Revision as of 22:45, 8 October 2006 editPPGMD (talk | contribs)1,955 edits Tagged Unbalanced as most criticism has been removed.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:31, 17 December 2024 edit undoDarrelljon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,519 edits →Charlton Heston interview: Heston later announced he had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|2002 film by Michael Moore}} | |||
{{Unbalanced}} | |||
{{All plot|date=October 2023}} | |||
{{Infobox_Film | | |||
{{Infobox film | |||
name = Bowling for Columbine | | |||
image = |
| image = Bowling for columbine.jpg | ||
caption = ] ] 8.3/10 (44,772 votes) | | |||
| alt = | |||
| caption = Theatrical release poster | |||
starring = Michael Moore<br>]<br>]<br>] | | |||
director = ] |
| director = ] | ||
| based_on = Causes of the ] in 1999 | |||
producer = Michael Moore | | |||
| producer = {{Plainlist| | |||
distributor = ] Distribution Co. | | |||
* Michael Moore | |||
released = ] ] | | |||
* Kathleen Glynn | |||
runtime = 120 min.| | |||
* Jim Czarnecki | |||
language = ] | | |||
* Charles Bishop | |||
budget = $4.3 million| | |||
* ]<ref>{{Cite web |title=About the Film: Credits |url=http://www.bowlingforcolumbine.com/about/credits.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081105110900/http://www.bowlingforcolumbine.com/about/credits.php |archive-date=November 5, 2008 |website=BowlingForColumbine.com}}</ref> | |||
music = | | |||
* Kurt Engfehr | |||
awards = | | |||
imdb_id = 0310793 | | |||
}} | }} | ||
| writer = Michael Moore | |||
'''''Bowling for Columbine''''' is a ] directed by and starring ]. It won an ] for Best Documentary Features, and has received praise, controversy, and criticism, both for the genre of the film (creative documentary), and the claims Moore makes in it. The film opened on ], ], and internationalized Moore's previously cultish American status. | |||
| starring = Michael Moore | |||
| narrator = Michael Moore | |||
| music = Jeff Gibbs | |||
| editing = Kurt Engfehr | |||
| production_companies = {{Plainlist| | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
| distributor = {{Plainlist| | |||
* ] (United States) | |||
* Alliance Atlantis (International)<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hunter |first=Allan |date=17 May 2002 |title=Review: Bowling for Columbine |url=https://www.screendaily.com/review-bowling-for-columbine/409284.article |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210809091004/https://www.screendaily.com/review-bowling-for-columbine/409284.article |archive-date=9 August 2021 |access-date=9 August 2021 |website=]}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
| released = {{Film date|2002|5|16|]|2002|10|11|United States|2002|10|18|Canada}} | |||
| runtime = 120 minutes | |||
| country = {{Plainlist| | |||
* United States | |||
* Canada<ref name="BFIBFC">{{Cite web |title=Bowling for Columbine (2002) |url=https://www2.bfi.org.uk/films-tv-people/4ce2b87f36796 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220110202408/https://www2.bfi.org.uk/films-tv-people/4ce2b87f36796 |archive-date=January 10, 2022 |access-date=November 2, 2016 |publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
* Germany<ref name="BFIBFC" /> | |||
}} | |||
| language = English | |||
| budget = $4 million | |||
| gross = $58 million | |||
}} | |||
{{Columbine High School massacre}} | |||
'''''Bowling for Columbine''''' is a 2002 ] written, produced, directed, and narrated by ]. The documentary film explores what Moore suggests are the primary causes for the ] in 1999 and other acts of ]. He focuses on the background and environment in which the massacre took place and some common public opinions and assumptions about related issues. The film also looks into the nature of violence in the United States, and American violence abroad.<ref>{{Cite AV media |author=The Criterion Collection |author-link=The Criterion Collection |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzzImeQS2x0 |title=Looking Back at Bowling for Columbine |date=27 June 2018 |access-date=2022-02-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220203211505/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzzImeQS2x0 |archive-date=2022-02-03 |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref> | |||
The film won the 55th Anniversary Prize at the ] ], and received a 13-minute standing ovation at the end of its screening at the festival. | |||
A critical and commercial success, the film brought Moore international attention as a rising filmmaker and won numerous awards, including the ], the ], a special ''55th Anniversary Prize'' at the ],<ref name="festival-cannes.com">{{Cite web |title=Festival de Cannes: Bowling for Columbine |url=http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/3137379/year/2002.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110710235222/http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/3137379/year/2002.html |archive-date=2011-07-10 |access-date=2009-10-24 |website=festival-cannes.com}}</ref> and the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bowling for Columbine |url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310793/awards |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308121731/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310793/awards |archive-date=2021-03-08 |access-date=2018-07-21 |via=]}}</ref> The film is widely considered one of the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=International Documentary Association Top Twenty Documentaries of All-Time |url=http://www.lib.cwu.edu/media/intnationaldoc20.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080213002531/http://www.lib.cwu.edu/media/intnationaldoc20.htm |archive-date=2008-02-13 |access-date=2009-09-18 |publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2002-12-12 |title="Bowling for Columbine" Named Best Documentary Film |url=http://movies.about.com/library/weekly/aabowlingawardnews.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090830151715/http://movies.about.com/library/weekly/aabowlingawardnews.htm |archive-date=2009-08-30 |access-date=2009-09-18 |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Top 100 Documentary Movies |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/top_100_documentary_movies/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306161130/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/top_100_documentary_movies/ |archive-date=March 6, 2016 |access-date=February 8, 2016 |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=December 3, 2012 |title=The 25 "Greatest" Documentaries of All Time: 5. Bowling for Columbine |url=http://www.pbs.org/pov/blog/news/2012/12/the-25-greatest-documentaries-of-all-time/22/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150713212530/http://www.pbs.org:80/pov/blog/news/2012/12/the-25-greatest-documentaries-of-all-time/22/ |archive-date=July 13, 2015 |access-date=June 10, 2022 |website=]}}</ref> | |||
== Summary == | |||
The film's purpose is to explore what Moore suggests are the reasons and causes for the ], and other acts of violence with guns. Moore focuses on the background and environment in which the massacre took place, and some common public opinions and assumptions about related issues. The film looks into the nature of ] in the ], focusing on guns as a symbol of both American freedom and its self-destruction. | |||
==Film content== | |||
In Moore's discussions with various people, including '']'' co-creator ], the ]'s president ], and musician ], he seeks to answer the questions of why the Columbine massacre occurred, and why the United States has higher rates of violent crimes (especially crimes involving guns) than other developed nations. | |||
In Moore's discussions with various people—including '']'' co-creator ], the ]'s then-president ], ] suspect James Nichols, and musician ]—he seeks to explain why the Columbine massacre occurred and why the United States' violent crime rate (especially concerning crimes committed with firearms) is substantially higher than those of other nations. <!-- That is bordering on POV as well --> | |||
===Bowling=== | ===Bowling=== | ||
The film title |
The film's title refers to the story that ]—the two students responsible for the ]—attended a school ] class at 6:00 AM on the day they committed the attacks at school, that commenced at 11:17 AM. Later investigations showed that this was based on mistaken recollections, and Glenn Moore of the Golden Police Department concluded that they were absent from school on the day the attack took place.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cullen |first=Dave |date=April 16, 2005 |title=A Little Unfinished Business on Bowling and Columbine |url=http://blogs.salon.com/0001137/2005/04/16.html#a1561 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715233749/http://blogs.salon.com/0001137/2005/04/16.html |archive-date=2011-07-15 |website=] |via=Boulder Daily Camera}}</ref> | ||
Moore incorporates the concept of bowling in other ways |
Moore also incorporates the concept of recreational bowling into the film in other ways. For example, the ] use bowling pins for their target practice. When interviewing former classmates of the two boys, Moore notes that the students took a bowling class instead of ]. He suggests that this might have very little educational value and the people he interviews generally agree, noting how Harris and Klebold led introverted lifestyles and had careless attitudes towards the game, and that nobody thought twice about it. Moore questions whether the school system is responding to the real needs of students or if they are reinforcing fear. Moore also interviews two young residents of ], ]. Moore suggests a ] created by the government and the media leads Americans to arm themselves, to the advantage of gun-making companies. Moore suggests that bowling could have been just as responsible for the attacks on the school as Marilyn Manson, or even President ], who launched ] on ] at the time.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hastings |first=Michael |date=January 21, 2004 |title=Wesley & Me |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/hey_wait_a_minute/2004/01/wesley_me.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113074533/http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/hey_wait_a_minute/2004/01/wesley_me.html |archive-date=2012-01-13 |access-date=2011-10-14 |website=]}}</ref> | ||
===Free |
===Free gun for opening a bank account=== | ||
]}}</ref>]] | |||
An early scene depicts a bank in northern Michigan that gives customers a free hunting rifle when they make a deposit of a certain size into a ] account.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2001-01-26 |title=Bank's Deposit Gifts Gunning for Business |url=https://extras.denverpost.com/business/biz0126a.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220814120622/https://extras.denverpost.com/business/biz0126a.htm |archive-date=2022-08-14 |access-date=2022-06-17 |website=]}}</ref> The film follows Moore as he goes to the bank, makes his deposit, fills out the forms, and awaits the result of a background check before walking out of the bank carrying a brand new ] hunting rifle. Just before leaving the bank, Moore asks: "Do you think it's a little dangerous handing out guns at a bank?"<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bowling for Columbine : Media Clips - Michael at the Bank |url=http://bowlingforcolumbine.michaelmoore.com/media/clips/index.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100110235715/http://bowlingforcolumbine.michaelmoore.com/media/clips/index.php |archive-date=January 10, 2010 |website=BowlingForColumbine.MichaelMoore.com}}</ref> | |||
