Misplaced Pages

2009 Aftonbladet Israel controversy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:19, 26 September 2009 editSposer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,684 edits fixing...← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:18, 29 October 2024 edit undoRchard2scout (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers35,780 editsm Fix lint error 
(648 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Controversy over report of organ harvesting by Israeli troops}}
{{POV|date=September 2009}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}}
The '''Aftonbladet-Israel controversy''' refers to an article in the Swedish ] ] that implied that the ] stole organs from dead Palestinians in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This evolved into a diplomatic controversy involving ''Aftonbladet'', Sweden, Israel, and members of many Jewish communities around the world. According to the ''Aftonbladet'' and the Swedish government the article is a valid manifestation of ]. According to the Israeli government and some Jewish groups, the article's allegations are akin to ancient antisemitic ] and should not have been published, or at least be denounced. Suspicions that organs were taken from Palestinian bodies held by the IDF first emerged during the ], but have never been investigated.<ref name=Cook/> Following the publication of the Aftonbladet article, the ] announced it would establish an inquiry commission to investigate the claims.<ref name=YnetPA>{{cite web|url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3771887,00.html|title=PA to probe 'IDF organ harvesting'|author=Ali Waked|date=September 3, 2009|accessdate=2009-09-07}}</ref>
]'', the largest ] ].]]
On 17 August 2009, the Swedish ] '']'' published an article accusing Israeli troops of ] of Palestinians in their custody. The Israeli government denied the allegations and called them anti-Semitic. The Swedish government refused to condemn the article, and upheld Aftonbladet's freedom of speech, leading to a rift between the Swedish and the Israeli governments.<ref name="latimes"> ''Los Angeles Times'' 24 August 2009</ref><ref name="rift">, CNN 17 August 2009</ref> Palestinian officials and families of the deceased called for an independent investigation. In December 2009, Israeli officials admitted that they had harvested the organs of Palestinians without their families' permission.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Black |first=Ian |date=2009-12-21 |title=Doctor admits Israeli pathologists harvested organs without consent |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/21/israeli-pathologists-harvested-organs |access-date=2024-09-26 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> These Palestinians had been killed by the Israeli military, but Israeli officials emphasized they did not kill Palestinians in order to harvest their organs.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=21 Dec 2009 |title=Israel admits to organ thefts |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2009/12/21/israel-admits-to-organ-thefts |access-date=2024-09-26 |website=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref>


The article that sparked the controversy was written by Swedish freelance<ref name="rift" /> photojournalist ], with the title ''Våra söner plundras på sina organ'' ("Our sons are being plundered for their organs"). It presented allegations that in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, many young men from the ] and ] had been seized by Israeli forces and their bodies returned to their families with organs missing. It was published by Aftonbladet, one of the largest daily newspapers in the ].
== The Aftonbladet article by Donald Boström ==
In August, 2009 the '']'' ran an article by freelance writer ] on its culture pages. The article opened by mentioning the ] related to a suspected money laundering and organ trafficking operation involving rabbis, politicians, and civil servants in New Jersey, USA. Briefly introducing the problem of the illegal ] worldwide, Boström then related things he heard and saw during his stay in the Palestinian territories in 1992 at the time of the First Intifada.<ref name=Bostrom>Original article in Swedish: , (third party translation: )</ref>


The Israeli government and several US representatives<ref name="wexler" /><ref name="cardin" /> condemned the article as baseless and incendiary, noted the history of ] and ] and asked the Swedish government to denounce the article. The government refused, citing ] and the ]. Swedish ambassador to Israel ] condemned the article as "shocking and appalling" and stated that freedom of the press carries responsibility, but the Swedish government distanced itself from her remarks.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091203082122/http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1108932.html |date=3 December 2009 }}, Haaretz 20 August 2009</ref> The Swedish Newspaper Publishers' Association and ] supported Sweden's refusal to condemn it. The former warned of venturing onto a slope with government officials damning occurrences in Swedish media, which may curb warranted debate and restrain freedom of expression by ].<ref>{{Cite news
A photograph accompanying the article depicted a ] with a line of stitches on the torso, identified as that of Bilal Ghanem, 19 years old when he was killed by ] soldiers on May 13, 1992.<ref name=jpost1>{{cite news|url=http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251145107193&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull | title=Palestinian family: We didn't say organs taken|last=Abu Toameh |first=Khaled|date=24 August 2009 Updated 25 August 2009|accessdate=2009-08-29|work=]}}</ref> The Ghanem family was not interviewed for his article, but Boström described his impressions of Ghanem's burial, which he attended:<blockquote>
| author = Tidningsutgivarna
| title = Tafsa inte på tryck- och yttrandefriheten
| access-date = 22 October 2012
| date = 12 August 2010
| url = http://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/pressroom/tidningsutgivarna__tu/pressrelease/view/tu-tidningsutgivarna-tafsa-inte-paa-tryck-och-yttrandefriheten-312311
| archive-url = https://archive.today/20130129084057/http://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/pressroom/tidningsutgivarna__tu/pressrelease/view/tu-tidningsutgivarna-tafsa-inte-paa-tryck-och-yttrandefriheten-312311
| archive-date = 29 January 2013
| url-status = dead
}}</ref> ] made a stillborn attempt to defuse the diplomatic situation by a European resolution condemning antisemitism.<ref name="primor" /> A survey among the cultural editors of the other major ] found that all would have refused the article.<ref>, '']'', 26 August 2009</ref> The ] announced that it would establish a commission to investigate the article's claims.<ref name="YnetPA">{{cite news |author=Ali Waked |date=3 September 2009 |title=PA to probe 'IDF organ harvesting' |url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3771887,00.html |access-date=7 September 2009 |newspaper=Ynetnews}}</ref><ref name="Amayreh" />


In December 2009, a 2000 interview with the chief pathologist at the L. Greenberg National Institute of Forensic Medicine ] was released in which he had admitted taking organs from the corpses of Israelis, Palestinians and foreign workers without their families' permission. Israeli health officials confirmed Hiss's confession but stated that such incidents had ended in the 1990s and noted that Hiss had been removed from his post.<ref name="google.com"> Google News 20 December 2009.</ref><ref name="ghiss">{{cite news| url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/21/israeli-pathologists-harvested-organs | work=The Guardian | location=London | title=Doctor admits Israeli pathologists harvested organs without consent | first=Ian | last=Black | date=21 December 2009 | access-date=23 April 2010| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100412202630/http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/21/israeli-pathologists-harvested-organs| archive-date= 12 April 2010 | url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article6323046.ab|title=Israel tog organ – utan tillstånd|access-date=10 October 2018}}</ref> The Palestinian press said the report "appeared to confirm Palestinians' allegations that Israel returned their relatives' bodies with their chests sewn up, having harvested their organs".<ref name="maannews.net">{{cite web|url=http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?ID=248510|title=Israel|website=Maan News Agency|access-date=10 October 2018}}</ref> Several news agencies reported that the ''Aftonbladet'' article had claimed that Israel killed Palestinians to harvest their organs,<ref>* , AP (reprinted in The Daily Telegraph 21 December 2009)
Together with the sharp noises from the shovels we could hear laughter from the soldiers who, as they waited to go home, exchanged some jokes. As Bilal was put in the grave his chest was uncovered. Suddenly it became clear to the few people present just what kind of abuse the boy had been exposed to. Bilal was not by far the first young Palestinian to be buried with a slit from his abdomen up to his chin.<ref name=Bostrom/>
* , AP (reprinted in Boston Globe 21 December 2009)
</blockquote> The next paragraph of the article quotes other Palestinian families, and reads as follows:<blockquote>
* , UPI 18 August 2009
The families in the West Bank and in Gaza felt that they knew exactly what had happened: “Our sons are used as involuntary organ donors,” relatives of Khaled from Nablus told me, as did the mother of Raed from Jenin and the uncles of Machmod and Nafes from Gaza, who had all disappeared for a number of days only to return at night, dead and autopsied.<br>
* , BBC News 21 August 2009
“Why are they keeping the bodies for up to five days before they let us bury them? What happened to the bodies during that time? Why are they performing autopsy, against our will, when the cause of death is obvious? Why are the bodies returned at night? Why is it done with a military escort? Why is the area closed off during the funeral? Why is the electricity interrupted?” Nafe’s uncle was upset and he had a lot of questions.<ref name=Bostrom/></blockquote>
* , CNN 23 August 2009
*
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110417175022/http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/cs.php?m15=99|date=17 April 2011}} database search 18 February 2010
* , Irish Times 7 September 2009
* Berthelsen, Morten; Ravid, David; et al ''Haaretz'' 18 August 2009
* Editorial: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120224112730/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1249418678304|date=24 February 2012}} ''The Jerusalem Post'', 23 August 2009</ref> although the author, the culture editor for ''Aftonbladet'', and Nancy Scheper-Hughes denied that it had made that claim.<ref>Navier, Hanna {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090826143552/http://www.second-opinion.se/so/view/645 |date=26 August 2009}} ("Donald Boström: Israel has not understood the article") ''Second Opinion'', 19 August 2009 (''in Swedish'')</ref>


==Article ==
Boström also writes that unnamed UN staff members told him that "organ theft definitely occurred", but that they were "prevented from doing anything about it."<ref name=Bostrom/><ref> </ref> He also reports the response of the IDF spokesperson as being that the allegations of organ theft were lies, and that all Palestinian victims are subjected to autopsy on a routine basis. Boström notes that according to Palestinian statistics for 1992, Bilal Ghanem was one of 133 Palestinians killed, and one of 69 who went through postmortem examination. He concludes his article with by expressing his opinion that the questions surrounding what is happening remain unanswered and should be investigated.<ref name=Bostrom/>
In August 2009, ''Aftonbladet'' ran an article by freelance writer Donald Boström in its culture section. The article opened by mentioning ] related to a suspected money-laundering and organ-trafficking operation involving rabbis, politicians and civil servants in ] and ]. Briefly introducing the problem of the illegal ] worldwide, Boström then related that he heard and saw things during his stay in the ] in 1992, during the ].<ref name="Bostrom">Original article in Swedish: , (third party translation: )</ref>

A photograph accompanying the article depicted a ] with a line of stitches on the torso, identified as that of Bilal Ghanem, who was 19 when he was killed by ] soldiers on 13 May 1992.<ref name="jpost1">{{cite news|url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251145107193&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull |title=Palestinian family: We didn't say organs taken |last=Abu Toameh |first=Khaled |date=25 August 2009 |access-date=29 August 2009 |work=] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110917025327/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251145107193&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull |archive-date=17 September 2011 }}</ref> The Ghanem family was not interviewed for his article, but Boström described his impressions of Ghanem's burial, which he attended:<blockquote>

Together with the sharp noises from the shovels we could hear occasional laughter from the soldiers who, as they waited to go home, exchanged some jokes. As Bilal was put in the grave his chest was uncovered and suddenly it became clear to the few people present just what kind of abuse he had been exposed to. Bilal was not by far the first to be buried with a slit from his abdomen up to his chin and speculations on the intent started.<ref name=Bostrom/>
</blockquote> The next paragraph of the article quoted other Palestinian families and reads as follows:<blockquote>
'''The affected Palestinian''' families in the West Bank and Gaza were sure of what happened to their sons. Our sons are used as involuntary organ donors, relatives of Khaled from Nablus told me, as did the mother of '''Raed''' from Jenin and the uncles of '''Machmod''' and '''Nafes''' from Gaza, who had all disappeared for a number of days only to return at night, dead and autopsied.<br />
– Why would they otherwise keep the bodies for up to five days before they let us bury them? What happened to the bodies during that time? Why are they performing an autopsy when the cause of death is obvious, and in all cases against our will? Why are the bodies returned at night? And why with a military escort? And why is the area closed off during the funeral? And why is the electricity cut off? There were lots of upset questions from Nafes uncle.<ref name=Bostrom/></blockquote>

Boström also wrote that unnamed UN staff members had told him that "organ theft definitely occurred" but that they had been "prevented from doing anything about it".<ref name=Bostrom/> He also reported the response of the IDF spokesperson as being that the allegations of organ theft were lies and that all Palestinian victims are routinely subjected to autopsy. Boström noted that according to Palestinian statistics for 1992, Bilal Ghanem had been one of 133 Palestinians killed and one of 69 going through postmortem examination. Boström concluded the article with his opinion: questions on what was happening remained unanswered and should be investigated.<ref name=Bostrom/>

Meanwhile, family members of Bilal Ghanem, the Palestinian at the centre of the article's allegations, stated that they had never told Boström that Ghanem's organs had been removed. However, even though they never spoke to Boström and lacked any proof to confirm the allegations, they thought that Bilal had been deprived of some organs.<ref name=jpost1/><ref name="al-jaz-gha"> ] 28 August 2009</ref> In a follow-up editorial, ''Aftonbladet'' editor ] wrote that he approved the article for publication "because it raises a few questions" but acknowledged that the paper then had no evidence for its claims.<ref>, Ynet News 24 August 2009</ref> In August 2009, Boström said that he did not know whether the claims were true but that he wanted them investigated;<ref name="clue">, Associated Press 19 August 2009 (reprinted in FOX News)</ref> he made similar remarks at a November conference in Israel.<ref>, Haaretz 12-1—2009</ref> ''Aftonbladet'' published an update noting the recent conviction of ], Chief Pathologist at Israel's ], and two of his colleagues for improperly taking body tissue from a dead Israeli soldier in 2001. The paper acknowledged that the event did not prove the truth of the original allegations.<ref name="Cook">. Jonathan Cook, Al-Ahram Weekly. Issue No. 963, 3–9 September 2009. Archived on 15 January 2010</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1125595.html|title=Swedish reporter repeats IDF organ theft allegations, this time in Israel|access-date=10 October 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aftonbladet.se/kultur/article6047398.ab|title=KULTUR: Nu faller domarna i den israeliska organhärvan|access-date=10 October 2018}}</ref>


== Israeli reactions == == Israeli reactions ==
===Government=== ===Government===
The claim in the article sparked an angry reaction by Israeli Foreign Ministry official Yigal Palmor who associated the article with the medieval ].<ref name=reuters1>{{cite news|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/featuredCrisis/idUSLJ189142|title=Israel slams Swedish tabloid's organ theft story|last=Macdonald|first=Alastair |date=19 August 2009|accessdate=2009-08-19|work=]}}</ref> On August 23, the ], ], called for the Swedish government to condemn the article. An Israeli official quoted him as saying: "We're not asking the Swedish government for an apology, we're asking for their condemnation." The ], ], said that a continued Swedish refusal to condemn the article, might lead Israel to cancel a visit, scheduled for September, by the ], ]. Steinitz told the ] that "Whoever doesn't distance himself from this kind of blood libel might not be a welcome guest in Israel at this time. Until the Swedish government understands differently, the state of Israel, the state of the Jews, cannot ignore anti-Semitic expressions and modern recycling of medieval anti-Semitism". The ], which accredits foreign journalists visiting the country, said it was delaying its approval for an Aftonbladet correspondent and photographer who are seeking permission to enter the ] by the maximum ninety days allowed by regulations.<ref name=nytimes>{{Cite news The claim in the article sparked an angry reaction by Israeli Foreign Ministry official Yigal Palmor, who associated the article with mediaeval and 19th-century ].<ref name="reuters1">{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/featuredCrisis/idUSLJ189142|title=Israel slams Swedish tabloid's organ theft story|last=Macdonald|first=Alastair |date=19 August 2009|access-date=19 August 2009|work=]}}</ref> On 23 August, the ], ], called for the Swedish government to condemn the article. An Israeli official quoted him as saying, "We're not asking the Swedish government for an apology, we're asking for their condemnation". The ], ], said that a continued Swedish refusal to condemn the article might lead Israel to cancel a visit, scheduled for September, by the ], ]. Steinitz told the ], "Whoever doesn't distance himself from this kind of blood libel might not be a welcome guest in Israel at this time. Until the Swedish government understands differently, the state of Israel, the state of the Jews, cannot ignore antisemitic expressions and modern recycling of medieval antisemitism". The ], which accredits foreign journalists visiting the country, said that it was delaying its approval for an ''Aftonbladet'' correspondent and photographer who are seeking permission to enter the ] by the maximum of 90 days allowed by regulations.<ref name="nytimes">{{Cite news
| issn = 0362-4331 | issn = 0362-4331
| last = The Associated Press | last = The Associated Press
| title = Netanyahu Wants Sweden to Condemn Organ Story | title = Netanyahu Wants Sweden to Condemn Organ Story
| work = The New York Times | work = The New York Times
| access-date = 31 August 2009
| accessdate = 2009-08-31
| date = 2009-08-23 | date = 23 August 2009
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/08/23/world/AP-ML-Israel-Sweden.html | url = https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/08/23/world/AP-ML-Israel-Sweden.html
}}</ref> }}</ref>


Netanyahu said that history was replete with ] that have led to the murder and that "These matters cannot be taken lightly. We are not asking from the Swedes anything that we did not ask of ourselves".He reminded his ministers that in February, 2009 after a satirical skit on the ] which poked fun at the ] belief that ] walked on water and Mary was a virgin had angered the ], then-Prime Minister ] expressed regret and sorrow for it. Netanyahu commented: "I don't recall that Olmert's condemnation damaged press freedom in Israel". The ], ] told Army Radio: "What angers us is that the Swedish government didn't condemn it but hastened to reprimand the ambassador who did find it right to condemn this blood libel, which recalls the ]." He also compared the article to "]," an anti-Semitic tract purporting to show a global Jewish conspiracy which was widely cited by Hitler and others.<ref></ref> He accused Sweden of hypocrisy and the affair has "an odor of anti-Semitism." <ref> </ref> and noted the Swedish condemnation of the ] affair in 2005, as well as Sweden's shutting down of an Internet site in the country that posted the caricatures and the Swedish foreign minister letter of apology to the president of ] for it. He criticized Sweden for its silence earlier in 2009, when the city of ] decided not to allow spectators to a ] match between Sweden and Israel.<ref name=keinon>{{Cite news Netanyahu said that history was replete with blood libel against Jews that have led to murder: "These matters cannot be taken lightly. We are not asking from the Swedes anything that we did not ask of ourselves". He reminded his ministers that in February 2009, after a satirical skit on the ] that had poked fun at the Christian belief that ] and ] had angered the ], Prime Minister ] had expressed regret and sorrow. Netanyahu commented: "I don't recall that Olmert's condemnation damaged press freedom in Israel".
The ], ], told ], "What angers us is that the Swedish government didn't condemn it but hastened to reprimand the ambassador who did find it right to condemn" the story, which he compared to historic anti-Semitic tracts.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE57M1DA20090823 | work=] | title=Israel curbs Swedish media over 'blood libel' | date=23 August 2009| access-date= 15 February 2010 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090827010519/https://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE57M1DA20090823| archive-date=27 August 2009| url-status= live}}</ref> He accused Sweden of hypocrisy and called the affair "an odor of anti-Semitism".<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-israel-sweden24-2009aug24,0,6566414.story | work=] | title=Article about organ harvesting sparks Israel-Sweden tiff | first=Richard | last=Boudreaux | date=24 August 2009| access-date= 15 February 2010 }}</ref> Lieberman noted the Swedish condemnation of the ] affair in 2005 as well as Sweden's shutdown of an Internet site in the country that had posted the caricatures and the Swedish foreign minister's letter of apology to the president of ] for doing so. He had criticized Sweden for its silence earlier that year when the ] decided not to allow spectators to a ] match between Sweden and Israel.<ref name="keinon">{{Cite news
| last = Keinon |last=Keinon
| first = Herb |first=Herb
|author-link=Herb Keinon
| title = Ministers fume over Swedish story
|title=Ministers fume over Swedish story
| work = The Jerusalem Post
|work=]
| accessdate = 2009-08-31
| date = 2009-08-23 |access-date=31 August 2009
|date=23 August 2009
| url = http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1249418678153
|url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1249418678153
|url-status=dead
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110917015144/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1249418678153
|archive-date=17 September 2011
}}</ref> }}</ref>


The ], ], said that he would act to prevent Aftonbladet reporters from receiving work permits in Israel, and the ], ] said that Israel should take legal steps against the paper. When asked why Israel did not investigate the article's claims, Israel's envoy to Sweden, Benny Dagan, said: "Why don't we investigate why the ] and the Jews were behind the bombing of the twin towers? Why won't we investigate why Jews are spreading ] in the Arab countries? Why won't we investigate why Jews killed Christian children and took their blood and organs to bake ] on ]?".<ref name=keinon/> The ], ], said that he would act to prevent the paper's reporters from receiving work permits in Israel. The ], ], said that Israel should take legal steps against the paper. When asked why Israel did not investigate the article's claims, Israel's envoy to Sweden, ], said: "Why don't we investigate why the ] and the Jews were behind the ]? Why won't we investigate why Jews are spreading ] in the Arab countries? Why won't we investigate why Jews killed Christian children and took their blood and organs to bake ] on ]?"<ref name=keinon/>

=== Admission ===
On 23 December 2009, after Israeli government officials admitted that organ harvesting had taken place in the 1990s, parliamentary hearings into the issue began in Israel's ]. Health officials testified that Israeli authorities had harvested organs from the dead bodies of Israelis and Palestinians in the 1990s for transplant purposes and said that the practice had since been ended. ], an ], and a ], testified that he had evidence indicating that organ theft continued, citing the case of Fadul Ordul Shaheen, a Palestinian from Gaza who died of diabetes in 2009. Tibi related that after Shaheen's body was returned to his family with bleeding from the eyes and a deep cut through the body, the family said that both the corneas and kidneys were taken from his corpse. Tibi asked for the complaint to be investigated and also for a government probe on whether organs were being harvested from ]. Yaacov Litzman, the deputy health minister, responded that he would investigate the case "with all seriousness".<ref name="Jazeera1">{{cite web|url=http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/12/2009122315425789179.html|title=Israel opens organ theft hearing|publisher=]|date=23 December 2009|access-date=26 December 2009| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20091226153053/http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/12/2009122315425789179.html| archive-date= 26 December 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref>


===Media=== ===Media===
], writing in ], criticized Boström for not engaging in documentation, investigation and the presentation of proof. He noted that, "There were cases in which the organs of Palestinians who had been killed were harvested without permission, something the ] has done to others in Israel, for research purposes. But it's a long way from that to suspicion of trafficking in organs based only on the fact that in 1992 a dead Palestinian was found whose organs had been removed and his body sewn back up. And 17 years later a few Jews were arrested on suspicion of trafficking in human organs. That's not professional journalism, that's cheap and harmful journalism."<ref name=Levy>{{cite web|url=http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1110401.html|date=August 27, 2009|accessdate=2009-08-30|title=Swedish article on organ harvesting was cheap and harmful journalism|author=Gideon Levy|publisher=]}}</ref> ], in '']'', criticized the article and the Israeli response and that the article damaged "the fight against the occupation". Levy criticized Boström for not engaging in documentation, investigation and the presentation of proof. He noted, "There were cases in which the organs of Palestinians who had been killed were harvested without permission, something the Institute of Forensic Medicine]] has done to others in Israel, for research purposes. But it's a long way from that to suspicion of trafficking in organs based only on the fact that in 1992 a dead Palestinian was found whose organs had been removed and his body sewn back up. And 17 years later a few Jews were arrested on suspicion of trafficking in human organs. That's not professional journalism, that's cheap and harmful journalism". However, he called Lieberman's response "ludicrous" and stated that it had diplomatically damaged Israel.<ref name="Levy">{{cite web |author=Levy |first=Gideon |date=27 August 2009 |title=Swedish article on organ harvesting was cheap and harmful journalism |url=https://www.haaretz.com/2009-08-27/ty-article/swedish-article-on-organ-harvesting-was-cheap-and-harmful-journalism/0000017f-dbcd-df62-a9ff-dfdf0d630000 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221126163455/https://www.haaretz.com/2009-08-27/ty-article/swedish-article-on-organ-harvesting-was-cheap-and-harmful-journalism/0000017f-dbcd-df62-a9ff-dfdf0d630000 |archive-date=26 November 2022 |access-date=26 November 2022 |website=] |publisher=}}</ref>


The editorial line of ''Ha'aretz'' was much harsher: "Donald Bostrom, a veteran Swedish journalist, wrote a despicable, utterly baseless article".<ref name="haaretzeditorial"> Ha'aretz 23 August 2009.</ref> It stated, however, that Lieberman' reaction was "no less outrageous or inciting" than Bostrom's article: "Lieberman's impassioned and demagogic reaction has damaged Israel. It cheapened the ], blew the article out of proportion and caused an international uproar, pushing ] – which currently holds the presidency of the ] – into an unnecessary confrontation with ]".<ref name="haaretzeditorial" />
] published an article “ Swedish Foreign Ministry Financed “study” of Stealing the Organs} in which it said :
“Most of the story presented in Aftonbladet has been written in Boström's 2001 book “Inshallah” which was financed by Swedish Foreign Ministry, Swedish trade unions and several Palestinian organizations<ref>
Swedish Foreign Ministry Financed “study” of Stealing the Organs| Maariv</ref><ref name=Maariv1>{{cite web|url=http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1249418673856&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull|date=August 23, 2009|title='Swedish officials may be unwelcome'|publisher=]|author=Jpost.com Staff|accessdate=2009-08-30}}</ref>


'']'' published an article reporting that much of Boström's story had come from his book ''Inshallah'' (2001), which it stated to have been partly financed by the Swedish Foreign Ministry.<ref> (Swedish Foreign Ministry Financed "study" of Stealing the Organs) ''Maariv'' (in Hebrew)</ref><ref name="Maariv1">{{cite web|url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1249418673856&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130706010752/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1249418673856&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull |url-status=dead |archive-date=6 July 2013 |date=23 August 2009 |title=Swedish officials may be unwelcome |work=] |author=Jpost.com Staff |access-date=30 August 2009 }}</ref>
] claimed ]’s reaction was “no less outrageous or inciting.” Accusing him of overreaction editorial said: “Lieberman's impassioned and demagogic reaction has damaged Israel. It cheapened the ], blew the article out of proportion and caused an international uproar, pushing ] - which currently holds the presidency of the ] - into an unnecessary confrontation with ].”
<ref> A bewildering response[http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1109448.html[</ref>


===Civil society=== ===Civil society===
] head of the ] at ], said the report touched a raw nerve among Israelis, who harbour deep distrust towards Europe and believe its newspapers to be pro-Palestinian. Agreeing on the lack of merit in the article, he suggests, however, that politicians had blown the controversy out of proportion for political purposes: "Lieberman expressed the feeling of many Israelis who do not understand the European narrative, and they think that any criticism comes from total misunderstanding of the Middle East, or because Europe is totally antisemitic and pro-Palestinian. Very few politicians, unfortunately, are sophisticated enough to distinguish between legitimate criticism and attacks by those with other motives".<ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2009/0825/p06s04-wome.html|title=Israeli officials press Sweden on journalist's organ theft story|journal=Christian Science Monitor|date=25 August 2009|access-date=10 October 2018}}</ref>
Former diplomat ] said that Sweden should know that there is a difference between freedom of the press and freedom of opinion, certainly that of journalists, “freedom of expression is not unlimited, even in that beautiful northern country:” She also criticized Israeli official and media reactions as “blown out of all reasonable proportion.“ She criticized the Israeli Foreign Minister for voicing “ridiculous and ultimately harmful threats” that the Swedish minister's visit might be canceled, or that Swedish journalists will be refused entry into the country .<ref></ref>

Former diplomat ] said that Sweden should know the difference between freedom of the press and freedom of opinion: "freedom of expression is not unlimited, even in that beautiful northern country". She criticised Israeli official and media reactions as "blown out of all reasonable proportion" and the Israeli Foreign Minister for voicing "ridiculous and ultimately harmful threats" of cancelling the Swedish minister's visit or refusing entry to Swedish journalists.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jpost.com/EditionFrancaise/Home.aspxservlet/Satellite?cid=1251145125249&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120709115757/http://www.jpost.com/EditionFrancaise/Home.aspxservlet/Satellite?cid=1251145125249&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull|url-status=dead|title=Israel News – Online Israeli News Covering Israel & The Jewish World …|date=9 July 2012|archive-date=9 July 2012|access-date=10 October 2018}}</ref>

A support meeting of families of Israeli and Palestinian donors of organs and tissues on 26 August at Sourasky Medical Center, in ], discussed the report. Participants stressed a message that "organ donation is saving lives without any conditions" and called the report ] against Israel.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3768990,00.html|title='We gave them life. So what if they're Arabs?'|newspaper=Ynetnews |date=30 August 2009|access-date=10 October 2018 |last1=Rubinstein |first1=Elad }}</ref>


== Swedish reactions == == Swedish reactions ==
=== Government === === Government ===
], the Swedish ambassador to Israel, strongly condemned the article, stating: "The article in the Swedish newspaper is shocking and terrifying for us Swedish, as it influences the Israeli citizens... The embassy can not emphasize more its disgust."<ref>http://www.mako.co.il/news-military/israel/Article-7d5089fd8323321004.htm</ref> The Swedish foreign ministry and the Swedish foreign minister ] distanced themselves from the ambassador's statement and underlined that Sweden is a democracy with ], and that state representatives should not comment on individual articles in newspapers.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://carlbildt.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/principer-och-praktik/|title=Principer och praktik|trans_title=Principles and practice|language=Swedish|last=Bildt|first=Carl|accessdate=2009-08-21}}</ref> Elisabet Borsiin Bonnier, the Swedish ambassador to Israel, strongly condemned the article: "The article in the Swedish newspaper is shocking and terrifying for us Swedes, as it influences the Israeli citizens.... The embassy can not emphasize more its disgust".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://reshet.ynet.co.il/%D7%97%D7%93%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%AA/News/Politics/StatePolicy/Article%2C25599.aspx |title = חדשות 2: שגרירת שוודיה: "מזועזעת מהכתבה" |access-date=7 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090822183604/http://reshet.ynet.co.il/%D7%97%D7%93%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%AA/News/Politics/StatePolicy/Article%2C25599.aspx |archive-date=22 August 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref> The Swedish foreign ministry and the Swedish foreign minister, ], distanced themselves from the ambassador's statement and underlined that Sweden is a democracy with ] and that state representatives should not comment on individual articles in newspapers.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://carlbildt.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/principer-och-praktik/|title=Principer och praktik|trans-title=Principles and practice|language=sv|last=Bildt|first=Carl|access-date=21 August 2009|date=2009-08-20}}</ref>


Mårten Schultz, senior lecturer in jurisprudence, thought that the appeals to freedom of speech were, "attempts to use the rhetorically convincing status of the freedom of expression and press legislation in order to pursue a political agenda," and exhorted politicians and journalists to bring out and read the Freedom of the Press Act before they say what the government is not entitled to do.<ref>Mårten Schultz: ("No constitutional ban on criticism of Aftonbladet") Newsmill.se, 24 augusti 2009.</ref> Mårten Schultz, senior lecturer in jurisprudence, thought that the appeals to freedom of speech were "attempts to use the rhetorically convincing status of the freedom of expression and press legislation in order to pursue a political agenda" and exhorted politicians and journalists to bring out and read the Freedom of the Press Act before they said what the government is not entitled to do.<ref>Mårten Schultz: {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090828170749/http://newsmill.se/artikel/2009/08/25/inget-grundlagshinder-att-kritisera-aftonbladet |date=28 August 2009 }} ("No constitutional ban on criticism of Aftonbladet") Newsmill.se, 24 augusti 2009.</ref> The Office of the Chancellor of Justice said that although, the government can not criticize the decision to publish, it might go further in its criticism of the article without violating the Constitution although that might be "inappropriate". The literal words by the Chancellor of Justice, Göran Lambertz, were the following, according to the Swedish news agency, Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå: "It is not completely clear where the limits are. There is rather a lot one may do, according to the constitution, even if it were to be regarded as politically and legally inappropriate".<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090829133403/http://svt.se/2.22620/1.1666252/lag_tillater_hardare_artikelkritik |date=29 August 2009 }} ], 25 August 2009. ("Law allows tougher criticism of article") {{in lang|sv}}</ref>
The Office of the Councellor of Justice said that, although, the government can not criticize the decision to publish, they might go further in its criticism of the article without violating the Constitution then they had, although that might be "inappropriate". The literal words by the Councellor of Justice, Göran Lambertz, were, according to the Swedish news agency Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå: "It is not completely clear where the limits are. There is rather a lot one may do, according to the constitution, even if it were to be regarded as politically and legally inappropriate."<ref> ], August 25, 2009. ("Law allows tougher criticism of article") {{sv icon}}</ref>


On September 6, 2009, Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt announced the cancellation of a trip he planned to make to Israel September 11. There was some speculation in Israel and elsewhere that this was related to the Aftonbladet controversy.<ref></ref> However, Swedish officials denied this.<ref></ref> On 6 September 2009, Bildt announced the cancellation of a trip he planned to make to Israel on 11 September. There was some speculation in Israel and elsewhere that it was related to the controversy.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/sweden-s-foreign-minister-cancels-israel-visit-1.815838 | work=CBC News | title=Sweden's foreign minister cancels Israel visit | date=6 September 2009| access-date= 15 February 2010 }}</ref> However, Swedish officials denied that.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jpost.com/EditionFrancaise/Home.aspxservlet/Satellite?cid=1251804505720&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120709041658/http://www.jpost.com/EditionFrancaise/Home.aspxservlet/Satellite?cid=1251804505720&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull|url-status=dead|title=Israel News – Online Israeli News Covering Israel & The Jewish World …|date=9 July 2012|archive-date=9 July 2012|access-date=10 October 2018}}</ref>


===Legal complaints=== ===Legal complaints===
The Swedish ], the sole attorney in enforcing violations to the conventions regarding ] (and ]) and the ] on supervising government action, have received two written requests asking for investigation into the matter.<ref> by Igor Gedilaghine for ]</ref> The first to asked the chancellor to judge whether the article "really would include anything that brings it beyond what the freedom of press allows - for example constitute ]." <!-- "verkligen skulle innehålla någonting som träder yttrandefriheten förnär - t.ex. hets mot folkgrupp" --> The second asked him to open an errand of supervision regarding the Swedish ambassador's statements, and on a principal level explain what a ambassador officially can express on behalf of the high office and the country.<ref>{{cite web |author=Andén, Axel |title=Två JK-anmälningar efter Aftonbladets artikel om organhandel |date=25 August 2009 |url=http://medievarlden.se/etik-a-politik/6-etik-a-politik/9987-tva-jk-anmaelningar-efter-aftonbladets-artikel-om-organhandel |accessdate=5 September 2009 |language=Swedish |trans_title=Two reports to the JK after the Aftonbladet article on organ trade |publisher = Mediavärlden}}</ref> Aftonbladet was acquitted of all charges.<ref> ("The publishing is not antisemitic")</ref> The Swedish ], the sole attorney in enforcing violations to the conventions regarding ] and ] as well as the ] on supervising government action both received two written requests asking for investigation into the matter.<ref name="ire">{{cite web|url=https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gT81eKZfdAsto-CP3S6gbVhYsvHA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100410130219/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gT81eKZfdAsto-CP3S6gbVhYsvHA |url-status=dead |archive-date=10 April 2010 |title=Sweden's free speech tradition runs into Israeli ire by Igor Gedilaghine for Agence France-Presse|access-date=10 October 2018}}</ref> One asked the chancellor to judge whether the article "really would include anything that brings it beyond what the freedom of press allows for example constitute ]." <!-- "verkligen skulle innehålla någonting som träder yttrandefriheten förnär - t.ex. hets mot folkgrupp" --> The second asked him to open an errand of supervision regarding the Swedish ambassador's statements, and on a principal level explain what an ambassador officially can express on behalf of the high office and the country.<ref>{{cite web|author=Andén, Axel |title=Två JK-anmälningar efter Aftonbladets artikel om organhandel |date=25 August 2009 |url=http://medievarlden.se/etik-a-politik/6-etik-a-politik/9987-tva-jk-anmaelningar-efter-aftonbladets-artikel-om-organhandel |access-date=5 September 2009 |language=sv |trans-title=Two reports to the JK after the Aftonbladet article on organ trade |publisher=Mediavärlden |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090903091921/http://www.medievarlden.se/etik-a-politik/6-etik-a-politik/9987-tva-jk-anmaelningar-efter-aftonbladets-artikel-om-organhandel |archive-date=3 September 2009 }}</ref> ''Aftonbladet'' was acquitted of all charges.<ref> ("The publishing is not antisemitic")</ref>


Nils Funcke, an Swedish journalist and author focusing on the Swedish constitution, is predicting that the Swedish ambassador to Israel will be criticized for her initiative. The question, he asks, is how sharp the criticism will be and how the government reacts. Although he has deep concerns regarding the quality of journalism in the article, he claims that it is "unthinkable" that the chancellor's office will take on legal actions regarding its contents.<ref>{{cite web |author=Funcke, Nils |title=Nils Funcke: Aftonbladet kritiserades för tidigt |date=31 August 2009 |url=http://www.medievarlden.se/etik-a-politik/6-etik-a-politik/10023-nils-funcke-aftonbladet-kritiserades-foer-tidigt |accessdate=6 September 2009 |language=Swedish |trans_title=Nils Funcke: Aftonbladet was criticized to early |publisher = Mediavärlden}}</ref> Nils Funcke, a Swedish journalist and author on the Swedish constitution, predicted that the Swedish ambassador to Israel would be criticized for her initiative. The question, he said, was how sharp the criticism would be and how the government would react. Despite his deep concerns regarding the quality of journalism in the article, he called it "unthinkable" that the chancellor's office would take legal action on its contents.<ref>{{cite web |author=Funcke, Nils |title=Nils Funcke: Aftonbladet kritiserades för tidigt |date=31 August 2009 |url=http://www.medievarlden.se/etik-a-politik/6-etik-a-politik/10023-nils-funcke-aftonbladet-kritiserades-foer-tidigt |access-date=6 September 2009 |language=sv |trans-title=Nils Funcke: Aftonbladet was criticized to early |publisher = Mediavärlden}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref>


=== Donald Boström and Aftonbladet Reaction === === Donald Boström and ''Aftonbladet'' ===
The author of the article, ], spoke to ] on 19 August 2009 and said he was worried by the allegations he reported: "It concerns me, to the extent that I want it to be investigated, that's true. But whether it's true or not I have no idea, I have no clue."<ref name=ap1>{{cite news|url=http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iSYpeLo9EP1NAwa_SduklhjH4znAD9A62EFG0|title=Israel furious over Swedish newspaper article|last=Friedman|first=Matti|date=19 August 2009|accessdate=2009-08-19|work=]}}</ref> Boström told ] that the purpose of his article was to call for an investigation into the claims about stealing organs in the early 1990s.<ref>, ]. accessed 24 August 2009.</ref> In an interview to the Arab media site ], Boström said there was "no conclusive evidence" that organ harvesting was a systematic IDF practice, but that there is a "collection of allegations and suspicious circumstances". He was quoted as saying: "The point is that we know there is organ trafficking in Israel. And we also know that there are families claiming that their children's organs have been harvested. These two facts together point to the need for further investigation". Aftonbladet's editor, ], said in response to the accusations: "I'm not a Nazi,I'm not anti-Semitic", and described himself as "a responsible editor who gave the green light to an article because it raises a few questions" but noted that , however, that Aftonbladet had no evidence that Israel practices organ harvesting. Aftonbladet published a follow-up to Boström's article, which defended his report and said that the organ-harvesting allegation "should be investigated, either to stop the relentless Palestinian rumors, or, if the rumors prove to be true, stop the trade in body parts". It called Bonnier's condemnation of the original article a "disgrace".<ref name=evidence>{{Cite news The author of the article, Donald Boström, spoke to ] on 19 August 2009 and said that he was worried by the allegations he reported: "It concerns me, to the extent that I want it to be investigated, that's true. But whether it's true or not I have no idea, I have no clue".<ref name="ap1">{{cite news|url=https://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iSYpeLo9EP1NAwa_SduklhjH4znAD9A62EFG0|title=Israel furious over Swedish newspaper article|last=Friedman|first=Matti|date=19 August 2009|access-date=19 August 2009|agency=Associated Press}}{{dead link|date=June 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> Boström told ] that the purpose of his article was to call for an investigation into the claims about stealing organs in the early 1990s.<ref>, ]. Retrieved 24 August 2009.</ref> In an interview to the Arab media site ], Boström said there was "no conclusive evidence" that organ harvesting was a systematic IDF practice but that there is a "collection of allegations and suspicious circumstances". He was quoted as saying, "The point is that we know there is organ trafficking in Israel. And we also know that there are families claiming that their children's organs have been harvested. These two facts together point to the need for further investigation". The newspaper's editor, ], said "I'm not a Nazi, I'm not anti-Semitic" and described himself as "a responsible editor who gave the green light to an article because it raises a few questions" but noted that Aftonbladet had no evidence that Israel practiced organ harvesting. Aftonbladet published a follow-up to Boström's article that defended his report and said that the organ-harvesting allegation "should be investigated, either to stop the relentless Palestinian rumors, or, if the rumors prove to be true, stop the trade in body parts". It called Bonnier's condemnation of the original article a "disgrace".<ref name="evidence">{{Cite news
| title = 'Aftonbladet' editor admits no evidence on organ-harvesting |title='Aftonbladet' editor admits no evidence on organ-harvesting
| work = The Jerusalem Post |work=The Jerusalem Post
|access-date=1 September 2009
| accessdate = 2009-09-01
| date = 2009-08-24 |date=24 August 2009
| url = http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1249418683207 |url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1249418683207
|url-status=dead
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110917030848/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1249418683207
|archive-date=17 September 2011
}}</ref> }}</ref>


Boström told Israeli newspaper ]: "I am not an anti-Semite, and that's what saddens me most in this whole story. I've been a journalist for 25 years and I've always written against racism and segregation". He said that he had not meant to imply that IDF soldiers were killing Palestinians for their organs, and that "Even the Palestinians don't say that. What they said is that when the Israeli army returned the bodies, 62 of them had been autopsied and 20 Palestinian families I spoke to were certain that their sons' organs had been harvested". He admitted he had no evidence of organ harvesting, since the bodies that were returned to the families were never examined to determine whether organs had been taken: "As far as I know no one examined the bodies. All I'm saying is that this needs to be investigated". He also said that "Sweden supports Israel as a country and a people, and I am a part of this. There are many people, I among them, who condemn the Israeli government's policy of occupation and violation of international law. Israel needs to withdraw to its borders and evacuate the settlements. If Israel does this, support for you will reappear".<ref name=gur>{{Cite news Boström told Israeli newspaper ], "I am not an anti-Semite, and that's what saddens me most in this whole story. I've been a journalist for 25 years and I've always written against racism and segregation". He said that he had not meant to imply that IDF soldiers killed Palestinians for their organs: "Even the Palestinians don't say that. What they said is that when the Israeli army returned the bodies, 62 of them had been autopsied and 20 Palestinian families I spoke to were certain that their sons' organs had been harvested". He acknowledged that he had not personally seen evidence of organ harvesting since the bodies that were returned to the families were never examined to determine whether organs had been taken: "As far as I know no one examined the bodies. All I'm saying is that this needs to be investigated". He also said, "Sweden supports Israel as a country and a people, and I am a part of this. There are many people, I among them, who condemn the Israeli government's policy of occupation and violation of international law. Israel needs to withdraw to its borders and evacuate the settlements. If Israel does this, support for you will reappear".<ref name="gur">{{Cite news
| last = Gur | last = Gur
| first = Yonatan | first = Yonatan
| title = Swedish editor: I'm not a Nazi | title = Swedish editor: I'm not a Nazi
| work = Ynetnews | work = Ynetnews
| accessdate = 2009-09-01 | access-date = 1 September 2009
| date = 2009-08-24 | date = 24 August 2009
| url = http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3766093,00.html | url = http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3766093,00.html
}}</ref> }}</ref>

] from Aftonbladet responded to Israel's allegations that the article constitutes a ] as follows:<blockquote>"The Israeli reactions to Aftonbladet's article about illegal trading in organs break records for exaggeration... The harsh tones from the Israeli side do not benefit the State of Israel... How should the Israeli government's behaviour be understood? It's about realpolitic... The Israeli government is one of the most extremely right-wing in the country's history and Foreign Minister Lieberman has had a cool reception in both the USA and the EU... Lieberman and Netanyahu need an external enemy to blame to unite domestic opinion... and Aftonbladet's article was a chance for the Israeli government to demonstrate its ability to act against alleged anti-Semitism."<ref name=BBC></ref></blockquote>


=== Other media === === Other media ===
The Swedish newspaper '']'' criticized ''Aftonbladet'' for publishing for what it called, "an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory."<ref name=haaretz1>{{cite news|url=http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1108554.html|title=Swedish newspaper 'blood libel' sparks harsh condemnation |last=Berthelsen|first=Morten |date=19 August 2009|accessdate=2009-08-19|work=]}}</ref> Henrik Bredberg in ''Sydsvenskan'' said: <blockquote>"Donald Boström publicised a variant of an anti-Semitic classic, the Jew who abducts children and steals their blood... The regrettable aspects just seem to grow and grow... the Israeli government rages and speaks of an article which 'shames Swedish democracy and the entire Swedish press'. Hardly. Freedom of expression and freedom of the press are part of democracy... Dare to believe in freedom of the press and open debate. Even when individual editors make stupid and tasteless decisions."<ref name=BBC/></blockquote> The Swedish rival newspaper '']'' sharply criticized ''Aftonbladet'' for publishing what it called "an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory".<ref name="haaretz1">{{cite news|url=http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1108554.html|title=Swedish newspaper 'blood libel' sparks harsh condemnation |last=Berthelsen|first=Morten |date=19 August 2009|access-date=19 August 2009|work=]}}</ref> Henrik Bredberg in ''Sydsvenskan'' said: <blockquote>"Donald Boström publicised a variant of an anti-Semitic classic, the Jew who abducts children and steals their blood.... The regrettable aspects just seem to grow and grow... the Israeli government rages and speaks of an article which 'shames Swedish democracy and the entire Swedish press'. Hardly. Freedom of expression and freedom of the press are part of democracy.... Dare to believe in freedom of the press and open debate. Even when individual editors make stupid and tasteless decisions."<ref name="BBC">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8218298.stm|title=Israeli and Swedish press on organ row|date=24 August 2009|access-date=10 October 2018|work=BBC News}}</ref></blockquote>


Bredberg also said:<blockquote>"The Foreign Ministry has made it clear that Swedish freedom of the press applies. Good. Aftonbladet should not be given the unwarranted glory of martyrdom... Publication seems to represent an obvious lack of judgment. Unfortunately the lack of judgment did not stop there. The Swedish ambassador in Tel Aviv... attacked the article and thereby created the impression that having views about or intervening in individual publications should be a task for the government and its representatives."<ref name=BBC/></blockquote> An editorial in '']'' stated:<blockquote>"The Foreign Ministry has made it clear that Swedish freedom of the press applies. Good. Aftonbladet should not be given the unwarranted glory of martyrdom.... Publication seems to represent an obvious lack of judgment. Unfortunately the lack of judgment did not stop there. The Swedish ambassador in Tel Aviv... attacked the article and thereby created the impression that having views about or intervening in individual publications should be a task for the government and its representatives."<ref name=BBC/></blockquote>


Several political commentators pointed out that Sweden holds the ] at the time of this dispute. From an Israeli point of view, they say, discrediting Sweden as anti-semitic may be a way to prevent European criticism of Israel's ] policies.<ref name=bashing></ref> Several political commentators pointed out that Sweden held the ] at the time of the dispute. From an Israeli point of view, they say, discrediting Sweden as anti-Semitic might be a way to prevent European criticism of Israel's policies.<ref name="bashing">{{Cite web|url=http://sydsvenskan.se/sverige/article545082/Political-strategy-behind-Sweden-bashing.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090827144207/http://sydsvenskan.se/sverige/article545082/Political-strategy-behind-Sweden-bashing.html|url-status=dead|title=Sydsvenskan, August 24 2009: Political strategy behind Sweden-bashing|archivedate=27 August 2009}}</ref><ref>{{Dead link|date=June 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} ("Presidency disturbed by Israel's verbal assault") {{in lang|sv}}</ref><ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090907084850/http://www.dagen.se/dagen/article.aspx?id=175859 |date=7 September 2009 }} ("All-out attacks on real and imagined enemies often lead to gains in domestic politics") {{in lang|sv}}</ref>
<ref> ("Presidency disturbed by Israel's verbal assault") {{sv icon}}</ref><ref> ("All-out attacks on real and imagined enemies often lead to gains in domestic politics") {{sv icon}}</ref>


===Civil society=== ===Swedish-Jewish community===
Lena Posner-Körösi, a leader of ], criticized Israel's official response to Boström's article, stating in an interview with the ] that Israel's reaction and media outrage had provided the claims with much more exposure than they would have had otherwise and had blown the story out of proportion.<ref name="jpost">{{cite news|url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1249418673856&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130706010752/http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1249418673856&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull |url-status=dead |archive-date=6 July 2013 |title='Those who don't condemn Swedish story may not be welcome' |work=] |date=23 August 2009 |access-date=27 August 2009 }}</ref> She noted how initial widespread condemnations of ''Aftonbladet'' and its article in the Swedish media quickly turned into united defence for freedom of the press when Israel requested that the government should condemn it as well. Posner-Körösi explained that "freedom of expression is sacred" to Swedes and that no one "understands how Israel dares to interfere".<ref name="latimes" /><ref> ''Ynet'' 23 August 2009</ref> Posner-Körösi was still critical of ''Aftonbladet'', stating in her letter to editor Jan Helin that "the Jewish Central Council in Sweden insists that the description is akin to classic antisemitism – Jews who kidnap children to slaughter them and steal their blood. We are confounded how a Swedish newspaper once again permits its pages to include such hate speech and expect that you, as editor and publisher to reject antisemitic statements".<ref name="snippa">{{Cite news|last=Posner-Körösi |first=Lena |title=Hets mot folkgrupp |work=Letter to Editor |access-date=1 September 2009 |date=30 August 2010 |url=http://www.snippa.net/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090417030251/http://www.snippa.net/ |archive-date=17 April 2009 }}</ref>


Anders Carlberg, the outgoing chairman of the Jewish Community in ] called Israel's response "unhelpful". He said that Israel should have responded by publishing a rebuttal: "The stance of the community in general is that it's strange that this has become a government issue at all.... It falls along the lines of ]: I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to death your right to say it."<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://jta.org/news/article/2009/08/24/1007429/did-israel-overreact-in-swedish-newspaper-controversy |title=The organ harvesting controversy: Did Sweden fumble or Israel overreact?|website=JTA – Jewish & Israel News |access-date=4 September 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090828151501/http://jta.org/news/article/2009/08/24/1007429/did-israel-overreact-in-swedish-newspaper-controversy |archive-date=28 August 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
Lena Posner-Korosi, a leader of ], criticized Israel's official response to Boström's article, stating in an interview with the ] that the Israeli reaction and media outrage had provided the claims with much more exposure than they would have had otherwise, and blown the story out of proportion.<ref name=jpost>{{cite news |url=http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1249418673856&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull |title='Those who don't condemn Swedish story may not be welcome' |work=] |date=2009-08-23 |accessdate=2009-08-27}}</ref>

Anders Carlberg, the outgoing chairman of the Jewish Community in Gothenburg, Sweden, said Israel should have responded by publishing a rebuttal. "The stance of the community in general is that it's strange that this has become a government issue at all," Carlberg said. "It falls along the lines of Voltaire: I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to death your right to say it." <ref></ref>

], chairman of ] and ] argued that the Israeli government had failed to present the autopsy reports and debunk the story, because it was in Israel's interest that the story lives on.<ref> shown on the 27th August 2009 on ] 09.49 {{sv icon}}</ref>

], an expert on religious extremism and religious racism, writes that it it is well known that Israeli spokespersons and self-appointed friends of Israel routinely try to obfuscate the issue by playing the antisemitism card.<ref> {{sv icon}}</ref>


==Palestinian reactions== ==Palestinian reactions==
===Palestinian Authority===
On 3 Sep 2009, the ] (PA) announced the formation of an interministerial panel to investigate allegations that the Israeli military "stole organs" from Palestinian detainees. The secretary general of the PA Council of Ministers, Dr ], if true, the alleged events, if true, would constitute violations of human rights. The PA's ministers of Health, Interior, and Foreign Affairs, and senior officials from each ministry would, he said, sit on the commission.<ref>Ma'an News, "High level PA panel to investigate 'organ theft' claims", 3 September 2009. </ref>


In November 2015, in a letter to the UN, the ] accused Israel of continuing to harvest organs from Palestinians killed by its forces. ] said that was a confirmation of "past reports about organ harvesting", which prompted Israel to reject the allegations and condemn them as anti-Semitic.<ref>. Reuters, 4 November 2015</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/pa-claims-israel-harvesting-organs-of-dead-palestinians/|title=PA claims Israel harvesting organs of dead Palestinians|work=The Times of Israel|date=5 November 2015|access-date=13 July 2023}}</ref>
===Palestinian Authority===
On Sept. 3, 2009, the ] (PA) announced the formation of an inter-ministerial panel to investigate allegations that the Israeli military “stole organs” from Palestinian detainees. The secretary general of the PA Council of Ministers, Dr Hassan Abu Libdeh, said that, if true, the alleged events would constitute violations of human rights. The PA's ministers of Health, Interior, and Foreign Affairs, and senior officials from each ministry would, he said, sit on the commission.<ref> Ma'an News, "High level PA panel to investigate 'organ theft' claims", Sept. 3, 2009. </ref>


=== Ghanem family and relatives === === Ghanem family and relatives ===
According to ], Jalal Ghanem, the brother of Bilal Ghanem whose photograph acompanied Boström's article, could not confirm the allegations made by the Aftonbladet. Jalal said that Bilal was evacuated by the IDF in a helicopter after being shot. His corpse was delivered to the family a few days later, and that there were stitches on Bilal's body that ran from the chest down to the bottom of the abdomen, and that his teeth were missing. Jalal also said the only time the family saw the Swedish photographer was at Bilal's funeral when he photographed the event. Their mother denied having told any foreign journalist that her son's organs had been stolen, but said that she does not rule out the possibility that Israel was harvesting organs of Palestinians. Another relative of the family, Ibrahim Ghanem, said the family never told the Swedish photographer that Israel had stolen organs from Bilal's body, and speculated that, "Maybe the journalist reached that conclusion on the basis of the stitches he saw on the body." He also said that the family does not know if the organs were removed because they never had their own autopsy conducted.<ref name="jpost1"/><br/> According to '']'', Jalal Ghanem, the brother of Bilal Ghanem, whose photograph had accompanied Boström's article, could not confirm the allegations. Jalal said that Bilal was evacuated by the IDF in a helicopter after he had been shot. His corpse was delivered to the family a few days later, and there were stitches on Bilal's body that ran from the chest down to the bottom of the abdomen, and his teeth were missing. Jalal also said that the only time the family saw the Swedish photographer was at Bilal's funeral photographing the event.<ref name="jpost1"/> In subsequent interview with '']'', he added that he thought Bilal was among those who had their organs stolen.<ref name="al-jaz-gha" />
Their mother denied having told any foreign journalist that her son's organs had been stolen, ''The Jerusalem Post'' reported in its article. However, she did not rule out the possibility that Israel was harvesting organs of Palestinians. Another relative of the family, Ibrahim Ghanem, said that the family never told the Swedish photographer that Israel had stolen organs from Bilal's body and speculated, "Maybe the journalist reached that conclusion on the basis of the stitches he saw on the body." He also said that the family had no evidence on whether the organs were removed because they had not had an autopsy conducted.<ref name="jpost1"/>

In another interview with Aftonbladet made one week after the original article, Jalal Ghanem and Bilals mother Saadega Ghanem still stood by their allegations and also claimed that Bilal was still alive when he was taken away. They also claimed that IDF soldiers tried to prevent journalists from taking pictures of the body.<ref>http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article5680904.ab</ref>
In an interview with ''Aftonbladet'' made one week after the original article, Jalal Ghanem and Bilal's mother, Saadega Ghanem, still stood by their allegations and also claimed that Bilal was still alive when he had been taken away. They also claimed that IDF soldiers tried to prevent journalists from taking pictures of the body.<ref>{{cite web|title=Mamma har aldrig slutat lida |work=Aftonbladet |url=http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article5680904.ab |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090826125308/http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article5680904.ab |archive-date=26 August 2009 |url-status=live |access-date=19 September 2009}}</ref>


===Media=== ===Media===
Palestinian journalist ] reported in an article in '']'' that prior accusations of organ harvesting had been made by representatives of the Palestinian Authority, including by late Palestinian leader ]. Amayreh noted that no genuine investigation had ever been carried out into the Palestinian allegations of unauthorized organ harvesting even though they had dated to before the 1990s.<ref name="Amayreh"> by ], published in ]. Retrieved 26 September 2009. 2009-09-28.</ref>
], a British journalist working in Israel / Palestine, noted that many Western journalists, himself included, had heard such rumors, but none before Boström had written about them. Cook wrote that, " the families making the claims were not given a hearing in the late 1980s and early 1990s, during the first Intifada, when most of the reports occurred, and are still being denied the right to voice their concerns today. Israel's sensitivity to the allegation of organ theft appears to trump the genuine concerns of families about possible abuse of their loved ones."<ref name=Cook>{{cite web||url=http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2009/963/op2.htm|title=But did it happen?|date=September 3-9, 2009|accessdae2009-09-06|author=]}}</ref>

] writing for '']'', said that Western journalists had heard about such rumours. According to Cook, "the families making the claims were not given a hearing in the late 1980s and early 1990s, during the first Intifada, when most of the reports occurred, and are still being denied the right to voice their concerns today".<ref name="Cook"/> In an article for the Scottish '']'', British politician ] asserted that Israel was "playing mini-Mengele on Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails", a reference to the Nazi physician ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/25375/galloway-compares-israel-nazi-doctor-mengele-0|title=Galloway compares Israel to Nazi doctor Mengele |publisher=The Jewish Chronicle| date=29 December 2009|access-date=2 January 2015 | location=London | first=Jessica | last=Elgot}}</ref>


===Civil society=== ===Civil society===
In September 2009, hundreds of Palestinians attended a conference marking the "national day for the return of the bodies of martyrs" in ]. Palestinian organizations say Israel is holding the bodies of 275 Palestinians and refusing to return them to their families. Following the conference, ], a Palestinian Member of Israel's ], made a connection between the missing bodies and the article in Aftonbladet, saying, "Israel has maintained its reputation and alerted the entire world to the Swedish article. They claim that what was published there could not be true ... The burden of proof falls on Israel, and as long as it refuses to say what the status of the bodies is or return them, it is hiding something awful."<ref name=Ofir>{{cite web|title=Barakeh justifies organs trafficking claims: Hadash chairman says he has 'right to question why Israel is keeping bodies of Palestinian martyrs'|author=Sharon Roffe Ofir|date=September 8, 2009|accessdate=2009-09-08|url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3774028,00.html}}</ref> In September 2009, hundreds of Palestinians attended a conference marking the "national day for the return of the bodies of martyrs" in ]. Palestinian organizations said that Israel was holding the bodies of 275 Palestinians and refusing to return them to their families. After the conference, ], a Palestinian ] in Israel, made a connection between the missing bodies and the article in Aftonbladet: ''"Israel has maintained its reputation and alerted the entire world to the Swedish article. They claim that what was published there could not be true.... The burden of proof falls on Israel, and as long as it refuses to say what the status of the bodies is or return them, it is hiding something awful".''<ref name="Ofir">{{cite news|title=Barakeh justifies organs trafficking claims|work=Ynetnews|author=Sharon Roffe Ofir|date=8 September 2009|access-date=8 September 2009|url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3774028,00.html}}</ref>


==Reactions from elsewhere== ==Reactions from elsewhere==

===Iran=== ===Iran===
The ]ian state newspaper ] quoted Arab reporter Kusar Aslam, who claims to have been stationed in Gaza and the West Bank for 22 years, as saying: "Since the early 1970s the Israelis have snatched thousands of Palestinian bodies from hospitals in the territories and transferred them to the Abu Kabir Forensic Institute", and that "My personal experience verifies the report published by (Donald) Boström". She said that the IDF kidnapped living Palestinians: "I personally witnessed Israeli soldiers and army vehicles snatching Palestinian bodies from emergency rooms. In other instances I saw soldiers follow Palestinians to cemeteries with the intent of stealing bodies before they were buried. This became so widespread that many people began to bury those murdered by IDF forces near their homes – in the yard or under a tree".<ref name=cohen>{{Cite news The Iranian state newspaper '']'' quoted Arab reporter Kusar Aslam, who claims to have been stationed in Gaza and the West Bank for 22 years, as saying, "Since the early 1970s the Israelis have snatched thousands of Palestinian bodies from hospitals in the territories and transferred them to the ].... My personal experience verifies the report published by (Donald) Boström". She said that the IDF kidnapped living Palestinians: "I personally witnessed Israeli soldiers and army vehicles snatching Palestinian bodies from emergency rooms. In other instances I saw soldiers follow Palestinians to cemeteries with the intent of stealing bodies before they were buried. This became so widespread that many people began to bury those murdered by IDF forces near their homes – in the yard or under a tree".<ref name="cohen">{{Cite news
| last = Cohen | last = Cohen
| first = Dudi | first = Dudi
| title = Iranian reporter: Swedish article on IDF organ harvesting 'credible' | title = Iranian reporter: Swedish article on IDF organ harvesting 'credible'
| work = Ynetnews | work = Ynetnews
| accessdate = 2009-09-05 | access-date = 5 September 2009
| date = 2009-09-01 | date = 1 September 2009
| url = http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3770443,00.html | url = http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3770443,00.html
}}</ref> }}</ref>


===Syria=== ===Syria===
Syrian President ]'s spokeswoman, ], praised Boström's article in '']'' and said Israel "should be put on trial" for its "criminal acts". She claimed that there was a connection between the violation of Palestinian corpses claimed by Boström and the accused Israeli-American organ-trafficking ring whose members were indicted in New Jersey and New York in July 2009.


Yossi Levy, the Israeli Foreign Ministry's spokesman said Shaaban's praise for the article should be a "warning light" for the Swedish government, which "unfortunately has still not fully and courageously condemned the article".<ref name="spanish">{{Cite news
]n President ]'s spokeswoman, Bouthaina Shaaban, praised Boström's article in '']'' and said Israel "should be put on trial" for its "criminal acts". She claimed there was a connection between the violation of Palestinian corpses claimed by Boström and the accused Israeli-American organ-trafficking ring whose members were indicted in New Jersey, USA, in July 2009.<ref>This needs a direct source! As it is here it is 2nd-hand from the J. Post, as footnoted in next graf.</ref>
|last=Keinon
|first=Herb
|title=Spanish paper turns to Irving for WWII 'expertise'
|work=The Jerusalem Post
|access-date=5 September 2009
|date=3 September 2009
|url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251804476311&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
}}{{dead link|date=June 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>


===United States===
Yossi Levy, the Israeli Foreign Ministry's spokesman said Shaaban's praise for the article should be a "warning light" for the Swedish government which "unfortunately has still not fully and courageously condemned the article."
In a letter to the Swedish prime minister, Representatives ] (D-FL) and ] (R-CA), members on the ], wrote:
<ref name=spanish>{{Cite news
"Given the far-reaching implications for this article, which raises the unfortunate specter of similar ]s and spurious charges that have been directed at Jews throughout the centuries, it is critical that your government unequivocally repudiate and reject the heinous allegations expressed in this article.... It is essential that this vitriolic article not be used by ], anti-Israel advocates, and extremists as an excuse to commit acts of violence and terrorism against the Jewish community in Sweden or internationally".<ref name="wexler">{{Cite web |url=http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1112191.html |title = U.S. Congressmen to EU: Condemn IDF organ harvesting article - Haaretz - Israel News |access-date=4 September 2009 |archive-date=6 September 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090906201000/http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1112191.html |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090910083237/http://www.csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewDetail&ContentRecord_id=803&ContentRecordType=P&ContentType=P&CFID=19352077&CFTOKEN=13897046 |date=10 September 2009 }}. Retrieved 19 September 2009. 2009-09-26.</ref>
| last = Keinon
| first = Herb
| title = Spanish paper turns to Irving for WWII 'expertise'
| work = The Jerusalem Post
| accessdate = 2009-09-05
| date = 2009-09-03
| url = http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251804476311&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
}}</ref>


Senator ] (D-MD), Chairman of U.S. Helsinki Commission, released a press release that urged European foreign ministers to denounce the ''Aftonbladet'' article: "We at the U.S. Helsinki Commission are dedicated to upholding human rights, particularly freedom of the press. But with freedom of the press comes responsibility. And when major press outlets fail to meet their responsibility, and instead raise the specter of racism or anti-Semitism, then public officials are duty bound to speak out and condemn such blatant falsehoods. I commend Sweden's Ambassador to Israel for fulfilling this duty, and I call on the Swedish Government, which currently holds the European Union Presidency, to support Italian and other EU efforts to denounce this harmful reporting".<ref name=cardin />
===The US===
In a letter to the Swedish prime minister, Congressmen ] (D-FL) and ] (R-CA), members on the ], wrote:.
"Given the far-reaching implications for this article, which raises the unfortunate specter of similar ]s and spurious charges that have been directed at Jews throughout the centuries, it is critical that your government unequivocally repudiate and reject the heinous allegations expressed in this article,"
"It is essential that this vitriolic article not be used by ], anti-Israel advocates, and extremists as an excuse to commit acts of violence and terrorism against the Jewish community in Sweden or internationally,? the letter stated. <ref></ref><ref>[
http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewDetail&ContentRecord_id=803&ContentRecordType=P&ContentType=P&CFID=18960450&CFTOKEN=82376781]</ref>


Co-Chairman of US Helsinki Commission Senator ] (D-FL) said, "This incendiary article draws on age old anti-Semitic imagery, and attempts to place it in a modern context of worrisome hostility in Europe towards both Jews and Israel. Government leaders must demand the press act with journalistic integrity and report responsibly, particularly when it can incite the violent potential of anti-Semitism and other forms of hatred".<ref name="cardin">{{cite web |title=CARDIN, HASTINGS CALL ON EUROPEAN LEADERS TO DENOUNCE ANTI-SEMITIC ARTICLE IN SWEDISH PRESS |url=http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewDetail&ContentRecord_id=803&ContentRecordType=P&ContentType=P&CFID=18960450&CFTOKEN=82376781 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090910083237/http://www.csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewDetail&ContentRecord_id=803&ContentRecordType=P&ContentType=P&CFID=19352077&CFTOKEN=13897046 |archive-date=10 September 2009 |url-status=dead |access-date=19 September 2009 }}</ref>
Senator ] (D-MD), Chairman of U.S. Helsinki Commission, released a press release that urged European Foreign ministers to denounce the Aftonbladet article. He said "We at the U.S. Helsinki Commission are dedicated to upholding human rights, particularly freedom of the press. But with freedom of the press comes responsibility. And when major press outlets fail to meet their responsibility, and instead raise the specter of racism or anti-Semitism, then public officials are duty bound to speak out and condemn such blatant falsehoods. I commend Sweden’s Ambassador to Israel for fulfilling this duty, and I call on the Swedish Government, which currently holds the European Union Presidency, to support Italian and other EU efforts to denounce this harmful reporting."<ref name=cardin />


], the National Director of the ] (ADL) of ] said that the ADL lodged a complaint with the Swedish embassy in Washington: "Such unfounded rumors – of Jews 'poisoning the wells' and carrying out acts of ritual murder—have been in the playbook of ] through the centuries, and continue to be believed in parts of the Arab world and elsewhere to this day. What could Mr. Boström and the editors who ushered this article into print have been thinking?" The letter stated, "This article represents nothing less than a base recycling of the medieval ] in which Jews were charged with killing Christian children for their alleged ritual use".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/5586_62.htm|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100408174447/http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/5586_62.htm|url-status=dead|title=Press Release&#124;ADL|archivedate=8 April 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ejpress.org/article/38365|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090822030358/http://www.ejpress.org/article/38365|url-status=dead|title=European Jewish Press|archivedate=22 August 2009}}</ref>
Co-Chairman of US Helsinki Commission US Senator ] (D-FL) said: "This incendiary article draws on age old anti-Semitic imagery, and attempts to place it in a modern context of worrisome hostility in Europe towards both Jews and Israel. Government leaders must demand the press act with journalistic integrity and report responsibly, particularly when it can incite the violent potential of anti-Semitism and other forms of hatred." <ref name=cardin></ref>


In a video on its website on 24 August 2014, '']'' quoted the 2009 Swedish ''Aftonbladet'' report as fact.<ref name=HoRe-TimeMagazine/> After a denouncing report from ] came out, ''Time'' retracted, within hours, the allegations that Israeli soldiers had harvested and sold Palestinian organs in 2009.<ref name="HoRe-TimeMagazine">{{cite web |date=2014-08-24 |title=Time Magazine Accuses IDF of Stealing Palestinian Organs |url=http://honestreporting.com/time-magazine-accuses-idf-of-stealing-palestinian-organs/ |publisher=HonestReporting – 24 August 2014}}</ref><ref name=TimesOfIsrael-TimesMagBloodLibel>{{cite web|last1=JTA|title=Time retracts IDF organ harvesting allegation|url=http://www.timesofisrael.com/time-retracts-idf-organ-harvesting-allegation/|publisher=The Times of Israel – 25 August 2014}}</ref>
], the National Director of the ] of B'nai B'rith said the ADL lodged a complaint with the Swedish embassy in Washington. "Such unfounded rumors -- of Jews ‘poisoning the wells’ and carrying out acts of ritual murder—have been in the playbook of ] through the centuries, and continue to be believed in parts of the Arab world and elsewhere to this day. What could Mr. Boström and the editors who ushered this article into print have been thinking?” The letter stated: “This article represents nothing less than a base recycling of the medieval ] in which Jews were charged with killing Christian children for their alleged ritual use," <ref></ref><ref></ref>


=== Reporters Without Borders === === Reporters Without Borders ===
] expressed regret that Israel had gone after the Swedish government for a condemnation: "Regardless of the article's content and although we understand the public outcry it has triggered in Israel, the Israeli authorities must refrain from asking their Swedish counterparts to intervene.... "Aftonbladet alone is responsible for the articles it publishes. The Swedish government is not responsible".<ref name="rwb"> '']'' 25 August 2009. Retrieved 19 September 2009. 2009-09-26.</ref>

The ] expressed grief over Israels decision to go after the Swedish government for a condemnation. "Regardless of the article’s content and although we understand the public outcry if has triggered in Israel, the Israeli authorities must refrain from asking their Swedish counterparts to intervene," they said, "Aftonbladet alone is responsible for the articles it publishes. The Swedish government is not responsible."<ref> '']'' 25 August 2009</ref>


=== Italy === === Italy ===
In an interview with Haa'rez on August 31, the ], ], said that he had recently met with Bildt, and that the two of them agreed that at a meeting of ] foreign ministers later the following week, they would work to pass a resolution making it clear that the EU, under the Swedish presidency, strongly condemns anti-Semitism and will take action against any manifestation of it in Europe. Frattini said he was intending to demand that the meeting's summary statement explicitly condemn the article.<ref name="primor">{{Cite news In an interview with ''Haa'rez'' on 31 August, ] ] said that he had recently met with Bildt and that both agreed that at a meeting of ] foreign ministers the next week, they would work to pass a resolution making it clear that the EU, under the Swedish presidency, strongly condemns anti-Semitism and will take action against any manifestation of it in Europe. Frattini said he was intending to demand that the meeting's summary statement explicitly condemn the article.<ref name="primor">{{Cite news |last=Primor |first=Adar |date=31 August 2009 |title=Following inflammatory article, Sweden to demand EU condemn anti-Semitism |url=https://www.haaretz.com/2009-08-31/ty-article/following-inflammatory-article-sweden-to-demand-eu-condemn-anti-semitism/0000017f-dc51-d856-a37f-fdd1109f0000 |access-date=31 August 2009 |work=Haaretz}}</ref>
| last = Primor
| first = Adar
| title = Following inflammatory article, Sweden to demand EU condemn anti-Semitism
| work = Haaretz
| accessdate = 2009-08-31
| date = 2009-08-31
| url = http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1111229.html
}}</ref>


Later that day, the Swedish news agency TT quoted ] as denying the Frattini's conclusion, and reported that the head of communications at the Swedish Foreign Ministry, Cecilia Julin, denied that Bildt and Frattini even had discussed the dispute, or a possible resolution at the Council of Ministers. Julin said: "From the Swedish side we have no plans to handle this question through the informal foreign ministers' meeting in Stockholm". According to her, Bildt suggested that Frattini's comment must have arisen through an "Italian misunderstanding". Reinfeldt also insisted that the Swedish government could not take a stand because of Sweden's freedom of the press. At a press conference in ], he said: "We cannot be asked by anyone to contravene the Swedish constitution, and this is something we will also not do within the European Union".<ref name=keinon318>{{Cite news Later that day, the Swedish news agency TT quoted ] as denying the Frattini's conclusion and reported that the head of communications at the Swedish Foreign Ministry, Cecilia Julin, denied that Bildt and Frattini even had discussed the dispute or a possible resolution at the Council of Ministers: "From the Swedish side we have no plans to handle this question through the informal foreign ministers' meeting in Stockholm". According to her, Bildt suggested that Frattini's comment must have arisen through an "Italian misunderstanding". Reinfeldt also insisted that the Swedish government could not take a stand because of Sweden's freedom of the press. At a press conference in ], he said: "We cannot be asked by anyone to contravene the Swedish constitution, and this is something we will also not do within the European Union".<ref name="keinon318">{{Cite news
| last = Keinon |last=Keinon
| first = Herb |first=Herb
| title = Bildt says no plan to condemn anti-Semitism |title=Bildt says no plan to condemn anti-Semitism
| work = The Jerusalem Post |work=The Jerusalem Post
|access-date=1 September 2009
| accessdate = 2009-09-01
| date = 2009-08-31 |date=31 August 2009
| url = http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251145167374&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull |url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1251145167374&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
}}{{dead link|date=June 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
}}</ref>


The Israeli Prime Minister's Office did not comment on Frattini's initiative. However, Palmor said: "Every initiative against anti-Semitism is welcome. But if the declaration is general and does not specifically relate to the article in Aftonbladet, it will not resolve anything". He added that "We did not ask for an apology, or for measures against the newspaper or the journalist. All we asked of Sweden and the Swedes is that they reject and decry the content of the report. And our position has not changed".<ref name="primor" /> The Israeli Prime Minister's Office did not comment on Frattini's initiative. However, Palmor said: "Every initiative against anti-Semitism is welcome. But if the declaration is general and does not specifically relate to the article in ''Aftonbladet'', it will not resolve anything". He added that "We did not ask for an apology, or for measures against the newspaper or the journalist. All we asked of Sweden and the Swedes is that they reject and decry the content of the report. And our position has not changed".<ref name="primor" />

==Yehuda Hiss interview==
In December 2009, ], an anthropology professor at the ] and founder of a newsletter, "Organs Watch", released the tape of an interview that she had conducted in 2000 with ], the director of Israel's ] (known colloquially as the "Abu Kabir" Forensic Institute). In the interview, which appeared on Israel's ] television, Hiss stated that he had harvested organs in the 1990s. "We started to harvest corneas.... Whatever was done was highly informal. No permission was asked from the family".<ref name=":0" /> Hiss was fired from his position as director of the forensic institute in 2004 for "repeated body-part scandals".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Siegel |first=Judy |date=2012-11-03 |title=Hiss fired for repeated body-part scandals |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103072619/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-94606108.html |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=Jerusalem Post {{!}} HighBeam Research}}</ref> Hiss was later reinstated and remained head of the institute until he retired in October 2012 after allegations of bad procedures at the institute.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Even |first=Dan |date= |title=Deputy Health Minister Fires Abu Kabir Chief Pathologist Yehuda Hiss |url=https://www.haaretz.com/2012-10-16/ty-article/.premium/top-pathologist-fired-over-allegedly-rotten-practices/0000017f-e10d-d7b2-a77f-e30f21400000 |access-date=Oct 26, 2024 |website=Haaretz}}</ref>

Israeli officials acknowledged that such incidents had taken place but stated that neither Israelis nor Palestinians had been specifically targeted, that no such incidents had occurred for a long time and that Hiss had been removed from his position.<ref> CNN, 21 December 2009.</ref>

Scheper-Hughes stated that Palestinians were not the only ones affected "by a long shot" but that she felt the interview must be made public now because "the symbolism, you know, of taking skin of the population considered to be the enemy, (is) something, just in terms of its symbolic weight, that has to be reconsidered".<ref>{{Cite web |title=Israel admits organ harvesting |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/israel-admits-organ-harvesting-1.850939 |access-date=2024-10-26 |website=The Irish Times |language=en}}</ref>

In an interview with Al Jazeera, Scheper-Hughes said the organ harvesting took place with the "sanction and approval" of the military establishment and that the "body parts were used by hospitals for transplant purposes – cornea transplants. They were sent to public hospitals ... and the skin went to a special skin bank, founded by the military, for their uses", like for burns victims.<ref name=":0" />


== See also == == See also ==
<!---♦♦♦ Please keep the list in alphabetical order ♦♦♦--->
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] / ] * ] / ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* '']''


== References == == References ==
{{Reflist|2}} {{reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT ADD ANY EXTERNAL LINKS TO NEWSPAPER ARTICLES OR OPINION PIECES HERE. Instead write a sentence describing the article in the main part of the article, and add a footnote with a link to the article -->
=== Video ===
* published in ] - including video with discussion between Dr. Mordachai Kedar and Daniel Boström


{{Israeli–Palestinian conflict}}
{{Israeli-Palestinian Conflict}}

<!-- What the controversy is about according to the Israeli side -->
<!-- What the controversy is about according to Aftonbladet and many on the Swedish side -->


{{DEFAULTSORT:Aftonbladet-Israel Controversy}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Aftonbladet-Israel Controversy}}
] ]
]
]<!-- What the controversy is about according to the Israeli side -->
]
]<!-- What the controversy is about according to the Israeli side -->
]<!-- What the controversy is about according to Aftonbladet and many on the Swedish side -->
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 09:18, 29 October 2024

Controversy over report of organ harvesting by Israeli troops

Former headquarters of Aftonbladet, the largest Swedish tabloid.

On 17 August 2009, the Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet published an article accusing Israeli troops of stealing the organs of Palestinians in their custody. The Israeli government denied the allegations and called them anti-Semitic. The Swedish government refused to condemn the article, and upheld Aftonbladet's freedom of speech, leading to a rift between the Swedish and the Israeli governments. Palestinian officials and families of the deceased called for an independent investigation. In December 2009, Israeli officials admitted that they had harvested the organs of Palestinians without their families' permission. These Palestinians had been killed by the Israeli military, but Israeli officials emphasized they did not kill Palestinians in order to harvest their organs.

The article that sparked the controversy was written by Swedish freelance photojournalist Donald Boström, with the title Våra söner plundras på sina organ ("Our sons are being plundered for their organs"). It presented allegations that in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, many young men from the West Bank and Gaza Strip had been seized by Israeli forces and their bodies returned to their families with organs missing. It was published by Aftonbladet, one of the largest daily newspapers in the Nordic countries.

The Israeli government and several US representatives condemned the article as baseless and incendiary, noted the history of antisemitism and blood libels against Jews and asked the Swedish government to denounce the article. The government refused, citing freedom of the press and the Swedish constitution. Swedish ambassador to Israel Elisabet Borsiin Bonnier condemned the article as "shocking and appalling" and stated that freedom of the press carries responsibility, but the Swedish government distanced itself from her remarks. The Swedish Newspaper Publishers' Association and Reporters Without Borders supported Sweden's refusal to condemn it. The former warned of venturing onto a slope with government officials damning occurrences in Swedish media, which may curb warranted debate and restrain freedom of expression by self-censorship. Italy made a stillborn attempt to defuse the diplomatic situation by a European resolution condemning antisemitism. A survey among the cultural editors of the other major Swedish newspapers found that all would have refused the article. The Palestinian National Authority announced that it would establish a commission to investigate the article's claims.

In December 2009, a 2000 interview with the chief pathologist at the L. Greenberg National Institute of Forensic Medicine Yehuda Hiss was released in which he had admitted taking organs from the corpses of Israelis, Palestinians and foreign workers without their families' permission. Israeli health officials confirmed Hiss's confession but stated that such incidents had ended in the 1990s and noted that Hiss had been removed from his post. The Palestinian press said the report "appeared to confirm Palestinians' allegations that Israel returned their relatives' bodies with their chests sewn up, having harvested their organs". Several news agencies reported that the Aftonbladet article had claimed that Israel killed Palestinians to harvest their organs, although the author, the culture editor for Aftonbladet, and Nancy Scheper-Hughes denied that it had made that claim.

Article

In August 2009, Aftonbladet ran an article by freelance writer Donald Boström in its culture section. The article opened by mentioning arrests related to a suspected money-laundering and organ-trafficking operation involving rabbis, politicians and civil servants in New Jersey and New York. Briefly introducing the problem of the illegal organ trade worldwide, Boström then related that he heard and saw things during his stay in the Palestinian territories in 1992, during the First Intifada.

A photograph accompanying the article depicted a cadaver with a line of stitches on the torso, identified as that of Bilal Ghanem, who was 19 when he was killed by IDF soldiers on 13 May 1992. The Ghanem family was not interviewed for his article, but Boström described his impressions of Ghanem's burial, which he attended:

Together with the sharp noises from the shovels we could hear occasional laughter from the soldiers who, as they waited to go home, exchanged some jokes. As Bilal was put in the grave his chest was uncovered and suddenly it became clear to the few people present just what kind of abuse he had been exposed to. Bilal was not by far the first to be buried with a slit from his abdomen up to his chin and speculations on the intent started.

The next paragraph of the article quoted other Palestinian families and reads as follows:

The affected Palestinian families in the West Bank and Gaza were sure of what happened to their sons. Our sons are used as involuntary organ donors, relatives of Khaled from Nablus told me, as did the mother of Raed from Jenin and the uncles of Machmod and Nafes from Gaza, who had all disappeared for a number of days only to return at night, dead and autopsied.

– Why would they otherwise keep the bodies for up to five days before they let us bury them? What happened to the bodies during that time? Why are they performing an autopsy when the cause of death is obvious, and in all cases against our will? Why are the bodies returned at night? And why with a military escort? And why is the area closed off during the funeral? And why is the electricity cut off? There were lots of upset questions from Nafes uncle.

Boström also wrote that unnamed UN staff members had told him that "organ theft definitely occurred" but that they had been "prevented from doing anything about it". He also reported the response of the IDF spokesperson as being that the allegations of organ theft were lies and that all Palestinian victims are routinely subjected to autopsy. Boström noted that according to Palestinian statistics for 1992, Bilal Ghanem had been one of 133 Palestinians killed and one of 69 going through postmortem examination. Boström concluded the article with his opinion: questions on what was happening remained unanswered and should be investigated.

Meanwhile, family members of Bilal Ghanem, the Palestinian at the centre of the article's allegations, stated that they had never told Boström that Ghanem's organs had been removed. However, even though they never spoke to Boström and lacked any proof to confirm the allegations, they thought that Bilal had been deprived of some organs. In a follow-up editorial, Aftonbladet editor Jan Helin wrote that he approved the article for publication "because it raises a few questions" but acknowledged that the paper then had no evidence for its claims. In August 2009, Boström said that he did not know whether the claims were true but that he wanted them investigated; he made similar remarks at a November conference in Israel. Aftonbladet published an update noting the recent conviction of Yehuda Hiss, Chief Pathologist at Israel's Abu Kabir Institute, and two of his colleagues for improperly taking body tissue from a dead Israeli soldier in 2001. The paper acknowledged that the event did not prove the truth of the original allegations.

Israeli reactions

Government

The claim in the article sparked an angry reaction by Israeli Foreign Ministry official Yigal Palmor, who associated the article with mediaeval and 19th-century blood libels. On 23 August, the Israeli Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, called for the Swedish government to condemn the article. An Israeli official quoted him as saying, "We're not asking the Swedish government for an apology, we're asking for their condemnation". The Israeli Finance Minister, Yuval Steinitz, said that a continued Swedish refusal to condemn the article might lead Israel to cancel a visit, scheduled for September, by the Swedish Foreign Minister, Carl Bildt. Steinitz told the Israel Army Radio, "Whoever doesn't distance himself from this kind of blood libel might not be a welcome guest in Israel at this time. Until the Swedish government understands differently, the state of Israel, the state of the Jews, cannot ignore antisemitic expressions and modern recycling of medieval antisemitism". The Israeli Government Press Office, which accredits foreign journalists visiting the country, said that it was delaying its approval for an Aftonbladet correspondent and photographer who are seeking permission to enter the Gaza Strip by the maximum of 90 days allowed by regulations.

Netanyahu said that history was replete with blood libel against Jews that have led to murder: "These matters cannot be taken lightly. We are not asking from the Swedes anything that we did not ask of ourselves". He reminded his ministers that in February 2009, after a satirical skit on the Israeli Channel 10 that had poked fun at the Christian belief that Jesus walked on water and Mary was a virgin had angered the Vatican, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had expressed regret and sorrow. Netanyahu commented: "I don't recall that Olmert's condemnation damaged press freedom in Israel".

The Israeli Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told Army Radio, "What angers us is that the Swedish government didn't condemn it but hastened to reprimand the ambassador who did find it right to condemn" the story, which he compared to historic anti-Semitic tracts. He accused Sweden of hypocrisy and called the affair "an odor of anti-Semitism". Lieberman noted the Swedish condemnation of the Muhammed cartoons affair in 2005 as well as Sweden's shutdown of an Internet site in the country that had posted the caricatures and the Swedish foreign minister's letter of apology to the president of Yemen for doing so. He had criticized Sweden for its silence earlier that year when the Malmö decided not to allow spectators to a Davis Cup match between Sweden and Israel.

The Israeli Interior Minister, Eli Yishai, said that he would act to prevent the paper's reporters from receiving work permits in Israel. The Welfare and Social Services Minister, Isaac Herzog, said that Israel should take legal steps against the paper. When asked why Israel did not investigate the article's claims, Israel's envoy to Sweden, Benny Dagan, said: "Why don't we investigate why the Mossad and the Jews were behind the bombing of the twin towers? Why won't we investigate why Jews are spreading AIDS in the Arab countries? Why won't we investigate why Jews killed Christian children and took their blood and organs to bake matzot on Pessah?"

Admission

On 23 December 2009, after Israeli government officials admitted that organ harvesting had taken place in the 1990s, parliamentary hearings into the issue began in Israel's Knesset. Health officials testified that Israeli authorities had harvested organs from the dead bodies of Israelis and Palestinians in the 1990s for transplant purposes and said that the practice had since been ended. Ahmed Tibi, an Arab citizen of Israel, and a member of the Knesset, testified that he had evidence indicating that organ theft continued, citing the case of Fadul Ordul Shaheen, a Palestinian from Gaza who died of diabetes in 2009. Tibi related that after Shaheen's body was returned to his family with bleeding from the eyes and a deep cut through the body, the family said that both the corneas and kidneys were taken from his corpse. Tibi asked for the complaint to be investigated and also for a government probe on whether organs were being harvested from Palestinian prisoners in Israel. Yaacov Litzman, the deputy health minister, responded that he would investigate the case "with all seriousness".

Media

Gideon Levy, in Ha'aretz, criticized the article and the Israeli response and that the article damaged "the fight against the occupation". Levy criticized Boström for not engaging in documentation, investigation and the presentation of proof. He noted, "There were cases in which the organs of Palestinians who had been killed were harvested without permission, something the Institute of Forensic Medicine has done to others in Israel, for research purposes. But it's a long way from that to suspicion of trafficking in organs based only on the fact that in 1992 a dead Palestinian was found whose organs had been removed and his body sewn back up. And 17 years later a few Jews were arrested on suspicion of trafficking in human organs. That's not professional journalism, that's cheap and harmful journalism". However, he called Lieberman's response "ludicrous" and stated that it had diplomatically damaged Israel.

The editorial line of Ha'aretz was much harsher: "Donald Bostrom, a veteran Swedish journalist, wrote a despicable, utterly baseless article". It stated, however, that Lieberman' reaction was "no less outrageous or inciting" than Bostrom's article: "Lieberman's impassioned and demagogic reaction has damaged Israel. It cheapened the Holocaust, blew the article out of proportion and caused an international uproar, pushing Sweden – which currently holds the presidency of the European Union – into an unnecessary confrontation with Israel".

Maariv published an article reporting that much of Boström's story had come from his book Inshallah (2001), which it stated to have been partly financed by the Swedish Foreign Ministry.

Civil society

Yoram Peri head of the Chaim Herzog Institute for Media, Politics and Society at Tel Aviv University, said the report touched a raw nerve among Israelis, who harbour deep distrust towards Europe and believe its newspapers to be pro-Palestinian. Agreeing on the lack of merit in the article, he suggests, however, that politicians had blown the controversy out of proportion for political purposes: "Lieberman expressed the feeling of many Israelis who do not understand the European narrative, and they think that any criticism comes from total misunderstanding of the Middle East, or because Europe is totally antisemitic and pro-Palestinian. Very few politicians, unfortunately, are sophisticated enough to distinguish between legitimate criticism and attacks by those with other motives".

Former diplomat Colette Avital said that Sweden should know the difference between freedom of the press and freedom of opinion: "freedom of expression is not unlimited, even in that beautiful northern country". She criticised Israeli official and media reactions as "blown out of all reasonable proportion" and the Israeli Foreign Minister for voicing "ridiculous and ultimately harmful threats" of cancelling the Swedish minister's visit or refusing entry to Swedish journalists.

A support meeting of families of Israeli and Palestinian donors of organs and tissues on 26 August at Sourasky Medical Center, in Tel Aviv, discussed the report. Participants stressed a message that "organ donation is saving lives without any conditions" and called the report black propaganda against Israel.

Swedish reactions

Government

Elisabet Borsiin Bonnier, the Swedish ambassador to Israel, strongly condemned the article: "The article in the Swedish newspaper is shocking and terrifying for us Swedes, as it influences the Israeli citizens.... The embassy can not emphasize more its disgust". The Swedish foreign ministry and the Swedish foreign minister, Carl Bildt, distanced themselves from the ambassador's statement and underlined that Sweden is a democracy with freedom of press and that state representatives should not comment on individual articles in newspapers.

Mårten Schultz, senior lecturer in jurisprudence, thought that the appeals to freedom of speech were "attempts to use the rhetorically convincing status of the freedom of expression and press legislation in order to pursue a political agenda" and exhorted politicians and journalists to bring out and read the Freedom of the Press Act before they said what the government is not entitled to do. The Office of the Chancellor of Justice said that although, the government can not criticize the decision to publish, it might go further in its criticism of the article without violating the Constitution although that might be "inappropriate". The literal words by the Chancellor of Justice, Göran Lambertz, were the following, according to the Swedish news agency, Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå: "It is not completely clear where the limits are. There is rather a lot one may do, according to the constitution, even if it were to be regarded as politically and legally inappropriate".

On 6 September 2009, Bildt announced the cancellation of a trip he planned to make to Israel on 11 September. There was some speculation in Israel and elsewhere that it was related to the controversy. However, Swedish officials denied that.

Legal complaints

The Swedish Chancellor of Justice, the sole attorney in enforcing violations to the conventions regarding freedom of the press and freedom of expression as well as the ombudsman on supervising government action both received two written requests asking for investigation into the matter. One asked the chancellor to judge whether the article "really would include anything that brings it beyond what the freedom of press allows – for example constitute hate speech." The second asked him to open an errand of supervision regarding the Swedish ambassador's statements, and on a principal level explain what an ambassador officially can express on behalf of the high office and the country. Aftonbladet was acquitted of all charges.

Nils Funcke, a Swedish journalist and author on the Swedish constitution, predicted that the Swedish ambassador to Israel would be criticized for her initiative. The question, he said, was how sharp the criticism would be and how the government would react. Despite his deep concerns regarding the quality of journalism in the article, he called it "unthinkable" that the chancellor's office would take legal action on its contents.

Donald Boström and Aftonbladet

The author of the article, Donald Boström, spoke to Israel Radio on 19 August 2009 and said that he was worried by the allegations he reported: "It concerns me, to the extent that I want it to be investigated, that's true. But whether it's true or not – I have no idea, I have no clue". Boström told CNN that the purpose of his article was to call for an investigation into the claims about stealing organs in the early 1990s. In an interview to the Arab media site Menassat, Boström said there was "no conclusive evidence" that organ harvesting was a systematic IDF practice but that there is a "collection of allegations and suspicious circumstances". He was quoted as saying, "The point is that we know there is organ trafficking in Israel. And we also know that there are families claiming that their children's organs have been harvested. These two facts together point to the need for further investigation". The newspaper's editor, Jan Helin, said "I'm not a Nazi, I'm not anti-Semitic" and described himself as "a responsible editor who gave the green light to an article because it raises a few questions" but noted that Aftonbladet had no evidence that Israel practiced organ harvesting. Aftonbladet published a follow-up to Boström's article that defended his report and said that the organ-harvesting allegation "should be investigated, either to stop the relentless Palestinian rumors, or, if the rumors prove to be true, stop the trade in body parts". It called Bonnier's condemnation of the original article a "disgrace".

Boström told Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot, "I am not an anti-Semite, and that's what saddens me most in this whole story. I've been a journalist for 25 years and I've always written against racism and segregation". He said that he had not meant to imply that IDF soldiers killed Palestinians for their organs: "Even the Palestinians don't say that. What they said is that when the Israeli army returned the bodies, 62 of them had been autopsied and 20 Palestinian families I spoke to were certain that their sons' organs had been harvested". He acknowledged that he had not personally seen evidence of organ harvesting since the bodies that were returned to the families were never examined to determine whether organs had been taken: "As far as I know no one examined the bodies. All I'm saying is that this needs to be investigated". He also said, "Sweden supports Israel as a country and a people, and I am a part of this. There are many people, I among them, who condemn the Israeli government's policy of occupation and violation of international law. Israel needs to withdraw to its borders and evacuate the settlements. If Israel does this, support for you will reappear".

Other media

The Swedish rival newspaper Sydsvenskan sharply criticized Aftonbladet for publishing what it called "an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory". Henrik Bredberg in Sydsvenskan said:

"Donald Boström publicised a variant of an anti-Semitic classic, the Jew who abducts children and steals their blood.... The regrettable aspects just seem to grow and grow... the Israeli government rages and speaks of an article which 'shames Swedish democracy and the entire Swedish press'. Hardly. Freedom of expression and freedom of the press are part of democracy.... Dare to believe in freedom of the press and open debate. Even when individual editors make stupid and tasteless decisions."

An editorial in Göteborgs-Posten stated:

"The Foreign Ministry has made it clear that Swedish freedom of the press applies. Good. Aftonbladet should not be given the unwarranted glory of martyrdom.... Publication seems to represent an obvious lack of judgment. Unfortunately the lack of judgment did not stop there. The Swedish ambassador in Tel Aviv... attacked the article and thereby created the impression that having views about or intervening in individual publications should be a task for the government and its representatives."

Several political commentators pointed out that Sweden held the presidency of the Council of the European Union at the time of the dispute. From an Israeli point of view, they say, discrediting Sweden as anti-Semitic might be a way to prevent European criticism of Israel's policies.

Swedish-Jewish community

Lena Posner-Körösi, a leader of Sweden's Jewish community, criticized Israel's official response to Boström's article, stating in an interview with the Israeli army radio that Israel's reaction and media outrage had provided the claims with much more exposure than they would have had otherwise and had blown the story out of proportion. She noted how initial widespread condemnations of Aftonbladet and its article in the Swedish media quickly turned into united defence for freedom of the press when Israel requested that the government should condemn it as well. Posner-Körösi explained that "freedom of expression is sacred" to Swedes and that no one "understands how Israel dares to interfere". Posner-Körösi was still critical of Aftonbladet, stating in her letter to editor Jan Helin that "the Jewish Central Council in Sweden insists that the description is akin to classic antisemitism – Jews who kidnap children to slaughter them and steal their blood. We are confounded how a Swedish newspaper once again permits its pages to include such hate speech and expect that you, as editor and publisher to reject antisemitic statements".

Anders Carlberg, the outgoing chairman of the Jewish Community in Gothenburg called Israel's response "unhelpful". He said that Israel should have responded by publishing a rebuttal: "The stance of the community in general is that it's strange that this has become a government issue at all.... It falls along the lines of Voltaire: I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to death your right to say it."

Palestinian reactions

Palestinian Authority

On 3 Sep 2009, the Palestinian Authority (PA) announced the formation of an interministerial panel to investigate allegations that the Israeli military "stole organs" from Palestinian detainees. The secretary general of the PA Council of Ministers, Dr Hassan Abu Libdeh, if true, the alleged events, if true, would constitute violations of human rights. The PA's ministers of Health, Interior, and Foreign Affairs, and senior officials from each ministry would, he said, sit on the commission.

In November 2015, in a letter to the UN, the Palestinian Ambassador to the United Nations accused Israel of continuing to harvest organs from Palestinians killed by its forces. Riyad Mansour said that was a confirmation of "past reports about organ harvesting", which prompted Israel to reject the allegations and condemn them as anti-Semitic.

Ghanem family and relatives

According to The Jerusalem Post, Jalal Ghanem, the brother of Bilal Ghanem, whose photograph had accompanied Boström's article, could not confirm the allegations. Jalal said that Bilal was evacuated by the IDF in a helicopter after he had been shot. His corpse was delivered to the family a few days later, and there were stitches on Bilal's body that ran from the chest down to the bottom of the abdomen, and his teeth were missing. Jalal also said that the only time the family saw the Swedish photographer was at Bilal's funeral photographing the event. In subsequent interview with Al-Jazeera, he added that he thought Bilal was among those who had their organs stolen.

Their mother denied having told any foreign journalist that her son's organs had been stolen, The Jerusalem Post reported in its article. However, she did not rule out the possibility that Israel was harvesting organs of Palestinians. Another relative of the family, Ibrahim Ghanem, said that the family never told the Swedish photographer that Israel had stolen organs from Bilal's body and speculated, "Maybe the journalist reached that conclusion on the basis of the stitches he saw on the body." He also said that the family had no evidence on whether the organs were removed because they had not had an autopsy conducted.

In an interview with Aftonbladet made one week after the original article, Jalal Ghanem and Bilal's mother, Saadega Ghanem, still stood by their allegations and also claimed that Bilal was still alive when he had been taken away. They also claimed that IDF soldiers tried to prevent journalists from taking pictures of the body.

Media

Palestinian journalist Khalid Amayreh reported in an article in Al-Ahram that prior accusations of organ harvesting had been made by representatives of the Palestinian Authority, including by late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. Amayreh noted that no genuine investigation had ever been carried out into the Palestinian allegations of unauthorized organ harvesting even though they had dated to before the 1990s.

Jonathan Cook writing for Al-Ahram Weekly, said that Western journalists had heard about such rumours. According to Cook, "the families making the claims were not given a hearing in the late 1980s and early 1990s, during the first Intifada, when most of the reports occurred, and are still being denied the right to voice their concerns today". In an article for the Scottish Daily Record, British politician George Galloway asserted that Israel was "playing mini-Mengele on Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails", a reference to the Nazi physician Josef Mengele.

Civil society

In September 2009, hundreds of Palestinians attended a conference marking the "national day for the return of the bodies of martyrs" in Nablus. Palestinian organizations said that Israel was holding the bodies of 275 Palestinians and refusing to return them to their families. After the conference, Mohammad Barakeh, a Palestinian Member of Knesset in Israel, made a connection between the missing bodies and the article in Aftonbladet: "Israel has maintained its reputation and alerted the entire world to the Swedish article. They claim that what was published there could not be true.... The burden of proof falls on Israel, and as long as it refuses to say what the status of the bodies is or return them, it is hiding something awful".

Reactions from elsewhere

Iran

The Iranian state newspaper Kayhan quoted Arab reporter Kusar Aslam, who claims to have been stationed in Gaza and the West Bank for 22 years, as saying, "Since the early 1970s the Israelis have snatched thousands of Palestinian bodies from hospitals in the territories and transferred them to the Abu Kabir Forensic Institute.... My personal experience verifies the report published by (Donald) Boström". She said that the IDF kidnapped living Palestinians: "I personally witnessed Israeli soldiers and army vehicles snatching Palestinian bodies from emergency rooms. In other instances I saw soldiers follow Palestinians to cemeteries with the intent of stealing bodies before they were buried. This became so widespread that many people began to bury those murdered by IDF forces near their homes – in the yard or under a tree".

Syria

Syrian President Bashar Assad's spokeswoman, Bouthaina Shaaban, praised Boström's article in Asharq Al-Awsat and said Israel "should be put on trial" for its "criminal acts". She claimed that there was a connection between the violation of Palestinian corpses claimed by Boström and the accused Israeli-American organ-trafficking ring whose members were indicted in New Jersey and New York in July 2009.

Yossi Levy, the Israeli Foreign Ministry's spokesman said Shaaban's praise for the article should be a "warning light" for the Swedish government, which "unfortunately has still not fully and courageously condemned the article".

United States

In a letter to the Swedish prime minister, Representatives Robert Wexler (D-FL) and Elton Gallegly (R-CA), members on the United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe, wrote: "Given the far-reaching implications for this article, which raises the unfortunate specter of similar blood libels and spurious charges that have been directed at Jews throughout the centuries, it is critical that your government unequivocally repudiate and reject the heinous allegations expressed in this article.... It is essential that this vitriolic article not be used by anti-Semites, anti-Israel advocates, and extremists as an excuse to commit acts of violence and terrorism against the Jewish community in Sweden or internationally".

Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD), Chairman of U.S. Helsinki Commission, released a press release that urged European foreign ministers to denounce the Aftonbladet article: "We at the U.S. Helsinki Commission are dedicated to upholding human rights, particularly freedom of the press. But with freedom of the press comes responsibility. And when major press outlets fail to meet their responsibility, and instead raise the specter of racism or anti-Semitism, then public officials are duty bound to speak out and condemn such blatant falsehoods. I commend Sweden's Ambassador to Israel for fulfilling this duty, and I call on the Swedish Government, which currently holds the European Union Presidency, to support Italian and other EU efforts to denounce this harmful reporting".

Co-Chairman of US Helsinki Commission Senator Alcee Hastings (D-FL) said, "This incendiary article draws on age old anti-Semitic imagery, and attempts to place it in a modern context of worrisome hostility in Europe towards both Jews and Israel. Government leaders must demand the press act with journalistic integrity and report responsibly, particularly when it can incite the violent potential of anti-Semitism and other forms of hatred".

Abraham Foxman, the National Director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith said that the ADL lodged a complaint with the Swedish embassy in Washington: "Such unfounded rumors – of Jews 'poisoning the wells' and carrying out acts of ritual murder—have been in the playbook of anti-Semites through the centuries, and continue to be believed in parts of the Arab world and elsewhere to this day. What could Mr. Boström and the editors who ushered this article into print have been thinking?" The letter stated, "This article represents nothing less than a base recycling of the medieval blood libel in which Jews were charged with killing Christian children for their alleged ritual use".

In a video on its website on 24 August 2014, Time magazine quoted the 2009 Swedish Aftonbladet report as fact. After a denouncing report from Honest Reporting came out, Time retracted, within hours, the allegations that Israeli soldiers had harvested and sold Palestinian organs in 2009.

Reporters Without Borders

Reporters Without Borders expressed regret that Israel had gone after the Swedish government for a condemnation: "Regardless of the article's content and although we understand the public outcry it has triggered in Israel, the Israeli authorities must refrain from asking their Swedish counterparts to intervene.... "Aftonbladet alone is responsible for the articles it publishes. The Swedish government is not responsible".

Italy

In an interview with Haa'rez on 31 August, Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said that he had recently met with Bildt and that both agreed that at a meeting of European Union foreign ministers the next week, they would work to pass a resolution making it clear that the EU, under the Swedish presidency, strongly condemns anti-Semitism and will take action against any manifestation of it in Europe. Frattini said he was intending to demand that the meeting's summary statement explicitly condemn the article.

Later that day, the Swedish news agency TT quoted Carl Bildt as denying the Frattini's conclusion and reported that the head of communications at the Swedish Foreign Ministry, Cecilia Julin, denied that Bildt and Frattini even had discussed the dispute or a possible resolution at the Council of Ministers: "From the Swedish side we have no plans to handle this question through the informal foreign ministers' meeting in Stockholm". According to her, Bildt suggested that Frattini's comment must have arisen through an "Italian misunderstanding". Reinfeldt also insisted that the Swedish government could not take a stand because of Sweden's freedom of the press. At a press conference in Stockholm, he said: "We cannot be asked by anyone to contravene the Swedish constitution, and this is something we will also not do within the European Union".

The Israeli Prime Minister's Office did not comment on Frattini's initiative. However, Palmor said: "Every initiative against anti-Semitism is welcome. But if the declaration is general and does not specifically relate to the article in Aftonbladet, it will not resolve anything". He added that "We did not ask for an apology, or for measures against the newspaper or the journalist. All we asked of Sweden and the Swedes is that they reject and decry the content of the report. And our position has not changed".

Yehuda Hiss interview

In December 2009, Nancy Scheper-Hughes, an anthropology professor at the University of California at Berkeley and founder of a newsletter, "Organs Watch", released the tape of an interview that she had conducted in 2000 with Yehuda Hiss, the director of Israel's L. Greenberg Institute of Forensic Medicine (known colloquially as the "Abu Kabir" Forensic Institute). In the interview, which appeared on Israel's Channel 2 television, Hiss stated that he had harvested organs in the 1990s. "We started to harvest corneas.... Whatever was done was highly informal. No permission was asked from the family". Hiss was fired from his position as director of the forensic institute in 2004 for "repeated body-part scandals". Hiss was later reinstated and remained head of the institute until he retired in October 2012 after allegations of bad procedures at the institute.

Israeli officials acknowledged that such incidents had taken place but stated that neither Israelis nor Palestinians had been specifically targeted, that no such incidents had occurred for a long time and that Hiss had been removed from his position.

Scheper-Hughes stated that Palestinians were not the only ones affected "by a long shot" but that she felt the interview must be made public now because "the symbolism, you know, of taking skin of the population considered to be the enemy, (is) something, just in terms of its symbolic weight, that has to be reconsidered".

In an interview with Al Jazeera, Scheper-Hughes said the organ harvesting took place with the "sanction and approval" of the military establishment and that the "body parts were used by hospitals for transplant purposes – cornea transplants. They were sent to public hospitals ... and the skin went to a special skin bank, founded by the military, for their uses", like for burns victims.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Article about organ harvesting sparks Israel-Sweden tiff" Los Angeles Times 24 August 2009
  2. ^ Paper's organ harvesting article causes Israel–Sweden rift, CNN 17 August 2009
  3. Black, Ian (21 December 2009). "Doctor admits Israeli pathologists harvested organs without consent". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 26 September 2024.
  4. ^ "Israel admits to organ thefts". Al Jazeera. 21 December 2009. Retrieved 26 September 2024.
  5. ^ "U.S. Congressmen to EU: Condemn IDF organ harvesting article - Haaretz - Israel News". Archived from the original on 6 September 2009. Retrieved 4 September 2009.
  6. ^ "CARDIN, HASTINGS CALL ON EUROPEAN LEADERS TO DENOUNCE ANTI-SEMITIC ARTICLE IN SWEDISH PRESS". Archived from the original on 10 September 2009. Retrieved 19 September 2009.
  7. Sweden: Not party to envoy's censure of IDF organ harvesting article Archived 3 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Haaretz 20 August 2009
  8. Tidningsutgivarna (12 August 2010). "Tafsa inte på tryck- och yttrandefriheten". Archived from the original on 29 January 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2012.
  9. ^ Primor, Adar (31 August 2009). "Following inflammatory article, Sweden to demand EU condemn anti-Semitism". Haaretz. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  10. Israelartikel ratas av kulturchefer, Svenska Dagbladet, 26 August 2009
  11. Ali Waked (3 September 2009). "PA to probe 'IDF organ harvesting'". Ynetnews. Retrieved 7 September 2009.
  12. ^ Horrid beyond words by Khalid Amayreh, published in Al-Ahram. Retrieved 26 September 2009. Archived 2009-09-28.
  13. Israel harvested organs in '90s without permission Google News 20 December 2009.
  14. Black, Ian (21 December 2009). "Doctor admits Israeli pathologists harvested organs without consent". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 12 April 2010. Retrieved 23 April 2010.
  15. "Israel tog organ – utan tillstånd". Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  16. "Israel". Maan News Agency. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  17. * Israeli army admits stealing organs, AP (reprinted in The Daily Telegraph 21 December 2009)
  18. Navier, Hanna "Donald Boström: Israel har inte förstått artikeln" Archived 26 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine ("Donald Boström: Israel has not understood the article") Second Opinion, 19 August 2009 (in Swedish)
  19. ^ Original article in Swedish: Aftonbladet, August 17, 2009: ”Våra söner plundras på sina organ”, Aftonbladet: "Our sons are plundered of their organs". (third party translation: Aftonbladet: "Our sons plundered for their organs".)
  20. ^ Abu Toameh, Khaled (25 August 2009). "Palestinian family: We didn't say organs taken". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 17 September 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
  21. ^ Palestinians seek organ theft probe Al Jazeera 28 August 2009
  22. Swedish editor: I'm not a Nazi, Ynet News 24 August 2009
  23. Israel Furious Over Swedish Newspaper Article, Associated Press 19 August 2009 (reprinted in FOX News)
  24. Report: IDF organ harvesting reporter 'rethinking' story, Haaretz 12-1—2009
  25. ^ But did it happen?. Jonathan Cook, Al-Ahram Weekly. Issue No. 963, 3–9 September 2009. Archived on 15 January 2010
  26. "Swedish reporter repeats IDF organ theft allegations, this time in Israel". Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  27. "KULTUR: Nu faller domarna i den israeliska organhärvan". Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  28. Macdonald, Alastair (19 August 2009). "Israel slams Swedish tabloid's organ theft story". Reuters. Retrieved 19 August 2009.
  29. The Associated Press (23 August 2009). "Netanyahu Wants Sweden to Condemn Organ Story". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  30. "Israel curbs Swedish media over 'blood libel'". Reuters. 23 August 2009. Archived from the original on 27 August 2009. Retrieved 15 February 2010.
  31. Boudreaux, Richard (24 August 2009). "Article about organ harvesting sparks Israel-Sweden tiff". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 15 February 2010.
  32. ^ Keinon, Herb (23 August 2009). "Ministers fume over Swedish story". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 17 September 2011. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
  33. "Israel opens organ theft hearing". Al Jazeera. 23 December 2009. Archived from the original on 26 December 2009. Retrieved 26 December 2009.
  34. Levy, Gideon (27 August 2009). "Swedish article on organ harvesting was cheap and harmful journalism". Ha'aretz. Archived from the original on 26 November 2022. Retrieved 26 November 2022.
  35. ^ A bewildering response Ha'aretz 23 August 2009.
  36. "'משרד החוץ השבדי מימן תחקיר 'גניבת האיברים" (Swedish Foreign Ministry Financed "study" of Stealing the Organs) Maariv (in Hebrew)
  37. Jpost.com Staff (23 August 2009). "Swedish officials may be unwelcome". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 6 July 2013. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
  38. "Israeli officials press Sweden on journalist's organ theft story". Christian Science Monitor. 25 August 2009. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  39. "Israel News – Online Israeli News Covering Israel & The Jewish World …". 9 July 2012. Archived from the original on 9 July 2012. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  40. Rubinstein, Elad (30 August 2009). "'We gave them life. So what if they're Arabs?'". Ynetnews. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  41. "חדשות 2: שגרירת שוודיה: "מזועזעת מהכתבה"". Archived from the original on 22 August 2009. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
  42. Bildt, Carl (20 August 2009). "Principer och praktik" [Principles and practice] (in Swedish). Retrieved 21 August 2009.
  43. Mårten Schultz: Inget grundlagshinder för att kritisera Aftonbladet Archived 28 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine ("No constitutional ban on criticism of Aftonbladet") Newsmill.se, 24 augusti 2009.
  44. Lag tillåter hårdare artikelkritik Archived 29 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine TT, 25 August 2009. ("Law allows tougher criticism of article") (in Swedish)
  45. "Sweden's foreign minister cancels Israel visit". CBC News. 6 September 2009. Retrieved 15 February 2010.
  46. "Israel News – Online Israeli News Covering Israel & The Jewish World …". 9 July 2012. Archived from the original on 9 July 2012. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  47. "Sweden's free speech tradition runs into Israeli ire by Igor Gedilaghine for Agence France-Presse". Archived from the original on 10 April 2010. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  48. Andén, Axel (25 August 2009). "Två JK-anmälningar efter Aftonbladets artikel om organhandel" [Two reports to the JK after the Aftonbladet article on organ trade] (in Swedish). Mediavärlden. Archived from the original on 3 September 2009. Retrieved 5 September 2009.
  49. Aftonbladet: Publiceringen är inte antisemitisk ("The publishing is not antisemitic")
  50. Funcke, Nils (31 August 2009). "Nils Funcke: Aftonbladet kritiserades för tidigt" [Nils Funcke: Aftonbladet was criticized to early] (in Swedish). Mediavärlden. Retrieved 6 September 2009.
  51. Friedman, Matti (19 August 2009). "Israel furious over Swedish newspaper article". Associated Press. Retrieved 19 August 2009.
  52. Swedish paper's organ harvesting article draws Israeli outrage, CNN. Retrieved 24 August 2009.
  53. "'Aftonbladet' editor admits no evidence on organ-harvesting". The Jerusalem Post. 24 August 2009. Archived from the original on 17 September 2011. Retrieved 1 September 2009.
  54. Gur, Yonatan (24 August 2009). "Swedish editor: I'm not a Nazi". Ynetnews. Retrieved 1 September 2009.
  55. Berthelsen, Morten (19 August 2009). "Swedish newspaper 'blood libel' sparks harsh condemnation". Haaretz. Retrieved 19 August 2009.
  56. ^ "Israeli and Swedish press on organ row". BBC News. 24 August 2009. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
  57. "Sydsvenskan, August 24 2009: Political strategy behind Sweden-bashing". Archived from the original on 27 August 2009.
  58. Dagens Nyheter, August 24, 2009: Ordförandeskapet i EU störs av Israels ordkrig ("Presidency disturbed by Israel's verbal assault") (in Swedish)
  59. Dagen, August 25, 2009: Arne Lapidus: Att slagkraftigt angripa verkliga och inbillade fiender ger ofta inrikespolitiska pluspoäng Archived 7 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine ("All-out attacks on real and imagined enemies often lead to gains in domestic politics") (in Swedish)
  60. "'Those who don't condemn Swedish story may not be welcome'". The Jerusalem Post. 23 August 2009. Archived from the original on 6 July 2013. Retrieved 27 August 2009.
  61. "Stockholm Jewish leader: Israel caused this mess" Ynet 23 August 2009
  62. Posner-Körösi, Lena (30 August 2010). "Hets mot folkgrupp". Letter to Editor. Archived from the original on 17 April 2009. Retrieved 1 September 2009.
  63. "The organ harvesting controversy: Did Sweden fumble or Israel overreact?". JTA – Jewish & Israel News. Archived from the original on 28 August 2009. Retrieved 4 September 2009.
  64. Ma'an News, "High level PA panel to investigate 'organ theft' claims", 3 September 2009. Maan News Agency: High level PA panel to investigate "organ theft" claims
  65. Israel blasts Palestinians after accusations of organ-harvesting. Reuters, 4 November 2015
  66. "PA claims Israel harvesting organs of dead Palestinians". The Times of Israel. 5 November 2015. Retrieved 13 July 2023.
  67. "Mamma har aldrig slutat lida". Aftonbladet. Archived from the original on 26 August 2009. Retrieved 19 September 2009.
  68. Elgot, Jessica (29 December 2009). "Galloway compares Israel to Nazi doctor Mengele". London: The Jewish Chronicle. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  69. Sharon Roffe Ofir (8 September 2009). "Barakeh justifies organs trafficking claims". Ynetnews. Retrieved 8 September 2009.
  70. Cohen, Dudi (1 September 2009). "Iranian reporter: Swedish article on IDF organ harvesting 'credible'". Ynetnews. Retrieved 5 September 2009.
  71. Keinon, Herb (3 September 2009). "Spanish paper turns to Irving for WWII 'expertise'". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 5 September 2009.
  72. Israel News – Haaretz Israeli News source. Archived 10 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 19 September 2009. Archived 2009-09-26.
  73. "Press Release|ADL". Archived from the original on 8 April 2010.
  74. "European Jewish Press". Archived from the original on 22 August 2009.
  75. ^ "Time Magazine Accuses IDF of Stealing Palestinian Organs". HonestReporting – 24 August 2014. 24 August 2014.
  76. JTA. "Time retracts IDF organ harvesting allegation". The Times of Israel – 25 August 2014.
  77. Swedish government refuses to condemn national newspaper’s perceived libel Reporters Without Borders 25 August 2009. Retrieved 19 September 2009. Archived 2009-09-26.
  78. Keinon, Herb (31 August 2009). "Bildt says no plan to condemn anti-Semitism". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 1 September 2009.
  79. Siegel, Judy (3 November 2012). "Hiss fired for repeated body-part scandals". Jerusalem Post | HighBeam Research. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
  80. Even, Dan. "Deputy Health Minister Fires Abu Kabir Chief Pathologist Yehuda Hiss". Haaretz. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
  81. Israel harvested organs without permission, officials say CNN, 21 December 2009.
  82. "Israel admits organ harvesting". The Irish Times. Retrieved 26 October 2024.

External links

Israeli–Palestinian conflict
Participants
Israelis
Palestinians
Principals
Other groups
Third-party groups
Individuals
Israelis
Palestinians
Background
1920–1948
 
1948–1970
Palestinian
insurgency
1968–1982
 
1973–1987
First Intifada
1987–1991
Second Intifada
2000–2005
Palestinian dissident
campaigns
2006–present
Gaza–Israel
conflict
2006–present
Diplomacy/law
Timeline
1948–1991
1990s
2000s
2010s
United Nations
Analysis
Categories: