Revision as of 15:54, 1 October 2013 editEsoglou (talk | contribs)31,527 editsm →Sedevacantists: closed parenthesis← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:24, 15 December 2024 edit undo2605:59c8:2600:aac:a4e2:8f90:7162:23e9 (talk) →Background: Needs a comma, almost had a stroke trying to read the mile long sentenceTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Catholic religious movement}} | |||
'''Traditionalist Catholics''' are ] who believe that there should be a restoration of many or all of the ] forms, public and private devotions and presentations of Catholic teachings which prevailed in the Catholic Church before the ] (1962–65).<ref>Traditionalist Catholics usually belong to the ]. See, however, the article on the ]</ref> They are most commonly associated with an attachment to the Mass liturgy in general use in that time period (often called the ], the Traditional Mass, the ], or ]), but their theological and practical concerns are broader in scope. | |||
{{about|the contemporary movement|the 19th-century theological position|Traditionalism (19th-century Catholicism)}} | |||
] celebrated '']'' according to the ]. The ornate altar and priests' ]s are characteristic of Traditionalist Catholic practice.]] | |||
{{Catholic Church sidebar}} | |||
{{Christianity|expanded=hide}} | |||
'''Traditionalist Catholicism''' is a movement that emphasizes ], practices, customs, traditions, ] forms, ] and presentations of ] associated with the ] before the ] (1962–1965).<ref name="Collinge 2012">{{cite book |last=Collinge |first=William J. |year=2012 |title=Historical Dictionary of Catholicism |chapter=Traditionalism |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L8C3TKNdn5oC&pg=PA433 |location=] |publisher=] |edition=2nd |series=Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements Series |pages=433–434 |isbn=978-0-8108-7979-9 |lccn=2011035077}}</ref><ref name="rtci" /> Traditionalist Catholics particularly emphasize the ], the ] liturgy largely replaced in general use by the post-Second Vatican Council ]. | |||
Many Traditionalist Catholics disliked the liturgical changes that followed the Second Vatican Council, and prefer to continue to practice pre-Second Vatican Council traditions and forms. Some also see present teachings on ] as blurring the distinction between Catholics and other ]s. Traditional Catholicism is often more ] in its philosophy and worldview, promoting a modest style of dressing and teaching a ] view of gender roles.<ref name="Ochstein2017">{{cite web |last1=Ochstein |first1=Jennifer |title=A progressive, feminist evangelical considers joining the Catholic Church |url=https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2017/09/07/progressive-feminist-evangelical-considers-joining-catholic-church |publisher=] |access-date=26 April 2021 |language=English |date=7 September 2017}}</ref> | |||
Traditionalist Catholics are distinct from other Catholics who have a broadly "traditional" or conservative outlook. | |||
A minority of Traditionalist Catholics reject the current papacy of the Catholic Church and follow positions of ], ], or ]. As these groups are no longer in ] with the ] and the ], they are not regarded by Holy See to be members of the Catholic Church, but instead separate religious groupings.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Library : Schismatic Traditionalists |url=https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=1056 |access-date=2023-07-12 |website=www.catholicculture.org}}</ref><ref name="rtci" /> A distinction is often made between these groups (sometimes called ''Radical'' Traditionalists) and Catholics who accept the teachings and authority of the Catholic Church while still preferring older traditions and practices as well as the Tridentine Mass in Latin.<ref name="rtci" /> | |||
==Terminology== | |||
Traditionalist Catholics generally prefer to be referred to either simply as ] or, if a distinction must be made, as "traditional Catholics" (with a lower-case T). However, since Roman Catholics in general consider themselves to be "traditional" in the sense of being faithful to historical Catholic teaching,<ref>The{{cite web| url = http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt1sect1chpt2.htm | title = ''Catechism of the Catholic Church'', 84}} states that "the entire holy people, united to its pastors, remains always faithful to the teaching of the apostles."</ref> the term "traditionalist Catholics" is used in this article as a means of clearly distinguishing them from other Roman Catholics. | |||
== History == | |||
==Different types of traditionalists== | |||
Toward the end of the Second Vatican Council, Father ] came into conflict with Cardinal ], Archbishop of Baltimore, over the interpretation of the council's teachings, particularly on liturgical matters. In January 1965, DePauw incorporated an organization called the Catholic Traditionalist Movement in New York State, purportedly with the support of Cardinal ], Archbishop of New York.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Allitt |first=Patrick |title=Catholic intellectuals and conservative politics in America, 1950–1985 |date=1993 |publisher=Cornell Univ. Press |isbn=978-0-8014-2295-9 |location=Ithaca |pages=130}}</ref> | |||
] in the ] of the ], ], Palm Sunday 2009]] | |||
Traditionalist Catholics may be divided into four broad groups. | |||
By the late 1960s and early 1970s, conservative Catholics opposed to or uncomfortable with the theological, social and liturgical developments brought about by the ] began to coalesce.<ref name="Dugan1974">{{cite web |last1=Dugan |first1=George |title=Latin Mass of Old Is Luring Catholics |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1974/01/06/archives/latin-mass-of-old-is-luring-catholics-other-chapels-established.html |work=] |access-date=18 April 2021 |language=English |date=6 January 1974}}</ref> In 1973, the ] (ORCM) was founded by two priests, Francis E. Fenton and ], and set up chapels in many parts of North America to preserve the Tridentine Mass.<ref name="Dugan1974" /> Priests who participated in this were listed as being on a leave of absence by their bishops, who disapproved of their actions.<ref name="Dugan1974" /> | |||
===Traditionalists in good standing with the Holy See=== | |||
Since the Second Vatican Council, several traditionalist organizations have been started with or have subsequently obtained approval from the Catholic Church. These organizations accept in principle the documents of the Second Vatican Council, and regard the changes associated with the Council (such as the revision of the Mass) as legitimate, if often prudentially unwise, but celebrate the older forms with the approval of the Holy See.<ref>See, for instance, the decrees of erection of the and of the </ref> | |||
In 1970, French Archbishop ] founded the ] (SSPX), made up of priests who would say only the ] and who opposed what he saw as excessive liberal influences in the Church after Vatican II. In 1988, ] without papal permission, resulting in ] '']'' for all six men directly involved. Some members of the SSPX, unwilling to participate in what they considered ], left and founded the ] (FSSP), which celebrates the Tridentine Mass and is in ] with the Holy See. In 2009, ] lifted the excommunications of the four surviving bishops, but clarified that the society had "no canonical status within the Catholic Church."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church concerning the remission of the excommunication of the four Bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre (March 10, 2009) | BENEDICT XVI |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/letters/2009/documents/hf_ben-xvi_let_20090310_remissione-scomunica.html |website=www.vatican.va}}</ref> | |||
The ] (IMBC) was founded in 1985. It is a ] religious congregation of clergy who were dissatisfied with the SSPX's position on the Pope, i.e., acknowledging ] as pope but disobeying him. Sedeprivationists hold that the current occupant of the papal office is a duly elected ] but lacks the authority and ability to teach or govern unless he recants the changes brought by the Second Vatican Council.<ref name="Pasulka2015" /> | |||
Some Catholics took the position of ], which teaches ] and his successors are heretics and therefore cannot be considered popes, and that the Catholic Church's sacraments are not ]. One sedevacantist group, the ] (SSPV), broke off from the SSPX in 1983, due to liturgical disputes. Another sedevacantist group, the ] (CMRI), formed spontaneously among the followers of ], but he was later expelled due to scandals and CMRI is now more aligned with other sedevacantist groups. | |||
Other groups known as ] have elected their own popes in opposition to the ] pontiffs. They are not considered serious claimants except by their very few followers. | |||
==Different types== | |||
] in a ] of the ], ], Palm Sunday 2009]] | |||
===Canonically regular with the Holy See=== | |||
Since the Second Vatican Council, several traditionalist organizations have been started with or have subsequently obtained approval from the Catholic Church. These organizations accept the documents of the Second Vatican Council and regard the changes associated with the Council (such as the revision of the Mass) as legitimate, but celebrate the older forms with the approval of the Holy See. | |||
* ] (FSSP) | * ] (FSSP) | ||
* ] (ICRSS |
* ] (ICRSS, ICKSP) | ||
* ] | * ] (FSSR) | ||
* ] ( |
* ] (IBP) | ||
* Servants of Jesus and Mary |
* ] (SJM) | ||
* ] (CRNJ) | * ] (CRNJ) | ||
* ] (SJC) | * ] (SJC) | ||
* | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] (PAASJV) | * ] (PAASJV) | ||
* ] (MC) | |||
There are also multiple monastic communities, including | There are also multiple monastic communities, including | ||
Line 28: | Line 42: | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
See ] for a more detailed list. | See ] for a more detailed list. | ||
=== Society of Saint Pius X === | |||
In addition, many traditionalist Catholics in good standing with Rome are served by local diocesan or religious priests who are willing and able to offer the traditional rites. Many other Catholics sympathize or identify as traditionalist who are not able to attend the traditional liturgy regularly because it is not offered in their area (at least not with regular canonical standing) and so they more or less reluctantly attend the ], the current ordinary or normal<ref> '']''</ref> Roman Rite of Mass following the ]. There are also numerous local and international lay organizations of traditionalist Catholics, such as the youth-groups of ]. | |||
The ] (SSPX) was founded in 1970, with the authorization of the bishop of ], by Archbishop ]. Lefebvre was ] in 1988, after ]. In January 2009 the Prefect of the ] remitted the excommunications the Congregation had declared to have been incurred by the Society's bishops in 1988.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0900355.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090131153433/http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0900355.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 31, 2009 |title=Pope lifts excommunications of Lefebvrite bishops |publisher=Catholicnews.com |date=27 January 2009|access-date=30 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
More recently, the Vatican has granted SSPX priests the authority to hear ] and has authorized local ], in certain circumstances, to grant delegation to SSPX priests to act as the qualified witness required for ] celebration of ].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2017/04/04/new_pastoral_provisions_for_sacrament_of_marriage_for_sspx/1303274|title=New pastoral provisions for Sacrament of Marriage for SSPX|access-date=2 November 2017}}</ref> The Our Lady of Guadalupe Monastery in ], which is affiliated with the SSPX, is seeking Vatican approval through the society.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Villagran |first1=Lauren |title=Men come to monastery 'to seek God' |url=https://www.abqjournal.com/326264/spiritual-quest-draws-men-to-monastery.html |access-date=26 April 2023 |work=] |date=25 December 2013}}</ref> | |||
Catholics in good standing with Rome who attend the traditional liturgy have diverse worldviews and outlooks ranging from (modern concepts of) liberal to conservative.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.christianorder.com/features/features_2001/features_mar01.html |title=Operative Points of View |publisher=Christianorder.com |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
In 2017, a statement from the Holy See said the SSPX had an irregular canonical status "for the time being".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lamb |first=Christopher |date=2017-04-05 |title=Francis grants SSPX right to celebrate marriage in sign of reconciliation |url=https://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/6940/francis-grants-sspx-right-to-celebrate-marriage-in-sign-of-reconciliation- |access-date=2023-05-30 |website=The Tablet |language=en}}</ref> | |||
===Traditionalists not in good standing with the Holy See=== | |||
Some traditionalists practise their faith outside the official structures of the Church, though they affirm their loyalty to the Church and to the ]. The largest priestly society to fit this description is the ] (SSPX), which was established in 1970 by Archbishop ], a founding figure of Catholic traditionalism. Members of this category view the post-Conciliar changes as being doctrinally and pastorally unacceptable. The fact that they recognise the official Church hierarchy while rejecting its decisions draws accusations of disloyalty and disobedience from the preceding groups — whom this group in turn accuse of blind, un-Catholic obedience. Discussions between the SSPX and the Holy See have been in progress for some years, and in January 2009 the Prefect of the ] remitted the excommunications which the Congregation had declared to have been incurred by the Society's bishops in 1988. He further expressed the hope that the Society would speedily return to full communion with the Church by showing "true fidelity and true acknowledgment of the Magisterium and the authority of the pope".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0900355.htm |title=Pope lifts excommunications of Lefebvrite bishops |publisher=Catholicnews.com |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
===Sedeprivationists=== | |||
{{Main|Sedeprivationism}} | |||
Sedeprivationists hold that the current occupant of the papal office is a duly elected ] but lacks the authority and ability to teach or govern unless he recants the changes brought by the ]. Sedeprivationists teach that the popes from ] onward fall into this category.<ref name="Pasulka2015">{{cite book |last1=Pasulka |first1=Diana Walsh |title=Heaven Can Wait: Purgatory in Catholic Devotional and Popular Culture |date=2015 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-19-538202-0 |page=180 |language=English}}</ref> Sedeprivationism is currently endorsed by two groups: | |||
* ] (IMBC), led by Superior General Fr. Francesco Ricossa; | |||
* Roman Catholic Institute (RCI), led by Bishop ]. | |||
===Sedevacantists=== | ===Sedevacantists=== | ||
{{Main|Sedevacantism}} | {{Main|Sedevacantism}} | ||
Sedevacantists hold that the popes have forfeited their position through acceptance of ] connected with the Second Vatican Council and consequently there is at present no true pope.<ref name=HDC> |
] hold that the Vatican II popes have forfeited their position through their acceptance of ] connected with the Second Vatican Council and consequently there is at present no true pope.<ref name="HDC">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L8C3TKNdn5oC&pg=PA399 |title=Historical Dictionary of Catholicism|isbn=9780810879799|access-date=15 February 2015|last1=Collinge|first1=William J.|date=23 February 2012|publisher=Scarecrow Press }}</ref> They conclude, on the basis of their rejection of the revised Mass rite and of certain aspects of postconciliar Church teaching as false, that the popes involved are also false.<ref name="IUP">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yUqp1_31B-MC&pg=PA257 |title=Being Right|isbn=0253329221|access-date=15 February 2015|last1=Weaver|first1=Mary Jo|last2=Scott Appleby|first2=R.|year=1995|publisher=Indiana University Press }}</ref> This is a minority position among traditionalist Catholics<ref name=HDC/><ref name="UCP">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qd5yzP5hdiEC&pg=PA88 |title=Fundamentalisms Observed|date=July 1994|publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=9780226508788|access-date=15 February 2015}}</ref> and a highly divisive one,<ref name=IUP/><ref name=UCP/> so that many who hold it prefer to say nothing of their view,<ref name=IUP/> while other sedevacantists have accepted episcopal ] from sources such as Archbishop ].<ref name=UCP/> | ||
The terms ''sedevacantist'' and '' |
The terms ''sedevacantist'' and ''sedevacantism'' derive from the Latin phrase '']'' ("while the chair/] ]] is vacant").<ref name=HDC/> Sedevacantist groups include: | ||
* ] (CMRI), formed in 1967. It operates in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia; is based in ], United States; and is headed by Bishop ]. | |||
Sedevacantist groups include the ] (SSPV) and the ] (CMRI). | |||
* ] (SSPV), formed in 1983 when nine American priests of the ] split from the organization over a number of issues including using the liturgical reforms implemented under Pope John XXIII.<ref>A more comprehensive list of objections can be found at {{citation |title=Letter of 'the Nine' to Abp. Marcel Lefebvre |date=May 1983 |url=http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=48&catname=12 |newspaper=The Roman Catholic |publisher=Traditional mass}}</ref> It operates in North America, is based in ], United States, and was headed by Bishop ] until his death in December 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Obituary of The Most Reverend Clarence J. Kelly {{!}} Dufresne & Cavanaugh Funeral Home |url=https://dufresneandcavanaugh.com/tribute/details/1824/The-Most-Reverend-Bishop-Clarence-Kelly/obituary.html |access-date=2023-12-11 |website=dufresneandcavanaugh.com |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
* {{lang|pt|Sociedad Sacerdotal Trento}} (Priestly Society of Trent; SST), formed in 1993 by the priests of the deceased Bishop ]. Its bishop is Bishop ]. | |||
===Conclavists=== | ===Conclavists=== | ||
{{Main|Conclavism}} | {{Main|Conclavism}} | ||
Conclavism is the belief and practice of some who, claiming that |
] is the belief and practice of some who, claiming that all recent occupants of the ] are not true popes, elect someone else and propose him as the true pope to whom the allegiance of Catholics is due. | ||
==Positions== | |||
==Traditionalist positions== | |||
{{Toryism|expanded=characteristics}} | |||
Traditionalist Catholics believe that they are preserving Catholic orthodoxy by not accepting all changes introduced since the ], changes that some of them have described as amounting to a "veritable revolution". They claim that the positions now taken by mainstream Catholics—even conservative Catholics—would have been considered "modernist" or "liberal" at the time of the Council, and that they themselves hold positions that were then considered "conservative" or "traditional". | |||
] contrasted the "hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture" that some apply to the Council (an interpretation adopted both by certain traditionalists and by certain "progressives")<ref>{{cite web |title=CatholicHerald.co.uk » Prefect of the CDF says seeing Vatican II as a 'rupture' is heresy |url=http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2012/11/30/prefect-of-the-cdf-says-seeing-vatican-ii-as-a-rupture-is-heresy/ |access-date=15 February 2015}}</ref> with the "hermeneutic of reform, as it was presented first by Pope John XXIII in his Speech inaugurating the Council on 11 October 1962 and later by Pope Paul VI in his Discourse for the Council's conclusion on 7 December 1965."<ref name="Christmas2">{{cite web |title=Address of His Holiness Benedict XVI to the Roman Curia offering them his Christmas greetings |url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2005/december/documents/hf_ben_xvi_spe_20051222_roman-curia_en.html |access-date=30 June 2011 |publisher=Vatican.va}}</ref> He made a similar point in a speech to the bishops of Chile in 1988, when he was still Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger:<blockquote> declared that he has finally understood that the agreement he signed aimed only at integrating his foundation into the "Conciliar Church". The Catholic Church in union with the Pope is, according to him, the 'Conciliar Church' which has broken with its own past. It seems indeed that he is no longer able to see that we are dealing with the Catholic Church in the totality of its Tradition, and that Vatican II belongs to that.<ref name="Ratzinger:Chile">{{cite web |title=Cardinal Ratzinger's Address to Bishops of Chile |url=http://www.unavoce.org/cardinal_ratzinger_chile.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070715080331/http://www.unavoce.org/cardinal_ratzinger_chile.htm |archive-date=15 July 2007 |access-date=15 February 2015}}</ref></blockquote>Responding to a comment that some consider tradition in a rigid way, ] remarked in 2016, "there’s a traditionalism that is a rigid fundamentalism; this is not good. Fidelity on the other hand implies growth. In transmitting the deposit of faith from one epoch to another, tradition grows and consolidates itself with the passing of time, as St ] said 'The dogma of the Christian religion too must follow these laws. It progresses, consolidates itself with the years, developing itself with time, deepening itself with age'.”<ref>{{Cite web |last=O'Connell |first=Gerard |date=December 6, 2016 |title=Pope Francis: There will be no 'reform of the reform' of the liturgy. |url=https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2016/12/06/pope-francis-there-will-be-no-reform-reform-liturgy |website=]}}</ref> | |||
===Radical Traditionalists' assessment of Vatican II=== | |||
Many traditionalists further believe that errors have crept into the presentation and understanding of Catholic teachings since the time of the Council. They attribute the blame for this to liberal interpretations of the Conciliar documents, to harmful post-Conciliar pastoral decisions, to the text of the Conciliar documents themselves, or to some combination of these. | |||
Radical Traditionalists' claims that substantive changes have taken place in Catholic teaching and practice since the Council often crystallize around the following specific alleged examples: | |||
* Sedevacantist ] rejects an ] that he claims fails to recognize the Catholic Church as the one true church established by Jesus Christ, and instead holds that the Roman Catholic Church is some subset of the church Christ founded. He sees some of the confusion as stemming from an unclear understanding of the phrase "]" which appears in the Vatican II document '']'', and which the Church has declared applies uniquely to the Catholic Church and means the "perduring, historical continuity and permanence of all the elements instituted by Christ in the Catholic Church, in which the Church of Christ is concretely found on this earth". He claims that this "new ecclesiology" contradicts ]'s '']'' and other papal documents.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Sanborn |first=Donald J. |url=http://www.traditionalmass.org/images/articles/CommunArt.pdf |title=Communion: Ratzinger's New Ecclesiology |year=1992}}</ref> | |||
Most traditionalists view the Council as a valid, albeit problematic, ] of the Catholic Church, though most ] regard it as wholly invalid. It is common for traditionalists in dispute with Rome to affirm that the Council was "pastoral", and hence that its decrees were not absolutely binding on Catholics in the same way as the dogmatic decrees of other Ecumenical Councils. Support for this view is sought in Pope John XXIII's ''Opening Address to the Council'', ] , statements from Pope Benedict XVI, and the lack of formal dogmatic definitions in the Conciliar documents. | |||
* The ] denounces a teaching on ] that attributes to the bishops of the world a share, with the Pope, of responsibility for the Church's governance in a way that it claims is destructive of papal authority and encourages a "national" church mentality that undermines the primacy of the ]. It also claims that national ], whose influence greatly increased following the Council, "diminish the personal responsibility of bishop" within their ].<ref>{{Citation | last = Wrighton | first = Basil | title = Collegiality: error of Vatican II | date = 16 January 2014 | publisher = Society of Saint Pius X | url = http://sspx.org/en/collegiality-error-vatican-ii-2 | access-date = 3 March 2015 }}</ref> | |||
] contrasted the "hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture" (an interpretation imposed by traditionalists and "progressives" alike)<ref></ref><ref></ref> apply to the Council with the "hermeneutic of reform" put forward by the Church authorities, quoting with approval ]'s statement that the Council was intended to "transmit <nowiki></nowiki> doctrine, pure and integral, without any attenuation or distortion".<ref name=Christmas>{{cite web|url=http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2005/december/documents/hf_ben_xvi_spe_20051222_roman-curia_en.html |title=Address of His Holiness Benedict XVI to the Roman Curia offering them his Christmas greetings |publisher=Vatican.va |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref></blockquote> He made a similar point in a speech to the bishops of Chile in 1988, when he was still Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger: | |||
<blockquote> declared that he has finally understood that the agreement he signed aimed only at integrating his foundation into the 'Conciliar Church'. The Catholic Church in union with the Pope is, according to him, the 'Conciliar Church' which has broken with its own past. It seems indeed that he is no longer able to see that we are dealing with the Catholic Church in the totality of its Tradition, and that Vatican II belongs to that.<ref name=Ratzinger:Chile></ref></blockquote> | |||
=== Criticism of the Radical Traditionalists' positions === | |||
There is some tension between different traditionalist groups at the official level: the SSPX, for example, condemns the FSSP and attendance at its Masses.<ref> sspx.org</ref> The SSPX itself also is often in conflict with other traditionalists. In fact, the only common denominator that is held by all the groups identifying as traditionalist is love of the traditional liturgy and, usually, suspicion of modern "neoconservative" Catholicism, which is viewed as shallow, ahistorical, and intellectually dishonest. On other questions, there are a variety of opinions. | |||
Those who in response to these criticisms by certain traditionalists defend the decisions of the Second Vatican Council and the subsequent changes made by the Holy See make the following counterclaims: | |||
* The criticisms are false, exaggerated, or lacking appreciation of the organic character of Tradition, traditionalist criticisms that '']'' contradicts the Church's earlier teaching on religious liberty are an example.<ref>Fr. Brian W. Harrison, O.S. catholic.net</ref> | |||
* Traditionalists who claim that there has been a break from and discontinuity with the Church's traditional teaching are displaying a Protestant attitude of "private judgment" on matters of doctrine instead of accepting the guidance of the Magisterium of the Church.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/articles.cfm?id=345 |title=On Waffling, Tradition and the Magisterium |publisher=Catholicculture.org |access-date=30 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
* Traditionalists fail to distinguish properly between changeable pastoral practices (such as the liturgy of the Mass) and the unchangeable principles of the Catholic faith (such as the dogmas surrounding the Mass).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Schluenderfritz |first=Malcolm |date=2022-03-30 |title=Is it so different? |url=https://wherepeteris.com/is-it-so-different/ |access-date=2023-05-30 |website=Where Peter Is |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
* Traditionalists of this kind treat papal authority in much the same way as the dissident, ]. While liberals believe that, on sexual matters, "the Pope can teach whatever he wants... but whether or not he should be listened to is very much an open question", the stance of certain traditionalists on the reform of the Mass liturgy and contemporary teachings on ecumenism and religious liberty amounts to the view that, on these issues, "faithful Catholics are always free to resist folly. As theories of religious dissent go, Catholic liberals couldn't ask for anything more."<ref> {{ISBN|0-8018-6265-5}}, {{ISBN|978-0-8018-6265-6}}), p. 119</ref> | |||
* Traditionalists claim that the Second Vatican Council was pastoral (and not infallible), but Paul VI subsequently emphasized the authoritative nature of the Council's teachings.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Likoudis |first1=James |title=The Pope, the Council, and the Mass: answers to the questions the "traditionalists" are asking |last2=Whitehead |first2=Kenneth D. |date=1982 |publisher=Christopher Publ. House |isbn=978-0-8158-0400-0 |edition=41 |location=W. Hanover, Mass}}</ref> | |||
===Reception=== | |||
Many traditionalist Catholics associate themselves with a particular priestly society. Other small groups of traditionalists sometimes form around an individual "independent" priest who has no ties with any particular organisation. | |||
] is traditionalist Catholicism that integrates social and political contexts. Kay Chadwick described Catholic integrism as a holding "], ] and ]" political objectives. She also noted its alignment with the ] press and an annual Parisian ] procession with participation by both integrists and ] supporters. A Tridentine Mass was celebrated before the annual ] meeting. Lefebvre was fined in France for "racial defamation" and "]" for proposing the removal of immigrants – particularly ]s – from Europe. Lefebvre also supported Latin American dictatorships, ], ], and the continued occupation of ].<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vTG7g11GGzIC&pg=PA272 |title=Catholicism, Politics and Society in Twentieth-century France|isbn=9780853239741|access-date=15 February 2015|last1=Chadwick|first1=Kay|year=2000|publisher=Liverpool University Press }}</ref> | |||
The ] (SPLC) used the term ''radical traditionalist Catholics'' to refer to those who "may make up the largest single group of serious ] in America, subscribe to an ideology that is rejected by the ] and some 70 million mainstream American Catholics. Many of their leaders have been condemned and even ]d by the official church."<ref name="rtci">, '']'', Southern Poverty Law Center, 2011</ref> The SPLC claims that adherents of radical traditional Catholicism "routinely pillory Jews as 'the perpetual enemy of Christ'",<ref name=rtci/><ref>, Southern Poverty Law Center, 2006</ref> reject the ] efforts of the Vatican, and sometimes assert that all recent Popes are illegitimate.<ref name=rtci/> The SPLC says that adherents are "incensed by the liberalizing reforms" of the ] (1962–1965) which condemned ] and "rejected the ] in the form of the ]"<ref name=rtci/> and that "Radical traditional Catholics" also embrace "extremely ] with respect to women."<ref name=rtci/> | |||
Some leaders of ] also claim to be traditionalist Catholics and to be preserving the ] and ancient traditions. Examples are the ], the ], and the ]. | |||
The SPLC clarifies: "Radical traditionalists are not the same as Catholics who call themselves 'traditionalists'—people who prefer the old Latin Mass to the mass now typically said in vernacular languages—although the radicals, as well, like their liturgy in Latin."<ref name="rtci"/> | |||
===Traditionalists' claims of discontinuity and rupture=== | |||
{{More footnotes|section|date=July 2013}} | |||
Traditionalists' claims that substantive changes have taken place in Catholic teaching and practice since the Council often crystallise around the following specific alleged examples, in which others see not what Pope Benedict XVI called "discontinuity and rupture", but what he called "renewal in the continuity of the one subject-Church which the Lord has given to us":<ref name=Christmas/> | |||
* '''A new ]''' which they claim fails to recognise the Catholic Church as the one true church established by Jesus Christ, and instead holds that the true church "]" the Catholic Church in an unclear way. They claim that this contradicts ]'s '']'' and other papal documents. | |||
* '''A new ]''' which they see as aiming at a false pan-Christian religious unity which does not require non-Catholics to convert to the Catholic faith. They see this as contradicting the teachings of the ], Pope ]'s ''],'' ]'s '']'' and other documents. | |||
* Acceptance of the '''principle of religious liberty''', based on one interpretation of Second Vatican Council's decree '']'', allegedly in contradiction to ]'s teachings in '']'' and the ]. | |||
* '''A ]''' of the Roman rite. They affirm that this revision de-emphasises the central Catholic doctrines that the Mass is a true ] and that the bread and wine are changed through ] into the body and blood of Jesus Christ, that it has been stripped of important prayers, that it is centered on the congregation rather than on God, that it is less beautiful and spiritually edifying, and that it omits certain Bible readings that mention subjects such as ], ]s, and ]. Traditionalists hold differing opinions on the validity and acceptability of the revised rite of Mass: | |||
** Some see it as valid, and as acceptable when necessary, though the ] should be attended when possible. | |||
** Some, including the leadership of the ], hold that it is in principle valid as a sacramental rite but maintain that the revisions in the liturgy are displeasing to God, and that it is often celebrated improperly to the extent of being sacramentally invalid. They therefore generally refuse to attend it. | |||
** Some, including many sedevacantists, see it as categorically invalid in principle and entirely unacceptable.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=8nODQotcSfkC |title=Adam Miller, Is the New Mass of Pope Paul VI Invalid? |publisher=Books.google.com |date= 2006-07-01|accessdate=2011-06-30|isbn=9781411699786}}</ref> | |||
** Some hold that celebration of any modern-language translation even of the Tridentine Mass would have to be presumed invalid.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://traditio.com/comment/com1008.htm |title=August 25: A Reader Asks: "Can a Valid Mass Be Celebrated in a Vulgar Tongue?" |publisher=Traditio |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
* An inappropriate emphasis on '''the "dignity of man"''', which they claim ignores ] and the need for supernatural grace, and which they also claim has led to a utopianism that sees world peace as possible without recognising the kingship of Christ. They see this orientation as contradicting ]'s '''', Pope Leo XIII's '','' and other papal and conciliar documents. | |||
* A teaching on ''']''' that attributes to the bishops of the world a share, with the Pope, of responsibility for the Church's governance in a way that they claim is destructive of papal authority and encourages a "national" church mentality that undermines the primacy of the Holy See. They also claim that national bishops' conferences, whose influence was greatly increased following the Council, "diminish the personal responsibility of bishop" within their dioceses. | |||
* A new and critical attitude towards the Bible that, they say, contradicts Leo XIII's '''' and Benedict XV's '''', among other documents. | |||
* A departure from the traditional belief that the Church and the world are at variance with one another to some degree, and that the Church has enemies. They believe that Pope Pius X's warnings in '','' Leo XIII's '''' and other papal warnings against Freemasonry and other alleged enemies of Christianity have gone unheeded. | |||
==Practices== | |||
==== Example of one such claimant ==== | |||
Traditionalist Catholicism has been described as "a self-conscious revival of the liturgies, practices, and trappings of an earlier time in the Catholic Church" and this manifests in a number of ways.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Phillips |first=Maggie |date=12 July 2022 |title=Back to the Land |url=https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/community/articles/back-to-the-land-catholic-land-movement |access-date=26 July 2023 |website=Tablet Magazine}}</ref> | |||
Georges de Nantes, a priest of the ] and founder of the traditionalist Catholic ], criticized the ] for encouraging ] and reform of the Church, and accused ] of heresy and of turning the Church into a movement for advancing democracy, a system of government that de Nantes abhorred. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a notification on 10 August 1969, stating that, as de Nantes continued to maintain his views on the Council, the '']'' of the Church, the French episcopate, and the "heresies" of Pope Paul VI, he thereby "disqualified the entirety of his writings and his activities".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19690810_notification-abbe-nantes_fr.html |title=Notification concerning Abbé de Nantes |authorlink=] |work=L’Osservatore Romano |date=August 10, 1969 |accessdate=July 7, 2012}}</ref> It issued another notification in 1983, published on '']'' of 16–17 May of that year, stating that de Nantes had come to Rome to present a "Book of Accusation against Pope John Paul II for Heresy, Schism and Scandal", and that the Secretary of the Congregation had received him, as instructed by the Pope, but had refused to accept from him a book that contained unjustified gravely offensive accusations of the same character as those that de Nantes had directed against Pope Paul VI in a book published in 1973. It added that the refusal of de Nantes to retract his previous attacks on Pope Paul VI and the Second Vatican Council, to which he was now adding attacks on Pope John Paul II, made it impossible to believe in the sincerity of his declaration in 1978 and 1981 of a desire for the reconciliation for which the Pope remained always disposed.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19830513_nantes-notification_fr.html |title=Notification concerning Abbé Georges de Nantes |authorlink=] |work=L’Osservatore Romano |date=May 16–17, 1983 |accessdate=July 7, 2012}}</ref> | |||
===Rite of Mass=== | |||
===Responses to traditionalists' claims=== | |||
], erected in 1700 and still used today. It faces both east and ''versus populum'' (towards the people).]] | |||
Those who in response to these criticisms by certain traditionalists defend the decisions of the Second Vatican Council and the subsequent changes made by the Holy See make the following counterclaims: | |||
* They say that the criticisms are false, exaggerated, or lacking appreciation of the organic character of Tradition, and give as examples traditionalist criticisms that ] contradicts the Church's earlier teaching on religious liberty,<ref>Fr. Brian W. Harrison, O.S. catholic.net</ref> and that the revised rite of Mass represents a break rather than a prudent development of the earlier liturgy. | |||
* They say that traditionalists who claim that there has been a break from and discontinuity with the Church's traditional teaching are displaying a Protestant attitude of "private judgement" on matters of doctrine, instead of accepting the guidance of the Magisterium of the Church.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/articles.cfm?id=345 |title=On Waffling, Tradition and the Magisterium |publisher=Catholicculture.org |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
* They say that such traditionalists fail to distinguish properly between changeable pastoral practices (such as the liturgy of the Mass) and the unchangeable principles of the Catholic faith (such as the dogmas surrounding the Mass). | |||
* They say that traditionalists of this kind treat papal authority in much the same way as the dissident, ] whom traditionalists claim to oppose. While liberals believe that, on sexual matters, "the Pope can teach whatever he wants... but whether or not he should be listened to is very much an open question", the stance of certain traditionalists on the reform of the Mass liturgy and contemporary teachings on ecumenism and religious liberty amounts to the view that, on these issues, "faithful Catholics are always free to resist folly.... As theories of religious dissent go, Catholic liberals couldn't ask for anything more."<ref>, p. 119</ref> | |||
* The traditionalist claim that the Second Vatican Council was pastoral is often countered by referring to Paul VI subsequently emphasising the authoritative nature of the Council's teachings.<ref>"In view of the pastoral nature of the Council, it avoided any extraordinary statement of dogmas that would be endowed with the note of infallibility, but it still provided its teaching with the authority of the supreme ordinary Magisterium. This ordinary Magisterium, which is so obviously official, has to be accepted with docility, and sincerity by all the faithful, in accordance with the mind of the Council on the nature and aims of the individual documents" ()</ref> | |||
The best-known and most visible sign of Catholic traditionalism is an attachment to the form that the ] liturgy of the ] had before the ], in the various editions of the ] published between 1570 and 1962. This form is generally known as the ], though traditionalists usually prefer to call it the ''Traditional Mass''. Many refer to it as the ''Latin Mass'', though ] is the language also of the official text of the ], to which vernacular translations are obliged to conform, and ] states that "the eucharistic celebration is to be carried out ''in the Latin language'' or in another language provided that the liturgical texts have been legitimately approved."<ref> (emphasis added)</ref> In his 2007 ] '']'' ] relaxed the regulations on use of the 1962 Missal, designating it "an" extraordinary form of the ], as opposed to "the" ordinary or normal form, as revised successively by ] and ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/motu_proprio/documents/hf_ben-xvi_motu-proprio_20070707_summorum-pontificum.html|title=Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum on the "Roman liturgy prior to the reform of 1970" (July 7, 2007) | BENEDICT XVI|website=www.vatican.va}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/letters/2007/documents/hf_ben-xvi_let_20070707_lettera-vescovi.html|title=Letter to the Bishops that accompanies the Apostolic Letter "Motu Proprio data" Summorum Pontificum on the Roman liturgy prior to the reform of 1970 (July 7, 2007) | BENEDICT XVI|website=www.vatican.va}}</ref> | |||
===Sedevacantists' criticisms of other traditionalists=== | |||
Sedevacantists claim that they avoid much of the mainstream Catholic critique of traditionalism because their view is that, beginning with ] or ], one or both of whom and all their successors they consider to be heretics, there is no valid Catholic Pope or body of bishops to whom allegiance or obedience is owed. They criticise non-sedevacantist traditionalists for recognising the recent Popes, on grounds such as the following:<ref>Cf. a talk available as audio files at this sedevacantist </ref> | |||
* By declaring that the ] liturgy of the ] promulgated and defended by these popes is evil, they teach that the Church can decree evil and has decreed evil. | |||
* By declaring that the teachings of the Second Vatican Council contradict the Church's Tradition, they either repudiate the teaching of the ] on the infallibility of even the ordinary and universal magisterium of the Pope and the bishops, or they implicitly deny that the Pope and bishops at the Second Vatican Council were truly the Pope and truly Catholic bishops. | |||
<!-- This isn't meant to be NPOV: it's the POV of certain sedevacantists, such as those in the audio files. --> | |||
* By refusing subjection to a supposedly legitimate pope, they contravene the famous Bull '']'' in which ] stated: "... we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff." | |||
* Compounding the problem, according to the sedevacantists, is the revising of the rite of Holy Orders in 1968; many believe that priests and bishops consecrated according to the new rite are invalid and could not administer traditional sacraments even if they wanted to. They say this problem applies to the FSSP and even to many SSPX priests, since the SSPX accepts priests ordained in the new rite, although it ordains its own new priests in the old. According to this line of reasoning, Benedict XVI is only a priest, and was never consecrated a bishop validly, and therefore has been given no true authority to be Pope, i.e., the Bishop of Rome. | |||
The Pope ruled that priests of the ] can freely choose between the 1962 Roman Missal and the ] "in Masses celebrated without the people".<ref>{{cite web |title=''Summorum Pontificum'', art. 2 |url=http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010043928/http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |archive-date=10 October 2012 |access-date=30 June 2011 |publisher=Sanctamissa.org}}</ref> Such celebrations may be attended by those who spontaneously ask to be allowed.<ref>{{cite web |title=''Summorum Pontificum'', art. 4 |url=http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010043928/http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |archive-date=10 October 2012 |access-date=30 June 2011 |publisher=Sanctamissa.org}}</ref> Priests in charge of churches can permit stable groups of laypeople attached to the earlier form to have Mass celebrated for them in that form, provided that the celebrating priest is "qualified to and not juridically impeded".<ref>{{cite web |title=''Summorum Pontificum'', art. 5 |url=http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010043928/http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |archive-date=10 October 2012 |access-date=30 June 2011 |publisher=Sanctamissa.org}}</ref> The Society of Saint Pius X welcomed the document, but referred to "difficulties that still remain", including "disputed doctrinal issues" and the notice of excommunication that still affected its bishops.<ref>{{cite web |date=17 June 2011 |title=Press Release from the General Superior of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, 7 July 2007 |url=http://www.fsspx.org/eng/index.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090219085433/http://fsspx.org/eng/index.html |archive-date=19 February 2009 |access-date=30 June 2011 |publisher=Fsspx.org}}</ref> | |||
===Radical traditional Catholicism-critique=== | |||
] is a term to describe those who adhere to radical traditional Catholicism.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}} It is used derisively in modern times by some who believe that certain Catholics have falsely elevated ] differences into differences in ], by degrees. For example, the term was used by liberal Catholics at the time of ] (Papacy 1903 to 1914) to deride those who defended his encyclical '']''.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}} These include those who separate the ] from the governance of Catholic faith, especially where it concerns the ] and reject what since 1970 is the normative form of the Mass in favour of the ] (which is recognized as an ]), but the term also is used toward some who believe and practice other forms of traditional Catholicism.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}} | |||
In 2021, Pope Francis promulgated '']'', amending and abrogating parts of ''Summorum Pontificum''.<ref>{{cite news|last=Allen|first=Elise Ann|date=16 July 2021|title=Francis reverses Benedict's liberalization of use of older Latin Mass|newspaper=]|url=https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2021/07/francis-reverses-benedicts-liberalization-of-use-of-older-latin-mass/|accessdate=16 July 2021}}</ref> | |||
The ] used the terms "radical traditionalist Catholics" to describe those who "may make up the largest single group of serious ] in America, subscribe to an ideology that is rejected by the Vatican and some 70 million mainstream American Catholics and many of their leaders have been condemned and even ]d by the official church.<ref name=rtci>, '']'', Southern Poverty Law Center, 2011</ref> It claims that adherents of radical traditional Catholicism "routinely pillory Jews as 'the perpetual enemy of Christ'",<ref name=rtci/><ref>, Southern Poverty Law Center, 2006</ref> reject the ] efforts of the Vatican, and sometimes assert all recent Popes are illegitimate.<ref name=rtci/> And it says that adherents are "incensed by the liberalizing reforms" of the ] (1962–65) which condemned hatred for Jewish people and "rejected the ] in the form of the crucifixion of Christ"<ref name=rtci/> and that "Radical traditional Catholics" also embrace "extremely ] with respect to women."<ref name=rtci/> | |||
===Individual and private devotions=== | |||
==Traditionalist practices== | |||
Some traditionalist Catholics stress on following customs prevailing immediately before the Second Vatican Council, such as the following: | |||
===Rite of Mass=== | |||
* '''Fasting from Midnight until the reception of ]'''. The traditional Catholic rule of fasting from midnight until the reception of Holy Communion (this Eucharistic Fast is from both food and liquids), which is required by the ], was shortened in 1953 by Pope Pius XII to a 3-hour fast.<ref>{{cite web |title=Motu proprio ''Sacram communionem'' |url=http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/P12FAST.HTM |access-date=30 June 2011 |publisher=Ewtn.com}}</ref> In 1966, Pope Paul VI reduced the fast further to one hour, a rule included in the 1983 ''Code of Canon Law''.<ref>{{cite web |date=4 May 2007 |title=Canon 919 |url=http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0017/_P38.HTM |access-date=30 June 2011 |publisher=Intratext.com}}</ref> Some traditional Catholics groups require fasting from midnight until they receive Holy Communion at Mass, while others will keep a Eucharistic fast for at least three hours.<ref>{{cite web |date=6 September 2016 |title=Lesson 28 — Holy Communion |url=https://cmri.org/baltimore-catechism-no-2/baltimore-catechism-no-2-lessons-21-30/ |access-date=2 March 2021 |publisher=] |language=English |quote=3. All Catholics may receive Holy Communion after fasting three hours from food and alcoholic drinks and one hour from non-alcoholic drinks. This rule applies to Holy Communion at midnight Mass as well as at Masses celebrated in the morning, afternoon or evening. A priest’s permission is not needed. 4. Catholics are urged to observe the eucharistic fast from midnight as formerly, and also to compensate for the use of the new privileges by works of charity and penance, but these practices are not obligatory.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Mater Dei Latin Mass Parish |date=2017-02-23 |title=Fasting and Abstinence - Current and Traditional Practices |url=https://materdeiparish.com/2017/02/fasting-abstinence-current-traditional-practices/ |access-date=2023-05-30 |website=Mater Dei Catholic Parish |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
], erected in 1700 and still used today. It faces both east and ''versus populum'' (towards the people)]] | |||
* '''Kneeling to receive Communion directly upon the tongue''', under the Host species alone, and from the hand of a cleric rather than a layperson. The SSPX regards the practice of receiving communion in the hand (though ancient<ref> (Liturgical Press, 1999 {{ISBN|0-8146-6163-7}}, {{ISBN|978-0-8146-6163-5}}) p. 307</ref><ref> (LIT Verlag Berlin-Hamburg-Münster, 2001 {{ISBN|3-8258-4854-X}}, 9783825848545), p. 241</ref> and authorised by the ]<ref> published also in ], 61 (1969) 546–547</ref>) as an abuse.<ref>. sspx.org</ref> | |||
The best-known and most visible sign of Catholic traditionalism is an attachment to the form that the ] liturgy of the ] had before the ] of 1969–1970, in the various editions of the ] published between 1570 and 1962. This form is generally known as the ], though traditionalists usually prefer to call it the ''Traditional Mass''. Many refer to it as the '']'', though the ] that replaced it can also be celebrated in Latin (Latin is the original language of all liturgical documents in the Roman Rite). In his 2007 ] '']'' ] relaxed the regulations on use of the 1962 Missal, designating it "an ]". Some refer to it, less exactly, as "''the'' extraordinary form". | |||
* '''Women wearing a ] when praying at home and when worshipping inside a church''' which is discussed in ] and required by the 1917 ''Code of Canon Law''. Many Traditionalist Catholic women wear a veil, a hat, or a headscarf when praying at home and when worshipping inside a church.<ref name="Fisher2019"/><ref name="Cieslik 2021">{{cite web |last1=Cieslik |first1=Emma |title=“Smells and Bells”: Catholic Material Religion in Twenty-First-Century America |url=https://folklife.si.edu/magazine/catholic-material-religion-modern-america |publisher=] |access-date=11 October 2024 |language=English |date=4 October 2021}}</ref> | |||
===Clothing and lifestyle=== | |||
Different traditionalist priests use different editions of the ] to celebrate the Tridentine Mass. Most, not only those in good standing with the Holy See but also such as those in the SSPX, use the 1962 edition, the only one that the Holy See authorises. A series of modifications to the 1962 liturgy introduced in 1965 are used by some traditionalists in good standing with Rome. This version of the liturgy is sometimes referred to as that of the "1965 Missal", though no new edition of the Roman Missal was in fact published in that year. | |||
Traditional Catholics, with respect to male and female gender roles, often adhere to the doctrine of ].<ref>Schar, Amanda. "Feminism and Faith: How Women Find Empowerment in the Roman Catholic Church" (2019). ''Celebration of Learning''.</ref> | |||
The standards of clothing among Traditional Catholics, based on instructions given by ] and consequently promoted by the Purity Crusade of ] Immaculate, is referred to as "Mary-like Modesty", which includes for women, wearing sleeves "extending at least to the elbows" and "skirts reaching below the knees", as well as having a neckline no more than two inches with the rest of the bodice fully covered.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Moczar |first1=Diane |title=The Church Under Attack: Five Hundred Years that Split the Church and Scattered the Flock |date=2013 |publisher=Sophia Institute Press |isbn=978-1-933184-93-7 |page=202 |language=English}}</ref><ref name="Evans2012">{{cite book |last1=Evans |first1=Rachel Held |title=A Year of Biblical Womanhood |date=2012 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-59555-367-6 |page=126 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
Since sedevacantists consider John XXIII not to have been a Pope, they reject the 1962 typical edition of the Roman Missal, which he promulgated. They generally use the 1920 typical edition, updated to some date previous to 1962. The ] follows the Missal as in 1955, accepting the changes introduced by Pius XII, but others reject ] of the calendar of saints and his revision of the rites of ].<ref> of 16 November 1955 (AAS 47 (1955) 838–847)</ref> Thus these others reject both John XXIII's 1962 edition and Pius XII's changes, seeing them as steps that led to the ]. There are no reports of priests regularly using any typical edition of the Missal earlier than that of 1920, which incorporated the rubrical and calendar changes made by Pope Pius X in 1910.<ref>Printings based on the earlier typical editions of 1884 or 1634, which immediately preceded that of 1920, would now be very difficult to find. However, the ''Libreria Editrice Vaticana'' made the ''editio princeps'' of 1570, the original Tridentine Mass as promulgated by Pope Pius V, available in reproduction in 1998 (ISBN 88-209-2547-8).</ref> | |||
It is commonplace for women who identify as traditionalist Catholics to wear a ] (veil) while praying at home and attending celebrations of the ].<ref name="Fisher2019">{{cite web |last1=Fisher |first1=Simcha |title=The types of women who veil at Mass |url=https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2019/12/03/types-women-who-veil-mass |publisher=] |access-date=15 November 2020 |language=en |date=3 December 2019}}</ref> | |||
Linked with the celebration of the Tridentine Mass is the observance of the liturgical calendar of saints' days as it existed before the revision of 1969 (see ]). Some also ignore the revisions of 1960 by Pope John XXIII, and of ], and use instead the ]. | |||
==In the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church== | |||
===Individual and private devotions=== | |||
Since the Second Vatican Council, various ] have removed some practices and emphases that were derived from those of the ]. Opposition to this has been given relatively high publicity with regard to the ] (UGCC). | |||
Traditionalist Catholics lay stress on strict following of customs prevailing immediately before the Second Vatican Council, such as the following: | |||
* '''Abstaining from meat on Fridays'''. Present discipline maintains Fridays and Lent as days and times of penance, declares that abstinence from meat or some other food as determined by the local ] is to be observed on all Fridays (excluding solemnities) and on Ash Wednesday, and allows episcopal conferences to permit other practices of personal penance to take the place of abstinence from meat.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P4O.HTM |title=Canons 1249–1253 of the Code of Canon Law |publisher=Vatican.va |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
* '''Fasting from midnight before receiving ]'''. This discipline was modified in 1953 by Pope Pius XII, who reduced the fast period to three hours,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/P12FAST.HTM |title=Motu proprio ''Sacram communionem'' |publisher=Ewtn.com |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> and this modification is accepted by many traditionalists. Few accept the one-hour rule promulgated by Paul VI in 1966, which is that laid down in the 1983 Code of Canon Law.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0017/_P38.HTM |title=Canon 919 |publisher=Intratext.com |date=2007-05-04 |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
* '''Kneeling to receive Communion directly upon the tongue''', under the Host species alone, and from the hand of a cleric rather than a layperson. Some would refuse to receive even from deacons, who, before the reforms of ], were allowed to give Holy Communion only if there were a serious reason for permitting them to do so.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.intratext.com/IXT/LAT0813/_P2P.HTM |title=canon 845 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law |publisher=Intratext.com |date=2007-05-04 |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> Many traditionalists regard the practice of receiving communion in the hand, though ancient<ref> (Liturgical Press, 1999 ISBN 0-8146-6163-7, ISBN 978-0-8146-6163-5) p. 307</ref><ref> (LIT Verlag Berlin-Hamburg-Münster, 2001 ISBN 3-8258-4854-X, 9783825848545), p. 241</ref> and authorised by the ],<ref> published also in ], 61 (1969) 546–547</ref> as an abuse<ref>. sspx.org</ref> and as sacrilegious.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tldm.org/news2/cih.htm |title=Communion in the hand is a sacrilege |publisher=Tldm.org |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
* '''Women wearing a ] in church''', a practice that was widespread, but not universal, before the Council,<ref>Canon 1262 of the mandated that, in church, women should cover their heads and men should uncover theirs "unless this is in contrast with approved customs of peoples".</ref> and that also is not universal among traditionalists today.<ref>Not all the women attending Mass in the SSPX church of St Nicholas de Chardonnet in Paris, as seen in this , even those singing in the choir, wore a head covering.</ref> | |||
* ''']''', a practice that grew in the first half of the twentieth century, when increasingly frequent Communion led to more frequent confession. | |||
* '''Prayers such as the ] and the ]''' in the form in use before the late twentieth century, and so without the alterations in the number and identity of the Stations that became common, though by no means universal, in the time of Pope Paul VI and without the addition of the ] of the Rosary recommended as an option by Pope John Paul II.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_20021016_rosarium-virginis-mariae_en.html |title=''Rosarium Virginis Mariae'', 19 |publisher=Vatican.va |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
=== Background === | |||
These practices are, of course, not confined to traditionalists; many mainstream Catholics also follow them. | |||
Even before the Second Vatican Council, the ] declared it important to guard and preserve whole and entire forever the customs and distinct forms for administering the sacraments in use in the Eastern Catholic Churches (], encyclical '']'').<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13orient.htm|author=Pope Leo XIIl|title=Orientalium dignitas|date=30 November 1894|access-date=15 February 2015}}</ref> Leo's successor ] said that the priests of the newly created ] should offer the ] ''Nec Plus, Nec Minus, Nec Aliter'' ("No more, No Less, No Different") than priests of the ] and the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250135379|title=Eastern Catholic Churches and the Question of 'Uniatism'|website=ResearchGate}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author1=George Thomas Kurian|author2=Mark A. Lamport|title=Encyclopedia of Christianity in the United States|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=73xfDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA1724|date=10 November 2016|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers|isbn=978-1-4422-4432-0|page=1724}}</ref> | |||
In the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, ] began with the 1930s corrections of the liturgical books by Metropolitan ]. According to his biographer Cyril Korolevsky, Metropolitan Andrey opposed use of coercion against those who remained attached to Latin liturgical practices, fearing that any attempt to do so would lead to a Greek Catholic equivalent of the ] within the ].<ref>Cyril Korolevsky, ''Metropolitan Andrew (1868–1944)'', Translated and Edited by Fr. Serge Keleher. Stauropegion Brotherhood, Lviv, 1993.</ref> | |||
===Traditionalism and the Eastern Catholic Churches=== | |||
The Second Vatican Council's decree ] encouraged the 22 ] to return to their own past traditions and practices, which in some cases had been overlaid with elements taken from the ]. Subsequent Vatican documents reinforced this tendency. Some of the Latinising modifications to be undone date back decades or even centuries, and the process of reviving older traditions is ongoing. This process has been opposed by some, perhaps most notably within the ]. The ] claims to be part of that ], while having close links with the ] (SSPX). On 3 March 2008 a group of ] priests stationed at ], Ukraine informed ] that four of them had been consecrated as bishops in order to "save" the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) from heresy and apostasy. On 11 August 2009, they announced the formation of the ] as a "new Church structure for the orthodox faithful of the UGCC", professing the Catholic faith, including the primacy of the Roman Pontiff, and disassociating themselves from "contemporary heresies which destroy both the Eastern and the Western Church".<ref>. Uogcc.org.ua (2009-08-11). Retrieved on 2013-07-04.</ref> Having elected their own patriarch, they declared on 1 May 2011 that both ] and ] were excommunicated, leaving the Holy See vacant; they added: "The Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate is now commissioned by God to protect the orthodox doctrine of the Catholic Church, including the Latin Church. Only after an orthodox Catholic hierarchy and an orthodox successor to the Papacy is elected, will the Patriarchate be relieved of this God-given duty."<ref>. Uogcc.org.ua. Retrieved on 2013-07-04.</ref> In some other Eastern Catholic Church too, there are small numbers who try to hold to practices as they were at the time of Pius XII's death (1958). | |||
De-latinization in the UGCC gained further momentum with the 1964 decree '']'' of the ]) and several subsequent documents. Latinizations were discarded within the ], while among Byzantine Catholics in Western Ukraine, forced into a clandestine existence following the Soviet ban on the UGCC, the latinizations remained, "an important component of their underground practices".<ref> Stéphanie Mahieu and Vlad Naumescu (2008), ''Churches In-between: Greek Catholic Churches in Postsocialist Europe'', Halle Studies in the Anthropology of Eurasia. Page 162, Footnote 10.</ref> In response, some priests, nuns, and candidates for the priesthood found themselves, "forced towards the periphery of the church since 1989 because of their wish to 'keep the tradition'." In some eparchies, particularly those of ] and ]-], the bishops would immediately suspend any priest who, "displayed his inclination toward 'traditionalist' practices".<ref> Stéphanie Mahieu and Vlad Naumescu (2008), ''Churches In-between: Greek Catholic Churches in Postsocialist Europe'', Halle Studies in the Anthropology of Eurasia. Pages 164–165.</ref> | |||
==Relations with the Holy See== | |||
The Holy See recognises as fully legitimate the preference that many Catholics have for the earlier forms of worship. This was apparent in Pope John Paul II's 1988 apostolic letter '']'' and Pope Benedict XVI's 2007 ] '']''. Naturally, however, the Holy See does not extend its approval to those who take a stand against the present-day Church leadership. | |||
Vlad Naumescu reports that an article in the February 2003 issue of '']'', the official journal of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, written by a student of the ], which since its 1994 foundation has been, "the strongest progressive voice within the Church". The article named priests and parishes in every ] in Ukraine as being involved in "a well-organized movement" and who described themselves as "traditionalists". According to the article, they constituted "a parallel structure" with connections with the ] and with a charismatic leader in Fr. ], the Pastor of St. Peter and Paul's Church in the ] of ]-Riasne.<ref>" in Stephanie Mahieu, Vlad Naumescu (editors), ''Churches In-between: Greek Catholic Churches in Postsocialist Europe'' (LIT Verlag Münster 2008), pp. 161–162, {{ISBN|978-3-8258-9910-3}}</ref> | |||
===''Ecclesia Dei'' Commission=== | |||
The ] was founded in July 1988 in the wake of Pope John Paul II's apostolic letter '']''. Pope Benedict XVI was a member of the Commission during his tenure as Cardinal Prefect of the ]. | |||
Speaking on 16 May 2007 to the , Cardinal Castrillón, the current head of the Commission, stated that his department had been founded for the care of those "traditionalist Catholics" who, while discontented with the liturgical reform of the ], had broken with Archbishop ], "because they disagreed with his schismatic action in ordaining Bishops without the required papal mandate". He added that at present the Commission's activity is not limited to the service of those Catholics, nor to "the efforts undertaken to end the regrettable schismatic situation and secure the return of those brethren belonging to the ] to ]." It extends also, he said, to "satisfying the just aspirations of people, unrelated to the two aforementioned groups, who, because of their specific sensitiveness, wish to keep alive the earlier ] liturgy in the celebration of the ] and the other ]s."<ref>The text of Cardinal Castrillón's speech, in the language in which he gave it, can be consulted at (Retrieved 17 May 2007) or at (Retrieved 7 December 2008). English translations may be consulted at (Retrieved 7 December 2008), and extracts are given in English at (Retrieved 7 December 2008).</ref> | |||
According to Vlad Naumescu, "Religious life in a traditionalist parish followed the model of the 'underground church.' Devotions were more intense, with each priest promoting his parish as a 'place of pilgrimage' for the neighboring areas, thus drawing larger crowds on Sunday than his local parish could provide. On Sundays and feast days, religious services took place three times a day (in Riasne), and the Sunday liturgy lasted for two and a half to three hours. The main religious celebrations took place outside the church in the middle of the neighborhood, and on every occasion traditionalists organized long processions through the entire locality. The community was strongly united by its common opponent, re-enacting the model of the 'defender of faith' common to times of repression. This model, which presupposes clear-cut attitudes and a firm moral stance, mobilized the community and reproduced the former determination of the 'underground' believers."<ref> Stephanie Mahieu, Vlad Naumescu (editors), ''Churches In-between: Greek Catholic Churches in Postsocialist Europe'' (LIT Verlag Münster 2008), page 164. {{ISBN|978-3-8258-9910-3}}</ref> | |||
In the same speech Cardinal Castrillón indicated that it was intended to make the Commission an organ of the ] for the purpose of preserving and maintaining the traditional liturgy; at the same time he stated that this was not with the purpose of "going backward, of returning to the times before the 1970 reform.... The Holy Father wishes to preserve the immense spiritual, cultural and aesthetic treasure linked with the old liturgy. Recovery of these riches goes together with the no less precious riches of the Church's present liturgy." | |||
=== Priestly Society of Saint Josaphat === | |||
===''Summorum Pontificum''=== | |||
The ] (SSJK), which operates a seminary, ] convent, and numerous parishes, receives priestly orders from the bishops of the SSPX. Its superior, Father ], has accused the UGCC hierarchy of using intense psychological pressure against priests who are reluctant or unwilling to de-Latinise. | |||
Following months of rumour and speculation, Pope Benedict XVI issued the ] '']'' in July 2007. The Pope ruled that priests of the ] can freely choose between the 1962 Roman Missal and the ] "in Masses celebrated without the people".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |title=''Summorum Pontificum'', art. 2 |publisher=Sanctamissa.org |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> Such celebrations may be attended by those who spontaneously ask to be allowed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |title=''Summorum Pontificum'', art. 4 |publisher=Sanctamissa.org |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> Priests in charge of churches can permit stable groups of laypeople attached to the earlier form to have Mass celebrated for them in that form, provided that the celebrating priest is "qualified to and not juridically impeded"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/resources/summorum-pontificum.html |title=''Summorum Pontificum'', art. 5 |publisher=Sanctamissa.org |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> (this would exclude traditionalist priests not in good standing with Rome). | |||
In 2003, Cardinal ], Major Archbishops of Kyiv-Galicia, excommunicated Father Kovpak, but this act was later declared null and void by the ] due to lack of canonical form. | |||
The document, as well as being welcomed by the traditionalist groups that have been in good relations with Rome, has been considered by groups such as the ], which have been in dispute with Rome, to be sufficient grounds for seeking an agreement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://papastronsay.blogspot.com/2008/04/immaculate-heart-of-marypray-for-us.html |title=Declaration on Relations with Rome |publisher=Papastronsay.blogspot.com |date=2008-04-28 |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> The Society of Saint Pius X welcomed the document, but referred to "difficulties that still remain", including "disputed doctrinal issues" and the notice of excommunication that still affected its bishops.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fsspx.org/eng/index.html |title=Press Release from the General Superior of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, 7 July 2007 |publisher=Fsspx.org |date=2011-06-17 |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> Sedevacantists of course consider all documents issued by Benedict XVI to be devoid of canonical force. | |||
On 22 November 2006, ] ], who was then a member of the ] (SSPX), ordained two priests and seven deacons in ], ], for the SSJK. Fr. John Jenkins, an SSPX priest who was present, later remarked, "We were all very edified by their piety, and I myself was astonished by the resemblance of the atmosphere amongst the seminarians with that which I knew in the seminary – this in spite of the difference of language, nationality and even rite."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.laportelatine.org/accueil/entret/2006/jenkins/versionanglaise/anglais2006.php |title=La Porte Latine - Jenkins anglais |access-date=2006-08-11 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060823133035/http://www.laportelatine.org/accueil/entret/2006/jenkins/versionanglaise/anglais2006.php |archive-date=23 August 2006 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> | |||
==Validity of holy orders of traditionalist clergy== | |||
]) before and after ].]] | |||
Catholic doctrine holds that any validly ordained bishop can ordain any other baptised male as a priest or a bishop, provided that he has the correct intention and uses an acceptable ordination liturgy. This remains the case whether or not the ordination is performed with official approval, and even if the individuals involved are not Catholics.<ref>, section 13: What is required for a valid sacrament?</ref> The conferring of ] may therefore be ].<ref>See especially Canons </ref> | |||
Archeparch ] of Lviv, the Archeparchy in which the PSSJ is most active, denounced the ordinations as a "criminal act", and condemned Fr. Kovpak's participation in the ceremony. He stressed that the two priests whom Bishop Williamson had ordained would not receive faculties within the Archeparchy.<ref>The Holy See likewise declared SSPX priests "suspended from exercising their priestly functions" (, Secretary of the ] Commission {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030202034019/http://www.unavoce.org/articles/2003/perl-011803.htm |date=2 February 2003 }}). A minority of them - ordained before 1976 by archbishop ] for the SSPX - remain incardinated in several European dioceses. They are thus in the same position as excommunicated Kovpak, who is incardinated in the Ukrainian Archdiocese of Lviv. The newly ordained clergy, however, are not incardinated into any Ukrainian Catholic diocese, and thus are not clergy of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.</ref> Officials of the Lviv archdiocese said that Kovpak could face ], and that ''"'he deceives the church by declaring that he is a Greek (Byzantine) Catholic priest,' while supporting a group '''' that uses the old Latin liturgy exclusively, eschewing the Byzantine tradition, and does not maintain allegiance to the Holy See."''<ref> The accusation of "eschewing the Byzantine tradition" refers to Father Kovpak's championing of Latinising elements which were followed by Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church since the 17th century, but forcibly purged following the Second Vatican Council.</ref> | |||
The Catholic Church obviously considers the orders of traditionalist clergy who are in good standing with the Holy See, such as the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter, to be both valid and licit. It sees as valid but illicit the orders of the bishops and priests of the Society of Saint Pius X, and accordingly considers them to be forbidden by law to exercise priestly offices.<ref> by ] concerning his remission of the excommunication of the four bishops of the Society of St Pius X</ref> As for the "independent" traditionalists, whether ] or priests, it certainly sees their ordination as illicit, but its judgement on the validity is less clear. The Holy See declared devoid of canonical effect the consecration ceremony conducted by Archbishop ] for the ] group at midnight of 31 December 1975, while expressly refraining from pronouncing on its validity. It made the same statement with regard also to any later ordinations that those bishops might confer, saying that, "as for those who have already thus unlawfully received ordination or any who may yet accept ordination from these, whatever may be the validity of the orders (''quidquid sit de ordinum validitate''), the Church does not and will not recognise their ordination (''ipsorum ordinationem''), and will consider them, for all legal effects, as still in the state in which they were before, except that the ... penalties remain until they repent."<ref>Sacred ], Decree ''Episcopi qui alios'' of 17 September 1976 – ''Acta Apostolicae Sedis'' 1976, page 623).</ref> | |||
Father Kovpak's excommunication process was restarted by the hierarchy of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church and was confirmed by the ] on 23 November 2007.<ref name="Ukrainian priest excommunicated"> Catholic World News, 21 November 2007</ref> | |||
Traditionalists themselves are divided on the question of the validity of the orders conferred using the Those who deny or put in doubt the validity of the sacramental liturgies as revised after the Second Vatican Council pass the same negative judgement on all such ordinations.<ref>See for instance .</ref> The Society of Saint Pius V split from that of Saint Pius X for reasons that included Archbishop Lefebvre's acceptance of priests ordained according to the revised sacramental rites as members of the traditionalist Society that he founded.<ref>See section "Doubtful Priests" in the </ref> | |||
=== Sedevacantism and Conclavism in the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church === | |||
==Number of traditionalist Catholics==<!--This section is linked from ] --> | |||
{{main|Ukrainian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church}} | |||
In March 2008 a group of ] priests in ], Ukraine, announced that four of them had been consecrated as bishops in order to save the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) from heresy and apostasy and in August 2009, they announced the formation of the ].<ref>. Uogcc.org.ua (11 August 2009). Retrieved on 2013-07-04.</ref> Having elected ] Basilian priest Fr. Anthony Elias Dohnal as "Patriarch Elijah", they declared ], establishing the ] (UOGCC).<ref>. Uogcc.org.ua. Retrieved on 4 July 2013.</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://uogcc.org.ua/res/download/pastoral_letter_for_the_catholic_church.doc|title=Pastoral letter for the Catholic Church}}</ref> | |||
According to the ''Statistical Yearbook of the Church'', the Catholic Church's worldwide recorded membership at the end of 2005 was 1,114,966,000.<ref name=StatYearbookfor2005>{{cite book |title=Statistical Yearbook of the Church 2005 |author=Central Statistics Office |publisher=Libreria Editrice Vaticana |year=2007 |isbn=978-88-209-7928-7}}</ref> Estimates of the number of traditionalist Catholics vary. Catholic World News reported that "the Vatican" estimated the number of those served by the Fraternity of St Peter, the Society of St Pius X and similar groups at "close to 1 million".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=37861 |title=Catholic World News : "All We Ask is for the Mass" |publisher=Cwnews.com |date=2005-05-01 |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> A poster on Yahoo GeoCities, put the number of traditionalist Catholics (in good standing with the Holy See or not) "somewhere around the six or seven million mark",<ref name=Geocities>{{cite web|url=http://geocities.com/catholic_traditionalist/ |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20091026233659/http://geocities.com/catholic_traditionalist/ |archivedate=2009-10-26 |title=Roman Catholic Traditionalism? |publisher=Web.archive.org |date=2009-10-26 |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> and a sedevacantist site put them at "60 to 120 million worldwide".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/06Jun/jun2str.htm |title=Traditional Catholics ARE the Christian Mainstream (jun2str.htm) |publisher=Dailycatholic.org |date=2006-06-02 |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> Various sources estimate the adherents of the Society of St Pius X alone at 1 million.<ref name=Geocities/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/archive-2006-1115-universal%20indult.htm |title=The Universal Indult vs |publisher=Remnantnewspaper.com |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/10/11/112628.shtml |title=Vatican Decree May Bring Back Latin Mass |publisher=Newsmax.com |date=2006-10-11 |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/mershon/061019 |title=SSPX to send spiritual bouquet and encouragement to Pope |publisher=Renewamerica.us |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> No major religious survey has ever made an attempt to sample and enumerate subsets of Catholics by their position on a liberal to mainstream conservative to traditionalist and sedevacantist continuum, so any figure on the numbers of traditionalist Catholics must by necessity be more or less educated guesses. | |||
The group was promptly excommunicated by the UGCC,<ref>{{Cite web |title=UOGCC / English / About Church |url=http://uogcc.org.ua/en/church/article/?article=4581 |access-date=2023-10-09 |website=uogcc.org.ua}}</ref> an act that was later confirmed by the ]<ref>{{Cite web |date=2012-04-02 |title=Vatican Says Excommunication of "Pidhirtsi Fathers" Final |url=http://old.risu.org.ua/eng/news/article;26027 |access-date=2023-10-09 |website=risu.org.ua|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402003907/http://old.risu.org.ua/eng/news/article;26027 |archive-date=2012-04-02 }}</ref> and the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=NULL |date=2012-03-29 |title=Dichiarazione della Santa Sede sui "sedicenti vescovi greco-cattolici di Pidhirci" |url=https://it.zenit.org/2012/03/29/dichiarazione-della-santa-sede-sui-sedicenti-vescovi-greco-cattolici-di-pidhirci/ |access-date=2023-10-09 |website=ZENIT - Italiano |language=it-IT}}</ref> | |||
The two most prominent societies of traditionalist priests – the SSPX and the FSSP – claim to have a presence in 31 and 14 countries respectively. A large share of their members in each case are stationed in ].<ref> </ref> Two other societies, the SSPV and CMRI, are based in the ] and also claim a presence in many countries, especially the CMRI. Traditionalist Catholics in ] countries and ] are more likely to be ] than those in France and other Latin countries. | |||
The UOGCC later ], Archbishop ] the former ], in October 2019. Whether Viganò accepted this "election" is unclear.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Habemus papam {{!}} |url=http://vkpatriarhat.org/en/?p=16979 |access-date=2023-10-09 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
For purposes of comparison with mainstream Catholic organisations, the ] in the United States are stated to have 1.7 million members, the ] is reported to have around 1 million members,<ref> from ]</ref> and ] is claimed to have 87,000 members. | |||
There have been allegations in both '']'' and the Lviv-based newspaper '']'' that the church leadership is linked to the ].<ref> Andrew Higgins (June 21, 2014). . '']''</ref> | |||
Another comparison is that ]s number 16 million. Approximately 7,650,000 belong to the ] Catholic Churches of ], whether they attend the ] in that liturgical rite or in another,<ref>"The practice, however long standing, of receiving the sacraments according to the rite of an autonomous ritual Church, does not bring with it membership of that Church" ().</ref> and 8,300,000 belong to other Eastern Catholic Churches of ], ] and ] traditions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.americancatholic.org/Newsletters/CU/ac0106.asp |title=What All Catholics Should Know About Eastern Catholic Churches |publisher=Americancatholic.org |date= |accessdate=2011-06-30}}</ref> | |||
==See |
== Relations with the Holy See == | ||
The Holy See recognises as fully legitimate the preference that many Catholics have for the earlier forms of worship. This was stated in Pope John Paul II's 1988 apostolic letter '']'' and Pope Benedict XVI's 2007 ] '']''. The Holy See does not extend its approval to those who oppose the present-day Church leadership, which is reiterated in '']''.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Weinandy |first1=Thomas |last2=Cavadini |first2=John |last3=Healy |first3=Mary |date=2022-12-01 |title=A Synoptic Look at the Failures and Successes of Post-Vatican II Liturgical Reforms |url=https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/a-synoptic-look-at-the-failures-and-successes-of-post-vatican-ii-liturgical-reforms/ |access-date=2023-05-30 |website=Church Life Journal |language=en}}</ref> | |||
===Doctrinal and liturgical issues=== | |||
* ] | |||
=== ''Ecclesia Dei'' Commission === | |||
* '']'' | |||
The ] was founded in July 1988 in the wake of John Paul II's apostolic letter '']''. Benedict XVI was a member of the Commission during his tenure as Cardinal Prefect of the ]. Speaking on 16 May 2007 to the Fifth General Conference of the Bishops of Latin America and the Caribbean, Cardinal Castrillón, the current head of the Commission, said his department had been founded for the care of those "traditionalist Catholics" who, while discontented with the liturgical reform of the ], had broken with Archbishop ] "because they disagreed with his schismatic action in ordaining Bishops without the required papal mandate". He added that at present the Commission's activity is not limited to the service of those Catholics, nor to "the efforts undertaken to end the regrettable schismatic situation and secure the return of those brethren belonging to the ] to ]." It extends also, he said, to "satisfying the just aspirations of people, unrelated to the two aforementioned groups, who, because of their specific sensitiveness, wish to keep alive the earlier ] in the celebration of the ] and the other ]s."<ref>The text of Cardinal Castrillón's speech, in the language in which he gave it, can be consulted at {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070525080327/http://www.celam.info/content/view/277/332/ |date=25 May 2007 }} (Retrieved 17 May 2007) or at {{Dead link|date=February 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} (Retrieved 7 December 2008). English translations may be consulted at (Retrieved 7 December 2008), and extracts are given in English at {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304185942/http://www.adoremus.org/0607NewsViews.html |date=2016-03-04 }}(Retrieved 7 December 2008).</ref> | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
In 2019, Pope Francis suppressed this commission and transferred its responsibilities directly to the ].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Tornielli |first1=Andrea |title=Ecclesia Dei, exceptional nature ends |url=https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2019-01/editorial-ecclesia-dei-exceptional-nature-ends.html |website=Vatican News |date=19 January 2019 |access-date=14 February 2024}}</ref> | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==Validity of holy orders== | |||
The conferring of ] may be ].<ref>See especially Canons </ref> The Catholic Church considers the orders of traditionalist clergy who are in good standing with the Holy See, such as the clergy of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter or the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest, to be both valid and licit. It sees as valid but illicit the orders of the bishops and priests of the Society of Saint Pius X, and accordingly considers them to be forbidden by law to exercise priestly offices, but still technically priests.<ref> by ] concerning his remission of the excommunication of the four bishops of the Society of St Pius X</ref> | |||
The Holy See declared devoid of canonical effect the consecration ceremony conducted by Archbishop ] for the ] group on December 31,1975, while expressly refraining from pronouncing on its validity. It made the same statement with regard also to any later ordinations that those bishops might confer, saying that: <blockquote>as for those who have already thus unlawfully received ordination or any who may yet accept ordination from these, whatever may be the validity of the orders (''quidquid sit de ordinum validitate''), the Church does not and will not recognise their ordination (''ipsorum ordinationem''), and will consider them, for all legal effects, as still in the state in which they were before, except that the penalties remain until they repent.<ref>Sacred ], Decree ''Episcopi qui alios'' of 17 September 1976 – ''Acta Apostolicae Sedis'' 1976, page 623.</ref></blockquote> | |||
==Demographics== | |||
{{See also|Preconciliar rites after the Second Vatican Council#Demography}} | |||
In 2005, ] reported that "the Vatican" estimated the number of those served by the Fraternity of St Peter, the Society of St Pius X and similar groups at "close to 1 million".<ref>{{cite web |last1=McCaffrey |first1=Roger A. |last2=Woods Jr. |first2=Thomas E. |date=May 2005 |title=Catholic World News : "All We Ask is for the Mass" |url=http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=37861 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060202233825/http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=37861 |archive-date=2 February 2006 |access-date=30 June 2011 |publisher=Cwnews.com}}</ref> | |||
==List of groups== | |||
{{Main|Communities using the Tridentine Mass}} | |||
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2021}} | |||
This is a list of notable traditionalist Catholic groups. Some are in full communion with the ]; some have irregular status according to doctrines and disciplines of the Catholic Church. | |||
As of 2023, largest priestly communities described as traditionalist are ] with 707 priests, ] with 368 priests, ] with 147 priests and ] with 61 priests. | |||
===Notable Traditionalist Catholics=== | |||
* ] | |||
===Canonically regular traditionalist groups=== | ===Canonically regular traditionalist groups=== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] also called the ''Order of the Poor Knights of Christ'' | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] (Still River, MA group only) | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] Catholics<ref>{{cite news |last1=Meltzer |first1=Marisa |title=Dimes Square Gets the Hotel It Deserves |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/25/style/dimes-square-nine-orchard-hotel.html |access-date=6 November 2023 |work=The New York Times |date=July 25, 2022}}</ref> | |||
* ] | |||
===Canonically irregular traditionalist groups=== | ===Canonically irregular traditionalist groups=== | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] in Park Hills, Kentucky | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
===Sedevacantist groups=== | ===Sedevacantist groups=== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* ] | |||
=== |
===Sedeprivationist groups=== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
===See also=== | |||
* ], a comparable phenomenon in the Russian Orthodox Church dating from the 17th century. | |||
===Conclavist groups=== | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==See also== | |||
===Doctrinal and liturgical issues=== | |||
* ] | |||
* '']'' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
===Comparable phenomena in other churches=== | |||
* ], a comparable phenomenon in the ] which dates back to the 17th century | |||
* ], ] and the ]—comparable phenomena in the ] that date to the 1920s | |||
* ], a comparable phenomenon in the ] | |||
* ], a similar movement in ] denominations | |||
===Other=== | |||
* ], which started in comparable circumstances surrounding ] and the ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ], for a discussion about a traditionalist Catholic news service which was shut down | |||
* ] – an American newspaper dedicated to traditionalist themes | * ] – an American newspaper dedicated to traditionalist themes | ||
* ], American group focused on traditional education | |||
* ] 1967 manifesto that angered traditionalists | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|35em}} | {{reflist|35em}} | ||
==External links== | |||
* The main international organisation of Traditionalists considered regular by the Holy See | |||
* The largest traditionalist body considered irregular by the Holy See | |||
* The Vatican department which deals with relations with traditionalists | |||
* Largest organization of young traditionalist Catholics | |||
* Site by Dr. Thomas A. Droleskey, one of the most prolific Catholic writers in the world providing all the proof needed for traditional Catholics | |||
* Largest sedevacantist religious congregation | |||
* Catholic news source for "Church in Eclipse" | |||
* Upholding the true Church and Traditional Latin Mass | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
* {{cite book|last= |
* {{cite book|last=Hull|first=Geoffrey|title=The Banished Heart: Origins of Heteropraxis in the Catholic Church|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3Jp0QwAACAAJ|publisher=Bloomsbury Academic|year=2010|location=London, UK|isbn=9780567442208}} | ||
* {{cite book|first=Edward|last=Jarvis|author-link=Edward Jarvis (author)|title=Sede Vacante: The Life and Legacy of Archbishop Thuc|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ID0GwgEACAAJ|access-date=29 August 2019|publisher=The Apocryphile Press|year=2018|location=Berkeley, CA|isbn=9781949643022}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Amerio|first=Romano|title=Iota Unum|publisher=Sarto House|location=Kansas City|isbn=0-9639032-1-7|year=1996}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Jungmann|first=Joseph|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1ns7zQEACAAJ|title=The Mass Of The Roman Rite: Its Origins and Development (Missarum Sollemnia)|volume=1|location=Allen, TX|publisher=Christian Classics|year=1986|isbn=0870611666}} | |||
* Hull, Geoffrey (2010). ''The Banished Heart: Origins of Heteropraxis in the Catholic Church'', 1995, rpt. T&T Clark/Continuum, London. ISBN 0-567-44220-8 | |||
* {{cite book|last=Manning|first=Christel|title=God Gave Us the Right: Conservative Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, and Orthodox Jewish Women Grapple with Feminism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vNsQ97AE0zwC|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=1999|isbn=0813525993}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Radecki, CMRI|first=Frs. Francisco and Dominic|title=Tumultuous Times|publisher=St.Joseph's Media|location=Wayne, MI / Newhall, CA|isbn=0-9715061-0-8|year=2004}} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia|last=Margry|first=Peter Jan|editor-last=Maunder|editor-first=Chris|year=2019|title=The Global Network of Deviant Revelatory Marian Movements|encyclopedia=The Oxford Handbook of Mary|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NgulDwAAQBAJ|location=NY|publisher=Oxford University Press|pages=662–683|isbn=9780198792550}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Radecki, CMRI|first=Frs. Francisco and Dominic|title=Tumultuous Times|publisher=St.Joseph's Media|location=Wayne, MI / Newhall, CA|isbn=0971506108|year=2004}} | |||
==Media== | |||
* {{cite book|last=Sinke Guimarães|first=Atila|title=In the Murky Waters of Vatican II|publisher=MAETA|location=Metairie|isbn=1889168068|year=1997}} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite book|first1=Mary Jo|last1=Weaver|first2=R. Scott|last2=Appleby|title=Being Right: Conservative Catholics in America|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W1KFNeoVo-UC|year=1995|publisher=Indiana University Press|location=Bloomington|isbn=9780253209993|access-date=28 November 2020}} | |||
{{Traditionalist Catholicism}} | {{Traditionalist Catholicism|state=collapsed}} | ||
{{Second Vatican Council}} | |||
{{SSPX}} | |||
{{Palmarian Church}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 22:24, 15 December 2024
Catholic religious movement This article is about the contemporary movement. For the 19th-century theological position, see Traditionalism (19th-century Catholicism).Part of a series on the | ||||||||||||||||
Catholic Church | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St. Peter's Basilica, Vatican City | ||||||||||||||||
Overview | ||||||||||||||||
Background | ||||||||||||||||
Organisation | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Texts
|
||||||||||||||||
Philosophy
|
||||||||||||||||
Worship | ||||||||||||||||
Rites
|
||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
Relations with: |
||||||||||||||||
Societal issues | ||||||||||||||||
Links and resources | ||||||||||||||||
Catholic Church portal | ||||||||||||||||
Part of a series on | ||||
Christianity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Theology | ||||
|
||||
Related topics | ||||
Traditionalist Catholicism is a movement that emphasizes beliefs, practices, customs, traditions, liturgical forms, devotions and presentations of teaching associated with the Catholic Church before the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965). Traditionalist Catholics particularly emphasize the Tridentine Mass, the Roman Rite liturgy largely replaced in general use by the post-Second Vatican Council Mass of Paul VI.
Many Traditionalist Catholics disliked the liturgical changes that followed the Second Vatican Council, and prefer to continue to practice pre-Second Vatican Council traditions and forms. Some also see present teachings on ecumenism as blurring the distinction between Catholics and other Christians. Traditional Catholicism is often more conservative in its philosophy and worldview, promoting a modest style of dressing and teaching a complementarian view of gender roles.
A minority of Traditionalist Catholics reject the current papacy of the Catholic Church and follow positions of sedevacantism, sedeprivationism, or conclavism. As these groups are no longer in full communion with the pope and the Holy See, they are not regarded by Holy See to be members of the Catholic Church, but instead separate religious groupings. A distinction is often made between these groups (sometimes called Radical Traditionalists) and Catholics who accept the teachings and authority of the Catholic Church while still preferring older traditions and practices as well as the Tridentine Mass in Latin.
History
Toward the end of the Second Vatican Council, Father Gommar DePauw came into conflict with Cardinal Lawrence Shehan, Archbishop of Baltimore, over the interpretation of the council's teachings, particularly on liturgical matters. In January 1965, DePauw incorporated an organization called the Catholic Traditionalist Movement in New York State, purportedly with the support of Cardinal Francis Spellman, Archbishop of New York.
By the late 1960s and early 1970s, conservative Catholics opposed to or uncomfortable with the theological, social and liturgical developments brought about by the Second Vatican Council began to coalesce. In 1973, the Orthodox Roman Catholic Movement (ORCM) was founded by two priests, Francis E. Fenton and Robert McKenna, and set up chapels in many parts of North America to preserve the Tridentine Mass. Priests who participated in this were listed as being on a leave of absence by their bishops, who disapproved of their actions.
In 1970, French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre founded the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), made up of priests who would say only the Traditional Latin Mass and who opposed what he saw as excessive liberal influences in the Church after Vatican II. In 1988, Lefebvre and another bishop consecrated four men as bishops without papal permission, resulting in excommunication latae sententiae for all six men directly involved. Some members of the SSPX, unwilling to participate in what they considered schism, left and founded the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP), which celebrates the Tridentine Mass and is in full communion with the Holy See. In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunications of the four surviving bishops, but clarified that the society had "no canonical status within the Catholic Church."
The Istituto Mater Boni Consilii (IMBC) was founded in 1985. It is a sedeprivationist religious congregation of clergy who were dissatisfied with the SSPX's position on the Pope, i.e., acknowledging John Paul II as pope but disobeying him. Sedeprivationists hold that the current occupant of the papal office is a duly elected pope but lacks the authority and ability to teach or govern unless he recants the changes brought by the Second Vatican Council.
Some Catholics took the position of sedevacantism, which teaches Pope John XXIII and his successors are heretics and therefore cannot be considered popes, and that the Catholic Church's sacraments are not valid. One sedevacantist group, the Society of Saint Pius V (SSPV), broke off from the SSPX in 1983, due to liturgical disputes. Another sedevacantist group, the Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen (CMRI), formed spontaneously among the followers of Francis Schuckardt, but he was later expelled due to scandals and CMRI is now more aligned with other sedevacantist groups.
Other groups known as Conclavists have elected their own popes in opposition to the post-Vatican II pontiffs. They are not considered serious claimants except by their very few followers.
Different types
Canonically regular with the Holy See
Since the Second Vatican Council, several traditionalist organizations have been started with or have subsequently obtained approval from the Catholic Church. These organizations accept the documents of the Second Vatican Council and regard the changes associated with the Council (such as the revision of the Mass) as legitimate, but celebrate the older forms with the approval of the Holy See.
- Priestly Fraternity of St Peter (FSSP)
- Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest (ICRSS, ICKSP)
- Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer (FSSR)
- Institute of the Good Shepherd (IBP)
- Servants of Jesus and Mary (SJM)
- Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem (CRNJ)
- Canons Regular of Saint John Cantius (SJC)
- Canons Regular of the Holy Cross
- Fraternity of Saint Vincent Ferrer
- Personal Apostolic Administration of Saint John Mary Vianney (PAASJV)
There are also multiple monastic communities, including
- Monastery of Our Lady of the Annunciation of Clear Creek
- Monastery of St. Benedict in Norcia
- Monks of the Most Blessed Virgin Mary of Mount Carmel
- Monastery of Our Lady of the Cenacle
- Le Barroux Abbey
See Communities using the Tridentine Mass for a more detailed list.
Society of Saint Pius X
The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) was founded in 1970, with the authorization of the bishop of Lausanne, Geneva and Fribourg, by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Lefebvre was declared to have incurred automatic excommunication in 1988, after illicit consecrations. In January 2009 the Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops remitted the excommunications the Congregation had declared to have been incurred by the Society's bishops in 1988.
More recently, the Vatican has granted SSPX priests the authority to hear confessions and has authorized local ordinaries, in certain circumstances, to grant delegation to SSPX priests to act as the qualified witness required for valid celebration of marriage. The Our Lady of Guadalupe Monastery in Silver City, New Mexico, which is affiliated with the SSPX, is seeking Vatican approval through the society.
In 2017, a statement from the Holy See said the SSPX had an irregular canonical status "for the time being".
Sedeprivationists
Main article: SedeprivationismSedeprivationists hold that the current occupant of the papal office is a duly elected pope but lacks the authority and ability to teach or govern unless he recants the changes brought by the Second Vatican Council. Sedeprivationists teach that the popes from Pope John XXIII onward fall into this category. Sedeprivationism is currently endorsed by two groups:
- Istituto Mater Boni Consilii (IMBC), led by Superior General Fr. Francesco Ricossa;
- Roman Catholic Institute (RCI), led by Bishop Donald Sanborn.
Sedevacantists
Main article: SedevacantismSedevacantists hold that the Vatican II popes have forfeited their position through their acceptance of heretical teachings connected with the Second Vatican Council and consequently there is at present no true pope. They conclude, on the basis of their rejection of the revised Mass rite and of certain aspects of postconciliar Church teaching as false, that the popes involved are also false. This is a minority position among traditionalist Catholics and a highly divisive one, so that many who hold it prefer to say nothing of their view, while other sedevacantists have accepted episcopal ordination from sources such as Archbishop Pierre Martin Ngô Đình Thục.
The terms sedevacantist and sedevacantism derive from the Latin phrase sede vacante ("while the chair/see is vacant"). Sedevacantist groups include:
- Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen (CMRI), formed in 1967. It operates in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia; is based in Omaha, Nebraska, United States; and is headed by Bishop Mark Pivarunas.
- Society of Saint Pius V (SSPV), formed in 1983 when nine American priests of the Society of Saint Pius X split from the organization over a number of issues including using the liturgical reforms implemented under Pope John XXIII. It operates in North America, is based in Oyster Bay Cove, New York, United States, and was headed by Bishop Clarence Kelly until his death in December 2023.
- Sociedad Sacerdotal Trento (Priestly Society of Trent; SST), formed in 1993 by the priests of the deceased Bishop Moisés Carmona. Its bishop is Bishop Martín Dávila Gandara.
Conclavists
Main article: ConclavismConclavism is the belief and practice of some who, claiming that all recent occupants of the papal see are not true popes, elect someone else and propose him as the true pope to whom the allegiance of Catholics is due.
Positions
Part of the Politics series on |
Toryism |
---|
Characteristics |
General topics |
People |
Related topics |
Pope Benedict XVI contrasted the "hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture" that some apply to the Council (an interpretation adopted both by certain traditionalists and by certain "progressives") with the "hermeneutic of reform, as it was presented first by Pope John XXIII in his Speech inaugurating the Council on 11 October 1962 and later by Pope Paul VI in his Discourse for the Council's conclusion on 7 December 1965." He made a similar point in a speech to the bishops of Chile in 1988, when he was still Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger:
declared that he has finally understood that the agreement he signed aimed only at integrating his foundation into the "Conciliar Church". The Catholic Church in union with the Pope is, according to him, the 'Conciliar Church' which has broken with its own past. It seems indeed that he is no longer able to see that we are dealing with the Catholic Church in the totality of its Tradition, and that Vatican II belongs to that.
Responding to a comment that some consider tradition in a rigid way, Pope Francis remarked in 2016, "there’s a traditionalism that is a rigid fundamentalism; this is not good. Fidelity on the other hand implies growth. In transmitting the deposit of faith from one epoch to another, tradition grows and consolidates itself with the passing of time, as St Vincent of Lérins said 'The dogma of the Christian religion too must follow these laws. It progresses, consolidates itself with the years, developing itself with time, deepening itself with age'.”
Radical Traditionalists' assessment of Vatican II
Radical Traditionalists' claims that substantive changes have taken place in Catholic teaching and practice since the Council often crystallize around the following specific alleged examples:
- Sedevacantist Donald J. Sanborn rejects an ecclesiology that he claims fails to recognize the Catholic Church as the one true church established by Jesus Christ, and instead holds that the Roman Catholic Church is some subset of the church Christ founded. He sees some of the confusion as stemming from an unclear understanding of the phrase "subsists in" which appears in the Vatican II document Lumen gentium, and which the Church has declared applies uniquely to the Catholic Church and means the "perduring, historical continuity and permanence of all the elements instituted by Christ in the Catholic Church, in which the Church of Christ is concretely found on this earth". He claims that this "new ecclesiology" contradicts Pope Pius XII's Mystici corporis Christi and other papal documents.
- The SSPX denounces a teaching on collegiality that attributes to the bishops of the world a share, with the Pope, of responsibility for the Church's governance in a way that it claims is destructive of papal authority and encourages a "national" church mentality that undermines the primacy of the Holy See. It also claims that national bishops' conferences, whose influence greatly increased following the Council, "diminish the personal responsibility of bishop" within their dioceses.
Criticism of the Radical Traditionalists' positions
Those who in response to these criticisms by certain traditionalists defend the decisions of the Second Vatican Council and the subsequent changes made by the Holy See make the following counterclaims:
- The criticisms are false, exaggerated, or lacking appreciation of the organic character of Tradition, traditionalist criticisms that Dignitatis humanae contradicts the Church's earlier teaching on religious liberty are an example.
- Traditionalists who claim that there has been a break from and discontinuity with the Church's traditional teaching are displaying a Protestant attitude of "private judgment" on matters of doctrine instead of accepting the guidance of the Magisterium of the Church.
- Traditionalists fail to distinguish properly between changeable pastoral practices (such as the liturgy of the Mass) and the unchangeable principles of the Catholic faith (such as the dogmas surrounding the Mass).
- Traditionalists of this kind treat papal authority in much the same way as the dissident, liberal Catholics. While liberals believe that, on sexual matters, "the Pope can teach whatever he wants... but whether or not he should be listened to is very much an open question", the stance of certain traditionalists on the reform of the Mass liturgy and contemporary teachings on ecumenism and religious liberty amounts to the view that, on these issues, "faithful Catholics are always free to resist folly. As theories of religious dissent go, Catholic liberals couldn't ask for anything more."
- Traditionalists claim that the Second Vatican Council was pastoral (and not infallible), but Paul VI subsequently emphasized the authoritative nature of the Council's teachings.
Reception
Integrism is traditionalist Catholicism that integrates social and political contexts. Kay Chadwick described Catholic integrism as a holding "anti-Masonic, anti-liberal and anti-Communist" political objectives. She also noted its alignment with the right-wing press and an annual Parisian Joan of Arc procession with participation by both integrists and National Front supporters. A Tridentine Mass was celebrated before the annual National Front party meeting. Lefebvre was fined in France for "racial defamation" and "incitement to racial hatred" for proposing the removal of immigrants – particularly Muslims – from Europe. Lefebvre also supported Latin American dictatorships, Charles Maurras, Philippe Pétain, and the continued occupation of French Algeria.
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) used the term radical traditionalist Catholics to refer to those who "may make up the largest single group of serious anti-Semites in America, subscribe to an ideology that is rejected by the Vatican and some 70 million mainstream American Catholics. Many of their leaders have been condemned and even excommunicated by the official church." The SPLC claims that adherents of radical traditional Catholicism "routinely pillory Jews as 'the perpetual enemy of Christ'", reject the ecumenical efforts of the Vatican, and sometimes assert that all recent Popes are illegitimate. The SPLC says that adherents are "incensed by the liberalizing reforms" of the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) which condemned hatred for Jewish people and "rejected the accusation that Jews are collectively responsible for deicide in the form of the crucifixion of Christ" and that "Radical traditional Catholics" also embrace "extremely conservative social ideals with respect to women."
The SPLC clarifies: "Radical traditionalists are not the same as Catholics who call themselves 'traditionalists'—people who prefer the old Latin Mass to the mass now typically said in vernacular languages—although the radicals, as well, like their liturgy in Latin."
Practices
Traditionalist Catholicism has been described as "a self-conscious revival of the liturgies, practices, and trappings of an earlier time in the Catholic Church" and this manifests in a number of ways.
Rite of Mass
The best-known and most visible sign of Catholic traditionalism is an attachment to the form that the Roman Rite liturgy of the Mass had before the liturgical reform of 1969–1970, in the various editions of the Roman Missal published between 1570 and 1962. This form is generally known as the Tridentine Mass, though traditionalists usually prefer to call it the Traditional Mass. Many refer to it as the Latin Mass, though Latin is the language also of the official text of the post-Vatican II Mass, to which vernacular translations are obliged to conform, and canon law states that "the eucharistic celebration is to be carried out in the Latin language or in another language provided that the liturgical texts have been legitimately approved." In his 2007 motu proprio Summorum Pontificum Pope Benedict XVI relaxed the regulations on use of the 1962 Missal, designating it "an" extraordinary form of the Roman Rite, as opposed to "the" ordinary or normal form, as revised successively by Pope Paul VI and Pope John Paul II.
The Pope ruled that priests of the Latin Church can freely choose between the 1962 Roman Missal and the later edition "in Masses celebrated without the people". Such celebrations may be attended by those who spontaneously ask to be allowed. Priests in charge of churches can permit stable groups of laypeople attached to the earlier form to have Mass celebrated for them in that form, provided that the celebrating priest is "qualified to and not juridically impeded". The Society of Saint Pius X welcomed the document, but referred to "difficulties that still remain", including "disputed doctrinal issues" and the notice of excommunication that still affected its bishops.
In 2021, Pope Francis promulgated Traditionis custodes, amending and abrogating parts of Summorum Pontificum.
Individual and private devotions
Some traditionalist Catholics stress on following customs prevailing immediately before the Second Vatican Council, such as the following:
- Fasting from Midnight until the reception of Holy Communion. The traditional Catholic rule of fasting from midnight until the reception of Holy Communion (this Eucharistic Fast is from both food and liquids), which is required by the 1917 Code of Canon Law, was shortened in 1953 by Pope Pius XII to a 3-hour fast. In 1966, Pope Paul VI reduced the fast further to one hour, a rule included in the 1983 Code of Canon Law. Some traditional Catholics groups require fasting from midnight until they receive Holy Communion at Mass, while others will keep a Eucharistic fast for at least three hours.
- Kneeling to receive Communion directly upon the tongue, under the Host species alone, and from the hand of a cleric rather than a layperson. The SSPX regards the practice of receiving communion in the hand (though ancient and authorised by the Holy See) as an abuse.
- Women wearing a headcovering when praying at home and when worshipping inside a church which is discussed in 1 Corinthians 11 and required by the 1917 Code of Canon Law. Many Traditionalist Catholic women wear a veil, a hat, or a headscarf when praying at home and when worshipping inside a church.
Clothing and lifestyle
Traditional Catholics, with respect to male and female gender roles, often adhere to the doctrine of complementarianism.
The standards of clothing among Traditional Catholics, based on instructions given by Pope Pius XI and consequently promoted by the Purity Crusade of Mary Immaculate, is referred to as "Mary-like Modesty", which includes for women, wearing sleeves "extending at least to the elbows" and "skirts reaching below the knees", as well as having a neckline no more than two inches with the rest of the bodice fully covered.
It is commonplace for women who identify as traditionalist Catholics to wear a head covering (veil) while praying at home and attending celebrations of the Mass.
In the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church
Since the Second Vatican Council, various Eastern Catholic Churches have removed some practices and emphases that were derived from those of the Latin Church. Opposition to this has been given relatively high publicity with regard to the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC).
Background
Even before the Second Vatican Council, the Holy See declared it important to guard and preserve whole and entire forever the customs and distinct forms for administering the sacraments in use in the Eastern Catholic Churches (Pope Leo XIII, encyclical Orientalium Dignitas). Leo's successor Pope Pius X said that the priests of the newly created Russian Catholic Church should offer the Divine Liturgy Nec Plus, Nec Minus, Nec Aliter ("No more, No Less, No Different") than priests of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Old Believers.
In the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, liturgical de-latinization began with the 1930s corrections of the liturgical books by Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky. According to his biographer Cyril Korolevsky, Metropolitan Andrey opposed use of coercion against those who remained attached to Latin liturgical practices, fearing that any attempt to do so would lead to a Greek Catholic equivalent of the 1666 Schism within the Russian Orthodox Church.
De-latinization in the UGCC gained further momentum with the 1964 decree Orientalium Ecclesiarum of the Second Vatican Council) and several subsequent documents. Latinizations were discarded within the Ukrainian diaspora, while among Byzantine Catholics in Western Ukraine, forced into a clandestine existence following the Soviet ban on the UGCC, the latinizations remained, "an important component of their underground practices". In response, some priests, nuns, and candidates for the priesthood found themselves, "forced towards the periphery of the church since 1989 because of their wish to 'keep the tradition'." In some eparchies, particularly those of Ivano-Frankivsk and Ternopil-Zboriv, the bishops would immediately suspend any priest who, "displayed his inclination toward 'traditionalist' practices".
Vlad Naumescu reports that an article in the February 2003 issue of Patriayarkhat, the official journal of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, written by a student of the Ukrainian Catholic University, which since its 1994 foundation has been, "the strongest progressive voice within the Church". The article named priests and parishes in every eparchy in Ukraine as being involved in "a well-organized movement" and who described themselves as "traditionalists". According to the article, they constituted "a parallel structure" with connections with the Society of St. Pius X and with a charismatic leader in Fr. Basil Kovpak, the Pastor of St. Peter and Paul's Church in the suburb of Lviv-Riasne.
According to Vlad Naumescu, "Religious life in a traditionalist parish followed the model of the 'underground church.' Devotions were more intense, with each priest promoting his parish as a 'place of pilgrimage' for the neighboring areas, thus drawing larger crowds on Sunday than his local parish could provide. On Sundays and feast days, religious services took place three times a day (in Riasne), and the Sunday liturgy lasted for two and a half to three hours. The main religious celebrations took place outside the church in the middle of the neighborhood, and on every occasion traditionalists organized long processions through the entire locality. The community was strongly united by its common opponent, re-enacting the model of the 'defender of faith' common to times of repression. This model, which presupposes clear-cut attitudes and a firm moral stance, mobilized the community and reproduced the former determination of the 'underground' believers."
Priestly Society of Saint Josaphat
The Priestly Society of Saint Josaphat (SSJK), which operates a seminary, Basilian convent, and numerous parishes, receives priestly orders from the bishops of the SSPX. Its superior, Father Basil Kovpak, has accused the UGCC hierarchy of using intense psychological pressure against priests who are reluctant or unwilling to de-Latinise.
In 2003, Cardinal Liubomyr Huzar, Major Archbishops of Kyiv-Galicia, excommunicated Father Kovpak, but this act was later declared null and void by the Roman Rota due to lack of canonical form.
On 22 November 2006, Bishop Richard Williamson, who was then a member of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), ordained two priests and seven deacons in Warsaw, Poland, for the SSJK. Fr. John Jenkins, an SSPX priest who was present, later remarked, "We were all very edified by their piety, and I myself was astonished by the resemblance of the atmosphere amongst the seminarians with that which I knew in the seminary – this in spite of the difference of language, nationality and even rite."
Archeparch Ihor Vozniak of Lviv, the Archeparchy in which the PSSJ is most active, denounced the ordinations as a "criminal act", and condemned Fr. Kovpak's participation in the ceremony. He stressed that the two priests whom Bishop Williamson had ordained would not receive faculties within the Archeparchy. Officials of the Lviv archdiocese said that Kovpak could face excommunication, and that "'he deceives the church by declaring that he is a Greek (Byzantine) Catholic priest,' while supporting a group that uses the old Latin liturgy exclusively, eschewing the Byzantine tradition, and does not maintain allegiance to the Holy See."
Father Kovpak's excommunication process was restarted by the hierarchy of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church and was confirmed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on 23 November 2007.
Sedevacantism and Conclavism in the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church
Main article: Ukrainian Orthodox Greek Catholic ChurchIn March 2008 a group of Basilian priests in Pidhirtsi, Ukraine, announced that four of them had been consecrated as bishops in order to save the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) from heresy and apostasy and in August 2009, they announced the formation of the Ukrainian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church. Having elected Czech Basilian priest Fr. Anthony Elias Dohnal as "Patriarch Elijah", they declared that the Holy See was vacant, establishing the Ukrainian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church (UOGCC).
The group was promptly excommunicated by the UGCC, an act that was later confirmed by the Apostolic Signatura and the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith.
The UOGCC later "elected" a new Pope, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò the former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, in October 2019. Whether Viganò accepted this "election" is unclear.
There have been allegations in both The New York Times and the Lviv-based newspaper Expres that the church leadership is linked to the Russian intelligence services.
Relations with the Holy See
The Holy See recognises as fully legitimate the preference that many Catholics have for the earlier forms of worship. This was stated in Pope John Paul II's 1988 apostolic letter Ecclesia Dei and Pope Benedict XVI's 2007 motu proprio Summorum Pontificum. The Holy See does not extend its approval to those who oppose the present-day Church leadership, which is reiterated in Traditionis Custodes.
Ecclesia Dei Commission
The Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei was founded in July 1988 in the wake of John Paul II's apostolic letter Ecclesia Dei. Benedict XVI was a member of the Commission during his tenure as Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Speaking on 16 May 2007 to the Fifth General Conference of the Bishops of Latin America and the Caribbean, Cardinal Castrillón, the current head of the Commission, said his department had been founded for the care of those "traditionalist Catholics" who, while discontented with the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council, had broken with Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre "because they disagreed with his schismatic action in ordaining Bishops without the required papal mandate". He added that at present the Commission's activity is not limited to the service of those Catholics, nor to "the efforts undertaken to end the regrettable schismatic situation and secure the return of those brethren belonging to the Fraternity of Saint Pius X to full communion." It extends also, he said, to "satisfying the just aspirations of people, unrelated to the two aforementioned groups, who, because of their specific sensitiveness, wish to keep alive the earlier Latin liturgy in the celebration of the Eucharist and the other sacraments."
In 2019, Pope Francis suppressed this commission and transferred its responsibilities directly to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Validity of holy orders
The conferring of holy orders may be valid but illicit. The Catholic Church considers the orders of traditionalist clergy who are in good standing with the Holy See, such as the clergy of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter or the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest, to be both valid and licit. It sees as valid but illicit the orders of the bishops and priests of the Society of Saint Pius X, and accordingly considers them to be forbidden by law to exercise priestly offices, but still technically priests.
The Holy See declared devoid of canonical effect the consecration ceremony conducted by Archbishop Pierre Martin Ngô Đình Thục for the Carmelite Order of the Holy Face group on December 31,1975, while expressly refraining from pronouncing on its validity. It made the same statement with regard also to any later ordinations that those bishops might confer, saying that:
as for those who have already thus unlawfully received ordination or any who may yet accept ordination from these, whatever may be the validity of the orders (quidquid sit de ordinum validitate), the Church does not and will not recognise their ordination (ipsorum ordinationem), and will consider them, for all legal effects, as still in the state in which they were before, except that the penalties remain until they repent.
Demographics
See also: Preconciliar rites after the Second Vatican Council § DemographyIn 2005, Catholic World News reported that "the Vatican" estimated the number of those served by the Fraternity of St Peter, the Society of St Pius X and similar groups at "close to 1 million".
List of groups
Main article: Communities using the Tridentine MassThis section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
This is a list of notable traditionalist Catholic groups. Some are in full communion with the Holy See; some have irregular status according to doctrines and disciplines of the Catholic Church.
As of 2023, largest priestly communities described as traditionalist are Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) with 707 priests, Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP) with 368 priests, Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest (ICKSP) with 147 priests and Institute of the Good Shepherd (IBP) with 61 priests.
Canonically regular traditionalist groups
- Canons Regular of Saint John Cantius
- Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem
- Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce
- Fœderatio Internationalis Juventutem
- Fraternity of Saint Vincent Ferrer
- Heralds of the Gospel
- Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest
- Institute of the Good Shepherd
- Latin Mass Society of England and Wales
- Militia Templi; The Poor Knights of Christ also called the Order of the Poor Knights of Christ
- Personal Apostolic Administration of Saint John Mary Vianney
- Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter
- Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary (Still River, MA group only)
- Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer
- Dimes Square Catholics
Canonically irregular traditionalist groups
- Society of Saint Pius X
- Fraternite Notre Dame
- Servants of the Holy Family
- Priestly Society of Saint Josaphat
- Missionaries of St. John the Baptist in Park Hills, Kentucky
Sedevacantist groups
Sedeprivationist groups
Conclavist groups
See also
Doctrinal and liturgical issues
- Cafeteria Catholicism
- Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus
- Feeneyism
- Second Vatican Council
- Mass of Paul VI
- Sedevacantism
- Tridentine Mass
- Catholic fundamentalism
Comparable phenomena in other churches
- Old Believers, a comparable phenomenon in the Russian Orthodox Church which dates back to the 17th century
- True Orthodoxy, Old Calendarism and the Catacomb Church—comparable phenomena in the Eastern Orthodox Church that date to the 1920s
- Continuing Anglican movement, a comparable phenomenon in the Anglican Communion
- Confessing Movement, a similar movement in Mainline Protestant denominations
Other
- Old Catholicism, which started in comparable circumstances surrounding papal infallibility and the First Vatican Council
- Independent Catholicism
- Freedom of religion in Germany § Censorship, for a discussion about a traditionalist Catholic news service which was shut down
- The Remnant – an American newspaper dedicated to traditionalist themes
- Cardinal Newman Society, American group focused on traditional education
- Land O'Lakes Statement 1967 manifesto that angered traditionalists
References
- Collinge, William J. (2012). "Traditionalism". Historical Dictionary of Catholicism. Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements Series (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 433–434. ISBN 978-0-8108-7979-9. LCCN 2011035077.
- ^ "Radical Traditional Catholicism", Intelligence Files, Southern Poverty Law Center, 2011
- Ochstein, Jennifer (7 September 2017). "A progressive, feminist evangelical considers joining the Catholic Church". America Magazine. Retrieved 26 April 2021.
- "Library : Schismatic Traditionalists". www.catholicculture.org. Retrieved 2023-07-12.
- Allitt, Patrick (1993). Catholic intellectuals and conservative politics in America, 1950–1985. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-8014-2295-9.
- ^ Dugan, George (6 January 1974). "Latin Mass of Old Is Luring Catholics". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- "Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church concerning the remission of the excommunication of the four Bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre (March 10, 2009) | BENEDICT XVI". www.vatican.va.
- ^ Pasulka, Diana Walsh (2015). Heaven Can Wait: Purgatory in Catholic Devotional and Popular Culture. Oxford University Press. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-19-538202-0.
- "Pope lifts excommunications of Lefebvrite bishops". Catholicnews.com. 27 January 2009. Archived from the original on January 31, 2009. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- "New pastoral provisions for Sacrament of Marriage for SSPX". Retrieved 2 November 2017.
- Villagran, Lauren (25 December 2013). "Men come to monastery 'to seek God'". Albuquerque Journal. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
- Lamb, Christopher (2017-04-05). "Francis grants SSPX right to celebrate marriage in sign of reconciliation". The Tablet. Retrieved 2023-05-30.
- ^ Collinge, William J. (23 February 2012). Historical Dictionary of Catholicism. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 9780810879799. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
- ^ Weaver, Mary Jo; Scott Appleby, R. (1995). Being Right. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253329221. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
- ^ Fundamentalisms Observed. University of Chicago Press. July 1994. ISBN 9780226508788. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
- A more comprehensive list of objections can be found at "Letter of 'the Nine' to Abp. Marcel Lefebvre", The Roman Catholic, Traditional mass, May 1983
- "Obituary of The Most Reverend Clarence J. Kelly | Dufresne & Cavanaugh Funeral Home". dufresneandcavanaugh.com. Retrieved 2023-12-11.
- "CatholicHerald.co.uk » Prefect of the CDF says seeing Vatican II as a 'rupture' is heresy". Retrieved 15 February 2015.
- "Address of His Holiness Benedict XVI to the Roman Curia offering them his Christmas greetings". Vatican.va. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- "Cardinal Ratzinger's Address to Bishops of Chile". Archived from the original on 15 July 2007. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
- O'Connell, Gerard (December 6, 2016). "Pope Francis: There will be no 'reform of the reform' of the liturgy". America.
- Sanborn, Donald J. (1992). Communion: Ratzinger's New Ecclesiology (PDF).
- Wrighton, Basil (16 January 2014), Collegiality: error of Vatican II, Society of Saint Pius X, retrieved 3 March 2015
- Fr. Brian W. Harrison, O.S. Vatican II and Religious Liberty: Contradiction or Continuity? catholic.net
- "On Waffling, Tradition and the Magisterium". Catholicculture.org. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- Schluenderfritz, Malcolm (2022-03-30). "Is it so different?". Where Peter Is. Retrieved 2023-05-30.
- Michael W. Cuneo, The Smoke of Satan: Conservative and Traditionalist Dissent in Contemporary American Catholicism (JHU Press, 1999 ISBN 0-8018-6265-5, ISBN 978-0-8018-6265-6), p. 119
- Likoudis, James; Whitehead, Kenneth D. (1982). The Pope, the Council, and the Mass: answers to the questions the "traditionalists" are asking (41 ed.). W. Hanover, Mass: Christopher Publ. House. ISBN 978-0-8158-0400-0.
- Chadwick, Kay (2000). Catholicism, Politics and Society in Twentieth-century France. Liverpool University Press. ISBN 9780853239741. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
- "Radical Traditionalist Catholics Spew Anti-Semitic Hate, Commit Violence Against Jews", Southern Poverty Law Center, 2006
- Phillips, Maggie (12 July 2022). "Back to the Land". Tablet Magazine. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
- Code of Canon Law, canon 928 (emphasis added)
- "Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum on the "Roman liturgy prior to the reform of 1970" (July 7, 2007) | BENEDICT XVI". www.vatican.va.
- "Letter to the Bishops that accompanies the Apostolic Letter "Motu Proprio data" Summorum Pontificum on the Roman liturgy prior to the reform of 1970 (July 7, 2007) | BENEDICT XVI". www.vatican.va.
- "Summorum Pontificum, art. 2". Sanctamissa.org. Archived from the original on 10 October 2012. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- "Summorum Pontificum, art. 4". Sanctamissa.org. Archived from the original on 10 October 2012. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- "Summorum Pontificum, art. 5". Sanctamissa.org. Archived from the original on 10 October 2012. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- "Press Release from the General Superior of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, 7 July 2007". Fsspx.org. 17 June 2011. Archived from the original on 19 February 2009. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- Allen, Elise Ann (16 July 2021). "Francis reverses Benedict's liberalization of use of older Latin Mass". Crux. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
- "Motu proprio Sacram communionem". Ewtn.com. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- "Canon 919". Intratext.com. 4 May 2007. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- "Lesson 28 — Holy Communion". Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen. 6 September 2016. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
3. All Catholics may receive Holy Communion after fasting three hours from food and alcoholic drinks and one hour from non-alcoholic drinks. This rule applies to Holy Communion at midnight Mass as well as at Masses celebrated in the morning, afternoon or evening. A priest's permission is not needed. 4. Catholics are urged to observe the eucharistic fast from midnight as formerly, and also to compensate for the use of the new privileges by works of charity and penance, but these practices are not obligatory.
- Mater Dei Latin Mass Parish (2017-02-23). "Fasting and Abstinence - Current and Traditional Practices". Mater Dei Catholic Parish. Retrieved 2023-05-30.
- Anscar J. Chupungco, Handbook for Liturgical Studies: The Eucharist (Liturgical Press, 1999 ISBN 0-8146-6163-7, ISBN 978-0-8146-6163-5) p. 307
- Michael Kunzler, The Church's Liturgy (LIT Verlag Berlin-Hamburg-Münster, 2001 ISBN 3-8258-4854-X, 9783825848545), p. 241
- Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship, Letter "En réponse a la demande" to presidents of those conferences of bishops petitioning the indult for communion in the hand, 29 May 1969 published also in Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 61 (1969) 546–547
- Why should Catholics have nothing to do with the Novus Ordo Missae?. sspx.org
- ^ Fisher, Simcha (3 December 2019). "The types of women who veil at Mass". America Magazine. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
- Cieslik, Emma (4 October 2021). ""Smells and Bells": Catholic Material Religion in Twenty-First-Century America". Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage. Retrieved 11 October 2024.
- Schar, Amanda. "Feminism and Faith: How Women Find Empowerment in the Roman Catholic Church" (2019). Celebration of Learning.
- Moczar, Diane (2013). The Church Under Attack: Five Hundred Years that Split the Church and Scattered the Flock. Sophia Institute Press. p. 202. ISBN 978-1-933184-93-7.
- Evans, Rachel Held (2012). A Year of Biblical Womanhood. Thomas Nelson. p. 126. ISBN 978-1-59555-367-6.
- Pope Leo XIIl (30 November 1894). "Orientalium dignitas". Retrieved 15 February 2015.
- "Eastern Catholic Churches and the Question of 'Uniatism'". ResearchGate.
- George Thomas Kurian; Mark A. Lamport (10 November 2016). Encyclopedia of Christianity in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 1724. ISBN 978-1-4422-4432-0.
- Cyril Korolevsky, Metropolitan Andrew (1868–1944), Translated and Edited by Fr. Serge Keleher. Stauropegion Brotherhood, Lviv, 1993.
- Stéphanie Mahieu and Vlad Naumescu (2008), Churches In-between: Greek Catholic Churches in Postsocialist Europe, Halle Studies in the Anthropology of Eurasia. Page 162, Footnote 10.
- Stéphanie Mahieu and Vlad Naumescu (2008), Churches In-between: Greek Catholic Churches in Postsocialist Europe, Halle Studies in the Anthropology of Eurasia. Pages 164–165.
- Vlad Naumescu, "Continuities and Ruptures of a Religious Tradition: Making ‘Orthodoxy’ in the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church" in Stephanie Mahieu, Vlad Naumescu (editors), Churches In-between: Greek Catholic Churches in Postsocialist Europe (LIT Verlag Münster 2008), pp. 161–162, ISBN 978-3-8258-9910-3
- Stephanie Mahieu, Vlad Naumescu (editors), Churches In-between: Greek Catholic Churches in Postsocialist Europe (LIT Verlag Münster 2008), page 164. ISBN 978-3-8258-9910-3
- "La Porte Latine - Jenkins anglais". Archived from the original on 23 August 2006. Retrieved 11 August 2006.
- The Holy See likewise declared SSPX priests "suspended from exercising their priestly functions" (Letter of Monsignor Camille Perl, Secretary of the Ecclesia Dei Commission Archived 2 February 2003 at the Wayback Machine). A minority of them - ordained before 1976 by archbishop Marcel Lefebvre for the SSPX - remain incardinated in several European dioceses. They are thus in the same position as excommunicated Kovpak, who is incardinated in the Ukrainian Archdiocese of Lviv. The newly ordained clergy, however, are not incardinated into any Ukrainian Catholic diocese, and thus are not clergy of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.
- Catholic World News: Byzantine Catholics decry Lefebvrite inroads into Ukraine The accusation of "eschewing the Byzantine tradition" refers to Father Kovpak's championing of Latinising elements which were followed by Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church since the 17th century, but forcibly purged following the Second Vatican Council.
- Ukrainian priest excommunicated Catholic World News, 21 November 2007
- Decree of Establishment of the UOGCC. Uogcc.org.ua (11 August 2009). Retrieved on 2013-07-04.
- Declaration of an excommunication upon Pope Benedict XVI and John Paul II. Uogcc.org.ua. Retrieved on 4 July 2013.
- "Pastoral letter for the Catholic Church".
- "UOGCC / English / About Church". uogcc.org.ua. Retrieved 2023-10-09.
- "Vatican Says Excommunication of "Pidhirtsi Fathers" Final". risu.org.ua. 2012-04-02. Archived from the original on 2012-04-02. Retrieved 2023-10-09.
- NULL (2012-03-29). "Dichiarazione della Santa Sede sui "sedicenti vescovi greco-cattolici di Pidhirci"". ZENIT - Italiano (in Italian). Retrieved 2023-10-09.
- "Habemus papam |". Retrieved 2023-10-09.
- Andrew Higgins (June 21, 2014). "Ukrainian Church Faces Obscure Pro-Russia Revolt In Its Own Ranks"". The New York Times
- Weinandy, Thomas; Cavadini, John; Healy, Mary (2022-12-01). "A Synoptic Look at the Failures and Successes of Post-Vatican II Liturgical Reforms". Church Life Journal. Retrieved 2023-05-30.
- The text of Cardinal Castrillón's speech, in the language in which he gave it, can be consulted at Intervención sobre Ecclesia Dei-16 de mayo de 2007 Archived 25 May 2007 at the Wayback Machine (Retrieved 17 May 2007) or at Intervención sobre Ecclesia Dei – Card. Darío Castrillón Hoyos, Presidente Ecclesia Dei (Retrieved 7 December 2008). English translations may be consulted at Rorate Caeli (Retrieved 7 December 2008), and extracts are given in English at Adoremus Bulletin Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine(Retrieved 7 December 2008).
- Tornielli, Andrea (19 January 2019). "Ecclesia Dei, exceptional nature ends". Vatican News. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
- See especially Canons 1012–1023
- Letter of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI to the Bishops of the Catholic Church concerning the remission of the excommunication of the four Bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre by Pope Benedict XVI concerning his remission of the excommunication of the four bishops of the Society of St Pius X
- Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Decree Episcopi qui alios of 17 September 1976 – Acta Apostolicae Sedis 1976, page 623.
- McCaffrey, Roger A.; Woods Jr., Thomas E. (May 2005). "Catholic World News : "All We Ask is for the Mass"". Cwnews.com. Archived from the original on 2 February 2006. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
- Meltzer, Marisa (July 25, 2022). "Dimes Square Gets the Hotel It Deserves". The New York Times. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
Further reading
- Hull, Geoffrey (2010). The Banished Heart: Origins of Heteropraxis in the Catholic Church. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 9780567442208.
- Jarvis, Edward (2018). Sede Vacante: The Life and Legacy of Archbishop Thuc. Berkeley, CA: The Apocryphile Press. ISBN 9781949643022. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
- Jungmann, Joseph (1986). The Mass Of The Roman Rite: Its Origins and Development (Missarum Sollemnia). Vol. 1. Allen, TX: Christian Classics. ISBN 0870611666.
- Manning, Christel (1999). God Gave Us the Right: Conservative Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, and Orthodox Jewish Women Grapple with Feminism. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 0813525993.
- Margry, Peter Jan (2019). "The Global Network of Deviant Revelatory Marian Movements". In Maunder, Chris (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Mary. NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 662–683. ISBN 9780198792550.
- Radecki, CMRI, Frs. Francisco and Dominic (2004). Tumultuous Times. Wayne, MI / Newhall, CA: St.Joseph's Media. ISBN 0971506108.
- Sinke Guimarães, Atila (1997). In the Murky Waters of Vatican II. Metairie: MAETA. ISBN 1889168068.
- Weaver, Mary Jo; Appleby, R. Scott (1995). Being Right: Conservative Catholics in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 9780253209993. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
Second Vatican Council | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Documents |
| ||||||||||
People |
| ||||||||||
General | |||||||||||
Other | |||||||||||
Criticism | |||||||||||
Society of Saint Pius X | ||
---|---|---|
History |
| |
People |
| |
General | ||
SSPX-affiliated religious orders |
| |
Derivatives |
| |
Related | ||
Palmarian Church | ||
---|---|---|
History | ||
Popes |
| |
See also | ||