Revision as of 15:00, 25 January 2006 view sourceHogeye (talk | contribs)3,004 edits →American individualist anarchism: tree v03 is latest version← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:00, 18 December 2024 view source Onel5969 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers935,522 editsm Disambiguating links to Rojava (link changed to Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria) using DisamAssist. | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Political philosophy and movement}} | |||
{{npov}} | |||
{{Other uses|Anarchy|Anarchism (disambiguation)|Anarchist (disambiguation)}} | |||
{{original_research}} | |||
{{ |
{{Pp-semi-indef}} | ||
{{Good article}} | |||
{{Use British English|date=August 2021}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2024}} | |||
{{Use shortened footnotes|date=May 2023}} | |||
{{Anarchism sidebar}} | |||
'''Anarchism''' is a ] and ] that is against all forms of authority and seeks to abolish the institutions it claims maintain unnecessary coercion and ], typically including the ] and ]. Anarchism advocates for the replacement of the state with ] and voluntary ]. A historically left-wing movement, anarchism is usually described as the ] wing of the ] (]). | |||
{{Anarchism}} | |||
'''Anarchism''' derives from the ] '']'' ("without ]s (ruler, chief, king)"). Thus anarchism, in its most general meaning, is the belief that rulers are unnecessary and should be abolished. '''Anarchism''' refers to various ] and related ]s that advocate the elimination of authoritarian institutions, particularly the ]. Most anarchists also oppose ], though some theorists have espoused ]. In place of authoritarian political structures and coercive economic institutions, anarchists advocate social relations they claim to be based upon ] of autonomous individuals, ], and ]. | |||
Although traces of anarchist ideas are found all throughout history, modern anarchism emerged from the ]. During the latter half of the 19th and the first decades of the 20th century, the anarchist movement flourished in most parts of the world and had a significant role in ] for ]. ] formed during this period. Anarchists have taken part in ], most notably in the ], the ] and the ], whose end marked the end of the ]. In the last decades of the 20th and into the 21st century, the anarchist movement has been resurgent once more, growing in popularity and influence within ], ] and ] movements. | |||
While anarchism is defined by what it is against, anarchists also offer positive visions of what they believe to be a truly free society. The word "]," as anarchists use it, does not imply ] or ], but rather a harmonious ] society. However, ideas about how an anarchist society might work vary considerably, especially with respect to economics. Also, there is disagreement about how a free society might be brought about. | |||
Anarchists employ ], which may be generally divided into ] and ]; there is significant overlap between the two. Evolutionary methods try to simulate what an anarchist society might be like, but revolutionary tactics, which have historically taken a ] turn, aim to overthrow authority and the state. Many facets of ] have been influenced by anarchist theory, critique, and ]. | |||
{{Toc limit|3}} | |||
== Etymology, terminology, and definition == | |||
=== Origins of anarchism === | |||
{{Main|Definition of anarchism and libertarianism}} | |||
{{wikiquote}} | |||
{{See also|Glossary of anarchism}} | |||
] is an example of a writer who added to anarchist theory without using the exact term.{{Sfn|Carlson|1972|pp=22–23}}]] | |||
The ] origin of ''anarchism'' is from the ] ''anarkhia'' (ἀναρχία), meaning "without a ruler", composed of the ] ''an-'' ("without") and the word ''arkhos'' ("leader" or "ruler"). The ] '']'' denotes the ideological current that favours anarchy.{{Sfnm|1a1=Bates|1y=2017|1p=128|2a1=Long|2y=2013|2p=217}} ''Anarchism'' appears in English from 1642 as ''anarchisme'' and ''anarchy'' from 1539; early English usages emphasised a sense of disorder.{{Sfnm|1a1=Merriam-Webster|1y=2019|1loc="Anarchism"|2a1=''Oxford English Dictionary''|2y=2005|2loc="Anarchism"|3a1=Sylvan|3y=2007|3p=260}} Various factions within the ] labelled their opponents as ''anarchists'', although few such accused shared many views with later anarchists. Many revolutionaries of the 19th century such as ] (1756–1836) and ] (1808–1871) would contribute to the anarchist doctrines of the next generation but did not use ''anarchist'' or ''anarchism'' in describing themselves or their beliefs.{{Sfn|Joll|1964|pp=27–37}} | |||
The first ] to call himself an ''anarchist'' ({{Langx|fr|link=no|anarchiste}}) was ] (1809–1865),{{Sfn|Kahn|2000}} marking the formal birth of anarchism in the mid-19th century. Since the 1890s and beginning in France,{{Sfn|Nettlau|1996|p=162}} '']'' has often been used as a synonym for anarchism;{{Sfn|Guérin|1970|loc="The Basic Ideas of Anarchism"}} its use as a synonym is still common outside the United States.{{Sfnm|1a1=Ward|1y=2004|1p=62|2a1=Goodway|2y=2006|2p=4|3a1=Skirda|3y=2002|3p=183|4a1=Fernández|4y=2009|4p=9}} Some usages of ''libertarianism'' refer to ] ] philosophy only, and ] in particular is termed ''libertarian anarchism''.{{Sfn|Morris|2002|p=61}} | |||
], and others, argue that before recorded ], human society was organized on anarchist principles.{{ref|Kropotkin_MutualAid}} Some anthropologists follow Kropotkin and Engels in believing that hunter-gatherer bands had an egalitarian structure due lack of a division of labour, accumulated wealth, or decreed law.{{ref|Engels_OriginsoftheFamily}} | |||
While the term ''libertarian'' has been largely synonymous with anarchism,{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1992|1p=641|2a1=Cohn|2y=2009|2p=6}} its meaning has more recently been diluted by wider adoption from ideologically disparate groups,{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} including both the ] and ], who do not associate themselves with ] or a ], and extreme ], who are primarily concerned with ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} Additionally, some anarchists use '']''{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1992|1p=641|2a1=Cohn|2y=2009|2p=6|3a1=Levy|3a2=Adams|3y=2018|3p=104}} to avoid anarchism's negative connotations and emphasise its connections with ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} ''Anarchism'' is broadly used to describe the ] wing of the ].{{Sfn|Levy|Adams|2018|p=104}}{{Refn|In ''Anarchism: From Theory to Practice'' (1970),{{Sfn|Guérin|1970|p=12}} anarchist historian ] described it as a synonym for ], and wrote that anarchism "is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State."{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2017}} In his many works on anarchism, historian ] describes anarchism, alongside ], as the ] wing of ].{{Sfn|Otero|1994|p=617}}|group=nb}} Anarchism is contrasted to socialist forms which are ] or from above.{{Sfn|Osgood|1889|p=1}} Scholars of anarchism generally highlight anarchism's socialist credentials{{Sfn|Newman|2005|p=15}} and criticise attempts at creating dichotomies between the two.{{Sfn|Morris|2015|p=64}} Some scholars describe anarchism as having many influences from liberalism,{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} and being both liberal and socialist but more so.{{Sfn|Walter|2002|p=44}} Many scholars reject ] as a misunderstanding of anarchist principles.{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1992|1pp=564–565|2a1=Jennings|2y=1993|2p=143|3a1=Gay|3a2=Gay|3y=1999|3p=15|4a1=Morris|4y=2008|4p=13|5a1=Johnson|5y=2008|5p=169|6a1=Franks|6y=2013|6pp=393–394}}{{Refn|] claimed that anarchism is "the extreme antithesis" of ] and ].{{Sfn|Osgood|1889|p=1}} ] states that "n general anarchism is closer to socialism than liberalism. ... Anarchism finds itself largely in the socialist camp, but it also has outriders in liberalism. It cannot be reduced to socialism, and is best seen as a separate and distinctive doctrine."{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} According to ], "t is hard not to conclude that these ideas", referring to ], "are described as anarchist only on the basis of a misunderstanding of what anarchism is." Jennings adds that "anarchism does not stand for the untrammelled freedom of the individual (as the 'anarcho-capitalists' appear to believe) but, as we have already seen, for the extension of individuality and community."{{Sfn|Jennings|1999|p=147}} ] wrote that "anarchism does derive from liberalism and socialism both historically and ideologically. ... In a sense, anarchists always remain liberals and socialists, and whenever they reject what is good in either they betray anarchism itself. ... We are liberals but more so, and socialists but more so."{{Sfn|Walter|2002|p=44}} Michael Newman includes anarchism as one of many ], especially the more socialist-aligned tradition following Proudhon and ].{{Sfn|Newman|2005|p=15}} ] argues that it is "conceptually and historically misleading" to "create a dichotomy between socialism and anarchism."{{Sfn|Morris|2015|p=64}}|group=nb}} | |||
Anarchists including the ] and ] find anarchist attitudes in the philosophy of ] in ]. {{ref|toxicpop}} {{ref|lewrockwell}}. ] found an early instance of anarchist philosophy in the ideas of ] ]. According to Kropotkin, Zeno "repudiated the omnipotence of the state, its intervention and regimentation, and proclaimed the sovereignty of the moral law of the individual". {{ref|blackcrayon}} | |||
While ] is central to anarchist thought, defining ''anarchism'' is not an easy task for scholars, as there is a lot of discussion among scholars and anarchists on the matter, and various currents perceive anarchism slightly differently.{{Sfn|Long|2013|p=217}}{{Refn|One common definition adopted by anarchists is that anarchism is a cluster of political philosophies opposing ] and ], including ], ], the ], and all associated institutions, in the conduct of all ] in favour of a society based on ], ], and ]. Scholars highlight that this definition has the same shortcomings as the definition based on anti-authoritarianism ('']'' conclusion), anti-statism (anarchism is much more than that),{{Sfnm|1a1=McLaughlin|1y=2007|1p=166|2a1=Jun|2y=2009|2p=507|3a1=Franks|3y=2013|3pp=386–388}} and etymology (negation of rulers).{{Sfnm|1a1=McLaughlin|1y=2007|1pp=25–29|2a1=Long|2y=2013|2pp=217}}|group=nb}} Major definitional elements include the will for a non-coercive society, the rejection of the state apparatus, the belief that ] allows humans to exist in or progress toward such a non-coercive society, and a suggestion on how to act to pursue the ideal of anarchy.{{Sfn|McLaughlin|2007|pp=25–26}} | |||
] | |||
The ]s of ] Europe are sometimes considered to be religious forerunners of modern anarchism. ], in his '']'', writes that the Anabaptists "repudiated all law, since they held that the good man will be guided at every moment by ]...rom this premise they arrive at ]...."{{ref|Russell_WesternPhilosophy}} ] or "True Levellers" were an early communistic movement during the time of the ], and are considered by some as forerunners of modern anarchism.{{red|Brit94}} <!-- We could all find this one easily :) --> | |||
The first use of the term ''anarchy'' in the ] to mean something other than chaos was by ] in his ''Nouveaux voyages dans l'Amérique septentrionale'', (1703), where he described the ] society, which had no state, laws, prisons, priests, or private property, as being in anarchy {{ref|virginiaedu}}. ], a ] and leader in the ], has repeatedly stated that he is "an anarchist, and so are all ancestors." | |||
== History == | |||
The first modern essay explicitly advocating the absence of government was ''A Vindication of Natural Society'' (1756) {{ref|libertyfund}} by ], although most historians believe this to be a ]. The first positive theory of anarchism was ]'s ''An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice'' (1793) {{ref|enqjustice}}. This was a very influential tract; though he did not use the word ''anarchism'', some today regard him as the "founder of philosophical anarchism." The themes of his work would become central to the future development of anarchism. But at this point no anarchist movement yet existed, and the term ''anarchiste'' was known only as an insult hurled by the ] ] at more radical elements in the ]. Other liberal anarchists include ], ], ], and ]. | |||
{{Main|History of anarchism}} | |||
=== |
=== Pre-modern era === | ||
] ({{Circa|334|262 BC}}), whose '']'' inspired ]{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=70}}]] | |||
{{main|Pierre-Joseph Proudhon|Mutualism}} | |||
The most notable precursors to anarchism in the ancient world were in ] and ]. In China, ] (the discussion on the legitimacy of the state) was delineated by ] philosophers ] and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Coutinho|1y=2016|2a1=Marshall|2y=1993|2p=54}} Alongside ], Taoism has been said to have had "significant anticipations" of anarchism.{{Sfn|Sylvan|2007|p=257}} | |||
Anarchic attitudes were also articulated by ] and ] in Greece. ] and ] used the myth of ] to illustrate the conflict between laws imposed by the state and personal ]. ] questioned ] authorities constantly and insisted on the right of individual ]. ] dismissed human law ('']'') and associated authorities while trying to live according to nature ('']''). ] were supportive of a society based on unofficial and friendly relations among its citizens without the presence of a state.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=4, 66–73}} | |||
It is commonly held that it wasn't until ] published '']'' in 1840 that the term "anarchist" was adopted as a self-description. It is for this reason that some claim Proudhon as the founder of modern anarchist theory. In What is Property Proudhon answers with the famous accusation "]." In this work he opposed the institution of "property" (propriété), Ian where owners have complete rights to 'use and abuse' their property as they wish. In its place Proudhon supported what he called 'possession' - individuals can have limited rights to use resources, capital and goods in accordance with principles of equality and justice. However, it should be noted that in later works Proudhon modified his ideas on property {{fact}}: in his ''Theory of Property'' he argues that property, in the full ] sense he had previously opposed, is a necessary counterweight to the centralising force of the state. One of his famous statements is that "anarchy is order", which is believed by some to be the source of the circled-A. | |||
In ], there was no anarchistic activity except some ascetic religious movements. These, and other Muslim movements, later gave birth to ]. In the ], ] called for an ] society and the ], only to be soon executed by Emperor ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=86}} In ], religious sects preached against the state.{{Sfn|Crone|2000|pp=3, 21–25}} In Europe, various religious sects developed anti-state and libertarian tendencies.{{Sfn|Nettlau|1996|p=8}} | |||
Proudhon's vision of anarchy, which he called ] (mutuellisme), involved an exchange economy where individuals and groups could trade the fruits of their labor by using labor-backed money (labor notes). The use of labor notes would insure that no one purchased a good with less of his own labor than the labor undertaken to produce the good he was purchasing. Hence, with labor notes, profitless transactions would be facilitated. Proudhon's ideas were influential within French working class movements, and his followers were active in the ] in France. | |||
Renewed interest in antiquity during the ] and in private judgment during the ] restored elements of anti-authoritarian ] in Europe, particularly in France.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=108}} ] challenges to intellectual authority (secular and religious) and the ] all spurred the ideological development of what became the era of classical anarchism.{{Sfn|Levy|Adams|2018|p=307}} | |||
===Max Stirner's Egoism=== | |||
{{main|Max Stirner|Egoism}} | |||
=== Modern era === | |||
Anarchists sometimes avoid criticisms of their ] by claiming that these criticisms are part of the ideology. In his ''The Ego and Its Own'' Stirner argued that most commonly accepted social institutions - including the notion of property as a right and the very notion of society itself - were mere illusions or ''ghosts'', saying of society that "the individuals are its reality." He advocated a form of amoralism, in which individuals would unite in 'associations of egoists' only when it was in their self interest to do so. For him, property simply comes about through might: "Whoever knows how to take, to defend, the thing, to him belongs property." And, "What I have in my power, that is my own. So long as I assert myself as holder, I am the proprietor of the thing." | |||
During the ], partisan groups such as the ] and the {{Lang|fr|]}} saw a turning point in the fermentation of anti-state and federalist sentiments.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=4}} The first anarchist currents developed throughout the 18th century as ] espoused ] ], morally delegitimising the state, ]'s thinking paved the way to ] and ]'s theory of ] found fertile soil ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=4–5}} By the late 1870s, various anarchist schools of thought had become well-defined and a wave of then-unprecedented ] occurred from 1880 to 1914.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|pp=10–15}} This era of ] lasted until the end of the ] and is considered the golden age of anarchism.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=4–5}} | |||
] and allied himself with the federalists in the First International before his expulsion by the Marxists.]] | |||
Stirner's ideas were influential on a wide range of anarchists, although interpretations of his thought are various. For example, American Individualist ]'s ideas on property were founded on egoism, as he believed that property could only come about by self-interested parties contracting to establish it: "the right of might and the right of contract - are the only rights that ever have been or ever can be." | |||
Drawing from mutualism, ] founded ] and entered the ], a class ] ] later known as the ] that formed in 1864 to unite diverse revolutionary currents. The International became a significant political force, with ] being a leading figure and a member of its General Council. Bakunin's faction (the ]) and Proudhon's followers (the mutualists) opposed ], advocating political ] and small property holdings.{{Sfnm|1a1=Dodson|1y=2002|1p=312|2a1=Thomas|2y=1985|2p=187|3a1=Chaliand|3a2=Blin|3y=2007|3p=116}} After bitter disputes, the Bakuninists were expelled from the International by the ] at the ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Graham|1y=2019|1pp=334–336|2a1=Marshall|2y=1993|2p=24}} Anarchists were treated similarly in the ], being ultimately expelled in 1896.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|p=12}} Bakunin predicted that if revolutionaries gained power by Marx's terms, they would end up the ]. In response to their expulsion from the First International, anarchists formed the ]. Under the influence of ], a Russian philosopher and scientist, ] overlapped with ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=5}} Anarcho-communists, who drew inspiration from the 1871 ], advocated for free federation and for the distribution of goods ].{{Sfn|Graham|2005|p=xii}} | |||
By the turn of the 20th century, anarchism had spread all over the world.{{Sfn|Moya|2015|p=327}} It was a notable feature of the international ] movement.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|p=16}} In ], small groups of students imported the ] pro-science version of anarcho-communism.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=519–521}} ] was a hotspot for ] youth from East Asian countries, who moved to the Japanese capital to study.{{Sfnm|1a1=Dirlik|1y=1991|1p=133|2a1=Ramnath|2y=2019|2pp=681–682}} In Latin America, ] was a stronghold for ], where it became the most prominent left-wing ideology.{{Sfnm|1a1=Levy|1y=2011|1p=23|2a1=Laursen|2y=2019|2p=157|3a1=Marshall|3y=1993|3pp=504–508}} During this time, a minority of anarchists adopted tactics of revolutionary ], known as ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=633–636}} The dismemberment of the French socialist movement into many groups and the execution and exile of many ] to ] following the suppression of the Paris Commune favoured individualist political expression and acts.{{Sfn|Anderson|2004}} Even though many anarchists distanced themselves from these terrorist acts, infamy came upon the movement and attempts were made to prevent ], including the ], also called the Anarchist Exclusion Act.{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1pp=633–636|2a1=Lutz|2a2=Ulmschneider|2y=2019|2p=46}} ] was another strategy which some anarchists adopted during this period.{{Sfn|Bantman|2019|p=374}} | |||
===American individualist anarchism=== | |||
]]] | |||
{{main|Individualist anarchism|American individualist anarchism}} | |||
]]] | |||
In 1825 ] had participated in a ] experiment headed by ] called ], which failed in a few years amidst much internal conflict. Warren blamed the community's failure on a lack of ] and a lack of private property. Warren proceeded to organise experimenal anarchist communities which respected what he called "the sovereignty of the individual' at ] and ] In 1833 Warren wrote and published ''The Peaceful Revolutionist'', which some have noted to be the first anarchist periodical ever published. Benjamin Tucker says that Warren "was the first man to expound and formulate the doctrine now known as Anarchism." (''Liberty'' XIV (December, 1900):1) | |||
Despite concerns, ] enthusiastically participated in the ] in opposition to the ], especially in the ]; however, they met harsh suppression after the ] had stabilised, including during the ].{{Sfn|Avrich|2006|p=204}} Several anarchists from Petrograd and Moscow fled to Ukraine, before the Bolsheviks crushed the ] too.{{Sfn|Avrich|2006|p=204}} With the anarchists being repressed in Russia, two new antithetical currents emerged, namely ] and ]. The former sought to create a coherent group that would push for revolution while the latter were against anything that would resemble a political party. Seeing the victories of the ] in the ] and the resulting ], many workers and activists turned to ], which grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the United States, members of major syndicalist movements such as the ] and the ] left their organisations and joined the ].{{Sfn|Nomad|1966|p=88}} | |||
In the ] of 1936–39, anarchists and syndicalists (] and ]) once again allied themselves with various currents of leftists. A long tradition of ] led to anarchists playing a pivotal role in the war, and particularly in the ]. In response to the army ], an ] of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of ] and of large areas of rural Spain, where they ] the land.{{Sfn|Bolloten|1984|p=1107}} The ] provided some limited assistance at the beginning of the war, but the result was a bitter fight between communists and other leftists in a series of events known as the ], as ] asserted Soviet control of the ] government, ending in another defeat of anarchists at the hands of the communists.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=xi, 466}} | |||
] became interested in anarchism through meeting Josiah Warren and ]. He edited and published ''Liberty'' from August 1881 to April 1908; it is widely considered to be the finest individualist-anarchist periodical ever issued in the English language. Tucker's conception of individualist anarchism incorporated the ideas of a variety of theorists: Greene's ideas on ]; Warren's ideas on ] (a ] variety of ]); ]'s market anarchism; ]'s ]; and, ]'s "law of equal freedom". Tucker strongly supported "]" in the product of labor and a ] for trading in private property. | |||
==== Post-WWII ==== | |||
The economic system of the individualists was called '']'', which differs from capitalism, as it sees profit as subverting labor-value, therefore being ]; and socialism, as it sees collective ownership as subverting self-ownership. Tucker believed that in a laissez-faire system, the ability to make a profit would be nearly non-existent due to an abundance of economic competition. Other 19th century individualists include ], ], and ]. Unlike anarcho-communists, the individualists aimed for equality of opportunity rather than equality of wealth. As ] explains: "In a world where inequality of ability is inevitable, anarchists do not sanction any attempt to produce equality by artificial or authoritarian means. The only equality they posit and will strive their utmost to defend is the equality of opportunity." (''Anarchism Applied to Economics'') | |||
] support efforts for workers to form cooperatives is exemplified in this sewing cooperative.]] | |||
By the end of ], the anarchist movement had been severely weakened.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=xi}} The 1960s witnessed a revival of anarchism, likely caused by a perceived failure of ] and tensions built by the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=539}} During this time, anarchism found a presence in other movements critical towards both capitalism and the state such as the ], ], and ]s, the ], and the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=xi, 539}} It also saw a transition from its previous revolutionary nature to provocative ]ism.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|pp=5|p=}} Anarchism became associated with ] as exemplified by bands such as ] and the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=493–494}} The established ] tendencies of ] returned with vigour during the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=556–557}} ] began to take form at this time and influenced anarchism's move from a ] demographic.{{Sfn|Williams|2015|p=680}} This coincided with its failure to gain traction in Northern Europe and its unprecedented height in Latin America.{{Sfn|Harmon|2011|p=70}} | |||
Around the turn of the 21st century, anarchism grew in popularity and influence within anti-capitalist, ] and ] movements.{{Sfn|Rupert|2006|p=66}} Anarchists became known for their involvement in protests against the ] (WTO), the ] and the ]. During the ]s, ''ad hoc'' ] anonymous cadres known as ]s engaged in rioting, ] and ] confrontations with the police. Other organisational tactics pioneered at this time include ]s, ] and the use of decentralised technologies such as the Internet. A significant event of this period was the confrontations at the ].{{Sfn|Rupert|2006|p=66}} Anarchist ideas have been influential in the development of the ] in ] and the Democratic Federation of Northern Syria, more commonly known as ], a ''de facto'' ] in northern ].{{Sfn|Ramnath|2019|p=691}} | |||
Political historian ] writes that "Since ], this tradition has been reborn and modified in the United States as ] or ]." {{ref|encarta}} However, labor-value individualist anarchism is still extant today, primarily in the United States, and is currently espoused by ] and ]. | |||
While having revolutionary aspirations, many contemporary forms of anarchism are not confrontational. Instead, they are trying to build an alternative way of ] (following the theories of ]), based on ] and voluntary cooperation. Scholar Carissa Honeywell takes the example of ] group of collectives, to highlight some features of how contemporary anarchist groups work: ], working together and in solidarity with those left behind. While doing so, Food Not Bombs provides ] about the rising rates of world ] and suggest policies to tackle hunger, ranging from ] the ] to addressing ] ] policies and ]s, helping ]s, and resisting the ] of food and housing.{{Sfn|Honeywell|2021|pp=34–44}} Honeywell also emphasizes that contemporary anarchists are interested in the flourishing not only of ]s, but ] and the ] as well.{{Sfn|Honeywell|2021|pp=1–2}} Honeywell argues that their analysis of capitalism and governments results in anarchists ] ] and the state as a whole.{{Sfn|Honeywell|2021|pp=1–3}} | |||
] | |||
{{Anchor|Branches}} | |||
===The First International=== | |||
{{main|International Workingmen's Association|Anarchism and Marxism}} | |||
== Schools of thought == | |||
In Europe, harsh reaction followed the revolutions of 1848. Twenty years later in 1864 the ], sometimes called the 'First International', united some diverse European revolutionary currents including anarchism. Due to its genuine links to active workers movements the International became signficiant. ]]] | |||
Anarchist schools of thought have been generally grouped into two main historical traditions, ] and ], owing to their different origins, ] and evolution.{{Sfnm|1a1=McLean|1a2=McMillan|1y=2003|1loc="Anarchism"|2a1=Ostergaard|2y=2003|2p=14|2loc="Anarchism"}} The individualist current emphasises ] in opposing restraints upon the free individual, while the social current emphasises ] in aiming to achieve the free potential of society through equality and ].{{Sfn|Harrison|Boyd|2003|p=251}} In a chronological sense, anarchism can be segmented by the classical currents of the late 19th century and the post-classical currents (], ], and ]) developed thereafter.{{Sfn|Levy|Adams|2018|p=9}} | |||
Beyond the specific factions of anarchist movements which constitute political anarchism lies philosophical anarchism which holds that the state lacks ], without necessarily accepting the imperative of revolution to eliminate it.{{Sfn|Egoumenides|2014|p=2}} A component especially of individualist anarchism,{{Sfnm|1a1=Ostergaard|1y=2003|1p=12|2a1=Gabardi|2y=1986|2pp=300–302}} philosophical anarchism may tolerate the existence of a ] but claims that citizens have no ] to obey government when it conflicts with individual ].{{Sfn|Klosko|2005|p=4}} Anarchism pays significant attention to moral arguments since ethics have a central role in anarchist philosophy.{{Sfn|Franks|2019|p=549}} Anarchism's emphasis on ], ], and for the extension of community and ]ity sets it apart from anarcho-capitalism and other types of ]ism.{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1992|1pp=564–565|2a1=Jennings|2y=1993|2p=143|3a1=Gay|3a2=Gay|3y=1999|3p=15|4a1=Morris|4y=2008|4p=13|5a1=Johnson|5y=2008|5p=169|6a1=Franks|6y=2013|6pp=393–394}} | |||
From the start ] was a leading figure in the International: he was elected to every succeeding General Council of the association. The first objections to Marx came from the ] who opposed communism and statism. Shortly after ] and his followers joined in 1868, the First International became polarised into two camps, with Marx and Bakunin as their respective figureheads. The clearest difference between the camps was over strategy. The anarchists around Bakunin favoured (in Kropotkin's words) "direct economical struggle against capitalism, without interfering in the political parliamentary agitation." At that time Marx and his followers focused on parliamentary activity. | |||
Anarchism is usually placed on the far-left of the political spectrum.{{Sfnm|1a1=Brooks|1y=1994|1p=|1ps=, "Usually considered to be an extreme left-wing ideology".}} Much of its ] and ] reflect ], ], ], and ] interpretations of left-wing and ] politics{{Sfn|Guérin|1970|p=12}} such as ], ], ], ], and ], among other ] economic theories.{{Sfn|Guérin|1970|p=35|loc="Critique of authoritarian socialism"}} As anarchism does not offer a fixed body of ] from a single particular ],{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=14–17}} many anarchist types and traditions exist and varieties of anarchy diverge widely.{{Sfn|Sylvan|2007|p=262}} One reaction against ] within the anarchist milieu was ], a call for ] and unity among anarchists first adopted by ] in 1889 in response to the bitter debates of anarchist theory at the time.{{Sfn|Avrich|1996|p=6}} Belief in political ] has been espoused by anarchists.{{Sfn|Walter|2002|p=52}} Despite separation, the various anarchist schools of thought are not seen as distinct entities but rather as tendencies that intermingle and are connected through a set of shared principles such as autonomy, ], ] and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1pp=1–6|2a1=Angelbeck|2a2=Grier|2y=2012|2p=551}} | |||
Bakunin characterised Marx's ideas as ], and predicted that if a Marxist party gained to power its leaders would end up as bad as the ] they had fought against. {{ref|litencyc}} In 1872 the conflict climaxed with a final split between the two groups at the ]. This is often cited as the origin of the ]. From this moment the '']'' and '']'' currents of socialism had distinct organisations including rival ] | |||
=== |
=== Classical === | ||
] is the primary proponent of ] and influenced many future ] and ] thinkers.{{Sfn|Wilbur|2019|pp=216–218}}]] | |||
{{main|Anarchist communism}} | |||
Inceptive currents among classical anarchist currents were ] and ]. They were followed by the major currents of social anarchism (], ] and ]). They differ on ] and economic aspects of their ideal society.{{Sfn|Levy|Adams|2018|p=2}} | |||
Mutualism is an 18th-century economic theory that was developed into anarchist theory by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Its aims include "abolishing the state",<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |title=The Desk Encyclopedia of World History |publisher=] |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-7394-7809-7 |editor-last=Wright |editor-first=Edmund |location=New York |pages=20–21}}</ref> ], ], voluntary contract, federation and ] of both credit and currency that would be regulated by a bank of the people.{{Sfn|Wilbur|2019|pp=213–218}} Mutualism has been retrospectively characterised as ideologically situated between individualist and collectivist forms of anarchism.{{Sfnm|1a1=Avrich|1y=1996|1p=6|2a1=Miller|2y=1991|2p=11}} In '']'' (1840), Proudhon first characterised his goal as a "third form of society, the synthesis of communism and property."{{Sfn|Pierson|2013|p=187}} Collectivist anarchism is a ] form of anarchism{{Sfn|Morris|1993|p=76}} commonly associated with ].{{Sfn|Shannon|2019|p=101}} Collectivist anarchists advocate ] of the ] which is theorised to be achieved through violent revolution{{Sfn|Avrich|1996|pp=3–4}} and that workers be paid according to time worked, rather than goods being distributed according to need as in communism. Collectivist anarchism arose alongside ] but rejected the ] despite the stated Marxist goal of a collectivist ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Heywood|1y=2017|1pp=146–147|2a1=Bakunin|2y=1990}} | |||
Proudhon and Bakunin both opposed ], which in their time was strongly associated with the statist ideas of thinkers such as ]. However, in the early 1870s the majority of Bakunin's followers moved away from Bakunin's philosophy (called "collectivism"), and embraced a new anarchist theory incorporating many communist concepts.{{ref|bakunin-f}} | |||
Anarcho-communism is a theory of anarchism that advocates a ] with ] of the means of production,{{Sfn|Mayne|1999|p=131}} held by a ] network of ]s,{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=327}} with production and consumption based on the guiding principle "]."{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1p=327|2a1=Turcato|2y=2019|2pp=237–238}} Anarcho-communism developed from radical socialist currents after the ]{{Sfn|Graham|2005}} but was first formulated as such in the ] section of the ].{{Sfn|Pernicone|2009|pp=111–113}} It was later expanded upon in the theoretical work of ],{{Sfn|Turcato|2019|pp=239–244}} whose specific style would go onto become the dominating view of anarchists by the late 19th century.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|p=6}} Anarcho-syndicalism is a branch of anarchism that views ]s as a potential force for revolutionary social change, replacing capitalism and the state with a new society democratically self-managed by workers. The basic principles of anarcho-syndicalism are ], workers' ] and ].{{Sfn|Van der Walt|2019|p=249}} | |||
Anarcho-communists believe in the collectivization of the products of labor, as opposed to private ownership. ], a member of the Italian section of the International which embraced anarchist communism at its 1876 congress, explained in his ''Anarchy and Communism'' : "If we preserve the individual appropriation of the products of labour, we would be forced to preserve money, leaving more or less accumulation of wealth according to more or less merit rather than need of individuals." | |||
Individualist anarchism is a set of several traditions of thought within the anarchist movement that emphasise the ] and their ] over any kinds of external determinants.{{Sfn|Ryley|2019|p=225}} Early influences on individualist forms of anarchism include ], ], and ]. Through many countries, individualist anarchism attracted a small yet diverse following of Bohemian artists and intellectuals{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=440}} as well as young anarchist outlaws in what became known as ] and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Imrie|1y=1994|2a1=Parry|2y=1987|2p=15}} | |||
This position was anticipated by ], notable as the first person to describe himself as a "]". {{ref|dejacque1}} {{ref|dejacque2}} He argued for the satisfaction of human needs over remuneration of labour in his US published journal ''Le Libertaire'' (1858-1861), rejecting the Proudhonian support of individual ownership of the product of labor and markets. He wrote a letter admonishing Proudon saying: "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature." | |||
=== Post-classical and contemporary === | |||
] | |||
{{Main|Contemporary anarchism}} | |||
] (right) are two prominent contemporary anarchist authors, with Zerzan being a prominent voice within ] and Jarach a notable advocate of ].]] | |||
Anarchist principles undergird contemporary radical ]s of the left. Interest in the anarchist movement developed alongside momentum in the anti-globalisation movement,{{Sfn|Evren|2011|p=1}} whose leading activist networks were anarchist in orientation.{{Sfn|Evren|2011|p=2}} As the movement shaped 21st century radicalism, wider embrace of anarchist principles signaled a revival of interest.{{Sfn|Evren|2011|p=2}} Anarchism has continued to generate many philosophies and movements, at times eclectic, drawing upon various sources and ] to create new philosophical approaches.{{Sfn|Williams|2007|p=303}} The anti-capitalist tradition of classical anarchism has remained prominent within contemporary currents.{{Sfn|Williams|2018|p=4}} | |||
Contemporary news coverage which emphasizes ] demonstrations has reinforced anarchism's historical association with chaos and violence. Its publicity has also led more scholars in fields such as ] and ] to engage with the anarchist movement, although contemporary anarchism favours actions over ] theory.{{Sfnm|1a1=Williams|1y=2010|1p=110|2a1=Evren|2y=2011|2p=1|3a1=Angelbeck|3a2=Grier|3y=2012|3p=549}} Various anarchist groups, tendencies, and schools of thought exist today, making it difficult to describe the contemporary anarchist movement.{{Sfn|Franks|2013|pp=385–386}} While theorists and activists have established "relatively stable constellations of anarchist principles", there is no consensus on which principles are core and commentators describe multiple ''anarchisms'', rather than a singular ''anarchism'', in which common principles are shared between schools of anarchism while each group prioritizes those principles differently. ] can be a common principle, although it ranks as a higher priority to anarcha-feminists than anarcho-communists.{{Sfn|Franks|2013|p=386}} | |||
] was the most important nineteenth century proponent of ]. In '']'' and '']'' Kropotkin outlined anarchist communist society and how to achieve it. Kropotkin's communism was based on his theory of ] where co-operation is more beneficial than competition, illustrated in nature in '']'' (1897). Subsequent anarchist communists include ] and ]. The ] movements (see below) generally saw anarchist communism as their objective. ]'s 1932 ''Comunismo Libertario'' was adopted by the Spanish ] as its manifesto for an anarchist communist society. | |||
Anarchists are generally committed against coercive authority in all forms, namely "all centralized and ] forms of government (e.g., monarchy, representative democracy, state socialism, etc.), economic class systems (e.g., capitalism, ], ], ], etc.), autocratic religions (e.g., ], ], etc.), ], ], ], and ]."{{Sfn|Jun|2009|pp=507–508}} Anarchist schools disagree on the methods by which these forms should be opposed.{{Sfn|Jun|2009|p=507}} The principle of ] is closer to anarchist political ethics in that it transcends both the liberal and socialist traditions. This entails that liberty and equality cannot be implemented within the state, resulting in the questioning of all forms of domination and hierarchy.{{Sfn|Egoumenides|2014|p=91}} | |||
Some anarchists disliked this merging of communism with anarchism. They maintained that abolition of private property was not consistent with liberty. For example, Benjamin Tucker, whilst professing respect for Kropotkin and publishing his work{{ref|Tucker-Kropotkin}}, described communist anarchism as "pseudo-anarchism". {{ref|Tucker-LAIP}} The view that anarcho-communism is not anarchism was the view of several individualist anarchists. | |||
== Tactics == | |||
===Propaganda of the deed=== | |||
Anarchists' tactics take various forms but in general serve two major goals, namely, to first oppose ] and secondly to promote anarchist ethics and reflect an anarchist vision of society, illustrating the ].{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=107–108}} A broad categorisation can be made between aims to destroy oppressive states and institutions by revolutionary means on one hand and aims to change society through evolutionary means on the other.{{Sfn|Williams|2018|pp=4–5}} Evolutionary tactics embrace ] and take a gradual approach to anarchist aims, although there is significant overlap between the two.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|p=125}} | |||
] was an outspoken advocate of violence]] | |||
{{main|Propaganda of the deed}} | |||
Anarchist tactics have shifted during the course of the last century. Anarchists during the early 20th century focused more on strikes and militancy while contemporary anarchists use a ].{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=112}} | |||
Anarchists have often been portrayed as dangerous and violent, due mainly to a number of high-profile violent acts including ]s, ]s, ]s, and ] by some anarchists. Some ]aries of the late 19th century encouraged acts of political violence, such as ]ings and the ]s of ] to further anarchism. Such actions have sometimes been called ']'. | |||
=== Classical era === | |||
One of the more outspoken advocates of this strategy was ], who said "the existing system will be quickest and most radically overthrown by the annihilation of its exponents. Therefore, massacres of the enemies of the people must be set in motion." Most's preferred method of terrorism, dynamite, earned him the moniker "Dynamost." | |||
] is a controversial subject among anarchists as shown by anarchist ] ] ].]] | |||
During the classical era, anarchists had a militant tendency. Not only did they confront state armed forces, as in Spain and Ukraine, but some of them also employed terrorism as ]. Assassination attempts were carried out against ], some of which were successful. Anarchists also took part in revolutions.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=112–113}} Many anarchists, especially the ], believed that these attempts would be the impetus for a revolution against capitalism and the state.{{Sfn|Norris|2020|pp=7–8}} Many of these attacks were done by individual assailants and the majority took place in the late 1870s, the early 1880s and the 1890s, with some still occurring in the early 1900s.{{Sfnm|1a1=Levy|1y=2011|1p=13|2a1=Nesser|2y=2012|2p=62}} Their decrease in prevalence was the result of further judicial power and of targeting and cataloging by state institutions.{{Sfn|Harmon|2011|p=55}} | |||
Anarchist perspectives towards violence have always been controversial.{{Sfn|Carter|1978|p=320}} ] advocate for non-violence means to achieve their stateless, nonviolent ends.{{Sfn|Fiala|2017|loc=section 3.1}} Other anarchist groups advocate ], a tactic which can include acts of ] or ]. This attitude was quite prominent a century ago when seeing the state as a ] and some anarchists believing that they had every right to oppose its oppression by any means possible.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=116–117}} ] and ], who were proponents of limited use of violence, stated that violence is merely a reaction to state violence as a ].{{Sfn|Carter|1978|pp=320–325}} | |||
However, there is no ] on the legitimacy or utility of violence in general. ] and ], for example, wrote of violence as a necessary and sometimes desirable force. At the same time, they both denounced violence and terrorist acts (Malatesta in "On Violence" and Bakunin when he refuted Nechaev). | |||
Anarchists took an active role in strike actions, although they tended to be antipathetic to formal ], seeing it as ]. They saw it as a part of the movement which sought to overthrow the state and capitalism.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=113}} Anarchists also reinforced their propaganda ], some of whom practiced ] and ]. Those anarchists also built communities which were based on friendship and were involved in the news media.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=114}} | |||
Other anarchists, sometimes identified as ], share a belief in ]. ], whose philosophy is often viewed as a form of ], believed that ] was the only method to achieve any lasting social change. For Tolstoy and other pacifists all violence is illegitimate, irrespective of whether it is perpetrated by the state or by its opponents. | |||
=== Revolutionary === | |||
===Anarchism in the labour movement=== | |||
]"]] | |||
{{seealso|Anarcho-syndicalism}} | |||
In the current era, ] ], a proponent of ], has reinstated the debate on violence by rejecting the nonviolence tactic adopted since the late 19th century by Kropotkin and other prominent anarchists afterwards. Both Bonanno and the French group ] advocate for small, informal affiliation groups, where each member is responsible for their own actions but works together to bring down oppression using ] and other violent means against state, capitalism, and other enemies. ] on various charges, terrorism included.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=134–135}} | |||
Overall, contemporary anarchists are much less violent and militant than their ideological ancestors. They mostly engage in confronting the police during demonstrations and riots, especially in countries such as ], ], and ]. Militant black bloc protest groups are known for clashing with the police;{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=115}} however, anarchists not only clash with state operators, they also engage in the struggle against ] and ], taking ] action and mobilizing to prevent hate rallies from happening.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=117}} | |||
] | |||
=== Evolutionary === | |||
Anarcho-syndicalism and Industrial Unionism are two early 20th century working class industrial movements which sought to overthrow capitalism, states and institute a worker controlled society. In the late 19th century, ] developed as a movement pursuing ]s, especially the ], as the primary strategy to achieve anarchist revolution, and "build the new society in the shell of the old". Most anarcho-syndicalists shared a belief in ] as the best form of the future society, although not all anarchist communists agreed with syndicalism. | |||
Anarchists commonly employ ]. This can take the form of disrupting and protesting against unjust hierarchy, or the form of self-managing their lives through the creation of counter-institutions such as ] and non-hierarchical collectives.{{Sfn|Williams|2018|pp=4–5}} Decision-making is often handled in an anti-authoritarian way, with everyone having ], an approach known as ].{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=109–117}} Contemporary-era anarchists have been engaging with various ] movements that are more or less based on horizontalism, although not explicitly anarchist, respecting personal autonomy and participating in mass activism such as strikes and demonstrations. In contrast with the "big-A Anarchism" of the classical era, the newly coined term "small-a anarchism" signals their tendency not to base their thoughts and actions on classical-era anarchism or to refer to classical anarchists such as Peter Kropotkin and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon to justify their opinions. Those anarchists would rather base their thought and praxis on their own experience, which they will later theorize.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=145–149}} | |||
The concept of ] is enacted by many contemporary anarchist groups, striving to embody the principles, organization and tactics of the changed social structure they hope to bring about. As part of this the decision-making process of small anarchist affinity groups plays a significant tactical role.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=109, 119}} Anarchists have employed various methods to build a rough consensus among members of their group without the need of a leader or a leading group. One way is for an individual from the group to play the role of ] to help achieve a ] without taking part in the discussion themselves or promoting a specific point. Minorities usually accept rough consensus, except when they feel the proposal contradicts anarchist ethics, goals and values. Anarchists usually form small groups (5–20 individuals) to enhance autonomy and friendships among their members. These kinds of groups more often than not interconnect with each other, forming larger networks. Anarchists still support and participate in strikes, especially ] as these are leaderless strikes not organised centrally by a syndicate.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=119–121}} | |||
After the ] French anarchism began to resurface and influenced the ''Bourses de Travails'' of autonomous workers groups and trade unions. From this movement the ] (General Confederation of Work, CGT) was formed in 1895 as the first major anarcho-syndicalist movement. ] and ]'s writing for the CGT saw ] developing from a ]. After 1914 the CGT moved away from anarcho-syndicalism due to the appeal of ]. French-style syndicalism was a significant movement in Europe prior to 1921, and remained a significant movement in Spain until the mid 1940s. | |||
As in the past, newspapers and journals are used, and anarchists have gone online to spread their message. Anarchists have found it easier to create websites because of distributional and other difficulties, hosting electronic libraries and other portals.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=118–119}} Anarchists were also involved in developing various software that are available for free. The way these ] work to develop and distribute resembles the anarchist ideals, especially when it comes to preserving users' privacy from ].{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=120–121}} | |||
The ] (IWW) was founded in 1905 in the United States. It espoused ], and sought to use the ] to usher in an ] (a stateless society). At its peak in 1923 the organization claimed some 100,000 members in good standing, and could marshal the support of perhaps 300,000 workers. While not explicitly syndicalist or anarchist, the ] organised using working class rank and file democracy, and embodied a spirit of resistance and freedom which has inspired many Anglophone syndicalists. | |||
Anarchists organize themselves to ] and reclaim ]s. During important events such as protests and when spaces are being occupied, they are often called ]s (TAZ), spaces where art, poetry, and ] are blended to display the anarchist ideal.{{Sfnm|1a1=Kinna|1y=2019|1p=139|2a1=Mattern|2y=2019|2p=596|3a1=Williams|3y=2018|3pp=5–6}} As seen by anarchists, ] is a way to regain urban space from the capitalist market, serving pragmatical needs and also being an exemplary direct action.{{Sfnm|1a1=Kinna|1y=2012|1p=250|2a1=Williams|2y=2019|2p=119}} Acquiring space enables anarchists to experiment with their ideas and build social bonds.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=122}} Adding up these tactics while having in mind that not all anarchists share the same attitudes towards them, along with various forms of protesting at highly symbolic events, make up a ] atmosphere that is part of contemporary anarchist vividity.{{Sfn|Morland|2004|pp=37–38}} | |||
] | |||
== Key issues == | |||
Spanish anarchist trade union federations were formed in the 1870's, 1900 and 1910. The most successful was the ] (National Confederation of Labour: CNT), was founded in 1910. Prior to the 1940s the CNT was the major force in Spanish working class politics. It had a membership of 1.58 million in 1934. The CNT played a major role in the ]. ''See also:'' ]. | |||
<!-- In the interest of restricting article length, these overview summaries are meant to be brief. Thank you. --> | |||
In the 1910-1917 ] anarcho-syndicalists like ] were key figures. This success has been influential for ] anarchism. This influence extends to the ] rebellion and the ] in Argentina and elsewhere. In Berlin in 1922 the CNT was amongst trade unions who joined together to form the ], an anarcho-syndicalist successor to the ]. | |||
As anarchism is a philosophy that embodies many diverse attitudes, tendencies, and schools of thought, disagreement over questions of values, ideology, and ] is common. Its diversity has led to widely different uses of identical terms among different anarchist traditions which has created a number of ]. The compatibility of ],{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1p=565|2a1=Honderich|2y=1995|2p=31|3a1=Meltzer|3y=2000|3p=50|4a1=Goodway|4y=2006|4p=4|5a1=Newman|5y=2010|5p=53}} ], and ] with anarchism is widely disputed, and anarchism enjoys complex relationships with ideologies such as communism, ], Marxism, and ]. Anarchists may be motivated by ], ], ], ], or any number of alternative ethical doctrines. Phenomena such as ], technology (e.g. within anarcho-primitivism), and the ] may be sharply criticised within some anarchist tendencies and simultaneously lauded in others.{{Sfn|De George|2005|pp=31–32}} | |||
=== The state === | |||
Contemporary anarcho-syndicalism continues as a minor force in many socities; much smaller than in the 1910s, 20s and 30s. | |||
<!-- Important! Strive to explain how anarchists perceive authority and oppression and why they reject them. Jun (2019), p. 41. -->] opposing state-waged war]] | |||
Objection to the ] and its institutions is a '']'' of anarchism.{{Sfnm|1a1=Carter|1y=1971|1p=14|2a1=Jun|2y=2019|2pp=29–30}} Anarchists consider the state as a tool of domination and believe it to be illegitimate regardless of its political tendencies. Instead of people being able to control the aspects of their life, major decisions are taken by a small elite. Authority ultimately rests solely on power, regardless of whether that power is ] or ], as it still has the ability to coerce people. Another anarchist argument against states is that the people constituting a government, even the most altruistic among officials, will unavoidably seek to gain more power, leading to corruption. Anarchists consider the idea that the state is the collective will of the people to be an unachievable fiction due to the fact that the ] is distinct from the rest of society.{{Sfn|Jun|2019|pp=32–38}} | |||
Specific anarchist attitudes towards the state vary. ] believed that the tension between authority and autonomy would mean the state could never be legitimate. Bakunin saw the state as meaning "coercion, domination by means of coercion, camouflaged if possible but unceremonious and overt if need be." ] and ], who leaned toward philosophical anarchism, believed that the state could be legitimate if it is governed by consensus, although they saw this as highly unlikely.{{Sfnm|1a1=Wendt|1y=2020|1p=2|2a1=Ashwood|2y=2018|2p=727}} Beliefs on how to abolish the state also differ.{{Sfn|Ashwood|2018|p=735}} | |||
The largest organised anarchist movement today is in Spain, in the form of the ] and the ]. The CGT claims a paid-up membership of 60,000, and received over a million votes in Spanish ] elections. Other active syndicalist movements include the US ], and the UK ]. The revolutionary industrial unionist ] also exists, claiming 2,000 paid members. Contemporary critics of anarcho-syndicalism and revolutionary industrial unionism claim that they are ] and fail to deal with economic life outside work. Post-leftist critics such as ] claim anarcho-syndicalism advocates oppressive social structures, such as ] and the ]. | |||
=== Gender, sexuality, and free love === | |||
Anarcho-syndicalists in general uphold principles of workers solidarity, ], and self-management. | |||
{{Main|Anarchism and issues related to love and sex}} | |||
As ] and ] carry along them dynamics of hierarchy, many anarchists address, analyse, and oppose the suppression of one's autonomy imposed by gender roles.{{Sfn|Nicholas|2019|p=603}} | |||
] protests, symbols, and flags]] | |||
===The Russian Revolution=== | |||
Sexuality was not often discussed by classical anarchists but the few that did felt that an anarchist society would lead to sexuality naturally developing.{{Sfn|Lucy|2020|p=162}} Sexual violence was a concern for anarchists such as ], who opposed ], believing they would benefit predatory men.{{Sfn|Lucy|2020|p=178}} A historical current that arose and flourished during 1890 and 1920 within anarchism was ]. In contemporary anarchism, this current survives as a tendency to support ], ], and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Nicholas|1y=2019|1p=611|2a1=Jeppesen|2a2=Nazar|2y=2012|2pp=175–176}} Free love advocates were against marriage, which they saw as a way of men imposing authority over women, largely because marriage law greatly favoured the power of men. The notion of free love was much broader and included a critique of the established order that limited women's sexual freedom and pleasure.{{Sfn|Jeppesen|Nazar|2012|pp=175–176}} Those free love movements contributed to the establishment of communal houses, where large groups of travelers, anarchists and other activists slept in beds together.{{Sfn|Jeppesen|Nazar|2012|p=177}} Free love had roots both in Europe and the United States; however, some anarchists struggled with the jealousy that arose from free love.{{Sfn|Jeppesen|Nazar|2012|pp=175–177}} Anarchist feminists were advocates of free love, against marriage, and ] (using a contemporary term), and had a similar agenda. Anarchist and non-anarchist feminists differed on ] but were supportive of one another.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=166–167}} | |||
{{main|Russian Revolution of 1917}} | |||
During the second half of the 20th century, anarchism intermingled with the ], radicalising some currents of the feminist movement and being influenced as well. By the latest decades of the 20th century, anarchists and feminists were advocating for the rights and autonomy of women, gays, queers and other marginalised groups, with some feminist thinkers suggesting a fusion of the two currents.{{Sfn|Nicholas|2019|pp=609–611}} With the ], sexual identity and ] became a subject of study for anarchists, yielding a ] critique of ].{{Sfn|Nicholas|2019|pp=610–611}} Some anarchists distanced themselves from this line of thinking, suggesting that it leaned towards an individualism that was dropping the cause of social liberation.{{Sfn|Nicholas|2019|pp=616–617}} | |||
The ] was a seismic event in the development of anarchism as a movement and as a philosophy. | |||
=== Education === | |||
Anarchists participated alongside the ] in both February and October revolutions, many anarchists initially supporting the Bolshevik coup. However the Bolsheviks soon turned against the anarchists and other left-wing opposition, a conflict which culminated in the 1918 ]. Anarchists in central Russia were imprisoned or driven underground, or joined the victorious Bolsheviks. In ] anarchists fought in the ] against both Whites and Bolsheviks within the Makhnovshchina peasant army led by ]). | |||
{{Main|Anarchism and education}} | |||
{|class="wikitable" style="border: none; float: right;" | |||
|+ Anarchist vs. statist perspectives on education<br/>{{Small|Ruth Kinna (2019){{Sfn|Kinna|2019|p=97}}}} | |||
|- | |||
!scope="col"| | |||
!scope="col"|Anarchist education | |||
!scope="col"|State education | |||
|- | |||
|Concept || Education as self-mastery || Education as service | |||
|- | |||
|Management || Community based || State run | |||
|- | |||
|Methods || Practice-based learning || Vocational training | |||
|- | |||
|Aims || Being a critical member of society || Being a productive member of society | |||
|} | |||
The interest of anarchists in education stretches back to the first emergence of classical anarchism. Anarchists consider proper education, one which sets the foundations of the future autonomy of the individual and the society, to be an act of ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Kinna|1y=2019|1pp=83–85|2a2=Suissa|2y=2019|2pp=514–515, 520}} Anarchist writers such as William Godwin ('']'') and Max Stirner ("]") attacked both ] and private education as another means by which the ruling class replicate their privileges.{{Sfnm|1a1=Suissa|1y=2019|1pp=514, 521|2a1=Kinna|2y=2019|2pp=83–86|3a1=Marshall|3y=1993|3p=222}} | |||
In 1901, ] anarchist and free thinker ] established the ] in Barcelona as an opposition to the established education system which was dictated largely by the Catholic Church.{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=511–512}} Ferrer's approach was secular, rejecting both state and church involvement in the educational process while giving pupils large amounts of autonomy in planning their work and attendance. Ferrer aimed to educate the working class and explicitly sought to foster ] among students. The school closed after constant harassment by the state and Ferrer was later arrested. Nonetheless, his ideas formed the inspiration for a series of ] around the world.{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=511–514}} ] ], who published the essay ''Education and Culture'', also established a similar school with its founding principle being that "for education to be effective it had to be free."{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=517–518}} In a similar token, ] founded what became the ] in 1921, also declaring being free from coercion.{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=518–519}} | |||
Expelled American anarchists ] and ] before leaving Russia were amongst those agitating in response to Bolshevik policy and the suppression of the Kronstadt uprising. Both wrote classic accounts of their experiences in Russia, aiming to expose the reality of Bolshevik control. For them, ]'s predictions about the consequences of Marxist rule had proved all too true. | |||
Anarchist education is based largely on the idea that a child's right to develop freely and without manipulation ought to be respected and that rationality would lead children to morally good conclusions; however, there has been little consensus among anarchist figures as to what constitutes ]. Ferrer believed that moral indoctrination was necessary and explicitly taught pupils that equality, liberty and ] were not possible under capitalism, along with other critiques of government and nationalism.{{Sfnm|1a1=Avrich|1y=1980|1pp=3–33|2a1=Suissa|2y=2019|2pp=519–522}} | |||
The victory of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution and the resulting Russian Civil War did serious damage to anarchist movements internationally. Many workers and activists saw Bolshevik success as setting an example; Communist parties grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the US for example, the major syndicalist movements of the ] and ] began to realign themselves away from anarchism and towards the ]. | |||
Late 20th century and contemporary anarchist writers (], ], and ]) intensified and expanded the anarchist critique of ], largely focusing on the need for a system that focuses on children's creativity rather than on their ability to attain a career or participate in ] as part of a consumer society.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=89–96}} Contemporary anarchists such as Ward claim that state education serves to perpetuate ].{{Sfn|Ward|1973|pp=39–48}} | |||
In Paris, the ] group of Russian anarchist exiles which included ] concluded that anarchists needed to develop new forms of organisation in response to the structures of Bolshevism. Their 1926 manifesto, known as the ], was supported by some communist anarchists, though opposed by many others. | |||
While few anarchist education institutions have survived to the modern-day, major tenets of anarchist schools, among them respect for ] and relying on reasoning rather than indoctrination as a teaching method, have spread among mainstream educational institutions. Judith Suissa names three schools as explicitly anarchists' schools, namely the Free Skool Santa Cruz in the United States which is part of a wider American-Canadian network of schools, the Self-Managed Learning College in ], and the Paideia School in Spain.{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=523–526}} | |||
The ''Platform'' continues to inspire some contemporary anarchist groups who believe in an anarchist movement organised around its principles of 'theoretical unity', 'tactical unity', 'collective responsibility' and 'federalism'. Platformist groups today include the ] in Ireland, the UK's ], and the late ] in the northeastern United States and bordering Canada. | |||
=== |
=== The arts === | ||
{{ |
{{Main|Anarchism and the arts}} | ||
] is a notable example of blending anarchism and the arts.{{Sfn|Antliff|1998|p=99}}]] | |||
The connection between anarchism and art was quite profound during the classical era of anarchism, especially among artistic currents that were developing during that era such as futurists, surrealists and others.{{Sfn|Mattern|2019|p=592}} In literature, anarchism was mostly associated with the ] and the ] movement.{{Sfn|Gifford|2019|p=577}} In music, anarchism has been associated with music scenes such as ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1pp=493–494|2a1=Dunn|2y=2012|3a1=Evren|3a2=Kinna|3a3=Rouselle|3y=2013|p=138}} Anarchists such as ] and ] stated that the border between the artist and the non-artist, what separates art from a daily act, is a construct produced by the alienation caused by capitalism and it prevents humans from living a joyful life.{{Sfn|Mattern|2019|pp=592–593}} | |||
Other anarchists advocated for or used art as a means to achieve anarchist ends.{{Sfn|Mattern|2019|p=593}} In his book ''Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerrillas, and Digital Ninjas'', Chris Robé claims that "anarchist-inflected practices have increasingly structured movement-based video activism."{{Sfn|Robé|2017|p=44}} Throughout the 20th century, many prominent anarchists (], ], ] and ]) and publications such as '']'' wrote about matters pertaining to the arts.{{Sfn|Miller|Dirlik|Rosemont|Augustyn|2019|p=1}} | |||
In the 1920s and 1930s the familiar dynamics of anarchism's conflict with the state were transformed by the rise of ] in Europe. In many cases, European anarchists faced difficult choices - should they join in ]s with reformist democrats and Soviet-led ] against a common fascist enemy? Luigi Fabbri, an exile from Italian fascism, was amongst those arguing that fascism was something different: | |||
Three overlapping properties made art useful to anarchists. It could depict a critique of existing society and hierarchies, serve as a prefigurative tool to reflect the anarchist ideal society and even turn into a means of direct action such as in protests. As it appeals to both emotion and reason, art could appeal to the whole human and have a powerful effect.{{Sfn|Mattern|2019|pp=593–596}} The 19th-century ] movement had an ecological aesthetic and offered an example of an anarchist perception of the road towards socialism.{{Sfn|Antliff|1998|p=78}} In ''Les chataigniers a Osny'' by anarchist painter ], the blending of aesthetic and social harmony is prefiguring an ideal anarchistic agrarian community.{{Sfn|Antliff|1998|p=99}} | |||
:Fascism is not just another form of government which, like all others, uses violence. It is the most authoritarian and the most violent form of government imaginable. It represents the utmost glorification of the theory and practice of the principle of authority. {{fact}} | |||
== Criticism == | |||
In France, where the fascists came close to insurrection in the February 1934 riots, anarchists divided over a 'united front' policy. {{ref|univmontp3}} In Spain, the ] initially refused to join a popular front electoral alliance, and abstention by CNT supporters led to a right wing election victory. But in 1936, the CNT changed its policy and anarchist votes helped bring the popular front back to power. Months later, the ruling class responded with an attempted coup, and the ] (1936-39) was underway. | |||
The most common critique of anarchism is the assertion that humans cannot ] and so a state is necessary for human survival. Philosopher ] supported this critique, stating that "eace and war, ]s, regulations of ] conditions and the sale of noxious ]s, the preservation of a just system of distribution: these, among others, are functions which could hardly be performed in a community in which there was no central government."{{Sfn|Krimerman|Perry|1966|p=494}} Another common criticism of anarchism is that it fits a world of ] in which only the small enough entities can be self-governing; a response would be that major anarchist thinkers advocated anarchist federalism.{{Sfn|Ward|2004|p=78}} | |||
Another criticism of anarchism is the belief that it is inherently unstable: that an anarchist society would inevitably evolve back into a state. ] and other early social contract theorists argued that the state emerges in response to natural anarchy to protect the people's interests and keep order. Philosopher ] argued that a "]", or minarchy, would emerge from anarchy through the process of an ], in which people would exercise their liberty and buy protection from protection agencies, evolving into a minimal state. Anarchists reject these criticisms by arguing that humans in a ] would not just be in a state of war. ] in particular argue that humans were better off in a state of nature in small tribes living close to the land, while anarchists in general argue that the negatives of state organization, such as hierarchies, monopolies and inequality, outweigh the benefits.<ref>{{Citation |last=Fiala |first=Andrew |title=Anarchism |date=2021 |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/anarchism |access-date=2023-06-17 |edition=Winter 2021 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref> | |||
In reponse to the army rebellion ] movement of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of the major ] of ] and of large areas of rural Spain where they ] the land. But even before the eventual fascist victory in ], the anarchists were losing ground in a bitter struggle with the ]. The CNT leadership often appeared confused and divided, with some members controversially entering the government. Stalinist-led troops suppressed the collectives, and persecuted both ] and anarchists. | |||
Philosophy lecturer Andrew G. Fiala composed a list of common arguments against anarchism which includes critiques such as that anarchism is innately related to violence and destruction, not only in the pragmatic world, such as at protests, but in the world of ethics as well. Secondly, anarchism is evaluated as unfeasible or utopian since the state cannot be defeated practically. This line of arguments most often calls for political action within the system to reform it. The third argument is that anarchism is self-contradictory as a ruling theory that has no ruling theory. Anarchism also calls for collective action while endorsing the autonomy of the individual, hence no collective action can be taken. Lastly, Fiala mentions a critique towards philosophical anarchism of being ineffective (all talk and thoughts) and in the meantime capitalism and bourgeois class remains strong.{{Sfn|Fiala|2017|loc="4. Objections and Replies"}} | |||
Since the late 1970s anarchists have been involved in fighting the rise of ] groups. In Germany and the United Kingdom some anarchists worked within ] ] groups alongside members of the ] left. They advocated directly combating fascists with physical force rather than relying on the state. Since the late 1990s, a similar tendency has developed within US anarchism. ''See also: ] (US), ] (UK), ]'' | |||
Philosophical anarchism has met the criticism of members of academia following the release of pro-anarchist books such as ]' ''Moral Principles and Political Obligations''.{{Sfn|Klosko|1999|p=536}} Law professor William A. Edmundson authored an essay to argue against three major philosophical anarchist principles which he finds fallacious. Edmundson says that while the individual does not owe the state a duty of obedience, this does not imply that anarchism is the inevitable conclusion and the state is still morally legitimate.{{Sfnm|1a1=Klosko|1y=1999|1p=536|2a1=Kristjánsson|2y=2000|2p=896}} In ''The Problem of Political Authority'', ] defends philosophical anarchism,{{Sfn|Dagger|2018|p=35}} claiming that "political authority is a moral illusion."{{Sfn|Rogers|2020|p=}} | |||
===Religious Anarchisms=== | |||
{{main|Christian anarchism|Anarchism and religion}} | |||
One of the earliest criticisms is that anarchism defies and fails to understand the biological inclination to authority.{{Sfn|Ferguson|1886}} ] states that the acceptance of authority implies the belief that following their instructions will afford more success.{{Sfn|Gans|1992|p=37}} Raz believes that this argument is true in following both authorities' successful and mistaken instruction.{{Sfn|Gans|1992|p=38}} Anarchists reject this criticism because challenging or disobeying authority does not entail the disappearance of its advantages by acknowledging authority such as doctors or lawyers as reliable, nor does it involve a complete surrender of independent judgment.{{Sfn|Gans|1992|pp=34, 38}} Anarchist perception of human nature, rejection of the state, and commitment to social revolution has been criticised by academics as naive, overly simplistic, and unrealistic, respectively.{{Sfn|Brinn|2020|p=206}} Classical anarchism has been criticised for relying too heavily on the belief that the abolition of the state will lead to human cooperation prospering.{{Sfn|Lucy|2020|p=162}} | |||
] 1828-1910]] | |||
], considered to be one of the principal founders of Marxism, criticised anarchism's anti-authoritarianism as inherently counter-revolutionary because in his view a revolution is by itself authoritarian.{{Sfn|Tucker|1978}} Academic ] writes in his book ''Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism'' that "anarchism cannot win", believing that it lacks the ability to properly implement its ideas.{{Sfn|Dodds|2011}} The Marxist criticism of anarchism is that it has a utopian character because all individuals should have anarchist views and values. According to the Marxist view, that a social idea would follow directly from this human ideal and out of the free will of every individual formed its essence. Marxists state that this contradiction was responsible for their inability to act. In the anarchist vision, the conflict between liberty and equality was resolved through coexistence and intertwining.{{Sfn|Baár|Falina|Janowski|Kopeček|2016|p=488}} | |||
Most anarchist culture tends to be ] if not outright ]. However, the combination of religious social conscience, historical religiousity amongst oppressed social classes, and the compatability of some interpretations of religious traditions with anarchism has resulted in religious anarchisms. | |||
== See also == | |||
] believe that there is no higher authority than ], and oppose earthly authority such as ] and established churches. They believe that Jesus' teachings were clearly anarchistic, but were corrupted when "Christianity" was declared the official religion of Rome. Christian anarchists, who follow Jesus' directive to "turn the other cheek", are strict ]. The most famous advocate of Christian anarchism was ], author of '']'', who called for a society based on compassion, nonviolent principles and freedom. Christian anarchists tend to form ]. They also occasionally ]. Many Christian anarchists are ] or ]{{fact}}. | |||
{{Portal|Anarchism|Libertarianism}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
'''Anarchist communities''' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
== References == | |||
] was most influential in the 1920s. Strands of Chinese anarchism included ]'s ] which was influenced by Tolstoy and the ]. | |||
=== Explanatory notes === | |||
{{Reflist|group=nb}} | |||
=== Citations === | |||
], with its focus on the environment and equality, along with its often decentralized nature, has lead to a number of neopagan anarchists. One of the most prominent is ], who writes extensively about both ] and ]. | |||
{{Reflist|25em}} | |||
=== |
=== General and cited sources === | ||
==== Primary sources ==== | |||
{{main|Anarcha-Feminism}} | |||
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} | |||
]]] | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bakunin |first=Mikhail |author-link=Mikhail Bakunin |title=Statism and Anarchy |title-link=Statism and Anarchy |publisher=] |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-5213-6182-8 |editor-last=Shatz |editor-first=Marshall |series=Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought |location=Cambridge, England |translator-last=Shatz |translator-first=Marshall |doi=10.1017/CBO9781139168083 |lccn=89077393 |oclc=20826465 |orig-date=1873}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
==== Secondary sources ==== | |||
Anarcha-feminism is a kind of ] that espouses the belief that ] is a fundamental problem in society. While anarchist feminism has existed for more than a hundred years, its explicit formulation as ''anarcha-feminism'' dates back to the early 70s {{ref|anarcha}}, during the ] feminist movement. Anarcha-feminism, views ] as the first manifestation of hierarchy in human history; thus, the first form of oppression occurred in the dominance of male over female. Anarcha-feminists then conclude that if feminists are against patriarchy, they must also be against all forms of ], and therefore must reject the authoritarian nature of the state and capitalism. {{fact}} | |||
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Angelbeck |first1=Bill |last2=Grier |first2=Colin |date=2012 |title=Anarchism and the Archaeology of Anarchic Societies: Resistance to Centralization in the Coast Salish Region of the Pacific Northwest Coast |url=https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/dc%3A312/datastream/PDF/view |url-status=live |journal=] |volume=53 |issue=5 |pages=547–587 |doi=10.1086/667621 |s2cid=142786065 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180721142558/https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/dc%3A312/datastream/PDF/view |archive-date=21 July 2018 |access-date=24 June 2021 |s2cid-access=free |issn = 0011-3204 }} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Antliff |first=Mark |date=1998 |title=Cubism, Futurism, Anarchism: The 'Aestheticism' of the "Action d'art" Group, 1906–1920 |journal=Oxford Art Journal |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=101–120 |doi=10.1093/oxartj/21.2.99 |jstor=1360616}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Anderson |first=Benedict |author-link=Benedict Anderson |date=2004 |title=In the World-Shadow of Bismarck and Nobel |url=http://newleftreview.org/II/28/benedict-anderson-in-the-world-shadow-of-bismarck-and-nobel |journal=] |volume=2 |issue=28 |pages=85–129 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151219130121/http://newleftreview.org/II/28/benedict-anderson-in-the-world-shadow-of-bismarck-and-nobel |archive-date=19 December 2015 |access-date=7 January 2016}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Arvidsson |first=Stefan |author-link=Stefan Arvidsson |title=The Style and Mythology of Socialism: Socialist Idealism, 1871–1914 |publisher=] |date=2017 |isbn=978-0-3673-4880-9 |edition=1st |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Ashwood |first=Loka |date=2018 |title=Rural Conservatism or Anarchism? The Pro-state, Stateless, and Anti-state Positions |journal=] |volume=83 |issue=4 |pages=717–748 |doi=10.1111/ruso.12226 |s2cid=158802675}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Avrich |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Avrich |title=] |publisher=] |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-6910-4494-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Avrich |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Avrich |title=The Russian Anarchists |title-link=The Russian Anarchists |publisher=] |date=2006 |isbn=978-1-9048-5948-2 |location=Stirling |author-mask=2}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Avrich |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Avrich |title=] |publisher=] |date=1980 |isbn=978-1-4008-5318-2 |pages=3–33 |oclc=489692159 |author-mask=2}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Baár |first1=Monika |title=A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe: Negotiating Modernity in the 'Long Nineteenth Century' |last2=Falina |first2=Maria |last3=Janowski |first3=Maciej |last4=Kopeček |first4=Michal |last5=Trencsényi |first5=Balázs Trencsényi |publisher=] |date=2016 |isbn=978-0-1910-5695-6 |volume=I |location=Oxford}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bantman |first=Constance |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=371–388 |chapter=The Era of Propaganda by the Deed |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m7BhDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA372}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bates |first=David |title=Political Ideologies |publisher=] |date=2017 |isbn=978-0-1987-2785-9 |editor-last=Wetherly |editor-first=Paul |chapter=Anarchism |access-date=2019-02-28 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uXfJDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA128 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111304/https://books.google.com/books?id=uXfJDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA128 |archive-date=2021-02-18 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bolloten |first=Burnett |author-link=Burnett Bolloten |title=The Spanish Civil War: Revolution and Counterrevolution |publisher=] |date=1984 |isbn=978-0-8078-1906-7}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Brinn |first=Gearóid |date=2020 |title=Smashing the State Gently: Radical Realism and Realist Anarchism |journal=] |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=206–227 |doi=10.1177/1474885119865975 |s2cid=202278143}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Brooks |first=Frank H. |title=The Individualist Anarchists: An Anthology of Liberty (1881–1908) |publisher=Transaction Publishers |date=1994 |isbn=978-1-5600-0132-4}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Carlson |first=Andrew R. |title=Anarchism in Germany; Vol. 1: The Early Movement |title-link=Anarchism in Germany (book) |publisher=Scarecrow Press |date=1972 |isbn=978-0-8108-0484-5 |location=Metuchen, New Jersey}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Carter |first=April |author-link=April Carter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3mlWPgAACAAJ |title=The Political Theory of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=1971 |isbn=978-0-4155-5593-7 |access-date=7 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214125/https://books.google.com/books?id=3mlWPgAACAAJ |archive-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Carter |first=April |date=1978 |title=Anarchism and violence |journal=Nomos |publisher=American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy |volume=19 |pages=320–340 |jstor=24219053}} | |||
* {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofterrori00grar |title=The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al-Quaeda |publisher=] |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-5202-4709-3 |editor-last=Chaliand |editor-first=Gerard |location=Berkeley; Los Angeles; London |oclc=634891265 |editor-last2=Blin |editor-first2=Arnaud |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2009 |title=Anarchism |encyclopedia=The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest |publisher=] |location=Oxford |last=Cohn |first=Jesse |editor-last=Ness |editor-first=Immanuel |editor-link=Immanuel Ness |pages=1–11 |doi=10.1002/9781405198073.wbierp0039 |isbn=978-1-4051-9807-3}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Crone |first=Patricia |author-link=Patricia Crone |date=2000 |title=Ninth-Century Muslim Anarchists |url=https://www.hs.ias.edu/files/Crone_Articles/Crone_Ninth_Century_Muslim_Anarchists.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=] |issue=167 |pages=3–28 |doi=10.1093/past/167.1.3 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200828210845/https://www.hs.ias.edu/files/Crone_Articles/Crone_Ninth_Century_Muslim_Anarchists.pdf |archive-date=28 August 2020 |access-date=3 January 2022}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dagger |first=Tristan J. |title=Playing Fair: Political Obligation and the Problems of Punishment |publisher=] |date=2018 |isbn=978-0-1993-8883-7 |location=Oxford}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dirlik |first=Arif |title=Anarchism in the Chinese Revolution |publisher=] |date=1991 |isbn=978-0-5200-7297-8 |location=Berkeley}} | |||
* {{Cite magazine |last=Dodds |first=Jonathan |date=October 2011 |title=Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism |url=http://socialistreview.org.uk/362/anarchism-marxist-criticism |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111328/http://socialistreview.org.uk/362/anarchism-marxist-criticism |archive-date=2021-02-18 |access-date=2020-07-31 |magazine=Socialist Review}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dodson |first=Edward |title=The Discovery of First Principles |publisher=Authorhouse |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-5952-4912-1 |volume=2}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Dunn |first=Kevin |date=August 2012 |title=Anarcho-Punk and Resistance in Everyday Life |journal=Punk & Post-Punk |publisher=Intellect |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=201–218 |doi=10.1386/punk.1.2.201_1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Egoumenides |first=Magda |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4qEMBAAAQBAJ |title=Philosophical Anarchism and Political Obligation |publisher=] |date=2014 |isbn=978-1-4411-2445-6 |location=New York |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111334/https://books.google.com/books?id=4qEMBAAAQBAJ |archive-date=18 February 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Evren |first=Süreyyya |author-link=Süreyyya Evren |title=Post-Anarchism: A Reader |publisher=] |date=2011 |isbn=978-0-7453-3086-0 |editor-last=Rousselle |editor-first=Duane |editor-link=Duane Rousselle |pages=1–19 |chapter=How New Anarchism Changed the World (of Opposition) after Seattle and Gave Birth to Post-Anarchism |editor-last2=Evren |editor-first2=Süreyyya |editor-link2=Süreyyya Evren}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Evren |first1=Süreyyya |author-link=Süreyyya Evren |title=Blasting the Canon |last2=Kinna |first2=Ruth |author-link2=Ruth Kinna |last3=Rouselle |first3=Duane |author-link3=Duane Rousselle |publisher=] |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-6158-3862-5 |location=Santa Barbara, California}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Ferguson |first=Francis L. |date=August 1886 |title=The Mistakes of Anarchism |journal=The North American Review |publisher=] |volume=143 |issue=357 |pages=204–206 |issn=0029-2397 |jstor=25101094}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Fernández |first=Frank |title=Cuban Anarchism: The History of A Movement |publisher=Sharp Press |date=2009 |orig-date=2001}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Franks |first=Benjamin |author-link=Benjamin Franks (philosopher) |title=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies |date=August 2013 |publisher=] |editor-last=Freeden |editor-first=Michael |pages=385–404 |chapter=Anarchism |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0001 |editor-last2=Stears |editor-first2=Marc}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Franks |first=Benjamin |author-link=Benjamin Franks (philosopher) |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=549–570 |chapter=Anarchism and Ethics |author-mask=2 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Gabardi |first=Wayne |date=1986 |title=Anarchism. By David Miller. (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1984. pp. 216 ) |journal=] |volume=80 |issue=1 |pages=300–302 |doi=10.2307/1957102 |jstor=446800 |s2cid=151950709}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Gans |first=Chaim |title=Philosophical Anarchism and Political Disobedience |publisher=] |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-5214-1450-0 |edition=reprint |location=Cambridge}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Gay |first1=Kathlyn |title=Encyclopedia of Political Anarchy |last2=Gay |first2=Martin |publisher=] |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-8743-6982-3}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Gifford |first=James |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Literature and Anarchism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Goodway |first=David |author-link=David Goodway |title=] |publisher=Liverpool Press |date=2006 |isbn=978-1-8463-1025-6}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Graham |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Graham (historian) |title=Anarchism: a Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas: from Anarchy to Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-5516-4250-5 |location=Montréal}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Graham |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Graham (historian) |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=325–342 |chapter=Anarchism and the First International |author-mask=2 |access-date=17 May 2020 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726001923/https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-date=26 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Guérin |first=Daniel |author-link=Daniel Guérin |url=http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/daniel-guerin-anarchism-from-theory-to-practice |title=Anarchism: From Theory to Practice |publisher=Monthly Review Press |date=1970 |isbn=978-0-8534-5128-0 |access-date=16 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200714125723/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/daniel-guerin-anarchism-from-theory-to-practice |archive-date=14 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Harrison |first1=Kevin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5qrJCgAAQBAJ |title=Understanding Political Ideas and Movements |last2=Boyd |first2=Tony |publisher=] |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-7190-6151-6 |access-date=7 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308074910/https://books.google.com/books?id=5qrJCgAAQBAJ |archive-date=8 March 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Harmon |first=Christopher C. |date=2011 |title=How Terrorist Groups End: Studies of the Twentieth Century |journal=Connections |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=51–104 |jstor=26310649}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Heywood |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Heywood |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Sy8hDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146 |title=Political Ideologies: An Introduction |publisher=Macmillan International Higher Education |date=2017 |isbn=978-1-1376-0604-4 |edition=6th |access-date=13 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111410/https://books.google.com/books?id=Sy8hDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146 |archive-date=18 February 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Honderich |first=Ted |url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hond |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |publisher=] |date=1995 |isbn=978-0-1986-6132-0 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Honeywell |first=C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qzKOzQEACAAJ |title=Anarchism |publisher=Wiley |date=2021 |isbn=978-1-5095-2390-0 |series=Key Concepts in Political Theory |access-date=2022-08-13}} | |||
* {{Cite news |last=Imrie |first=Doug |date=1994 |title=The Illegalists |url=http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908072801/http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm |archive-date=2015-09-08 |access-date=2010-12-09 |work=Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed |language=en}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Jennings |first=Jeremy |author-link=Jeremy Jennings |title=Contemporary Political Ideologies |publisher=Pinter |date=1993 |isbn=978-0-8618-7096-7 |editor-last=Eatwell |editor-first=Roger |editor-link=Roger Eatwell |location=London |pages=127–146 |chapter=Anarchism |editor-last2=Wright |editor-first2=Anthony}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Jennings |first=Jeremy |author-link=Jeremy Jennings |title=Contemporary Political Ideologies |publisher=A & C Black |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-8264-5173-6 |editor-last=Eatwell |editor-first=Roger |editor-link=Roger Eatwell |edition=reprinted, 2nd |location=London |chapter=Anarchism |editor-last2=Wright |editor-first2=Anthony}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Jeppesen |first1=Sandra |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dNuoAwAAQBAJ |title=The Bloomsbury Companion to Anarchism |last2=Nazar |first2=Holly |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=978-1-4411-4270-2 |editor-last=Kinna |editor-first=Ruth |editor-link=Ruth Kinna |chapter=Genders and Sexualities in Anarchist Movements |access-date=26 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214158/https://books.google.com/books?id=dNuoAwAAQBAJ |archive-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Johnson |first=Charles |title=Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country? |publisher=] |date=2008 |isbn=978-0-7546-6066-8 |editor-last=Long |editor-first=Roderick T. |pages=155–188 |chapter=Liberty, Equality, Solidarity Toward a Dialectical Anarchism |editor-last2=Machan |editor-first2=Tibor R. |editor-link2=Tibor Machan}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Joll |first=James |author-link=James Joll |title=] |publisher=] |date=1964 |isbn=978-0-6740-3642-0}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Jun |first=Nathan |date=September 2009 |title=Anarchist Philosophy and Working Class Struggle: A Brief History and Commentary |url=https://philarchive.org/rec/JUNAPA-2 |journal=] |language=en |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=505–519 |doi=10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00251.x |issn=1089-7011}}<!-- to revisit, p. 508+ --> | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Jun |first=Nathan |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=27–47 |chapter=The State |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Kinna |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Kinna |title=The Bloomsbury Companion to Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=978-1-6289-2430-5}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Kinna |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Kinna |title=] |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-0-2413-9655-1}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Klosko |first=George |date=1999 |title=More than Obligation – William A. Edmundson: Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority |journal=The Review of Politics |volume=61 |issue=3 |pages=536–538 |doi=10.1017/S0034670500028989 |issn=1748-6858 |s2cid=144417469}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Klosko |first=George |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ToHmfIj8d_gC |title=Political Obligations |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-1995-5104-0 |access-date=7 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124033632/https://books.google.com/books?id=ToHmfIj8d_gC |archive-date=24 November 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |url=http://archive.org/details/patternsofanarch00krim |title=Patterns of Anarchy: A Collection of Writings on the Anarchist Tradition |date=1966 |publisher=Anchor Books |editor-last=Krimerman |editor-first=Leonard I. |location=Garden City, New York |language=en |editor-last2=Perry |editor-first2=Lewis}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Kristjánsson |first=Kristján |date=2000 |title=Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority by William A. Edmundson |journal=] |volume=109 |issue=436 |pages=896–900 |jstor=2660038}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Laursen |first=Ole Birk |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=149–168 |chapter=Anti-Imperialism |access-date=17 May 2020 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726001923/https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-date=26 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Levy |first=Carl |author-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |date=8 May 2011 |title=Social Histories of Anarchism |journal=Journal for the Study of Radicalism |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=1–44 |doi=10.1353/jsr.2010.0003 |issn=1930-1197 |s2cid=144317650}} | |||
* {{Cite book |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |date=2018 |publisher=] |isbn=978-3-3197-5619-6 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Long |first=Roderick T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z7MzEHaJgKAC |title=The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy |publisher=] |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-4158-7456-4 |editor-last=Gaud |editor-first=Gerald F. |access-date=2019-02-28 |editor-last2=D'Agostino |editor-first2=Fred |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809085833/https://books.google.com/books?id=z7MzEHaJgKAC |archive-date=2020-08-09 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Lucy |first=Nicholas |title=The SAGE Handbook of Global Sexualities |publisher=] |date=2020 |isbn=978-1-5297-2194-2 |pages=160–183 |chapter=Anarchism and Sexuality |access-date=21 February 2022 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-t7KDwAAQBAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214344/https://books.google.com/books?id=-t7KDwAAQBAJ |archive-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Lutz |first1=James M. |last2=Ulmschneider |first2=Georgia Wralstad |date=2019 |title=Civil Liberties, National Security and U.S. Courts in Times of Terrorism |journal=Perspectives on Terrorism |volume=13 |issue=6 |pages=43–57 |jstor=26853740}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Marshall |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Marshall (author) |title=] |publisher=] |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-0021-7855-6 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Marshall |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Marshall (author) |title=Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism |publisher=PM Press |date=1993 |isbn=978-1-6048-6064-1 |location=Oakland, California |author-mask=2}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Mattern |first=Mark |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=589–602 |chapter=Anarchism and Art |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Mayne |first=Alan James |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6MkTz6Rq7wUC&q=Communist+anarchism+believes+in+collective+ownership&pg=PA131 |title=From Politics Past to Politics Future: An Integrated Analysis of Current and Emergent Paradigms |publisher=] |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-2759-6151-0 |access-date=20 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418013303/https://books.google.com/books?id=6MkTz6Rq7wUC&q=Communist+anarchism+believes+in+collective+ownership&pg=PA131 |archive-date=18 April 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=McLaughlin |first=Paul |title=Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-7546-6196-2 |location=Aldershot}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Morland |first=Dave |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=etb2UFzCBv4C |title=Changing Anarchism: Anarchist Theory and Practice in a Global Age |publisher=] |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-7190-6694-8 |editor-last=Purkis |editor-first=Jonathan |pages=23–38 |chapter=Anti-capitalism and poststructuralist anarchism |access-date=24 January 2020 |editor-last2=Bowen |editor-first2=James |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111517/https://books.google.com/books?id=etb2UFzCBv4C |archive-date=18 February 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Meltzer |first=Albert |author-link=Albert Meltzer |url=https://archive.org/details/anarchism00albe |title=Anarchism: Arguments For and Against |publisher=] |date=2000 |isbn=978-1-8731-7657-3 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Morris |first=Brian |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GJXy5eCpPawC |title=Bakunin: The Philosophy of Freedom |publisher=] |date=1993 |isbn=978-1-8954-3166-7 |access-date=8 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225175003/https://books.google.com/books?id=GJXy5eCpPawC |archive-date=25 February 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Morris |first=Brian |title=Anthropology, Ecology, and Anarchism: A Brian Morris Reader |publisher=] |others=Marshall, Peter |date=2015 |isbn=978-1-6048-6093-1 |edition=illustrated |location=Oakland |author-mask=2}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Morris |first=Christopher W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uuyJ9Bw8w7QC |title=An Essay on the Modern State |publisher=] |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-5215-2407-0 |access-date=15 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214335/https://books.google.com/books?id=uuyJ9Bw8w7QC |archive-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Moya |first=Jose C. |title=In Defiance of Boundaries: Anarchism in Latin American History |publisher=] |others=Kirwin R. Shaffer |date=2015 |isbn=978-0-8130-5138-3 |editor-last=Laforcade |editor-first=Geoffroy de |chapter=Transference, culture, and critique The Circulation of Anarchist Ideas and Practices |access-date=6 March 2019 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ikt6AQAACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809085903/https://books.google.com/books?id=ikt6AQAACAAJ |archive-date=9 August 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Nesser |first=Petter |date=2012 |title=Research Note: Single Actor Terrorism: Scope, Characteristics and Explanations |journal=Perspectives on Terrorism |volume=6 |issue=6 |pages=61–73 |jstor=26296894}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Nettlau |first=Max |author-link=Max Nettlau |title=] |publisher=Freedom Press |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-9003-8489-9}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Newman |first=Michael |title=Socialism: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-1928-0431-0 |location=Oxford}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Newman |first=Saul |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SiqBiViUsOkC&pg=PA43 |title=The Politics of Postanarchism |publisher=] |date=2010 |isbn=978-0-7486-3495-8 |access-date=29 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200103005542/https://books.google.com/books?id=SiqBiViUsOkC&pg=PA43 |archive-date=3 January 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Nicholas |first=Lucy |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Gender and Sexuality |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Norris |first=Jesse J. |date=2020 |title=Idiosyncratic Terrorism: Disaggregating an Undertheorized Concept |journal=Perspectives on Terrorism |volume=14 |issue=3 |issn=2334-3745 |jstor=26918296s}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Nomad |first=Max |title=Revolutionary Internationals 1864–1943 |publisher=] |date=1966 |isbn=978-0-8047-0293-5 |editor-last=Drachkovitch |editor-first=Milorad M. |page=88 |chapter=The Anarchist Tradition}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Osgood |first=Herbert L. |date=March 1889 |title=Scientific Anarchism |journal=] |publisher=The Academy of Political Science |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=1–36 |doi=10.2307/2139424 |jstor=2139424}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Otero |first=Carlos Peregrín |title=Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments |publisher=] |date=1994 |isbn=978-0-4150-1005-4 |volume=2–3 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Parry |first=Richard |url=https://archive.org/details/bonnotgang0000parr |title=The Bonnot Gang |publisher=Rebel Press |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-9460-6104-4 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Pernicone |first=Nunzio |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3ttgjwEACAAJ |title=Italian Anarchism, 1864–1892 |publisher=] |date=2009 |isbn=978-0-6916-3268-1 |access-date=8 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200819161516/https://books.google.com/books?id=3ttgjwEACAAJ |archive-date=19 August 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Pierson |first=Christopher |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7jvKDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA187 |title=Just Property: Enlightenment, Revolution, and History |publisher=] |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-1996-7329-2 |access-date=8 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210316125550/https://books.google.com/books?id=7jvKDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA187 |archive-date=16 March 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Ramnath |first=Maia |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Non-Western Anarchisms and Postcolonialism |access-date=17 May 2020 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726001923/https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-date=26 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Robé |first=Chris |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336710855 |title=Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerrillas, and Digital Ninjas |publisher=] |date=2017 |isbn=978-1-6296-3233-9 |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220221022844/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336710855_Breaking_the_Spell_A_History_of_Anarchist_Filmmakers_Videotape_Guerrillas_and_Digital_Ninjas |archive-date=21 February 2022 |url-status=live |via=ResearchGate}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Rogers |first=Tristan J. |title=The Authority of Virtue: Institutions and Character in the Good Society |publisher=] |date=2020 |isbn=978-1-0002-2264-7 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Rupert |first=Mark |url=https://archive.org/details/globalizationint00rupe |title=Globalization and International Political Economy |publisher=] |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-7425-2943-4 |location=Lanham}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Ryley |first=Peter |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=225–236 |chapter=Individualism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Shannon |first=Deric |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=91–106 |chapter=Anti-Capitalism and Libertarian Political Economy |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Skirda |first=Alexandre |title=Facing the Enemy: A History of Anarchist Organization From Proudhon to May 1968 |publisher=] |date=2002 |isbn=978-1-9025-9319-7}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Sylvan |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Sylvan |title=A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy |date=2007 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-4051-3653-2 |editor-last=Goodin |editor-first=Robert E. |editor-link=Robert E. Goodin |edition=2nd |series=Blackwell Companions to Philosophy |volume=5 |chapter=Anarchism |editor-last2=Pettit |editor-first2=Philip |editor-link2=Philip Pettit |editor-last3=Pogge |editor-first3=Thomas |editor-link3=Thomas Pogge}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Suissa |first=Judith |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Anarchist Education |access-date=17 May 2020 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726001923/https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-date=26 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Thomas |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Thomas (Marx scholar) |title=] |publisher=] & Kegan Paul |date=1985 |isbn=978-0-7102-0685-5 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite book |title=The Marx-Engels Reader |publisher=] |date=1978 |isbn=0-3930-5684-8 |editor-last=Tucker |editor-first=Robert C. |edition=2nd |location=New York |oclc=3415145}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Turcato |first=Davide |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Anarchist Communism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Van der Walt |first=Lucien |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=249–264 |chapter=Syndicalism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Ward |first=Colin |author-link=Colin Ward |date=1973 |title=The Role of the State |journal=Education Without Schools |pages=39–48}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Ward |first=Colin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nkgSDAAAQBAJ |title=Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=] |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-1928-0477-8 |location=Oxford |author-mask=2 |access-date=12 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304153805/https://books.google.com/books?id=nkgSDAAAQBAJ |archive-date=4 March 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Walter |first=Nicholas |title=About Anarchism |publisher=Freedom Press |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-9003-8490-5 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Wendt |first=Fabian |date=2020 |title=Against Philosophical Anarchism |journal=Law and Philosophy |volume=39 |issue=5 |pages=527–544 |doi=10.1007/s10982-020-09377-4 |s2cid=213742949}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Wilbur |first=Shawn |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Mutualism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Dana M. |date=2015 |title=Black Panther Radical Factionalization and the Development of Black Anarchism |journal=] |location=Thousand Oaks |publisher=] |volume=46 |issue=7 |pages=678–703 |doi=10.1177/0021934715593053 |jstor=24572914 |s2cid=145663405}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Dana M. |author-mask=2 |date=2018 |title=Contemporary Anarchist and Anarchistic Movements |journal=Sociology Compass |publisher=] |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=e12582 |doi=10.1111/soc4.12582 |issn=1751-9020}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Williams |first=Dana M. |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Tactics: Conceptions of Social Change, Revolution, and Anarchist Organisation |author-mask=2 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Leonard |date=September 2007 |title=Anarchism Revived |journal=] |language=en |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=297–312 |doi=10.1080/07393140701510160 |issn=0739-3148 |s2cid=220354272}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Leonard |author-mask=2 |date=2010 |title=Hakim Bey and Ontological Anarchism |journal=Journal for the Study of Radicalism |location=East Lansing |publisher=] |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=109–137 |doi=10.1353/jsr.2010.0009 |jstor=41887660 |s2cid=143304524}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
==== Tertiary sources ==== | |||
Anarcho-primitivists see the creation of gender roles and patriarchy a creation of the start of ], and therefore consider primitivism to also be an anarchist school of thought that addresses feminist concerns. ] is often considered a feminist variant of green anarchist feminist thought. | |||
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{Cite web |last=Coutinho |first=Steve |date=3 March 2016 |title=Zhuangzi |url=http://www.iep.utm.edu/zhuangzi |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303175106/http://www.iep.utm.edu/zhuangzi |archive-date=2016-03-03 |access-date=2019-03-05 |publisher=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |language=en}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=De George |first=Richard T. |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-1992-6479-7 |editor-last=Honderich |editor-first=Ted |editor-link=Ted Honderich}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2017 |title=Anarchism |encyclopedia=] |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, ] |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/anarchism |access-date=12 March 2019 |last=Fiala |first=Andrew |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200828210847/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/anarchism |archive-date=28 August 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2019 |title=Anarchism In The Arts |encyclopedia=] |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/anarchism/Anarchism-in-the-arts#info-article-contributors |access-date=31 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201128002441/https://www.britannica.com/topic/anarchism/Anarchism-in-the-arts#info-article-contributors |archive-date=28 November 2020 |last2=Dirlik |first2=Arif |last3=Rosemont |first3=Franklin |last4=Augustyn |first4=Adam |last5=Duignan |first5=Brian |last6=Lotha |first6=Gloria |last1=Miller |first1=Martin A. |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2008 |title=Anarcho-capitalism |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |publisher=SAGE; ] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC&pg=PT51 |access-date=2 September 2020 |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-first=Ronald |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |pages=13–14 |doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n8 |isbn=978-1-4129-6580-4 |oclc=191924853 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111721/https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC&pg=PT51 |archive-date=18 February 2021 |last1=Morris |first1=Andrew |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=McLean |first1=Iain |url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordconcisedic00iain |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics |last2=McMillan |first2=Alistair |publisher=] |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-1928-0276-7 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite web |date=2019 |title=Definition of Anarchism |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchism |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111728/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchism |archive-date=2021-02-18 |access-date=2019-02-28 |website=Merriam-Webster |language=en |ref={{Sfnref|Merriam-Webster|2019}}}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Miller |first=David |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NIZfQTd3nSMC |title=The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought |publisher=] |date=1991 |isbn=978-0-6311-7944-3 |access-date=7 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200818145221/https://books.google.com/books?id=NIZfQTd3nSMC |archive-date=18 August 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2003 |title=Anarchism |encyclopedia=The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought |publisher=] |location=Malden, Massachusetts |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JJmdpqJwkwwC&pg=PA12 |access-date=15 August 2020 |last=Ostergaard |first=Geoffrey |author-link=Geoffrey Ostergaard |editor-last=Outhwaite |editor-first=William |edition=2nd |isbn=978-0-6312-2164-7 |oclc=49704935 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418004719/https://books.google.com/books?id=JJmdpqJwkwwC&pg=PA12 |archive-date=18 April 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |title=Oxford English Dictionary |date=September 2005 |publisher=] |edition=3rd |chapter=Anarchy |ref={{Harvid|Oxford English Dictionary|2005}}}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
Anarcha-feminism is most often associated with early 20th-century authors and theorists such as ] and ], although even early first-wave feminist ] held proto-anarchist views, and William Godwin is often considered a feminist anarchist precursor. It should be noted that Goldman and de Cleyre, though they both opposed the state, had opposing philosophies, as de Cleyre explains: "Miss Goldman is a communist; I am an individualist. She wishes to destroy the right of property, I wish to assert it. I make my war upon privilege and authority, whereby the right of property, the true right in that which is proper to the individual, is annihilated. She believes that co-operation would entirely supplant competition; I hold that competition in one form or another will always exist, and that it is highly desirable it should." In the ], an anarcha-feminist group, "Free Women", organized to defend both anarchist and feminist ideas. | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Avrich |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Avrich |title=] |date=1995 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-6910-3412-6 |location=Princeton |language=English }} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Barclay |first=Harold B. |author-link=Harold Barclay |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MrFHQgAACAAJ |title=People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy |publisher=Kahn & Averill |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-9393-0609-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Baker |first=Zoe |author-link=Zoe Baker |title=Means and Ends: The Revolutionary Practice of Anarchism in Europe and the United States |publisher=] |year=2023 |isbn=978-1-8493-5498-1 |oclc=1345217229 }} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Chomsky |first=Noam |author-link=Noam Chomsky |title=Chomsky on Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-9048-5926-0 |editor-last=Pateman |editor-first=Barry |location=Oakland}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Edmundson |first=William A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q_gClKUbJyYC |title=Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority |date=2007 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-5210-3751-8}} Criticism of philosophical anarchism. | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Esenwein |first=George |title=Anarchist Ideology and the Working-Class Movement in Spain, 1868–1898 |publisher=University of California Press |date=1989 |isbn=978-0-5200-6398-3 |location=Berkeley}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Harper |first=Clifford |author-link=Clifford Harper |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W63aAAAAMAAJ |title=Anarchy: A Graphic Guide |publisher=Camden Press |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-9484-9122-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Huemer |first=Michael |title=The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=978-1-1372-8164-7 |location=London |page=137}} A defence of philosophical anarchism, stating that "both kinds of 'anarchism' are philosophical and political claims." | |||
* {{Cite news |last=Kahn |first=Joseph |date=2000-08-05 |title=Anarchism, the Creed That Won't Stay Dead; The Spread of World Capitalism Resurrects a Long-Dormant Movement |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/05/arts/anarchism-creed-that-won-t-stay-dead-spread-world-capitalism-resurrects-long.html |page=B9 |issn=0362-4331}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Kinna |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Kinna |title=Anarchism: A Beginners Guide |publisher=Oneworld |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-8516-8370-3}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Le Guin |first=Ursula K. |author-link=Ursula K. Le Guin |title=The Dispossessed |title-link=The Dispossessed |publisher=] |date=2009}} Anarchistic popular fiction novel.<!-- Gifford 2019, p 580. --> | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Sartwell |first=Crispin |author-link=Crispin Sartwell |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bk-aaMVGKO0C |title=Against the State: An Introduction to Anarchist Political Theory |publisher=] |date=2008 |isbn=978-0-7914-7447-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Scott |first=James C. |author-link=James C. Scott |title=Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play |title-link=Two Cheers for Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=978-0-6911-5529-6 |location=Princeton, New Jersey}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Suissa |first=Judith |date=1 July 2019b |title=Education and Non-domination: Reflections from the Radical Tradition |journal=Studies in Philosophy and Education |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=359–375 |doi=10.1007/s11217-019-09662-3 |s2cid=151210357 |doi-access=free}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Wolff |first=Robert Paul |author-link=Robert Paul Wolff |title=In Defense of Anarchism |title-link=In Defense of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-5202-1573-3}} An argument for philosophical anarchism. | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Woodcock |first=George |author-link=George Woodcock |date=January 1962 |title=Anarchism in Spain |url=https://www.historytoday.com/archive/anarchism-spain |journal=] |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=22–32 |access-date=14 October 2020}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Levy |first1=Carl |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2 |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |last2=Adams |first2=Matthew S. |date=2019 |publisher=] |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2 |s2cid=149333615}} | |||
== External links == | |||
In the modern day anarchist movement, many anarchists, male or female, consider themselves feminists, and anarcha-feminist ideas are growing. The publishing of Quiet Rumors, an anarcha-feminist reader, has helped to spread various kinds of anti-authoritarian and anarchist feminist ideas to the broader movement. Wendy McElroy has popularized an anarcho-capitalist take on feminism in her books, articles, and individualist feminist website {{ref|ifeminists}}. | |||
<!-- Attention! The external link portion of this article regularly grows far beyond manageable size. PLEASE only list an outside link if it applies to anarchism in general, is somewhat noteworthy, and has consensus on the talkpage. Links to sites which cover anarchist submovements will be routinely moved to subarticles to keep this article free of clutter. --> | |||
{{Prone to spam|date=November 2014}} | |||
* – an online research center on the history and theory of anarchism. | |||
{{Sister bar|wikt=yes|commons=yes|q=yes|s=yes|b=yes|d=yes|v=yes|n=yes}} | |||
===Anarcho-capitalism=== | |||
] (1926-1995)]] | |||
{{main|Anarcho capitalism}} | |||
Anarcho-capitalism is a predominantly United States based theoretical tradition that desires a stateless society with the economic system of ] ]. Anarcho-capitalists believe all ] ] between ] should be legal. They do not oppose employment or interest. Unlike 19th century American individualism, anarcho-capitalism does not generally hold with the ], but rather holds the ]. As such they do not oppose ]. Anarcho-capitalists oppose ]. | |||
]'s synthesis of ] and ] was germinal for the development of contemporary anarcho-capitalist theory. Rothbard defines anarchism in terms of the ]. For Rothbard, "an anarchist society one where there is no legal possibility for coercive aggression against the person or property of any individual." {{ref|Rothbard-SWAS-1975}} Anarcho-capitalists favor complete laissez-faire capitalism as opposed to state capitalism; Rothbard says the "difference between free-market capitalism and state capitalism is precisely the difference between, on the one hand, peaceful, voluntary exchange, and on the other, violent expropriation." {{ref|Rothbard-Future}} Though the term anarcho-capitalism was coined by Rothbard, similar philosophies existed prior to Rothbard that noted anarcho-capitalists, along with some historians such as David Hart and ], consider to be anarcho-capitalist. These include the philosophies of 18th and 19th theorists such as ], ], ], and ] {{ref|Rothbard-Molinari}} {{ref|Hart-Molinari}} {{ref|Raico}} {{ref|Hoppe}} Rothbard's conception is based on the concept of ]. Competiting theorists use egoism, ] (]), or ] (]). | |||
Important anarcho-capitalists include ], ], and ]. Some ], such as ], ], and ], have influenced anarcho-capitalism. | |||
Most anarchists, societarians and individualists, deny that anarcho-capitalism is a form of anarchism, arguing that capitalism runs contrary to an egalitarian power structure and is an inherently authoritarian institution.{{fact}}<!-- suggest Anarchist FAQ for a cite here --> The latter criticism is contested by anarcho-capitalists, and by some ].{{fact}} <!-- suggest these previously embedded links get turned into {{ref|}}{{note|}} format citations --> | |||
Anarcho-capitalism is also criticized by anarchists that compare it with ].{{fact}} In ''Noam Chomsky on Anarchism'', Chomsky writes, "Anarcho-capitalism, in my opinion, is a doctrinal system which, if ever implemented, would lead to forms of tyranny and oppression that have few counterparts in human history", although he adds that he finds himself, "in substantial agreement with people who consider themselves anarcho-capitalists on a whole range of issues". {{ref|totse}} | |||
===Anarchism and the environment=== | |||
{{seealso|Anarcho-primitivism|Green anarchism|Eco-anarchism|Ecofeminism}} | |||
Since the late 1970s anarchists in Anglophone and European countries have been taking action for the natural environment. ] or ] believe in ]. This is a worldview that embraces ] and ]. Eco-anarchists often use ] against what they see as earth-destroying institutions. Of particular importance is the ] movement, that takes action such as ]. Another important component is ], which sees the domination of nature as a metaphor for the domination of women. Green anarchism also involves a critique of industrial capitalism, and, for some green anarchists, civilization itself.{{fact}} | |||
Primitivism is a predominantly Western philosophy that advocates a return to a pre-industrial and usually pre-agricultural society. It develops a critique of industrial civilization. In this critique ] and ] have ] people from the natural world. This philosophy develops themes present in the political action of the ] and the writings of ]. Primitivism developed in the context of the ], Earth First! and the ] movements. ] wrote that ] — not just the state — would need to fall for anarchy to be achieved.{{fact}} Anarcho-primitivists point to the anti-authoritarian nature of many 'primitive' or hunter-gatherer societies throughout the world's history, as examples of anarchist societies. | |||
===Other branches and offshoots=== | |||
Anarchism generates many eclectic and syncretic philosophies and movements. Since the Western social formet in the 1960s and 1970s a number new of movements and schools have appeared. Most of these stances are limited to even smaller numbers than the schools and movements listed above. | |||
]]] | |||
*'''Post-left anarchy''' - Post-left anarchy (also called egoist-anarchism) seeks to distance itself from the traditional "left" - communists, liberals, social democrats, etc. - and to escape the confines of ] in general. Post-leftists argue that anarchism has been weakened by its long attachment to contrary "leftist" movements and single issue causes (], ], etc.). It calls for a synthesis of anarchist thought and a specifically anti-authoritarian revolutionary movement outside of the leftist milieu. It often focuses on the individual rather than speaking in terms of class or other broad generalizations and shuns organizational tendencies in favor of the complete absence of explicit hierarchy. Important groups and individuals associated with Post-left anarchy include: ], the magazine ] and its editor ], ], ] and others. For more information, see ]'s ''Anarchy After Leftism'' {{ref|infoshopaal}} section, and the on ''See also:'' ] | |||
*'''Post-structuralism''' - The term postanarchism was originated by ], first receiving popular attention in his book '']'' to refer to a theoretical move towards a synthesis of classical anarchist theory and ] thought. Subsequent to Newman's use of the term, however, it has taken on a life of its own and a wide range of ideas including ], ], ], ] and Zapatismo. By its very nature post-anarchism rejects the idea that it should be a coherent set of doctrines and beliefs. As such it is difficult, if not impossible, to state with any degree of certainty who should or shouldn't be grouped under the rubric. Nonetheless key thinkers associated with post-anarchism include ], ], ] and ]. ''External reference: Postanarchism Clearinghouse'' {{ref|pach}} ''See also'' ] | |||
*'''Insurrectionary anarchism''' - Insurrectionary anarchism is a form of revolutionary anarchism critical of formal anarchist labor unions and federations. Insurrectionary anarchists advocate informal organization, including small affinity groups, carrying out acts of resistance in various struggles, and mass organizations called base structures, which can include exploited individuals who are not anarchists. Proponents include ] and ], author of works including "Armed Joy" and "The Anarchist Tension". This tendency is represented in the US in magazines such as ] and ]. ''See also:'' ] | |||
*'''Small 'a' anarchism''' - '''Small 'a' anarchism''' is a term used in two different, but not unconnected contexts. Dave Neal posited the term in opposition to big 'A' Anarchism in the article . While big 'A' Anarchism referred to ideological Anarchists, small 'a' anarchism was applied to their methodological counterparts; those who viewed anarchism as "a way of acting, or a historical tendency against illegitimate authority." As an anti-ideological position, small 'a' anarchism shares some similarities with ]. ] and ] offer an alternative use of the term, applying it to groups and movements organising according to or acting in a manner consistent with anarchist principles of decentralisation, voluntary association, mutual aid, the network model, and crucially, "the rejection of any idea that the end justifies the means, let alone that the business of a revolutionary is to seize state power and then begin imposing one's vision at the point of a gun." {{ref|zmag}} | |||
==Other issues== | |||
*'''Conceptions of an anarchist society''' - Many political philosophers justify support of the state as a means of regulating violence, so that the destruction caused by human conflict is minimized and fair relationships are established. Anarchists argue that pursuit of these ends does not justify the establishment of a state; many argue that the state is incompatible with those goals and the ''cause'' of chaos, violence, and war. Anarchists argue that the state helps to create a ], and uses violence to advance elite interests. Much effort has been dedicated to explaining how anarchist societies would handle criminality.''See also:'' ] | |||
*'''Civil rights and cultural sovereignty''' - ] opposes the existence of a state, capitalism, and subjugation and domination of people of color, and favors a non-hierarchical organization of society. Theorists include ], ], and ]. ] was created as a forum for non-caucasian anarchists to express their thoughts about racial issues within the anarchist movement, particularly within the United States. ] is a political view which seeks to unite cultural or ethnic preservation with anarchist views. Its adherents propose that those preventing ethnic groups (or ]) from living in separate autonomous groupings should be resisted. ] is not an anarchist group, but many anarchists are involved. It focuses on publicly confronting racist agitators. The ] movement of Chiapas, Mexico is a cultural sovereignty group with some anarchist proclivities. | |||
*'''Neo-imperialism and Globalization''' - To anarchists, ] amounts to inter-state loan-sharking. All anarchists oppose neo-imperialism and the state cartels which carry it out, such as the ], ], ], and the ]. ] is an ambiguous term that has different meanings to different anarchist factions. Most anarchists use the term to mean neo-imperialism, with many active in the ] movement. Others, particularly anarcho-capitalists, use "globalization" to mean the worldwide expansion of the division of labor and trade, which they see as beneficial so long as governments do not intervene. | |||
*'''Parallel structures''' - Many anarchists try to set up alternatives to state-supported institutions and "outposts," such as ], ], educational systems such as home-schooling, neighborhood mediation/arbitration groups, and so on. The idea is to creating the structures for a new anti-authoritarian society in the shell of the old, authoritarian one. | |||
*'''Technology''' - Recent technological developments have made the anarchist cause both easier to advance and more conceivable to people. Many people use the Internet to form on-line communities. ] is undermined and a gift-culture supported by ], ] programming, and the ]. These cyber-communities include the ], ], ], and ]. ] has made anonymous digital currencies such as ] and ] an alternative to statist ]. Some anarchists see ] as the best weapon to defeat authoritarianism. Some even think the information age makes eventual anarchy inevitable. {{ref|modulaware}} ''See also'': ] and ]. | |||
*'''Pacifism''' - Some anarchists consider ] (opposition to ]) to be inherent in their philosophy. ] take it further and follow ]'s belief in ]. Anarchists see war as an activity in which the state seeks to gain and consolidate power, both domestically and in foreign lands, and subscribe to ]'s view that "war is the health of the state" {{ref|struggle}}. A lot of anarchist activity has been ] based. | |||
*'''Parliamentarianism''' - In general terms, the anarchist ethos opposes voting in elections, because voting amounts to condoning the state. {{ref|vlntryst}}. ] is an anarchist school of thought which emphasizes "tending your own garden" and "neither ballots nor bullets." The anarchist case against voting is explained in ''The Ethics of Voting'' {{ref|voluntaryism}} by ]. (Also see "Voting Anarchists: An Oxymoron or What?" by ], and writings by ]). | |||
*'''Sectarianism''' - Most anarchist schools of thought are, to some degree, ]. There is often a difference of opinion ''within'' each school about how to react to, or interact with, other schools. Some, such as ], believe that it is possible for a variety of modes of social life to coexist and compete. Some anarchists view opposing schools as a social impossibility and resist interaction; others see opportunities for coalition-building, or at least temporary alliances for specific purposes. ''See ].'' | |||
==Criticisms of anarchism== | |||
'''Violence.''' The very word ''anarchism'' originated as a term of abuse first used during against the working class ] during the ]. Since then, anarchism has often been associated by with violence and destruction. | |||
'''Utopianism.''' Anarchism is often criticised as unfeasible, or plain ], even by many who agree that it's a nice idea in principle. | |||
'''] character.''' ] have characterised anarchism as an expression of the class interests of the ] or perhaps the ]. See e.g. Plekhanov {{ref|plekhanov}} for a swingeing Marxist critique of 1895. Anarchists have also been characterised as spoilt ] ]s, most recently in relation to ] protesters. | |||
'''Tacit authoritarianism.''' In recent decades anarchism has been criticised by 'situationists', 'post-anarchists' and others of preserving 'tacitly statist', authoritarian or bureaucratic tendencies behind a dogmatic facade.{{fact}} | |||
'''Hypocrisy.''' Some critics point to the ] and ] views of some prominent anarchists, notably ] and ], as examples of ] inherent within anarchism. Most anarchists, however, dismiss that the personal prejudices of 19th century theorists influence the beliefs of present-day anarchists. | |||
==Cultural phenomena== | |||
] (1928–)]] | |||
The kind of anarchism that is most easily encountered in popular culture is represented by celebrities who publicly identify themselves as anarchists. Although some anarchists reject any focus on such famous living individuals as inherently élitist, the following figures are examples of prominent publicly self-avowed anarchists: | |||
* the ] professor of ] ] | |||
* the ] author ] | |||
* the social historian ] | |||
* entertainer and author ] | |||
* the ] artist ] | |||
In ], the ] was created in downtown ]. The housing and employment crisis in most of ] led to the formation of ] and squatter movements like the one still thriving in ], in ]. Militant ] in places like Germany, and the uprisings of ], ], and ] groups in France and Italy also helped to give popularity to anti-authoritarian, non-capitalist ideas. | |||
In various musical styles, anarchism rose in popularity. Most famous for the linking of anarchist ideas and music has been punk rock, although in the modern age, hip hop, and folk music are also becoming important mediums for the spreading of the anarchist message. In the ] this was associated with the ] movement; the band ] is celebrated for its anarchist and ] ideas. The ] punk band ] further exemplifies this expression. | |||
''For further details, see ]'' | |||
==See also== | |||
<!-- (Please take care in adding to this list that it not grow excessively large, consider adding to the list of anarchist concepts page) --> | |||
There are many concepts relevant to the topic of anarchism, this is a brief summary. There is also a more extensive ]. | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
===Historical events=== | |||
*] (]) | |||
*] (]) | |||
*] (] — ]) | |||
*] (]) | |||
*] (]) (see ] and ]) | |||
*], France (]) | |||
*] (]) | |||
===Books=== | |||
{{main|List of anarchist books}} | |||
The following is a sample of books that have been referenced in this page, a more complete list can be found at the ]. | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*] '''' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
===Anarchism by region/culture=== | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | |||
<!-- How to add a footnote: | |||
NOTE: Footnotes in this article use names, not numbers. Please see ] for details. | |||
1) Assign your footnote a unique name, for example TheSun_Dec9. | |||
2) Add the macro {{ref|TheSun_Dec9}} to the body of the article, where you want the new footnote. | |||
3) Take note of the name of the footnote that immediately precedes yours in the article body. | |||
4) Add #{{Note|TheSun_Dec9}} to the list, immediately below the footnote you noted in step 3. No need to re-number anything! | |||
5) Multiple footnotes to the same reference: see ] for a how-to. | |||
NOTE: It is important to add footnotes in the right order in the list! | |||
--> | |||
# {{note|Kropotkin_MutualAid}} Peter Kropotkin. ''].'' 1902. | |||
# {{note|Engels_OriginsoftheFamily}} Friedrich Engels. '''' 1884. | |||
# {{note|toxicpop}} The Anarchy Organization (Toronto). ''Taoism and Anarchy.'' April 14, 2002 | |||
# {{note|lewrockwell}} Murray Rothbard. "The Ancient Chinese Libertarian Tradition" extract from "Concepts of the Role of Intellectuals in Social Change Toward Laissez Faire" ''The Journal of Libertarian Studies'' 9 (2) Fall 1990. | |||
# {{note|blackcrayon}} | |||
# {{note|Russell_WesternPhilosophy}} Bertrand Russell. "Ancient philosophy" in ''A History of Western Philosophy, and its connection with political and social circumstances from the earliest times to the present day.'' 1945. | |||
# {{note|Brit94}} - from Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1994 | |||
# {{note|virginiaedu}} | |||
# {{note|libertyfund}} | |||
# {{note|enqjustice}} | |||
# {{note|encarta}} | |||
# {{note|litencyc}} | |||
# {{note|bakunin-f}} | |||
# {{note|dejacque1}} | |||
# {{note|dejacque2}} (in ]) | |||
# {{note|Tucker-LAIP}} Tucker, Benjamin Individual Liberty: Selections From the Writings of Benjamin R. Tucker, Vanguard Press, New York, 1926, Kraus Reprint Co., Millwood, NY, 1973. | |||
# {{note|Tucker-Kropotkin}} | |||
# {{note|univmontp3}} | |||
# {{note|anarcha}} | |||
# {{note|ifeminists}} | |||
# {{note|Rothbard-SWAS-1975}} by Gustave de Molinari, translated by J. Huston McCulloch, Occasional Papers Series #2 (Richard M. Ebeling, Editor), New York: The Center for Libertarian Studies, May 1977. | |||
# {{note|Rothbard-Future}} Rothbard, Murray N. Modern Political Economy, James H. Weaver, ed. pp. 419-430, Chapter 28, (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1973) | |||
# {{note|Rothbard-Molinari}} by Gustave de Molinari, translated by J. Huston McCulloch, Occasional Papers Series #2 (Richard M. Ebeling, Editor), New York: The Center for Libertarian Studies, May 1977 | |||
# {{note|Hart-Molinari}} Hart, David Journal of Libertarian Studies, in three parts, (Summer 1981), V, no. 3: 263-290; (Fall 1981), V. no. 4: 399-434; (Winter 1982), VI, no. 1: 83-104 | |||
# {{note|Raico}} Raico, Ralph Ecole Polytechnique, Centre de Recherce en Epistemologie Appliquee, Unité associée au CNRS (2004). | |||
# {{note|Hoppe}} Hoppe, Hans-Hermann , (December 3, 2001). | |||
# {{note|totse}} | |||
# {{note|infoshopaal}} | |||
# {{note|pach}} | |||
# {{note|zmag}} | |||
# {{note|modulaware}} | |||
# {{note|struggle}} | |||
# {{note|vlntryst}} | |||
# {{note|voluntaryism}} | |||
# {{note|plekhanov}} | |||
'''These notes have no corresponding reference in the article. They might be re-used.''' | |||
# {{note|bill}} | |||
# {{note|praxeology}} | |||
# {{note|platform}} | |||
# {{note|appleton}} | |||
==External links== | |||
The overwhelming diversity and number of links relating to anarchism is extensively covered on the ]. | |||
* Blogs by Anarchists. | |||
* extensively archives information relating to famous anarchists. This includes many of their books and other publications. | |||
*Hundreds of anarchists are listed, with short bios, links & dedicated pages | |||
* | |||
* | |||
<!-- Attention! The external link portion of this article regularly grows far beyond manageable size. Please only list an outside link if it applies to anarchism in general and is somewhat noteworthy. Links to lesser known sites or submovements will be routinely moved to the list page to keep this article free of clutter --> | |||
{{Anarchism}} | |||
{{Navboxes | |||
|list= | |||
{{Libertarian socialism}} | |||
] | |||
{{Libertarianism}} | |||
] | |||
{{Philosophy topics}} | |||
] | |||
{{Political culture}} | |||
] | |||
{{Political ideologies}} | |||
{{Political philosophy}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 11:00, 18 December 2024
Political philosophy and movement For other uses, see Anarchy, Anarchism (disambiguation), and Anarchist (disambiguation).
Anarchism is a political philosophy and movement that is against all forms of authority and seeks to abolish the institutions it claims maintain unnecessary coercion and hierarchy, typically including the state and capitalism. Anarchism advocates for the replacement of the state with stateless societies and voluntary free associations. A historically left-wing movement, anarchism is usually described as the libertarian wing of the socialist movement (libertarian socialism).
Although traces of anarchist ideas are found all throughout history, modern anarchism emerged from the Enlightenment. During the latter half of the 19th and the first decades of the 20th century, the anarchist movement flourished in most parts of the world and had a significant role in workers' struggles for emancipation. Various anarchist schools of thought formed during this period. Anarchists have taken part in several revolutions, most notably in the Paris Commune, the Russian Civil War and the Spanish Civil War, whose end marked the end of the classical era of anarchism. In the last decades of the 20th and into the 21st century, the anarchist movement has been resurgent once more, growing in popularity and influence within anti-capitalist, anti-war and anti-globalisation movements.
Anarchists employ diverse approaches, which may be generally divided into revolutionary and evolutionary strategies; there is significant overlap between the two. Evolutionary methods try to simulate what an anarchist society might be like, but revolutionary tactics, which have historically taken a violent turn, aim to overthrow authority and the state. Many facets of human civilization have been influenced by anarchist theory, critique, and praxis.
Etymology, terminology, and definition
Main article: Definition of anarchism and libertarianism See also: Glossary of anarchismThe etymological origin of anarchism is from the Ancient Greek anarkhia (ἀναρχία), meaning "without a ruler", composed of the prefix an- ("without") and the word arkhos ("leader" or "ruler"). The suffix -ism denotes the ideological current that favours anarchy. Anarchism appears in English from 1642 as anarchisme and anarchy from 1539; early English usages emphasised a sense of disorder. Various factions within the French Revolution labelled their opponents as anarchists, although few such accused shared many views with later anarchists. Many revolutionaries of the 19th century such as William Godwin (1756–1836) and Wilhelm Weitling (1808–1871) would contribute to the anarchist doctrines of the next generation but did not use anarchist or anarchism in describing themselves or their beliefs.
The first political philosopher to call himself an anarchist (French: anarchiste) was Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809–1865), marking the formal birth of anarchism in the mid-19th century. Since the 1890s and beginning in France, libertarianism has often been used as a synonym for anarchism; its use as a synonym is still common outside the United States. Some usages of libertarianism refer to individualistic free-market philosophy only, and free-market anarchism in particular is termed libertarian anarchism.
While the term libertarian has been largely synonymous with anarchism, its meaning has more recently been diluted by wider adoption from ideologically disparate groups, including both the New Left and libertarian Marxists, who do not associate themselves with authoritarian socialists or a vanguard party, and extreme cultural liberals, who are primarily concerned with civil liberties. Additionally, some anarchists use libertarian socialist to avoid anarchism's negative connotations and emphasise its connections with socialism. Anarchism is broadly used to describe the anti-authoritarian wing of the socialist movement. Anarchism is contrasted to socialist forms which are state-oriented or from above. Scholars of anarchism generally highlight anarchism's socialist credentials and criticise attempts at creating dichotomies between the two. Some scholars describe anarchism as having many influences from liberalism, and being both liberal and socialist but more so. Many scholars reject anarcho-capitalism as a misunderstanding of anarchist principles.
While opposition to the state is central to anarchist thought, defining anarchism is not an easy task for scholars, as there is a lot of discussion among scholars and anarchists on the matter, and various currents perceive anarchism slightly differently. Major definitional elements include the will for a non-coercive society, the rejection of the state apparatus, the belief that human nature allows humans to exist in or progress toward such a non-coercive society, and a suggestion on how to act to pursue the ideal of anarchy.
History
Main article: History of anarchismPre-modern era
The most notable precursors to anarchism in the ancient world were in China and Greece. In China, philosophical anarchism (the discussion on the legitimacy of the state) was delineated by Taoist philosophers Zhuang Zhou and Laozi. Alongside Stoicism, Taoism has been said to have had "significant anticipations" of anarchism.
Anarchic attitudes were also articulated by tragedians and philosophers in Greece. Aeschylus and Sophocles used the myth of Antigone to illustrate the conflict between laws imposed by the state and personal autonomy. Socrates questioned Athenian authorities constantly and insisted on the right of individual freedom of conscience. Cynics dismissed human law (nomos) and associated authorities while trying to live according to nature (physis). Stoics were supportive of a society based on unofficial and friendly relations among its citizens without the presence of a state.
In medieval Europe, there was no anarchistic activity except some ascetic religious movements. These, and other Muslim movements, later gave birth to religious anarchism. In the Sasanian Empire, Mazdak called for an egalitarian society and the abolition of monarchy, only to be soon executed by Emperor Kavad I. In Basra, religious sects preached against the state. In Europe, various religious sects developed anti-state and libertarian tendencies.
Renewed interest in antiquity during the Renaissance and in private judgment during the Reformation restored elements of anti-authoritarian secularism in Europe, particularly in France. Enlightenment challenges to intellectual authority (secular and religious) and the revolutions of the 1790s and 1848 all spurred the ideological development of what became the era of classical anarchism.
Modern era
During the French Revolution, partisan groups such as the Enragés and the sans-culottes saw a turning point in the fermentation of anti-state and federalist sentiments. The first anarchist currents developed throughout the 18th century as William Godwin espoused philosophical anarchism in England, morally delegitimising the state, Max Stirner's thinking paved the way to individualism and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's theory of mutualism found fertile soil in France. By the late 1870s, various anarchist schools of thought had become well-defined and a wave of then-unprecedented globalisation occurred from 1880 to 1914. This era of classical anarchism lasted until the end of the Spanish Civil War and is considered the golden age of anarchism.
Drawing from mutualism, Mikhail Bakunin founded collectivist anarchism and entered the International Workingmen's Association, a class worker union later known as the First International that formed in 1864 to unite diverse revolutionary currents. The International became a significant political force, with Karl Marx being a leading figure and a member of its General Council. Bakunin's faction (the Jura Federation) and Proudhon's followers (the mutualists) opposed state socialism, advocating political abstentionism and small property holdings. After bitter disputes, the Bakuninists were expelled from the International by the Marxists at the 1872 Hague Congress. Anarchists were treated similarly in the Second International, being ultimately expelled in 1896. Bakunin predicted that if revolutionaries gained power by Marx's terms, they would end up the new tyrants of workers. In response to their expulsion from the First International, anarchists formed the St. Imier International. Under the influence of Peter Kropotkin, a Russian philosopher and scientist, anarcho-communism overlapped with collectivism. Anarcho-communists, who drew inspiration from the 1871 Paris Commune, advocated for free federation and for the distribution of goods according to one's needs.
By the turn of the 20th century, anarchism had spread all over the world. It was a notable feature of the international syndicalist movement. In China, small groups of students imported the humanistic pro-science version of anarcho-communism. Tokyo was a hotspot for rebellious youth from East Asian countries, who moved to the Japanese capital to study. In Latin America, Argentina was a stronghold for anarcho-syndicalism, where it became the most prominent left-wing ideology. During this time, a minority of anarchists adopted tactics of revolutionary political violence, known as propaganda of the deed. The dismemberment of the French socialist movement into many groups and the execution and exile of many Communards to penal colonies following the suppression of the Paris Commune favoured individualist political expression and acts. Even though many anarchists distanced themselves from these terrorist acts, infamy came upon the movement and attempts were made to prevent anarchists immigrating to the US, including the Immigration Act of 1903, also called the Anarchist Exclusion Act. Illegalism was another strategy which some anarchists adopted during this period.
Despite concerns, anarchists enthusiastically participated in the Russian Revolution in opposition to the White movement, especially in the Makhnovshchina; however, they met harsh suppression after the Bolshevik government had stabilised, including during the Kronstadt rebellion. Several anarchists from Petrograd and Moscow fled to Ukraine, before the Bolsheviks crushed the anarchist movement there too. With the anarchists being repressed in Russia, two new antithetical currents emerged, namely platformism and synthesis anarchism. The former sought to create a coherent group that would push for revolution while the latter were against anything that would resemble a political party. Seeing the victories of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution and the resulting Russian Civil War, many workers and activists turned to communist parties, which grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the United States, members of major syndicalist movements such as the General Confederation of Labour and the Industrial Workers of the World left their organisations and joined the Communist International.
In the Spanish Civil War of 1936–39, anarchists and syndicalists (CNT and FAI) once again allied themselves with various currents of leftists. A long tradition of Spanish anarchism led to anarchists playing a pivotal role in the war, and particularly in the Spanish Revolution of 1936. In response to the army rebellion, an anarchist-inspired movement of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of Barcelona and of large areas of rural Spain, where they collectivised the land. The Soviet Union provided some limited assistance at the beginning of the war, but the result was a bitter fight between communists and other leftists in a series of events known as the May Days, as Joseph Stalin asserted Soviet control of the Republican government, ending in another defeat of anarchists at the hands of the communists.
Post-WWII
By the end of World War II, the anarchist movement had been severely weakened. The 1960s witnessed a revival of anarchism, likely caused by a perceived failure of Marxism–Leninism and tensions built by the Cold War. During this time, anarchism found a presence in other movements critical towards both capitalism and the state such as the anti-nuclear, environmental, and peace movements, the counterculture of the 1960s, and the New Left. It also saw a transition from its previous revolutionary nature to provocative anti-capitalist reformism. Anarchism became associated with punk subculture as exemplified by bands such as Crass and the Sex Pistols. The established feminist tendencies of anarcha-feminism returned with vigour during the second wave of feminism. Black anarchism began to take form at this time and influenced anarchism's move from a Eurocentric demographic. This coincided with its failure to gain traction in Northern Europe and its unprecedented height in Latin America.
Around the turn of the 21st century, anarchism grew in popularity and influence within anti-capitalist, anti-war and anti-globalisation movements. Anarchists became known for their involvement in protests against the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Group of Eight and the World Economic Forum. During the protests, ad hoc leaderless anonymous cadres known as black blocs engaged in rioting, property destruction and violent confrontations with the police. Other organisational tactics pioneered at this time include affinity groups, security culture and the use of decentralised technologies such as the Internet. A significant event of this period was the confrontations at the 1999 Seattle WTO conference. Anarchist ideas have been influential in the development of the Zapatistas in Mexico and the Democratic Federation of Northern Syria, more commonly known as Rojava, a de facto autonomous region in northern Syria.
While having revolutionary aspirations, many contemporary forms of anarchism are not confrontational. Instead, they are trying to build an alternative way of social organization (following the theories of dual power), based on mutual interdependence and voluntary cooperation. Scholar Carissa Honeywell takes the example of Food Not Bombs group of collectives, to highlight some features of how contemporary anarchist groups work: direct action, working together and in solidarity with those left behind. While doing so, Food Not Bombs provides consciousness raising about the rising rates of world hunger and suggest policies to tackle hunger, ranging from de-funding the arms industry to addressing Monsanto seed-saving policies and patents, helping farmers, and resisting the commodification of food and housing. Honeywell also emphasizes that contemporary anarchists are interested in the flourishing not only of humans, but non-humans and the environment as well. Honeywell argues that their analysis of capitalism and governments results in anarchists rejecting representative democracy and the state as a whole.
Schools of thought
Anarchist schools of thought have been generally grouped into two main historical traditions, social anarchism and individualist anarchism, owing to their different origins, values and evolution. The individualist current emphasises negative liberty in opposing restraints upon the free individual, while the social current emphasises positive liberty in aiming to achieve the free potential of society through equality and social ownership. In a chronological sense, anarchism can be segmented by the classical currents of the late 19th century and the post-classical currents (anarcha-feminism, green anarchism, and post-anarchism) developed thereafter.
Beyond the specific factions of anarchist movements which constitute political anarchism lies philosophical anarchism which holds that the state lacks moral legitimacy, without necessarily accepting the imperative of revolution to eliminate it. A component especially of individualist anarchism, philosophical anarchism may tolerate the existence of a minimal state but claims that citizens have no moral obligation to obey government when it conflicts with individual autonomy. Anarchism pays significant attention to moral arguments since ethics have a central role in anarchist philosophy. Anarchism's emphasis on anti-capitalism, egalitarianism, and for the extension of community and individuality sets it apart from anarcho-capitalism and other types of economic libertarianism.
Anarchism is usually placed on the far-left of the political spectrum. Much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian, anti-statist, libertarian, and radical interpretations of left-wing and socialist politics such as collectivism, communism, individualism, mutualism, and syndicalism, among other libertarian socialist economic theories. As anarchism does not offer a fixed body of doctrine from a single particular worldview, many anarchist types and traditions exist and varieties of anarchy diverge widely. One reaction against sectarianism within the anarchist milieu was anarchism without adjectives, a call for toleration and unity among anarchists first adopted by Fernando Tarrida del Mármol in 1889 in response to the bitter debates of anarchist theory at the time. Belief in political nihilism has been espoused by anarchists. Despite separation, the various anarchist schools of thought are not seen as distinct entities but rather as tendencies that intermingle and are connected through a set of shared principles such as autonomy, mutual aid, anti-authoritarianism and decentralisation.
Classical
Inceptive currents among classical anarchist currents were mutualism and individualism. They were followed by the major currents of social anarchism (collectivist, communist and syndicalist). They differ on organisational and economic aspects of their ideal society.
Mutualism is an 18th-century economic theory that was developed into anarchist theory by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Its aims include "abolishing the state", reciprocity, free association, voluntary contract, federation and monetary reform of both credit and currency that would be regulated by a bank of the people. Mutualism has been retrospectively characterised as ideologically situated between individualist and collectivist forms of anarchism. In What Is Property? (1840), Proudhon first characterised his goal as a "third form of society, the synthesis of communism and property." Collectivist anarchism is a revolutionary socialist form of anarchism commonly associated with Mikhail Bakunin. Collectivist anarchists advocate collective ownership of the means of production which is theorised to be achieved through violent revolution and that workers be paid according to time worked, rather than goods being distributed according to need as in communism. Collectivist anarchism arose alongside Marxism but rejected the dictatorship of the proletariat despite the stated Marxist goal of a collectivist stateless society.
Anarcho-communism is a theory of anarchism that advocates a communist society with common ownership of the means of production, held by a federal network of voluntary associations, with production and consumption based on the guiding principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Anarcho-communism developed from radical socialist currents after the French Revolution but was first formulated as such in the Italian section of the First International. It was later expanded upon in the theoretical work of Peter Kropotkin, whose specific style would go onto become the dominating view of anarchists by the late 19th century. Anarcho-syndicalism is a branch of anarchism that views labour syndicates as a potential force for revolutionary social change, replacing capitalism and the state with a new society democratically self-managed by workers. The basic principles of anarcho-syndicalism are direct action, workers' solidarity and workers' self-management.
Individualist anarchism is a set of several traditions of thought within the anarchist movement that emphasise the individual and their will over any kinds of external determinants. Early influences on individualist forms of anarchism include William Godwin, Max Stirner, and Henry David Thoreau. Through many countries, individualist anarchism attracted a small yet diverse following of Bohemian artists and intellectuals as well as young anarchist outlaws in what became known as illegalism and individual reclamation.
Post-classical and contemporary
Main article: Contemporary anarchismAnarchist principles undergird contemporary radical social movements of the left. Interest in the anarchist movement developed alongside momentum in the anti-globalisation movement, whose leading activist networks were anarchist in orientation. As the movement shaped 21st century radicalism, wider embrace of anarchist principles signaled a revival of interest. Anarchism has continued to generate many philosophies and movements, at times eclectic, drawing upon various sources and combining disparate concepts to create new philosophical approaches. The anti-capitalist tradition of classical anarchism has remained prominent within contemporary currents.
Contemporary news coverage which emphasizes black bloc demonstrations has reinforced anarchism's historical association with chaos and violence. Its publicity has also led more scholars in fields such as anthropology and history to engage with the anarchist movement, although contemporary anarchism favours actions over academic theory. Various anarchist groups, tendencies, and schools of thought exist today, making it difficult to describe the contemporary anarchist movement. While theorists and activists have established "relatively stable constellations of anarchist principles", there is no consensus on which principles are core and commentators describe multiple anarchisms, rather than a singular anarchism, in which common principles are shared between schools of anarchism while each group prioritizes those principles differently. Gender equality can be a common principle, although it ranks as a higher priority to anarcha-feminists than anarcho-communists.
Anarchists are generally committed against coercive authority in all forms, namely "all centralized and hierarchical forms of government (e.g., monarchy, representative democracy, state socialism, etc.), economic class systems (e.g., capitalism, Bolshevism, feudalism, slavery, etc.), autocratic religions (e.g., fundamentalist Islam, Roman Catholicism, etc.), patriarchy, heterosexism, white supremacy, and imperialism." Anarchist schools disagree on the methods by which these forms should be opposed. The principle of equal liberty is closer to anarchist political ethics in that it transcends both the liberal and socialist traditions. This entails that liberty and equality cannot be implemented within the state, resulting in the questioning of all forms of domination and hierarchy.
Tactics
Anarchists' tactics take various forms but in general serve two major goals, namely, to first oppose the Establishment and secondly to promote anarchist ethics and reflect an anarchist vision of society, illustrating the unity of means and ends. A broad categorisation can be made between aims to destroy oppressive states and institutions by revolutionary means on one hand and aims to change society through evolutionary means on the other. Evolutionary tactics embrace nonviolence and take a gradual approach to anarchist aims, although there is significant overlap between the two.
Anarchist tactics have shifted during the course of the last century. Anarchists during the early 20th century focused more on strikes and militancy while contemporary anarchists use a broader array of approaches.
Classical era
During the classical era, anarchists had a militant tendency. Not only did they confront state armed forces, as in Spain and Ukraine, but some of them also employed terrorism as propaganda of the deed. Assassination attempts were carried out against heads of state, some of which were successful. Anarchists also took part in revolutions. Many anarchists, especially the Galleanists, believed that these attempts would be the impetus for a revolution against capitalism and the state. Many of these attacks were done by individual assailants and the majority took place in the late 1870s, the early 1880s and the 1890s, with some still occurring in the early 1900s. Their decrease in prevalence was the result of further judicial power and of targeting and cataloging by state institutions.
Anarchist perspectives towards violence have always been controversial. Anarcho-pacifists advocate for non-violence means to achieve their stateless, nonviolent ends. Other anarchist groups advocate direct action, a tactic which can include acts of sabotage or terrorism. This attitude was quite prominent a century ago when seeing the state as a tyrant and some anarchists believing that they had every right to oppose its oppression by any means possible. Emma Goldman and Errico Malatesta, who were proponents of limited use of violence, stated that violence is merely a reaction to state violence as a necessary evil.
Anarchists took an active role in strike actions, although they tended to be antipathetic to formal syndicalism, seeing it as reformist. They saw it as a part of the movement which sought to overthrow the state and capitalism. Anarchists also reinforced their propaganda within the arts, some of whom practiced naturism and nudism. Those anarchists also built communities which were based on friendship and were involved in the news media.
Revolutionary
In the current era, Italian anarchist Alfredo Bonanno, a proponent of insurrectionary anarchism, has reinstated the debate on violence by rejecting the nonviolence tactic adopted since the late 19th century by Kropotkin and other prominent anarchists afterwards. Both Bonanno and the French group The Invisible Committee advocate for small, informal affiliation groups, where each member is responsible for their own actions but works together to bring down oppression using sabotage and other violent means against state, capitalism, and other enemies. Members of The Invisible Committee were arrested in 2008 on various charges, terrorism included.
Overall, contemporary anarchists are much less violent and militant than their ideological ancestors. They mostly engage in confronting the police during demonstrations and riots, especially in countries such as Canada, Greece, and Mexico. Militant black bloc protest groups are known for clashing with the police; however, anarchists not only clash with state operators, they also engage in the struggle against fascists and racists, taking anti-fascist action and mobilizing to prevent hate rallies from happening.
Evolutionary
Anarchists commonly employ direct action. This can take the form of disrupting and protesting against unjust hierarchy, or the form of self-managing their lives through the creation of counter-institutions such as communes and non-hierarchical collectives. Decision-making is often handled in an anti-authoritarian way, with everyone having equal say in each decision, an approach known as horizontalism. Contemporary-era anarchists have been engaging with various grassroots movements that are more or less based on horizontalism, although not explicitly anarchist, respecting personal autonomy and participating in mass activism such as strikes and demonstrations. In contrast with the "big-A Anarchism" of the classical era, the newly coined term "small-a anarchism" signals their tendency not to base their thoughts and actions on classical-era anarchism or to refer to classical anarchists such as Peter Kropotkin and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon to justify their opinions. Those anarchists would rather base their thought and praxis on their own experience, which they will later theorize.
The concept of prefigurative politics is enacted by many contemporary anarchist groups, striving to embody the principles, organization and tactics of the changed social structure they hope to bring about. As part of this the decision-making process of small anarchist affinity groups plays a significant tactical role. Anarchists have employed various methods to build a rough consensus among members of their group without the need of a leader or a leading group. One way is for an individual from the group to play the role of facilitator to help achieve a consensus without taking part in the discussion themselves or promoting a specific point. Minorities usually accept rough consensus, except when they feel the proposal contradicts anarchist ethics, goals and values. Anarchists usually form small groups (5–20 individuals) to enhance autonomy and friendships among their members. These kinds of groups more often than not interconnect with each other, forming larger networks. Anarchists still support and participate in strikes, especially wildcat strikes as these are leaderless strikes not organised centrally by a syndicate.
As in the past, newspapers and journals are used, and anarchists have gone online to spread their message. Anarchists have found it easier to create websites because of distributional and other difficulties, hosting electronic libraries and other portals. Anarchists were also involved in developing various software that are available for free. The way these hacktivists work to develop and distribute resembles the anarchist ideals, especially when it comes to preserving users' privacy from state surveillance.
Anarchists organize themselves to squat and reclaim public spaces. During important events such as protests and when spaces are being occupied, they are often called Temporary Autonomous Zones (TAZ), spaces where art, poetry, and surrealism are blended to display the anarchist ideal. As seen by anarchists, squatting is a way to regain urban space from the capitalist market, serving pragmatical needs and also being an exemplary direct action. Acquiring space enables anarchists to experiment with their ideas and build social bonds. Adding up these tactics while having in mind that not all anarchists share the same attitudes towards them, along with various forms of protesting at highly symbolic events, make up a carnivalesque atmosphere that is part of contemporary anarchist vividity.
Key issues
As anarchism is a philosophy that embodies many diverse attitudes, tendencies, and schools of thought, disagreement over questions of values, ideology, and tactics is common. Its diversity has led to widely different uses of identical terms among different anarchist traditions which has created a number of definitional concerns in anarchist theory. The compatibility of capitalism, nationalism, and religion with anarchism is widely disputed, and anarchism enjoys complex relationships with ideologies such as communism, collectivism, Marxism, and trade unionism. Anarchists may be motivated by humanism, divine authority, enlightened self-interest, veganism, or any number of alternative ethical doctrines. Phenomena such as civilisation, technology (e.g. within anarcho-primitivism), and the democratic process may be sharply criticised within some anarchist tendencies and simultaneously lauded in others.
The state
Objection to the state and its institutions is a sine qua non of anarchism. Anarchists consider the state as a tool of domination and believe it to be illegitimate regardless of its political tendencies. Instead of people being able to control the aspects of their life, major decisions are taken by a small elite. Authority ultimately rests solely on power, regardless of whether that power is open or transparent, as it still has the ability to coerce people. Another anarchist argument against states is that the people constituting a government, even the most altruistic among officials, will unavoidably seek to gain more power, leading to corruption. Anarchists consider the idea that the state is the collective will of the people to be an unachievable fiction due to the fact that the ruling class is distinct from the rest of society.
Specific anarchist attitudes towards the state vary. Robert Paul Wolff believed that the tension between authority and autonomy would mean the state could never be legitimate. Bakunin saw the state as meaning "coercion, domination by means of coercion, camouflaged if possible but unceremonious and overt if need be." A. John Simmons and Leslie Green, who leaned toward philosophical anarchism, believed that the state could be legitimate if it is governed by consensus, although they saw this as highly unlikely. Beliefs on how to abolish the state also differ.
Gender, sexuality, and free love
Main article: Anarchism and issues related to love and sexAs gender and sexuality carry along them dynamics of hierarchy, many anarchists address, analyse, and oppose the suppression of one's autonomy imposed by gender roles.
Sexuality was not often discussed by classical anarchists but the few that did felt that an anarchist society would lead to sexuality naturally developing. Sexual violence was a concern for anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker, who opposed age of consent laws, believing they would benefit predatory men. A historical current that arose and flourished during 1890 and 1920 within anarchism was free love. In contemporary anarchism, this current survives as a tendency to support polyamory, relationship anarchy, and queer anarchism. Free love advocates were against marriage, which they saw as a way of men imposing authority over women, largely because marriage law greatly favoured the power of men. The notion of free love was much broader and included a critique of the established order that limited women's sexual freedom and pleasure. Those free love movements contributed to the establishment of communal houses, where large groups of travelers, anarchists and other activists slept in beds together. Free love had roots both in Europe and the United States; however, some anarchists struggled with the jealousy that arose from free love. Anarchist feminists were advocates of free love, against marriage, and pro-choice (using a contemporary term), and had a similar agenda. Anarchist and non-anarchist feminists differed on suffrage but were supportive of one another.
During the second half of the 20th century, anarchism intermingled with the second wave of feminism, radicalising some currents of the feminist movement and being influenced as well. By the latest decades of the 20th century, anarchists and feminists were advocating for the rights and autonomy of women, gays, queers and other marginalised groups, with some feminist thinkers suggesting a fusion of the two currents. With the third wave of feminism, sexual identity and compulsory heterosexuality became a subject of study for anarchists, yielding a post-structuralist critique of sexual normality. Some anarchists distanced themselves from this line of thinking, suggesting that it leaned towards an individualism that was dropping the cause of social liberation.
Education
Main article: Anarchism and educationAnarchist education | State education | |
---|---|---|
Concept | Education as self-mastery | Education as service |
Management | Community based | State run |
Methods | Practice-based learning | Vocational training |
Aims | Being a critical member of society | Being a productive member of society |
The interest of anarchists in education stretches back to the first emergence of classical anarchism. Anarchists consider proper education, one which sets the foundations of the future autonomy of the individual and the society, to be an act of mutual aid. Anarchist writers such as William Godwin (Political Justice) and Max Stirner ("The False Principle of Our Education") attacked both state education and private education as another means by which the ruling class replicate their privileges.
In 1901, Catalan anarchist and free thinker Francisco Ferrer established the Escuela Moderna in Barcelona as an opposition to the established education system which was dictated largely by the Catholic Church. Ferrer's approach was secular, rejecting both state and church involvement in the educational process while giving pupils large amounts of autonomy in planning their work and attendance. Ferrer aimed to educate the working class and explicitly sought to foster class consciousness among students. The school closed after constant harassment by the state and Ferrer was later arrested. Nonetheless, his ideas formed the inspiration for a series of modern schools around the world. Christian anarchist Leo Tolstoy, who published the essay Education and Culture, also established a similar school with its founding principle being that "for education to be effective it had to be free." In a similar token, A. S. Neill founded what became the Summerhill School in 1921, also declaring being free from coercion.
Anarchist education is based largely on the idea that a child's right to develop freely and without manipulation ought to be respected and that rationality would lead children to morally good conclusions; however, there has been little consensus among anarchist figures as to what constitutes manipulation. Ferrer believed that moral indoctrination was necessary and explicitly taught pupils that equality, liberty and social justice were not possible under capitalism, along with other critiques of government and nationalism.
Late 20th century and contemporary anarchist writers (Paul Goodman, Herbert Read, and Colin Ward) intensified and expanded the anarchist critique of state education, largely focusing on the need for a system that focuses on children's creativity rather than on their ability to attain a career or participate in consumerism as part of a consumer society. Contemporary anarchists such as Ward claim that state education serves to perpetuate socioeconomic inequality.
While few anarchist education institutions have survived to the modern-day, major tenets of anarchist schools, among them respect for child autonomy and relying on reasoning rather than indoctrination as a teaching method, have spread among mainstream educational institutions. Judith Suissa names three schools as explicitly anarchists' schools, namely the Free Skool Santa Cruz in the United States which is part of a wider American-Canadian network of schools, the Self-Managed Learning College in Brighton, England, and the Paideia School in Spain.
The arts
Main article: Anarchism and the artsThe connection between anarchism and art was quite profound during the classical era of anarchism, especially among artistic currents that were developing during that era such as futurists, surrealists and others. In literature, anarchism was mostly associated with the New Apocalyptics and the neo-romanticism movement. In music, anarchism has been associated with music scenes such as punk. Anarchists such as Leo Tolstoy and Herbert Read stated that the border between the artist and the non-artist, what separates art from a daily act, is a construct produced by the alienation caused by capitalism and it prevents humans from living a joyful life.
Other anarchists advocated for or used art as a means to achieve anarchist ends. In his book Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerrillas, and Digital Ninjas, Chris Robé claims that "anarchist-inflected practices have increasingly structured movement-based video activism." Throughout the 20th century, many prominent anarchists (Peter Kropotkin, Emma Goldman, Gustav Landauer and Camillo Berneri) and publications such as Anarchy wrote about matters pertaining to the arts.
Three overlapping properties made art useful to anarchists. It could depict a critique of existing society and hierarchies, serve as a prefigurative tool to reflect the anarchist ideal society and even turn into a means of direct action such as in protests. As it appeals to both emotion and reason, art could appeal to the whole human and have a powerful effect. The 19th-century neo-impressionist movement had an ecological aesthetic and offered an example of an anarchist perception of the road towards socialism. In Les chataigniers a Osny by anarchist painter Camille Pissarro, the blending of aesthetic and social harmony is prefiguring an ideal anarchistic agrarian community.
Criticism
The most common critique of anarchism is the assertion that humans cannot self-govern and so a state is necessary for human survival. Philosopher Bertrand Russell supported this critique, stating that "eace and war, tariffs, regulations of sanitary conditions and the sale of noxious drugs, the preservation of a just system of distribution: these, among others, are functions which could hardly be performed in a community in which there was no central government." Another common criticism of anarchism is that it fits a world of isolation in which only the small enough entities can be self-governing; a response would be that major anarchist thinkers advocated anarchist federalism.
Another criticism of anarchism is the belief that it is inherently unstable: that an anarchist society would inevitably evolve back into a state. Thomas Hobbes and other early social contract theorists argued that the state emerges in response to natural anarchy to protect the people's interests and keep order. Philosopher Robert Nozick argued that a "night-watchman state", or minarchy, would emerge from anarchy through the process of an invisible hand, in which people would exercise their liberty and buy protection from protection agencies, evolving into a minimal state. Anarchists reject these criticisms by arguing that humans in a state of nature would not just be in a state of war. Anarcho-primitivists in particular argue that humans were better off in a state of nature in small tribes living close to the land, while anarchists in general argue that the negatives of state organization, such as hierarchies, monopolies and inequality, outweigh the benefits.
Philosophy lecturer Andrew G. Fiala composed a list of common arguments against anarchism which includes critiques such as that anarchism is innately related to violence and destruction, not only in the pragmatic world, such as at protests, but in the world of ethics as well. Secondly, anarchism is evaluated as unfeasible or utopian since the state cannot be defeated practically. This line of arguments most often calls for political action within the system to reform it. The third argument is that anarchism is self-contradictory as a ruling theory that has no ruling theory. Anarchism also calls for collective action while endorsing the autonomy of the individual, hence no collective action can be taken. Lastly, Fiala mentions a critique towards philosophical anarchism of being ineffective (all talk and thoughts) and in the meantime capitalism and bourgeois class remains strong.
Philosophical anarchism has met the criticism of members of academia following the release of pro-anarchist books such as A. John Simmons' Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Law professor William A. Edmundson authored an essay to argue against three major philosophical anarchist principles which he finds fallacious. Edmundson says that while the individual does not owe the state a duty of obedience, this does not imply that anarchism is the inevitable conclusion and the state is still morally legitimate. In The Problem of Political Authority, Michael Huemer defends philosophical anarchism, claiming that "political authority is a moral illusion."
One of the earliest criticisms is that anarchism defies and fails to understand the biological inclination to authority. Joseph Raz states that the acceptance of authority implies the belief that following their instructions will afford more success. Raz believes that this argument is true in following both authorities' successful and mistaken instruction. Anarchists reject this criticism because challenging or disobeying authority does not entail the disappearance of its advantages by acknowledging authority such as doctors or lawyers as reliable, nor does it involve a complete surrender of independent judgment. Anarchist perception of human nature, rejection of the state, and commitment to social revolution has been criticised by academics as naive, overly simplistic, and unrealistic, respectively. Classical anarchism has been criticised for relying too heavily on the belief that the abolition of the state will lead to human cooperation prospering.
Friedrich Engels, considered to be one of the principal founders of Marxism, criticised anarchism's anti-authoritarianism as inherently counter-revolutionary because in his view a revolution is by itself authoritarian. Academic John Molyneux writes in his book Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism that "anarchism cannot win", believing that it lacks the ability to properly implement its ideas. The Marxist criticism of anarchism is that it has a utopian character because all individuals should have anarchist views and values. According to the Marxist view, that a social idea would follow directly from this human ideal and out of the free will of every individual formed its essence. Marxists state that this contradiction was responsible for their inability to act. In the anarchist vision, the conflict between liberty and equality was resolved through coexistence and intertwining.
See also
- Outline of anarchism
- List of anarchist movements by region
- List of anarchist political ideologies
- List of books about anarchism
- List of films dealing with anarchism
Anarchist communities
References
Explanatory notes
- In Anarchism: From Theory to Practice (1970), anarchist historian Daniel Guérin described it as a synonym for libertarian socialism, and wrote that anarchism "is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State." In his many works on anarchism, historian Noam Chomsky describes anarchism, alongside libertarian Marxism, as the libertarian wing of socialism.
- Herbert L. Osgood claimed that anarchism is "the extreme antithesis" of authoritarian communism and state socialism. Peter Marshall states that "n general anarchism is closer to socialism than liberalism. ... Anarchism finds itself largely in the socialist camp, but it also has outriders in liberalism. It cannot be reduced to socialism, and is best seen as a separate and distinctive doctrine." According to Jeremy Jennings, "t is hard not to conclude that these ideas", referring to anarcho-capitalism, "are described as anarchist only on the basis of a misunderstanding of what anarchism is." Jennings adds that "anarchism does not stand for the untrammelled freedom of the individual (as the 'anarcho-capitalists' appear to believe) but, as we have already seen, for the extension of individuality and community." Nicolas Walter wrote that "anarchism does derive from liberalism and socialism both historically and ideologically. ... In a sense, anarchists always remain liberals and socialists, and whenever they reject what is good in either they betray anarchism itself. ... We are liberals but more so, and socialists but more so." Michael Newman includes anarchism as one of many socialist traditions, especially the more socialist-aligned tradition following Proudhon and Mikhail Bakunin. Brian Morris argues that it is "conceptually and historically misleading" to "create a dichotomy between socialism and anarchism."
- One common definition adopted by anarchists is that anarchism is a cluster of political philosophies opposing authority and hierarchical organisation, including capitalism, nationalism, the state, and all associated institutions, in the conduct of all human relations in favour of a society based on decentralisation, freedom, and voluntary association. Scholars highlight that this definition has the same shortcomings as the definition based on anti-authoritarianism (a posteriori conclusion), anti-statism (anarchism is much more than that), and etymology (negation of rulers).
Citations
- Carlson 1972, pp. 22–23.
- Bates 2017, p. 128; Long 2013, p. 217.
- Merriam-Webster 2019, "Anarchism"; Oxford English Dictionary 2005, "Anarchism"; Sylvan 2007, p. 260.
- Joll 1964, pp. 27–37.
- Kahn 2000.
- Nettlau 1996, p. 162.
- Guérin 1970, "The Basic Ideas of Anarchism".
- Ward 2004, p. 62; Goodway 2006, p. 4; Skirda 2002, p. 183; Fernández 2009, p. 9.
- Morris 2002, p. 61.
- Marshall 1992, p. 641; Cohn 2009, p. 6.
- ^ Marshall 1992, p. 641.
- Marshall 1992, p. 641; Cohn 2009, p. 6; Levy & Adams 2018, p. 104.
- Levy & Adams 2018, p. 104.
- ^ Guérin 1970, p. 12.
- Arvidsson 2017.
- Otero 1994, p. 617.
- ^ Osgood 1889, p. 1.
- ^ Newman 2005, p. 15.
- ^ Morris 2015, p. 64.
- ^ Walter 2002, p. 44.
- ^ Marshall 1992, pp. 564–565; Jennings 1993, p. 143; Gay & Gay 1999, p. 15; Morris 2008, p. 13; Johnson 2008, p. 169; Franks 2013, pp. 393–394.
- Jennings 1999, p. 147.
- Long 2013, p. 217.
- McLaughlin 2007, p. 166; Jun 2009, p. 507; Franks 2013, pp. 386–388.
- McLaughlin 2007, pp. 25–29; Long 2013, pp. 217.
- McLaughlin 2007, pp. 25–26.
- Marshall 1993, p. 70.
- Coutinho 2016; Marshall 1993, p. 54.
- Sylvan 2007, p. 257.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 4, 66–73.
- Marshall 1993, p. 86.
- Crone 2000, pp. 3, 21–25.
- Nettlau 1996, p. 8.
- Marshall 1993, p. 108.
- Levy & Adams 2018, p. 307.
- Marshall 1993, p. 4.
- ^ Marshall 1993, pp. 4–5.
- Levy 2011, pp. 10–15.
- Dodson 2002, p. 312; Thomas 1985, p. 187; Chaliand & Blin 2007, p. 116.
- Graham 2019, pp. 334–336; Marshall 1993, p. 24.
- Levy 2011, p. 12.
- Marshall 1993, p. 5.
- Graham 2005, p. xii.
- Moya 2015, p. 327.
- Levy 2011, p. 16.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 519–521.
- Dirlik 1991, p. 133; Ramnath 2019, pp. 681–682.
- Levy 2011, p. 23; Laursen 2019, p. 157; Marshall 1993, pp. 504–508.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 633–636.
- Anderson 2004.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 633–636; Lutz & Ulmschneider 2019, p. 46.
- Bantman 2019, p. 374.
- ^ Avrich 2006, p. 204.
- Nomad 1966, p. 88.
- Bolloten 1984, p. 1107.
- Marshall 1993, pp. xi, 466.
- Marshall 1993, p. xi.
- Marshall 1993, p. 539.
- Marshall 1993, pp. xi, 539.
- Levy 2011, pp. 5.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 493–494.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 556–557.
- Williams 2015, p. 680.
- Harmon 2011, p. 70.
- ^ Rupert 2006, p. 66.
- Ramnath 2019, p. 691.
- Honeywell 2021, pp. 34–44.
- Honeywell 2021, pp. 1–2.
- Honeywell 2021, pp. 1–3.
- McLean & McMillan 2003, "Anarchism"; Ostergaard 2003, p. 14, "Anarchism".
- Harrison & Boyd 2003, p. 251.
- Levy & Adams 2018, p. 9.
- Egoumenides 2014, p. 2.
- Ostergaard 2003, p. 12; Gabardi 1986, pp. 300–302.
- Klosko 2005, p. 4.
- Franks 2019, p. 549.
- Brooks 1994, p. xi, "Usually considered to be an extreme left-wing ideology".
- Guérin 1970, p. 35, "Critique of authoritarian socialism".
- Marshall 1993, pp. 14–17.
- Sylvan 2007, p. 262.
- Avrich 1996, p. 6.
- Walter 2002, p. 52.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 1–6; Angelbeck & Grier 2012, p. 551.
- Wilbur 2019, pp. 216–218.
- Levy & Adams 2018, p. 2.
- Wright, Edmund, ed. (2006). The Desk Encyclopedia of World History. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-0-7394-7809-7.
- Wilbur 2019, pp. 213–218.
- Avrich 1996, p. 6; Miller 1991, p. 11.
- Pierson 2013, p. 187.
- Morris 1993, p. 76.
- Shannon 2019, p. 101.
- Avrich 1996, pp. 3–4.
- Heywood 2017, pp. 146–147; Bakunin 1990.
- Mayne 1999, p. 131.
- Marshall 1993, p. 327.
- Marshall 1993, p. 327; Turcato 2019, pp. 237–238.
- Graham 2005.
- Pernicone 2009, pp. 111–113.
- Turcato 2019, pp. 239–244.
- Levy 2011, p. 6.
- Van der Walt 2019, p. 249.
- Ryley 2019, p. 225.
- Marshall 1993, p. 440.
- Imrie 1994; Parry 1987, p. 15.
- Evren 2011, p. 1.
- ^ Evren 2011, p. 2.
- Williams 2007, p. 303.
- Williams 2018, p. 4.
- Williams 2010, p. 110; Evren 2011, p. 1; Angelbeck & Grier 2012, p. 549.
- Franks 2013, pp. 385–386.
- Franks 2013, p. 386.
- Jun 2009, pp. 507–508.
- Jun 2009, p. 507.
- Egoumenides 2014, p. 91.
- Williams 2019, pp. 107–108.
- ^ Williams 2018, pp. 4–5.
- Kinna 2019, p. 125.
- Williams 2019, p. 112.
- Williams 2019, pp. 112–113.
- Norris 2020, pp. 7–8.
- Levy 2011, p. 13; Nesser 2012, p. 62.
- Harmon 2011, p. 55.
- Carter 1978, p. 320.
- Fiala 2017, section 3.1.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 116–117.
- Carter 1978, pp. 320–325.
- Williams 2019, p. 113.
- Williams 2019, p. 114.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 134–135.
- Williams 2019, p. 115.
- Williams 2019, p. 117.
- Williams 2019, pp. 109–117.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 145–149.
- Williams 2019, pp. 109, 119.
- Williams 2019, pp. 119–121.
- Williams 2019, pp. 118–119.
- Williams 2019, pp. 120–121.
- Kinna 2019, p. 139; Mattern 2019, p. 596; Williams 2018, pp. 5–6.
- Kinna 2012, p. 250; Williams 2019, p. 119.
- Williams 2019, p. 122.
- Morland 2004, pp. 37–38.
- Marshall 1993, p. 565; Honderich 1995, p. 31; Meltzer 2000, p. 50; Goodway 2006, p. 4; Newman 2010, p. 53.
- De George 2005, pp. 31–32.
- Carter 1971, p. 14; Jun 2019, pp. 29–30.
- Jun 2019, pp. 32–38.
- Wendt 2020, p. 2; Ashwood 2018, p. 727.
- Ashwood 2018, p. 735.
- Nicholas 2019, p. 603.
- ^ Lucy 2020, p. 162.
- Lucy 2020, p. 178.
- Nicholas 2019, p. 611; Jeppesen & Nazar 2012, pp. 175–176.
- Jeppesen & Nazar 2012, pp. 175–176.
- Jeppesen & Nazar 2012, p. 177.
- Jeppesen & Nazar 2012, pp. 175–177.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 166–167.
- Nicholas 2019, pp. 609–611.
- Nicholas 2019, pp. 610–611.
- Nicholas 2019, pp. 616–617.
- Kinna 2019, p. 97.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 83–85.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 514, 521; Kinna 2019, pp. 83–86; Marshall 1993, p. 222.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 511–512.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 511–514.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 517–518.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 518–519.
- Avrich 1980, pp. 3–33; Suissa 2019, pp. 519–522.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 89–96.
- Ward 1973, pp. 39–48.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 523–526.
- ^ Antliff 1998, p. 99.
- Mattern 2019, p. 592.
- Gifford 2019, p. 577.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 493–494; Dunn 2012; Evren, Kinna & Rouselle 2013.
- Mattern 2019, pp. 592–593.
- Mattern 2019, p. 593.
- Robé 2017, p. 44.
- Miller et al. 2019, p. 1.
- Mattern 2019, pp. 593–596.
- Antliff 1998, p. 78.
- Krimerman & Perry 1966, p. 494.
- Ward 2004, p. 78.
- Fiala, Andrew (2021), "Anarchism", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 17 June 2023
- Fiala 2017, "4. Objections and Replies".
- Klosko 1999, p. 536.
- Klosko 1999, p. 536; Kristjánsson 2000, p. 896.
- Dagger 2018, p. 35.
- Rogers 2020.
- Ferguson 1886.
- Gans 1992, p. 37.
- Gans 1992, p. 38.
- Gans 1992, pp. 34, 38.
- Brinn 2020, p. 206.
- Tucker 1978.
- Dodds 2011.
- Baár et al. 2016, p. 488.
General and cited sources
Primary sources
- Bakunin, Mikhail (1990) . Shatz, Marshall (ed.). Statism and Anarchy. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Translated by Shatz, Marshall. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139168083. ISBN 978-0-5213-6182-8. LCCN 89077393. OCLC 20826465.
Secondary sources
- Angelbeck, Bill; Grier, Colin (2012). "Anarchism and the Archaeology of Anarchic Societies: Resistance to Centralization in the Coast Salish Region of the Pacific Northwest Coast". Current Anthropology. 53 (5): 547–587. doi:10.1086/667621. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 142786065. Archived from the original on 21 July 2018. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
- Antliff, Mark (1998). "Cubism, Futurism, Anarchism: The 'Aestheticism' of the "Action d'art" Group, 1906–1920". Oxford Art Journal. 21 (2): 101–120. doi:10.1093/oxartj/21.2.99. JSTOR 1360616.
- Anderson, Benedict (2004). "In the World-Shadow of Bismarck and Nobel". New Left Review. 2 (28): 85–129. Archived from the original on 19 December 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
- Arvidsson, Stefan (2017). The Style and Mythology of Socialism: Socialist Idealism, 1871–1914 (1st ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-3673-4880-9.
- Ashwood, Loka (2018). "Rural Conservatism or Anarchism? The Pro-state, Stateless, and Anti-state Positions". Rural Sociology. 83 (4): 717–748. doi:10.1111/ruso.12226. S2CID 158802675.
- Avrich, Paul (1996). Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-6910-4494-1.
- —— (2006). The Russian Anarchists. Stirling: AK Press. ISBN 978-1-9048-5948-2.
- —— (1980). The Modern School Movement: Anarchism and Education in the United States. Princeton University Press. pp. 3–33. ISBN 978-1-4008-5318-2. OCLC 489692159.
- Baár, Monika; Falina, Maria; Janowski, Maciej; Kopeček, Michal; Trencsényi, Balázs Trencsényi (2016). A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe: Negotiating Modernity in the 'Long Nineteenth Century'. Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1910-5695-6.
- Bantman, Constance (2019). "The Era of Propaganda by the Deed". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 371–388. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Bates, David (2017). "Anarchism". In Wetherly, Paul (ed.). Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1987-2785-9. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- Bolloten, Burnett (1984). The Spanish Civil War: Revolution and Counterrevolution. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-1906-7.
- Brinn, Gearóid (2020). "Smashing the State Gently: Radical Realism and Realist Anarchism". European Journal of Political Theory. 19 (2): 206–227. doi:10.1177/1474885119865975. S2CID 202278143.
- Brooks, Frank H. (1994). The Individualist Anarchists: An Anthology of Liberty (1881–1908). Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5600-0132-4.
- Carlson, Andrew R. (1972). Anarchism in Germany; Vol. 1: The Early Movement. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-0484-5.
- Carter, April (1971). The Political Theory of Anarchism. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4155-5593-7. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Carter, April (1978). "Anarchism and violence". Nomos. 19. American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy: 320–340. JSTOR 24219053.
- Chaliand, Gerard; Blin, Arnaud, eds. (2007). The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al-Quaeda. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5202-4709-3. OCLC 634891265.
- Cohn, Jesse (2009). "Anarchism". In Ness, Immanuel (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 1–11. doi:10.1002/9781405198073.wbierp0039. ISBN 978-1-4051-9807-3.
- Crone, Patricia (2000). "Ninth-Century Muslim Anarchists" (PDF). Past & Present (167): 3–28. doi:10.1093/past/167.1.3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 August 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
- Dagger, Tristan J. (2018). Playing Fair: Political Obligation and the Problems of Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1993-8883-7.
- Dirlik, Arif (1991). Anarchism in the Chinese Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5200-7297-8.
- Dodds, Jonathan (October 2011). "Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism". Socialist Review. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- Dodson, Edward (2002). The Discovery of First Principles. Vol. 2. Authorhouse. ISBN 978-0-5952-4912-1.
- Dunn, Kevin (August 2012). "Anarcho-Punk and Resistance in Everyday Life". Punk & Post-Punk. 1 (2). Intellect: 201–218. doi:10.1386/punk.1.2.201_1.
- Egoumenides, Magda (2014). Philosophical Anarchism and Political Obligation. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4411-2445-6. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
- Evren, Süreyyya (2011). "How New Anarchism Changed the World (of Opposition) after Seattle and Gave Birth to Post-Anarchism". In Rousselle, Duane; Evren, Süreyyya (eds.). Post-Anarchism: A Reader. Pluto Press. pp. 1–19. ISBN 978-0-7453-3086-0.
- Evren, Süreyyya; Kinna, Ruth; Rouselle, Duane (2013). Blasting the Canon. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. ISBN 978-0-6158-3862-5.
- Ferguson, Francis L. (August 1886). "The Mistakes of Anarchism". The North American Review. 143 (357). University of Northern Iowa: 204–206. ISSN 0029-2397. JSTOR 25101094.
- Fernández, Frank (2009) . Cuban Anarchism: The History of A Movement. Sharp Press.
- Franks, Benjamin (August 2013). "Anarchism". In Freeden, Michael; Stears, Marc (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press. pp. 385–404. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0001.
- —— (2019). "Anarchism and Ethics". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 549–570. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Gabardi, Wayne (1986). "Anarchism. By David Miller. (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1984. pp. 216 )". American Political Science Review. 80 (1): 300–302. doi:10.2307/1957102. JSTOR 446800. S2CID 151950709.
- Gans, Chaim (1992). Philosophical Anarchism and Political Disobedience (reprint ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-5214-1450-0.
- Gay, Kathlyn; Gay, Martin (1999). Encyclopedia of Political Anarchy. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-8743-6982-3.
- Gifford, James (2019). "Literature and Anarchism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Goodway, David (2006). Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow. Liverpool Press. ISBN 978-1-8463-1025-6.
- Graham, Robert (2005). Anarchism: a Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas: from Anarchy to Anarchism. Montréal: Black Rose Books. ISBN 978-1-5516-4250-5.
- —— (2019). "Anarchism and the First International". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 325–342. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Guérin, Daniel (1970). Anarchism: From Theory to Practice. Monthly Review Press. ISBN 978-0-8534-5128-0. Archived from the original on 14 July 2020. Retrieved 16 February 2013.
- Harrison, Kevin; Boyd, Tony (2003). Understanding Political Ideas and Movements. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-6151-6. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Harmon, Christopher C. (2011). "How Terrorist Groups End: Studies of the Twentieth Century". Connections. 10 (2): 51–104. JSTOR 26310649.
- Heywood, Andrew (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction (6th ed.). Macmillan International Higher Education. ISBN 978-1-1376-0604-4. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- Honderich, Ted (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1986-6132-0.
- Honeywell, C. (2021). Anarchism. Key Concepts in Political Theory. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-5095-2390-0. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- Imrie, Doug (1994). "The Illegalists". Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed. Archived from the original on 8 September 2015. Retrieved 9 December 2010.
- Jennings, Jeremy (1993). "Anarchism". In Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (eds.). Contemporary Political Ideologies. London: Pinter. pp. 127–146. ISBN 978-0-8618-7096-7.
- Jennings, Jeremy (1999). "Anarchism". In Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (eds.). Contemporary Political Ideologies (reprinted, 2nd ed.). London: A & C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-5173-6.
- Jeppesen, Sandra; Nazar, Holly (2012). "Genders and Sexualities in Anarchist Movements". In Kinna, Ruth (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Anarchism. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4411-4270-2. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
- Johnson, Charles (2008). "Liberty, Equality, Solidarity Toward a Dialectical Anarchism". In Long, Roderick T.; Machan, Tibor R. (eds.). Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country?. Ashgate Publishing. pp. 155–188. ISBN 978-0-7546-6066-8.
- Joll, James (1964). The Anarchists. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-6740-3642-0.
- Jun, Nathan (September 2009). "Anarchist Philosophy and Working Class Struggle: A Brief History and Commentary". WorkingUSA. 12 (3): 505–519. doi:10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00251.x. ISSN 1089-7011.
- Jun, Nathan (2019). "The State". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 27–47. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Kinna, Ruth (2012). The Bloomsbury Companion to Anarchism. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1-6289-2430-5.
- Kinna, Ruth (2019). The Government of No One: The Theory and Practice of Anarchism. Penguin Random House. ISBN 978-0-2413-9655-1.
- Klosko, George (1999). "More than Obligation – William A. Edmundson: Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority". The Review of Politics. 61 (3): 536–538. doi:10.1017/S0034670500028989. ISSN 1748-6858. S2CID 144417469.
- Klosko, George (2005). Political Obligations. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1995-5104-0. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Krimerman, Leonard I.; Perry, Lewis, eds. (1966). Patterns of Anarchy: A Collection of Writings on the Anarchist Tradition. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
- Kristjánsson, Kristján (2000). "Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority by William A. Edmundson". Mind. 109 (436): 896–900. JSTOR 2660038.
- Laursen, Ole Birk (2019). "Anti-Imperialism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 149–168. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Levy, Carl (8 May 2011). "Social Histories of Anarchism". Journal for the Study of Radicalism. 4 (2): 1–44. doi:10.1353/jsr.2010.0003. ISSN 1930-1197. S2CID 144317650.
- Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S., eds. (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-3197-5619-6.
- Long, Roderick T. (2013). Gaud, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4158-7456-4. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- Lucy, Nicholas (2020). "Anarchism and Sexuality". The SAGE Handbook of Global Sexualities. SAGE Publishing. pp. 160–183. ISBN 978-1-5297-2194-2. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
- Lutz, James M.; Ulmschneider, Georgia Wralstad (2019). "Civil Liberties, National Security and U.S. Courts in Times of Terrorism". Perspectives on Terrorism. 13 (6): 43–57. JSTOR 26853740.
- Marshall, Peter (1992). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. London: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-0021-7855-6.
- —— (1993). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. Oakland, California: PM Press. ISBN 978-1-6048-6064-1.
- Mattern, Mark (2019). "Anarchism and Art". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 589–602. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Mayne, Alan James (1999). From Politics Past to Politics Future: An Integrated Analysis of Current and Emergent Paradigms. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-2759-6151-0. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2010.
- McLaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism. Aldershot: Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-6196-2.
- Morland, Dave (2004). "Anti-capitalism and poststructuralist anarchism". In Purkis, Jonathan; Bowen, James (eds.). Changing Anarchism: Anarchist Theory and Practice in a Global Age. Manchester University Press. pp. 23–38. ISBN 978-0-7190-6694-8. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
- Meltzer, Albert (2000). Anarchism: Arguments For and Against. AK Press. ISBN 978-1-8731-7657-3.
- Morris, Brian (1993). Bakunin: The Philosophy of Freedom. Black Rose Books. ISBN 978-1-8954-3166-7. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- —— (2015). Anthropology, Ecology, and Anarchism: A Brian Morris Reader. Marshall, Peter (illustrated ed.). Oakland: PM Press. ISBN 978-1-6048-6093-1.
- Morris, Christopher W. (2002). An Essay on the Modern State. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-5215-2407-0. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
- Moya, Jose C. (2015). "Transference, culture, and critique The Circulation of Anarchist Ideas and Practices". In Laforcade, Geoffroy de (ed.). In Defiance of Boundaries: Anarchism in Latin American History. Kirwin R. Shaffer. University Press of Florida. ISBN 978-0-8130-5138-3. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
- Nesser, Petter (2012). "Research Note: Single Actor Terrorism: Scope, Characteristics and Explanations". Perspectives on Terrorism. 6 (6): 61–73. JSTOR 26296894.
- Nettlau, Max (1996). A Short History of Anarchism. Freedom Press. ISBN 978-0-9003-8489-9.
- Newman, Michael (2005). Socialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1928-0431-0.
- Newman, Saul (2010). The Politics of Postanarchism. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-3495-8. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
- Nicholas, Lucy (2019). "Gender and Sexuality". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Norris, Jesse J. (2020). "Idiosyncratic Terrorism: Disaggregating an Undertheorized Concept". Perspectives on Terrorism. 14 (3). ISSN 2334-3745. JSTOR 26918296s.
- Nomad, Max (1966). "The Anarchist Tradition". In Drachkovitch, Milorad M. (ed.). Revolutionary Internationals 1864–1943. Stanford University Press. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-8047-0293-5.
- Osgood, Herbert L. (March 1889). "Scientific Anarchism". Political Science Quarterly. 4 (1). The Academy of Political Science: 1–36. doi:10.2307/2139424. JSTOR 2139424.
- Otero, Carlos Peregrín (1994). Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments. Vol. 2–3. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4150-1005-4.
- Parry, Richard (1987). The Bonnot Gang. Rebel Press. ISBN 978-0-9460-6104-4.
- Pernicone, Nunzio (2009). Italian Anarchism, 1864–1892. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-6916-3268-1. Archived from the original on 19 August 2020. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Pierson, Christopher (2013). Just Property: Enlightenment, Revolution, and History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1996-7329-2. Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Ramnath, Maia (2019). "Non-Western Anarchisms and Postcolonialism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Robé, Chris (2017). Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerrillas, and Digital Ninjas. PM Press. ISBN 978-1-6296-3233-9. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2022 – via ResearchGate.
- Rogers, Tristan J. (2020). The Authority of Virtue: Institutions and Character in the Good Society. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-0002-2264-7.
- Rupert, Mark (2006). Globalization and International Political Economy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7425-2943-4.
- Ryley, Peter (2019). "Individualism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 225–236. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Shannon, Deric (2019). "Anti-Capitalism and Libertarian Political Economy". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 91–106. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Skirda, Alexandre (2002). Facing the Enemy: A History of Anarchist Organization From Proudhon to May 1968. AK Press. ISBN 978-1-9025-9319-7.
- Sylvan, Richard (2007). "Anarchism". In Goodin, Robert E.; Pettit, Philip; Pogge, Thomas (eds.). A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Vol. 5 (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-3653-2.
- Suissa, Judith (2019). "Anarchist Education". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Thomas, Paul (1985). Karl Marx and the Anarchists. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN 978-0-7102-0685-5.
- Tucker, Robert C., ed. (1978). The Marx-Engels Reader (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-3930-5684-8. OCLC 3415145.
- Turcato, Davide (2019). "Anarchist Communism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Van der Walt, Lucien (2019). "Syndicalism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 249–264. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Ward, Colin (1973). "The Role of the State". Education Without Schools: 39–48.
- —— (2004). Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1928-0477-8. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
- Walter, Nicholas (2002). About Anarchism. London: Freedom Press. ISBN 978-0-9003-8490-5.
- Wendt, Fabian (2020). "Against Philosophical Anarchism". Law and Philosophy. 39 (5): 527–544. doi:10.1007/s10982-020-09377-4. S2CID 213742949.
- Wilbur, Shawn (2019). "Mutualism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Williams, Dana M. (2015). "Black Panther Radical Factionalization and the Development of Black Anarchism". Journal of Black Studies. 46 (7). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing: 678–703. doi:10.1177/0021934715593053. JSTOR 24572914. S2CID 145663405.
- —— (2018). "Contemporary Anarchist and Anarchistic Movements". Sociology Compass. 12 (6). Wiley: e12582. doi:10.1111/soc4.12582. ISSN 1751-9020.
- —— (2019). "Tactics: Conceptions of Social Change, Revolution, and Anarchist Organisation". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Williams, Leonard (September 2007). "Anarchism Revived". New Political Science. 29 (3): 297–312. doi:10.1080/07393140701510160. ISSN 0739-3148. S2CID 220354272.
- —— (2010). "Hakim Bey and Ontological Anarchism". Journal for the Study of Radicalism. 4 (2). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press: 109–137. doi:10.1353/jsr.2010.0009. JSTOR 41887660. S2CID 143304524.
Tertiary sources
- Coutinho, Steve (3 March 2016). "Zhuangzi". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 5 March 2019.
- De George, Richard T. (2005). Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1992-6479-7.
- Fiala, Andrew (2017). "Anarchism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 28 August 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
- Miller, Martin A.; Dirlik, Arif; Rosemont, Franklin; Augustyn, Adam; Duignan, Brian; Lotha, Gloria (2019). "Anarchism In The Arts". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- Morris, Andrew (2008). "Anarcho-capitalism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. SAGE; Cato Institute. pp. 13–14. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n8. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4. OCLC 191924853. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
- McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (2003). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1928-0276-7.
- "Definition of Anarchism". Merriam-Webster. 2019. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- Miller, David (1991). The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-6311-7944-3. Archived from the original on 18 August 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Ostergaard, Geoffrey (2003). "Anarchism". In Outhwaite, William (ed.). The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought (2nd ed.). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-0-6312-2164-7. OCLC 49704935. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
- "Anarchy". Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. September 2005.
Further reading
- Avrich, Paul (1995). Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-6910-3412-6.
- Barclay, Harold B. (1990). People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy. Kahn & Averill. ISBN 978-0-9393-0609-1.
- Baker, Zoe (2023). Means and Ends: The Revolutionary Practice of Anarchism in Europe and the United States. AK Press. ISBN 978-1-8493-5498-1. OCLC 1345217229.
- Chomsky, Noam (2005). Pateman, Barry (ed.). Chomsky on Anarchism. Oakland: AK Press. ISBN 978-1-9048-5926-0.
- Edmundson, William A. (2007). Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-5210-3751-8. Criticism of philosophical anarchism.
- Esenwein, George (1989). Anarchist Ideology and the Working-Class Movement in Spain, 1868–1898. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5200-6398-3.
- Harper, Clifford (1987). Anarchy: A Graphic Guide. Camden Press. ISBN 978-0-9484-9122-1.
- Huemer, Michael (2012). The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey. London: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 137. ISBN 978-1-1372-8164-7. A defence of philosophical anarchism, stating that "both kinds of 'anarchism' are philosophical and political claims."
- Kahn, Joseph (5 August 2000). "Anarchism, the Creed That Won't Stay Dead; The Spread of World Capitalism Resurrects a Long-Dormant Movement". The New York Times. p. B9. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Kinna, Ruth (2005). Anarchism: A Beginners Guide. Oneworld. ISBN 978-1-8516-8370-3.
- Le Guin, Ursula K. (2009). The Dispossessed. HarperCollins. Anarchistic popular fiction novel.
- Sartwell, Crispin (2008). Against the State: An Introduction to Anarchist Political Theory. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-7447-1.
- Scott, James C. (2012). Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-6911-5529-6.
- Suissa, Judith (1 July 2019b). "Education and Non-domination: Reflections from the Radical Tradition". Studies in Philosophy and Education. 38 (4): 359–375. doi:10.1007/s11217-019-09662-3. S2CID 151210357.
- Wolff, Robert Paul (1998). In Defense of Anarchism. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5202-1573-3. An argument for philosophical anarchism.
- Woodcock, George (January 1962). "Anarchism in Spain". History Today. 12 (1): 22–32. Retrieved 14 October 2020.
- Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (2019). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. S2CID 149333615.
External links
- Anarchy Archives – an online research center on the history and theory of anarchism.
- Definitions from Wiktionary
- Media from Commons
- News from Wikinews
- Quotations from Wikiquote
- Texts from Wikisource
- Textbooks from Wikibooks
- Resources from Wikiversity
- Data from Wikidata
Anarchism | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concepts |
| ||||||
Issues |
| ||||||
Schools of thought |
| ||||||
Types of federation | |||||||
Economics | |||||||
Culture |
| ||||||
History |
| ||||||
People |
| ||||||
Lists |
| ||||||
By region |
| ||||||
Related topics |
Nietzsche and Max Stirner | ||||||
|
Links to related articles | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|