Revision as of 09:22, 15 August 2014 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,679 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:05, 29 September 2014 edit undoViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,107 edits Warning: Edit warring on Neil deGrasse Tyson. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
== September 2014 == | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 22:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:05, 29 September 2014
Welcome!
|
Apology
My apologies and glad to see the Usercheck outcome. I hope you can see the other side of it that given the continuing problem it is better that any potential question be cleaned away. Best wishes with your editing. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Dont worry about it. Judging by Kaufners abuse of multiple accounts, it was a prudent move. The guilty flee where no man pursues. WeldNeck (talk) 13:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'd also like to apologize. The worst side effect of long-term sockpuppet abuse is that innocent people can get rolled over by it. I'm glad to see the investigation turn out the way it did. Cheers, and happy editing.--Cúchullain /c 18:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Dont worry about it, its like I said it looked to be a prudent move. WeldNeck (talk) 18:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Theme (talk) 13:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. WeldNeck (talk) 14:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
ANI
You've been reported to ANI. Charles J. Hanley 13:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjhanley (talk • contribs)
Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No Gun Ri Massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page F-80 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Newsmax
Greetings. Your input is requested in the discussion at . Thank you.CFredkin (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Reverting Edits over at Deepwater Horizon
Hi. There seems to be some debate over your edits at Deepwater Horizon. Let's not have repeating reversions of edits, per the three revert rule WP:3R. There seem to be some issues on the content that we can discuss on the article's talk page. Geogene (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
"Self published crank"
Your notes in the edit summary are completely invalid. You don't get to decide who is a reliable source based on a personal opinion, and there is no valid reason to remove the notes from the 2012 inspection of the Fort Calhoun facility. This is considered POV and disruptive editing. Please see WP:RS. petrarchan47tc 00:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Budget sequestration in 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Mercer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Neil deGrasse Tyson. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Viriditas (talk) 22:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)