Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 05:11, 27 December 2024

This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Misplaced Pages" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The free online encyclopedia Misplaced Pages has been criticized since its creation in 2001. Most of the criticism has been directed toward its content, community of established volunteer users, process, and rules. Critics have questioned its factual reliability, the readability and organization of its articles, the lack of methodical fact-checking, and its political bias.

Concerns have also been raised about systemic bias along gender, racial, political, corporate, institutional, and national lines. Conflicts of interest arising from corporate campaigns to influence content have also been highlighted. Further concerns include the vandalism and partisanship facilitated by anonymous editing, clique behavior (from contributors as well as administrators and other top figures), social stratification between a guardian class and newer users, excessive rule-making, edit warring, and uneven policy application.

Criticism of content

The reliability of Misplaced Pages is often questioned. In Misplaced Pages: The Dumbing Down of World Knowledge (2010), journalist Edwin Black characterized the content of articles as a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods". Oliver Kamm, in his 2007 op-ed, said that articles usually are dominated by the loudest and most persistent editorial voices or by an interest group with an ideological "axe to grind".

In his article The 'Undue Weight' of Truth on Misplaced Pages (2012), Timothy Messer–Kruse criticized the undue-weight policy that deals with the relative importance of sources, observing that it showed Misplaced Pages's goal was not to present correct and definitive information about a subject but to present the majority opinion of the sources cited. The authors of another 2012 article noted another author's point that omissions within an article might give the reader false ideas about a topic, based upon the incomplete content of Misplaced Pages.

Misplaced Pages is sometimes characterized as having a hostile editing environment. In a 2014 article, Dariusz Jemielniak, a steward for Wikimedia Foundation projects, stated that the complexity of the rules and laws governing editorial content and the behavior of the editors is a burden for new editors and a license for the "office politics" of disruptive editors. In a follow-up article, Jemielniak said that abridging and rewriting the editorial rules and laws of Misplaced Pages for clarity of purpose and simplicity of application would resolve the bureaucratic bottleneck of too many rules. In a 2013 article, Aaron Halfaker said the over-complicated rules and laws of Misplaced Pages unintentionally provoked the decline in editorial participation that began in 2009—frightening away new editors who otherwise would contribute to Misplaced Pages.

There have also been works that describe the possible misuse of Misplaced Pages. In Misplaced Pages or Wickedpedia? (2008), the Hoover Institution said Misplaced Pages is an unreliable resource for correct knowledge, information, and facts about a subject, because, as an open-source website, the editorial content of the articles is readily subjected to manipulation and propaganda by government and corporate parties. The 2014 edition of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's official student handbook, Academic Integrity at MIT, informs students that Misplaced Pages is not a reliable academic source, stating, "the bibliography published at the end of the Misplaced Pages entry may point you to potential sources. However, do not assume that these sources are reliable – use the same criteria to judge them as you would any other source. Do not consider the Misplaced Pages bibliography as a replacement for your own research."

Accuracy of information

Not authoritative

Misplaced Pages acknowledges that the encyclopedia should not be used as a primary source for research, either academic or informational. The British librarian Philip Bradley said, "the main problem is the lack of authority. With printed publications, the publishers have to ensure that their data are reliable, as their livelihood depends on it. But with something like this, all that goes out the window." Likewise, Robert McHenry, editor-in-chief of Encyclopedia Britannica from 1992 to 1997, said that readers of Misplaced Pages articles cannot know who wrote the article they are reading—it might have been written by an expert in the subject matter or by an amateur. In November 2015, Misplaced Pages co-founder Larry Sanger told Zach Schwartz in Vice: "I think Misplaced Pages never solved the problem of how to organize itself in a way that didn't lead to mob rule" and that since he left the project, "People that I would say are trolls sort of took over. The inmates started running the asylum."

Comparative study of science articles

In "Internet Encyclopedias Go Head-to-head", a 2005 article published in the scientific journal Nature, the results of a blind experiment (single-blind study), which compared the factual and informational accuracy of entries from Misplaced Pages and the Encyclopædia Britannica, were reported. The 42-entry sample included science articles and biographies of scientists, which were compared for accuracy by anonymous academic reviewers; they found that the average Misplaced Pages entry contained four errors and omissions, while the average Encyclopædia Britannica entry contained three errors and omissions. The study concluded that Misplaced Pages and Britannica were comparable in terms of the accuracy of its science entries. Nevertheless, the reviewers had two principal criticisms of the Misplaced Pages science entries: (i) thematically confused content, without an intelligible structure (order, presentation, interpretation); and (ii) that undue weight is given to controversial, fringe theories about the subject matter.

The dissatisfaction of the Encyclopædia Britannica editors led to Nature publishing additional survey documentation that substantiated the results of the comparative study. Based upon the additional documents, Encyclopædia Britannica denied the validity of the study, stating it was flawed, because the Britannica extracts were compilations that sometimes included articles written for the youth version of the encyclopedia. In turn, Nature acknowledged that some Britannica articles were compilations, but denied that such editorial details invalidated the conclusions of the comparative study of the science articles.

The editors of Britannica also said that while the Nature study showed that the rate of error between the two encyclopedias was similar, the errors in a Misplaced Pages article usually were errors of fact, while the errors in a Britannica article were errors of omission. According to the editors of Britannica, Britannica was more accurate than Misplaced Pages in that respect. Subsequently, Nature magazine rejected the Britannica response with a rebuttal of the editors' specific objections about the research method of the study.

Lack of methodical fact-checking

Inaccurate information that is not obviously false may persist in Misplaced Pages for a long time before it is challenged. The most prominent cases reported by mainstream media involved biographies of living people.

The Misplaced Pages Seigenthaler biography incident demonstrated that the subject of a biographical article must sometimes fix blatant lies about themselves. In May 2005, an anonymous user edited the biographical article on American journalist and writer John Seigenthaler so that it contained several false and defamatory statements. The inaccurate claims went unnoticed from May until September 2005 when they were discovered by Victor S. Johnson Jr., a friend of Seigenthaler. Misplaced Pages content is often mirrored at sites such as Answers.com, which means that incorrect information can be replicated alongside correct information through a number of web sources. Such information can thereby develop false authority due to its presence at such sites.

In another example, on March 2, 2007, MSNBC.com reported that then-New York Senator Hillary Clinton had been incorrectly listed for 20 months in her Misplaced Pages biography as having been valedictorian of her class of 1969 at Wellesley College, when she was not. The article included a link to the Misplaced Pages edit, where the incorrect information was added on July 9, 2005. The inaccurate information was removed within 24 hours after the MSNBC.com report appeared.

Attempts to perpetrate hoaxes may not be confined to editing existing Misplaced Pages articles, but can also include creating new articles. In October 2005, Alan Mcilwraith, a call center worker from Scotland, created a Misplaced Pages article in which he wrote that he was a highly decorated war hero. The article was quickly identified as a hoax by other users and deleted.

There have also been instances of users deliberately inserting false information into Misplaced Pages in order to test the system and demonstrate its alleged unreliability. Gene Weingarten, a journalist, ran such a test in 2007, in which he inserted false information into his own Misplaced Pages article; it was removed 27 hours later by a Misplaced Pages editor. Misplaced Pages considers the deliberate insertion of false and misleading information to be vandalism.

Neutral point of view and conflicts of interest

Misplaced Pages regards the concept of a neutral point of view as one of its non-negotiable principles; however, it acknowledges that such a concept has its limitations – its NPOV policy states that articles should be "as far as possible" written "without editorial bias". Mark Glaser, a journalist, also wrote that this may be an impossible ideal due to the inevitable biases of editors. Research has shown that articles can maintain bias in spite of the neutral point of view policy through word choice, the presentation of opinions and controversial claims as facts, and framing bias.

In August 2007, a tool called WikiScanner—developed by Virgil Griffith, a visiting researcher from the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico—was released to match edits to the encyclopedia by non-registered users with an extensive database of IP addresses. News stories appeared about IP addresses from various organizations such as the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Republican Congressional Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Diebold, Inc. and the Australian government being used to make edits to Misplaced Pages articles, sometimes of an opinionated or questionable nature. Another story stated that an IP address from the BBC itself had been used to vandalize the article on George W. Bush. The BBC quoted a Misplaced Pages spokesperson as praising the tool: "We really value transparency and the scanner really takes this to another level. Misplaced Pages Scanner may prevent an organization or individuals from editing articles that they're really not supposed to." Not everyone hailed WikiScanner as a success for Misplaced Pages. Oliver Kamm, in a column for The Times, argued instead that:

The WikiScanner is thus an important development in bringing down a pernicious influence on our intellectual life. Critics of the web decry the medium as the cult of the amateur. Misplaced Pages is worse than that; it is the province of the covert lobby. The most constructive course is to stand on the sidelines and jeer at its pretensions.

WikiScanner reveals conflicts of interest only when the editor does not have a Misplaced Pages account and their IP address is used instead. Conflict-of-interest editing done by editors with accounts is not detected, since those edits are anonymous to everyone except some Misplaced Pages administrators.

Scientific disputes

The 2005 Nature study also gave two brief examples of challenges that Wikipedian science writers purportedly faced on Misplaced Pages. The first concerned the addition of a section on violence to the schizophrenia article, which was little more than a "rant" about the need to lock people up, in the view of one of the article's regular editors, neuropsychologist Vaughan Bell. He said that editing it stimulated him to look up the literature on the topic.

Another dispute involved the climate researcher William Connolley, a Misplaced Pages editor who was opposed by others. The topic in this second dispute was "language pertaining to the greenhouse effect", and The New Yorker reported that this dispute, which was far more protracted, had led to arbitration, which took three months to produce a decision. The outcome of arbitration was for Connolley to be restricted to undoing edits on articles once per day.

Exposure to political operatives and advocates

While Misplaced Pages policy requires articles to have a neutral point of view, it is not immune from attempts by outsiders (or insiders) with an agenda to place a spin on articles. In January 2006, it was revealed that several staffers of members of the U.S. House of Representatives had embarked on a campaign to cleanse their respective bosses' biographies on Misplaced Pages, as well as inserting negative remarks on political opponents. References to a campaign promise by Martin Meehan to surrender his seat in 2000 were deleted, and negative comments were inserted into the articles on United States Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, and Eric Cantor, a congressman from Virginia. Numerous other changes were made from an IP address assigned to the House of Representatives. In an interview, Misplaced Pages co-founder Jimmy Wales remarked that the changes were "not cool".

Larry Delay and Pablo Bachelet wrote that from their perspective, some articles dealing with Latin American history and groups (such as the Sandinistas and Cuba) lack political neutrality and are written from a sympathetic Marxist perspective which treats socialist dictatorships favorably at the expense of alternative positions.

In 2008, the pro-Israel group Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) organized an e-mail campaign to encourage readers to correct perceived Israel-related biases and inconsistencies in Misplaced Pages. CAMERA argued the excerpts were unrepresentative and that it had explicitly campaigned merely "toward encouraging people to learn about and edit the online encyclopedia for accuracy". Defenders of CAMERA and the competing group, Electronic Intifada, went into mediation. Israeli diplomat David Saranga said Misplaced Pages is generally fair in regard to Israel. When it was pointed out that the entry on Israel mentioned the word "occupation" nine times, whereas the entry on the Palestinian people mentioned "terror" only once, he responded, "It means only one thing: Israelis should be more active on Misplaced Pages. Instead of blaming it, they should go on the site much more, and try and change it."

Israeli journalist Haviv Rettig Gur, reviewing widespread perceptions in Israel of organized campaigns to introduce systemic bias into Misplaced Pages articles, has argued that there are deeper structural problems creating this bias: anonymous editing favors biased results, especially if the editors organize concerted campaigns of defamation as has been done in articles dealing with Arab-Israeli issues, and current Misplaced Pages policies, while well-meant, have proven ineffective in handling this.

On August 31, 2008, The New York Times ran an article detailing the edits made to the biography of Alaska governor Sarah Palin in the wake of her nomination as the running mate of Arizona Senator John McCain. During the 24 hours before the McCain campaign announcement, thirty edits, many of them adding flattering details, were made to the article by the user "Young_Trigg". This person later acknowledged working on the McCain campaign, and having several other user accounts.

In November 2007, libelous accusations were made against two politicians from southwestern France, Jean-Pierre Grand and Hélène Mandroux-Colas, on their Misplaced Pages biographies. Grand asked the president of the French National Assembly and Prime Minister to reinforce the legislation on the penal responsibility of Internet sites and of authors who peddle false information in order to cause harm. Senator Jean Louis Masson then requested the Minister of Justice to tell him whether it would be possible to increase the criminal responsibilities of hosting providers, site operators, and authors of libelous content; the minister declined to do so, recalling the existing rules in the LCEN law (see Internet censorship in France).

On August 25, 2010, the Toronto Star reported that the Canadian "government is now conducting two investigations into federal employees who have taken to Misplaced Pages to express their opinion on federal policies and bitter political debates."

In 2010, Al Jazeera's Teymoor Nabili suggested that the article Cyrus Cylinder had been edited for political purposes by "an apparent tussle of opinions in the shadowy world of hard drives and 'independent' editors that comprise the Misplaced Pages industry." He suggested that after the Iranian presidential election of 2009 and ensuing "anti-Iranian activities", a "strenuous attempt to portray the cylinder as nothing more than the propaganda tool of an aggressive invader" was visible. The edits following his analysis of the edits during 2009 and 2010, represented "a complete dismissal of the suggestion that the cylinder, or Cyrus' actions, represent a concern for human rights or any kind of enlightened intent," in stark contrast to Cyrus' own reputation as documented in the Old Testament and the people of Babylon.

Commandeering or sanitizing articles

Articles of particular interest to an editor or group of editors are sometimes modified based on these editors' respective points of views. Some companies and organizations—such as Sony, Diebold, Nintendo, Dell, the CIA, and the Church of Scientology—as well as individuals, such as United States Congressional staffers, were all shown to have modified the Misplaced Pages pages about themselves in order to present a point of view that describes them positively; these organizations may have editors who revert negative changes as soon as these changes are submitted.

The Chinese Misplaced Pages article on the Tiananmen Square massacre was rewritten to describe it as necessary to "quell the counterrevolutionary riots" and Taiwan was described as "a province in the People's Republic of China". According to the BBC, "there are indications that are not all necessarily organic, nor random" and were in fact encouraged by the Chinese government.

Quality of presentation

Quality of writing

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Misplaced Pages the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Misplaced Pages article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination. For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Misplaced Pages in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.

Contrasting Misplaced Pages's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization ... his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice ... and ... his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Misplaced Pages's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy— means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Misplaced Pages history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians ... remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Misplaced Pages articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Misplaced Pages critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Misplaced Pages entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage." A comparative study of Misplaced Pages, Britannica and Simple Misplaced Pages in 2012 by Adam Jatowt and Katsumi Tanaka using a range of readability metrics on a subset of 90k articles from Britannica and 25k articles from both Misplaced Pages and Simple Misplaced Pages, revealed that Britannica tends to have articles that are 21% easier to read than Misplaced Pages, while Simple Misplaced Pages is on average 26% easier than Misplaced Pages. The authors attributed these differences to the fact that Misplaced Pages articles have multiple authors who may rarely collaborate towards a readable and coherent text unlike the case of Britannica.

A study of Misplaced Pages articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Misplaced Pages's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing". The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".

In a December 2023 video interview with Andrew Keen about his prose experiment "The Hofmann Wobble: Misplaced Pages and the problem of historical memory", published in Harper's Magazine the same month, Ben Lerner said that he wrote the piece in part because he realized that the optimism of the early days of Misplaced Pages concerning "tinkering with language" to "unmask" the ideology of those in power was misguided, and that writing Misplaced Pages was an inefficient use of creative energy. In his view, writing bland prose to offload memory to the cloud simply could not lead to the conceptual re-framing of ideas for which he said both he and his narrator had naively hoped. Following Keen, he agreed that Wikipedians may well have provided stylistic training material for the "affective neutrality" of ChatGPT. Lerner explained that his narrator is manifestly unreliable by design, telling the reader from the start that he is remembering wrongly, that he regularly shifted identities to "manipulate" Misplaced Pages readers, and finally asking his reader to believe that he has handed off the narration of the experiment's conclusion to a machine. This ambient unreliability is meant to mirror the experience of consuming digital text whose authority is constantly wobbling as it is successively rewritten by unknown actors.

The Wall Street Journal debate

In the September 12, 2006, edition of The Wall Street Journal, Jimmy Wales debated with Dale Hoiberg, editor-in-chief of Encyclopædia Britannica. Hoiberg focused on a need for expertise and control in an encyclopedia and cited Lewis Mumford that overwhelming information could "bring about a state of intellectual enervation and depletion hardly to be distinguished from massive ignorance." Wales emphasized Misplaced Pages's differences and asserted that openness and transparency lead to quality. Hoiberg said he "had neither the time nor space to respond to " and "could corral any number of links to articles alleging errors in Misplaced Pages", to which Wales responded: "No problem! Misplaced Pages to the rescue with a fine article", and included a link to the Misplaced Pages article about criticism of Misplaced Pages.

Systemic bias in coverage

Misplaced Pages has been accused of systemic bias, which is to say its general nature leads, without necessarily any conscious intention, to the propagation of various prejudices. Although many articles in newspapers have concentrated on minor factual errors in Misplaced Pages articles, there are also concerns about large-scale, presumably unintentional effects from the increasing influence and use of Misplaced Pages as a research tool at all levels. In an article in the Times Higher Education magazine (London), philosopher Martin Cohen describes Misplaced Pages as having "become a monopoly" with "all the prejudices and ignorance of its creators," which he calls a "youthful cab-drivers" perspective. Cohen concludes that "o control the reference sources that people use is to control the way people comprehend the world. Misplaced Pages may have a benign, even trivial face, but underneath may lie a more sinister and subtle threat to freedom of thought." That freedom is undermined by what he sees as what matters on Misplaced Pages, "not your sources but the 'support of the community."

Researchers from Washington University in St. Louis developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Misplaced Pages's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.

Critics also point to the tendency to cover topics in detail disproportionate to their importance. For example, Stephen Colbert once mockingly praised Misplaced Pages for having a longer entry on 'lightsabers' than it does on the 'printing press'. Dale Hoiberg, the editor-in-chief of Encyclopædia Britannica, said "People write of things they're interested in, and so many subjects don't get covered, and news events get covered in great detail. In the past, the entry on Hurricane Frances was more than five times the length of that on Chinese art, and the entry on Coronation Street was twice as long as the article on Tony Blair."

This approach of comparing two articles, one about a traditionally encyclopedic subject and the other about one more popular with the crowd, has been called "wikigroaning". A defense of inclusion criteria is that the encyclopedia's longer coverage of pop culture does not deprive the more "worthy" or serious subjects of space. That being said, 2023 research suggests that Misplaced Pages creates systematic biases against poorer countries.

Notability of article topics

Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines, which are used by editors to determine if a subject merits its own article, and the application thereof, are the subject of much criticism. In May 2018, a Misplaced Pages editor rejected a draft article about Donna Strickland before she won the Nobel Prize in Physics in November of the same year, because no independent sources were given to show that Strickland was sufficiently notable by Misplaced Pages's standards. Journalists highlighted this as an indicator of the limited visibility of women in science compared to their male colleagues.

The gender bias on Misplaced Pages is well documented and has prompted a movement to increase the number of notable women on Misplaced Pages through the Women in Red WikiProject. In an article entitled "Seeking Disambiguation", Annalisa Merelli interviewed Catalina Cruz, a candidate for office in Queens, New York in the 2018 election who had the notorious SEO disadvantage of having the same name as a porn star with a Misplaced Pages page. Merelli also interviewed the Misplaced Pages editor who wrote the candidate's ill-fated article (which was deleted, then restored, after she won the election). She described the Articles for Deletion process and pointed to other candidates who had pages on the English Misplaced Pages despite never having held office.

Novelist Nicholson Baker, critical of deletionism, writes: "There are quires, reams, bales of controversy over what constitutes notability in Misplaced Pages: nobody will ever sort it out."

Journalist Timothy Noah wrote of his treatment: "Misplaced Pages's notability policy resembles U.S. immigration policy before 9/11: stringent rules, spotty enforcement". In the same article, Noah mentions that the Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Stacy Schiff was not considered notable enough for a Misplaced Pages entry until she wrote her article "Know it All" about the Misplaced Pages Essjay controversy.

On a more generic level, a 2014 study found no correlation between the characteristics of a given Misplaced Pages page about an academic and the academic's notability as determined by citation counts. The metrics of each Misplaced Pages page examined included length, number of links to the page from other articles, and number of edits made to the page. This study also found that Misplaced Pages did not cover notable ISI highly cited researchers properly.

In 2020, Misplaced Pages was criticized for the amount of time it took for an article about Theresa Greenfield, a candidate for the 2020 United States Senate election in Iowa, to leave Misplaced Pages's Articles for Creation process and become published. Particularly, the criteria for notability were criticized, with The Washington Post reporting: "Greenfield is a uniquely tricky case for Misplaced Pages because she doesn't have the background that most candidates for major political office typically have (like prior government experience or prominence in business). Even if Misplaced Pages editors could recognize she was prominent, she had a hard time meeting the official criteria for notability." Jimmy Wales also criticized the long process on his talk page.

Partisanship

According to Haaretz, "Misplaced Pages has succeeded in being accused of being both too liberal and too conservative, and has critics from across the spectrum", while also noting that Misplaced Pages is "usually accused of being too liberal". According to CNN, Misplaced Pages's ideological bias "may match the ideological bias of the news ecosystem."

U.S. commentators, mostly politically conservative ones, have suggested that a politically liberal viewpoint is predominant in the English Misplaced Pages. Andrew Schlafly created Conservapedia because of his perception that Misplaced Pages contained a liberal bias. Conservapedia's editors have compiled a list of alleged examples of liberal bias in Misplaced Pages. Lawrence Solomon of National Review considered the Misplaced Pages articles on subjects like global warming, intelligent design, and Roe v. Wade all to be slanted in favor of liberal views. In a September 2010 issue of the conservative weekly Human Events, Rowan Scarborough presented a critique of Misplaced Pages's coverage of American politicians prominent in the approaching U.S. midterm elections as evidence of systemic liberal bias. Scarborough compares the biographical articles of liberal and conservative opponents in Senate races in the Alaska Republican primary and the Delaware and Nevada general election, emphasizing the quantity of negative coverage of Tea Party movement-endorsed candidates. He also cites criticism by Lawrence Solomon and quotes in full the lead section of Misplaced Pages's article on Conservapedia as evidence of an underlying bias.

In 2006, Misplaced Pages co-founder Jimmy Wales said: "The Misplaced Pages community is very diverse, from liberal to conservative to libertarian and beyond. If averages mattered, and due to the nature of the wiki software (no voting) they almost certainly don't, I would say that the Misplaced Pages community is slightly more liberal than the U.S. population on average, because we are global and the international community of English speakers is slightly more liberal than the U.S. population. There are no data or surveys to back that." In 2007, Wales said that claims of liberal bias on Misplaced Pages "are not supported by the facts". Shane Greenstein and Feng Zhu analyzed 2012 era Misplaced Pages articles on U.S. politics, going back a decade, and wrote a study arguing the more contributors there were to an article, the less biased the article would be, and that – based on a study of frequent collocations – fewer articles "leaned Democrat" than was the case in Misplaced Pages's early years. Sorin Adam Matei, a professor at Purdue University, said that "for certain political topics, there's a central-left bias. There's also a slight, when it comes to more political topics, counter-cultural bias. It's not across the board, and it's not for all things."

In February 2021, Fox News accused Misplaced Pages of whitewashing communism and socialism. In November 2021, the English Misplaced Pages's entry for "Mass killings under communist regimes" was nominated for deletion, with some editors arguing that it has "a biased 'anti-Communist' point of view", that "it should not resort to 'simplistic presuppositions that events are driven by any specific ideology'", and that "by combining different elements of research to create a 'synthesis', this constitutes original research and therefore breaches Misplaced Pages rules." This was criticized by historian Robert Tombs, who called it "morally indefensible, at least as bad as Holocaust denial, because 'linking ideology and killing' is the very core of why these things are important. I have read the Misplaced Pages page, and it seems to be careful and balanced. Therefore, attempts to remove it can only be ideologically motivated – to whitewash Communism." Other Misplaced Pages editors and users on social media opposed the deletion of the article. The article's deletion nomination received considerable attention from conservative media. The Heritage Foundation, an American conservative think tank, called the arguments made in favor of deletion "absurd and ahistorical". On December 1, 2021, a panel of four administrators found that the discussion yielded no consensus, meaning that the status quo was retained, and the article was not deleted. The article's deletion discussion was the largest in Misplaced Pages's history.

Hindutvas have accused Misplaced Pages of being anti-Hindu and anti-Indian.

National or corporate bias

In 2008, Tim Anderson, a senior lecturer in political economy at the University of Sydney, said Misplaced Pages administrators display an American-focused bias in their interactions with editors and their determinations of which sources are appropriate for use on the site. Anderson was outraged after several of the sources he used in his edits to the Hugo Chávez article, including Venezuela Analysis and Z Magazine, were disallowed as "unusable". Anderson also described Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy to ZDNet Australia as "a facade" and that Misplaced Pages "hides behind a reliance on corporate media editorials".

Racial bias

Misplaced Pages has been charged with having a systemic racial bias in its coverage, due to an underrepresentation of people of colour as editors. The President of Wikimedia D.C., James Hare, noted that "a lot of black history is left out" of Misplaced Pages, due to articles predominately being written by white editors. Articles that do exist on African topics are, according to some critics, largely edited by editors from Europe and North America and thus reflect their knowledge and consumption of media, which "tend to perpetuate a negative image" of Africa. Maira Liriano, of the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, has argued that the lack of information regarding black history on Misplaced Pages "makes it seem like it's not important." San Francisco Poet Laureate Alejandro Murguía has stressed how it is important for Latinos to be part of Misplaced Pages "because it is a major source of where people get their information." In 2010, an analysis of Misplaced Pages edits revealed that Asia, as the most populous continent, was represented in only 16.67% of edits. Africa (6.35%) and South America (2.58%) were equally underrepresented.

In 2018, the Southern Poverty Law Center criticized Misplaced Pages for being "vulnerable to manipulation by neo-Nazis, white nationalists and racist academics seeking a wider audience for extreme views." According to the SPLC, "ivil POV-pushers can disrupt the editing process by engaging other users in tedious and frustrating debates or tie up administrators in endless rounds of mediation. Users who fall into this category include racialist academics and members of the human biodiversity, or HBD, blogging community. ... In recent years, the proliferation of far-right online spaces, such as white nationalist forums, alt-right boards and HBD blogs, has created a readymade pool of users that can be recruited to edit on Misplaced Pages en masse. ... The presence of white nationalists and other far-right extremists on Misplaced Pages is an ongoing problem that is unlikely to go away in the near future given the rightward political shift in countries where the majority of the site's users live." The SPLC cited the article "Race and intelligence" as an example of the alt-right influence on Misplaced Pages, stating that at that time the article presented a "false balance" between fringe racialist views and the "mainstream perspective in psychology." In 2022 The Chronicle of Higher Education reported on a researcher at Cleveland State University whose "home institution was essentially providing a soapbox for racist pseudoscience." The article states that he had some influence on "public misperceptions of race" as a result of heavy editing of an early version of Misplaced Pages's article on race and intelligence.

Gender bias and sexism

Misplaced Pages has a longstanding controversy concerning gender bias and sexism. Gender bias on Misplaced Pages refers to the finding that between 84 and 91 percent of Misplaced Pages editors are male, which allegedly leads to systemic bias. Misplaced Pages has been criticized by some journalists and academics for lacking not only women contributors but also extensive and in-depth encyclopedic attention to many topics regarding gender. Sue Gardner, former executive director of the Foundation, said that increasing diversity was about making the encyclopedia "as good as it could be". Factors cited as possibly discouraging women from editing included the "obsessive fact-loving realm", associations with the "hard-driving hacker crowd", and the necessity to be "open to very difficult, high-conflict people, even misogynists."

In 2011, the Wikimedia Foundation set a goal of increasing the proportion of female contributors to 25 percent by 2015. In August 2013, Gardner conceded defeat: "I didn't solve it. We didn't solve it. The Wikimedia Foundation didn't solve it. The solution won't come from the Wikimedia Foundation." In August 2014, Misplaced Pages co-founder Jimmy Wales acknowledged in a BBC interview the failure of Misplaced Pages to fix the gender gap and announced the Wikimedia Foundation's plans for "doubling down" on the issue. Wales said the Foundation would be open to more outreach and more software changes.

Writing in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society, Marie Vitulli states that "mathematicians have had a difficult time when writing biographies of women mathematicians," and she describes the aggressiveness of editors and administrators in deleting such articles.

Criticism was presented on this topic in The Signpost (WP:THREATENING2MEN).

Antisemitic bias

Misplaced Pages has been praised for its responsiveness to antisemitic vandalism of encyclopedia articles, such as the placement of swastikas, compared to social media websites. In 2010, one study suggested that "systematic use of criticism elimination" had allowed Misplaced Pages editors to prevent criticism of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including two cases where an NGO was accused of using antisemitic or anti-Israel discourse. In 2018, journalist Yair Rosenberg criticized those Misplaced Pages editors who sought to delete accusations of antisemitism made against the UK Labour Party.

Since 2016, several studies have examined Misplaced Pages's handling of the mass murder of Jews during the Holocaust, including Wikipedias in different languages, with one study finding that explicit anti-Jewish statements were rare, articles differed in presenting Holocaust denial and Jewish heroics, and problems did not necessarily correlate to the Misplaced Pages host culture (i.e., language). In 2023, Jan Grabowski and Shira Klein argued that Misplaced Pages editors intentionally introduced skewed views and distortions in representations of the Holocaust in Poland. The English Misplaced Pages's Arbitration Committee subsequently evaluated the actions of editors in the affected articles and banned two editors from contributing to the topic area. Klein criticized the proposed remedies as " depth and consequence".

In June 2024, major American Jewish organizations asked the Wikimedia Foundation to reconsider the English Misplaced Pages's decision to treat the Anti-Defamation League as "only marginally reliable (meaning that its use is context-dependent) on questions of antisemitism outside of matters related to Israel and Zionism", stating that this would hamper the Jewish community's efforts to protect themselves from antisemitism.

Institutional bias

Misplaced Pages has been criticized for reflecting the bias and influence of media that are seen as reliable due to their dominance, and for being a site of conflict between entrenched or special institutional interests. Public relations firms and interest lobbies, corporate, political and otherwise, have been accused of working systemically to distort Misplaced Pages's articles in their respective interests.

Firearms-related articles

Misplaced Pages has been criticized for issues related to bias in firearms-related articles. According to critics, systematic bias arises from the tendency of the editors most active in maintaining firearms-related articles to also be gun enthusiasts, and firearms-related articles are dominated by technical information while issues of the social impact and regulation of firearms are relegated to separate articles. Communications were facilitated by a "WikiProject," called "WikiProject Firearms", an on-wiki group of editors with a common interest. The alleged pro-gun bias drew increased attention after the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, in February 2018. The Wikimedia Foundation defended itself from allegations of being host to opinion-influencing campaigns of pro-gun groups, saying that the contents are always being updated and improved.

Skeptical bias

In 2014, supporters of holistic healing and energy psychology began a Change.org petition asking for "true scientific discourse" on Misplaced Pages, complaining that "much of the information related to holistic approaches to healing is biased, misleading, out-of-date, or just plain wrong". In response, Jimmy Wales said Misplaced Pages covers only works that are published in respectable scientific journals.

Misplaced Pages has been accused of being biased against views outside of the scientific mainstream due to influence from the skeptical movement. Social scientist Brian Martin examined the influence of skeptics on Misplaced Pages by looking for parallels between Misplaced Pages entries and characteristic techniques used by skeptics, finding that the result "does not prove that Skeptics are shaping Misplaced Pages but is compatible with that possibility."

Sexual content

Misplaced Pages was criticized in 2008 for allowing graphic sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation as well as photos from hardcore pornographic films found on its articles. Child protection campaigners say graphic sexual content appears on many Misplaced Pages entries, displayed without any warning or age verification.

The Misplaced Pages article Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from German heavy metal band Scorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. In December 2008, the Internet Watch Foundation, a nonprofit, nongovernment-affiliated organization, added the article to its blacklist, criticizing the inclusion of the picture as "distasteful". As a result, access to the article was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom. Seth Finkelstein writing for The Guardian argues that the debate over the album cover masks a structural lack of accountability on Misplaced Pages, in particular when it comes to sexual content. For example, the deletion by Misplaced Pages co-founder Jimmy Wales of images of lolicon versions of the character Wikipe-tan created a minor controversy on the topic. The deletion was taken as endorsement of the non-lolicon images of Wikipe-tan, which Wales later had to explicitly deny: "I don't like Wikipe-tan and never have." Finkelstein sees Misplaced Pages as composed of fiefdoms, which makes it difficult for the Misplaced Pages community to deal with such issues, and sometimes necessitates top-down intervention. The prevalence of displayed unexpected pornographic content when porn-unrelated search terms are entered on the connected site Wikimedia Commons is also a subject of criticism.

Exposure to vandals

As an online encyclopedia that almost anyone can edit, Misplaced Pages has had problems with vandalism of articles, which range from blanking articles to inserting profanities, hoaxes, or nonsense. Misplaced Pages has a range of tools available to users and administrators in order to fight against vandalism, including blocking and banning vandals and automated bots that detect and repair vandalism. Supporters of the project argue that the vast majority of vandalism on Misplaced Pages is reverted within a short time, and a study by Fernanda Viégas of the MIT Media Lab and Martin Wattenberg and Kushal Dave of IBM Research found that most vandal edits were reverted within around five minutes; however, they state that "it is essentially impossible to find a crisp definition of vandalism." While most instances of page blanking or the addition of offensive material are soon reverted, less obvious vandalism, or vandalism to a little-viewed article, has remained for longer periods.

A 2007 conference paper estimated that 1 in 271 articles had some "damaged" content. Most of the damage involved nonsense; 20% involved actual misinformation. It reported that 42% of damage gets repaired before any reader clicked on the article, and 80% before 30 people did so.

Privacy concerns

Most privacy concerns refer to cases of government or employer data gathering, computer or electronic monitoring; or trading data between organizations. According to James Donnelly and Jenifer Haeckel, "the Internet has created conflicts between personal privacy, commercial interests and the interests of society at large". Balancing the rights of all concerned as technology alters the social landscape will not be easy. It "is not yet possible to anticipate the path of the common law or governmental regulation" regarding this problem.

The concern in the case of Misplaced Pages is the right of a private citizen to remain private; to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.

In 2005, Agence France-Presse quoted Daniel Brandt, the Misplaced Pages Watch owner, as saying that "the basic problem is that no one, neither the trustees of Wikimedia Foundation, nor the volunteers who are connected with Misplaced Pages, consider themselves responsible for the content."

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Misplaced Pages shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker who was formerly with the Chaos Computer Club. More specifically, the court ordered that the URL within the German .de domain (http://www.wikipedia.de/) may no longer redirect to the encyclopedia's servers in Florida at http://de.wikipedia.org although German readers were still able to use the US-based URL directly, and there was virtually no loss of access on their part. The court order arose out of a lawsuit filed by Floricic's parents, demanding that their son's surname be removed from Misplaced Pages. The next month on February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.

Criticism of the community

Role of Jimmy Wales

The community of Misplaced Pages editors has been criticized for placing an irrational emphasis on Jimmy Wales as a person. Wales's role in personally determining the content of some articles has also been criticized as contrary to the independent spirit that Misplaced Pages supposedly has gained. In early 2007, Wales dismissed the criticism of the Misplaced Pages model: "I am unaware of any problems with the quality of discourse on the site. I don't know of any higher-quality discourse anywhere."

WikiBullying

"WikiBullying" is the term used by Misplaced Pages editors to refer to the online harassments that occur on-wiki. In a 2008 article in The Brooklyn Rail, Misplaced Pages contributor David Shankbone contended that he had been harassed and stalked because of his work on Misplaced Pages, had received no support from the authorities or the Wikimedia Foundation, and only mixed support from the Misplaced Pages community. Shankbone wrote, "If you become a target on Misplaced Pages, do not expect a supportive community."

David Auerbach, writing in Slate magazine, said:

I am not exaggerating when I say it is the closest thing to Kafka's The Trial I have ever witnessed, with editors and administrators giving conflicting and confusing advice, complaints getting "boomeranged" onto complainants who then face disciplinary action for complaining, and very little consistency in the standards applied. In my short time there, I repeatedly observed editors lawyering an issue with acronyms, only to turn around and declare "Ignore all rules!" when faced with the same rules used against them ... The problem instead stems from the fact that administrators and longtime editors have developed a fortress mentality in which they see new editors as dangerous intruders who will wreck their beautiful encyclopedia, and thus antagonize and even persecute them.

Misplaced Pages has also been criticized for its weak enforcement against perceived toxicities among the editing community at various times.

In one case, a longtime editor was nearly driven to suicide following online abuse from editors and a ban from the site before being rescued from the suicide attempt.

In order to address this problem the Wikimedia Foundation planned to institute a new rule of conduct aimed at combating 'toxic behavior'. The development of the new rule of conduct would take place in two phases. The first will include setting policies for in-person and virtual events as well as policies for technical spaces including chat rooms and other Wikimedia projects. A second phase outlining enforcement when the rules are broken is planned to be approved by the end of 2020, according to the Wikimedia board's plan.

A 2023 study of Misplaced Pages talk pages found that toxic comments were closely correlated with reduced editor activity. The study's authors estimated that toxic comments increase the probability of an editor leaving the website, which had ultimately resulted in 265 cumulative years of lost productivity.

Conflict of interest cases

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2024)

A Business Insider article wrote about a controversy in September 2012 where two Wikimedia Foundation employees were found to have been "running a PR business on the side and editing Misplaced Pages on behalf of their clients."

Unfair treatment of women

In 2015, The Atlantic published a story by Emma Paling about a contributor who was able to obtain no relief from the Arbitration Committee for off-site harassment. Paling quotes a then-sitting Arbitrator speaking about bias against women on the Arbitration Committee.

In the online magazine Slate, David Auerbach criticized the Arbitration Committee's decision to block a woman indefinitely without simultaneously blocking her "chief antagonists" in the December 2014 Gender Gap Task Force case. He mentions his own experience with what he calls "the unblockable"—abrasive editors who can get away with complaints against them because there are enough supporters, and that he had observed a "general indifference or even hostility to an outside opinion" on the English Misplaced Pages. Auerbach considers the systematic defense of vulgar language use by insiders as a symptom of the toxicity he describes.

In January 2015, The Guardian reported that the Arbitration Committee had banned five feminist editors from gender-related articles on a case related to the Gamergate controversy while including quotes from a Misplaced Pages editor alleging unfair treatment. Other commentators, including from Gawker and ThinkProgress, provided additional analysis while sourcing from The Guardian's story. Reports in The Washington Post, Slate and Social Text described these articles as "flawed" or factually inaccurate, pointing out that the Arbitration case had not concluded as at the time of publishing; no editor had been banned. After the result was published, Gawker wrote that "ArbCom ruled to punish six editors who could be broadly classified as 'anti-Gamergate' and five who are 'pro-Gamergate'." All of the supposed "Five Horsemen" were among the editors punished, with one of them being the sole editor banned due to this case. An article called "ArbitrationGate" regarding this situation was created (and quickly deleted) on Misplaced Pages, while The Guardian later issued a correction to their article. The Committee and the Wikimedia Foundation issued press statements that the Gamergate case was in response to the atmosphere of the Gamergate article resembling a "battlefield" due to "various sides of the discussion violated community policies and guidelines on conduct", and that the committee was fulfilling its role to "uphold a civil, constructive atmosphere" on Misplaced Pages. The committee also wrote that it "does not rule on the content of articles, or make judgements on the personal views of parties to the case".

Croatian Misplaced Pages

On the Croatian Misplaced Pages, a group of administrators were criticized for blocking Wikipedians who were in favor of LGBT rights. In an interview given to Index.hr, Robert Kurelić, a professor of history at the Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, has commented that "the Croatian Misplaced Pages is only a tool used by its administrators to promote their own political agendas, giving false and distorted facts". As two particularly prominent examples, he listed the Croatian Misplaced Pages's coverage of Istrian identity (the regionalist identity in Istria, a region mostly located in Croatia), defined as a "movement fabricated to reduce the number of Croats", and antifašizam (anti-fascism), which according to him is defined as the opposite of what it really means. Kurelić further advised "that it would be good if a larger number of people got engaged and started writing on Misplaced Pages", because "administrators want to exploit high-school and university students, the most common users of Misplaced Pages, to change their opinions and attitudes, which presents a serious issue".

In 2013, Croatia's Minister of Science, Education and Sports at the time, Željko Jovanović, called for pupils and students in Croatia to avoid using the Croatian Misplaced Pages. In an interview given to Novi list, Jovanović said that:

the idea of openness and relevance as a knowledge source that Misplaced Pages could and should represent has been completely discredited – which, for certain, has never been the goal of Misplaced Pages's creators nor the huge number of people around the world who share their knowledge and time using that medium. Croatian pupils and students have been wronged by this, so we have to warn them, unfortunately, that a large part of the content of the Croatian version of Misplaced Pages is not only dubious but also obvious forgeries, and therefore we invite them to use more reliable sources of information, which include Misplaced Pages in English and in other major languages of the world.

Jovanović has also commented on the Croatian Misplaced Pages editors – calling them a "minority group that has usurped the right to edit the Croatian-language Misplaced Pages".

Lack of verifiable identities

Scandals involving administrators and arbitrators

David Boothroyd, a Misplaced Pages editor and a Labour Party (United Kingdom) member, created controversy in 2009, when Misplaced Pages Review contributor "Tarantino" discovered that he committed sockpuppeting, editing under the accounts "Dbiv", "Fys", and "Sam Blacketer", none of which acknowledged his real identity. After earning Administrator status with one account, then losing it for inappropriate use of the administrative tools, Boothroyd regained Administrator status with the Sam Blacketer sockpuppet account in April 2007. Later in 2007, Boothroyd's Sam Blacketer account became part of the English Misplaced Pages's Arbitration Committee. Under the Sam Blacketer account, Boothroyd edited many articles related to United Kingdom politics, including that of rival Conservative Party leader David Cameron. Boothroyd then resigned as an administrator and as an arbitrator.

Essjay controversy

In July 2006, The New Yorker ran a feature by Stacy Schiff about "a highly credentialed Misplaced Pages editor". The initial version of the article included an interview with a Misplaced Pages administrator using the pseudonym Essjay, who described himself as a tenured professor of theology. Essjay's Misplaced Pages user page, now removed, said the following:

I am a tenured professor of theology at a private university in the eastern United States; I teach both undergraduate and graduate theology. I have been asked repeatedly to reveal the name of the institution, however, I decline to do so; I am unsure of the consequences of such an action, and believe it to be in my best interests to remain anonymous.

Essjay also said he held four academic degrees: Bachelor of Arts in religious studies (B.A.), Master of Arts in religion (M.A.R.), Doctorate of Philosophy in theology (Ph.D.), and Doctorate in Canon Law (JCD). Essjay specialized in editing articles about religion on Misplaced Pages, including subjects such as "the penitential rite, transubstantiation, the papal tiara". On one occasion, he was called in to give some "expert testimony" on the status of Mary in the Roman Catholic Church. In January 2007, Essjay was hired as a manager with Wikia, a wiki-hosting service founded by Wales and Angela Beesley. In February, Wales appointed Essjay a member of the Misplaced Pages Arbitration Committee, a group with powers to issue binding rulings in disputes relating to Misplaced Pages.

In late February 2007, The New Yorker added an editorial note to its article on Misplaced Pages stating that it had learned that Essjay was Ryan Jordan, a 24-year-old college dropout from Kentucky with no advanced degrees and no teaching experience. Initially Jimmy Wales commented on the issue of Essjay's identity: "I regard it as a pseudonym and I don't really have a problem with it." Larry Sanger, co-founder of Misplaced Pages, responded to Wales on his Citizendium blog by calling Wales' initial reaction "utterly breathtaking, and ultimately tragic". Sanger said the controversy "reflects directly on the judgment and values of the management of Misplaced Pages."

Wales later issued a new statement saying he had not previously understood that "EssJay used his false credentials in content disputes." He added: "I have asked EssJay to resign his positions of trust within the Misplaced Pages community." Sanger responded the next day: "It seems Jimmy finds nothing wrong, nothing trust-violating, with the act itself of openly and falsely touting many advanced degrees on Misplaced Pages. But there most obviously is something wrong with it, and it's just as disturbing for Misplaced Pages's head to fail to see anything wrong with it."

On March 4, Essjay wrote on his user page that he was leaving Misplaced Pages, and he also resigned his position with Wikia. A subsequent article in The Courier-Journal (Louisville) suggested that the new résumé he had posted at his Wikia page was exaggerated. The March 19, 2007, issue of The New Yorker published a formal apology by Wales to the magazine and Stacy Schiff for Essjay's false statements.

Discussing the incident, the New York Times noted that the Misplaced Pages community had responded to the affair with "the fury of the crowd", and observed:

The Essjay episode underlines some of the perils of collaborative efforts like Misplaced Pages that rely on many contributors acting in good faith, often anonymously and through self-designated user names. But it also shows how the transparency of the Misplaced Pages process—all editing of entries is marked and saved—allows readers to react to suspected fraud.

The Essjay incident received extensive media coverage, including a national United States television broadcast on ABC's World News with Charles Gibson  and the March 7, 2007, Associated Press story. The controversy has led to a proposal that users who say they possess academic qualifications should have to provide evidence before citing them in Misplaced Pages content disputes. The proposal was not accepted.

Anonymity

Misplaced Pages has been criticised for allowing editors to contribute anonymously (without a registered account and using an auto-generated IP-labeled account) or pseudonymously (using a registered account), with critics saying that this leads to a lack of accountability. This also sometimes leads to uncivil conduct in debates between Wikipedians. For privacy reasons, Misplaced Pages forbids editors to reveal information about another editor on Misplaced Pages.

Criticism of process

Level of debate and edit wars

The standard of debate on Misplaced Pages has been called into question by people who have noted that contributors can make a long list of salient points and pull in a wide range of empirical observations to back up their arguments, only to have them ignored completely on the site. An academic study of Misplaced Pages articles found that the level of debate among Misplaced Pages editors on controversial topics often degenerated into counterproductive squabbling:

For uncontroversial, "stable" topics self-selection also ensures that members of editorial groups are substantially well-aligned with each other in their interests, backgrounds, and overall understanding of the topics ... For controversial topics, on the other hand, self-selection may produce a strongly misaligned editorial group. It can lead to conflicts among the editorial group members, continuous edit wars, and may require the use of formal work coordination and control mechanisms. These may include intervention by administrators who enact dispute review and mediation processes, completely disallow or limit and coordinate the types and sources of edits.

In 2008, a team from the Palo Alto Research Center found that for editors who make between two and nine edits a month, the percentage of their edits being reverted had gone from 5% in 2004 to about 15%, and people who make only one edit a month were being reverted at a 25% rate. According to The Economist magazine (2008), "The behaviour of Misplaced Pages's self-appointed deletionist guardians, who excise anything that does not meet their standards, justifying their actions with a blizzard of acronyms, is now known as 'wiki-lawyering'." In regards to the decline in the number of Misplaced Pages editors since the 2007 policy changes, another study stated this was partly down to the way "in which newcomers are rudely greeted by automated quality control systems and are overwhelmed by the complexity of the rule system."

Another complaint about Misplaced Pages focuses on the efforts of contributors with idiosyncratic beliefs, who push their point of view in an effort to dominate articles, especially controversial ones. This sometimes results in revert wars and pages being locked down. In response, an Arbitration Committee has been formed on the English Misplaced Pages that deals with the worst alleged offenders—though a conflict resolution strategy is actively encouraged before going to this extent. Also, to stop the continuous reverting of pages, Jimmy Wales introduced a "three-revert rule", whereby those users who reverse the effect of others' contributions to one article more than three times in a 24-hour period may be blocked.

Consensus and the "hive mind"

Oliver Kamm, Wikimedia advisor Benjamin Mako Hill and trustee Dariusz Jemielniakalso criticized the ability for some arguments to be won by sheer stamina instead of merit.

In his article, "Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism" (first published online by Edge: The Third Culture, May 30, 2006), computer scientist and digital theorist Jaron Lanier describes Misplaced Pages as a hive mind whose collectivism could be swayed away from meritocracy. Lanier also says the current economic trend is to reward entities that aggregate information, rather than those that actually generate content. In the absence of "new business models", the popular demand for content will be sated by mediocrity, thus reducing or even eliminating any monetary incentives for the production of new knowledge.

Lanier's opinions produced some strong disagreement. Internet consultant Clay Shirky noted that Misplaced Pages has many internal controls in place and is not a mere mass of unintelligent collective effort:

Neither proponents nor detractors of hive mind rhetoric have much interesting to say about Misplaced Pages itself, because both groups ignore the details ... Misplaced Pages is best viewed as an engaged community that uses a large and growing number of regulatory mechanisms to manage a huge set of proposed edits ... To take the specific case of Misplaced Pages, the Seigenthaler/Kennedy debacle catalyzed both soul-searching and new controls to address the problems exposed, and the controls included, inter alia, a greater focus on individual responsibility, the very factor "Digital Maoism" denies is at work.

Excessive rule-making

Various figures involved with the Wikimedia Foundation have argued that Misplaced Pages's increasingly complex policies and guidelines are driving away new contributors to the site. Former chair Kat Walsh was quoted in a 2009 article as criticizing the project, saying, "It was easier when I joined in 2004 ... Everything was a little less complicated ... It's harder and harder for new people to adjust." Misplaced Pages administrator Oliver Moran views "policy creep" as the major barrier, writing that "the loose collective running the site today, estimated to be 90 percent male, operates a crushing bureaucracy with an often abrasive atmosphere that deters newcomers who might increase participation in Misplaced Pages and broaden its coverage". According to Jemielniak, the sheer complexity of the rules and laws governing content and editor behavior has become excessive and creates a learning burden for new editors. In 2014, Jemielniak suggested actively rewriting, and abridging, the rules and laws to decrease their complexity and size.

Social stratification

Despite the perception that the Misplaced Pages process is democratic, some assert that "a small number of people are running the show", including administrators, bureaucrats, stewards, checkusers, mediators, arbitrators, and oversighters. In an article on Misplaced Pages conflicts in 2007, The Guardian discussed "a backlash among some editors, who argue that blocking users compromises the supposedly open nature of the project, and the imbalance of power between users and administrators may even be a reason some users choose to vandalise in the first place", based on the experiences of one editor who became a vandal after his edits were reverted and he was blocked for edit warring.

See also

• Censorship of Misplaced Pages
• Deletionism and inclusionism in Misplaced Pages – Opposing philosophies within the Misplaced Pages community
• History of Misplaced Pages
• Ideological bias on Misplaced Pages
• List of Misplaced Pages controversies
• Predictions of the end of Misplaced Pages – Theories that Misplaced Pages will break down or become obsolete
• Reliability of Misplaced Pages
• Wikimedia Foundation#Disputes, criticisms of the nonprofit
• Misplaced Pages:Criticisms
• Misplaced Pages:List of hoaxes on Misplaced Pages
• Misplaced Pages:Press coverage
• Misplaced Pages:Replies to common objections
• Misplaced Pages:Why Misplaced Pages is not so great
• Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source

Footnotes

1. "a research finding stating that War on Want was 'accused of making political use of "Holocaust and anti-Semitic themes" ' was revised by Evelyn727 to state that the NGO was accused of being 'involved in international lobbying to isolate Israel.' " "RachaelO has removed text criticizing B'Tselem for 'using outdated sources for reports on highly charged political topics,' and attacked the source which she introduced as 'a watchdog group that accuses organizations such as Amnesty International of anti-Israel bias.' "

References

1. "Misplaced Pages: Articles for deletion/Klee Irwin (3rd nomination)". Misplaced Pages. January 15, 2014.
2. Black, Edwin (April 19, 2010). "Misplaced Pages—The Dumbing Down of World Knowledge". History News Network. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved October 21, 2014.
3. ^ Kamm, Oliver (August 16, 2007). "Opinion: Wisdom? More like dumbness of the crowds". The Times. Archived from the original on August 14, 2011. (Author's own copy Archived September 5, 2016, at the Wayback Machine)
4. Messer-Kruse, Timothy (February 12, 2012). "The 'Undue Weight' of Truth on Misplaced Pages". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on December 18, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
5. "Misplaced Pages Experience Sparks National Debate". The BG News. Bowling Green State University. February 27, 2012. Archived from the original on August 27, 2016. Retrieved March 27, 2014.
6. Colón-Aguirre, Monica; Fleming-May, Rachel A. (October 11, 2012). "'You Just Type in What You Are Looking For': Undergraduates' Use of Library Resources vs. Misplaced Pages" (PDF). The Journal of Academic Librarianship. p. 392. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 19, 2016. Retrieved March 27, 2014. cited Fallis, Don. "Toward an Epistemology" (2008)
7. ^ Jemielniak, Dariusz (2014). Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Misplaced Pages. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9780804791205.
8. ^ Jemielniak, Dariusz (June 22, 2014). "The Unbearable Bureaucracy of Misplaced Pages: the legalistic atmosphere is making it impossible to attract and keep the new editors the site needs". Slate. Archived from the original on September 10, 2016. Retrieved September 18, 2016.
9. Vergano, Dan (January 3, 2013). "Study: Misplaced Pages is driving away newcomers". USA Today. Archived from the original on September 21, 2015. Retrieved November 19, 2014.
10. ^ Halfaker, Aaron; Geiger, R. Stuart; Morgan, Jonathan T.; Riedl, John (2012). "The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Misplaced Pages's Reaction to Popularity Is Causing Its Decline". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (5): 664. doi:10.1177/0002764212469365. ISSN 0002-7642. S2CID 144208941.
11. Petrilli, Michael J. (February 29, 2008). "Misplaced Pages or Wickedpedia?". Education Next. Archived from the original on November 21, 2016. Retrieved October 22, 2014.
12. "Citing Electronic Sources". Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved October 21, 2014.
13. ^ Waldman, Simon (October 26, 2004). "Who knows?". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on April 6, 2019. Retrieved December 30, 2005.
14. Vallely, Paul (October 10, 2006). "The Big Question: Do we Need a More Reliable Online Encyclopedia than Misplaced Pages?". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on October 24, 2006. Retrieved October 18, 2006.
15. Schwartz, Zach (November 11, 2015). "Misplaced Pages's Co-Founder Is Misplaced Pages's Most Outspoken Critic". Vice Media. Archived from the original on November 14, 2015. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
16. "Research:Wikimedia Summer of Research 2011/Newbie teaching strategy trends". Meta.wikimedia.org. June 3, 2011. Archived from the original on December 13, 2013. Retrieved December 6, 2013.
17. ^ Giles, Jim (December 15, 2005). "Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head". Nature. 438 (7070): 900–901. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 16355180.
18. "Misplaced Pages head to head with Britannica". ABC Science. Agence France-Presse. December 15, 2005. Archived from the original on February 16, 2015. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
19. Giles, J (December 22, 2005). "Supplementary Information to Accompany Nature news article 'Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head'". Nature. 438 (7070): 900–901. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180.
20. ^ "Fatally Flawed: Refuting the Recent Study on Encyclopaedic Accuracy by the journal Nature" (PDF). Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. March 2006. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2018. Retrieved June 30, 2009.
21. "Britannica attacks". Nature. 440 (7084): 582. March 30, 2006. Bibcode:2006Natur.440R.582.. doi:10.1038/440582b. PMID 16572128.
22. "Misplaced Pages study 'fatally flawed'". BBC. March 24, 2006. Archived from the original on August 5, 2017. Retrieved September 1, 2008.
23. "Encyclopædia Britannica and Nature: A Response" (PDF). Press release. March 23, 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 6, 2016. Retrieved September 1, 2008.
24. John Seigenthaler (November 29, 2005). "A false Misplaced Pages 'biography'". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 6, 2012. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
25. Seelye, Katharine Q. (December 3, 2005). "Snared in the Web of a Misplaced Pages Liar". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 7, 2014. Retrieved February 18, 2017.
26. "Mistakes and hoaxes on-line". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. April 15, 2006. Archived from the original on November 13, 2012. Retrieved April 28, 2007.
27. Dedman, Bill (March 3, 2007). "Reading Hillary Clinton's hidden thesis". NBC News. Archived from the original on March 6, 2013. Retrieved March 17, 2007.
28. "Hillary Rodham Clinton [archived version]". Misplaced Pages.org. July 9, 2005. Archived from the original on February 16, 2016. Retrieved March 17, 2007.
29. "Hillary Rodham Clinton [archived version]". Misplaced Pages.org. March 2, 2007. Archived from the original on February 16, 2016. Retrieved March 17, 2007.
30. Paige, Cara (April 11, 2006). "Exclusive: Meet the Real Sir Walter Mitty". Daily Record. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved November 24, 2007.
31. Weingarten, Gene (March 16, 2007). "A wickedly fun test of Misplaced Pages". The News & Observer. Archived from the original on March 20, 2007. Retrieved April 8, 2006.
32. "Misplaced Pages:Vandalism [archived version]". Misplaced Pages.org. November 24, 2009.
33. Mark Glaser (April 17, 2006). "Misplaced Pages Bias: Is There a Neutral View on George W. Bush?". PBS. Archived from the original on October 2, 2015. Retrieved October 27, 2007. The search for a 'neutral point of view' mirrors the efforts of journalists to be objective, to show both sides without taking sides and remaining unbiased. But maybe this is impossible and unattainable, and perhaps misguided. Because if you open it up for anyone to edit, you're asking for anything but neutrality.
34. Hube, Christoph; Fetahu, Besnik (November 4–7, 2019). "Neural Based Statement Classification for Biased Language". Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. WSDM '19 Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Melbourne VIC, Australia. pp. 259–268. arXiv:1811.05740. doi:10.1145/3289600.3291018. ISBN 978-1-4503-5940-5..
35. ^ Martin, Brian (2021). "Policing orthodoxy on Misplaced Pages: Skeptics in action?". Journal of Science Communication. 20 (2): A09. doi:10.22323/2.20020209. S2CID 234824157.
36. Verkaik, Robert (August 18, 2007). "Misplaced Pages and the art of censorship". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
37. Blakely, Rhys (August 15, 2007). "Exposed: guess who has been polishing their Misplaced Pages entries?". The Times. London. Archived from the original on May 17, 2009. Retrieved August 15, 2007.
38. Fildes, Jonathan (August 15, 2007). "Misplaced Pages 'shows CIA page edits'". BBC. Archived from the original on January 11, 2009. Retrieved August 15, 2007.
39. Metz, Cade (December 18, 2007). "Truth, anonymity and the Misplaced Pages Way: Why it's broke and how it can be fixed". The Register. Archived from the original on August 10, 2017. Retrieved August 10, 2017.
40. ^ Schiff, Stacy (July 31, 2006). "Know it all: Can Misplaced Pages conquer expertise?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on November 22, 2008. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
41. Lehmann, Evan (January 27, 2006). "Rewriting history under the dome". Lowell Sun. Archived from the original on February 2, 2006. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
42. "Senator staffers spam Misplaced Pages". January 30, 2006. Archived from the original on March 29, 2006. Retrieved September 13, 2006.
43. Bachelet, Pablo (May 3, 2006). "War of Words: Website Can't Define Cuba". The Miami Herald. Archived from the original on October 6, 2015. Alt URL Archived September 23, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
44. Delay, Larry (August 3, 2006). "A Pernicious Model for Control of the World Wide Web: The Cuba Case" (PDF). Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy (ASCE). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2008. Retrieved July 8, 2008.
45. ^ McElroy, Damien (May 8, 2008). "Israeli battles rage on Misplaced Pages". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on May 9, 2008. Retrieved May 8, 2008.
46. "Letter in Harper's Magazine About Misplaced Pages Issues". CAMERA. August 14, 2008. Archived from the original on July 31, 2016. Retrieved March 31, 2010.
47. Liphshiz, Cnaan (December 25, 2007). "Your Wiki Entry Counts". Haaretz. Archived from the original on June 5, 2011. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
48. Rettig Gur, Haviv (May 16, 2010). "Israeli-Palestinian conflict rages on Misplaced Pages". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved December 6, 2013.
49. Cohen, Noam (August 31, 2008). "Don't Like Palin's Misplaced Pages Story? Change It". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 28, 2018. Retrieved February 18, 2017.
50. "Sarah Palins Misplaced Pages entry glossed over by mystery user hrs. before VP announcement". Thaindian News. September 2, 2008. Archived from the original on May 24, 2011. Retrieved November 16, 2008.
51. "Wikipédia en butte à une nouvelle affaire de calomnie". Vnunet.fr. November 28, 2007. Archived from the original on May 16, 2008.
52. "Responsabilité pénale des intervenants sur Internet : hébergeur du site, responsible du site et auteur d'allégations diffamatoires". Official website of the French Sénat. February 14, 2008. Archived from the original on July 21, 2011. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
53. Woods, Allan (August 25, 2010). "Ottawa investigating Misplaced Pages edits". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on August 27, 2010. Retrieved August 26, 2010.
54. Nabili, Teymoor (September 11, 2010). "The Cyrus Cylinder, Misplaced Pages and Iran conspiracies". blogs.alJazeera.net. Archived from the original on March 11, 2012. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
55. Jackson, Ron (August 4, 2009). "Open Season on Domainers and Domaining — Overtly Biased L.A. Times Article Leads Latest Assault on Objectivity and Accuracy". Archived from the original on August 14, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
56. "Umbria Blogosphere Analysis — Misplaced Pages and Corporate Blogging" (PDF). J.D. Power Web Intelligence. August 24, 2007. "Organizations like Sony, Diebold, Nintendo, Dell, the CIA, and the Church of Scientology were all shown to have sanitized pages about themselves."
57. MacDonald, Marc (February 1, 2008). "Misplaced Pages Continues To Sanitize Bush Content". Archived from the original on October 8, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
58. Walker, Christopher; Kalathil, Shanthi; Ludwig, Jessica (2020). "The Cutting Edge of Sharp Power". Journal of Democracy. 31 (1): 124–137. doi:10.1353/jod.2020.0010. S2CID 211145754.
59. Miller, Carl (October 5, 2019). "China and Taiwan clash over Misplaced Pages edits". BBC. Retrieved August 24, 2020.
60. Anderson, Chris (May 8, 2006). "Jimmy Wales – The 2006 Time 100". Time. Retrieved November 11, 2017.
61. Kittur, Aniket; Kraut, Robert E. (2008). "Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Misplaced Pages: quality through coordination". Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. New York: ACM. pp. 37–46. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.546.9900. doi:10.1145/1460563.1460572. ISBN 978-1-60558-007-4. S2CID 1184433.
62. ^ Rosenzweig, Roy (June 2006). "Can History be Open Source? Misplaced Pages and the Future of the Past". The Journal of American History. 93 (1): pp. 117–146. doi:10.2307/4486062. JSTOR 4486062. Archived from the original on April 25, 2010. Retrieved August 11, 2006. (Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media)
63. Orlowski, Andrew (October 18, 2005). "Misplaced Pages founder admits to serious quality problems". The Register. Retrieved September 30, 2007.
64. Jatowt, Adam; Tanaka, Katsumi (2012). "Is Misplaced Pages too Difficult?: Comparative Analysis of Readability of Misplaced Pages, Simple Misplaced Pages and Britannica". CIKM '12 Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. New York, NY, US: ACM. pp. 2607–2610. doi:10.1145/2396761.2398703. ISBN 9781450311564. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
65. "Cancer information on Misplaced Pages is accurate, but not very readable, study finds". ScienceDaily. June 2, 2010. Retrieved December 31, 2010.
66. "Fact or fiction? Misplaced Pages's variety of contributors is not only a strength". The Economist. March 10, 2007. Retrieved December 31, 2010.
67. Lerner, Ben (December 2023). "The Hofmann Wobble: Misplaced Pages and the problem of historical memory". Harper's Magazine. Vol. 347, no. 2083. pp. 27–32.
68. Keen, Andrew; Lerner, Ben (December 8, 2023). "Ben Lerner on the Dangers of Digital Technology". Literary Hub. Retrieved September 29, 2024.
69. ^ "Will Misplaced Pages Mean the End Of Traditional Encyclopedias?". The Wall Street Journal. September 12, 2006. Archived from the original on January 15, 2016. Retrieved September 13, 2006.
70. ^ Cohen, Martin (August 28, 2008). "Encyclopaedia Idiotica". Times Higher Education. Archived from the original on September 6, 2011. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
71. Das, Sanmay; Allen, Lavoie; Malik, Magdon-Ismail (November 1, 2013). "Manipulation among the arbiters of collective intelligence: How Misplaced Pages administrators mold public opinion". CIKM '13 Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. San Francisco, California, US: ACM. pp. 1097–1106. doi:10.1145/2505515.2505566. ISBN 978-1-4503-2263-8. Archived from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
72. Stephen Colbert. The Colbert Report episode 3109. August 21, 2007.
73. Brophy-Warren, Jamin. "Oh, that John Locke". The Wall Street Journal. No. 2007–06–16. p. 3. Archived from the original on September 4, 2017. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
74. Hendren, Johnny "DocEvil" (June 5, 2007). "The Art of Wikigroaning". Something Awful. Archived from the original on June 16, 2007. Retrieved June 17, 2007.
75. Brown, Andrew (June 14, 2007). "No amount of collaboration will make the sun orbit the Earth". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on June 23, 2007. Retrieved March 27, 2010.
76. Tossell, Ivor (June 15, 2007). "Duality of Misplaced Pages". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. Archived from the original on December 21, 2012. Retrieved December 25, 2019.
77. Ruprechter, Thorsten; Burghardt, Keith; Helic, Denis (November 8, 2023). "Poor attention: The wealth and regional gaps in event attention and coverage on Misplaced Pages". PLOS One. 18 (11): e0289325. Bibcode:2023PLoSO..1889325R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289325. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 10631632. PMID 37939022.
78. Kirby, J.P. (October 20, 2007). "The Problem with Misplaced Pages". J.P.'s Random Ramblings . Archived from the original on August 9, 2011.
79. Corinne Purtill; Zoë Schlanger (October 2, 2018). "Misplaced Pages had rejected Nobel Prize winner Donna Strickland because she wasn't famous enough". Quartz. Archived from the original on October 25, 2018. Retrieved November 20, 2018.
80. Resnick, Brian (October 3, 2018). "The 2018 Nobel Prize reminds us that women scientists too often go unrecognized". Vox. Archived from the original on October 25, 2018. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
81. Annalisa Merelli (August 18, 2018). "Seeking Disambiguation: Running for office is hard when you have a porn star's name. This makes it worse". Quartz. Archived from the original on November 21, 2018. Retrieved November 20, 2018.
82. Baker, Nicholson (March 20, 2008). "The Charms of Misplaced Pages". The New York Review of Books. 55 (4). Archived from the original on March 3, 2008. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
83. Noah, Timothy (February 24, 2007). "Evicted from Misplaced Pages". Slate. Archived from the original on June 21, 2009. Retrieved March 31, 2010.
84. Samoilenko, Anna; Yasseri, Taha (January 22, 2014). "The distorted mirror of Misplaced Pages: a quantitative analysis of Misplaced Pages coverage of academics". EPJ Data Science. 3 (1). arXiv:1310.8508. doi:10.1140/epjds20. S2CID 4971771.
85. Steinsson, Sverrir. "Senate candidate Theresa Greenfield finally got her Misplaced Pages page. Here's why it took so long". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
86. Harrison, Stephen (October 27, 2020). "Why Did It Take So Long for the Democratic Senate Candidate in Iowa to Get a Misplaced Pages Page?". Slate. The Slate Group. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
87. Benjakob, Omer (May 27, 2018). "The Witch Hunt Against a 'pro-Israel' Misplaced Pages Editor". Haaretz. Retrieved March 16, 2022.
88. Kelly, Samantha Murphy (May 20, 2022). "Meet the Misplaced Pages editor who published the Buffalo shooting entry minutes after it started". CNN. Retrieved May 24, 2022.
89. Johnson, Bobbie (March 1, 2007). "Conservapedia — the US religious right's answer to Misplaced Pages". The Guardian. London. Retrieved March 27, 2010.
90. Turner, Adam (March 5, 2007). "Conservapedia aims to set Misplaced Pages right". IT Wire. Archived from the original on March 31, 2012. Retrieved May 12, 2008.
91. Solomon, Lawrence (July 8, 2008). "Wikipropaganda On Global Warming". National Review. CBS News. Archived from the original on August 28, 2008. Retrieved July 20, 2008.
92. Scarborough, Rowan (September 27, 2010). "Misplaced Pages Whacks the Right". Human Events. Archived from the original on December 7, 2010. Retrieved October 3, 2010.
93. Glaser, Mark (April 21, 2006). "Email Debate: Wales Discusses Political Bias on Misplaced Pages". PBS Mediashift. Archived from the original on October 5, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
94. Chung, Andrew (March 11, 2007). "Conservative wants to set Misplaced Pages right". The Toronto Star. ISSN 0319-0781. Retrieved December 16, 2021.
95. Greenstein, Shane; Zhu, Feng (March 1, 2016). Do Experts or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Misplaced Pages — Working Paper 15-023 (PDF). Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard Business School. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 8, 2016. Retrieved October 31, 2016.
96. Greenstein, Shane; Zhu, Feng (December 1, 2012). "Is Misplaced Pages Biased? Verifying the "neutral point of view"". Archived from the original on October 31, 2016. Retrieved October 31, 2016.
97. Khimm, Suzy (June 18, 2012). "Study: Misplaced Pages perpetuates political bias". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 5, 2015. Retrieved May 29, 2013.
98. Matsakis, Louise (March 16, 2018). "Don't Ask Misplaced Pages to Cure the Internet". Wired. Archived from the original on March 16, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
99. Lott, Maxim (February 18, 2021). "Inside Misplaced Pages's leftist bias: socialism pages whitewashed, communist atrocities buried". Fox News. Retrieved March 31, 2022.
100. ^ Simpson, Craig (November 27, 2021). "Misplaced Pages may delete entry on 'mass killings' under Communism due to claims of bias". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2021.
101. Chasmar, Jessica (November 29, 2021). "Misplaced Pages page on 'Mass killings under communist regimes' considered for deletion, prompting bias accusations". Fox News. Archived from the original on November 30, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
102. ^ Rauwerda, Annie (December 31, 2021). "To delete or not to delete? The fate of the most contentious Misplaced Pages articles". Input Mag. Retrieved February 7, 2022.
103. "Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mass killings under communist regimes (4th nomination)", English Misplaced Pages, December 2, 2021, retrieved December 1, 2021
104. Kauntia, Nishant (November 30, 2020). "How Misplaced Pages earned the ire of the Hindu Right". The Caravan. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
105. Dasgupta, Sravasti (August 2, 2020). "'Biased, anti-Hindu' — campaign begins against Misplaced Pages after it urges Indians to donate". ThePrint. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
106. Browne, Marcus (February 12, 2008). "Misplaced Pages accused of 'US-centric bias'". ZDNet Australia. Archived from the original on October 1, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
107. Melamed, Samantha (March 26, 2015). "Edit-athon aims to put left-out black artists into Misplaced Pages". Philadelphia Daily News. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved April 13, 2015.
108. Smith, Jada (February 20, 2015). "Howard University Fills in Misplaced Pages's Gaps in Black History". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 23, 2015. Retrieved April 13, 2015.
109. Goko, Colleen. "Drive launched to 'Africanise' Misplaced Pages". Business Day. South Africa. Archived from the original on July 6, 2015. Retrieved April 13, 2015.
110. Cassano, Jay. "Black History Matters, So Why Is Misplaced Pages Missing So Much Of It?". Fast Company. Archived from the original on May 10, 2015. Retrieved April 13, 2015.
111. Reynosa, Peter (December 3, 2015). "Why Don't More Latinos Contribute To Misplaced Pages?". El Tecolote. Archived from the original on December 8, 2015. Retrieved December 5, 2015.
112. Livingstone, Randall M. (November 23, 2010). "Let's Leave the Bias to the Mainstream Media: A Misplaced Pages Community Fighting for Information Neutrality". M/C Journal. 13 (6). doi:10.5204/mcj.315. ISSN 1441-2616.
113. ^ Justin Ward (March 12, 2018). "Misplaced Pages wars: inside the fight against far-right editors, vandals and sock puppets". Archived from the original on May 14, 2020. Retrieved March 1, 2020.
114. Standifer, Cid (October 13, 2022). "Racial Pseudoscience on the Faculty: A professor's research flew under the radar for years. What finally got him fired?". The Chronicle of Higher Education.
115. Gardner, Sue (February 19, 2011). "Nine Reasons Why Women Don't Edit Misplaced Pages, In Their Own Words" (blog). suegardner.org. Archived from the original on July 18, 2015. Retrieved September 8, 2015.
116. ^ Cassell, Justine (February 4, 2011). "Editing Wars Behind the Scenes". The New York Times. Retrieved December 15, 2023.
117. Dunn, Gaby (May 1, 2013). "Does Sexism Lurk?". Daily Dot. Retrieved December 15, 2023.
118. Zandt, Deanna (April 26, 2013). "Yes, Misplaced Pages Is Sexist – That's Why It Needs You". Forbes. New York. Retrieved December 15, 2023.
119. Lih, Andrew (June 20, 2015). "Can Misplaced Pages Survive?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 21, 2015. Retrieved June 21, 2015. ... the considerable and often-noted gender gap among Misplaced Pages editors; in 2011, less than 15 percent were women.
120. Statistics based on Wikimedia Foundation Misplaced Pages editor surveys 2011 (Nov. 2010-April 2011) and November 2011 Archived June 5, 2016, at the Wayback Machine (April - October 2011)
121. ^ Cohen, Noam (January 30, 2011). "Define Gender Gap? Look Up Misplaced Pages's Contributor List". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 3, 2011. Retrieved January 31, 2011.
122. Huang, Keira (August 11, 2013). "Misplaced Pages fails to bridge gender gap". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on January 15, 2016. Retrieved October 27, 2015.
123. Misplaced Pages 'completely failed' to fix gender imbalance Archived December 29, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, BBC interview with Jimmy Wales, August 8, 2014; starting at 45 seconds.
124. Vitulli, Marie A. (2018). "Writing women in mathematics into Misplaced Pages". Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 65 (3): 331–332. arXiv:1710.11103. doi:10.1090/noti1650.
125. Peake, Bryce (2015). "WP:THREATENING2MEN: Misogynist Infopolitics and the Hegemony of the Asshole Consensus on English Misplaced Pages". Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology (7). doi:10.7264/N3TH8JZS (inactive November 1, 2024). Archived from the original on February 12, 2020. Retrieved February 18, 2020.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
126. Fox, Mira (August 16, 2021). "Misplaced Pages fixed its swastika problem fast. Why can't anyone else?". The Forward. Retrieved October 31, 2024.
127. Oboler, Andre; Steinberg, Gerald; Stern, Rephael (October 11, 2010). "The Framing of Political NGOs in Misplaced Pages through Criticism Elimination". Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 7 (4): 284–299. doi:10.1080/19331680903577822. ISSN 1933-1681.
128. "How Some Misplaced Pages Editors Tried—and Failed—To Erase the UK Labour Party's Anti-Semitism Problem". January 10, 2018.
129. Makhortykh, Mykola (2017). "Framing the Holocaust Online: Memory of the Babi Yar Massacres on Misplaced Pages". Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media. 18: 67–94. ISSN 2043-7633.
130. den Hartogh, R. (2014). The future of the past. A case study on the representation of the Holocaust on Misplaced Pages.
131. Wolniewicz-Slomka, D. (2016). Framing the Holocaust in popular knowledge: 3 articles about the Holocaust in English, Hebrew and Polish Misplaced Pages. Adeptus, (8), 29-49.
132. Grabowski, Jan; Klein, Shira (2023). "Misplaced Pages's Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust". The Journal of Holocaust Research. 37 (2): 133–190. doi:10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939.
133. Elia-Shalev, Asaf (March 1, 2023). "Misplaced Pages's 'Supreme Court' tackles alleged conspiracy to distort articles on Holocaust". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved March 11, 2023.
134. Metzger, Cerise Valenzuela (May 16, 2023). "Ruling on Misplaced Pages's Distortion of Holocaust History Lacks Depth". Chapman University. Archived from the original on May 27, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
135. Bandler, Aaron (June 25, 2024). "Forty-three Jewish Orgs Call on Wikimedia to Reconsider Editors' Decision on ADL". Jewish Journal. Retrieved October 31, 2024.
136. "PR firms pledge 'ethical' use of Misplaced Pages". BBC. June 12, 2014. Retrieved November 9, 2021.
137. Parakilas, Jacob (March 18, 2014). "Misplaced Pages, neutrality, and guns". Action on Armed Violence. Archived from the original on September 14, 2017. Retrieved March 7, 2018. But if a reader had started on the page for either of Breivik's guns, the Ruger or the Glock, they would not know this. That reader would find a great deal of technical information about the weapons in question – their weights, lengths, cartridges, rates of fire, magazine capacities, muzzle velocities – and detailed descriptions of their designs, all illustrated with abundant photographs and diagrams.
138. Walther, Matthew (November 7, 2017). "The adolescent cult of the AR-15". The Week. Archived from the original on March 24, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2018. What do the perpetrators of the massacres at Sandy Hook, at Aurora, at Orlando, and at Sutherland Springs have in common? They were all men under 30 and they all used versions of the same kind of firearm, the AR-15, the semi-automatic version of the military's M-16, and the bestselling gun in America. It might be difficult to make this connection because as I write this, the section on the use of AR-15s in mass killings has been deleted from Misplaced Pages ...
139. Brandom, Russell (March 6, 2018). "How gun buffs took over Misplaced Pages's AR-15 page; After Parkland, gun control information was strangely hard to find". The Verge. Vox Media. Archived from the original on March 9, 2018. Retrieved March 9, 2018. But on Misplaced Pages, as in the real world, the users with the deepest technical knowledge of firearms are also the most fervent gun owners and the most hostile to gun control. For critics, that's led to a persistent pro-gun bias on the web's leading source of neutral information at a time when the gun control debate is more heated than ever.
140. "Pro-gun Misplaced Pages users spark fierce editing war; Editors against tighter controls on firearms have been purging information that shows weapons such as AR-15s in a bad light". Sky News. March 7, 2018. Archived from the original on March 10, 2018. Retrieved March 9, 2018. The bias in the articles was not explicit, but structural. The project did not insert false information into the articles but instead purged information that showed the weapons in a bad light - dismissing it as "off-topic".
141. Brennan, David (March 7, 2018). "Pro-gun Group Edited AR-15 Misplaced Pages Page to Hide Mass Shootings". Newsweek. Archived from the original on March 8, 2018. Retrieved March 9, 2018. A group of pro-gun Misplaced Pages editors tried to hide the true number of mass shootings associated with the AR-15 rifle in the aftermath of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida.
142. Einenkel, Walter (March 8, 2018). "A gun group has been editing Misplaced Pages's firearms pages to sanitize mass shootings, for months". Yahoo! News. Newsweek. Archived from the original on March 10, 2018. Retrieved March 9, 2018. The Wikimedia Foundation has defended itself and Misplaced Pages from allegations of being host to these kinds of influence campaigns, arguing that the encyclopaedia is constantly being updated and improved.
143. Benjakob, Omer (March 18, 2018). "Gun Enthusiasts Are Waging a War of Attrition on Misplaced Pages, and It Looks Like They're Winning". Haaretz. Archived from the original on March 24, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2018. According to The Verge report and an independent follow-up by Haaretz, the top editors of the Colt page are pro-gun enthusiasts who skewed the information presented on it and are also involved in editing other articles on Misplaced Pages – for example, the much more general article, titled AR 15 – to push their worldview ... Through countless exhausting debates, this small group of pro-gun Misplaced Pages editors – linked together through Misplaced Pages's Firearms project (or "WikiProject:Firearms," mentioned below) – has managed to control almost completely the discourse around the rifle, predominantly by making sure any potentially negative details about it be excluded from the original Colt AR-15 article.
144. Sifferlin, Alexandra (March 25, 2014). "Misplaced Pages Founder Sticks It To 'Lunatic' Holistic Healers". Time. Archived from the original on October 14, 2014. Retrieved October 22, 2014.
145. Newman, Lily Hay (March 27, 2014). "Jimmy Wales Gets Real, and Sassy, About Misplaced Pages's Holistic Healing Coverage". Slate. Archived from the original on June 25, 2018. Retrieved October 22, 2014.
146. Maxton, Richard (September 9, 2008). "Misplaced Pages attacked over porn pages". Macquarie National News. Livenews.com.au. Archived from the original on September 17, 2008. Retrieved March 31, 2010.
147. Raphael, JR (December 10, 2008). "Misplaced Pages Censorship Sparks Free Speech Debate". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 29, 2011. Retrieved May 10, 2009.
148. ^ Seth Finkelstein (December 18, 2008), "Sting in the Scorpions tale is the exposure of Wiki's weakness", The Guardian, archived from the original on December 7, 2013, retrieved May 23, 2018
149. Dorothy Howard; Patrick W. Galbraith (November 20, 2015), Meet the manga avatars of your favorite tech platforms, Hopes&Fears, archived from the original on May 23, 2018, retrieved May 23, 2018
150. Morris, Kevin (June 25, 2013). "How Wikimedia Commons became a massive amateur porn hub". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on February 14, 2021. Retrieved September 20, 2023.
151. Viégas, Fernanda B.; Wattenberg, Martin; Dave, Kushal (April 24–29, 2004). "Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations" (PDF). Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations. CHI '04 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM). Vienna, Austria: ACM. pp. 575–582. doi:10.1145/985692.985765. ISBN 1-58113-702-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 11, 2018. Retrieved September 1, 2008.
152. Priedhorsky, Reid; Chen, Jilin; Lam, Shyong (Tony) K.; Panciera, Katherine; Terveen, Loren; Riedl, John (November 4, 2007). Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia (PDF). Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work. Sanibel Island, Florida, US: ACM. p. 259. doi:10.1145/1316624.1316663. ISBN 978-1-59593-845-9. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 22, 2019.
153. ^ Donnelly, James; Haeckl, Jenifer (April 12, 2001). "Privacy, and Security on the Internet: What Rights, What Remedies?". Archived from the original on December 1, 2008.
154. See "Public and Private Figures" Archived May 19, 2016, at the Wayback Machine by the Digital Media Law Project for the legal distinction.
155. Lever, Rob (December 11, 2005). "Misplaced Pages Becomes Internet Force, Faces Crisis". Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on October 6, 2007. Retrieved December 26, 2007.
156. "Court overturns temporary restraining order against Wikimedia Deutschland". Heinz Heise. February 9, 2006. Archived from the original on February 8, 2007. Retrieved January 31, 2014.
157. Arthur, Charles (February 9, 2009). "Jimmy Wales in drive-by shooting of Misplaced Pages". The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 6, 2015. Retrieved August 31, 2015.
158. Mitchell, Dan (December 24, 2005). "Insider Editing at Misplaced Pages". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 29, 2015. Retrieved August 31, 2015.
159. "Misplaced Pages Co-Founder Creates Competing Site". Infopackets.com. April 4, 2007. Archived from the original on November 5, 2013. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
160. Bergstein, Brian (March 26, 2007). "Building an alternative to Misplaced Pages". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 5, 2013. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
161. "Misplaced Pages Vs Citizendium.org: The Art of Competing with Oneself". Yahoo! Voices. April 17, 2007. Archived from the original on July 28, 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
162. "Misplaced Pages Co-Founder Unveils Rival 💕". Fox News Channel. Associated Press. March 28, 2007. Archived from the original on July 15, 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
163. ^ Bergstein, Brian (March 25, 2007). "Citizendium aims to be better Misplaced Pages". USA Today. Archived from the original on October 16, 2012. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
164. Shankbone, David (June 7, 2008). "Nobody's Safe in Cyberspace". The Brooklyn Rail. Archived from the original on August 28, 2008. Retrieved July 10, 2008.
165. ^ Auerbach, David (December 11, 2014). "Encyclopedia Frown: Misplaced Pages is amazing. But it's become a rancorous, sexist, elitist, stupidly bureaucratic mess". Slate. Archived from the original on December 16, 2014. Retrieved December 17, 2014.
166. Koebler, Jason (May 17, 2016). "Misplaced Pages Editor Says Site's Toxic Community Has Him Contemplating Suicide". Vice Media. Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2020.
167. "Misplaced Pages sets new rules to combat 'toxicity'". BBC. May 23, 2020. Archived from the original on June 5, 2020. Retrieved June 11, 2020.
168. Smirnov, Ivan; Oprea, Camelia; Strohmaier, Markus (December 2023). "Toxic comments are associated with reduced activity of volunteer editors on Misplaced Pages". PNAS Nexus. 2 (12): pgad385. doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad385. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 10697426. PMID 38059265.
169. Wood, Mike (January 9, 2013). "I Get Paid To Edit Misplaced Pages For Leading Companies". Business Insider. Archived from the original on November 23, 2013. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
170. Paling, Emma (October 21, 2015). "How Misplaced Pages Is Hostile to Women". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on October 21, 2015. Retrieved October 21, 2015.
171. Hern, Alex (January 23, 2015). "Misplaced Pages votes to ban some editors from gender-related articles". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 26, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
172. ^ Auerbach, David (February 5, 2015). "The Misplaced Pages Ouroboros". Slate. Archived from the original on February 5, 2015. Retrieved February 5, 2015.
173. Louise, Maryam (January 25, 2015). "GamerGate Misplaced Pages Ruling Bans Harassed Feminist Editors, Outrage Ensues". Inquisitr. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
174. Williams, Lauren (January 23, 2015). "Misplaced Pages Wants To Ban Feminists From Editing GamerGate Articles". Think Progress. Archived from the original on March 10, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
175. Bennett, Alanna (January 24, 2015). "Misplaced Pages Has Banned Five Feminist Editors From Gamergate Articles & More". The Mary Sue. Archived from the original on August 12, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
176. Cush, Andy (January 23, 2015). "Misplaced Pages Purged a Group of Feminist Editors Because of Gamergate". Gawker. Archived from the original on September 13, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
177. ^ Dewey, Caitlin (January 29, 2015). "Gamergate, Misplaced Pages and the limits of 'human knowledge'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 29, 2015. Retrieved January 29, 2015.
178. Mandiberg, Michael (February 1, 2015). "The Affective Labor of Misplaced Pages: GamerGate, Harassment, and Peer Production". Social Text. Archived from the original on February 22, 2015. Retrieved February 21, 2015.
179. Cush, Andy (January 30, 2015). "The Gamergate Decision Shows Exactly What's Broken About Misplaced Pages". Gawker. Archived from the original on February 17, 2015. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
180. Beaudette, Philippe (January 27, 2015). "Civility, Misplaced Pages, and the conversation on Gamergate". Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on January 31, 2015. Retrieved January 28, 2015.
181. ^ "Jovanović: Djeco, ne baratajte hrvatskom Wikipedijom jer su sadržaji falsificirani" [Jovanović: "Children, do not use the Croatian Misplaced Pages because its contents are forgeries"] (in Croatian). Novi list. Archived from the original on September 1, 2019. Retrieved September 13, 2013.
182. "Trolls hijack Misplaced Pages to turn articles against gays". Archived from the original on July 8, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2021.
183. How pro-fascist ideologues are rewriting Croatia's history
184. ^ "Jovanovićeva poruka učenicima i studentima: Ne koristite hrvatsku Wikipediju!" [Jovanović's message to the pupils and students: Don't use Croatian Misplaced Pages!] (in Croatian). Index.hr. Retrieved September 13, 2013.
185. "User Rights Log". Misplaced Pages.
186. "Arbitration Series". Misplaced Pages. Archived from the original on October 12, 2017.
187. Metz, Cade (May 26, 2009). "Sockpuppeting British politico resigns from Wikisupremecourt". The Register. Archived from the original on May 29, 2009. Retrieved May 27, 2009.
188. "Meta: Steward requests/Permissions". Meta-Wiki. Archived from the original on January 15, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2014.
189. Welham, Jamie; Lakhani, Nina (June 7, 2009). "Misplaced Pages 'sentinel' quits after using alias to alter entries". The Independent. Archived from the original on March 18, 2010. Retrieved March 31, 2010.
190. Finkelstein, Seth (March 8, 2007). "Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive". The Guardian. Archived from the original on March 29, 2007. Retrieved August 1, 2007. At some point, Essjay said he had sent a letter to a real-life college professor using his invented persona's credentials, vouching for Misplaced Pages's accuracy. In the letter he wrote in part, "It is never the case that known incorrect information is allowed to remain in Misplaced Pages."
191. "User: Essjay". Misplaced Pages. Archived from the original on February 25, 2006.
192. "Talk:Five solas [archived version]". Misplaced Pages.org. June 11, 2005. Archived from the original on February 16, 2016. Retrieved June 18, 2007.
193. Orlowski, Andrew (March 2, 2007). "Bogus Misplaced Pages Prof. was blessed then promoted: The Counterfactual History Man". The Register. Archived from the original on March 4, 2007. Retrieved March 18, 2007.
194. "Fake professor in Misplaced Pages storm". BBC. March 6, 2007. Archived from the original on March 8, 2007. Retrieved March 8, 2007.
195. Bergstein, Brian (March 25, 2007). "Sanger says he co-started Misplaced Pages". The Washington Post. Associated Press. Archived from the original on November 12, 2012. Retrieved March 26, 2007. The nascent Web encyclopedia Citizendium springs from Larry Sanger, a philosophy Ph.D. who counts himself as a co-founder of Misplaced Pages, the site he now hopes to usurp. The claim doesn't seem particularly controversial—Sanger has long been cited as a co-founder. Yet the other founder, Jimmy Wales, isn't happy about it.
196. Meyers, Peter (September 20, 2001). "Fact-Driven? Collegial? This Site Wants You". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2009. Retrieved August 30, 2015. "I can start an article that will consist of one paragraph, and then a real expert will come along and add three paragraphs and clean up my one paragraph", said Larry Sanger of Las Vegas, who founded Misplaced Pages with Mr. Wales.
197. Mehegan, David (February 12, 2006). "Bias, sabotage haunt Misplaced Pages's free world". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on May 12, 2006. Retrieved July 30, 2007.
198. Sanger, Larry (March 1, 2007). "Misplaced Pages firmly supports your right to identity fraud". Citizendium Blog. Archived from the original on March 4, 2007. Retrieved March 2, 2007.
199. "User talk:Jimbo Wales [archived version]". Misplaced Pages.org. Archived from the original on February 16, 2016. Retrieved September 1, 2008.
200. Sanger, Larry (March 3, 2007). "Jimmy Wales' latest response on the Essjay situation". Citizendium Blog. Archived from the original on March 6, 2007. Retrieved March 3, 2007.
201. "Essjay's Wikia user page". Wikia.com. Archived from the original on November 6, 2007. Retrieved September 19, 2007.
202. Wolfson, Andrew (March 6, 2007). "Misplaced Pages editor who posed as professor is Ky. dropout: Man resigns post after controversy". Louisville Courier-Journal. Retrieved March 7, 2007. Alt URL Archived September 30, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
203. Wales, Jimmy (March 19, 2007). "Making amends". The New Yorker. p. 24.
204. Cohen, Noam (March 5, 2007). "A Contributor to Misplaced Pages Has His Fictional Side". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 13, 2007. Retrieved March 5, 2007.
205. "[ABC News broadcast on Essjay]". ABC News. Archived from the original on March 10, 2007. Retrieved March 8, 2007.
206. Bergstein, Brian (March 7, 2007). "After flap over phony professor, Misplaced Pages wants some writers to share real names". USA Today. Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 16, 2009. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
207. Williams, Martyn (March 9, 2007). "Misplaced Pages Founder Addresses User Credentials". PC World. IDG News Service. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved August 31, 2015.
208. "Misplaced Pages's credentials policy [archived version]". Misplaced Pages.org. January 5, 2008. Archived from the original on January 15, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2015.
209. ^ Spicuzza, Mary (February 13, 2008). "Misplaced Pages Idiots: The Edit Wars of San Francisco". SF Weekly. p. 2. Archived from the original on September 11, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
210. "Privacy". Misplaced Pages.
211. Arthur, Charles (December 14, 2005). "Log on and join in, but beware the web cults". The Guardian. Archived from the original on May 3, 2006. Retrieved July 14, 2006.
212. Stvilla, Besiki; Twidale, Michael; Smith, Linda; Gasser, Les (February 21, 2008). "Information Quality Work Organization in Misplaced Pages" (PDF). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 20, 2007. (subscription required)
213. Johnson, Bobbie (August 12, 2009). "Misplaced Pages approaches its limits". The Guardian. Archived from the original on March 1, 2014. Retrieved May 25, 2014.
214. "The battle for Misplaced Pages's soul". The Economist. March 6, 2008. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved August 31, 2015.
215. Hickman, Martin; Roberts, Genevieve (February 13, 2006). "Misplaced Pages – separating fact from fiction". The New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved April 17, 2007. Such checking leads to a daily battle of wits with the cyber-wreckers who insert erroneous, ludicrous and offensive material into entries. How frequently entries get messed about with depends on the controversy of their subjects. This week the entry Muslim is being attacked dozens of times a day following the row about cartoons of Mohammed with angry denunciations of suicide bombing and claims of hypocrisy. Prime Minister Tony Blair's entry is a favourite for distortion with new statements casting aspersions on his integrity.
216. Kleinz, Torsten (February 2005). "World of Knowledge" (PDF). Linux Magazine. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 2, 2015. Retrieved May 12, 2007. The Misplaced Pages's open structure makes it a target for trolls and vandals who malevolently add incorrect information to articles, get other people tied up in endless discussions, and generally do everything to draw attention to themselves.
217. "Wiki page on Three-revert-rule". Misplaced Pages. Archived from the original on July 13, 2017.
218. Hill, Benjamin Mako (March 27, 2013). "The Institute for Cultural Diplomacy and Misplaced Pages". mako.cc. eous. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved August 31, 2015. In Misplaced Pages, debates can be won by stamina. If you care more and argue longer, you will tend to get your way. The result, very often, is that individuals and organizations with a very strong interest in having Misplaced Pages say a particular thing tend to win out over other editors who just want the encyclopedia to be solid, neutral, and reliable. These less-committed editors simply have less at stake and their attention is more distributed.
219. Postril, Virginia (November 17, 2014). "Who Killed Misplaced Pages?". Pacific Standard. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 31, 2015. 'Tiring out one's opponent is a common strategy among experienced Wikipedians ... I have resorted to it many times.'
220. Cite error: The named reference JaronLanier2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
221. Lanier, Jaron (May 30, 2006). "Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism". Edge. Archived from the original on April 29, 2007. Retrieved April 30, 2007.
222. Shirky, Clay (June 7, 2006). "Reactions to Digital Maoism". Corante.com. Archived from the original on June 13, 2006. Retrieved May 1, 2007.
223. Angwin, Julia; Fowler, Geoffrey A. (November 27, 2009). "Volunteers Log Off as Misplaced Pages Ages". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on October 25, 2017. Retrieved July 28, 2013.(subscription required)
224. Simonite, Tom (October 22, 2013). "The Decline of Misplaced Pages". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on June 19, 2015. Retrieved March 26, 2015.
225. ^ Jemielniak, Dariusz (June 22, 2014). "The Unbearable Bureaucracy of Misplaced Pages". Slate. Archived from the original on July 1, 2014. Retrieved July 1, 2014.
226. Wilson, Chris (February 22, 2008). "The Wisdom of the Chaperones: Digg, Misplaced Pages, and the myth of Web 2.0 democracy". Slate. Archived from the original on March 20, 2013. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
227. Kleeman, Jenny (March 25, 2007). "Wiki wars". The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 31, 2013. Retrieved October 4, 2007.

Works cited

• Report on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election, Volume 2: Russia's Use of Social Media with Additional Views (PDF) (Report). United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. October 8, 2019. Retrieved June 23, 2023.

Further reading

• Jacobs, Julia (April 8, 2019). "Misplaced Pages Isn't Officially a Social Network. But the Harassment Can Get Ugly". The New York Times.
• Simonite, Tom (October 22, 2013). "The Decline of Misplaced Pages: Even As More People Than Ever Rely on It, Fewer People Create It". MIT Technology Review. 116 (6). Archived from the original on June 19, 2015. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
• Rafaeli, Sheizaf & Ariel, Yaron (2008). "Online motivational factors: Incentives for participation and contribution in Misplaced Pages." In A. Barak (ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 243–267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • "Cyberpsych.Yeda.info". Archived from the original on November 27, 2012. Retrieved November 19, 2013.
• Keen, Andrew. The Cult of the Amateur. Doubleday/Currency, 2007. ISBN 978-0-385-52080-5 (substantial criticisms of Misplaced Pages and another web 2.0 projects).
  • Keen, Andrew (June 16, 2007). "Does the Internet Undermine Culture?". NPR. Retrieved March 31, 2010. (Audio version (with transcript) of the NPR interview with Andrew Keen on June 16, 2007).

External links

• A Compendium of Misplaced Pages Criticism by Wikipediocracy blog
• The Geographically Uneven Coverage of Misplaced Pages – Oxford Internet Institute – University of Oxford

• Criticism of Misplaced Pages
• Criticisms of software and websites