The '']'' called this scene a fabrication: | |||
An early scene narrates how Moore discovered a bank in Michigan that would give you a free hunting rifle when you made a deposit of a certain size into a ''term deposit'' account. The movie follows Moore as he goes to the bank, makes his deposit, fills out the forms and awaits the result of a background check before walking out of the bank carrying a brand new Weatherby hunting rifle. In March 2003, John Fund reported in a '']'' diary page that the bank employee who handled Moore's account, Jan Jacobson, claimed that Moore had arranged the transaction weeks in advance, and that customers have "a week to 10 days waiting period" before collecting their guns. <ref>{{cite web | title=Unmoored From Reality | url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110003233 | author=John Fund | publisher=Wall Street Journal | year=] ] | accessdate=2006-06-26}}</ref> | |||
{{blockquote|text=he bank doesn't ordinarily hand over guns to customers. Moore's people arranged this exchange well in advance. The required paperwork and waiting time for gun ownership was done long before the scene was shot and as a favor to Moore the rifle had been delivered to the bank so Moore could pick it up there rather than going to the gun dealer as is ordinarily required. One Michigan bank does indeed reward a savings account with a gift certificate for a rifle...But nothing else in this scene, according to the bank official, has anything to do with reality.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Stone |first=Alan A. |date=2003-06-01 |title=Cheap Shots |url=https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/alan-stone-cheap-shots/ |access-date=2024-09-18 |magazine=]}}</ref>}} | |||
Moore later responded to these criticisms, writing,"Nothing was done out of the ordinary other than to phone ahead and ask permission to let me bring a camera..." He also states that the background check took less than 10 minutes and he was handed the rifle 5 minutes later. To back up his version of events, he posted out-takes from the documentary. The video shows Jacobson explaining the process to Moore, including that the rifles are held in the bank's vault. <ref name="wackoattacko">{{cite web | title=How to Deal with the Lies and the Lying Liars When They Lie about "Bowling for Columbine" | url=http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/wackoattacko/ | author=Michael Moore | year=September ] | accessdate=2006-06-26 }} </ref> The footage in which an employee states that the guns are stored in the bank's vault appears in televised broadcasts of the film. | |||
Similarly, '']'' called the scene "staged."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Fund |first=John |date=2003-03-21 |title=Unmoored from Reality |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122459994451554213 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151008210039/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122459994451554213 |archive-date=2015-10-08 |access-date=2024-09-19 |work=]}}</ref> | |||
===Weapons of Mass Destruction=== | |||
==="Happiness Is a Warm Gun" montage=== | |||
Early in the movie Moore links the violent behaviour of the Columbine shooters to the presence in Littleton of a large defence establishment, manufacturing rocket technology. It is implied that the presence of this facility, and the acceptance of ] as a solution, contributed to the mindset that led to the massacre. | |||
About 20 minutes into the film, the ] song "]" plays during a ] in which footage of the following is shown: | |||
* People buying guns | |||
Moore conducts an interview with Evan McCollum, Director of Communications at a ] plant near Columbine, and asked him | |||
* Residents of ], a town that passed a law requiring all residents to own guns | |||
:"So you don't think our kids say to themselves, 'Dad goes off to the factory every day, he builds missiles of ]. What's the difference between that mass destruction and the mass destruction over at Columbine High School?'" | |||
* People firing rifles at ]s and ]s | |||
McCollum responded: | |||
* Denise Ames operating a ] | |||
:"I guess I don't see that specific connection because the missiles that you're talking about were built and designed to defend us from somebody else who would be aggressors against us." | |||
* ], a blind gun enthusiast from ], ] | |||
The comment then cuts to a montage of questionable American ] decisions, with the intent to contradict McCollum's statement, and cite examples of how the United States has, in Moore's view, frequently been the aggressor nation (''see section'' ]). McCollum has later clarified that the plant no longer produces missiles (the plant manufactured parts for ]s with a nuclear warhead in the mid-1980s), but rockets used for launching ]s. Indeed, the plant was also used to take former nuclear missiles ''out'' of service, converting decommissioned Titan missiles into launch vehicles for satellites. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20030201093826/http://www.bowlingforcolumbine.com/about/faq.php|title=Bowling For Columbine : About the Film : FAQ|first=Michael|last=Moore}}</ref> Moore later added to his statements from the movie, to say that satellites were equally responsible as nuclear missiles for US-instigated violence, to maintain this point. | |||
* ] killing Jeff Doucet, who had kidnapped and ] Plauché's son | |||
* The suicide of ] | |||
* A 1993 murder where Emilio Nuñez shot and killed his ex-wife ] during an interview on the ] program '']'' | |||
* The suicide of ], an AIDS and cancer patient who was protesting ]s | |||
* A man who takes his shirt off and is shot during a ] | |||
===Weapons of mass destruction=== | |||
It should be noted that McCollum, in the part of the interview that is shown, does not refute Moore's statements about Lockheed's weapons manufacture, which implies Moore is attacking (and McCollum is defending) Lockheed in general, not specifically the Littleton plant. As of 2005, Lockheed was still the world's largest defense contractor by revenue, which Moore states in the film.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defensenews.com/content/features/2005chart1.html|title=2005 Defense News Top 100|author=Defense News research}}</ref> | |||
Early in the film, Moore links the violent behavior of the Columbine shooters to the presence of a large defense establishment manufacturing rocket technology in ]. It is implied that the presence of this facility within the community, and the acceptance of ] as a solution to conflict, contributed to the mindset that led to the massacre. | |||
Moore conducts an interview with Evan McCollum, Director of Communications at a ] plant near Columbine, and asks him: | |||
===Climate of Fear=== | |||
{{blockquote|So you don't think our kids say to themselves, 'Dad goes off to the factory every day, he builds missiles of ].' What's the difference between that mass destruction and the mass destruction over at Columbine High School?}} | |||
Moore's central theme is that the Columbine massacre is not merely a product of the easy availability of guns in the US, but also of the 'climate of fear' that he contends is engendered by American media and society. He illustrates this with news clips, each tending to indicate the prominence given to violence and crime in news reports. Interviews also illustrate the 'security-minded' attitude of US residents. | |||
McCollum responds: | |||
Moore attempts to contrast this with the attitude prevailing in ], where he states that gun ownership is at similar levels to the US. He illustrates his thesis with by visiting neighbourhoods in Canada, near the US border, where he finds front doors unlocked and much less concern over crime and security. | |||
{{blockquote|I guess I don't see that specific connection because the missiles that you're talking about were built and designed to defend us from somebody else who would be aggressors against us.}} | |||
Another major highlight of the documentary is the interview between Moore and rock star ], in which the "soft-spoken" side of the singer is revealed. When Moore brings up the mention of the Columbine shootings, Manson agrees that parents blame the subject matter of his songs for the violence in schools. However, it is purely for media and sales, not for encouraging people to engage in violence. He states that if he could have spoken to the killers and the students that day, ''"I wouldn't say a thing. I would just listen to them,"'' proclaimed Manson. ''"And that's what nobody did."'' | |||
After the release of the film, McCollum clarified that the plant no longer produces missiles (the plant manufactured parts for ]s with a ] in the mid-1980s), but rockets used for launching ]s: | |||
=== "What a Wonderful World" segment === | |||
In one segment of the film, Michael Moore lists a series of military, clandestine, and diplomatic actions by the United States (set to the song "]" performed by ]). The segment is a satirical response to the comments which immediately precede it: those of a Littleton defense contractor claiming that there is no connection between the inherently violent manufacture of weapons of mass destruction by the parents of Columbine students and the violence of the students themselves, because, he claims, the United States isn't aggressive towards other countries. | |||
{{blockquote|I provided specific information to Moore about the space launch vehicles we build to launch spacecraft for ], ], the ] and commercial customers, including ] and ].<ref name="möller">Möller, Erik. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904124927/http://www.kuro5hin.org/print/2003/8/12/171427/607 |date=2015-09-04 }} kuro5hin.org August 13, 2003.</ref>}} | |||
On the website accompanying the film, Moore provides additional background information. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/bowlingforcolumbine/library/wonderful/index.php |title=Bowling for Columbine : Library : What a Wonderful World|publisher=MichaelMoore.com}}</ref> | |||
Erik Möller argues that Moore's question was not limited to the Littleton-area Lockheed Martin facility: | |||
The following is an exact transcript of the onscreen text in the ''Wonderful World'' segment: | |||
{{blockquote|First, note the word "our" in Moore's question. Moore is not from Colorado -- his question is generic, not meant to refer specifically to the Lockheed Martin plant in question. ... Of course, critics have conveniently ignored the fact that Lockheed Martin does supply weapons of mass destruction to the US military, and that the company is the nation's largest military contractor.<ref name="möller" />{{dead link|date=July 2021}}}} | |||
#]: U.S. overthrows Prime Minister ] of ]. U.S. installs ] as dictator. | |||
#]: U.S. overthrows democratically-elected President ] of ]. 200,000 civilians killed. | |||
#]: U.S. backs assassination of ] ]. | |||
#]-]: American military kills 4 million people in ]. | |||
#], ]: U.S. stages coup in ]. Democratically-elected President ] assassinated. Dictator ] installed. 5,000 Chileans murdered. | |||
