Revision as of 00:32, 26 October 2014 editFrosty (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,249 edits Undid revision 631121075 by 50.103.148.57 (talk) Not neutral, not so much as one source. All of this is OR.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:04, 22 December 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,810 edits Reformat 2 archive links. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20 | ||
(934 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Feminist movement, 1990s–2020s}} | |||
{{multiple issues| | |||
{{Feminism sidebar|expanded=history}} | |||
{{globalize/US|date=February 2013}} | |||
] in 2003. The term ''third wave'' is credited to Walker's 1992 article, "Becoming the Third Wave."<ref name=Walker1992/>]] | |||
{{lead too short|date=August 2013}} | |||
'''Third-wave feminism''' is a ] that began in the early 1990s,{{sfn|Evans|2015|loc=22}} prominent in the decades prior to the ].<ref>{{cite book|first=Nicola|last=Rivers|title=Postfeminism(s) and the Arrival of the Fourth Wave|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|year=2017|at=8}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Cochrane|first=Kira|author-link=Kira Cochrane|title=The Fourth Wave of Feminism: Meet the Rebel Women|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/10/fourth-wave-feminism-rebel-women|newspaper=The Guardian|date=10 December 2013|access-date=2 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314123922/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/10/fourth-wave-feminism-rebel-women|archive-date=14 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Grounded in the civil-rights advances of the ], ] third-wave feminists born in the 1960s and 1970s embraced ] and ] in women, and sought to redefine what it meant to be a feminist.{{sfn|Evans|2015|loc=22}}<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190528171627/https://www.britannica.com/topic/feminism/The-third-wave-of-feminism#ref1228639 |date=2019-05-28 }}, ''Encyclopaedia Britannica''.</ref><ref name="Baumgardner_Richards">{{harvnb|Baumgardner|Richards|2000|p=77}}</ref> The third wave saw the emergence of new feminist currents and theories, such as ], ], ], ], and ]. According to feminist scholar Elizabeth Evans, the "confusion surrounding what constitutes third-wave feminism is in some respects its defining feature."{{sfn|Evans|2015|loc=49}} | |||
{{POV|date=March 2014}} | |||
{{Undue|date=May 2014}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Feminism sidebar |History}} | |||
The third wave is traced to ]'s televised testimony in 1991 to an all-male all-white ] that the judge ] had ] her. The term ''third wave'' is credited to ], who responded to Thomas's appointment to the Supreme Court with an article in '']'' magazine, "Becoming the Third Wave" (1992).<ref></ref><ref name=Walker1992>{{cite journal| last1 = Walker| first1 = Rebecca| author-link1 = Rebecca Walker| title = Becoming the Third Wave| journal = ]| pages = 39–41| issn = 0047-8318| oclc = 194419734| date = January 1992| url = http://www.msmagazine.com/spring2002/BecomingThirdWaveRebeccaWalker.pdf| access-date = 2016-10-13| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170115202333/http://www.msmagazine.com/spring2002/BecomingThirdWaveRebeccaWalker.pdf| archive-date = 2017-01-15| url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="Baumgardner_Richards"/> She wrote: | |||
'''Third-wave feminism''' is a term identified with several diverse strains of ] activity and study, whose exact boundaries in the history of feminism are a subject of debate, but are generally marked as beginning in the early 1990s and continuing to the present. The movement arose partially as a response to the perceived failures of and backlash against initiatives and movements created by ] during the 1960s, '70s, and '80s, and the perception that women are of "many colors, ethnicities, nationalities, religions and cultural backgrounds".<ref name="Tong">{{Cite book|last=Tong|first=Rosemarie|title=Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction|year=2009|edition=Third|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=978-0-8133-4375-4|oclc=156811918|pages=284–285, 289}}</ref> ] coined the term "third-wave feminism" in a 1992 essay. It has been proposed that Walker has become somewhat of a symbol of the third wave's focus on ] and non-white women.<ref></ref> As political and economic equality has been granted to women in most parts of the western world,{{cn|date=September 2014}} Third Wave feminists have broadened their goals, focusing on ideas like queer theory, abolishing gender roles and stereotypes, and defending sex work, pornography, reproductive rights, and sex-positivity.{{cn|date=September 2014}} | |||
{{blockquote|So I write this as a plea to all women, especially women of my generation: Let Thomas' confirmation serve to remind you, as it did me, that the fight is far from over. Let this dismissal of a woman's experience move you to anger. Turn that outrage into political power. Do not vote for them unless they work for us. Do not have sex with them, do not break bread with them, do not nurture them if they don't prioritize our freedom to control our bodies and our lives. I am not a post-feminism feminist. I am the Third Wave.<ref></ref><ref name="Walker1992" />}} | |||
==Purpose== | |||
The shift from second wave feminism came about with many of the legal and institutional rights that were extended to women. In addition to these institutional gains, third-wave feminists believed there needed to be further changes in stereotypes, media portrayals, and language to define women. Third-wave ideology focuses on a more ] interpretation of gender and sexuality.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hardin|first=Marie|author2=Whiteside, Erin|chapter=From Second-Wave to Poststructuralist Feminism|title=The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies: Media Effects/Media Psychology|year=2013|doi=10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems991|url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems991/pdf|publisher=Blackwell}}</ref> In "Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism," ] describes how language has been used as a way to understand the world, however, "post-structuralists insist that words and texts have no fixed or intrinsic meanings, that there is no transparent or self-evident relationship between them and either ideas or things, no basic or ultimate correspondence between language and the world"<ref>W. Scott, Joan. (1941). "Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism."</ref> Thus, while language has been used to create binaries (such as male/female), post-structuralists see these binaries as artificial constructs created to maintain the power of dominant groups.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Poststructural feminism in education: An overview|journal=International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education|year=2000|volume=13|issue=5|pages=477–515|doi=10.1080/09518390050156422|author=Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre}}</ref> | |||
Walker sought to establish that third-wave feminism was not just a reaction but a movement in itself because the feminist cause had more work ahead. The term '']'' to describe the idea that women experience "layers of oppression" caused, for example, by gender, race, and class had been introduced by ] in 1989, and it was during the third wave that the concept flourished.{{sfn|Evans|2015|loc=19}} | |||
==Elements== | |||
Third-wave theory usually incorporates elements of ], ] and ] consciousness; ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], new ], ] politics, and a rejection of the ].{{citation needed|date=November 2013}} Also considered part of the third wave is ], a celebration of ] as a positive aspect of life, with broader definitions of what ] means and what ] and ] may imply in the context of sex.{{citation needed|date=May 2014}} For example, many third-wave feminists have reconsidered the opposition to ] and ] of the second wave, and challenge existing beliefs that participants in pornography and sex work are always being exploited.<ref name="Johnson">{{Cite book|editor-last=Johnson|editor-first=Merri Lisa|title=Jane Sexes It Up: True Confessions of Feminist Desire|year=2002|publisher=]|location=New York|isbn=978-1-56858-180-4|oclc=49515674}}</ref> | |||
In addition, third-wave feminism is traced to the emergence of the ] feminist ] in ], in the early 1990s.{{efn|Steve Feliciano (New York Public Library, 2013): "The emergence of the Riot Grrrl movement began in the early 1990s, when a group of women in Olympia, Washington, held a meeting to discuss how to address sexism in the punk scene. The women decided they wanted to start a 'girl riot' against a society they felt offered no validation of women's experiences. And thus the Riot Grrrl movement was born."<ref>{{cite web|last1=Feliciano|first1=Steve|title=The Riot Grrrl Movement|url=http://www.nypl.org/blog/2013/06/19/riot-grrrl-movement|publisher=New York Public Library|date=19 June 2013|access-date=2 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190403081524/https://www.nypl.org/blog/2013/06/19/riot-grrrl-movement|archive-date=3 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>}} As feminists came online in the late 1990s and early 2000s and reached a global audience with blogs and e-]s, they broadened their goals, focusing on abolishing gender-role stereotypes and expanding feminism to include women with diverse racial and cultural identities.<ref name=Brunell2008/><ref name=Tong>{{cite book |last=Tong |first=Rosemarie |title=Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction |year=2009 |edition=Third |publisher=Westview Press |location=Boulder, CO |isbn=978-0-8133-4375-4 |oclc=156811918 |pages=284–285, 289}}</ref> | |||
==New generations and feminism== | |||
Third-wave feminists such as Elle Green often focus on "micro-politics", and challenge the second wave's paradigm as to what is, or is not, good for women.<ref name="Freedman">{{Cite book |last=Freedman|first=Estelle B. |title=No Turning Back: The History of Feminism and the Future of Women|year=2002 |publisher=] |location=London| oclc=49193867}}</ref><ref name="Henry">{{Cite book|last=Henry|first=Astrid |title=Not My Mother's Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism|year=2004|publisher=] |location=] |oclc=53932637}}</ref><ref name="Gillis">{{Cite book |editor-last=Gillis| editor-first=Stacy|editor2-last=Howie| editor2-first=Gillian| editor3-last=Munford| editor3-first=Rebecca |title=Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration|edition=Expanded Second| year=2007| publisher=]|location=] |isbn=978-0-230-52174-2| oclc=77795615}}</ref><ref name="Faludi">{{Cite book| last=Faludi| first=Susan| title=Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women |year=1991 |publisher=] |location=New York| isbn=978-0-517-57698-4| oclc=23016353}}</ref> | |||
== History == | |||
Proponents of third-wave feminism claim that it allows women to define ] for themselves by incorporating their own identities into the belief system of what feminism is and what it can become through one's own perspective. In the introduction to the idea of third-wave feminism in ''Manifesta'', authors ] and ] suggest that feminism can change with every generation and individual: | |||
{{Further|First-wave feminism|Second-wave feminism|Feminist sex wars|Fourth-wave feminism}} | |||
The rights and programs gained by feminists of the second wave served as a foundation for the third wave. The gains included ] (equal access to education), public discussion about the abuse and rape of women, access to contraception and other reproductive services (including the legalization of abortion), the creation and enforcement of sexual-harassment policies for women in the workplace, the creation of domestic-abuse shelters for women and children, child-care services, educational funding for young women, and ] programs. | |||
Feminists of color such as ], ], ], ], ], ] and the members of the ] sought to negotiate a space within feminist thought for consideration of race.<ref name="Gillis" /><ref name="Heywood">{{Cite book|editor-last=Heywood|editor-first=Leslie|editor2-last=Drake|editor2-first=Jennifer|title=Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism|year=1997|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=978-0-8166-3005-9|oclc=36876149|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/thirdwaveagendab0000unse}}</ref> Cherríe Moraga and Gloria E. Anzaldúa had published the anthology '']'' (1981), which, along with '']'' (1982), edited by ], ], and ], argued that second-wave feminism had focused primarily on the problems of white women. The emphasis on the intersection between race and gender became increasingly prominent. However, allowing third wave feminism to adopt the paradigm of intersectionality can erase the narrative of second-wave feminist of color who worked towards inclusion.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/344074469 |title=No permanent waves: recasting histories of U.S. feminism |date=2010 |publisher=Rutgers University Press |isbn=978-0-8135-4724-4 |editor-last=Hewitt |editor-first=Nancy A. |location=New Brunswick, N.J |oclc=344074469}}</ref> | |||
{{quote|The fact that feminism is no longer limited to arenas where we expect to see it – ], '']'', ], and redsuited ] – perhaps means that young women today have really reaped what feminism has sown. Raised after ] and '']'' <nowiki>]<nowiki>]</nowiki>, young women emerged from college or high school or two years of marriage or their first job and began challenging some of the received wisdom of the past ten or twenty years of feminism. We're not doing feminism the same way that the seventies feminists did it; being liberated doesn't mean copying what came before but finding one's own way-- a way that is genuine to one's own generation.<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" />}} | |||
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the ] arose as a reaction against the ] of the second wave and ], countering with a concept of "]", and heralding the third wave.<ref name="end">As noted in: | |||
Some third-wave feminists prefer not to call themselves feminists, as the word ''feminist'' can be misinterpreted as insensitive to the ] and the potential ]s inherent in all ], or perhaps misconstrued as exclusive or elitist by critics.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}} Others have kept and redefined the term to include these ideas.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}} Third-wave feminism seeks to challenge any universal definition of femininity.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}} In the introduction of ''To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism'', the Third Wave Foundation founder and leader ] writes: | |||
*{{cite book |author1=Duggan, Lisa |author2=Hunter, Nan D. |title=Sex wars: sexual dissent and political culture |year=1995 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |isbn=978-0-415-91036-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/sexwarssexualdis0000dugg }} | |||
*{{cite book |author=Hansen, Karen Tranberg |author2=Philipson, Ilene J. |title=Women, class, and the feminist imagination: a socialist-feminist reader |year=1990 |publisher=Temple University Press |location=Philadelphia |isbn=978-0-87722-630-7 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/womenclassfemini0000unse }} | |||
*{{cite book |author=Gerhard, Jane F. |title=Desiring revolution: second-wave feminism and the rewriting of American sexual thought, 1920 to 1982 |year=2001 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-231-11204-8}} | |||
*{{cite book |author=Leidholdt, Dorchen |author-link=Dorchen Leidholdt |author2=Raymond, Janice G |title=The Sexual liberals and the attack on feminism |year=1990 |publisher=Pergamon Press |location=New York|isbn=978-0-08-037457-4}} | |||
*{{cite book |author=Vance, Carole S |title=Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality |year=1989 |publisher=Thorsons Publishers |isbn=978-0-04-440593-1}}</ref> | |||
Another crucial point for the start of the third wave is the publication in 1990 of '']'' by ], which soon became one of the most influential works of contemporary ]. In it, Butler argued against homogenizing conceptions of "women", which had a normative and exclusionary effect not only in the social world more broadly but also within feminism. This was the case not only for racialized or working-class women, but also for ], ], or ] women.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Butler |first1=Judith |title=Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity |date=1999 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |pages=160, 9 |edition=2nd}}</ref> They outlined their theory of gender as ], which posited that gender works by enforcing a series of repetitions of verbal and non-verbal acts that generate the "illusion" of a coherent and intelligible gender expression and identity, which would otherwise ].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Mikkola |first1=Mari |title=Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-gender/ |website=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=18 June 2022 |date=18 January 2022}}</ref> Lastly, Butler developed the claim that there is no "natural" ], but that what we call as such is always already culturally mediated, and therefore inseparable from gender.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Butler |first1=Judith |title=Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity |date=1990 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |page=12}}</ref> These views were foundational for the field of ], and played a major role in the development of third-wave feminist theories and practices.<ref>{{cite web|last=Rottenberg|first=Catherine|title=Judith Butler|url=http://www.litencyc.com/php/speople.php?rec=true&UID=5173|publisher=The Literary Encyclopedia|access-date=18 June 2022|date=27 August 2003}}</ref> | |||
{{quote|Whether the young women who refuse the feminist label realize it or not, on some level they recognize that an ideal woman born of prevalent notions of how empowered women look, act, or think is simply another impossible contrivance of perfect womanhood, another scripted role to perform in the name of biology and virtue.<ref name="Walker" />}} | |||
== |
==Early years== | ||
Third-wave feminism deals with issues which appear to limit or oppress women, as well as other marginalized identities. ] activism, which has been referred to as "the collective critical reconstitution of the meaning of women’s social experience, as women live through it"<ref>A. Mackinnon, Catharine. (1991). "Toward A Feminist Theory of the State." Harvard University press.</ref> {{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} In their book ''Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism and the Future'', ] and ] write: | |||
===Anita Hill=== | |||
{{quote|Consciousness among women is what caused this , and consciousness, one's ability to open their mind to the fact that male domination does affect the women of our generation, is what we need... The presence of feminism in our lives is taken for granted. For our generation, feminism is like fluoride. We scarcely notice we have it – it's simply in the water.<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" />}} | |||
{{main|Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination}} | |||
], 2014]] | |||
In 1991, ], when questioned, accused ], an African-American judge who had been nominated to the ], of ]. Thomas denied the accusations, calling them a "high-tech lynching". After extensive debate, the ] voted 52–48 in favor of Thomas.<ref name="Gillis" /><ref name="Heywood" /><ref name="Walker">{{Cite book|last=Walker|first=Rebecca|title=To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism|year=1995|publisher=Anchor Books|location=New York|isbn=978-0-385-47262-3|oclc=32274323|url=https://archive.org/details/toberealtelling00walk}}</ref> In response, ''Ms. Magazine'' published an article by ], entitled "Becoming the Third Wave", in which she stated: "I am not a post-feminism feminist. I am the third wave." Many had argued that Thomas should be confirmed, despite Hill's accusations, because of his plans to create opportunities for people of color. When Walker asked her partner his opinion and he said the same thing, she asked: "When will progressive black men prioritize my rights and well-being?" She wanted racial equality but without dismissing women.<ref name="Walker1992"/> | |||
In 1992, dubbed the "]", four women entered the ] to join the two already there. The following year, another woman, ], won a special election, bringing the number to seven. The 1990s saw the US's first female ] (]) and ] (]), as well as the second woman on the Supreme Court, ], and the first US ], ], to have had an independent political, legal and activist career. | |||
Feminist scholars such as ] object to the "wave construct" because it ignores important progress between the so-called waves. Furthermore, if feminism is a global movement, she feels the fact that the "first-, second-, and third waves time periods correspond most closely to American feminist developments" raises serious problems about how feminism recognizes the history of political issues around the world.<ref name="Tarrant">{{Cite book|last=Tarrant|first=Shira|title=When Sex Became Gender|page=222|year=2006|publisher=]|location=New York|isbn=978-0-415-95347-4|oclc=62281555}}</ref> | |||
===Riot grrrl=== | |||
Arguably, the biggest challenge to the efforts of third-wave feminism is the decline in popular support for the relevance and importance of feminism in what some claim is the "post-feminist" era. Manon Tremblay refers to this phenomenon as the "antifeminist undercurrent" of the West. Here, a concern for what Amy Friedman calls third-wave feminism's "radical fanaticism" is expressed.<ref name="tremblay">Tremblay, Manon. "Gender and Society: Rights and Realities." Canada and the United States: Differences that Count. Ed. David Thomas. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 1993.</ref> Essentially, the claim is that gender equality has already been achieved via the first two waves, and that further attempts to push for women's rights are either irrelevant and unnecessary, or are excessively pushing the pendulum towards advantaging women over men and exaggerating the state of women in modern western society. Indeed, we see this very issue manifesting itself in the heated debates over whether or not affirmative action initiatives really are creating societal gender equality, or are actually disadvantaging/punishing white, middle-class, males for a biological history that they have merely inherited.<ref>Newman, Jacquetta A., and Linda A. White. Women, Politics, and Public Policy: The Political Struggles of Canadian Women. Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford UP, 2012. 14–15. Print.</ref> | |||
], lead singer of ], 1991]] | |||
The emergence of ], the feminist ], in the early 1990s in ], marked the beginning of third-wave feminism.<ref name=Piepmeier2009p45>{{cite book|first=Alison|last=Piepmeier|title=Girl Zines: Making Media, Doing Feminism|location=New York|publisher=New York University Press|year=2009|page=45}}</ref> The triple "r" in ''grrrl'' was intended to reclaim the word ''girl'' for women.<ref name=Rowe-Finbeiner>{{cite book|title=The F Word: Feminism in Jeopardy|last=Rowe-Finkbeiner|first=Kristin|year=2004|publisher=Seal Press|location=Emeryville, CA|page=|isbn=978-1-58005-114-9|url=https://archive.org/details/fwordfeminisminj00rowe/page/85}}</ref> ] writes that riot grrrl and ]'s ''Action Girl Newsletter'' formulated "a style, rhetoric, and iconography for grrrl ]" that came to define third-wave feminism,<ref name=Piepmeier2009p45/> and that focused on the viewpoint of adolescent girls.<ref>Starr, Chelsea (2000). "Adolescent girls and feminism", in Code, Lorraine (ed.). ''Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories''. London and New York: Routledge, p. 3. {{ISBN|0-415-30885-2}}.</ref> Based on hard-core ], the movement created zines and art, talked about rape, patriarchy, sexuality, and female empowerment, started chapters, and supported and organized women in music.<ref name=Schilt>Schilt, Kristen (2003). {{"'}}A Little Too Ironic': The Appropriation and Packaging of Riot Grrrl Politics by Mainstream Female Musicians", in ''Popular Music and Society'', 26.</ref> An undated<sup>but collected by 2013</sup> ] tour flier asked "What is Riot grrrl?": | |||
{{blockquote|BECAUSE in every form of media I see us/myself slapped, decapitated, laughed at, objectified, raped, trivialized, pushed, ignored, stereotyped, kicked, scorned, molested, silenced, invalidated, knifed, shot, choked, and killed. ... BECAUSE a safe space needs to be created for girls where we can open our eyes and reach out to each other without being threatened by this sexist society and our day to day bullshit. ... BECAUSE we girls want to create mediums that speak to US. We are tired of boy band after boy band, boy zine after boy zine, boy punk after boy punk after boy. BECAUSE I am tired of these things happening to me; I'm not a fuck toy. I'm not a punching bag. I'm not a joke.<ref>{{cite book|editor1-last = Darms|editor1-first = Lisa|title = The Riot Grrrl Collection|publisher = The Feminist Press at the City University of New York|year= 2013 |isbn = 978-1558618220|at = 168}}</ref>}} | |||
In response to such sentiments, we can trace many previously self-proclaimed feminists crossing the floor to becoming self-proclaimed post-feminists, claiming that the strands of feminism extant today are out of sync with the reality of the success story of women's gains.<ref name="steenbergen">Steenbergen, Candis (2001). . Retrieved on 5 June 2013.</ref> The popular media has played a large role in propounding this image of radical feminists{{Citation needed|date=May 2014}}. Donna LaFromboise is known for accusing third-wave feminism of having "perpetuated the myth of female martyrdom, stated that feminists have deliberately maintained such fictions to ensure its survival, and differentiated between "a feminism that informs one's opinions and a feminism that dictates how one should think".<ref name="laframboise">LaFramboise, Donna (1996). . Retrieved on 5 June 2013.</ref> | |||
Riot grrrl was grounded in the ] of ], adopting an ] stance of ] and self-reliance.<ref name=Rowe-Finbeiner/> Its emphasis on universal female identity and separatism often appeared more closely allied with second-wave feminism.<ref name=Rosenberg_Garofalo>Rosenberg, Jessica and Gitana, Garofalo (Spring 1998). "Riot Grrrl: Revolutions from within", ''Signs'', 23(3). {{JSTOR|3175311}}</ref> Bands associated with the movement included ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ],<ref name=Schilt/> and most prominently ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Marcu |first1=Sara |url=https://archive.org/details/girlstothefronttrue0000mare/page/nl/mode/2up |title=Girls To The Front: The True Story of the Riot Grrrl Revolution |date=2010 |publisher=HarperPerennial |location=New York |isbn=978-0-06-180636-0 |access-date=26 December 2022}}</ref> | |||
== History == | |||
Third-wave feminism began in the early 1990s, arising as a response to perceived failures of the second wave and to address the backlash against initiatives and movements created by the second wave. However, the fundamental rights and programs gained by feminist activists of the second wave – including the creation of domestic-abuse shelters for women and children and the acknowledgment of abuse and rape of women on a public level, access to contraception and other reproductive services (including the legalization of abortion), the creation and enforcement of sexual-harassment policies for women in the workplace, child-care services, equal or greater educational and extracurricular funding for young women, ] programs, and much more – have also served as a foundation and a tool for third-wave feminists. | |||
Feminist leaders rooted in the second wave like ], ], Kerry Ann Kane, ], ], ], ] and many other feminists of color, sought to negotiate a space within feminist thought for consideration of subjects related to race.<ref name="Gillis" /><ref name="Heywood">{{Cite book|editor-last=Heywood|editor-first=Leslie|editor2-last=Drake|editor2-first=Jennifer|title=Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism|year=1997|publisher=]|location=]|isbn=978-0-8166-3005-9|oclc=36876149}}</ref> | |||
Riot grrrl culture gave people the space to enact change on a macro, meso and micro scale. As Kevin Dunn explains:<blockquote>Using the do-it-yourself ethos of punk to provide resources for individual empowerment, Riot Grrrl encouraged females to engage in multiple sites of resistance. At the macro-level, Riot Grrrls resist society's dominant constructions of femininity. At the meso-level, they resist stifling gender roles in punk. At the micro-level, they challenge gender constructions in their families and among their peers.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Dunn|first=Kevin C.|date=2014-04-03|title=Pussy Rioting|journal=International Feminist Journal of Politics|language=en|volume=16|issue=2|pages=317–334|doi=10.1080/14616742.2014.919103|s2cid=146989637|issn=1461-6742}}</ref></blockquote>The demise of riot grrrl is linked to commodification and misrepresentation of its message, mainly through media coverage.<ref name=":0" /> Writing in '']'' magazine, Jennifer Keishin Armstrong states: | |||
In 1981, ] and ] published the anthology ''],'' which, along with ''All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave: Black Women's Studies'' (1982), critiqued second-wave feminism, which focused primarily on the problems and political positions of white women. | |||
{{blockquote|In the early 1990s, the women's movement seemed dead to the mainstream. Few pop cultural figures embraced the term "feminist." The underground punk movement known as "Riot Grrrl" scared anyone outside of it, while Alanis Morissette's breakthrough single "You Oughta Know" scared everyone else even more. Then, in the middle of the decade, the ] took all of that fear and made feminism – popularized as ] – fun. Suddenly, regular girls far outside Women's Studies classrooms had at least an inkling of what would be known in wonky circles as Third Wave Feminism – led by ]ers pushing for sexual freedom and respect for traditionally "girly" pursuits like makeup and fashion, among many other issues.<ref>{{cite news |title=Spice Girls' 'Wannabe': How 'Girl Power' Reinvigorated Mainstream Feminism in the '90s |url=https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/features/7439005/spice-girls-wannabe-girl-power-feminism |access-date=March 21, 2019 |magazine=Billboard |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323030031/https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/features/7439005/spice-girls-wannabe-girl-power-feminism |archive-date=March 23, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref>}} | |||
The roots of the third wave began, however, in the mid-1980s. Feminist leaders rooted in the second wave called for a new subjectivity in feminist voice. They sought to negotiate prominent space within feminist thought for consideration of race-related subjectivities. This focus on the intersection between race and gender remained prominent through the Hill-Thomas hearings, but was perceived{{By whom|date=August 2010}} to shift with the ], the first project of the Walker-led Third Wave Direct Action Corporation. This drive to register voters in poor minority communities was surrounded with rhetoric that focused on rallying young women.<ref>{{Cite news | last=Hayes Taylor | first=Kimberly | title=Feminism reaches the next generation – Walker underscores need for inclusion, change in 'third wave' | newspaper=] | date = March 8, 1995 | page=1B}}</ref> | |||
El Hunt of '']'' states, "Riot grrrl bands in general were very focused on making space for women at gigs. They understood the importance of giving women a platform and voice to speak out against abusers. For a lot of young women and girls, who probably weren't following the Riot grrrl scene at all, The Spice Girls brought this spirit into the mainstream and made it accessible."<ref>{{cite news |title=Spice Girls: What happened to Girl Power? |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48381340 |access-date=May 25, 2019 |agency=BBC |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190525011653/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48381340 |archive-date=May 25, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
] was the lead singer of ]: a ] band formed in 1990.]] | |||
In the early 1990s, the ] movement began in ] and ]. It sought to give women the power to control their voices and artistic expressions.<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner" /> Its links to social and political issues are where the beginnings of the third-wave feminism can be seen. The music and zine writings produced are strong examples of "cultural politics in action, with strong women giving voice to important social issues though an empowered, female oriented community, many people link the emergence of the third-wave feminism to this time".<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner" /> The movement encouraged and made "adolescent girls' standpoints central", allowing them to express themselves fully.<ref name="Code">{{cite book |title=Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories |last=Code |first=Lorraine |authorlink= |year=2000 |publisher=] |location=] |isbn=0-415-30885-2 }}</ref> It was grounded in the ] of ], riot grrrls took an ] stance of ] and ].<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner">{{cite book |title=The F-Word |last=Rowe-Finkbeiner |first=Kristin |authorlink= |year=2004 |publisher=] |location=] |isbn=978-1-58005-114-9 |url= |accessdate=| oclc=55504351}}</ref> Riot grrrl's emphasis on universal female identity and separatism often appears more closely allied with second-wave feminism than with the third wave.<ref name="Rosenberg_Garofalo">{{cite journal |last1=Rosenberg |first1=Jessica |last2=Garofalo |first2=Gitana |year=1998 |title=Riot Grrrl: Revolutions from Within |journal=Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society |volume=23 |issue=3: Feminisms and Youth Cultures |pages=809–841 |publisher=] |doi=10.1086/495289 |url= |accessdate= |oclc=486795617 |issn=0097-9740 }}</ref> Riot grrrl bands often address issues such as rape, domestic abuse, sexuality, and female empowerment. Some bands associated with the movement are: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. In addition to a music scene, riot grrrl is also a ]: ], the DIY ethic, art, political action, and activism are part of the movement. Riot grrrls hold meetings, start chapters, and support and organize women in music.<ref name="Schilt">{{cite journal |last=Schilt |first=Kristen |year=2003 |title=A Little Too Ironic: The Appropriation and Packaging of Riot Grrrl Politics by Mainstream Female Musicians |journal=Popular Music and Society |volume=26 |issue=1 |pages=5–16 |publisher=] |doi=10.1080/0300776032000076351 |url=http://www.public.asu.edu/~kleong/staffpage/course/riottgrrl%20analysis.pdf |accessdate=18 April 2011 |oclc=360399883 |issn=0300-7766 }}</ref> The term ''Riot Grrrl'' uses a "growling" double or triple ''r'', placing it in the word ''girl'' as an appropriation of the perceived derogatory use of the term.<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner" /> | |||
==Purpose== | |||
In 1991, ] accused ], a man nominated to the ], of ]. Thomas denied the accusations and, after extensive debate, the ] voted 52–48 in favor of Thomas.<ref name="Walker">{{Cite book|last=Walker|first=Rebecca|title=To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism|year=1995|publisher=]|location=New York|isbn=978-0-385-47262-3|oclc=32274323}}</ref><ref name="Heywood" /><ref name=autogenerated3>{{Cite book|last=Gillis|first=Stacy|last2=Howie|first2=Gillian|last3=Munford|first3=Rebecca|title=Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration|year=2004|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-4039-1821-5|oclc=54454680}}</ref> | |||
<!--check and re-write: The shift from second-wave feminism came about with the legal and institutional rights that were extended to women. In addition to these institutional gains, third-wave feminists believed there needed to be further changes in stereotypes, media portrayals, and language to define women. The purpose was to celebrate diverse identities.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web|url=https://rachelyon1.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/third-wave-feminism.pdf|title=Third-wave feminism and individualism: promoting equality or reinforcing the status quo?|last=Iannello|first=Katherine P.|year=1998|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019073259/https://rachelyon1.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/third-wave-feminism.pdf|archive-date=2016-10-19|url-status=live}}</ref>--> | |||
], co-author of ''Manifesta'' (2000), in 2008]] | |||
In response to this case, ] published an article entitled "Becoming the Third Wave" in which she stated, "I am not a post-feminism feminist. I am the third-wave."<ref name="Walker1992">{{cite journal| last1 = Rebecca| first1 = Walker| authorlink1 = Rebecca Walker| editor-last=| editor-first =| editor-link=/February| title = Becoming the Third Wave| journal = ]| issue = | pages = 39–41| location = New York| publisher = Liberty Media for Women| issn = 0047-8318| oclc = 194419734|date= January 1992}}</ref> | |||
Arguably the biggest challenge to third-wave feminism was that the gains of second-wave feminism were taken for granted, and the importance of feminism not understood. Baumgardner and Richards (2000) wrote: "or anyone born after the early 1960s, the presence of feminism in our lives is taken for granted. For our generation, feminism is like fluoride. We scarcely notice that we have it—it's simply in the water."<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" /> | |||
Essentially the claim was that gender equality had already been achieved, via the first two waves, and further attempts to push for women's rights were irrelevant and unnecessary, or perhaps even pushed the pendulum too far in women's favor. This issue manifested itself in the heated debates about whether affirmative action was creating gender equality or punishing white, middle-class males for the biological history that they had inherited.{{sfn|Newman|White|2012|p=14–15}}<!--Not clear what this refers to: Manon Tremblay referred to this as the "antifeminist undercurrent" of the West.<ref name="tremblay">Tremblay, Manon (1993). "Gender and Society: Rights and Realities". In David Thomas (ed.). ''Canada and the United States: Differences that Count''. Peterborough: Broadview Press.</ref>--><!--check the following--> Third-wave feminism therefore focused on ]—"one's ability to open their mind to the fact that male domination does affect the women of our generation, is what we need.<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" /><ref>{{cite book|last=MacKinnon|first=Catharine A.|year=1989|title=Toward A Feminist Theory of the State|publisher=Harvard University Press|page=|isbn=9780674896451|url=https://archive.org/details/towardfeministth00mack|url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
In 1992, the "]" saw four women enter the ] to join the two already there. The following year another woman (]) won a special election, bringing the number to seven. The 1990s also saw the first female ] and ], as well as the second woman on the Supreme Court, ], and the first US ] (]) to have an independent political, legal, corporate executive, activist, and public service career. However, the ], which is supported by second- and third-wave feminists, remains a work in progress. | |||
Third-wave feminists often engaged in "micro-politics", and challenged the second wave's paradigm as to what was good for women.<ref name="Freedman">{{Cite book |last=Freedman|first=Estelle B. |title=No Turning Back: The History of Feminism and the Future of Women|url=https://archive.org/details/noturningbackhis00free|url-access=registration|year=2002 |publisher=] |location=London|isbn=9780345450531 | oclc=49193867}}</ref>{{sfn|Henry|2004}}<ref name="Gillis">{{harvnb|Gillis|Howie|Munford|2007}}</ref><ref name="Faludi">{{Cite book| last=Faludi| first=Susan| title=Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women | url=https://archive.org/details/backlashundeclar00falu| url-access=registration|year=1991 |publisher=] |location=New York| isbn=978-0-517-57698-4| oclc=23016353}}</ref> Proponents of third-wave feminism said that it allowed women to define feminism for themselves. Describing third-wave feminism in ''Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism And The Future'' (2000), ] and ] suggested that feminism could change with every generation and individual: | |||
Third-wave feminists have recently utilized the internet and modern technology to enhance their movement, which has allowed for information and organization to reach a larger audience. | |||
{{quote|The increasing ease of publishing on the Internet meant that e-zines (electronic magazines) and blogs became ubiquitous. Many serious independent writers, not to mention organizations, found that the Internet offered a forum for the exchange of information and the publication of essays and videos that made their point to a potentially huge audience. The Internet radically democratized the content of the feminist movement with respect to participants, aesthetics, and issues<ref name="Brunell, Laura 2008">Brunell, Laura. 2008. "Feminism Re-Imagined: The Third Wave." Encyclopedia Britannica Book of the Year. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.</ref>}} | |||
{{blockquote|The fact that feminism is no longer limited to arenas where we expect to see it—], '']'', ], and redsuited ]—perhaps means that young women today have really reaped what feminism has sown. Raised after ] and '']'' {{sic}}, young women emerged from college or high school or two years of marriage or their first job and began challenging some of the received wisdom of the past ten or twenty years of feminism. We're not doing feminism the same way that the seventies feminists did it; being liberated doesn't mean copying what came before but finding one's own way—a way that is genuine to one's own generation.<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" />}} | |||
==Prominent issues== | |||
] | |||
Third-wave feminists used personal narratives as a form of feminist theory. Expressing personal experiences gave women space to recognize that they were not alone in the oppression and discrimination they faced. Using these accounts has benefits because it records personal details that may not be available in traditional historical texts.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=YU|first=SU-LIN|date=October 2011|title=Reclaiming the Personal: Personal Narratives of Third-Wave Feminists|journal=Women's Studies|language=en|volume=40|issue=7|pages=873–889|doi=10.1080/00497878.2011.603606|s2cid=144937285|issn=0049-7878}}</ref> | |||
Third-wave ideology focused on a more ] interpretation of gender and sexuality.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hardin|first=Marie|author2=Whiteside, Erin|chapter=From Second-Wave to Poststructuralist Feminism|title=The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies: Media Effects/Media Psychology|year=2013|doi=10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems991|publisher=Blackwell|isbn=9781405193566}}</ref> Post-structuralist feminists saw binaries such as male–female as an artificial construct created to maintain the power of the dominant group.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Poststructural feminism in education: An overview|journal=International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education|year=2000|volume=13|issue=5|pages=477–515|doi=10.1080/09518390050156422|author=Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre|s2cid=216559048 }}</ref> ] wrote in 1998 that "poststructuralists insist that words and texts have no fixed or intrinsic meanings, that there is no transparent or self-evident relationship between them and either ideas or things, no basic or ultimate correspondence between language and the world".<ref>{{cite journal|last=Scott|first=Joan W|year=1988|title=Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism|journal=Feminist Studies|volume=14|issue=1|pages=32–50|jstor=3177997|doi=10.2307/3177997|hdl=2027/spo.0499697.0014.104|hdl-access=free}}</ref>{{efn|Amber Lynn Zimmerman, M. Joan McDermott, and Christina M. Gould wrote in 2009 that third-wave feminism offered five primary focuses: (1) Responsible choice grounded in dialogue; (2) respect and appreciation for experiences and dynamic knowledge; (3) an understanding of "the personal is political" that incorporates both the idea that personal experiences have roots in structural problems and the idea that responsible, individuated personal action has social consequences; (4) use of personal narratives in both theorizing and political activism; (5) political activism as local, with global connections and consequences.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=The Local is Global: Third Wave Feminism, Peace, and Social Justice|journal=Contemporary Justice Review|volume=12|pages=77–90|first1=Amber Lynn|last1=Zimmerman|first2=M. Joan|last2=McDermott|first3=Christina M.|last3=Gould|doi=10.1080/10282580802681766|year=2009|s2cid=143985823}}</ref>}} | |||
===Gender violence=== | |||
Gender violence has become a central issue for third-wave feminists. Organizations such as ], have formed with the goal of ending gender violence, and artistic expressions such as '']'' have generated awareness and action around issues relating to women's sexuality. Third-wave feminists want to transform the traditional notions of sexuality and embrace “an exploration of women’s feelings about sexuality that included vagina-centred topics as diverse as orgasm, birth, and rape."<ref name="Brunell, Laura 2008"/> | |||
===Relationship with second wave=== | |||
===Reproductive rights=== | |||
The second wave of feminism is often accused of being elitist and ignoring groups such as women of colour and transgender women; instead, it focused on white, middle class, cisgender women. Third wave feminists questioned the beliefs of their predecessors and began to apply feminist theory to a wider variety of women, who had not been previously included in feminist activity.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Davies |first1=Edward |title=Third Wave Feminism and Transgender: Strength Through Diversity |date=2018 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=9781315107776 |edition=1 }}</ref> | |||
{{Main|Reproductive rights}} | |||
] defined the feminist culture for the third wave as "third wave because it's an expression of having grown up with feminism".<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner" /> Second-wave feminists grew up where the politics intertwined within the culture, such as "Kennedy, the Vietnam War, civil rights, and women's rights". In contrast, the third wave sprang from a culture of "punk-rock, hip-hop, 'zines, products, consumerism and the Internet".<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" /> In an essay entitled "Generations, Academic Feminists in dialogue" ] wrote: | |||
One of feminism's primary concerns is women's reproductive rights, such as access to contraception and abortion. According to Baumgardner and Richards, "It is not feminism's goal to control any woman's fertility, only to free each woman to control her own".<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards">{{cite book |title=Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future |last1=Baumgardner |first1=Jennifer |author1-link=Jennifer Baumgardner |last2=Richards |first2=Amy |author2-link=Amy Richards |year=2000 |publisher=] |location=] |isbn=978-0-374-52622-1 |oclc=43607358 |page= |url= |accessdate=}}</ref> South Dakota's 2006 attempt to ban ] in all cases, except when necessary to protect the mother's life,<ref name="Davey">{{Cite news |last=Davey |first=Monica |title=South Dakota Bans Abortion, Setting Up a Battle | newspaper= New York Times |volume=155 |issue=53511 |pages=A1–A14 |date=7 March 2006 }}</ref> and the US Supreme Court's recent vote to uphold the ] ban are viewed by many feminists as restrictions on women's civil and reproductive rights.<ref>{{Cite journal | last = Ludlow | first = Jeannie | title=Sometimes, It's a Child and a Choice: Toward an Embodied Abortion Praxis | journal=]| volume=20 | issue= 1 | pages=26–50 | date=Spring 2008| oclc=364432908}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | last1=Weitz | first1=Tracy A.| last2=Yanow | first2=Susan | title=Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States| journal=Reproductive Health Matters |volume=16 |issue=31 |pages=99–107 |date=May 2008 | doi=10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31374-3 | pmid=18772090 | oclc=282104847}}</ref> Restrictions on the 1973 Supreme Court decision in ''],'' which legalized abortion in the United States, are becoming more common in states around the country; such restrictions include mandatory waiting periods,<ref>] x (1993; amended 1997)</ref> parental-consent laws,<ref>] Code </ref> and spousal-consent laws.<ref>] Code </ref> | |||
{{blockquote|sign=|source=|This problem manifests itself when senior feminists insist that junior feminists be good daughters, defending the same kind of feminism their mothers advocated. Questions and criticisms are allowed, but only if they proceed from the approved brand of feminism. Daughters are not allowed to invent new ways of thinking and doing feminism for themselves; feminists' politics should take the same shape that it has always assumed.<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" />}} | |||
===Reclaiming derogatory terms=== | |||
English-speakers continue to use words such as '']'', ''bitch'', '']'', and ''cunt'' to refer to women in derogatory ways. ] writes, "I posit that we're free to seize a word that was kidnapped and co-opted in a pain-filled, distant, past, with a ransom that cost our grandmothers' freedom, children, traditions, pride, and land." Third-wave feminists prefer to change the connotation of a sexist word rather than censor it from speech.{{Citation needed|date=June 2014}} | |||
], in ''To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism'' (1995), wrote about her fear of rejection by her mother (]) and her godmother (]) for challenging their views: | |||
Part of taking back the word ''bitch'' was fueled by the 1994 single, "]" by the all-woman band ], and, later, by the 1999 book ''Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women'' by ]. In the successful declaration of the word ''bitch'', Wurtzel introduces her philosophy: "I intend to scream, shout, race the engine, call when I feel like it, throw tantrums in Bloomingdale's if I feel like it and confess intimate details about my life to complete strangers. I intend to do what I want to do and be whom I want to be and answer only to myself: that is, quite simply, the bitch philosophy."<ref name="Wurtzel 1998">{{Cite book|last=Wurtzel|first=Elizabeth|title=Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women|page=|year=1998|publisher=]|location=New York|isbn=978-0-385-48400-8|oclc=38144418}}</ref> | |||
{{blockquote|sign=|source=|Young Women feminists find themselves watching their speech and tone in their works so as not to upset their elder feminist mothers. There is a definite gap among feminists who consider themselves to be second-wave and those who would label themselves as third-wave. Although, the age criteria for second-wave feminists and third-wave feminists is murky, younger feminists definitely have a hard time proving themselves worthy as feminist scholars and activists.<ref name="Walker" />}} | |||
===Rape=== | |||
{{Main|SlutWalk}} | |||
Since 2011,<ref>{{cite web|title=SlutWalk Toronto: What|url=http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/about/what|accessdate=19 October 2011}}</ref> the utility of the reclamation strategy has been a hot topic among third-wave feminists with the advent of ]s. The first SlutWalk took place in Toronto on April 3, 2011, in response to Toronto police officer Michael Sanguinetti's statement that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized."<ref name="slutwalktoronto1">{{cite web|url=http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/about/why|title=SlutWalk Toronto}}</ref> Additional SlutWalks sprung up rapidly in cities all over the world, with marchers reclaiming the word "slut" to make the point that if victimized women are sluts, then all women must be, since anyone can be victimized regardless of what they are wearing.<ref name="slutwalktoronto2">{{cite web|title=Satellites List|url=http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/satellite/satellites-list-dates|work=Satellites List, SlutWalk Toronto}}</ref><ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web|title=Slutwalks – Do you agree with the Toronto policeman?|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00ggb5t|work=World Have Your Say 60|publisher=BBC}}</ref> SlutWalks have occurred in major cities all over the world, including New York City, Berlin, Seattle, West Hollywood, and London. Third-wave feminist bloggers have both praised and criticized the Slutwalks, with the reclamation of the word "slut" being questioned for its possible exclusion of some cultural groups.<ref>{{cite web|last=Murphy|first=Meghan|title=We're sluts, not feminists. Wherein my relationship with Slutwalk gets rocky.|url=http://www.feminisms.org/2585/were-sluts-not-feminists-wherein-my-relationship-with-slutwalk-gets-rocky/|work=The F-Word}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Beyerstein|first=Lindsay|title=Sluts Like Me|url=http://bigthink.com/ideas/38362|work=Big Think}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Women: Should they have autonomy?|url=http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2011/05/women-should-they-have-autonomy.html|work=Women: Shakesville}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Four Brief Critiques of SlutWalk's Whiteness, Privilege and Unexamined Power Dynamics|url=http://therotund.tumblr.com/post/5582939739/four-brief-critiques-of-slutwalks-whiteness-privilege}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Walia|first=Harsha|title=Slutwalk – To March or Not to March|url=http://www.racialicious.com/2011/05/19/slutwalk-–-to-march-or-not-to-march/|work=Racialicious}}</ref> | |||
== |
==Issues== | ||
===Violence against women=== | |||
Third-wave feminism regards race, social class, transgender rights, and sexual liberation as central issues. However, it also pays attention to workplace matters such as the ], ], unfair ] policies,<ref> | |||
]'' premiered in New York in 1996.]] | |||
{{Cite journal | |||
], including ], ], and ], became{{Citation needed|date=February 2018}}<!-- Where was violence against women not a central issue of feminism? (re: lead of second-wave feminism) --> a central issue. Organizations such as ] formed with the goal of ending gender violence, and artistic expressions, such as ''],'' generated awareness. Third-wave feminists wanted to transform traditional notions of sexuality and embrace "an exploration of women's feelings about sexuality that included vagina-centred topics as diverse as orgasm, birth, and rape".<ref name=Brunell2008>Brunell, Laura (2008). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180922115211/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Feminism-Reimagined-The-Third-Wave-1376924 |date=2018-09-22 }}. ''Encyclopædia Britannica Book of the Year''. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.</ref> | |||
| first = Frank | last=Munden | |||
| title=Female medical workers feel maternity leave unfair| journal=The Kapi'o Newspress | volume=36 | issue=28|date= 7 May 2003 | |||
|url=http://kapio.kcc.hawaii.edu/archive/v36/36_28/nurse.html| archiveurl=http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20090228075410/http://kapio.kcc.hawaii.edu/archive/v36/36_28/nurse.html | |||
| archivedate=28 February 2009| accessdate=14 April 2011 }} | |||
</ref> | |||
motherhood – support for ]s by means of ] and ] and respect for working mothers and for mothers who decide to leave their ]s to raise their children full-time. | |||
===Reproductive rights=== | |||
Third-wave feminism is often associated{{by whom?|date=July 2014}} with the emergence of so-called "lipstick" or "girly" feminisms and with the rise of "raunch culture". This is because these new feminisms advocated for "expressions of femininity and female sexuality as a challenge to objectification".<ref name="Newman & White 2012 246">{{cite book|last=Newman & White|title=Women, Politics, and Public Policy: The Political Struggles of Canadian Women|year=2012|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Toronto|page=246|edition=2nd|chapter=11}}</ref> Accordingly, this included the dismissal of any restriction, whether deemed patriarchal or feminist, to define or control how women or girls can dress, act, or generally express themselves.<ref name="Newman & White 2012 246"/> These emerging positions stood in stark contrast with the ] strains of feminism prevalent in the 1980s. These new feminisms posit that the ability to make autonomous choices about self-expression can be an empowering act of resistance, not simply internalized oppression. However, such views have been critiqued{{by whom?|date=July 2014}} because of the subjective nature of ] and autonomy. Scholars are unsure if empowerment is best measured as an "internal feeling of power and agency" or as an external "measure of power and control".<ref name="Newman & White 2012 247">{{cite book|last=Newman & White|title=Women, Politics, and Public Policy: The Political Struggles of Canadian Women|year=2012|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Toronto|page=247|edition=2nd|chapter=11}}</ref> Moreover, they critique an over-investment in "a model of free will and choice" in the marketplace of identities and ideas.<ref name="Newman & White 2012 247"/> Regardless, the "girly" feminisms attempted to be open to all different selves while maintaining a dialogue about the meaning of identity and femininity in the contemporary world. | |||
{{Main|Reproductive rights}} | |||
One of third-wave feminism's primary goals was to demonstrate that access to contraception and abortion are women's reproductive rights. According to Baumgardner and Richards, "It is not feminism's goal to control any woman's fertility, only to free each woman to control her own."<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards"/> South Dakota's 2006 attempt to ban abortion in all cases, except when necessary to protect the mother's life,<ref name="Davey">{{Cite news |last=Davey |first=Monica |title=South Dakota Bans Abortion, Setting Up a Battle | newspaper= The New York Times |volume=155 |issue=53511 |pages=A1–A14 |date=7 March 2006 }}</ref> and the US Supreme Court's vote to uphold the ] ban were viewed as restrictions on women's civil and reproductive rights.<ref>{{Cite journal | last = Ludlow | first = Jeannie | title=Sometimes, It's a Child and a Choice: Toward an Embodied Abortion Praxis | journal=]| volume=20 | issue= 1 | pages=26–50 | date=Spring 2008| doi = 10.1353/ff.2008.a236179 | oclc=364432908 | jstor=40071251}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | last1=Weitz | first1=Tracy A.| last2=Yanow | first2=Susan | title=Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States| journal=Reproductive Health Matters |volume=16 |issue=31 |pages=99–107 |date=May 2008 | doi=10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31374-3 | pmid=18772090 | oclc=282104847 | jstor=25475407| s2cid=10189579}}</ref> Restrictions on abortion in the US, which was mostly legalized by the 1973 Supreme Court decision in '']'', were becoming more common in states around the country. These included mandatory waiting periods,<ref>] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090409200304/http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title16/ar34/ch2.html#IC16-34-2-1.1 |date=2009-04-09 }} x (1993; amended 1997)</ref> parental-consent laws,<ref>] Code {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090208231736/http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/DisplayStatute.aspx?Statute=34-23A-7&Type=Statute |date=2009-02-08 }}</ref> and spousal-consent laws.<ref>] Code {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721061925/http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t44c041.htm#44-41-10 |date=2011-07-21 }}</ref> | |||
===Reclaiming derogatory terms=== | |||
Third-wave Feminists claim that these view-points shouldn't be limited by the label "girly" feminism or regarded as simply advocating for "raunch culture".{{or|date=July 2014}} Rather, these feminisms seek to be inclusive of the many diverse relationships and roles women fulfill. Gender scholars Linda Duits and Liesbet van Zoonen highlight this inclusiveness by looking at the politicization of women's clothing choices and how the "controversial ] choices of girls" and women are constituted in public discourse as "a locus of necessary regulation".<ref name="Newman & White 2012 246"/> Thus the "]" and the "]", as dress choices, are both identified as requiring regulation but for different reasons. The two clothing items of women that have caused a great deal of controversy initially appear to be opposing forms of self-expression. However, through the lens of "girly" feminisms, one can view both as symbolic of "political agency and resistance to objectification".<ref name="Newman & White 2012 247"/> The "hijab" can be seen as an act of resistance against western ambivalence towards Islamic identity, while the "belly shirt" can be viewed as an act of resistance towards patriarchal society’s narrow views of female sexuality: Both are regarded as valid forms of self-expression.<ref name="Newman & White 2012 247"/> | |||
], Toronto, 2011]] | |||
English speakers continued to use words such as '']'', ''bitch'', '']'', and '']'' to refer to women in derogatory ways. ] wrote, "I posit that we're free to seize a word that was kidnapped and co-opted in a pain-filled, distant past, with a ransom that cost our grandmothers' freedom, children, traditions, pride and land."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Muscio |first=Inga |author-link=Inga Muscio |title=Cunt: A Declaration of Independence |location=Seattle |publisher=Seal Press |year=1998 |page= |isbn=978-1-58005-015-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/cuntdeclarationo00musc_0/page/9 }}</ref> Taking back the word ''bitch'' was fueled by the single "]" (1994) by the all-woman band ], and by the book ''Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women'' (1999) by ].<ref name="Wurtzel 1998">{{Cite book|last=Wurtzel|first=Elizabeth|title=Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women|year=1998|publisher=]|location=New York|isbn=978-0-385-48400-8|oclc=38144418|url=https://archive.org/details/bitchinpraiseofd00wurt_0}}</ref> | |||
The utility of the reclamation strategy became a hot topic with the introduction of ]s in 2011. The first took place in Toronto on 3 April that year in response to a Toronto police officer's remark that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized."<ref name="slutwalktoronto1">{{cite web|url=http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/about/why|title=SlutWalk Toronto|access-date=2011-05-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522042925/http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/about/why|archive-date=2011-05-22|url-status=live}}</ref> Additional SlutWalks sprang up internationally, including in Berlin, London, New York City, Seattle, and West Hollywood.<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web|title=Slutwalks – Do you agree with the Toronto policeman?|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00ggb5t|work=World Have Your Say 60|publisher=BBC|access-date=2011-05-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514134350/http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00ggb5t|archive-date=2011-05-14|url-status=live}}</ref> Several feminist bloggers criticized the campaign; reclamation of the word ''slut'' was questioned.<ref>{{cite web|last=Murphy|first=Meghan|title=We're sluts, not feminists. Wherein my relationship with Slutwalk gets rocky.|url=http://www.feminisms.org/2585/were-sluts-not-feminists-wherein-my-relationship-with-slutwalk-gets-rocky/|work=The F-Word|access-date=2011-05-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610062654/http://www.feminisms.org/2585/were-sluts-not-feminists-wherein-my-relationship-with-slutwalk-gets-rocky/|archive-date=2011-06-10|url-status=usurped}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Beyerstein|first=Lindsay|title=Sluts Like Me|url=http://bigthink.com/ideas/38362|work=Big Think|access-date=2011-05-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110521232025/http://bigthink.com/ideas/38362|archive-date=2011-05-21|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Women: Should they have autonomy?|url=http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2011/05/women-should-they-have-autonomy.html|work=Women: Shakesville|access-date=2011-05-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727030246/http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2011/05/women-should-they-have-autonomy.html|archive-date=2011-07-27|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Walia|first=Harsha|title=Slutwalk – To March or Not to March|url=http://www.racialicious.com/2011/05/19/slutwalk-–-to-march-or-not-to-march/|work=Racialicious|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120801101813/http://www.racialicious.com/2011/05/19/slutwalk-%E2%80%93-to-march-or-not-to-march/|archive-date=2012-08-01}}</ref> | |||
==Internationally== | |||
] founded the ] in 1997 following a ] in which she was involved as a student attorney dealing with ].<ref name="case">Fauziya Kassindja, ''Do They Hear You When You Cry.'' p. 171. The case name became ''Matter of Kasinga'', because Fauziya did not know if it was proper to correct the ] official who misspelled her last name on her entry into the ].</ref> Miller-Muro later co-wrote a book with the client she had aided and used her portion of the proceeds for the initial funding of the center named after ]. As of 2012, the organization had assisted more than 13,000 ] and ] fleeing from a wide variety of abuses.<ref name="services"> ''Tahirih Justice Center'', Retrieved June 6, 2012</ref> The organization played a significant role in the passage of the ] (IMBRA), which was signed by ] in early 2006 and incorporated into the ] (VAWA). IMBRA gives foreign women important information about prospective American husbands (for a summary, see also ]). | |||
=== Sexual liberation === | |||
== Timeline of third-wave feminism worldwide == | |||
Third-wave feminists expanded the second-wave feminist's definition of sexual liberation to "mean a process of first becoming conscious of the ways one's gender identity and sexuality have been shaped by society and then intentionally constructing (and becoming free to express) one's authentic gender identity".<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|url=http://www.britannica.com/topic/feminism/The-third-wave-of-feminism.|title=feminism {{!}} Definition, History, & Examples|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Britannica|access-date=2018-10-08|language=en}}</ref> Since third-wave feminism relied on different personal definitions to explain feminism, there is controversy surrounding what sexual liberation really entails. Many third-wave feminists supported the idea that women should embrace their sexuality as a way to take back their power.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Harnois|first=Catherine|date=Spring 2008|title=Re-Presenting Feminisms: Past, Present, and Future|journal=NWSA Journal|volume=20 |pages=120–145 |doi=10.1353/ff.2008.a236183 }}</ref> | |||
=== |
===Other issues=== | ||
Third-wave feminism regarded race, social class, and transgender rights<ref>{{cite web|last1=Yenor|first1=Scott|title=The Rolling Revolution in Sex and Gender: A History|url=https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/07/19766/|website=Public Discourse|publisher=]|date=July 31, 2017|access-date=21 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215060405/https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/07/19766/|archive-date=15 December 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Grady|first1=Constance|title=The waves of feminism, and why people keep fighting over them, explained|url=https://www.vox.com/2018/3/20/16955588/feminism-waves-explained-first-second-third-fourth|website=]|date=July 20, 2018|access-date=21 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405172242/https://www.vox.com/2018/3/20/16955588/feminism-waves-explained-first-second-third-fourth|archive-date=5 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> as central issues. It also paid attention to workplace matters such as the ], unfair ] policies,<ref>{{Cite journal | first = Frank | last=Munden | title=Female medical workers feel maternity leave unfair| journal=The Kapi'o Newspress | volume=36 | issue=28|date= 7 May 2003|url=http://kapio.kcc.hawaii.edu/archive/v36/36_28/nurse.html| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090228075410/http://kapio.kcc.hawaii.edu/archive/v36/36_28/nurse.html| archive-date=28 February 2009}}</ref> motherhood support for ]s by means of ] and ], respect for working mothers, and the rights of mothers who decide to leave their careers to raise their children full-time.<ref>{{Cite book|chapter-url=http://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=poliscifac|chapter=Women's Leadership and Third-Wave Feminism|last=Iannello|first=Kathleen|editor1-first=Karen|editor1-last=O'Connor|title=Gender and Women's Leadership: A Reference Handbook|publisher=Sage Publishing|year=2010|isbn=978-1412960830|pages=70–77|via=The Cupola at Gettysburg College}}</ref> | |||
* In the early 1990s, the ] movement began in ] and ]. It sought to give women the power to control their voices and artistic expressions.<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner" /> | |||
* 1991: In '']'', the U.S. Supreme Court declared that employers could not exclude women from jobs in which exposure to toxic substances could harm a developing fetus.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=499&invol=187 |title=FindLaw | Cases and Codes |publisher=Caselaw.lp.findlaw.com |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1991: ] was launched. It was the first campaign in the United Kingdom aimed at increasing the quality and quantity of women's employment opportunities.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fenman.co.uk/traineractive/training-activity/Equal-opportunities-for-women.html |title=Equal opportunities for women Training Activity – TrainerActive, Training Activity Portal |publisher=Fenman.co.uk |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref><ref name="autogenerated1990">{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/timeline/1990.shtml |title=BBC Radio 4 – Woman's Hour – Women's History Timeline: 1990–1999 |publisher=Bbc.co.uk |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1991: The U. S. Senate voted overwhelmingly to open combat positions for women aviators.<ref>{{cite news|author=By ERIC SCHMITTPublished: August 01, 1991 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/01/us/senate-votes-to-remove-ban-on-women-as-combat-pilots.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm |title=Senate Votes to Remove Ban On Women as Combat Pilots – New York Times |publisher=Nytimes.com |date=1991-08-01 |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1991: American feminist ] published '']'', about the backlash to feminism in the 1980s.<ref>{{cite news|author=Emily Wilson |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/dec/13/classics.gender |title=A quick reminder: Backlash by Susan Faludi | Books |publisher=The Guardian |date= 2005-12-13|accessdate=2012-10-31 |location=London}}</ref> | |||
* 1992: The "]" saw four women enter the ] to join the two already there. | |||
* 1992: Third Wave Direct Action Corporation was founded by the American feminists ] and ] as a multiracial, multicultural, multi-issue organization to support young activists. The organization’s initial mission was to fill a void in young women’s leadership and to mobilize young people to become more involved socially and politically in their communities.<ref>{{cite web|author=Third Wave Foundation |url=http://www.thirdwavefoundation.org/about-us/history/ |title=History |publisher=Third Wave Foundation |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1992: In response to the ] sexual harassment case, American feminist ] published an article in ] entitled "Becoming the Third Wave" in which she stated, "I am not a post-feminism feminist. I am the third-wave."<ref name="Walker1992" /> | |||
* 1993: The ] became law in the U.S.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/family_and_medical_leave_act_1993 |title=Family and Medical Leave Act (1993) | LII / Legal Information Institute |publisher=Law.cornell.edu |date=2012-10-12 |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1993: ] was nominated and confirmed as the first female U.S. Attorney General, after both of Bill Clinton's previous choices, ] and ], had problems ]. | |||
* 1993: Take Our Daughters to Work Day debuted, designed to build American girls' self-esteem and open their eyes to a variety of career possibilities for women. It is now called ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ms.foundation.org/about_us/our-history/take-our-daughters-and-sons-to-work |title=Ms. Foundation for Women – Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work |publisher=ms.foundation.org |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1994: Women taking back the word ''bitch'' was helped by the single "]" by the all-woman Canadian band ].<ref>{{cite web|author=36c |url=http://www.amazon.com/36c-Fifth-Column/dp/B000003RMV/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1348859218&sr=1-1&keywords=fifth+column |title=36c: Music |publisher=Amazon.com |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1994: The ] became law in the U.S. It banned sex-role stereotyping and gender discrimination in the classroom.<ref>{{cite news|author=By EMILY EAKINPublished: March 30, 2002 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/30/arts/listening-for-the-voices-of-women.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm |title=Listening for the Voices of Women – New York Times |publisher=Nytimes.com |date=2002-03-30 |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1994: ] was declared illegal in the United Kingdom as part of the ].<ref name="autogenerated1990"/> | |||
* 1994: The ] became law in the U.S.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:uYS7BWkAcj4J:www.ncdsv.org/images/historyofvawa.pdf+&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShvRg9i_8d9wLxRp840bWNr2EsxUVby4Fi8Urd0zcg6OcOI_alPg0JWSiS0bkOAuBFWqoj0zmsWNhNW9JMevMogDzSQhit60gZDrIw18xBdCPEcsp7q_OM7gQdrYYTcxqmLffgB&sig=AHIEtbQ9YUKL-B15C5x3XoU7L7vg1o3laQ |title=Powered by Google Docs |publisher=Docs.google.com |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1995: The ] was held in China.<ref name="autogenerated1990"/> | |||
* 1996: The ] was founded.<ref name="autogenerated1990"/> | |||
* 1996: The feminist play '']'', written by American playwright ], premiered in New York.<ref name="qsanantonio.com">{{cite web|url=http://qsanantonio.com/vday2.html |title="Vagina Monologues" performances mark S.A. V-Day |publisher=QSanAntonio |date=2012-02-25 |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1996: In ] the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the male-only admissions policy of the state-supported Virginia Military Institute violates the Fourteenth Amendment.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_94_1941 |title=United States v. Virginia | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law |publisher=Oyez.org |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 1997: ] founded the ] in the U.S. in 1997 following a ] in which she was involved as a student attorney dealing with ].<ref></ref> | |||
* 1998: ] and others, including ], a producer of the Westside Theatre production of '']'', launched V-Day, a global non-profit movement that has raised over $75 million for women's ] groups through benefits performances.<ref name="qsanantonio.com"/><ref></ref> | |||
* 1999: The book ''Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women'' by the American author ] was published. In the successful declaration of the word ''bitch'', Wurtzel introduced her philosophy: "I intend to scream, shout, race the engine, call when I feel like it, throw tantrums in Bloomingdale's if I feel like it and confess intimate details about my life to complete strangers. I intend to do what I want to do and be whom I want to be and answer only to myself: that is, quite simply, the bitch philosophy."<ref name="Wurtzel 1998"/> | |||
===2000s=== | |||
* 2000: CBS agreed to pay $8 million to settle a sex discrimination lawsuit on behalf of 200 women.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-122125264/cbs-pay-8-million.html |title=Article: CBS to pay $8 million to settle sex discrimination lawsuit. | AccessMyLibrary – Promoting library advocacy |publisher=AccessMyLibrary |date=2000-10-25 |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 2001: The ] passed its first sex discrimination bill.<ref name="autogenerated2000">{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/timeline/2000.shtml |title=BBC Radio 4 – Woman's Hour – Women's History Timeline: 2000–now |publisher=Bbc.co.uk |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 2004: The ] was held in Washington, D.C., to support the right to abortion, access to birth control, scientifically accurate sex education, and prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections, and to show public support for mothers and children.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2005/04/25/index.html |title=March for Women's Lives |publisher=Guttmacher.org |date= |accessdate=2012-10-31}}</ref> | |||
* 2004: Asylum Gender Guidelines were introduced by the ] of the United Kingdom to tackle issues involving women fleeing their countries.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
* 2007: The Gender Equality Duty of the ] came into effect in the United Kingdom. It requires that public bodies promote equality of opportunity with a special focus on gender equality. It is each public body’s duty to publish a gender equality scheme which is to be revised every three years. There also has to be an annual report on what actions were taken to achieve objectives outlined in the equality scheme.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
* 2008: Norway requires all companies to have at least forty percent women on their boards.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
* 2008: Diana Bijon's husband Michael takes her last name upon marriage, after their lawsuit which led to a new California state law guaranteeing the rights of both married couples and registered domestic partners to choose whichever last name they prefer on their marriage and driving licenses.<ref name="DianaBijon">{{cite news|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/2008/05/05/us-usa-name-idUKN0541896320080505 |title=Los Angeles man wins right to use wife's last name |publisher=cnn.com |date= 2008-05-05|accessdate=2012-12-03}}</ref> | |||
* 2008: The Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act came into force in the United Kingdom.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
===2010s=== | |||
* 2011: The first ] took place in Toronto on April 3, 2011 in response to Toronto police officer Michael Sanguinetti's statement that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized."<ref name="slutwalktoronto1">{{cite web|url=http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/about/why|title=SlutWalk Toronto}}</ref> Additional SlutWalks sprung up rapidly in cities all over the world, with marchers reclaiming the word "slut" with the belief that if victimized women are sluts, then all women must be, since anyone can be victimized regardless of what they are wearing.<ref name="slutwalktoronto2">{{cite web|title=Satellites List|url=http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/satellite/satellites-list-dates|work=Satellites List, SlutWalk Toronto}}</ref><ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web|title=Slutwalks – Do you agree with the Toronto policeman?|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00ggb5t|work=World Have Your Say 60|publisher=BBC}}</ref> | |||
* 2012: The Atheism Plus movement was founded, in large measure to bring Feminist thought in general and Third Wave Feminism specifically to the ] movement.<ref>Jen McCreight. . ''Blag Hag''. 2012 August 19.</ref> | |||
* 2013: The first woman to bring a gender discrimination lawsuit in China, a 23 year old who goes by the pseudonym of ], won a small settlement of 30,000 yuan and an official apology from the ].<ref></ref> | |||
== |
== Criticism == | ||
===Lack of cohesion=== | ===Lack of cohesion=== | ||
One issue raised by critics |
One issue raised by critics was a lack of cohesion because of the absence of a single cause for third-wave feminism. The first wave fought for and gained the right for women to vote. The second wave fought for the right for women to have access to an equal opportunity in the workforce, as well as the end of legal sex discrimination. The third wave allegedly lacked a cohesive goal and was often seen as an extension of the second wave.<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner" /> Some argued that the third wave could be dubbed the "Second Wave, Part Two" when it came to the politics of feminism and that "only young feminist culture" was "truly third wave".<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" /> One argument ran that the equation of third-wave feminism with individualism prevented the movement from growing and moving towards political goals. Kathleen P. Iannello wrote: | ||
{{blockquote|sign=|source=|The conceptual and real-world 'trap' of ] (between work and home) has led women to challenge each other rather than the patriarchy. Individualism conceived of as 'choice' does not empower women; it silences them and prevents feminism from becoming a political movement and addressing the real issues of distribution of resources.<ref name=Iannello2011>{{Cite book|chapter-url=https://rachelyon1.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/third-wave-feminism.pdf|chapter=Third-Wave Feminism and Individualism: Promoting Equality or Reinforcing the Status Quo?|last=Iannello|first=Katherine P.|year=1998|title=Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders? A Collection of Readings|editor1-last=Whitaker|editor1-first=Lois Duke|location=Boston, Mass|publisher=Longman}}</ref>}} | |||
The third wave of feminism, some argue, lacks a cohesive goal, and it is often seen as an extension of the second wave.<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner" /> Also, third-wave feminism does not have a set definition that can distinguish itself from second-wave feminism. Some argue the third wave can be dubbed the "Second Wave, Part Two" when it comes to the politics of feminism, and "only young feminist culture as truly third wave".<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" /> | |||
===Objection to "wave construct"=== | |||
Amy Richards defines the feminist culture for this generation as "third wave because it's an expression of having grown up with feminism".<ref name="Rowe-Finbeiner" /> Second-wave feminists grew up where the politics intertwined within the culture, such as "Kennedy, the Vietnam War, civil rights, and women's rights"; while the third wave sprang from a culture of "punk-rock, hip-hop, 'zines, products, consumerism and the Internet".<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" /> | |||
Feminist scholars such as ] objected to the "wave construct" because it ignored important progress between the periods. Furthermore, if feminism is a global movement, she argued, the fact that the "first-, second-, and third waves time periods correspond most closely to American feminist developments" raises serious problems about how feminism fails to recognize the history of political issues around the world.<ref name="Tarrant">{{cite book|last=Tarrant|first=Shira|title=When Sex Became Gender|url=https://archive.org/details/whensexbecamegen00tarr|url-access=limited|page=|year=2006|publisher=Routledge|location=New York|isbn=978-0-415-95347-4|oclc=62281555}}</ref> The "wave construct", critics argued, also focused on white women's suffrage and continued to marginalize the issues of women of color and lower-class women.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
===Relationship with women of color=== | |||
In an essay entitled "Generations, Academic Feminists in dialogue" ] writes: | |||
Third-wave feminists proclaim themselves as the most inclusive wave of feminism. Critics have noted that while progressive, there is still exclusion of women of color. Black feminists argue that "the women rights movements were not uniquely for the liberation of Blacks or Black Women. Rather, efforts such as women's suffrage and abolition of slavery ultimately uplifted, strengthened, and benefited White society and White women".<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Marbley|first=Aretha Faye|date=Fall 2005|title=African-American Women's Feelings of Alienation from Third-Wave Feminism: A Conversation with My Sisters|journal=Western Journal of Black Studies}}</ref> | |||
==="Girly" feminism=== | |||
{{quote|This problem manifests itself when senior feminists insist that junior feminists be good daughters, defending the same kind of feminism their mothers advocated. Questions and criticisms are allowed, but only if they proceed from the approved brand of feminism. Daughters are not allowed to invent new ways of thinking and doing feminism for themselves; feminists’ politics should take the same shape that it has always assumed.<ref name="Baumgardner_Richards" />}} | |||
Third-wave feminism was often associated, primarily by its critics, with the emergence of so-called "lipstick" or "girly" feminists and the rise of "raunch culture". This was because these new feminists advocated "expressions of femininity and female sexuality as a challenge to objectification". Accordingly, this included the dismissal of any restriction, whether deemed patriarchal or feminist, to define or control how women or girls should dress, act, or generally express themselves.<ref name="Newman & White 2012 246">{{harvnb|Newman|White|2012|p=246}}</ref> These emerging positions stood in stark contrast with the ] strains of feminism prevalent in the 1980s. Second-wave feminism viewed pornography as encouraging violence towards women.<ref name=Iannello2011/> The new feminists posited that the ability to make autonomous choices about self-expression could be an empowering act of resistance, not simply ]. | |||
Such views were critiqued because of the subjective nature of ] and autonomy. Scholars were unsure whether empowerment was best measured as an "internal feeling of power and agency" or as an external "measure of power and control". Moreover they critiqued an over-investment in "a model of free will and choice" in the marketplace of identities and ideas.{{sfn|Newman|White|2012|p=247}} Regardless, the "girly" feminists attempted to be open to all different selves while maintaining a dialogue about the meaning of identity and femininity in the contemporary world. | |||
], in ''To Be Real'', writes about her fear of rejection by her mother (author ]) and by her godmother (]) for challenging their views: | |||
Third-wave feminists said that these viewpoints should not be limited by the label "girly" feminism or regarded as simply advocating "raunch culture". Rather, they sought to be inclusive of the many diverse roles women fulfill. Gender scholars {{ill|Linda Duits|nl}} and Liesbet van Zoonen highlighted this inclusivity by looking at the politicization of women's clothing choices and how the "controversial ] choices of girls" and women are constituted in public discourse as "a locus of necessary regulation".<ref name="Newman & White 2012 246"/> Thus the "]" and the "]", as dress choices, were both identified as requiring regulation but for different reasons. Both caused controversy, while appearing to be opposing forms of self-expression. Through the lens of "girly" feminists, one can view both as symbolic of "political agency and resistance to objectification". The "hijab" could be seen as an act of resistance against Western ambivalence towards Islamic identity, and the "belly shirt" an act of resistance against patriarchal society's narrow views of female sexuality. Both were regarded as valid forms of self-expression.{{sfn|Newman|White|2012|p=247}} | |||
{{quote|Young Women feminists find themselves watching their speech and tone in their works so as not to upset their elder feminist mothers. There is a definite gap among feminists who consider themselves to be second-wave and those who would label themselves as third-wave. Although, the age criteria for second-wave feminists and third-wave feminists is murky, younger feminists definitely have a hard time proving themselves worthy as feminist scholars and activists.<ref name=autogenerated2>{{Cite book|last=Walker |first=Rebecca |authorlink=Rebecca Walker |title=To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism |location=] |publisher=] |year=1995| isbn=978-0-385-47262-3| oclc=32274323}}</ref>}} | |||
== |
== Timeline == | ||
===1990s=== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%; width: 90%; text-align:left; float:center; margin-left:10px;" | |||
|- | |||
! scope="col" style="width:10em;"|Date | |||
! Event | |||
|- | |||
|1990||Publication of ], '']''. | |||
|- | |||
|1990||Publication of ], '']''. | |||
|- | |||
| 1991 ||] movement begins in ] and ] in the US.<ref name=Rowe-Finbeiner/> | |||
|- | |||
|March 1991||In '']'', the House of Lords in the UK rules that a ] exemption does not exist in English law. | |||
|- | |||
|March 1991|| In '']'', the US Supreme Court declares that employers cannot exclude women from jobs in which exposure to toxic substances could harm a developing fetus.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=499&invol=187 |title=FindLaw | Cases and Codes |publisher=FindLaw |access-date=2012-09-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121114025317/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=499&invol=187 |archive-date=2012-11-14 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|May 1991||Release of the film '']'': "It took all those feelings of alienation and anger—which until that point had mostly found expression in things like 'Take Back the Night' rallies—and turned them into something rebellious, transgressive, iconic, punk rock and mainstream." – Carina Chocano, ''New York Times''.<ref>Chocano, Carina (21 April 2011). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928213913/https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/24/magazine/mag-24Riff-t.html |date=2018-09-28 }}, ''The New York Times''.</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|31 July 1991||The US Senate votes overwhelmingly to open combat positions for women aviators.<ref>{{cite news|first=Eric|last=Schmitt|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/01/us/senate-votes-to-remove-ban-on-women-as-combat-pilots.html|title=Senate Votes to Remove Ban on Women as Combat Pilots|work=The New York Times|date=1 August 1991|access-date=2 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307015324/http://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/01/us/senate-votes-to-remove-ban-on-women-as-combat-pilots.html|archive-date=7 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1991||] publishes '']''.<ref>{{cite news |first=Emily |last=Wilson |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2005/dec/13/classics.gender |title=Backlash by Susan Faludi |work=The Guardian |date=13 December 2005 |access-date=2 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171228042301/https://www.theguardian.com/books/2005/dec/13/classics.gender |archive-date=28 December 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|July 1991||] and the televised testimony in October of ] that he had sexually harassed her. | |||
|- | |||
|October 1991||"Opportunity 2000" is launched in the UK to increase women's employment opportunities.<ref>Jones, Judy (28 December 1992). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181104022931/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/equality-campaign-for-women-falters-1565691.html |date=2018-11-04 }}, ''The Independent''.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fenman.co.uk/traineractive/training-activity/Equal-opportunities-for-women.html |title=Equal opportunities for women Training Activity – TrainerActive, Training Activity Portal |publisher=Fenman.co.uk |access-date=2012-10-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121123003115/http://www.fenman.co.uk/traineractive/training-activity/Equal-opportunities-for-women.html |archive-date=2012-11-23 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="autogenerated1990">{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/timeline/1990.shtml |title=BBC Radio 4 – Woman's Hour – Women's History Timeline: 1990–1999 |publisher=BBC |access-date=2012-10-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120319071725/http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/timeline/1990.shtml |archive-date=2012-03-19 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|January 1992||In response to the Thomas nomination, American feminist ] publishes "Becoming the Third Wave" in '']'' magazine.<ref name="Walker1992" /> | |||
|- | |||
|1992||Four women enter the ] to join the two already there, lending 1992 the label "]" in the US. | |||
|- | |||
|1992||Third Wave Direct Action Corporation (later Third Wave Foundation and the Third Wave Fund) founded in the US by ] and ] to support young activists;<ref>{{cite web |author=Third Wave Foundation |url=http://thirdwavefund.org/history.html |title=History |publisher=Third Wave Foundation |access-date=2012-10-31 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151025214042/http://thirdwavefund.org/history.html |archive-date=2015-10-25 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.masslive.com/news/2019/05/shannon-liss-riordan-touts-fresh-perspective-in-campaign-to-unseat-us-sen-ed-markey.html|title=Shannon Liss-Riordan touts 'fresh perspective' in campaign to unseat U.S. Sen. Ed Markey|last=Schoenberg|first=Shira|date=2019-05-22|website=masslive.com|language=en-US|access-date=2019-08-02}}</ref> organized Freedom Ride 1992, a nationwide bus tour to register voters.<ref>{{cite book | last=Dicker | first=R.C. | title=A History of U.S. Feminisms | publisher=Basic Books | series=Seal Studies | year=2016 | isbn=978-1-58005-614-4 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jrRKDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT102 | access-date=22 November 2022 | page=102}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last1=Dicker | first1=R. | last2=Piepmeier | first2=A. | title=Catching a Wave: Reclaiming Feminism for the 21st Century | publisher=Northeastern University Press | year=2016 | isbn=978-1-55553-856-9 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=h_PwCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT242 | access-date=22 November 2022 | page=242}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last=Jones | first=R. | title=Women in Changing Society | publisher=EDTECH | year=2019 | isbn=978-1-83947-434-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I4NJEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA149 | access-date=22 November 2022 | page=149}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1993||] becomes law in the US.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/family_and_medical_leave_act_1993 |title=Family and Medical Leave Act (1993) | LII / Legal Information Institute |publisher=Law.cornell.edu |date=2012-10-12 |access-date=2012-10-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121025122953/http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/family_and_medical_leave_act_1993 |archive-date=2012-10-25 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1993||] nominated and confirmed as the first female US Attorney General after President ]'s previous choices, ] and ], fail because of ]. | |||
|- | |||
||1993||"Take Our Daughters to Work Day" debuts in the US to build girls' self-esteem and open their eyes to a variety of career possibilities for women. It was later renamed ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ms.foundation.org/about_us/our-history/take-our-daughters-and-sons-to-work |title=Ms. Foundation for Women – Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work |publisher=ms.foundation.org |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121018030645/http://ms.foundation.org/about_us/our-history/take-our-daughters-and-sons-to-work |archive-date=2012-10-18 }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1993||First edition of '']'' magazine appears, founded by Laurie Henzel, ], and ]. | |||
|- | |||
|1994||Women taking back the word ''bitch'' are helped by the single "]" by the all-woman Canadian band ]. | |||
|- | |||
|1994||] confirms that ] is illegal in the UK.<ref name="autogenerated1990"/> | |||
|- | |||
|1994||] becomes law in the US and establishes the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.legalmomentum.org/history-vawa|title=History of the Violence Against Women Act|website=Legal Momentum|access-date=2016-04-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160519144926/http://www.legalmomentum.org/history-vawa|archive-date=2016-05-19|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1995||Publication of ] (ed.), ''To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism''.<ref name=Snyder2008>{{harvnb|Snyder|2008|pp=176–177}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1995||] held in China.<ref name="autogenerated1990"/> | |||
|- | |||
|1996||] founded.<ref name="autogenerated1990"/> | |||
|- | |||
|1996||Feminist play '']'', by American playwright ], premieres in New York.<ref name="qsanantonio.com">{{cite web |url=http://qsanantonio.com/vday2.html |title="Vagina Monologues" performances mark S.A. V-Day |publisher=QSanAntonio |date=25 February 2012 |access-date=28 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120810202654/http://www.qsanantonio.com/vday2.html |archive-date=10 August 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Ensler |first=Eve |author-link=Eve Ensler|title=The Vagina Monologues |publisher=] |year=2001 |location=New York |isbn=978-0-375-75052-6 |oclc=37492271 |title-link=The Vagina Monologues }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
||1996||In '']'', the US Supreme Court rules that male-only admissions policy of state-supported Virginia Military Institute violates the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_94_1941 |title=United States v. Virginia |publisher=The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law |access-date=2012-10-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104094720/http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_94_1941 |archive-date=2012-11-04 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1996||First edition of the magazine '']'' appears.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://bitchmagazine.org/history|title=Bitch Magazine: Our History|work=Bitch: Feminist Response to Pop Culture|access-date=2019-06-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610080910/http://bitchmagazine.org/history|archive-date=2011-06-10|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1997||Publication of Leslie Heywood and Jennifer Drake (eds.), ''Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism''.<ref name=Snyder2008/> | |||
|- | |||
|1997||Turkish feminist ] shared the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|1997||] founds the ] in the US following ], an asylum case dealing with ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tahirih.org/services/|title=Services|author=Tahirih Justice Center|access-date=30 November 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006095120/http://www.tahirih.org/services/|archive-date=6 October 2014}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1998||] and others, including ], a producer of the Westside Theatre production of '']'', launch V-Day, a global non-profit movement that raises over $75 million for women's ] groups.<ref name="qsanantonio.com"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.womensmediacenter.com/ex/013008.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100104191925/http://womensmediacenter.com/ex/013008.html|archive-date=4 January 2010|title=From Superdome to SUPERLOVE—V-Day at 10|first=Marianne|last=Schnall|date=January 30, 2008}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|1999||Publication of ], ''The Whole Woman'' | |||
|- | |||
|1999||Publication of ] and ] (eds.), ''The BUST Guide to the New Girl Order''.<ref name=Snyder2008/> | |||
|- | |||
|1999||Publication of ], ''Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women''.<ref name="Wurtzel 1998"/> | |||
|- | |||
|1999||Publication of ], ''The World's Wife'' | |||
|} | |||
===2000s=== | |||
The feminist movement is often accused of ] due to their neglect{{citation needed|date=October 2014}}, or even causing {{citation needed|date=October 2014}}, of men's issues. Several men's rights movements and organizations, such as ], often criticize feminists for the creation of laws alienating men or targeting them. Among these issues is the feminist neglect for male rape victims and even branding all men "potential rapists" regardless of background {{citation needed|date=October 2014}} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%; width: 90%; text-align:left; float:center; margin-left:10px;" | |||
|- | |||
! scope="col" style="width:10em;"|Date | |||
! Event | |||
|- | |||
|2000||Publication of ] and ], ''Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future''{{sfn|Baumgardner|Richards|2000}} | |||
|- | |||
|October 2000||CBS agrees to pay $8 million to settle a sex discrimination lawsuit on behalf of 200 women.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-72470958.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160911033207/https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-72470958.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2016-09-11 |title=CBS to pay $8 million to settle sex discrimination lawsuit |last=Carlson|first=Scott|publisher=Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service |date=2000-10-25 |access-date=2016-04-25}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|2001||The ] passes its first sex-discrimination bill.<ref name="autogenerated2000">{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/timeline/2000.shtml |title=Women's History Timeline: 2000–now |publisher=Woman's Hour, BBC Radio 4 |access-date=2012-10-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151019051316/http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/timeline/2000.shtml |archive-date=2015-10-19 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|2001||] becomes the first female US national security adviser.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
|2004||The ] is held in Washington, D.C., to support the right to abortion, access to birth control, scientifically accurate sex education, and prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections, and to show public support for mothers and children.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2005/04/25/index.html |title=March for Women's Lives |publisher=Guttmacher.org |date=April 25, 2005 |access-date=September 28, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130310100654/http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2005/04/25/index.html |archive-date=March 10, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|2004||Asylum Gender Guidelines are introduced by the UK for female asylum seekers.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
|2004|| Publication of Vivien Labaton and Dawn Lundy (eds.), ''The Fire This Time: Young Activists and the New Feminism''.<ref name=Snyder2008/> | |||
|- | |||
|2004|| Start of '']'' blog by ] and Vanessa Valenti. | |||
|- | |||
|2005||] in Liberia becomes Africa's first elected woman leader and the first black female president in the world.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
|2005||] becomes Germany's first female chancellor.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
|2007||] becomes the first woman Speaker in the US Congress.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
|1 April 2007||The Gender Equality Duty of the ] comes into effect in the UK. It requires public authorities "to promote equality of opportunity between women and men".<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
|2007||Publication of ], ''Full Frontal Feminism: A Young Woman's Guide to Why Feminism Matters''. | |||
|- | |||
|2007 | |||
|Publication of ], '']'' | |||
|- | |||
|2008||Publication of ] and Jessica Valenti (eds.), '']''. | |||
|- | |||
|2008||Norway requires of all companies that at least 40 percent of their board members be women.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
|May 2008|| In Los Angeles, Diana Bijon's husband, Michael, takes her last name upon marriage, after their lawsuit led to a new California state law guaranteeing the rights of married couples and registered domestic partners to choose whichever last name they prefer.<ref name="DianaBijon">{{cite news |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-usa-name-idUKN0541896320080505 |title=Los Angeles man wins right to use wife's last name |work=Reuters |date=2008-05-05 |access-date=2012-12-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130506055814/http://uk.reuters.com/article/2008/05/05/us-usa-name-idUKN0541896320080505 |archive-date=2013-05-06 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|2008||] comes into force in the UK.<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
|2009||In the UK, ] becomes the first female ].<ref name="autogenerated2000"/> | |||
|- | |||
| 3 April 2011 || First ] takes place in Toronto in response to Toronto police officer Michael Sanguinetti's statement that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized".{{sfn|Chamberlain|2017|pp=114–115}}<ref name="slutwalktoronto1"/> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== |
==Notes== | ||
{{notelist}} | |||
{{Columns-list|3| | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist |
{{Reflist}} | ||
==Bibliography== | |||
*{{cite book |last1=Chamberlain |first1=Prudence |title=The feminist fourth wave : affective temporality |date=2017 |publisher=Springer |isbn=9783319536828 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8AIkDwAAQBAJ |access-date=27 May 2019}} | |||
*{{cite book|last=Evans|first=Elizabeth|year=2015|title=The Politics of Third Wave Feminisms: Neoliberalism, Intersectionality, and the State in Britain and the US|location=London|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-1-137-29527-9}} | |||
*{{Cite book| last1 = Gillis | last2 = Howie | last3=Munford | first1=Stacy | first2=Gillian | first3=Rebecca |author2-link=Gillian Howie |title=Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration |edition=Revised| publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-4039-1821-5}} | |||
*{{Cite book|last=Henry|first=Astrid |title=Not My Mother's Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism|year=2004|publisher=] |location=] |oclc=53932637 |isbn=978-0-253-21713-4 }} | |||
*{{cite book |title=Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future |last1=Baumgardner |first1=Jennifer |author1-link=Jennifer Baumgardner |last2=Richards |first2=Amy |author2-link=Amy Richards |year=2000 |publisher=] |location=New York |isbn=978-0-374-52622-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/manifestayoungwo00baum }} | |||
*{{cite book|last1=Newman|first1=Jacquetta A.|last2=White|first2=Linda Ann|title=Women, Politics, and Public Policy: The Political Struggles of Canadian Women|year=2012|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Toronto|isbn=9780195432497|edition=2nd}} | |||
*{{Cite journal|last=Snyder|first=R. Claire|date=1 September 2008|title=What Is Third-Wave Feminism? A New Directions Essay|journal=Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society|volume=34|issue=1|pages=175–196|doi=10.1086/588436|jstor=10.1086/588436|s2cid=144068546|issn=0097-9740}} | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
{{refbegin|30em}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last1=Baumgardner |first1=Jennifer |author1-link=Baumgardner |last2=Richards| first2=Amy |author2-link=Amy Richards |title=Grassroots: A Field Guide for Feminist Activism |location=] |publisher=] |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-374-52865-2 |oclc=55109024}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last1=Baumgardner |first1=Jennifer |author1-link= Jennifer Baumgardner |last2=Richards| first2=Amy |author2-link=Amy Richards |title=Grassroots: A Field Guide for Feminist Activism |location=New York |publisher=Farrar, Straus, and Giroux |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-374-52865-2}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=DeKoven |first=Marianne |title=Jouissance, Cyborgs, and Companion Species: Feminist Experiment |journal=PMLA |volume=121 |issue=5 |pages=1690–1696 |doi=10.1632/pmla.2006.121.5.1690 |oclc=104244114 |issn=0030-8129 |date=October 2006}} | |||
* {{cite journal | last = Evans | first = Elizabeth | title = What makes a (third) wave?| journal = International Feminist Journal of Politics | volume = 18 | issue = 3 | pages = 409–428| doi = 10.1080/14616742.2015.1027627 | date = 2016 | hdl = 1983/7fb16f95-5556-4a3f-b3c0-178a0cf69671 | s2cid = 145102947 | url = https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/en/publications/what-makes-a-third-wave(7fb16f95-5556-4a3f-b3c0-178a0cf69671).html | hdl-access = free }} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Ensler |first=Eve |authorlink=Eve Ensler|title=The Vagina Monologues |publisher=] |year=2001 |location=] |isbn=978-0-375-75052-6 |oclc=37492271 }} | |||
*{{cite book|first=Leela|last=Fernandes|chapter=Unsettling 'Third Wave Feminism': Feminist Waves, Intersectionality, and Identity Politics in Retrospect|editor-last1=Hewitt|editor-first1=Nancy|title=No Permanent Waves: Recasting Histories of U.S. Feminism|publisher=Rutgers University Press|isbn=978-0-8135-4724-4|year=2010}} | |||
* {{Cite book|editor-last=Findlen |editor-first=Barbara |title=Listen Up! Voices from the Next Feminist Generation |publisher=] |year=1995 |location=] |isbn=978-1-878067-61-6 |oclc=31607164}} | |||
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Findlen |editor-first=Barbara |title=Listen Up! Voices from the Next Feminist Generation |publisher=Seal Press |year=1995 |location=Seattle |isbn=978-1-878067-61-6 |url=https://archive.org/details/listenupvoicesfr00find }} | |||
* {{Cite book| last1 = Gillis | last2 = Howie | last3=Munford | first1=Stacy | first2=Gillian | first3=Rebecca |title=Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration |edition=Revised| publisher=] |year=2007 |isbn=1-4039-1821-X }} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Harnois |first=Catherine |title=Re-presenting feminisms: Past, present, and future |journal=NWSA Journal|volume=20 |issue=1 |pages=120–145 |year=2008 |doi=10.1353/ff.2008.a236183 |jstor=40071255 |url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/nwsa_journal/summary/v020/20.1.harnois.html }} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Henry |first=Astrid |title=Not My Mother's Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism|publisher=] |year=2004 |isbn=0-253-21713-X}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last1= |
* {{Cite book |last1=Hernández |first1=Daisy |last2=Reman |first2=Bushra |author1-link=Daisy Hernández |title=Colonize This! Young Women of Color and Today's Feminism |publisher=Seal Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-1-58005-067-8 |url=https://archive.org/details/colonizethisyoun0000hern }} | ||
* Heywood, Leslie L., ed. (2005). ''The Women's Movement Today: An Encyclopedia of Third-Wave Feminism''. 2 vols. Westport: Greenwood Press. | |||
* {{Cite book| last=Karaian |first=Lara |editor1-last=Rundle |editor1-first=Lisa Bryn | editor2-last=Mitchell |editor2-first=Allyson |title=Turbo Chicks: Talking Young Feminisms |location=] |publisher=Sumach Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-1-894549-06-6 |oclc=46629305}} | |||
* {{ |
* {{cite journal | last = Hitchens | first = Donna | title = Feminism in the Nineties: Coalition Strategies | journal = Yale Journal of Law and Feminism | volume = 4 | issue = 1 | pages = 57–63| date = Fall 1991 | url = http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/yjfem4&div=12&id=&page=}} | ||
* {{Cite book| |
* {{Cite book |last=Karaian |first=Lara |editor1-last=Rundle |editor1-first=Lisa Bryn |editor2-last=Mitchell |editor2-first=Allyson |editor2-link=Allyson Mitchell |title=Turbo Chicks: Talking Young Feminisms |location=Toronto |publisher=Sumach Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-1-894549-06-6 |oclc=46629305 |url=https://archive.org/details/turbochickstalki0000unse }} | ||
* {{Cite journal |last=Kinser |first=Amber E. |title=Negotiating spaces for/through third-wave feminism |journal=NWSA Journal |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=124–153 |year=2004 |jstor=4317084 |s2cid=145349611 |url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/nwsa_journal/summary/v016/16.3kinser.html }} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Muscio |first=Inga |authorlink=Inga Muscio |title=Cunt: A Declaration of Independence|location=] |publisher=] |year=1998 |isbn=978-1-58005-015-9 |oclc=9781580050159}} | |||
* {{Cite journal | last = Springer | first = Kimberly | title = Third Wave Black Feminism? | journal = ] | volume = 27 | issue = 4 | pages = 1059–1082 | doi = 10.1086/339636 | jstor = 10.1086/339636 | date = Summer 2002| s2cid = 143519056 }} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last=Musse |first=Fowzia |journal=War Crimes Against Girls and Women |title=Somalia – The Untold Story: The War Through the Eyes of Somali Women |location=]|publisher=] |year=2004 |pages=69–76 |isbn=978-0-7453-2209-4 |oclc=53038753 }} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Verhofstadt |first=Dirk |authorlink=Dirk Verhofstadt |title=De derde feministische golf |publisher=Houtekiet |location=] |year=2006 |language=] |isbn=978-90-5240-915-3 |oclc=84677530 }} | |||
* {{Cite book |last=Walker |first=Rebecca |title=To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism |publisher=] |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-385-47261-6 |oclc=32274323 }} | |||
==Suggested listening== | |||
* ] - '']'' (]) (1994) | |||
* ] - '']'' (Kill Rock Stars) (1992) | |||
* ] - '']'' EP ]'' split LP with Bikini Kill] (Kill Rock Stars) (1993) | |||
* ] - '']'' (]/]) (1995) | |||
* ] - '']'' (Matador) (1993) | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* | |||
* | |||
* |
* | ||
* | * | ||
Line 204: | Line 287: | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:3}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:3}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 03:04, 22 December 2024
Feminist movement, 1990s–2020sThird-wave feminism is a feminist movement that began in the early 1990s, prominent in the decades prior to the fourth wave. Grounded in the civil-rights advances of the second wave, Gen X third-wave feminists born in the 1960s and 1970s embraced diversity and individualism in women, and sought to redefine what it meant to be a feminist. The third wave saw the emergence of new feminist currents and theories, such as intersectionality, sex positivity, vegetarian ecofeminism, transfeminism, and postmodern feminism. According to feminist scholar Elizabeth Evans, the "confusion surrounding what constitutes third-wave feminism is in some respects its defining feature."
The third wave is traced to Anita Hill's televised testimony in 1991 to an all-male all-white Senate Judiciary Committee that the judge Clarence Thomas had sexually harassed her. The term third wave is credited to Rebecca Walker, who responded to Thomas's appointment to the Supreme Court with an article in Ms. magazine, "Becoming the Third Wave" (1992). She wrote:
So I write this as a plea to all women, especially women of my generation: Let Thomas' confirmation serve to remind you, as it did me, that the fight is far from over. Let this dismissal of a woman's experience move you to anger. Turn that outrage into political power. Do not vote for them unless they work for us. Do not have sex with them, do not break bread with them, do not nurture them if they don't prioritize our freedom to control our bodies and our lives. I am not a post-feminism feminist. I am the Third Wave.
Walker sought to establish that third-wave feminism was not just a reaction but a movement in itself because the feminist cause had more work ahead. The term intersectionality to describe the idea that women experience "layers of oppression" caused, for example, by gender, race, and class had been introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989, and it was during the third wave that the concept flourished.
In addition, third-wave feminism is traced to the emergence of the riot grrrl feminist punk subculture in Olympia, Washington, in the early 1990s. As feminists came online in the late 1990s and early 2000s and reached a global audience with blogs and e-zines, they broadened their goals, focusing on abolishing gender-role stereotypes and expanding feminism to include women with diverse racial and cultural identities.
History
Further information: First-wave feminism, Second-wave feminism, Feminist sex wars, and Fourth-wave feminismThe rights and programs gained by feminists of the second wave served as a foundation for the third wave. The gains included Title IX (equal access to education), public discussion about the abuse and rape of women, access to contraception and other reproductive services (including the legalization of abortion), the creation and enforcement of sexual-harassment policies for women in the workplace, the creation of domestic-abuse shelters for women and children, child-care services, educational funding for young women, and women's studies programs.
Feminists of color such as Gloria E. Anzaldúa, bell hooks, Cherríe Moraga, Audre Lorde, Maxine Hong Kingston, Leslie Marmon Silko and the members of the Combahee River Collective sought to negotiate a space within feminist thought for consideration of race. Cherríe Moraga and Gloria E. Anzaldúa had published the anthology This Bridge Called My Back (1981), which, along with All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave (1982), edited by Akasha (Gloria T.) Hull, Patricia Bell-Scott, and Barbara Smith, argued that second-wave feminism had focused primarily on the problems of white women. The emphasis on the intersection between race and gender became increasingly prominent. However, allowing third wave feminism to adopt the paradigm of intersectionality can erase the narrative of second-wave feminist of color who worked towards inclusion.
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the feminist sex wars arose as a reaction against the radical feminism of the second wave and its views on sexuality, countering with a concept of "sex-positivity", and heralding the third wave.
Another crucial point for the start of the third wave is the publication in 1990 of Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity by Judith Butler, which soon became one of the most influential works of contemporary feminist theory. In it, Butler argued against homogenizing conceptions of "women", which had a normative and exclusionary effect not only in the social world more broadly but also within feminism. This was the case not only for racialized or working-class women, but also for masculine, lesbian, or non-binary women. They outlined their theory of gender as performativity, which posited that gender works by enforcing a series of repetitions of verbal and non-verbal acts that generate the "illusion" of a coherent and intelligible gender expression and identity, which would otherwise lack any essential property. Lastly, Butler developed the claim that there is no "natural" sex, but that what we call as such is always already culturally mediated, and therefore inseparable from gender. These views were foundational for the field of queer theory, and played a major role in the development of third-wave feminist theories and practices.
Early years
Anita Hill
Main article: Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nominationIn 1991, Anita Hill, when questioned, accused Clarence Thomas, an African-American judge who had been nominated to the United States Supreme Court, of sexual harassment. Thomas denied the accusations, calling them a "high-tech lynching". After extensive debate, the United States Senate voted 52–48 in favor of Thomas. In response, Ms. Magazine published an article by Rebecca Walker, entitled "Becoming the Third Wave", in which she stated: "I am not a post-feminism feminist. I am the third wave." Many had argued that Thomas should be confirmed, despite Hill's accusations, because of his plans to create opportunities for people of color. When Walker asked her partner his opinion and he said the same thing, she asked: "When will progressive black men prioritize my rights and well-being?" She wanted racial equality but without dismissing women.
In 1992, dubbed the "Year of the Woman", four women entered the United States Senate to join the two already there. The following year, another woman, Kay Bailey Hutchison, won a special election, bringing the number to seven. The 1990s saw the US's first female Attorney General (Janet Reno) and Secretary of State (Madeleine Albright), as well as the second woman on the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and the first US First Lady, Hillary Clinton, to have had an independent political, legal and activist career.
Riot grrrl
The emergence of riot grrrl, the feminist punk subculture, in the early 1990s in Olympia, Washington, marked the beginning of third-wave feminism. The triple "r" in grrrl was intended to reclaim the word girl for women. Alison Piepmeier writes that riot grrrl and Sarah Dyer's Action Girl Newsletter formulated "a style, rhetoric, and iconography for grrrl zines" that came to define third-wave feminism, and that focused on the viewpoint of adolescent girls. Based on hard-core punk rock, the movement created zines and art, talked about rape, patriarchy, sexuality, and female empowerment, started chapters, and supported and organized women in music. An undated Bikini Kill tour flier asked "What is Riot grrrl?":
BECAUSE in every form of media I see us/myself slapped, decapitated, laughed at, objectified, raped, trivialized, pushed, ignored, stereotyped, kicked, scorned, molested, silenced, invalidated, knifed, shot, choked, and killed. ... BECAUSE a safe space needs to be created for girls where we can open our eyes and reach out to each other without being threatened by this sexist society and our day to day bullshit. ... BECAUSE we girls want to create mediums that speak to US. We are tired of boy band after boy band, boy zine after boy zine, boy punk after boy punk after boy. BECAUSE I am tired of these things happening to me; I'm not a fuck toy. I'm not a punching bag. I'm not a joke.
Riot grrrl was grounded in the DIY philosophy of punk values, adopting an anti-corporate stance of self-sufficiency and self-reliance. Its emphasis on universal female identity and separatism often appeared more closely allied with second-wave feminism. Bands associated with the movement included Bratmobile, Excuse 17, Jack Off Jill, Free Kitten, Heavens to Betsy, Huggy Bear, L7, Fifth Column, and Team Dresch, and most prominently Bikini Kill.
Riot grrrl culture gave people the space to enact change on a macro, meso and micro scale. As Kevin Dunn explains:
Using the do-it-yourself ethos of punk to provide resources for individual empowerment, Riot Grrrl encouraged females to engage in multiple sites of resistance. At the macro-level, Riot Grrrls resist society's dominant constructions of femininity. At the meso-level, they resist stifling gender roles in punk. At the micro-level, they challenge gender constructions in their families and among their peers.
The demise of riot grrrl is linked to commodification and misrepresentation of its message, mainly through media coverage. Writing in Billboard magazine, Jennifer Keishin Armstrong states:
In the early 1990s, the women's movement seemed dead to the mainstream. Few pop cultural figures embraced the term "feminist." The underground punk movement known as "Riot Grrrl" scared anyone outside of it, while Alanis Morissette's breakthrough single "You Oughta Know" scared everyone else even more. Then, in the middle of the decade, the Spice Girls took all of that fear and made feminism – popularized as Girl Power – fun. Suddenly, regular girls far outside Women's Studies classrooms had at least an inkling of what would be known in wonky circles as Third Wave Feminism – led by Generation Xers pushing for sexual freedom and respect for traditionally "girly" pursuits like makeup and fashion, among many other issues.
El Hunt of NME states, "Riot grrrl bands in general were very focused on making space for women at gigs. They understood the importance of giving women a platform and voice to speak out against abusers. For a lot of young women and girls, who probably weren't following the Riot grrrl scene at all, The Spice Girls brought this spirit into the mainstream and made it accessible."
Purpose
Arguably the biggest challenge to third-wave feminism was that the gains of second-wave feminism were taken for granted, and the importance of feminism not understood. Baumgardner and Richards (2000) wrote: "or anyone born after the early 1960s, the presence of feminism in our lives is taken for granted. For our generation, feminism is like fluoride. We scarcely notice that we have it—it's simply in the water."
Essentially the claim was that gender equality had already been achieved, via the first two waves, and further attempts to push for women's rights were irrelevant and unnecessary, or perhaps even pushed the pendulum too far in women's favor. This issue manifested itself in the heated debates about whether affirmative action was creating gender equality or punishing white, middle-class males for the biological history that they had inherited. Third-wave feminism therefore focused on Consciousness raising—"one's ability to open their mind to the fact that male domination does affect the women of our generation, is what we need.
Third-wave feminists often engaged in "micro-politics", and challenged the second wave's paradigm as to what was good for women. Proponents of third-wave feminism said that it allowed women to define feminism for themselves. Describing third-wave feminism in Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism And The Future (2000), Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards suggested that feminism could change with every generation and individual:
The fact that feminism is no longer limited to arenas where we expect to see it—NOW, Ms., women's studies, and redsuited congresswomen—perhaps means that young women today have really reaped what feminism has sown. Raised after Title IX and William Wants a Doll [sic], young women emerged from college or high school or two years of marriage or their first job and began challenging some of the received wisdom of the past ten or twenty years of feminism. We're not doing feminism the same way that the seventies feminists did it; being liberated doesn't mean copying what came before but finding one's own way—a way that is genuine to one's own generation.
Third-wave feminists used personal narratives as a form of feminist theory. Expressing personal experiences gave women space to recognize that they were not alone in the oppression and discrimination they faced. Using these accounts has benefits because it records personal details that may not be available in traditional historical texts.
Third-wave ideology focused on a more post-structuralist interpretation of gender and sexuality. Post-structuralist feminists saw binaries such as male–female as an artificial construct created to maintain the power of the dominant group. Joan W. Scott wrote in 1998 that "poststructuralists insist that words and texts have no fixed or intrinsic meanings, that there is no transparent or self-evident relationship between them and either ideas or things, no basic or ultimate correspondence between language and the world".
Relationship with second wave
The second wave of feminism is often accused of being elitist and ignoring groups such as women of colour and transgender women; instead, it focused on white, middle class, cisgender women. Third wave feminists questioned the beliefs of their predecessors and began to apply feminist theory to a wider variety of women, who had not been previously included in feminist activity.
Amy Richards defined the feminist culture for the third wave as "third wave because it's an expression of having grown up with feminism". Second-wave feminists grew up where the politics intertwined within the culture, such as "Kennedy, the Vietnam War, civil rights, and women's rights". In contrast, the third wave sprang from a culture of "punk-rock, hip-hop, 'zines, products, consumerism and the Internet". In an essay entitled "Generations, Academic Feminists in dialogue" Diane Elam wrote:
This problem manifests itself when senior feminists insist that junior feminists be good daughters, defending the same kind of feminism their mothers advocated. Questions and criticisms are allowed, but only if they proceed from the approved brand of feminism. Daughters are not allowed to invent new ways of thinking and doing feminism for themselves; feminists' politics should take the same shape that it has always assumed.
Rebecca Walker, in To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism (1995), wrote about her fear of rejection by her mother (Alice Walker) and her godmother (Gloria Steinem) for challenging their views:
Young Women feminists find themselves watching their speech and tone in their works so as not to upset their elder feminist mothers. There is a definite gap among feminists who consider themselves to be second-wave and those who would label themselves as third-wave. Although, the age criteria for second-wave feminists and third-wave feminists is murky, younger feminists definitely have a hard time proving themselves worthy as feminist scholars and activists.
Issues
Violence against women
Violence against women, including rape, domestic violence, and sexual harassment, became a central issue. Organizations such as V-Day formed with the goal of ending gender violence, and artistic expressions, such as The Vagina Monologues, generated awareness. Third-wave feminists wanted to transform traditional notions of sexuality and embrace "an exploration of women's feelings about sexuality that included vagina-centred topics as diverse as orgasm, birth, and rape".
Reproductive rights
Main article: Reproductive rightsOne of third-wave feminism's primary goals was to demonstrate that access to contraception and abortion are women's reproductive rights. According to Baumgardner and Richards, "It is not feminism's goal to control any woman's fertility, only to free each woman to control her own." South Dakota's 2006 attempt to ban abortion in all cases, except when necessary to protect the mother's life, and the US Supreme Court's vote to uphold the partial birth abortion ban were viewed as restrictions on women's civil and reproductive rights. Restrictions on abortion in the US, which was mostly legalized by the 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, were becoming more common in states around the country. These included mandatory waiting periods, parental-consent laws, and spousal-consent laws.
Reclaiming derogatory terms
English speakers continued to use words such as spinster, bitch, whore, and cunt to refer to women in derogatory ways. Inga Muscio wrote, "I posit that we're free to seize a word that was kidnapped and co-opted in a pain-filled, distant past, with a ransom that cost our grandmothers' freedom, children, traditions, pride and land." Taking back the word bitch was fueled by the single "All Women Are Bitches" (1994) by the all-woman band Fifth Column, and by the book Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women (1999) by Elizabeth Wurtzel.
The utility of the reclamation strategy became a hot topic with the introduction of SlutWalks in 2011. The first took place in Toronto on 3 April that year in response to a Toronto police officer's remark that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized." Additional SlutWalks sprang up internationally, including in Berlin, London, New York City, Seattle, and West Hollywood. Several feminist bloggers criticized the campaign; reclamation of the word slut was questioned.
Sexual liberation
Third-wave feminists expanded the second-wave feminist's definition of sexual liberation to "mean a process of first becoming conscious of the ways one's gender identity and sexuality have been shaped by society and then intentionally constructing (and becoming free to express) one's authentic gender identity". Since third-wave feminism relied on different personal definitions to explain feminism, there is controversy surrounding what sexual liberation really entails. Many third-wave feminists supported the idea that women should embrace their sexuality as a way to take back their power.
Other issues
Third-wave feminism regarded race, social class, and transgender rights as central issues. It also paid attention to workplace matters such as the glass ceiling, unfair maternity-leave policies, motherhood support for single mothers by means of welfare and child care, respect for working mothers, and the rights of mothers who decide to leave their careers to raise their children full-time.
Criticism
Lack of cohesion
One issue raised by critics was a lack of cohesion because of the absence of a single cause for third-wave feminism. The first wave fought for and gained the right for women to vote. The second wave fought for the right for women to have access to an equal opportunity in the workforce, as well as the end of legal sex discrimination. The third wave allegedly lacked a cohesive goal and was often seen as an extension of the second wave. Some argued that the third wave could be dubbed the "Second Wave, Part Two" when it came to the politics of feminism and that "only young feminist culture" was "truly third wave". One argument ran that the equation of third-wave feminism with individualism prevented the movement from growing and moving towards political goals. Kathleen P. Iannello wrote:
The conceptual and real-world 'trap' of choice feminism (between work and home) has led women to challenge each other rather than the patriarchy. Individualism conceived of as 'choice' does not empower women; it silences them and prevents feminism from becoming a political movement and addressing the real issues of distribution of resources.
Objection to "wave construct"
Feminist scholars such as Shira Tarrant objected to the "wave construct" because it ignored important progress between the periods. Furthermore, if feminism is a global movement, she argued, the fact that the "first-, second-, and third waves time periods correspond most closely to American feminist developments" raises serious problems about how feminism fails to recognize the history of political issues around the world. The "wave construct", critics argued, also focused on white women's suffrage and continued to marginalize the issues of women of color and lower-class women.
Relationship with women of color
Third-wave feminists proclaim themselves as the most inclusive wave of feminism. Critics have noted that while progressive, there is still exclusion of women of color. Black feminists argue that "the women rights movements were not uniquely for the liberation of Blacks or Black Women. Rather, efforts such as women's suffrage and abolition of slavery ultimately uplifted, strengthened, and benefited White society and White women".
"Girly" feminism
Third-wave feminism was often associated, primarily by its critics, with the emergence of so-called "lipstick" or "girly" feminists and the rise of "raunch culture". This was because these new feminists advocated "expressions of femininity and female sexuality as a challenge to objectification". Accordingly, this included the dismissal of any restriction, whether deemed patriarchal or feminist, to define or control how women or girls should dress, act, or generally express themselves. These emerging positions stood in stark contrast with the anti-pornography strains of feminism prevalent in the 1980s. Second-wave feminism viewed pornography as encouraging violence towards women. The new feminists posited that the ability to make autonomous choices about self-expression could be an empowering act of resistance, not simply internalized oppression.
Such views were critiqued because of the subjective nature of empowerment and autonomy. Scholars were unsure whether empowerment was best measured as an "internal feeling of power and agency" or as an external "measure of power and control". Moreover they critiqued an over-investment in "a model of free will and choice" in the marketplace of identities and ideas. Regardless, the "girly" feminists attempted to be open to all different selves while maintaining a dialogue about the meaning of identity and femininity in the contemporary world.
Third-wave feminists said that these viewpoints should not be limited by the label "girly" feminism or regarded as simply advocating "raunch culture". Rather, they sought to be inclusive of the many diverse roles women fulfill. Gender scholars Linda Duits [nl] and Liesbet van Zoonen highlighted this inclusivity by looking at the politicization of women's clothing choices and how the "controversial sartorial choices of girls" and women are constituted in public discourse as "a locus of necessary regulation". Thus the "hijab" and the "belly shirt", as dress choices, were both identified as requiring regulation but for different reasons. Both caused controversy, while appearing to be opposing forms of self-expression. Through the lens of "girly" feminists, one can view both as symbolic of "political agency and resistance to objectification". The "hijab" could be seen as an act of resistance against Western ambivalence towards Islamic identity, and the "belly shirt" an act of resistance against patriarchal society's narrow views of female sexuality. Both were regarded as valid forms of self-expression.
Timeline
1990s
Date | Event |
---|---|
1990 | Publication of Judith Butler, Gender Trouble. |
1990 | Publication of Naomi Wolf, The Beauty Myth. |
1991 | Riot grrrl movement begins in Olympia, Washington and Washington, D.C. in the US. |
March 1991 | In R v R, the House of Lords in the UK rules that a marital rape exemption does not exist in English law. |
March 1991 | In United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc., the US Supreme Court declares that employers cannot exclude women from jobs in which exposure to toxic substances could harm a developing fetus. |
May 1991 | Release of the film Thelma and Louise: "It took all those feelings of alienation and anger—which until that point had mostly found expression in things like 'Take Back the Night' rallies—and turned them into something rebellious, transgressive, iconic, punk rock and mainstream." – Carina Chocano, New York Times. |
31 July 1991 | The US Senate votes overwhelmingly to open combat positions for women aviators. |
1991 | Susan Faludi publishes Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women. |
July 1991 | Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination and the televised testimony in October of Anita Hill that he had sexually harassed her. |
October 1991 | "Opportunity 2000" is launched in the UK to increase women's employment opportunities. |
January 1992 | In response to the Thomas nomination, American feminist Rebecca Walker publishes "Becoming the Third Wave" in Ms. magazine. |
1992 | Four women enter the US Senate to join the two already there, lending 1992 the label "Year of the Woman" in the US. |
1992 | Third Wave Direct Action Corporation (later Third Wave Foundation and the Third Wave Fund) founded in the US by Rebecca Walker and Shannon Liss-Riordan to support young activists; organized Freedom Ride 1992, a nationwide bus tour to register voters. |
1993 | Family and Medical Leave Act becomes law in the US. |
1993 | Janet Reno nominated and confirmed as the first female US Attorney General after President Bill Clinton's previous choices, Zoë Baird and Kimba Wood, fail because of Nannygate. |
1993 | "Take Our Daughters to Work Day" debuts in the US to build girls' self-esteem and open their eyes to a variety of career possibilities for women. It was later renamed Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day. |
1993 | First edition of Bust magazine appears, founded by Laurie Henzel, Marcelle Karp, and Debbie Stoller. |
1994 | Women taking back the word bitch are helped by the single "All Women Are Bitches" by the all-woman Canadian band Fifth Column. |
1994 | Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 confirms that marital rape is illegal in the UK. |
1994 | Violence Against Women Act becomes law in the US and establishes the Office on Violence Against Women. |
1995 | Publication of Rebecca Walker (ed.), To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism. |
1995 | Fourth World Conference on Women held in China. |
1996 | Northern Ireland Women's Coalition founded. |
1996 | Feminist play The Vagina Monologues, by American playwright Eve Ensler, premieres in New York. |
1996 | In United States v. Virginia, the US Supreme Court rules that male-only admissions policy of state-supported Virginia Military Institute violates the Fourteenth Amendment. |
1996 | First edition of the magazine Bitch: Feminist Response to Pop Culture appears. |
1997 | Publication of Leslie Heywood and Jennifer Drake (eds.), Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism. |
1997 | Turkish feminist Şenal Sarıhan shared the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Award. |
1997 | Layli Miller-Muro founds the Tahirih Justice Center in the US following Matter of Kasinga, an asylum case dealing with female genital mutilation. |
1998 | Eve Ensler and others, including Willa Shalit, a producer of the Westside Theatre production of The Vagina Monologues, launch V-Day, a global non-profit movement that raises over $75 million for women's anti-violence groups. |
1999 | Publication of Germaine Greer, The Whole Woman |
1999 | Publication of Marcelle Karp and Debbie Stoller (eds.), The BUST Guide to the New Girl Order. |
1999 | Publication of Elizabeth Wurtzel, Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women. |
1999 | Publication of Carol Ann Duffy, The World's Wife |
2000s
Date | Event |
---|---|
2000 | Publication of Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards, Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future |
October 2000 | CBS agrees to pay $8 million to settle a sex discrimination lawsuit on behalf of 200 women. |
2001 | The Isle of Man passes its first sex-discrimination bill. |
2001 | Condoleezza Rice becomes the first female US national security adviser. |
2004 | The March for Women's Lives is held in Washington, D.C., to support the right to abortion, access to birth control, scientifically accurate sex education, and prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections, and to show public support for mothers and children. |
2004 | Asylum Gender Guidelines are introduced by the UK for female asylum seekers. |
2004 | Publication of Vivien Labaton and Dawn Lundy (eds.), The Fire This Time: Young Activists and the New Feminism. |
2004 | Start of Feministing blog by Jessica Valenti and Vanessa Valenti. |
2005 | Ellen Johnson Sirleaf in Liberia becomes Africa's first elected woman leader and the first black female president in the world. |
2005 | Angela Merkel becomes Germany's first female chancellor. |
2007 | Nancy Pelosi becomes the first woman Speaker in the US Congress. |
1 April 2007 | The Gender Equality Duty of the Equality Act 2006 comes into effect in the UK. It requires public authorities "to promote equality of opportunity between women and men". |
2007 | Publication of Jessica Valenti, Full Frontal Feminism: A Young Woman's Guide to Why Feminism Matters. |
2007 | Publication of Julia Serrano, Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Feminism and the Scapegoating of Femininity |
2008 | Publication of Jaclyn Friedman and Jessica Valenti (eds.), Yes Means Yes. |
2008 | Norway requires of all companies that at least 40 percent of their board members be women. |
May 2008 | In Los Angeles, Diana Bijon's husband, Michael, takes her last name upon marriage, after their lawsuit led to a new California state law guaranteeing the rights of married couples and registered domestic partners to choose whichever last name they prefer. |
2008 | Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 comes into force in the UK. |
2009 | In the UK, Carol Ann Duffy becomes the first female Poet Laureate. |
3 April 2011 | First SlutWalk takes place in Toronto in response to Toronto police officer Michael Sanguinetti's statement that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized". |
Notes
- Steve Feliciano (New York Public Library, 2013): "The emergence of the Riot Grrrl movement began in the early 1990s, when a group of women in Olympia, Washington, held a meeting to discuss how to address sexism in the punk scene. The women decided they wanted to start a 'girl riot' against a society they felt offered no validation of women's experiences. And thus the Riot Grrrl movement was born."
- Amber Lynn Zimmerman, M. Joan McDermott, and Christina M. Gould wrote in 2009 that third-wave feminism offered five primary focuses: (1) Responsible choice grounded in dialogue; (2) respect and appreciation for experiences and dynamic knowledge; (3) an understanding of "the personal is political" that incorporates both the idea that personal experiences have roots in structural problems and the idea that responsible, individuated personal action has social consequences; (4) use of personal narratives in both theorizing and political activism; (5) political activism as local, with global connections and consequences.
References
- ^ Walker, Rebecca (January 1992). "Becoming the Third Wave" (PDF). Ms.: 39–41. ISSN 0047-8318. OCLC 194419734. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-01-15. Retrieved 2016-10-13.
- ^ Evans 2015, 22.
- Rivers, Nicola (2017). Postfeminism(s) and the Arrival of the Fourth Wave. Palgrave Macmillan. 8.
- Cochrane, Kira (10 December 2013). "The Fourth Wave of Feminism: Meet the Rebel Women". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
- "The Third Wave of Feminism" Archived 2019-05-28 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopaedia Britannica.
- ^ Baumgardner & Richards 2000, p. 77
- Evans 2015, 49.
- "Becoming the Third Wave" by Rebecca Walker
- "Becoming the Third Wave" by Rebecca Walker
- Evans 2015, 19.
- Feliciano, Steve (19 June 2013). "The Riot Grrrl Movement". New York Public Library. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
- ^ Brunell, Laura (2008). "Feminism Re-Imagined: The Third Wave" Archived 2018-09-22 at the Wayback Machine. Encyclopædia Britannica Book of the Year. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
- Tong, Rosemarie (2009). Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction (Third ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. pp. 284–285, 289. ISBN 978-0-8133-4375-4. OCLC 156811918.
- ^ Gillis, Howie & Munford 2007
- ^ Heywood, Leslie; Drake, Jennifer, eds. (1997). Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-3005-9. OCLC 36876149.
- Hewitt, Nancy A., ed. (2010). No permanent waves: recasting histories of U.S. feminism. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-4724-4. OCLC 344074469.
- As noted in:
- Duggan, Lisa; Hunter, Nan D. (1995). Sex wars: sexual dissent and political culture. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-91036-1.
- Hansen, Karen Tranberg; Philipson, Ilene J. (1990). Women, class, and the feminist imagination: a socialist-feminist reader. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. ISBN 978-0-87722-630-7.
- Gerhard, Jane F. (2001). Desiring revolution: second-wave feminism and the rewriting of American sexual thought, 1920 to 1982. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-11204-8.
- Leidholdt, Dorchen; Raymond, Janice G (1990). The Sexual liberals and the attack on feminism. New York: Pergamon Press. ISBN 978-0-08-037457-4.
- Vance, Carole S (1989). Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Thorsons Publishers. ISBN 978-0-04-440593-1.
- Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. pp. 160, 9.
- Mikkola, Mari (18 January 2022). "Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 18 June 2022.
- Butler, Judith (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge. p. 12.
- Rottenberg, Catherine (27 August 2003). "Judith Butler". The Literary Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18 June 2022.
- ^ Walker, Rebecca (1995). To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism. New York: Anchor Books. ISBN 978-0-385-47262-3. OCLC 32274323.
- ^ Piepmeier, Alison (2009). Girl Zines: Making Media, Doing Feminism. New York: New York University Press. p. 45.
- ^ Rowe-Finkbeiner, Kristin (2004). The F Word: Feminism in Jeopardy. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press. p. 85. ISBN 978-1-58005-114-9.
- Starr, Chelsea (2000). "Adolescent girls and feminism", in Code, Lorraine (ed.). Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories. London and New York: Routledge, p. 3. ISBN 0-415-30885-2.
- ^ Schilt, Kristen (2003). "'A Little Too Ironic': The Appropriation and Packaging of Riot Grrrl Politics by Mainstream Female Musicians", in Popular Music and Society, 26.
- Darms, Lisa, ed. (2013). The Riot Grrrl Collection. The Feminist Press at the City University of New York. 168. ISBN 978-1558618220.
- Rosenberg, Jessica and Gitana, Garofalo (Spring 1998). "Riot Grrrl: Revolutions from within", Signs, 23(3). JSTOR 3175311
- Marcu, Sara (2010). Girls To The Front: The True Story of the Riot Grrrl Revolution. New York: HarperPerennial. ISBN 978-0-06-180636-0. Retrieved 26 December 2022.
- ^ Dunn, Kevin C. (2014-04-03). "Pussy Rioting". International Feminist Journal of Politics. 16 (2): 317–334. doi:10.1080/14616742.2014.919103. ISSN 1461-6742. S2CID 146989637.
- "Spice Girls' 'Wannabe': How 'Girl Power' Reinvigorated Mainstream Feminism in the '90s". Billboard. Archived from the original on March 23, 2019. Retrieved March 21, 2019.
- "Spice Girls: What happened to Girl Power?". BBC. Archived from the original on May 25, 2019. Retrieved May 25, 2019.
- Newman & White 2012, p. 14–15.
- MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1989). Toward A Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard University Press. p. 83. ISBN 9780674896451.
- Freedman, Estelle B. (2002). No Turning Back: The History of Feminism and the Future of Women. London: Ballantine Books. ISBN 9780345450531. OCLC 49193867.
- Henry 2004.
- Faludi, Susan (1991). Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women. New York: Crown Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-517-57698-4. OCLC 23016353.
- YU, SU-LIN (October 2011). "Reclaiming the Personal: Personal Narratives of Third-Wave Feminists". Women's Studies. 40 (7): 873–889. doi:10.1080/00497878.2011.603606. ISSN 0049-7878. S2CID 144937285.
- Hardin, Marie; Whiteside, Erin (2013). "From Second-Wave to Poststructuralist Feminism". The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies: Media Effects/Media Psychology. Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems991. ISBN 9781405193566.
- Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre (2000). "Poststructural feminism in education: An overview". International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 13 (5): 477–515. doi:10.1080/09518390050156422. S2CID 216559048.
- Scott, Joan W (1988). "Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism". Feminist Studies. 14 (1): 32–50. doi:10.2307/3177997. hdl:2027/spo.0499697.0014.104. JSTOR 3177997.
- Zimmerman, Amber Lynn; McDermott, M. Joan; Gould, Christina M. (2009). "The Local is Global: Third Wave Feminism, Peace, and Social Justice". Contemporary Justice Review. 12: 77–90. doi:10.1080/10282580802681766. S2CID 143985823.
- Davies, Edward (2018). Third Wave Feminism and Transgender: Strength Through Diversity (1 ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315107776.
- Davey, Monica (7 March 2006). "South Dakota Bans Abortion, Setting Up a Battle". The New York Times. Vol. 155, no. 53511. pp. A1–A14.
- Ludlow, Jeannie (Spring 2008). "Sometimes, It's a Child and a Choice: Toward an Embodied Abortion Praxis". NWSA Journal. 20 (1): 26–50. doi:10.1353/ff.2008.a236179. JSTOR 40071251. OCLC 364432908.
- Weitz, Tracy A.; Yanow, Susan (May 2008). "Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States". Reproductive Health Matters. 16 (31): 99–107. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31374-3. JSTOR 25475407. OCLC 282104847. PMID 18772090. S2CID 10189579.
- Indiana Code Title 16, art. XXXIV, ch. 2, § 1.1 cl. 1: Voluntary and informed consent required; viewing of fetal ultrasound Archived 2009-04-09 at the Wayback Machine x (1993; amended 1997)
- South Dakota Code Title 34, ch. 23A, § 7 Archived 2009-02-08 at the Wayback Machine
- South Carolina Code Title 44, ch. 41, art. 1, § 10 Archived 2011-07-21 at the Wayback Machine
- Muscio, Inga (1998). Cunt: A Declaration of Independence. Seattle: Seal Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-58005-015-9.
- ^ Wurtzel, Elizabeth (1998). Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-48400-8. OCLC 38144418.
- ^ "SlutWalk Toronto". Archived from the original on 2011-05-22. Retrieved 2011-05-28.
- "Slutwalks – Do you agree with the Toronto policeman?". World Have Your Say 60. BBC. Archived from the original on 2011-05-14. Retrieved 2011-05-28.
- Murphy, Meghan. "We're sluts, not feminists. Wherein my relationship with Slutwalk gets rocky". The F-Word. Archived from the original on 2011-06-10. Retrieved 2011-05-28.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link) - Beyerstein, Lindsay. "Sluts Like Me". Big Think. Archived from the original on 2011-05-21. Retrieved 2011-05-28.
- "Women: Should they have autonomy?". Women: Shakesville. Archived from the original on 2011-07-27. Retrieved 2011-05-28.
- Walia, Harsha. "Slutwalk – To March or Not to March". Racialicious. Archived from the original on 2012-08-01.
- "feminism | Definition, History, & Examples". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2018-10-08.
- ^ Harnois, Catherine (Spring 2008). "Re-Presenting Feminisms: Past, Present, and Future". NWSA Journal. 20: 120–145. doi:10.1353/ff.2008.a236183.
- Yenor, Scott (July 31, 2017). "The Rolling Revolution in Sex and Gender: A History". Public Discourse. Witherspoon Institute. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 21 April 2019.
- Grady, Constance (July 20, 2018). "The waves of feminism, and why people keep fighting over them, explained". Vox. Archived from the original on 5 April 2019. Retrieved 21 April 2019.
- Munden, Frank (7 May 2003). "Female medical workers feel maternity leave unfair". The Kapi'o Newspress. 36 (28). Archived from the original on 28 February 2009.
- Iannello, Kathleen (2010). "Women's Leadership and Third-Wave Feminism". In O'Connor, Karen (ed.). Gender and Women's Leadership: A Reference Handbook. Sage Publishing. pp. 70–77. ISBN 978-1412960830 – via The Cupola at Gettysburg College.
- ^ Iannello, Katherine P. (1998). "Third-Wave Feminism and Individualism: Promoting Equality or Reinforcing the Status Quo?" (PDF). In Whitaker, Lois Duke (ed.). Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders? A Collection of Readings. Boston, Mass: Longman.
- Tarrant, Shira (2006). When Sex Became Gender. New York: Routledge. p. 222. ISBN 978-0-415-95347-4. OCLC 62281555.
- Marbley, Aretha Faye (Fall 2005). "African-American Women's Feelings of Alienation from Third-Wave Feminism: A Conversation with My Sisters". Western Journal of Black Studies.
- ^ Newman & White 2012, p. 246
- ^ Newman & White 2012, p. 247.
- "FindLaw | Cases and Codes". FindLaw. Archived from the original on 2012-11-14. Retrieved 2012-09-28.
- Chocano, Carina (21 April 2011). "Thelma, Louise and All the Pretty Women" Archived 2018-09-28 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times.
- Schmitt, Eric (1 August 1991). "Senate Votes to Remove Ban on Women as Combat Pilots". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
- Wilson, Emily (13 December 2005). "Backlash by Susan Faludi". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 December 2017. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
- Jones, Judy (28 December 1992). "Equality campaign for women falters" Archived 2018-11-04 at the Wayback Machine, The Independent.
- "Equal opportunities for women Training Activity – TrainerActive, Training Activity Portal". Fenman.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2012-11-23. Retrieved 2012-10-31.
- ^ "BBC Radio 4 – Woman's Hour – Women's History Timeline: 1990–1999". BBC. Archived from the original on 2012-03-19. Retrieved 2012-10-31.
- Third Wave Foundation. "History". Third Wave Foundation. Archived from the original on 2015-10-25. Retrieved 2012-10-31.
- Schoenberg, Shira (2019-05-22). "Shannon Liss-Riordan touts 'fresh perspective' in campaign to unseat U.S. Sen. Ed Markey". masslive.com. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
- Dicker, R.C. (2016). A History of U.S. Feminisms. Seal Studies. Basic Books. p. 102. ISBN 978-1-58005-614-4. Retrieved 22 November 2022.
- Dicker, R.; Piepmeier, A. (2016). Catching a Wave: Reclaiming Feminism for the 21st Century. Northeastern University Press. p. 242. ISBN 978-1-55553-856-9. Retrieved 22 November 2022.
- Jones, R. (2019). Women in Changing Society. EDTECH. p. 149. ISBN 978-1-83947-434-7. Retrieved 22 November 2022.
- "Family and Medical Leave Act (1993) | LII / Legal Information Institute". Law.cornell.edu. 2012-10-12. Archived from the original on 2012-10-25. Retrieved 2012-10-31.
- "Ms. Foundation for Women – Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work". ms.foundation.org. Archived from the original on 2012-10-18.
- "History of the Violence Against Women Act". Legal Momentum. Archived from the original on 2016-05-19. Retrieved 2016-04-26.
- ^ Snyder 2008, pp. 176–177
- ^ ""Vagina Monologues" performances mark S.A. V-Day". QSanAntonio. 25 February 2012. Archived from the original on 10 August 2012. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- Ensler, Eve (2001). The Vagina Monologues. New York: Villard. ISBN 978-0-375-75052-6. OCLC 37492271.
- "United States v. Virginia". The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Archived from the original on 2012-11-04. Retrieved 2012-10-31.
- "Bitch Magazine: Our History". Bitch: Feminist Response to Pop Culture. Archived from the original on 2011-06-10. Retrieved 2019-06-02.
- Tahirih Justice Center. "Services". Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 30 November 2014.
- Schnall, Marianne (January 30, 2008). "From Superdome to SUPERLOVE—V-Day at 10". Archived from the original on 4 January 2010.
- Baumgardner & Richards 2000.
- Carlson, Scott (2000-10-25). "CBS to pay $8 million to settle sex discrimination lawsuit". Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service. Archived from the original on 2016-09-11. Retrieved 2016-04-25.
- ^ "Women's History Timeline: 2000–now". Woman's Hour, BBC Radio 4. Archived from the original on 2015-10-19. Retrieved 2012-10-31.
- "March for Women's Lives". Guttmacher.org. April 25, 2005. Archived from the original on March 10, 2013. Retrieved September 28, 2012.
- "Los Angeles man wins right to use wife's last name". Reuters. 2008-05-05. Archived from the original on 2013-05-06. Retrieved 2012-12-03.
- Chamberlain 2017, pp. 114–115.
Bibliography
- Chamberlain, Prudence (2017). The feminist fourth wave : affective temporality. Springer. ISBN 9783319536828. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
- Evans, Elizabeth (2015). The Politics of Third Wave Feminisms: Neoliberalism, Intersectionality, and the State in Britain and the US. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-29527-9.
- Gillis, Stacy; Howie, Gillian; Munford, Rebecca (2007). Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration (Revised ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-1821-5.
- Henry, Astrid (2004). Not My Mother's Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-21713-4. OCLC 53932637.
- Baumgardner, Jennifer; Richards, Amy (2000). Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 978-0-374-52622-1.
- Newman, Jacquetta A.; White, Linda Ann (2012). Women, Politics, and Public Policy: The Political Struggles of Canadian Women (2nd ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195432497.
- Snyder, R. Claire (1 September 2008). "What Is Third-Wave Feminism? A New Directions Essay". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 34 (1): 175–196. doi:10.1086/588436. ISSN 0097-9740. JSTOR 10.1086/588436. S2CID 144068546.
Further reading
- Baumgardner, Jennifer; Richards, Amy (2005). Grassroots: A Field Guide for Feminist Activism. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. ISBN 978-0-374-52865-2.
- Evans, Elizabeth (2016). "What makes a (third) wave?". International Feminist Journal of Politics. 18 (3): 409–428. doi:10.1080/14616742.2015.1027627. hdl:1983/7fb16f95-5556-4a3f-b3c0-178a0cf69671. S2CID 145102947.
- Fernandes, Leela (2010). "Unsettling 'Third Wave Feminism': Feminist Waves, Intersectionality, and Identity Politics in Retrospect". In Hewitt, Nancy (ed.). No Permanent Waves: Recasting Histories of U.S. Feminism. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-4724-4.
- Findlen, Barbara, ed. (1995). Listen Up! Voices from the Next Feminist Generation. Seattle: Seal Press. ISBN 978-1-878067-61-6.
- Harnois, Catherine (2008). "Re-presenting feminisms: Past, present, and future". NWSA Journal. 20 (1): 120–145. doi:10.1353/ff.2008.a236183. JSTOR 40071255.
- Hernández, Daisy; Reman, Bushra (2002). Colonize This! Young Women of Color and Today's Feminism. Seal Press. ISBN 978-1-58005-067-8.
- Heywood, Leslie L., ed. (2005). The Women's Movement Today: An Encyclopedia of Third-Wave Feminism. 2 vols. Westport: Greenwood Press.
- Hitchens, Donna (Fall 1991). "Feminism in the Nineties: Coalition Strategies". Yale Journal of Law and Feminism. 4 (1): 57–63. Pdf.
- Karaian, Lara (2001). Rundle, Lisa Bryn; Mitchell, Allyson (eds.). Turbo Chicks: Talking Young Feminisms. Toronto: Sumach Press. ISBN 978-1-894549-06-6. OCLC 46629305.
- Kinser, Amber E. (2004). "Negotiating spaces for/through third-wave feminism". NWSA Journal. 16 (3): 124–153. JSTOR 4317084. S2CID 145349611.
- Springer, Kimberly (Summer 2002). "Third Wave Black Feminism?". Signs. 27 (4): 1059–1082. doi:10.1086/339636. JSTOR 10.1086/339636. S2CID 143519056.
Suggested listening
- Bikini Kill - The C.D. Version of the First Two Records (Kill Rock Stars) (1994)
- Heavens to Betsy - Calculated (Kill Rock Stars) (1992)
- Huggy Bear - Our Troubled Youth EP (Kill Rock Stars) (1993)
- Alanis Morissette - Jagged Little Pill (Maverick/Reprise) (1995)
- Liz Phair - Exile in Guyville (Matador) (1993)
External links
- "Becoming the Third Wave" by Rebecca Walker
- interview with Rebecca Walker in Satya Magazine
- Interview with Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards
Feminism | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
History |
| ||||||
Movements and ideologies |
| ||||||
Concepts |
| ||||||
Theory |
| ||||||
By country |
| ||||||
Lists |
| ||||||