Revision as of 20:38, 18 January 2013 editIñaki LL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,819 edits →Background: Citation fix← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:58, 18 December 2024 edit undo91.110.224.175 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Frankish military and political leader (c. 688–741)}} | |||
{{About|the Frankish Ruler}} | |||
{{About|the Frankish ruler}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2019}} | |||
{{Infobox royalty | {{Infobox royalty | ||
| |
| name = Charles Martel | ||
| title = ] |
| title = {{plainlist| | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
| image = Charles Martel 01.jpg | |||
| |
| image = Charles Martel 01.jpg | ||
| caption = 1839 sculpture of Charles by ], located in the ]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Les collections – Château de Versailles |url=https://collections.chateauversailles.fr/#d9907040-29a2-4e2f-bf19-b508f28802bd |access-date=2024-01-17 |website=collections.chateauversailles.fr}}</ref> | |||
| succession = ] | |||
| |
| succession = ] | ||
| |
| reign = 718 – 22 October 741 | ||
| predecessor = ] | | predecessor = ] | ||
| successor |
| successor = {{plainlist| | ||
*] | |||
| succession1 = ] of ] | |||
*] | |||
| reign1 = 715 – 741 | |||
}} | |||
| coronation1 = 715 | |||
| succession1 = ] of ] | |||
| predecessor1 = ] | |||
| reign1 = 715 – 22 October 741 | |||
| successor1 = ] | |||
| predecessor1 = ] | |||
| succession2 = ] of ] | |||
| |
| successor1 = ] | ||
| succession2 = ] of ] | |||
| coronation2 = 718 | |||
| reign2 = 718 – 22 October 741 | |||
| predecessor2 = ] | |||
| |
| predecessor2 = ] | ||
| |
| successor2 = ] | ||
| |
| spouse = {{plainlist| | ||
* ] | |||
| coronation2 = 737 | |||
* ] | |||
| predecessor2 = ] | |||
}} | |||
| successor2 = ] | |||
| |
| issue = {{plainlist| | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
| house = ] | |||
* ] | |||
| father = ] | |||
* ] | |||
| mother = ] | |||
* ] | |||
| birth_date = 688 | |||
* ] | |||
| birth_place = ] | |||
* ] | |||
| death_date = 741 | |||
* ] | |||
| death_place = ] | |||
}} | |||
| house = ] <br/>] (founder) | |||
| father = ] | |||
| mother = ] | |||
| birth_date = 23 August c. 686 or 688<ref>{{Cite book |last=Fouracre |first=Paul |date=2000 |title=The Age of Charles Martel |location=Harlow, England |publisher=Longman |pages=1, 55 |isbn=0582064759 |oclc=43634337}}</ref> | |||
| birth_place = ], ] | |||
| death_date = 22 October 741 (aged 51–53) | |||
| death_place = ], ] | |||
| place of burial = ] | | place of burial = ] | ||
| signature |
| signature = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Campaignbox Charles Martel}} | {{Campaignbox Charles Martel}} | ||
{{Carolingians|315px}} | |||
'''Charles Martel''' ( |
'''Charles Martel''' ({{IPAc-en|m|ɑr|ˈ|t|ɛ|l}}; {{circa|688}} – 22 October 741),<ref name="EB1911">{{Cite EB1911|wstitle= Charles Martel |volume= 5 |last= Pfister |first= Christian |author-link= Christian Pfister | pages = 942–943 }}</ref> ''Martel'' being a sobriquet in Old French for "The Hammer", was a ] political and military leader who, as ] and ], was the de facto ruler of the Franks from 718 until his death.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Schulman |first=Jana K. |title=The Rise of the Medieval World, 500–1300: A Biographical Dictionary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=f_jLbHTM_zgC&pg=PA101 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=2002 |page=101 |isbn=0-313-30817-9}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Cawthorne |first=Nigel |author-link=Nigel Cawthorne |title=Military Commanders: The 100 Greatest Throughout History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=F-QawgVmYn8C&pg=PA52 |publisher=Enchanted Lion Books |year=2004 |pages=52–53 |isbn=1-59270-029-2}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Kibler |first1=William W. |last2=Zinn |first2=Grover A. |title=Medieval France: An Encyclopedia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4qFY1jpF2JAC&pg=PA205 |publisher=] |year=1995 |pages=205–206 |isbn=0-8240-4444-4}}</ref> He was a son of the Frankish statesman ] and a noblewoman named ]. Charles successfully asserted his claims to power as successor to his father as the ] in Frankish politics. Continuing and building on his father's work, he restored ] in Francia and began the series of military campaigns that re-established the Franks as the undisputed masters of all ]. According to a near-contemporary source, the '']'', Charles was "a warrior who was uncommonly ... effective in battle".<ref>{{Cite book |editor1-last=Fouracre |editor1-first=Paul |editor2-last=Gerberding |editor2-first=Richard A. |title=Late Merovingian France: history and hagiography, 640–720 |date=1996 |publisher=Manchester University Press |translator=Paul Fouracre and Richard A. Gerberding |isbn=0719047900 |location=Manchester |page=93 |oclc=32699266}}</ref> | ||
Charles gained a very consequential victory against an Umayyad invasion of Aquitaine at the ], at a time when the ] controlled most of the ]. Alongside his military endeavours, Charles has been traditionally credited with an influential role in the development of the Frankish system of ].<ref>{{cite book|author1-last=White, Jr.|author1-first=Lynn|title=Medieval technology and social change|date=1962|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=London, England|pages=2–14}}</ref><ref>Mclaughlin, William, ": Charles Martel the 'Hammer' preserves Western Christianity", War History Online.</ref> | |||
The illegitimate son of Frankish strongman, ], and a noblewoman named ], Martel ] to his father as the ] in Frankish politics. Continuing and building on his father's work, he restored centralized government in ] and ] of all ]. In foreign wars, Martel subjugated ], ], ], vanquished the pagan ], and halted the ] at the ].<ref>"Charles's victory has often been regarded as decisive for world history, since it preserved western Europe from the Moors conquest and Islamization." </ref> | |||
At the end of his reign, Charles divided Francia between his sons, ] and ]. The latter became the first king of the ]. Pepin's son ], grandson of Charles, extended the Frankish realms and became the first emperor in the West since the ].<ref name="Fouracre00">Fouracre, Paul (2000). . London: Longman. {{ISBN|0-582-06475-9}}. Accessed 2 August 2015.{{page needed|date=August 2015}}</ref> | |||
Martel is considered to be the founding figure of the European ]. Skilled as an administrator and warrior, he is often credited with a seminal role in the development of ] and ]. Martel was a great patron of ] and made the first attempt at reconciliation between the ] and the Franks. The ] wished him to become the defender of the ] and offered him the ]ship. Martel refused the offer, but it was a ].<ref>"Pope Gregory III, menaced by the Lombards, invoked the aid of Charles in 739, sent him a deputation with the keys of the Holy Sepulchre and the chains of St. Peter, and offered to break with the emperor and Constantinople, and to give Charles the Roman consulate (ut a partibus imperatoris recederet et Romanum consulatum Carolo sanciret). This proposal, though unsuccessful, was the starting point of a new papal policy." </ref><ref>. 2001. The Encyclopedia of World History</ref> | |||
== Background == | |||
Although Martel never assumed the title of king, he divided Francia, like a king, between his sons ] and ]. The latter became the first of the ]s, the family of Charles Martel, to become king. Martel's grandson, ], extended the Frankish realms to include much of the West, and became the first ] since the fall of ]. Therefore, on the basis of his achievements, Martel is seen as laying the groundwork for the ].<ref name=Fouracre>Fouracre, John. “The Age of Charles Martel''</ref><ref>deMartelly, Louis. . "Charles Martel and the Lance of Destiny." Author Solutions (2008).</ref> In summing up the man, ] has written, Martel was "the hero of the ]," whereas ] describes him as being the "champion of | |||
Charles, nicknamed "Martel" ("the Hammer") in later chronicles, was a son of ] and his mistress, possible second wife, ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Women in World History: A Biographical Encyclopedia|date=2002|publisher=Yorkin Publications|isbn=0-7876-4074-3|editor1-last=Commire|editor1-first=Anne|location=Waterford, Connecticut|chapter=Alphaida (c. 654–c. 714)|chapter-url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-2591300322.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924170313/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-2591300322.html|archive-date=2015-09-24|url-status=dead|chapter-url-access=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Hanson|first=Victor Davis|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XGr16-CxpH8C|title=Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise to Western Power|date=2007-12-18|publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-307-42518-8|language=en}}</ref> He had a brother named ], who later became the Frankish ''dux'' (that is, ''duke'') of ].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Commire|first=Anne|date=2015-09-24|orig-year=2002|title=Alphaida (c. 654–c. 714) – Women in World History: A Biographical Encyclopedia |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-2591300322.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924170313/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-2591300322.html|archive-date=24 September 2015|access-date=2020-09-24|publisher=Yorkin Publications|publication-place=Waterford, Connecticut}}</ref>And is the great grandson of ]. | |||
the ] against the ]."<ref>Edward Gibbon, The history of the decline and fall of the Roman empire, Volume 6, p. 197.</ref><ref>Albert Guerard, France: A Modern History.</ref> | |||
Older historiography commonly describes Charles as "illegitimate", but the dividing line between wives and concubines was not clear-cut in eighth-century Francia. It is likely that the accusation of "illegitimacy" derives from the desire of Pepin's first wife ] to see her progeny as heirs to Pepin's throne.<ref name="Matthiesen Verlag">{{cite book|author1-last=Joch|author1-first=Waltraud|title=Legitimität und Integration: Untersuchungen zu den Anfängen Karl Martells|date=1999|publisher=Matthiesen Verlag|location=Husum, Germany}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite news|author1-last=Gerberding|author1-first=Richard A.|title=Review of ''Legitimität und Integration: Untersuchungen zu den Anfängen Karl Martells'' by Waltraud Joch|date=October 2002|journal=Speculum|volume=77|number=4|pages=1322–1323}}</ref> | |||
==Background== | |||
Martel was born as the illegitimate son of ] and his concubine ].<ref>{{cite book|title=World military leaders: a biographical dictionary|year=2007|publisher=Facts on File|isbn=978-0-8160-4732-1|page=63|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=QSJoaugn2h8C&lpg=PA63&dq=Charles%20Martel%20born%20Herstal&pg=PA63#v=onepage&q=Charles%20Martel%20born%20Herstal&f=false|author=Mark Grossman|accessdate=2 June 2011}}</ref><ref>{{CathEncy|wstitle=Charles Martel}}</ref> He had a brother named ], who later became the Frankish dux of ]. The brothers being illegitimate, were not considered to be part of their father's paternal family, the ], who since the early seventh century, had dominated the politics of ]. | |||
By Charles's lifetime the ]s had ceded power to the ], who controlled the royal treasury, dispensed patronage, and granted land and privileges in the name of the figurehead king. Charles's father, Pepin of Herstal, had united the Frankish realm by conquering ] and ]. Pepin was the first to call himself Duke and Prince of the Franks, a title later taken up by Charles. | |||
== Contesting for power == | |||
Pepin died of old age in 714. His legitimate grandchildren (his legitimate sons having predeceased him) claimed themselves to be his true successors and, with the help of Pepin's legitimate wife, ], tried to assume power in the realm. Pepin had agreed to name one of them, ], heir to Francia. Plectrude subsequently imprisoned Charles to secure matters. But, he managed to escape. Charles was able to gather an army for himself, having gained favour among the Franks, primarily for his military prowess. Indeed, he was nicknamed ''Martel'', meaning "the hammer", by later, 9th century chronicles.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Riche |first=Paul |title=The Carolingians: A Family Who Forged Europe |url= |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |year=2002 |page=44 |isbn=0-8122-1342-4}}</ref> Although he was entirely neglected in his father's will, being a bastard son, Martel was now determined to become the ruler of all Francia. | |||
] | |||
In December 714, ] died.<ref name=Kurth> Vol. 6. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909</ref> A few months before his death and shortly after the murder of his son ], he had taken the advice of his wife ] to designate as his sole heir ], his grandson by their deceased son ]. This was immediately opposed by the Austrasian nobles because Theudoald was a child of only eight years of age. To prevent Charles using this unrest to his own advantage, Plectrude had him imprisoned in ], the city which was intended to be her capital. This prevented an uprising on his behalf in ], but not in ]. | |||
==Contesting for power== | |||
] | |||
In December 714, ] died. Prior to his death, he had, at his wife Plectrude's urging, designated ], his grandson by their son ], his heir in the entire realm. This was immediately opposed by the nobles because Theudoald was a child of only eight years of age. To prevent Charles using this unrest to his own advantage, Plectrude had him imprisoned in ], the city which was destined to be her capital. This prevented an uprising on his behalf in ], but not in ]. | |||
===Civil war of |
=== Civil war of 715–718 === | ||
{{Carolingians|315px}} | |||
In 715, the Neustrian noblesse proclaimed ] ] on behalf of, and apparently with the support of, ], who in theory had the legal authority to select a mayor, though by this time the ] dynasty had lost most such powers. | |||
Pepin's death occasioned open conflict between his heirs and the Neustrian nobles who sought political independence from Austrasian control. In 715, ] named ] ]. On 26 September 715, Raganfrid's Neustrians met the young Theudoald's forces at the ]. Theudoald was defeated and fled back to Cologne. Before the end of the year, Charles had escaped from prison and been acclaimed mayor by the nobles of Austrasia.<ref name=Kurth /> That same year, Dagobert III died and the Neustrians proclaimed ], the cloistered son of ], as king. | |||
==== Battle of Cologne ==== | |||
The Austrasians were not to be left supporting a woman and her young son for long. Before the end of the year, Charles Martel had escaped from prison and been acclaimed mayor by the nobles of that kingdom. The Neustrians had been attacking Austrasia and the nobles were waiting for a strong man to lead them against their invading countrymen. That year, Dagobert died and the Neustrians proclaimed ] king without the support of the rest of the Frankish people. | |||
{{main|Battle of Cologne}} | |||
In 716, Chilperic and Raganfrid together led an army into Austrasia intent on seizing the Pippinid wealth at Cologne. The Neustrians allied with another invading force under ] and met Charles in battle near ], which was still held by Plectrude. Charles had little time to gather men or prepare and the result was inevitable. The Frisians held off Charles, while the king and his mayor besieged Plectrude at Cologne, where she bought them off with a substantial portion of Pepin's treasure. After that they withdrew.<ref name="Costambeys">Costambeys, Marios; Matthew Innes & MacLean, Simon (2011) ''The Carolingian World,'' p. 43, Cambridge, GBR: Cambridge University Press, see , accessed 2 August 2015.</ref> The Battle of Cologne is the only defeat of Charles's career. | |||
==== Battle of Amblève ==== | |||
In 716, Chilperic and Ragenfrid together led an army into Austrasia. The Neustrians allied with another invading force under ] and met Charles in battle near Cologne, which was still held by Plectrude. Charles had little time to gather men, or prepare, and the result was the only defeat of his life. According to Strauss and Gustave, Martel fought a brilliant battle, but realized he could not prevail because he was outnumbered so badly, and retreated. | |||
{{main|Battle of Amblève}} | |||
Charles retreated to the hills of the ] to gather and train men. In April 716, he fell upon the triumphant army near ] as it was returning to Neustria. In the ensuing ], Charles attacked as the enemy rested at midday. According to one source, he split his forces into several groups which fell at them from many sides.<ref> Daniel, Gabriel. ''The History of France'', G. Strahan, 1726, p. 148]</ref> Another suggests that while this was his intention, he then decided, given the enemy's unpreparedness, this was not necessary. In any event, the suddenness of the assault led them to believe they were facing a much larger host. Many of the enemy fled and Charles's troops gathered the spoils of the camp. His reputation increased considerably as a result, and he attracted more followers. This battle is often considered by historians as the turning point in Charles's struggle.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Age of Charles Martel|last=Fouracre|first=Paul|date=2000|publisher=Longman|isbn=0582064759|location=Harlow, England|pages=61|oclc=43634337}}</ref> | |||
==== Battle of Vincy ==== | |||
He fled the field as soon as he realized he did not have the time or the men to prevail, retreating to the mountains of the ] to gather men, and train them. The king and his mayor then turned to besiege their other rival in the city and took it and the treasury, and received the recognition of both Chilperic as king and Ragenfrid as mayor. Plectrude surrendered on Theudoald's behalf. | |||
{{main|Battle of Vincy}} | |||
] points out that up to this time, much of Charles's support was probably from his mother's kindred in the lands around Liege. After Amblève, he seems to have won the backing of the influential ], founder of the ]. The abbey had been built on land donated by Plectrude's mother, ], but most of Willibrord's missionary work had been carried out in Frisia. In joining Chilperic and Raganfrid, Radbod of Frisia sacked Utrecht, burning churches and killing many missionaries. Willibrord and his monks were forced to flee to Echternach. Gerberding suggests that Willibrord had decided that the chances of preserving his life's work were better with a successful field commander like Charles than with Plectrude in Cologne. Willibrord subsequently baptized Charles's son ]. Gerberding suggests a likely date of Easter 716.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.medievalists.net/2014/11/716-crucial-year-charles-martel/| title = Gerberding, Richard. "716: A Crucial Year For Charles Martel", Medievalists.net, November 3, 2014| date = 3 November 2014}}</ref> Charles also received support from bishop Pepo of Verdun. | |||
Charles took time to rally more men and prepare. By the following spring, he had attracted enough support to invade Neustria. Charles sent an envoy who proposed a cessation of hostilities if Chilperic would recognize his rights as mayor of the palace in Austrasia. The refusal was not unexpected but served to impress upon Charles's forces the unreasonableness of the Neustrians. They met near Cambrai at the ] on 21 March 717. The victorious Charles pursued the fleeing king and mayor to Paris, but as he was not yet prepared to hold the city, he turned back to deal with Plectrude and Cologne. He took the city and dispersed her adherents. Plectrude was allowed to retire to a convent. Theudoald lived to 741 under his uncle's protection. | |||
===Military genius=== | |||
At this juncture, however, events turned in favour of Charles. Having made the proper preparations, he fell upon the triumphant army near ] as it was returning to its own province, and, in the ensuing ], routed it. The few troops who were not killed or captured, fled. Several things were notable about this battle, in which Charles set the pattern for the remainder of his military career: first, he appeared ''where'' his enemies least expected him, while they were marching triumphantly home and far outnumbered him. | |||
== Consolidation of power == | |||
He also attacked ''when'' least expected, at midday, when armies of that era traditionally were resting. Finally, he attacked them ''how'' they least expected it, by feigning a retreat to draw his opponents into a trap. The feigned retreat, next to unknown in Western Europe at that time — it was a traditionally eastern tactic — required both extraordinary discipline on the part of the troops and exact timing on the part of their commander. Charles, in this battle, had begun demonstrating the military genius that would mark his rule. The result was an unbroken victory streak that lasted until his death. | |||
Upon this success, Charles proclaimed ] king in ] in opposition to Chilperic and deposed ], ], replacing him with ], a lifelong supporter. | |||
In 718, Chilperic responded to Charles's new ascendancy by making an alliance with ] (or Eudes, as he is sometimes known), the ], who had become independent during the civil war in 715, but was again defeated, at the ], by Charles.<ref name="Strauss">Strauss, Gustave Louis M. (1854) ''Moslem and Frank; or, Charles Martel and the rescue of Europe,'' Oxford, GBR:Oxford University Press, see , accessed 2 August 2015.{{page needed|date=August 2015}}</ref> Chilperic fled with his ducal ally to the land south of the ] and Raganfrid fled to ]. Soon Chlotar IV died and Odo surrendered King Chilperic in exchange for Charles recognizing his dukedom. Charles recognized Chilperic as king of the Franks in return for legitimate royal affirmation of his own mayoralty over all the kingdoms. | |||
In Spring 717, Charles returned to Neustria with an army and confirmed his supremacy with a victory at the ], near ]. He chased the fleeing king and mayor to ], before turning back to deal with Plectrude and Cologne. He took her city and dispersed her adherents. He allowed both Plectrude and the young Theudoald to live and treated them with kindness—unusual for those ], when mercy to a former gaoler, or a potential rival, was rare. | |||
=== Wars of 718–732 === | |||
On this success, he proclaimed ] king of ] in opposition to Chilperic and deposed the ], ], replacing him with ], a lifelong supporter. | |||
].]] | |||
Between 718 and 732, Charles secured his power through a series of victories. Having unified the Franks under his banner, Charles was determined to punish the Saxons who had invaded Austrasia. Therefore, late in 718, he laid waste their country to the banks of the ], the ], and the ].<ref name=Kurth/> He defeated them in the ] and thus secured the Frankish border. | |||
When the Frisian leader ] died in 719, Charles seized West Frisia without any great resistance on the part of the ], who had been subjected to the Franks but had rebelled upon the death of Pippin. When Chilperic II died in 721, Charles appointed as his successor the son of Dagobert III, ], who was still a minor, and who occupied the throne from 721 to 737. Charles was now appointing the kings whom he supposedly served ('']''). By the end of his reign, he didn't appoint any at all. At this time, Charles again marched against the Saxons. Then the Neustrians rebelled under Raganfrid, who had left the county of Anjou. They were easily defeated in 724 but Raganfrid gave up his sons as hostages in turn for keeping his county. This ended the civil wars of Charles' reign. | |||
==Consolidation of power== | |||
After subjugating all ], he marched against ] and pushed him back into his territory, even forcing the concession of ] (later ]). He also sent the ] back over the ] and thus secured his borders—in the name of the new king Clotaire, of course. | |||
In 718, Chilperic responded to Charles' new ascendancy by making an alliance with ] (or Eudes, as he is sometimes known), the ], who had made himself independent during the civil war in 715, but was again defeated, at the ], by Charles. | |||
The next six years were devoted in their entirety to assuring Frankish authority over the neighboring political groups. Between 720 and 723, Charles was fighting in Bavaria, where the ] dukes had gradually evolved into independent rulers, recently in alliance with ]. He forced the ] to accompany him, and Duke ] submitted to Frankish suzerainty. In 725 he brought back the Agilolfing Princess Swanachild as a second wife. | |||
The king fled with his ducal ally to the land south of the ] and Ragenfrid fled to ]. Soon Clotaire IV died and Odo gave up on Chilperic and, in exchange for recognising his dukedom, surrendered the king to Charles, who recognised his kingship over all the Franks in return for legitimate royal affirmation of his mayoralty, likewise over all the kingdoms (718). | |||
In 725 and 728, he again entered Bavaria but, in 730, he marched against ], Duke of Alemannia, who had also become independent, and killed him in battle. He forced the Alemanni to capitulate to Frankish suzerainty and did not appoint a successor to Lantfrid. Thus, southern Germany once more became part of the Frankish kingdom, as had northern Germany during the first years of the reign. | |||
===Foreign wars from 718-732=== | |||
] | |||
The ensuing years were full of strife. Between 718 and 723, Charles secured his power through a series of victories: he won the loyalty of several important bishops and abbots (by donating lands and money for the foundation of abbeys such as ]), he subjugated ] and ], and he defeated the pagan ]. | |||
== Aquitaine and the Battle of Tours in 732 == | |||
Having unified the Franks under his banner, Charles was determined to punish the Saxons who had invaded Austrasia. Therefore, late in 718, he laid waste their country to the banks of the ], the ], and the ]. He defeated them in the ]. In 719, Charles seized West Frisia without any great resistance on the part of the ], who had been subjects of the Franks but had seized control upon the death of Pippin. Although Charles did not trust the pagans, their ruler, ], accepted Christianity, and Charles sent ], ], the famous "Apostle to the Frisians" to convert the people. Charles also did much to support Winfrid, later ], the "Apostle of the Germans." | |||
When Chilperic II died the following year (720), Charles appointed as his successor the son of Dagobert III, ], who was still a minor, and who occupied the throne from 720 to 737. Charles was now appointing the kings whom he supposedly served, ] who were mere puppets in his hands; by the end of his reign they were so useless that he didn't even bother appointing one. At this time, Charles again marched against the Saxons. Then the Neustrians rebelled under Ragenfrid, who had left the county of Anjou. They were easily defeated (724), but Ragenfrid gave up his sons as hostages in turn for keeping his county. This ended the civil wars of Charles' reign. | |||
The next six years were devoted in their entirety to assuring Frankish authority over the dependent Germanic tribes. Between 720 and 723, Charles was fighting in Bavaria, where the ] dukes had gradually evolved into independent rulers, recently in alliance with ]. He forced the ] to accompany him, and Duke ] submitted to Frankish suzerainty. | |||
In 725 and 728, he again entered Bavaria and the ties of lordship seemed strong. From his first campaign, he brought back the Agilolfing princess Swanachild, who apparently became his concubine. In 730, he marched against ], duke of Alemannia, who had also become independent, and killed him in battle. He forced the Alemanni capitulation to Frankish suzerainty and did not appoint a successor to Lantfrid. Thus, southern Germany once more became part of the Frankish kingdom, as had northern Germany during the first years of the reign. | |||
But by 731, his own realm secure, Charles began to prepare exclusively for the coming storm from the south and west. | |||
In 721, the ] had built up a strong army from ], ], and ] to conquer ], the large duchy in the southwest of Gaul, nominally under Frankish sovereignty, but in practice almost independent in the hands of the ], the ], since the Merovingian kings had lost power. The invading Muslims besieged the city of Toulouse, then Aquitaine's most important city, and Odo (also called Eudes, or Eudo) immediately left to find help. | |||
He returned three months later just before the city was about to surrender and defeated the Muslim invaders on June 9, 721, at what is now known as the ]. This critical defeat was essentially the result of a classic enveloping movement by Odo's forces. (After Odo originally fled, the Muslims became overconfident and failed to maintain strong outer defenses and continuous scouting.) Thus, when Odo returned, he was able to launch a near complete surprise attack on the besieging force, scattering it at the first attack, and slaughtering units caught resting or that fled without weapons or armour. | |||
==== Raising an army ==== | |||
Due to the situation in Iberia, Martel believed he needed a virtually full-time army—one he could train intensely—as a core of veteran Franks who would be augmented with the usual conscripts called up in time of war. (During the ], troops were only available after the crops had been planted and before harvesting time.) To train the kind of infantry that could withstand the Muslim heavy cavalry, Charles needed them year-round, and he needed to pay them so their families could buy the food they would have otherwise grown. | |||
To obtain money he seized church lands and property, and used the funds to pay his soldiers. The same Charles who had secured the support of the ''ecclesia'' by donating land, seized some of it back between 724 and 732. Of course, Church officials were enraged, and, for a time, it looked as though Charles might even be excommunicated for his actions. But then came a significant invasion. | |||
===Eve of the Battle of Tours=== | |||
]s", showing Umayyad dominance stretching from the Middle East to the Iberian peninsula, including the port of ], c. 720]] | |||
Historian ] wrote, "Having defeated Eudes, he turned to the Rhine to strengthen his northeastern borders - but in 725 was diverted south with the activity of the Muslims in Acquitane."<ref>{{cite book | last = Davis | first = P. K. | authorlink = Paul K. Davis (historian) | |||
| title = 100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present | publisher = ] | |||
| year = 1999 | chapter = Tours (Poitiers) | |||
| oclc = 442348155 | isbn = 978-0-19-514366-9 |page = 104 | |||
}}</ref> Martel then concentrated his attention to the Umayyads, virtually for the remainder of his life. Indeed, 12 years later, when he had thrice rescued Gaul from Umayyad invasions, ] noted when he destroyed an Umayyad army sent to reinforce the invasion forces of the 735 campaigns, "Charles Martel again came to the rescue."<ref name=Santosuosso>{{cite book | last = Santosuosso | first = A. | authorlink = Antonio Santosuosso | |||
| title = Barbarians, marauders, and infidels : the ways of medieval warfare | publisher = ] | |||
| year = 2004 | oclc = 433381450| isbn = 978-0-8133-9153-3 }}</ref> Charles Martel could have pursued the wars against the Saxons—but he was determined to prepare for what he thought was a greater danger. | |||
The Muslims were not aware, at that time, of the true strength of the Franks, or the fact that they were building a disciplined ] instead of the typical barbarian hordes that had dominated Europe after Rome's fall. The Arab Chronicles, the history of that age, show that Arab awareness of the Franks as a growing military power came only after the Battle of Tours when the Caliph expressed shock at his army's catastrophic defeat. | |||
==Battle of Tours== | |||
{{Main|Battle of Tours}} | {{Main|Battle of Tours}} | ||
In 731, after defeating the Saxons, Charles turned his attention to the rival southern realm of Aquitaine, and crossed the Loire, breaking the treaty with Duke Odo. The Franks ransacked Aquitaine twice, and captured ], although Odo retook it. The ''Continuations of Fredegar'' allege that Odo called on assistance from the recently established emirate of al-Andalus, but there had been Arab raids into Aquitaine from the 720s onwards. Indeed, the anonymous ] records a victory for Odo in 721 at the ], while the '']'' records that Odo had killed 375,000 Saracens.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Age of Charles Martel|last=Fouracre|first=Paul|date=2000|publisher=Longman|isbn=0582064759|location=Harlow, England|pages=84–5|oclc=43634337}}</ref> It is more likely that this invasion or raid took place in revenge for Odo's support for a rebel Berber leader named ]. | |||
Whatever the precise circumstances were, it is clear that an army under the leadership of ] headed north, and after some minor engagements marched on the wealthy city of Tours. According to British medieval historian ], "Their campaign should perhaps be interpreted as a long-distance raid rather than the beginning of a war".<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Age of Charles Martel|last=Fouracre|first=Paul|date=2000|publisher=Longman|isbn=0582064759|location=Harlow, England|pages=88|oclc=43634337}}</ref> They were, however, defeated by the army of Charles at the ] (known in France as the Battle of Poitiers), at a location between the French cities of ] and ], in a victory described by the ''Continuations of Fredegar''. According to the historian ], the Arab army, mostly mounted, failed to break through the Frankish infantry.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bachrach |first=Bernard S. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/43095805 |title=Early Carolingian warfare : prelude to empire |date=2001 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |isbn=0-8122-3533-9 |location=Philadelphia |pages=170–178 |oclc=43095805}}</ref> News of this battle spread, and may be recorded in Bede's ] (Book V, ch. 23). However, it is not given prominence in Arabic sources from the period.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Christys|first=Ann|title=Sons of Ishmael, Turn Back!|year=2019|chapter-url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781316941072%23CN-bp-20/type/book_part|series=East and West in the Early Middle Ages|pages=318–328|editor-last=Esders|editor-first=Stefan|edition=1|publisher=Cambridge University Press|doi=10.1017/9781316941072.021|isbn=9781316941072|access-date=2019-05-07|editor2-last=Fox|editor2-first=Yaniv|editor3-last=Hen|editor3-first=Yitzhak|editor4-last=Sarti|editor4-first=Laury|chapter='Sons of Ishmael, Turn Back!'|s2cid=166413345 }}</ref> | |||
===Lead-up and importance=== | |||
{{Quote|It was under one of their ablest and most renowned commanders, with a veteran army, and with every apparent advantage of time, place, and circumstance, that the Arabs made their great effort at the conquest of Europe north of the Pyrenees.<ref></ref> | |||
|]|'']''}} | |||
Despite his victory, Charles did not gain full control of Aquitaine, and Odo remained duke until 735. | |||
The ]n ] had previously invaded ] and had been stopped in its northward sweep at the ], in 721. The hero of that less celebrated event had been ], Duke of Aquitaine, who was not the progenitor of a race of kings and patron of chroniclers. It has previously been explained how Odo defeated the invading Muslims, but when they returned, things were far different. The arrival in the interim of a new ], ], who brought with him a huge force of Arabs and ] horsemen, triggered a far greater invasion. | |||
== Wars of 732–737 == | |||
Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi had been at Toulouse, and the Arab Chronicles make clear he had strongly opposed the Emir's decision not to secure outer defenses against a relief force, which allowed Odo and his relief force to attack with impunity before the Islamic cavalry could assemble or mount. Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi had no intention of permitting such a disaster again. This time the Umayyad horsemen were ready for battle, and the results were horrific for the ]ans. | |||
] | |||
Between his victory of 732 and 735, Charles reorganized the kingdom of ], replacing the counts and dukes with his loyal supporters, thus strengthening his hold on power. He was forced, by the ventures of ], to invade independent-minded Frisia again in 734. In that year, he slew the duke at the ]. Charles ordered the Frisian pagan shrines destroyed, and so wholly subjugated the populace that the region was peaceful for twenty years after. | |||
Odo, hero of Toulouse, was badly defeated in the Muslim invasion of 732 at the battle prior to the Muslim sacking of ], and when he gathered a second army, at the ]—Western chroniclers state, "God alone knows the number of the slain"— and the city of Bordeaux was sacked and looted. Odo fled to Charles, seeking help. Charles agreed to come to Odo's rescue, provided Odo acknowledged Charles and his house as his overlords, which Odo did formally at once. Charles was pragmatic; while most commanders would never use their enemies in battle, Odo and his remaining Aquitanian nobles formed the right flank of Charles's forces at Tours. | |||
In 735, Duke Odo of Aquitaine died. Though Charles wished to rule the duchy directly and went there to elicit the submission of the Aquitanians, the aristocracy proclaimed Odo's son, ], as duke, and Charles and Hunald eventually recognised each other's position. | |||
The ] earned Charles the ] "Martel" ('Hammer') for the merciless way he hammered his enemies. Many historians, including ], believe that had he failed at Tours, ] would probably have overrun ], and perhaps the remainder of Western Europe. ] made clear his belief that the Umayyad armies would have conquered from Japan to the Rhine, and even England, having the English Channel for protection, with ease, had Martel not prevailed. Creasy said "the great victory won by Charles Martel ... gave a decisive check to the career of Arab conquest in Western Europe, rescued Christendom from Islam, preserved the relics of ancient and the germs of modern civilization." | |||
== Interregnum (737–741) == | |||
Gibbon's belief that the fate of Christianity hinged on this battle is echoed by other historians including ], and was very popular for most of modern historiography. It fell somewhat out of style in the 20th century, when historians such as ] contended that Arabs had little intention of occupying northern France. More recently, however, many historians have tended once again to view the Battle of Tours as a very significant event in the history of Europe and Christianity. Equally, many, such as ], still believe this battle was one of macrohistorical world-changing importance, if they do not go so far as Gibbon does rhetorically. | |||
In 737, at the tail end of his campaigning in Provence and ], the Merovingian king, Theuderic IV, died. Charles, titling himself ''maior domus'' and ''princeps et dux Francorum'', did not appoint a new king and nobody acclaimed one. The throne lay vacant until Charles' death. The interregnum, the final four years of Charles' life, was relatively peaceful although in 738 he compelled the Saxons of ] to submit and pay tribute and in 739 he checked an uprising in Provence where some rebels united under the leadership of ]. | |||
Charles used the relative peace to set about integrating the outlying realms of his empire into the Frankish church. He erected four dioceses in Bavaria (], ], ], and ]) and gave them ] as ] and ] over all Germany east of the Rhine, with his seat at ]. Boniface had been under his protection from 723 on. Indeed, the saint himself explained to his old friend, ], that without it he could neither administer his church, defend his clergy nor prevent idolatry. | |||
==== Contemporary historians ==== | |||
] from 1834 to 1837.]] | |||
In 739, ] begged Charles for his aid against ], but Charles was loath to fight his onetime ally and ignored the plea. Nonetheless, the pope's request for Frankish protection showed how far Charles had come from the days when he was tottering on excommunication, and set the stage for his son and grandson to assert themselves in the peninsula. | |||
In the modern era, ] and his co-authors of ''Fighting Techniques of the Medieval World'', published in 2005, argue that "few battles are remembered 1,000 years after they are fought ... but the Battle of Poitiers, (Tours) is an exception ... Charles Martel turned back a Muslim raid that, had it been allowed to continue, might have conquered Gaul." Michael Grant, author of ''History of Rome'', grants the Battle of Tours such importance that he lists it in the macrohistorical dates of the Roman era. | |||
== Death and transition in rule == | |||
It is important to note however that modern Western historians, military historians, and writers, essentially fall into three camps. The first, those who believe Gibbon was right in his assessment that Martel saved Christianity and Western civilization by this battle are typified by Bennett, Paul Davis, Robert Martin, and educationalist ] who writes in ''An Islamic Europe'': | |||
] | |||
].]] | |||
Charles died on 22 October 741, at ] in what is today the ] '']'' in the ] region of France. He was buried at ] in ].<ref>{{cite web|title=History of the Monument|url=http://www.saint-denis-basilique.fr/en/Explore/History-of-the-monument|website=Basilique Cathédrale de Saint-Denis|access-date=27 January 2017|archive-date=15 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200615060407/http://www.saint-denis-basilique.fr/en/Explore/History-of-the-monument|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
{{quote|A Muslim France? Historically, it nearly happened. But as a result of Martel’s fierce opposition, which ended Muslim advances and set the stage for centuries of war thereafter, Islam moved no farther into Europe. European schoolchildren learn about the Battle of Tours in much the same way that American students learn about Valley Forge and Gettysburg."<ref>, ''Tomorrow's World'', Volume 8, No 3. ; </ref>}} | |||
His territories had been divided among his adult sons a year earlier: to ] he gave Austrasia, Alemannia, and Thuringia, and to ] Neustria, Burgundy, Provence, and Metz and Trier in the "Mosel duchy". ] was given several lands throughout the kingdom, but at a later date, just before Charles died.<ref name="Riche93">Riche, Pierre (1993) ''The Carolingians: A Family Who Forged Europe,'' , Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, {{ISBN|0-8122-1342-4}}, see , accessed 2 August 2015.</ref>{{rp|50}} | |||
The second camp of contemporary historians believe that a failure by Martel at Tours could have been a disaster, destroying what would become Western civilization after the ]. Certainly all historians agree that no power would have remained in Europe able to halt Islamic expansion had the Franks failed. ], one of the most respected historians of this era, strongly supports Tours as a macrohistorical event, but distances himself from the rhetoric of Gibbon and Drubeck, writing, for example, of the battle's importance in Frankish and world history in 1993: | |||
== Legacy == | |||
{{quote|There is clearly some justification for ranking Tours-Poitiers among the most significant events in Frankish history when one considers the result of the battle in light of the remarkable record of the successful establishment by Muslims of Islamic political and cultural dominance along the entire eastern and southern rim of the former Christian, Roman world. The rapid Muslim conquest of Palestine, Syria, Egypt and the North African coast all the way to Morocco in the seventh century resulted in the permanent imposition by force of Islamic culture onto a previously Christian and largely non-Arab base. The Visigothic kingdom fell to Muslim conquerors in a single battle at the ] on the ] in 711, and the Hispanic Christian population took seven long centuries to regain control of the Iberian Peninsula. The Reconquista, of course, was completed in 1492, only months before Columbus received official backing for his fateful voyage across the Atlantic Ocean. Had Charles Martel suffered at Tours-Poitiers the fate of King Roderick at the Rio Barbate, it is doubtful that a "do-nothing" sovereign of the Merovingian realm could have later succeeded where his talented major domus had failed. Indeed, as Charles was the progenitor of the Carolingian line of Frankish rulers and grandfather of Charlemagne, one can even say with a degree of certainty that the subsequent history of the West would have proceeded along vastly different currents had ‘Abd ar-Rahman been victorious at Tours-Poitiers in 732.<ref>Watson, William, E. (1993). . ''Providence: Studies in Western Civilization'' v.2 n.1.</ref>}} | |||
Earlier in his life Charles had many internal opponents and felt the need to appoint his own kingly claimant, ]. Later, however, the dynamics of rulership in Francia had changed, and no hallowed Merovingian ruler was required. Charles divided his realm among his sons without opposition (though he ignored his young son ]). For many historians, Charles laid the foundations for his son Pepin's rise to the Frankish throne in 751, and his grandson Charlemagne's imperial acclamation in 800. However, for Paul Fouracre, while Charles was "the most effective military leader in Francia", his career "finished on a note of unfinished business".<ref>Paul Fouracre, 'Writing about Charles Martel', in ''Law, Laity and Solidarities: essays in honour of Susan Reynolds,'' ed. Pauline Stafford et al. (Manchester, 2001), pp. 12–26.</ref> | |||
] | |||
The final camp of Western historians believe that the importance of the battle is dramatically overstated. This view is typified by Alessandro Barbero, who writes, "Today, historians tend to play down the significance of the battle of Poitiers, pointing out that the purpose of the Arab force defeated by Charles Martel was not to conquer the Frankish kingdom, but simply to pillage the wealthy monastery of St-Martin of Tours".<ref>Barbero, 2004, p. 10.</ref> Similarly, Tomaž Mastnak writes: | |||
===Family and children=== | |||
{{quote|Modern historians have constructed a myth presenting this victory as having saved Christian Europe from the Muslims. Edward Gibbon, for example, called Charles Martel the savior of Christendom and the battle near Poitiers an encounter that changed the history of the world... This myth has survived well into our own times... Contemporaries of the battle, however, did not overstate its significance. The continuators of Fredegar's chronicle, who probably wrote in the mid-eighth century, pictured the battle as just one of many military encounters between Christians and Saracens - moreover, as only one in a series of wars fought by Frankish princes for booty and territory... One of Fredegar's continuators presented the battle of Poitiers as what it really was: an episode in the struggle between Christian princes as the Carolingians strove to bring Aquitaine under their rule.<ref>Mastnak, 2002, pp. 99-100.</ref>}} | |||
Charles married twice, his first wife being ], daughter either of ], or of ], Count of Treves.{{Citation needed|date=March 2024}} They had the following children: | |||
However, it is vital to note, when assessing Charles Martel's life, that even those historians who dispute the significance of this one battle as the event that saved Christianity, do not dispute that Martel himself had a huge effect on Western European history. Modern military historian ] acknowledges the debate on this battle, citing historians both for and against its macrohistorical placement: | |||
{{quote|Recent scholars have suggested Poitiers, so poorly recorded in contemporary sources, was a mere raid and thus a construct of western myth-making or that a Muslim victory might have been preferable to continued Frankish dominance. What is clear is that Poitiers marked a general continuance of the successful defense of Europe (from the Muslims). Flush from the victory at Tours, Charles Martel went on to clear southern France from Islamic attackers for decades, unify the warring kingdoms into the foundations of the Carolingian Empire, and ensure ready and reliable troops from local estates.<ref>Hanson, Victor Davis, 2001, p. 167.</ref>}} | |||
* ] | |||
==After Tours== | |||
* ]<ref name=Riche93 />{{rp|50}} | |||
In the subsequent decade, Charles led the Frankish army against the eastern duchies, Bavaria and Alemannia, and the southern duchies, ] and ]. He dealt with the ongoing conflict with the ]ns and ] to his northeast with some success, but full conquest of the Saxons and their incorporation into the Frankish empire would wait for his grandson Charlemagne, primarily because Martel concentrated the bulk of his efforts against Muslim expansion. | |||
* Landrade, also rendered as Landres {{Citation needed|date=March 2024}} | |||
* ], also rendered as Aldana {{Citation needed|date=March 2024}} | |||
* ]<ref name=Riche93 />{{rp|50}} | |||
Most of the children married and had issue. ] married ] (]). Landrade was once believed to have married a ] (Count of Hesbania) but Sigrand's wife was more likely the sister of Rotrude. ] married ]. | |||
So instead of concentrating on conquest to his east, he continued expanding Frankish authority in the west, and denying the Emirate of Córdoba a foothold in Europe beyond Al-Andalus. After his victory at Tours, Martel continued on in campaigns in 736 and 737 to drive other Muslim armies from bases in Gaul after they again attempted to expand beyond Al-Andalus. | |||
Charles also married a second time, to ] and they had a child named ].<ref name=Riche93 />{{rp|50}} | |||
===Wars from 732-737=== | |||
], published in 1553.]] | |||
With ], with whom he had: | |||
Between his victory of 732 and 735, Charles reorganized the kingdom of ], replacing the counts and dukes with his loyal supporters, thus strengthening his hold on power. He was forced, by the ventures of ], ] (719-734), son of the Duke Aldegisel who had accepted the ] Willibrord and Boniface, to invade independence-minded Frisia again in 734. In that year, he slew the duke, who had expelled the Christian missionaries, in the ] and so wholly subjugated the populace (he destroyed every pagan shrine) that the people were peaceful for twenty years after. | |||
* ] ({{circa|720}}–787), | |||
The dynamic changed in 735 because of the death of Odo the Great, who had been forced to acknowledge, albeit reservedly, the suzerainty of Charles in 719. Though Charles wished to unite the duchy directly to himself and went there to elicit the proper homage of the Aquitainians, the nobility proclaimed Odo's son, ], whose dukedom Charles recognised when the Umayyads invaded Provence the next year, and who equally was forced to acknowledge Charles as overlord as he had no hope of holding off the Muslims alone. | |||
* ] ({{circa|722}} – after 782), | |||
* ] (d. 771) ]. | |||
== Reputation and historiography == | |||
This naval Arab invasion was headed by Abdul Rahman's son. It landed in ] in 736 and moved at once to reinforce ] and move inland. Charles temporarily put the conflict with Hunold on hold, and descended on the Provençal strongholds of the Umayyads. In 736, he retook ] and ], and Arles and ] with the help of ]. ], ], and ], held by Islam since 725, fell to him and their fortresses were destroyed. | |||
]'' by ], published in 1553]] | |||
He crushed one Umayyad army at Arles, as that force sallied out of the city, and then took the city itself by a direct and brutal frontal attack, and burned it to the ground to prevent its use again as a stronghold for Umayyad expansion. He then moved swiftly and defeated a mighty host outside of Narbonnea at the River Berre, but failed to take the city. Military historians believe he could have taken it, had he chosen to tie up all his resources to do so—but he believed his life was coming to a close, and he had much work to do to prepare for his sons to take control of the Frankish realm. | |||
=== Military victories === | |||
A direct frontal assault, such as took Arles, using rope ladders and rams, plus a few catapults, simply was not sufficient to take Narbonne without horrific loss of life for the Franks, troops Martel felt he could not lose. Nor could he spare years to starve the city into submission, years he needed to set up the administration of an empire his heirs would reign over. In addition, he faced strong opposition from regional lords such as the patrician Maurentius, from Marseille, who revolted against the Frankish leader. Moreover, the Aquitanian duke Hunald threatened his lines of communication with the north, so deciding him to withdraw from Septimania and destroy several strongholds (Béziers, Agde, etc.).<ref>{{cite book |last=Lewis |first=Archibald R |title= The Development of Southern French and Catalan Society, 718–1050 |year= 1965|publisher= University of Texas Press: Austin |location= |isbn= 9780292729414/0292729413 |page= |pages= |url=http://libro.uca.edu/lewis/sfcatsoc.htm |accessdate=}}</ref> He left Narbonne therefore, isolated and surrounded, and his son would return to conquer it for the Franks. | |||
For early medieval authors, Charles was famous for his military victories. ] for instance attributed a victory against the ]s actually won by Odo of Aquitaine to Charles.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Age of Charles Martel|last=Fouracre|first=Paul|date=2000|publisher=Longman|isbn=0582064759|location=Harlow, England|page=85|oclc=43634337}}</ref> However, alongside this there soon developed a darker reputation, for his alleged abuse of church property. A ninth-century text, the ''Visio Eucherii'', possibly written by ], portrayed Charles as suffering in ] for this reason.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Merovingian kingdoms, 450–751|last=Wood|first=I. N.|date=1994|publisher=Longman|isbn=0582218780|location=London|oclc=27172340}} pp. 275–276</ref> According to British medieval historian ], this was "the single most important text in the construction of Charles's reputation as a seculariser or despoiler of church lands".<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Age of Charles Martel|last=Fouracre|first=Paul|date=2000|publisher=Longman|isbn=0582064759|location=Harlow, England|page=124|oclc=43634337}}</ref> | |||
Notable about these campaigns was Charles' incorporation, for the first time, of heavy cavalry with stirrups to augment his ]. His ability to coordinate infantry and cavalry veterans was unequaled in that era and enabled him to face superior numbers of invaders, and to decisively defeat them again and again. Some historians believe the Battle against the main Muslim force at the River Berre, near Narbonne, in particular was as important a victory for Christian Europe as Tours.<ref>In ''Barbarians, Marauders, and Infidels'', ], Professor Emeritus of History at the ], and considered an expert historian in the era in dispute, puts forth an interesting modern opinion on Martel, Tours, and the subsequent campaigns against Rahman's son in 736-737. Santosuosso presents a compelling case that these later defeats of invading Muslim armies were at least as important as Tours in their defence of Western Christendom and the preservation of ], the monasteries of which were the centers of learning which ultimately led Europe out of her ]. He also makes a compelling argument, after studying the Arab histories of the period, that these were clearly armies of invasion, sent by the Caliph not just to avenge Tours, but to begin the conquest of Christian Europe and bring it into the Caliphate.</ref> | |||
By the eighteenth century, historians such as ] had begun to portray the Frankish leader as the saviour of Christian Europe from a full-scale Islamic invasion.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ccel.org/g/gibbon/decline/volume2/chap52.htm|title=Chapter 52 of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire|website=www.ccel.org}}</ref> | |||
Further, unlike his father at Tours, Rahman's son in 736-737 knew that the Franks were a real power, and that Martel personally was a force to be reckoned with. He had no intention of allowing Martel to catch him unaware and dictate the time and place of battle, as his father had. He concentrated instead on seizing a substantial portion of the coastal plains around ] in 736 and heavily reinforced ] as he advanced inland. | |||
In the nineteenth century, the German historian ] argued that Charles had confiscated church lands in order to fund military reforms that allowed him to defeat the Arab conquests, in this way brilliantly combining two traditions about the ruler. However, Fouracre argued that "...there is not enough evidence to show that there was a decisive change either in the way in which the Franks fought, or in the way in which they organised the resources needed to support their warriors."<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Age of Charles Martel|last=Fouracre|first=Paul|date=2000|publisher=Longman|isbn=0582064759|location=Harlow, England|page=149|oclc=43634337}}</ref> | |||
Abdul Rahman's son planned from there to move from city to city, fortifying as they went, and if Martel wished to stop them from making a permanent enclave for expansion of the Caliphate, he would have to come to them, in the open, where, he, unlike his father, would dictate the place of battle. All worked as he had planned, until Martel arrived, albeit more swiftly than the Moors believed he could call up his entire army. Unfortunately for Rahman's son, however, he had overestimated the time it would take Martel to develop heavy cavalry equal to that of the Muslims. | |||
Many twentieth-century European historians continued to develop Gibbon's perspectives, such as French medievalist ], who wrote in 1911 that | |||
The Caliphate believed it would take a generation, but Martel managed it in five years. Prepared to face the Frankish phalanx, the Muslims were totally unprepared to face a mixed force of heavy cavalry and infantry in a phalanx. Thus, Charles again championed Christianity and halted Muslim expansion into Europe. These defeats, plus those at the hands of Leo in Anatolia, were the last great attempt at expansion by the Umayyad Caliphate before the destruction of the dynasty at the ], and the rending of the Caliphate forever, especially the utter destruction of the Umayyad army at River Berre near Narbonne in 737. | |||
{{blockquote|"Besides establishing a certain unity in Gaul, Charles saved it from a great peril. In 711 the Arabs had conquered Spain. In 720 they crossed the Pyrenees, seized Narbonensis, a dependency of the kingdom of the Visigoths, and advanced on Gaul. By his able policy Odo succeeded in arresting their progress for some years; but a new vali, ], a member of an extremely fanatical sect, resumed the attack, reached Poitiers, and advanced on Tours, the holy town of Gaul. In October 732—just 100 years after the death of ]—Charles gained a brilliant victory over ], who was called back to Africa by revolts of the Berbers and had to give up the struggle. ...After his victory, Charles took the offensive".<ref name="EB1911"/>|sign=|source=}} | |||
===Interregnum=== | |||
In 737, at the tail end of his campaigning in Provence and ], the king, Theuderic IV, died. Martel, titling himself ''maior domus'' and ''princeps et dux Francorum'', did not appoint a new king and nobody acclaimed one. The throne lay vacant until Martel's death. As the historian ] says (''The Dark Ages'', pg 297), "he cared not for name or style so long as the real power was in his hands." | |||
Similarly, ], who wrote of the battle's importance in Frankish and world history in 1993, suggested that | |||
Gibbon has said Martel was "content with the titles of Mayor or Duke of the Franks, but he deserved to become the father of a line of kings," which he did. Gibbon also says of him, "in the public danger, he was summoned by the voice of his country." | |||
{{blockquote|"Had Charles Martel suffered at Tours-Poitiers the fate of King Roderick at the Rio Barbate, it is doubtful that a "do-nothing" sovereign of the Merovingian realm could have later succeeded where his talented major domus had failed. Indeed, as Charles was the progenitor of the Carolingian line of Frankish rulers and grandfather of Charlemagne, one can even say with a degree of certainty that the subsequent history of the West would have proceeded along vastly different currents had 'Abd al-Rahman been victorious at Tours-Poitiers in 732."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Watson|first=William|date=1993|title=The Battle of Tours-Poitiers Revisited|journal=Providence: Studies in Western Civilization|volume=2}}</ref>|sign=|source=}} | |||
The interregnum, the final four years of Charles' life, was more peaceful than most of it had been and much of his time was now spent on administrative and organisational plans to create a more efficient state. Though, in 738, he compelled the Saxons of ] to do him homage and pay tribute, and in 739 checked an uprising in Provence, the rebels being under the leadership of Maurontus. Charles set about integrating the outlying realms of his empire into the Frankish church. | |||
And in 1993, the influential political scientist ] saw the battle of Tours as marking the end of the "Arab and Moorish surge west and north".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Huntington |first=Samuel P. |date=1993 |title=The Clash of Civilizations? |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20045621 |journal=Foreign Affairs |volume=72 |issue=3 |pages=22–49 |doi=10.2307/20045621 |jstor=20045621 |issn=0015-7120}}</ref> | |||
He erected four dioceses in Bavaria (], ], ], and ]) and gave them Boniface as ] and ] over all Germany east of the Rhine, with his seat at ]. Boniface had been under his protection from 723 on; indeed the saint himself explained to his old friend, Daniel of Winchester, that without it he could neither administer his church, defend his clergy, nor prevent idolatry. It was Boniface who had defended Charles most stoutly for his deeds in seizing ecclesiastical lands to pay his army in the days leading to Tours, as one doing what he must to defend Christianity. | |||
Other recent historians, however, argue that the importance of the battle is dramatically overstated, both for European history in general and for Charles's reign in particular. This view is typified by ], who in 2004 wrote, | |||
In 739, ] begged Charles for his aid against Liutprand, but Charles was loath to fight his onetime ally and ignored the Papal plea. Nonetheless, the Papal applications for Frankish protection showed how far Martel had come from the days he was tottering on excommunication, and set the stage for his son and grandson to rearrange Italian political boundaries to suit the Papacy, and protect it. | |||
{{blockquote|"Today, historians tend to play down the significance of the battle of Poitiers, pointing out that the purpose of the Arab force defeated by Charles Martel was not to conquer the Frankish kingdom, but simply to pillage the wealthy monastery of St-Martin of Tours".<ref>{{Cite book|title=Charlemagne : father of a continent|first=Alessandro|last=Barbero|date=2004|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=0520239431|location=Berkeley|oclc=52773483|page=10}}</ref>|sign=|source=}} | |||
==Death (741)== | |||
] | |||
Charles Martel died on October 22, 741, at ] in what is today the ] '']'' in the ] region of France. He was buried at ] in ]. His territories were divided among his adult sons a year earlier: to ] he gave Austrasia and Alemannia (with Bavaria as a vassal), to ] Neustria and Burgundy (with Aquitaine as a vassal), and to ] nothing, though some sources indicate he intended to give him a strip of land between Neustria and Austrasia. | |||
Similarly, in 2002 Tomaž Mastnak wrote: | |||
Gibbon called him "the hero of the age" and declared "Christendom ... delivered ... by the genius and good fortune of one man, Charles Martel." | |||
{{blockquote|"The continuators of Fredegar's chronicle, who probably wrote in the mid-eighth century, pictured the battle as just one of many military encounters between Christians and Saracens—moreover, as only one in a series of wars fought by Frankish princes for booty and territory... One of Fredegar's continuators presented the battle of Poitiers as what it really was: an episode in the struggle between Christian princes as the Carolingians strove to bring Aquitaine under their rule."<ref>{{Cite book|title=Crusading peace : Christendom, the Muslim world, and Western political order|first=Tomaž|last=Mastnak|date=2002|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=9780520925991|location=Berkeley|oclc=52861403|page= }}</ref>}} | |||
More recently, the memory of Charles has been appropriated by ] and ] groups, such as the ']' in France, and by the perpetrator of the ] at ] and ] in ], New Zealand, in 2019.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/03/18/fake-history-that-fueled-accused-christchurch-shooter/|title=Perspective {{!}} The fake history that fueled the accused Christchurch shooter|newspaper=Washington Post|language=en|access-date=2019-06-04}}</ref> The memory of Charles is a topic of debate in contemporary French politics on both the right and the left.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Blanc |first=William |title=Charles Martel et la Bataille de Poitiers |year=2022 |publisher=Libertalia |isbn=9782377292356}}</ref> | |||
==Legacy== | |||
{{refimprove section|date=November 2011}} | |||
At the beginning of Charles Martel's career, he had many internal opponents and felt the need to appoint his own kingly claimant, Clotaire IV. By his end, however, the dynamics of rulership in Francia had changed, no hallowed Meroving was needed, neither for defence nor legitimacy: Charles divided his realm between his sons without opposition (though he ignored his young son ]). In between, he strengthened the Frankish state by consistently defeating, through superior generalship, the host of hostile foreign nations which beset it on all sides, including the non-Christian Saxons, which his grandson Charlemagne would fully subdue, and Moors, which he halted on a path of continental domination. | |||
=== Order of the Genet === | |||
] | |||
In the seventeenth century, a legend emerged that Charles had formed the first regular order of knights in France. In 1620, Andre Favyn stated (without providing a source) that among the spoils Charles's forces captured after the Battle of Tours were many ] (raised for their fur) and several of their pelts.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Favyn |first=Andre |title=Le Theatre d'honneur et de chevalerie |year=1620}}</ref> Charles gave these furs to leaders amongst his army, forming the first order of knighthood, the Order of the Genet. Favyn's claim was then repeated and elaborated in later works in English, for instance by ] in 1672,<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ashmole |first=Elias |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=woFlAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA97 |title=The Institution, Laws and Ceremonies of the Most Noble Order of the Garter |year=1672 |pages=97|publisher=J. Macock }}</ref> and James Coats in 1725.<ref>{{cite book |author=James Coats |title=A New Dictionary of Heraldry |date=1725 |publisher=Jer. Batley |pages=163–164}}</ref> | |||
Though he never cared about titles, his son ] did, and finally asked the ] "who should be King, he who has the title, or he who has the power?" The Pope, highly dependent on Frankish armies for his independence from Lombard and ] power (the ] still considered himself to be the only legitimate "]", and thus, ruler of all of the provinces of the ], whether recognised or not), declared for "he who had the power" and immediately crowned Pippin. | |||
== References == | |||
Decades later, in 800, Pippin's son ] was crowned emperor by the Pope, further extending the principle by delegitimising the nominal authority of the Byzantine Emperor in the Italian peninsula (which had, by then, shrunk to encompass little more than ] and ] at best) and ancient Roman Gaul, including the Iberian outposts Charlemagne had established in the '']'' across the ], what today forms ]. In short, though the Byzantine Emperor claimed authority over all the old ], as the legitimate "Roman" Emperor, it was simply not reality. | |||
{{reflist|30em}} | |||
== External links == | |||
The bulk of the ] had come under Carolingian rule, the Byzantine Emperor having had almost no authority in the West since the sixth century, though Charlemagne, a consummate politician, preferred to avoid an open breach with Constantinople. An institution unique in history was being born: the ]. Though the sardonic ] ridiculed its nomenclature, saying that the Holy Roman Empire was "neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire," it constituted an enormous political power for a time, especially under the ] and ] and, to a lesser, extent, the ]. It lasted until 1806, by which time it was a nonentity. Though his grandson became its first emperor, the "empire" such as it was, was largely born during the reign of Charles Martel. | |||
{{commonscat}} | |||
{{Wikiquote}} | |||
{{EB9 Poster|Charles Martel}} | |||
{{NIE Poster|year=1905}} | |||
* : A sketch giving the context of the conflict from the Arab point of view. | |||
Charles was that rarest of commodities in the Middle Ages: a brilliant strategic general, who also was a tactical commander ''par excellence'', able in the heat of battle to adapt his plans to his foe's forces and movement — and amazingly, to defeat them repeatedly, especially when, as at Tours, they were far superior in men and weaponry, and at Berre and Narbonne, when they were superior in numbers of fighting men. Charles had the last quality which defines genuine greatness in a military commander: he foresaw the dangers of his foes, and prepared for them with care; he used ground, time, place, and fierce loyalty of his troops to offset his foe's superior weaponry and tactics; third, he adapted, again and again, to the enemy on the battlefield, shifting to compensate for the unforeseen and unforeseeable. | |||
* | |||
* —'']'', ] (2014) | |||
Gibbon, whose tribute to Martel has been noted, was not alone among the great mid era historians in fervently praising Martel; Thomas Arnold ranks the victory of Charles Martel even higher than the victory of ] in the ] in its impact on all of modern history: | |||
* ({{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011132606/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/732tours.html |date=11 October 2014 }}) | |||
* ({{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011132606/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/732tours.html |date=11 October 2014 }}) from the ] | |||
{{quote|Charles Martel's victory at Tours was among those signal deliverances which have affected for centuries the happiness of mankind.|History of the later Roman Commonwealth, vol ii. p. 317.}} | |||
* ({{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080429225422/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/g2-martellet.html |date=29 April 2008 }}) | |||
* {{Cite EB1911|wstitle= Charles Martel |volume= 5 |last= Pfister |first= Christian |author-link= Christian Pfister | pages = 942–943 |short= 1}} | |||
]<ref>Created under ]; cf. R.E. Giesey, ''The royal funeral ceremony in Renaissance France'' (1960), p. 31 n. 13; E.A.R. Brown, ''The Oxford collection of the drawings of Roger de Gaignières and the royal tombs of Saint-Denis'' (1988), p. 11 n. 15.</ref>]] | |||
] (detail).]] | |||
German historians are especially ardent in their praise of Martel and in their belief that he saved Europe and Christianity from then all-conquering Islam, praising him also for driving back the ferocious Saxon barbarians on his borders. Schlegel speaks of this "mighty victory" in terms of fervent gratitude, and tells how "the arm of Charles Martel saved and delivered the Christian nations of the West from the deadly grasp of all-destroying Islam", and Ranke points out, | |||
{{quote|as one of the most important epochs in the history of the world, the commencement of the eighth century, when on the one side Mohammedanism threatened to overspread Italy and Gaul, and on the other the ancient idolatry of Saxony and Friesland once more forced its way across the Rhine. In this peril of Christian institutions, a youthful prince of Germanic race, Karl Martell, arose as their champion, maintained them with all the energy which the necessity for self-defence calls forth, and finally extended them into new regions.{{citation needed|date=December 2010}}}} | |||
In 1922 and 1923, Belgian historian ] published a series of papers, known collectively as the "Pirenne Thesis", which remain influential to this day. Pirenne held that the Roman Empire continued, in the Frankish realms, up until the time of the ] in the 7th century. These conquests disrupted Mediterranean trade routes leading to a decline in the European economy. Such continued disruption would have meant complete disaster except for Charles Martel's halting of Islamic expansion into Europe from 732 on. What he managed to preserve led to the ], named after him. | |||
Professor Santosuosso<ref name= Santosuosso>Santosuosso, Antonio. ''Barbarians, Marauders, and Infidels''</ref> perhaps sums up Martel best when he talks about his coming to the rescue of his Christian allies in Provence, and driving the Muslims back into the Iberian Peninsula forever in the mid and late 730s: | |||
{{quote|After assembling forces at Saragossa the Muslims entered French territory in 735,{{citation needed|date=January 2012}} crossed the River Rhone and captured and looted Arles. From there they struck into the heart of Provence, ending with the capture of Avignon, despite strong resistance. Islamic forces remained in French territory for about four years, carrying raids to Lyon, Burgundy, and Piedmont. Again Charles Martel came to the rescue, reconquering most of the lost territories in two campaigns in 736 and 739, except for the city of Narbonne, which finally fell in 759. The second (Muslim) expedition was probably more dangerous than the first to Poitiers. Yet its failure (at Martel's hands) put an end to any serious Muslim expedition across the Pyrenees (forever).{{citation needed|date=December 2010}}}} | |||
Skilled as an administrator and ruler, Martel organized what would become the medieval European government: a system of fiefdoms, loyal to barons, counts, dukes and ultimately the King, or in his case, simply ''maior domus'' and princeps et dux Francorum. ("], ]") His close coordination of church with state began the medieval pattern for such government. He created what would become the first western standing army since the fall of Rome by his maintaining a core of loyal veterans around which he organized the normal feudal levies. In essence, he changed Europe from a horde of barbarians fighting with one another, to an organized state. | |||
===Beginning of the ''Reconquista''=== | |||
{{Further|Reconquista}} | |||
Although it took another two decades for the Franks to drive all the Arab garrisons out of ] and across the ], Charles Martel's halt of the invasion of French soil turned the tide of Islamic advances, and the unification of the Frankish kingdoms under Martel, his son Pippin the Younger, and his grandson Charlemagne created a western power which prevented the Emirate of Córdoba from expanding over the Pyrenees. Martel, who in 732 was on the verge of excommunication, instead was recognised by the Church as its paramount defender. ] wrote to him more than once, asking his protection and aid,<ref></ref> and he remained, till his death, fixated on stopping the Muslims. | |||
Martel's son ] (Pepin II, The Short) kept his father's promise and returned and took Narbonne by siege in 759. His grandson, ], actually established the '']'' across the Pyrenees in part of what today is Catalonia, reconquering ] in 785 and ] in 801. Carolingians called this region of modern-day Spain "The Moorish Marches", and saw it as more than a simple check on the Muslims in Hispania.{{Citation needed|date=October 2010}} It formed a permanent buffer zone against Islam and became the basis, along with the efforts of ] (Latin: Pelagius) and his descendants, for the ]. | |||
==Military legacy== | |||
===Heavy infantry and permanent army=== | |||
].]] | |||
] argues that Charles Martel launched "the thousand year struggle" between ]an ] and ] ].<ref>Hanson, 2001, p. 141-166.</ref> Of course, Martel is also the father of heavy cavalry in Europe, as he integrated heavy armoured cavalry into his forces. This creation of a real army would continue all through his reign, and that of his son, Pepin the Short, until his Grandson, Charlemagne, would possess the world's largest and finest army since the peak of Rome.<ref name="autogenerated2">Bennett, Michael. ''Fighting Techniques of the Medieval World''</ref> Equally, the Muslims used infantry - indeed, at the Battle of Toulouse most of their forces were light infantry. It was not till Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi brought a huge force of Arab and Berber cavalry with him when he assumed the emirate of Al-Andulus that the Muslim forces became primarily cavalry. | |||
Martel's army was the first standing permanent army since the fall of Rome in 476.<ref name="autogenerated2" /> At its core was a body of tough, seasoned heavy infantry who displayed exceptional resolution at Tours. The Frankish infantry wore as much as 70 pounds of armour, including their heavy wooden shields with an iron boss. Standing close together, and well disciplined, they were unbreakable at Tours.<ref>Hanson, 2001, p. 154.</ref> Martel had taken the money and property he had seized from the church and paid local nobles to supply trained ready infantry year round. | |||
This was the core of veterans who served with him on a permanent basis, and as Hanson says, "provided a steady supply of dependable troops year around." While other Germanic cultures, such as the Visigoths or Vandals, had a proud martial tradition, and the Franks themselves had an annual muster of military aged men, such tribes were only able to field armies around planting and harvest. It was Martel's creation of a system whereby he could call on troops year round that gave the Carolingians the first standing and permanent army since Rome's fall in the west. | |||
Charles Martel's most important military achievement was the victory at Tours. Creasy argues that the Martel victory "preserved the relics of ancient and the gems of modern civilizations." Gibbon called those eight days in 732, the week leading up to Tours, and the battle itself, "the events that rescued our ancestors of Britain, and our neighbours of Gaul , from the civil and religious yoke of the Koran." Paul Akers, in his editorial on Charles Martel, says for those who value life and freedom "you might spare a minute sometime today, and every October, to say a silent 'thank you' to a gang of half-savage Germans and especially to their leader, Charles 'The Hammer' Martel."<ref></ref> | |||
Martel analysed what would be necessary for him to withstand a larger force and superior technology (the Muslim horsemen had adopted the armour and accoutrements of heavy cavalry from the Sassanid warrior class, which made the armored mounted knight possible). Not daring to send his few horsemen against the Islamic cavalry, he had his army fight in a formation used by the ] to withstand superior numbers and weapons by discipline, courage, and a willingness to die for their cause: a phalanx. He had trained a core of his men year round, using mostly Church funds, and some had been with him since his earliest days after his father's death. It was this hard core of disciplined veterans that won the day for him at Tours. | |||
Hanson emphasizes that Martel's greatest accomplishment as a general may have been his ability to keep his troops under control. Iron discipline saved his infantry from the fate of so many infantrymen - such as the Saxons at Hastings - who broke formation and were slaughtered piecemeal. After using this infantry force by itself at Tours, he studied the foe's forces and further adapted to them, initially using stirrups and saddles recovered from the foe's dead horses, and armour from the dead horsemen. | |||
The defeats Martel inflicted on the Muslims were vital in that the split in the Islamic world left the ] unable to mount an all-out attack on Europe via its Iberian stronghold after 750. His ability to meet this challenge, until the fragmentation of authority within the Muslims, is considered by most historians to be of ] importance, and is why ] writes of him in Heaven as one of the "Defenders of the Faith." | |||
] says of Charles Martel's decisive defeat of the Muslims in his "Short History of the World: | |||
{{quote|The Muslim when they crossed the Pyrenees in 720 found this Frankish kingdom under the practical rule of Charles Martel, the Mayor of the Palace of a degenerate descendant of Clovis, and experienced the decisive defeat of Poitiers (732) at his hands. This Charles Martel was practically overlord of Europe north of the Alps from the Pyrenees to Hungary."<ref></ref>}} | |||
However, when the Muslim first crossed the Pyrenees, Aquitaine was actually an independent realm under duke Odo's leadership and the Gothic ] remained out of Frankish rule. Odo, who was Charles's southern rival, had struck a peace treaty after the Frankish civil wars in Neustria and Austrasia, and garnered much popularity and the Pope's favour for his victory on the 721 Battle of Toulouse against the Moors. On the eve of the Muslim expedition north (731), Charles Martel crossed the Loire and captured the Aquitanian city of Bourges, while Odo re-captured it briefly after. | |||
] says in “''Famous Men of the Middle Ages''” | |||
{{quote|The battle of Tours, or Poitiers, as it should be called, is regarded as one of the decisive battles of the world. It decided that Christians, and not Moslems, should be the ruling power in Europe. Charles Martel is especially celebrated as the hero of this battle.}} | |||
Just as his grandson, Charlemagne, would become famous for his swift and unexpected movements in his campaigns, Charles was renowned for never doing what his enemies forecast he would do, and for moving far faster than his opponents believed he could. | |||
It is notable that the Northmen did not begin their European raids until after the death of Martel's grandson, Charlemagne. They had the naval capacity to begin those raids at least three generations earlier, and constructed defenses against counterattacks by land, but chose not to challenge Martel, his son Pippin, or his grandson, Charlemagne. This was probably fortunate for Martel, who despite his enormous gifts, would probably not have been able to repel the Vikings in addition to the Muslims, Saxons, and everyone else he defeated. | |||
==Conclusion== | |||
J.M. Roberts says of Charles Martel in his note on the Carolingians on page 315 of his 1993 ''History of the World'': | |||
::It (the Carolingian line) produced Charles Martel, the soldier who turned the Arabs back at Tours, and the supporter of Saint Boniface, the Evangelizer of Germany. This is a considerable double mark to have left on the history of Europe." | |||
Gibbon perhaps summarized Charles Martel's legacy most eloquently: "in a laborious administration of 24 years he had restored and supported the dignity of the throne... by the activity of a warrior who in the same campaign could display his banner on the Elbe, the Rhone, and shores of the ocean." | |||
==Family and children== | |||
Charles Martel married twice: | |||
His first wife was Rotrude, daughter of ], (died 724). They had the following children: | |||
*] (d. 754), married ], ] | |||
*] | |||
* Landrade (Landres), married Sigrand, Count of Hesbania. | |||
* Auda, Aldana, or Alane, married ]. | |||
*] | |||
His second wife was ]. They had the following child: | |||
*] | |||
Charles Martel also had a mistress, ]. They had the following children: | |||
*] (b. before 732–787) | |||
*Hieronymus, son of Charles Martel|Hieronymus | |||
*], ] (d. 771) | |||
==Notes== | |||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
==References== | |||
*deMartelly, Louis. , ''Charles Martel and the Lance of Destiny'', 8 (2008). | |||
*Watson, William E., , ''Providence: Studies in Western Civilization'', 2 (1993) | |||
*Poke,, from Sir Edward Creasy, MA, ''Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World From Marathon to Waterloo'' | |||
*Riche, Paul (1993). ''The Carolingians: A Family Who Forged Europe''. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 0-8122-1342-4 | |||
*Edward Gibbon, , '']'' | |||
*Michael Grant "''History of Rome''" | |||
==External links== | |||
{{NIE Poster|year=1905}} | |||
{{Portal|Crusades}} | |||
*: A sketch giving the context of the conflict from the Arab point of view. | |||
*http://www.standin.se/fifteen07a.htm ''Poke's edition of Creasy's "15 Most Important Battles Ever Fought According to Edward Shepherd Creasy" Chapter VII. The Battle of Tours, A.D. 732.'' | |||
*Richard Hooker, | |||
*, from "]" online. | |||
*Robert W. Martin, , from ] | |||
* | |||
* from the ] | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* {{Cite EB1911|Charles Martel|short=x}} | |||
{{S-start}} | {{S-start}} | ||
{{S-hou|]||686||741}} | {{S-hou|] Dynasty||676, 686, 688 or 690||741}} | ||
{{s-reg |
{{s-reg}} | ||
{{S-bef|before=]}} | {{S-bef|before=]}} | ||
{{S-ttl|title= |
{{S-ttl|title=]|years=717–741}} | ||
{{S-aft|after=]}} | {{S-aft|after=]}} | ||
{{s-break}} | {{s-break}} | ||
{{S-bef|before=]}} | {{S-bef|before=]}} | ||
{{S-ttl|title=]|years=717–741}} | {{S-ttl|title=]|years=717–741}} | ||
{{S-aft|after=]}} | {{S-aft|after=]}} | ||
{{ |
{{S-end}} | ||
{{s-bef|before=]}} | |||
{{s-ttl|title=]<br>(Acting)|years=737–741}} | |||
{{s-aft|after=]|reason=]}} | |||
{{s-end}} | |||
{{Carolingians footer}} | |||
{{Authority control|VIAF=807219}} | |||
{{Portal bar|Christianity}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see ]. --> | |||
] | |||
|NAME =Martel, Charles | |||
] | |||
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES = | |||
] | |||
|SHORT DESCRIPTION = | |||
] | |||
|DATE OF BIRTH = c. 688 | |||
] | |||
|PLACE OF BIRTH = Herstal, Austrasia, Frankish Empire (present-day Belgium) | |||
] | |||
|DATE OF DEATH = 22 October 741 (aged about 53) | |||
|PLACE OF DEATH = Quierzy, Picardy, France | |||
}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Martel, Charles}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] <!--infobox gives various dates--> | |||
] | |||
{{Link GA|no}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 19:58, 18 December 2024
Frankish military and political leader (c. 688–741) This article is about the Frankish ruler. For other uses, see Charles Martel (disambiguation).
Charles Martel | |
---|---|
1839 sculpture of Charles by Jean Baptiste Joseph De Bay père, located in the Palace of Versailles | |
Duke and Prince of the Franks | |
Reign | 718 – 22 October 741 |
Predecessor | Pepin of Herstal |
Successor | |
Mayor of the Palace of Austrasia | |
Reign | 715 – 22 October 741 |
Predecessor | Theudoald |
Successor | Carloman |
Mayor of the Palace of Neustria | |
Reign | 718 – 22 October 741 |
Predecessor | Raganfrid |
Successor | Pepin the Younger |
Born | 23 August c. 686 or 688 Herstal, Austrasia |
Died | 22 October 741 (aged 51–53) Quierzy, Frankish Empire |
Burial | Basilica of St Denis |
Spouse | |
Issue | |
House | Arnulfings Carolingian (founder) |
Father | Pepin of Herstal |
Mother | Alpaida |
Campaigns of Charles Martel | |
---|---|
Charles Martel (/mɑːrˈtɛl/; c. 688 – 22 October 741), Martel being a sobriquet in Old French for "The Hammer", was a Frankish political and military leader who, as Duke and Prince of the Franks and Mayor of the Palace, was the de facto ruler of the Franks from 718 until his death. He was a son of the Frankish statesman Pepin of Herstal and a noblewoman named Alpaida. Charles successfully asserted his claims to power as successor to his father as the power behind the throne in Frankish politics. Continuing and building on his father's work, he restored centralized government in Francia and began the series of military campaigns that re-established the Franks as the undisputed masters of all Gaul. According to a near-contemporary source, the Liber Historiae Francorum, Charles was "a warrior who was uncommonly ... effective in battle".
Charles gained a very consequential victory against an Umayyad invasion of Aquitaine at the Battle of Tours, at a time when the Umayyad Caliphate controlled most of the Iberian Peninsula. Alongside his military endeavours, Charles has been traditionally credited with an influential role in the development of the Frankish system of feudalism.
At the end of his reign, Charles divided Francia between his sons, Carloman and Pepin. The latter became the first king of the Carolingian dynasty. Pepin's son Charlemagne, grandson of Charles, extended the Frankish realms and became the first emperor in the West since the Fall of the Western Roman Empire.
Background
Charles, nicknamed "Martel" ("the Hammer") in later chronicles, was a son of Pepin of Herstal and his mistress, possible second wife, Alpaida. He had a brother named Childebrand, who later became the Frankish dux (that is, duke) of Burgundy.And is the great grandson of Arnulf of Metz.
Older historiography commonly describes Charles as "illegitimate", but the dividing line between wives and concubines was not clear-cut in eighth-century Francia. It is likely that the accusation of "illegitimacy" derives from the desire of Pepin's first wife Plectrude to see her progeny as heirs to Pepin's throne.
By Charles's lifetime the Merovingians had ceded power to the Mayors of the Palace, who controlled the royal treasury, dispensed patronage, and granted land and privileges in the name of the figurehead king. Charles's father, Pepin of Herstal, had united the Frankish realm by conquering Neustria and Burgundy. Pepin was the first to call himself Duke and Prince of the Franks, a title later taken up by Charles.
Contesting for power
In December 714, Pepin of Herstal died. A few months before his death and shortly after the murder of his son Grimoald the Younger, he had taken the advice of his wife Plectrude to designate as his sole heir Theudoald, his grandson by their deceased son Grimoald. This was immediately opposed by the Austrasian nobles because Theudoald was a child of only eight years of age. To prevent Charles using this unrest to his own advantage, Plectrude had him imprisoned in Cologne, the city which was intended to be her capital. This prevented an uprising on his behalf in Austrasia, but not in Neustria.
Civil war of 715–718
Carolingian dynasty |
---|
Pippinids
|
Arnulfings
|
Carolingians
|
After the Treaty of Verdun (843)
|
Pepin's death occasioned open conflict between his heirs and the Neustrian nobles who sought political independence from Austrasian control. In 715, Dagobert III named Raganfrid mayor of the palace. On 26 September 715, Raganfrid's Neustrians met the young Theudoald's forces at the Battle of Compiègne. Theudoald was defeated and fled back to Cologne. Before the end of the year, Charles had escaped from prison and been acclaimed mayor by the nobles of Austrasia. That same year, Dagobert III died and the Neustrians proclaimed Chilperic II, the cloistered son of Childeric II, as king.
Battle of Cologne
Main article: Battle of CologneIn 716, Chilperic and Raganfrid together led an army into Austrasia intent on seizing the Pippinid wealth at Cologne. The Neustrians allied with another invading force under Redbad, King of the Frisians and met Charles in battle near Cologne, which was still held by Plectrude. Charles had little time to gather men or prepare and the result was inevitable. The Frisians held off Charles, while the king and his mayor besieged Plectrude at Cologne, where she bought them off with a substantial portion of Pepin's treasure. After that they withdrew. The Battle of Cologne is the only defeat of Charles's career.
Battle of Amblève
Main article: Battle of AmblèveCharles retreated to the hills of the Eifel to gather and train men. In April 716, he fell upon the triumphant army near Malmedy as it was returning to Neustria. In the ensuing Battle of Amblève, Charles attacked as the enemy rested at midday. According to one source, he split his forces into several groups which fell at them from many sides. Another suggests that while this was his intention, he then decided, given the enemy's unpreparedness, this was not necessary. In any event, the suddenness of the assault led them to believe they were facing a much larger host. Many of the enemy fled and Charles's troops gathered the spoils of the camp. His reputation increased considerably as a result, and he attracted more followers. This battle is often considered by historians as the turning point in Charles's struggle.
Battle of Vincy
Main article: Battle of VincyRichard Gerberding points out that up to this time, much of Charles's support was probably from his mother's kindred in the lands around Liege. After Amblève, he seems to have won the backing of the influential Willibrord, founder of the Abbey of Echternach. The abbey had been built on land donated by Plectrude's mother, Irmina of Oeren, but most of Willibrord's missionary work had been carried out in Frisia. In joining Chilperic and Raganfrid, Radbod of Frisia sacked Utrecht, burning churches and killing many missionaries. Willibrord and his monks were forced to flee to Echternach. Gerberding suggests that Willibrord had decided that the chances of preserving his life's work were better with a successful field commander like Charles than with Plectrude in Cologne. Willibrord subsequently baptized Charles's son Pepin. Gerberding suggests a likely date of Easter 716. Charles also received support from bishop Pepo of Verdun.
Charles took time to rally more men and prepare. By the following spring, he had attracted enough support to invade Neustria. Charles sent an envoy who proposed a cessation of hostilities if Chilperic would recognize his rights as mayor of the palace in Austrasia. The refusal was not unexpected but served to impress upon Charles's forces the unreasonableness of the Neustrians. They met near Cambrai at the Battle of Vincy on 21 March 717. The victorious Charles pursued the fleeing king and mayor to Paris, but as he was not yet prepared to hold the city, he turned back to deal with Plectrude and Cologne. He took the city and dispersed her adherents. Plectrude was allowed to retire to a convent. Theudoald lived to 741 under his uncle's protection.
Consolidation of power
Upon this success, Charles proclaimed Chlothar IV king in Austrasia in opposition to Chilperic and deposed Rigobert, archbishop of Reims, replacing him with Milo, a lifelong supporter.
In 718, Chilperic responded to Charles's new ascendancy by making an alliance with Odo the Great (or Eudes, as he is sometimes known), the duke of Aquitaine, who had become independent during the civil war in 715, but was again defeated, at the Battle of Soissons, by Charles. Chilperic fled with his ducal ally to the land south of the Loire and Raganfrid fled to Angers. Soon Chlotar IV died and Odo surrendered King Chilperic in exchange for Charles recognizing his dukedom. Charles recognized Chilperic as king of the Franks in return for legitimate royal affirmation of his own mayoralty over all the kingdoms.
Wars of 718–732
Between 718 and 732, Charles secured his power through a series of victories. Having unified the Franks under his banner, Charles was determined to punish the Saxons who had invaded Austrasia. Therefore, late in 718, he laid waste their country to the banks of the Weser, the Lippe, and the Ruhr. He defeated them in the Teutoburg Forest and thus secured the Frankish border.
When the Frisian leader Radbod died in 719, Charles seized West Frisia without any great resistance on the part of the Frisians, who had been subjected to the Franks but had rebelled upon the death of Pippin. When Chilperic II died in 721, Charles appointed as his successor the son of Dagobert III, Theuderic IV, who was still a minor, and who occupied the throne from 721 to 737. Charles was now appointing the kings whom he supposedly served (rois fainéants). By the end of his reign, he didn't appoint any at all. At this time, Charles again marched against the Saxons. Then the Neustrians rebelled under Raganfrid, who had left the county of Anjou. They were easily defeated in 724 but Raganfrid gave up his sons as hostages in turn for keeping his county. This ended the civil wars of Charles' reign.
The next six years were devoted in their entirety to assuring Frankish authority over the neighboring political groups. Between 720 and 723, Charles was fighting in Bavaria, where the Agilolfing dukes had gradually evolved into independent rulers, recently in alliance with Liutprand the Lombard. He forced the Alemanni to accompany him, and Duke Hugbert submitted to Frankish suzerainty. In 725 he brought back the Agilolfing Princess Swanachild as a second wife.
In 725 and 728, he again entered Bavaria but, in 730, he marched against Lantfrid, Duke of Alemannia, who had also become independent, and killed him in battle. He forced the Alemanni to capitulate to Frankish suzerainty and did not appoint a successor to Lantfrid. Thus, southern Germany once more became part of the Frankish kingdom, as had northern Germany during the first years of the reign.
Aquitaine and the Battle of Tours in 732
Main article: Battle of ToursIn 731, after defeating the Saxons, Charles turned his attention to the rival southern realm of Aquitaine, and crossed the Loire, breaking the treaty with Duke Odo. The Franks ransacked Aquitaine twice, and captured Bourges, although Odo retook it. The Continuations of Fredegar allege that Odo called on assistance from the recently established emirate of al-Andalus, but there had been Arab raids into Aquitaine from the 720s onwards. Indeed, the anonymous Chronicle of 754 records a victory for Odo in 721 at the Battle of Toulouse, while the Liber Pontificalis records that Odo had killed 375,000 Saracens. It is more likely that this invasion or raid took place in revenge for Odo's support for a rebel Berber leader named Munnuza.
Whatever the precise circumstances were, it is clear that an army under the leadership of Abd al-Rahman al-Ghafiqi headed north, and after some minor engagements marched on the wealthy city of Tours. According to British medieval historian Paul Fouracre, "Their campaign should perhaps be interpreted as a long-distance raid rather than the beginning of a war". They were, however, defeated by the army of Charles at the Battle of Tours (known in France as the Battle of Poitiers), at a location between the French cities of Tours and Poitiers, in a victory described by the Continuations of Fredegar. According to the historian Bernard Bachrach, the Arab army, mostly mounted, failed to break through the Frankish infantry. News of this battle spread, and may be recorded in Bede's Ecclesiastical History (Book V, ch. 23). However, it is not given prominence in Arabic sources from the period.
Despite his victory, Charles did not gain full control of Aquitaine, and Odo remained duke until 735.
Wars of 732–737
Between his victory of 732 and 735, Charles reorganized the kingdom of Burgundy, replacing the counts and dukes with his loyal supporters, thus strengthening his hold on power. He was forced, by the ventures of Bubo, Duke of the Frisians, to invade independent-minded Frisia again in 734. In that year, he slew the duke at the Battle of the Boarn. Charles ordered the Frisian pagan shrines destroyed, and so wholly subjugated the populace that the region was peaceful for twenty years after.
In 735, Duke Odo of Aquitaine died. Though Charles wished to rule the duchy directly and went there to elicit the submission of the Aquitanians, the aristocracy proclaimed Odo's son, Hunald I of Aquitaine, as duke, and Charles and Hunald eventually recognised each other's position.
Interregnum (737–741)
In 737, at the tail end of his campaigning in Provence and Septimania, the Merovingian king, Theuderic IV, died. Charles, titling himself maior domus and princeps et dux Francorum, did not appoint a new king and nobody acclaimed one. The throne lay vacant until Charles' death. The interregnum, the final four years of Charles' life, was relatively peaceful although in 738 he compelled the Saxons of Westphalia to submit and pay tribute and in 739 he checked an uprising in Provence where some rebels united under the leadership of Maurontus.
Charles used the relative peace to set about integrating the outlying realms of his empire into the Frankish church. He erected four dioceses in Bavaria (Salzburg, Regensburg, Freising, and Passau) and gave them Boniface as archbishop and metropolitan over all Germany east of the Rhine, with his seat at Mainz. Boniface had been under his protection from 723 on. Indeed, the saint himself explained to his old friend, Daniel of Winchester, that without it he could neither administer his church, defend his clergy nor prevent idolatry.
In 739, Pope Gregory III begged Charles for his aid against Liutprand, but Charles was loath to fight his onetime ally and ignored the plea. Nonetheless, the pope's request for Frankish protection showed how far Charles had come from the days when he was tottering on excommunication, and set the stage for his son and grandson to assert themselves in the peninsula.
Death and transition in rule
Charles died on 22 October 741, at Quierzy-sur-Oise in what is today the Aisne département in the Picardy region of France. He was buried at Saint Denis Basilica in Paris.
His territories had been divided among his adult sons a year earlier: to Carloman he gave Austrasia, Alemannia, and Thuringia, and to Pippin the Younger Neustria, Burgundy, Provence, and Metz and Trier in the "Mosel duchy". Grifo was given several lands throughout the kingdom, but at a later date, just before Charles died.
Legacy
Earlier in his life Charles had many internal opponents and felt the need to appoint his own kingly claimant, Chlotar IV. Later, however, the dynamics of rulership in Francia had changed, and no hallowed Merovingian ruler was required. Charles divided his realm among his sons without opposition (though he ignored his young son Bernard). For many historians, Charles laid the foundations for his son Pepin's rise to the Frankish throne in 751, and his grandson Charlemagne's imperial acclamation in 800. However, for Paul Fouracre, while Charles was "the most effective military leader in Francia", his career "finished on a note of unfinished business".
Family and children
Charles married twice, his first wife being Rotrude of Treves, daughter either of Lambert II, Count of Hesbaye, or of Leudwinus, Count of Treves. They had the following children:
- Hiltrud
- Carloman
- Landrade, also rendered as Landres
- Auda, also rendered as Aldana
- Pepin the Younger
Most of the children married and had issue. Hiltrud married Odilo I (Duke of Bavaria). Landrade was once believed to have married a Sigrand (Count of Hesbania) but Sigrand's wife was more likely the sister of Rotrude. Auda married Theoderic, Count of Autun.
Charles also married a second time, to Swanhild and they had a child named Grifo.
With Ruodhaid, with whom he had:
- Bernhard (c. 720–787),
- Hieronymus (c. 722 – after 782),
- Remigius (d. 771) archbishop of Rouen.
Reputation and historiography
Military victories
For early medieval authors, Charles was famous for his military victories. Paul the Deacon for instance attributed a victory against the Saracens actually won by Odo of Aquitaine to Charles. However, alongside this there soon developed a darker reputation, for his alleged abuse of church property. A ninth-century text, the Visio Eucherii, possibly written by Hincmar of Reims, portrayed Charles as suffering in hell for this reason. According to British medieval historian Paul Fouracre, this was "the single most important text in the construction of Charles's reputation as a seculariser or despoiler of church lands".
By the eighteenth century, historians such as Edward Gibbon had begun to portray the Frankish leader as the saviour of Christian Europe from a full-scale Islamic invasion.
In the nineteenth century, the German historian Heinrich Brunner argued that Charles had confiscated church lands in order to fund military reforms that allowed him to defeat the Arab conquests, in this way brilliantly combining two traditions about the ruler. However, Fouracre argued that "...there is not enough evidence to show that there was a decisive change either in the way in which the Franks fought, or in the way in which they organised the resources needed to support their warriors."
Many twentieth-century European historians continued to develop Gibbon's perspectives, such as French medievalist Christian Pfister, who wrote in 1911 that
"Besides establishing a certain unity in Gaul, Charles saved it from a great peril. In 711 the Arabs had conquered Spain. In 720 they crossed the Pyrenees, seized Narbonensis, a dependency of the kingdom of the Visigoths, and advanced on Gaul. By his able policy Odo succeeded in arresting their progress for some years; but a new vali, Abdur Rahman, a member of an extremely fanatical sect, resumed the attack, reached Poitiers, and advanced on Tours, the holy town of Gaul. In October 732—just 100 years after the death of Mahomet—Charles gained a brilliant victory over Abdur Rahman, who was called back to Africa by revolts of the Berbers and had to give up the struggle. ...After his victory, Charles took the offensive".
Similarly, William E. Watson, who wrote of the battle's importance in Frankish and world history in 1993, suggested that
"Had Charles Martel suffered at Tours-Poitiers the fate of King Roderick at the Rio Barbate, it is doubtful that a "do-nothing" sovereign of the Merovingian realm could have later succeeded where his talented major domus had failed. Indeed, as Charles was the progenitor of the Carolingian line of Frankish rulers and grandfather of Charlemagne, one can even say with a degree of certainty that the subsequent history of the West would have proceeded along vastly different currents had 'Abd al-Rahman been victorious at Tours-Poitiers in 732."
And in 1993, the influential political scientist Samuel Huntington saw the battle of Tours as marking the end of the "Arab and Moorish surge west and north".
Other recent historians, however, argue that the importance of the battle is dramatically overstated, both for European history in general and for Charles's reign in particular. This view is typified by Alessandro Barbero, who in 2004 wrote,
"Today, historians tend to play down the significance of the battle of Poitiers, pointing out that the purpose of the Arab force defeated by Charles Martel was not to conquer the Frankish kingdom, but simply to pillage the wealthy monastery of St-Martin of Tours".
Similarly, in 2002 Tomaž Mastnak wrote:
"The continuators of Fredegar's chronicle, who probably wrote in the mid-eighth century, pictured the battle as just one of many military encounters between Christians and Saracens—moreover, as only one in a series of wars fought by Frankish princes for booty and territory... One of Fredegar's continuators presented the battle of Poitiers as what it really was: an episode in the struggle between Christian princes as the Carolingians strove to bring Aquitaine under their rule."
More recently, the memory of Charles has been appropriated by far right and white nationalist groups, such as the 'Charles Martel Group' in France, and by the perpetrator of the Christchurch mosque shootings at Al Noor Mosque and Linwood Islamic Centre in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2019. The memory of Charles is a topic of debate in contemporary French politics on both the right and the left.
Order of the Genet
In the seventeenth century, a legend emerged that Charles had formed the first regular order of knights in France. In 1620, Andre Favyn stated (without providing a source) that among the spoils Charles's forces captured after the Battle of Tours were many genets (raised for their fur) and several of their pelts. Charles gave these furs to leaders amongst his army, forming the first order of knighthood, the Order of the Genet. Favyn's claim was then repeated and elaborated in later works in English, for instance by Elias Ashmole in 1672, and James Coats in 1725.
References
- "Les collections – Château de Versailles". collections.chateauversailles.fr. Retrieved 17 January 2024.
- Fouracre, Paul (2000). The Age of Charles Martel. Harlow, England: Longman. pp. 1, 55. ISBN 0582064759. OCLC 43634337.
- ^ Pfister, Christian (1911). "Charles Martel" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 5 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 942–943.
- Schulman, Jana K. (2002). The Rise of the Medieval World, 500–1300: A Biographical Dictionary. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 101. ISBN 0-313-30817-9.
- Cawthorne, Nigel (2004). Military Commanders: The 100 Greatest Throughout History. Enchanted Lion Books. pp. 52–53. ISBN 1-59270-029-2.
- Kibler, William W.; Zinn, Grover A. (1995). Medieval France: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. pp. 205–206. ISBN 0-8240-4444-4.
- Fouracre, Paul; Gerberding, Richard A., eds. (1996). Late Merovingian France: history and hagiography, 640–720. Translated by Paul Fouracre and Richard A. Gerberding. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 93. ISBN 0719047900. OCLC 32699266.
- White, Jr., Lynn (1962). Medieval technology and social change. London, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 2–14.
- Mclaughlin, William, "732 Battle of Tours: Charles Martel the 'Hammer' preserves Western Christianity", War History Online.
- Fouracre, Paul (2000). The Age of Charles Martel. London: Longman. ISBN 0-582-06475-9. Accessed 2 August 2015.
- Commire, Anne, ed. (2002). "Alphaida (c. 654–c. 714)". Women in World History: A Biographical Encyclopedia. Waterford, Connecticut: Yorkin Publications. ISBN 0-7876-4074-3. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015.
- Hanson, Victor Davis (18 December 2007). Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise to Western Power. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-42518-8.
- Commire, Anne (24 September 2015) . "Alphaida (c. 654–c. 714) – Women in World History: A Biographical Encyclopedia". Waterford, Connecticut: Yorkin Publications. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
- Joch, Waltraud (1999). Legitimität und Integration: Untersuchungen zu den Anfängen Karl Martells. Husum, Germany: Matthiesen Verlag.
- Gerberding, Richard A. (October 2002). "Review of Legitimität und Integration: Untersuchungen zu den Anfängen Karl Martells by Waltraud Joch". Speculum. Vol. 77, no. 4. pp. 1322–1323.
- ^ Kurth, Godefroid. "The Franks." The Catholic Encyclopedia Vol. 6. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909
- Costambeys, Marios; Matthew Innes & MacLean, Simon (2011) The Carolingian World, p. 43, Cambridge, GBR: Cambridge University Press, see , accessed 2 August 2015.
- Daniel, Gabriel. The History of France, G. Strahan, 1726, p. 148]
- Fouracre, Paul (2000). The Age of Charles Martel. Harlow, England: Longman. p. 61. ISBN 0582064759. OCLC 43634337.
- "Gerberding, Richard. "716: A Crucial Year For Charles Martel", Medievalists.net, November 3, 2014". 3 November 2014.
- Strauss, Gustave Louis M. (1854) Moslem and Frank; or, Charles Martel and the rescue of Europe, Oxford, GBR:Oxford University Press, see , accessed 2 August 2015.
- Fouracre, Paul (2000). The Age of Charles Martel. Harlow, England: Longman. pp. 84–5. ISBN 0582064759. OCLC 43634337.
- Fouracre, Paul (2000). The Age of Charles Martel. Harlow, England: Longman. p. 88. ISBN 0582064759. OCLC 43634337.
- Bachrach, Bernard S. (2001). Early Carolingian warfare : prelude to empire. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 170–178. ISBN 0-8122-3533-9. OCLC 43095805.
- Christys, Ann (2019). "'Sons of Ishmael, Turn Back!'". In Esders, Stefan; Fox, Yaniv; Hen, Yitzhak; Sarti, Laury (eds.). Sons of Ishmael, Turn Back!. East and West in the Early Middle Ages (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 318–328. doi:10.1017/9781316941072.021. ISBN 9781316941072. S2CID 166413345. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
- "History of the Monument". Basilique Cathédrale de Saint-Denis. Archived from the original on 15 June 2020. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
- ^ Riche, Pierre (1993) The Carolingians: A Family Who Forged Europe, , Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, ISBN 0-8122-1342-4, see , accessed 2 August 2015.
- Paul Fouracre, 'Writing about Charles Martel', in Law, Laity and Solidarities: essays in honour of Susan Reynolds, ed. Pauline Stafford et al. (Manchester, 2001), pp. 12–26.
- Fouracre, Paul (2000). The Age of Charles Martel. Harlow, England: Longman. p. 85. ISBN 0582064759. OCLC 43634337.
- Wood, I. N. (1994). The Merovingian kingdoms, 450–751. London: Longman. ISBN 0582218780. OCLC 27172340. pp. 275–276
- Fouracre, Paul (2000). The Age of Charles Martel. Harlow, England: Longman. p. 124. ISBN 0582064759. OCLC 43634337.
- "Chapter 52 of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire". www.ccel.org.
- Fouracre, Paul (2000). The Age of Charles Martel. Harlow, England: Longman. p. 149. ISBN 0582064759. OCLC 43634337.
- Watson, William (1993). "The Battle of Tours-Poitiers Revisited". Providence: Studies in Western Civilization. 2.
- Huntington, Samuel P. (1993). "The Clash of Civilizations?". Foreign Affairs. 72 (3): 22–49. doi:10.2307/20045621. ISSN 0015-7120. JSTOR 20045621.
- Barbero, Alessandro (2004). Charlemagne : father of a continent. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 10. ISBN 0520239431. OCLC 52773483.
- Mastnak, Tomaž (2002). Crusading peace : Christendom, the Muslim world, and Western political order. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 9780520925991. OCLC 52861403.
- "Perspective | The fake history that fueled the accused Christchurch shooter". Washington Post. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
- Blanc, William (2022). Charles Martel et la Bataille de Poitiers. Libertalia. ISBN 9782377292356.
- Favyn, Andre (1620). Le Theatre d'honneur et de chevalerie.
- Ashmole, Elias (1672). The Institution, Laws and Ceremonies of the Most Noble Order of the Garter. J. Macock. p. 97.
- James Coats (1725). A New Dictionary of Heraldry. Jer. Batley. pp. 163–164.
External links
- Ian Meadows, "The Arabs in Occitania": A sketch giving the context of the conflict from the Arab point of view.
- Poke's edition of Creasy's 15 Most Important Battles Ever Fought According to Edward Shepherd Creasy "Chapter VII. The Battle of Tours, A.D. 732."
- "The Battle of Tours"—In Our Time, BBC Radio 4 (2014)
- Medieval Sourcebook: Arabs, Franks, and the Battle of Tours, 732 (Archived 11 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine)
- Arabs, Franks, and the Battle of Tours, 732: Three Accounts (Archived 11 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine) from the Internet Medieval Sourcebook
- Medieval Sourcebook: Gregory II to Charles Martel, 739 (Archived 29 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine)
- Pfister, Christian (1911). "Charles Martel" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 5 (11th ed.). pp. 942–943.
Charles Martel Carolingian DynastyBorn: 676, 686, 688 or 690 Died: 741 | ||
Regnal titles | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded byPepin II the Middle | Mayor of the Palace of Austrasia 717–741 |
Succeeded byCarloman |
Preceded byRaganfrid | Mayor of the Palace of Neustria 717–741 |
Succeeded byPepin the Younger |