Misplaced Pages

High-fructose corn syrup: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:00, 26 May 2015 edit85.211.108.65 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:20, 21 December 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,809 edits Rescued 1 archive link; reformat 1 link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20 
(781 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Processed corn syrup}}
{{Redirect-distinguish2|HFCS|]}}
{{Redirect-distinguish-text|HFCS|]}}
{{nutritionalvalue| name = High-fructose corn syrup | kJ=1176 | protein=0 g | fat=0 g | carbs=76 g | sugar=76 g | fiber=0 g | sodium_mg=2 | potassium_mg = 0 | vitC_mg=0 | riboflavin_mg=0.019 | niacin_mg=0 | pantothenic_mg=0.011 | folate_ug=0 | iron_mg=0.42 | magnesium_mg=2 | phosphorus_mg=4 | zinc_mg=0.22 | calcium_mg=6 | vitB6_mg=0.024 | water=24 g | right=1 | source_usda=1 | note=Shown is for 100 g, roughly 5.25 tbsp.}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2023}}
]
'''High fructose corn syrup''' ('''HFCS''') (also called '''glucose-fructose'''<ref>Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: </ref> and '''isoglucose'''<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.aaf-eu.org/factsheet-on-glucose-fructose-syrups-and-isoglucose/ | title=Factsheet on Glucose Fructose Syrups and Isoglucose | author=European Starch Association}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | author= | title=Frequently Asked Questions: What is Glucose-Fructose Syrup? | url=http://www.eufic.org/page/en/page/FAQ/faqid/glucose-fructose-syrup/ | publisher=European Food Information Council (EUFIC) | accessdate=2 April 2013}}</ref>) is made from ] that has been ] by ] to convert some of its ] into ]. High fructose corn syrup was first brought to market in the early 1970s through the cooperative effort of a US company, the Clinton Corn Processing Company, and the Japanese research institute where the enzyme was discovered.


]s) of fructose (left) and glucose (right)]]
HFCS is used worldwide to sweeten foods and beverages since it is easier to handle than granulated sugar, and since price of the raw material, corn, has generally been more stable due to government subsidies and a wider worldwide base of production, than the sugar cane used for sugar production. Use of HCFS peaked in the late 1990s; demand decreased due to public concern about a possible link between HCFS and metabolic diseases like obesity and diabetes as well as reports of widespread mercury contamination in US HFCS in 2009. The ] has attempted to counter negative public perceptions by marketing campaigns describing HFCS as "natural" and by attempting to change the name of the product to "corn sugar," which the FDA rejected.


'''High-fructose corn syrup''' ('''HFCS'''), also known as '''glucose–fructose''', '''isoglucose''' and '''glucose–fructose syrup''',<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aaf-eu.org/factsheet-on-glucose-fructose-syrups-and-isoglucose/ | title=Factsheet on Glucose Fructose Syrups and Isoglucose |author=European Starch Association| date=10 June 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=Glucose-fructose syrup: How is it produced? |url=http://www.eufic.org/en/food-production/article/glucose-fructose-how-is-it-produced-infographic | publisher=European Food Information Council (EUFIC) |access-date=9 February 2024 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170517230154/http://www.eufic.org/en/food-production/article/glucose-fructose-how-is-it-produced-infographic |archive-date=17 May 2017}}</ref> is a ] made from ]. As in the production of conventional ], the starch is broken down into glucose by enzymes. To make HFCS, the corn syrup is further ] by ] to convert some of its ] into ]. HFCS was first marketed in the early 1970s by the Clinton Corn Processing Company, together with the Japanese Agency of Industrial Science and Technology, where the enzyme was discovered in 1965.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|5}}
== Uses and composition==
HFCS is 24% water, the rest mainly fructose and glucose with 0–5% unprocessed ],<ref name=Rizkalla>{{cite pmid | 21050460 }}</ref> HFCS 55 (≈55% fructose if water were removed) is mostly used in soft drinks; HFCS 42 is used in beverages, processed foods, cereals, and baked goods.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/sugar-sweeteners/background.aspx|title=Sugar and Sweeteners: Background |publisher=] Economic Research Service |date=November 14, 2014 |accessdate=May 26, 2015 }}</ref> HFCS-90 has some niche uses<ref>{{cite magazine |author=John S. White |url=http://www.foodproductdesign.com/articles/2008/12/hfcs-how-sweet-it-is.aspx |title=HFCS: How sweet it is |work=Food Product Design |date=December 2, 2008 |accessdate=September 6, 2009 }}</ref> but mainly mixed with HFCS 42 to make HFCS 55.


As a sweetener, HFCS is often compared to ], but manufacturing advantages of HFCS over sugar include that it is <!-- {{how?|date=March 2021}} Here's how, from the 22 April 2009 Journal of Nutrition article ff.: "ease of handling—beverage production with dry, bulk sugar was labor and energy intensive. HFCS could be pumped from the delivery vehicle directly into a holding tank and from there to the mixing tank. Dilution to desired solids was a simple matter of adding water and agitation" --> cheaper.<ref name=white09/> "HFCS 42" and "HFCS 55" refer to dry weight fructose compositions of 42% and 55% respectively, the rest being glucose.<ref name="fda">{{cite web|url=https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/high-fructose-corn-syrup-questions-and-answers|title=High Fructose Corn Syrup: Questions and Answers|publisher=US Food and Drug Administration|date=4 January 2018|access-date=19 August 2019}}</ref> HFCS 42 is mainly used for ]s and ]s, whereas HFCS 55 is used mostly for production of ]s.<ref name=fda/>
===Food===
In the U.S., HFCS is among the sweeteners that mostly replaced ] (table sugar) in the food industry.<ref>(Bray, 2004 & U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Sugar and Sweetener Yearbook series, Tables 50–52)</ref> Factors include production quotas of domestic sugar, import tariff on foreign sugar, and ], raising the price of sucrose and lowering that of HFCS, making it cheapest for many sweetener applications.<ref>{{cite news |author=Pollan M |url=http://michaelpollan.com/articles-archive/the-way-we-live-now-the-agricultural-contradictions-of-obesity/ |title=The (Agri)Cultural Contradictions Of Obesity |newspaper=] |date=12 October 2003}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Engber |first=Daniel |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2216796 |title=The decline and fall of high-fructose corn syrup. – By Daniel Engber – Slate Magazine |publisher=Slate.com |date=2009-04-28 |accessdate=2010-11-06}}</ref> The relative ] of HFCS 55, used most commonly is soft drinks, is comparable to ].<ref>{{cite journal | author = Hanover LM, White JS | year = 1993 | title = Manufacturing, composition, and applications of fructose | url = | journal = Am J Clin Nutr | volume = 58 | issue = suppl 5| pages = 724S–732S|pmid=8213603 }}</ref>


The United States ] (FDA) states that it is not aware of evidence showing that HFCS is less safe than traditional sweeteners such as ] and ].<ref name=fda/> Uses and exports of HFCS from American producers have grown steadily during the early 21st century.<ref name=fas/>
Because of its superficially similar sugar profile and lower price, HFCS has been used illegally to "stretch" honey. Assays to detect adulteration with HFCA use ] and other advanced testing methods.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/augustseptember-2009/advances-in-honey-adulteration-detection/ |title=Advances in Honey Adulteration Detection |publisher=Food Safety Magazine |date=1974-08-12 |accessdate=2015-05-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |authors=Everstine K et al. |title=Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents. |journal=J Food Prot. |date=April 2013 |volume=76 |issue=4 |pages=723-35 |pmid=23575142 |doi=10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-399 |quote=Because the sugar profile of high-fructose corn syrup is similar to that of honey, high-fructose corn syrup was more difficult to detect until new tests were developed in the 1980s. Honey adulteration has continued to evolve to evade testing methodology, requiring continual updating of testing methods. }}</ref>


===Beekeeping=== == Food ==
In the United States, HFCS is among the sweeteners that have mostly replaced ] (table sugar) in the food industry.<ref>(Bray, 2004 & U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Sugar and Sweetener Yearbook series, Tables 50–52)</ref><ref name=white-straight/> Factors contributing to the increased use of HFCS in food manufacturing include production quotas of domestic sugar, import ]s on foreign sugar, and ], raising the price of sucrose and reducing that of HFCS, creating a manufacturing-cost advantage among sweetener applications.<ref name=white-straight/><ref>{{cite web |last=Engber |first=Daniel |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2216796 |title=Dark sugar: The decline and fall of high-fructose corn syrup |work=Slate Magazine |publisher=Slate.com |date=28 April 2009 |access-date=6 November 2010}}</ref> In spite of having a 10% greater fructose content,<ref name="Goran 55–64">{{Cite journal|last1=Goran|first1=Michael I.|last2=Ulijaszek|first2=Stanley J.|last3=Ventura|first3=Emily E.|date=1 January 2013|title=High fructose corn syrup and diabetes prevalence: A global perspective|journal=Global Public Health|volume=8|issue=1|pages=55–64|doi=10.1080/17441692.2012.736257|issn=1744-1692|pmid=23181629|s2cid=15658896}}</ref> the relative ] of HFCS 55, used most commonly in soft drinks,<ref name=fda/> is comparable to that of sucrose.<ref name=white-straight/> HFCS provides advantages in food and beverage manufacturing, such as simplicity of formulation, stability, and enabling processing efficiencies.<ref name=fda/><ref name=white-straight/><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Hanover LM, White JS | year = 1993 | title = Manufacturing, composition, and applications of fructose | journal = American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | volume = 58 | issue = suppl 5|pages=724S–732S |pmid=8213603| doi = 10.1093/ajcn/58.5.724S | doi-access = free }}</ref>
In ] in the United States, HFCS became a sucrose replacement for ]s starting in the late 1970s. When HFCS is heated to about 45 degrees C, ] can form from the breakdown of fructose, and is toxic to bees. HCFS has been investigated as a possible source of ].<ref name=Parker>{{cite journal |authors=Parker K, Salas M, Nwosu VC |url=http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1380113250_Parker%20et%20al.pdf |title=High fructose corn syrup: Production, uses and public health concerns |journal=Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Review |issn=1538-2273 |volume=5 |issue=5 |pages=71-78 |date=December 2010 }}</ref>

HFCS (or standard ]) is the primary ingredient in most brands of commercial "pancake syrup," as a less expensive substitute for ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.consumerreports.org/maple-syrup/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-maple-syrup|title=5 Things You Need to Know About Maple Syrup|access-date=29 September 2016}}</ref> ]s to detect adulteration of sweetened products with HFCS, such as liquid honey, use ] and other advanced testing methods.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/augustseptember-2009/advances-in-honey-adulteration-detection/ |title=Advances in Honey Adulteration Detection |publisher=Food Safety Magazine |date=12 August 1974 |access-date=9 May 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Everstine K, Spink J, Kennedy S |title=Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents |journal=J Food Prot |date=April 2013 |volume=76 |issue=4 |pages=723–35 |pmid=23575142 |doi=10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-399 |quote=Because the sugar profile of high-fructose corn syrup is similar to that of honey, high-fructose corn syrup was more difficult to detect until new tests were developed in the 1980s. Honey adulteration has continued to evolve to evade testing methodology, requiring continual updating of testing methods.|doi-access=free }}</ref>


