Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
In all honesty, I feel that UseTheCommandLine is using bully tactics to prevent these edits (which accurately reflect the content of the articles), from appearing on the page, as they go against his personal opinion. This was a '''preliminary''' attempt to get me blocked."] (]) 01:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
In all honesty, I feel that UseTheCommandLine is using bully tactics to prevent these edits (which accurately reflect the content of the articles), from appearing on the page, as they go against his personal opinion. This was a '''preliminary''' attempt to get me blocked."] (]) 01:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
== Topic ban from fringe science ==
Under the authority of ] as provided in ], and pursuant to the decision at you are indefinitely banned from the topic of ], on all pages of Misplaced Pages. For clarity, this includes all the articles in {{cat|Fringe science}} including ]. If you disagree with this action, see the instructions for appealing at the top of ]. You should use the template {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}}. This ban can be appealed to me as the enforcing admin, to ] or to the Arbitration committee. Thank you, ] (]) 03:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account!
Your IP address, 198.189.184.243, is registered to California State University and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.
If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
old warnings from 2009 to May 2012
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
January 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Voletta Wallace, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Voletta Wallace was changed by 198.189.184.243(u)(t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-29T19:06:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Heavy metal music, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Heavy metal music was changed by 198.189.184.243(u)(t) deleting 26636 characters on 2009-03-16T19:24:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Casual relationship appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Lord of Bats21:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of the Jews in the United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tarantula hawk, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Princess (manhwa), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automatedcomputer program called ClueBot NG.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thoracic vertebrae, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automatedcomputer program called ClueBot NG.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The content that you are edit warring to restore to Weston A. Price Foundation was removed earlier by consensus by experienced editors. You will need to gather consensus on the article talk page to re-introduce such content into the article again. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I notice that you added some content to Orthomolecular medicine that appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint. Unfortunately, the edits appear to give undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and have been reverted or altered. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in any article. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bishonen | talk22:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC).
Ok, not vandalism. That's just a generic message, but your edits do go against established consensus. Looking at the affiliations, "1Department of Complementary and Alternative Medicine," I'm not convinced. Sorry. James12345 18:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
You are only further diminishing the credibility of wikipedia as a source with this policy, and your action will be used as an example of how wikipedia engages in censorship and information control.
The prevailing view on wikipedia seems to be - if the establishment doesn't like something, we're going to marginalize it at all costs, even if reviews in mainstream journals show evidence. Furthermore, we will misrepresent what these journals say, and lie, to serve the interests of reinforcing establishment views.
My comment was "However, there has been a recent emergence of interest in pharmacological ascorbate as cancer treatment as evidence has emerged that intravenous administration is required to achieve an anti-cancer effect, as reflected by three recent reviews in mainstream journals.": http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Orthomolecular_medicine&diff=569761391&oldid=569759324
All the reviews I gave support the position. As I noted in the talk page of the person who reverted my edits, "your edit is misleading, the reviews provide evidence for high doses if intravenous ascorbate - the specific point of this review is that intravenous administration achieves effects that oral administration does not: http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/29/3/809.long
I also noted, regarding the first review, regarding the misconception inferred by only reading a little into the first review that "what the article is refute that by providing a convergence of efficacy for intravenous (as opposed to oral, which the 2 trials used) vitamin C - read the rest of it and the conclusion"
These are not fringe sources, these are recent, and support the idea that there is a rising view among researchers in the scientific community, based on new research, that intravenous ascorbate needs to be reconsidered. You can obfuscate it all you want, but the facts remain the same.
The reviews do not support the statement "Despite a lack of evidence for its efficacy, interest in intravenous high dose vitamin C therapy has not been permanently extinguished, and some research groups to continue to investigate whether it has an effect as a possible cancer treatment." Rather, they provide evidence of efficacy, once calls for a reconsideration of the traditional view, and others compile more evidence. The point of the original source is that intravenous vitamin C is effective where oral is not.
There is an assumption that evidence, as established by reputable sources, and the view of government bodies are one and the same. This is a mistaken assumption, especially in this case, and ignores the fact, among many other facts relevant to this, that increased pharmaceutical advertising in journals is associated with publishing fewer articles about vitamins and publishing more articles with conclusions that vitamins are unsafe: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/8/11
I'm sorry it took an actual block to get you to respond to anything on this page. Now that you're blocked, don't talk to me, if you wish to be unblocked; get an uninvolved admin to review my block. This you can do by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below the block notice, just the way it's described in the block notice above. The magic curly brackets and other code will mean your request appears in Category:Requests for unblock. Click on the link to see the page. Nobody's going to see your argument if you just write it here, as you've done; but if it appears on that page, many admins will. I'd strongly advise you to read the guide to appealing blocks first.
P.S., you say above that you " received talkpage page comment", but that must be some misunderstanding. I haven't written any other talkpage comments than my warnings + block notice here, on this page. Please note that there's a signature after every talkpage posts (except yours, indeed; please use four tildes, ~~~~, to sign your posts). You won't find mine, Bishonen, on Talk:Orthomolecular medicine. Bishonen | talk01:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC).
Articles of interest to you are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBPS
Please carefully read the following notice:
The Arbitration Committee authorises Misplaced Pages administrators to impose sanctions on editors who edit pages relating to pseudoscience and fringe science. Blocks, bans on reverting edits, bans from the entire topic area, or other sanctions may be imposed for disruptive edits to pages relating to pseudoscience and fringe science.
Before you make any more edits to this topic area, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. The arbitration decision affecting your edits can be read here. I will record on the arbitration case decision page that you have been given this notice. You must understand that this notice formally makes you aware that discretionary sanctions have been authorised and may be imposed on you with no further warning. Please do not hesitate to contact me or any other editor if you have any questions.
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
I do not see how I am doing this, as I did not revert another person's edits, attempted to accurately reflect content of articles while demonstrating NPOV, and posted concerns on the talk page. The warning is inappropriate.198.189.184.243 (talk) 01:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
"To UseTheCommandLine - I attempted to accurately reflect the content of the articles, as well as the phase I trials. Please tell me how I violated policy. You appear to be demonstrating lack of NPOV, as you are not accurately reflecting the content of the articles. The reviews are here, my coverage of them is accurate: http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/29/3/809.long, http://advances.nutrition.org/content/2/2/78
I do not see how I am violating policy and edit warring, as I did not do anything close to violating 3RR (I only made 1 edit, I didn't even revert the article after that edit was reverted), attempted to accurately reflect content of articles while demonstrating NPOV, and posted concerns on the talk page. The warning is inappropriate. I brought up this issue on his talk page, and he merely said "please do not comment here", showing how his animosity was driving his edit decisions: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:UseTheCommandLine&diff=574262022&oldid=574261422
In all honesty, I feel that UseTheCommandLine is using bully tactics to prevent these edits (which accurately reflect the content of the articles), from appearing on the page, as they go against his personal opinion. This was a preliminary attempt to get me blocked."198.189.184.243 (talk) 01:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Welcome!Last edited:
Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Please stop. Articles on Misplaced Pages do not give 
Hello. There is currently a discussion at