Revision as of 20:29, 3 February 2012 edit94.197.100.236 (talk) →Contractions on a Hilbert space: typo← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:39, 7 October 2024 edit undoThatsme314 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,841 editsm →Dilation theorem for contraction semigroups: en dash | ||
(38 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Bounded operators with sub-unit norm}} | |||
In ], a ] ''T'': ''X'' |
In ], a ] ''T'': ''X'' → ''Y'' between ]s ''X'' and ''Y'' is said to be a '''contraction''' if its ] ||''T'' || ≤ 1. This notion is a special case of the concept of a ], but every bounded operator becomes a contraction after suitable scaling. The analysis of contractions provides insight into the structure of operators, or a family of operators. The theory of contractions on ] is largely due to ] and ]. | ||
== Contractions on a Hilbert space == | == Contractions on a Hilbert space == | ||
{{redirect|Operator angle||Camera angle}} | |||
If ''T'' is a contraction acting on a ] <math>\mathcal{H}</math>, the following basic objects associated with ''T'' can be defined. | |||
The '''defect operators''' of ''T'' are the operators ''D<sub>T</sub>'' = (1 − ''T*T'')<sup> |
The '''defect operators''' of ''T'' are the operators ''D<sub>T</sub>'' = (1 − ''T*T'')<sup>½</sup> and ''D<sub>T*</sub>'' = (1 − ''TT*'')<sup>½</sup>. The square root is the ] given by the ]. The '''defect spaces''' <math>\mathcal{D}_T</math> and <math>\mathcal{D}_{T*}</math> are the closure of the ranges Ran(''D<sub>T</sub>'') and Ran(''D<sub>T*</sub>'') respectively. The positive operator ''D<sub>T</sub>'' induces an inner product on <math>\mathcal{H}</math>. The inner product space can be identified naturally with Ran(''D''<sub>''T''</sub>). A similar statement holds for <math>\mathcal{D}_{T*}</math>. | ||
The '''defect indices''' of ''T'' are the pair |
The '''defect indices''' of ''T'' are the pair | ||
:<math>(\ |
:<math>(\dim\mathcal{D}_T, \dim\mathcal{D}_{T^*}).</math> | ||
The defect operators and the defect indices are a measure of the non-unitarity of ''T''. |
The defect operators and the defect indices are a measure of the non-unitarity of ''T''. | ||
A contraction ''T'' on a Hilbert space can be canonically decomposed into an orthogonal direct sum | A contraction ''T'' on a Hilbert space can be canonically decomposed into an orthogonal direct sum | ||
Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
:<math>T = \Gamma \oplus U</math> | :<math>T = \Gamma \oplus U</math> | ||
where ''U'' is a unitary operator and |
where ''U'' is a unitary operator and Γ is ''completely non-unitary'' in the sense that it has no non-zero ]s on which its restriction is unitary. If ''U'' = 0, ''T'' is said to be a '''completely non-unitary contraction'''. A special case of this decomposition is the ] for an ], where Γ is a proper isometry. | ||
Contractions on Hilbert spaces can be viewed as the operator analogs of cos  |
Contractions on Hilbert spaces can be viewed as the operator analogs of cos θ and are called '''operator angles''' in some contexts. The explicit description of contractions leads to (operator-)parametrizations of positive and unitary matrices. | ||
==Dilation theorem for contractions== | ==Dilation theorem for contractions== | ||
], proved in 1953, states that for any contraction ''T'' on a Hilbert space ''H'', there is a ] ''U'' on a larger Hilbert space ''K'' ⊇ ''H'' such that if ''P'' is the orthogonal projection of ''K'' onto ''H'' then ''T''<sup>''n''</sup> =''P'' ''U''<sup>''n''</sup> ''P'' for all ''n'' > 0. The operator ''U'' is called a ] of ''T'' and is uniquely determined if ''U'' is |
], proved in 1953, states that for any contraction ''T'' on a Hilbert space ''H'', there is a ] ''U'' on a larger Hilbert space ''K'' ⊇ ''H'' such that if ''P'' is the orthogonal projection of ''K'' onto ''H'' then ''T''<sup>''n''</sup> = ''P'' ''U''<sup>''n''</sup> ''P'' for all ''n'' > 0. The operator ''U'' is called a ] of ''T'' and is uniquely determined if ''U'' is minimal, i.e. ''K'' is the smallest closed subspace invariant under ''U'' and ''U''* containing ''H''. | ||
In fact define<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010| |
In fact define<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|pp=10–14}}</ref> | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{\mathcal{H}=H\oplus H\oplus H \oplus \cdots ,}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{\mathcal{H}=H\oplus H\oplus H \oplus \cdots ,}</math> | ||
Line 34: | Line 36: | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{V(\xi_1,\xi_2,\xi_3,\dots)=(T\xi_1, \sqrt{I-T^*T}\xi_1,\xi_2,\xi_3,\dots).}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{V(\xi_1,\xi_2,\xi_3,\dots)=(T\xi_1, \sqrt{I-T^*T}\xi_1,\xi_2,\xi_3,\dots).}</math> | ||
Let |
Let | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{\mathcal{K}=\mathcal{H} \oplus \mathcal{H}.}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{\mathcal{K}=\mathcal{H} \oplus \mathcal{H}.}</math> | ||
Define a unitary ''W'' on <math>\mathcal K</math> by |
Define a unitary ''W'' on <math>\mathcal K</math> by | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{W(x,y)=(Vx+(I-VV^*)y,-V^*y).}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{W(x,y)=(Vx+(I-VV^*)y,-V^*y).}</math> | ||
Line 47: | Line 49: | ||
==Dilation theorem for contraction semigroups== | ==Dilation theorem for contraction semigroups== | ||
There is an alternative proof of Sz.-Nagy's dilation theorem, which allows significant |
There is an alternative proof of Sz.-Nagy's dilation theorem, which allows significant generalization.<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|pp=24–28}}</ref> | ||
Let ''G'' be a group, ''U''(''g'') a unitary representation of ''G'' on a Hilbert space ''K'' and ''P'' an orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace ''H'' = ''PK'' of ''K''. | Let ''G'' be a group, ''U''(''g'') a unitary representation of ''G'' on a Hilbert space ''K'' and ''P'' an orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace ''H'' = ''PK'' of ''K''. | ||
Line 57: | Line 59: | ||
with values in operators on ''K'' satisfies the positive-definiteness condition | with values in operators on ''K'' satisfies the positive-definiteness condition | ||
:<math> |
:<math> \sum \lambda_i\overline{\lambda_j} \Phi(g_j^{-1}g_i) = PT^*TP\ge 0,</math> | ||
where | where | ||
Line 63: | Line 65: | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{T=\sum \lambda_i U(g_i).}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{T=\sum \lambda_i U(g_i).}</math> | ||
Moreover |
Moreover, | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{\Phi(1)=P.}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{\Phi(1)=P.}</math> | ||
Conversely, every operator-valued positive-definite function arises in this way. Recall that every (continuous) scalar-valued positive-definite function on a topological group induces an inner product and group representation φ(''g'') = 〈''U<sub>g</sub> v'', ''v''〉 where ''U<sub>g</sub>'' is a (strongly continuous) unitary representation (see ]). Replacing ''v'', a rank-1 projection, by a general projection gives the operator-valued statement. In fact the construction is identical; this is sketched below. | |||
Conversely, by a generalisation of the ], every operator-valued positive-definite function arises in this way. | |||
Let <math>\mathcal H</math> be the space of functions on ''G'' of finite support with values in ''H'' with inner product | |||
:<math>\displaystyle{(f_1,f_2)=\sum_{g,h} (\Phi(h^{-1}g)f_1(g),f_2(h)).}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{(f_1,f_2)=\sum_{g,h} (\Phi(h^{-1}g)f_1(g),f_2(h)).}</math> | ||
Line 77: | Line 79: | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{U(g)f(x)=f(g^{-1}x).}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{U(g)f(x)=f(g^{-1}x).}</math> | ||
Moreover ''H'' can be |
Moreover, ''H'' can be identified with a closed subspace of <math>\mathcal H</math> using the isometric embedding | ||
sending ''v'' in ''H'' to ''f''<sub>''v''</sub> with | sending ''v'' in ''H'' to ''f''<sub>''v''</sub> with | ||
:<math> |
:<math>f_v(g)=\delta_{g,1} v. \, </math> | ||
If ''P'' is the projection of <math>\mathcal H</math> onto ''H'', then | If ''P'' is the projection of <math>\mathcal H</math> onto ''H'', then | ||
Line 88: | Line 90: | ||
using the above identification. | using the above identification. | ||
When ''G'' is a separable topological group, Φ is continuous in the strong (or weak) operator topology if and only if ''U'' is. |
When ''G'' is a separable topological group, Φ is continuous in the strong (or weak) ] if and only if ''U'' is. | ||
In this case functions supported on a countable dense subgroup of ''G'' are dense in <math>\mathcal H</math>, so that <math>\mathcal H</math> is separable. | In this case functions supported on a countable dense subgroup of ''G'' are dense in <math>\mathcal H</math>, so that <math>\mathcal H</math> is separable. | ||
When ''G'' = '''Z''' any contraction operator ''T'' defines such a function Φ through |
When ''G'' = '''Z''' any contraction operator ''T'' defines such a function Φ through | ||
:<math>\displaystyle |
:<math>\displaystyle \Phi(0)=I, \,\,\, \Phi(n)=T^n,\,\,\, \Phi(-n)=(T^*)^n, </math> | ||
for ''n'' > 0. The above construction then yields a minimal unitary dilation. | for ''n'' > 0. The above construction then yields a minimal unitary dilation. | ||
The same method can be applied to prove a second dilation theorem of Sz._Nagy for a one-parameter strongly continuous contraction semigroup ''T''(''t'') (''t'' ≥ 0) on a Hilbert space ''H''. {{harvtxt|Cooper|1947}} had |
The same method can be applied to prove a second dilation theorem of Sz._Nagy for a one-parameter strongly continuous contraction semigroup ''T''(''t'') (''t'' ≥ 0) on a Hilbert space ''H''. {{harvtxt|Cooper|1947}} had previously proved the result for one-parameter semigroups of isometries,<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|pp=28–30}}</ref> | ||
The theorem states that there is a larger Hilbert space ''K'' containing ''H'' and a unitary representation ''U''(''t'') of '''R''' such that | The theorem states that there is a larger Hilbert space ''K'' containing ''H'' and a unitary representation ''U''(''t'') of '''R''' such that | ||
Line 114: | Line 116: | ||
The previous construction yields a minimal unitary representation ''U''(''t'') and projection ''P''. | The previous construction yields a minimal unitary representation ''U''(''t'') and projection ''P''. | ||
The ] assigns a closed ] ''A'' to every contractive one-parameter semigroup ''T'''(''t'') through | The ] assigns a closed ] ''A'' to every contractive one-parameter semigroup ''T'''(''t'') through | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{A\xi=\lim_{t\downarrow 0} {1\over t}(T(t)-I)\xi,}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{A\xi=\lim_{t\downarrow 0} {1\over t}(T(t)-I)\xi,}</math> | ||
Line 138: | Line 140: | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{A=(T+I)(T-I)^{-1}.}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{A=(T+I)(T-I)^{-1}.}</math> | ||
In particular a dilation of ''T'' on ''K'' ⊃ ''H'' immediately gives a dilation of the semigroup.<ref> |
In particular a dilation of ''T'' on ''K'' ⊃ ''H'' immediately gives a dilation of the semigroup.<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|pp=143, 147}}</ref> | ||
==Functional calculus== | ==Functional calculus== | ||
Let ''T'' be totally non-unitary contraction on ''H''. Then the minimal unitary |
Let ''T'' be totally non-unitary contraction on ''H''. Then the minimal unitary dilation ''U'' of ''T'' on ''K'' ⊃ ''H'' is unitarily equivalent to a direct sum of copies the bilateral shift operator, i.e. multiplication by ''z'' on L<sup>2</sup>(''S''<sup>1</sup>).<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|pp=87–88}}</ref> | ||
If ''P'' is the orthogonal projection onto ''H'' then for ''f'' in L<sup>∞</sup> = L<sup>∞</sup>(''S''<sup>1</sup>) it follows that the operator ''f''(''T'') can be defined | If ''P'' is the orthogonal projection onto ''H'' then for ''f'' in L<sup>∞</sup> = L<sup>∞</sup>(''S''<sup>1</sup>) it follows that the operator ''f''(''T'') can be defined | ||
Line 148: | Line 150: | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{f(T)\xi=Pf(U)\xi.}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{f(T)\xi=Pf(U)\xi.}</math> | ||
Let H<sup>∞</sup> be the space of bounded holomorphic functions on the unit disk ''D''. Any such function has boundary values in L<sup>∞</sup> and is uniquely determined by these, so that there is an embedding H<sup>∞</sup> ⊂ L<sup>∞</sup>. |
Let H<sup>∞</sup> be the space of bounded holomorphic functions on the unit disk ''D''. Any such function has boundary values in L<sup>∞</sup> and is uniquely determined by these, so that there is an embedding H<sup>∞</sup> ⊂ L<sup>∞</sup>. | ||
For ''f'' in H<sup>∞</sup>, ''f''(''T'') can be defined | For ''f'' in H<sup>∞</sup>, ''f''(''T'') can be defined | ||
without reference to the unitary dilation. |
without reference to the unitary dilation. | ||
In fact if | In fact if | ||
Line 161: | Line 163: | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{f_r(z))=\sum_{n\ge 0} r^n a_n z^n}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{f_r(z))=\sum_{n\ge 0} r^n a_n z^n}</math> | ||
is holomorphic on |''z''| < 1/''r''. |
is holomorphic on |''z''| < 1/''r''. | ||
In that case ''f''<sub>''r''</sub>(''T'') is defined by the holomorphic functional calculus and ''f''(''T'') can be defined by | In that case ''f''<sub>''r''</sub>(''T'') is defined by the holomorphic functional calculus and ''f'' (''T'' ) can be defined by | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{f(T)\xi=\lim_{r\rightarrow 1} f_r(T)\xi.}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{f(T)\xi=\lim_{r\rightarrow 1} f_r(T)\xi.}</math> | ||
The map sending ''f'' to ''f''(''T'') defines an algebra homomorphism of H<sup>∞</sup> into bounded operators on ''H''. Moreover if | The map sending ''f'' to ''f''(''T'') defines an algebra homomorphism of H<sup>∞</sup> into bounded operators on ''H''. Moreover, if | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{f^\sim(z)=\sum_{n\ge 0} a_n \overline{z}^n,}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{f^\sim(z)=\sum_{n\ge 0} a_n \overline{z}^n,}</math> | ||
Line 192: | Line 194: | ||
A completely non-unitary contraction ''T'' is said to belong to the class C<sub>0</sub> if and only if ''f''(''T'') = 0 for some non-zero | A completely non-unitary contraction ''T'' is said to belong to the class C<sub>0</sub> if and only if ''f''(''T'') = 0 for some non-zero | ||
''f'' in H<sup>∞</sup>. In this case the set of such ''f'' forms an ideal in H<sup>∞</sup>. It has the form φ ⋅ H<sup>∞</sup> where ''g'' | ''f'' in H<sup>∞</sup>. In this case the set of such ''f'' forms an ideal in H<sup>∞</sup>. It has the form φ ⋅ H<sup>∞</sup> where ''g'' | ||
is an ], i.e. such that |φ| = 1 on ''S''<sup>1</sup>: φ is uniquely determined up to multiplication by a complex number of modulus 1 and is called the '''minimal function''' of ''T''. It has properties analogous to the ] of a matrix. | is an ], i.e. such that |φ| = 1 on ''S''<sup>1</sup>: φ is uniquely determined up to multiplication by a complex number of modulus 1 and is called the '''minimal function''' of ''T''. It has properties analogous to the ] of a matrix. | ||
The minimal function φ admits a canonical factorization | The minimal function φ admits a canonical factorization | ||
Line 202: | Line 204: | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{B(z)=\prod \left^{m_i},}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{B(z)=\prod \left^{m_i},}</math> | ||
with |
with | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{\sum m_i(1-|\lambda_i|) <\infty,}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{\sum m_i(1-|\lambda_i|) <\infty,}</math> | ||
and ''P''(''z'') is holomorphic with non-negative real part in ''D''. By the ], |
and ''P''(''z'') is holomorphic with non-negative real part in ''D''. By the ], | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{P(z) =\int_0^{2\pi} {1 + e^{-i\theta}z\over 1 -e^{-i\theta}z} \, d\mu(\theta)}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{P(z) =\int_0^{2\pi} {1 + e^{-i\theta}z\over 1 -e^{-i\theta}z} \, d\mu(\theta)}</math> | ||
for some non-negative finite measure μ on the circle: in this case, if non-zero, μ must be ] with respect to Lebesgue measure. In the above decomposition of φ, either of the two factors can be absent. |
for some non-negative finite measure μ on the circle: in this case, if non-zero, μ must be ] with respect to Lebesgue measure. In the above decomposition of φ, either of the two factors can be absent. | ||
The minimal function φ determines the ] of ''T''. Within the unit disk, the spectral values are the zeros of φ. There are at most countably many such λ<sub>i</sub>, all eigenvalues of ''T'', the zeros of ''B''(''z''). A point of the unit circle does not lie in the spectrum of ''T'' if and only if φ has a holomorphic continuation to a |
The minimal function φ determines the ] of ''T''. Within the unit disk, the spectral values are the zeros of φ. There are at most countably many such λ<sub>i</sub>, all eigenvalues of ''T'', the zeros of ''B''(''z''). A point of the unit circle does not lie in the spectrum of ''T'' if and only if φ has a holomorphic continuation to a neighborhood of that point. | ||
φ reduces to a Blaschke product exactly when ''H'' equals the closure of the direct sum (not necessarily orthogonal) of the generalized eigenspaces<ref> |
φ reduces to a Blaschke product exactly when ''H'' equals the closure of the direct sum (not necessarily orthogonal) of the generalized eigenspaces<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|p=138}}</ref> | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{H_i=\{\xi:(T-\lambda_i I)^{m_i} \xi=0\}.}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{H_i=\{\xi:(T-\lambda_i I)^{m_i} \xi=0\}.}</math> | ||
Line 223: | Line 225: | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{AT_1=T_2A,\,\,\, BT_2=T_1B.}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{AT_1=T_2A,\,\,\, BT_2=T_1B.}</math> | ||
The following properties of a contraction ''T'' are preserved under quasi- |
The following properties of a contraction ''T'' are preserved under quasi-similarity: | ||
*being unitary | *being unitary | ||
*being completely non-unitary | *being completely non-unitary | ||
*being in the class C<sub>0</sub> | *being in the class C<sub>0</sub> | ||
*being '''multiplicity free''', i.e. having a commutative ] |
*being '''multiplicity free''', i.e. having a commutative ] | ||
Two quasi-similar C<sub>0</sub> contractions have the same minimal function and hence the same spectrum. | Two quasi-similar C<sub>0</sub> contractions have the same minimal function and hence the same spectrum. | ||
The |
The ''']''' for C<sub>0</sub> contractions states that two multiplicity free C<sub>0</sub> contractions are quasi-similar if and only if they have the same minimal function (up to a scalar multiple).<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|pp=395–440}}</ref> | ||
A model for multiplicity free C<sub>0</sub> contractions with minimal function φ is given by taking | A model for multiplicity free C<sub>0</sub> contractions with minimal function φ is given by taking | ||
Line 240: | Line 242: | ||
where H<sup>2</sup> is the ] of the circle and letting ''T'' be multiplication by ''z''.<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|p=126}}</ref> | where H<sup>2</sup> is the ] of the circle and letting ''T'' be multiplication by ''z''.<ref>{{harvnb|Sz.-Nagy|Foias|Bercovici|Kérchy|2010|p=126}}</ref> | ||
Such operators are called '''Jordan blocks''' and denoted ''S''(φ). | |||
⚫ | '''Examples.''' |
||
As a generalization of ], the commutant of such an operator consists exactly of operators ψ(''T'') with ψ in ''H''<sup>≈</sup>, i.e. multiplication operators on ''H''<sup>2</sup> corresponding to functions in ''H''<sup>≈</sup>. | |||
⚫ | *If a contraction ''T'' if quasi-similar to an operator ''S'' with |
||
A C<sub>0</sub> contraction operator ''T'' is multiplicity free if and only if it is quasi-similar to a Jordan block (necessarily corresponding the one corresponding to its minimal function). | |||
⚫ | '''Examples.''' | ||
⚫ | *If a contraction ''T'' if quasi-similar to an operator ''S'' with | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{Se_i=\lambda_i e_i}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{Se_i=\lambda_i e_i}</math> | ||
with the λ<sub>i</sub>'s distinct, of modulus less than 1, such that |
with the λ<sub>i</sub>'s distinct, of modulus less than 1, such that | ||
:<math>\displaystyle{\sum (1-|\lambda_i|) < 1}</math> | :<math>\displaystyle{\sum (1-|\lambda_i|) < 1}</math> | ||
Line 252: | Line 260: | ||
and (''e''<sub>''i''</sub>) is an orthonormal basis, then ''S'', and hence ''T'', is C<sub>0</sub> and multiplicity free. Hence ''H'' is the closure of direct sum of the λ<sub>i</sub>-eigenspaces of ''T'', each having multiplicity one. This can also be seen directly using the definition of quasi-similarity. | and (''e''<sub>''i''</sub>) is an orthonormal basis, then ''S'', and hence ''T'', is C<sub>0</sub> and multiplicity free. Hence ''H'' is the closure of direct sum of the λ<sub>i</sub>-eigenspaces of ''T'', each having multiplicity one. This can also be seen directly using the definition of quasi-similarity. | ||
*The results above can be applied equally well to one-parameter semigroups, since, from the functional calculus, two semigroups are quasi-similar if and only if their cogenerators are quasi-similar. | *The results above can be applied equally well to one-parameter semigroups, since, from the functional calculus, two semigroups are quasi-similar if and only if their cogenerators are quasi-similar.<ref>{{harvnb|Bercovici|1988|p=95}}</ref> | ||
'''Classification theorem for C<sub>0</sub> contractions:''' ''Every C<sub>0</sub> contraction is canonically quasi-similar to a direct sum of Jordan blocks.'' | |||
In fact every C<sub>0</sub> contraction is quasi-similar to a unique operator of the form | |||
:<math>\displaystyle{S=S(\varphi_1)\oplus S(\varphi_1\varphi_2)\oplus S(\varphi_1\varphi_2\varphi_3) \oplus \cdots }</math> | |||
where the φ<sub>''n''</sub> are uniquely determined inner functions, with φ<sub>''1''</sub> the minimal function of ''S'' and hence ''T''.<ref>{{harvnb|Bercovici|1988|pp=35–66}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
⚫ | * |
||
* {{annotated link|Contraction mapping}} | |||
⚫ | *] | ||
* {{annotated link|Kallman–Rota inequality}} | |||
⚫ | * {{annotated link|Stinespring dilation theorem}} | ||
⚫ | * ] | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Line 262: | Line 281: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
*{{citation|last=Bercovici|first= H.|title=Operator theory and arithmetic in H<sup>∞</sup>|series= | |||
Mathematical Surveys and Monographs|volume= 26|publisher= American Mathematical Society|year= 1988| |
*{{citation|last=Bercovici|first= H.|title=Operator theory and arithmetic in H<sup>∞</sup>|series=Mathematical Surveys and Monographs|volume= 26|publisher= American Mathematical Society|year= 1988|isbn= 0-8218-1528-8}} | ||
*{{citation|last=Cooper|first=J. L. B.|title= One-parameter semigroups of isometric operators in Hilbert space|journal= Ann. of Math. |volume=48|year=1947| pages=827–842|authorlink=Lionel Cooper (mathematician)}} | *{{citation|last=Cooper|first=J. L. B.|title= One-parameter semigroups of isometric operators in Hilbert space|journal= Ann. of Math. |volume=48|year=1947|issue=4| pages=827–842|authorlink=Lionel Cooper (mathematician)|doi=10.2307/1969382|jstor=1969382}} | ||
*{{citation|last=Gamelin|first= T. W.|title=Uniform algebras|publisher=Prentice-Hall|year= 1969}} | *{{citation|last=Gamelin|first= T. W.|title=Uniform algebras|publisher=Prentice-Hall|year= 1969}} | ||
*{{citation|last=Hoffman|first= K.|title=Banach spaces of analytic functions|publisher=Prentice-Hall|year= 1962}} | *{{citation|last=Hoffman|first= K.|title=Banach spaces of analytic functions|publisher=Prentice-Hall|year= 1962}} | ||
*{{citation| |
*{{citation|last1=Sz.-Nagy|first1= B.|last2= Foias|first2= C.|last3= Bercovici|first3= H.|last4= Kérchy|first4= L.| | ||
title=Harmonic analysis of operators on Hilbert space|edition=Second|series= Universitext|publisher= Springer|year= 2010| |
title=Harmonic analysis of operators on Hilbert space|edition=Second|series= Universitext|publisher= Springer|year= 2010|isbn= 978-1-4419-6093-1}} | ||
*{{citation| |
*{{citation|last1=Riesz|first1= F.|last2=Sz.-Nagy|first2= B.|title=Functional analysis. Reprint of the 1955 original|series= Dover Books on Advanced Mathematics|publisher=Dover|year= 1995|pages=466–472|isbn= 0-486-66289-6}} | ||
{{Functional analysis}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
{{Banach spaces}} | |||
* {{citation | title=Unitary dilations of contraction operators | volume=46 | series=Rozprawy matematyczne | first=Włodzimierz | last=Mlak | publisher=Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe | year=1965 }} | |||
{{Hilbert space}} | |||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 05:39, 7 October 2024
Bounded operators with sub-unit normIn operator theory, a bounded operator T: X → Y between normed vector spaces X and Y is said to be a contraction if its operator norm ||T || ≤ 1. This notion is a special case of the concept of a contraction mapping, but every bounded operator becomes a contraction after suitable scaling. The analysis of contractions provides insight into the structure of operators, or a family of operators. The theory of contractions on Hilbert space is largely due to Béla Szőkefalvi-Nagy and Ciprian Foias.
Contractions on a Hilbert space
"Operator angle" redirects here. For other uses, see Camera angle.If T is a contraction acting on a Hilbert space , the following basic objects associated with T can be defined.
The defect operators of T are the operators DT = (1 − T*T) and DT* = (1 − TT*). The square root is the positive semidefinite one given by the spectral theorem. The defect spaces and are the closure of the ranges Ran(DT) and Ran(DT*) respectively. The positive operator DT induces an inner product on . The inner product space can be identified naturally with Ran(DT). A similar statement holds for .
The defect indices of T are the pair
The defect operators and the defect indices are a measure of the non-unitarity of T.
A contraction T on a Hilbert space can be canonically decomposed into an orthogonal direct sum
where U is a unitary operator and Γ is completely non-unitary in the sense that it has no non-zero reducing subspaces on which its restriction is unitary. If U = 0, T is said to be a completely non-unitary contraction. A special case of this decomposition is the Wold decomposition for an isometry, where Γ is a proper isometry.
Contractions on Hilbert spaces can be viewed as the operator analogs of cos θ and are called operator angles in some contexts. The explicit description of contractions leads to (operator-)parametrizations of positive and unitary matrices.
Dilation theorem for contractions
Sz.-Nagy's dilation theorem, proved in 1953, states that for any contraction T on a Hilbert space H, there is a unitary operator U on a larger Hilbert space K ⊇ H such that if P is the orthogonal projection of K onto H then T = P U P for all n > 0. The operator U is called a dilation of T and is uniquely determined if U is minimal, i.e. K is the smallest closed subspace invariant under U and U* containing H.
In fact define
the orthogonal direct sum of countably many copies of H.
Let V be the isometry on defined by
Let
Define a unitary W on by
W is then a unitary dilation of T with H considered as the first component of .
The minimal dilation U is obtained by taking the restriction of W to the closed subspace generated by powers of W applied to H.
Dilation theorem for contraction semigroups
There is an alternative proof of Sz.-Nagy's dilation theorem, which allows significant generalization.
Let G be a group, U(g) a unitary representation of G on a Hilbert space K and P an orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace H = PK of K.
The operator-valued function
with values in operators on K satisfies the positive-definiteness condition
where
Moreover,
Conversely, every operator-valued positive-definite function arises in this way. Recall that every (continuous) scalar-valued positive-definite function on a topological group induces an inner product and group representation φ(g) = 〈Ug v, v〉 where Ug is a (strongly continuous) unitary representation (see Bochner's theorem). Replacing v, a rank-1 projection, by a general projection gives the operator-valued statement. In fact the construction is identical; this is sketched below.
Let be the space of functions on G of finite support with values in H with inner product
G acts unitarily on by
Moreover, H can be identified with a closed subspace of using the isometric embedding sending v in H to fv with
If P is the projection of onto H, then
using the above identification.
When G is a separable topological group, Φ is continuous in the strong (or weak) operator topology if and only if U is.
In this case functions supported on a countable dense subgroup of G are dense in , so that is separable.
When G = Z any contraction operator T defines such a function Φ through
for n > 0. The above construction then yields a minimal unitary dilation.
The same method can be applied to prove a second dilation theorem of Sz._Nagy for a one-parameter strongly continuous contraction semigroup T(t) (t ≥ 0) on a Hilbert space H. Cooper (1947) had previously proved the result for one-parameter semigroups of isometries,
The theorem states that there is a larger Hilbert space K containing H and a unitary representation U(t) of R such that
and the translates U(t)H generate K.
In fact T(t) defines a continuous operator-valued positove-definite function Φ on R through
for t > 0. Φ is positive-definite on cyclic subgroups of R, by the argument for Z, and hence on R itself by continuity.
The previous construction yields a minimal unitary representation U(t) and projection P.
The Hille–Yosida theorem assigns a closed unbounded operator A to every contractive one-parameter semigroup T'(t) through
where the domain on A consists of all ξ for which this limit exists.
A is called the generator of the semigroup and satisfies
on its domain. When A is a self-adjoint operator
in the sense of the spectral theorem and this notation is used more generally in semigroup theory.
The cogenerator of the semigroup is the contraction defined by
A can be recovered from T using the formula
In particular a dilation of T on K ⊃ H immediately gives a dilation of the semigroup.
Functional calculus
Let T be totally non-unitary contraction on H. Then the minimal unitary dilation U of T on K ⊃ H is unitarily equivalent to a direct sum of copies the bilateral shift operator, i.e. multiplication by z on L(S).
If P is the orthogonal projection onto H then for f in L = L(S) it follows that the operator f(T) can be defined by
Let H be the space of bounded holomorphic functions on the unit disk D. Any such function has boundary values in L and is uniquely determined by these, so that there is an embedding H ⊂ L.
For f in H, f(T) can be defined without reference to the unitary dilation.
In fact if
for |z| < 1, then for r < 1
is holomorphic on |z| < 1/r.
In that case fr(T) is defined by the holomorphic functional calculus and f (T ) can be defined by
The map sending f to f(T) defines an algebra homomorphism of H into bounded operators on H. Moreover, if
then
This map has the following continuity property: if a uniformly bounded sequence fn tends almost everywhere to f, then fn(T) tends to f(T) in the strong operator topology.
For t ≥ 0, let et be the inner function
If T is the cogenerator of a one-parameter semigroup of completely non-unitary contractions T(t), then
and
C0 contractions
A completely non-unitary contraction T is said to belong to the class C0 if and only if f(T) = 0 for some non-zero f in H. In this case the set of such f forms an ideal in H. It has the form φ ⋅ H where g is an inner function, i.e. such that |φ| = 1 on S: φ is uniquely determined up to multiplication by a complex number of modulus 1 and is called the minimal function of T. It has properties analogous to the minimal polynomial of a matrix.
The minimal function φ admits a canonical factorization
where |c|=1, B(z) is a Blaschke product
with
and P(z) is holomorphic with non-negative real part in D. By the Herglotz representation theorem,
for some non-negative finite measure μ on the circle: in this case, if non-zero, μ must be singular with respect to Lebesgue measure. In the above decomposition of φ, either of the two factors can be absent.
The minimal function φ determines the spectrum of T. Within the unit disk, the spectral values are the zeros of φ. There are at most countably many such λi, all eigenvalues of T, the zeros of B(z). A point of the unit circle does not lie in the spectrum of T if and only if φ has a holomorphic continuation to a neighborhood of that point.
φ reduces to a Blaschke product exactly when H equals the closure of the direct sum (not necessarily orthogonal) of the generalized eigenspaces
Quasi-similarity
Two contractions T1 and T2 are said to be quasi-similar when there are bounded operators A, B with trivial kernel and dense range such that
The following properties of a contraction T are preserved under quasi-similarity:
- being unitary
- being completely non-unitary
- being in the class C0
- being multiplicity free, i.e. having a commutative commutant
Two quasi-similar C0 contractions have the same minimal function and hence the same spectrum.
The classification theorem for C0 contractions states that two multiplicity free C0 contractions are quasi-similar if and only if they have the same minimal function (up to a scalar multiple).
A model for multiplicity free C0 contractions with minimal function φ is given by taking
where H is the Hardy space of the circle and letting T be multiplication by z.
Such operators are called Jordan blocks and denoted S(φ).
As a generalization of Beurling's theorem, the commutant of such an operator consists exactly of operators ψ(T) with ψ in H, i.e. multiplication operators on H corresponding to functions in H.
A C0 contraction operator T is multiplicity free if and only if it is quasi-similar to a Jordan block (necessarily corresponding the one corresponding to its minimal function).
Examples.
- If a contraction T if quasi-similar to an operator S with
with the λi's distinct, of modulus less than 1, such that
and (ei) is an orthonormal basis, then S, and hence T, is C0 and multiplicity free. Hence H is the closure of direct sum of the λi-eigenspaces of T, each having multiplicity one. This can also be seen directly using the definition of quasi-similarity.
- The results above can be applied equally well to one-parameter semigroups, since, from the functional calculus, two semigroups are quasi-similar if and only if their cogenerators are quasi-similar.
Classification theorem for C0 contractions: Every C0 contraction is canonically quasi-similar to a direct sum of Jordan blocks.
In fact every C0 contraction is quasi-similar to a unique operator of the form
where the φn are uniquely determined inner functions, with φ1 the minimal function of S and hence T.
See also
- Contraction mapping – Function reducing distance between all points
- Kallman–Rota inequality
- Stinespring dilation theorem
- Hille-Yosida theorem for contraction semigroups
Notes
- Sz.-Nagy et al. 2010, pp. 10–14
- Sz.-Nagy et al. 2010, pp. 24–28
- Sz.-Nagy et al. 2010, pp. 28–30
- Sz.-Nagy et al. 2010, pp. 143, 147
- Sz.-Nagy et al. 2010, pp. 87–88
- Sz.-Nagy et al. 2010, p. 138
- Sz.-Nagy et al. 2010, pp. 395–440
- Sz.-Nagy et al. 2010, p. 126
- Bercovici 1988, p. 95
- Bercovici 1988, pp. 35–66
References
- Bercovici, H. (1988), Operator theory and arithmetic in H, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 26, American Mathematical Society, ISBN 0-8218-1528-8
- Cooper, J. L. B. (1947), "One-parameter semigroups of isometric operators in Hilbert space", Ann. of Math., 48 (4): 827–842, doi:10.2307/1969382, JSTOR 1969382
- Gamelin, T. W. (1969), Uniform algebras, Prentice-Hall
- Hoffman, K. (1962), Banach spaces of analytic functions, Prentice-Hall
- Sz.-Nagy, B.; Foias, C.; Bercovici, H.; Kérchy, L. (2010), Harmonic analysis of operators on Hilbert space, Universitext (Second ed.), Springer, ISBN 978-1-4419-6093-1
- Riesz, F.; Sz.-Nagy, B. (1995), Functional analysis. Reprint of the 1955 original, Dover Books on Advanced Mathematics, Dover, pp. 466–472, ISBN 0-486-66289-6
Functional analysis (topics – glossary) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spaces |
| ||||
Theorems | |||||
Operators | |||||
Algebras | |||||
Open problems | |||||
Applications | |||||
Advanced topics | |||||
Banach space topics | |
---|---|
Types of Banach spaces | |
Banach spaces are: | |
Function space Topologies | |
Linear operators | |
Operator theory | |
Theorems |
|
Analysis | |
Types of sets |
|
Subsets / set operations | |
Examples | |
Applications |
Hilbert spaces | |
---|---|
Basic concepts | |
Main results | |
Other results | |
Maps | |
Examples |