#]: U.S. backs military rulers of ]. 70,000 Salvadorans and four American nuns killed. | |||
#]: U.S. trains ] and fellow ] to kill ]s. CIA gives them $3 billion. | |||
#]: ] administration trains and funds "]." 30,000 ]ns die. | |||
#]: U.S. provides billions in aid to ] for weapons to kill Iranians. | |||
#]: The ] secretly gives Iran ] to kill ]is. | |||
#]: CIA agent ] (also serving as ]) disobeys orders from Washington. U.S. invades Panama and removes Noriega. 3,000 Panamanian civilian casualties. | |||
#]: Iraq invades ] with weapons from U.S. | |||
#]: ]. Bush reinstates dictator of Kuwait. | |||
#]: ] bombs ] in ]. Factory turns out to be making ]. | |||
#] to present: American planes bomb Iraq on a weekly basis. ] estimates 500,000 Iraqi children die from bombing and sanctions. | |||
#]-]: U.S. gives ]-ruled ] $245 million in "aid." | |||
#]: ] uses his expert ] training to murder 3,000 people. | |||
==="What a Wonderful World" montage=== | |||
Critics point to a passage saying that the US gave $245 million to "]-ruled ]" (see above). Although literally correct in the sense that the US did give the aid, its placement in a list of evil acts by the US and its careful wording suggest that the US gave the aid to the Taliban, when in fact this was humanitarian aid that was sent through the UN and ]s, and was intended to bypass the Taliban.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/05/17/us.afghanistan.aid/|title=U.S. gives $43 million to Afghanistan|first=Elise|last=Labott|publisher=CNN|year=2001}}</ref> | |||
The film cuts to a montage of American ] decisions, with the intent to counter McCollum's statement by citing examples of how the United States has frequently been the aggressor nation. This montage is set to the song "]", performed by ]. | |||
The following is a transcript of the onscreen text in the ''Wonderful World'' segment: | |||
In the same "What a Wonderful World" sequence Moore claims that the United States trained and gave money to ]'s terrorist groups. However, the bipartisan ] concluded in chapter 2 of its final report that the United States gave bin Laden himself little or no money or training. <ref>], </ref> They cite a passage from ]'s biography ''Knights Under the Prophet's Banner'' in which he denies accepting any money from the US. <ref>], </ref> | |||
Bin Laden has also denied receiving money from the US. Large factions critical of American Foreign policy have maintained that the United States government in all probability supported and even funded bin Laden's ] organization following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (as the MAK and the United States both opposed the Soviet presence there), though the US government and the CIA have denied this, claiming they gave aid only to Afghan fighters, not the MAK. Former support of the ] in Afghanistan by the American government during this time is likewise common knowledge and widely accepted by most. | |||
# 1953: U.S. ] Prime Minister ] of ]. U.S. installs ] as absolute monarch. | |||
===Charlton Heston=== | |||
# 1954: U.S. ] democratically elected President ] of ] ] that resulted in up to 200,000 civilians killed. | |||
# 1963: U.S. backs ] of ]ese President ]. | |||
# 1963–75: The ] kills 4 million people ].{{verify source|date=September 2022}} | |||
# September 11, 1973: U.S. stages ] in Chile. Democratically elected President ] ]. Dictator ] installed. ].{{Verify source|date=September 2022}} | |||
# 1977: U.S. backs ] of ]. ]. | |||
# 1980s: U.S. trains ]<ref name="CIAtraining">See '']''.</ref> and fellow ] to kill ]s. CIA gives them $3 billion. | |||
# 1981: ] administration ] the ]. 30,000 ]ns die. | |||
# 1982: U.S. provides billions of dollars in aid to ] for weapons to ]. | |||
# 1983: The ] ] to kill ]is. | |||
# 1989: CIA agent ] (also serving as ]) disobeys orders from Washington, D.C. ] and removes Noriega. 3,000 Panamanian civilian casualties. | |||
# 1990: Iraq ] ] with weapons from U.S. | |||
# 1991: ]. ] reinstates absolute monarch of Kuwait. | |||
# 1998: ] bombs possible ] in ]. Factory turns out to be making aspirin. | |||
# 1991 to 2003: American planes ] on a weekly basis. ] estimates 500,000 Iraqi children die from bombing and sanctions. | |||
# 2000–01: U.S. gives ] $245 million in aid. | |||
# ]: ] uses his expert ] training to murder 2,977 people.<ref name=CIAtraining/> | |||
The montage ends with handheld-camera footage of ] crashing into the South Tower of the ] on September 11, 2001, the audio consisting solely of the emotional reactions of the witnesses, recorded by the camera's microphone. On the website accompanying the film, Moore provides additional background information for this section.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bowling for Columbine : Library : What a Wonderful World |url=http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/bowlingforcolumbine/library/wonderful/index.php |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090628131147/http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/bowlingforcolumbine/library/wonderful/index.php |archive-date=2009-06-28 |website=MichaelMoore.com}}</ref> | |||
Towards the end of the movie Moore secures an interview with NRA president ], who gave a speech in defense of gun ownership at Littleton very shortly after the Columbine incident. Moore describes himself truthfully as an NRA member when securing the interview. He questions and challenges Heston about the speech and its appropriateness. Heston reacts to these challenges by walking away from the interview (with the cameras still rolling). Moore leaves a photograph of one of the Columbine victims in Hestons house when he departs. | |||
== |
===Climate of fear=== | ||
Moore contrasts his portrayal of the U.S. attitude toward guns and violence with the attitude prevailing in areas of Canada where gun ownership is at similar levels to the U.S. He illustrates his thesis by visiting neighborhoods in Canada near the ], where he finds front doors unlocked and much less concern over crime and ]. In regards to the film, Farber states "Moore's thesis, which he later elaborated in ''Fahrenheit 9/11'', is that the fear-mongering that permeates American society contributes to our epidemic of gun violence". Moore shows news stories in Canada which do not follow the "if it bleeds it leads" mentality. This adds to Moore's argument that the media is driving America's fear and their need for protection. The cartoon "A Brief History of the United States of America" encompasses Moore's view of where the fear in America started and how it has progressed and changed over the years.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Farber |first=Stephen |date=30 November 2007 |title=Michael Moore's 'Bowling for Columbine' (2002) |url=http://www.documentary.org/magazine/michael-moores-bowling-columbine-2002 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160504085435/http://www.documentary.org/magazine/michael-moores-bowling-columbine-2002 |archive-date=2016-05-04 |access-date=2016-05-01 |website=IDA}}</ref> | |||
Despite being praised by most professional film critics, Bowling for Columbine is highly controversial. | |||
In this section, there is a montage of several social pundits stating possible causes for gun violence. Many claim links with violence in television, cinema, and video games; towards the end of the montage, however, the same people all change their claims to ]'s responsibility. Following this is an interview between Moore and Marilyn Manson. Manson shares his views about the United States' climate with Moore, stating that he believes U.S. society is based on "fear and consumption", citing ] commercials that promise "if you have bad breath, are not going to talk to you" and other commercials containing fear-based messages. Manson also mentions that the media, under heavy government influence, had asserted that his influence on the acts of Klebold and Harris was far greater than that of President Clinton, who ordered more bombings on ] on April 20, 1999, than any other day during the ]. When Moore asks Manson what he would say to the students at ], Manson replies, "I wouldn't say a single word to them; I would listen to what they have to say, and that's what no one did."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2002-10-11 |title=Marilyn Manson Interview on Bowling for Columbine |url=http://www.bowlingforcolumbine.com/media/clips/windowsmedia.php?Clip=manson1021LG |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110615135947/http://www.bowlingforcolumbine.com/media/clips/windowsmedia.php?Clip=manson1021LG |archive-date=2011-06-15 |access-date=2010-11-15 |publisher=Bowling for Columbine Official Website}}</ref> | |||
===Pro-gun groups=== | |||
The gun-rights lobby believes that Moore unfairly portrayed lawful gun owners in the USA as a violence-prone group. | |||
'']'' co-creator ]—who grew up in Littleton—agreed to talk with Moore about his hometown and the shooting in the film. Although he did not feel that Moore mischaracterized him or his statements in the film, he harbored ill feelings about the cartoon "A Brief History of the United States of America". Both Stone and his fellow ''South Park'' creator ] felt that the cartoon was done in a style very similar to theirs, and its proximity to Stone's interview may have led viewers to believe that they created the cartoon. "It was a good lesson in what Michael Moore does in films. He doesn't necessarily say explicitly this is what it is, but he creates meaning where there is none by cutting things together," Stone remarked in a later interview.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Anwar Brett |date=2005-01-13 |title=BBC - Movies - Interview - Matt Stone |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2005/01/13/matt_stone_team_america_interview.shtml |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160302120005/http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2005/01/13/matt_stone_team_america_interview.shtml |archive-date=2016-03-02 |access-date=2016-03-11 |work=]}}</ref> As a humorous retort to this, Stone and Parker portrayed Moore as "a gibbering, overweight, hot-dog-eating buffoon" who ultimately commits a suicide bombing against the protagonists in their 2004 film, '']''.<ref name="msnbc 6228221">{{Cite web |date=October 15, 2004 |title='Team America' Takes on Moviegoers |url=https://www.today.com/popculture/team-america-takes-moviegoers-wbna6228221 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200921170848/https://www.today.com/popculture/team-america-takes-moviegoers-wbna6228221 |archive-date=2020-09-21 |website=]}}</ref> | |||
===Anti-gun groups=== | |||
Moore argues that high gun ''ownership'' is not responsible for violence in America, and instead argues that there must be something about the American psyche and the media that makes the nation uniquely prone to high rates of murder and shootings. In support of his claims, Moore argues that ] gun ownership levels are as high as the U.S. Ben Fritz in ] considers this misleading because "Moore ignores the fact that Canada has significantly fewer handguns and a much stricter gun licensing system."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20021119.html|title=Viewer Beware|author=Ben Fritz|work=Spinsanity|year=Nov ember 19, 2002}}</ref> The 1996 International Crime (Victim) Survey from the Canada Department of Justice found that handguns were owned by 6.02% to 16.07% of households, depending on the province (the remainder being shotguns or long guns).<ref> Canada Firearms Centre. Accessed: 2006-06-29.</ref> By contrast, gun deaths in the U.S. are generally related to handguns in inner cities. It is easier to legally purchase a handgun in the United States than in any other industrialized nation.{{fact}} In ''Bowling for Columbine'', Moore claims that it is easy to buy guns in Canada too, and attempts to prove this by buying some ammunition. | |||
===Statistics=== | |||
===Ignoring the Role of Municipal Governance=== | |||
Moore follows up by exploring popular explanations as to why gun violence is so high in the United States. He examines Marilyn Manson as a cause, but states that more German citizens listen to Marilyn Manson (per capita) and that the country has a larger Goth population than the United States, with less gun violence (Germany: 381 incidents per year). He examines violent movies, but notes that other countries have the same violent movies, showing '']'' with French subtitles (France: 255 incidents per year). He also examines video games, but observes that many violent video games come from Japan (Japan: 39 incidents per year). He concludes his comparisons by considering the suggestion that the United States' violent history is the cause, but notes the similarly violent histories of Germany, Japan, France, and the United Kingdom (68 incidents per year). Moore ends this segment with gun-related-deaths-per-year statistics of the following countries: | |||
'']'' published a piece by ] criticizing the movie for ignoring the role that municipal governance plays in crime in America, and ignoring ] urban victims of crime to focus on the unusual events of Columbine. "A decline in murders in ] alone—from 1,927 in 1993 to 643 in 2001 — had, for example, a considerable impact on the declining national rate. Not a lot of those killers or victims were the sort of sports-hunters or militiamen Moore goes out of his way to interview and make fun of."<ref>Garance Franke-Ruta, , '']'', November 22, 2002</ref> | |||
* Japan: 39 (0.030/100,000) | |||
===The NRA/KKK Cartoon=== | |||
* Australia: 65 (0.292/100,000) | |||
''Bowling for Columbine'' includes a brief interview with '']'' co-creator ], who suggests that ''South Park'' was largely inspired by Stone' s childhood experiences in ]. Stone presents a vision of Littleton as painfully normal, and highly intolerant of non-conformist behavior. While publicising the ] '']'', Stone explained that ''Team America'' depicts Moore as a suicide bomber, because of a segment that followed his interview in ''Bowling for Columbine''. The animated segment, written by Moore and produced by ], depicts the ] and ] as interchangeable evil organizations. Stone, and ''Team America'' co-creator ], believe that because the segment follows Stone's interview it may lead people to think that they were involved in producing it. They also believe that the segment is animated in a similar style to the ''South Park'' cartoon that may also lead people to think they were involved in creating the cartoon.<ref name="fuckyeah">Associated Press, , ], October 15, 2004</ref> | |||
* United Kingdom: 68 (0.109/100,000) | |||
* Canada: 165 (0.484/100,000) | |||
* France: 255 (0.389/100,000) | |||
* Germany: 381 (0.466/100,000) | |||
* United States: 11,127 (3.601/100,000) | |||
'']'' published a piece by ] criticizing the film for ignoring the role that ] plays in crime in the United States, and ignoring African-American urban victims of violence while focusing on the unusual events of Columbine. "A decline in murders in New York City alone—from 1,927 in 1993 to 643 in 2001—had, for example, a considerable impact on the declining national rate. Not a lot of those killers or victims were the sort of sports-hunters or militiamen Moore goes out of his way to interview and make fun of."<ref>Garance Franke-Ruta, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110810212644/http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=moores_the_pity |date=2011-08-10 }}, '']'', November 22, 2002</ref> | |||
== Awards and nominations == | |||
* ] Winner, 55th Anniversary Prize, ] | |||
* ] Winner, ], Best Foreign Film | |||
* ] Winner, International Documentary Association (IDA), - Best Documentary of All Time | |||
* ] Winner, ], Best Documentary Features | |||
== |
===Kmart refund=== | ||
Moore takes two Columbine survivors, Mark Taylor and Richard Castaldo (along with Brooks Brown, who remains unidentified during the segment), to the ] ] of American superstore ] to claim a refund on the bullets still lodged in their bodies, which were purchased by the perpetrators at a Kmart store. Moore and the victims wait for hours in the building's lobby, speaking to several Kmart employees, who evade the issue. Moore then decides to visit a Kmart in nearby ], where they purchase the store's entire supply of ammunition, and the three return to the company's headquarters the following day with several members of the local media. The company's vice president of communications is quickly sent down to address Moore and the press, and announces that the company will phase out handgun ammunition sales within 90 days. "We've won," says Moore, in disbelief. "That was more than we asked for."<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090703233332/http://www.bowlingforcolumbine.com/reviews/2002-10-25-sacra.php |date=July 3, 2009 }}, '']'', October 25, 2002</ref> | |||
With a budget of only $4,000,000, ''Bowling for Columbine'' grossed $40,000,000 worldwide, including $21,575,207 in the United States. The documentary also broke box office records internationally, becoming the highest-grossing documentary of all time in the ], ], and ]. These records were later eclipsed by Moore's '']''. | |||
===Charlton Heston interview=== | |||
==References== | |||
For the final scene of the film, Moore visits ]'s home and asks to speak to him via the speakerbox in front of his gated home. Heston declines to speak to him at the time, but agrees to look at his schedule for the next day. Moore returns and first shows his NRA card, which Heston expresses pleasure at. They go inside the large property and sit down to discuss American firearm violence. Heston's response includes the suggestions that the United States has a "history of violence" and more "mixed ethnicity" than other countries. He also states that he does not believe that the United States is any more violent than other countries.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Jonathan Curiel |date=2002-10-18 |title=Moore captures U.S. zeitgeist |url=https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/Moore-captures-U-S-zeitgeist-Bowling-for-2761485.php |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110430185024/http://articles.sfgate.com/2002-10-18/entertainment/17566584_1_columbine-killings-columbine-high-school-nra-president-charlton-heston |archive-date=2011-04-30 |access-date=2011-02-24 |work=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Chris Coates |date=2002-10-21 |title=Moore puts gun culture in cross hairs |url=http://www.columbiachronicle.com/back/2002_fall/2002-10-21/arts1.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110708175635/http://www.columbiachronicle.com/back/2002_fall/2002-10-21/arts1.html |archive-date=2011-07-08 |access-date=2011-02-24 |publisher=The Columbia Chronicle}}</ref> Moore then asks Heston if he would like to apologize for leading NRA rallies in ], ] (Moore's hometown) after the ] and in Littleton after the Columbine shooting. Heston claims he did not know about the girl's death or how soon the rally was after it. When Moore presses to know if he would have cancelled the rally, he declines to answer and walks out of the interview. Moore implores him not to leave and asks him to look at a picture of the girl. Heston turns around, but then turns back to continue his exit. Upon his exit, Moore leaves the picture outside the home.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Alan A. Stone |date=Summer 2003 |title=Cheap Shots |url=http://bostonreview.net/BR28.3/stone.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402173852/http://bostonreview.net/BR28.3/stone.html |archive-date=2012-04-02 |access-date=2011-02-24 |magazine=]}}</ref> Moore was later criticized by some for his perceived "ambush" of the actor.<ref>{{Citation |last=Ebert, Roger |title='9/11': Just the facts? |date=2004-06-18 |work=] |page=55}}.</ref> Heston later announced he had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. | |||
<references /> | |||
"I'm uncomfortable watching the scene now, and I'm uncomfortable sitting there with him," Moore told '']''{{'}}s Katey Rich in 2019. "But I wasn't going to not put it in the film either. He revealed his core beliefs. But I remember feeling kind of sad about it later. Here's a man who 40 years prior to that marched with ], and now in his elderly years had just turned into this angry white guy who believed that we should have these laws where it's O.K. to shoot first and ask questions later."<ref name="Nast 2019">{{Cite magazine |date=2019-01-25 |title=The 25 Most Influential Movie Scenes of the Past 25 Years |url=https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/01/25-best-movie-scenes |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107233809/https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/01/25-best-movie-scenes |archive-date=2020-11-07 |access-date=2019-01-31 |magazine=Vanity Fair}}</ref> | |||
== Further reading == | |||
* The has country-by-country statistics about both gun ownership rates and death by firearm rates. | |||
== |
===Dedication=== | ||
The film is dedicated to the memory of three people who all died in gun related circumstances: | |||
* Moore's other documentaries '']'', '']'' and '']'' | |||
* ] | |||
* John Alberts, a sound designer and mixer for much of Moore's work. He had initially been hired to do the sound work on the film, but killed himself with a gun in January 2001. | |||
== External links == | |||
* Herbert "Sluggo" Cleaves Jr., the oldest child of two of Moore's closest friends. He was shot in the stomach in a ] and died at an area hospital in February 2001. | |||
* | |||
* Laura Wilcox, a victim of handgun violence who was killed in the ]. Her death led to the implementation of ], which allows compulsory treatment of patients with violent psychiatric disorders.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sam Allen |date=2002 |title=This film was dedicated to the following individuals |url=http://www.indiana.edu/~polfilm/student5/allen/dedications.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200221053820/http://www.indiana.edu/~polfilm/student5/allen/dedications.htm |archive-date=February 21, 2020 |access-date=2017-01-22 |publisher=Indiana University}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=October 14, 2002 |title=Film honors gun victim |url=https://www.theunion.com/news/local-news/film-honors-gun-victim/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210817012725/https://www.theunion.com/news/local-news/film-honors-gun-victim/ |archive-date=August 17, 2021 |access-date=November 30, 2020 |work=The Union}}</ref> | |||
* | |||
** | |||
* | |||
*{{imdb title|id=0310793|title=Bowling for Columbine}} | |||
==Release== | |||
=== Critical views === | |||
* from | |||
* from ''Forbes Magazine'', charges that several claims in the film are misleading | |||
* , criticism of several key scenes and arguments of the film | |||
* by ] | |||
** . An open letter to David Hardy by Erik Möller. Published and discussed at ] | |||
* | |||
* - seventeen criticisms of the movie | |||
===Critical reception=== | |||
The film earned positive reviews from critics. On the review aggregator ], it holds a 95% approval rating based on 173 reviews, with an average rating of 8.20/10. The consensus states, "Though it may not always convince, ''Bowling for Columbine'' asks important questions and provokes thought."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bowling for Columbine (2002) |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bowling_for_columbine |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210820000433/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bowling_for_columbine |archive-date=August 20, 2021 |access-date=September 13, 2021 |website=] |publisher=]}}</ref> Another score aggregator, ], which assigns a weighted average rating in the 0–100 range based on reviews from top mainstream critics, calculated a score of 72 based on 32 reviews, signifying 'generally favorable reviews'.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bowling for Columbine Reviews |url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/bowling-for-columbine |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180903093050/http://www.metacritic.com/movie/bowling-for-columbine |archive-date=September 3, 2018 |access-date=August 1, 2019 |website=] |publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
Michael Wilmington of the '']'' wrote, "It's unnerving, stimulating, likely to provoke anger and sorrow on both political sides—and, above all, it's extremely funny."<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20021206171943/http://www.bowlingforcolumbine.com/reviews/2002-10-18-metromix.php |date=December 6, 2002 }}</ref> A.O. Scott of '']'' wrote, "The slippery logic, tendentious grandstanding, and outright ] on display in ''Bowling for Columbine'' should be enough to give pause to its most ardent partisans, while its disquieting insights into the culture of violence in America should occasion sober reflection from those who would prefer to stop their ears."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Scott |first=A.O. |date=2002-10-11 |title=Film Review: Bowling for Columbine |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/11/movies/film-review-seeking-a-smoking-gun-in-us-violence.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612201820/https://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/11/movies/film-review-seeking-a-smoking-gun-in-us-violence.html |archive-date=2018-06-12 |access-date=2018-06-08 |website=]}}</ref> | |||
However, the film had its detractors as ] of '']'' thought that the film lacked a coherent message, asking "A lot of this is amusing and somehow telling. There was a parody of this movie called 'Bowling for Midway', a conservative Utah family movie to counter Moore's movie, and this paralleled the Docudrama, 'This Divided State'. But what does it all add up to?"<ref>{{Cite news |last=Howe |first=Desson |date=2002-10-18 |title=Moore Shoots Himself In the Foot |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2002/10/18/moore-shoots-himself-in-the-foot/d4ffedd4-378d-4544-a62a-29fac26e4658/ |access-date=2010-04-26 |work=]}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> | |||
===MPAA rating=== | |||
The film was rated R by the ], which means that children under the age of 17 were not admitted to see the film theatrically unless under supervision. Film critic ] chastized the MPAA for this move as "banning teenagers from those films they most need to see".<ref>Ebert, Roger (October 18, 2002). {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221116154227/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bowling-for-columbine-2002 |date=2022-11-16 }}. rogerebert.com</ref> Ebert had criticized the MPAA rating system on previous occasions.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=2010-12-11 |title=Getting Real About Movie Ratings |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703766704576009343432436296 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150706203750/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703766704576009343432436296 |archive-date=2015-07-06 |access-date=2013-04-05 |newspaper=]}}</ref> The film was noted for "some violent images and language".<ref>Turan, Kenneth (October 11, 2002). . '']''.</ref> | |||
===Gross revenue=== | |||
With a budget of $4 million, ''Bowling for Columbine'' grossed $58,008,423 worldwide, including $21,576,018 in the United States.<ref>In nominal dollars, from 1982 to the present.</ref> The documentary also broke box office records internationally, becoming the highest-grossing documentary in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Austria. These records were later eclipsed by Moore's next documentary, '']''.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Documentary Movies at the Box Office - Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=documentary.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120920112425/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=documentary.htm |archive-date=2012-09-20 |access-date=2007-12-27 |website=]}}</ref> | |||
==Awards and nominations== | |||
* 2002 Winner, 55th Anniversary Prize, ]<ref name="festival-cannes.com" /> | |||
* 2002 Winner, VPRO IDFA Audience Award, ] | |||
* 2003 Winner, ], ] | |||
* 2003 Winner, International Documentary Association (IDA) - Best Documentary of All Time | |||
* 2003 Winner, ], ]<ref>{{Cite web |date=5 October 2014 |title=2003{{!}}Oscars.org |url=https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/2003 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417092738/https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/2003 |archive-date=2018-04-17 |access-date=2022-02-03}}</ref> | |||
During the screening at the ] the film received a 13-minute standing ovation. It also won "Most Popular International Film" at the 2002 ]. | |||
Moore was both applauded and booed at the ]s on March 23, 2003, when he used his acceptance speech as an opportunity to proclaim his opposition to the ] and the ], which had begun just a few days earlier.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2003-03-24 |title=Chicago scoops six Oscars |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/24/oscars2003.film |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160916163040/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/24/oscars2003.film |archive-date=2016-09-16 |access-date=2016-12-17 |work=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=16 July 2012 |title=Michael Moore winning an Oscar® for "Bowling for Columbine" - Oscars on YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7Is43K6lrg |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220203205848/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7Is43K6lrg |archive-date=2022-02-03 |access-date=2022-02-03 |website=]}}</ref> | |||
In 2005, it was voted the third most popular film in the British ] program ''The 50 Greatest Documentaries'' of all time.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Channel 4's "50 Greatest Documentaries" |url=https://www.imdb.com/list/ls000124764/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170307051702/http://www.imdb.com/list/ls000124764/ |archive-date=7 March 2017 |access-date=25 June 2021 |website=IMDB}}</ref> | |||
==Home media== | |||
''Bowling for Columbine'' was released on ] and ] by ] on August 19, 2003. The film was released on DVD and ] in a digital restoration with supplementary features by ] in June 2018.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bowling for Columbine (2002) |url=https://www.criterion.com/films/28785-bowling-for-columbine |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180321131038/https://www.criterion.com/films/28785-bowling-for-columbine |archive-date=March 21, 2018 |access-date=March 20, 2018 |publisher=The Criterion Collection}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Michael Nordine |date=March 15, 2018 |title='Bowling for Columbine,' 'Female Trouble,' and More Coming to the Criterion Collection |url=http://www.indiewire.com/2018/03/criterion-collection-june-2018-bowling-for-columbine-1201939814/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180321131215/http://www.indiewire.com/2018/03/criterion-collection-june-2018-bowling-for-columbine-1201939814/ |archive-date=March 21, 2018 |access-date=March 20, 2018 |work=IndieWire}}</ref> | |||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist|2}} | |||
==External links== | |||
{{sister project links|auto=yes}} | |||
* {{IMDb title|0310793}} | |||
* {{mojo title|bowlingforcolumbine}} | |||
* {{rotten-tomatoes|bowling_for_columbine}} | |||
* {{Metacritic film}} | |||
* at ] | |||
* an essay by Eric Hynes at the ] | |||
* at Michael Moore's | |||
{{Michael Moore}} | |||
{{Navboxes | |||
|title = Awards for ''Bowling for Columbine'' | |||
|list = | |||
{{AcademyAwardBestDocumentaryFeature2001-2020}} | |||
{{César Award for Best Foreign Film}} | |||
{{Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Documentary}} | |||
{{Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Documentary Film}} | |||
{{Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association Award for Best Documentary Film}} | |||
{{Florida Film Critics Circle Award for Best Documentary Film}} | |||
{{Independent Spirit Award for Best Documentary Feature}} | |||
{{National Board of Review Award for Best Documentary Film}} | |||
{{Online Film Critics Society Award for Best Documentary Film}} | |||
{{TFCA Award for Best Documentary Film}} | |||
}} | |||
{{School shootings in the United States}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bowling For Columbine}} | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 13:31, 17 December 2024
2002 film by Michael MooreThis article consists almost entirely of a plot summary. Please help improve the article by adding more real-world context. (October 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Bowling for Columbine | |
---|---|
Theatrical release poster | |
Directed by | Michael Moore |
Written by | Michael Moore |
Based on | Causes of the Columbine High School massacre in 1999 |
Produced by |
|
Starring | Michael Moore |
Narrated by | Michael Moore |
Edited by | Kurt Engfehr |
Music by | Jeff Gibbs |
Production companies | |
Distributed by |
|
Release dates |
|
Running time | 120 minutes |
Countries |
|
Language | English |
Budget | $4 million |
Box office | $58 million |
Part of a series of articles on the |
Columbine High School massacre |
---|
Location: Perpetrators: Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold |
Victims |
Weaponry |
Related persons |
Media
|
Cultural impact and aftermath |
Entertainment affected
|
Controversies |
Related topics
|
Bowling for Columbine is a 2002 documentary film written, produced, directed, and narrated by Michael Moore. The documentary film explores what Moore suggests are the primary causes for the Columbine High School massacre in 1999 and other acts of gun violence. He focuses on the background and environment in which the massacre took place and some common public opinions and assumptions about related issues. The film also looks into the nature of violence in the United States, and American violence abroad.
A critical and commercial success, the film brought Moore international attention as a rising filmmaker and won numerous awards, including the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature, the Independent Spirit Award for Best Documentary Feature, a special 55th Anniversary Prize at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival, and the César Award for Best Foreign Film. The film is widely considered one of the greatest documentary films of all time.
Film content
In Moore's discussions with various people—including South Park co-creator Matt Stone, the National Rifle Association's then-president Charlton Heston, Oklahoma City bombing suspect James Nichols, and musician Marilyn Manson—he seeks to explain why the Columbine massacre occurred and why the United States' violent crime rate (especially concerning crimes committed with firearms) is substantially higher than those of other nations.
Bowling
The film's title refers to the story that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold—the two students responsible for the Columbine High School massacre—attended a school bowling class at 6:00 AM on the day they committed the attacks at school, that commenced at 11:17 AM. Later investigations showed that this was based on mistaken recollections, and Glenn Moore of the Golden Police Department concluded that they were absent from school on the day the attack took place.
Moore also incorporates the concept of recreational bowling into the film in other ways. For example, the Michigan Militia use bowling pins for their target practice. When interviewing former classmates of the two boys, Moore notes that the students took a bowling class instead of physical education. He suggests that this might have very little educational value and the people he interviews generally agree, noting how Harris and Klebold led introverted lifestyles and had careless attitudes towards the game, and that nobody thought twice about it. Moore questions whether the school system is responding to the real needs of students or if they are reinforcing fear. Moore also interviews two young residents of Oscoda, Michigan. Moore suggests a culture of fear created by the government and the media leads Americans to arm themselves, to the advantage of gun-making companies. Moore suggests that bowling could have been just as responsible for the attacks on the school as Marilyn Manson, or even President Bill Clinton, who launched bombing attacks on Serbia at the time.
Free gun for opening a bank account
An early scene depicts a bank in northern Michigan that gives customers a free hunting rifle when they make a deposit of a certain size into a time deposit account. The film follows Moore as he goes to the bank, makes his deposit, fills out the forms, and awaits the result of a background check before walking out of the bank carrying a brand new Weatherby hunting rifle. Just before leaving the bank, Moore asks: "Do you think it's a little dangerous handing out guns at a bank?"
The Boston Review called this scene a fabrication:
he bank doesn't ordinarily hand over guns to customers. Moore's people arranged this exchange well in advance. The required paperwork and waiting time for gun ownership was done long before the scene was shot and as a favor to Moore the rifle had been delivered to the bank so Moore could pick it up there rather than going to the gun dealer as is ordinarily required. One Michigan bank does indeed reward a savings account with a gift certificate for a rifle...But nothing else in this scene, according to the bank official, has anything to do with reality.
Similarly, The Wall Street Journal called the scene "staged."
"Happiness Is a Warm Gun" montage
About 20 minutes into the film, the Beatles song "Happiness Is a Warm Gun" plays during a montage in which footage of the following is shown:
- People buying guns
- Residents of Virgin, Utah, a town that passed a law requiring all residents to own guns
- People firing rifles at carnivals and shooting ranges
- Denise Ames operating a rifle
- Carey McWilliams, a blind gun enthusiast from Fargo, North Dakota
- Gary Plauché killing Jeff Doucet, who had kidnapped and molested Plauché's son
- The suicide of R. Budd Dwyer
- A 1993 murder where Emilio Nuñez shot and killed his ex-wife Maritza Martin during an interview on the Telemundo program Ocurrió Así
- The suicide of Daniel V. Jones, an AIDS and cancer patient who was protesting health maintenance organizations
- A man who takes his shirt off and is shot during a riot
Weapons of mass destruction
Early in the film, Moore links the violent behavior of the Columbine shooters to the presence of a large defense establishment manufacturing rocket technology in Littleton. It is implied that the presence of this facility within the community, and the acceptance of institutionalized violence as a solution to conflict, contributed to the mindset that led to the massacre.
Moore conducts an interview with Evan McCollum, Director of Communications at a Lockheed Martin plant near Columbine, and asks him:
So you don't think our kids say to themselves, 'Dad goes off to the factory every day, he builds missiles of mass destruction.' What's the difference between that mass destruction and the mass destruction over at Columbine High School?
McCollum responds:
I guess I don't see that specific connection because the missiles that you're talking about were built and designed to defend us from somebody else who would be aggressors against us.
After the release of the film, McCollum clarified that the plant no longer produces missiles (the plant manufactured parts for intercontinental ballistic missiles with a nuclear warhead in the mid-1980s), but rockets used for launching satellites:
I provided specific information to Moore about the space launch vehicles we build to launch spacecraft for NASA, NOAA, the Dept. of Defense and commercial customers, including DirecTV and EchoStar.
Erik Möller argues that Moore's question was not limited to the Littleton-area Lockheed Martin facility:
First, note the word "our" in Moore's question. Moore is not from Colorado -- his question is generic, not meant to refer specifically to the Lockheed Martin plant in question. ... Of course, critics have conveniently ignored the fact that Lockheed Martin does supply weapons of mass destruction to the US military, and that the company is the nation's largest military contractor.
"What a Wonderful World" montage
The film cuts to a montage of American foreign policy decisions, with the intent to counter McCollum's statement by citing examples of how the United States has frequently been the aggressor nation. This montage is set to the song "What a Wonderful World", performed by Louis Armstrong.
The following is a transcript of the onscreen text in the Wonderful World segment:
- 1953: U.S. overthrows Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh of Iran. U.S. installs Shah Pahlavi as absolute monarch.
- 1954: U.S. overthrows democratically elected President Jacobo Árbenz of Guatemala as part of a conflict that resulted in up to 200,000 civilians killed.
- 1963: U.S. backs assassination of South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem.
- 1963–75: The American military kills 4 million people during the Vietnam War.
- September 11, 1973: U.S. stages 1973 Chilean coup d'état in Chile. Democratically elected President Salvador Allende assassinated. Dictator Augusto Pinochet installed. 3,000 Chileans murdered.
- 1977: U.S. backs military Junta of El Salvador. 70,000 Salvadorans and four American nuns killed.
- 1980s: U.S. trains Osama bin Laden and fellow mujahideen to kill Soviets. CIA gives them $3 billion.
- 1981: Reagan administration trains and funds the Contras. 30,000 Nicaraguans die.
- 1982: U.S. provides billions of dollars in aid to Saddam Hussein for weapons to kill Iranians.
- 1983: The White House secretly gives Iran weapons to kill Iraqis.
- 1989: CIA agent Manuel Noriega (also serving as President of Panama) disobeys orders from Washington, D.C. U.S. invades Panama and removes Noriega. 3,000 Panamanian civilian casualties.
- 1990: Iraq invades Kuwait with weapons from U.S.
- 1991: U.S. enters Iraq. George H. W. Bush reinstates absolute monarch of Kuwait.
- 1998: Clinton bombs possible weapons factory in Sudan. Factory turns out to be making aspirin.
- 1991 to 2003: American planes bomb Iraq on a weekly basis. U.N. estimates 500,000 Iraqi children die from bombing and sanctions.
- 2000–01: U.S. gives Taliban-ruled Afghanistan $245 million in aid.
- September 11, 2001: Osama bin Laden uses his expert CIA training to murder 2,977 people.
The montage ends with handheld-camera footage of United Airlines Flight 175 crashing into the South Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, the audio consisting solely of the emotional reactions of the witnesses, recorded by the camera's microphone. On the website accompanying the film, Moore provides additional background information for this section.
Climate of fear
Moore contrasts his portrayal of the U.S. attitude toward guns and violence with the attitude prevailing in areas of Canada where gun ownership is at similar levels to the U.S. He illustrates his thesis by visiting neighborhoods in Canada near the Canada–U.S. border, where he finds front doors unlocked and much less concern over crime and security. In regards to the film, Farber states "Moore's thesis, which he later elaborated in Fahrenheit 9/11, is that the fear-mongering that permeates American society contributes to our epidemic of gun violence". Moore shows news stories in Canada which do not follow the "if it bleeds it leads" mentality. This adds to Moore's argument that the media is driving America's fear and their need for protection. The cartoon "A Brief History of the United States of America" encompasses Moore's view of where the fear in America started and how it has progressed and changed over the years.
In this section, there is a montage of several social pundits stating possible causes for gun violence. Many claim links with violence in television, cinema, and video games; towards the end of the montage, however, the same people all change their claims to Marilyn Manson's responsibility. Following this is an interview between Moore and Marilyn Manson. Manson shares his views about the United States' climate with Moore, stating that he believes U.S. society is based on "fear and consumption", citing Colgate commercials that promise "if you have bad breath, are not going to talk to you" and other commercials containing fear-based messages. Manson also mentions that the media, under heavy government influence, had asserted that his influence on the acts of Klebold and Harris was far greater than that of President Clinton, who ordered more bombings on Kosovo on April 20, 1999, than any other day during the NATO campaign against Yugoslavia. When Moore asks Manson what he would say to the students at Columbine, Manson replies, "I wouldn't say a single word to them; I would listen to what they have to say, and that's what no one did."
South Park co-creator Matt Stone—who grew up in Littleton—agreed to talk with Moore about his hometown and the shooting in the film. Although he did not feel that Moore mischaracterized him or his statements in the film, he harbored ill feelings about the cartoon "A Brief History of the United States of America". Both Stone and his fellow South Park creator Trey Parker felt that the cartoon was done in a style very similar to theirs, and its proximity to Stone's interview may have led viewers to believe that they created the cartoon. "It was a good lesson in what Michael Moore does in films. He doesn't necessarily say explicitly this is what it is, but he creates meaning where there is none by cutting things together," Stone remarked in a later interview. As a humorous retort to this, Stone and Parker portrayed Moore as "a gibbering, overweight, hot-dog-eating buffoon" who ultimately commits a suicide bombing against the protagonists in their 2004 film, Team America: World Police.
Statistics
Moore follows up by exploring popular explanations as to why gun violence is so high in the United States. He examines Marilyn Manson as a cause, but states that more German citizens listen to Marilyn Manson (per capita) and that the country has a larger Goth population than the United States, with less gun violence (Germany: 381 incidents per year). He examines violent movies, but notes that other countries have the same violent movies, showing The Matrix with French subtitles (France: 255 incidents per year). He also examines video games, but observes that many violent video games come from Japan (Japan: 39 incidents per year). He concludes his comparisons by considering the suggestion that the United States' violent history is the cause, but notes the similarly violent histories of Germany, Japan, France, and the United Kingdom (68 incidents per year). Moore ends this segment with gun-related-deaths-per-year statistics of the following countries:
- Japan: 39 (0.030/100,000)
- Australia: 65 (0.292/100,000)
- United Kingdom: 68 (0.109/100,000)
- Canada: 165 (0.484/100,000)
- France: 255 (0.389/100,000)
- Germany: 381 (0.466/100,000)
- United States: 11,127 (3.601/100,000)
The American Prospect published a piece by Garance Franke-Ruta criticizing the film for ignoring the role that municipal governance plays in crime in the United States, and ignoring African-American urban victims of violence while focusing on the unusual events of Columbine. "A decline in murders in New York City alone—from 1,927 in 1993 to 643 in 2001—had, for example, a considerable impact on the declining national rate. Not a lot of those killers or victims were the sort of sports-hunters or militiamen Moore goes out of his way to interview and make fun of."
Kmart refund
Moore takes two Columbine survivors, Mark Taylor and Richard Castaldo (along with Brooks Brown, who remains unidentified during the segment), to the Troy, Michigan headquarters of American superstore Kmart to claim a refund on the bullets still lodged in their bodies, which were purchased by the perpetrators at a Kmart store. Moore and the victims wait for hours in the building's lobby, speaking to several Kmart employees, who evade the issue. Moore then decides to visit a Kmart in nearby Sterling Heights, where they purchase the store's entire supply of ammunition, and the three return to the company's headquarters the following day with several members of the local media. The company's vice president of communications is quickly sent down to address Moore and the press, and announces that the company will phase out handgun ammunition sales within 90 days. "We've won," says Moore, in disbelief. "That was more than we asked for."
Charlton Heston interview
For the final scene of the film, Moore visits Charlton Heston's home and asks to speak to him via the speakerbox in front of his gated home. Heston declines to speak to him at the time, but agrees to look at his schedule for the next day. Moore returns and first shows his NRA card, which Heston expresses pleasure at. They go inside the large property and sit down to discuss American firearm violence. Heston's response includes the suggestions that the United States has a "history of violence" and more "mixed ethnicity" than other countries. He also states that he does not believe that the United States is any more violent than other countries. Moore then asks Heston if he would like to apologize for leading NRA rallies in Flint, Michigan (Moore's hometown) after the shooting death of a six-year-old girl at Buell Elementary School and in Littleton after the Columbine shooting. Heston claims he did not know about the girl's death or how soon the rally was after it. When Moore presses to know if he would have cancelled the rally, he declines to answer and walks out of the interview. Moore implores him not to leave and asks him to look at a picture of the girl. Heston turns around, but then turns back to continue his exit. Upon his exit, Moore leaves the picture outside the home. Moore was later criticized by some for his perceived "ambush" of the actor. Heston later announced he had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease.
"I'm uncomfortable watching the scene now, and I'm uncomfortable sitting there with him," Moore told Vanity Fair's Katey Rich in 2019. "But I wasn't going to not put it in the film either. He revealed his core beliefs. But I remember feeling kind of sad about it later. Here's a man who 40 years prior to that marched with Martin Luther King, and now in his elderly years had just turned into this angry white guy who believed that we should have these laws where it's O.K. to shoot first and ask questions later."
Dedication
The film is dedicated to the memory of three people who all died in gun related circumstances:
- John Alberts, a sound designer and mixer for much of Moore's work. He had initially been hired to do the sound work on the film, but killed himself with a gun in January 2001.
- Herbert "Sluggo" Cleaves Jr., the oldest child of two of Moore's closest friends. He was shot in the stomach in a drive-by shooting and died at an area hospital in February 2001.
- Laura Wilcox, a victim of handgun violence who was killed in the 2001 Nevada County shootings. Her death led to the implementation of Laura's Law, which allows compulsory treatment of patients with violent psychiatric disorders.
Release
Critical reception
The film earned positive reviews from critics. On the review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, it holds a 95% approval rating based on 173 reviews, with an average rating of 8.20/10. The consensus states, "Though it may not always convince, Bowling for Columbine asks important questions and provokes thought." Another score aggregator, Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average rating in the 0–100 range based on reviews from top mainstream critics, calculated a score of 72 based on 32 reviews, signifying 'generally favorable reviews'.
Michael Wilmington of the Chicago Tribune wrote, "It's unnerving, stimulating, likely to provoke anger and sorrow on both political sides—and, above all, it's extremely funny." A.O. Scott of The New York Times wrote, "The slippery logic, tendentious grandstanding, and outright demagoguery on display in Bowling for Columbine should be enough to give pause to its most ardent partisans, while its disquieting insights into the culture of violence in America should occasion sober reflection from those who would prefer to stop their ears."
However, the film had its detractors as Desson Thomson of The Washington Post thought that the film lacked a coherent message, asking "A lot of this is amusing and somehow telling. There was a parody of this movie called 'Bowling for Midway', a conservative Utah family movie to counter Moore's movie, and this paralleled the Docudrama, 'This Divided State'. But what does it all add up to?"
MPAA rating
The film was rated R by the Motion Picture Association of America, which means that children under the age of 17 were not admitted to see the film theatrically unless under supervision. Film critic Roger Ebert chastized the MPAA for this move as "banning teenagers from those films they most need to see". Ebert had criticized the MPAA rating system on previous occasions. The film was noted for "some violent images and language".
Gross revenue
With a budget of $4 million, Bowling for Columbine grossed $58,008,423 worldwide, including $21,576,018 in the United States. The documentary also broke box office records internationally, becoming the highest-grossing documentary in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Austria. These records were later eclipsed by Moore's next documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11.
Awards and nominations
- 2002 Winner, 55th Anniversary Prize, 2002 Cannes Film Festival
- 2002 Winner, VPRO IDFA Audience Award, International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam
- 2003 Winner, César Awards, Best Foreign Film
- 2003 Winner, International Documentary Association (IDA) - Best Documentary of All Time
- 2003 Winner, Academy Award, Best Documentary Feature
During the screening at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival the film received a 13-minute standing ovation. It also won "Most Popular International Film" at the 2002 Vancouver International Film Festival.
Moore was both applauded and booed at the Academy Awards on March 23, 2003, when he used his acceptance speech as an opportunity to proclaim his opposition to the presidency of George W. Bush and the United States-led invasion of Iraq, which had begun just a few days earlier.
In 2005, it was voted the third most popular film in the British Channel 4 program The 50 Greatest Documentaries of all time.
Home media
Bowling for Columbine was released on VHS and DVD by MGM Home Entertainment on August 19, 2003. The film was released on DVD and Blu-ray in a digital restoration with supplementary features by the Criterion Collection in June 2018.
References
- "About the Film: Credits". BowlingForColumbine.com. Archived from the original on November 5, 2008.
- Hunter, Allan (17 May 2002). "Review: Bowling for Columbine". Screen Daily. Archived from the original on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 9 August 2021.
- ^ "Bowling for Columbine (2002)". British Film Institute. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved November 2, 2016.
- The Criterion Collection (27 June 2018). Looking Back at Bowling for Columbine. Archived from the original on 2022-02-03. Retrieved 2022-02-03 – via YouTube.
- ^ "Festival de Cannes: Bowling for Columbine". festival-cannes.com. Archived from the original on 2011-07-10. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- "Bowling for Columbine". Archived from the original on 2021-03-08. Retrieved 2018-07-21 – via IMDb.
- "International Documentary Association Top Twenty Documentaries of All-Time". Central Washington University. Archived from the original on 2008-02-13. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
- ""Bowling for Columbine" Named Best Documentary Film". About.com. 2002-12-12. Archived from the original on 2009-08-30. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
- "Top 100 Documentary Movies". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on March 6, 2016. Retrieved February 8, 2016.
- "The 25 "Greatest" Documentaries of All Time: 5. Bowling for Columbine". PBS. December 3, 2012. Archived from the original on July 13, 2015. Retrieved June 10, 2022.
- Cullen, Dave (April 16, 2005). "A Little Unfinished Business on Bowling and Columbine". Salon. Archived from the original on 2011-07-15 – via Boulder Daily Camera.
- Hastings, Michael (January 21, 2004). "Wesley & Me". Slate. Archived from the original on 2012-01-13. Retrieved 2011-10-14.
- Nol, Michael (January 28, 2001). "Banks Use Gifts to Target Depositors". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on 2024-05-24.
- "Bank's Deposit Gifts Gunning for Business". The Denver Post. 2001-01-26. Archived from the original on 2022-08-14. Retrieved 2022-06-17.
- "Bowling for Columbine : Media Clips - Michael at the Bank". BowlingForColumbine.MichaelMoore.com. Archived from the original on January 10, 2010.
- Stone, Alan A. (2003-06-01). "Cheap Shots". Boston Review. Retrieved 2024-09-18.
- Fund, John (2003-03-21). "Unmoored from Reality". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2015-10-08. Retrieved 2024-09-19.
- ^ Möller, Erik. A defense of Michael Moore and "Bowling for Columbine" Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine kuro5hin.org August 13, 2003.
- ^ See Allegations of CIA assistance to Osama bin Laden.
- "Bowling for Columbine : Library : What a Wonderful World". MichaelMoore.com. Archived from the original on 2009-06-28.
- Farber, Stephen (30 November 2007). "Michael Moore's 'Bowling for Columbine' (2002)". IDA. Archived from the original on 2016-05-04. Retrieved 2016-05-01.
- "Marilyn Manson Interview on Bowling for Columbine". Bowling for Columbine Official Website. 2002-10-11. Archived from the original on 2011-06-15. Retrieved 2010-11-15.
- Anwar Brett (2005-01-13). "BBC - Movies - Interview - Matt Stone". BBC. Archived from the original on 2016-03-02. Retrieved 2016-03-11.
- "'Team America' Takes on Moviegoers". MSNBC. October 15, 2004. Archived from the original on 2020-09-21.
- Garance Franke-Ruta, Moore's the Pity Archived 2011-08-10 at the Wayback Machine, The American Prospect, November 22, 2002
- "I'm trying to connect the dots between the local violence and the global violence," says director Michael Moore of his new film, "Bowling for Columbine" Archived July 3, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, The Sacramento Bee, October 25, 2002
- Jonathan Curiel (2002-10-18). "Moore captures U.S. zeitgeist". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 2011-04-30. Retrieved 2011-02-24.
- Chris Coates (2002-10-21). "Moore puts gun culture in cross hairs". The Columbia Chronicle. Archived from the original on 2011-07-08. Retrieved 2011-02-24.
- Alan A. Stone (Summer 2003). "Cheap Shots". Boston Review. Archived from the original on 2012-04-02. Retrieved 2011-02-24.
- Ebert, Roger (2004-06-18), "'9/11': Just the facts?", Chicago Sun-Times, p. 55.
- "The 25 Most Influential Movie Scenes of the Past 25 Years". Vanity Fair. 2019-01-25. Archived from the original on 2020-11-07. Retrieved 2019-01-31.
- Sam Allen (2002). "This film was dedicated to the following individuals". Indiana University. Archived from the original on February 21, 2020. Retrieved 2017-01-22.
- "Film honors gun victim". The Union. October 14, 2002. Archived from the original on August 17, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
- "Bowling for Columbine (2002)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Archived from the original on August 20, 2021. Retrieved September 13, 2021.
- "Bowling for Columbine Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on September 3, 2018. Retrieved August 1, 2019.
- Bowling for Columbine : Reviews & Acclaim : Articles & Press Archived December 6, 2002, at the Wayback Machine
- Scott, A.O. (2002-10-11). "Film Review: Bowling for Columbine". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2018-06-12. Retrieved 2018-06-08.
- Howe, Desson (2002-10-18). "Moore Shoots Himself In the Foot". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2010-04-26.
- Ebert, Roger (October 18, 2002). Bowling For Columbine Archived 2022-11-16 at the Wayback Machine. rogerebert.com
- Ebert, Roger (2010-12-11). "Getting Real About Movie Ratings". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2015-07-06. Retrieved 2013-04-05.
- Turan, Kenneth (October 11, 2002). "'Columbine's' Aim Slightly Off" . Los Angeles Times.
- In nominal dollars, from 1982 to the present.
- "Documentary Movies at the Box Office - Box Office Mojo". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 2012-09-20. Retrieved 2007-12-27.
- "2003|Oscars.org". 5 October 2014. Archived from the original on 2018-04-17. Retrieved 2022-02-03.
- "Chicago scoops six Oscars". The Guardian. 2003-03-24. Archived from the original on 2016-09-16. Retrieved 2016-12-17.
- "Michael Moore winning an Oscar® for "Bowling for Columbine" - Oscars on YouTube". YouTube. 16 July 2012. Archived from the original on 2022-02-03. Retrieved 2022-02-03.
- "Channel 4's "50 Greatest Documentaries"". IMDB. Archived from the original on 7 March 2017. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
- "Bowling for Columbine (2002)". The Criterion Collection. Archived from the original on March 21, 2018. Retrieved March 20, 2018.
- Michael Nordine (March 15, 2018). "'Bowling for Columbine,' 'Female Trouble,' and More Coming to the Criterion Collection". IndieWire. Archived from the original on March 21, 2018. Retrieved March 20, 2018.
External links
- Bowling for Columbine at IMDb
- Bowling for Columbine at Box Office Mojo
- Bowling for Columbine at Rotten Tomatoes
- Bowling for Columbine at Metacritic
- Bowling for Columbine at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
- Bowling for Columbine: By Any Means Necessary an essay by Eric Hynes at the Criterion Collection
- Full documentary movie, free for viewing at Michael Moore's Youtube Channel
Michael Moore | |
---|---|
Films |
|
Television |
|
Books |
|
Related |
School shootings in the United States | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prior to 2000 (full list) |
| ||||||||||
2000 to present (full list) |
| ||||||||||
In media |
| ||||||||||
Related terms and topics |
- 2002 films
- Works about the Columbine High School massacre
- 2002 documentary films
- American documentary films
- American independent films
- Canadian documentary films
- Canadian independent films
- German documentary films
- German independent films
- Ten-pin bowling films
- English-language Canadian films
- English-language German films
- Films directed by Michael Moore
- Documentary films about American politics
- Films about school violence
- United Artists films
- Best Documentary Feature Academy Award winners
- Best Foreign Film César Award winners
- American films with live action and animation
- Lessin and Deal productions
- DHX Media films
- Alliance Atlantis films
- Cultural depictions of George W. Bush
- Documentary films about violence
- Documentary films about the military–industrial complex
- Films about coups d'état
- Documentary films about crime in the United States
- Cultural depictions of Bill Clinton
- 2000s English-language films
- 2000s American films
- 2000s Canadian films
- 2000s German films
- English-language documentary films