== Production == == Production ==
=== Process ===
]s, including HFCS, are made from ], which is turn refined from ]. The process of turning starches into sugars dates back to the nineteenth century; commercial production of corn syrup began in 1864.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014>White JS. Sucrose, HFCS, and Fructose: History, Manufacture, Composition, Applications, and Production. Chapter 2 in J.M. Rippe (ed.), Fructose, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Sucrose and Health, Nutrition and Health. Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014. ISBN 9781489980779.</ref>{{rp|17}} In the late 1950s scientists at Clinton Corn Processing Company in Iowa attempted to turn glucose from corn starch into fructose, but the process was not scalable.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|17}}<ref>{{cite journal | author = MARSHALL RO, KOOI ER | title = Enzymatic Conversion of d-Glucose to d-Fructose | journal = Science | volume = 125 | issue = 3249 | pages = 648–649 | year = 1957 | pmid = 13421660 | pmc = | doi = 10.1126/science.125.3249.648 }}</ref> In the mid 1960s a scientist, Yoshiyuki Takasaki, at the Japanese ] (AIST) developed a heat-stable ] enyzme from yeast, and three years later AIST partnered with the Clinton company to commercialize the process.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|17}}
In the contemporary process, corn is milled to extract ] and an "acid-enzyme" process is used, in which the corn-starch solution is acidified to begin breaking up the existing ]s. High-temperature enzymes are added to further metabolize the starch and convert the resulting sugars to fructose.<ref name=Hobbs/>{{rp|808–813}} The first enzyme added is ], which breaks the long chains down into shorter sugar chains (]s). ] is mixed in and converts them to glucose. The resulting solution is filtered to remove protein using ]. Then the solution is demineralized using ]. That purified solution is then run over immobilized xylose isomerase, which turns the sugars to ~50–52% glucose with some unconverted oligosaccharides and 42% fructose (HFCS 42), and again demineralized and again purified using activated carbon. Some is processed into HFCS 90 by liquid ], and then mixed with HFCS 42 to form HFCS 55. The enzymes used in the process are made by ].<ref name=Hobbs>{{cite book|last1=Hobbs|first1=Larry|editor1-last=BeMiller|editor1-first=James N.|editor2-last=Whistler|editor2-first=Roy L.|title=Starch: chemistry and technology|date=2009|publisher=Academic Press/Elsevier|location=London|isbn=978-0-12-746275-2|pages=797–832|edition=3rd|doi=10.1016/B978-0-12-746275-2.00021-5|chapter=21. Sweeteners from Starch: Production, Properties and Uses}}</ref>{{rp|808–813}}<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|20–22}}


=== Composition and varieties ===
In the contemporary process, corn (]) is milled to produces ] and an "acid-enzyme" process is used in which the corn starch solution is acidified to begin breaking up the existing carbohydrates, and then enzymes are added to further metabolize the starch and convert the resulting sugars to fructose.<ref name=Hobbs/>{{rp|808-813}} The first enzyme added is ] which turns breaks the long chains down into shorter sugar chains – ]s. ] is mixed in and converts them to glucose; the resulting solution is filtered to remove protein, then using ], and then demineralized using ]. The purified solution is then run over immobilized ], which turns the sugars to ~50–52% glucose with some unconverted oligosaccharides, and 42% fructose (HFCS 42), and again demineralized and again purified using activated carbon. Some is processed into HFCS 90 by liquid ], then mixed with HFCS 42 to form HFCS 55. The enzymes used in the process are made by ].<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|20-22}}<ref name=Hobbs>Larry Hobbs. Sweeteners from Starch: Production, Properties and Uses. Chapter 21 in Starch: Chemistry and Technology, Third Edition. Eds. James N. BeMiller, Roy L. Whistler. Elsevier Inc.: 2009. ISBN 9780127462752</ref>{{rp|808-813}}
HFCS is 24% water, the rest being mainly fructose and glucose with 0–5% unprocessed ].<ref name=Rizkalla>{{Cite journal | last1 = Rizkalla | first1 = S. W. | doi = 10.1186/1743-7075-7-82 | title = Health implications of fructose consumption: A review of recent data | journal = Nutrition & Metabolism | volume = 7 | pages = 82 | year = 2010 | pmid = 21050460 | pmc =2991323 | doi-access = free }}</ref>


The most common forms of HFCS used for food and beverage manufacturing contain fructose in either 42% ("HFCS 42") or 55% ("HFCS 55") by dry weight, as described in the U.S. ] (21 CFR 184.1866).<ref name=fda/>
== Sweetener consumption patterns ==


* HFCS 42 (approx. 42% fructose if water were ignored) is used in beverages, processed foods, cereals, and baked goods.<ref name=fda/><ref name="usda14">{{cite web |url=http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/sugar-sweeteners/background.aspx|title=Sugar and Sweeteners: Background |publisher=] Economic Research Service |date=14 November 2014 |access-date=26 May 2015}}</ref>
=== Historical ===
* HFCS 55 is mostly used in soft drinks.<ref name=fda/>
Prior to the development of the worldwide sugar industry, dietary fructose was limited to only a few items. Milk, meats, and most vegetables, the staples of many early diets, have no fructose, and only 5–10% fructose by weight is found in fruits such as grapes, apples, and blueberries. Molasses and common dried fruits have a content of less than 10% fructose sugar. From 1970 to 2000 there was a 25% increase in "added sugars" in the U.S.<ref name="Bray2007">{{cite journal | author = Leeper HA, Jones E | title = How bad is fructose? | journal = Am J Clin Nutr | volume = 86 | issue = 4 | pages = 895–896 | date = October 2007 | pmid = 1792136 | url = http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/86/4/895.full.pdf | publisher = American Society for Clinical Nutrition }}</ref> After being classified as "]" (GRAS) by the ] in 1976, <ref name=FDAC>{{cite web|url=http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fcn/fcnDetailNavigation.cfm?rpt=scogsListing&id=95 |title=Database of Select Committee on GRAS Substances (SCOGS) Reviews |publisher=Accessdata.fda.gov |date=2006-10-31 |accessdate=2010-11-06}}</ref> HFCS began to replace ] as the main sweetener of ]s in the United States. At the same time, rates of ] rose. That correlation, in combination with laboratory research and epidemiological studies that suggested a link between consuming large amounts of fructose and changes to various proxy health measures including elevated blood ]s, size and type of ]s, ] levels, and weight, raised concerns about health effects of HFCS itself.<ref name = Rizkalla>{{cite pmid | 21050460 }}</ref>
*HFCS 70 is used in filling jellies<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170216006427/en/Japan-Corn-Starch-Ltd.-Releasing-New-High-Fructose|title=Japan Corn Starch Co., Ltd. Releasing the New High-Fructose Corn Syrup, "HFCS 70"!!|date=17 February 2017|website=www.businesswire.com|language=en|access-date=4 December 2019}}</ref>


==Commerce and consumption==
=== United States ===
]
]:High_fructose_corn_syrup/Archive_5#Error_in_chart-->]]


The global market for HFCS is expected to grow from $5.9&nbsp;billion in 2019 to a projected $7.6&nbsp;billion in 2024.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/high-fructose-corn-syrup-market-2019-industry-research-share-trend-global-industry-size-price-future-analysis-regional-outlook-to-2024-research-report-2019-05-20|title=High Fructose Corn Syrup Market 2019 Industry Research, Share, Trend, Global Industry Size, Price, Future Analysis, Regional Outlook to 2024 Research Report|website=MarketWatch|language=en-US|access-date=4 December 2019}}</ref>{{dubious|date=December 2019}}
In the US, sugar tariffs and quotas keep imported sugar at up to twice the global price since 1797,<ref>{{cite web |title=An Economic History of the United States Sugar Program |url=http://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/2554/WiltgenT1207.pdf?sequence=1 |author=Tyler James Wiltgen |date=August 2007}} Masters thesis.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://sugarcane.org/global-policies/policies-in-the-united-states/sugar-in-the-united-states |title=U.S. Sugar Policy |work=SugarCane.org |accessdate=2015-02-11}}</ref> while subsidies to corn growers cheapen the primary ingredient in HFCS, ]. Industrial users looking for cheaper replacements rapidly adopted HFCS in the 1970s.<ref>{{cite web|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203158/http://www.iatp.org/iatp/factsheets.cfm?accountID=258&refID=89968 |archivedate=2007-09-27 |title=Food without Thought: How U.S. Farm Policy Contributes to Obesity |publisher=Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy |date=November 2006|url=http://www.iatp.org/iatp/factsheets.cfm?accountID=258&refID=89968 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/1127_corn_acreage_production_and_value_by.html |title=Corn Production/Value |publisher=Allcountries.org |accessdate=2010-11-06}}</ref>


=== China ===
HFCS is easier to handle than granulated sucrose, although some sucrose is transported as solution. Unlike sucrose, HFCS cannot be hydrolyzed, but the free fructose in HFCS may produce ] when stored at high temperatures; these differences are most prominent in acidic beverages.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://beverageinstitute.org/article/understanding-high-fructose-corn-syrup/ | title = Understanding High Fructose Corn Syrup | publisher = Beverage Institute}}</ref> Soft drink makers such as ] and ] use sugar in other nations, but switched to HFCS in the U.S. in 1984.<ref> by James Bovard, April 1998 The Future of Freedom Foundation</ref> Large corporations, such as ], ] for the continuation of government corn subsidies.<ref name="cato.org-corporate_welfare">{{cite web|url=http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-241.html |title=Archer Daniels Midland: A Case Study in Corporate Welfare |author=James Bovard |publisher=]|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref>
HFCS in China makes up about 20% of sweetener demand. HFCS has gained popularity due to rising prices of sucrose, while selling for a third the price. Production was estimated to reach 4,150,000 tonnes in 2017. About half of total produced HFCS is exported to the Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, and India.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-corn-sugar/old-foes-sugar-and-corn-syrup-battle-for-lucrative-asian-market-idUSKBN1A50HF|title=Old foes sugar and corn syrup battle for lucrative Asian market|last1=Gu|first1=Hallie|last2=Cruz|first2=Enrico Dela|date=20 July 2017|website=Reuters|access-date=18 November 2019}}</ref>

Other countries, including Mexico, typically use sugar in soft drinks. Some Americans seek out ] in ethnic groceries because they prefer the taste compared to Coca-Cola in the U.S. which is made with HFCS.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041109/news_1b9mexcoke.html | title=Is Mexican Coke the real thing? | author=Louise Chu,Associated Press | work=The San Diego Union-Tribune | date=2004-11-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002076071_coke29.html | title = Mexican Coke a hit in U.S.| work=The Seattle Times}}</ref> ] for ] Coca-Cola sold in the U.S. around the ] holiday also uses sucrose rather than HFCS and is also highly sought after by people who prefer the original taste.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2009-04-08-kosher-coke_N.htm | work=USA Today | title=Kosher Coke 'flying out of the store' | date=April 9, 2009 | accessdate=May 4, 2010 | first1=Duffie | last1=Dixon}}</ref>

Consumption of HFCS in the U.S. has declined since it peaked at {{convert|37.5|lb|kg|abbr=on}} per person in 1999. The average American consumed approximately {{convert|27.1|lb|kg|abbr=on}} of HFCS in 2012,<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.ers.usda.gov/datafiles/Sugar_and_Sweeteners_Yearbook_Tables/US_Consumption_of_Caloric_Sweeteners_/table51.xls | title=table51 – Refined cane and beet sugar: estimated number of per capita calories consumed daily, by calendar year | publisher=] | accessdate=2013-07-19}}</ref> versus {{convert|39.0|lb|kg|abbr=on}} of refined cane and beet sugar.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.ers.usda.gov/datafiles/Sugar_and_Sweeteners_Yearbook_Tables/US_Consumption_of_Caloric_Sweeteners_/table50.xls | title=table50 – U.S. per capita caloric sweeteners estimated deliveries for domestic food and beverage use, by calendar year | publisher=] | accessdate=2013-07-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/sugar-and-sweeteners-yearbook-tables.aspx#25512 | title=U.S. Consumption of Caloric Sweeteners | publisher=] | accessdate=2013-07-19}}</ref>


=== European Union === === European Union ===
In the ] (EU), HFCS is known as isoglucose or glucose–fructose syrup (GFS) which has 20–30% fructose content compared to 42% (HFCS 42) and 55% (HFCS 55) in the United States.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.starch.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/5247.055_starch_eu-fiche-glucose-fructose-webC-1.pdf|title=Glucose-fructose syrup: An ingredient worth knowing|date=June 2017|publisher=Starch EU, Brussels, Belgium|access-date=20 October 2019}}</ref> While HFCS is produced exclusively with corn in the U.S., manufacturers in the EU use corn and wheat to produce GFS.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=https://starch.eu/blog/2017/06/20/starch-europe-position-on-the-end-of-eu-sugar-and-isoglucose-production-quotas/|title=The end of EU sugar production quotas and its impact on sugar consumption in the EU|date=20 June 2017|publisher=Starch EU, Brussels, Belgium|access-date=10 October 2019}}</ref> GFS was once subject to a sugar production quota, which was abolished on 1 October 2017, removing the previous production cap of 720,000 tonnes, and allowing production and export without restriction.<ref name=":2" /> Use of GFS in soft drinks is limited in the EU because manufacturers do not have a sufficient supply of GFS containing at least 42% fructose content. As a result, soft drinks are primarily sweetened by sucrose which has a 50% fructose content.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://starch.eu/blog/2018/07/13/ttps-www-starch-eu-wp-content-uploads-2018-10-2018-07-update-factsheet-on-glucose-fructose-syrups-isoglucose-and-high-fructose-corn-syrup-pdf/#6552bf5a017976b17|title=Updated factsheet on glucose fructose syrups, isoglucose and high fructose corn syrup|date=13 July 2018|publisher=Starch EU, Brussels, Belgium|access-date=20 October 2019}}</ref>
In the ] (EU), HFCS, known as isoglucose in sugar regime, is subject to a ]. In 2005, this quota was set at 303,000 tons; in comparison, the EU produced an average of 18.6 million tons of sugar annually between 1999 and 2001.<ref>{{cite book|editor=M. Ataman Aksoy, John C. Beghin |title=Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries |year=2005 |publisher=World Bank Publications |isbn=0-8213-5863-4 |page=329 |chapter=Sugar Policies: An Opportunity for Change}}</ref> Wide-scale replacement of sugar with HFCS has not occurred in the EU.{{Citation needed|reason=No source, also no date. Quite possibly does not reflect real current situation in EU regarding this issue.|date=August 2014}} For labeling purpose, syrup which is predominantly glucose, like HFCS 42, is called '''Glucose-Fructose Syrup''' (GFS), while syrup which is predominantly fructose, like HFCS 55, called '''Fructose-Glucose Syrup''' (FGS).


=== Japan === === Japan ===
In Japan, HFCS is manufactured mostly from imported US corn and the output is regulated by the government. For the period from 2007 to 2012 HFCS had a 27-30% share of the Japanese sweetener market.<ref>International Sugar Organization March 2012 </ref>{{rp|21}} In Japan, HFCS is also referred to as 異性化糖 (iseika-to; isomerized sugar).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.puntofocal.gov.ar/notific_otros_miembros/jpn208_t.pdf|title=Quality Labeling Standard for Processed Foods|date=27 October 2006|website=Punto Focal|access-date=18 November 2019}}</ref> HFCS production arose in Japan after government policies created a rise in the price of sugar.<ref name="Sweetener Policies in Japan">{{Cite web|url=https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/39233/38024_sss23401.pdf?v=41668|title=Sweetener Policies in Japan|access-date=26 April 2020|archive-date=21 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170521134008/https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/39233/38024_sss23401.pdf?v=41668|url-status=dead}}</ref> Japanese HFCS is manufactured mostly from imported U.S. corn, and the output is regulated by the government. For the period from 2007 to 2012, HFCS had a 27–30% share of the Japanese sweetener market.<ref>International Sugar Organization March 2012 .</ref> Japan consumed approximately 800,000 tonnes of HFCS in 2016.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.usdajapan.org/wpusda/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Japan-Trade-Agreements-Affect-US-Sweetener-Confections_Tokyo_Japan_2-5-2019.pdf|title=Japan Trade Agreements Affect US Sweetener Confections|date=5 February 2019|website=US Department of Agriculture Japan|access-date=17 November 2019}}</ref> The United States Department of Agriculture states that HFCS is produced in Japan from U.S. corn. Japan imports at a level of 3 million tonnes per year, leading 20 percent of corn imports to be for HFCS production.<ref name="Sweetener Policies in Japan"/>

=== Mexico ===
Mexico is the largest importer of U.S. HFCS.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/53304/Table32.xls?v=2627.9|title=Table 32-U.S. high fructose corn syrup exports, by destinations, 2000–2015|date=20 November 2018|website=United States Department of Agriculture, ]|access-date=11 November 2019|archive-date=1 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801163004/https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/53304/Table32.xls?v=2627.9|url-status=dead}}</ref> HFCS accounts for about 27 percent of total sweetener consumption, with Mexico importing 983,069 tonnes of HFCS in 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Sugar%20Semi-annual_Mexico%20City_Mexico_9-26-2018.pdf|title=Production Sufficient to Meet U.S. Quota Demand|date=15 April 2019|website=United States Department of Agriculture, ]|access-date=11 November 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/53304/Table34a.xls?v=2944.3|title=Table 34a-U.S. exports of high fructose corn syrup to Mexico|date=6 November 2019|website=United States Department of Agriculture, ]|access-date=11 November 2019}}{{Dead link|date=August 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Mexico's soft drink industry is shifting from sugar to HFCS which is expected to boost U.S. HFCS exports to Mexico according to a U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service report.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.world-grain.com/articles/985-mexico-s-hfcs-imports-usage-increasing|title=Mexicos HFCS imports usage increasing {{!}} World-grain.com {{!}} 29 April 2011 09:04|website=www.world-grain.com|access-date=4 December 2019}}</ref>

On 1 January 2002, Mexico imposed a 20% beverage tax on soft drinks and syrups not sweetened with cane sugar. The United States challenged the tax, appealing to the ] (WTO). On 3 March 2006, the WTO ruled in favor of the U.S. citing the tax as discriminatory against U.S. imports of HFCS without being justified under WTO rules.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/FTA/AdvisoryCommitteeReports/Agricultural%20Technical%20Advisory%20Committee%20%28ATAC%29%2C%20Sweeteners%20and%20Sweetener%20Products.pdf|title=Report of the Agricultural Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) for Sweeteners and Sweetener Products|date=27 September 2018|website=]|access-date=17 November 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ustr.gov/archive/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2006/March/US_Wins_Mexico_Beverage_Tax_Dispute.html|title=U.S. Wins Mexico Beverage Tax Dispute|date=3 March 2006|website=]|access-date=11 November 2019}}</ref>

=== Philippines ===
The Philippines was the largest importer of Chinese HFCS. Imports of HFCS would peak at 373,137 tonnes in 2016. Complaints from domestic sugar producers would result in a crackdown on Chinese exports.<ref name=":3" /> On 1 January 2018, the Philippine government imposed a tax of 12 pesos ($.24) on drinks sweetened with HFCS versus 6 pesos ($.12) for drinks sweetened with other sugars.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/philippines-sugar/philippines-drinks-makers-shun-china-corn-syrup-imports-to-avoid-tax-idUSL4N1PP1TW|title=Philippines drinks makers shun China corn syrup imports to avoid tax|date=30 January 2018|website=Reuters|access-date=18 November 2019}}</ref>

===United States===
In the United States, HFCS was widely used in food manufacturing from the 1970s through the early 21st century, primarily as a replacement for sucrose because its sweetness was similar to sucrose, it improved manufacturing quality, was easier to use, and was cheaper.<ref name="white-straight">{{cite journal | last=White | first=John S | title=Straight talk about high-fructose corn syrup: what it is and what it ain't | journal=The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition| volume=88 | issue=6 | date=1 November 2008 | issn=0002-9165 | doi=10.3945/ajcn.2008.25825b | pages=1716S–1721S|pmid=19064536| doi-access=free }}</ref> Domestic production of HFCS increased from 2.2&nbsp;million tons in 1980 to a peak of 9.5&nbsp;million tons in 1999.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/sugar-sweeteners/background.aspx#hfcs|title=USDA ERS – Background|website=www.ers.usda.gov|access-date=4 December 2019}}</ref> Although HFCS use is about the same as sucrose use in the United States, more than 90% of sweeteners used in global manufacturing is sucrose.<ref name=white-straight/>

Production of HFCS in the United States was 8.3&nbsp;million tons in 2017.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/sugar-sweeteners/background/|title=Sugar and sweeteners|date=20 August 2019|publisher=United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service|access-date=15 October 2019}}</ref> HFCS is easier to handle than granulated sucrose, although some sucrose is transported as solution. Unlike sucrose, HFCS cannot be hydrolyzed, but the free fructose in HFCS may produce ] when stored at high temperatures; these differences are most prominent in acidic beverages.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://beverageinstitute.org/article/understanding-high-fructose-corn-syrup/ | title = Understanding High Fructose Corn Syrup | publisher = Beverage Institute}}</ref> Soft drink makers such as ] and ] continue to use sugar in other nations but transitioned to HFCS for U.S. markets in 1980 before completely switching over in 1984.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1984/11/07/business/coke-pepsi-to-use-more-corn-syrup.html|title=Coke, Pepsi to use more corn syrup|last=Daniels|first=Lee A.|date=7 November 1984|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> Large corporations, such as ], ] for the continuation of government corn subsidies.<ref name="cato.org-corporate_welfare">{{cite web |url=http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-241.html |title=Archer Daniels Midland: A Case Study in Corporate Welfare |author=James Bovard |publisher=] |access-date=12 July 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070711092430/http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-241.html |archive-date=11 July 2007 }}</ref>

Consumption of HFCS in the U.S. has declined since it peaked at {{convert|37.5|lb|kg|abbr=on}} per person in 1999. The average American consumed approximately {{convert|22.1|lb|kg|abbr=on}} of HFCS in 2018,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/53304/table52.xls?v=5617.5|title=Table 52-High fructose corn syrup: estimated number of per capita calories consumed daily, by calendar year|date=18 July 2019|publisher=]|access-date=17 November 2019|archive-date=1 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801150239/https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/53304/table52.xls?v=5617.5|url-status=dead}}</ref> versus {{convert|40.3|lb|kg|abbr=on}} of refined cane and beet sugar.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/53304/table51.xls?v=667|title=Table 51-Refined cane and beet sugar: estimated number of per capita calories consumed daily, by calendar year|date=18 July 2019|publisher=]|access-date=17 November 2019|archive-date=1 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801135413/https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/53304/table51.xls?v=667|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/sugar-and-sweeteners-yearbook-tables/sugar-and-sweeteners-yearbook-tables/#U.S.%20Consumption%20of%20Caloric%20Sweeteners|title=U.S. Consumption of Caloric Sweeteners|publisher=]|access-date=17 November 2019}}</ref> This decrease in domestic consumption of HFCS resulted in a push in exporting of the product. In 2014, exports of HFCS were valued at $436&nbsp;million, a decrease of 21% in one year, with Mexico receiving about 75% of the export volume.<ref name="fas">{{cite web|url=https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/us-exports-corn-based-products-continue-climb|title=U.S. Exports of Corn-Based Products Continue to Climb|publisher=Foreign Agricultural Service, US Department of Agriculture|date=21 January 2015|access-date=4 March 2017}}</ref>

In 2010, the ] petitioned the FDA to call HFCS "corn sugar," but the petition was denied.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofFoods/CFSAN/CFSANFOIAElectronicReadingRoom/ucm305226.htm|title=Response to Petition from Corn Refiners Association to Authorize "Corn Sugar" as an Alternate Common or Usual Name for High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)|publisher=Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration|author=Landa, Michael M|date=30 May 2012|access-date=3 March 2017}}</ref>

=== Vietnam ===
90% of Vietnam's HFCS import comes from China and South Korea. Imports would total 89,343 tonnes in 2017.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web|url=https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/448778/sugar-association-seeks-help-against-corn-syrup-imports.html|title=Sugar association seeks help against corn syrup imports|date=28 May 2018|website=Vietnam News|access-date=18 November 2019}}</ref> One ton of HFCS was priced at $398 in 2017, while one ton of sugar would cost $702. HFCS has a zero cent import tax and no quota, while ] under quota has a 5% tax, and white and raw sugar not under quota have an 85% and 80% tax.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web|url=https://english.thesaigontimes.vn/62102/vssa-proposes-self-defense-measure-against-hfcs.html|title=VSSA proposes self-defense measure against HFCS|last=Chanh|first=Trung|date=20 August 2018|website=The Saigon Times|access-date=18 November 2019|archive-date=1 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801155536/https://english.thesaigontimes.vn/62102/vssa-proposes-self-defense-measure-against-hfcs.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2018, the Vietnam Sugarcane and Sugar Association (VSSA) called for government intervention on current tax policies.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5" /> According to the VSSA, sugar companies face tighter lending policies which cause the association's member companies with increased risk of bankruptcy.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://dtinews.vn/en/news/018/61633/sugar-association-seeks-help-amid-bankruptcy-fears.html|date=10 April 2019|title=Sugar association seeks help amid bankruptcy fears {{!}} DTiNews – Dan Tri International|website=dtinews.vn|access-date=4 December 2019}}</ref>


== Health == == Health ==
{{nutritionalvalue
Health concerns have been raised about a relationship between HFCS and metabolic disorders, and with regard to manufacturing contaminants.
| name = High-fructose corn syrup
| kJ=1176
| water=24 g | protein=0 g | fat=0 g | carbs=76 g | sugars=76 g | fiber=0 g
| sodium_mg=2 | potassium_mg = 0 | iron_mg=0.42 | magnesium_mg=2 | phosphorus_mg=4 | zinc_mg=0.22 | calcium_mg=6
| vitB6_mg=0.024 | vitC_mg=0 | riboflavin_mg=0.019 | niacin_mg=0 | pantothenic_mg=0.011 | folate_ug=0
| source_usda=1
| note=
}}


===Nutrition===
===Obesity and metabolic disorders===
HFCS is 76% ] and 24% water, containing no fat, ], or ]s in significant amounts. In a 100-gram reference amount, it supplies 281 ], while in one ] of 19 grams, it supplies 53 calories.
Sugars became a health concern among the American public in the early 1970s with the publication of ]’s book, Pure, White and Deadly, which claimed that simple sugars, an increasingly large part of the Western diet, were dangerous.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014>White JS. Sucrose, HFCS, and Fructose: History, Manufacture, Composition, Applications, and Production. Chapter 2 in J.M. Rippe (ed.), Fructose, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Sucrose and Health, Nutrition and Health. Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014. ISBN 9781489980779.</ref>{{rp|18}} In the 1980s and 1990s ] and Sheldon Reiser of the USDA published papers discussing the dangers of dietary ] from consumption of ] and of HFCS, especially with regard to heart disease, diabetes, and obesity.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|18}} These concerns came to the public's attention through media attention to a 2004 commentary in '']'' that suggested that the altered ] of ] when compared to ] may be a factor in increasing obesity rates since, as compared to ], fructose may be more readily ] and the sugar causes less of a rise in ] and ], both of which increase feelings of ]. Fructose, in contrast to glucose, was shown to potently stimulate lipogenesis (creation of fatty acids, for conversion to fat).<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|18}}<ref name = Samuel>{{cite journal | author = Samuel VT | title = Fructose induced lipogenesis: from sugar to fat to insulin resistance | journal = Trends Endocrinol. Metab. | volume = 22 | issue = 2 | pages = 60–5 | date = February 2011 | pmid = 21067942 | doi = 10.1016/j.tem.2010.10.003 | url = }}</ref><ref name = Bray>{{Cite journal| last = Bray | first = GA |author2=Nielsen SJ |author3=Popkin BM | title = Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity | journal = American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | volume = 79 | issue = 4 | pages = 537–543 | url = http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/79/4/537 | pmid = 15051594 | year = 2004 }}</ref> In subsequent interviews, two of the study's authors stated the article was distorted to place emphasis solely on HFCS when the actual issue was the overconsumption of any type of sugar.<ref name = NYTblog>{{Cite news | url=http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/in-worries-about-sweeteners-think-of-all-sugars/ | work = ] | title=In Worries About Sweeteners, Think of All Sugars | first=Tara | last=Parker-Pope | date=September 20, 2010 | accessdate=2011-04-20}}</ref><ref name="Warner NYTimes">{{Cite news | url = http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/business/yourmoney/02syrup.html?pagewanted=all | work = ] | title = A Sweetener With a Bad Rap | first = M| last = Warner | date = 2006-07-02 | accessdate = 2012-05-02 }}</ref> While fructose absorption and modification by the ] and ] does differ from glucose initially, the majority of the fructose molecules are converted to glucose or metabolized into byproducts identical to those produced by glucose metabolism. Consumption of moderate amounts of fructose has also been linked to positive outcomes, including reducing appetite if consumed before a meal, lower blood sugar increases compared to glucose, and (again compared to glucose) delaying exhaustion if consumed during exercise.<ref name = Rizkalla/>


=== Obesity and metabolic syndrome ===
In 2007 an expert panel assembled by the ]'s Center for Food, Nutrition and Agriculture Policy reviewed the links between HFCS and obesity and concluded there was no ] in the association between rising ]es (a measure of obesity) and the consumption of HFCS. The panel stated that since the ratio of fructose to glucose had not changed substantially in the United States since the 1960s when HFCS was introduced, the changes in obesity rates were probably not due to HFCS specifically but rather a greater consumption of calories overall, and recommended further research on the topic.<ref name="Forshee">{{Cite journal|title=A critical examination of the evidence relating high-fructose corn syrup and weight gain |author=Forshee RA |journal=Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition|year=2007|volume=47|pages=561–82 |doi=10.1080/10408390600846457 |pmid=17653981 |url=http://www.sweetsurprise.com/sites/default/files/CriticalReviewsinFSandN47-6-561-582.pdf|format=pdf | last2 = Storey | first2 = ML | last3 = et al. | issue = 6}}</ref> In 2009 the ] published a ] on HFCS and concluded that based on the science available at the time it appeared unlikely that HFCS contributed more to obesity or other health conditions than sucrose, and there was insufficient evidence to suggest warning about or restricting use of HFCS or other fructose-containing sweeteners in foods. The review did report that studies found direct associations between high intakes of fructose and adverse health outcomes, including obesity and the metabolic syndrome.<ref name=Moeller2009rev>Moeller SM et al. The effects of high fructose syrup. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Dec;28(6):619-26. PMID 20516261</ref>
The role of fructose in ] has been the subject of controversy, but {{as of|lc=yes|2022}}, there is no scientific consensus that fructose or HFCS has any impact on cardiometabolic markers when substituted for sucrose.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Fattore E, Botta F, Bosetti C |title=Effect of fructose instead of glucose or sucrose on cardiometabolic markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of isoenergetic intervention trials |journal=Nutrition Reviews |volume=79 |issue=2 |pages=209–226 |date=January 2022 |pmid=33029629 |doi=10.1093/nutrit/nuaa077|url=https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article/79/2/209/5919255|type=Systematic review}}</ref><ref name = Allocca>{{cite book | first = M | last = Allocca |author2=Selmi C | year = 2010 | chapter = Emerging nutritional treatments for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease | title = Nutrition, diet therapy, and the liver | pages = | isbn = 978-1-4200-8549-5 | publisher = ] |editor1=Preedy VR |editor2=Lakshman R |editor3=Rajaskanthan RS}}</ref> A 2014 ] found little evidence for an association between HFCS consumption and ], ] or fat content.<ref>{{cite journal|pmc=4135494|year=2014|last1=Chung|first1=M|title=Fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or indexes of liver health: A systematic review and meta-analysis|journal=American Journal of Clinical Nutrition|volume=100|issue=3|pages=833–849|last2=Ma|first2=J|last3=Patel|first3=K|last4=Berger|first4=S|last5=Lau|first5=J|last6=Lichtenstein|first6=A. H.|doi=10.3945/ajcn.114.086314|pmid=25099546}}</ref>


A 2018 review found that lowering consumption of sugary beverages and fructose products may reduce hepatic fat accumulation, which is associated with ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Jensen|first1=Thomas|last2=Abdelmalek|first2=Manal F.|last3=Sullivan|first3=Shelby|last4=Nadeau|first4=Kristen J.|last5=Green|first5=Melanie|last6=Roncal|first6=Carlos|last7=Nakagawa|first7=Takahiko|last8=Kuwabara|first8=Masanari|last9=Sato|first9=Yuka|last10=Kang|first10=Duk-Hee|last11=Tolan|first11=Dean R.|date=May 2018|title=Fructose and Sugar: A Major Mediator of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease|journal=Journal of Hepatology|volume=68|issue=5|pages=1063–1075|doi=10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.019|issn=0168-8278|pmc=5893377|pmid=29408694}}</ref> In 2018, the ] recommended that people limit total added sugar (including maltose, sucrose, high-fructose corn syrup, molasses, cane sugar, corn sweetener, raw sugar, syrup, honey, or fruit juice concentrates) in their diets to nine teaspoons per day for men and six for women.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=American Heart Association|date=17 April 2018|url=https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-smart/sugar/added-sugars|title=Added sugars|quote=The AHA recommendations focus on all added sugars, without singling out any particular types such as high-fructose corn syrup}}</ref>
In 2010, ] noted that "HFCS has roughly the same composition as cane sugar—about half glucose and half fructose—and the same number of calories. Concerns that it's directly responsible for rising obesity rates or somehow intrinsically more fat-inducing than sugar are largely unfounded, though researchers continue to study whether the body handles HFCS differently."<ref name=ConsumerRep2010>{{cite web | author=Staff writers | title=The lowdown on high-fructose corn syrup | url=http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine-archive/2010/march/food/high-fructose-corn-syrup/overview/high-fructose-corn-syrup-ov.htm | work=Consumer Reports | date=March 2010 }}</ref>


=== Safety and manufacturing concerns ===
] has suggested that the increase in metabolic disorders like obesity and ], is linked to increased consumption of sugars and/or calories in general, and not due to any special effect of HFCS<ref name=Rizkalla /><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Stanhope|first1=Kimber L.|last2=Schwarz|first2=Jean-Marc|last3=Havel|first3=Peter J.|title=Adverse metabolic effects of dietary fructose|journal=Current Opinion in Lipidology|date=June 2013|volume=24|issue=3|pages=198–206|doi=10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283613bca}}</ref><ref name = Allocca>{{cite book | first = M | last = Allocca |author2=Selmi C | year = 2010 | chapter = Emerging nutritional treatments for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease | title = Nutrition, diet therapy, and the liver | pages = | isbn = 1-4200-8549-2 | publisher = ] | editors = Preedy VR; Lakshman R; Rajaskanthan RS }}</ref> High fructose consumption has been linked to high levels of ] in the blood, though this is only thought to be a concern for patients with ].<ref name = Rizkalla/>
Since 2014, the United States FDA has determined that HFCS is ] (GRAS) as an ],<ref name="gras">{{Cite web|title=CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21: Listing of Specific Substances Affirmed as GRAS. Sec. 184.1866. High fructose corn syrup (amended 1 April 2020)|url=https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=184.1866|access-date=10 January 2021|publisher=US Code of Regulations, Food and Drug Administration|date=23 August 1996}}</ref> and there is no evidence that retail HFCS products differ in safety from those containing alternative nutritive sweeteners. The ] recommended that ] should be limited in the diet.<ref name="white09" /><ref name="fda" />


One consumer concern about HFCS is that processing of corn is more complex than used for common sugar sources, such as fruit ]s or ], but all sweetener products derived from ]s involve similar processing steps of ], ], ] treatment, and filtration, among other common steps of sweetener manufacturing from natural sources.<ref name=white09/> In the contemporary process to make HFCS, an "acid-enzyme" step is used in which the corn starch solution is acidified to digest the existing carbohydrates, then enzymes are added to further metabolize the corn starch and convert the resulting sugars to their constituents of fructose and glucose. Analyses published in 2014 showed that HFCS content of fructose was consistent across samples from 80 randomly selected ]s sweetened with HFCS.<ref>{{cite journal|pmc=4285619|year=2014|last1=White|first1=J. S.|title=Fructose content and composition of commercial HFCS-sweetened carbonated beverages|journal=International Journal of Obesity|volume=39|issue=1|pages=176–182|last2=Hobbs|first2=L. J.|last3=Fernandez|first3=S|doi=10.1038/ijo.2014.73|pmid=24798032}}</ref>
Numerous agencies in the United States recommend reducing the consumption of all sugars, including HFCS, without singling it out as presenting extra concerns. The ] cites the ]'s recommendation that women limit the added sugar in their diet to 100 calories a day (~6 teaspoons) and that men limit it to 150 calories a day (~9 teaspoons), noting that there is not enough evidence to support HFCS having more adverse health effects than excess consumption of any other type of sugar.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/high-fructose-corn-syrup/AN01588 | title = High-fructose corn syrup: What are the health concerns? | publisher = ] | accessdate = 2012-10-17 | date = 2012-09-27 }}</ref> The United States departments of ] and ] recommendations for a healthy diet state that consumption of all types of added sugars be reduced.<ref name="USDA">{{Cite book | publisher = ] and ] | title = Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition| accessdate = 2012-10-17 | date = December 2010 | url = http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2010/DietaryGuidelines2010.pdf | format = pdf }}</ref>{{rp|p.27}}


One prior concern in manufacturing was whether HFCS contains reactive ] compounds or ] evolved during processing.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070823094819.htm|title=Soda Warning? High-fructose Corn Syrup Linked To Diabetes, New Study Suggests|website=ScienceDaily|date=23 August 2007|access-date=3 March 2017}}</ref> This concern was dismissed, however, with evidence that HFCS poses no dietary risk from these compounds.<ref name="white09">{{cite journal|pmid=19386820|year=2009|last1=White|first1=J. S.|title=Misconceptions about high-fructose corn syrup: Is it uniquely responsible for obesity, reactive dicarbonyl compounds, and advanced glycation endproducts?|journal=Journal of Nutrition|volume=139|issue=6|pages=1219S–1227S|doi=10.3945/jn.108.097998|doi-access=free}}</ref>
===Mercury and other contaminants===
A study in '']'' published in 2009 found detectable levels of ] in 45% (in a sample set of 22) of their commercial samples of products with a major ingredient being HFCS. Concurrently, the ] (IATP) conducted an independent study where mercury was found in nearly a third of the products the group tested. Subsequently, David Wallinga, a co-author of both studies, via an IATP news release, commented that "Mercury is toxic in all its forms. Given how much high-fructose corn syrup is consumed by children, it could be a significant additional source of mercury never before considered. We are calling for immediate changes by industry and the to help stop this avoidable mercury contamination of the food supply." In response, Audrae Erickson, president of the Corn Refiners Association, rejected the findings of the two studies, stating "our industry has used mercury-free versions of the two re-agents mentioned in the study, hydrochloric acid and caustic soda, for several years. These mercury-free re-agents perform important functions, including adjusting pH balances." However, the IATP found that plants in Georgia, Tennessee, Ohio, and West Virgin continued to employ ] that commonly leads to mercury contamination. Ben Lilliston of the IATP also noted that both studies were based on information gathered by the FDA in 2005 and, in the case of the latter study, supplemented with information from shelf-purchased products in 2008.<ref name="MERCURY-WASHINGTON-POST">"". ''The Washington Post''. Wednesday, January 28, 2009. See also the studies referred to in the report: Dufault, et al. 2009. "" in ''Environmental Health''. 8: 2. and Wallinga, et al. 2009. "". Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.</ref>


As late as 2004, some factories manufacturing HFCS used a ] corn processing method which, in cases of applying ] for digesting corn raw material, left trace residues of ] in some batches of HFCS.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Dufault|first=Renee|year=2009|title=Mercury from chlor-alkali plants: measured concentrations in food product sugar|journal=Environmental Health|volume=8|issue=1 |pages=2|doi=10.1186/1476-069X-8-2|pmid=19171026|pmc=2637263 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2009EnvHe...8....2D }}</ref> In a 2009 release,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://corn.org/hfcs-mercury-study-outdated/|title=High Fructose Corn Syrup Mercury Study Outdated; Based on Discontinued Technology|publisher=The Corn Refiners Association|date=26 January 2009|access-date=14 March 2017|archive-date=15 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170315085549/http://corn.org/hfcs-mercury-study-outdated/|url-status=dead}}</ref> The Corn Refiners Association stated that all factories in the American industry for manufacturing HFCS had used mercury-free processing over several previous years, making the prior report outdated.<ref name=":0"/>
HFCS contains reactive dicarbonyl compounds that are created during the processing steps. These compounds include ] (the major dicarbonyl) and ].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=White|first1=J.S.|title=Misconceptions about High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Is It Uniquely Responsible for Obesity, Reactive Dicarbonyl Compounds, and Advanced Glycation Endproducts?|journal=J Nutr|year=2009|volume=139|issue=6 |pages=1219S-1227S|pmid=19386820 |url=http://jn.nutrition.org/content/139/6/1219S.long}}</ref> These dicarbonyl compounds can in turn create ], the possible health effects of which were under investigation as of 2013.<ref>Poulsen MW et al Advanced glycation endproducts in food and their effects on health. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Oct;60:10-37.PMID 23867544</ref><!--before adding that assertion about bread/instant coffee/alcoholic beverages/toast/coffee/soybean paste/sauce/cheeses, look at the data from that study: http://jn.nutrition.org/content/139/6/1219S/T1.expansion.html; you will see the total dicarbonyls for those foods are ==lower== than for HFCS; there is missing data on 3-DG, the major dicarbonyl by far, so a direct comparison has no meaning-->
== Public relations ==
{{Main|Public relations of high fructose corn syrup}}
There are various public relations issues with HFCS, including with its labeling as "natural", with its advertising, with companies that have moved back to sugar, and a proposed name change to "corn sugar". In 2010 the ] applied to allow HFCS to be renamed "corn sugar", but were rejected by the United States ] in 2012.<ref></ref>


== See also == == Other ==
=== Taste difference ===
* ]
Most countries, including Mexico, use sucrose, or table sugar, in soft drinks. In the U.S., soft drinks, such as Coca-Cola, are typically made with HFCS 55. HFCS has a sweeter taste than sucrose. Some Americans seek out drinks such as ] in ethnic groceries because they prefer the taste over that of HFCS-sweetened Coca-Cola.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041109/news_1b9mexcoke.html|title=Is Mexican Coke the real thing?|date=9 November 2004|work=The San Diego Union-Tribune|author=Louise Chu|agency=Associated Press|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071027080246/http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041109/news_1b9mexcoke.html|archive-date=27 October 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002076071_coke29.html |title=Mexican Coke a hit in U.S. |work=The Seattle Times |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629002034/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002076071_coke29.html |archive-date=29 June 2011 }}</ref> ] Coca-Cola, sold in the U.S. around the Jewish holiday of ], also uses sucrose rather than HFCS.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2009-04-08-kosher-coke_N.htm|title=Kosher Coke 'flying out of the store'|date=9 April 2009|work=USA Today|access-date=4 May 2010|first1=Duffie|last1=Dixon|archive-date=2 February 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110202121310/http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2009-04-08-kosher-coke_N.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>


== Further reading == === Beekeeping ===
{{Main|Colony collapse disorder}}
{{cite book | last=Litchfield | first=Ruth | title=High Fructose Corn Syrup—How sweet it is | year=2008 | publisher=Iowa State University Extension and Outreach | location=Ames, Iowa | url=http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/extension_families_pubs/23/ | accessdate=2013-03-01}}
In ] in the United States, HFCS is a honey substitute for some managed ] colonies during times when nectar is in low supply.<ref name="mao">{{cite journal|pmc=3670375|year=2013|last1=Mao|first1=W|title=Honey constituents up-regulate detoxification and immunity genes in the western honey bee Apis mellifera|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=110|issue=22|pages=8842–8846|last2=Schuler|first2=M. A.|last3=Berenbaum|first3=M. R.|doi=10.1073/pnas.1303884110|bibcode=2013PNAS..110.8842M|pmid=23630255|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="wheeler">{{cite journal|pmc=4103092|year=2014|last1=Wheeler|first1=M. M.|title=Diet-dependent gene expression in honey bees: Honey vs. Sucrose or high fructose corn syrup|journal=Scientific Reports|volume=4|pages=5726|last2=Robinson|first2=G. E.|doi=10.1038/srep05726|pmid=25034029|bibcode=2014NatSR...4.5726W}}</ref> However, when HFCS is heated to about {{convert|45|C|F}}, ], which is toxic to bees, can form from the breakdown of fructose.<ref>{{cite journal|pmid=26590927|year=2016|last1=Krainer|first1=S|title=Effect of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) on mortality of artificially reared honey bee larvae (Apis mellifera carnica)|journal=Ecotoxicology|volume=25|issue=2|pages=320–8|last2=Brodschneider|first2=R|last3=Vollmann|first3=J|last4=Crailsheim|first4=K|last5=Riessberger-Gallé|first5=U|doi=10.1007/s10646-015-1590-x|bibcode=2016Ecotx..25..320K |s2cid=207121566|url=http://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubg:1-36811}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|pmid=19645504|year=2009|last1=Leblanc|first1=B. W.|title=Formation of hydroxymethylfurfural in domestic high-fructose corn syrup and its toxicity to the honey bee (Apis mellifera)|journal=Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry|volume=57|issue=16|pages=7369–76|last2=Eggleston|first2=G|last3=Sammataro|first3=D|last4=Cornett|first4=C|last5=Dufault|first5=R|last6=Deeby|first6=T|last7=St Cyr|first7=E|doi=10.1021/jf9014526|bibcode=2009JAFC...57.7369L }}</ref> Although some researchers cite honey substitution with HFCS as one factor among many for ], there is no evidence that HFCS is the only cause.<ref name=mao/><ref name=wheeler/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.epa.gov/pollinator-protection/colony-collapse-disorder|title=Colony collapse disorder|publisher=US Environmental Protection Agency|date=16 September 2016|access-date=3 March 2017}}</ref> Compared to hive honey, both HFCS and sucrose caused signs of malnutrition in bees fed with them, apparent in the ] of genes involved in ] and other processes affecting honey bee health.<ref name=wheeler/>


=== Public relations ===
==Alternative names==
{{Main|Public relations of high-fructose corn syrup}}
{{reflist|group=alternative names}}
There are various public relations concerns with HFCS, including how HFCS products are advertised and labeled as "natural." As a consequence, several companies reverted to manufacturing with sucrose (table sugar) from products that had previously been made with HFCS.<ref name="forbes">{{Cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/kavinsenapathy/2016/04/28/pepsi-coke-want-you-to-think-real-sugar-is-good-for-you/|title=Pepsi, Coke And Other Soda Companies Want You To Think 'Real' Sugar Is Good For You—It's Not|last=Senapathy|first=Kavin|date=28 April 2016|website=Forbes|location=US|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.today/20200323002511/https://www.forbes.com/sites/kavinsenapathy/2016/04/28/pepsi-coke-want-you-to-think-real-sugar-is-good-for-you/%232bb7806664d1|archive-date=23 March 2020}}</ref> In 2010, the Corn Refiners Association applied to allow HFCS to be renamed "corn sugar," but that petition was rejected by the FDA in 2012.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fda-rejects-industry-bid-to-change-name-of-high-fructose-corn-syrup-to-corn-sugar/|title=FDA rejects industry bid to change name of high fructose corn syrup to "corn sugar"|work=CBS News|date=31 May 2012}}</ref>

In August 2016, in a move to please consumers with health concerns, ] announced that it would be replacing all HFCS in their ]s with sucrose (table sugar) and would remove preservatives and other artificial additives from its menu items.<ref name="cnbc">{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/02/mcdonalds-to-remove-corn-syrup-from-buns-curbs-antibiotics-in-chicken.html|title=McDonald's to remove corn syrup from buns, curbs antibiotics in chicken|date=2 August 2016|website=CNBC|access-date=16 November 2016}}</ref> Marion Gross, senior vice president of McDonald's stated, "We know that they don't feel good about high-fructose corn syrup so we're giving them what they're looking for instead."<ref name=cnbc/> Over the early 21st century, other companies such as ], ], and ] also phased out HFCS, replacing it with conventional sugar because consumers perceived sugar to be healthier.<ref name="zmuda">{{Cite news|url=http://adage.com/article/news/major-brands-longer-sweet-high-fructose-corn-syrup/142788/|title=Major Brands No Longer Sweet on High-Fructose Corn Syrup|author=Zmuda, Natalie|date=15 March 2010|access-date=16 November 2016}}</ref><ref name="guardian">{{cite web|title=Hershey considers removing high-fructose corn syrup from products in favor of sugar|url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/us-money-blog/2014/dec/03/hershey-corn-syrup-sugar-chocolate|publisher=The Guardian, London, UK|access-date=30 January 2018|date=3 December 2014}}</ref> Companies such as ] and Heinz have also released products that use sugar in lieu of HFCS, although they still sell HFCS-sweetened products.<ref name=forbes/><ref name=zmuda/>

== History ==
Commercial production of HFCS began in 1964.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014>{{cite book|
last=White| first= John S.| chapter=Sucrose, HFCS, and Fructose: History, Manufacture, Composition, Applications, and Production| editor-last=Rippe| editor-first=James M.| title=Fructose, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Sucrose and Health| date= 21 February 2014| publisher=Humana Press| ol = 37192628M| publication-date=2014| isbn=9781489980779}}</ref>{{rp|17}} In the late 1950s, scientists at Clinton Corn Processing Company of ], Iowa, tried to turn glucose from corn starch into fructose, but the process they used was not scalable.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|17}}<ref>{{cite journal |author=Marshall R. O. |author2=Kooi E. R. | title = Enzymatic Conversion of d-Glucose to d-Fructose | journal = Science | volume = 125 | issue = 3249 | pages = 648–649 | year = 1957 | pmid = 13421660 | doi = 10.1126/science.125.3249.648| bibcode = 1957Sci...125..648M }}</ref> In 1965–1970, Yoshiyuki Takasaki, at the Japanese ] developed a heat-stable xylose isomerase enzyme from yeast. In 1967, the Clinton Corn Processing Company obtained an exclusive license to manufacture glucose ] derived from '']'' bacteria and began shipping an early version of HFCS in February 1967.<ref name=WhiteChapter2014/>{{rp|140}} In 1983, the FDA accepted HFCS as "generally recognized as safe," and that decision was reaffirmed in 1996.<ref name=FDAC>{{cite web|url=https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=SCOGS |title=Database of Select Committee on GRAS Substances (SCOGS) Reviews (updated 29 April 2019)|publisher=US Food and Drug Administration |date=2019 |access-date=17 November 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=High Fructose Corn Syrup: A Guide for Consumers, Policymakers, and the Media|date=2008|publisher=Grocery Manufacturers Association|pages=1–14|url=http://www.gmaonline.org/downloads/research-and-reports/SciPol_HFCS_0602.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101204050842/http://www.gmaonline.org/downloads/research-and-reports/SciPol_HFCS_0602.pdf|url-status=usurped|archive-date=4 December 2010}}</ref>

Prior to the development of the worldwide sugar industry, dietary fructose was limited to only a few items. Milk, meats, and most vegetables, the staples of many early diets, have no fructose, and only 5–10% fructose by weight is found in fruits such as grapes, apples, and blueberries. Most ]s, however, contain about 50% fructose. From 1970 to 2000, there was a 25% increase in "added sugars" in the U.S.<ref name="Bray2007">{{cite journal |author=Leeper H. A. |author2=Jones E. | title = How bad is fructose? | journal = Am. J. Clin. Nutr. | volume = 86 | issue = 4 | pages = 895–896 | date = October 2007 | pmid = 17921361 | url = http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/86/4/895.full.pdf |doi=10.1093/ajcn/86.4.895 | doi-access = free }}</ref> When recognized as a cheaper, more versatile sweetener, HFCS replaced sucrose as the main sweetener of soft drinks in the United States.<ref name=white-straight/>

Since 1789, the U.S. sugar industry has had trade protection in the form of tariffs on foreign-produced sugar,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://sugarcane.org/sugar-policy-in-united-states/ |title=U.S. Sugar Policy |work=SugarCane.org |access-date=11 February 2015 |archive-date=19 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180919114552/http://sugarcane.org/sugar-policy-in-united-states/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> while subsidies to corn growers cheapen the primary ingredient in HFCS, ]. Accordingly, industrial users looking for cheaper sugar replacements rapidly adopted HFCS in the 1970s.<ref>{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203158/http://www.iatp.org/iatp/factsheets.cfm?accountID=258&refID=89968 |archive-date=27 September 2007 |title=Food without Thought: How U.S. Farm Policy Contributes to Obesity |publisher=Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy |date=November 2006|url=http://www.iatp.org/iatp/factsheets.cfm?accountID=258&refID=89968}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/1127_corn_acreage_production_and_value_by.html |title=Corn Production/Value |publisher=Allcountries.org |access-date=6 November 2010}}</ref>

== See also ==
* ]
* ]


== References == == References ==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} {{Reflist|30em}}
{{Refbegin}}
{{Refend}}


== External links == ==External links==
*{{Commons category-inline}}
*
* {{dmoz|Society/Issues/Health/Food,_Drink_and_Nutrition/Food_Additives/Sugar_Substitutes/High_Fructose_Corn_Syrup}}
* , article in ''FDA Consumer'' published in 1991


{{corn}} {{corn}}
{{Sugar}}
{{Consumer Food Safety}} {{Consumer Food Safety}}


Line 93: Line 132:
] ]
] ]
]

]
]

Latest revision as of 01:20, 21 December 2024

Processed corn syrup "HFCS" redirects here. Not to be confused with HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons).

Structural formulae (Fischer projections) of fructose (left) and glucose (right)

High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), also known as glucose–fructose, isoglucose and glucose–fructose syrup, is a sweetener made from corn starch. As in the production of conventional corn syrup, the starch is broken down into glucose by enzymes. To make HFCS, the corn syrup is further processed by D-xylose isomerase to convert some of its glucose into fructose. HFCS was first marketed in the early 1970s by the Clinton Corn Processing Company, together with the Japanese Agency of Industrial Science and Technology, where the enzyme was discovered in 1965.

As a sweetener, HFCS is often compared to granulated sugar, but manufacturing advantages of HFCS over sugar include that it is cheaper. "HFCS 42" and "HFCS 55" refer to dry weight fructose compositions of 42% and 55% respectively, the rest being glucose. HFCS 42 is mainly used for processed foods and breakfast cereals, whereas HFCS 55 is used mostly for production of soft drinks.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that it is not aware of evidence showing that HFCS is less safe than traditional sweeteners such as sucrose and honey. Uses and exports of HFCS from American producers have grown steadily during the early 21st century.

Food

In the United States, HFCS is among the sweeteners that have mostly replaced sucrose (table sugar) in the food industry. Factors contributing to the increased use of HFCS in food manufacturing include production quotas of domestic sugar, import tariffs on foreign sugar, and subsidies of U.S. corn, raising the price of sucrose and reducing that of HFCS, creating a manufacturing-cost advantage among sweetener applications. In spite of having a 10% greater fructose content, the relative sweetness of HFCS 55, used most commonly in soft drinks, is comparable to that of sucrose. HFCS provides advantages in food and beverage manufacturing, such as simplicity of formulation, stability, and enabling processing efficiencies.

HFCS (or standard corn syrup) is the primary ingredient in most brands of commercial "pancake syrup," as a less expensive substitute for maple syrup. Assays to detect adulteration of sweetened products with HFCS, such as liquid honey, use differential scanning calorimetry and other advanced testing methods.

Production

Process

In the contemporary process, corn is milled to extract corn starch and an "acid-enzyme" process is used, in which the corn-starch solution is acidified to begin breaking up the existing carbohydrates. High-temperature enzymes are added to further metabolize the starch and convert the resulting sugars to fructose. The first enzyme added is alpha-amylase, which breaks the long chains down into shorter sugar chains (oligosaccharides). Glucoamylase is mixed in and converts them to glucose. The resulting solution is filtered to remove protein using activated carbon. Then the solution is demineralized using ion-exchange resins. That purified solution is then run over immobilized xylose isomerase, which turns the sugars to ~50–52% glucose with some unconverted oligosaccharides and 42% fructose (HFCS 42), and again demineralized and again purified using activated carbon. Some is processed into HFCS 90 by liquid chromatography, and then mixed with HFCS 42 to form HFCS 55. The enzymes used in the process are made by microbial fermentation.

Composition and varieties

HFCS is 24% water, the rest being mainly fructose and glucose with 0–5% unprocessed glucose oligomers.

The most common forms of HFCS used for food and beverage manufacturing contain fructose in either 42% ("HFCS 42") or 55% ("HFCS 55") by dry weight, as described in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 184.1866).

  • HFCS 42 (approx. 42% fructose if water were ignored) is used in beverages, processed foods, cereals, and baked goods.
  • HFCS 55 is mostly used in soft drinks.
  • HFCS 70 is used in filling jellies

Commerce and consumption

Consumption of sugar and corn-based sweeteners in the United States from 1966 to 2013, in dry-basis pounds per capita

The global market for HFCS is expected to grow from $5.9 billion in 2019 to a projected $7.6 billion in 2024.

China

HFCS in China makes up about 20% of sweetener demand. HFCS has gained popularity due to rising prices of sucrose, while selling for a third the price. Production was estimated to reach 4,150,000 tonnes in 2017. About half of total produced HFCS is exported to the Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, and India.

European Union

In the European Union (EU), HFCS is known as isoglucose or glucose–fructose syrup (GFS) which has 20–30% fructose content compared to 42% (HFCS 42) and 55% (HFCS 55) in the United States. While HFCS is produced exclusively with corn in the U.S., manufacturers in the EU use corn and wheat to produce GFS. GFS was once subject to a sugar production quota, which was abolished on 1 October 2017, removing the previous production cap of 720,000 tonnes, and allowing production and export without restriction. Use of GFS in soft drinks is limited in the EU because manufacturers do not have a sufficient supply of GFS containing at least 42% fructose content. As a result, soft drinks are primarily sweetened by sucrose which has a 50% fructose content.

Japan

In Japan, HFCS is also referred to as 異性化糖 (iseika-to; isomerized sugar). HFCS production arose in Japan after government policies created a rise in the price of sugar. Japanese HFCS is manufactured mostly from imported U.S. corn, and the output is regulated by the government. For the period from 2007 to 2012, HFCS had a 27–30% share of the Japanese sweetener market. Japan consumed approximately 800,000 tonnes of HFCS in 2016. The United States Department of Agriculture states that HFCS is produced in Japan from U.S. corn. Japan imports at a level of 3 million tonnes per year, leading 20 percent of corn imports to be for HFCS production.

Mexico

Mexico is the largest importer of U.S. HFCS. HFCS accounts for about 27 percent of total sweetener consumption, with Mexico importing 983,069 tonnes of HFCS in 2018. Mexico's soft drink industry is shifting from sugar to HFCS which is expected to boost U.S. HFCS exports to Mexico according to a U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service report.

On 1 January 2002, Mexico imposed a 20% beverage tax on soft drinks and syrups not sweetened with cane sugar. The United States challenged the tax, appealing to the World Trade Organization (WTO). On 3 March 2006, the WTO ruled in favor of the U.S. citing the tax as discriminatory against U.S. imports of HFCS without being justified under WTO rules.

Philippines

The Philippines was the largest importer of Chinese HFCS. Imports of HFCS would peak at 373,137 tonnes in 2016. Complaints from domestic sugar producers would result in a crackdown on Chinese exports. On 1 January 2018, the Philippine government imposed a tax of 12 pesos ($.24) on drinks sweetened with HFCS versus 6 pesos ($.12) for drinks sweetened with other sugars.

United States

In the United States, HFCS was widely used in food manufacturing from the 1970s through the early 21st century, primarily as a replacement for sucrose because its sweetness was similar to sucrose, it improved manufacturing quality, was easier to use, and was cheaper. Domestic production of HFCS increased from 2.2 million tons in 1980 to a peak of 9.5 million tons in 1999. Although HFCS use is about the same as sucrose use in the United States, more than 90% of sweeteners used in global manufacturing is sucrose.

Production of HFCS in the United States was 8.3 million tons in 2017. HFCS is easier to handle than granulated sucrose, although some sucrose is transported as solution. Unlike sucrose, HFCS cannot be hydrolyzed, but the free fructose in HFCS may produce hydroxymethylfurfural when stored at high temperatures; these differences are most prominent in acidic beverages. Soft drink makers such as Coca-Cola and Pepsi continue to use sugar in other nations but transitioned to HFCS for U.S. markets in 1980 before completely switching over in 1984. Large corporations, such as Archer Daniels Midland, lobby for the continuation of government corn subsidies.

Consumption of HFCS in the U.S. has declined since it peaked at 37.5 lb (17.0 kg) per person in 1999. The average American consumed approximately 22.1 lb (10.0 kg) of HFCS in 2018, versus 40.3 lb (18.3 kg) of refined cane and beet sugar. This decrease in domestic consumption of HFCS resulted in a push in exporting of the product. In 2014, exports of HFCS were valued at $436 million, a decrease of 21% in one year, with Mexico receiving about 75% of the export volume.

In 2010, the Corn Refiners Association petitioned the FDA to call HFCS "corn sugar," but the petition was denied.

Vietnam

90% of Vietnam's HFCS import comes from China and South Korea. Imports would total 89,343 tonnes in 2017. One ton of HFCS was priced at $398 in 2017, while one ton of sugar would cost $702. HFCS has a zero cent import tax and no quota, while sugarcane under quota has a 5% tax, and white and raw sugar not under quota have an 85% and 80% tax. In 2018, the Vietnam Sugarcane and Sugar Association (VSSA) called for government intervention on current tax policies. According to the VSSA, sugar companies face tighter lending policies which cause the association's member companies with increased risk of bankruptcy.

Health

High-fructose corn syrup
Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)
Energy1,176 kJ (281 kcal)
Carbohydrates76 g
Sugars76 g
Dietary fiber0 g
Fat0 g
Protein0 g
Vitamins and minerals
VitaminsQuantity %DV
Riboflavin (B2)1% 0.019 mg
Niacin (B3)0% 0 mg
Pantothenic acid (B5)0% 0.011 mg
Vitamin B61% 0.024 mg
Folate (B9)0% 0 μg
Vitamin C0% 0 mg
MineralsQuantity %DV
Calcium0% 6 mg
Iron2% 0.42 mg
Magnesium0% 2 mg
Phosphorus0% 4 mg
Potassium0% 0 mg
Sodium0% 2 mg
Zinc2% 0.22 mg
Other constituentsQuantity
Water24 g

Full report from USDA National Nutrient Database
Percentages estimated using US recommendations for adults, except for potassium, which is estimated based on expert recommendation from the National Academies.

Nutrition

HFCS is 76% carbohydrates and 24% water, containing no fat, protein, or micronutrients in significant amounts. In a 100-gram reference amount, it supplies 281 calories, while in one tablespoon of 19 grams, it supplies 53 calories.

Obesity and metabolic syndrome

The role of fructose in metabolic syndrome has been the subject of controversy, but as of 2022, there is no scientific consensus that fructose or HFCS has any impact on cardiometabolic markers when substituted for sucrose. A 2014 systematic review found little evidence for an association between HFCS consumption and liver diseases, enzyme levels or fat content.

A 2018 review found that lowering consumption of sugary beverages and fructose products may reduce hepatic fat accumulation, which is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. In 2018, the American Heart Association recommended that people limit total added sugar (including maltose, sucrose, high-fructose corn syrup, molasses, cane sugar, corn sweetener, raw sugar, syrup, honey, or fruit juice concentrates) in their diets to nine teaspoons per day for men and six for women.

Safety and manufacturing concerns

Since 2014, the United States FDA has determined that HFCS is safe (GRAS) as an ingredient for food and beverage manufacturing, and there is no evidence that retail HFCS products differ in safety from those containing alternative nutritive sweeteners. The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommended that added sugars should be limited in the diet.

One consumer concern about HFCS is that processing of corn is more complex than used for common sugar sources, such as fruit juice concentrates or agave nectar, but all sweetener products derived from raw materials involve similar processing steps of pulping, hydrolysis, enzyme treatment, and filtration, among other common steps of sweetener manufacturing from natural sources. In the contemporary process to make HFCS, an "acid-enzyme" step is used in which the corn starch solution is acidified to digest the existing carbohydrates, then enzymes are added to further metabolize the corn starch and convert the resulting sugars to their constituents of fructose and glucose. Analyses published in 2014 showed that HFCS content of fructose was consistent across samples from 80 randomly selected carbonated beverages sweetened with HFCS.

One prior concern in manufacturing was whether HFCS contains reactive carbonyl compounds or advanced glycation end-products evolved during processing. This concern was dismissed, however, with evidence that HFCS poses no dietary risk from these compounds.

As late as 2004, some factories manufacturing HFCS used a chlor-alkali corn processing method which, in cases of applying mercury cell technology for digesting corn raw material, left trace residues of mercury in some batches of HFCS. In a 2009 release, The Corn Refiners Association stated that all factories in the American industry for manufacturing HFCS had used mercury-free processing over several previous years, making the prior report outdated.

Other

Taste difference

Most countries, including Mexico, use sucrose, or table sugar, in soft drinks. In the U.S., soft drinks, such as Coca-Cola, are typically made with HFCS 55. HFCS has a sweeter taste than sucrose. Some Americans seek out drinks such as Mexican Coca-Cola in ethnic groceries because they prefer the taste over that of HFCS-sweetened Coca-Cola. Kosher Coca-Cola, sold in the U.S. around the Jewish holiday of Passover, also uses sucrose rather than HFCS.

Beekeeping

Main article: Colony collapse disorder

In apiculture in the United States, HFCS is a honey substitute for some managed honey bee colonies during times when nectar is in low supply. However, when HFCS is heated to about 45 °C (113 °F), hydroxymethylfurfural, which is toxic to bees, can form from the breakdown of fructose. Although some researchers cite honey substitution with HFCS as one factor among many for colony collapse disorder, there is no evidence that HFCS is the only cause. Compared to hive honey, both HFCS and sucrose caused signs of malnutrition in bees fed with them, apparent in the expression of genes involved in protein metabolism and other processes affecting honey bee health.

Public relations

Main article: Public relations of high-fructose corn syrup

There are various public relations concerns with HFCS, including how HFCS products are advertised and labeled as "natural." As a consequence, several companies reverted to manufacturing with sucrose (table sugar) from products that had previously been made with HFCS. In 2010, the Corn Refiners Association applied to allow HFCS to be renamed "corn sugar," but that petition was rejected by the FDA in 2012.

In August 2016, in a move to please consumers with health concerns, McDonald's announced that it would be replacing all HFCS in their buns with sucrose (table sugar) and would remove preservatives and other artificial additives from its menu items. Marion Gross, senior vice president of McDonald's stated, "We know that they don't feel good about high-fructose corn syrup so we're giving them what they're looking for instead." Over the early 21st century, other companies such as Yoplait, Gatorade, and Hershey's also phased out HFCS, replacing it with conventional sugar because consumers perceived sugar to be healthier. Companies such as PepsiCo and Heinz have also released products that use sugar in lieu of HFCS, although they still sell HFCS-sweetened products.

History

Commercial production of HFCS began in 1964. In the late 1950s, scientists at Clinton Corn Processing Company of Clinton, Iowa, tried to turn glucose from corn starch into fructose, but the process they used was not scalable. In 1965–1970, Yoshiyuki Takasaki, at the Japanese National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology developed a heat-stable xylose isomerase enzyme from yeast. In 1967, the Clinton Corn Processing Company obtained an exclusive license to manufacture glucose isomerase derived from Streptomyces bacteria and began shipping an early version of HFCS in February 1967. In 1983, the FDA accepted HFCS as "generally recognized as safe," and that decision was reaffirmed in 1996.

Prior to the development of the worldwide sugar industry, dietary fructose was limited to only a few items. Milk, meats, and most vegetables, the staples of many early diets, have no fructose, and only 5–10% fructose by weight is found in fruits such as grapes, apples, and blueberries. Most traditional dried fruits, however, contain about 50% fructose. From 1970 to 2000, there was a 25% increase in "added sugars" in the U.S. When recognized as a cheaper, more versatile sweetener, HFCS replaced sucrose as the main sweetener of soft drinks in the United States.

Since 1789, the U.S. sugar industry has had trade protection in the form of tariffs on foreign-produced sugar, while subsidies to corn growers cheapen the primary ingredient in HFCS, corn. Accordingly, industrial users looking for cheaper sugar replacements rapidly adopted HFCS in the 1970s.

See also

References

  1. European Starch Association (10 June 2013). "Factsheet on Glucose Fructose Syrups and Isoglucose".
  2. "Glucose-fructose syrup: How is it produced?". European Food Information Council (EUFIC). Archived from the original on 17 May 2017. Retrieved 9 February 2024.
  3. ^ White, John S. (21 February 2014). "Sucrose, HFCS, and Fructose: History, Manufacture, Composition, Applications, and Production". In Rippe, James M. (ed.). Fructose, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Sucrose and Health. Humana Press (published 2014). ISBN 9781489980779. OL 37192628M.
  4. ^ White, J. S. (2009). "Misconceptions about high-fructose corn syrup: Is it uniquely responsible for obesity, reactive dicarbonyl compounds, and advanced glycation endproducts?". Journal of Nutrition. 139 (6): 1219S–1227S. doi:10.3945/jn.108.097998. PMID 19386820.
  5. ^ "High Fructose Corn Syrup: Questions and Answers". US Food and Drug Administration. 4 January 2018. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  6. ^ "U.S. Exports of Corn-Based Products Continue to Climb". Foreign Agricultural Service, US Department of Agriculture. 21 January 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
  7. (Bray, 2004 & U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Sugar and Sweetener Yearbook series, Tables 50–52)
  8. ^ White, John S (1 November 2008). "Straight talk about high-fructose corn syrup: what it is and what it ain't". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 88 (6): 1716S–1721S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.25825b. ISSN 0002-9165. PMID 19064536.
  9. Engber, Daniel (28 April 2009). "Dark sugar: The decline and fall of high-fructose corn syrup". Slate Magazine. Slate.com. Retrieved 6 November 2010.
  10. Goran, Michael I.; Ulijaszek, Stanley J.; Ventura, Emily E. (1 January 2013). "High fructose corn syrup and diabetes prevalence: A global perspective". Global Public Health. 8 (1): 55–64. doi:10.1080/17441692.2012.736257. ISSN 1744-1692. PMID 23181629. S2CID 15658896.
  11. Hanover LM, White JS (1993). "Manufacturing, composition, and applications of fructose". American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 58 (suppl 5): 724S–732S. doi:10.1093/ajcn/58.5.724S. PMID 8213603.
  12. "5 Things You Need to Know About Maple Syrup". Retrieved 29 September 2016.
  13. "Advances in Honey Adulteration Detection". Food Safety Magazine. 12 August 1974. Retrieved 9 May 2015.
  14. Everstine K, Spink J, Kennedy S (April 2013). "Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents". J Food Prot. 76 (4): 723–35. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-399. PMID 23575142. Because the sugar profile of high-fructose corn syrup is similar to that of honey, high-fructose corn syrup was more difficult to detect until new tests were developed in the 1980s. Honey adulteration has continued to evolve to evade testing methodology, requiring continual updating of testing methods.
  15. ^ Hobbs, Larry (2009). "21. Sweeteners from Starch: Production, Properties and Uses". In BeMiller, James N.; Whistler, Roy L. (eds.). Starch: chemistry and technology (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press/Elsevier. pp. 797–832. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-746275-2.00021-5. ISBN 978-0-12-746275-2.
  16. Rizkalla, S. W. (2010). "Health implications of fructose consumption: A review of recent data". Nutrition & Metabolism. 7: 82. doi:10.1186/1743-7075-7-82. PMC 2991323. PMID 21050460.
  17. "Sugar and Sweeteners: Background". United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. 14 November 2014. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  18. "Japan Corn Starch Co., Ltd. Releasing the New High-Fructose Corn Syrup, "HFCS 70"!!". www.businesswire.com. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
  19. "High Fructose Corn Syrup Market 2019 Industry Research, Share, Trend, Global Industry Size, Price, Future Analysis, Regional Outlook to 2024 Research Report". MarketWatch. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
  20. ^ Gu, Hallie; Cruz, Enrico Dela (20 July 2017). "Old foes sugar and corn syrup battle for lucrative Asian market". Reuters. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
  21. ^ "Glucose-fructose syrup: An ingredient worth knowing" (PDF). Starch EU, Brussels, Belgium. June 2017. Retrieved 20 October 2019.
  22. ^ "The end of EU sugar production quotas and its impact on sugar consumption in the EU". Starch EU, Brussels, Belgium. 20 June 2017. Retrieved 10 October 2019.
  23. "Updated factsheet on glucose fructose syrups, isoglucose and high fructose corn syrup". Starch EU, Brussels, Belgium. 13 July 2018. Retrieved 20 October 2019.
  24. "Quality Labeling Standard for Processed Foods" (PDF). Punto Focal. 27 October 2006. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
  25. ^ "Sweetener Policies in Japan" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 May 2017. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
  26. International Sugar Organization March 2012 Alternative Sweeteners in a High Sugar Price Environment.
  27. "Japan Trade Agreements Affect US Sweetener Confections" (PDF). US Department of Agriculture Japan. 5 February 2019. Retrieved 17 November 2019.
  28. "Table 32-U.S. high fructose corn syrup exports, by destinations, 2000–2015". United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 20 November 2018. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  29. "Production Sufficient to Meet U.S. Quota Demand" (PDF). United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. 15 April 2019. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  30. "Table 34a-U.S. exports of high fructose corn syrup to Mexico". United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 6 November 2019. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  31. "Mexicos HFCS imports usage increasing | World-grain.com | 29 April 2011 09:04". www.world-grain.com. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
  32. "Report of the Agricultural Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) for Sweeteners and Sweetener Products" (PDF). Office of the United States Trade Representative. 27 September 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2019.
  33. "U.S. Wins Mexico Beverage Tax Dispute". Office of the United States Trade Representative. 3 March 2006. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  34. "Philippines drinks makers shun China corn syrup imports to avoid tax". Reuters. 30 January 2018. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
  35. "USDA ERS – Background". www.ers.usda.gov. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
  36. "Sugar and sweeteners". United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 20 August 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2019.
  37. "Understanding High Fructose Corn Syrup". Beverage Institute.
  38. Daniels, Lee A. (7 November 1984). "Coke, Pepsi to use more corn syrup". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  39. James Bovard. "Archer Daniels Midland: A Case Study in Corporate Welfare". cato.org. Archived from the original on 11 July 2007. Retrieved 12 July 2007.
  40. "Table 52-High fructose corn syrup: estimated number of per capita calories consumed daily, by calendar year". Economic Research Service. 18 July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 17 November 2019.
  41. "Table 51-Refined cane and beet sugar: estimated number of per capita calories consumed daily, by calendar year". Economic Research Service. 18 July 2019. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 17 November 2019.
  42. "U.S. Consumption of Caloric Sweeteners". Economic Research Service. Retrieved 17 November 2019.
  43. Landa, Michael M (30 May 2012). "Response to Petition from Corn Refiners Association to Authorize "Corn Sugar" as an Alternate Common or Usual Name for High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)". Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  44. ^ "Sugar association seeks help against corn syrup imports". Vietnam News. 28 May 2018. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
  45. ^ Chanh, Trung (20 August 2018). "VSSA proposes self-defense measure against HFCS". The Saigon Times. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 18 November 2019.
  46. "Sugar association seeks help amid bankruptcy fears | DTiNews – Dan Tri International". dtinews.vn. 10 April 2019. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
  47. United States Food and Drug Administration (2024). "Daily Value on the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels". FDA. Archived from the original on 27 March 2024. Retrieved 28 March 2024.
  48. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Food and Nutrition Board; Committee to Review the Dietary Reference Intakes for Sodium and Potassium (2019). "Chapter 4: Potassium: Dietary Reference Intakes for Adequacy". In Oria, Maria; Harrison, Meghan; Stallings, Virginia A. (eds.). Dietary Reference Intakes for Sodium and Potassium. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US). pp. 120–121. doi:10.17226/25353. ISBN 978-0-309-48834-1. PMID 30844154. Retrieved 5 December 2024.
  49. Fattore E, Botta F, Bosetti C (January 2022). "Effect of fructose instead of glucose or sucrose on cardiometabolic markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of isoenergetic intervention trials". Nutrition Reviews (Systematic review). 79 (2): 209–226. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuaa077. PMID 33029629.
  50. Allocca, M; Selmi C (2010). "Emerging nutritional treatments for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease". In Preedy VR; Lakshman R; Rajaskanthan RS (eds.). Nutrition, diet therapy, and the liver. CRC Press. pp. 131–146. ISBN 978-1-4200-8549-5.
  51. Chung, M; Ma, J; Patel, K; Berger, S; Lau, J; Lichtenstein, A. H. (2014). "Fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or indexes of liver health: A systematic review and meta-analysis". American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 100 (3): 833–849. doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.086314. PMC 4135494. PMID 25099546.
  52. Jensen, Thomas; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Sullivan, Shelby; Nadeau, Kristen J.; Green, Melanie; Roncal, Carlos; Nakagawa, Takahiko; Kuwabara, Masanari; Sato, Yuka; Kang, Duk-Hee; Tolan, Dean R. (May 2018). "Fructose and Sugar: A Major Mediator of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease". Journal of Hepatology. 68 (5): 1063–1075. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.019. ISSN 0168-8278. PMC 5893377. PMID 29408694.
  53. "Added sugars". American Heart Association. 17 April 2018. The AHA recommendations focus on all added sugars, without singling out any particular types such as high-fructose corn syrup
  54. "CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21: Listing of Specific Substances Affirmed as GRAS. Sec. 184.1866. High fructose corn syrup (amended 1 April 2020)". US Code of Regulations, Food and Drug Administration. 23 August 1996. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  55. White, J. S.; Hobbs, L. J.; Fernandez, S (2014). "Fructose content and composition of commercial HFCS-sweetened carbonated beverages". International Journal of Obesity. 39 (1): 176–182. doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.73. PMC 4285619. PMID 24798032.
  56. "Soda Warning? High-fructose Corn Syrup Linked To Diabetes, New Study Suggests". ScienceDaily. 23 August 2007. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  57. ^ Dufault, Renee (2009). "Mercury from chlor-alkali plants: measured concentrations in food product sugar". Environmental Health. 8 (1): 2. Bibcode:2009EnvHe...8....2D. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-8-2. PMC 2637263. PMID 19171026.
  58. "High Fructose Corn Syrup Mercury Study Outdated; Based on Discontinued Technology". The Corn Refiners Association. 26 January 2009. Archived from the original on 15 March 2017. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  59. Louise Chu (9 November 2004). "Is Mexican Coke the real thing?". The San Diego Union-Tribune. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 27 October 2007.
  60. "Mexican Coke a hit in U.S." The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011.
  61. Dixon, Duffie (9 April 2009). "Kosher Coke 'flying out of the store'". USA Today. Archived from the original on 2 February 2011. Retrieved 4 May 2010.
  62. ^ Mao, W; Schuler, M. A.; Berenbaum, M. R. (2013). "Honey constituents up-regulate detoxification and immunity genes in the western honey bee Apis mellifera". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (22): 8842–8846. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.8842M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1303884110. PMC 3670375. PMID 23630255.
  63. ^ Wheeler, M. M.; Robinson, G. E. (2014). "Diet-dependent gene expression in honey bees: Honey vs. Sucrose or high fructose corn syrup". Scientific Reports. 4: 5726. Bibcode:2014NatSR...4.5726W. doi:10.1038/srep05726. PMC 4103092. PMID 25034029.
  64. Krainer, S; Brodschneider, R; Vollmann, J; Crailsheim, K; Riessberger-Gallé, U (2016). "Effect of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) on mortality of artificially reared honey bee larvae (Apis mellifera carnica)". Ecotoxicology. 25 (2): 320–8. Bibcode:2016Ecotx..25..320K. doi:10.1007/s10646-015-1590-x. PMID 26590927. S2CID 207121566.
  65. Leblanc, B. W.; Eggleston, G; Sammataro, D; Cornett, C; Dufault, R; Deeby, T; St Cyr, E (2009). "Formation of hydroxymethylfurfural in domestic high-fructose corn syrup and its toxicity to the honey bee (Apis mellifera)". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 57 (16): 7369–76. Bibcode:2009JAFC...57.7369L. doi:10.1021/jf9014526. PMID 19645504.
  66. "Colony collapse disorder". US Environmental Protection Agency. 16 September 2016. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  67. ^ Senapathy, Kavin (28 April 2016). "Pepsi, Coke And Other Soda Companies Want You To Think 'Real' Sugar Is Good For You—It's Not". Forbes. US. Archived from the original on 23 March 2020.
  68. "FDA rejects industry bid to change name of high fructose corn syrup to "corn sugar"". CBS News. 31 May 2012.
  69. ^ "McDonald's to remove corn syrup from buns, curbs antibiotics in chicken". CNBC. 2 August 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
  70. ^ Zmuda, Natalie (15 March 2010). "Major Brands No Longer Sweet on High-Fructose Corn Syrup". Retrieved 16 November 2016.
  71. "Hershey considers removing high-fructose corn syrup from products in favor of sugar". The Guardian, London, UK. 3 December 2014. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  72. Marshall R. O.; Kooi E. R. (1957). "Enzymatic Conversion of d-Glucose to d-Fructose". Science. 125 (3249): 648–649. Bibcode:1957Sci...125..648M. doi:10.1126/science.125.3249.648. PMID 13421660.
  73. "Database of Select Committee on GRAS Substances (SCOGS) Reviews (updated 29 April 2019)". US Food and Drug Administration. 2019. Retrieved 17 November 2019.
  74. High Fructose Corn Syrup: A Guide for Consumers, Policymakers, and the Media (PDF). Grocery Manufacturers Association. 2008. pp. 1–14. Archived from the original on 4 December 2010.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  75. Leeper H. A.; Jones E. (October 2007). "How bad is fructose?" (PDF). Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 86 (4): 895–896. doi:10.1093/ajcn/86.4.895. PMID 17921361.
  76. "U.S. Sugar Policy". SugarCane.org. Archived from the original on 19 September 2018. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  77. "Food without Thought: How U.S. Farm Policy Contributes to Obesity". Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. November 2006. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
  78. "Corn Production/Value". Allcountries.org. Retrieved 6 November 2010.

External links

Maize and corn
Varieties
Parts
Processing
Pathology
Production
Culture
Maize dishes
Ingredients
Soups, stews,
and porridge
Tamales
Breads and cakes
Fried dishes
Other foods
Beverages
Sugar as food commodity
List of sugars and sugar products
Chemistry
Sources
Products
Syrups
Solid forms
Other forms
Industry
Production
By region
Current
Historical
History
Culture
Related
Research
Consumer food safety
Adulterants, food contaminants
Food additives
Intestinal parasites, parasitic disease
Microorganisms
Pesticides
Preservatives
Sugar substitutes
Toxins, poisons, environment pollution
Food fraud
Food processing
Food contamination incidents
Regulation, standards, watchdogs
Institutions
Related topics
Categories: