Revision as of 19:10, 24 April 2006 view sourceRJII (talk | contribs)25,810 edits →Anarcho-capitalism: sources for many scholars regarding it as anarchism. need more?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:32, 28 December 2024 view source Tassedethe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators1,365,479 editsm v2.05 - fix links - Peter Marshall (author)Tag: WPCleaner | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Political philosophy and movement}} | |||
{{Anarchism}} | |||
{{Other uses|Anarchy|Anarchism (disambiguation)|Anarchist (disambiguation)}} | |||
{{disputed}} | |||
{{Pp-semi-indef}} | |||
'''Anarchism''' is ] the ] '']'' ("without ]s (ruler, chief, king)"). Anarchism as a ], is the belief that all forms of social ], such as governments and social hierarchies are undesireable. <ref>]''The Politics of Individualism'', p. 106</ref> {{dubious}}. Anarchism also refers to related ]s that advocate the elimination of coercive institutions. The word "]", as most anarchists use it, does not imply ], ], or ], but rather a harmonious ] society that is based on individual ] and personal involvement. In place of what are regarded as authoritarian political structures and coercive economic institutions, anarchists advocate social relations based upon ] of free individuals in autonomous communities, ], and ]. | |||
{{Good article}} | |||
{{Use British English|date=August 2021}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2024}} | |||
{{Use shortened footnotes|date=May 2023}} | |||
{{Anarchism sidebar}} | |||
'''Anarchism''' is a ] and ] that is against all forms of authority and seeks to abolish the institutions it claims maintain unnecessary coercion and ], typically including the ] and ]. Anarchism advocates for the replacement of the state with ] and voluntary ]. A historically left-wing movement, anarchism is usually described as the ] wing of the ] (]). | |||
The word ''anarchist'' originated as a term of ]. At the ] (]) during the ], ] remarked "I know that some particular men we debate with believe we are for anarchy" after ] had said "No man says that you have a mind to anarchy, but that the consequence of this rule tends to anarchy, must end in anarchy"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://courses.essex.ac.uk/cs/cs101/putney.htm|title=The Putney debates|accessdate=2004-03-24}}</ref>. The term was later used against ] ]s and '']'' during and following the ]. Whilst the term is still used in a pejorative way to describe ''"any act that used violent means to destroy the organization of society"''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cas.sc.edu/socy/faculty/deflem/zhistorintpolency.html|title=History of International Police Cooperation|accessdate=2006-03-24|author=Mathieu Deflem|year=2005|work=The Encyclopedia | |||
of Criminology|publisher=Routledge}}</ref>, it has also been taken up as a positive label by self-defined anarchists. | |||
Although traces of anarchist ideas are found all throughout history, modern anarchism emerged from the ]. During the latter half of the 19th and the first decades of the 20th century, the anarchist movement flourished in most parts of the world and had a significant role in ] for ]. ] formed during this period. Anarchists have taken part in ], most notably in the ], the ] and the ], whose end marked the end of the ]. In the last decades of the 20th and into the 21st century, the anarchist movement has been resurgent once more, growing in popularity and influence within ], ] and ] movements. | |||
While anarchism is most easily defined by what it is against, anarchists also offer positive visions of what they believe to be a truly free society. However, ideas about how an anarchist society might work vary considerably, especially with respect to economics; there is also disagreement about how a free society might be brought about. Scholars generally do not consider there to be one monolithic "anarchism"; however a number of anarchists do, and often do not identify or organize more specifically. Beyond the commonality that justifies a wide variety of philosophies as all being forms of anarchism, specific forms of anarchism may overlap in additional respects with other forms and may conflict in some ways as well. Moreover, degrees of commonality and conflict also exist ''within'' each form of anarchism as a result of the unique opinions of those who theorize within the broad genres. | |||
Anarchists employ ], which may be generally divided into ] and ]; there is significant overlap between the two. Evolutionary methods try to simulate what an anarchist society might be like, but revolutionary tactics, which have historically taken a ] turn, aim to overthrow authority and the state. Many facets of ] have been influenced by anarchist theory, critique, and ]. | |||
==Origins and predecessors== | |||
{{Toc limit|3}} | |||
In '']'', ] argued that mutual aid was a natural feature of animal and human relations. <ref>], Peter. ''"]"'', 1902.</ref> Most ] agree that the ] is not a natural phenomenon and that many hunter-gatherer bands were egalitarian and lacked ], accumulated wealth, or decreed ], and had equal access to resources.<ref>], Freidrich. ''""'', 1884.</ref> | |||
] | |||
== Etymology, terminology, and definition == | |||
Many anarchists cite earlier religious, social, and political movements as inspirational and sometimes as embodying "anarchistic principles" even though they have not proclaimed themselves as anarchist. An example of this is ] from ]<ref>The Anarchy Organization (Toronto). ''Taoism and Anarchy.'' ] ] </ref>, although Taoism became the ] in China in ] C.E.<ref>http://www.imperialtours.net/comparative_history.htm</ref>. According to ] the ] ] "repudiated the ] of the state, its intervention and regimentation, and proclaimed the ] of the moral law of the individual". <ref>, written by Peter Kropotkin, from Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1910]</ref> | |||
{{Main|Definition of anarchism and libertarianism}} | |||
{{See also|Glossary of anarchism}} | |||
] is an example of a writer who added to anarchist theory without using the exact term.{{Sfn|Carlson|1972|pp=22–23}}]] | |||
The ] origin of ''anarchism'' is from the ] ''anarkhia'' (ἀναρχία), meaning "without a ruler", composed of the ] ''an-'' ("without") and the word ''arkhos'' ("leader" or "ruler"). The ] '']'' denotes the ideological current that favours anarchy.{{Sfnm|1a1=Bates|1y=2017|1p=128|2a1=Long|2y=2013|2p=217}} ''Anarchism'' appears in English from 1642 as ''anarchisme'' and ''anarchy'' from 1539; early English usages emphasised a sense of disorder.{{Sfnm|1a1=Merriam-Webster|1y=2019|1loc="Anarchism"|2a1=''Oxford English Dictionary''|2y=2005|2loc="Anarchism"|3a1=Sylvan|3y=2007|3p=260}} Various factions within the ] labelled their opponents as ''anarchists'', although few such accused shared many views with later anarchists. Many revolutionaries of the 19th century such as ] (1756–1836) and ] (1808–1871) would contribute to the anarchist doctrines of the next generation but did not use ''anarchist'' or ''anarchism'' in describing themselves or their beliefs.{{Sfn|Joll|1964|pp=27–37}} | |||
The first ] to call himself an ''anarchist'' ({{Langx|fr|link=no|anarchiste}}) was ] (1809–1865),{{Sfn|Kahn|2000}} marking the formal birth of anarchism in the mid-19th century. Since the 1890s and beginning in France,{{Sfn|Nettlau|1996|p=162}} '']'' has often been used as a synonym for anarchism;{{Sfn|Guérin|1970|loc="The Basic Ideas of Anarchism"}} its use as a synonym is still common outside the United States.{{Sfnm|1a1=Ward|1y=2004|1p=62|2a1=Goodway|2y=2006|2p=4|3a1=Skirda|3y=2002|3p=183|4a1=Fernández|4y=2009|4p=9}} Some usages of ''libertarianism'' refer to ] ] philosophy only, and ] in particular is termed ''libertarian anarchism''.{{Sfn|Morris|2002|p=61}} | |||
Likewise ], in his '']'', writes that the ]s "repudiated all law, since they held that the good man will be guided at every moment by ]...rom this premise they arrive at ]...."<ref>], Bertrand. ''"Ancient philosophy"'' in ''A History of Western Philosophy, and its connection with political and social circumstances from the earliest times to the present day'', 1945.</ref> ] or "True Levellers" were an early communistic movement during the time of the ], and have been cited as forerunners of modern anarchism.<ref>, from Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1994.</ref> | |||
While the term ''libertarian'' has been largely synonymous with anarchism,{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1992|1p=641|2a1=Cohn|2y=2009|2p=6}} its meaning has more recently been diluted by wider adoption from ideologically disparate groups,{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} including both the ] and ], who do not associate themselves with ] or a ], and extreme ], who are primarily concerned with ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} Additionally, some anarchists use '']''{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1992|1p=641|2a1=Cohn|2y=2009|2p=6|3a1=Levy|3a2=Adams|3y=2018|3p=104}} to avoid anarchism's negative connotations and emphasise its connections with ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} ''Anarchism'' is broadly used to describe the ] wing of the ].{{Sfn|Levy|Adams|2018|p=104}}{{Refn|In ''Anarchism: From Theory to Practice'' (1970),{{Sfn|Guérin|1970|p=12}} anarchist historian ] described it as a synonym for ], and wrote that anarchism "is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State."{{Sfn|Arvidsson|2017}} In his many works on anarchism, historian ] describes anarchism, alongside ], as the ] wing of ].{{Sfn|Otero|1994|p=617}}|group=nb}} Anarchism is contrasted to socialist forms which are ] or from above.{{Sfn|Osgood|1889|p=1}} Scholars of anarchism generally highlight anarchism's socialist credentials{{Sfn|Newman|2005|p=15}} and criticise attempts at creating dichotomies between the two.{{Sfn|Morris|2015|p=64}} Some scholars describe anarchism as having many influences from liberalism,{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} and being both liberal and socialist but more so.{{Sfn|Walter|2002|p=44}} Many scholars reject ] as a misunderstanding of anarchist principles.{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1992|1pp=564–565|2a1=Jennings|2y=1993|2p=143|3a1=Gay|3a2=Gay|3y=1999|3p=15|4a1=Morris|4y=2008|4p=13|5a1=Johnson|5y=2008|5p=169|6a1=Franks|6y=2013|6pp=393–394}}{{Refn|] claimed that anarchism is "the extreme antithesis" of ] and ].{{Sfn|Osgood|1889|p=1}} ] states that "n general anarchism is closer to socialism than liberalism. ... Anarchism finds itself largely in the socialist camp, but it also has outriders in liberalism. It cannot be reduced to socialism, and is best seen as a separate and distinctive doctrine."{{Sfn|Marshall|1992|p=641}} According to ], "t is hard not to conclude that these ideas", referring to ], "are described as anarchist only on the basis of a misunderstanding of what anarchism is." Jennings adds that "anarchism does not stand for the untrammelled freedom of the individual (as the 'anarcho-capitalists' appear to believe) but, as we have already seen, for the extension of individuality and community."{{Sfn|Jennings|1999|p=147}} ] wrote that "anarchism does derive from liberalism and socialism both historically and ideologically. ... In a sense, anarchists always remain liberals and socialists, and whenever they reject what is good in either they betray anarchism itself. ... We are liberals but more so, and socialists but more so."{{Sfn|Walter|2002|p=44}} Michael Newman includes anarchism as one of many ], especially the more socialist-aligned tradition following Proudhon and ].{{Sfn|Newman|2005|p=15}} ] argues that it is "conceptually and historically misleading" to "create a dichotomy between socialism and anarchism."{{Sfn|Morris|2015|p=64}}|group=nb}} | |||
In the ], the first to use the term '''Anarchy''' to mean something other than chaos was ] in his ''Nouveaux voyages dans l'Amérique septentrionale'', (1703), where he described the ] society, which had no state, laws, prisons, priests, or private property, as being in anarchy<ref></ref>. ], a ] and leader in the ], has repeatedly stated that he is "an anarchist, and so are all ancestors." | |||
While ] is central to anarchist thought, defining ''anarchism'' is not an easy task for scholars, as there is a lot of discussion among scholars and anarchists on the matter, and various currents perceive anarchism slightly differently.{{Sfn|Long|2013|p=217}}{{Refn|One common definition adopted by anarchists is that anarchism is a cluster of political philosophies opposing ] and ], including ], ], the ], and all associated institutions, in the conduct of all ] in favour of a society based on ], ], and ]. Scholars highlight that this definition has the same shortcomings as the definition based on anti-authoritarianism ('']'' conclusion), anti-statism (anarchism is much more than that),{{Sfnm|1a1=McLaughlin|1y=2007|1p=166|2a1=Jun|2y=2009|2p=507|3a1=Franks|3y=2013|3pp=386–388}} and etymology (negation of rulers).{{Sfnm|1a1=McLaughlin|1y=2007|1pp=25–29|2a1=Long|2y=2013|2pp=217}}|group=nb}} Major definitional elements include the will for a non-coercive society, the rejection of the state apparatus, the belief that ] allows humans to exist in or progress toward such a non-coercive society, and a suggestion on how to act to pursue the ideal of anarchy.{{Sfn|McLaughlin|2007|pp=25–26}} | |||
In 1793, in the thick of the ], ] published ''An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice'' . Although Godwin did not use the word ''anarchism'', many later anarchists have regarded this book as the first major anarchist text, and Godwin as the "founder of philosophical anarchism." But at this point no anarchist movement yet existed, and the term ''anarchiste'' was known mainly as an insult hurled by the ] ] at more radical elements in the ]. | |||
== History == | |||
==The first self-labelled anarchist== | |||
{{Main|History of anarchism}} | |||
] | |||
{{main articles|] and ]}} | |||
=== Pre-modern era === | |||
] is commonly regarded as the first self-proclaimed anarchist, a label he adopted in his ground breaking work '']'', published in 1840. It is for this reason that some claim Proudhon as the founder of modern anarchist theory. In ] Proudhon answers with the famous accusation "]." In this work he opposed the institution of decreed "property" (propriété), where owners have complete rights to "use and abuse" their property as they wish, such as exploiting workers for profit.<ref name="proudhon-prop">], Pierre-Joseph. ''""'' from ''"]"'', 1840</ref> At first, Proudhon starkly contrasted what he called 'possession' - limited rights to use resources, capital and goods in accordance with principles of equality and justice - with existing forms of 'property.' | |||
] ({{Circa|334|262 BC}}), whose '']'' inspired ]{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=70}}]] | |||
The most notable precursors to anarchism in the ancient world were in ] and ]. In China, ] (the discussion on the legitimacy of the state) was delineated by ] philosophers ] and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Coutinho|1y=2016|2a1=Marshall|2y=1993|2p=54}} Alongside ], Taoism has been said to have had "significant anticipations" of anarchism.{{Sfn|Sylvan|2007|p=257}} | |||
Anarchic attitudes were also articulated by ] and ] in Greece. ] and ] used the myth of ] to illustrate the conflict between laws imposed by the state and personal ]. ] questioned ] authorities constantly and insisted on the right of individual ]. ] dismissed human law ('']'') and associated authorities while trying to live according to nature ('']''). ] were supportive of a society based on unofficial and friendly relations among its citizens without the presence of a state.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=4, 66–73}} | |||
His opposition to capitalism, the state and organised religion inspired subsequent anarchists and made him one of the leading socialist thinkers of his time. For Proudhon: | |||
In ], there was no anarchistic activity except some ascetic religious movements. These, and other Muslim movements, later gave birth to ]. In the ], ] called for an ] society and the ], only to be soon executed by Emperor ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=86}} In ], religious sects preached against the state.{{Sfn|Crone|2000|pp=3, 21–25}} In Europe, various religious sects developed anti-state and libertarian tendencies.{{Sfn|Nettlau|1996|p=8}} | |||
:''"Capital . . . in the political field is analogous to government . . . The economic idea of capitalism, the politics of government or of authority, and the theological idea of the Church are three identical ideas, linked in various ways. To attack one of them is equivalent to attacking all of them . . . What capital does to labour, and the State to liberty, the Church does to the spirit. This trinity of absolutism is as baneful in practice as it is in philosophy. The most effective means for oppressing the people would be simultaneously to enslave its body, its will and its reason."'' <ref>quoted by Max Nettlau, A Short History of Anarchism, pp. 43-44</ref> | |||
Renewed interest in antiquity during the ] and in private judgment during the ] restored elements of anti-authoritarian ] in Europe, particularly in France.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=108}} ] challenges to intellectual authority (secular and religious) and the ] all spurred the ideological development of what became the era of classical anarchism.{{Sfn|Levy|Adams|2018|p=307}} | |||
A few years before his death in 1865, when his thinking became dominated by the theory of irreducible "antinomies," he came to support "property" in a more conventional sense "by its aims" - as a source of social stability and independence - without abandoning his earlier critique (as the size of ownership was limited to the amount an individual, family or group could use by themselves). | |||
=== Modern era === | |||
By then, however, Proudhon had moved away from anarchism, arguing in ''The Principle of Federation'' (1863) that anarchy was to remain a perpetual desideratum. Nevertheless, his ideas still contained anarchistic elements, particularly his notion that social and political relations should be based on genuinely voluntary contracts between free and equal producers. He argued for a federative state, an "agro-industial federation," and for the right of secession. He accepted the need for small-scale property to keep "the State on an even keel" (while property was "an absolutism within an absolutism") and the need to "regulate the market" to "protect the citizens of the federated states from capitalist and financial feudalism, both within them and from the outside." <ref>'''Selected Writings''' and '''The Principle of Federation'''</ref> In his political testament, ''On the Political Capacity of the Working Classes'' (1865), he argued that a federative political organization could only function based on ] economics, which would provide for "the effective sovereignty of the laboring masses" through their mutualist associations | |||
During the ], partisan groups such as the ] and the {{Lang|fr|]}} saw a turning point in the fermentation of anti-state and federalist sentiments.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=4}} The first anarchist currents developed throughout the 18th century as ] espoused ] ], morally delegitimising the state, ]'s thinking paved the way to ] and ]'s theory of ] found fertile soil ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=4–5}} By the late 1870s, various anarchist schools of thought had become well-defined and a wave of then-unprecedented ] occurred from 1880 to 1914.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|pp=10–15}} This era of ] lasted until the end of the ] and is considered the golden age of anarchism.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=4–5}} | |||
] and allied himself with the federalists in the First International before his expulsion by the Marxists.]] | |||
Proudhon's ] (mutuellisme) involved an exchange economy where individuals and groups could trade the products of their labor using ''labor notes'' which represented the amount of working time involved in production. This would ensure that no one would profit from the labor of others. Workers could freely join together in co-operative workshops. An interest-free bank would be set up to provide everyone with access to the means of production and allow them to manage their own work (i.e. to ensure workers' control of production). Proudhon's ideas were influential within French working class movements, and his followers were active in the ] in France as well as the ] of 1871. Anarcho-communists, such as Kropotkin, later disagreed with Proudhon for his support of "private property" in the products of labour (i.e. wages, or ''"remuneration for work done"'') rather than free distribution of the products of labour.<ref>Kropotkin, Peter. , G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York and London, 1906.</ref> | |||
Drawing from mutualism, ] founded ] and entered the ], a class ] ] later known as the ] that formed in 1864 to unite diverse revolutionary currents. The International became a significant political force, with ] being a leading figure and a member of its General Council. Bakunin's faction (the ]) and Proudhon's followers (the mutualists) opposed ], advocating political ] and small property holdings.{{Sfnm|1a1=Dodson|1y=2002|1p=312|2a1=Thomas|2y=1985|2p=187|3a1=Chaliand|3a2=Blin|3y=2007|3p=116}} After bitter disputes, the Bakuninists were expelled from the International by the ] at the ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Graham|1y=2019|1pp=334–336|2a1=Marshall|2y=1993|2p=24}} Anarchists were treated similarly in the ], being ultimately expelled in 1896.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|p=12}} Bakunin predicted that if revolutionaries gained power by Marx's terms, they would end up the ]. In response to their expulsion from the First International, anarchists formed the ]. Under the influence of ], a Russian philosopher and scientist, ] overlapped with ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=5}} Anarcho-communists, who drew inspiration from the 1871 ], advocated for free federation and for the distribution of goods ].{{Sfn|Graham|2005|p=xii}} | |||
By the turn of the 20th century, anarchism had spread all over the world.{{Sfn|Moya|2015|p=327}} It was a notable feature of the international ] movement.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|p=16}} In ], small groups of students imported the ] pro-science version of anarcho-communism.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=519–521}} ] was a hotspot for ] youth from East Asian countries, who moved to the Japanese capital to study.{{Sfnm|1a1=Dirlik|1y=1991|1p=133|2a1=Ramnath|2y=2019|2pp=681–682}} In Latin America, ] was a stronghold for ], where it became the most prominent left-wing ideology.{{Sfnm|1a1=Levy|1y=2011|1p=23|2a1=Laursen|2y=2019|2p=157|3a1=Marshall|3y=1993|3pp=504–508}} During this time, a minority of anarchists adopted tactics of revolutionary ], known as ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=633–636}} The dismemberment of the French socialist movement into many groups and the execution and exile of many ] to ] following the suppression of the Paris Commune favoured individualist political expression and acts.{{Sfn|Anderson|2004}} Even though many anarchists distanced themselves from these terrorist acts, infamy came upon the movement and attempts were made to prevent ], including the ], also called the Anarchist Exclusion Act.{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1pp=633–636|2a1=Lutz|2a2=Ulmschneider|2y=2019|2p=46}} ] was another strategy which some anarchists adopted during this period.{{Sfn|Bantman|2019|p=374}} | |||
As a socialist, Proudhon opposed private property in workplaces, land and housing in favour of a system of "possession" by their users (''"all accumulated capital being social property, no one can be its exclusive proprietor."'' <ref> Chapter 3, section 6 of "What is Property?", p. 130 </ref>). While he opposed communism and favoured remuneration for labour, he also opposed ] (i.e. when capitalists and landlords hire labourers to work for them). <ref>], Pierre-Joseph. ''The General Idea of the Revolution'', p. 281</ref> He urged workers ''"to form themselves into democratic societies, with equal conditions for all members, on pain of a relapse into feudalism."'' Under capitalism, he argued employees are ''"subordinated, exploited"'' and their ''"permanent condition is one of obedience,"'' a ''"slave."'' Capitalist companies ''"plunder the bodies and souls of wage workers"'' and they are ''"an outrage upon human dignity and personality."'' He advocated workers' co-operatives to replace capitalism. The worker becomes an ''"associate"'' and ''"forms a part of the producing organisation . . . forms a part of the sovereign power, of which he was before but the subject."'' Without this, people ''"would remain related as subordinates and superiors, and there would ensue two industrial castes of masters and wage-workers, which is repugnant to a free and democratic society."'' <ref>], Pierre-Joseph. ''The General Idea of the Revolution'', p. 277 and pp. 216-8</ref> Support for workers' management of production is shared by all schools of social anarchism. | |||
]]] | |||
Proudhon's philosophy of property is complex: it was developed in a number of works over his lifetime, and there are differing interpretations of some of his ideas. ''For more detailed discussion see ].'' | |||
Despite concerns, ] enthusiastically participated in the ] in opposition to the ], especially in the ]; however, they met harsh suppression after the ] had stabilised, including during the ].{{Sfn|Avrich|2006|p=204}} Several anarchists from Petrograd and Moscow fled to Ukraine, before the Bolsheviks crushed the ] too.{{Sfn|Avrich|2006|p=204}} With the anarchists being repressed in Russia, two new antithetical currents emerged, namely ] and ]. The former sought to create a coherent group that would push for revolution while the latter were against anything that would resemble a political party. Seeing the victories of the ] in the ] and the resulting ], many workers and activists turned to ], which grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the United States, members of major syndicalist movements such as the ] and the ] left their organisations and joined the ].{{Sfn|Nomad|1966|p=88}} | |||
In the ] of 1936–39, anarchists and syndicalists (] and ]) once again allied themselves with various currents of leftists. A long tradition of ] led to anarchists playing a pivotal role in the war, and particularly in the ]. In response to the army ], an ] of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of ] and of large areas of rural Spain, where they ] the land.{{Sfn|Bolloten|1984|p=1107}} The ] provided some limited assistance at the beginning of the war, but the result was a bitter fight between communists and other leftists in a series of events known as the ], as ] asserted Soviet control of the ] government, ending in another defeat of anarchists at the hands of the communists.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=xi, 466}} | |||
==Max Stirner's egoism== | |||
{{main articles|] and ]}} | |||
==== Post-WWII ==== | |||
In his '']'', Stirner argued that most commonly accepted social institutions - including the notion of State, property as a right, natural rights in general, and the very notion of society - were mere illusions or ''ghosts'' in the mind, saying of society that "the individuals are its reality." He advocated egoism and a form of amoralism, in which individuals would unite in 'associations of egoists' only when it was in their self interest to do so. For him, property simply comes about through might: "Whoever knows how to take, to defend, the thing, to him belongs property." And, "What I have in my power, that is my own. So long as I assert myself as holder, I am the proprietor of the thing." | |||
] support efforts for workers to form cooperatives is exemplified in this sewing cooperative.]] | |||
By the end of ], the anarchist movement had been severely weakened.{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=xi}} The 1960s witnessed a revival of anarchism, likely caused by a perceived failure of ] and tensions built by the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=539}} During this time, anarchism found a presence in other movements critical towards both capitalism and the state such as the ], ], and ]s, the ], and the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=xi, 539}} It also saw a transition from its previous revolutionary nature to provocative ]ism.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|pp=5|p=}} Anarchism became associated with ] as exemplified by bands such as ] and the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=493–494}} The established ] tendencies of ] returned with vigour during the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=556–557}} ] began to take form at this time and influenced anarchism's move from a ] demographic.{{Sfn|Williams|2015|p=680}} This coincided with its failure to gain traction in Northern Europe and its unprecedented height in Latin America.{{Sfn|Harmon|2011|p=70}} | |||
Around the turn of the 21st century, anarchism grew in popularity and influence within anti-capitalist, ] and ] movements.{{Sfn|Rupert|2006|p=66}} Anarchists became known for their involvement in protests against the ] (WTO), the ] and the ]. During the ]s, ''ad hoc'' ] anonymous cadres known as ]s engaged in rioting, ] and ] confrontations with the police. Other organisational tactics pioneered at this time include ]s, ] and the use of decentralised technologies such as the Internet. A significant event of this period was the confrontations at the ].{{Sfn|Rupert|2006|p=66}} Anarchist ideas have been influential in the development of the ] in ] and the Democratic Federation of Northern Syria, more commonly known as ], a ''de facto'' ] in northern ].{{Sfn|Ramnath|2019|p=691}} | |||
Stirner never called himself an anarchist - he accepted only the label 'egoist'. Nevertheless, he is considered by most to be an anarchist, and his ideas were influential on many anarchists, although interpretations of his thought are diverse. | |||
While having revolutionary aspirations, many contemporary forms of anarchism are not confrontational. Instead, they are trying to build an alternative way of ] (following the theories of ]), based on ] and voluntary cooperation. Scholar Carissa Honeywell takes the example of ] group of collectives, to highlight some features of how contemporary anarchist groups work: ], working together and in solidarity with those left behind. While doing so, Food Not Bombs provides ] about the rising rates of world ] and suggest policies to tackle hunger, ranging from ] the ] to addressing ] ] policies and ]s, helping ]s, and resisting the ] of food and housing.{{Sfn|Honeywell|2021|pp=34–44}} Honeywell also emphasizes that contemporary anarchists are interested in the flourishing not only of ]s, but ] and the ] as well.{{Sfn|Honeywell|2021|pp=1–2}} Honeywell argues that their analysis of capitalism and governments results in anarchists ] ] and the state as a whole.{{Sfn|Honeywell|2021|pp=1–3}} | |||
==American individualist anarchism== | |||
{{main articles|] and ]}} | |||
{{Anchor|Branches}} | |||
The context of American anarchism can be traced back to the ] and the ], ], and similar local revolts following American independence. ] theory had been used to justify the secession of the American colonies from Britain, and by extension settlers on the Western frontier claimed the right of counties and towns to ] from American states, and for pioneers to live in what was effectively the ]. Although the Whiskey Rebellion was put down by ], ] ultimately did secede from ] during the ], following Virginia's secession into the ]. The movement's economic projects also had colonial roots. The mutual bank was a reinvention of the private land banks and public loan offices of the colonies, a tradition extending back to 1681 and the establishment of "The Fund at Boston." | |||
== Schools of thought == | |||
]]] | |||
Anarchist schools of thought have been generally grouped into two main historical traditions, ] and ], owing to their different origins, ] and evolution.{{Sfnm|1a1=McLean|1a2=McMillan|1y=2003|1loc="Anarchism"|2a1=Ostergaard|2y=2003|2p=14|2loc="Anarchism"}} The individualist current emphasises ] in opposing restraints upon the free individual, while the social current emphasises ] in aiming to achieve the free potential of society through equality and ].{{Sfn|Harrison|Boyd|2003|p=251}} In a chronological sense, anarchism can be segmented by the classical currents of the late 19th century and the post-classical currents (], ], and ]) developed thereafter.{{Sfn|Levy|Adams|2018|p=9}} | |||
Beyond the specific factions of anarchist movements which constitute political anarchism lies philosophical anarchism which holds that the state lacks ], without necessarily accepting the imperative of revolution to eliminate it.{{Sfn|Egoumenides|2014|p=2}} A component especially of individualist anarchism,{{Sfnm|1a1=Ostergaard|1y=2003|1p=12|2a1=Gabardi|2y=1986|2pp=300–302}} philosophical anarchism may tolerate the existence of a ] but claims that citizens have no ] to obey government when it conflicts with individual ].{{Sfn|Klosko|2005|p=4}} Anarchism pays significant attention to moral arguments since ethics have a central role in anarchist philosophy.{{Sfn|Franks|2019|p=549}} Anarchism's emphasis on ], ], and for the extension of community and ]ity sets it apart from anarcho-capitalism and other types of ]ism.{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1992|1pp=564–565|2a1=Jennings|2y=1993|2p=143|3a1=Gay|3a2=Gay|3y=1999|3p=15|4a1=Morris|4y=2008|4p=13|5a1=Johnson|5y=2008|5p=169|6a1=Franks|6y=2013|6pp=393–394}} | |||
In 1825 ] had participated in a ] experiment headed by ] called ], which failed in a few years amidst much internal conflict. Warren blamed the community's failure on a lack of ] and a lack of private property. Warren proceeded to organise experimental anarchist communities which respected what he called "the sovereignty of the individual" at ] and ]. In 1833 Warren wrote and published ''The Peaceful Revolutionist'', which some have noted to be the first anarchist periodical ever published. Benjamin Tucker says that Warren "was the first man to expound and formulate the doctrine now known as Anarchism." (''Liberty'' XIV (December, 1900):1) | |||
Anarchism is usually placed on the far-left of the political spectrum.{{Sfnm|1a1=Brooks|1y=1994|1p=|1ps=, "Usually considered to be an extreme left-wing ideology".}} Much of its ] and ] reflect ], ], ], and ] interpretations of left-wing and ] politics{{Sfn|Guérin|1970|p=12}} such as ], ], ], ], and ], among other ] economic theories.{{Sfn|Guérin|1970|p=35|loc="Critique of authoritarian socialism"}} As anarchism does not offer a fixed body of ] from a single particular ],{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|pp=14–17}} many anarchist types and traditions exist and varieties of anarchy diverge widely.{{Sfn|Sylvan|2007|p=262}} One reaction against ] within the anarchist milieu was ], a call for ] and unity among anarchists first adopted by ] in 1889 in response to the bitter debates of anarchist theory at the time.{{Sfn|Avrich|1996|p=6}} Belief in political ] has been espoused by anarchists.{{Sfn|Walter|2002|p=52}} Despite separation, the various anarchist schools of thought are not seen as distinct entities but rather as tendencies that intermingle and are connected through a set of shared principles such as autonomy, ], ] and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1pp=1–6|2a1=Angelbeck|2a2=Grier|2y=2012|2p=551}} | |||
] became interested in anarchism through meeting Josiah Warren and ]. He edited and published ''Liberty'' from August 1881 to April 1908; it is widely considered to be the finest individualist-anarchist periodical ever issued in the English language. Tucker's conception of individualist anarchism incorporated the ideas of a variety of theorists: Greene's ideas on ]; Warren's ideas on ] (a ] variety of ]); ]'s market anarchism; ]'s ]; and, ]'s "law of equal freedom". Tucker strongly supported the individual's right to own the product of his or her labour as "]", and believed in a <ref name="tucker-pay">], Benjamin. ''""'' Individual Liberty: Selections From the Writings of Benjamin R. Tucker, Vanguard Press, New York, 1926, Kraus Reprint Co., Millwood, NY, 1973.</ref>] for trading this property. However, like most anarchists, he rejected intellectual property rights as well as opposing private property in land and other natural resources in favour of "occupancy and use" He argued that in a truly free market system without the state, the abundance of competition would eliminate profits, interest and rent and ensure that all workers received the full value of their labor. Many individualists (such as Tucker and Yarros) supported market-provided private defense of labour produced property and land occupied by those who used it. | |||
=== Classical === | |||
Other nineteenth century individualists included ], ], and ]. | |||
] is the primary proponent of ] and influenced many future ] and ] thinkers.{{Sfn|Wilbur|2019|pp=216–218}}]] | |||
Inceptive currents among classical anarchist currents were ] and ]. They were followed by the major currents of social anarchism (], ] and ]). They differ on ] and economic aspects of their ideal society.{{Sfn|Levy|Adams|2018|p=2}} | |||
Mutualism is an 18th-century economic theory that was developed into anarchist theory by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Its aims include "abolishing the state",<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |title=The Desk Encyclopedia of World History |publisher=] |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-7394-7809-7 |editor-last=Wright |editor-first=Edmund |location=New York |pages=20–21}}</ref> ], ], voluntary contract, federation and ] of both credit and currency that would be regulated by a bank of the people.{{Sfn|Wilbur|2019|pp=213–218}} Mutualism has been retrospectively characterised as ideologically situated between individualist and collectivist forms of anarchism.{{Sfnm|1a1=Avrich|1y=1996|1p=6|2a1=Miller|2y=1991|2p=11}} In '']'' (1840), Proudhon first characterised his goal as a "third form of society, the synthesis of communism and property."{{Sfn|Pierson|2013|p=187}} Collectivist anarchism is a ] form of anarchism{{Sfn|Morris|1993|p=76}} commonly associated with ].{{Sfn|Shannon|2019|p=101}} Collectivist anarchists advocate ] of the ] which is theorised to be achieved through violent revolution{{Sfn|Avrich|1996|pp=3–4}} and that workers be paid according to time worked, rather than goods being distributed according to need as in communism. Collectivist anarchism arose alongside ] but rejected the ] despite the stated Marxist goal of a collectivist ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Heywood|1y=2017|1pp=146–147|2a1=Bakunin|2y=1990}} | |||
==The First International== | |||
] ]-]]] | |||
{{main articles|], ]}} | |||
Anarcho-communism is a theory of anarchism that advocates a ] with ] of the means of production,{{Sfn|Mayne|1999|p=131}} held by a ] network of ]s,{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=327}} with production and consumption based on the guiding principle "]."{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1p=327|2a1=Turcato|2y=2019|2pp=237–238}} Anarcho-communism developed from radical socialist currents after the ]{{Sfn|Graham|2005}} but was first formulated as such in the ] section of the ].{{Sfn|Pernicone|2009|pp=111–113}} It was later expanded upon in the theoretical work of ],{{Sfn|Turcato|2019|pp=239–244}} whose specific style would go onto become the dominating view of anarchists by the late 19th century.{{Sfn|Levy|2011|p=6}} Anarcho-syndicalism is a branch of anarchism that views ]s as a potential force for revolutionary social change, replacing capitalism and the state with a new society democratically self-managed by workers. The basic principles of anarcho-syndicalism are ], workers' ] and ].{{Sfn|Van der Walt|2019|p=249}} | |||
In Europe, harsh reaction followed the revolutions of 1848. Twenty years later in 1864 the ], sometimes called the 'First International', united some diverse European revolutionary currents, including French followers of ], ], English trade unionists, ] and ]. Due to its genuine links to active workers movements the International became a significant organization. | |||
Individualist anarchism is a set of several traditions of thought within the anarchist movement that emphasise the ] and their ] over any kinds of external determinants.{{Sfn|Ryley|2019|p=225}} Early influences on individualist forms of anarchism include ], ], and ]. Through many countries, individualist anarchism attracted a small yet diverse following of Bohemian artists and intellectuals{{Sfn|Marshall|1993|p=440}} as well as young anarchist outlaws in what became known as ] and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Imrie|1y=1994|2a1=Parry|2y=1987|2p=15}} | |||
] was a leading figure in the International and a member of its General Council. Proudhon's followers, the ], opposed Marx's ], advocating political abstentionism and small property holdings. ] joined in 1868, allying with the anti-authoritarian socialist sections of the International, who advocated the revolutionary overthrow of the state and the collectivization of property. At first, the ] worked with the Marxists to push the First International into a more revolutionary socialist direction. Subsequently, the International became polarised into two camps, with Marx and Bakunin as their respective figureheads. The clearest difference between the camps was over strategy. The anarchist collectivists around Bakunin favoured (in Kropotkin's words) "direct economic struggle against capitalism, without interfering in the political parliamentary agitation." Marx and his followers focused on parliamentary activity and the need for structured political parties with central leadership and control. | |||
=== Post-classical and contemporary === | |||
Bakunin characterised Marx's ideas as ], and predicted that if a Marxist party came to power its leaders would simply take the place of the ] they had fought against.<ref>{{cite book|last=Bakunin|first=Mikhail|authorlink=Mikhail Bakunin|origyear=1873|year = 1991|title =Statism and Anarchy | publisher = Cambridge University Press|location = | id = ISBN 0521369738}}</ref> In 1872 the conflict climaxed with a final split between the two groups, when at the ] Marx engineered the expulsion of Bakunin and ] from the International and had its headquarters transferred to New York. In response, the anti-authoritarian sections formed their own International at the ], adopting a revolutionary anarchist program. | |||
{{Main|Contemporary anarchism}} | |||
] (right) are two prominent contemporary anarchist authors, with Zerzan being a prominent voice within ] and Jarach a notable advocate of ].]] | |||
Anarchist principles undergird contemporary radical ]s of the left. Interest in the anarchist movement developed alongside momentum in the anti-globalisation movement,{{Sfn|Evren|2011|p=1}} whose leading activist networks were anarchist in orientation.{{Sfn|Evren|2011|p=2}} As the movement shaped 21st century radicalism, wider embrace of anarchist principles signaled a revival of interest.{{Sfn|Evren|2011|p=2}} Anarchism has continued to generate many philosophies and movements, at times eclectic, drawing upon various sources and ] to create new philosophical approaches.{{Sfn|Williams|2007|p=303}} The anti-capitalist tradition of classical anarchism has remained prominent within contemporary currents.{{Sfn|Williams|2018|p=4}} | |||
Contemporary news coverage which emphasizes ] demonstrations has reinforced anarchism's historical association with chaos and violence. Its publicity has also led more scholars in fields such as ] and ] to engage with the anarchist movement, although contemporary anarchism favours actions over ] theory.{{Sfnm|1a1=Williams|1y=2010|1p=110|2a1=Evren|2y=2011|2p=1|3a1=Angelbeck|3a2=Grier|3y=2012|3p=549}} Various anarchist groups, tendencies, and schools of thought exist today, making it difficult to describe the contemporary anarchist movement.{{Sfn|Franks|2013|pp=385–386}} While theorists and activists have established "relatively stable constellations of anarchist principles", there is no consensus on which principles are core and commentators describe multiple ''anarchisms'', rather than a singular ''anarchism'', in which common principles are shared between schools of anarchism while each group prioritizes those principles differently. ] can be a common principle, although it ranks as a higher priority to anarcha-feminists than anarcho-communists.{{Sfn|Franks|2013|p=386}} | |||
Many contemporary debates among the Left can be traced back to the debate between Bakunin and Marx over the role of revolutionary parties in the revolution and in post-revolutionary society. Many leftists, communist and anarchist, reject the traditional ] and ] concept of a vanguard party prepared to form a new proletarian state, in part because of the historical failures of the Soviet Union but also out of concern for the development of an aparatchik/bureaucratic class that will replace the existing ruling class with their own bureaucratic dictatorship, although the radical communists do not share the anarchists' opposition to all political power (see a 1992 interview with ], former leader of the militant urban guerilla group Action Directe in France). | |||
Anarchists are generally committed against coercive authority in all forms, namely "all centralized and ] forms of government (e.g., monarchy, representative democracy, state socialism, etc.), economic class systems (e.g., capitalism, ], ], ], etc.), autocratic religions (e.g., ], ], etc.), ], ], ], and ]."{{Sfn|Jun|2009|pp=507–508}} Anarchist schools disagree on the methods by which these forms should be opposed.{{Sfn|Jun|2009|p=507}} The principle of ] is closer to anarchist political ethics in that it transcends both the liberal and socialist traditions. This entails that liberty and equality cannot be implemented within the state, resulting in the questioning of all forms of domination and hierarchy.{{Sfn|Egoumenides|2014|p=91}} | |||
==Anarchist communism== | |||
{{main|Anarchist communism}} | |||
] | |||
== Tactics == | |||
Whereas Proudhon disliked the collective aspects of ], Bakunin was originally sympathetic to it, translating the ] into ]. Bakunin was to repudiate communism, however, which he associated with statism, for a form of ]. The collectivist anarchists advocated remuneration for labor but held out the possibility of a post-revolutionary transition to a communist system of distribution according to need. Bakunin's associate, ], put it this way in his essay, '''' (1876): "When… production comes to outstrip consumption… veryone will draw what he needs from the abundant social reserve of commodities, without fear of depletion; and the moral sentiment which will be more highly developed among free and equal workers will prevent, or greatly reduce, abuse and waste." | |||
Anarchists' tactics take various forms but in general serve two major goals, namely, to first oppose ] and secondly to promote anarchist ethics and reflect an anarchist vision of society, illustrating the ].{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=107–108}} A broad categorisation can be made between aims to destroy oppressive states and institutions by revolutionary means on one hand and aims to change society through evolutionary means on the other.{{Sfn|Williams|2018|pp=4–5}} Evolutionary tactics embrace ] and take a gradual approach to anarchist aims, although there is significant overlap between the two.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|p=125}} | |||
Anarchist tactics have shifted during the course of the last century. Anarchists during the early 20th century focused more on strikes and militancy while contemporary anarchists use a ].{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=112}} | |||
An early anarchist communist was ], the first person to describe himself as "]".<ref> (in ])</ref> Unlike Proudhon, he argued that "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature." He announced his ideas in his US published journal Le Libertaire (1858-1861). | |||
=== Classical era === | |||
], often seen as the most important theorist of anarchist communism, outlined his economic ideas in '']'' and '']''. Kropotkin felt co-operation to be more beneficial than competition, arguing in '']'' that this was illustrated in nature. | |||
] is a controversial subject among anarchists as shown by anarchist ] ] ].]] | |||
He advocated the abolition of private property through the "expropriation of the whole of social wealth" by the people themselves<ref>], Peter. ''Words of a Rebel'', p99.</ref>, and for the economy to be co-ordinated through a horizontal network of voluntary associations<ref>], Peter. '']'', p145.</ref>. He maintained that in anarcho-communism "houses, fields, and factories will no longer be private property, and that they will belong to the commune or the nation" and money, wages, and trade would be abolished.<ref>Kropotkin, Peter. , G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York and London, 1906.</ref> Individuals and groups would use and control whatever resources they needed as the aim of anarchist-communism was to place "the product reaped or manufactured at the disposal of all, leaving to each the liberty to consume them as he pleases in his own home." <ref>''The Place of Anarchism in the Evolution of Socialist Thought''</ref> Moreover, he repeatedly stressed (like other communist-anarchists) that individuals would not be forced into communism, arguing that the peasant "who is in possession of just the amount of land he can cultivate," the family "inhabiting a house which affords them just enough space… considered necessary for that number of people" and the artisan "working with their own tools or handloom" would be free to live as they saw fit. <ref>''Act for Yourself'', pp. 104-5</ref> Some argue that communist-anarchism is based on the same distinction between possession and property as found in ]'s work. | |||
During the classical era, anarchists had a militant tendency. Not only did they confront state armed forces, as in Spain and Ukraine, but some of them also employed terrorism as ]. Assassination attempts were carried out against ], some of which were successful. Anarchists also took part in revolutions.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=112–113}} Many anarchists, especially the ], believed that these attempts would be the impetus for a revolution against capitalism and the state.{{Sfn|Norris|2020|pp=7–8}} Many of these attacks were done by individual assailants and the majority took place in the late 1870s, the early 1880s and the 1890s, with some still occurring in the early 1900s.{{Sfnm|1a1=Levy|1y=2011|1p=13|2a1=Nesser|2y=2012|2p=62}} Their decrease in prevalence was the result of further judicial power and of targeting and cataloging by state institutions.{{Sfn|Harmon|2011|p=55}} | |||
Anarchist perspectives towards violence have always been controversial.{{Sfn|Carter|1978|p=320}} ] advocate for non-violence means to achieve their stateless, nonviolent ends.{{Sfn|Fiala|2017|loc=section 3.1}} Other anarchist groups advocate ], a tactic which can include acts of ] or ]. This attitude was quite prominent a century ago when seeing the state as a ] and some anarchists believing that they had every right to oppose its oppression by any means possible.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=116–117}} ] and ], who were proponents of limited use of violence, stated that violence is merely a reaction to state violence as a ].{{Sfn|Carter|1978|pp=320–325}} | |||
Other important anarchist communists include ], ] and ], while ] moved from individualist to communist anarchism. Many in the anarcho-syndicalist movements (see below) saw anarchist communism as their objective. ]'s 1932 '']'' was adopted by the Spanish CNT as its manifesto for a post-revolutionary society. | |||
Anarchists took an active role in strike actions, although they tended to be antipathetic to formal ], seeing it as ]. They saw it as a part of the movement which sought to overthrow the state and capitalism.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=113}} Anarchists also reinforced their propaganda ], some of whom practiced ] and ]. Those anarchists also built communities which were based on friendship and were involved in the news media.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=114}} | |||
Some anarchists disliked merging communism with anarchism. A number of individualist anarchists maintained that abolition of private property was not consistent with liberty. For example, Benjamin Tucker, whilst professing respect for Kropotkin and publishing his work, described communist anarchism as "pseudo-anarchism".<ref name="tucker-pay"/> | |||
=== Revolutionary === | |||
==Propaganda of the deed== | |||
]"]] | |||
] was an outspoken advocate of violence]] | |||
In the current era, ] ], a proponent of ], has reinstated the debate on violence by rejecting the nonviolence tactic adopted since the late 19th century by Kropotkin and other prominent anarchists afterwards. Both Bonanno and the French group ] advocate for small, informal affiliation groups, where each member is responsible for their own actions but works together to bring down oppression using ] and other violent means against state, capitalism, and other enemies. ] on various charges, terrorism included.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=134–135}} | |||
{{main|Propaganda of the deed}} | |||
Overall, contemporary anarchists are much less violent and militant than their ideological ancestors. They mostly engage in confronting the police during demonstrations and riots, especially in countries such as ], ], and ]. Militant black bloc protest groups are known for clashing with the police;{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=115}} however, anarchists not only clash with state operators, they also engage in the struggle against ] and ], taking ] action and mobilizing to prevent hate rallies from happening.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=117}} | |||
Anarchists have often been portrayed as dangerous and violent, due mainly to a number of high-profile violent acts, including ]s, ]s, ]s, and ] by some anarchists. Some ]aries of the late 19th century encouraged acts of political violence, such as ]ings and the ]s of ] to further anarchism. Such actions have sometimes been called ']'. However, the term originally referred to exemplary forms of direct action meant to inspire the masses to revolution. Propaganda of the deed may be violent or nonviolent. | |||
=== Evolutionary === | |||
There is no ] on the legitimacy or utility of violence in general. ] and ], for example, wrote of violence as a necessary and sometimes desirable force in revolutionary settings. But at the same time, they denounced acts of individual terrorism. (Bakunin, "The Program of the International Brotherhood" (1869) and Malatesta, "Violence as a Social Factor" (1895)). | |||
Anarchists commonly employ ]. This can take the form of disrupting and protesting against unjust hierarchy, or the form of self-managing their lives through the creation of counter-institutions such as ] and non-hierarchical collectives.{{Sfn|Williams|2018|pp=4–5}} Decision-making is often handled in an anti-authoritarian way, with everyone having ], an approach known as ].{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=109–117}} Contemporary-era anarchists have been engaging with various ] movements that are more or less based on horizontalism, although not explicitly anarchist, respecting personal autonomy and participating in mass activism such as strikes and demonstrations. In contrast with the "big-A Anarchism" of the classical era, the newly coined term "small-a anarchism" signals their tendency not to base their thoughts and actions on classical-era anarchism or to refer to classical anarchists such as Peter Kropotkin and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon to justify their opinions. Those anarchists would rather base their thought and praxis on their own experience, which they will later theorize.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=145–149}} | |||
The concept of ] is enacted by many contemporary anarchist groups, striving to embody the principles, organization and tactics of the changed social structure they hope to bring about. As part of this the decision-making process of small anarchist affinity groups plays a significant tactical role.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=109, 119}} Anarchists have employed various methods to build a rough consensus among members of their group without the need of a leader or a leading group. One way is for an individual from the group to play the role of ] to help achieve a ] without taking part in the discussion themselves or promoting a specific point. Minorities usually accept rough consensus, except when they feel the proposal contradicts anarchist ethics, goals and values. Anarchists usually form small groups (5–20 individuals) to enhance autonomy and friendships among their members. These kinds of groups more often than not interconnect with each other, forming larger networks. Anarchists still support and participate in strikes, especially ] as these are leaderless strikes not organised centrally by a syndicate.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=119–121}} | |||
Other anarchists, sometimes identified as ], advocated complete ]. ], whose philosophy is often viewed as a form of ] ''(see below)'', was a notable exponent of ]. | |||
As in the past, newspapers and journals are used, and anarchists have gone online to spread their message. Anarchists have found it easier to create websites because of distributional and other difficulties, hosting electronic libraries and other portals.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=118–119}} Anarchists were also involved in developing various software that are available for free. The way these ] work to develop and distribute resembles the anarchist ideals, especially when it comes to preserving users' privacy from ].{{Sfn|Williams|2019|pp=120–121}} | |||
==Anarchism in the labour movement== | |||
{{seealso|Anarcho-syndicalism}} | |||
Anarchists organize themselves to ] and reclaim ]s. During important events such as protests and when spaces are being occupied, they are often called ]s (TAZ), spaces where art, poetry, and ] are blended to display the anarchist ideal.{{Sfnm|1a1=Kinna|1y=2019|1p=139|2a1=Mattern|2y=2019|2p=596|3a1=Williams|3y=2018|3pp=5–6}} As seen by anarchists, ] is a way to regain urban space from the capitalist market, serving pragmatical needs and also being an exemplary direct action.{{Sfnm|1a1=Kinna|1y=2012|1p=250|2a1=Williams|2y=2019|2p=119}} Acquiring space enables anarchists to experiment with their ideas and build social bonds.{{Sfn|Williams|2019|p=122}} Adding up these tactics while having in mind that not all anarchists share the same attitudes towards them, along with various forms of protesting at highly symbolic events, make up a ] atmosphere that is part of contemporary anarchist vividity.{{Sfn|Morland|2004|pp=37–38}} | |||
] is anarchism focusing on the labor movement ("syndicalism" being derived from the French ''syndicalisme'', meaning "trade unionism"). Anarcho-syndicalists view labour unions as a potential force for revolutionary social change, replacing capitalism and the State with a society self-managed by workers. Anarcho-syndicalists seek to abolish the wage system and private ownership of the means of production, which they believe lead to class division. | |||
== Key issues == | |||
After the ] French anarchism reemerged, influencing the ''Bourses de Travails'' of autonomous workers groups and trade unions. From this movement the ] (General Confederation of Labour, CGT) was formed in 1895 as the first major anarcho-syndicalist movement. ] and ]'s writing for the CGT saw ] developing from a ]. After 1914 the CGT moved away from anarcho-syndicalism due to the appeal of ]. French-style syndicalism was a significant movement in Europe prior to 1921, and remained a significant movement in Spain until the mid 1940s.] | |||
Spanish anarchist trade union federations were formed in the 1870's, 1900 and 1910. The most successful was the ] (National Confederation of Labour: CNT), founded in 1910. Prior to the 1940s the CNT was the major force in Spanish working class politics. With a membership of 1.58 million in 1934, the CNT played a major role in the ]. ''See also:'' ]. | |||
<!-- In the interest of restricting article length, these overview summaries are meant to be brief. Thank you. --> | |||
Syndicalists like ] were key figures in the ]. ]n anarchism was strongly influenced, extending to the ] rebellion and the ] in Argentina. In Berlin in 1922 the CNT was joined with the ], an anarcho-syndicalist successor to the ]. | |||
As anarchism is a philosophy that embodies many diverse attitudes, tendencies, and schools of thought, disagreement over questions of values, ideology, and ] is common. Its diversity has led to widely different uses of identical terms among different anarchist traditions which has created a number of ]. The compatibility of ],{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1p=565|2a1=Honderich|2y=1995|2p=31|3a1=Meltzer|3y=2000|3p=50|4a1=Goodway|4y=2006|4p=4|5a1=Newman|5y=2010|5p=53}} ], and ] with anarchism is widely disputed, and anarchism enjoys complex relationships with ideologies such as communism, ], Marxism, and ]. Anarchists may be motivated by ], ], ], ], or any number of alternative ethical doctrines. Phenomena such as ], technology (e.g. within anarcho-primitivism), and the ] may be sharply criticised within some anarchist tendencies and simultaneously lauded in others.{{Sfn|De George|2005|pp=31–32}} | |||
=== The state === | |||
The largest organised anarchist movement today is in Spain, in the form of the ] (CGT) and the ]. The CGT claims a paid-up membership of 60,000, and received over a million votes in Spanish ] elections. Other active syndicalist movements include the US ], and the UK ]. The revolutionary industrial unionist ] also exists, claiming 2,000 paid members. | |||
<!-- Important! Strive to explain how anarchists perceive authority and oppression and why they reject them. Jun (2019), p. 41. -->] opposing state-waged war]] | |||
Objection to the ] and its institutions is a '']'' of anarchism.{{Sfnm|1a1=Carter|1y=1971|1p=14|2a1=Jun|2y=2019|2pp=29–30}} Anarchists consider the state as a tool of domination and believe it to be illegitimate regardless of its political tendencies. Instead of people being able to control the aspects of their life, major decisions are taken by a small elite. Authority ultimately rests solely on power, regardless of whether that power is ] or ], as it still has the ability to coerce people. Another anarchist argument against states is that the people constituting a government, even the most altruistic among officials, will unavoidably seek to gain more power, leading to corruption. Anarchists consider the idea that the state is the collective will of the people to be an unachievable fiction due to the fact that the ] is distinct from the rest of society.{{Sfn|Jun|2019|pp=32–38}} | |||
Specific anarchist attitudes towards the state vary. ] believed that the tension between authority and autonomy would mean the state could never be legitimate. Bakunin saw the state as meaning "coercion, domination by means of coercion, camouflaged if possible but unceremonious and overt if need be." ] and ], who leaned toward philosophical anarchism, believed that the state could be legitimate if it is governed by consensus, although they saw this as highly unlikely.{{Sfnm|1a1=Wendt|1y=2020|1p=2|2a1=Ashwood|2y=2018|2p=727}} Beliefs on how to abolish the state also differ.{{Sfn|Ashwood|2018|p=735}} | |||
Contemporary critics of anarcho-syndicalism and revolutionary industrial unionism claim that they are ] and fail to deal with economic life outside work. Post-leftist critics such as ] claim anarcho-syndicalism advocates oppressive social structures, such as ], ], and compulsory membership in ]s, which violates the concept of individual autonomy by denying the ]. | |||
=== Gender, sexuality, and free love === | |||
==The Russian Revolution== | |||
{{Main|Anarchism and issues related to love and sex}} | |||
{{main|Russian Revolution of 1917}} | |||
As ] and ] carry along them dynamics of hierarchy, many anarchists address, analyse, and oppose the suppression of one's autonomy imposed by gender roles.{{Sfn|Nicholas|2019|p=603}} | |||
] protests, symbols, and flags]] | |||
The ] was a seismic event in the development of anarchism as a movement and as a philosophy. | |||
Sexuality was not often discussed by classical anarchists but the few that did felt that an anarchist society would lead to sexuality naturally developing.{{Sfn|Lucy|2020|p=162}} Sexual violence was a concern for anarchists such as ], who opposed ], believing they would benefit predatory men.{{Sfn|Lucy|2020|p=178}} A historical current that arose and flourished during 1890 and 1920 within anarchism was ]. In contemporary anarchism, this current survives as a tendency to support ], ], and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Nicholas|1y=2019|1p=611|2a1=Jeppesen|2a2=Nazar|2y=2012|2pp=175–176}} Free love advocates were against marriage, which they saw as a way of men imposing authority over women, largely because marriage law greatly favoured the power of men. The notion of free love was much broader and included a critique of the established order that limited women's sexual freedom and pleasure.{{Sfn|Jeppesen|Nazar|2012|pp=175–176}} Those free love movements contributed to the establishment of communal houses, where large groups of travelers, anarchists and other activists slept in beds together.{{Sfn|Jeppesen|Nazar|2012|p=177}} Free love had roots both in Europe and the United States; however, some anarchists struggled with the jealousy that arose from free love.{{Sfn|Jeppesen|Nazar|2012|pp=175–177}} Anarchist feminists were advocates of free love, against marriage, and ] (using a contemporary term), and had a similar agenda. Anarchist and non-anarchist feminists differed on ] but were supportive of one another.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=166–167}} | |||
During the second half of the 20th century, anarchism intermingled with the ], radicalising some currents of the feminist movement and being influenced as well. By the latest decades of the 20th century, anarchists and feminists were advocating for the rights and autonomy of women, gays, queers and other marginalised groups, with some feminist thinkers suggesting a fusion of the two currents.{{Sfn|Nicholas|2019|pp=609–611}} With the ], sexual identity and ] became a subject of study for anarchists, yielding a ] critique of ].{{Sfn|Nicholas|2019|pp=610–611}} Some anarchists distanced themselves from this line of thinking, suggesting that it leaned towards an individualism that was dropping the cause of social liberation.{{Sfn|Nicholas|2019|pp=616–617}} | |||
Anarchists participated alongside the ] in both February and October revolutions, many anarchists initially supporting the Bolshevik coup. However the Bolsheviks soon turned against the anarchists and other left-wing opposition, a conflict which culminated in the 1921 ]. Anarchists in central Russia were imprisoned or driven underground, or joined the victorious Bolsheviks. In ] anarchists fought in the ] against both Whites and Bolsheviks within the Makhnovshchina peasant army led by ]. | |||
=== Education === | |||
Expelled American anarchists ] and ] before leaving Russia were amongst those agitating in response to Bolshevik policy and the suppression of the Kronstadt uprising. Both wrote classic accounts of their experiences in Russia, aiming to expose the reality of Bolshevik control. For them, ]'s predictions about the consequences of Marxist rule had proved all too true. | |||
{{Main|Anarchism and education}} | |||
{|class="wikitable" style="border: none; float: right;" | |||
|+ Anarchist vs. statist perspectives on education<br/>{{Small|Ruth Kinna (2019){{Sfn|Kinna|2019|p=97}}}} | |||
|- | |||
!scope="col"| | |||
!scope="col"|Anarchist education | |||
!scope="col"|State education | |||
|- | |||
|Concept || Education as self-mastery || Education as service | |||
|- | |||
|Management || Community based || State run | |||
|- | |||
|Methods || Practice-based learning || Vocational training | |||
|- | |||
|Aims || Being a critical member of society || Being a productive member of society | |||
|} | |||
The interest of anarchists in education stretches back to the first emergence of classical anarchism. Anarchists consider proper education, one which sets the foundations of the future autonomy of the individual and the society, to be an act of ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Kinna|1y=2019|1pp=83–85|2a2=Suissa|2y=2019|2pp=514–515, 520}} Anarchist writers such as William Godwin ('']'') and Max Stirner ("]") attacked both ] and private education as another means by which the ruling class replicate their privileges.{{Sfnm|1a1=Suissa|1y=2019|1pp=514, 521|2a1=Kinna|2y=2019|2pp=83–86|3a1=Marshall|3y=1993|3p=222}} | |||
In 1901, ] anarchist and free thinker ] established the ] in Barcelona as an opposition to the established education system which was dictated largely by the Catholic Church.{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=511–512}} Ferrer's approach was secular, rejecting both state and church involvement in the educational process while giving pupils large amounts of autonomy in planning their work and attendance. Ferrer aimed to educate the working class and explicitly sought to foster ] among students. The school closed after constant harassment by the state and Ferrer was later arrested. Nonetheless, his ideas formed the inspiration for a series of ] around the world.{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=511–514}} ] ], who published the essay ''Education and Culture'', also established a similar school with its founding principle being that "for education to be effective it had to be free."{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=517–518}} In a similar token, ] founded what became the ] in 1921, also declaring being free from coercion.{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=518–519}} | |||
The victory of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution and the resulting Russian Civil War did serious damage to anarchist movements internationally. Many workers and activists saw Bolshevik success as setting an example; Communist parties grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the US for example, the major syndicalist movements of the ] and ] began to realign themselves away from anarchism and towards the ]. | |||
Anarchist education is based largely on the idea that a child's right to develop freely and without manipulation ought to be respected and that rationality would lead children to morally good conclusions; however, there has been little consensus among anarchist figures as to what constitutes ]. Ferrer believed that moral indoctrination was necessary and explicitly taught pupils that equality, liberty and ] were not possible under capitalism, along with other critiques of government and nationalism.{{Sfnm|1a1=Avrich|1y=1980|1pp=3–33|2a1=Suissa|2y=2019|2pp=519–522}} | |||
In Paris, the ] group of Russian anarchist exiles which included ] concluded that anarchists needed to develop new forms of organisation in response to the structures of Bolshevism. Their 1926 manifesto, known as the ], was supported by some communist anarchists, though opposed by many others. | |||
Late 20th century and contemporary anarchist writers (], ], and ]) intensified and expanded the anarchist critique of ], largely focusing on the need for a system that focuses on children's creativity rather than on their ability to attain a career or participate in ] as part of a consumer society.{{Sfn|Kinna|2019|pp=89–96}} Contemporary anarchists such as Ward claim that state education serves to perpetuate ].{{Sfn|Ward|1973|pp=39–48}} | |||
The ''Platform'' continues to inspire some contemporary anarchist groups who believe in an anarchist movement organised around its principles of 'theoretical unity', 'tactical unity', 'collective responsibility' and 'federalism'. Platformist groups today include the ] in Ireland, the UK's ], and the ] in the northeastern United States and bordering Canada and Québec. | |||
While few anarchist education institutions have survived to the modern-day, major tenets of anarchist schools, among them respect for ] and relying on reasoning rather than indoctrination as a teaching method, have spread among mainstream educational institutions. Judith Suissa names three schools as explicitly anarchists' schools, namely the Free Skool Santa Cruz in the United States which is part of a wider American-Canadian network of schools, the Self-Managed Learning College in ], and the Paideia School in Spain.{{Sfn|Suissa|2019|pp=523–526}} | |||
==The fight against fascism== | |||
], ]. Members of the ] construct ]s to fight against the ]s in one of the ] factories.]] | |||
{{main articles|] and ]}} | |||
In the 1920s and 1930s the familiar dynamics of anarchism's conflict with the state were transformed by the rise of ] in Europe. In many cases, European anarchists faced difficult choices - should they join in ]s with reformist democrats and Soviet-led ] against a common fascist enemy Luigi Fabbri, an exile from Italian fascism, was amongst those arguing that fascism was something different: | |||
=== The arts === | |||
:"Fascism is not just another form of government which, like all others, uses violence. It is the most authoritarian and the most violent form of government imaginable. It represents the utmost glorification of the theory and practice of the principle of authority." | |||
{{Main|Anarchism and the arts}} | |||
] is a notable example of blending anarchism and the arts.{{Sfn|Antliff|1998|p=99}}]] | |||
The connection between anarchism and art was quite profound during the classical era of anarchism, especially among artistic currents that were developing during that era such as futurists, surrealists and others.{{Sfn|Mattern|2019|p=592}} In literature, anarchism was mostly associated with the ] and the ] movement.{{Sfn|Gifford|2019|p=577}} In music, anarchism has been associated with music scenes such as ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Marshall|1y=1993|1pp=493–494|2a1=Dunn|2y=2012|3a1=Evren|3a2=Kinna|3a3=Rouselle|3y=2013|p=138}} Anarchists such as ] and ] stated that the border between the artist and the non-artist, what separates art from a daily act, is a construct produced by the alienation caused by capitalism and it prevents humans from living a joyful life.{{Sfn|Mattern|2019|pp=592–593}} | |||
Other anarchists advocated for or used art as a means to achieve anarchist ends.{{Sfn|Mattern|2019|p=593}} In his book ''Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerrillas, and Digital Ninjas'', Chris Robé claims that "anarchist-inflected practices have increasingly structured movement-based video activism."{{Sfn|Robé|2017|p=44}} Throughout the 20th century, many prominent anarchists (], ], ] and ]) and publications such as '']'' wrote about matters pertaining to the arts.{{Sfn|Miller|Dirlik|Rosemont|Augustyn|2019|p=1}} | |||
Italy saw the first struggles between anarchists and fascists. Anarchists played a key role in the anti-fascist organisation '''Arditi del Popolo.''' This group was strongest in areas with anarchist traditions and marked up numerous successful victories, including the total humiliation of thousands of Blackshirts in the anarchist stronghold of Parma in August 1922. Unfortunately, anarchist calls for a united front against fascism were ignored by the socialists and communists until it was too late. <ref></ref> In France, where the fascists came close to insurrection in the February 1934 riots, anarchists divided over a 'united front' policy. In Spain, the ] initially refused to join a popular front electoral alliance, and abstention by CNT supporters led to a right wing election victory. But in 1936, the CNT changed its policy and anarchist votes helped bring the popular front back to power. Months later, the ruling class responded with an attempted coup, and the ] (1936-39) was underway. | |||
Three overlapping properties made art useful to anarchists. It could depict a critique of existing society and hierarchies, serve as a prefigurative tool to reflect the anarchist ideal society and even turn into a means of direct action such as in protests. As it appeals to both emotion and reason, art could appeal to the whole human and have a powerful effect.{{Sfn|Mattern|2019|pp=593–596}} The 19th-century ] movement had an ecological aesthetic and offered an example of an anarchist perception of the road towards socialism.{{Sfn|Antliff|1998|p=78}} In ''Les chataigniers a Osny'' by anarchist painter ], the blending of aesthetic and social harmony is prefiguring an ideal anarchistic agrarian community.{{Sfn|Antliff|1998|p=99}} | |||
In response to the army rebellion ] movement of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of the major ] of ] and of large areas of rural Spain where they ] the land. But even before the eventual fascist victory in 1939, the anarchists were losing ground in a bitter struggle with the ]. The CNT leadership often appeared confused and divided, with some members controversially entering the government. Stalinist-led troops suppressed the collectives, and persecuted both ] and anarchists. | |||
== Criticism == | |||
Since the late 1970s anarchists have been involved in fighting the rise of ] groups. In Germany and the United Kingdom some anarchists worked within ] ] groups alongside members of the ] left. They advocated directly combating fascists with physical force rather than relying on the state. Since the late 1990s, a similar tendency has developed within US anarchism. ''See also: ] (US), ] (UK/Europe), ]'' | |||
The most common critique of anarchism is the assertion that humans cannot ] and so a state is necessary for human survival. Philosopher ] supported this critique, stating that "eace and war, ]s, regulations of ] conditions and the sale of noxious ]s, the preservation of a just system of distribution: these, among others, are functions which could hardly be performed in a community in which there was no central government."{{Sfn|Krimerman|Perry|1966|p=494}} Another common criticism of anarchism is that it fits a world of ] in which only the small enough entities can be self-governing; a response would be that major anarchist thinkers advocated anarchist federalism.{{Sfn|Ward|2004|p=78}} | |||
Another criticism of anarchism is the belief that it is inherently unstable: that an anarchist society would inevitably evolve back into a state. ] and other early social contract theorists argued that the state emerges in response to natural anarchy to protect the people's interests and keep order. Philosopher ] argued that a "]", or minarchy, would emerge from anarchy through the process of an ], in which people would exercise their liberty and buy protection from protection agencies, evolving into a minimal state. Anarchists reject these criticisms by arguing that humans in a ] would not just be in a state of war. ] in particular argue that humans were better off in a state of nature in small tribes living close to the land, while anarchists in general argue that the negatives of state organization, such as hierarchies, monopolies and inequality, outweigh the benefits.<ref>{{Citation |last=Fiala |first=Andrew |title=Anarchism |date=2021 |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/anarchism |access-date=2023-06-17 |edition=Winter 2021 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref> | |||
==Religious anarchism== | |||
] 1828-1910]] | |||
{{main articles|], ], ], and ]}} | |||
Philosophy lecturer Andrew G. Fiala composed a list of common arguments against anarchism which includes critiques such as that anarchism is innately related to violence and destruction, not only in the pragmatic world, such as at protests, but in the world of ethics as well. Secondly, anarchism is evaluated as unfeasible or utopian since the state cannot be defeated practically. This line of arguments most often calls for political action within the system to reform it. The third argument is that anarchism is self-contradictory as a ruling theory that has no ruling theory. Anarchism also calls for collective action while endorsing the autonomy of the individual, hence no collective action can be taken. Lastly, Fiala mentions a critique towards philosophical anarchism of being ineffective (all talk and thoughts) and in the meantime capitalism and bourgeois class remains strong.{{Sfn|Fiala|2017|loc="4. Objections and Replies"}} | |||
Most anarchist culture tends to be ] if not outright ]. However, the combination of religious social conscience, historical religiosity amongst oppressed social classes, and the compatibility of some interpretations of religious traditions with anarchism has resulted in religious anarchism. | |||
Philosophical anarchism has met the criticism of members of academia following the release of pro-anarchist books such as ]' ''Moral Principles and Political Obligations''.{{Sfn|Klosko|1999|p=536}} Law professor William A. Edmundson authored an essay to argue against three major philosophical anarchist principles which he finds fallacious. Edmundson says that while the individual does not owe the state a duty of obedience, this does not imply that anarchism is the inevitable conclusion and the state is still morally legitimate.{{Sfnm|1a1=Klosko|1y=1999|1p=536|2a1=Kristjánsson|2y=2000|2p=896}} In ''The Problem of Political Authority'', ] defends philosophical anarchism,{{Sfn|Dagger|2018|p=35}} claiming that "political authority is a moral illusion."{{Sfn|Rogers|2020|p=}} | |||
] believe that there is no higher authority than ], and oppose earthly authority such as ] and established churches. They believe that Jesus' teachings were clearly anarchistic, but were corrupted when "Christianity" was declared the official religion of Rome. Christian anarchists, who follow Jesus' directive to "turn the other cheek", are strict ]. The most famous advocate of Christian anarchism was ], author of '']'', who called for a society based on compassion, nonviolent principles and freedom. Christian anarchists tend to form ]. They also occasionally ]. | |||
One of the earliest criticisms is that anarchism defies and fails to understand the biological inclination to authority.{{Sfn|Ferguson|1886}} ] states that the acceptance of authority implies the belief that following their instructions will afford more success.{{Sfn|Gans|1992|p=37}} Raz believes that this argument is true in following both authorities' successful and mistaken instruction.{{Sfn|Gans|1992|p=38}} Anarchists reject this criticism because challenging or disobeying authority does not entail the disappearance of its advantages by acknowledging authority such as doctors or lawyers as reliable, nor does it involve a complete surrender of independent judgment.{{Sfn|Gans|1992|pp=34, 38}} Anarchist perception of human nature, rejection of the state, and commitment to social revolution has been criticised by academics as naive, overly simplistic, and unrealistic, respectively.{{Sfn|Brinn|2020|p=206}} Classical anarchism has been criticised for relying too heavily on the belief that the abolition of the state will lead to human cooperation prospering.{{Sfn|Lucy|2020|p=162}} | |||
Christian anarchy can be said to have roots as old as the religion's birth, as the ] exhibits many anarchistic tendencies, such as communal goods and wealth. By aiming to obey utterly certain of the Bible's teachings certain ] groups of sixteenth century Europe attempted to emulate the early church's social-economic organisation and philosophy by regarding it as the only social structure capable of true obedience to Jesus' teachings, and utterly rejected (in theory) all earthly hierarchies and authority (and indeed non-anabaptists in general) and violence as ungodly. Such groups, for example the ], typically went from initially anarchistic beginnings to, as their movements stabilised, more authoritarian social models. | |||
], considered to be one of the principal founders of Marxism, criticised anarchism's anti-authoritarianism as inherently counter-revolutionary because in his view a revolution is by itself authoritarian.{{Sfn|Tucker|1978}} Academic ] writes in his book ''Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism'' that "anarchism cannot win", believing that it lacks the ability to properly implement its ideas.{{Sfn|Dodds|2011}} The Marxist criticism of anarchism is that it has a utopian character because all individuals should have anarchist views and values. According to the Marxist view, that a social idea would follow directly from this human ideal and out of the free will of every individual formed its essence. Marxists state that this contradiction was responsible for their inability to act. In the anarchist vision, the conflict between liberty and equality was resolved through coexistence and intertwining.{{Sfn|Baár|Falina|Janowski|Kopeček|2016|p=488}} | |||
] was most influential in the 1920s. Strands of Chinese anarchism included ]'s ] which was influenced by Tolstoy and the ]. Buddhist anarchism was later revived in the ] by writers such as ]. | |||
== See also == | |||
], with its focus on the environment and equality, along with its often decentralized nature, has lead to a number of neopagan anarchists. One of the most prominent is ], who writes extensively about both ] and ]. | |||
{{Portal|Anarchism|Libertarianism}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
'''Anarchist communities''' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
== References == | |||
==Anarchism and feminism== | |||
=== Explanatory notes === | |||
]]] | |||
{{Reflist|group=nb}} | |||
{{main|Anarcha-Feminism}} | |||
=== Citations === | |||
Early ] such as ] and ] criticised the ] in the anarchism of ] during the 1850s. | |||
{{Reflist|25em}} | |||
=== General and cited sources === | |||
Anarcha-feminism is a kind of ] that espouses the belief that ] is a fundamental problem in society. However, it was not explicitly formulation as ''anarcha-feminism'' until early 1970s<ref></ref>, during the ] feminist movement. Anarcha-feminism, views ] as the first manifestation of hierarchy in human history; thus, the first form of oppression occurred in the dominance of male over female. Anarcha-feminists then conclude that if feminists are against patriarchy, they must also be against all forms of ], and therefore must reject the authoritarian nature of the state and capitalism. {{fact}} | |||
==== Primary sources ==== | |||
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bakunin |first=Mikhail |author-link=Mikhail Bakunin |title=Statism and Anarchy |title-link=Statism and Anarchy |publisher=] |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-5213-6182-8 |editor-last=Shatz |editor-first=Marshall |series=Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought |location=Cambridge, England |translator-last=Shatz |translator-first=Marshall |doi=10.1017/CBO9781139168083 |lccn=89077393 |oclc=20826465 |orig-date=1873}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
==== Secondary sources ==== | |||
Anarcho-primitivists see the creation of gender roles and patriarchy a creation of the start of ], and therefore consider primitivism to also be an anarchist school of thought that addresses feminist concerns. ] is often considered a feminist variant of green anarchist feminist thought. | |||
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Angelbeck |first1=Bill |last2=Grier |first2=Colin |date=2012 |title=Anarchism and the Archaeology of Anarchic Societies: Resistance to Centralization in the Coast Salish Region of the Pacific Northwest Coast |url=https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/dc%3A312/datastream/PDF/view |url-status=live |journal=] |volume=53 |issue=5 |pages=547–587 |doi=10.1086/667621 |s2cid=142786065 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180721142558/https://arcabc.ca/islandora/object/dc%3A312/datastream/PDF/view |archive-date=21 July 2018 |access-date=24 June 2021 |s2cid-access=free |issn = 0011-3204 }} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Antliff |first=Mark |date=1998 |title=Cubism, Futurism, Anarchism: The 'Aestheticism' of the "Action d'art" Group, 1906–1920 |journal=Oxford Art Journal |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=101–120 |doi=10.1093/oxartj/21.2.99 |jstor=1360616}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Anderson |first=Benedict |author-link=Benedict Anderson |date=2004 |title=In the World-Shadow of Bismarck and Nobel |url=http://newleftreview.org/II/28/benedict-anderson-in-the-world-shadow-of-bismarck-and-nobel |journal=] |volume=2 |issue=28 |pages=85–129 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151219130121/http://newleftreview.org/II/28/benedict-anderson-in-the-world-shadow-of-bismarck-and-nobel |archive-date=19 December 2015 |access-date=7 January 2016}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Arvidsson |first=Stefan |author-link=Stefan Arvidsson |title=The Style and Mythology of Socialism: Socialist Idealism, 1871–1914 |publisher=] |date=2017 |isbn=978-0-3673-4880-9 |edition=1st |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Ashwood |first=Loka |date=2018 |title=Rural Conservatism or Anarchism? The Pro-state, Stateless, and Anti-state Positions |journal=] |volume=83 |issue=4 |pages=717–748 |doi=10.1111/ruso.12226 |s2cid=158802675}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Avrich |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Avrich |title=] |publisher=] |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-6910-4494-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Avrich |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Avrich |title=The Russian Anarchists |title-link=The Russian Anarchists |publisher=] |date=2006 |isbn=978-1-9048-5948-2 |location=Stirling |author-mask=2}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Avrich |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Avrich |title=] |publisher=] |date=1980 |isbn=978-1-4008-5318-2 |pages=3–33 |oclc=489692159 |author-mask=2}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Baár |first1=Monika |title=A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe: Negotiating Modernity in the 'Long Nineteenth Century' |last2=Falina |first2=Maria |last3=Janowski |first3=Maciej |last4=Kopeček |first4=Michal |last5=Trencsényi |first5=Balázs Trencsényi |publisher=] |date=2016 |isbn=978-0-1910-5695-6 |volume=I |location=Oxford}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bantman |first=Constance |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=371–388 |chapter=The Era of Propaganda by the Deed |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m7BhDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA372}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bates |first=David |title=Political Ideologies |publisher=] |date=2017 |isbn=978-0-1987-2785-9 |editor-last=Wetherly |editor-first=Paul |chapter=Anarchism |access-date=2019-02-28 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uXfJDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA128 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111304/https://books.google.com/books?id=uXfJDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA128 |archive-date=2021-02-18 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Bolloten |first=Burnett |author-link=Burnett Bolloten |title=The Spanish Civil War: Revolution and Counterrevolution |publisher=] |date=1984 |isbn=978-0-8078-1906-7}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Brinn |first=Gearóid |date=2020 |title=Smashing the State Gently: Radical Realism and Realist Anarchism |journal=] |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=206–227 |doi=10.1177/1474885119865975 |s2cid=202278143}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Brooks |first=Frank H. |title=The Individualist Anarchists: An Anthology of Liberty (1881–1908) |publisher=Transaction Publishers |date=1994 |isbn=978-1-5600-0132-4}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Carlson |first=Andrew R. |title=Anarchism in Germany; Vol. 1: The Early Movement |title-link=Anarchism in Germany (book) |publisher=Scarecrow Press |date=1972 |isbn=978-0-8108-0484-5 |location=Metuchen, New Jersey}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Carter |first=April |author-link=April Carter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3mlWPgAACAAJ |title=The Political Theory of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=1971 |isbn=978-0-4155-5593-7 |access-date=7 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214125/https://books.google.com/books?id=3mlWPgAACAAJ |archive-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Carter |first=April |date=1978 |title=Anarchism and violence |journal=Nomos |publisher=American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy |volume=19 |pages=320–340 |jstor=24219053}} | |||
* {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofterrori00grar |title=The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al-Quaeda |publisher=] |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-5202-4709-3 |editor-last=Chaliand |editor-first=Gerard |location=Berkeley; Los Angeles; London |oclc=634891265 |editor-last2=Blin |editor-first2=Arnaud |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2009 |title=Anarchism |encyclopedia=The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest |publisher=] |location=Oxford |last=Cohn |first=Jesse |editor-last=Ness |editor-first=Immanuel |editor-link=Immanuel Ness |pages=1–11 |doi=10.1002/9781405198073.wbierp0039 |isbn=978-1-4051-9807-3}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Crone |first=Patricia |author-link=Patricia Crone |date=2000 |title=Ninth-Century Muslim Anarchists |url=https://www.hs.ias.edu/files/Crone_Articles/Crone_Ninth_Century_Muslim_Anarchists.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=] |issue=167 |pages=3–28 |doi=10.1093/past/167.1.3 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200828210845/https://www.hs.ias.edu/files/Crone_Articles/Crone_Ninth_Century_Muslim_Anarchists.pdf |archive-date=28 August 2020 |access-date=3 January 2022}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dagger |first=Tristan J. |title=Playing Fair: Political Obligation and the Problems of Punishment |publisher=] |date=2018 |isbn=978-0-1993-8883-7 |location=Oxford}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dirlik |first=Arif |title=Anarchism in the Chinese Revolution |publisher=] |date=1991 |isbn=978-0-5200-7297-8 |location=Berkeley}} | |||
* {{Cite magazine |last=Dodds |first=Jonathan |date=October 2011 |title=Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism |url=http://socialistreview.org.uk/362/anarchism-marxist-criticism |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111328/http://socialistreview.org.uk/362/anarchism-marxist-criticism |archive-date=2021-02-18 |access-date=2020-07-31 |magazine=Socialist Review}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Dodson |first=Edward |title=The Discovery of First Principles |publisher=Authorhouse |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-5952-4912-1 |volume=2}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Dunn |first=Kevin |date=August 2012 |title=Anarcho-Punk and Resistance in Everyday Life |journal=Punk & Post-Punk |publisher=Intellect |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=201–218 |doi=10.1386/punk.1.2.201_1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Egoumenides |first=Magda |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4qEMBAAAQBAJ |title=Philosophical Anarchism and Political Obligation |publisher=] |date=2014 |isbn=978-1-4411-2445-6 |location=New York |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111334/https://books.google.com/books?id=4qEMBAAAQBAJ |archive-date=18 February 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Evren |first=Süreyyya |author-link=Süreyyya Evren |title=Post-Anarchism: A Reader |publisher=] |date=2011 |isbn=978-0-7453-3086-0 |editor-last=Rousselle |editor-first=Duane |editor-link=Duane Rousselle |pages=1–19 |chapter=How New Anarchism Changed the World (of Opposition) after Seattle and Gave Birth to Post-Anarchism |editor-last2=Evren |editor-first2=Süreyyya |editor-link2=Süreyyya Evren}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Evren |first1=Süreyyya |author-link=Süreyyya Evren |title=Blasting the Canon |last2=Kinna |first2=Ruth |author-link2=Ruth Kinna |last3=Rouselle |first3=Duane |author-link3=Duane Rousselle |publisher=] |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-6158-3862-5 |location=Santa Barbara, California}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Ferguson |first=Francis L. |date=August 1886 |title=The Mistakes of Anarchism |journal=The North American Review |publisher=] |volume=143 |issue=357 |pages=204–206 |issn=0029-2397 |jstor=25101094}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Fernández |first=Frank |title=Cuban Anarchism: The History of A Movement |publisher=Sharp Press |date=2009 |orig-date=2001}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Franks |first=Benjamin |author-link=Benjamin Franks (philosopher) |title=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies |date=August 2013 |publisher=] |editor-last=Freeden |editor-first=Michael |pages=385–404 |chapter=Anarchism |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0001 |editor-last2=Stears |editor-first2=Marc}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Franks |first=Benjamin |author-link=Benjamin Franks (philosopher) |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=549–570 |chapter=Anarchism and Ethics |author-mask=2 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Gabardi |first=Wayne |date=1986 |title=Anarchism. By David Miller. (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1984. pp. 216 ) |journal=] |volume=80 |issue=1 |pages=300–302 |doi=10.2307/1957102 |jstor=446800 |s2cid=151950709}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Gans |first=Chaim |title=Philosophical Anarchism and Political Disobedience |publisher=] |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-5214-1450-0 |edition=reprint |location=Cambridge}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Gay |first1=Kathlyn |title=Encyclopedia of Political Anarchy |last2=Gay |first2=Martin |publisher=] |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-8743-6982-3}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Gifford |first=James |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Literature and Anarchism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Goodway |first=David |author-link=David Goodway |title=] |publisher=Liverpool Press |date=2006 |isbn=978-1-8463-1025-6}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Graham |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Graham (historian) |title=Anarchism: a Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas: from Anarchy to Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-5516-4250-5 |location=Montréal}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Graham |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Graham (historian) |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=325–342 |chapter=Anarchism and the First International |author-mask=2 |access-date=17 May 2020 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726001923/https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-date=26 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Guérin |first=Daniel |author-link=Daniel Guérin |url=http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/daniel-guerin-anarchism-from-theory-to-practice |title=Anarchism: From Theory to Practice |publisher=Monthly Review Press |date=1970 |isbn=978-0-8534-5128-0 |access-date=16 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200714125723/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/daniel-guerin-anarchism-from-theory-to-practice |archive-date=14 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Harrison |first1=Kevin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5qrJCgAAQBAJ |title=Understanding Political Ideas and Movements |last2=Boyd |first2=Tony |publisher=] |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-7190-6151-6 |access-date=7 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308074910/https://books.google.com/books?id=5qrJCgAAQBAJ |archive-date=8 March 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Harmon |first=Christopher C. |date=2011 |title=How Terrorist Groups End: Studies of the Twentieth Century |journal=Connections |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=51–104 |jstor=26310649}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Heywood |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Heywood |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Sy8hDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146 |title=Political Ideologies: An Introduction |publisher=Macmillan International Higher Education |date=2017 |isbn=978-1-1376-0604-4 |edition=6th |access-date=13 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111410/https://books.google.com/books?id=Sy8hDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146 |archive-date=18 February 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Honderich |first=Ted |url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hond |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |publisher=] |date=1995 |isbn=978-0-1986-6132-0 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Honeywell |first=C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qzKOzQEACAAJ |title=Anarchism |publisher=Wiley |date=2021 |isbn=978-1-5095-2390-0 |series=Key Concepts in Political Theory |access-date=2022-08-13}} | |||
* {{Cite news |last=Imrie |first=Doug |date=1994 |title=The Illegalists |url=http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908072801/http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm |archive-date=2015-09-08 |access-date=2010-12-09 |work=Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed |language=en}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Jennings |first=Jeremy |author-link=Jeremy Jennings |title=Contemporary Political Ideologies |publisher=Pinter |date=1993 |isbn=978-0-8618-7096-7 |editor-last=Eatwell |editor-first=Roger |editor-link=Roger Eatwell |location=London |pages=127–146 |chapter=Anarchism |editor-last2=Wright |editor-first2=Anthony}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Jennings |first=Jeremy |author-link=Jeremy Jennings |title=Contemporary Political Ideologies |publisher=A & C Black |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-8264-5173-6 |editor-last=Eatwell |editor-first=Roger |editor-link=Roger Eatwell |edition=reprinted, 2nd |location=London |chapter=Anarchism |editor-last2=Wright |editor-first2=Anthony}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Jeppesen |first1=Sandra |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dNuoAwAAQBAJ |title=The Bloomsbury Companion to Anarchism |last2=Nazar |first2=Holly |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=978-1-4411-4270-2 |editor-last=Kinna |editor-first=Ruth |editor-link=Ruth Kinna |chapter=Genders and Sexualities in Anarchist Movements |access-date=26 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214158/https://books.google.com/books?id=dNuoAwAAQBAJ |archive-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Johnson |first=Charles |title=Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country? |publisher=] |date=2008 |isbn=978-0-7546-6066-8 |editor-last=Long |editor-first=Roderick T. |pages=155–188 |chapter=Liberty, Equality, Solidarity Toward a Dialectical Anarchism |editor-last2=Machan |editor-first2=Tibor R. |editor-link2=Tibor Machan}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Joll |first=James |author-link=James Joll |title=] |publisher=] |date=1964 |isbn=978-0-6740-3642-0}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Jun |first=Nathan |date=September 2009 |title=Anarchist Philosophy and Working Class Struggle: A Brief History and Commentary |url=https://philarchive.org/rec/JUNAPA-2 |journal=] |language=en |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=505–519 |doi=10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00251.x |issn=1089-7011}}<!-- to revisit, p. 508+ --> | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Jun |first=Nathan |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=27–47 |chapter=The State |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Kinna |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Kinna |title=The Bloomsbury Companion to Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=978-1-6289-2430-5}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Kinna |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Kinna |title=] |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-0-2413-9655-1}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Klosko |first=George |date=1999 |title=More than Obligation – William A. Edmundson: Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority |journal=The Review of Politics |volume=61 |issue=3 |pages=536–538 |doi=10.1017/S0034670500028989 |issn=1748-6858 |s2cid=144417469}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Klosko |first=George |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ToHmfIj8d_gC |title=Political Obligations |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-1995-5104-0 |access-date=7 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124033632/https://books.google.com/books?id=ToHmfIj8d_gC |archive-date=24 November 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |url=http://archive.org/details/patternsofanarch00krim |title=Patterns of Anarchy: A Collection of Writings on the Anarchist Tradition |date=1966 |publisher=Anchor Books |editor-last=Krimerman |editor-first=Leonard I. |location=Garden City, New York |language=en |editor-last2=Perry |editor-first2=Lewis}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Kristjánsson |first=Kristján |date=2000 |title=Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority by William A. Edmundson |journal=] |volume=109 |issue=436 |pages=896–900 |jstor=2660038}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Laursen |first=Ole Birk |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=149–168 |chapter=Anti-Imperialism |access-date=17 May 2020 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726001923/https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-date=26 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Levy |first=Carl |author-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |date=8 May 2011 |title=Social Histories of Anarchism |journal=Journal for the Study of Radicalism |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=1–44 |doi=10.1353/jsr.2010.0003 |issn=1930-1197 |s2cid=144317650}} | |||
* {{Cite book |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |date=2018 |publisher=] |isbn=978-3-3197-5619-6 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Long |first=Roderick T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z7MzEHaJgKAC |title=The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy |publisher=] |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-4158-7456-4 |editor-last=Gaud |editor-first=Gerald F. |access-date=2019-02-28 |editor-last2=D'Agostino |editor-first2=Fred |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809085833/https://books.google.com/books?id=z7MzEHaJgKAC |archive-date=2020-08-09 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Lucy |first=Nicholas |title=The SAGE Handbook of Global Sexualities |publisher=] |date=2020 |isbn=978-1-5297-2194-2 |pages=160–183 |chapter=Anarchism and Sexuality |access-date=21 February 2022 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-t7KDwAAQBAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214344/https://books.google.com/books?id=-t7KDwAAQBAJ |archive-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Lutz |first1=James M. |last2=Ulmschneider |first2=Georgia Wralstad |date=2019 |title=Civil Liberties, National Security and U.S. Courts in Times of Terrorism |journal=Perspectives on Terrorism |volume=13 |issue=6 |pages=43–57 |jstor=26853740}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Marshall |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Marshall (author, born 1946) |title=] |publisher=] |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-0021-7855-6 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Marshall |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Marshall (author, born 1946) |title=Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism |publisher=PM Press |date=1993 |isbn=978-1-6048-6064-1 |location=Oakland, California |author-mask=2}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Mattern |first=Mark |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=589–602 |chapter=Anarchism and Art |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Mayne |first=Alan James |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6MkTz6Rq7wUC&q=Communist+anarchism+believes+in+collective+ownership&pg=PA131 |title=From Politics Past to Politics Future: An Integrated Analysis of Current and Emergent Paradigms |publisher=] |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-2759-6151-0 |access-date=20 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418013303/https://books.google.com/books?id=6MkTz6Rq7wUC&q=Communist+anarchism+believes+in+collective+ownership&pg=PA131 |archive-date=18 April 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=McLaughlin |first=Paul |title=Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-7546-6196-2 |location=Aldershot}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Morland |first=Dave |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=etb2UFzCBv4C |title=Changing Anarchism: Anarchist Theory and Practice in a Global Age |publisher=] |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-7190-6694-8 |editor-last=Purkis |editor-first=Jonathan |pages=23–38 |chapter=Anti-capitalism and poststructuralist anarchism |access-date=24 January 2020 |editor-last2=Bowen |editor-first2=James |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111517/https://books.google.com/books?id=etb2UFzCBv4C |archive-date=18 February 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Meltzer |first=Albert |author-link=Albert Meltzer |url=https://archive.org/details/anarchism00albe |title=Anarchism: Arguments For and Against |publisher=] |date=2000 |isbn=978-1-8731-7657-3 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Morris |first=Brian |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GJXy5eCpPawC |title=Bakunin: The Philosophy of Freedom |publisher=] |date=1993 |isbn=978-1-8954-3166-7 |access-date=8 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225175003/https://books.google.com/books?id=GJXy5eCpPawC |archive-date=25 February 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Morris |first=Brian |title=Anthropology, Ecology, and Anarchism: A Brian Morris Reader |publisher=] |others=Marshall, Peter |date=2015 |isbn=978-1-6048-6093-1 |edition=illustrated |location=Oakland |author-mask=2}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Morris |first=Christopher W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uuyJ9Bw8w7QC |title=An Essay on the Modern State |publisher=] |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-5215-2407-0 |access-date=15 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115214335/https://books.google.com/books?id=uuyJ9Bw8w7QC |archive-date=15 January 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Moya |first=Jose C. |title=In Defiance of Boundaries: Anarchism in Latin American History |publisher=] |others=Kirwin R. Shaffer |date=2015 |isbn=978-0-8130-5138-3 |editor-last=Laforcade |editor-first=Geoffroy de |chapter=Transference, culture, and critique The Circulation of Anarchist Ideas and Practices |access-date=6 March 2019 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ikt6AQAACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809085903/https://books.google.com/books?id=ikt6AQAACAAJ |archive-date=9 August 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Nesser |first=Petter |date=2012 |title=Research Note: Single Actor Terrorism: Scope, Characteristics and Explanations |journal=Perspectives on Terrorism |volume=6 |issue=6 |pages=61–73 |jstor=26296894}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Nettlau |first=Max |author-link=Max Nettlau |title=] |publisher=Freedom Press |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-9003-8489-9}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Newman |first=Michael |title=Socialism: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-1928-0431-0 |location=Oxford}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Newman |first=Saul |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SiqBiViUsOkC&pg=PA43 |title=The Politics of Postanarchism |publisher=] |date=2010 |isbn=978-0-7486-3495-8 |access-date=29 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200103005542/https://books.google.com/books?id=SiqBiViUsOkC&pg=PA43 |archive-date=3 January 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Nicholas |first=Lucy |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Gender and Sexuality |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Norris |first=Jesse J. |date=2020 |title=Idiosyncratic Terrorism: Disaggregating an Undertheorized Concept |journal=Perspectives on Terrorism |volume=14 |issue=3 |issn=2334-3745 |jstor=26918296s}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Nomad |first=Max |title=Revolutionary Internationals 1864–1943 |publisher=] |date=1966 |isbn=978-0-8047-0293-5 |editor-last=Drachkovitch |editor-first=Milorad M. |page=88 |chapter=The Anarchist Tradition}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Osgood |first=Herbert L. |date=March 1889 |title=Scientific Anarchism |journal=] |publisher=The Academy of Political Science |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=1–36 |doi=10.2307/2139424 |jstor=2139424}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Otero |first=Carlos Peregrín |title=Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments |publisher=] |date=1994 |isbn=978-0-4150-1005-4 |volume=2–3 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Parry |first=Richard |url=https://archive.org/details/bonnotgang0000parr |title=The Bonnot Gang |publisher=Rebel Press |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-9460-6104-4 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Pernicone |first=Nunzio |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3ttgjwEACAAJ |title=Italian Anarchism, 1864–1892 |publisher=] |date=2009 |isbn=978-0-6916-3268-1 |access-date=8 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200819161516/https://books.google.com/books?id=3ttgjwEACAAJ |archive-date=19 August 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Pierson |first=Christopher |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7jvKDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA187 |title=Just Property: Enlightenment, Revolution, and History |publisher=] |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-1996-7329-2 |access-date=8 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210316125550/https://books.google.com/books?id=7jvKDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA187 |archive-date=16 March 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Ramnath |first=Maia |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Non-Western Anarchisms and Postcolonialism |access-date=17 May 2020 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726001923/https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-date=26 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Robé |first=Chris |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336710855 |title=Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerrillas, and Digital Ninjas |publisher=] |date=2017 |isbn=978-1-6296-3233-9 |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220221022844/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336710855_Breaking_the_Spell_A_History_of_Anarchist_Filmmakers_Videotape_Guerrillas_and_Digital_Ninjas |archive-date=21 February 2022 |url-status=live |via=ResearchGate}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Rogers |first=Tristan J. |title=The Authority of Virtue: Institutions and Character in the Good Society |publisher=] |date=2020 |isbn=978-1-0002-2264-7 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Rupert |first=Mark |url=https://archive.org/details/globalizationint00rupe |title=Globalization and International Political Economy |publisher=] |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-7425-2943-4 |location=Lanham}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Ryley |first=Peter |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=225–236 |chapter=Individualism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Shannon |first=Deric |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=91–106 |chapter=Anti-Capitalism and Libertarian Political Economy |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Skirda |first=Alexandre |title=Facing the Enemy: A History of Anarchist Organization From Proudhon to May 1968 |publisher=] |date=2002 |isbn=978-1-9025-9319-7}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Sylvan |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Sylvan |title=A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy |date=2007 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-4051-3653-2 |editor-last=Goodin |editor-first=Robert E. |editor-link=Robert E. Goodin |edition=2nd |series=Blackwell Companions to Philosophy |volume=5 |chapter=Anarchism |editor-last2=Pettit |editor-first2=Philip |editor-link2=Philip Pettit |editor-last3=Pogge |editor-first3=Thomas |editor-link3=Thomas Pogge}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Suissa |first=Judith |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Anarchist Education |access-date=17 May 2020 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726001923/https://books.google.com/books?id=SRyQswEACAAJ |archive-date=26 July 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Thomas |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Thomas (Marx scholar) |title=] |publisher=] & Kegan Paul |date=1985 |isbn=978-0-7102-0685-5 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite book |title=The Marx-Engels Reader |publisher=] |date=1978 |isbn=0-3930-5684-8 |editor-last=Tucker |editor-first=Robert C. |edition=2nd |location=New York |oclc=3415145}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Turcato |first=Davide |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Anarchist Communism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Van der Walt |first=Lucien |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |pages=249–264 |chapter=Syndicalism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Ward |first=Colin |author-link=Colin Ward |date=1973 |title=The Role of the State |journal=Education Without Schools |pages=39–48}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Ward |first=Colin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nkgSDAAAQBAJ |title=Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=] |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-1928-0477-8 |location=Oxford |author-mask=2 |access-date=12 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304153805/https://books.google.com/books?id=nkgSDAAAQBAJ |archive-date=4 March 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Walter |first=Nicholas |title=About Anarchism |publisher=Freedom Press |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-9003-8490-5 |location=London}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Wendt |first=Fabian |date=2020 |title=Against Philosophical Anarchism |journal=Law and Philosophy |volume=39 |issue=5 |pages=527–544 |doi=10.1007/s10982-020-09377-4 |s2cid=213742949}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Wilbur |first=Shawn |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Mutualism |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Dana M. |date=2015 |title=Black Panther Radical Factionalization and the Development of Black Anarchism |journal=] |location=Thousand Oaks |publisher=] |volume=46 |issue=7 |pages=678–703 |doi=10.1177/0021934715593053 |jstor=24572914 |s2cid=145663405}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Dana M. |author-mask=2 |date=2018 |title=Contemporary Anarchist and Anarchistic Movements |journal=Sociology Compass |publisher=] |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=e12582 |doi=10.1111/soc4.12582 |issn=1751-9020}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Williams |first=Dana M. |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2019 |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |editor-last=Levy |editor-first=Carl |editor-link=Carl Levy (political scientist) |chapter=Tactics: Conceptions of Social Change, Revolution, and Anarchist Organisation |author-mask=2 |editor-last2=Adams |editor-first2=Matthew S.}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Leonard |date=September 2007 |title=Anarchism Revived |journal=] |language=en |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=297–312 |doi=10.1080/07393140701510160 |issn=0739-3148 |s2cid=220354272}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Williams |first=Leonard |author-mask=2 |date=2010 |title=Hakim Bey and Ontological Anarchism |journal=Journal for the Study of Radicalism |location=East Lansing |publisher=] |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=109–137 |doi=10.1353/jsr.2010.0009 |jstor=41887660 |s2cid=143304524}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
==== Tertiary sources ==== | |||
Early first-wave feminist ] held proto-anarchist views, and William Godwin is often considered a feminist anarchist precursor. It became more strictly formulated through the work of a number of late ] ]. While most anarchists of the period did not take these ideas seriously, others, such as ] and ], held gender equality as a topic of significant importance.<ref>Marsh, Margaret S. ''Anarchist Women, 1870-1920''. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981.</ref> Anarcha-feminism garnered further attention through the work of early 20th-century authors and theorists including ] and ]. In the ], an anarcha-feminist group, "Free Women", organized to defend both anarchist and feminist ideas. | |||
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}} | |||
* {{Cite web |last=Coutinho |first=Steve |date=3 March 2016 |title=Zhuangzi |url=http://www.iep.utm.edu/zhuangzi |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303175106/http://www.iep.utm.edu/zhuangzi |archive-date=2016-03-03 |access-date=2019-03-05 |publisher=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |language=en}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=De George |first=Richard T. |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-1992-6479-7 |editor-last=Honderich |editor-first=Ted |editor-link=Ted Honderich}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2017 |title=Anarchism |encyclopedia=] |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, ] |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/anarchism |access-date=12 March 2019 |last=Fiala |first=Andrew |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200828210847/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/anarchism |archive-date=28 August 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2019 |title=Anarchism In The Arts |encyclopedia=] |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/anarchism/Anarchism-in-the-arts#info-article-contributors |access-date=31 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201128002441/https://www.britannica.com/topic/anarchism/Anarchism-in-the-arts#info-article-contributors |archive-date=28 November 2020 |last2=Dirlik |first2=Arif |last3=Rosemont |first3=Franklin |last4=Augustyn |first4=Adam |last5=Duignan |first5=Brian |last6=Lotha |first6=Gloria |last1=Miller |first1=Martin A. |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2008 |title=Anarcho-capitalism |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |publisher=SAGE; ] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC&pg=PT51 |access-date=2 September 2020 |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-first=Ronald |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |pages=13–14 |doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n8 |isbn=978-1-4129-6580-4 |oclc=191924853 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111721/https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC&pg=PT51 |archive-date=18 February 2021 |last1=Morris |first1=Andrew |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=McLean |first1=Iain |url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordconcisedic00iain |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics |last2=McMillan |first2=Alistair |publisher=] |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-1928-0276-7 |url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{Cite web |date=2019 |title=Definition of Anarchism |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchism |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210218111728/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchism |archive-date=2021-02-18 |access-date=2019-02-28 |website=Merriam-Webster |language=en |ref={{Sfnref|Merriam-Webster|2019}}}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Miller |first=David |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NIZfQTd3nSMC |title=The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought |publisher=] |date=1991 |isbn=978-0-6311-7944-3 |access-date=7 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200818145221/https://books.google.com/books?id=NIZfQTd3nSMC |archive-date=18 August 2020 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |date=2003 |title=Anarchism |encyclopedia=The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought |publisher=] |location=Malden, Massachusetts |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JJmdpqJwkwwC&pg=PA12 |access-date=15 August 2020 |last=Ostergaard |first=Geoffrey |author-link=Geoffrey Ostergaard |editor-last=Outhwaite |editor-first=William |edition=2nd |isbn=978-0-6312-2164-7 |oclc=49704935 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418004719/https://books.google.com/books?id=JJmdpqJwkwwC&pg=PA12 |archive-date=18 April 2021 |url-status=live}} | |||
* {{Cite book |title=Oxford English Dictionary |date=September 2005 |publisher=] |edition=3rd |chapter=Anarchy |ref={{Harvid|Oxford English Dictionary|2005}}}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
In the modern day anarchist movement, many anarchists, male or female, consider themselves feminists, and anarcha-feminist ideas are growing. The publishing of Quiet Rumors, an anarcha-feminist reader, has helped to spread various kinds of anti-authoritarian and anarchist feminist ideas to the broader movement. | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Avrich |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Avrich |title=] |date=1995 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-6910-3412-6 |location=Princeton |language=English }} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Barclay |first=Harold B. |author-link=Harold Barclay |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MrFHQgAACAAJ |title=People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy |publisher=Kahn & Averill |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-9393-0609-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Baker |first=Zoe |author-link=Zoe Baker |title=Means and Ends: The Revolutionary Practice of Anarchism in Europe and the United States |publisher=] |year=2023 |isbn=978-1-8493-5498-1 |oclc=1345217229 }} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Chomsky |first=Noam |author-link=Noam Chomsky |title=Chomsky on Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-9048-5926-0 |editor-last=Pateman |editor-first=Barry |location=Oakland}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Edmundson |first=William A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q_gClKUbJyYC |title=Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority |date=2007 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-5210-3751-8}} Criticism of philosophical anarchism. | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Esenwein |first=George |title=Anarchist Ideology and the Working-Class Movement in Spain, 1868–1898 |publisher=University of California Press |date=1989 |isbn=978-0-5200-6398-3 |location=Berkeley}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Harper |first=Clifford |author-link=Clifford Harper |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W63aAAAAMAAJ |title=Anarchy: A Graphic Guide |publisher=Camden Press |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-9484-9122-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Huemer |first=Michael |title=The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=978-1-1372-8164-7 |location=London |page=137}} A defence of philosophical anarchism, stating that "both kinds of 'anarchism' are philosophical and political claims." | |||
* {{Cite news |last=Kahn |first=Joseph |date=2000-08-05 |title=Anarchism, the Creed That Won't Stay Dead; The Spread of World Capitalism Resurrects a Long-Dormant Movement |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/05/arts/anarchism-creed-that-won-t-stay-dead-spread-world-capitalism-resurrects-long.html |page=B9 |issn=0362-4331}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Kinna |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Kinna |title=Anarchism: A Beginners Guide |publisher=Oneworld |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-8516-8370-3}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Le Guin |first=Ursula K. |author-link=Ursula K. Le Guin |title=The Dispossessed |title-link=The Dispossessed |publisher=] |date=2009}} Anarchistic popular fiction novel.<!-- Gifford 2019, p 580. --> | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Sartwell |first=Crispin |author-link=Crispin Sartwell |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bk-aaMVGKO0C |title=Against the State: An Introduction to Anarchist Political Theory |publisher=] |date=2008 |isbn=978-0-7914-7447-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Scott |first=James C. |author-link=James C. Scott |title=Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play |title-link=Two Cheers for Anarchism |publisher=] |date=2012 |isbn=978-0-6911-5529-6 |location=Princeton, New Jersey}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Suissa |first=Judith |date=1 July 2019b |title=Education and Non-domination: Reflections from the Radical Tradition |journal=Studies in Philosophy and Education |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=359–375 |doi=10.1007/s11217-019-09662-3 |s2cid=151210357 |doi-access=free}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Wolff |first=Robert Paul |author-link=Robert Paul Wolff |title=In Defense of Anarchism |title-link=In Defense of Anarchism |publisher=] |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-5202-1573-3}} An argument for philosophical anarchism. | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Woodcock |first=George |author-link=George Woodcock |date=January 1962 |title=Anarchism in Spain |url=https://www.historytoday.com/archive/anarchism-spain |journal=] |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=22–32 |access-date=14 October 2020}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Levy |first1=Carl |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2 |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism |last2=Adams |first2=Matthew S. |date=2019 |publisher=] |isbn=978-3-3197-5620-2 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2 |s2cid=149333615}} | |||
== External links == | |||
==Anarcho-capitalism== | |||
<!-- Attention! The external link portion of this article regularly grows far beyond manageable size. PLEASE only list an outside link if it applies to anarchism in general, is somewhat noteworthy, and has consensus on the talkpage. Links to sites which cover anarchist submovements will be routinely moved to subarticles to keep this article free of clutter. --> | |||
] (1926-1995)]] | |||
{{Prone to spam|date=November 2014}} | |||
{{main|Anarcho-capitalism}} | |||
* – an online research center on the history and theory of anarchism. | |||
Anarcho-capitalism is a predominantly United States-based theoretical tradition that desires an economic system of ] ] in which the market would be extended to include such current state functions defence of private property. Because anarcho-capitalism does not oppose ], rent, interest or ], most anarchists, as well as most well-known anarchist writers, do not acknowledge anarcho-capitalism as a form of anarchism. <ref>Peter Marshall, '''Demanding the Impossible'''; John Clark, '''The Anarchist Moment'''; Albert Meltzer, '''Anarchism: Arguments for and Against'''; Noam Chomsky, '''Understanding Power''', David Weick, ''Anarchist Justice''; Brian Morris, ''"Anthropology and Anarchism,"'' '''Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed''' (no. 45); Peter Sabatini, ''Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy''; Donald Rooum, '''What is Anarchism?'''; Bob Black, ''Libertarian as Conservative''</ref> Anarchist organisations, for example the ] (spain) and the ] (UK), all take an explicitly anti-capitalist stance. However, many scholars do regard it as a form of anarchism.<ref>1) Tormey, Simon. ''Anti-Capitalism'', One World, 2004. 2) Perlin, Terry M. ''Contemporary Anarchism'', Transaction Books, NJ 1979. 3) Raico, Ralph. ''Authentic German Liberalism of the 19th Century'', Ecole Polytechnique, Centre de Recherce en Epistemologie Appliquee, Unité associée au CNRS, 2004. 4) Levy, Carl. ''Anarchism'', MS Encarta Encyclopedia. 5) Heider, Ulrike. ''Anarchism:Left, Right, and Green'', City Lights, 1994. 6) ], Richard. ''Anarchism''. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, editors Goodin, Robert E. and Pettit, Philip. Blackwell Publishing, 1995, p.231. 7) ], Richard T. ''Anarchism and Authority'', Anarchism (Nomos, XIX), Ed. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, New York: New York University Press, 1978, p. 108. 9) DeLeon, David. ''The American As Anarchist: Reflections on Indigenous Radicalism'', John Hopkins University Press, 1978.</ref> | |||
{{Sister bar|wikt=yes|commons=yes|q=yes|s=yes|b=yes|d=yes|v=yes|n=yes}} | |||
]'s synthesis of ] and ] was germinal for the development of contemporary anarcho-capitalist theory. Rothbardian anarcho-capitalists believe the private property can result only from being the product of labor and that it may only be transferred by trade, gift, or abandonment (after a given period of time). Another prominent anarcho-capitalist is ]. Some ], such as ] and ], have influenced anarcho-capitalism. | |||
{{Anarchism}} | |||
Some anarcho-capitalists, along with some libertarian historians such as David Hart and ], considered similar philosophies existing prior to Rothbard to be anarcho-capitalist, such as those of ] and ] <ref>Hart, David Journal of Libertarian Studies, in three parts, (Summer 1981), V, no. 3: 263-290; (Fall 1981), V. no. 4: 399-434; (Winter 1982), VI, no. 1: 83-104</ref><ref>], Ralph Ecole Polytechnique, Centre de Recherce en Epistemologie Appliquee, Unité associée au CNRS (2004).</ref> | |||
{{Navboxes | |||
|list= | |||
{{Libertarian socialism}} | |||
Critics note that neither Molinari nor Herbert considered themselves to be anarchist, and argue that their theories were unanarchist.<ref>McKay, Iain; Elkin, Gary; Neal, Dave ''et al'' ''] Version 11.5'' Accessed April 24, 2006.</ref> Interestingly, Molinari described his system as one of "competing governments" as well as "a free state." . Anarcho-capitalist David Hart also suggests Molinari retreated from this view in his later writing, but many anarcho-capitalists nevertheless see Molinari's ideas as the first exposition of anarcho-capitalist theory. Significantly, Hart notes that Molinari was aware of Proudhon and as a direct result rejected the term "anarchist" as this "was intimately linked with socialist and statist economic views." Proudhon, in return, argued that the "school of Say" was "the chief focus of counter-revolution next to the Jesuits" and that, currently, free market capitalism was "the foundation of government." <ref>'''The General Idea of the Revolution''', p. 225 and p. 226</ref> | |||
{{Libertarianism}} | |||
{{Philosophy topics}} | |||
For more on debate about the place of anarcho-capitalism within anarchism see '']''. | |||
{{Political culture}} | |||
{{Political ideologies}} | |||
==Anarchism and the environment== | |||
{{Political philosophy}} | |||
{{seealso|Green anarchism|Eco-anarchism|Social ecology|Anarcho-primitivism|Ecofeminism|Green syndicalism}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
Since the late 1970s anarchists in ] and European countries have been agitating for the natural environment. ] or ] believe in ]. This is a worldview that embraces ] and ]. Eco-anarchists often use ] against what they see as earth-destroying institutions. Of particular importance is the ] movement, that takes action such as ]. Another important component is ], which sees the domination of nature as a metaphor for the domination of women. ]'s work on ], ]'s work with ] magazine, ]'s work in the UK publication ], and ]'s writings on ] have all contributed to the broad variety and scope of green anarchist/eco-anarchist thought and action. Green anarchism also involves a critique of industrial capitalism, and, for some green anarchists, civilization itself.{{fact}} | |||
Primitivism is a predominantly Western philosophy that advocates a return to a pre-industrial and usually pre-agricultural society. It develops a critique of industrial civilization. In this critique ] and ] have ] people from the natural world. This philosophy develops themes present in the political action of the ] and the writings of ]. Primitivism developed in the context of the ], Earth First! and the ] movements. ] wrote that ] — not just the state — would need to fall for anarchy to be achieved.{{fact}} Anarcho-primitivists point to the anti-authoritarian nature of many 'primitive' or hunter-gatherer societies throughout the world's history, as examples of anarchist societies. | |||
==Other branches and offshoots== | |||
Anarchism generates many eclectic and syncretic philosophies and movements. Since the Western social ferment in the 1960's and 1970's a number of new movements and schools have appeared. Most of these stances are limited to even smaller numbers than the schools and movements listed above. | |||
]]] | |||
*'''Post-left anarchy''' - Post-left anarchy seeks to distance itself from the traditional "left" - communists, socialists, social democrats, etc. - and to escape the confines of ] in general. Post-leftists argue that anarchism has been weakened by its long attachment to contrary "leftist" movements and single issue causes (], ], etc.). It calls for a synthesis of anarchist thought and a specifically anti-authoritarian revolutionary movement outside of the leftist milieu. Important groups and individuals associated with Post-left anarchy include: ], the magazine ] and its editor ], ], ] and others. For more information, see ]'s ''Anarchy After Leftism''<ref></ref> section, and the on ''See also:'' ] | |||
*'''Post-Anarchism''' - The term ] was originated by ], first receiving popular attention in his book '']'' to refer to a theoretical move towards a synthesis of classical anarchist theory and ] thought. Subsequent to Newman's use of the term, however, it has taken on a life of its own and a wide range of ideas including ], ], ], ] and Zapatismo. By its very nature post-anarchism rejects the idea that it should be a coherent set of doctrines and beliefs. As such it is difficult, if not impossible, to state with any degree of certainty who should or should not be grouped under the rubric. Nonetheless key thinkers associated with post-anarchism include ], ], ] and ]. ''External reference: Postanarchism Clearinghouse''<ref></ref> ''See also'' ] | |||
*'''Insurrectionary anarchism''' - Insurrectionary anarchism is a form of revolutionary anarchism critical of formal anarchist labor unions and federations. Insurrectionary anarchists advocate informal organization, including small affinity groups, carrying out acts of resistance in various struggles, and mass organizations called base structures, which can include exploited individuals who are not anarchists. Proponents include ] and ], author of works including "Armed Joy" and "The Anarchist Tension". This tendency is represented in the US in magazines such as ] and ]. ''See also:'' ] | |||
*'''Small 'a' anarchism''' - Small 'a' anarchism is a term used in two different, but not unconnected contexts. Dave Neal posited the term in opposition to big 'A' Anarchism in the article . While big 'A' Anarchism referred to ideological Anarchists, small 'a' anarchism was applied to their methodological counterparts; those who viewed anarchism as "a way of acting, or a historical tendency against illegitimate authority." As an anti-ideological position, small 'a' anarchism shares some similarities with ]. ] and ] offer an alternative use of the term, applying it to groups and movements organising according to or acting in a manner consistent with anarchist principles of decentralisation, voluntary association, mutual aid, the network model, and crucially, "the rejection of any idea that the end justifies the means, let alone that the business of a revolutionary is to seize state power and then begin imposing one's vision at the point of a gun." | |||
==Other issues== | |||
*'''Conceptions of an anarchist society''' - Many political philosophers justify support of the state as a means of regulating violence, so that the destruction caused by human conflict is minimized and fair relationships are established. Anarchists argue that pursuit of these ends does not justify the establishment of a state; many argue that the state is incompatible with those goals and the ''cause'' of chaos, violence, and war. Anarchists argue that the state helps to create a ], and uses violence to advance elite interests. Much effort has been dedicated to explaining how anarchist societies would handle criminality.''See also:'' ] | |||
*'''Anti-Racism, Anti-Fascism, and Anti-Oppression''' - ] opposes the existence of a state, capitalism, and subjugation and domination of people of color, and favors a non-hierarchical organization of society. Theorists include ], ], and ]. Some of these theorists have had past experiences with the ], and came to anarchism after they became critical of the Black Panther Party's brand of Marxist-Leninism. ], (or APOC), was created as a forum for non-Caucasian anarchists to express their thoughts about racial issues within the anarchist movement, particularly within the United States. ] is not an anarchist group, but many anarchists are involved. It focuses on publicly confronting racist agitators, such as the ], ] groups, etc. The ] movement of Chiapas, Mexico is a cultural sovereignty group with some anarchist proclivities. ] is also seen as part of the push by anarchists to create a movement that fights against ], and ]. | |||
*'''Neocolonialism and Globalization''' - Nearly all anarchists oppose ] as an attempt to use economic coercion on a global scale, carried out through state institutions such as the ], ], ], and the ]. ] is an ambiguous term that has different meanings to different anarchist factions. Most anarchists use the term to mean neocolonialism and/or ] (which they may see as related). Many are active in the ] movement. Others, particularly anarcho-capitalists, use "globalization" to mean the worldwide expansion of the division of labor and trade, which they see as beneficial so long as governments do not intervene. | |||
*'''Parallel structures''' - Many anarchists set up alternatives to state-supported institutions and "outposts," such as ], ], ] collectives, ] projects, ]s, educational systems such as free schools, neighborhood mediation/arbitration groups, and so on. The idea is to create the structures for a new anti-authoritarian society in the shell of the old authoritarian one, (also known as ]). | |||
*'''Technology''' - Recent technological developments have made the anarchist cause both easier to advance and more conceivable to people. Many people use the Internet to form on-line communities. ] is undermined and a gift-culture supported by ], collaborative software development, and ] (] ]). These cyber-communities include the ], ], ], and ]. <!-- ***NEEDS SOURCE THAT E-GOLD IS USED BY ANARCHISTS*** ] has made anonymous digital currencies such as ] and ] an alternative to statist ]. --> Some anarchists see ] as the best weapon to defeat authoritarianism. Some even think the information age makes eventual anarchy inevitable.<ref></ref> ''See also'': ] and ]. | |||
*'''Pacifism''' - Some anarchists consider ], (opposition to ]), to be inherent in their philosophy. ] take it further and follow ]'s belief in ]. Although many anarchist projects have been based around the ] of non-violence, (], ]), many anarchists reject pacifism, and support a ], in their organizing efforts. Most anarchists do not see the destruction of property to be violent. Anarchists see war as an activity in which the state seeks to gain and consolidate power, both domestically and in foreign lands, and subscribe to ]'s view that "war is the health of the state"<ref></ref>. A lot of anarchist activity has been ] based, largely in protests, demonstrations, and ]. | |||
*'''Parliamentarianism''' - In general terms, anarchism opposes voting in elections. This is for three reasons. Firstly, it is ineffective, at best resulting in minor reforms. Secondly, taking part in elections has always resulted in radicals becoming part of the system they oppose rather than ending it.<ref></ref>. Thirdly, because voting amounts to condoning the state.<ref>"Voting Anarchists: An Oxymoron or What?" by ], and writings by ].</ref> The anarchist ] ] around the 2004 Presidential election in the US, endorsed a campaign called, "]", which promoted the importance of ], as opposed to electoral change, regarding social change in society. | |||
*'''Sectarianism''' - Most anarchist schools of thought are, to some degree, ]. There is often a difference of opinion ''within'' each school about how to react to, or interact with, other schools. Some, such as ], believe that it is possible for a variety of modes of social life to coexist and compete. Some anarchists view opposing schools as a social impossibility and resist interaction; others see opportunities for coalition-building, or at least temporary alliances for specific purposes. ''See ].'' Many anarchists however, draw from a wide range of political perspectives, as there has been a growth in recent decades on the anti-authoritarian left of groups that are against the state, capitalism, and hierarchal organization, and are often highly critical of anarchism. This could include the ], ], ], the ], ], various ], and many more. | |||
==Criticisms of anarchism== | |||
:''Main article:'' ] | |||
'''Violence.''' Since anarchism has often been associated with violence and destruction, some people have seen it as being too violent. On the other hand, ] criticised anarchists for not being violent enough: | |||
:''"A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois?"<ref></ref> | |||
'''Utopianism.''' Anarchism is often criticised as unfeasible, or plain ], even by many who agree that it's a nice idea in principle. For example, Carl Landauer in his book ''European Socialism'' criticizes anarchism as being unrealistically utopian, and holds that government is a "lesser evil" than a society without "repressive force." He holds that the belief that "ill intentions will cease if repressive force disappears" is an "absurdity."<ref>], Carl. ''European Socialism: A History of Ideas and Movements'' (1959)</ref> However, it must be noted that not all anarchists have such a utopian view of anarchism. For example, some, such as Benjamin Tucker, advocate privately-funded institutions that defend individual liberty and property. Other anarchists view anarchy as a utopia that in fact cannot be reached but should be continuously worked toward. ] once said, "I am an anarchist not because I believe anarchism is the final goal, but because there is no such thing as a final goal" (The London Years, 1956). However, other anarchists, such as Sir ], proudly accept the characterization "utopian." | |||
'''Hypocrisy.''' Some critics point to the ]<ref>], ''""''</ref> and ] views of some prominent anarchists, notably ] and ], as examples of ] inherent within anarchism. While many anarchists, however, dismiss that the personal prejudices of 19th century theorists influence the beliefs of present-day anarchists, others criticise modern anarchism for continuing to be ] and reference the impact of anarchist thinkers like Proudhon on ] through groups like ].<ref></ref> Anarcho-capitalist ] argues that the treatment of fascists and suspected fascist sympathizers by Spanish Anarchists in the Spanish Civil War was a form of illegitimate coercion, making the professed anarchists "ultimately just a third faction of totalitarians," alongside the communists and fascists. He also criticizes the willingness of the CNT to join the (statist) Republican government during the civil war, and references ]'s book on the Franco regime which claims that the CNT entered negotiations with the fascist government six years after the war.<ref>], Bryan. ''""''</ref> | |||
'''] character.''' ] have characterised anarchism as an expression of the class interests of the ] or perhaps the ]. See e.g. Plekhanov<ref>] ''""''</ref> for a Marxist critique of 1895. Anarchists have also been characterised as spoilt ] ], most recently in relation to ] protesters. | |||
'''Tacit authoritarianism.''' In recent decades anarchism has been criticised by 'situationists' and others of preserving 'tacitly statist', authoritarian or bureaucratic tendencies behind a dogmatic facade.<ref> Paragraph 91</ref> Post-anarchists share similar concerns regarding the methods, rather than intentions, of some anarchists. For instance, they reject ], seeing means of forceful anarchism as effectively authoritarian and only transforming power rather than eliminating it. | |||
'''Nationalism.''' In recent years, an obscure movement known as ] emerged, which mixes anarchist, ] and ] beliefs. They advocate racial separation, as well as political, social, and economic decentralization. The vast majority of anarchists consider national anarchism to be inherently ] and consider it inconsistent with anarchism. | |||
Some critics argue that the reason why anarchism has failed to be a major political movement is that it always invariably leads to a type of feudalism, as different "free" groups begin to bunch together. As the saying goes, "strength in numbers". {{citeneeded}} | |||
==Cultural phenomena== | |||
] (1928–)]] | |||
The kind of anarchism that is most easily encountered in popular culture is represented by celebrities who publicly identify themselves as anarchists. Although some anarchists reject any focus on such famous living individuals as inherently élitist, the following figures are examples of prominent publicly self-avowed anarchists: | |||
*the ] professor of ] ] | |||
*the ] author ] | |||
*the social historian ] | |||
*author ] | |||
*author ] | |||
*]ist ] | |||
*entertainer and author ] | |||
*] fighter and champion ] | |||
In ], the ] was created in downtown ]. The housing and employment crisis in most of ] led to the formation of ] and squatter movements like the one still thriving in ], in ]. Although not always explicitly anarchist, militant ] in places like Germany, and the uprisings of ], ], and ] groups in France and Italy also helped to give popularity to anti-authoritarian, non-capitalist ideas. | |||
In various musical styles, anarchism rose in popularity. Most famous for the linking of anarchist ideas and music has been punk rock, although in the modern age, hip hop, and folk music are also becoming important mediums for the spreading of the anarchist message. In the ] this was associated with the ] movement; the band ] is celebrated for its anarchist and ] ideas. | |||
''For further details, see ] and ].'' | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Political ideology entry points}} | |||
<!-- (Please take care in adding to this list that it not grow excessively large, consider adding to the list of anarchist concepts page) --> | |||
There are many concepts relevant to the topic of anarchism, this is a brief summary. There is also a more extensive ]. | |||
*], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
===Historical events=== | |||
*] (1871) | |||
*] (1886) | |||
*] (1917 — 1921) | |||
*] (1921) | |||
*] (1936) (see ] and ]) | |||
*], France (1968) | |||
*] (1999) | |||
*] (2001) | |||
===Books=== | |||
{{main|List of anarchist books}} | |||
The following is a sample of books that have been referenced in this page. A more complete list can be found at the ]. | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
*], '']'' | |||
===Anarchism by region/culture=== | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | |||
<!--This article uses the Cite.php citation mechanism. If you would like more information on how to add references to this article, please see http://meta.wikimedia.org/Cite/Cite.php --> | |||
<div style="font-size: 90%"> | |||
<references /> | |||
</div> | |||
'''These notes have no corresponding reference in the article. They might be re-used.''' | |||
# {{note|praxeology}} | |||
# {{note|platform}} | |||
# {{note|appleton}} | |||
# {{note|Yarros-NotUtopian}} ] ''Liberty'' VII, ] ]. | |||
# {{note|totse}} | |||
==External links== | |||
The overwhelming diversity and number of links relating to anarchism is extensively covered on the ]. | |||
{{wikiquote|Definitions of anarchism}} | |||
* - ] - includes a fifty page bibliography. | |||
* Blogs by Anarchists. | |||
* extensively archives information relating to famous anarchists. This includes many of their books and other publications. | |||
*1,500+ anarchists listed, with short bios, links & dedicated pages | |||
* (]) | |||
<!-- Attention! The external link portion of this article regularly grows far beyond manageable size. Please only list an outside link if it applies to anarchism in general and is somewhat noteworthy. Links to lesser known sites or submovements will be routinely moved to the list page to keep this article free of clutter --> | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 18:32, 28 December 2024
Political philosophy and movement For other uses, see Anarchy, Anarchism (disambiguation), and Anarchist (disambiguation).
Anarchism is a political philosophy and movement that is against all forms of authority and seeks to abolish the institutions it claims maintain unnecessary coercion and hierarchy, typically including the state and capitalism. Anarchism advocates for the replacement of the state with stateless societies and voluntary free associations. A historically left-wing movement, anarchism is usually described as the libertarian wing of the socialist movement (libertarian socialism).
Although traces of anarchist ideas are found all throughout history, modern anarchism emerged from the Enlightenment. During the latter half of the 19th and the first decades of the 20th century, the anarchist movement flourished in most parts of the world and had a significant role in workers' struggles for emancipation. Various anarchist schools of thought formed during this period. Anarchists have taken part in several revolutions, most notably in the Paris Commune, the Russian Civil War and the Spanish Civil War, whose end marked the end of the classical era of anarchism. In the last decades of the 20th and into the 21st century, the anarchist movement has been resurgent once more, growing in popularity and influence within anti-capitalist, anti-war and anti-globalisation movements.
Anarchists employ diverse approaches, which may be generally divided into revolutionary and evolutionary strategies; there is significant overlap between the two. Evolutionary methods try to simulate what an anarchist society might be like, but revolutionary tactics, which have historically taken a violent turn, aim to overthrow authority and the state. Many facets of human civilization have been influenced by anarchist theory, critique, and praxis.
Etymology, terminology, and definition
Main article: Definition of anarchism and libertarianism See also: Glossary of anarchismThe etymological origin of anarchism is from the Ancient Greek anarkhia (ἀναρχία), meaning "without a ruler", composed of the prefix an- ("without") and the word arkhos ("leader" or "ruler"). The suffix -ism denotes the ideological current that favours anarchy. Anarchism appears in English from 1642 as anarchisme and anarchy from 1539; early English usages emphasised a sense of disorder. Various factions within the French Revolution labelled their opponents as anarchists, although few such accused shared many views with later anarchists. Many revolutionaries of the 19th century such as William Godwin (1756–1836) and Wilhelm Weitling (1808–1871) would contribute to the anarchist doctrines of the next generation but did not use anarchist or anarchism in describing themselves or their beliefs.
The first political philosopher to call himself an anarchist (French: anarchiste) was Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809–1865), marking the formal birth of anarchism in the mid-19th century. Since the 1890s and beginning in France, libertarianism has often been used as a synonym for anarchism; its use as a synonym is still common outside the United States. Some usages of libertarianism refer to individualistic free-market philosophy only, and free-market anarchism in particular is termed libertarian anarchism.
While the term libertarian has been largely synonymous with anarchism, its meaning has more recently been diluted by wider adoption from ideologically disparate groups, including both the New Left and libertarian Marxists, who do not associate themselves with authoritarian socialists or a vanguard party, and extreme cultural liberals, who are primarily concerned with civil liberties. Additionally, some anarchists use libertarian socialist to avoid anarchism's negative connotations and emphasise its connections with socialism. Anarchism is broadly used to describe the anti-authoritarian wing of the socialist movement. Anarchism is contrasted to socialist forms which are state-oriented or from above. Scholars of anarchism generally highlight anarchism's socialist credentials and criticise attempts at creating dichotomies between the two. Some scholars describe anarchism as having many influences from liberalism, and being both liberal and socialist but more so. Many scholars reject anarcho-capitalism as a misunderstanding of anarchist principles.
While opposition to the state is central to anarchist thought, defining anarchism is not an easy task for scholars, as there is a lot of discussion among scholars and anarchists on the matter, and various currents perceive anarchism slightly differently. Major definitional elements include the will for a non-coercive society, the rejection of the state apparatus, the belief that human nature allows humans to exist in or progress toward such a non-coercive society, and a suggestion on how to act to pursue the ideal of anarchy.
History
Main article: History of anarchismPre-modern era
The most notable precursors to anarchism in the ancient world were in China and Greece. In China, philosophical anarchism (the discussion on the legitimacy of the state) was delineated by Taoist philosophers Zhuang Zhou and Laozi. Alongside Stoicism, Taoism has been said to have had "significant anticipations" of anarchism.
Anarchic attitudes were also articulated by tragedians and philosophers in Greece. Aeschylus and Sophocles used the myth of Antigone to illustrate the conflict between laws imposed by the state and personal autonomy. Socrates questioned Athenian authorities constantly and insisted on the right of individual freedom of conscience. Cynics dismissed human law (nomos) and associated authorities while trying to live according to nature (physis). Stoics were supportive of a society based on unofficial and friendly relations among its citizens without the presence of a state.
In medieval Europe, there was no anarchistic activity except some ascetic religious movements. These, and other Muslim movements, later gave birth to religious anarchism. In the Sasanian Empire, Mazdak called for an egalitarian society and the abolition of monarchy, only to be soon executed by Emperor Kavad I. In Basra, religious sects preached against the state. In Europe, various religious sects developed anti-state and libertarian tendencies.
Renewed interest in antiquity during the Renaissance and in private judgment during the Reformation restored elements of anti-authoritarian secularism in Europe, particularly in France. Enlightenment challenges to intellectual authority (secular and religious) and the revolutions of the 1790s and 1848 all spurred the ideological development of what became the era of classical anarchism.
Modern era
During the French Revolution, partisan groups such as the Enragés and the sans-culottes saw a turning point in the fermentation of anti-state and federalist sentiments. The first anarchist currents developed throughout the 18th century as William Godwin espoused philosophical anarchism in England, morally delegitimising the state, Max Stirner's thinking paved the way to individualism and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's theory of mutualism found fertile soil in France. By the late 1870s, various anarchist schools of thought had become well-defined and a wave of then-unprecedented globalisation occurred from 1880 to 1914. This era of classical anarchism lasted until the end of the Spanish Civil War and is considered the golden age of anarchism.
Drawing from mutualism, Mikhail Bakunin founded collectivist anarchism and entered the International Workingmen's Association, a class worker union later known as the First International that formed in 1864 to unite diverse revolutionary currents. The International became a significant political force, with Karl Marx being a leading figure and a member of its General Council. Bakunin's faction (the Jura Federation) and Proudhon's followers (the mutualists) opposed state socialism, advocating political abstentionism and small property holdings. After bitter disputes, the Bakuninists were expelled from the International by the Marxists at the 1872 Hague Congress. Anarchists were treated similarly in the Second International, being ultimately expelled in 1896. Bakunin predicted that if revolutionaries gained power by Marx's terms, they would end up the new tyrants of workers. In response to their expulsion from the First International, anarchists formed the St. Imier International. Under the influence of Peter Kropotkin, a Russian philosopher and scientist, anarcho-communism overlapped with collectivism. Anarcho-communists, who drew inspiration from the 1871 Paris Commune, advocated for free federation and for the distribution of goods according to one's needs.
By the turn of the 20th century, anarchism had spread all over the world. It was a notable feature of the international syndicalist movement. In China, small groups of students imported the humanistic pro-science version of anarcho-communism. Tokyo was a hotspot for rebellious youth from East Asian countries, who moved to the Japanese capital to study. In Latin America, Argentina was a stronghold for anarcho-syndicalism, where it became the most prominent left-wing ideology. During this time, a minority of anarchists adopted tactics of revolutionary political violence, known as propaganda of the deed. The dismemberment of the French socialist movement into many groups and the execution and exile of many Communards to penal colonies following the suppression of the Paris Commune favoured individualist political expression and acts. Even though many anarchists distanced themselves from these terrorist acts, infamy came upon the movement and attempts were made to prevent anarchists immigrating to the US, including the Immigration Act of 1903, also called the Anarchist Exclusion Act. Illegalism was another strategy which some anarchists adopted during this period.
Despite concerns, anarchists enthusiastically participated in the Russian Revolution in opposition to the White movement, especially in the Makhnovshchina; however, they met harsh suppression after the Bolshevik government had stabilised, including during the Kronstadt rebellion. Several anarchists from Petrograd and Moscow fled to Ukraine, before the Bolsheviks crushed the anarchist movement there too. With the anarchists being repressed in Russia, two new antithetical currents emerged, namely platformism and synthesis anarchism. The former sought to create a coherent group that would push for revolution while the latter were against anything that would resemble a political party. Seeing the victories of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution and the resulting Russian Civil War, many workers and activists turned to communist parties, which grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the United States, members of major syndicalist movements such as the General Confederation of Labour and the Industrial Workers of the World left their organisations and joined the Communist International.
In the Spanish Civil War of 1936–39, anarchists and syndicalists (CNT and FAI) once again allied themselves with various currents of leftists. A long tradition of Spanish anarchism led to anarchists playing a pivotal role in the war, and particularly in the Spanish Revolution of 1936. In response to the army rebellion, an anarchist-inspired movement of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of Barcelona and of large areas of rural Spain, where they collectivised the land. The Soviet Union provided some limited assistance at the beginning of the war, but the result was a bitter fight between communists and other leftists in a series of events known as the May Days, as Joseph Stalin asserted Soviet control of the Republican government, ending in another defeat of anarchists at the hands of the communists.
Post-WWII
By the end of World War II, the anarchist movement had been severely weakened. The 1960s witnessed a revival of anarchism, likely caused by a perceived failure of Marxism–Leninism and tensions built by the Cold War. During this time, anarchism found a presence in other movements critical towards both capitalism and the state such as the anti-nuclear, environmental, and peace movements, the counterculture of the 1960s, and the New Left. It also saw a transition from its previous revolutionary nature to provocative anti-capitalist reformism. Anarchism became associated with punk subculture as exemplified by bands such as Crass and the Sex Pistols. The established feminist tendencies of anarcha-feminism returned with vigour during the second wave of feminism. Black anarchism began to take form at this time and influenced anarchism's move from a Eurocentric demographic. This coincided with its failure to gain traction in Northern Europe and its unprecedented height in Latin America.
Around the turn of the 21st century, anarchism grew in popularity and influence within anti-capitalist, anti-war and anti-globalisation movements. Anarchists became known for their involvement in protests against the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Group of Eight and the World Economic Forum. During the protests, ad hoc leaderless anonymous cadres known as black blocs engaged in rioting, property destruction and violent confrontations with the police. Other organisational tactics pioneered at this time include affinity groups, security culture and the use of decentralised technologies such as the Internet. A significant event of this period was the confrontations at the 1999 Seattle WTO conference. Anarchist ideas have been influential in the development of the Zapatistas in Mexico and the Democratic Federation of Northern Syria, more commonly known as Rojava, a de facto autonomous region in northern Syria.
While having revolutionary aspirations, many contemporary forms of anarchism are not confrontational. Instead, they are trying to build an alternative way of social organization (following the theories of dual power), based on mutual interdependence and voluntary cooperation. Scholar Carissa Honeywell takes the example of Food Not Bombs group of collectives, to highlight some features of how contemporary anarchist groups work: direct action, working together and in solidarity with those left behind. While doing so, Food Not Bombs provides consciousness raising about the rising rates of world hunger and suggest policies to tackle hunger, ranging from de-funding the arms industry to addressing Monsanto seed-saving policies and patents, helping farmers, and resisting the commodification of food and housing. Honeywell also emphasizes that contemporary anarchists are interested in the flourishing not only of humans, but non-humans and the environment as well. Honeywell argues that their analysis of capitalism and governments results in anarchists rejecting representative democracy and the state as a whole.
Schools of thought
Anarchist schools of thought have been generally grouped into two main historical traditions, social anarchism and individualist anarchism, owing to their different origins, values and evolution. The individualist current emphasises negative liberty in opposing restraints upon the free individual, while the social current emphasises positive liberty in aiming to achieve the free potential of society through equality and social ownership. In a chronological sense, anarchism can be segmented by the classical currents of the late 19th century and the post-classical currents (anarcha-feminism, green anarchism, and post-anarchism) developed thereafter.
Beyond the specific factions of anarchist movements which constitute political anarchism lies philosophical anarchism which holds that the state lacks moral legitimacy, without necessarily accepting the imperative of revolution to eliminate it. A component especially of individualist anarchism, philosophical anarchism may tolerate the existence of a minimal state but claims that citizens have no moral obligation to obey government when it conflicts with individual autonomy. Anarchism pays significant attention to moral arguments since ethics have a central role in anarchist philosophy. Anarchism's emphasis on anti-capitalism, egalitarianism, and for the extension of community and individuality sets it apart from anarcho-capitalism and other types of economic libertarianism.
Anarchism is usually placed on the far-left of the political spectrum. Much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian, anti-statist, libertarian, and radical interpretations of left-wing and socialist politics such as collectivism, communism, individualism, mutualism, and syndicalism, among other libertarian socialist economic theories. As anarchism does not offer a fixed body of doctrine from a single particular worldview, many anarchist types and traditions exist and varieties of anarchy diverge widely. One reaction against sectarianism within the anarchist milieu was anarchism without adjectives, a call for toleration and unity among anarchists first adopted by Fernando Tarrida del Mármol in 1889 in response to the bitter debates of anarchist theory at the time. Belief in political nihilism has been espoused by anarchists. Despite separation, the various anarchist schools of thought are not seen as distinct entities but rather as tendencies that intermingle and are connected through a set of shared principles such as autonomy, mutual aid, anti-authoritarianism and decentralisation.
Classical
Inceptive currents among classical anarchist currents were mutualism and individualism. They were followed by the major currents of social anarchism (collectivist, communist and syndicalist). They differ on organisational and economic aspects of their ideal society.
Mutualism is an 18th-century economic theory that was developed into anarchist theory by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Its aims include "abolishing the state", reciprocity, free association, voluntary contract, federation and monetary reform of both credit and currency that would be regulated by a bank of the people. Mutualism has been retrospectively characterised as ideologically situated between individualist and collectivist forms of anarchism. In What Is Property? (1840), Proudhon first characterised his goal as a "third form of society, the synthesis of communism and property." Collectivist anarchism is a revolutionary socialist form of anarchism commonly associated with Mikhail Bakunin. Collectivist anarchists advocate collective ownership of the means of production which is theorised to be achieved through violent revolution and that workers be paid according to time worked, rather than goods being distributed according to need as in communism. Collectivist anarchism arose alongside Marxism but rejected the dictatorship of the proletariat despite the stated Marxist goal of a collectivist stateless society.
Anarcho-communism is a theory of anarchism that advocates a communist society with common ownership of the means of production, held by a federal network of voluntary associations, with production and consumption based on the guiding principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Anarcho-communism developed from radical socialist currents after the French Revolution but was first formulated as such in the Italian section of the First International. It was later expanded upon in the theoretical work of Peter Kropotkin, whose specific style would go onto become the dominating view of anarchists by the late 19th century. Anarcho-syndicalism is a branch of anarchism that views labour syndicates as a potential force for revolutionary social change, replacing capitalism and the state with a new society democratically self-managed by workers. The basic principles of anarcho-syndicalism are direct action, workers' solidarity and workers' self-management.
Individualist anarchism is a set of several traditions of thought within the anarchist movement that emphasise the individual and their will over any kinds of external determinants. Early influences on individualist forms of anarchism include William Godwin, Max Stirner, and Henry David Thoreau. Through many countries, individualist anarchism attracted a small yet diverse following of Bohemian artists and intellectuals as well as young anarchist outlaws in what became known as illegalism and individual reclamation.
Post-classical and contemporary
Main article: Contemporary anarchismAnarchist principles undergird contemporary radical social movements of the left. Interest in the anarchist movement developed alongside momentum in the anti-globalisation movement, whose leading activist networks were anarchist in orientation. As the movement shaped 21st century radicalism, wider embrace of anarchist principles signaled a revival of interest. Anarchism has continued to generate many philosophies and movements, at times eclectic, drawing upon various sources and combining disparate concepts to create new philosophical approaches. The anti-capitalist tradition of classical anarchism has remained prominent within contemporary currents.
Contemporary news coverage which emphasizes black bloc demonstrations has reinforced anarchism's historical association with chaos and violence. Its publicity has also led more scholars in fields such as anthropology and history to engage with the anarchist movement, although contemporary anarchism favours actions over academic theory. Various anarchist groups, tendencies, and schools of thought exist today, making it difficult to describe the contemporary anarchist movement. While theorists and activists have established "relatively stable constellations of anarchist principles", there is no consensus on which principles are core and commentators describe multiple anarchisms, rather than a singular anarchism, in which common principles are shared between schools of anarchism while each group prioritizes those principles differently. Gender equality can be a common principle, although it ranks as a higher priority to anarcha-feminists than anarcho-communists.
Anarchists are generally committed against coercive authority in all forms, namely "all centralized and hierarchical forms of government (e.g., monarchy, representative democracy, state socialism, etc.), economic class systems (e.g., capitalism, Bolshevism, feudalism, slavery, etc.), autocratic religions (e.g., fundamentalist Islam, Roman Catholicism, etc.), patriarchy, heterosexism, white supremacy, and imperialism." Anarchist schools disagree on the methods by which these forms should be opposed. The principle of equal liberty is closer to anarchist political ethics in that it transcends both the liberal and socialist traditions. This entails that liberty and equality cannot be implemented within the state, resulting in the questioning of all forms of domination and hierarchy.
Tactics
Anarchists' tactics take various forms but in general serve two major goals, namely, to first oppose the Establishment and secondly to promote anarchist ethics and reflect an anarchist vision of society, illustrating the unity of means and ends. A broad categorisation can be made between aims to destroy oppressive states and institutions by revolutionary means on one hand and aims to change society through evolutionary means on the other. Evolutionary tactics embrace nonviolence and take a gradual approach to anarchist aims, although there is significant overlap between the two.
Anarchist tactics have shifted during the course of the last century. Anarchists during the early 20th century focused more on strikes and militancy while contemporary anarchists use a broader array of approaches.
Classical era
During the classical era, anarchists had a militant tendency. Not only did they confront state armed forces, as in Spain and Ukraine, but some of them also employed terrorism as propaganda of the deed. Assassination attempts were carried out against heads of state, some of which were successful. Anarchists also took part in revolutions. Many anarchists, especially the Galleanists, believed that these attempts would be the impetus for a revolution against capitalism and the state. Many of these attacks were done by individual assailants and the majority took place in the late 1870s, the early 1880s and the 1890s, with some still occurring in the early 1900s. Their decrease in prevalence was the result of further judicial power and of targeting and cataloging by state institutions.
Anarchist perspectives towards violence have always been controversial. Anarcho-pacifists advocate for non-violence means to achieve their stateless, nonviolent ends. Other anarchist groups advocate direct action, a tactic which can include acts of sabotage or terrorism. This attitude was quite prominent a century ago when seeing the state as a tyrant and some anarchists believing that they had every right to oppose its oppression by any means possible. Emma Goldman and Errico Malatesta, who were proponents of limited use of violence, stated that violence is merely a reaction to state violence as a necessary evil.
Anarchists took an active role in strike actions, although they tended to be antipathetic to formal syndicalism, seeing it as reformist. They saw it as a part of the movement which sought to overthrow the state and capitalism. Anarchists also reinforced their propaganda within the arts, some of whom practiced naturism and nudism. Those anarchists also built communities which were based on friendship and were involved in the news media.
Revolutionary
In the current era, Italian anarchist Alfredo Bonanno, a proponent of insurrectionary anarchism, has reinstated the debate on violence by rejecting the nonviolence tactic adopted since the late 19th century by Kropotkin and other prominent anarchists afterwards. Both Bonanno and the French group The Invisible Committee advocate for small, informal affiliation groups, where each member is responsible for their own actions but works together to bring down oppression using sabotage and other violent means against state, capitalism, and other enemies. Members of The Invisible Committee were arrested in 2008 on various charges, terrorism included.
Overall, contemporary anarchists are much less violent and militant than their ideological ancestors. They mostly engage in confronting the police during demonstrations and riots, especially in countries such as Canada, Greece, and Mexico. Militant black bloc protest groups are known for clashing with the police; however, anarchists not only clash with state operators, they also engage in the struggle against fascists and racists, taking anti-fascist action and mobilizing to prevent hate rallies from happening.
Evolutionary
Anarchists commonly employ direct action. This can take the form of disrupting and protesting against unjust hierarchy, or the form of self-managing their lives through the creation of counter-institutions such as communes and non-hierarchical collectives. Decision-making is often handled in an anti-authoritarian way, with everyone having equal say in each decision, an approach known as horizontalism. Contemporary-era anarchists have been engaging with various grassroots movements that are more or less based on horizontalism, although not explicitly anarchist, respecting personal autonomy and participating in mass activism such as strikes and demonstrations. In contrast with the "big-A Anarchism" of the classical era, the newly coined term "small-a anarchism" signals their tendency not to base their thoughts and actions on classical-era anarchism or to refer to classical anarchists such as Peter Kropotkin and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon to justify their opinions. Those anarchists would rather base their thought and praxis on their own experience, which they will later theorize.
The concept of prefigurative politics is enacted by many contemporary anarchist groups, striving to embody the principles, organization and tactics of the changed social structure they hope to bring about. As part of this the decision-making process of small anarchist affinity groups plays a significant tactical role. Anarchists have employed various methods to build a rough consensus among members of their group without the need of a leader or a leading group. One way is for an individual from the group to play the role of facilitator to help achieve a consensus without taking part in the discussion themselves or promoting a specific point. Minorities usually accept rough consensus, except when they feel the proposal contradicts anarchist ethics, goals and values. Anarchists usually form small groups (5–20 individuals) to enhance autonomy and friendships among their members. These kinds of groups more often than not interconnect with each other, forming larger networks. Anarchists still support and participate in strikes, especially wildcat strikes as these are leaderless strikes not organised centrally by a syndicate.
As in the past, newspapers and journals are used, and anarchists have gone online to spread their message. Anarchists have found it easier to create websites because of distributional and other difficulties, hosting electronic libraries and other portals. Anarchists were also involved in developing various software that are available for free. The way these hacktivists work to develop and distribute resembles the anarchist ideals, especially when it comes to preserving users' privacy from state surveillance.
Anarchists organize themselves to squat and reclaim public spaces. During important events such as protests and when spaces are being occupied, they are often called Temporary Autonomous Zones (TAZ), spaces where art, poetry, and surrealism are blended to display the anarchist ideal. As seen by anarchists, squatting is a way to regain urban space from the capitalist market, serving pragmatical needs and also being an exemplary direct action. Acquiring space enables anarchists to experiment with their ideas and build social bonds. Adding up these tactics while having in mind that not all anarchists share the same attitudes towards them, along with various forms of protesting at highly symbolic events, make up a carnivalesque atmosphere that is part of contemporary anarchist vividity.
Key issues
As anarchism is a philosophy that embodies many diverse attitudes, tendencies, and schools of thought, disagreement over questions of values, ideology, and tactics is common. Its diversity has led to widely different uses of identical terms among different anarchist traditions which has created a number of definitional concerns in anarchist theory. The compatibility of capitalism, nationalism, and religion with anarchism is widely disputed, and anarchism enjoys complex relationships with ideologies such as communism, collectivism, Marxism, and trade unionism. Anarchists may be motivated by humanism, divine authority, enlightened self-interest, veganism, or any number of alternative ethical doctrines. Phenomena such as civilisation, technology (e.g. within anarcho-primitivism), and the democratic process may be sharply criticised within some anarchist tendencies and simultaneously lauded in others.
The state
Objection to the state and its institutions is a sine qua non of anarchism. Anarchists consider the state as a tool of domination and believe it to be illegitimate regardless of its political tendencies. Instead of people being able to control the aspects of their life, major decisions are taken by a small elite. Authority ultimately rests solely on power, regardless of whether that power is open or transparent, as it still has the ability to coerce people. Another anarchist argument against states is that the people constituting a government, even the most altruistic among officials, will unavoidably seek to gain more power, leading to corruption. Anarchists consider the idea that the state is the collective will of the people to be an unachievable fiction due to the fact that the ruling class is distinct from the rest of society.
Specific anarchist attitudes towards the state vary. Robert Paul Wolff believed that the tension between authority and autonomy would mean the state could never be legitimate. Bakunin saw the state as meaning "coercion, domination by means of coercion, camouflaged if possible but unceremonious and overt if need be." A. John Simmons and Leslie Green, who leaned toward philosophical anarchism, believed that the state could be legitimate if it is governed by consensus, although they saw this as highly unlikely. Beliefs on how to abolish the state also differ.
Gender, sexuality, and free love
Main article: Anarchism and issues related to love and sexAs gender and sexuality carry along them dynamics of hierarchy, many anarchists address, analyse, and oppose the suppression of one's autonomy imposed by gender roles.
Sexuality was not often discussed by classical anarchists but the few that did felt that an anarchist society would lead to sexuality naturally developing. Sexual violence was a concern for anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker, who opposed age of consent laws, believing they would benefit predatory men. A historical current that arose and flourished during 1890 and 1920 within anarchism was free love. In contemporary anarchism, this current survives as a tendency to support polyamory, relationship anarchy, and queer anarchism. Free love advocates were against marriage, which they saw as a way of men imposing authority over women, largely because marriage law greatly favoured the power of men. The notion of free love was much broader and included a critique of the established order that limited women's sexual freedom and pleasure. Those free love movements contributed to the establishment of communal houses, where large groups of travelers, anarchists and other activists slept in beds together. Free love had roots both in Europe and the United States; however, some anarchists struggled with the jealousy that arose from free love. Anarchist feminists were advocates of free love, against marriage, and pro-choice (using a contemporary term), and had a similar agenda. Anarchist and non-anarchist feminists differed on suffrage but were supportive of one another.
During the second half of the 20th century, anarchism intermingled with the second wave of feminism, radicalising some currents of the feminist movement and being influenced as well. By the latest decades of the 20th century, anarchists and feminists were advocating for the rights and autonomy of women, gays, queers and other marginalised groups, with some feminist thinkers suggesting a fusion of the two currents. With the third wave of feminism, sexual identity and compulsory heterosexuality became a subject of study for anarchists, yielding a post-structuralist critique of sexual normality. Some anarchists distanced themselves from this line of thinking, suggesting that it leaned towards an individualism that was dropping the cause of social liberation.
Education
Main article: Anarchism and educationAnarchist education | State education | |
---|---|---|
Concept | Education as self-mastery | Education as service |
Management | Community based | State run |
Methods | Practice-based learning | Vocational training |
Aims | Being a critical member of society | Being a productive member of society |
The interest of anarchists in education stretches back to the first emergence of classical anarchism. Anarchists consider proper education, one which sets the foundations of the future autonomy of the individual and the society, to be an act of mutual aid. Anarchist writers such as William Godwin (Political Justice) and Max Stirner ("The False Principle of Our Education") attacked both state education and private education as another means by which the ruling class replicate their privileges.
In 1901, Catalan anarchist and free thinker Francisco Ferrer established the Escuela Moderna in Barcelona as an opposition to the established education system which was dictated largely by the Catholic Church. Ferrer's approach was secular, rejecting both state and church involvement in the educational process while giving pupils large amounts of autonomy in planning their work and attendance. Ferrer aimed to educate the working class and explicitly sought to foster class consciousness among students. The school closed after constant harassment by the state and Ferrer was later arrested. Nonetheless, his ideas formed the inspiration for a series of modern schools around the world. Christian anarchist Leo Tolstoy, who published the essay Education and Culture, also established a similar school with its founding principle being that "for education to be effective it had to be free." In a similar token, A. S. Neill founded what became the Summerhill School in 1921, also declaring being free from coercion.
Anarchist education is based largely on the idea that a child's right to develop freely and without manipulation ought to be respected and that rationality would lead children to morally good conclusions; however, there has been little consensus among anarchist figures as to what constitutes manipulation. Ferrer believed that moral indoctrination was necessary and explicitly taught pupils that equality, liberty and social justice were not possible under capitalism, along with other critiques of government and nationalism.
Late 20th century and contemporary anarchist writers (Paul Goodman, Herbert Read, and Colin Ward) intensified and expanded the anarchist critique of state education, largely focusing on the need for a system that focuses on children's creativity rather than on their ability to attain a career or participate in consumerism as part of a consumer society. Contemporary anarchists such as Ward claim that state education serves to perpetuate socioeconomic inequality.
While few anarchist education institutions have survived to the modern-day, major tenets of anarchist schools, among them respect for child autonomy and relying on reasoning rather than indoctrination as a teaching method, have spread among mainstream educational institutions. Judith Suissa names three schools as explicitly anarchists' schools, namely the Free Skool Santa Cruz in the United States which is part of a wider American-Canadian network of schools, the Self-Managed Learning College in Brighton, England, and the Paideia School in Spain.
The arts
Main article: Anarchism and the artsThe connection between anarchism and art was quite profound during the classical era of anarchism, especially among artistic currents that were developing during that era such as futurists, surrealists and others. In literature, anarchism was mostly associated with the New Apocalyptics and the neo-romanticism movement. In music, anarchism has been associated with music scenes such as punk. Anarchists such as Leo Tolstoy and Herbert Read stated that the border between the artist and the non-artist, what separates art from a daily act, is a construct produced by the alienation caused by capitalism and it prevents humans from living a joyful life.
Other anarchists advocated for or used art as a means to achieve anarchist ends. In his book Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerrillas, and Digital Ninjas, Chris Robé claims that "anarchist-inflected practices have increasingly structured movement-based video activism." Throughout the 20th century, many prominent anarchists (Peter Kropotkin, Emma Goldman, Gustav Landauer and Camillo Berneri) and publications such as Anarchy wrote about matters pertaining to the arts.
Three overlapping properties made art useful to anarchists. It could depict a critique of existing society and hierarchies, serve as a prefigurative tool to reflect the anarchist ideal society and even turn into a means of direct action such as in protests. As it appeals to both emotion and reason, art could appeal to the whole human and have a powerful effect. The 19th-century neo-impressionist movement had an ecological aesthetic and offered an example of an anarchist perception of the road towards socialism. In Les chataigniers a Osny by anarchist painter Camille Pissarro, the blending of aesthetic and social harmony is prefiguring an ideal anarchistic agrarian community.
Criticism
The most common critique of anarchism is the assertion that humans cannot self-govern and so a state is necessary for human survival. Philosopher Bertrand Russell supported this critique, stating that "eace and war, tariffs, regulations of sanitary conditions and the sale of noxious drugs, the preservation of a just system of distribution: these, among others, are functions which could hardly be performed in a community in which there was no central government." Another common criticism of anarchism is that it fits a world of isolation in which only the small enough entities can be self-governing; a response would be that major anarchist thinkers advocated anarchist federalism.
Another criticism of anarchism is the belief that it is inherently unstable: that an anarchist society would inevitably evolve back into a state. Thomas Hobbes and other early social contract theorists argued that the state emerges in response to natural anarchy to protect the people's interests and keep order. Philosopher Robert Nozick argued that a "night-watchman state", or minarchy, would emerge from anarchy through the process of an invisible hand, in which people would exercise their liberty and buy protection from protection agencies, evolving into a minimal state. Anarchists reject these criticisms by arguing that humans in a state of nature would not just be in a state of war. Anarcho-primitivists in particular argue that humans were better off in a state of nature in small tribes living close to the land, while anarchists in general argue that the negatives of state organization, such as hierarchies, monopolies and inequality, outweigh the benefits.
Philosophy lecturer Andrew G. Fiala composed a list of common arguments against anarchism which includes critiques such as that anarchism is innately related to violence and destruction, not only in the pragmatic world, such as at protests, but in the world of ethics as well. Secondly, anarchism is evaluated as unfeasible or utopian since the state cannot be defeated practically. This line of arguments most often calls for political action within the system to reform it. The third argument is that anarchism is self-contradictory as a ruling theory that has no ruling theory. Anarchism also calls for collective action while endorsing the autonomy of the individual, hence no collective action can be taken. Lastly, Fiala mentions a critique towards philosophical anarchism of being ineffective (all talk and thoughts) and in the meantime capitalism and bourgeois class remains strong.
Philosophical anarchism has met the criticism of members of academia following the release of pro-anarchist books such as A. John Simmons' Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Law professor William A. Edmundson authored an essay to argue against three major philosophical anarchist principles which he finds fallacious. Edmundson says that while the individual does not owe the state a duty of obedience, this does not imply that anarchism is the inevitable conclusion and the state is still morally legitimate. In The Problem of Political Authority, Michael Huemer defends philosophical anarchism, claiming that "political authority is a moral illusion."
One of the earliest criticisms is that anarchism defies and fails to understand the biological inclination to authority. Joseph Raz states that the acceptance of authority implies the belief that following their instructions will afford more success. Raz believes that this argument is true in following both authorities' successful and mistaken instruction. Anarchists reject this criticism because challenging or disobeying authority does not entail the disappearance of its advantages by acknowledging authority such as doctors or lawyers as reliable, nor does it involve a complete surrender of independent judgment. Anarchist perception of human nature, rejection of the state, and commitment to social revolution has been criticised by academics as naive, overly simplistic, and unrealistic, respectively. Classical anarchism has been criticised for relying too heavily on the belief that the abolition of the state will lead to human cooperation prospering.
Friedrich Engels, considered to be one of the principal founders of Marxism, criticised anarchism's anti-authoritarianism as inherently counter-revolutionary because in his view a revolution is by itself authoritarian. Academic John Molyneux writes in his book Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism that "anarchism cannot win", believing that it lacks the ability to properly implement its ideas. The Marxist criticism of anarchism is that it has a utopian character because all individuals should have anarchist views and values. According to the Marxist view, that a social idea would follow directly from this human ideal and out of the free will of every individual formed its essence. Marxists state that this contradiction was responsible for their inability to act. In the anarchist vision, the conflict between liberty and equality was resolved through coexistence and intertwining.
See also
- Outline of anarchism
- List of anarchist movements by region
- List of anarchist political ideologies
- List of books about anarchism
- List of films dealing with anarchism
Anarchist communities
References
Explanatory notes
- In Anarchism: From Theory to Practice (1970), anarchist historian Daniel Guérin described it as a synonym for libertarian socialism, and wrote that anarchism "is really a synonym for socialism. The anarchist is primarily a socialist whose aim is to abolish the exploitation of man by man. Anarchism is only one of the streams of socialist thought, that stream whose main components are concern for liberty and haste to abolish the State." In his many works on anarchism, historian Noam Chomsky describes anarchism, alongside libertarian Marxism, as the libertarian wing of socialism.
- Herbert L. Osgood claimed that anarchism is "the extreme antithesis" of authoritarian communism and state socialism. Peter Marshall states that "n general anarchism is closer to socialism than liberalism. ... Anarchism finds itself largely in the socialist camp, but it also has outriders in liberalism. It cannot be reduced to socialism, and is best seen as a separate and distinctive doctrine." According to Jeremy Jennings, "t is hard not to conclude that these ideas", referring to anarcho-capitalism, "are described as anarchist only on the basis of a misunderstanding of what anarchism is." Jennings adds that "anarchism does not stand for the untrammelled freedom of the individual (as the 'anarcho-capitalists' appear to believe) but, as we have already seen, for the extension of individuality and community." Nicolas Walter wrote that "anarchism does derive from liberalism and socialism both historically and ideologically. ... In a sense, anarchists always remain liberals and socialists, and whenever they reject what is good in either they betray anarchism itself. ... We are liberals but more so, and socialists but more so." Michael Newman includes anarchism as one of many socialist traditions, especially the more socialist-aligned tradition following Proudhon and Mikhail Bakunin. Brian Morris argues that it is "conceptually and historically misleading" to "create a dichotomy between socialism and anarchism."
- One common definition adopted by anarchists is that anarchism is a cluster of political philosophies opposing authority and hierarchical organisation, including capitalism, nationalism, the state, and all associated institutions, in the conduct of all human relations in favour of a society based on decentralisation, freedom, and voluntary association. Scholars highlight that this definition has the same shortcomings as the definition based on anti-authoritarianism (a posteriori conclusion), anti-statism (anarchism is much more than that), and etymology (negation of rulers).
Citations
- Carlson 1972, pp. 22–23.
- Bates 2017, p. 128; Long 2013, p. 217.
- Merriam-Webster 2019, "Anarchism"; Oxford English Dictionary 2005, "Anarchism"; Sylvan 2007, p. 260.
- Joll 1964, pp. 27–37.
- Kahn 2000.
- Nettlau 1996, p. 162.
- Guérin 1970, "The Basic Ideas of Anarchism".
- Ward 2004, p. 62; Goodway 2006, p. 4; Skirda 2002, p. 183; Fernández 2009, p. 9.
- Morris 2002, p. 61.
- Marshall 1992, p. 641; Cohn 2009, p. 6.
- ^ Marshall 1992, p. 641.
- Marshall 1992, p. 641; Cohn 2009, p. 6; Levy & Adams 2018, p. 104.
- Levy & Adams 2018, p. 104.
- ^ Guérin 1970, p. 12.
- Arvidsson 2017.
- Otero 1994, p. 617.
- ^ Osgood 1889, p. 1.
- ^ Newman 2005, p. 15.
- ^ Morris 2015, p. 64.
- ^ Walter 2002, p. 44.
- ^ Marshall 1992, pp. 564–565; Jennings 1993, p. 143; Gay & Gay 1999, p. 15; Morris 2008, p. 13; Johnson 2008, p. 169; Franks 2013, pp. 393–394.
- Jennings 1999, p. 147.
- Long 2013, p. 217.
- McLaughlin 2007, p. 166; Jun 2009, p. 507; Franks 2013, pp. 386–388.
- McLaughlin 2007, pp. 25–29; Long 2013, pp. 217.
- McLaughlin 2007, pp. 25–26.
- Marshall 1993, p. 70.
- Coutinho 2016; Marshall 1993, p. 54.
- Sylvan 2007, p. 257.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 4, 66–73.
- Marshall 1993, p. 86.
- Crone 2000, pp. 3, 21–25.
- Nettlau 1996, p. 8.
- Marshall 1993, p. 108.
- Levy & Adams 2018, p. 307.
- Marshall 1993, p. 4.
- ^ Marshall 1993, pp. 4–5.
- Levy 2011, pp. 10–15.
- Dodson 2002, p. 312; Thomas 1985, p. 187; Chaliand & Blin 2007, p. 116.
- Graham 2019, pp. 334–336; Marshall 1993, p. 24.
- Levy 2011, p. 12.
- Marshall 1993, p. 5.
- Graham 2005, p. xii.
- Moya 2015, p. 327.
- Levy 2011, p. 16.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 519–521.
- Dirlik 1991, p. 133; Ramnath 2019, pp. 681–682.
- Levy 2011, p. 23; Laursen 2019, p. 157; Marshall 1993, pp. 504–508.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 633–636.
- Anderson 2004.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 633–636; Lutz & Ulmschneider 2019, p. 46.
- Bantman 2019, p. 374.
- ^ Avrich 2006, p. 204.
- Nomad 1966, p. 88.
- Bolloten 1984, p. 1107.
- Marshall 1993, pp. xi, 466.
- Marshall 1993, p. xi.
- Marshall 1993, p. 539.
- Marshall 1993, pp. xi, 539.
- Levy 2011, pp. 5.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 493–494.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 556–557.
- Williams 2015, p. 680.
- Harmon 2011, p. 70.
- ^ Rupert 2006, p. 66.
- Ramnath 2019, p. 691.
- Honeywell 2021, pp. 34–44.
- Honeywell 2021, pp. 1–2.
- Honeywell 2021, pp. 1–3.
- McLean & McMillan 2003, "Anarchism"; Ostergaard 2003, p. 14, "Anarchism".
- Harrison & Boyd 2003, p. 251.
- Levy & Adams 2018, p. 9.
- Egoumenides 2014, p. 2.
- Ostergaard 2003, p. 12; Gabardi 1986, pp. 300–302.
- Klosko 2005, p. 4.
- Franks 2019, p. 549.
- Brooks 1994, p. xi, "Usually considered to be an extreme left-wing ideology".
- Guérin 1970, p. 35, "Critique of authoritarian socialism".
- Marshall 1993, pp. 14–17.
- Sylvan 2007, p. 262.
- Avrich 1996, p. 6.
- Walter 2002, p. 52.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 1–6; Angelbeck & Grier 2012, p. 551.
- Wilbur 2019, pp. 216–218.
- Levy & Adams 2018, p. 2.
- Wright, Edmund, ed. (2006). The Desk Encyclopedia of World History. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-0-7394-7809-7.
- Wilbur 2019, pp. 213–218.
- Avrich 1996, p. 6; Miller 1991, p. 11.
- Pierson 2013, p. 187.
- Morris 1993, p. 76.
- Shannon 2019, p. 101.
- Avrich 1996, pp. 3–4.
- Heywood 2017, pp. 146–147; Bakunin 1990.
- Mayne 1999, p. 131.
- Marshall 1993, p. 327.
- Marshall 1993, p. 327; Turcato 2019, pp. 237–238.
- Graham 2005.
- Pernicone 2009, pp. 111–113.
- Turcato 2019, pp. 239–244.
- Levy 2011, p. 6.
- Van der Walt 2019, p. 249.
- Ryley 2019, p. 225.
- Marshall 1993, p. 440.
- Imrie 1994; Parry 1987, p. 15.
- Evren 2011, p. 1.
- ^ Evren 2011, p. 2.
- Williams 2007, p. 303.
- Williams 2018, p. 4.
- Williams 2010, p. 110; Evren 2011, p. 1; Angelbeck & Grier 2012, p. 549.
- Franks 2013, pp. 385–386.
- Franks 2013, p. 386.
- Jun 2009, pp. 507–508.
- Jun 2009, p. 507.
- Egoumenides 2014, p. 91.
- Williams 2019, pp. 107–108.
- ^ Williams 2018, pp. 4–5.
- Kinna 2019, p. 125.
- Williams 2019, p. 112.
- Williams 2019, pp. 112–113.
- Norris 2020, pp. 7–8.
- Levy 2011, p. 13; Nesser 2012, p. 62.
- Harmon 2011, p. 55.
- Carter 1978, p. 320.
- Fiala 2017, section 3.1.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 116–117.
- Carter 1978, pp. 320–325.
- Williams 2019, p. 113.
- Williams 2019, p. 114.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 134–135.
- Williams 2019, p. 115.
- Williams 2019, p. 117.
- Williams 2019, pp. 109–117.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 145–149.
- Williams 2019, pp. 109, 119.
- Williams 2019, pp. 119–121.
- Williams 2019, pp. 118–119.
- Williams 2019, pp. 120–121.
- Kinna 2019, p. 139; Mattern 2019, p. 596; Williams 2018, pp. 5–6.
- Kinna 2012, p. 250; Williams 2019, p. 119.
- Williams 2019, p. 122.
- Morland 2004, pp. 37–38.
- Marshall 1993, p. 565; Honderich 1995, p. 31; Meltzer 2000, p. 50; Goodway 2006, p. 4; Newman 2010, p. 53.
- De George 2005, pp. 31–32.
- Carter 1971, p. 14; Jun 2019, pp. 29–30.
- Jun 2019, pp. 32–38.
- Wendt 2020, p. 2; Ashwood 2018, p. 727.
- Ashwood 2018, p. 735.
- Nicholas 2019, p. 603.
- ^ Lucy 2020, p. 162.
- Lucy 2020, p. 178.
- Nicholas 2019, p. 611; Jeppesen & Nazar 2012, pp. 175–176.
- Jeppesen & Nazar 2012, pp. 175–176.
- Jeppesen & Nazar 2012, p. 177.
- Jeppesen & Nazar 2012, pp. 175–177.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 166–167.
- Nicholas 2019, pp. 609–611.
- Nicholas 2019, pp. 610–611.
- Nicholas 2019, pp. 616–617.
- Kinna 2019, p. 97.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 83–85.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 514, 521; Kinna 2019, pp. 83–86; Marshall 1993, p. 222.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 511–512.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 511–514.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 517–518.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 518–519.
- Avrich 1980, pp. 3–33; Suissa 2019, pp. 519–522.
- Kinna 2019, pp. 89–96.
- Ward 1973, pp. 39–48.
- Suissa 2019, pp. 523–526.
- ^ Antliff 1998, p. 99.
- Mattern 2019, p. 592.
- Gifford 2019, p. 577.
- Marshall 1993, pp. 493–494; Dunn 2012; Evren, Kinna & Rouselle 2013.
- Mattern 2019, pp. 592–593.
- Mattern 2019, p. 593.
- Robé 2017, p. 44.
- Miller et al. 2019, p. 1.
- Mattern 2019, pp. 593–596.
- Antliff 1998, p. 78.
- Krimerman & Perry 1966, p. 494.
- Ward 2004, p. 78.
- Fiala, Andrew (2021), "Anarchism", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 17 June 2023
- Fiala 2017, "4. Objections and Replies".
- Klosko 1999, p. 536.
- Klosko 1999, p. 536; Kristjánsson 2000, p. 896.
- Dagger 2018, p. 35.
- Rogers 2020.
- Ferguson 1886.
- Gans 1992, p. 37.
- Gans 1992, p. 38.
- Gans 1992, pp. 34, 38.
- Brinn 2020, p. 206.
- Tucker 1978.
- Dodds 2011.
- Baár et al. 2016, p. 488.
General and cited sources
Primary sources
- Bakunin, Mikhail (1990) . Shatz, Marshall (ed.). Statism and Anarchy. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Translated by Shatz, Marshall. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139168083. ISBN 978-0-5213-6182-8. LCCN 89077393. OCLC 20826465.
Secondary sources
- Angelbeck, Bill; Grier, Colin (2012). "Anarchism and the Archaeology of Anarchic Societies: Resistance to Centralization in the Coast Salish Region of the Pacific Northwest Coast". Current Anthropology. 53 (5): 547–587. doi:10.1086/667621. ISSN 0011-3204. S2CID 142786065. Archived from the original on 21 July 2018. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
- Antliff, Mark (1998). "Cubism, Futurism, Anarchism: The 'Aestheticism' of the "Action d'art" Group, 1906–1920". Oxford Art Journal. 21 (2): 101–120. doi:10.1093/oxartj/21.2.99. JSTOR 1360616.
- Anderson, Benedict (2004). "In the World-Shadow of Bismarck and Nobel". New Left Review. 2 (28): 85–129. Archived from the original on 19 December 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
- Arvidsson, Stefan (2017). The Style and Mythology of Socialism: Socialist Idealism, 1871–1914 (1st ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-3673-4880-9.
- Ashwood, Loka (2018). "Rural Conservatism or Anarchism? The Pro-state, Stateless, and Anti-state Positions". Rural Sociology. 83 (4): 717–748. doi:10.1111/ruso.12226. S2CID 158802675.
- Avrich, Paul (1996). Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-6910-4494-1.
- —— (2006). The Russian Anarchists. Stirling: AK Press. ISBN 978-1-9048-5948-2.
- —— (1980). The Modern School Movement: Anarchism and Education in the United States. Princeton University Press. pp. 3–33. ISBN 978-1-4008-5318-2. OCLC 489692159.
- Baár, Monika; Falina, Maria; Janowski, Maciej; Kopeček, Michal; Trencsényi, Balázs Trencsényi (2016). A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe: Negotiating Modernity in the 'Long Nineteenth Century'. Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1910-5695-6.
- Bantman, Constance (2019). "The Era of Propaganda by the Deed". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 371–388. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Bates, David (2017). "Anarchism". In Wetherly, Paul (ed.). Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1987-2785-9. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- Bolloten, Burnett (1984). The Spanish Civil War: Revolution and Counterrevolution. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-1906-7.
- Brinn, Gearóid (2020). "Smashing the State Gently: Radical Realism and Realist Anarchism". European Journal of Political Theory. 19 (2): 206–227. doi:10.1177/1474885119865975. S2CID 202278143.
- Brooks, Frank H. (1994). The Individualist Anarchists: An Anthology of Liberty (1881–1908). Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5600-0132-4.
- Carlson, Andrew R. (1972). Anarchism in Germany; Vol. 1: The Early Movement. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-0484-5.
- Carter, April (1971). The Political Theory of Anarchism. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4155-5593-7. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Carter, April (1978). "Anarchism and violence". Nomos. 19. American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy: 320–340. JSTOR 24219053.
- Chaliand, Gerard; Blin, Arnaud, eds. (2007). The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al-Quaeda. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5202-4709-3. OCLC 634891265.
- Cohn, Jesse (2009). "Anarchism". In Ness, Immanuel (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 1–11. doi:10.1002/9781405198073.wbierp0039. ISBN 978-1-4051-9807-3.
- Crone, Patricia (2000). "Ninth-Century Muslim Anarchists" (PDF). Past & Present (167): 3–28. doi:10.1093/past/167.1.3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 August 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
- Dagger, Tristan J. (2018). Playing Fair: Political Obligation and the Problems of Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1993-8883-7.
- Dirlik, Arif (1991). Anarchism in the Chinese Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5200-7297-8.
- Dodds, Jonathan (October 2011). "Anarchism: A Marxist Criticism". Socialist Review. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- Dodson, Edward (2002). The Discovery of First Principles. Vol. 2. Authorhouse. ISBN 978-0-5952-4912-1.
- Dunn, Kevin (August 2012). "Anarcho-Punk and Resistance in Everyday Life". Punk & Post-Punk. 1 (2). Intellect: 201–218. doi:10.1386/punk.1.2.201_1.
- Egoumenides, Magda (2014). Philosophical Anarchism and Political Obligation. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4411-2445-6. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
- Evren, Süreyyya (2011). "How New Anarchism Changed the World (of Opposition) after Seattle and Gave Birth to Post-Anarchism". In Rousselle, Duane; Evren, Süreyyya (eds.). Post-Anarchism: A Reader. Pluto Press. pp. 1–19. ISBN 978-0-7453-3086-0.
- Evren, Süreyyya; Kinna, Ruth; Rouselle, Duane (2013). Blasting the Canon. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. ISBN 978-0-6158-3862-5.
- Ferguson, Francis L. (August 1886). "The Mistakes of Anarchism". The North American Review. 143 (357). University of Northern Iowa: 204–206. ISSN 0029-2397. JSTOR 25101094.
- Fernández, Frank (2009) . Cuban Anarchism: The History of A Movement. Sharp Press.
- Franks, Benjamin (August 2013). "Anarchism". In Freeden, Michael; Stears, Marc (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press. pp. 385–404. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0001.
- —— (2019). "Anarchism and Ethics". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 549–570. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Gabardi, Wayne (1986). "Anarchism. By David Miller. (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1984. pp. 216 )". American Political Science Review. 80 (1): 300–302. doi:10.2307/1957102. JSTOR 446800. S2CID 151950709.
- Gans, Chaim (1992). Philosophical Anarchism and Political Disobedience (reprint ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-5214-1450-0.
- Gay, Kathlyn; Gay, Martin (1999). Encyclopedia of Political Anarchy. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-8743-6982-3.
- Gifford, James (2019). "Literature and Anarchism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Goodway, David (2006). Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow. Liverpool Press. ISBN 978-1-8463-1025-6.
- Graham, Robert (2005). Anarchism: a Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas: from Anarchy to Anarchism. Montréal: Black Rose Books. ISBN 978-1-5516-4250-5.
- —— (2019). "Anarchism and the First International". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 325–342. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Guérin, Daniel (1970). Anarchism: From Theory to Practice. Monthly Review Press. ISBN 978-0-8534-5128-0. Archived from the original on 14 July 2020. Retrieved 16 February 2013.
- Harrison, Kevin; Boyd, Tony (2003). Understanding Political Ideas and Movements. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-6151-6. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Harmon, Christopher C. (2011). "How Terrorist Groups End: Studies of the Twentieth Century". Connections. 10 (2): 51–104. JSTOR 26310649.
- Heywood, Andrew (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction (6th ed.). Macmillan International Higher Education. ISBN 978-1-1376-0604-4. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- Honderich, Ted (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1986-6132-0.
- Honeywell, C. (2021). Anarchism. Key Concepts in Political Theory. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-5095-2390-0. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- Imrie, Doug (1994). "The Illegalists". Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed. Archived from the original on 8 September 2015. Retrieved 9 December 2010.
- Jennings, Jeremy (1993). "Anarchism". In Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (eds.). Contemporary Political Ideologies. London: Pinter. pp. 127–146. ISBN 978-0-8618-7096-7.
- Jennings, Jeremy (1999). "Anarchism". In Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (eds.). Contemporary Political Ideologies (reprinted, 2nd ed.). London: A & C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-5173-6.
- Jeppesen, Sandra; Nazar, Holly (2012). "Genders and Sexualities in Anarchist Movements". In Kinna, Ruth (ed.). The Bloomsbury Companion to Anarchism. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4411-4270-2. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
- Johnson, Charles (2008). "Liberty, Equality, Solidarity Toward a Dialectical Anarchism". In Long, Roderick T.; Machan, Tibor R. (eds.). Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country?. Ashgate Publishing. pp. 155–188. ISBN 978-0-7546-6066-8.
- Joll, James (1964). The Anarchists. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-6740-3642-0.
- Jun, Nathan (September 2009). "Anarchist Philosophy and Working Class Struggle: A Brief History and Commentary". WorkingUSA. 12 (3): 505–519. doi:10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00251.x. ISSN 1089-7011.
- Jun, Nathan (2019). "The State". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 27–47. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Kinna, Ruth (2012). The Bloomsbury Companion to Anarchism. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1-6289-2430-5.
- Kinna, Ruth (2019). The Government of No One: The Theory and Practice of Anarchism. Penguin Random House. ISBN 978-0-2413-9655-1.
- Klosko, George (1999). "More than Obligation – William A. Edmundson: Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority". The Review of Politics. 61 (3): 536–538. doi:10.1017/S0034670500028989. ISSN 1748-6858. S2CID 144417469.
- Klosko, George (2005). Political Obligations. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1995-5104-0. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Krimerman, Leonard I.; Perry, Lewis, eds. (1966). Patterns of Anarchy: A Collection of Writings on the Anarchist Tradition. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
- Kristjánsson, Kristján (2000). "Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority by William A. Edmundson". Mind. 109 (436): 896–900. JSTOR 2660038.
- Laursen, Ole Birk (2019). "Anti-Imperialism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 149–168. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Levy, Carl (8 May 2011). "Social Histories of Anarchism". Journal for the Study of Radicalism. 4 (2): 1–44. doi:10.1353/jsr.2010.0003. ISSN 1930-1197. S2CID 144317650.
- Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S., eds. (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-3197-5619-6.
- Long, Roderick T. (2013). Gaud, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4158-7456-4. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- Lucy, Nicholas (2020). "Anarchism and Sexuality". The SAGE Handbook of Global Sexualities. SAGE Publishing. pp. 160–183. ISBN 978-1-5297-2194-2. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
- Lutz, James M.; Ulmschneider, Georgia Wralstad (2019). "Civil Liberties, National Security and U.S. Courts in Times of Terrorism". Perspectives on Terrorism. 13 (6): 43–57. JSTOR 26853740.
- Marshall, Peter (1992). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. London: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-0021-7855-6.
- —— (1993). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. Oakland, California: PM Press. ISBN 978-1-6048-6064-1.
- Mattern, Mark (2019). "Anarchism and Art". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 589–602. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Mayne, Alan James (1999). From Politics Past to Politics Future: An Integrated Analysis of Current and Emergent Paradigms. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-2759-6151-0. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2010.
- McLaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism. Aldershot: Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-6196-2.
- Morland, Dave (2004). "Anti-capitalism and poststructuralist anarchism". In Purkis, Jonathan; Bowen, James (eds.). Changing Anarchism: Anarchist Theory and Practice in a Global Age. Manchester University Press. pp. 23–38. ISBN 978-0-7190-6694-8. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
- Meltzer, Albert (2000). Anarchism: Arguments For and Against. AK Press. ISBN 978-1-8731-7657-3.
- Morris, Brian (1993). Bakunin: The Philosophy of Freedom. Black Rose Books. ISBN 978-1-8954-3166-7. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- —— (2015). Anthropology, Ecology, and Anarchism: A Brian Morris Reader. Marshall, Peter (illustrated ed.). Oakland: PM Press. ISBN 978-1-6048-6093-1.
- Morris, Christopher W. (2002). An Essay on the Modern State. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-5215-2407-0. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
- Moya, Jose C. (2015). "Transference, culture, and critique The Circulation of Anarchist Ideas and Practices". In Laforcade, Geoffroy de (ed.). In Defiance of Boundaries: Anarchism in Latin American History. Kirwin R. Shaffer. University Press of Florida. ISBN 978-0-8130-5138-3. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
- Nesser, Petter (2012). "Research Note: Single Actor Terrorism: Scope, Characteristics and Explanations". Perspectives on Terrorism. 6 (6): 61–73. JSTOR 26296894.
- Nettlau, Max (1996). A Short History of Anarchism. Freedom Press. ISBN 978-0-9003-8489-9.
- Newman, Michael (2005). Socialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1928-0431-0.
- Newman, Saul (2010). The Politics of Postanarchism. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-3495-8. Archived from the original on 3 January 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
- Nicholas, Lucy (2019). "Gender and Sexuality". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Norris, Jesse J. (2020). "Idiosyncratic Terrorism: Disaggregating an Undertheorized Concept". Perspectives on Terrorism. 14 (3). ISSN 2334-3745. JSTOR 26918296s.
- Nomad, Max (1966). "The Anarchist Tradition". In Drachkovitch, Milorad M. (ed.). Revolutionary Internationals 1864–1943. Stanford University Press. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-8047-0293-5.
- Osgood, Herbert L. (March 1889). "Scientific Anarchism". Political Science Quarterly. 4 (1). The Academy of Political Science: 1–36. doi:10.2307/2139424. JSTOR 2139424.
- Otero, Carlos Peregrín (1994). Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments. Vol. 2–3. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4150-1005-4.
- Parry, Richard (1987). The Bonnot Gang. Rebel Press. ISBN 978-0-9460-6104-4.
- Pernicone, Nunzio (2009). Italian Anarchism, 1864–1892. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-6916-3268-1. Archived from the original on 19 August 2020. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Pierson, Christopher (2013). Just Property: Enlightenment, Revolution, and History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1996-7329-2. Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Ramnath, Maia (2019). "Non-Western Anarchisms and Postcolonialism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Robé, Chris (2017). Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerrillas, and Digital Ninjas. PM Press. ISBN 978-1-6296-3233-9. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2022 – via ResearchGate.
- Rogers, Tristan J. (2020). The Authority of Virtue: Institutions and Character in the Good Society. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-0002-2264-7.
- Rupert, Mark (2006). Globalization and International Political Economy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7425-2943-4.
- Ryley, Peter (2019). "Individualism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 225–236. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Shannon, Deric (2019). "Anti-Capitalism and Libertarian Political Economy". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 91–106. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Skirda, Alexandre (2002). Facing the Enemy: A History of Anarchist Organization From Proudhon to May 1968. AK Press. ISBN 978-1-9025-9319-7.
- Sylvan, Richard (2007). "Anarchism". In Goodin, Robert E.; Pettit, Philip; Pogge, Thomas (eds.). A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Vol. 5 (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-3653-2.
- Suissa, Judith (2019). "Anarchist Education". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Thomas, Paul (1985). Karl Marx and the Anarchists. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN 978-0-7102-0685-5.
- Tucker, Robert C., ed. (1978). The Marx-Engels Reader (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-3930-5684-8. OCLC 3415145.
- Turcato, Davide (2019). "Anarchist Communism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Van der Walt, Lucien (2019). "Syndicalism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. pp. 249–264. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Ward, Colin (1973). "The Role of the State". Education Without Schools: 39–48.
- —— (2004). Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1928-0477-8. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
- Walter, Nicholas (2002). About Anarchism. London: Freedom Press. ISBN 978-0-9003-8490-5.
- Wendt, Fabian (2020). "Against Philosophical Anarchism". Law and Philosophy. 39 (5): 527–544. doi:10.1007/s10982-020-09377-4. S2CID 213742949.
- Wilbur, Shawn (2019). "Mutualism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Williams, Dana M. (2015). "Black Panther Radical Factionalization and the Development of Black Anarchism". Journal of Black Studies. 46 (7). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing: 678–703. doi:10.1177/0021934715593053. JSTOR 24572914. S2CID 145663405.
- —— (2018). "Contemporary Anarchist and Anarchistic Movements". Sociology Compass. 12 (6). Wiley: e12582. doi:10.1111/soc4.12582. ISSN 1751-9020.
- —— (2019). "Tactics: Conceptions of Social Change, Revolution, and Anarchist Organisation". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer Publishing. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2.
- Williams, Leonard (September 2007). "Anarchism Revived". New Political Science. 29 (3): 297–312. doi:10.1080/07393140701510160. ISSN 0739-3148. S2CID 220354272.
- —— (2010). "Hakim Bey and Ontological Anarchism". Journal for the Study of Radicalism. 4 (2). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press: 109–137. doi:10.1353/jsr.2010.0009. JSTOR 41887660. S2CID 143304524.
Tertiary sources
- Coutinho, Steve (3 March 2016). "Zhuangzi". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 5 March 2019.
- De George, Richard T. (2005). Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1992-6479-7.
- Fiala, Andrew (2017). "Anarchism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 28 August 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
- Miller, Martin A.; Dirlik, Arif; Rosemont, Franklin; Augustyn, Adam; Duignan, Brian; Lotha, Gloria (2019). "Anarchism In The Arts". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- Morris, Andrew (2008). "Anarcho-capitalism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. SAGE; Cato Institute. pp. 13–14. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n8. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4. OCLC 191924853. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
- McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (2003). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1928-0276-7.
- "Definition of Anarchism". Merriam-Webster. 2019. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- Miller, David (1991). The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-6311-7944-3. Archived from the original on 18 August 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
- Ostergaard, Geoffrey (2003). "Anarchism". In Outhwaite, William (ed.). The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought (2nd ed.). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-0-6312-2164-7. OCLC 49704935. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
- "Anarchy". Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. September 2005.
Further reading
- Avrich, Paul (1995). Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-6910-3412-6.
- Barclay, Harold B. (1990). People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy. Kahn & Averill. ISBN 978-0-9393-0609-1.
- Baker, Zoe (2023). Means and Ends: The Revolutionary Practice of Anarchism in Europe and the United States. AK Press. ISBN 978-1-8493-5498-1. OCLC 1345217229.
- Chomsky, Noam (2005). Pateman, Barry (ed.). Chomsky on Anarchism. Oakland: AK Press. ISBN 978-1-9048-5926-0.
- Edmundson, William A. (2007). Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-5210-3751-8. Criticism of philosophical anarchism.
- Esenwein, George (1989). Anarchist Ideology and the Working-Class Movement in Spain, 1868–1898. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5200-6398-3.
- Harper, Clifford (1987). Anarchy: A Graphic Guide. Camden Press. ISBN 978-0-9484-9122-1.
- Huemer, Michael (2012). The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey. London: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 137. ISBN 978-1-1372-8164-7. A defence of philosophical anarchism, stating that "both kinds of 'anarchism' are philosophical and political claims."
- Kahn, Joseph (5 August 2000). "Anarchism, the Creed That Won't Stay Dead; The Spread of World Capitalism Resurrects a Long-Dormant Movement". The New York Times. p. B9. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Kinna, Ruth (2005). Anarchism: A Beginners Guide. Oneworld. ISBN 978-1-8516-8370-3.
- Le Guin, Ursula K. (2009). The Dispossessed. HarperCollins. Anarchistic popular fiction novel.
- Sartwell, Crispin (2008). Against the State: An Introduction to Anarchist Political Theory. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-7447-1.
- Scott, James C. (2012). Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-6911-5529-6.
- Suissa, Judith (1 July 2019b). "Education and Non-domination: Reflections from the Radical Tradition". Studies in Philosophy and Education. 38 (4): 359–375. doi:10.1007/s11217-019-09662-3. S2CID 151210357.
- Wolff, Robert Paul (1998). In Defense of Anarchism. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-5202-1573-3. An argument for philosophical anarchism.
- Woodcock, George (January 1962). "Anarchism in Spain". History Today. 12 (1): 22–32. Retrieved 14 October 2020.
- Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (2019). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2. ISBN 978-3-3197-5620-2. S2CID 149333615.
External links
- Anarchy Archives – an online research center on the history and theory of anarchism.
- Definitions from Wiktionary
- Media from Commons
- News from Wikinews
- Quotations from Wikiquote
- Texts from Wikisource
- Textbooks from Wikibooks
- Resources from Wikiversity
- Data from Wikidata
Anarchism | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concepts |
| ||||||
Issues |
| ||||||
Schools of thought |
| ||||||
Types of federation | |||||||
Economics | |||||||
Culture |
| ||||||
History |
| ||||||
People |
| ||||||
Lists |
| ||||||
By region |
| ||||||
Related topics |
Nietzsche and Max Stirner | ||||||
|
Links to related articles | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|