Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:19, 22 February 2008 editHu12 (talk | contribs)91,877 edits →User:Zsero reported by User:Snowfire51 (Result: Deferred to ANI)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:44, 28 December 2024 edit undoAmigao (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users71,681 edits →User:Infinty 0 reported by User:Amigao (Result: ): added WP:OWN to the listTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
{{moveprotected|small=yes}}
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
<noinclude><center>'''Do not continue a dispute on this page. Please keep on topic.<br/>]: Please do not hesitate to move disputes to user talk pages.'''<br/> '''Your report will not be dealt with if you do not follow the instructions for new reports correctly.''' <br/></center>
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRHeader}}
</noinclude>
]
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 66 |counter = 490
|algo = old(72h) |algo = old(2d)
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
|key = b03db258cd90da0d9e168ffa42a33ae9
|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
}}</noinclude>
}}
<!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->


== ] reported by ] (Result: Warned users) ==
=Violations=
:Please place ] {{highlight|at the '''BOTTOM'''}}. If you do not see your report, you can for it.


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Giganotosaurus}} <br />
<!--
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|PaleoFile}}
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS.


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
-->


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: 24h) ==
#
#
#
#


*] violation on
{{Article|Piedmont, California}}. {{3RRV|Akhamenehpour}}: Time reported: 10:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
*Previous version reverted to:
*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:
*6th revert:
{{Article|Piedmont High School (California)}}. {{3RRV|Akhamenehpour}}: Time reported: 10:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


*Previous version reverted to:
*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:


*Diff of 3RR warning:


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)
Not a strict 24h/3rr but long term constant reinsertion of unsourced pov statement and reverting all removals or fact tags with inappropriate 'removing vandalism' edit summary. ] (]) 10:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead
:<s>User warned. I didn't see any previous attempt at engaging this new user in talk or warn him, so I think an immediate block would not be warranted at this point. However, I'd be for blocking immediately if he resumes. ] ] 10:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)</s>
::Strike that. Blocking 24h. My bad for not checking his talk page history. He was indeed warned, removed the warning, and went on edit-warring. ] ] 11:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
<s>'''RESUBMIT''' <s>wasn't blocked properly before and</s> continues to edit war despite all warnings, call for discussion. Has threatened to puppet disrupt these articles. ] (]) 08:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)</s> ] (]) 11:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
== ] reported by 65.96.171.231 (Result: 48 hours; reporter blocked 12 hours) ==


] | ] 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
*] violation on
*Both users have been {{AN3|w}}. ] (]) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Article|Rogers Cadenhead}}. {{3RRV|Bramlet Abercrombie}}: Time reported: 19:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
*:Those users and {{userlinks|Mei23448}} seems continuing edit wars on '']'' and '']'' articles.
*:1.
*:2.
*:3.
*:4.
*:5.
*:6.
*:In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.
*:Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing, while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) ] (]) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*::17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. ] (]) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's ]. ] | ] 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*::Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. ] (]) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{ping|ToBeFree}} The problem persists, ] and ] continue their edit war / vandalism on both pages. --] (]) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
*:Thank you very much for the notification, {{u|Jens Lallensack}}. Both blocked indefinitely, the latter unlikely to be unblocked any time soon. ] (]) 13:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Declined) ==
*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Ambedkar Jayanti}} <br />
<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Callmehelper}}
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
*1st revert:
*2nd revert: #
*3rd revert: #
*4th revert: #
#


Established user, clearly well aware of 3RR given three previous revert blocks (see block log).
Was clearly advised twice in edit summaries that the material re-added in the revert was
removed on BLP grounds. While Bramlet disputed BLP applicability in his 4th revert edit summary (wrongly in my view), that doesn't justify
a 3RR violation, particularly when all I requested was a reliable source. (btw, I'm not a sock. am a former named editor, inactive
for almost a year, scrambled password, and prefer to ip my few one-off edits now.). ] (]) 19:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
:Clear troll who himself violated 3RR. Single-purpose account trying to remove "co-founder" references, and then making up nonsensical BLP claim to remove entire paragraph where the "co-founder" occurs. ] (]) 19:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
*Bramlet Abercrombie has three previous blocks for edit warring, 48 hour block. The IP reporting has violated 3RR as well, but with no block history gets 12 hours. ] (]) 19:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


The recent anon Stifle blocked may already have an account and has been deleting cited text for months.


http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Trulexicon troll/sockpuppet account


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/65.96.171.231 suspected IP sock


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
Take a look at the similarities of both the anon and logged in account.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bramlet_Abercrombie#Three-revert_rule '''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />Frequent edit warring by this user with several editors on an article falling under contentious and general sanctions. Also edit warring on ]. ] (]) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
By the way, the three revert rules does not apply to reverting a troll/sockpuppet account IMHO.


:It's me @].
Regards, ] (]) 01:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
:'''Clarification by my side ; '''
:Firstly I never ever got any Edit Warning before.
:* ''Disputes details'' ;
:# Firstly , I edit ] check history of that page from to
:#''' process of reverting by others and my responses'''
:** then and we had a little discussion on my talk page for this disputes ] then i thought matter would be solved.
:*But other editor revert again by saying no need to improvement and my response of revert and discussion on his talk page ]
:Then instead of healthy discussion this guy response me by saying you have problem with ambedkar article as well so first solve there
:Now I want to clarify that this guy totally misused the healthy discussion and try to show like there is editing warning on me about Ambedkar Main article talk ] but this matter solve 1 month ago by further discussion on ]
:So here in ambedkar page, there is nothing issue about any dispute about that discussion specifically.
:the current discussion on Ambedkar page is going on about my changes that is under ] or not about new fresh topic. check last discussion on talk page ] this discussion is currently going on as there is no response given further by anyone yet.
:so there is nothing like editing warning on me regarding Ambedkar page .
:'''Conclusion'''
:So all my point is whenever I edit, i edit with much responsiblity that this should be based on fact and figures with the valuable citations. I gave explanation of everything what i edit with sources and editing summary.
:Some editor, i don't know what's want? they don't discuss on facts and sources.
:i left a discussion on ] page for further discussion as well but response are so weak in my POV amd also misleading my claim and sources ].
:I think, i clarify my side well enough. for further discussioni am on.
:
:I hope Administrator will look up this discussion/dispute from NPOV.
:Much Regards. ] (]) 09:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
::{{AN3|d}} Discussion has started on the talk page. Let's let it play out. ] (]) 20:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24h) ==
:Ironically enough, I didn't realize I had also crossed 3, so my block was also in order. However, Quack I am neither sock nor troll. Nor have I even been editing "for months" (try 2 days) as you obviously know perfectly well by having look at my contribs. I gave well-reasoned edits and edit summaries grounded in policy with citations to the same. Bramlet simply repeatedly punched rollback without comment or discussion. I'd ask you to assume good faith Quack; it's hardly shocking that two people disagree with you and Bramlet -- indeed many other editors including slimvirgin and jimmy wales himself are on record disagreeing with you -- or perhaps jimbo is also a troll sock of truelexicon? by your logic, you and bramlet must also be sock-buddies since you two share the same opinion and edits? Regards, ] (]) 16:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Angelo Rules}} <br />
== ] reported by ] (Result: 24 hours) ==
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Johnny test person}}


'''Previous version reverted to:''' ]
*] violation on
{{Article|Y-chromosomal Aaron}}. {{3RRV|Chriscohen}}: Time reported: 09:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->
# ]
# ]
# ]
# ]


<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' ]
<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->
*1st revert: (Text added back line by line over ~90 minutes)
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:
*6th revert:
*7th revert: (combined diff of edits made over 5 minutes)
*8th revert:
*9th revert:
*10th revert:
*11th revert:


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' ] and ]
*Diff of 3RR warning:


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' ]
*See also: (Edit summary specifically citing 3RR)
* (polite request to him to avoid ])
*plus long attempts to engage him with him reasonably on the article ]


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
Editor repeatedly restoring unsourced content, making four reverts in just under an hour. - ] (]) 20:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
:{{AN3|b|24 hours}} ] (]) 20:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Indefinitely blocked) ==
The user insists on putting the same misconceived material into the article ], against the protests of several editors, and eventually 3RR warnings.


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Grail Movement}}
I know we have to be gentle with him, because he's a new to Misplaced Pages, and also because English may not be his first language, but this can't go on.


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Folawiki}}
In scientific terms, what he's trying to add is as wrong as saying 2+2 = 6. I have tried to explain why it's wrong in talk, and he puts it back. ] tried to explain why it was wrong, and he put it back. ] tried to take it out for the sourcing not being sufficient, but he put it back. ] asked him to take it to talk and stop edit warring, , but back it comes. ] tried to get in a mediator, and left an edit summary specifically warning about 3RR, but now Chris has reverted that too.


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
In his latest response on the talk page, he seems to finally accept ( - see "(2)") that the CMH is not a ] - one of the fundamental scientific points. And yet the material he puts back in uses the phrase "Cohen Unique-Event Polymorphism" no fewer than ''seven'' times.


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
I don't want to see the page locked down and protected - there are other areas there that needs to be corrected, with cites to more up to date material. And, per ]'s latest edit summary, I guess it shouldn't be me that tries to put the page back to rights any more myself, because I really don't want to be seen as edit warring.
# {{diff2|1265465790|02:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "The claimed reason provided, "whitewashing", provides nothing concrete to justify such action. What is whitewashing? And what precisely in the edit qualified as such? Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265465049|02:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265464033|02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265459461|01:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
But this misconceived material shouldn't be allowed to stand on Misplaced Pages, just because one editor insists on reinserting it.
# {{diff2|1265461000|01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]."
] (]) 09:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
# {{diff2|1265464521|02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* December 2024 */ ] notice"
*Blocked for 24 hours and I admire your patience in not reporting until now. ] (]) 11:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
# {{diff2|1265464576|02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Disruptive editing on ]."
# {{diff2|1265465123|02:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
# {{diff2|1265464764|02:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "{{re|Folawiki}} The whitewashing has to stop. ] (]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)"


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
== ] reported by ] (Result: 1 week) ==


Cult whitewashing. ] (]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
*] violation on
*Indefinitely blocked.--] (]) 02:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Article|Certis CISCO}}. {{3RRV|Huaiwei}}: Time reported: 16:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==
*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Trisha Krishnan}}
<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|TheHappiestEditor}}
<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
*Diff of 3RR warning: – This editor has a as long as your arm – more than a dozen 3rr violations, the last one just a week ago. I’m surprised that he is still editong,and don;t belive a “warning” is need here.
# {{diff2|1265432813|22:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) She works in Malayalam cinema.There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha. The total number of Malayalam films is not two."
# {{diff2|1265165246|13:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* top */She works in Malayalam films too. There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha."


*Diffs from other articles (language POV and edit war)
User edit wars to add information which the consensus judged to be undue weight. ] (]) 16:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
#
#
#


#
:Given that:
:*The page in question is now protected for a couple of days.
:*Talk page discussions have been ongoing throughout.
:*Whilst there was a violation of the 3RR, there were only 5 minutes in it.
:I would be inclined to see a block as unnecessary and essentially punitive. I will, however, leave this report open for any other comments. ] (]) 21:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


# - putting fake sources/infomation
::The editor committed 3RR despite multiple requests from different editors to discuss on the talk page; given his 14-or-so previous offences, I've decided to hand him a 1 week block. Hopefully the point gets sent across... ] ] 01:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
# - putting fake sources/infomation
# - putting fake sources/infomation


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
== ] reported by ]♠] (Result: 1 week) ==
#


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
*] violation on
{{Article|Barack Obama}}. {{3RRV|Morpheus Lyric}}: Time reported: 13:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


* Revert comparison ("compare"): ().


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
''Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC''


POV pushing/cherry-picking "Malayalam" and edit warring in a lot of articles. Apart from the above listed, the user has been pushing "Malayalam" as one of the languages in which "actor XYZ" has acted 'predominantly' in but in actuality the entries are only a few . The editor has received multiple warnings for being disruptiove and a recent one for from {{u|Krimuk2.0}}. - ] (]) 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
# () <small>(edit summary: "formatted entry")</small>
# () <small>(edit summary: "Reverted wiki to previous state. Changes made are neither vandalism nor gag. Image uploaded is a somewhat popular pro-Obama primary graphic.")</small>
# () <small>(edit summary: "/* Cultural and political image */")</small>
# () <small>(edit summary: "/* Cultural and political image */")</small>
# () <small>(edit summary: "/* Cultural and political image */")</small>
# () <small>(edit summary: "/* Cultural and political image */")</small>
# () <small>(edit summary: "]Replaced page with ']
Ban me, but Texas, take note... It is over. I have committed wikisuicide. Viva Obama!'")</small>
# () <small>(edit summary: "Anger at something so trivial? Is this less than death? No? Very well, then. We will treat it as such.")</small>
# () <small>(edit summary: "] revision 192792567 by ] (])")</small>


:{{u|TheHappiestEditor}}, please respond to these allegations. ] (]) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
* Diff of warning:


== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==
User continues to insert image after being reverted by several users and asked to use the talk page...twice replacing the entire article with the image after being warned about 3rr. -—]♠] 13:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Hariprasad Chaurasia}}
{{AN3|ab}} --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 22:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|103.84.130.238}}
== ] reported by ] (Result: 31 hours) ==


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
*] violation on
]. {{3RRV|Cebactokpatop}}: Time reported: 16:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
*Previous version reverted to:
# {{diff|oldid=1262480024|diff=1265542339|label=Consecutive edits made from 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) to 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|1265541681|12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
## {{diff2|1265542339|12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""https://www.hariprasadchaurasia.com" check the site pandit is part of his name , the site is run by him, also there are other similar cases too on wikipedia "
#
#
#
#
#
#
#


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
*1st revert:
*2nd revert: #
*3rd revert: #
*4th revert:


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
Cebactokpatop repeatedly insists on placing POV description on MZizijulas.jpg file. This is part of ongoing dispute over the article on ]. (Previous 3RR violation by Cebactokpatop on that page resulted in page being protected for 10 days.) ] (]) 16:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


Note, I have stepped in on this and I am attempting to mediate. <font color="blue">'' ''']'''<sub>(]|])</sub> ''</font> 16:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
:There was no 3RR violation on ]. <font color="blue">'' ''']'''<sub>(]|])</sub> ''</font> 17:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


Keeps on adding (edit wars) honorifics despite explanation about ] and ] in edit summaries and warnings ] (]) 14:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
::Okay, 3RR warning given . <font color="blue">'' ''']'''<sub>(]|])</sub> ''</font> 17:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
:The IP was initially reported to AIV, since disruptive edits continued after a warning, but was to report it here. - ] (]) 14:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|p}} ] (]) 22:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result:Indefinitely blocked) ==
'''Cebactokpatop has reverted the text again.''' <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Angelo Rules}}
:Fixed by me. <font color="blue">'' ''']'''<sub>(]|])</sub> ''</font> 19:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
::Blocked for 31 hours. · ] <sup>]</sup> 19:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Johnny test person}}
== ] reported by ] (Result: 1 week) ==


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
*] violation on
{{Article|Circumcision}}. {{3RRV|LPRABCMP}}: Time reported: 22:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->
# {{diff2|1265621270|21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265402736|19:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265399005|19:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265395466|18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
# {{diff2|1265394604|18:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->


<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
*1st revert: as ]
*2nd revert: as ]
*3rd revert:
*4th revert: as ]


*Diff of 3RR warning:


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
Note: should there be any doubt that the two users are the same, ] a post made by ].


After being blocked for edit warring at 19:25, 18 February 2008, this user has now started edit warring over a different issue at the same page. ] (]) 22:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC) Back from an edit warring block with an additional personal attack (]) ] (]) 21:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{AN3|b| indef}} Two day old account with 19 edits, a block, and that personal attack? Bye. <b>]</b><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 21:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==
*{{AN3|bb|1 week}} (IP and sock). --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 22:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Automotive industry in China}} <br />
== ] reported by ] (result: page protected) ==
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Infinty 0}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
*] violation on
{{Article|Hezbollah}}. {{3RRV|GHcool}} Time reported: 22:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
#
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->
#
#
#


<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->


*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:


*Diff of 3RR warning: user is not a newbie, he's aware of the policy.


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
Revert-war on how ] should state why Hezbollah launched Katyusha rockets in the 2006 war. - ] (]) 22:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' ]
*{{AN3|pp}} --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 23:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result:No block ) ==


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
{{resolved}}
This user continued to even ''after'' a 3RR warning was on the user's talk page. The user does not seem to want to address substantive issues on talk to reach consensus and instead prefers to engage in NPOV, ], ] behavior and ad hominem attacks. - ] (]) 17:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)


:Ironically, the user @] made a substantial change to the article without explanation or consensus (as can be clearly seen from the article edit history) before any useful discussion took place. He had always emphasized that edits should be made based on discussion, but his actions were exactly the opposite. If someone is instigating an edit war, I think it is clear which side started it first. ] (]) 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
*] violation on
:And ad hominem attacks? This is a very serious accusation, and I do hope you have enough evidence to support it, otherwise it is just malicious prosecution and frame-up. All our communications and opinion exchange is clearly visible on the talk page and edit history. ] (]) 18:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Article|User:Rschen7754/Problems with Misplaced Pages}}. {{3RRV|Rschen7754}}: Time reported: 02:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked one week) ==
*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Hephthalite–Gokturk raids of 614–616}} <br />
<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|وقت الصلاة}}
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->
#
#
#
#


*1st revert: '''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
*Diff of 3RR warning:


Bonus ]/]; . Also very high likelihood of sock/meatpuppetry, I'll file an SPI later just to be sure its not the former. --] (]) 18:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Basically Rschen7754 thinks he can do what he wants because he's an admin (see ]). He wrote up a little essay that's factually inaccurate. ] 02:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|one week}}. ] (]) 18:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
:* Also '''ECP protected''' (I edit-conflicted with Bbb23 here) I was going to block the editor concerned, but instead I have reverted their latest edits and ECPd the article; they can discuss their edits on the talk page rather than edit-warring when they are unblocked. ] 18:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
:*:Big thanks to you both! ] (]) 21:39, 28 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==
: A 3RR on a user's sandbox page? Mmmm... Not applicable, NE2. If and when he moves it to the Misplaced Pages namespace, then yes. ] <small>]</small> 02:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Justice}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Remsense}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: No violation; page protected) ==


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
*] violation on
#
{{Article|Reggaeton}}. {{3RRV|74.228.158.68}}: Time reported: 08:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
#
#
#


*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->


<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->


<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->


*1st revert: 01:10, 21 February 2008 '''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
*2nd revert: 16:56, 20 February 2008
*3rd revert: 16:51, 20 February 2008


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
*Diff of 3RR warning: The user is well aware of the policy (he even complained about me!)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
Guilty as charged. None of my justifications matter, since 3RR doesn't care that IPs can just slip into the night instead of actually engaging in discussion on talk, leaving a highly visible article in a broken state for hours because my hands are tied to fix it. Can't ask anyone else to fix it because that's canvassing. I've been given a lot of wiggle room here over the past couple months, so if this earns me a week then so be it. It's extremely frustrating trying to protect the most important articles on the site, so maybe after this I should just give up. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff">&nbsp;‥&nbsp;</span>]</span> 20:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)


:{{reply to|Remsense}} Your accusation that I left {{tqi|a highly visible article in a broken state for hours}} is a completely baseless ] and should lengthen your block. Any administrator can read the article's diffs and confirm that at no point did I do such a thing. You're the one who deleted well-referenced material. ] (]) 20:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
This anonymous user keeps on deleting referenced information (see discussion page: lyrics from songs are provided which show explicit sexism; links to newsmedia with complaints to women´s right councils; internal links to wikipedia musical definitions are also provided to define the lacks of this music. Seeing his historial, I realize he´s a reggaeton fan which cannot admit the less criticism to his loved music.
--] (]) 08:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
::I'll get straight to the point. Xareau_bs was vandalizing that wiki on a daily basis with critical POV statements. He refuses to include a single reference. I reported him for 3RR last week, and an admin protected the page to prevent further vandalism by him. Take 10 seconds to look at the talk page and the wiki history, his additions are noticeably POV, and he has yet to actually reference anything. He isn't even trying to source anything. I also think he just inadvertantly butchered the 3RR noticeboard coding. ] (]) 08:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


Add to the above the following ] by Remsense on the article's talk page: . ] (]) 20:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
:The three-revert rule prohibits ''more'' than three reverts in a 24-hour period. You have provided only three. No violation made out. ] (]) 09:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


:Additionally, when I Remsense with the appropriate user warning for this personal attack, they {{tqi|get the hell off my page}}. This is a clear violation of ]. Add it to the list. ] (]) 20:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
::This is ridiculous! Don't start a revert war on this page. Wait for an admin to follow-up.&nbsp;- ] <sup>]</sup> 10:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
*I've protected the page due to further edit warring. ] (]) 10:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Semi-protected) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|California State Route 88}}. {{3RRV|75.47.138.61}}: Time reported: 08:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:

*Diff of 3RR warning:

This guy changes IP every day so blocking might have no effect. ] 08:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
:Page semi-protected. ] (]) 09:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: 24 hrs) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|Oink's Pink Palace}}. {{3RRV|Phantomia}}: Time reported: 14:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:

There were also two reverts extending back to 18 February.

*Diff of 3RR warning:

User continues to add in spam links regarding Oink's Pink Palace. Claims that he is an "ex-Moderator of OiNK Member of OiNKv2" and states that " have seen the new site at the new url with the old data so I can confirm it is real." But the primary states otherwise. It's been previously reported to ], seen ]. ] <small>(]) (])</small> 14:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
: {{done}} 24 hrs. ] <small>]</small> 16:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: 24h) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|Carolina-Clemson rivalry}}. {{3RRV|Tigeringtown}}: Time reported: 16:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:

*Diff of 3RR warning:

After being warned of the 3RR the user responded by posting a vandalism template to my talk page, in addition to calling me a liar in violation of ]. Then the user decided to simply ignore the warning and revert the article for the 4th time in 3 hours. This user has no other history of editing and appears to be primarily interested in trying to start an edit war over a topic that has been covered in the article already. I have reason to believe the user is also using sockpuppets for this purpose, as this edit was made by an IP user just before this user started making the same edit, please consider blocking 64.234.75.220 and 209.221.240.193 simultaneous to this user. In fact, semi-protection might be in order for this article until this user gets bored and moves on. ] (]) 16:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

:Both blocked for 24 hours. ]]<sup>]</sup> 21:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: 24 hours) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|Scotland}}. {{3RRV|Malarious}}: Time reported: 21:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:

*Diff of 3RR warning:

Discussion open on talk, user not interested, given warning, paid no attention. Other contribs. of user strongly suggest that ] is irrelevent to them. ] (]) 21:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

:Blocked for twenty-four hours, per the evidence above. -- ''']''' 01:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: No violation) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|Amon Amarth}} and {{Article|Dissection (band)}}. {{3RRV|Twsx}}: Time reported: 23:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->

<small>Note: These are all the Amon Amarth edits, I'm not sure if I got all of them, though. I can also provide the diffs for Dissection, but that would just take me even longer. The later edits are more interesting, if you care.</small>
*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:
*6th revert:
*7th revert:
*8th revert:
*9th revert:
*10th revert:
*11th revert:
*12th revert:
*13th revert:
*14th revert:
*15th revert:
*16th revert:
*17th revert:
*18th revert:
*19th revert:
*20th revert:
*21st revert:
*22nd revert:
*23rd revert:
*24th revert:
*25th revert:
*26th revert:
*27th revert:
*28th revert:
*29th revert:
*30th revert:
*31st revert:
*32nd revert:
*33rd revert:
*34th revert:
*35th revert:
*36th revert:
*37th revert:
*38th revert:
*39th revert:
*40th revert:
*41st revert:
*42nd revert:
*43rd revert:
*44th revert:
*45th revert:
*46th revert:
*47th revert:


*Diff of 3RR warning:

User has been warring on both of those pages long before I took up the issue with him. The user has been warned repeatedly by a handful of users and has made it clear that they don't care. Though, for the past few months, it has been mostly me reverting the user, if you look through both pages' histories you will see that many other users have reverted Twsx as well. I'm sure some of my past indisgressions may be brought up (I have been blocked for edit warring myself a couple times, though I still believe I was in the right on my latest one), but I assure you that I've changed and I ''do'' mean to help wikipedia and this kind of nonsense only makes us all go crazy and not focus on good editing. I also admit that when this edit warring started between me and Twsx it was mostly a comma break vs line break issue, but as I said, I only want the edit warring to stop now. I'm asking for a block to teach the user a lesson and stop edit warring. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

:Interesting that i have never thought of this before. Please note that I could make the very same list with this editors revisions (which usually take place within, say, 12 hours after my edit). More argumentation and referencing concerning the issue can be found at ], (so yes, I had to deal with this before, kinda :-)). As far as my humble judgement goes (partially based on the history of this editors behavoir, as seen on the page linked above) I have to assume that he is placing this report in bad faith. ~&nbsp;<span style="color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;">|&nbsp;<small>]</small>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small>&nbsp;|</span>&nbsp;~ 00:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

:There is no evidence that a violation of the three-revert rule has occurred. Hence, no action here. -- ''']''' 01:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] ] reported by ] (]) 01:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC) (Result: Stale) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|St. John's University (New York City)‎}}. {{3RRV|208.40.192.194}}: Time reported: 01:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->


*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:

*Diff of 3RR warning: not a new user has been blocked in the past for same incident

This is the same user TiconderogaCCB as can be seen by who has been blocked in the past for edit warring and abusive use of sockpuppets ] (]) 01:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


] (]) 01:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
*Report is stale - edit war was a couple of days ago. ] (]) 10:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: page protected ) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|Serbia}}. {{3RRV|Imperium_Europeum}}: Time reported: 02:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:
*6th revert:
*7th revert:

*Diff of 3RR warning:

*{{AN3|pp}} Multiple editors were reverting and general chaos seemed to be ensuing, so it's protected for now. --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 04:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Deferred to ANI) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|User talk:Klpalmer}}. {{3RRV|Zsero}}: Time reported: 09:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

*Previous version reverted to:

*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:

*Diff of 3RR warning: (edit war)
*2nd 3RR Warning (3RR)

] is engaged in an edit war over a warning left by admin ] on the pages of five accounts suspected of leaving spam. There is currently a discussion of this matter at ], however, Zsero feels the spam warnings are not valid and deletes them before any consensus can be gained. On the ] page, he admitted to being fully aware of violating the policy here .

He has also done the same multiple reverts to , , and . I've attempted to talk to him about this on both his talk page and mine, but he remains adamant about removing the warnings because he feels his edit war is justified the spam warnings are ].
] (]) 09:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
*Deferred to ]. There are wider issues here and blocking Zsero would be unhelpful. ] (]) 10:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Here's the full others;
*] ] violation on {{IPvandal|134.68.172.247}}
*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:

*] ] violation on {{IPvandal|134.68.173.135}}
*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:

*] ] violation on {{IPvandal|134.68.172.247}}
*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:
*5th revert:
--] (]) 10:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

== Example ==

<pre>
<!-- COPY FROM BELOW THIS LINE -->
== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

*] violation on
{{Article|ARTICLE NAME}}. {{3RRV|NAME_OF_USER}}: Time reported: ~~~~~

*Previous version reverted to: <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to.-->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert:
*2nd revert:
*3rd revert:
*4th revert:

*Diff of 3RR warning:

A short explanation of the incident. ~~~~

<!-- COPY FROM ABOVE THIS LINE -->
</pre>

== See also ==

* ]
* &ndash; helps simplify diff gathering and reporting. Be sure to remove non-reverts from the report or it may be rejected.

Latest revision as of 23:44, 28 December 2024

Noticeboard for edit warring

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.
    Click here to create a new report
    Noticeboard archives
    Administrators' (archives, search)
    348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357
    358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367
    Incidents (archives, search)
    1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165
    1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175
    Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
    471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480
    481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
    Arbitration enforcement (archives)
    327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336
    337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346
    Other links

    User:PaleoFile reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Warned users)

    Page: Giganotosaurus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: PaleoFile (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Bowler the Carmine | talk 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Callmehelper reported by User:Srijanx22 (Result: Declined)

    Page: Ambedkar Jayanti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Callmehelper (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 02:20, 26 December 2024
    2. 17:41, 24 December 2024
    3. 00:25, 22 December 2024
    4. 17:57, 21 December 2024



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    Frequent edit warring by this user with several editors on an article falling under contentious and general sanctions. Also edit warring on B. R. Ambedkar. Srijanx22 (talk) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

    It's me @Callmehelper.
    Clarification by my side ;
    Firstly I never ever got any Edit Warning before.
    • Disputes details ;
    1. Firstly , I edit Ambedkar Jayanti check history of that page from here to final version
    2. process of reverting by others and my responses
    • But other editor revert again by saying no need to improvement see and my response of revert here and discussion on his talk page here
    Then instead of healthy discussion this guy response me by saying you have problem with ambedkar article as well so first solve there see
    Now I want to clarify that this guy totally misused the healthy discussion and try to show like there is editing warning on me about Ambedkar Main article talk here but this matter solve 1 month ago by further discussion on Talk:B. R. Ambedkar#Request_for_Administrator Review_of_Recent_Edits_on_Dr. B.R._Ambedkar's_Page
    So here in ambedkar page, there is nothing issue about any dispute about that discussion specifically.
    the current discussion on Ambedkar page is going on about my changes that is under WP:UNDUE or not about new fresh topic. check last discussion on talk page ] this discussion is currently going on as there is no response given further by anyone yet.
    so there is nothing like editing warning on me regarding Ambedkar page .
    Conclusion
    So all my point is whenever I edit, i edit with much responsiblity that this should be based on fact and figures with the valuable citations. I gave explanation of everything what i edit with sources and editing summary.
    Some editor, i don't know what's want? they don't discuss on facts and sources.
    i left a discussion on Ambedkar Jayanti page for further discussion as well but response are so weak in my POV amd also misleading my claim and sources look.
    I think, i clarify my side well enough. for further discussioni am on.
    I hope Administrator will look up this discussion/dispute from NPOV.
    Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 09:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
    Declined Discussion has started on the talk page. Let's let it play out. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Johnny test person reported by User:Aoidh (Result: Blocked 24h)

    Page: Angelo Rules (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Johnny test person (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: Special:Diff/1265377722

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:34, December 26, 2024
    2. 18:40, December 26, 2024
    3. 19:05, December 26, 2024
    4. 19:31, December 26, 2024


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1265395592

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User talk:Aoidh#Angelo Rules and Talk:Angelo Rules#Unsourced character biography section

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Special:Diff/1265406607

    Comments:
    Editor repeatedly restoring unsourced content, making four reverts in just under an hour. - Aoidh (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

    Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Folawiki reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

    Page: Grail Movement (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Folawiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 02:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "The claimed reason provided, "whitewashing", provides nothing concrete to justify such action. What is whitewashing? And what precisely in the edit qualified as such? Undid revision 1265465515 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
    2. 02:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265464633 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
    3. 02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265460975 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
    4. 01:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1240888069 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Grail Movement."
    2. 02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "/* December 2024 */ WP:FTN notice"
    3. 02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on Grail Movement."
    4. 02:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Grail Movement."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 02:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "@Folawiki: The whitewashing has to stop. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)"

    Comments:

    Cult whitewashing. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:TheHappiestEditor reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: )

    Page: Trisha Krishnan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: TheHappiestEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 22:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265170057 by Fylindfotberserk (talk) She works in Malayalam cinema.There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha. The total number of Malayalam films is not two."
    2. 13:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "/* top */She works in Malayalam films too. There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha."
    • Diffs from other articles (language POV and edit war)
    1. - putting fake sources/infomation
    2. - putting fake sources/infomation
    3. - putting fake sources/infomation

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    POV pushing/cherry-picking "Malayalam" and edit warring in a lot of articles. Apart from the above listed, the user has been pushing "Malayalam" as one of the languages in which "actor XYZ" has acted 'predominantly' in but in actuality the entries are only a few . The editor has received multiple warnings for being disruptiove and a recent one for edit-warring from Krimuk2.0. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    TheHappiestEditor, please respond to these allegations. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:103.84.130.238 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: Page protected)

    Page: Hariprasad Chaurasia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 103.84.130.238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. Consecutive edits made from 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) to 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
      1. 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1262480024 by Fylindfotberserk (talk)"
      2. 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC) ""https://www.hariprasadchaurasia.com" check the site pandit is part of his name , the site is run by him, also there are other similar cases too on wikipedia "

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Keeps on adding (edit wars) honorifics despite explanation about WP:NCIN and MOS:HON in edit summaries and warnings Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    The IP was initially reported to AIV, since disruptive edits continued after a level 4 warning, but was asked to report it here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Johnny test person reported by User:ToBeFree (Result:Indefinitely blocked)

    Page: Angelo Rules (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Johnny test person (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265440086 by ToBeFree (talk)"
    2. 19:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265401281 by Codename AD (talk)"
    3. 19:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265395978 by Codename AD (talk)"
    4. 18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265395008 by Aoidh (talk)"
    5. 18:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265382744 by Aoidh (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Back from an edit warring block with an additional personal attack (Special:Diff/1265613452) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Infinty 0 reported by User:Amigao (Result: )

    Page: Automotive industry in China (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Infinty 0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: 3RR warning given

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Automotive_industry_in_China#EU_technology_transfer_demand

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    This user continued to revert even after a 3RR warning was provided on the user's talk page. The user does not seem to want to address substantive issues on talk to reach consensus and instead prefers to engage in NPOV, WP:OWNBEHAVIOR, WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior and ad hominem attacks. - Amigao (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

    Ironically, the user @Amigao made a substantial change to the article without explanation or consensus (as can be clearly seen from the article edit history) before any useful discussion took place. He had always emphasized that edits should be made based on discussion, but his actions were exactly the opposite. If someone is instigating an edit war, I think it is clear which side started it first. Infinty 0 (talk) 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
    And ad hominem attacks? This is a very serious accusation, and I do hope you have enough evidence to support it, otherwise it is just malicious prosecution and frame-up. All our communications and opinion exchange is clearly visible on the talk page and edit history. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:وقت الصلاة reported by User:HistoryofIran (Result: Blocked one week)

    Page: Hephthalite–Gokturk raids of 614–616 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: وقت الصلاة (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Comments:

    Bonus WP:NPA/WP:ASPERSIONS; You may hate Turkish people.. If you Look the userpage of "HistoryofIran" you can clearly see she is obsessed with turkish people.. Also very high likelihood of sock/meatpuppetry, I'll file an SPI later just to be sure its not the former. --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Remsense reported by User:2001:569:7FEA:2900:D124:450:C36:AF27 (Result: )

    Page: Justice (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Remsense (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments: Guilty as charged. None of my justifications matter, since 3RR doesn't care that IPs can just slip into the night instead of actually engaging in discussion on talk, leaving a highly visible article in a broken state for hours because my hands are tied to fix it. Can't ask anyone else to fix it because that's canvassing. I've been given a lot of wiggle room here over the past couple months, so if this earns me a week then so be it. It's extremely frustrating trying to protect the most important articles on the site, so maybe after this I should just give up. Remsense ‥ 论 20:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

    @Remsense: Your accusation that I left a highly visible article in a broken state for hours is a completely baseless attack and should lengthen your block. Any administrator can read the article's diffs and confirm that at no point did I do such a thing. You're the one who deleted well-referenced material. 2001:569:7FEA:2900:D124:450:C36:AF27 (talk) 20:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

    Add to the above the following personal attack by Remsense on the article's talk page: . 2001:569:7FEA:2900:D124:450:C36:AF27 (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

    Additionally, when I notified Remsense with the appropriate user warning for this personal attack, they replied with get the hell off my page. This is a clear violation of WP:CIVILITY. Add it to the list. 2001:569:7FEA:2900:D124:450:C36:AF27 (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
    Categories: