htm |date=18 May 2009 }}, Official website of Kargil District</ref> Like other areas in the ], Kargil has a continental climate. Summers are cool with frigid nights, while winters are long and chilly with temperatures often dropping to {{cvt|-48|C|||}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://kargil.nic.in/profile/climate.htm|title=Climate & Soil conditions|work=Official website of Kargil District|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090410042319/http://kargil.nic.in/profile/climate.htm|archive-date=10 April 2009}}</ref>
]

The area that witnessed the infiltration and fighting is a 160 km long stretch on the border of the LOC, overlooking a vital highway on the Indian side of Kashmir. Apart from the district capital, Kargil, the ] in the conflict encompassed the tiny town of ] as well as the Batalik sector, Mushko ] and other nearby areas along the de facto ]. The military outposts on these ]s were generally around 5,000 metres (16,000 ft) high, with a few as high as 5,600 metres (18,000 ft). One of the main reasons why Kargil was specifically targeted for incursions was its terrain lent itself to a ]. With tactically vital features and well-prepared defensive posts atop the peaks, it provided an ideal high ground for a defender akin to a ]. Any attack to dislodge the enemy and reclaim high ground in a ] would require a far higher ratio of attackers to defenders, which is further exacerbated by the high altitude and freezing temperatures. Additionally, Kargil was just 173 km (108 mi) from the Pakistani controlled town of ], which was capable of providing logistical and artillery support to the Pakistani ]s. All these tactical reasons, plus the Kargil district being a Muslim majority, were probably contributing factors to why Kargil was chosen as the location to attack.
An Indian ] (]) connecting Srinagar to ] cuts through Kargil. The area that witnessed the infiltration and fighting is a {{convert|160|km|-2|adj=on|}} long stretch of ]s overlooking this only road linking Srinagar and Leh.{{citation needed|date=February 2023}} The military outposts on the ridges above the highway were generally around {{cvt|5000|m||}} high, with a few as high as {{cvt|5485|m||}}.<ref name="Summary">{{cite web|url=http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/war_in_kargil.pdf |title=War in Kargil – The CCC's summary on the war |access-date=20 May 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327120658/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/war_in_kargil.pdf |archive-date=27 March 2009 }}</ref> Apart from the district capital, Kargil, the populated areas near the front line in the conflict included the ] and the town of ]s, southwest of Kargil, as well as the ] sector and other areas northeast of Kargil.

Kargil was targeted partly because the terrain was conducive to the ] of several unoccupied military positions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://acdis.illinois.edu/publications/207/publication-LimitedWarwithPakistanWillItSecureIndiasInterests.html|title=Limited War with Pakistan: Will It Secure India's Interests?|work=ACDIS Occasional Paper|publisher=Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security (ACDIS), University of Illinois|first=Suba|last=Chandran|year=2004|access-date=20 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100705081726/http://acdis.illinois.edu/publications/207/publication-LimitedWarwithPakistanWillItSecureIndiasInterests.html|archive-date=5 July 2010}}</ref> With tactically vital features and well-prepared defensive posts atop the peaks, a defender on the high ground would enjoy advantages akin to that of a fortress. Any attack to dislodge a defender from high ground in ] requires a far higher ratio of attackers to defenders,<ref>Against the {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081122125130/http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR638/ |date=22 November 2008 }}, the ratio over mountain terrain is estimated at 6:1. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081206183309/http://www.india-today.com/itoday/19990726/cover3.html |date=6 December 2008 }}, '']''</ref> and the difficulties would be exacerbated by the high altitude and freezing temperatures.<ref>Acosta, Marcus P., CPT, U.S. Army, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071128055321/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/theses/Acosta03.pdf |date=28 November 2007 }}, June 2003. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020190328/https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA417318 |date=20 October 2021 }}</ref>

Kargil is just {{convert|173|km|mi|abbr=on}} from the Pakistani-controlled town of ], which was capable of providing logistical and artillery support to Pakistani combatants. A ], which was closed in 1949.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/opinion/kargil-skardu-road-only-connect/|title=Kargil-Skardu Road: Only Connect|date=24 May 2015|website=Greater Kashmir|access-date=17 June 2019|archive-date=30 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200430145637/https://www.greaterkashmir.com/news/opinion/kargil-skardu-road-only-connect/|url-status=live}}</ref>


==Background== ==Background==
] is strategically located.]]
After the ], there had been a long period of relative calm among the two neighbours - notwithstanding India's preemptive assault and capture of most of ] and the resulting high altitute warfare in the 1980s.<Ref> Outside Magazine</ref> But during the 1990s, escalating ] with ] as well as ] by both countries in 1998 changed the scenario. Despite the belligerent atmosphere, both countries signed the ] in February 1999 to provide a peaceful and ] solution to the Kashmiri issue. However, elements in the ] covertly trained and sent troops and ] forces, some allegedly in the guise of ], into the Indian territory. The aim was to sever the link between Kashmir and Ladakh, and cause Indian forces to withdraw from the ], thus forcing India to negotiate a settlement of the broader Kashmir dispute. Pakistan also believed that any tension in the region would internationalise the Kashmir issue, helping it to secure a speedy resolution. Yet another goal may have been to boost the morale of the decade-long ] in ] by taking a proactive role. Some writers have speculated that the operation's objective may also have been as a retaliation for India's ] in 1984 that seized much of Siachen Glacier.<ref>{{cite book | author=Robert G. Wirsing | title=Kashmir in the Shadow of War: regional rivalries in a nuclear age | publisher=M.E. Sharpe | year=2003 |id=ISBN 0-7656-1090-6}} Pg 38</ref>

After the ], there had been a long period with relatively few direct armed conflicts involving the military forces of the two neighbours—notwithstanding the efforts of both nations to control the ] by establishing military outposts on the surrounding mountains ridges and the resulting military skirmishes in the 1980s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://outside.away.com/outside/features/200302/200302_siachen_7.html|title=The Coldest War|work=Outside Magazine|access-date=20 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090402185925/http://outside.away.com/outside/features/200302/200302_siachen_7.html|archive-date=2 April 2009}}</ref> During the 1990s, however, escalating ] due to ], some of which were supported by Pakistan,<ref>{{cite news|title=Pervez Musharraf admits Pakistan nurtured terrorism|url=http://www.freepressjournal.in/pervez-musharraf-admits-pakistan-nurtured-terrorism/|date=28 October 2015|access-date=3 November 2015|newspaper=The Free Press Journal|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151029154400/http://www.freepressjournal.in/pervez-musharraf-admits-pakistan-nurtured-terrorism/|archive-date=29 October 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Pak backed terror groups like LeT to fan militancy: Musharraf|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/pak-backed-terror-groups-like-let-to-fan-militancy-musharraf-115102800590_1.html|date=28 October 2015|access-date=3 November 2015|newspaper=Business Standard|archive-date=29 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190829155010/https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/pak-backed-terror-groups-like-let-to-fan-militancy-musharraf-115102800590_1.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Pakistan Supported, Trained Terror Groups Like LeT to Fan Militancy: Pervez Musharraf|url=http://www.outlookindia.com/news/article/pakistan-supported-trained-terror-groups-like-let-to-fan-militancy-pervez-musharraf/918376|date=28 October 2015|access-date=3 November 2015|archive-date=31 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160131122518/http://www.outlookindia.com/news/article/pakistan-supported-trained-terror-groups-like-let-to-fan-militancy-pervez-musharraf/918376|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Pakistan trained terrorists against India: Pervez Musharraf|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/laden-zawahiri-haqqani-taliban-lashkar-are-pakistans-heroes-says-musharraf/1/508852.html|date=27 October 2015|access-date=3 November 2015|work=India Today|archive-date=12 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171012064844/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/laden-zawahiri-haqqani-taliban-lashkar-are-pakistans-heroes-says-musharraf/1/508852.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Pakistan Supported, Trained Terror Groups: Pervez Musharraf|url=http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/pakistan-supported-trained-terror-groups-pervez-musharraf-1237173|date=28 October 2015|access-date=3 November 2015|work=NDTV|archive-date=30 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200430160226/https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/pakistan-supported-trained-terror-groups-pervez-musharraf-1237173|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Pervez Musharraf's confession on Pakistan terror groups: Truth finally out, say Indian political parties|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-pervez-musharraf-s-confession-on-pakistan-terror-groups-truth-finally-out-say-indian-political-parties-2139590|date=28 October 2015|access-date=3 November 2015|newspaper=DNA India|archive-date=30 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200430160521/https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-pervez-musharraf-s-confession-on-pakistan-terror-groups-truth-finally-out-say-indian-political-parties-2139590|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Musharraf equates Bal Thackeray with Hafiz Saeed|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Musharraf-equates-Bal-Thackeray-with-Hafiz-Saeed/articleshow/49560785.cms|date=28 October 2015|access-date=3 November 2015|newspaper=The Times of India|archive-date=30 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200430145642/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Musharraf-equates-Bal-Thackeray-with-Hafiz-Saeed/articleshow/49560785.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> as well as the conducting of ] by both countries in 1998, led to an increasingly belligerent atmosphere. In an attempt to defuse the situation, both countries signed the ] in February 1999, promising to provide a peaceful and bilateral solution to the ].

During the winter of 1998–1999, some elements of the ] were covertly training and sending Pakistani troops and paramilitary forces, some allegedly in the guise of ], into territory on the Indian side of the LOC. The infiltration was ]d "Operation Badr";<ref name="VP Malik"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121216074135/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_26-7-2002_pg4_12 |date=16 December 2012 }}, India's then ] VP Malik, expressing his views on Operation Vijay. Hosted on '']''</ref><ref>Vikas Kapur and Vipin Narang, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121218052440/http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjir/3.1.06_kapur-narang.html |date=18 December 2012 }}, ''Stanford Journal of International Relations''</ref><ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090108040104/http://www.ipcs.org/ipcs/displayReview.jsp?kValue=102 |date= 8 January 2009 }}, Hosted on IPCS</ref> its aim was to sever the link between Kashmir and Ladakh, and cause Indian forces to withdraw from the ], thus forcing India to negotiate a settlement of the broader Kashmir dispute. Pakistan also believed that any tension in the region would internationalise the Kashmir issue, helping it to secure a speedy resolution. Yet another goal may have been to boost the morale of the decade-long rebellion in ] by taking a proactive role.

Pakistani ] ], and then head of ] analysis wing, has confirmed there were no mujahideen but only regular Pakistan Army soldiers who took part in the Kargil War.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2013/20130128/world.htm#6 |title=No mujahideen, our soldiers took part in Kargil: Pak ex-Gen |work=The Tribune (Online Edition) |date=28 January 2013 |access-date=28 June 2014 |archive-date=13 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513034735/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2013/20130128/world.htm#6 |url-status=live }}</ref> "There were no Mujahideen, only taped wireless messages, which fooled no one. Our soldiers were made to occupy barren ridges, with hand held weapons and ammunition", Lt Gen Aziz wrote in his article in ''The Nation'' daily in January 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nation.com.pk/06-Jan-2013/putting-our-children-in-line-of-fire |title=Putting our children in line of fire |work=The Nation |date=6 January 2013 |author=Shahid Aziz |access-date=28 June 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131113151140/http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/columns/06-Jan-2013/putting-our-children-in-line-of-fire |archive-date=13 November 2013 }}</ref>

Some writers have speculated that the operation's objective may also have been retaliation for India's ] in 1984 that seized much of Siachen Glacier.<ref>{{cite book | author=Robert G. Wirsing | title=Kashmir in the Shadow of War: regional rivalries in a nuclear age | publisher=M.E. Sharpe | year=2003 |isbn=0-7656-1090-6|page=38}}</ref>

According to India's then ] ], and many scholars,<ref>{{cite book |title=Operation Badr:Mussharef's contribution to Pakistan's thousand years war against India |last= Ludra |first=Kuldip S. |year=2001 |publisher=Institute for Strategic Research and Analysis ] }}</ref><ref>Low Intensity Conflicts in India By Vivek Chadha, United Service Institution of India Published by SAGE, 2005, {{ISBN|0-7619-3325-5}}</ref> much of the background planning, including construction of logistical supply routes, had been undertaken much earlier. On several occasions during the 1980s and 1990s, the army had given Pakistani leaders (] and ]) similar proposals for infiltration into the Kargil region, but the plans had been shelved for fear of drawing the nations into all-out war.<ref name="Hassan Abbas">{{cite book | author=Hassan Abbas | title=Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, the Army, and America's War on Terror | publisher=M.E. Sharpe | year=2004 | isbn=0-7656-1497-9 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/pakistansdriftin00hass }}</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120723125533/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_2-7-2003_pg7_19 |date=23 July 2012 }}, 'Musharraf planned Kargil when I was PM' : Bhutto – Previous interview to '']'', 30 November 2001.</ref><ref name=swords>{{cite book|last=Nawaz|first=Shuja|title=Crossed Swords: Pakistan, Its Army, and the Wars Within|date=2008|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|isbn=978-0195476972}}</ref>

Some analysts believe that the blueprint of attack was reactivated soon after Pervez Musharraf was appointed ] in October 1998.<ref name="VP Malik" /><ref>{{cite book |title=Dangerous Deterrent |last= Kapur |first=S. Paul |year=2007 |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-5550-4 |page=118}}</ref> After the war, ], Prime Minister of Pakistan during the Kargil conflict, claimed that he was unaware of the plans, and that he first learned about the situation when he received an urgent phone call from ], his counterpart in India.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1581473.cms|title=Nawaz blames Musharraf for Kargil|work=The Times of India|date=28 May 2006|access-date=20 May 2009|archive-date=13 January 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090113062703/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1581473.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> Sharif attributed the plan to Musharraf and "just two or three of his ]",<ref name=sharifunaware>{{cite news|url=http://www.dawn.com/2006/05/29/nat1.htm |title=I learnt about Kargil from Vajpayee, says Nawaz |publisher=Dawn |date=29 May 2006|access-date=29 May 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927222852/http://www.dawn.com/2006/05/29/nat1.htm |archive-date=27 September 2007 }}</ref> a view shared by some Pakistani writers who have stated that only four generals, including Musharraf, knew of the plan.<ref name="Hassan Abbas" /><ref name="Qadir">{{cite web|url=http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf|title=An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999|date=April 2002|last=Qadir|first=Shaukat|work=RUSI Journal|access-date=20 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327120655/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf|archive-date=27 March 2009}}</ref> Musharraf, however, asserted that Sharif had been briefed on the Kargil operation 15 days ahead of Vajpayee's journey to ] on 20 February.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=71008|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130102134734/http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=71008|url-status=dead|archive-date=2 January 2013|title=Kargil planned before Vajpayee's visit: Musharraf|work=]|date=13 July 2006|access-date=20 May 2009}}</ref>

==Course of the war==
{{Further|Kargil order of battle |Kargil Air War}}


===Conflict events===
According to India's then ] Ved Prakash Malik, and many other scholars, the infiltration was ]d "Operation Badr",<ref> - Hosted on '']''; Stanford Journal of International Relations; - Hosted on IPCS</ref> and much of the background planning, including construction of logistical supply routes, had been undertaken much earlier. On more than one occasion, the army had given past Pakistani leaders (namely ] and ]) similar proposals for an infiltration in the Kargil region in the 1980s and 1990s. However, the plans had been shelved for fear of drawing the nations into all-out war.<ref name="Hassan Abbas">{{cite book | author=Hassan Abbas | title=Pakistan's Drift Into Extremism: Allah, the Army, and America's War on Terror | publisher=M.E. Sharpe | year=2004|id=ISBN 0-7656-1497-9}}</ref><ref>, , Interview in 2003. ‘Musharraf planned Kargil when I was PM’ : Bhutto - Previous interview to ] on ] ]</ref> Some analysts believe that the blueprint of attack was reactivated when Pervez Musharraf was appointed ] in October 1998. In a disclosure made by ], the then Prime Minister of Pakistan, he states that he was unaware of the preparation of the intrusion, and it was an urgent phone call from ], his counterpart in India, that informed him about the situation.<ref> ] ] - Hosted on Rediff.com </ref> Responding to this, Musharraf asserted that the Prime Minister had been briefed on the Kargil operation 15 days ahead of Vajpayee's journey to ] on ].<ref> ] ] - ]</ref> Sharif had attributed the plan to Musharraf and "just two or three of his ]",<ref name=sharifunaware>{{cite news
{| class="wikitable"
|url = http://www.dawn.com/2006/05/29/nat1.htm
|-
|title = I learnt about Kargil from Vajpayee, says Nawaz
! style="width:10%;"| '''Date (1999)'''
|work =
! style="width:90%; text-align:center;"| '''Event'''<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110726/edit.htm#6 |title=The Tribune, Chandigarh, India – Opinions |publisher=Tribuneindia.com |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-date=8 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120308123358/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110726/edit.htm#6 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>V.&nbsp;P. Malik, "Kargil War: Need to learn strategic lessons", ''India Tribune'', 26 July 2011.</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/387702.stm |title=Kargil conflict timeline |publisher=BBC News |date=13 July 1999 |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-date=29 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120129170557/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/387702.stm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Factfile |newspaper=The Tribune (Chandigarh) |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110726/edit.htm#6 |date=26 July 2011 |access-date=26 July 2011 |archive-date=5 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111205233521/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110726/edit.htm#6 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|publisher = Dawn
|-
|date = ] ]
| 3 May || A Pakistani intrusion in the ] is reported by local shepherds.
|accessdate = 2006-05-29
|-
}}</ref> a view shared by some Pakistani writers who have stated that, only four ]s, including Musharraf, knew of the plan.<ref name="Hassan Abbas" /><ref name="Qadir"></ref>
| 5 May || ] patrols are sent out in response to earlier reports; 5 Indian soldiers are captured and subsequently killed.
|-
| 9 May || Heavy ] by the ] damages Indian ammunition dumps in ].
|-
| 10 May || Multiple infiltrations across the ] are confirmed in ], Kaksar, and ] sectors.
|-
| Mid-May || India moves in more soldiers from the ] to Kargil district.
|-
| 26 May || The ] (IAF) begins ]s against suspected infiltrator positions.
|-
| 27 May || One IAF ] and one ] aircraft are shot down by ] ]s of the Pakistan Army's ] Corps;<ref>{{Cite web|title=SA-7 GRAIL|url=http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/sa-7.htm|date=1999-03-21|publisher=]|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090203110123/http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/sa-7.htm|archive-date=3 February 2009|access-date=2009-02-09}}</ref> ] ] (pilot of the MiG-27) is captured by a Pakistani patrol and given ] status (released on 3 June 1999).
|-
| 28 May || One IAF ] is shot down by Pakistani forces; four crew members are killed.
|-
| 1 June || The Pakistan Army begins shelling operations on India's ] in ] and ].
|-
| 5 June ||India releases documents recovered from three Pakistani soldiers that officially indicate Pakistan's involvement in the conflict.
|-
| 6 June || The Indian Army begins a major offensive in Kargil.
|-
| 9 June || Indian troops re-capture two key positions in the ] sector.
|-
| 11 June || India releases intercepts of conversations between Pakistani ] ] ] (on a visit to China) and ] ] ] (in ]) as proof of the Pakistan Army's involvement in the infiltrations.
|-
| 13 June || Indian forces ] in Dras after a fierce battle with ]s backed by Pakistani troops.
|-
| 15 June ||] ] forces then ], ] to immediately pull all Pakistani troops and ] out from Kargil.
|-
| 29 June || Under pressure from their government, Pakistani forces begin their retreat from Indian-administered Kashmir and the Indian Army advances towards ].
|-
| 4 July || Three Indian regiments (], ] and ]) engage elements of the remaining Pakistani ] regiment in the ]. The region is recaptured by Indian forces after more than 12 hours of fighting.
|-
| 5 July || Nawaz Sharif officially announces the Pakistan Army's withdrawal from Kargil following a meeting with President Clinton. Indian forces subsequently take control of Dras.
|-
| 7 July || Indian troops recapture Jubar Heights in Batalik.
|-
| 11 July || Pakistani forces disengage from the region; India retakes key peak points in Batalik.
|-
| 14 July ||] ] declares Operation ''Vijay'' a success. The ] sets conditions for talks with Pakistan.
|-
| 26 July || Kargil War officially comes to an end. Indian Army announces the complete withdrawal of Pakistani irregular and regular forces.
|}


There were three major phases to the Kargil War. First, Pakistan infiltrated forces into the Indian-controlled section of Kashmir and occupied strategic locations enabling it to bring ] within range of its artillery fire. The next stage consisted of India discovering the infiltration and mobilising forces to respond to it. The final stage involved major battles by Indian and Pakistani forces resulting in India recapturing most of the territories<ref name="auto">{{cite news|url=http://www.lrb.co.uk/v23/n08/ali_01_.html|title=Bitter Chill of Winter|first=Tariq|last=Ali|author-link=Tariq Ali|newspaper=]=|access-date=20 May 2009|archive-date=1 October 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091001175541/http://www.lrb.co.uk/v23/n08/ali_01_.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="Colonel Ravi Nanda 1999">{{cite book | author=Colonel Ravi Nanda | title=Kargil: A Wake Up Call | publisher=Vedams Books | year=1999 | isbn=81-7095-074-0}} {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928055430/https://www.vedamsbooks.com/no14953.htm |date=28 September 2007 }}</ref> held by Pakistani forces and the subsequent withdrawal of Pakistani forces back across the LOC after international pressure.
==War progress==
There were three major phases to the Kargil War. First, Pakistan captured several strategic high points in the Indian-controlled section of Kashmir. India responded by first capturing strategic transportation routes, then militarily pushing Pakistani forces back across the Line of Control.


===Occupation by Pakistan=== ===Occupation by Pakistan===
]
Because of the extreme winter weather in Kashmir, it was common practice for the Indian and Pakistan Army to abandon forward posts and reoccupy them in the spring. That particular spring, the Pakistan Army reoccupied the forward posts before the scheduled time.
]
In early May 1999, the ] decided to occupy the Kargil posts, numbering around 130, and thus control the area. Troops from the elite ] as well as four to seven ]s<ref name="Memoirs">{{cite book|author=] | title=] | publisher=Free Press | year=2006 | id=ISBN 0-7432-8344-9}}</ref><ref>] ]] - ]</ref> of the ] (a paramilitary regiment not part of the regular Pakistani army at that time) backed by Kashmiri ] and ] ]<ref name="Militant">It is estimated that around 2,000 "Mujahideen" might have been involved as Musharraf stated on ], ] to Pakistan's ''The News''; in the ] quoting the General's estimate. An Indian Major General(retd) too puts the apart from the NLI ] Regiment.</ref> covertly and overtly set up bases on the vantage points of the Indian-controlled region. Initially, these incursions were not spotted due to the heavy artillery fire by Pakistan across the Line of Control, which ] for the infiltrators. But by the second week of May, the ]ing of an Indian patrol team, acting on a tip-off by a local shepherd in the Batalik sector, led to the exposure of the infiltration. Initially with little knowledge of the nature or extent of the encroachment, the Indian troops in the area claimed that they would evict them within a few days. However, reports of ] elsewhere along the LoC made it clear that the entire plan of attack was on a much bigger scale. The total area seized by the ingress is generally accepted to between 130 km² - 200 km²;<ref name="Qadir" /><ref> (]) - ], ] ]</ref> Musharraf however, stated that 500 square miles (1,300 km²) of Indian territory was occupied.<ref name="Memoirs" />


During February 1999, the ] sent forces to occupy some posts on the Indian side of the LOC.<ref>{{cite magazine| url=http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,991457,00.html| archive-url=https://archive.today/20120914151255/http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,991457,00.html| url-status=dead| archive-date=14 September 2012|title=How I Started A War|date=12 July 1999|magazine=]| access-date=20 May 2009}}</ref> Troops from the elite ] as well as four to seven ]s<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://orbat.com/site/history/historical/pakistan/nli_kargil1999.html|title=The Northern Light Infantry in the Kargil Operations|access-date=20 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090628181523/http://orbat.com/site/history/historical/pakistan/nli_kargil1999.html|archive-date=28 June 2009}} by Ravi Rikhye 1999 August 25, 2002 – ]</ref> of the ] (a paramilitary regiment not part of the regular Pakistani army at that time) covertly and overtly set up bases on 132 vantage points of the Indian-controlled region.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ti_xPBoC8hY |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211221/Ti_xPBoC8hY |archive-date=2021-12-21 |url-status=live|title=Guns and Glory Episode 7: 1999 Indo-Pak War in Kargil, Part 1|date=18 January 2014|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}</ref> According to some reports, these Pakistani forces were backed by Kashmiri ] and Afghan ].<ref name="Militant">It is estimated that around 2,000 "Mujahideen" might have been involved as Musharraf stated on 6 July 1999, to Pakistan's ''The News''; , '']'' quoting the General's estimate. An Indian Major General (retd) too puts the {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060106040520/http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/jul/15ashok.htm |date=6 January 2006 }}, apart from the NLI ] Regiment.</ref> According to General ], the bulk of the infiltration occurred in April.<ref name=CLAWS>{{citation |first=V.P. |last=Malik |title=The Kargil War: Some Reflections |journal=CLAWS Journal |date=Summer 2009 |url=http://www.claws.in/images/journals_doc/1400824315V%20P%20Malik%20%20CJ%20SSummer%202009.pdf |access-date=24 January 2018 |archive-date=9 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190809144256/https://www.claws.in/images/journals_doc/1400824315V%20P%20Malik%20%20CJ%20SSummer%202009.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
The ] responded with ], a mobilisation of 200,000 Indian troops. However, because of the nature of the terrain, ] and ] operations could not be mounted; the scale of most fighting was at the ]al or battalion level. In effect, two ] of the Indian Army,<ref></ref> numbering 20,000, plus several thousand from the ] and the air force were deployed in the conflict zone. The total number of Indian soldiers that were involved in the ] on the Kargil-Drass sector was thus close to 30,000. The number of infiltrators, including those providing logistical backup, has been put at approximately 5,000 at the height of the conflict.<ref name="Qadir" /><ref name = "Globalsecurity"> -]</ref><ref name="Militant" /> This figure includes troops from ] that were involved in the war providing additional artillery support.


Pakistani intrusions took place in the heights of the lower Mushkoh Valley, along the ] ridgeline in Dras, in Kaksar near Kargil, in the Batalik sector east of the ], on the heights above of the ] sector where the LOC turns North and in the ] sector south of the ] area.
===Protection of National Highway No. 1A===
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] (Pakistan controlled Kashmir) shelling Indian troops via ].]] -->
The terrain of Kashmir is mountainous and at high altitudes; even the best roads, such as National Highway No. 1 (NH 1) from Leh to Srinagar, are only two lanes. The rough terrain and narrow roads slowed traffic, and the high altitude, which affected the ability of aircraft to carry loads, made control of NH 1A (the actual stretch of the highway which was under Pakistani fire) a priority for India. From their ]s, the Pakistani forces had a clear line of sight to lay down ] on NH 1A, inflicting heavy casualties on the Indians.<ref name ="NLI"> ] ] Daily Times, Pakistan</ref> This was a serious problem for the Indian Army as the highway was its main logistical and supply route. The Pakistani shelling of the ] posed the threat of Leh being cut off, though an alternative (and longer) road to Leh existed via ].


===India discovers infiltration and mobilises===
The infiltrators, apart from being equipped with ] and ]s, were also armed with ], ] and ]s. Many posts were also heavily ], with India later recovering nearly 9,000 ] according to ]. Pakistan's ] was done through ] and ]s supplied by the US.<ref></ref> The initial Indian attacks were aimed at controlling the hills overlooking NH 1A, with high priority being given to the stretches of the highway near the town of Kargil. The majority of posts along the Line of Control were adjacent to the highway, and therefore the recapture of nearly every infiltrated post increased both the territorial gains and the security of the highway. The protection of this route and the recapture of the forward posts were thus ''ongoing objectives'' throughout the war. Though most of the posts in the vicinity of the highway were cleared by mid-June, some parts of the highway near Drass witnessed sporadic shelling until the end of the war.
Initially, these incursions were not detected for a number of reasons: Indian patrols were not sent into some of the areas infiltrated by the Pakistani forces and heavy artillery fire by Pakistan in some areas ] for the infiltrators. But by the second week of May, the ambushing of an Indian patrol team led by Capt ], who acted on a tip-off by a local shepherd in the Batalik sector, led to the exposure of the infiltration.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindu.com/2009/07/06/stories/2009070655650700.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090713030728/http://www.hindu.com/2009/07/06/stories/2009070655650700.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=13 July 2009 |work=] |title=Saurabh Kalia's parents waging a lone battle to highlight war crimes |access-date=15 June 2012}}</ref> Initially, with little knowledge of the nature or extent of the infiltration, the Indian troops in the area assumed that the infiltrators were jihadis and claimed that they would evict them within a few days. Subsequent discovery of infiltration elsewhere along the LOC, and the difference in tactics employed by the infiltrators, caused the Indian army to realise that the plan of attack was on a much bigger scale. The total area seized by the ingress is generally accepted to between {{cvt|130|and|200|km2|-1}}.<ref name="Qadir" /><ref name="Memoirs">{{cite book |author=Musharraf |first=Pervez |title=In the Line of Fire: A Memoir |title-link=In the Line of Fire: A Memoir |publisher=Free Press |year=2006 |isbn=0-7432-8344-9 |pages= |language=en |author-link=Pervez Musharraf}}</ref><ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327120658/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/war_in_kargil.pdf |date=27 March 2009 }} {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110607151609/http://www.tni.org/archives/bidwai/danger.htm |date=7 June 2011 }}, '']'', 7 June 1999</ref>


The ] responded with Operation Vijay, a mobilisation of 200,000 Indian troops. However, because of the nature of the terrain, ] and ] operations could not be mounted; subsequent fighting was conducted mostly at the brigade or ] level. In effect, two ] of the Indian Army,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE4-6/malik.html|last=Gen VP Malik|title=Lessons from Kargil|access-date=20 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090408082728/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE4-6/malik.html|archive-date=8 April 2009}}</ref> numbering 20,000, plus several thousand from the ] and the air force were deployed in the conflict zone. The total number of Indian soldiers that were involved in the ] on the Kargil-Drass sector was thus close to 30,000. The number of infiltrators, including those providing logistical backup, has been put at approximately 5,000 at the height of the conflict.<ref name="Qadir" /><ref name="Militant" /> This figure includes troops from ] who provided additional artillery support.
===Indian territory recovery===
]
Once India regained control of the hills overlooking NH 1A, the Indian Army turned to driving the invading force back across the Line of Control, but elected not to pursue forces further into the ]. The ], among other assaults, slowly tilted the combat in India's favor. Nevertheless, some of the posts put up a stiff resistance, including Tiger Hill (Point 5140) that fell only later in the war. A few of the assaults occurred atop hitherto unheard of peaks – most of them unnamed with only Point numbers to differentiate them – which witnessed fierce ]. As the operation was fully underway, about 250 artillery guns were brought in to clear the infiltrators in the posts that were in the ]. The ] field ] (infamous in India due to the ]) played a vital role, with Indian ]s making maximum use of the ] that assisted such an attack. However, its success was limited elsewhere due to the lack of space and depth to deploy the Bofors gun. It was in this type of terrain that ] were introduced. The ] launched ] but was limited by the high altitude, which in turn limited bomb loads and the number of ]s that could be used. The IAF lost a ] ] which it attributed to an ] as well as a ] ] which was shot down by Pakistan; Pakistan said it shot down both jets after they crossed into its territory<ref></ref><ref></ref> and one ] ] to ] ]s. During attacks the IAF used ]s to destroy well-entrenched positions of the Pakistani forces. It is estimated that in the war, nearly 700 intruders were killed by air action alone.<ref name = "Globalsecurity" />


The ] launched ] in support of the mobilisation of Indian land forces on 26 May. The Indian government cleared limited use of Air Power only on 25 May, for fear of undesirable escalation, with the fiat that IAF fighter jets were not to cross the LOC under any circumstance.<ref name="auto1">{{Cite journal|title=All you need to know about Kargil War|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/iaf-planned-to-bomb-targets-in-pakistan-during-kargil-war/indias-restraint/slideshow/59769657.cms|journal=The Economic Times|access-date=9 March 2019|archive-date=29 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190329101347/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/iaf-planned-to-bomb-targets-in-pakistan-during-kargil-war/indias-restraint/slideshow/59769657.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> This was the first time any air war was fought at such high altitudes globally, with targets at altitudes between {{convert|6000|to|18000|ft|m|order=flip}} ]. The rarified air at these altitudes affected ballistic trajectories of air to ground weapons, such as rockets, dumb and laser guided bombs. There was no opposition at all by the Pakistani Air Force, leaving the IAF free to carry out its attacks with impunity.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=How The IAF Dominated the Skies During Kargil War|url=http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2016/07/how-iaf-dominated-skies-during-kargil.html|journal=Indian Defence News|access-date=9 March 2019|archive-date=29 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190329090109/http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2016/07/how-iaf-dominated-skies-during-kargil.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The total air dominance of the IAF gave the aircrew enough time to modify aiming indices and firing techniques, increasing its effectiveness during the high altitude war. Poor weather conditions and range limitations intermittently affected bomb loads and the number of ]s that could be used, except for the ] fleet, which commenced operations on 30 May.<ref>{{Cite journal |title= The Mirage 2000 in Kargil |url= http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/history/kargil/1056-pcamp.html |journal= Bharat Rakshak |access-date= 9 March 2019 |archive-date= 7 August 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110807084357/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/Kargil/PCamp.html |url-status= dead }}</ref>
In some vital points, neither artillery nor air power could dislodge the outposts manned by the Pakistan soldiers, who were out of visible range. The Indian Army mounted some direct frontal ground assaults which were slow and took a heavy toll given the steep ascent that had to be made on peaks as high as 18,000 feet (5,500 m). Since any daylight attack would be suicidal, all the advances had to be made under the cover of darkness, escalating the risk of freezing. Accounting for the ] factor, the temperatures were often as low as −11&nbsp;°C to −15&nbsp;°C (12 °F to 5 °F) near the mountain tops. Based on ], much of the costly ]s by the Indians could have been avoided if the Indian Military had chosen to ] the supply route of the opposing force, virtually creating a ]. Such a move would have involved the Indian troops crossing the LoC as well as initiating aerial attacks on Pakistan soil, a manoeuvre India was not willing to exercise fearing an expansion of the ] and reducing international support for its cause.


====Naval action====
] of ]'s successful strike mission on Tiger Hill.]]
The ] also prepared to blockade the ] (primarily the ])<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/CP65.Grare.FINAL.pdf|title=The Resurgence of Baluch nationalism|first=Frédéric|last=Grare|publisher=]|access-date=20 May 2009|archive-date=20 April 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090420061901/https://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/CP65.Grare.FINAL.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> to cut off supply routes under ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Sea Power|url=http://www.forceindia.net/SeaPower.aspx|access-date=17 August 2013|newspaper=Force India|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130818112456/http://www.forceindia.net/SeaPower.aspx|archive-date=18 August 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Azam Khan|first=Cdr (Retd) Muhammad|title=Exercise Seaspark – 2001|url=http://www.defencejournal.com/2001/apr/seaspark.htm|publisher=Defence Journal|access-date=17 August 2013|archive-date=16 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121216075557/http://www.defencejournal.com/2001/apr/seaspark.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Indian Navy celebrates its silent Kargil victory|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/12113/report-indian-navy-celebrates-its-silent-kargil-victory|access-date=17 August 2013|newspaper=DNA India|date=30 November 2005}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=General Ashok K Mehta|title=The silent sentinel|url=http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/aug/05ashok.htm|access-date=17 August 2013|newspaper=Rediff|date=5 August 2005|archive-date=10 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170210030822/http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/aug/05ashok.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> The Indian Navy's ] and ] joined in the North ] and began aggressive patrols and threatened to cut Pakistan's sea trade. This exploited Pakistan's dependence on sea-based oil and trade flows.<ref name=navy>{{cite news|title=The silent sentinel|url=http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/aug/05ashok.htm|access-date=19 October 2014|date=5 August 1999|author=General Ashok K Mehta|archive-date=10 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170210030822/http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/aug/05ashok.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Later, then–] Nawaz Sharif disclosed that Pakistan was left with just six days of fuel to sustain itself if a full-scale war had broken out.<ref>{{cite book |first=Bruce |last=Riedel |title=Avoiding Armageddon |date=2 May 2013 |publisher=HarperCollins |isbn=978-9350299944 |url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/7days/story_16836328.jsp |access-date=17 August 2013 |archive-date=12 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171012061345/https://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/7days/story_16836328.jsp |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{page needed|date=July 2020}}<ref>{{cite book|last=Lambeth|first=Benjamin|title=Airpower at 18,000': The Indian Air Force in the Kargil War|year=2012|publisher=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace|page=54|url=http://carnegieendowment.org/files/kargil.pdf|access-date=25 October 2013|archive-date=30 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131030023123/http://carnegieendowment.org/files/kargil.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Hiranandani|first=G.&nbsp;M.|title=Transition to Guardianship: The Indian Navy 1991–2000|year=2009|publisher=Lancer Publishers|location=New Delhi|isbn=978-1935501268|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w2snz5Cfb0gC&q=a%20leander%20class%20frigate%20barrier&pg=PA1924|access-date=6 March 2021|archive-date=8 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230208123643/https://books.google.com/books?id=w2snz5Cfb0gC&q=a%20leander%20class%20frigate%20barrier&pg=PA1924|url-status=live}}</ref>{{page needed|date=July 2020}}


===India attacks Pakistani positions===
Meanwhile, the ] also readied itself for an attempted blockade of ] (primarily ])<ref> - ]</ref> to cut off supply routes.<ref> Defence Journal, April 2001</ref> Later, the then-] Nawaz Sharif disclosed that Pakistan was left with just six days of fuel to sustain itself if a full-fledged war had broken out.<ref name = "Globalsecurity" /> As Pakistan found itself entwined in a prickly position, the army had covertly planned a ] on India, the news of which alarmed ] ], resulting in a stern warning to Nawaz Sharif.<ref></ref> Two months into the conflict, Indian troops had slowly retaken most of the ridges they had lost;<ref> - ], ]</ref><ref>{{cite book | author=Colonel Ravi Nanda | title=Kargil : A Wake Up Call | publisher=Vedams Books | year=1999 | id=ISBN 81-7095-074-0}} </ref> according to official count, an estimated 75%–80% of the intruded area and nearly all high ground was back under Indian control.<ref> - India's then ] VP Malik, expressing his views on Operation Vijay in an article in ''The ]''.</ref>
{{more citations needed section|date=July 2017}}<!--three paragraphs with no references-->
The terrain of Kashmir is mountainous and at high altitudes; even the best roads, such as ] (NH1) from Srinagar to Leh, are only two lanes. The rough terrain and narrow roads slowed down traffic, and the high altitude, which affected the ability of aircraft to carry loads, made control of NH 1 (the actual stretch of the highway which was under Pakistani fire) a priority for India. From their 130+ covertly occupied ]s, the Pakistani forces had a clear line-of-sight to lay down ] on NH 1, inflicting heavy casualties on the Indians.<ref name="NLI">{{cite web|url=http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_5-5-2003_pg7_14 |title=Indian general praises Pakistani valour at Kargil |work=Daily Times |date=5 May 2003 |access-date=20 May 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090116123416/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_5-5-2003_pg7_14 |archive-date=16 January 2009 }}</ref> This was a serious problem for the Indian Army as the highway was the main logistical and supply route.<ref>Kashmir in the Shadow of War By Robert Wirsing Published by M.E. Sharpe, 2003 {{ISBN|0-7656-1090-6}} p. 36</ref> The Pakistani shelling of the ] threatened to cut Leh off, though an alternative (and longer) road to Leh existed via ], the ].
]


The infiltrators, apart from being equipped with ] and ]s, were also armed with ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aviation-defence-universe.com/kargil-war-reiterated-indias-supremacy-pakistan|title=Kargil War reiterated India's supremacy over Pakistan|access-date=15 June 2012|archive-date=9 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170309093223/http://www.aviation-defence-universe.com/kargil-war-reiterated-indias-supremacy-pakistan/|url-status=live}}</ref> Many posts were also heavily ], with India later stating to have recovered more than 8,000 ] according to an ] report.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.icbl.org/lm/2000/india |title=Landmine monitor – India |publisher=Icbl.org |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-date=2 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202122453/http://www.icbl.org/lm/2000/india |url-status=live }}</ref> Pakistan's ] was done through ] and ]s supplied by the US.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.webindia123.com/news/articles/India/20060718/394515.html|title=Indian Army gets hostile weapon locating capability|work=webindia123.com|access-date=9 January 2015|archive-date=24 December 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151224103905/http://news.webindia123.com/news/articles/India/20060718/394515.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The initial Indian attacks were aimed at controlling the hills overlooking NH 1, with high priority being given to the stretches of the highway near the town of Kargil. The majority of posts along the LOC were adjacent to the highway, and therefore the recapture of nearly every infiltrated post increased both the territorial gains and the security of the highway. The protection of this route and the recapture of the forward posts were thus ongoing objectives throughout the war.
Following the Washington accord on ], where Sharif agreed to withdraw the Pakistani troops, most of the fighting came to a gradual halt. In spite of this, some of the militants still holed up did not wish to ], and the ] (an umbrella for all ] groups) rejected Pakistan's plan for a climb-down, instead deciding to fight on.<ref></ref> Following this, the Indian army launched its final attacks in the last week of July; as soon as the last of these ]s in the Drass subsector had been cleared, the fighting ceased on ]. The day has since been marked as ''Kargil Vijay Diwas'' (Kargil Victory Day) in India. By the end of the war, India had resumed control of all territory south and east of the Line of Control, as was established in July 1972 as per the ].

The Indian Army's first priority was to recapture peaks that were in the immediate vicinity of NH 1. This resulted in Indian troops first targeting the Tiger Hill and Tololing complex in Dras, which dominated the Srinagar-Leh route.<ref name=frankcass>{{cite book|title=Managing Armed Conflicts in the 21st Century|publisher=Frank Cass Publishers|location=London|isbn=0714681369|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tKF05qekf9gC|editor=Adekeye Adebajo and Chandra Lekha Sriram|pages=192–193|year=2001|access-date=15 November 2015|archive-date=8 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230208123643/https://books.google.com/books?id=tKF05qekf9gC|url-status=live}}</ref> This was soon followed by the Batalik-Turtok sub-sector which provided access to ]. The recapture of Point 4590 on Tololing by Indian troops on 14 June was significant, notwithstanding the fact that it resulted in the Indian Army suffering the most casualties in a single battle during the conflict.<ref name=pradeep>{{cite book|last=Barua|first=Pradeep P.|title=The State at War in South Asia|date=2005|publisher=University of Nebraska Press|isbn=978-0-8032-1344-9|page=261|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FIIQhuAOGaIC|access-date=15 November 2015|archive-date=16 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230116054856/https://books.google.com/books?id=FIIQhuAOGaIC|url-status=live}}</ref> Although most of the posts in the vicinity of the highway were cleared by mid-June, some parts of the highway near Drass witnessed sporadic shelling until the end of the war.

]s were used extensively in the Kargil War.]]
Once India regained control of the hills overlooking NH 1, the Indian Army turned to driving the invading force back across the LOC. The ], amongst other assaults, slowly tilted the combat in India's favour. The Pakistani troops at Tololing were aided by Pakistani fighters from Kashmir. Some of the posts put up a stiff resistance, including Tiger Hill (Point 5140) that fell only later in the war. Indian troops found well-entrenched Pakistani soldiers at Tiger Hill, and both sides suffered heavy casualties. After a final assault on the peak in which ten Pakistani soldiers and five Indian soldiers were killed, Tiger Hill finally fell. A few of the assaults occurred atop hitherto unheard of peaks—most of them unnamed with only Point numbers to differentiate them—which witnessed fierce ].

As the operation was fully underway, about 250 artillery guns were brought in to clear the infiltrators in the posts that were in the ]. The ] ] played a vital role, with Indian gunners making maximum use of the terrain. However, its success was limited elsewhere due to the lack of space and depth to deploy it.

The ] was tasked to act jointly with ] on 25 May.<ref name="auto1"/> The ] assigned to their role was ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://indianairforce.nic.in/content/op-safed-sagar|title=Op Safed Sagar &#124; Indian Air Force &#124; Government of India|website=indianairforce.nic.in|access-date=24 March 2019|archive-date=29 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190329115807/http://indianairforce.nic.in/content/op-safed-sagar|url-status=live}}</ref> It was in this type of terrain that ] were used, initially with limited effectiveness. On 27 May 1999, the IAF lost a ] ] piloted by Flt. Lt. ], which it attributed to an ], and a ] ] piloted by Sqn Ldr ] which was shot down by the Pakistani army, both over Batalik sector.;<ref name="BBC">{{Cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/354120.stm|title=BBC News &#124; South Asia &#124; India loses two jets|website=news.bbc.co.uk|access-date=17 June 2019|archive-date=17 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190617203651/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/354120.stm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="telegraph">{{cite web|url = http://www.telegraphindia.com/1060522/asp/frontpage/story_6254165.asp|title = Flyer pushes frontier again – Nachiketa returns to area where his plane was shot down|access-date = 2006-09-18|publisher = Telegraph India|archive-date = 30 June 2007|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070630215528/https://www.telegraphindia.com/1060522/asp/frontpage/story_6254165.asp|url-status = dead}}</ref> initially Pakistan said it shot down both jets after they crossed into its territory.<ref name="jet">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/354120.stm |title=India loses two jets |publisher=BBC News |date=27 May 1999 |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-date=1 January 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080101230237/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/354120.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> According to reports, Ahuja had bailed out of his stricken plane safely but was apparently killed by his captors as his body was returned riddled with bullet wounds.{{citation needed|date=February 2023}} One Indian ] helicopter was also lost due to ] ]. French made ] of the IAF were tasked to drop ]s to destroy well-entrenched positions of the Pakistani forces{{citation needed|date=February 2023}} and flew its first sortie on 30 May.<ref name="Bharat-rakshak.com">{{Cite web|url=http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/Kargil/PCamp.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110807084357/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/Kargil/PCamp.html|url-status=dead|title=The Kargil Operations. The Mirage-2000 at Kargil. Bharat-rakshak.com|archive-date=7 August 2011}}</ref> The effects of the pinpoint non-stop bombing by the Mirage-2000, by day and by night, became evident with almost immediate effect.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.sps-aviation.com/interviews/?id=48&h=20-years-after-Kargil-War-Man-who-bombed-Tiger-Hill-tells-how-the-War-was-won-from-the-air|title=20 years after Kargil War: Man who bombed Tiger Hill tells how the War was won from the air|access-date=29 July 2019|archive-date=18 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418051941/http://sps-aviation.com/interviews/?id=48&h=20-years-after-Kargil-War-Man-who-bombed-Tiger-Hill-tells-how-the-War-was-won-from-the-air|url-status=dead}}</ref>

In many vital points, neither artillery nor air power could dislodge the outposts manned by the Pakistani soldiers, who were out of visible range. The Indian Army mounted some direct frontal ground assaults which were slow and took a heavy toll given the steep ascent that had to be made on peaks as high as {{convert|18000|ft|order=flip}}. Since any daylight attack would be suicidal, all the advances had to be made under the cover of darkness, escalating the risk of freezing. Accounting for the ] factor, the temperatures were often as low as {{cvt|-15|to|-11|C|}} near the mountain tops. Based on ], much of the costly ]s by the Indians could have been avoided if the Indian Military had chosen to blockade the supply route of the opposing force, creating a ]. Such a move would have involved the Indian troops crossing the LOC as well as initiating aerial attacks on Pakistani soil, however, a manoeuvre India was not willing to exercise due to the likely expansion of the ] and reduced international support for its cause.

Two months into the conflict, Indian troops had slowly retaken most of the ridges that were encroached upon by the infiltrators;<ref name="auto"/><ref name="Colonel Ravi Nanda 1999"/> according to the official count, an estimated 75–80% of the intruded area and nearly all the high ground were back under Indian control.<ref name="VP Malik" />

===Washington Accord and final battles===
Following the outbreak of armed fighting, Pakistan sought American help in de-escalating the conflict. ], who was then an aide to President ], reported that US intelligence had imaged Pakistani movements of nuclear weapons to forward deployments for fear of the Kargil hostilities escalating into a wider conflict. However, President Clinton refused to intervene until Pakistan had removed all forces from the Indian side of the LOC.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1989886.stm |title=Pakistan 'prepared nuclear strike' |publisher=BBC News |date=16 May 2002 |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-date=12 January 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090112044143/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1989886.stm |url-status=live }}</ref>

Following the Washington accord of 4 July 1999, when Sharif agreed to withdraw Pakistani troops, most of the fighting came to a gradual halt, but some Pakistani forces remained in positions on the Indian side of the LoC. In addition, the ] (an umbrella for extremist groups) rejected Pakistan's plan for a climb-down, instead deciding to fight on.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/386537.stm| title=Pakistan and the Kashmir militants| work=BBC News| access-date=20 May 2009| date=5 July 1999| archive-date=28 February 2003| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030228190044/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/386537.stm| url-status=live}}</ref>

The Indian army launched its final attacks in the last week of July in co-ordination with relentless attacks by the IAF, both by day and night, in their totally successful ]; as soon as the Drass subsector had been cleared of Pakistani forces, the fighting ceased on 26 July. The day has since been marked as ''Kargil Vijay Diwas'' (Kargil Victory Day) in India. In the wake of its successive military defeats in Kargil, diplomatic isolation in the international arena, its precarious economic situation, and the mounting international pressure, the ] was compelled to negotiate a face saving withdrawal from the residual areas on the Indian side of the LoC, thereby restoring the sanctity of the LoC, as was established in July 1972 as per the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.india-today.com/itoday/26071999/cover.html|title=Kargil War – Pakistan: Face-Saving Retreat|work=india-today.com|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924042405/http://www.india-today.com/itoday/26071999/cover.html|archive-date=24 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Singh |first=Amarinder |year=2001 |title=A Ridge Too Far: War in the Kargil Heights 1999 |publisher=Motibagh Palace |isbn=9788193107416 |page=xii }}</ref>


==World opinion== ==World opinion==
Pakistan was criticised by other countries for allowing its paramilitary forces and ]s to cross the ].<ref>{{cite book | author=Hassan Abbas|title=Pakistan's Drift Into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War On Terror|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|year=2004|id=ISBN 0-7656-1497-9}} Pg 173; </ref> Pakistan's primary diplomatic response, one of ] linking the incursion to what it officially termed as "Kashmiri ]s", was in the end not successful. Veteran analysts argued that the battle was fought at heights where only seasoned troops could survive, so poorly equipped freedom fighters would neither have the ability nor the wherewithal to seize land and defend it. Moreover, while the army had initially denied the involvement of its troops in the intrusion, two soldiers were awarded the ] (Pakistan's highest military honour). Another 90 soldiers were also given ] awards, most of them ]ly, confirming Pakistan's role in the episode. India also released ] phone conversations between the Army Chief and a senior Pakistani general where the latter is recorded saying: "the scruff of necks is in our hands,"<ref></ref> although Pakistan dismissed it as a "total fabrication". Concurrently, Pakistan made several contradicting statements, confirming its role in Kargil, when it defended the incursions saying that the LOC itself was disputed.<ref>, ] ] Jang</ref> Pakistan also attempted to internationalize the Kashmir issue, by linking the crisis in Kargil to the larger ] but, such a diplomatic stance found few backers on the world stage.<ref name="ASEAN"> ] ] ]</ref> Pakistan was heavily criticised by other countries for instigating the war, as its ] forces and ] had crossed the LOC (]).<ref>{{cite book|author=Hassan Abbas|title=Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|year=2004|isbn=0-7656-1497-9|page=|url=https://archive.org/details/pakistansdriftin00hass/page/173}} {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060808080703/http://www.ipcs.org/whatsNewArticle11.jsp?action=showView&kValue=1647&status=article&mod=b |date=8 August 2006 }}</ref> Pakistan's primary diplomatic response, one of ] linking the incursion to what it officially termed as "Kashmiri ]s", was in the end not successful.<ref name="dawn">{{cite news|url=http://www.dawn.com/weekly/cowas/990711.htm |title=Lesson learnt? |newspaper=Dawn |date=24 July 2006 |access-date=2 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080725055002/http://www.dawn.com/weekly/cowas/990711.htm |archive-date=25 July 2008 }}</ref> Veteran analysts argued that the battle was fought at heights where only seasoned troops could survive, so poorly equipped "freedom fighters" would neither have the ability nor the wherewithal to seize land and defend it. Moreover, while the army had initially denied the involvement of its troops in the intrusion, two soldiers were awarded the ] (Pakistan's highest military honour). Another 90 soldiers were also given ] awards, most of them ], confirming Pakistan's role in the episode. India also released ] phone conversations between the Army Chief and a senior Pakistani general where the latter is recorded saying: "the scruff of necks is in our hands",<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.india-today.com/kargil/audio.html|title=Transcripts of conversations between Lt Gen Mohammad Aziz, Chief of General Staff and Musharraf|work=India Today| access-date=20 May 2009 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080701220255/http://www.india-today.com/kargil/audio.html |archive-date = 1 July 2008}}</ref> although Pakistan dismissed it as a "total fabrication". Concurrently, Pakistan made several contradicting statements, confirming its role in Kargil, when it defended the incursions saying that the LOC itself was disputed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.atimes.com/ind-pak/AG07Df01.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000925124418/http://atimes.com/ind-pak/AG07Df01.html |url-status=unfit |archive-date=25 September 2000 |title=U.S. brokers Kargil peace but problems remain |publisher=Atimes.com |date=7 July 1999 |access-date=15 June 2012}}</ref> Pakistan also attempted to internationalise the Kashmir issue, by linking the crisis in Kargil to the larger ], but such a diplomatic stance found few backers on the world stage.<ref name="ASEAN">{{cite news| url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99jul25/world.htm#6| title=ASEAN backs India's stand| newspaper=]| date=24 July 2006| access-date=20 May 2009| archive-date=2 December 2008| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202050338/http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99jul25/world.htm#6| url-status=live}}</ref>


As the Indian counter-attacks picked up momentum, Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif flew to meet U.S. president Bill Clinton on ] to obtain support from the United States. Clinton rebuked Sharif, however, and asked him to use his contacts to rein in the militants and withdraw Pakistani soldiers from Indian territory. Clinton would later reveal in ] that "''Sharif’s moves were perplexing''" since the Indian prime minister had travelled to Lahore to promote bilateral talks aimed at resolving the Kashmir problem and "''by crossing the Line of Control, Pakistan had wrecked the talks.''"<ref>{{cite book | author=Bill Clinton | title=] | publisher=] | year=2004|id=ISBN 0-375-41457-6}}, Pg 865</ref> On the other hand, he applauded Indian restraint for not crossing the LoC and escalating the conflict into an all-out war.<ref> - ]</ref> The other ] nations, too, supported India and condemned the Pakistani violation of the LoC at the ] summit. The ] was also opposed to the violation of the LoC.<ref> - ]</ref> ], a long-time ally of Pakistan, did not intervene in Pakistan's favour, insisting on a pullout of forces to the LoC and settling border issues peacefully. Other organizations like the ] too supported India's stand on the inviolability of the LOC.<ref name="ASEAN" /> Faced with growing international pressure, Sharif managed to pull back the remaining soldiers from Indian territory. The joint statement issued by Clinton and Sharif conveyed the need to respect the Line of Control and resume bilateral talks as the best forum to resolve all disputes.<ref></ref> As the Indian counter-attacks picked up momentum, Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif flew to meet US President Bill Clinton on 4 July to obtain support from the United States. Clinton rebuked Sharif, however, and asked him to use his contacts to rein in the militants and withdraw Pakistani soldiers from Indian territory. Clinton would later reveal in ] that "Sharif's moves were perplexing" since the Indian Prime Minister had travelled to Lahore to promote bilateral talks aimed at resolving the Kashmir problem and "by crossing the Line of Control, Pakistan had wrecked the talks".<ref>{{cite book | author=Bill Clinton | title=My Life | publisher=Random House | year=2004 | isbn=0-375-41457-6 | page= | title-link=My Life (Bill Clinton autobiography) }}</ref> On the other hand, he applauded Indian restraint for not crossing the LOC and escalating the conflict into an all-out war.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/399897.stm|title=BBC News South Asia Kashmir: Dialogue call amid fresh fighting|work=bbc.co.uk|access-date=9 January 2006|archive-date=13 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210213043125/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/399897.stm|url-status=live}}</ref>

] nations supported India and condemned the Pakistani violation of the LOC at the ] summit. The ] also opposed Pakistan's violation of the LOC.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/asiapcf/9907/02/kashmir.pakistan/|title=India encircles rebels on Kashmir mountaintop|work=]| access-date=20 May 2009 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080614150423/http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/asiapcf/9907/02/kashmir.pakistan/ |archive-date = 14 June 2008}}CNN</ref> ], a long-time ally of Pakistan, insisted on a pullout of forces to the pre-conflict positions along the LOC and settling border issues peacefully. Other organisations like the ] too supported India's stand on the inviolability of the LOC.<ref name="ASEAN" />

Faced with growing international pressure, Sharif managed to pull back the remaining soldiers from Indian territory. The joint statement issued by Clinton and Sharif conveyed the need to respect the LOC and resume bilateral talks as the best forum to resolve all disputes.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/asiapcf/9907/05/kashmir.02/|title=Text of joint Clinton-Sharif statement|work=CNN| access-date=20 May 2009 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080516134001/http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/asiapcf/9907/05/kashmir.02/ |archive-date = 16 May 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd39/39kash.htm| title=Disarmament Diplomacy: Complete texts of Indian and Pakistani statements following Pakistan's decision to withdraw its troops in Kargil| access-date=20 May 2009| archive-date=5 December 2008| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081205044657/http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd39/39kash.htm| url-status=dead}}</ref>

==Gallantry awards==
===India===
]

A number of Indian soldiers earned awards for gallantry.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://indianarmy.nic.in/PVC/pvc.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130815195436/http://indianarmy.nic.in/PVC/pvc.html|url-status=dead|title=Indian Army Param Vir Chakra Winners|archive-date=15 August 2013}}|</ref> Four ]s and 11 ]s were awarded.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/460870/1/7759.pdf|title=Gallantaryawards To Fighters Of Kargil Conflict|date=|access-date=2022-02-27|archive-date=27 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220227090020/https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/460870/1/7759.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! scope="col" | Award
! scope="col" | Rank
! scope="col" | Name
! scope="col" | Unit
! scope="col" | References

|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=YOGENDER SINGH YADAV {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/yogender-singh-yadav |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=11 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811064623/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/yogender-singh-yadav |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Param Vir Chakra (PVC), Awardee: Grenadier Yogendra Singh Yadav, PVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1078 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=30 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200330024915/http://twdi.in/node/1078 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/manoj-kumar-pandey |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=12 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812205011/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/manoj-kumar-pandey |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Param Vir Chakra (PVC), Awardee: Lt Manoj Kumar Pandey, PVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1067 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=7 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210307235409/http://twdi.in/node/1067 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=VIKRAM BATRA {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/vikram-batra |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=12 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812204913/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/vikram-batra |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Param Vir Chakra (PVC), Awardee: Capt Vikram Batra, PVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1059 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308082043/http://twdi.in/node/1059 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=SANJAY KUMAR {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/sanjay-kumar |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=12 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812213413/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/sanjay-kumar |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Param Vir Chakra (PVC), Awardee: Rfn Sanjay Kumar, PVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1072 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901072821/http://twdi.in/node/1072 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=ANUJ NAYYAR {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/anuj-nayyar |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901072812/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/anuj-nayyar |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Capt Anuj Nayyar, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1434 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=20 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160720060432/http://twdi.in/node/1434 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=RAJESH SINGH ADHIKARI {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/rajesh-singh-adhikari |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901071218/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/rajesh-singh-adhikari |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Maj Rajesh Singh Adhikari, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1302 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=20 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200620012250/http://twdi.in/node/1302 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ]|| ] || Gurjinder Singh Suri || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=GURJINDER SINGH SURI {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/gurjinder-singh-suri |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=24 January 2020 |archive-date=14 September 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190914054931/http://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/gurjinder-singh-suri |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Capt Gurjinder Singh Suri, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1493 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=9 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809045009/http://twdi.in/node/1493 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ]|| ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=DIGENDRA KUMAR {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/digendra-kumar |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901072822/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/digendra-kumar |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Nk Digendra Kumar, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1356 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=9 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809051220/http://twdi.in/node/1356 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ]|| ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=BALWAN SINGH {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/balwan-singh |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901074132/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/balwan-singh |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Maj Balwan Singh, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1319 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901071139/http://twdi.in/node/1319 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || Imliakum Ao || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=IMLIAKUM {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/imliakum |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901065706/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/imliakum |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Nk Imliakumao, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1390 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901073718/http://twdi.in/node/1390 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=KEISHING CLIFFORD NONGRUM {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/keishing-clifford-nongrum |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901072741/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/keishing-clifford-nongrum |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Lt Keishing Clifford Nongrun, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1435 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901080222/http://twdi.in/node/1435 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=NEIKEZHAKUO KENGURUSE {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/neikezhakuo-kenguruse |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901065656/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/neikezhakuo-kenguruse |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Capt Neikezhakuo Kenguruse, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1401 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901072140/http://twdi.in/node/1401 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=PADMAPANI ACHARYA {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/padmapani-acharya |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=11 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811002218/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/padmapani-acharya |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Maj Padmapani Acharya, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1301 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901064140/http://twdi.in/node/1301 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=SONAM WANGCHUK {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/sonam-wangchuk |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901072832/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/sonam-wangchuk |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Lt Col Sonam Wangchuk, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1489 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901071534/http://twdi.in/node/1489 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
| ] || ] || ] || ] || <ref>{{cite web |title=VIVEK GUPTA {{!}} Gallantry Awards |url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/vivek-gupta |website=gallantryawards.gov.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=1 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200901071229/https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/vivek-gupta |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Maj Vivek Gupta, MVC @ TWDI |url=http://twdi.in/node/1374 |website=twdi.in |access-date=9 April 2020 |archive-date=12 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812072822/http://twdi.in/node/1374 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|}

The following units were awarded the ''COAS' unit citations'' for their exemplary role in the war<ref>{{cite book |last1=Malik |first1=V. P. |title=Kargil - From Surprise to Victory |date=2006 |publisher=Harper Collins |isbn=9788172236359 |page=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://sainiksamachar.nic.in/englisharchives/2017/jun16-17/h16.htm|title=Pedongi, the Brave|date=2017-06-16|access-date=2022-02-27|archive-date=27 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220227090020/http://sainiksamachar.nic.in/englisharchives/2017/jun16-17/h16.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> -
*]
**2 Rajputana Rifles
**8 Sikh
**17 Jat
**18 Grenadiers
**1 Bihar
**13 Jammu and Kashmir Rifles
**18 Garhwal Rifles
**12 Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry
**2 Naga
**1/11 Gorkha Rifles
**Ladakh Scouts
*]
**108 Medium Regiment
**141 Field Regiment
**197 Field Regiment
*]
**663 (Reconnaissance and Observation) Squadron
**666 (Reconnaissance and Observation) Squadron
*]
**874 Animal Transport Battalion

=== Pakistan ===
Two Pakistani soldiers received the ], Pakistan's highest military gallantry award:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shaheedfoundation.org/NishaneHaider.asp |title=Shaheed Foundation Pakistan |publisher=Shaheed Foundation |access-date=15 June 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140812211253/http://www.shaheedfoundation.org/nishanehaider.asp |archive-date=12 August 2014 }}</ref>
* Capt. ], 27th Battalion, ]: Nishan-e-Haider (posthumous)
* Hav. ], ]: Nishan-e-Haider (posthumous)


==Impact and influence of media== ==Impact and influence of media==
The Kargil War was significant for the impact and influence of the mass media on public opinion in both nations. Coming at a time of exploding growth in ] in India, the Kargil news stories and war footage were often telecast live on TV, and many websites provided in-depth analysis of the war.<ref name=perk>{{cite book|last=Perkovich|first=George|title=India's Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation|date=2001|page=473|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley, CA|isbn=978-0520232105|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UDA9dUryS8EC|edition=Updated Edition with a New Afterword|access-date=15 November 2015|archive-date=8 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230208123643/https://books.google.com/books?id=UDA9dUryS8EC|url-status=live}}</ref> The conflict became the first "live" war in South Asia and it was given such detailed media coverage that one effect was the drumming up of ] feelings.<ref>{{cite web |first=A.K. |last=Sachdev |title=Media Related Lessons From Kargil |url=http://www.idsa-india.org/an-jan00-10.html |date=January 2000 |volume=XXIII |issue=10 |access-date=24 May 2014 |archive-date=24 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140524065856/http://www.idsa-india.org/an-jan00-10.html |url-status=usurped }}</ref>
] news footage shows the ] ] being fired in the background. The ] barrage was aimed at Tiger Hill. The reporter is ]. Images like these were relayed on most networks in India.]]

<!-- Image with unknown copyright status removed: ] news footage shows downed ] airman Ft Lt Nachiketa of the ] being interview in ].]] -->
The conflict soon turned into a ] war, in which press briefings given by government officials of each nation produced conflicting claims and counterclaims. The Indian government placed a temporary ] on information from Pakistan, banning the telecast of the ] Pakistani channel ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19990603/ige03090.html|title=Centre bans PTV|access-date=20 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202051334/http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19990603/ige03090.html|archive-date=2 December 2008}} ] 3 June 1999</ref> and blocking access to online editions of the '']'' newspaper.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202074127/http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/17jul99.html#delh |date=2 December 2008 }}, '']'' wire service 17 July 1999</ref> The Pakistani media criticised this apparent curbing of ] in India, while India media claimed it was in the interest of ]. The Indian government ran advertisements in foreign publications including '']'' and '']'' detailing Pakistan's ] in Kashmir in an attempt to garner political support for its position.


As the war progressed, media coverage of the conflict was more intense in India than in Pakistan.<ref>Rasheeda Bhagat, {{usurped|1=}}, Volume 16 – Issue 19, 11–24 Sep 1999 '']''</ref> Many Indian channels showed images from the battle zone in a style reminiscent of ]'s coverage of the ] (one of the shells fired by Pakistan troops even hit a ] transmission centre in Kargil; coverage continued, however).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.indiantelevision.com/newsletter/070699/dd070699.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201202918/http://www.indiantelevision.com/newsletter/070699/dd070699.htm|url-status=dead|title=Pak TV ban gets good response|archive-date=1 December 2008}}</ref> Reasons for India's increased coverage included the greater number of privately owned electronic media in India compared to Pakistan and relatively greater ] in the ]. At a seminar in ], Pakistani journalists agreed that while the Indian government had taken the press and the people into its confidence, Pakistan had not.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/jul/20media.htm|title=Rediff on the NeT: Pak media lament lost opportunity|work=rediff.com|access-date=31 January 2006|archive-date=6 January 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060106041056/http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/jul/20media.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>
The Kargil War was significant for the impact and influence of the ] in both nations, especially on the Indian side. Coming at a time of exploding growth in ] in India, the Kargil news stories and war footage were often telecast live on TV, and many ]s provided in-depth analysis of the war. The conflict became the first "]" war in ] that was given such detailed ] coverage, often to the extent of drumming up ] feelings. The conflict soon turned into a ] war, with the official press briefings of both nations producing claims and counterclaims. It reached such a stage where an outside observer listening to both Indian as well as Pakistani coverage of this conflict, would wonder whether both sides were reporting on the same conflict. The Indian government placed a temporary ] on information from Pakistan, even banning the telecast of the ] Pakistani channel ] and blocked access to ] editions of '']'' newspaper. The Pakistani media played up this apparent curbing of ] in India, while the latter claimed it was in the interests of ]. Incidentally, one of the shells fired by Pakistan troops even hit a ] transmission centre in Kargil, although coverage continued.<ref></ref>


As the war progressed, media coverage was more intense in India compared to Pakistan. Many Indian channels were showing images from the battle zone with their troops in a style reminiscent of ]'s coverage of the ]. One of the reasons for India's increased coverage was the proliferation of numerous privately owned channels vis-à-vis the Pakistani ] scenario which was still at a nascent stage. Yet another was the relatively greater ] in the ]. In fact, at a ] in ], Pakistani ]s agreed that while the Indian government had taken the press and the people into its confidence, this was missing on the Pakistan side.<ref> - Editorial statements and news headlines from Pakistan hosted on ]</ref> The Indian government also ran ]s in foreign publications like '']'' and '']'' detailing Pakistan's ] in Kashmir in an attempt to garner political support for its cause during the combat. The print media in India and abroad was largely sympathetic to the Indian cause, with ]s in ]s based in the west and other neutral countries observing that Pakistan was largely responsible for the incursions. Analysts believe that the power of the Indian media, which was both larger in number and assumed to be more credible, might have acted as a ] for the Indian military operation in Kargil,<ref>, </ref> and served as a ] booster. As the fighting intensified, the Pakistani version of events found little backing on the world stage. This helped India gain valuable ] for its position on the issue. The print media in India and abroad was largely sympathetic to the Indian cause, with editorials in newspapers based in the west and other neutral countries observing that Pakistan was largely responsible for the conflict. Some analysts believe that Indian media, which was both larger in number and more credible, may have acted as a ] for the Indian military operation in Kargil and served as a morale booster.<ref name=pib/><ref>Sultan M. Hali, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090706045959/http://www.defencejournal.com/2000/aug/role-media-war.htm |date=6 July 2009 }}, ''Defence Journal'', August 2000.</ref> As the fighting intensified, the Pakistani version of events found little backing on the world stage. This helped India gain valuable ] for its position.


==WMDs and the nuclear factor== ==WMDs and the nuclear factor==
One of the main concerns in the international community during the Kargil crisis was that both neighbours had access to ], and if the war intensified, it could have led to ]. Both countries had tested their nuclear capability a year before in 1998; India conducted its first test in 1974 while it was Pakistan's first-ever ]. Many ] believed the tests to be an indication of the escalating stakes in the scenario in South Asia. With the outbreak of clashes in Kashmir just a year after the nuclear tests, many nations took notice of the conflict and desired to end it. Since Pakistan and India each had ], many in the international community were concerned that if the Kargil conflict intensified, it could lead to ]. Both countries had tested their nuclear capability in 1998 (India conducted its ] in 1974 while it was Pakistan's first-ever ]). Many ] believed the tests to be an indication of the escalating stakes in the scenario in South Asia. When the Kargil conflict started just a year after the nuclear tests, many nations desired to end it before it intensified.


The first hint of the possible use of a nuclear bomb was on ] when Pakistani ] Shamshad Ahmad made a statement warning that an escalation of the limited conflict could lead Pakistan to use "any weapon" in its ].<ref>Quoted in News Desk, “Pakistan May Use Any Weapon, The News, ] ].</ref> This was immediately interpreted as an obvious threat of a nuclear retaliation by Pakistan in the event of an extended war, and the leader of ] noted, "The purpose International concerns increased when Pakistani ] ] made a statement on 31 May warning that an escalation of the limited conflict could lead Pakistan to use "any weapon" in its arsenal.<ref>Quoted in News Desk, "Pakistan May Use Any Weapon", ''The News'', 31 May 1999.</ref> This was immediately interpreted as a threat of nuclear retaliation by Pakistan in the event of an extended war, and the belief was reinforced when the leader of ] noted, "The purpose
of developing weapons becomes meaningless if they are not used when they are needed."<ref> (])</ref> Many such ambiguous statements from officials of both countries were viewed as an impending nuclear crisis. The limited nuclear arsenals of both sides, paradoxically could have led to 'tactical' nuclear warfare in the belief that a nuclear strike would not have ended in total nuclear warfare with ], as could have occurred between the ] and the ]. Some experts believe that following nuclear tests in 1998, Pakistani military was emboldened by its nuclear deterrent cover to markedly increase coercion against India.<ref> - Testimony by George Perkovich before the House Armed Services Committee, ] ]</ref> of developing weapons becomes meaningless if they are not used when they are needed".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nd.edu/~krocinst/ocpapers/op_18_2.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081112015736/http://www.nd.edu/~krocinst/ocpapers/op_18_2.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Program|archivedate=12 November 2008}}</ref> Many such ambiguous statements from officials of both countries were viewed as warnings of an impending nuclear crisis where the combatants would consider use of their limited nuclear arsenals in "tactical" nuclear warfare in the belief that it would not have ended in ], as could have occurred in a nuclear conflict between the United States and the ]. Some experts believe that following nuclear tests in 1998, the Pakistani military was emboldened by its nuclear deterrent to markedly increase coercion against India.<ref>George Perkovich, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080112075840/https://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=17967 |date=12 January 2008 }}, Testimony before the ], 1 February 2006.</ref>


The nature of the India-Pakistan conflict took a more sinister proportion when the U.S. received intelligence that Pakistani nuclear ]s were being moved towards the border. Bill Clinton tried to dissuade Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif from nuclear ], even threatening Pakistan of dire consequences. According to a ] official, Sharif seemed to be genuinely surprised by this supposed missile movement and responded that India was probably planning the same. This was later confirmed in an article in May 2000, which stated that India too had readied at least five nuclear-tipped ]s.<ref>''India had deployed ] during Kargil'', Article from "Indian Express" 19/6/2000</ref> Sensing a deteriorating military scenario, diplomatic isolation, and the risks of a larger conventional and nuclear war, Sharif ordered the Pakistani army to vacate the Kargil heights. He later claimed in his official ] that General Pervez Musharraf had moved nuclear warheads without informing him.<ref> - Excerpts from Nawaz's Sharif's ] biography ''Ghadaar Kaun? Nawaz Sharif Ki Kahani, Unki Zubani'' (Who is the traitor? Nawaz Sharif’s story in his own words.)</ref> Recently however, Pervez Musharraf revealed in his ] that Pakistan’s nuclear delivery system was not operational during the Kargil war;<ref name="Memoirs" /> something that would have put Pakistan under serious disadvantage if the conflict went nuclear. The nature of the India-Pakistan conflict took a more sinister turn when the United States received intelligence that Pakistani nuclear ]s were being moved towards the border. Bill Clinton tried to dissuade Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif from nuclear ], even threatening Pakistan of dire consequences. According to a ] official, Sharif seemed to be genuinely surprised by this supposed missile movement and responded that India was probably planning the same. In an article published in a defence journal in 2000, Sanjay Badri-Maharaj, a security expert, claimed while quoting another expert that India too had readied at least five nuclear-tipped ]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/Storyold/154298/|title=India had deployed Agni during Kargil Expert|work=The Hindu|access-date=17 August 2020|date=19 June 2000|archive-date=8 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230208123645/https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/india-had-deployed-agni-during-kargil-expert/|url-status=live}}</ref>


Sensing a deteriorating military scenario, diplomatic isolation, and the risks of a larger conventional and nuclear war, Sharif ordered the Pakistani army to vacate the Kargil heights. He later claimed in his official biography that General Pervez Musharraf had moved nuclear warheads without informing him.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/july-2006/6/index16.php|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071223045736/http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/july-2006/6/index16.php|archive-date=23 December 2007|title=Musharraf moved nuclear weapons in Kargil war|work=The Nation|access-date=27 May 2009}}</ref> Recently however, Pervez Musharraf revealed in his memoirs that Pakistan's nuclear delivery system was not operational during the Kargil war;<ref name="Memoirs" /> something that would have put Pakistan under serious disadvantage if the conflict went nuclear.
Additionally, the threat of ] included a suspected use of ] and even ]s. Pakistan accused India of using chemical weapons and ] such as ] against the Kashmiri fighters. India, on the other hand, showcased a cache of ]s, among other ], as proof that Pakistan may have been prepared to use non-conventional weapons. One militant group even claimed to possess chemical weapons; this was later found to be a ], and even the gas masks were most likely intended by the Pakistanis as protection from an Indian attack. The Pakistani allegations of India using banned chemicals in its bombs were proven to be unfounded by the U.S. administration at the time and the ].<ref> - ] </ref>

The threat of ] included ] and even ]s. Pakistan accused India of using chemical weapons and ] such as ] against the Kashmiri fighters. India, on the other hand, showcased a cache of ]s as proof that Pakistan may have been prepared to use non-conventional weapons. US official and the ] determined that Pakistani allegations of India using banned chemicals in its bombs were unfounded.<ref>, ] ( on the ])</ref>


==Aftermath== ==Aftermath==
===India=== ===India===
] ] flashes the ] after the ]ary elections in which his coalition emerged the victors. His handling of the Kargil crisis is believed to have played a big part in garnering the ]s.]]


From the end of the war until February 2000, the ] rose by more than 30%. The next ] included major increases in military spending.
The aftermath of the war saw the rise of the ] by over 30%. The next ] included major increases in military spending. From the end of the war until February 2000, the ] was ]. There was a surge in ], with many celebrities pitching in towards the Kargil cause.<ref>, </ref> Indians were also angered by the death of ] ] under controversial circumstances, and especially after Indian authorities reported that Ahuja had been murdered and his body ] by Pakistani troops. The war had also produced higher than expected fatalities for the Indian military, with a sizeable percentage of them including newly ]. One month later, the ] - where a ] plane was shot down by India - briefly reignited fears of a conflict between the two countries.


There was a surge in patriotism, with many celebrities expressing their support for the Kargil cause.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/2000/0410/india.kargil.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001214215900/http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/2000/0410/india.kargil.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=14 December 2000|title=The Spoils of War|date=10 April 2000|work=]}}</ref> Indians were angered by media reports of the death of pilot ], especially after Indian authorities reported that Ahuja had been murdered and his body ] by Pakistani troops. The war had produced higher than expected fatalities for the Indian military, with a sizeable percentage of them including newly ]. One month after conclusion of the Kargil War, the ], in which a ] plane was shot down by India, briefly reignited fears of a conflict between the two countries.
After the war, the Indian government severed ties with Pakistan and increased defence preparedness. Since the Kargil conflict, India raised its ] as it sought to acquire more state of the art equipment; however, a few irregularities came to light during this period of heightened military expenditure.<ref>, </ref> There was also severe criticism of the ] like ], which failed to predict either the intrusions or the identity/number of infiltrators during the war. An internal assessment report by the armed forces, published in an Indian magazine, showed several other failings, including "a sense of complacency" and being "unprepared for a ]" on the presumption that ] would sustain peace. It also highlighted the lapses in ], the insufficient troop levels and the dearth of large-] guns like the Bofors.<ref>''War Against Error'', ] on ], ], ] ()</ref> In 2006, retired ], A.Y. Tipnis, alleged that the Indian Army did not fully inform the government about the intrusions, adding that the army chief Ved Prakash Malik, was initially reluctant to use the full strike capability of the Indian Air Force, instead requesting only ] support.<ref> ] ] - ]</ref> Soon after the conflict, India also decided to complete the project - previously stalled by Pakistan - to fence the entire LOC.<ref> - ]</ref>


After the war, the Indian government severed ties with Pakistan and increased defence preparedness. India increased its defence budget as it sought to acquire more state of the art equipment.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081206131936/http://www.financialexpress.com/news/Centre-files-second-affidavit-in-Kargil-scam/131793/ |date=6 December 2008 }} ] 14 April 2005</ref> Media reported about military procurement irregularities<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20011212/edit.htm#2 |title=Kargil coffin scam |newspaper=] |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-date=2 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102024451/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20011212/edit.htm#2 |url-status=live }}</ref> and criticism of ] like ], which failed to predict the intrusions or the identity and number of infiltrators during the war. An internal assessment report by the armed forces, published in an Indian magazine, showed several other failings, including "a sense of complacency" and being "unprepared for a ]" on the presumption that ] would sustain peace. It also highlighted the lapses in ], the insufficient troop levels and the dearth of large-] guns like the Bofors.<ref>''War Against Error'', Cover story on ], 28 February 2005 ({{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }})</ref> In 2006, retired ], A.&nbsp;Y. Tipnis, alleged that the Indian Army did not fully inform the government about the intrusions, adding that the army chief Ved Prakash Malik, was initially reluctant to use the full strike capability of the Indian Air Force, instead requesting only ] support.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012160203/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2115734.cms |date=12 October 2007 }}, 7 October 2006, '']''.</ref> Soon after the conflict, India also decided to complete the project, previously stalled by Pakistan, to fence the entire LOC.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061027052910/http://www.india-today.com/webexclusive/dispatch/20010421/vinayak.html |date=27 October 2006 }}, '']''</ref>
The Kargil victory was followed by the ] to the ], which gave a decisive ] to the ] government. It was re-elected to power in September–October 1999 with a majority of 303 seats out of 545 in the ]. On the diplomatic front, the conflict was a major boost to ], as the United States appreciated Indian attempts to restrict the conflict to a limited geographic area. These ties were further strengthened following the ] attacks and a general shift in foreign policy of the two nations. ] – which had discreetly aided India with ordnance supply and ] such as ]s and laser-guided bombs, as well as ] – also were bolstered following the end of the conflict.<ref> and mentioning the ] support to India during the conflict.</ref>

The end of the Kargil conflict was followed by the ] to the ], which gave a decisive ] to the ] (NDA) government. It was re-elected to power in September–October 1999 with a majority of 303 seats out of 545 in the Lok Sabha. On the diplomatic front, ] improved, as the United States appreciated Indian attempts to restrict the conflict to a limited geographic area.<ref>Paul R. Dettman, "India Changes Course" (Greenwood Publishing Group: 2001), {{ISBN|0-275-97308-5}}, pp. 117–118</ref> ]—which had discreetly aided India with ordnance supply and ] such as ]s, laser-guided bombs, and ]—also were bolstered.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120730012210/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_30-7-2002_pg7_37 |date=30 July 2012 }} and {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060923000104/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3088780.stm |date=23 September 2006 }} mentioning the ] support to India during the conflict.</ref>

The end and victory of the Kargil War is celebrated annually in India as ].

===Kargil Review Committee===
]
{{main|Kargil Review Committee}}
Soon after the war the ] ] set up an inquiry into its causes and to analyse perceived Indian intelligence failures. The high-powered committee was chaired by eminent strategic affairs analyst ] and given powers to interview anyone with current or past associations with Indian security, including former ]. The committee's final report (also referred to as the "Subrahmanyam Report")<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.indiamart.com/news-analysis/kargil-subrahmanyam--6975.html |title=Kargil : Subrahmanyam Committee's Report |work=Indian News |access-date=20 October 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061019174555/http://news.indiamart.com/news-analysis/kargil-subrahmanyam--6975.html |archive-date=19 October 2006 }}</ref> led to a large-scale restructuring of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/ie/daily/20000320/ied20064.html|title=Kargil report shows the way|work=]|access-date=20 October 2009}}{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> It, however, came in for heavy criticism in the Indian media for its perceived avoidance of assigning specific responsibility for failures over detecting the Kargil intrusions.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XnzRttnqExUC |title=Pg 56–60 Dixit, JN, "India-Pakistan in War & Peace", Routledge, 2002 |date= 2 August 2003|access-date=15 June 2012|isbn=9780203301104 |last1=Dixit |first1=J. N. |publisher=Taylor & Francis }}</ref> The committee was also embroiled in controversy for indicting ] Surinder Singh of the Indian Army for his failure to report enemy intrusions in time, and for his subsequent conduct. Many press reports questioned or contradicted this finding and claimed that Singh had in fact issued early warnings that were ignored by senior Indian Army commanders and, ultimately, higher government functionaries.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1813/18130410.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010908024051/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1813/18130410.htm|url-status=usurped|archive-date=8 September 2001|title=The sacking of a Brigadier|work=Frontline|access-date=20 October 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2001/07/01/stories/05011344.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104060144/http://www.hindu.com/2001/07/01/stories/05011344.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=4 November 2012|title=Scapegoat for the system|access-date=20 October 2009|location=Chennai, India|work=]|date=1 July 2001}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rediff.com/news/2000/feb/16kargil.htm|title=Army's Kargil inquiry indicts Brig Surinder Singh|work=Rediff|access-date=20 October 2009|archive-date=5 September 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080905194652/http://www.rediff.com/news/2000/feb/16kargil.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>

In a departure from the norm the final report was published and made publicly available.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1722/17220240.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011220052833/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1722/17220240.htm|url-status=usurped|archive-date=20 December 2001|title=The Kargil Story|work=The Hindu|access-date=20 October 2009}}</ref> Some chapters and all annexures, however, were deemed to contain classified information by the government and not released. K. Subrahmanyam later wrote that the annexures contained information on the development of India's ] and the roles played by Prime Ministers ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20041229/edit.htm#6|title=P.&nbsp;V. Narasimha Rao and the Bomb|work=The Tribune|access-date=20 October 2009|archive-date=29 August 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080829123450/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20041229/edit.htm#6|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Pakistan=== ===Pakistan===
]'' reported from the front line<ref> ], ], ]</ref> of the combat and provided one of the few images of a Pakistani soldier at his post.]]
Faced with the possibility of international isolation, the already fragile ] was weakened further.<ref name="Samina Ahmed"> (Belfer Center for International Affairs, ])</ref><ref>, </ref> The morale of its forces after the withdrawal was affected<ref> (Belfer Center for International Affairs, ])</ref> as many units of the ] were destroyed,<ref> - The CCC's summary on the war.</ref> and the government refused to even recognise the dead bodies of its soldiers,<ref></ref><ref></ref> an issue that provoked outrage and protests in the Northern Areas.<ref>Second-Class Citizens by M. Ilyas Khan, ], July 2000. (])</ref><ref> - ] ] ]</ref> Pakistan initially did not acknowledge many of its casualties, but Sharif later said that over 4,000 Pakistani troops were killed in the operation and that Pakistan had lost the conflict. Responding to this, ] Pervez Musharraf said, "It hurts me when an ex-premier undermines his own forces," and claimed that Indian casualties were more than that of Pakistan.<ref></ref>


], ] at that time, after a few months a ] was initiated that ousted him and his government.]]
Many in Pakistan had expected a victory over the ] based on Pakistani official reports on the war,<ref name="Samina Ahmed" /> but were dismayed by the turn of events and questioned the eventual retreat.<ref name="Hassan Abbas" /><ref>] ]], , - Hosted on ] Centre.</ref> The military leadership is believed to have felt let down by the prime minister's decision to ] the remaining fighters. However, some authors, including ex-] Commander ], and ex-PM Nawaz Sharif, state that it was the General who requested Sharif to withdraw the Pakistani troops.<ref>{{cite book | author=], Gen. Tony Zinni (Retd) and ] | title=Battle Ready | publisher=] | year=2004 | id=ISBN 0-399-15176-1}}</ref><ref></ref> With Sharif placing the onus of the Kargil attacks squarely on the army chief Pervez Musharraf, there was an atmosphere of uneasiness between the two. On ] ], General Musharraf staged a bloodless '']'', ousting Nawaz Sharif.


Shortly after declaring itself a nuclear weapons state, Pakistan had been humiliated diplomatically and militarily.<ref name="Defeat Is an Orphan: How Pakistan Lost the Great South Asian War">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YIXlDQAAQBAJ |title=Defeat Is an Orphan: How Pakistan Lost the Great South Asian War |last=Macdonald |first=Myra |publisher=Random House India |year=2017 |isbn=978-9385990830|quote=Less than a year after declaring itself a nuclear-armed power, Pakistan had been humiliated diplomatically and militarily}}</ref> Faced with the possibility of ], the already fragile ] was weakened further.<ref name="Samina Ahmed">Samina Ahmed, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110804180723/http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1209/diplomatic_fiasco.html |date=4 August 2011 }}, Belfer Center for International Affairs, ].</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/10/13/reacts/print.html |title=Coup d'itat: Pakistan gets a new sheriff |author=Daryl Lindsey and Alicia Montgomery |work=salon.com |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091220041521/http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/10/13/reacts/print.html |archive-date=20 December 2009 }}</ref> The morale of Pakistan forces after the withdrawal declined as many units of the ] suffered heavy casualties.<ref name="Summary" /><ref>Samina Ahmed, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304114856/http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1002/friend_for_all_seasons.html |date=4 March 2016 }}, (Belfer Center for International Affairs, ])</ref> The government refused to accept the dead bodies of many officers,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/jul/11karg1.htm |title=Pakistan refuses to take even officers' bodies |work=Rediff.com |date=11 July 1999 |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-date=24 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224181953/https://www.rediff.com/news/1999/jul/11karg1.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indianembassy.org/pic/PR_1999/July_1999/PR_July_15_1999.html|title=Sorry for the inconvenience.|access-date=23 August 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100615050107/http://www.indianembassy.org/pic/PR_1999/July_1999/PR_July_15_1999.html|archive-date=15 June 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref> an issue that provoked outrage and protests in the Northern Areas.<ref>Second-Class Citizens by M. Ilyas Khan, ], July 2000. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721181806/http://www.warbirds.in/downloads/HeraldKargil.pdf |date=21 July 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{usurped|1=}}, '']'', 25 September 2006</ref> Pakistan initially did not acknowledge many of its casualties, but Sharif later said that over 4,000 Pakistani troops were killed in the operation.<ref name="Hindu Sharif"/> Responding to this, Pervez Musharraf said, "It hurts me when an ex-premier undermines his own forces", and claimed that Indian casualties were more than that of Pakistan.<ref>{{cite web |author=Press Trust of India |url=http://expressindia.indianexpress.com/news/fullstory.php?newsid=34665 |title=India suffered more casualties in Kargil than Pakistan, claims Musharraf |publisher=Expressindia.com |date=5 August 2004 |access-date=28 August 2013 |archive-date=24 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140524074730/http://expressindia.indianexpress.com/news/fullstory.php?newsid=34665 |url-status=live }}</ref> The legacy of Kargil war still continues to be debated on Pakistan's news channels and television political correspondents, which Musharraf repeatedly appeared to justify.<ref name="ARY News TV">{{cite news|last=Badmi|first=Vaseem|title=11th Hour|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7G5GDa_jE8|access-date=30 January 2013|newspaper=ARY News TV|date=30 January 2013}}{{cbignore}}{{Dead YouTube link|date=February 2022}}</ref><ref name="Dunya News">{{cite news|last=Bacha|first=Sana|title=Top Story|url=http://www.thenewstribe.com/2013/01/30/some-people-trying-to-scandalize-pakistan-army-over-kargil-war-pervez-musharraf/|access-date=30 January 2013|newspaper=Dunya News|date=30 January 2013|archive-date=3 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130203131642/http://www.thenewstribe.com/2013/01/30/some-people-trying-to-scandalize-pakistan-army-over-kargil-war-pervez-musharraf/|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Benazir Bhutto, an opposition leader and former prime minister, called the Kargil War "Pakistan's greatest blunder". Many ex-officials of the military and the ] (Pakistan's principal ]) also were of the view that "Kargil was a waste of time" and "could not have resulted in any advantage" on the larger issue of Kashmir.<ref> (])</ref>
A retired Pakistani Army General, Lt Gen ], lambasted the war as "a disaster bigger than the ] tragedy",<ref name="kuli"> - Interview of Lt Gen ]. </ref> adding that the plan was "flawed in terms of its conception, tactical planning and execution" that ended in "sacrificing so many soldiers.".<ref> Jang, ], ]</ref><ref name="kuli" /> The Pakistani media too was vocal in its criticism of the whole plan and the eventual climbdown from the Kargil heights since there were no gains to show for the loss of lives and only resulted in international condemnation for its actions.<ref>, by ] - ] </ref>


Many in Pakistan had expected a victory over the ] based on Pakistani official reports on the war,<ref name="Samina Ahmed" /> but were dismayed by the turn of events and questioned the eventual retreat.<ref name="Hassan Abbas" /><ref>K.&nbsp;Ratnayake, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121027225617/https://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/aug1999/pak-a07.shtml |date=27 October 2012 }}, 7 August 1999, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030407201436/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/389884.stm |date=7 April 2003 }}, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202155136/http://www.stimson.org/southasia/?SN=SA20041217738 |date=2 December 2008 }} – Hosted on ] Centre.</ref> The military leadership is believed to have felt let down by the prime minister's decision to withdraw the remaining fighters. However, some authors, including Musharraf's close friend and former American ] Commander General ], and former Prime minister Nawaz Sharif, state that it was General Musharraf who requested that Sharif withdraw Pakistani troops.<ref>{{cite book | title=Battle Ready | publisher=] | year=2004 | isbn=0-399-15176-1 |author1=Tom Clancy |author2=Tony Koltz |author-link1=Tom Clancy |author-link2=Tony Koltz }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.weeklyvoice.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1443&Itemid=66|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011135734/http://www.weeklyvoice.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1443&Itemid=66|url-status=dead|title=Musharraf Vs. Sharif: Who's Lying?|archive-date=11 October 2007}}</ref> In 2012, Musharraf's senior officer and retired major-general ] maintained that Kargil was a "total disaster" and bitterly criticised General Musharraf.<ref name="The News International, 2012">{{cite news|last=Tariq Butt|title=Kargil was a total disaster|url=http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-2-142768-Kargil-war-was-a-total-disaster-claims-Gen-Majeed-Malik|access-date=30 January 2013|newspaper=The News International, 2012|date=14 November 2012|archive-date=1 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130201054012/http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-2-142768-Kargil-war-was-a-total-disaster-claims-Gen-Majeed-Malik|url-status=dead}}</ref> Pointing out the fact that Pakistan was in no position to fight India in that area; the Nawaz Sharif government initiated the diplomatic process by involving the US President ] and got Pakistan out of the difficult scenario.<ref name="The News International, 2012"/> Malik maintained that soldiers were not "Mujaheddin" but active-duty serving officers and soldiers of the ].<ref name="The News International, 2012"/>
Despite calls by many for a probe, no public commission of inquiry was set up to investigate the people responsible for initiating the conflict. However, the Pakistani political party, ] unveiled a ] in 2006, which states that Nawaz Sharif constituted an inquiry committee that recommended a ] for General Pervez Musharraf.<ref> - ] </ref> The party alleges that Musharraf "stole the report" after toppling the government, to save himself. The report also claims that India knew about the plan 11 months before its launch, enabling a complete victory for India on military, diplomatic and economic fronts.<ref> Pak Tribune, ] ]</ref> A statement in June, 2008 by a former army corps commander of Pakistan that Sharif "was never briefed by the army" on the Kargil attack,<ref> ]June 3, 2008</ref> had reignited the demand for a proble on the episode by legal & political groups.<ref> Associated Press of Pakistan June 3, 2008</ref><ref> The Nation</ref> Though the Kargil conflict had brought the Kashmir dispute into international focus – which was one of the aims of Pakistan – it had done so in negative circumstances that eroded its credibility, since the infiltration came just after a peace process between the two countries was underway. The sanctity of the LoC too received international recognition.


In a national security meeting with Prime minister Nawaz Sharif at the ], General Musharraf became heavily involved with serious altercations with ] Admiral ] who ultimately called for a court-martial against General Musharraf.<ref name="Daily Times">{{cite news|last=Daily Times Report|title=Musharraf planned coup much before Oct 12: Fasih Bokhari|url=http://www.antisystemic.org/satribune/www.satribune.com/archives/oct7_13_02/DTimes_fasihoct9.htm|access-date=18 May 2012|newspaper=Daily Times|date=9 October 2002|quote=Navy chief says the general feared court martial for masterminding Kargil|archive-date=15 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120315013903/http://www.antisystemic.org/satribune/www.satribune.com/archives/oct7_13_02/DTimes_fasihoct9.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> With Sharif placing the onus of the Kargil attacks squarely on the army chief Pervez Musharraf, there was an atmosphere of uneasiness between the two. On ], General Musharraf staged a bloodless ''coup d'état'', ousting Nawaz Sharif.
After the war, a few changes were made to the army. In recognition of the Northern Light Infantry's performance in the war - which even drew praise from a retired Indian Lt. General<ref name ="NLI" /> - the regiment was incorporated into the regular army. The war showed that despite a tactically sound plan that had the element of surprise, little groundwork had been done to gauge the politico-diplomatic ramifications.<ref> ], ] Dawn</ref> And like previous unsuccessful infiltrations attempts like '']'' that sparked ], there was little coordination or information sharing among the branches of the ]. One U.S. Intelligence study is reported to have stated that Kargil was yet another example of Pakistan’s (lack of) ], repeating the follies of the previous wars.<ref> ] ] Daily Times, Pakistan</ref> All these factors contributed to a strategic failure for Pakistan in Kargil.


], an ] in the ] and former prime minister, called the Kargil War "Pakistan's greatest blunder".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://farjinews.blogspot.com/2009/07/kargil-was-success-only-for-pervez-only.html |title=Kargil Was Success Only For Pervez |publisher=Farjinews.blogspot.com |date=24 July 2009 |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-date=16 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120316234357/http://farjinews.blogspot.com/2009/07/kargil-was-success-only-for-pervez-only.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Many ex-officials of the military and the ] (Pakistan's principal ]) also believed that "Kargil was a waste of time" and "could not have resulted in any advantage" on the larger issue of Kashmir.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ipcs.org/PakMedia05-UAug04.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060304101954/http://www.ipcs.org/PakMedia05-UAug04.pdf|url-status=dead|title=IPCS &#124; Institute Of Peace & Conflict Studies|archivedate=4 March 2006|website=www.ipcs.org}}</ref>
==Kargil War in the arts==
A retired Pakistan Army's Lieutenant-General ], lambasted the war as "a disaster bigger than the ] tragedy",<ref name="kuli"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080406092138/http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1056536 |date=6 April 2008 }} – Interview of Lt Gen ].</ref> adding that the plan was "flawed in terms of its conception, tactical planning and execution" that ended in "sacrificing so many soldiers".<ref name="kuli" /><ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061124225759/http://jang.com.pk/thenews/oct2006-weekly/books%26people-19-10-2006/index.html |date=24 November 2006 }} Jang, 19 October 2006</ref> The Pakistani media criticised the whole plan and the eventual climbdown from the Kargil heights since there were no gains to show for the loss of lives and it only resulted in international condemnation.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070217075137/http://www.dawn.com/weekly/ayaz/990709.htm |date=17 February 2007 }}, '']''</ref><ref>], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061029184219/http://dawn.com/weekly/ayaz/990723.htm |date=29 October 2006 }}, '']''</ref>
The brief conflict has provided considerable material for both filmmakers and authors alike in India. Some ] which were shot on the subject were even used by the ruling party ], led by ], in furthering its ] that immediately followed the war. The following is a list of the major films and dramas on the subject.
] of LOC Kargil which had the largest cast of ] in an ].]]
* '']'' (2003), a ] movie which depicts most of the incidents from the Kargil War was one of the longest in Indian movie history running for more than four hours.<ref> the website ].</ref>
* '']'' (2004), another Hindi movie portraying a fictionalised account of the conflict. ]s have generally appreciated the realistic portrayal of characters.<ref> ]</ref> The film also received good reviews in Pakistan because it portrays both sides fairly.<ref> Daily Times</ref>
* ''Dhoop'' (2003),<ref>{{imdb title|id=0387164|title=Dhoop}}</ref> directed by ] winner Ashwini Chaudhary, which depicted the life of ]'s parents after his death. Anuj Nayyar was a captain in the Indian army and was awarded ] posthumously. ] plays the role of S.K. Nayyar, Anuj's father.
* ''Mission Fateh - Real Stories of Kargil Heroes'', a ] telecast on ] channel chronicling the Indian Army's missions.
* ''Fifty Day War'' - A ] production on the war, the title indicating the length of the Kargil conflict. This was claimed to be the biggest production of its kind in ], involving real aircraft and explosions in an outdoor ].


Despite calls by many,{{who|date=January 2019}} no public commission of inquiry was set up in Pakistan to investigate the people responsible for initiating the conflict. The ] (PML(N)) published a ] in 2006, which stated that Nawaz Sharif constituted an inquiry committee that recommended a ] for General Pervez Musharraf, but Musharraf "stole the report" after toppling the government, to save himself.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=2382|title=Today's Newspaper – The News International|work=The News International, Pakistan|access-date=9 August 2006|archive-date=6 December 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081206125830/http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=2382|url-status=dead}}</ref> The report also claims that India knew about the plan 11 months before its launch, enabling a complete victory for India on military, diplomatic and economic fronts.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061022085431/http://www.paktribune.com/news/index.shtml?151668 |date=22 October 2006 }} Pak Tribune, 6 August 2006</ref> A statement in June 2008 by a former ] commander and ] of ] that time, ] (retired) ] said that: "As Prime minister, Nawaz Sharif "was never briefed by the army" on the Kargil attack,<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080819190026/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7434427.stm |date=19 August 2008 }} ] 3 June 2008</ref> reignited the demand for a probe of the episode by legal and political groups.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081202121602/http://www.app.com.pk/en_/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40288&Itemid=2 |date=2 December 2008 }} Associated Press of Pakistan 3 June 2008</ref><ref> The Nation</ref>
Many other movies like '']''<ref>{{imdb title|id=0444913|title=Tango Charlie}}</ref> also drew heavily upon the Kargil episode, which still continues to be a ] for mainstream movies with a ] movie '']'',<ref>{{imdb title|id=0485922|title=Keerthi Chakra}}</ref> being based on an incident in Kargil. The impact of the war in the sporting arena was also visible during the India-Pakistan clash in the ], which coincided with the Kargil ]. The game witnessed heightened passions and was one of the most viewed matches in the tournament.


Though the Kargil conflict had brought the Kashmir dispute into international focus, which was one of Pakistan's aims, it had done so in negative circumstances that eroded its credibility, since the infiltration came just after a peace process between the two countries had been concluded. The sanctity of the LOC too received international recognition. President Clinton's move to ask Islamabad to withdraw hundreds of armed militants from Indian-administered Kashmir was viewed by many in Pakistan as indicative of a clear shift in US policy against Pakistan.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140524071606/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/371945.stm |date=24 May 2014 }}, ] 17 June 1999</ref>
==Notes==
<div class="references-small">
{{fnb|(I)}} Names for the conflict: There have been various names for the conflict. During the actual fighting in Kargil, the Indian Government was careful not to use the term "war", calling it a "war-like situation", even though both nations indicated that they were in a "state of war". Terms like Kargil "conflict", Kargil "incident" or the official military assault, "]", were thus preferred. After the end of the war however, the Indian Government increasingly called it the "Kargil War", even though there had been no official declaration of war. Other less popularly used names included "Third Kashmir War" and Pakistan's codename given to the infiltration: "Operation Badr".


After the war, a few changes were made to the Pakistan armed forces. In recognition of the Northern Light Infantry's performance in the war, which even drew praise from a retired Indian Lt. General, the regiment was incorporated into the regular army.<ref name="NLI" /> The war showed that despite a tactically sound plan that had the element of surprise, little groundwork had been done to gauge the political ramifications.<ref>Irfan Husain, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070808141333/http://www.dawn.com/weekly/mazdak/20000429.htm |date=8 August 2007 }}, 29 April 2000 Dawn</ref> And like previous unsuccessful infiltrations attempts, such as '']'', which sparked ], there was little co-ordination or information sharing among the branches of the ]. One US Intelligence study is reported to have stated that Kargil was yet another example of Pakistan's (lack of) ], repeating the follies of the previous wars.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120731003704/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_19-7-2004_pg3_1 |date=31 July 2012 }}, ''Daily Times'', 19 July 2004, Pakistan</ref> In 2013, General Musharraf's close collaborator and confidential subordinate ] (retired) ] revealed to Pakistan's ] and ], that " adventure' was India's intelligence failure and Pakistan's miscalculated move, the Kargil operation was known only to General Parvez Musharraf and four of his close collaborators".<ref name="National Turk English">{{cite news|last=APP|title=Kargil adventure was India's intelligence failure, Pakistan's miscalculated move: Ex-Pak General|url=http://www.nationalturk.com/en/kargil-adventure-was-indias-intelligence-failure-pakistans-miscalculated-move-ex-pak-general-33029|access-date=30 January 2013|newspaper=National Turk English|date=30 January 2013|archive-date=31 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130131114957/http://www.nationalturk.com/en/kargil-adventure-was-indias-intelligence-failure-pakistans-miscalculated-move-ex-pak-general-33029|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="GEO News">{{cite news|title=Ex General reveals details about Kargil fiasco|url=http://www.geo.tv/GeoDetail.aspx?ID=85798|access-date=30 January 2013|newspaper=GEO News|date=29 January 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130207014934/http://www.geo.tv/GeoDetail.aspx?ID=85798|archive-date=7 February 2013}}</ref><ref name="Dawn News">{{cite news|last=Khalid Kaikani|title=Kargil adventure was four-man show: general|url=http://dawn.com/2013/01/29/kargil-adventure-was-four-man-show-general/|access-date=30 January 2013|newspaper=Dawn News|date=29 January 2013|archive-date=29 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130129230009/http://dawn.com/2013/01/29/kargil-adventure-was-four-man-show-general/|url-status=live}}</ref>
{{fnb|(II)}} Casualties: The exact count of Pakistan army losses has been somewhat more difficult to figure out, partly because Pakistan has not yet published an official casualties list. The ] had made an early, partial estimate of close to 700 fatalities. After the end of the war, this figure was revised upwards by scholars as well as authors. Estimates on Pakistan casualties vary wildly given the problems of assessing the number of deaths in the militant ranks. According to numbers stated by Nawaz Sharif there were 4,000+ fatalities. His party ] in its "white paper" on the war mentioned that more than 3,000 Mujahideens, officers and soldiers were killed.<ref> ], ], PakTribune</ref> Another major Pakistani political party, the ], assesses the casualties to be three thousand soldiers and ], as given . Indian estimates, as stated by the country's Army Chief mention 1,042 Pakistani soldiers were killed<ref name="ht"></ref> Musharraf, in his ] version of his memoirs, titled "Agnipath", differs from all the estimates stating that 357 troops were killed with a further 665 wounded.<ref name="Indianexpress" /> Apart from General Musharraf's figure on the number of Pakistanis wounded, the number of people injured in the Pakistan camp is not yet fully known. <!-- Commenting out. Is the following needed?


==Casualties==
The Indian government claims that they recovered as many as 249 bodies of the infilitrators on the Kargil slopes,<ref name="vik"></ref> out of which 197 were buried by the Indian Army. Of the remaining 52, five were accepted by Pakistan, and 47 were in shallow graves built by the retreating Pakistani forces.--> One Indian Pilot was officially captured during the fighting, while there were eight Pakistani soldiers who were captured during the fighting, and were repatriated on ] ];<ref name="tribpow" />
]
</div>

{{reflist|3}}
Pakistani army losses have been difficult to determine. Pakistan confirmed that 453 soldiers were killed. The ] had made an early, partial estimate of close to 700 fatalities. According to numbers stated by Nawaz Sharif there were over 4,000 fatalities. His PML (N) party in its "white paper" on the war mentioned that more than 3,000 Mujahideens, officers and soldiers were killed.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061022085431/http://www.paktribune.com/news/index.shtml?151668 |date=22 October 2006 }} 6 August 2006, PakTribune</ref> Another major Pakistani political party, the ], also says that "thousands" of soldiers and ] died.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ppp.org.pk/articles/article30.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012153208/http://ppp.org.pk/articles/article30.htm|archive-date=12 October 2007|title=Indo-Pak summit 2001|date=12 October 2007|access-date=27 May 2009|work=Pakistan Peoples Party}}</ref> Indian estimates stand at 1,042 Pakistani soldiers killed.<ref name="ht">{{Cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/archive-news/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930035001/http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1805833%2C0008.htm|url-status=dead|title=Hindustan Times – Archive News|archive-date=30 September 2007|website=Hindustan Times}}</ref> Musharraf, in his ] version of his memoirs, titled "Agnipath", differs from all the estimates stating that 357 troops were killed with a further 665 wounded.<ref name="Indianexpress">{{cite web|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/story/14208.html |title=President Musharaffs disclosure on Pakistani Casualties in his book |work=] |access-date=20 May 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080522152015/http://www.indianexpress.com/story/14208.html |archive-date=22 May 2008 }}</ref> Apart from General Musharraf's figure on the number of Pakistanis wounded, the number of people injured in the Pakistan camp is not yet fully known although they are at least more than 400 according to Pakistan army's website.<ref name="Shuhadas Corner"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100824193749/http://www.pakistanarmy.gov.pk/modules/shuhadascorner/embed_shuhada_list.aspx |date=24 August 2010 }}, November 2010</ref> One Indian pilot was officially captured during the fighting, while there were eight Pakistani soldiers who were captured during the fighting, and were repatriated on 13 August 1999.<ref name="tribpow">{{cite web| url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99aug15/nation.htm#9| title=Tribune Report on Pakistani POWs| access-date=20 May 2009| archive-date=18 January 2012| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120118031055/http://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99aug15/nation.htm#9| url-status=live}}</ref>
India gave its official casualty figures as 527 dead and 1,363 wounded.

==Kargil War Memorial, India==
{{main|Dras War Memorial}}
] by the ] at ], India]]

The Kargil War memorial, built by the Indian Army, is located in Dras, in the foothills of the Tololing Hill. The memorial, located about 5&nbsp;km from the city centre across the Tiger Hill, commemorates the martyrs of the Kargil War. A poem "Pushp Kii Abhilasha"<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://kavitakosh.org/kk/%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AA_%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%80_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%BE_/_%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%96%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B2_%E0%A4%9A%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%80|title=पुष्प की अभिलाषा / माखनलाल चतुर्वेदी – कविता कोश|website=kavitakosh.org|language=hi|access-date=26 February 2019|archive-date=8 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190308145409/http://www.kavitakosh.org/kk/%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AA_%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%80_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%BE_/_%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%96%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B2_%E0%A4%9A%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%80|url-status=live}}</ref> (Wish of a Flower) by ], a renowned 20th century ] Hindi poet, is inscribed on the gateway of the memorial greets visitors. The names of the soldiers who lost their lives in the War are inscribed on the Memorial Wall and can be read by visitors. A museum attached to the Kargil War Memorial, which was established to celebrate the victory of Operation Vijay, houses pictures of Indian soldiers, archives of important war documents and recordings, Pakistani war equipments and gear, and official emblems of the Army from the Kargil war.

A giant national flag, weighing 15&nbsp;kg was hoisted at the Kargil war memorial on ] to commemorate the 13th anniversary of India's victory in the war.<ref>. Ibnlive.in.com (25 July 2012). Retrieved on 12 July 2013.</ref>

==Popular culture==
* '']'' is a 1999 episode in the first season of ''The West Wing'' which depicts a fictionalised representation of the Kargil conflict.
* ] single, 'Price of Bullets', released in 1999 dealt with the Kargil War.
* '']'' (2001), a Hindi movie directed by Dilip Gulati was released in 2001, based on the incident of Kargil conflict.
* '']'' (2003), a Hindi movie which depicts many incidents from the war was one of the longest in Indian movie history, running for more than four hours.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171130171447/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0347416/ |date=30 November 2017 }} the website ].</ref>
* '']'' (2004), another Hindi movie portraying a fictionalised account of the conflict. ]s have generally appreciated the realistic portrayal of characters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lakshya/?show=all|title=Lakshya|date=18 June 2004|work=rottentomatoes.com|access-date=17 February 2006|archive-date=1 October 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001011325/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lakshya/?show=all|url-status=live}}</ref> The film also received good reviews in Pakistan because it portrays both sides fairly.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930183001/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/print.asp?page=2004%5C06%5C24%5Cstory_24-6-2004_pg3_3 |date=30 September 2007 }} Daily Times</ref>
* ''Sainika'' (2002),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kannadaaudio.com/Songs/FilmStories/home/Sainika.php |title=Sainika Film Story |publisher=KannadaAudio.com |access-date=15 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120310111352/http://www.kannadaaudio.com/Songs/FilmStories/home/Sainika.php |archive-date=10 March 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref> the Kannada film directed by Mahesh Sukhdhare depicted the life of a soldier with Kargil war as one of the events. Starring C.P.Yogishwar and ].
* '']'' (2003), Hindi film directed by Ashwini Chaudhary depicted the life of ]'s parents after his death. Anuj Nayyar was a captain in the Indian army and was awarded ] posthumously. ] plays the role of S.K. Nayyar, Anuj's father.
* ''Mission Fateh – Real Stories of Kargil Heroes'', a TV series telecast on ] channel chronicling the Indian Army's missions.
* ''Fifty Day War'' – A theatrical production on the war, directed by ], the title indicating the length of the Kargil conflict. This was claimed to be the biggest production of its kind in Asia, budget of Rs. 15&nbsp;million, involving real aircraft and explosions in an outdoor setting.<ref>{{cite news|title=The larger than life director |url=http://www.financialexpress.com/old/fe/daily/20000219/fle13016.html |publisher=Financial Express |date=19 February 2000 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130514234312/http://www.financialexpress.com/old/fe/daily/20000219/fle13016.html |archive-date=14 May 2013 }}</ref>
* '']'' (2008) – A Malayalam film directed by a former Indian Army Major Ravi (Retd) based on his experience of Kargil War.
* '']'' (2000) – A Pakistani film-drama based on the armed intrusions and struggle of Pakistan army soldiers in the conflict.
* ''Kargil Kartoons'' (1999) – With the support of eight leading cartoonists, ] compiled a collection of cartoons dedicated to the Indian defence forces.<ref>Kargil Kartoons {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210309053800/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUZHllsiexI. |date=9 March 2021 }}</ref> He also coordinated ''Kargil Kartoons'' (A Collection of Cartoons and a chain of Cartoon Exhibition), the solidarity gesture of drawing on-the-spot cartoons of ''army men'' who passing through the New Delhi railway station on their way to Kargil. The cartoons on Kargil War were later exhibited at The Lalit Kala Academy, New Delhi. 25–31 July 1999, followed by the chain exhibition of cartoons at ], Chandigarh, ] and ].<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928020953/http://expressindia.indianexpress.com/news/ie/daily/19990714/ige14012.html |date=28 September 2013 }} Indian Express, 14 July 1999.</ref>
* '']'' (2003) – A film expressing the mixed emotions of ] celebrations and mourning associated with individual's casualty in the Kargil war.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindu.com/lf/2003/03/02/stories/2003030201300200.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140727090731/http://www.hindu.com/lf/2003/03/02/stories/2003030201300200.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=2014-07-27|work=]|title=Bowled over by the star of 'Stumped'}}</ref>
* '']'' (2011), romantic drama film directed by ], spanned over the period between 1992 and 2002 covering major events.
* '']'' (2020) – An Indian biographical film was based on life of Indian Air Force pilot ], the first Indian female air force pilot in combat during Kargil War.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/angad-bedi-joins-star-cast-gunjan-saxenas-biopic-kargil-girl/|title=Angad Bedi joins the star cast of Gunjan Saxena's biopic, Kargil Girl|website=]|date=25 February 2019|access-date=27 April 2019|archive-date=2 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190302152531/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/angad-bedi-joins-star-cast-gunjan-saxenas-biopic-kargil-girl/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* '']'' (2021) – An Indian war film based on life of Indian army captain ], recipient of the ].<ref name="rd">{{cite news|url=https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/shershaah-on-birthday-sidharth-malhotra-shares-first-look-posters-of-the-vikram-batra-biopic-2164768|title=Shershaah: On Birthday, Sidharth Malhotra Shares First Look Posters Of The Vikram Batra Biopic|publisher=NDTV|date=16 January 2020|access-date=16 January 2020|archive-date=14 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211214115656/https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/shershaah-on-birthday-sidharth-malhotra-shares-first-look-posters-of-the-vikram-batra-biopic-2164768|url-status=live}}</ref>
* '']'' (2022) an Indian remake of '']''.
The impact of the war in the sporting arena was visible during the India-Pakistan clash in the ], which coincided with the Kargil timeline. The game witnessed heightened passions and was one of the most viewed matches in the tournament.<ref name="huffingtonpost">{{Cite news |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/uzair-hasan-rizvi/india-vs-pakistan-a-match_b_6671130.html |title=India vs. Pakistan: A Match Made in Heaven And Hell |last=Hasan |first=Uzair |access-date=30 May 2017 |work=] |date=14 February 2015 |archive-date=12 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171012062112/http://www.huffingtonpost.in/uzair-hasan-rizvi/india-vs-pakistan-a-match_b_6671130.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ], Prisoner of war
* ]


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}}
* the CCC Kargil Project.
* Ashwani Shrotriya. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160727095532/http://dbvideos.bhaskar.com/interesting_weird/26453 |date=27 July 2016 }}, '']''
* (])

* (])
==Footnotes==
* (Center for Contemporary Conflict) PDF download
{{refbegin}}
*
* {{note|fn_(I)| Note (I):}} Names for the conflict: There have been various names for the conflict. During the actual fighting in Kargil, the Indian Government was careful not to use the term "war", calling it a "war-like situation", even though both nations indicated that they were in a "state of war". Terms like Kargil "conflict", Kargil "incident" or the official military assault, "Operation Vijay", were thus preferred. After the end of the war however, the Indian Government increasingly called it the "Kargil War", even though there had been no official declaration of war. Other less popularly used names included "Third Kashmir War" and Pakistan's codename given to the infiltration: "Operation Badr".
* {{cite book | author=] | title=The Idea of Pakistan | publisher=Brookings Institution Press | year=2004 | id=ISBN 0-8157-1502-1}}
{{refend}}
* {{cite book | author=Kargil Review Committee | title=From Surprise to Reckoning: The Kargil Review Committee Report | publisher=SAGE Publications | year=2000 | id=ISBN 0-7619-9466-1}}

*
==References==
* (])
* the CCC Kargil Project.
* (])
* (Center for Contemporary Conflict) (PDF)
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090712042543/http://www.jammu-kashmir.com/archives/archives1999/99august05.html |date=12 July 2009 }}
* {{Cite book | author=Stephen P. Cohen | title=The Idea of Pakistan | publisher=Brookings Institution Press | year=2004 | isbn=0-8157-1502-1 | url=https://archive.org/details/ideaofpakistan00cohe | author-link=Stephen P. Cohen }}
* {{Cite book | author=Kargil Review Committee | title=From Surprise to Reckoning: The Kargil Review Committee Report | publisher=SAGE Publications | year=2000 | isbn=0-7619-9466-1}}
* ACDIS Occasional Paper by Suba Chandran, Published 2004 by Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security (ACDIS), University of Illinois.
* , by ], RUSI Journal, April 2002
* {{Cite book |author=V.P. Malik| title= Kargil; From Surprise to Victory|year=2006 | publisher= Harper Collins, New Delhi, India.}}


==Further reading== ==Further reading==
===Indian literature on Kargil war===
* {{cite book | author=M. K. Akbar | title=Kargil Cross Border Terrorism | publisher=South Asia Books | year=1999 | id=ISBN 81-7099-734-8}}
* {{Cite book | author=M.K. Akbar | title=Kargil Cross Border Terrorism | publisher=South Asia Books | year=1999 | isbn=81-7099-734-8}}
* Amarinder Singh. ''A Ridge Too Far: War in the Kargil Heights''. ASIN: B0006E8KKW
* {{cite book | author=Jasijit Singh | title=Kargil 1999: Pakistan's Fourth War for Kashmir | publisher=South Asia Books | year=1999 | id=ISBN 81-86019-22-7}} * {{Cite book |author=Amarinder Singh| title=A Ridge Too Far: War in the Kargil Heights 1999| year=2001| publisher=Motibagh Palace, Patiala| asin =B0006E8KKW| author-link=Amarinder Singh}}
* {{cite book | author=] | title=India-Pakistan in War & Peace | publisher=Books Today | year=2002 | id=ISBN 0-415-30472-5}} * {{Cite book | author=Jasjit Singh|author-link=Jasjit Singh (IAF officer) | title=Kargil 1999: Pakistan's Fourth War for Kashmir | publisher=South Asia Books | year=1999 | isbn=81-86019-22-7}}
* {{Cite book | author=J.N. Dixit | title=India–Pakistan in War & Peace | publisher=Books Today | year=2002 | isbn=0-415-30472-5| author-link=J.N. Dixit }}
* Muhammad Ayub. An Army; Its role and Rule (A History of the Pakistan Army From Independence to Kargil 1947–1999). Published by Rosedog Books, Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania, USA. ISBN 0-8059-9594-3
* {{Cite book |author=Ranjan Kumar Singh| title= Sarhad Zero Mile| year= 2006|publisher= Parijat Prakashan.|isbn=81-903561-0-0}}
* {{Cite book |author=Mona Bhan| title= Counterinsurgency, Democracy and the Politics of Identity in India|publisher= Routledge Contemporary South Asia Series| author-link= Mona Bhan| title-link= Counterinsurgency, Democracy and the Politics of Identity in India}}
* {{Cite web|url=http://www.saag.org/papers13/paper1231.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012085214/http://www.saag.org/papers13/paper1231.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=2007-10-12|title=Pakistan's Lessons from its Kargil War (1999): An Analysis|last=Kapila|first=Subhash|date=2007-10-12|access-date=2018-05-25|publisher=South Asia Analysis Group}}<


===Pakistan literature on Kargil theatre===
==External links==
* {{Cite book |author=Muhammad Ayub| title= An Army; Its role and Rule (A History of the Pakistan Army From Independence to Kargil 1947–1999)|publisher= Rosedog Books, Pittsburgh, PA|isbn=0-8059-9594-3| date= January 2005}}
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages|Kargil War.ogg|2006-08-10}}
* {{cite book|last=Hussain, P.A.|first=Ashfaq|title=Witness to Blunder|year=2008|publisher=Idara Matbuaat-e-Sulemani|isbn=978-81-87330-51-6 |url=https://www.amazon.com/Witness-Blunder-Kargil-Story-Unfolds/dp/B003EB5S72|access-date=1 February 2013}}
*
* {{cite book|last=Mazari|first=Shireen M.|title=The Kargil conflict, 1999 : separating fact from fiction|year=2003|publisher=Institute of Strategic Studies|location=Islamabad|isbn=978-9698772000|edition=1st}}
* - ]
* {{cite book|last=Aziz, P.A.|first=Shahid|title=Yeh Khamoshi Kahan Tak?|year=2008|publisher=Army Press Publications|location=Islamabad}}
* - ] report
* {{cite book|last=Musharraf|first=Pervez|title=In the Line of Fire: A Memoir|year=2006|publisher=Free Press|location=New York|isbn=074-3283449|url=https://archive.org/details/inlineoffirememo00mush}}
*
* {{cite book|last=Hilali|first=A.Z.|title=US–Pakistan relationship : Soviet invasion of Afghanistan|year=2005|publisher=Ashgate|location=Burlington, VT|isbn=978-0754-642206|chapter=Renewal of US–Pakistan Partnership: President BIll Clinton in Kargil War}}
* - ]
* {{cite book|last=Aziz|first=Mazhar|title=Military control in Pakistan: The parallel state|year=2008|publisher=Routledge|location=London|isbn=978-0-203-93357-2|chapter=L'État, c'est militaire'}}
* Acosta, Marcus P., CPT, U.S. Army, , June 2003. Master's degree Thesis about the Kargil War. Authored in completion of master's degree requirements in the Department of National Security Affairs,] ], ].
* {{cite web|last=Kiani, P.A.|first=Jameshed Gulzar |title=Making an example |url=http://www.geo.tv/6-3-2008/18848.htm |publisher=GEO Television Press Publishers |access-date=1 February 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080606010200/http://www.geo.tv/6-3-2008/18848.htm |archive-date= 6 June 2008 }}
*
* {{cite book|last=Siddiqa|first=Ayesha|title=Military Inc|year=2007|publisher=Pluto Press|location=London|isbn=978-0745325453}}
* – ]
* {{cite book|last=Nawaz|first=Shuja|title=Crossed Swords: Pakistan, Its Army, and the Wars Within|year=2008|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Karachi|isbn=978-0195476606|title-link=Crossed Swords: Pakistan, Its Army, and the Wars Within}}
*
* by ] (])
* - ]
* - Pakistan's Daily Times
*
* - Complete texts of Indian and Pakistani statements following Pakistan's decision to withdraw its troops in Kargil
* - Article by ] in ]-based magazine '']''; and to Brecher's article at The Acorn/Indian National Interest.
* hosted on ]
* - ] video.
{{featured article}}


==External links==
{{Contains special characters|Indic}}
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages|Kargil War.ogg|date=2006-08-10}}
* {{commons category-inline}}
*
* – ]
*
{{Kashmir conflict}}
{{Indo-Pakistani relations}}
{{Military history of Pakistan}}
{{Military of India}} {{Military of India}}
{{Post-Cold War Asian conflicts}}
{{Authority control}}


{{Military of Pakistan}}

]
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
]

]
{{Link FA|ml}}
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 10:42, 28 December 2024

1999 India–Pakistan conflict "Operation Vijay (1999)" redirects here. For the 1961 Indian operation, see Annexation of Goa.

Kargil War
Part of the Kashmir conflict and the India–Pakistan conflict
Kargil_war
Indian soldiers after capturing a hill from Pakistani forces during the Kargil War
Date3 May – 26 July 1999
(2 months, 3 weeks and 2 days)
LocationKargil district, Jammu and Kashmir (now Ladakh), India
Result

Indian victory

  • India regains possession of Kargil
Territorial
changes
Status quo ante bellum
Belligerents
 India  Pakistan
Commanders and leaders

Atal Bihari Vajpayee
Ved Prakash Malik

Anil Yashwant Tipnis

Nawaz Sharif
Pervez Musharraf

Muhammad Aziz Khan
Strength
30,000 5,000
Casualties and losses

Indian official figures:

Pakistani claims:

  • 1,600 (per Musharraf)

Independent figures:

Pakistani figures:

  • 2,700–4,000 killed (per Sharif)
  • 453 killed (per the Pakistan Army)
  • 3,000 killed (PML-N White Paper)
  • 357 killed and 665+ wounded (per Musharraf)
  • 8 POWs

Indian claims:

  • 737–1,200 killed (at least 249 bodies recovered in Indian territory)
  • 1000+ wounded
Kargil War
  • Tiger Hill
  • Point 5140
  • Tololing
  • Safed Sagar
  • Talwar
  • Kargil Air War
  • Indo-Pakistani conflicts
    Kashmir conflict

    Other conflicts

    Border skirmishes

    Strikes

    The Kargil War, also known as the Kargil conflict, was fought between India and Pakistan from May to July 1999 in the Kargil district of Ladakh (erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir) and elsewhere along the Line of Control (LoC). In India, the conflict is also referred to as Operation Vijay (Sanskrit: विजय, lit. 'Victory'), which was the codename of the Indian military operation in the region. The Indian Air Force acted jointly with the Indian Army to flush out the Pakistan Army and paramilitary troops from vacated Indian positions along the LoC, in what was designated as Operation Safed Sagar (Hindi: ऑपरेशन सफेद सागर, lit. 'White Sea').

    The conflict was triggered by the infiltration of Pakistani troops—disguised as Kashmiri militants—into strategic positions on the Indian side of the LoC, which serves as the de facto border between the two countries in the disputed region of Kashmir. During its initial stages, Pakistan blamed the fighting entirely on independent Kashmiri insurgents, but documents left behind by casualties and later statements by Pakistan's Prime Minister and Chief of Army Staff showed the involvement of Pakistani paramilitary forces, led by General Ashraf Rashid. The Indian Army, later supported by the Indian Air Force, recaptured a majority of the positions on the Indian side of the LoC; facing international diplomatic opposition, Pakistani forces withdrew from all remaining Indian positions along the LoC.

    The Kargil War is the most recent example of high-altitude warfare in mountainous terrain, and as such, posed significant logistical problems for the combatting sides. It also marks one of only two instances of conventional warfare between nuclear-armed states (alongside the Sino-Soviet border conflict). India had conducted its first successful test in 1974; Pakistan, which had been developing its nuclear capability in secret since around the same time, conducted its first known tests in 1998, just two weeks after a second series of tests by India.

    Location

    Before the Partition of India in 1947, Kargil was a tehsil of Ladakh, a sparsely populated region with diverse linguistic, ethnic and religious groups, living in isolated valleys separated by some of the world's highest mountains. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1947-1948 concluded with the Line of Control bisecting the Ladakh district, with the Skardu tehsil going to Pakistan (now part of Gilgit-Baltistan). After Pakistan's defeat in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, the two nations signed the Simla Agreement promising not to engage in armed conflict with respect to that boundary.

    The town of Kargil is located 205 km (127 mi) from Srinagar, facing the Northern Areas across the LOC. Like other areas in the Himalayas, Kargil has a continental climate. Summers are cool with frigid nights, while winters are long and chilly with temperatures often dropping to −48 °C (−54 °F).

    An Indian national highway (NH 1) connecting Srinagar to Leh cuts through Kargil. The area that witnessed the infiltration and fighting is a 160-kilometre (100 mi) long stretch of ridges overlooking this only road linking Srinagar and Leh. The military outposts on the ridges above the highway were generally around 5,000 m (16,000 ft) high, with a few as high as 5,485 m (17,995 ft). Apart from the district capital, Kargil, the populated areas near the front line in the conflict included the Mushkoh Valley and the town of Drass, southwest of Kargil, as well as the Batalik sector and other areas northeast of Kargil.

    Kargil was targeted partly because the terrain was conducive to the preemptive seizure of several unoccupied military positions. With tactically vital features and well-prepared defensive posts atop the peaks, a defender on the high ground would enjoy advantages akin to that of a fortress. Any attack to dislodge a defender from high ground in mountain warfare requires a far higher ratio of attackers to defenders, and the difficulties would be exacerbated by the high altitude and freezing temperatures.

    Kargil is just 173 km (107 mi) from the Pakistani-controlled town of Skardu, which was capable of providing logistical and artillery support to Pakistani combatants. A road between Kargil and Skardu exists, which was closed in 1949.

    Background

    The town of Kargil is strategically located.

    After the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971, there had been a long period with relatively few direct armed conflicts involving the military forces of the two neighbours—notwithstanding the efforts of both nations to control the Siachen Glacier by establishing military outposts on the surrounding mountains ridges and the resulting military skirmishes in the 1980s. During the 1990s, however, escalating tensions and conflict due to separatist activities in Kashmir, some of which were supported by Pakistan, as well as the conducting of nuclear tests by both countries in 1998, led to an increasingly belligerent atmosphere. In an attempt to defuse the situation, both countries signed the Lahore Declaration in February 1999, promising to provide a peaceful and bilateral solution to the Kashmir conflict.

    During the winter of 1998–1999, some elements of the Pakistani Armed Forces were covertly training and sending Pakistani troops and paramilitary forces, some allegedly in the guise of mujahideen, into territory on the Indian side of the LOC. The infiltration was codenamed "Operation Badr"; its aim was to sever the link between Kashmir and Ladakh, and cause Indian forces to withdraw from the Siachen Glacier, thus forcing India to negotiate a settlement of the broader Kashmir dispute. Pakistan also believed that any tension in the region would internationalise the Kashmir issue, helping it to secure a speedy resolution. Yet another goal may have been to boost the morale of the decade-long rebellion in Jammu and Kashmir by taking a proactive role.

    Pakistani Lieutenant General Shahid Aziz, and then head of ISI analysis wing, has confirmed there were no mujahideen but only regular Pakistan Army soldiers who took part in the Kargil War. "There were no Mujahideen, only taped wireless messages, which fooled no one. Our soldiers were made to occupy barren ridges, with hand held weapons and ammunition", Lt Gen Aziz wrote in his article in The Nation daily in January 2013.

    Some writers have speculated that the operation's objective may also have been retaliation for India's Operation Meghdoot in 1984 that seized much of Siachen Glacier.

    According to India's then army chief Ved Prakash Malik, and many scholars, much of the background planning, including construction of logistical supply routes, had been undertaken much earlier. On several occasions during the 1980s and 1990s, the army had given Pakistani leaders (Zia ul Haq and Benazir Bhutto) similar proposals for infiltration into the Kargil region, but the plans had been shelved for fear of drawing the nations into all-out war.

    Some analysts believe that the blueprint of attack was reactivated soon after Pervez Musharraf was appointed chief of army staff in October 1998. After the war, Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister of Pakistan during the Kargil conflict, claimed that he was unaware of the plans, and that he first learned about the situation when he received an urgent phone call from Atal Bihari Vajpayee, his counterpart in India. Sharif attributed the plan to Musharraf and "just two or three of his cronies", a view shared by some Pakistani writers who have stated that only four generals, including Musharraf, knew of the plan. Musharraf, however, asserted that Sharif had been briefed on the Kargil operation 15 days ahead of Vajpayee's journey to Lahore on 20 February.

    Course of the war

    Further information: Kargil order of battle and Kargil Air War

    Conflict events

    Date (1999) Event
    3 May A Pakistani intrusion in the Kargil district is reported by local shepherds.
    5 May Indian Army patrols are sent out in response to earlier reports; 5 Indian soldiers are captured and subsequently killed.
    9 May Heavy shelling by the Pakistan Army damages Indian ammunition dumps in Kargil.
    10 May Multiple infiltrations across the LoC are confirmed in Dras, Kaksar, and Mushkoh sectors.
    Mid-May India moves in more soldiers from the Kashmir Valley to Kargil district.
    26 May The Indian Air Force (IAF) begins airstrikes against suspected infiltrator positions.
    27 May One IAF MiG-21 and one MiG-27 aircraft are shot down by Anza surface-to-air missiles of the Pakistan Army's Air Defence Corps; Flt. Lt. Kambampati Nachiketa (pilot of the MiG-27) is captured by a Pakistani patrol and given POW status (released on 3 June 1999).
    28 May One IAF Mi-17 is shot down by Pakistani forces; four crew members are killed.
    1 June The Pakistan Army begins shelling operations on India's National Highway 1 in Kashmir and Ladakh.
    5 June India releases documents recovered from three Pakistani soldiers that officially indicate Pakistan's involvement in the conflict.
    6 June The Indian Army begins a major offensive in Kargil.
    9 June Indian troops re-capture two key positions in the Batalik sector.
    11 June India releases intercepts of conversations between Pakistani COAS Gen. Pervez Musharraf (on a visit to China) and CGS Lt. Gen. Aziz Khan (in Rawalpindi) as proof of the Pakistan Army's involvement in the infiltrations.
    13 June Indian forces secure Tololing in Dras after a fierce battle with militias backed by Pakistani troops.
    15 June United States President Bill Clinton forces then Prime Minister of Pakistan, Nawaz Sharif to immediately pull all Pakistani troops and irregulars out from Kargil.
    29 June Under pressure from their government, Pakistani forces begin their retreat from Indian-administered Kashmir and the Indian Army advances towards Tiger Hill.
    4 July Three Indian regiments (Sikh, Grenadiers and Naga) engage elements of the remaining Pakistani Northern Light Infantry regiment in the Battle of Tiger Hill. The region is recaptured by Indian forces after more than 12 hours of fighting.
    5 July Nawaz Sharif officially announces the Pakistan Army's withdrawal from Kargil following a meeting with President Clinton. Indian forces subsequently take control of Dras.
    7 July Indian troops recapture Jubar Heights in Batalik.
    11 July Pakistani forces disengage from the region; India retakes key peak points in Batalik.
    14 July Prime Minister of India Atal Bihari Vajpayee declares Operation Vijay a success. The Indian government sets conditions for talks with Pakistan.
    26 July Kargil War officially comes to an end. Indian Army announces the complete withdrawal of Pakistani irregular and regular forces.

    There were three major phases to the Kargil War. First, Pakistan infiltrated forces into the Indian-controlled section of Kashmir and occupied strategic locations enabling it to bring NH1 within range of its artillery fire. The next stage consisted of India discovering the infiltration and mobilising forces to respond to it. The final stage involved major battles by Indian and Pakistani forces resulting in India recapturing most of the territories held by Pakistani forces and the subsequent withdrawal of Pakistani forces back across the LOC after international pressure.

    Occupation by Pakistan

    Infiltration and military build-up

    During February 1999, the Pakistan Army sent forces to occupy some posts on the Indian side of the LOC. Troops from the elite Special Services Group as well as four to seven battalions of the Northern Light Infantry (a paramilitary regiment not part of the regular Pakistani army at that time) covertly and overtly set up bases on 132 vantage points of the Indian-controlled region. According to some reports, these Pakistani forces were backed by Kashmiri guerrillas and Afghan mercenaries. According to General Ved Malik, the bulk of the infiltration occurred in April.

    Pakistani intrusions took place in the heights of the lower Mushkoh Valley, along the Marpo La ridgeline in Dras, in Kaksar near Kargil, in the Batalik sector east of the Indus River, on the heights above of the Chorbat La sector where the LOC turns North and in the Turtuk sector south of the Siachen area.

    India discovers infiltration and mobilises

    Initially, these incursions were not detected for a number of reasons: Indian patrols were not sent into some of the areas infiltrated by the Pakistani forces and heavy artillery fire by Pakistan in some areas provided cover for the infiltrators. But by the second week of May, the ambushing of an Indian patrol team led by Capt Saurabh Kalia, who acted on a tip-off by a local shepherd in the Batalik sector, led to the exposure of the infiltration. Initially, with little knowledge of the nature or extent of the infiltration, the Indian troops in the area assumed that the infiltrators were jihadis and claimed that they would evict them within a few days. Subsequent discovery of infiltration elsewhere along the LOC, and the difference in tactics employed by the infiltrators, caused the Indian army to realise that the plan of attack was on a much bigger scale. The total area seized by the ingress is generally accepted to between 130 and 200 km (50 and 80 sq mi).

    The Government of India responded with Operation Vijay, a mobilisation of 200,000 Indian troops. However, because of the nature of the terrain, division and corps operations could not be mounted; subsequent fighting was conducted mostly at the brigade or battalion level. In effect, two divisions of the Indian Army, numbering 20,000, plus several thousand from the Paramilitary forces of India and the air force were deployed in the conflict zone. The total number of Indian soldiers that were involved in the military operation on the Kargil-Drass sector was thus close to 30,000. The number of infiltrators, including those providing logistical backup, has been put at approximately 5,000 at the height of the conflict. This figure includes troops from Pakistan-administered Kashmir who provided additional artillery support.

    The Indian Air Force launched Operation Safed Sagar in support of the mobilisation of Indian land forces on 26 May. The Indian government cleared limited use of Air Power only on 25 May, for fear of undesirable escalation, with the fiat that IAF fighter jets were not to cross the LOC under any circumstance. This was the first time any air war was fought at such high altitudes globally, with targets at altitudes between 1,800 to 5,500 metres (6,000 to 18,000 ft) above sea level. The rarified air at these altitudes affected ballistic trajectories of air to ground weapons, such as rockets, dumb and laser guided bombs. There was no opposition at all by the Pakistani Air Force, leaving the IAF free to carry out its attacks with impunity. The total air dominance of the IAF gave the aircrew enough time to modify aiming indices and firing techniques, increasing its effectiveness during the high altitude war. Poor weather conditions and range limitations intermittently affected bomb loads and the number of airstrips that could be used, except for the Mirage 2000 fleet, which commenced operations on 30 May.

    Naval action

    The Indian Navy also prepared to blockade the Pakistani ports (primarily the Karachi port) to cut off supply routes under Operation Talwar. The Indian Navy's western and eastern fleets joined in the North Arabian Sea and began aggressive patrols and threatened to cut Pakistan's sea trade. This exploited Pakistan's dependence on sea-based oil and trade flows. Later, then–Prime Minister of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif disclosed that Pakistan was left with just six days of fuel to sustain itself if a full-scale war had broken out.

    India attacks Pakistani positions

    This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

    The terrain of Kashmir is mountainous and at high altitudes; even the best roads, such as National Highway 1 (India) (NH1) from Srinagar to Leh, are only two lanes. The rough terrain and narrow roads slowed down traffic, and the high altitude, which affected the ability of aircraft to carry loads, made control of NH 1 (the actual stretch of the highway which was under Pakistani fire) a priority for India. From their 130+ covertly occupied observation posts, the Pakistani forces had a clear line-of-sight to lay down indirect artillery fire on NH 1, inflicting heavy casualties on the Indians. This was a serious problem for the Indian Army as the highway was the main logistical and supply route. The Pakistani shelling of the arterial road threatened to cut Leh off, though an alternative (and longer) road to Leh existed via Himachal Pradesh, the Leh–Manali Highway.

    Indian soldiers after winning a battle during the Kargil War

    The infiltrators, apart from being equipped with small arms and grenade launchers, were also armed with mortars, artillery and anti-aircraft guns. Many posts were also heavily mined, with India later stating to have recovered more than 8,000 anti-personnel mines according to an ICBL report. Pakistan's reconnaissance was done through unmanned aerial vehicles and AN/TPQ-36 Firefinder radars supplied by the US. The initial Indian attacks were aimed at controlling the hills overlooking NH 1, with high priority being given to the stretches of the highway near the town of Kargil. The majority of posts along the LOC were adjacent to the highway, and therefore the recapture of nearly every infiltrated post increased both the territorial gains and the security of the highway. The protection of this route and the recapture of the forward posts were thus ongoing objectives throughout the war.

    The Indian Army's first priority was to recapture peaks that were in the immediate vicinity of NH 1. This resulted in Indian troops first targeting the Tiger Hill and Tololing complex in Dras, which dominated the Srinagar-Leh route. This was soon followed by the Batalik-Turtok sub-sector which provided access to Siachen Glacier. The recapture of Point 4590 on Tololing by Indian troops on 14 June was significant, notwithstanding the fact that it resulted in the Indian Army suffering the most casualties in a single battle during the conflict. Although most of the posts in the vicinity of the highway were cleared by mid-June, some parts of the highway near Drass witnessed sporadic shelling until the end of the war.

    IAF MiG-21s were used extensively in the Kargil War.

    Once India regained control of the hills overlooking NH 1, the Indian Army turned to driving the invading force back across the LOC. The Battle of Tololing, amongst other assaults, slowly tilted the combat in India's favour. The Pakistani troops at Tololing were aided by Pakistani fighters from Kashmir. Some of the posts put up a stiff resistance, including Tiger Hill (Point 5140) that fell only later in the war. Indian troops found well-entrenched Pakistani soldiers at Tiger Hill, and both sides suffered heavy casualties. After a final assault on the peak in which ten Pakistani soldiers and five Indian soldiers were killed, Tiger Hill finally fell. A few of the assaults occurred atop hitherto unheard of peaks—most of them unnamed with only Point numbers to differentiate them—which witnessed fierce hand to hand combat.

    As the operation was fully underway, about 250 artillery guns were brought in to clear the infiltrators in the posts that were in the line-of-sight. The Bofors FH-77B field howitzer played a vital role, with Indian gunners making maximum use of the terrain. However, its success was limited elsewhere due to the lack of space and depth to deploy it.

    The Indian Air Force was tasked to act jointly with ground troops on 25 May. The code name assigned to their role was Operation Safed Sagar It was in this type of terrain that aerial attacks were used, initially with limited effectiveness. On 27 May 1999, the IAF lost a MiG-27 strike aircraft piloted by Flt. Lt. Nachiketa, which it attributed to an engine failure, and a MiG-21 fighter piloted by Sqn Ldr Ajay Ahuja which was shot down by the Pakistani army, both over Batalik sector.; initially Pakistan said it shot down both jets after they crossed into its territory. According to reports, Ahuja had bailed out of his stricken plane safely but was apparently killed by his captors as his body was returned riddled with bullet wounds. One Indian Mi-8 helicopter was also lost due to Stinger SAMs. French made Mirage 2000H of the IAF were tasked to drop laser-guided bombs to destroy well-entrenched positions of the Pakistani forces and flew its first sortie on 30 May. The effects of the pinpoint non-stop bombing by the Mirage-2000, by day and by night, became evident with almost immediate effect.

    In many vital points, neither artillery nor air power could dislodge the outposts manned by the Pakistani soldiers, who were out of visible range. The Indian Army mounted some direct frontal ground assaults which were slow and took a heavy toll given the steep ascent that had to be made on peaks as high as 5,500 metres (18,000 ft). Since any daylight attack would be suicidal, all the advances had to be made under the cover of darkness, escalating the risk of freezing. Accounting for the wind chill factor, the temperatures were often as low as −15 to −11 °C (5 to 12 °F) near the mountain tops. Based on military tactics, much of the costly frontal assaults by the Indians could have been avoided if the Indian Military had chosen to blockade the supply route of the opposing force, creating a siege. Such a move would have involved the Indian troops crossing the LOC as well as initiating aerial attacks on Pakistani soil, however, a manoeuvre India was not willing to exercise due to the likely expansion of the theatre of war and reduced international support for its cause.

    Two months into the conflict, Indian troops had slowly retaken most of the ridges that were encroached upon by the infiltrators; according to the official count, an estimated 75–80% of the intruded area and nearly all the high ground were back under Indian control.

    Washington Accord and final battles

    Following the outbreak of armed fighting, Pakistan sought American help in de-escalating the conflict. Bruce Riedel, who was then an aide to President Bill Clinton, reported that US intelligence had imaged Pakistani movements of nuclear weapons to forward deployments for fear of the Kargil hostilities escalating into a wider conflict. However, President Clinton refused to intervene until Pakistan had removed all forces from the Indian side of the LOC.

    Following the Washington accord of 4 July 1999, when Sharif agreed to withdraw Pakistani troops, most of the fighting came to a gradual halt, but some Pakistani forces remained in positions on the Indian side of the LoC. In addition, the United Jihad Council (an umbrella for extremist groups) rejected Pakistan's plan for a climb-down, instead deciding to fight on.

    The Indian army launched its final attacks in the last week of July in co-ordination with relentless attacks by the IAF, both by day and night, in their totally successful Operation Safed Sagar; as soon as the Drass subsector had been cleared of Pakistani forces, the fighting ceased on 26 July. The day has since been marked as Kargil Vijay Diwas (Kargil Victory Day) in India. In the wake of its successive military defeats in Kargil, diplomatic isolation in the international arena, its precarious economic situation, and the mounting international pressure, the Pakistani establishment was compelled to negotiate a face saving withdrawal from the residual areas on the Indian side of the LoC, thereby restoring the sanctity of the LoC, as was established in July 1972 as per the Simla Agreement.

    World opinion

    Pakistan was heavily criticised by other countries for instigating the war, as its paramilitary forces and insurgents had crossed the LOC (Line of Control). Pakistan's primary diplomatic response, one of plausible deniability linking the incursion to what it officially termed as "Kashmiri freedom fighters", was in the end not successful. Veteran analysts argued that the battle was fought at heights where only seasoned troops could survive, so poorly equipped "freedom fighters" would neither have the ability nor the wherewithal to seize land and defend it. Moreover, while the army had initially denied the involvement of its troops in the intrusion, two soldiers were awarded the Nishan-E-Haider (Pakistan's highest military honour). Another 90 soldiers were also given gallantry awards, most of them posthumously, confirming Pakistan's role in the episode. India also released taped phone conversations between the Army Chief and a senior Pakistani general where the latter is recorded saying: "the scruff of necks is in our hands", although Pakistan dismissed it as a "total fabrication". Concurrently, Pakistan made several contradicting statements, confirming its role in Kargil, when it defended the incursions saying that the LOC itself was disputed. Pakistan also attempted to internationalise the Kashmir issue, by linking the crisis in Kargil to the larger Kashmir conflict, but such a diplomatic stance found few backers on the world stage.

    As the Indian counter-attacks picked up momentum, Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif flew to meet US President Bill Clinton on 4 July to obtain support from the United States. Clinton rebuked Sharif, however, and asked him to use his contacts to rein in the militants and withdraw Pakistani soldiers from Indian territory. Clinton would later reveal in his autobiography that "Sharif's moves were perplexing" since the Indian Prime Minister had travelled to Lahore to promote bilateral talks aimed at resolving the Kashmir problem and "by crossing the Line of Control, Pakistan had wrecked the talks". On the other hand, he applauded Indian restraint for not crossing the LOC and escalating the conflict into an all-out war.

    G8 nations supported India and condemned the Pakistani violation of the LOC at the Cologne summit. The European Union also opposed Pakistan's violation of the LOC. China, a long-time ally of Pakistan, insisted on a pullout of forces to the pre-conflict positions along the LOC and settling border issues peacefully. Other organisations like the ASEAN Regional Forum too supported India's stand on the inviolability of the LOC.

    Faced with growing international pressure, Sharif managed to pull back the remaining soldiers from Indian territory. The joint statement issued by Clinton and Sharif conveyed the need to respect the LOC and resume bilateral talks as the best forum to resolve all disputes.

    Gallantry awards

    India

    Operation Vijay Medal – Awarded to armed forces of India who were deployed during Operation Vijay

    A number of Indian soldiers earned awards for gallantry. Four Param Vir Chakras and 11 Maha Vir Chakras were awarded.

    Award Rank Name Unit References
    Param Vir Chakra Grenadier Yogendra Singh Yadav 18 Grenadiers
    Param Vir Chakra Lieutenant Manoj Kumar Pandey 1/11 Gorkha Rifles
    Param Vir Chakra Captain Vikram Batra 13 JAK Rifles
    Param Vir Chakra Rifleman Sanjay Kumar 13 JAK Rifles
    Mahavir Chakra Captain Anuj Nayyar 17 Jat
    Mahavir Chakra Major Rajesh Singh Adhikari 18 Grenadiers
    Mahavir Chakra Captain Gurjinder Singh Suri 12 Bihar
    Mahavir Chakra Naik Digendra Kumar 2 Rajputana Rifles
    Mahavir Chakra Lieutenant Balwan Singh 18 Grenadiers
    Mahavir Chakra Naik Imliakum Ao 2 Naga
    Mahavir Chakra Captain Keishing Clifford Nongrum 12 JAK LI
    Mahavir Chakra Captain Neikezhakuo Kenguruse 2 Rajputana Rifles
    Mahavir Chakra Major Padmapani Acharya 2 Rajputana Rifles
    Mahavir Chakra Major Sonam Wangchuk Ladakh Scouts
    Mahavir Chakra Major Vivek Gupta 2 Rajputana Rifles

    The following units were awarded the COAS' unit citations for their exemplary role in the war -

    • Infantry
      • 2 Rajputana Rifles
      • 8 Sikh
      • 17 Jat
      • 18 Grenadiers
      • 1 Bihar
      • 13 Jammu and Kashmir Rifles
      • 18 Garhwal Rifles
      • 12 Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry
      • 2 Naga
      • 1/11 Gorkha Rifles
      • Ladakh Scouts
    • Artillery
      • 108 Medium Regiment
      • 141 Field Regiment
      • 197 Field Regiment
    • Army Aviation Corps
      • 663 (Reconnaissance and Observation) Squadron
      • 666 (Reconnaissance and Observation) Squadron
    • Army Service Corps
      • 874 Animal Transport Battalion

    Pakistan

    Two Pakistani soldiers received the Nishan-e-Haider, Pakistan's highest military gallantry award:

    Impact and influence of media

    The Kargil War was significant for the impact and influence of the mass media on public opinion in both nations. Coming at a time of exploding growth in electronic journalism in India, the Kargil news stories and war footage were often telecast live on TV, and many websites provided in-depth analysis of the war. The conflict became the first "live" war in South Asia and it was given such detailed media coverage that one effect was the drumming up of jingoistic feelings.

    The conflict soon turned into a news propaganda war, in which press briefings given by government officials of each nation produced conflicting claims and counterclaims. The Indian government placed a temporary News Embargo on information from Pakistan, banning the telecast of the state-run Pakistani channel PTV and blocking access to online editions of the Dawn newspaper. The Pakistani media criticised this apparent curbing of freedom of the press in India, while India media claimed it was in the interest of national security. The Indian government ran advertisements in foreign publications including The Times and The Washington Post detailing Pakistan's role in supporting extremists in Kashmir in an attempt to garner political support for its position.

    As the war progressed, media coverage of the conflict was more intense in India than in Pakistan. Many Indian channels showed images from the battle zone in a style reminiscent of CNN's coverage of the Gulf War (one of the shells fired by Pakistan troops even hit a Doordarshan transmission centre in Kargil; coverage continued, however). Reasons for India's increased coverage included the greater number of privately owned electronic media in India compared to Pakistan and relatively greater transparency in the Indian media. At a seminar in Karachi, Pakistani journalists agreed that while the Indian government had taken the press and the people into its confidence, Pakistan had not.

    The print media in India and abroad was largely sympathetic to the Indian cause, with editorials in newspapers based in the west and other neutral countries observing that Pakistan was largely responsible for the conflict. Some analysts believe that Indian media, which was both larger in number and more credible, may have acted as a force multiplier for the Indian military operation in Kargil and served as a morale booster. As the fighting intensified, the Pakistani version of events found little backing on the world stage. This helped India gain valuable diplomatic recognition for its position.

    WMDs and the nuclear factor

    Since Pakistan and India each had weapons of mass destruction, many in the international community were concerned that if the Kargil conflict intensified, it could lead to nuclear war. Both countries had tested their nuclear capability in 1998 (India conducted its first test in 1974 while it was Pakistan's first-ever nuclear test). Many political pundits believed the tests to be an indication of the escalating stakes in the scenario in South Asia. When the Kargil conflict started just a year after the nuclear tests, many nations desired to end it before it intensified.

    International concerns increased when Pakistani foreign secretary Shamshad Ahmad made a statement on 31 May warning that an escalation of the limited conflict could lead Pakistan to use "any weapon" in its arsenal. This was immediately interpreted as a threat of nuclear retaliation by Pakistan in the event of an extended war, and the belief was reinforced when the leader of Pakistan's senate noted, "The purpose of developing weapons becomes meaningless if they are not used when they are needed". Many such ambiguous statements from officials of both countries were viewed as warnings of an impending nuclear crisis where the combatants would consider use of their limited nuclear arsenals in "tactical" nuclear warfare in the belief that it would not have ended in mutual assured destruction, as could have occurred in a nuclear conflict between the United States and the USSR. Some experts believe that following nuclear tests in 1998, the Pakistani military was emboldened by its nuclear deterrent to markedly increase coercion against India.

    The nature of the India-Pakistan conflict took a more sinister turn when the United States received intelligence that Pakistani nuclear warheads were being moved towards the border. Bill Clinton tried to dissuade Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif from nuclear brinkmanship, even threatening Pakistan of dire consequences. According to a White House official, Sharif seemed to be genuinely surprised by this supposed missile movement and responded that India was probably planning the same. In an article published in a defence journal in 2000, Sanjay Badri-Maharaj, a security expert, claimed while quoting another expert that India too had readied at least five nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles.

    Sensing a deteriorating military scenario, diplomatic isolation, and the risks of a larger conventional and nuclear war, Sharif ordered the Pakistani army to vacate the Kargil heights. He later claimed in his official biography that General Pervez Musharraf had moved nuclear warheads without informing him. Recently however, Pervez Musharraf revealed in his memoirs that Pakistan's nuclear delivery system was not operational during the Kargil war; something that would have put Pakistan under serious disadvantage if the conflict went nuclear.

    The threat of WMD included chemical and even biological weapons. Pakistan accused India of using chemical weapons and incendiary weapons such as napalm against the Kashmiri fighters. India, on the other hand, showcased a cache of gas masks as proof that Pakistan may have been prepared to use non-conventional weapons. US official and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons determined that Pakistani allegations of India using banned chemicals in its bombs were unfounded.

    Aftermath

    India

    From the end of the war until February 2000, the Indian stock market rose by more than 30%. The next Indian national budget included major increases in military spending.

    There was a surge in patriotism, with many celebrities expressing their support for the Kargil cause. Indians were angered by media reports of the death of pilot Ajay Ahuja, especially after Indian authorities reported that Ahuja had been murdered and his body mutilated by Pakistani troops. The war had produced higher than expected fatalities for the Indian military, with a sizeable percentage of them including newly commissioned officers. One month after conclusion of the Kargil War, the Atlantique Incident, in which a Pakistan Navy plane was shot down by India, briefly reignited fears of a conflict between the two countries.

    After the war, the Indian government severed ties with Pakistan and increased defence preparedness. India increased its defence budget as it sought to acquire more state of the art equipment. Media reported about military procurement irregularities and criticism of intelligence agencies like Research and Analysis Wing, which failed to predict the intrusions or the identity and number of infiltrators during the war. An internal assessment report by the armed forces, published in an Indian magazine, showed several other failings, including "a sense of complacency" and being "unprepared for a conventional war" on the presumption that nuclearism would sustain peace. It also highlighted the lapses in command and control, the insufficient troop levels and the dearth of large-calibre guns like the Bofors. In 2006, retired Air Chief Marshal, A. Y. Tipnis, alleged that the Indian Army did not fully inform the government about the intrusions, adding that the army chief Ved Prakash Malik, was initially reluctant to use the full strike capability of the Indian Air Force, instead requesting only helicopter gunship support. Soon after the conflict, India also decided to complete the project, previously stalled by Pakistan, to fence the entire LOC.

    The end of the Kargil conflict was followed by the 13th Indian General Elections to the Lok Sabha, which gave a decisive mandate to the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. It was re-elected to power in September–October 1999 with a majority of 303 seats out of 545 in the Lok Sabha. On the diplomatic front, Indo-US relations improved, as the United States appreciated Indian attempts to restrict the conflict to a limited geographic area. Relations with Israel—which had discreetly aided India with ordnance supply and materiel such as unmanned aerial vehicles, laser-guided bombs, and satellite imagery—also were bolstered.

    The end and victory of the Kargil War is celebrated annually in India as Kargil Vijay Diwas.

    Kargil Review Committee

    Prime minister Vajpayee checking the guns captured from Pakistani intruders during Kargil war
    Main article: Kargil Review Committee

    Soon after the war the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government set up an inquiry into its causes and to analyse perceived Indian intelligence failures. The high-powered committee was chaired by eminent strategic affairs analyst K. Subrahmanyam and given powers to interview anyone with current or past associations with Indian security, including former Prime Ministers. The committee's final report (also referred to as the "Subrahmanyam Report") led to a large-scale restructuring of Indian Intelligence. It, however, came in for heavy criticism in the Indian media for its perceived avoidance of assigning specific responsibility for failures over detecting the Kargil intrusions. The committee was also embroiled in controversy for indicting Brigadier Surinder Singh of the Indian Army for his failure to report enemy intrusions in time, and for his subsequent conduct. Many press reports questioned or contradicted this finding and claimed that Singh had in fact issued early warnings that were ignored by senior Indian Army commanders and, ultimately, higher government functionaries.

    In a departure from the norm the final report was published and made publicly available. Some chapters and all annexures, however, were deemed to contain classified information by the government and not released. K. Subrahmanyam later wrote that the annexures contained information on the development of India's nuclear weapons program and the roles played by Prime Ministers Rajiv Gandhi, P. V. Narasimha Rao and V. P. Singh.

    Pakistan

    Nawaz Sharif, Prime minister at that time, after a few months a military coup d'état was initiated that ousted him and his government.

    Shortly after declaring itself a nuclear weapons state, Pakistan had been humiliated diplomatically and militarily. Faced with the possibility of international isolation, the already fragile Pakistan economy was weakened further. The morale of Pakistan forces after the withdrawal declined as many units of the Northern Light Infantry suffered heavy casualties. The government refused to accept the dead bodies of many officers, an issue that provoked outrage and protests in the Northern Areas. Pakistan initially did not acknowledge many of its casualties, but Sharif later said that over 4,000 Pakistani troops were killed in the operation. Responding to this, Pervez Musharraf said, "It hurts me when an ex-premier undermines his own forces", and claimed that Indian casualties were more than that of Pakistan. The legacy of Kargil war still continues to be debated on Pakistan's news channels and television political correspondents, which Musharraf repeatedly appeared to justify.

    Many in Pakistan had expected a victory over the Indian military based on Pakistani official reports on the war, but were dismayed by the turn of events and questioned the eventual retreat. The military leadership is believed to have felt let down by the prime minister's decision to withdraw the remaining fighters. However, some authors, including Musharraf's close friend and former American CENTCOM Commander General Anthony Zinni, and former Prime minister Nawaz Sharif, state that it was General Musharraf who requested that Sharif withdraw Pakistani troops. In 2012, Musharraf's senior officer and retired major-general Abdul Majeed Malik maintained that Kargil was a "total disaster" and bitterly criticised General Musharraf. Pointing out the fact that Pakistan was in no position to fight India in that area; the Nawaz Sharif government initiated the diplomatic process by involving the US President Bill Clinton and got Pakistan out of the difficult scenario. Malik maintained that soldiers were not "Mujaheddin" but active-duty serving officers and soldiers of the Pakistan Army.

    In a national security meeting with Prime minister Nawaz Sharif at the Joint Headquarters, General Musharraf became heavily involved with serious altercations with Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Fasih Bokhari who ultimately called for a court-martial against General Musharraf. With Sharif placing the onus of the Kargil attacks squarely on the army chief Pervez Musharraf, there was an atmosphere of uneasiness between the two. On 12 October 1999, General Musharraf staged a bloodless coup d'état, ousting Nawaz Sharif.

    Benazir Bhutto, an opposition leader in the parliament and former prime minister, called the Kargil War "Pakistan's greatest blunder". Many ex-officials of the military and the Inter-Services Intelligence (Pakistan's principal intelligence agency) also believed that "Kargil was a waste of time" and "could not have resulted in any advantage" on the larger issue of Kashmir. A retired Pakistan Army's Lieutenant-General Ali Kuli Khan, lambasted the war as "a disaster bigger than the East Pakistan tragedy", adding that the plan was "flawed in terms of its conception, tactical planning and execution" that ended in "sacrificing so many soldiers". The Pakistani media criticised the whole plan and the eventual climbdown from the Kargil heights since there were no gains to show for the loss of lives and it only resulted in international condemnation.

    Despite calls by many, no public commission of inquiry was set up in Pakistan to investigate the people responsible for initiating the conflict. The Pakistan Muslim League (PML(N)) published a white paper in 2006, which stated that Nawaz Sharif constituted an inquiry committee that recommended a court martial for General Pervez Musharraf, but Musharraf "stole the report" after toppling the government, to save himself. The report also claims that India knew about the plan 11 months before its launch, enabling a complete victory for India on military, diplomatic and economic fronts. A statement in June 2008 by a former X Corps commander and Director-General of Military Intelligence (M.I.) that time, Lieutenant-General (retired) Jamshed Gulzar Kiani said that: "As Prime minister, Nawaz Sharif "was never briefed by the army" on the Kargil attack, reignited the demand for a probe of the episode by legal and political groups.

    Though the Kargil conflict had brought the Kashmir dispute into international focus, which was one of Pakistan's aims, it had done so in negative circumstances that eroded its credibility, since the infiltration came just after a peace process between the two countries had been concluded. The sanctity of the LOC too received international recognition. President Clinton's move to ask Islamabad to withdraw hundreds of armed militants from Indian-administered Kashmir was viewed by many in Pakistan as indicative of a clear shift in US policy against Pakistan.

    After the war, a few changes were made to the Pakistan armed forces. In recognition of the Northern Light Infantry's performance in the war, which even drew praise from a retired Indian Lt. General, the regiment was incorporated into the regular army. The war showed that despite a tactically sound plan that had the element of surprise, little groundwork had been done to gauge the political ramifications. And like previous unsuccessful infiltrations attempts, such as Operation Gibraltar, which sparked the 1965 war, there was little co-ordination or information sharing among the branches of the Pakistani Armed Forces. One US Intelligence study is reported to have stated that Kargil was yet another example of Pakistan's (lack of) grand strategy, repeating the follies of the previous wars. In 2013, General Musharraf's close collaborator and confidential subordinate Lieutenant General (retired) Shahid Aziz revealed to Pakistan's news televisions and electronic media, that " adventure' was India's intelligence failure and Pakistan's miscalculated move, the Kargil operation was known only to General Parvez Musharraf and four of his close collaborators".

    Casualties

    Memorial of Operation Vijay

    Pakistani army losses have been difficult to determine. Pakistan confirmed that 453 soldiers were killed. The US Department of State had made an early, partial estimate of close to 700 fatalities. According to numbers stated by Nawaz Sharif there were over 4,000 fatalities. His PML (N) party in its "white paper" on the war mentioned that more than 3,000 Mujahideens, officers and soldiers were killed. Another major Pakistani political party, the Pakistan Peoples Party, also says that "thousands" of soldiers and irregulars died. Indian estimates stand at 1,042 Pakistani soldiers killed. Musharraf, in his Hindi version of his memoirs, titled "Agnipath", differs from all the estimates stating that 357 troops were killed with a further 665 wounded. Apart from General Musharraf's figure on the number of Pakistanis wounded, the number of people injured in the Pakistan camp is not yet fully known although they are at least more than 400 according to Pakistan army's website. One Indian pilot was officially captured during the fighting, while there were eight Pakistani soldiers who were captured during the fighting, and were repatriated on 13 August 1999. India gave its official casualty figures as 527 dead and 1,363 wounded.

    Kargil War Memorial, India

    Main article: Dras War Memorial
    The main entrance of Kargil War Memorial by the Indian Army at Dras, India

    The Kargil War memorial, built by the Indian Army, is located in Dras, in the foothills of the Tololing Hill. The memorial, located about 5 km from the city centre across the Tiger Hill, commemorates the martyrs of the Kargil War. A poem "Pushp Kii Abhilasha" (Wish of a Flower) by Makhanlal Chaturvedi, a renowned 20th century neo-romantic Hindi poet, is inscribed on the gateway of the memorial greets visitors. The names of the soldiers who lost their lives in the War are inscribed on the Memorial Wall and can be read by visitors. A museum attached to the Kargil War Memorial, which was established to celebrate the victory of Operation Vijay, houses pictures of Indian soldiers, archives of important war documents and recordings, Pakistani war equipments and gear, and official emblems of the Army from the Kargil war.

    A giant national flag, weighing 15 kg was hoisted at the Kargil war memorial on Kargil Vijay Diwas to commemorate the 13th anniversary of India's victory in the war.

    Popular culture

    • Lord John Marbury is a 1999 episode in the first season of The West Wing which depicts a fictionalised representation of the Kargil conflict.
    • Pentagram's single, 'Price of Bullets', released in 1999 dealt with the Kargil War.
    • Shaheed-E-Kargil (2001), a Hindi movie directed by Dilip Gulati was released in 2001, based on the incident of Kargil conflict.
    • LOC: Kargil (2003), a Hindi movie which depicts many incidents from the war was one of the longest in Indian movie history, running for more than four hours.
    • Lakshya (2004), another Hindi movie portraying a fictionalised account of the conflict. Movie critics have generally appreciated the realistic portrayal of characters. The film also received good reviews in Pakistan because it portrays both sides fairly.
    • Sainika (2002), the Kannada film directed by Mahesh Sukhdhare depicted the life of a soldier with Kargil war as one of the events. Starring C.P.Yogishwar and Sakshi Shivanand.
    • Dhoop (2003), Hindi film directed by Ashwini Chaudhary depicted the life of Anuj Nayyar's parents after his death. Anuj Nayyar was a captain in the Indian army and was awarded Maha Vir Chakra posthumously. Om Puri plays the role of S.K. Nayyar, Anuj's father.
    • Mission Fateh – Real Stories of Kargil Heroes, a TV series telecast on Sahara channel chronicling the Indian Army's missions.
    • Fifty Day War – A theatrical production on the war, directed by Aamir Raza Husain, the title indicating the length of the Kargil conflict. This was claimed to be the biggest production of its kind in Asia, budget of Rs. 15 million, involving real aircraft and explosions in an outdoor setting.
    • Kurukshetra (2008) – A Malayalam film directed by a former Indian Army Major Ravi (Retd) based on his experience of Kargil War.
    • Laag (2000) – A Pakistani film-drama based on the armed intrusions and struggle of Pakistan army soldiers in the conflict.
    • Kargil Kartoons (1999) – With the support of eight leading cartoonists, Shekhar Gurera compiled a collection of cartoons dedicated to the Indian defence forces. He also coordinated Kargil Kartoons (A Collection of Cartoons and a chain of Cartoon Exhibition), the solidarity gesture of drawing on-the-spot cartoons of army men who passing through the New Delhi railway station on their way to Kargil. The cartoons on Kargil War were later exhibited at The Lalit Kala Academy, New Delhi. 25–31 July 1999, followed by the chain exhibition of cartoons at Jaipur, Chandigarh, Patna and Indore.
    • Stumped (2003) – A film expressing the mixed emotions of 1999 Cricket World Cup celebrations and mourning associated with individual's casualty in the Kargil war.
    • Mausam (2011), romantic drama film directed by Pankaj Kapoor, spanned over the period between 1992 and 2002 covering major events.
    • Gunjan Saxena: The Kargil Girl (2020) – An Indian biographical film was based on life of Indian Air Force pilot Gunjan Saxena, the first Indian female air force pilot in combat during Kargil War.
    • Shershaah (2021) – An Indian war film based on life of Indian army captain Vikram Batra, recipient of the Param Vir Chakra.
    • Laal Singh Chaddha (2022) an Indian remake of Forrest Gump.

    The impact of the war in the sporting arena was visible during the India-Pakistan clash in the 1999 Cricket World Cup, which coincided with the Kargil timeline. The game witnessed heightened passions and was one of the most viewed matches in the tournament.

    See also

    References

    1. ^ Chakraborty, A. K. (21 July 2000). "Kargil War Brings into Sharp Focus India's Commitment to Peace" (PDF). Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 July 2022. Retrieved 26 July 2022.
    2. Fernandes, George (28 November 2002). "Soldiers Killed in Kargil War". Parliamentary Questions, Lok Sabha. Parliament of India. Starred Question No 160. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    3. "Complete Roll of Honour of Indian Army's Killed in Action during Op Vijay". Indian Army. Archived from the original on 22 December 2007. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    4. Fernandes, George (8 December 1999). "Soldiers Killed During Indo Pak Wars". Parliamentary Questions, Lok Sabha. Parliament of India. Unstarred Question No 793. Archived from the original on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    5. "Musharraf claims Kargil was a big success militarily for Pakistan". Greater Kashmir. 1 February 2013. Archived from the original on 29 May 2013. Retrieved 6 April 2013.
    6. Khan, M. Ilyas (26 July 2019). "Kargil: The forgotten victims of the world's highest war". BBC News. Archived from the original on 17 February 2021. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
    7. ^ "Kargil probe body had sought Musharraf's court martial". The News International. AFP. 13 January 2013. Archived from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
    8. Tavares, Rodrigo (2006). Understanding Regional Peace and Security. Göteborg University. p. 297. ISBN 978-9187380679. the US State Department quoted the Pakistani military casualties at 700, but according to the then PM Nawaz Sharif (quoted in Gulf News, February 2002), the entire Northern Light Infantry of Pakistan was wiped out during the conflict claiming 2,700 lives.
    9. ^ "Over 4,000 soldiers killed in Kargil: Sharif". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 3 October 2003. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
    10. "Pak quietly names 453 men killed in Kargil war". Rediff News. 18 November 2010. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 6 April 2013.
    11. "Pakistan Army admits to Kargil martyrs". NDTV. Archived from the original on 21 November 2010. Retrieved 19 November 2010.
    12. "Musharraf now has Pak's Kargil toll: 357". Indian Express. 7 October 2006. Archived from the original on 18 December 2012. Retrieved 2 February 2013.
    13. "Tribune Report on Pakistani POWs". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 18 January 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    14. Malik, V. P. (2006). Kargil: From Surprise to Victory. HarperCollins. p. 342. ISBN 9788172236359. According to our intelligence estimates, their Army suffered over 737 casualties, primarily due to our artillery fire.
    15. Pubby, Manu (19 November 2010). "Kargil: Pak suffered most casualties at Batalik". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 27 June 2018. Indian records say a total of 249 bodies of Pakistani soldiers were recovered during the battle but estimates of total enemy casualties is put around 1000–1200.
    16. Kanwal, Gurmeet (2009). "Pakistan's Strategic Blunder at Kargil" (PDF). CLAWS Journal: 72. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 August 2019. Retrieved 27 June 2018. The army recovered 249 dead bodies of Pakistani regular soldiers from the area of operations in Kargil; 244 dead bodies were buried as per military norms with religious rites; five bodies were accepted by Pakistan and taken back
    17. "How artillery changed the tide of the Kargil war". The Economic Times. 25 July 2017. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 27 June 2018.
    18. It is also sometimes referred to as Operation Vijay Kargil so as to distinguish it from Operation Vijay, the 1961 operation by the military of India that led to the capture of Goa, Daman and Diu and Anjidiv Islands.
    19. "Op Safed Sagar: Understanding Air Operations in Kargil". Indian Air Force. Archived from the original on 6 August 2021.
    20. ^ Qadir, Shaukat (April 2002). "An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999" (PDF). RUSI Journal. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    21. ^ Musharraf, Pervez (2006). In the Line of Fire: A Memoir. Free Press. pp. 90–91. ISBN 0-7432-8344-9.
    22. Clancy, Tom; Zinni, Tony; Koltz, Tony (2004). Battle Ready. Grosset & Dunlap. ISBN 0-399-15176-1.
    23. Pubby, Manu (12 June 2009). "Pak commander blows the lid on Islamabad's Kargil plot". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 20 January 2011. Retrieved 13 June 2009.
    24. "Sharif admits he let down Vajpayee on Kargil conflict". The Hindu. Chennai, India. PTI. 10 September 2007. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2017.
    25. Nawaz, Shuja (2007). Crossed Swords: Pakistan, Its Army, and the Wars Within. p. 420.
    26. Hussain, Javed (21 October 2006). "Kargil: what might have happened". Dawn. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    27. Cheema, Pervaiz Iqbal (2003). The Armed Forces of Pakistan. Allen & Unwin. p. 4. ISBN 1-86508-119-1.
    28. "Profile of Kargil District" Archived 18 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Official website of Kargil District
    29. "Climate & Soil conditions". Official website of Kargil District. Archived from the original on 10 April 2009.
    30. ^ "War in Kargil – The CCC's summary on the war" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    31. Chandran, Suba (2004). "Limited War with Pakistan: Will It Secure India's Interests?". ACDIS Occasional Paper. Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security (ACDIS), University of Illinois. Archived from the original on 5 July 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    32. Against the "accepted 3:1 ratio for attacking troops vs defending troops" Archived 22 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine, the ratio over mountain terrain is estimated at 6:1. "Men At War" Archived 6 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine, India Today
    33. Acosta, Marcus P., CPT, U.S. Army, "High Altitude Warfare: The Kargil Conflict & the Future" Archived 28 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine, June 2003. Alternate Link Archived 20 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine
    34. "Kargil-Skardu Road: Only Connect". Greater Kashmir. 24 May 2015. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
    35. "The Coldest War". Outside Magazine. Archived from the original on 2 April 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    36. "Pervez Musharraf admits Pakistan nurtured terrorism". The Free Press Journal. 28 October 2015. Archived from the original on 29 October 2015. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
    37. "Pak backed terror groups like LeT to fan militancy: Musharraf". Business Standard. 28 October 2015. Archived from the original on 29 August 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
    38. "Pakistan Supported, Trained Terror Groups Like LeT to Fan Militancy: Pervez Musharraf". 28 October 2015. Archived from the original on 31 January 2016. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
    39. "Pakistan trained terrorists against India: Pervez Musharraf". India Today. 27 October 2015. Archived from the original on 12 October 2017. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
    40. "Pakistan Supported, Trained Terror Groups: Pervez Musharraf". NDTV. 28 October 2015. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
    41. "Pervez Musharraf's confession on Pakistan terror groups: Truth finally out, say Indian political parties". DNA India. 28 October 2015. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
    42. "Musharraf equates Bal Thackeray with Hafiz Saeed". The Times of India. 28 October 2015. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
    43. ^ "Kargil: where defence met diplomacy" Archived 16 December 2012 at the Wayback Machine, India's then Chief of Army Staff VP Malik, expressing his views on Operation Vijay. Hosted on Daily Times
    44. Vikas Kapur and Vipin Narang, "The Fate of Kashmir" Archived 18 December 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Stanford Journal of International Relations
    45. "Book review of The Indian Army: A Brief History by Maj Gen Ian Cardozo" Archived 8 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Hosted on IPCS
    46. "No mujahideen, our soldiers took part in Kargil: Pak ex-Gen". The Tribune (Online Edition). 28 January 2013. Archived from the original on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 28 June 2014.
    47. Shahid Aziz (6 January 2013). "Putting our children in line of fire". The Nation. Archived from the original on 13 November 2013. Retrieved 28 June 2014.
    48. Robert G. Wirsing (2003). Kashmir in the Shadow of War: regional rivalries in a nuclear age. M.E. Sharpe. p. 38. ISBN 0-7656-1090-6.
    49. Ludra, Kuldip S. (2001). Operation Badr:Mussharef's contribution to Pakistan's thousand years war against India. Institute for Strategic Research and Analysis Chandigarh.
    50. Low Intensity Conflicts in India By Vivek Chadha, United Service Institution of India Published by SAGE, 2005, ISBN 0-7619-3325-5
    51. ^ Hassan Abbas (2004). Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, the Army, and America's War on Terror. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 0-7656-1497-9.
    52. Musharraf advised against Kargil, says Benazir Archived 23 July 2012 at archive.today, 'Musharraf planned Kargil when I was PM' : Bhutto – Previous interview to Hindustan Times, 30 November 2001.
    53. Nawaz, Shuja (2008). Crossed Swords: Pakistan, Its Army, and the Wars Within. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195476972.
    54. Kapur, S. Paul (2007). Dangerous Deterrent. Stanford University Press. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-8047-5550-4.
    55. "Nawaz blames Musharraf for Kargil". The Times of India. 28 May 2006. Archived from the original on 13 January 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    56. "I learnt about Kargil from Vajpayee, says Nawaz". Dawn. 29 May 2006. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 29 May 2006.
    57. "Kargil planned before Vajpayee's visit: Musharraf". The Indian Express. 13 July 2006. Archived from the original on 2 January 2013. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    58. "The Tribune, Chandigarh, India – Opinions". Tribuneindia.com. Archived from the original on 8 March 2012. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    59. V. P. Malik, "Kargil War: Need to learn strategic lessons", India Tribune, 26 July 2011.
    60. "Kargil conflict timeline". BBC News. 13 July 1999. Archived from the original on 29 January 2012. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    61. "Factfile". The Tribune (Chandigarh). 26 July 2011. Archived from the original on 5 December 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
    62. "SA-7 GRAIL". FAS. 21 March 1999. Archived from the original on 3 February 2009. Retrieved 9 February 2009.
    63. ^ Ali, Tariq. "Bitter Chill of Winter". London Review of Books=. Archived from the original on 1 October 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    64. ^ Colonel Ravi Nanda (1999). Kargil: A Wake Up Call. Vedams Books. ISBN 81-7095-074-0. Online summary of the Book Archived 28 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
    65. "How I Started A War". Time. 12 July 1999. Archived from the original on 14 September 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    66. "The Northern Light Infantry in the Kargil Operations". Archived from the original on 28 June 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009. by Ravi Rikhye 1999 August 25, 2002 – ORBAT
    67. "Guns and Glory Episode 7: 1999 Indo-Pak War in Kargil, Part 1". 18 January 2014. Archived from the original on 21 December 2021 – via YouTube.
    68. ^ It is estimated that around 2,000 "Mujahideen" might have been involved as Musharraf stated on 6 July 1999, to Pakistan's The News; online article, Asia Times quoting the General's estimate. An Indian Major General (retd) too puts the "Number of guerrillas at 2,000" Archived 6 January 2006 at the Wayback Machine, apart from the NLI Infantry Regiment.
    69. Malik, V.P. (Summer 2009), "The Kargil War: Some Reflections" (PDF), CLAWS Journal, archived from the original (PDF) on 9 August 2019, retrieved 24 January 2018
    70. "Saurabh Kalia's parents waging a lone battle to highlight war crimes". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 13 July 2009. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    71. ^ Musharraf, Pervez (2006). In the Line of Fire: A Memoir. Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-8344-9.
    72. "War in Kargil" Archived 27 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine "Islamabad Playing with Fire by Praful Bidwai" Archived 7 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine, The Tribune, 7 June 1999
    73. Gen VP Malik. "Lessons from Kargil". Archived from the original on 8 April 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    74. ^ "All you need to know about Kargil War". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019. Retrieved 9 March 2019.
    75. "How The IAF Dominated the Skies During Kargil War". Indian Defence News. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019. Retrieved 9 March 2019.
    76. "The Mirage 2000 in Kargil". Bharat Rakshak. Archived from the original on 7 August 2011. Retrieved 9 March 2019.
    77. Grare, Frédéric. "The Resurgence of Baluch nationalism" (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 April 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    78. "Sea Power". Force India. Archived from the original on 18 August 2013. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
    79. Azam Khan, Cdr (Retd) Muhammad. "Exercise Seaspark – 2001". Defence Journal. Archived from the original on 16 December 2012. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
    80. "Indian Navy celebrates its silent Kargil victory". DNA India. 30 November 2005. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
    81. General Ashok K Mehta (5 August 2005). "The silent sentinel". Rediff. Archived from the original on 10 February 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
    82. General Ashok K Mehta (5 August 1999). "The silent sentinel". Archived from the original on 10 February 2017. Retrieved 19 October 2014.
    83. Riedel, Bruce (2 May 2013). Avoiding Armageddon. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-9350299944. Archived from the original on 12 October 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
    84. Lambeth, Benjamin (2012). Airpower at 18,000': The Indian Air Force in the Kargil War (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. p. 54. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 October 2013. Retrieved 25 October 2013.
    85. Hiranandani, G. M. (2009). Transition to Guardianship: The Indian Navy 1991–2000. New Delhi: Lancer Publishers. ISBN 978-1935501268. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
    86. ^ "Indian general praises Pakistani valour at Kargil". Daily Times. 5 May 2003. Archived from the original on 16 January 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    87. Kashmir in the Shadow of War By Robert Wirsing Published by M.E. Sharpe, 2003 ISBN 0-7656-1090-6 p. 36
    88. "Kargil War reiterated India's supremacy over Pakistan". Archived from the original on 9 March 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    89. "Landmine monitor – India". Icbl.org. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    90. "Indian Army gets hostile weapon locating capability". webindia123.com. Archived from the original on 24 December 2015. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
    91. Adekeye Adebajo and Chandra Lekha Sriram, ed. (2001). Managing Armed Conflicts in the 21st Century. London: Frank Cass Publishers. pp. 192–193. ISBN 0714681369. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
    92. Barua, Pradeep P. (2005). The State at War in South Asia. University of Nebraska Press. p. 261. ISBN 978-0-8032-1344-9. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
    93. "Op Safed Sagar | Indian Air Force | Government of India". indianairforce.nic.in. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019. Retrieved 24 March 2019.
    94. "BBC News | South Asia | India loses two jets". news.bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 17 June 2019. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
    95. "Flyer pushes frontier again – Nachiketa returns to area where his plane was shot down". Telegraph India. Archived from the original on 30 June 2007. Retrieved 18 September 2006.
    96. "India loses two jets". BBC News. 27 May 1999. Archived from the original on 1 January 2008. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    97. "The Kargil Operations. The Mirage-2000 at Kargil. Bharat-rakshak.com". Archived from the original on 7 August 2011.
    98. "20 years after Kargil War: Man who bombed Tiger Hill tells how the War was won from the air". Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 29 July 2019.
    99. "Pakistan 'prepared nuclear strike'". BBC News. 16 May 2002. Archived from the original on 12 January 2009. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    100. "Pakistan and the Kashmir militants". BBC News. 5 July 1999. Archived from the original on 28 February 2003. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    101. "Kargil War – Pakistan: Face-Saving Retreat". india-today.com. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015.
    102. Singh, Amarinder (2001). A Ridge Too Far: War in the Kargil Heights 1999. Motibagh Palace. p. xii. ISBN 9788193107416.
    103. Hassan Abbas (2004). Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror. M.E. Sharpe. p. 173. ISBN 0-7656-1497-9.Revisiting Kargil: Was it a Failure for Pakistan's Military?, IPCS Archived 8 August 2006 at the Wayback Machine
    104. "Lesson learnt?". Dawn. 24 July 2006. Archived from the original on 25 July 2008. Retrieved 2 August 2009.
    105. "Transcripts of conversations between Lt Gen Mohammad Aziz, Chief of General Staff and Musharraf". India Today. Archived from the original on 1 July 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    106. "U.S. brokers Kargil peace but problems remain". Atimes.com. 7 July 1999. Archived from the original on 25 September 2000. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    107. ^ "ASEAN backs India's stand". The Tribune. 24 July 2006. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    108. Bill Clinton (2004). My Life. Random House. p. 865. ISBN 0-375-41457-6.
    109. "BBC News – South Asia – Kashmir: Dialogue call amid fresh fighting". bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 13 February 2021. Retrieved 9 January 2006.
    110. "India encircles rebels on Kashmir mountaintop". CNN. Archived from the original on 14 June 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.CNN
    111. "Text of joint Clinton-Sharif statement". CNN. Archived from the original on 16 May 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    112. "Disarmament Diplomacy: Complete texts of Indian and Pakistani statements following Pakistan's decision to withdraw its troops in Kargil". Archived from the original on 5 December 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    113. "Indian Army Param Vir Chakra Winners". Archived from the original on 15 August 2013.|
    114. "Gallantaryawards To Fighters Of Kargil Conflict" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
    115. "YOGENDER SINGH YADAV | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    116. "Param Vir Chakra (PVC), Awardee: Grenadier Yogendra Singh Yadav, PVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    117. "MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    118. "Param Vir Chakra (PVC), Awardee: Lt Manoj Kumar Pandey, PVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    119. "VIKRAM BATRA | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    120. "Param Vir Chakra (PVC), Awardee: Capt Vikram Batra, PVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    121. "SANJAY KUMAR | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    122. "Param Vir Chakra (PVC), Awardee: Rfn Sanjay Kumar, PVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    123. "ANUJ NAYYAR | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    124. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Capt Anuj Nayyar, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 20 July 2016. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    125. "RAJESH SINGH ADHIKARI | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    126. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Maj Rajesh Singh Adhikari, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 20 June 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    127. "GURJINDER SINGH SURI | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 14 September 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
    128. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Capt Gurjinder Singh Suri, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    129. "DIGENDRA KUMAR | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    130. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Nk Digendra Kumar, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    131. "BALWAN SINGH | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    132. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Maj Balwan Singh, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    133. "IMLIAKUM | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    134. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Nk Imliakumao, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    135. "KEISHING CLIFFORD NONGRUM | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    136. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Lt Keishing Clifford Nongrun, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    137. "NEIKEZHAKUO KENGURUSE | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    138. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Capt Neikezhakuo Kenguruse, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    139. "PADMAPANI ACHARYA | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    140. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Maj Padmapani Acharya, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    141. "SONAM WANGCHUK | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    142. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Lt Col Sonam Wangchuk, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    143. "VIVEK GUPTA | Gallantry Awards". gallantryawards.gov.in. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    144. "Mahavir Chakra (MVC), Awardee: Maj Vivek Gupta, MVC @ TWDI". twdi.in. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
    145. Malik, V. P. (2006). Kargil - From Surprise to Victory. Harper Collins. ISBN 9788172236359.
    146. "Pedongi, the Brave". 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
    147. "Shaheed Foundation Pakistan". Shaheed Foundation. Archived from the original on 12 August 2014. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    148. Perkovich, George (2001). India's Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation (Updated Edition with a New Afterword ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. p. 473. ISBN 978-0520232105. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
    149. Sachdev, A.K. (January 2000). "Media Related Lessons From Kargil". Archived from the original on 24 May 2014. Retrieved 24 May 2014.
    150. "Centre bans PTV". Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009. Indian Express 3 June 1999
    151. "Delhi lifts ban on Dawn website, PTV broadcasts" Archived 2 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Dawn wire service 17 July 1999
    152. Rasheeda Bhagat, "A different view of Kargil", Volume 16 – Issue 19, 11–24 Sep 1999 The Frontline
    153. "Pak TV ban gets good response". Archived from the original on 1 December 2008.
    154. "Rediff on the NeT: Pak media lament lost opportunity". rediff.com. Archived from the original on 6 January 2006. Retrieved 31 January 2006.
    155. Sultan M. Hali, "The role of media in war" Archived 6 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Defence Journal, August 2000.
    156. Quoted in News Desk, "Pakistan May Use Any Weapon", The News, 31 May 1999.
    157. "Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Program" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 November 2008.
    158. George Perkovich, "Options Available to the United States to Counter a Nuclear Iran" Archived 12 January 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Testimony before the United States House Committee on Armed Services, 1 February 2006.
    159. "India had deployed Agni during Kargil – Expert". The Hindu. 19 June 2000. Archived from the original on 8 February 2023. Retrieved 17 August 2020.
    160. "Musharraf moved nuclear weapons in Kargil war". The Nation. Archived from the original on 23 December 2007. Retrieved 27 May 2009.
    161. "NTI: Country Overview", Nuclear Threat Initiative (Archive on the Wayback Machine)
    162. "The Spoils of War". Time. 10 April 2000. Archived from the original on 14 December 2000.
    163. Centre files second affidavit in Kargil scam Archived 6 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine The Financial Express 14 April 2005
    164. "Kargil coffin scam". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    165. War Against Error, Cover story on Outlook, 28 February 2005 (Online edition)
    166. "Army was reluctant to tell govt about Kargil: Tipnis" Archived 12 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine, 7 October 2006, The Times of India.
    167. "Fencing Duel" Archived 27 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine, India Today
    168. Paul R. Dettman, "India Changes Course" (Greenwood Publishing Group: 2001), ISBN 0-275-97308-5, pp. 117–118
    169. News reports from Daily Times (Pakistan) Archived 30 July 2012 at archive.today and BBC Archived 23 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine mentioning the Israeli military support to India during the conflict.
    170. "Kargil : Subrahmanyam Committee's Report". Indian News. Archived from the original on 19 October 2006. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
    171. "Kargil report shows the way". The Indian Express. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
    172. Dixit, J. N. (2 August 2003). Pg 56–60 Dixit, JN, "India-Pakistan in War & Peace", Routledge, 2002. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9780203301104. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    173. "The sacking of a Brigadier". Frontline. Archived from the original on 8 September 2001. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
    174. "Scapegoat for the system". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 1 July 2001. Archived from the original on 4 November 2012. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
    175. "Army's Kargil inquiry indicts Brig Surinder Singh". Rediff. Archived from the original on 5 September 2008. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
    176. "The Kargil Story". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 20 December 2001. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
    177. "P. V. Narasimha Rao and the Bomb". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 29 August 2008. Retrieved 20 October 2009.
    178. Macdonald, Myra (2017). Defeat Is an Orphan: How Pakistan Lost the Great South Asian War. Random House India. ISBN 978-9385990830. Less than a year after declaring itself a nuclear-armed power, Pakistan had been humiliated diplomatically and militarily
    179. ^ Samina Ahmed, "Diplomatic Fiasco: Pakistan's Failure on the Diplomatic Front Nullifies its Gains on the Battlefield" Archived 4 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Belfer Center for International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
    180. Daryl Lindsey and Alicia Montgomery. "Coup d'itat: Pakistan gets a new sheriff". salon.com. Archived from the original on 20 December 2009.
    181. Samina Ahmed, "A Friend for all Seasons" Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, (Belfer Center for International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School)
    182. "Pakistan refuses to take even officers' bodies". Rediff.com. 11 July 1999. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    183. "Sorry for the inconvenience". Archived from the original on 15 June 2010. Retrieved 23 August 2009.
    184. Second-Class Citizens by M. Ilyas Khan, The Herald, July 2000. Online scanned version of the article Archived 21 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
    185. "Musharraf and the truth about Kargil", The Hindu, 25 September 2006
    186. Press Trust of India (5 August 2004). "India suffered more casualties in Kargil than Pakistan, claims Musharraf". Expressindia.com. Archived from the original on 24 May 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
    187. Badmi, Vaseem (30 January 2013). "11th Hour". ARY News TV. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
    188. Bacha, Sana (30 January 2013). "Top Story". Dunya News. Archived from the original on 3 February 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
    189. K. Ratnayake, "Pakistani opposition presses for Sharif's resignation" Archived 27 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 7 August 1999, Can Sharif deliver? Archived 7 April 2003 at the Wayback Machine, Michael Krepon. "The Stability-Instability Paradox in South Asia" Archived 2 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine – Hosted on Henry L. Stimson Centre.
    190. Tom Clancy; Tony Koltz (2004). Battle Ready. Grosset & Dunlap. ISBN 0-399-15176-1.
    191. "Musharraf Vs. Sharif: Who's Lying?". Archived from the original on 11 October 2007.
    192. ^ Tariq Butt (14 November 2012). "Kargil was a total disaster". The News International, 2012. Archived from the original on 1 February 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
    193. Daily Times Report (9 October 2002). "Musharraf planned coup much before Oct 12: Fasih Bokhari". Daily Times. Archived from the original on 15 March 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2012. Navy chief says the general feared court martial for masterminding Kargil
    194. "Kargil Was Success Only For Pervez". Farjinews.blogspot.com. 24 July 2009. Archived from the original on 16 March 2012. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    195. "IPCS | Institute Of Peace & Conflict Studies" (PDF). www.ipcs.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2006.
    196. ^ Kargil was a bigger disaster than 1971 Archived 6 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine – Interview of Lt Gen Ali Kuli Khan Khattak.
    197. Review of Musharraf's memoirs by S. A. Haleem Archived 24 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine Jang, 19 October 2006
    198. "Victory in reverse: the great climbdown" Archived 17 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine, Dawn
    199. Ayaz Amir, "For this submission what gain?" Archived 29 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine, Dawn
    200. "Today's Newspaper – The News International". The News International, Pakistan. Archived from the original on 6 December 2008. Retrieved 9 August 2006.
    201. Ill-conceived planning by Musharraf led to second major military defeat in Kargil: PML-N Archived 22 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine Pak Tribune, 6 August 2006
    202. Call for Musharraf treason trial By M Ilyas Khan Archived 19 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine BBC News 3 June 2008
    203. Lawmakers demand probe into Kargil debacle Archived 2 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine Associated Press of Pakistan 3 June 2008
    204. MNAs seek probe into Kargil debacle By Naveed Butt The Nation
    205. "Analysis: Shift in US Kashmir stance?" Archived 24 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine, BBC 17 June 1999
    206. Irfan Husain, "Kargil: the morning after" Archived 8 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine, 29 April 2000 Dawn
    207. "Editorial: Kargil: A blessing in disguise?" Archived 31 July 2012 at archive.today, Daily Times, 19 July 2004, Pakistan
    208. APP (30 January 2013). "Kargil adventure was India's intelligence failure, Pakistan's miscalculated move: Ex-Pak General". National Turk English. Archived from the original on 31 January 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
    209. "Ex General reveals details about Kargil fiasco". GEO News. 29 January 2013. Archived from the original on 7 February 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
    210. Khalid Kaikani (29 January 2013). "Kargil adventure was four-man show: general". Dawn News. Archived from the original on 29 January 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
    211. Ill-conceived planning by Musharraf led to second major military defeat in Kargil: PML-N Archived 22 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine 6 August 2006, PakTribune
    212. "Indo-Pak summit 2001". Pakistan Peoples Party. 12 October 2007. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 27 May 2009.
    213. "Hindustan Times – Archive News". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007.
    214. "President Musharaffs disclosure on Pakistani Casualties in his book". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 22 May 2008. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    215. Pakistan army publishes list of army regulars who died in various conflicts Archived 24 August 2010 at the Wayback Machine, November 2010
    216. "Tribune Report on Pakistani POWs". Archived from the original on 18 January 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
    217. "पुष्प की अभिलाषा / माखनलाल चतुर्वेदी – कविता कोश". kavitakosh.org (in Hindi). Archived from the original on 8 March 2019. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
    218. 15-kg Tricolour hoisted at Kargil war memorial Jammu and Kashmir Videos-IBNLive. Ibnlive.in.com (25 July 2012). Retrieved on 12 July 2013.
    219. LOC: Kargil main page on Archived 30 November 2017 at the Wayback Machine the website IMDb.
    220. "Lakshya". rottentomatoes.com. 18 June 2004. Archived from the original on 1 October 2007. Retrieved 17 February 2006.
    221. Bollywood's Kargil – Ihsan Aslam Archived 30 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine Daily Times
    222. "Sainika Film Story". KannadaAudio.com. Archived from the original on 10 March 2012. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
    223. "The larger than life director". Financial Express. 19 February 2000. Archived from the original on 14 May 2013.
    224. Kargil Kartoons a collection of cartoons Archived 9 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine
    225. "Humour for warriors up front," Archived 28 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine Indian Express, 14 July 1999.
    226. "Bowled over by the star of 'Stumped'". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014.
    227. "Angad Bedi joins the star cast of Gunjan Saxena's biopic, Kargil Girl". Bollywood Hungama. 25 February 2019. Archived from the original on 2 March 2019. Retrieved 27 April 2019.
    228. "Shershaah: On Birthday, Sidharth Malhotra Shares First Look Posters Of The Vikram Batra Biopic". NDTV. 16 January 2020. Archived from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2020.
    229. Hasan, Uzair (14 February 2015). "India vs. Pakistan: A Match Made in Heaven And Hell". HuffPost. Archived from the original on 12 October 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.

    Footnotes

    • ^ Note (I): Names for the conflict: There have been various names for the conflict. During the actual fighting in Kargil, the Indian Government was careful not to use the term "war", calling it a "war-like situation", even though both nations indicated that they were in a "state of war". Terms like Kargil "conflict", Kargil "incident" or the official military assault, "Operation Vijay", were thus preferred. After the end of the war however, the Indian Government increasingly called it the "Kargil War", even though there had been no official declaration of war. Other less popularly used names included "Third Kashmir War" and Pakistan's codename given to the infiltration: "Operation Badr".

    References

    Further reading

    Indian literature on Kargil war

    Pakistan literature on Kargil theatre

    External links

    This article contains Indic text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks or boxes, misplaced vowels or missing conjuncts instead of Indic text. Listen to this article (32 minutes)
    Spoken Misplaced Pages iconThis audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 10 August 2006 (2006-08-10), and does not reflect subsequent edits.(Audio help · More spoken articles)
    Kashmir conflict
    Wars and conflicts
    Border skirmishes
    Operations
    Negotiations
    Bombings and massacres
    Militant organisations
    Observances
    Related
    India India–Pakistan relations Pakistan
    Diplomatic posts
    Diplomacy
    Conflicts
    Incidents
    Related
    Category:India–Pakistan relations
    Armed conflict involving the Pakistan Armed Forces
    Domestic
    India and Pakistan
    Afghanistan
    Middle East
    Worldwide
    Foreign deployments
    Anti-piracy
    Indian Armed Forces
    Leadership
    Organisation
    Ministry and
    committees/councils
    Commands
    Joint
    Army
    Navy
    Air Force
    Other components
    Personnel
    Operations
    Wars
    External
    conflicts
    Annexations
    Insurgencies
    Equipment
    Army
    Navy
    Air Force
    Documents
    Other topics
    Post–Cold War conflicts in Asia
    South Asia
    India
    Pakistan
    Sri Lanka
    Others
    East Asia
    China
    Korea (North
    and South)
    Taiwan
    Southeast Asia
    Cambodia
    Indonesia
    Myanmar
    Thailand
    East Timor
    Others
    Central Asia
    Afghanistan
    Kazakhstan
    Kyrgyzstan
    Tajikistan
    Uzbekistan
    Western Asia
    Azerbaijan
    Bahrain
    Iran
    Iraq
    Israel
    Lebanon
    Palestine
    Saudi Arabia
    Syria
    Turkey
    Yemen
    Inter-continental
    conflict
    Related topics
    Categories: