Misplaced Pages

Jihad: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:58, 18 December 2004 view sourceKyrin (talk | contribs)183 editsm rv: Pre-198.11.22.28 (Contrib) edit. Reason: vandalism.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:16, 14 December 2024 view source WifiFu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users703 edits As per source citedTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Struggle of a religious kind in Islam}}
{{TotallyDisputed}}
{{Other uses}}{{pp-semi-protected|small=yes}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2021}}
{{Fiqh|military}}
{{Jihadism sidebar}}
'''''Jihad''''' ({{IPAc-en|dʒ|ɪ|ˈ|h|ɑː|d}}; {{langx|ar|جِهَاد|jihād}} {{IPA|ar|dʒiˈhaːd|}}) is an Arabic word that means "exerting", "striving", or "struggling", particularly with a praiseworthy aim.<ref name="ODI">{{cite encyclopedia|title=Jihad|editor-first=John L. |editor-last=Esposito|encyclopedia=The Oxford Dictionary of Islam|location=] |publisher=] |year=2014 |url=http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e1199|access-date=29 August 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140903062853/http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e1199|archive-date=3 September 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="OEIP"/><ref name="EI2">{{cite encyclopedia |author-last=Tyan |author-first=E. |year=1965 |title=D̲j̲ihād |editor1-last=Bosworth |editor1-first=C. E. |editor1-link=Clifford Edmund Bosworth |editor2-last=van Donzel |editor2-first=E. J. |editor2-link=Emeri Johannes van Donzel |editor3-last=Heinrichs |editor3-first=W. P. |editor3-link=Wolfhart Heinrichs |editor4-last=Lewis |editor4-first=B. |editor5-last=Pellat |editor5-first=Ch. |editor5-link=Charles Pellat |editor6-last=Schacht |editor6-first=J. |editor6-link=Joseph Schacht |encyclopedia=] |location=] |publisher=] |volume=2 |doi=10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0189 |isbn=978-90-04-16121-4}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> In an Islamic context, it encompasses almost any effort to make personal and social life conform with ]'s guidance, such as an ] against evil in oneself, efforts to build a good Muslim community ('']''), and struggle to defend ].<ref name=ODI/><ref name=OEIP/><ref name="DeLong-Bas 2018">{{cite encyclopedia |author-last=DeLong-Bas |author-first=Natana J. |author-link=Natana J. DeLong-Bas |date=22 February 2018 |orig-date=10 May 2017 |title=Jihad |encyclopedia=Oxford Bibliographies – Islamic Studies |location=] |publisher=] |doi=10.1093/obo/9780195390155-0045 |url=http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0045.xml |url-access=limited |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160629215212/http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0045.xml |archive-date=29 June 2016 |access-date=25 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |title=Jihad |year=2013 |editor-first=Gerhard |editor-last=Böwering |editor2-first=Patricia |editor2-last=Crone |encyclopedia=The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought |location=] |publisher=] |quote=Literally meaning "struggle", ''jihad'' may be associated with almost any activity by which Muslims attempt to bring personal and social life into a pattern of conformity with the guidance of God.}}</ref> Literally meaning 'struggle', the term is most frequently ].<ref name=":0">{{cite book|title=What is Islamic philosophy?|first=Roy |last=Jackson|publisher=Routledge|page=173|year=2014|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=5XPMAgAAQBAJ|page=173}}|quote=''jihad'' Literally 'struggle' which has many meanings, though most frequently associated with war.|isbn=978-1317814047}}</ref>


''Jihad'' is classified into inner ("greater") ''jihad'', which involves a struggle against one's own passions and impulses, and outer ("lesser") ''jihad'', which is further subdivided into ''jihad'' of the pen/tongue (debate or persuasion) and ''jihad'' of the sword (warfare).<ref name="DeLong-Bas 2018" /><ref name=Bonner>{{cite book|last1=Bonner|first1=Michael|title=Jihad in Islamic History: Doctrines and Practice|date=2006|publisher=]|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Qxq7eykoJgoC}}|isbn=978-1400827381}}</ref>{{rp|13}}<ref name="ER">{{cite encyclopedia |year=2005 |title=Jihad |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Religion |publisher=MacMillan Reference |editor-first=Lindsay |editor-last=Jones |edition=2nd |volume=7 |page=4917 |first=Rudolph |last=Peters}}</ref> Much of Muslim opinion considers inner ''jihad'' to have primacy over outer ''jihad'', although many Western scholars disagree. The analysis of a large survey from 2002 reveals considerable nuance in the conceptions of ''jihad'' held by Muslims around the world, ranging from ] and ] to ].<ref name="gallop" />
"'''Jihad'''" (&#1580;&#1607;&#1575;&#1583;) is an ] word which comes from the Arabic root word "jahada"; which means "exerting utmost effort" or "to strive." The word connotes a wide range of meanings, from an inward spiritual struggle to attain perfect faith to an outward material struggle. During the period of Qur'anic revelation while Muhammad was in Mecca, jihad meant essentially a nonviolent struggle. Following his move from Mecca to Medina in ], and the establishment of an Islamic state, fighting in self-defense was sanctioned by the Qur'an (22:39). The Qur'an began referring increasingly to the word ''qital'' (fighting or warfare), instead of jihad. Two of the last verses on this topic (9:5, 29) suggest a war of conquest against unbeliever enemies. In medieval legal sources, jihad generally referred to a divinely sanctioned struggle to establish Muslim hegemony over non-Muslims as a prelude to the propagation of the Islamic faith.


The word ''jihad'' appears frequently in the ] referring to both religious and spiritual struggle and to war and physical struggle,{{efn|Seventeen derivatives of ''jihad'' occur altogether forty-one times (eleven Meccan texts and thirty Medinan ones), with the following five meanings: striving because of religious belief (21), war (12), non-Muslim parents exerting pressure, that is, jihād, to make their children abandon Islam (2), solemn oaths (5), and physical strength (1).<ref name="AD11"/>{{rp|56}}}} often in the idiomatic expression "striving in the path of God ''(al-jihad fi sabil ])''",<ref name="morgan2010">{{cite book |last=Morgan |first=Diane |url=https://archive.org/details/essentialislamco0000morg |title=Essential Islam: A Comprehensive Guide to Belief and Practice |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2010 |isbn=978-0313360251 |page= |access-date=5 January 2011 |url-access=registration}}</ref><ref name="MIC">{{cite encyclopedia |year=2005 |encyclopedia=Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia |publisher=] |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=BFZsBgAAQBAJ|page=419}} |editor-first=Josef W. |editor-last=Meri |editor-link=Josef W. Meri |isbn=978-041596690-0 |title=Jihad |page=419 }}</ref> conveying a sense of self-exertion.<ref name=Esposito>{{cite book|last=Esposito|first=John L.|author-link=John Esposito|title=Islam: The Straight Path|url=https://archive.org/details/islamstraightpat00espo|url-access=registration|year=1988|publisher=]|isbn=978-0195043983}}</ref>{{rp|54}} In the '']'', ''jihad'' refers predominantly to warfare. Greater ''jihad'' refers to spiritual and moral struggle, and has traditionally been emphasized in ] and ] circles.<ref name="DeLong-Bas 2018" /><ref name="ER" /><ref name="EI2" /> The sense of ''jihad'' as armed resistance was first used in the context of ], when the community had two choices: further emigration ('']'') or ].<ref name=Esposito/>{{rp|30}} The Qur'an justifies war in self-defense or in response to aggression towards other Muslims, however the ] have historically been interpreted to renounce other verses and justify offensive war against unbelievers, forcibly converting ] during the ].<ref>{{cite web |work=BBC |title=Islam and war |date=13 August 2009 |access-date=14 July 2024 |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/islamethics/war.shtml}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=al-Fasi |first1=Muhammad | last2=Hrbek |first2=Ivan |title=General History of Africa: Volume 3 |chapter=The coming of Islam and the expansion of the Muslim empire |chapter-url=https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000077953|publisher=UNESCO |year=1988 |url=https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000184282}}</ref>{{rp|pages=46}} A ] were developed, including prohibitions on harming those who are not engaged in combat, on killing animals such as horses, and on unnecessary destruction of enemy property.<ref>{{cite web |author=Bernard Lewis |date=27 September 2001 |title=Jihad vs. Crusade |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1001547201928681240 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160816162048/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1001547201928681240 |archive-date=16 August 2016 |access-date=4 August 2016 |publisher=Opinionjournal.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Blankinship |first=Khalid Yahya |author-link=Khalid Yahya Blankinship |year=2011 |title=Parity of Muslim and Western Concepts of Just War |journal=The Muslim World |volume=101 |issue=3 |page=416 |doi=10.1111/j.1478-1913.2011.01384.x |issn=1478-1913 |quote=In classical Muslim doctrine on war, likewise, genuine non-combatants are not to be harmed. These include women, minors, servants and slaves who do not take part in the fighting, the blind, monks, hermits, the aged, those physically unable to fight, the insane, the delirious, farmers who do not fight, traders, merchants, and contractors. The main criterion distinguishing combatants from non-combatants is that the latter do not fight and do not contribute to the war effort.}}</ref>
==As a general struggle==


In the twentieth century, the notion of ''jihad'' lost its jurisprudential relevance and instead gave rise to ideological and political discourse.<ref name="DeLong-Bas 2018" /><ref name="hallaq334">{{Cite book |last=Hallaq |first=Wael B. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=eVJsAAAAQBAJ|page=334}} |title=Sharī'a: Theory, Practice, Transformations |date=2009-04-16 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-86147-2 |language=en|pages=334–38}}</ref> While ] have emphasized the defensive and non-military aspects of ''jihad'', some ] have advanced aggressive interpretations that go beyond the classical texts.<ref name="hallaq334" /><ref name="Jalal 2009">{{Cite book |last=Jalal |first=Ayesha |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=y7VVWhi9jGIC}}
Muslims often refer to two meanings of ''jihad'' by citing a ] recorded by Imam Baihaqi and al-Khatib al-Baghdadi (even though its ] is categorized as "weak"):
|title=Partisans of Allah: Jihad in South Asia |date=2009-06-30 |isbn=978-0-674-03907-0 |language=en|author-link=Ayesha Jalal |publisher=] |location=] |pages=239–240 |chapter=Islam Subverted? ''Jihad'' as Terrorism |doi=10.4159/9780674039070-007 |s2cid=152941120}}</ref> The term has gained additional attention in recent decades through its use by various ] ], ] ], and ] individuals and organizations.<ref name="DeLong-Bas 2018" /><ref name="Badara 2017">{{cite journal |last1=Badara |first1=Mohamed |last2=Nagata |first2=Masaki |date=November 2017 |title=Modern Extremist Groups and the Division of the World: A Critique from an Islamic Perspective |journal=] |location=] |publisher=] |volume=31 |issue=4 |pages=305–335 |doi=10.1163/15730255-12314024 |issn=1573-0255 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Cook |first=David |author-link=David Cook (historian) |year=2005 |title=Understanding Jihad |isbn=978-0-520-24203-6 |chapter=Radical Islam and Contemporary ''Jihad'' Theory |pages=93–127 |publisher=University of California Press |jstor=10.1525/j.ctv1xxt55.10 |lccn=2015010201 |chapter-url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=SqE2DwAAQBAJ|page=93}} }}</ref>{{rp|93}}<ref name="Jalal 2009" /> Today, the word ''jihad'' is often used without religious connotations, like the English '']''.<ref name="ODI" /><ref name="OEIP" />


==Etymology and literary origins==
* "lesser ''(outer)'' jihad" &mdash; a military struggle, i.e. a holy war
The term ''jihad'' is derived from the ] ''jahada'', meaning "to exert strength and effort, to use all means in order to accomplish a task". In its expanded sense, it can be fighting the enemies of ], as well as adhering to religious teachings, enjoining good and forbidding evil.<ref name=Oz/> The peaceful sense of "efforts towards the moral uplift of society or towards the spread of Islam" can be known as "''jihad'' of the tongue" or "''jihad'' of the pen", as opposed to "''jihad'' of the sword".<ref name="Jihād">{{cite encyclopedia|title=Jihād|url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/islam/islam/jihad|publisher=encyclopedia.com|date=21 May 2013}}</ref> It is used as a term in '']'' (Islamic jurisprudence) mostly in the latter sense, while in ] mostly in the sense of fighting the ''nafs al-ammara'', which is the ] of succumbing to one's own desires.<ref name=Oz>{{cite encyclopedia|url=https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/cihad |last=Özel |first=Ahmed|date=1993|title=Jihad|encyclopedia=]|volume=7 |pages=527–531|publisher=Turkish Diyanet Foundation |location=Istanbul|lang=tr}}</ref> Spiritual and moral ''jihad'' is generally emphasized in pious and mystical circles.<ref name="Jihād"/>
* "greater ''(inner)'' jihad" &mdash; the struggle of personal self-improvement against the self's base desires


The Hans Wehr '']'' defines the term as "fight, battle; ''jihad'', ] (against the ], as a religious duty)".<ref name=hanswehr>{{Cite book |last=Wehr |first=Hans |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=WTak55pG-_IC|page=142}}
Other examples of actions that could be considered jihad (on the basis of ]s with better ]) include:
|title=A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic |date=1979 |publisher=Otto Harrassowitz Verlag |isbn=978-3-447-02002-2 |language=en|page=142|edition=3rd}}</ref> However, given the range of meanings, it is incorrect to equate it simply with "holy war".<ref name="Jihād"/> The notion of ''jihad'' has its origins in the Islamic idea that the whole humankind will embrace Islam.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |editor-last=Lewis |editor-first=B. |editor-first2=Charles |editor-last2=Pellat|editor-first3=J. |editor-last3=Schatcht|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=mB-qzwEACAAJ|page=538}} |encyclopedia=]: Khe-Naz. Vol. 5-7 |date=1967 |publisher=E. J. Brill |isbn=978-90-04-09739-1 |language=en|last=Tyan |first=Emile |page=538 }}</ref>{{full citation needed|date=September 2024}} In the Qur'an and in later Muslim usage, ''jihad'' is commonly followed by the expression ''fi sabil illah'', "in the path of God."<ref>For a listing of all appearances in the Qur'an of ''jihad'' and related words, see {{Cite book |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=GrGNtwAACAAJ|page=587}}|title=al-Mu'jam al-mufahras li-alfaz al-Qur'an al-karim |date=1988 |publisher=دار حديث، |language=ar|authorlink=Muhammad Fu'ad 'Abd al-Baqi|pages= 182–83}} and {{Cite book |last=Kassis |first=Hanna E. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=RKbeEAAAQBAJ|page=587}} |title=A Concordance of the Qur'an |date=2023-11-03 |publisher=Univ of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-34261-3 |language=en|pages= 587–588}}</ref> ] stated that it indicates "the way of truth and justice, including all the teachings it gives on the justifications and the conditions for the conduct of war and peace."<ref>{{Cite book|title=Understanding the Qurʼan : Themes and Style|last=Abdel Haleem|first=Muhammed|date=2001|publisher=I.B. Tauris|isbn=9781860640094|location=London|pages=62|oclc=56728422}}</ref>
* Speaking out against an oppressive ruler (], Book 37, Number 4330)
* Going to ] - for women, this is the best form of jihad, (], Volume 2, Book 26, Number 595).
* Taking care of elderly parents, as the prophet ] ordered a youth to do, instead of joining a military campaign (Narrated by ], Muslim, ], ], and ]).


In ], the term ''jihad'' is used for a struggle for causes, both religious and ]. It is sometimes used without religious connotation, with a meaning similar to the English word "]" (as in "a crusade against drugs").<ref name="OISO">{{cite web|title=Oxford Islamic Studies Online|url=http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e1199|publisher=Oxford University Press|access-date=29 August 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140903062853/http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e1199|archive-date=3 September 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> ''Jihad'' is used commonly in Arabic countries, in the neutral sense of "a struggle for a noble cause", as a unisex name given to children.<ref>{{cite news|title='My wife can never call my name in public'|first=Rebecca|last=Seales|publisher=BBC |date=5 July 2018|access-date=29 November 2021|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-42009219}}</ref> Nonetheless, ''jihad'' is usually used in the religious sense and its beginnings trace to the Qur'an and the words and actions of ].<ref name="Peters-jihad-OEIW">{{cite encyclopedia|first=Rudolph |last=Peters |title=Jihād |encyclopedia=The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World|url=http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/MainSearch.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081121021514/http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/MainSearch.html |archive-date=21 November 2008 |access-date=17 February 2008}}</ref><ref name="Berkey-2003">{{Cite book |last=Berkey |first=Jonathan P. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=mLV6lo4mvj0C}} |title=The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600-1800 |date=2003 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-58813-3 |language=en}}</ref>
The more literal meaning of the word jihad is simply "a struggle," and so it is sometimes dubbed the "inner jihad." This "inner jihad" essentially refers to all the struggles that a Muslim could go through, in adhering to the religion. For example, a scholarly study of Islam is an intellectual struggle that some may refer to as "jihad," though it is not common for a scholar of Islam to refer to his studies as "engaging in jihad."


===Quran===
The tradition identifying interior struggle as "greater" (that is, non-military) Jihad appears to have been profoundly influenced by ], an ancient and diverse mystical movement within Islam.
''Jihad'' is mentioned in four places in the ] as a noun, while its derived verb is used in twenty-four places. '']'', the ] meaning "]", is mentioned in two verses.<ref name=Oz/> In some of these mentions (see ] 9/41, 44, 81, 86), it is understood that the word ''jihad'' directly refers to war, and in others, ''jihad'' is used in the sense of "the effort to live in accordance with Allah's will".<ref name=Oz/> Qur'anic exhortations to ''jihad'' have been ] by Islamic scholars both in the combative and non-combative sense.<ref>{{cite book|title=Striving in the Path of God ''Jihad'' and Martyrdom in Islamic Thought|author=]|publisher=]|year=2013|page=11}}</ref> Ahmed al-Dawoody wrote that there seventeen references to or derivatives of ''jihad'' occur altogether forty-one times in eleven ] texts and thirty ] ones, with 28 mentions related to religious belief or spiritual struggle and 13 mentions related to warfare or physical struggle.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|56}}


===Hadith===
Today, the word jihad is used in many circles as though it had an exclusively military dimension. Yet even though this is the most common popular understanding of jihad, it is worth noting that the word is not used in this narrow sense in the ], the holy text of Islam. It is also true, however, that the word is used in both military and non-military contexts in a number of ]s.
There are also many ] (records of the teachings, deeds and sayings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad) about ''jihad'', typically under the headings of ''kitab al-jihad'' (book of ''jihad'') or ''faza'il al-jihad'' (virtues of ''jihad'') in ''hadith'' collections or as the subject of independent works.<ref name=Oz/> Of the 199 ''hadith'' references to ''jihad'' in the ] collection of ''hadith'', all assume that ''jihad'' means warfare.<ref name="bukhari">{{cite book|last=ibn Ismāʻīl Bukhārī|first=Muḥammad |title=Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī: The Translation of the Meanings of Sahih Al-Bukhari|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=tB9quQEACAAJ}}|volume=v4|year=1981|publisher=Dar al-Fikr|location=Medina|pages=34–204|translator-last=Muhsin Khan|translator-first=Muhammad}}. Quoted in {{cite journal |url=http://www.meforum.org/357/what-does-jihad-mean |title=What Does ''Jihad'' Mean? |last=Streusand |first=Douglas E. |journal=Middle East Quarterly |date=September 1997 |pages=9–17 |quote=In ''hadith'' collections, ''jihad'' means armed action; for example, the 199 references to ''jihad'' in the most standard collection of ''hadith'', Sahih al-Bukhari, all assume that ''jihad'' means warfare. |access-date=24 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140908145532/http://www.meforum.org/357/what-does-jihad-mean |archive-date=8 September 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Streusand-1997">{{cite journal|last1=Streusand|first1=Douglas E.|title=What Does ''Jihad'' Mean?|journal=Middle East Quarterly|date=September 1997|volume=4|issue=3|pages=9–17|url=http://www.meforum.org/357/what-does-jihad-mean|access-date=12 July 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150701081937/http://www.meforum.org/357/what-does-jihad-mean|archive-date=1 July 2015|url-status=live}}</ref>


Among reported sayings of Muhammad involving ''jihad'' are:
] have tended to promote an understanding of jihad that rejects the identification of jihad with armed struggle, choosing instead to emphasize principles of non-violence. Such Muslims cite the Qur'anic figure of ] in support of the belief that someone who dies as a result of refusing to commit violence may attain forgiveness for sins. This is not the prevailing understanding of such matters among mainstream Muslims, however; an emphasis on self-defense and defense of the Muslim community is far more common among traditional Muslim scholars.


{{blockquote|The best ''Jihad'' is the word of Justice in front of the oppressive sultan.|cited by ] and narrated by Ibn Habbaan<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.khilafah.com/index.php/analysis/middle-east/11132-protestors-lose-their-fear-of-the-egyptian-regime-and-perform-the-best-jihad-the-word-of-justice-in-front-of-the-oppressive-ruler|title=Protestors lose their fear of the Egyptian regime and perform the best ''jihad'' – the word of justice in front of the oppressive ruler|last=Abdul-Kareem|first=Ibrahim|date=2011-01-28|website=The Khilafah|access-date=2019-08-09|archive-date=26 February 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110226122709/http://www.khilafah.com/index.php/analysis/middle-east/11132-protestors-lose-their-fear-of-the-egyptian-regime-and-perform-the-best-jihad-the-word-of-justice-in-front-of-the-oppressive-ruler|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://muslimmatters.org/2011/02/01/reflections-on-the-protests-in-egypt/|title=Reflections on the Protests in Egypt|last=Shehata|first=Ali|date=1 February 2011|website=MuslimMatters.org|language=en-US|access-date=9 August 2019}}</ref><ref name="Hashim1">{{cite book|last1=Hashim Kamali|first1=Mohammad|author-link=Mohammad Hashim Kamali|title=Shari'ah Law: An Introduction|date=2008|publisher=]|isbn=978-1851685653|page=204}}</ref>}}
A discussion of the military dimensions of jihad within Islam follows.
and
{{blockquote|The Messenger of Allah was asked about the best ''jihad''. He said: "The best ''jihad'' is the one in which your horse is slain and your blood is spilled."|cited by ] and narrated by Ibn Habbaan<ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/TheBookOfJihadByIbnNuhass|title=The Book of ''Jihad''|via=]|author=Abi Zakaryya Al Dimashqi Al Dumyati|date=2016-10-23|pages=|translator-last=Yamani|translator-first=Noor|access-date=2019-08-09}}</ref>}}


Ibn Nuhaas cited a ] from ], where Muhammad stated that the highest kind ''jihad'' is "The person who is killed whilst spilling the last of his blood" (Ahmed 4/144).<ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/TheBookOfJihadByIbnNuhass|title=The Book of ''Jihad''|via=]|author=Abi Zakaryya Al Dimashqi Al Dumyati|date=23 October 2016|pages=|translator-last=Yamani|translator-first=Noor|access-date=9 August 2019}}</ref> Muhammad also said, “I cannot find anything” as meritorious as ''jihad''; he further likened ''jihad'' to “praying ceaselessly and fasting continuously”.<ref name=1t4>{{cite book|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=1T4yAQAAQBAJ}}|title=The Intensification and Reorientation of Sunni ''Jihad'' Ideology in the Crusader Period|date=3 December 2012 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=9789004242791 }}</ref>{{rp|70, 145}}<ref>{{cite book|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=CD9IdzJ4fFQC}}|title=Reconquest and Crusade in Medieval Spain|page=12|isbn=0812218892 |last1=O'Callaghan |first1=Joseph F. |date=24 February 2004 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press }}</ref> Muhammad said that “if it were not a hardship for the Muslims, I would never idle behind from a raiding party going out to fight in the path of Allah.... I love to raid in the path of Allah and be killed, to raid again and be killed, and to raid again and be killed”.<ref name=1t4/>{{rp|147}} Muhammad also said that "Lining up for battle in the path of Allah is worthier than 60 years of worship".<ref name=1t4/>{{rp|151}} Muhammad claimed that any Muslim who refused to fight in ''jihad'' “will be tortured like no other sinful human” in hell with confirmation from Qur'an 8:15-16.<ref name=1t4/>{{rp|71}}<ref>{{cite web | url=https://quran.com/en/al-anfal/15-16 | title=Surah Al-Anfal - 15-16 }}</ref> In another ''hadith'' Muhammad said, “the sword wipes away all sins” and “being killed in the path of Allah washes away impurity”.<ref>{{cite book|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=LuzFSDvKXJ4C}}|title=Understanding ''Jihad''|date=23 May 2005 |page=15|publisher=University of California Press |isbn=9780520931879 }}</ref><ref name=1t4/>{{rp|183}}
==As Islamic "Holy War"==


According to another ''hadith'',<ref>{{Citehadith|bukhari|5972|b=yl}}</ref> supporting one's parents is an example of ''jihad''.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|76}} It has been reported that Muhammad considered performing '']'' well to be the best ''jihad'' for Muslim women.<ref>{{Citehadith|bukhari|2784|b=yl}}</ref><ref name=AD11>{{cite book|first1=Ahmed|last1=Al-Dawoody|date=2011|title=The Islamic Law of War: Justifications and Regulations|url=https://archive.org/details/islamiclawwarjus00alda|url-access=limited|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-0230111608}}</ref>{{rp|58}}
===Defensive Jihad===
Militant Islamists identify two types of armed religious warfare, namely the defensive jihad and the offensive jihad. Most Muslims consider armed struggle against foreign occupation or oppression by domestic government to be worthy of defensive jihad. In colonial times, Muslim populations often rose up against the colonial authorities under the banner of jihad (examples include ], ], the ] against ], and the ] against ]). In this sense, defensive jihad is no different from the right of armed resistance against occupation that is sanctioned under the ] and ].


The ''hadith'' emphasize ''jihad'' as one of the means to ]. All sins (except debt) would be forgiven for the one who dies in it.<ref name=Bonney04>{{cite book|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=5Mcf0AEACAAJ}}|title=Jihad: From Qu'ran to Bin Laden|last=Bonney|first=Richard|author-link=Richard Bonney|year=2004|publisher=]}}</ref>{{rp|34-35}} Participation in ''jihad'' had to be voluntary and intention must be pure, for ''jihad'' is only waged for the sake of God not for material wealth.<ref name=Bonney04/>{{rp|34-35}} On the contrary, ''jihad'' required man to put both his life and wealth at risk.<ref name=Bonney04/>{{rp|34-35}} ''Jihad'' is ranked as one of the highest good deeds; according to one ''hadith'' it is the third-best deed after ] and being good to one's parents.<ref name=Bonney04/>{{rp|35}} One ''hadith'' exempts military ''jihad'' on men whose parents are alive, as serving one's parents is considered a superior ''jihad''.<ref name=Bonney04/>{{rp|35}}
Islamic tradition holds that when Muslims are attacked, then it becomes obligatory for all Muslims to defend against the attack; to participate in jihad. When the ] in 1979, the prominent militant Islamist, Dr. ], issued a ], ''Defense of the Muslim Lands, the First Obligation after Faith'' , declaring that both the Afghan and Palestinian struggles were jihads in which killing '']'' (unbelievers) was '']'' (a personal obligation) for all Muslims. The edict was supported by Saudi Arabia's ] (highest religious scholar), ]. In his fatwa, Dr. Azzam explained:


==Greater and lesser ''jihad''==
:''... the Ulama of the four ] (Maliki, Hanafi, Shaffie and Hanbali), the Muhadditheen, and the ] commentators , are agreed that in all Islamic ages, Jihad under this condition becomes Fard Ayn upon the Muslims of the land which the Kuffar have attacked and upon the Muslims close by, where the children will march forth without the permission of the parents, the wife without the permission of her husband and the debtor without the permission of the creditor. And, if the Muslims of this land cannot expel the Kuffar because of lack of forces, because they slacken, are indolent or simply do not act, then the Fard Ayn obligation spreads in the shape of a circle from the nearest to the next nearest. If they too slacken or there is again a shortage of manpower, then it is upon the people behind them, and on the people behind them, to march forward. This process continues until it becomes Fard Ayn upon the whole world.''
Tradition distinguishes the "greater ''jihad''" (inner struggle against sinful behavior) from the "lesser ''jihad''" (military sense).<ref name="DeLong-Bas 2018"/> Early Islamic thought considered non-violent interpretations of ''jihad'', especially for those Muslims who could not partake in warfare in distant lands.{{CN|date=September 2023}} Most classical writings use the term "''jihad''" in the military sense.<ref>Lewis, Bernard, '']'', 2001 </ref><ref name="Lewis-1988">{{Cite book |last=Lewis |first=Bernard |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=NXCTjv2oFtUC}} |title=The Political Language of Islam |date=1991-06-11 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-47693-3 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|}} The tradition differentiating between the "greater and lesser ''jihad''" is not included in any of the authoritative compilations of Hadith. In consequence, some Islamists dismiss it as not authentic.<ref name="Peters-jihad"/>{{rp|116}}


The most commonly cited ''hadith'' for "greater ''jihad''" is:{{CN|date=September 2023}}
===Offensive Jihad===
<blockquote>A number of fighters came to ] and he said "You have come from the 'lesser ''jihad''{{'}} to the 'greater ''jihad''{{'}}." The fighters asked "what is the greater ''jihad''?" Muhammad replied, "It is the struggle against one's passions."<ref name="bbcislam">{{cite web|title= ''Jihad''|url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/beliefs/jihad_1.shtml|publisher= BBC|date=3 August 2009|access-date=4 June 2010|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100827133231/http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/beliefs/jihad_1.shtml|archive-date= 27 August 2010|url-status= live|df= dmy-all}}</ref></blockquote>
Offensive jihad is the waging of wars of aggression and conquest against non-Muslims in order to bring them and their territories under Islamic rule. According to the ], "offensive jihad, i.e. attacking, is fully permissible in Sunni Islam." . An Islamic theologian considered the father of the modern Islamist movement, Dr. ], declared in his ], ''Defense of the Muslim Lands; the First Obligation after Faith'' that:
:''"Jihad Against the Kuffar is of two Types: Offensive Jihad (where the enemy is attacked in his own territory) ... Defensive Jihad. This is expelling the Kuffar from our land, and it is Fard Ayn , a compulsory duty upon all...''


This passage was cited in ''The History of Baghdad'' by ], an 11th-century Islamic scholar.<ref>] vol. 4 p. 511</ref><ref name="Streusand-greater">{{cite journal|last1= Streusand|first1= Douglas E.|title= What Does ''Jihad'' Mean?|journal= Middle East Quarterly|date= September 1997|volume= iv |issue= 3|pages= 9–17|url= http://www.meforum.org/357/what-does-jihad-mean|access-date= 26 August 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140908145532/http://www.meforum.org/357/what-does-jihad-mean|archive-date= 8 September 2014|url-status= live}}</ref> This reference gave rise to the practice of distinguishing "greater" and "lesser" ''jihad''.<ref name="bbcislam"/> Islamic scholars such as ] consider the ''hadith'' to have a weak ].<ref>{{Cite web |url= http://www.sunnah.org/tasawwuf/jihad004.html |title=Sunnah.org |access-date=15 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110609212254/http://www.sunnah.org/tasawwuf/jihad004.html |archive-date=9 June 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref>
:''Where the Kuffar are not gathering to fight the Muslims, the fighting becomes Fard Kifaya with the minimum requirement of appointing believers to guard borders, and the sending of an army at least once a year to terrorise the enemies of Allah. It is a duty of the Imam to assemble and send out an army unit into the land of war once or twice every year. Moreover, it is the responsibility of the Muslim population to assist him, and if he does not send an army he is in sin. - And the Ulama have mentioned that this type of jihad is for maintaining the payment of Jizya. The scholars of the principles of religion have also said: "Jihad is Daw'ah with a force, and is obligatory to perform with all available capabilities, until there remains only Muslims or people who submit to Islam."''


The concept has had "enormous influence" in Islamic mysticism (]).<ref name=Kadri12>{{cite book |last=Kadri |first=Sadakat |year=2012 |title=Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia |publisher=] |location=London |isbn=978-0099523277 |pages=150–151, 157, 172–175 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=ztCRZOhJ10wC}} }}
Muslims who do not subscribe to this militant interpretation of Jihad dispute the neccessity and obligation of the offensive Jihad in contemporary times. The "land of war" described in Shaikh Azzam's fatwa refers to the hostile regimes and empires surrounding early Islamic communities. This interpretation contends that offensive Jihad was practiced only to preserve Islam from destruction and that the concept is now obsolete because they believe that the Islamic world is not under attack by hostile forces and religious freedom for Muslims to practice Islam exists in most countries.
</ref>{{rp|78–79}}{{sfn|Kadri|2012|pp= 103|loc= According to al-Ghazali, he had told Muslims after their first major military victory at Badr that their struggle (jihad) was not won: they had only won a 'lesser struggle', while the greater struggle to fortify their spiritual defenses still lay ahead.}}


] lists four kinds of ''jihad fi sabilillah'' (struggle in the cause of God):
The militant interpretation of Jihad suggests that hostile anti-Islamic forces are currently preventing Islam from realizing its full potential for peaceful global expansion. Islam will eventually be adopted by all mankind if these hostile forces are confronted.
* ''Jihad'' of the heart ''(jihad bil qalb/nafs)'' is concerned with combatting ] and in the attempt to escape his persuasion to evil. This type of ''jihad'' was regarded{{cn|date=November 2023}} as the greater ''jihad'' (''al-jihad al-akbar'').
* ''Jihad'' by the tongue ''(jihad bil lisan)'' (also ''jihad'' by the word, ''jihad al-qalam'') is concerned with speaking the truth and spreading the word of Islam with one's tongue.
* ''Jihad'' by the hand ''(jihad bil yad)'' refers to choosing to do what is right and to combat injustice and what is wrong with action.
* ''Jihad'' by the sword ''(jihad bis saif)'' refers to ''qital fi sabilillah'' (armed fighting in the way of God, or ]), the most common usage by ] Muslims and offshoots of the ].<ref name="Khadduri">{{Cite book |last=Khadduri |first=Majid |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=UHWd6gLZsFIC}} |title=War and Peace in the Law of Islam |date=2006 |publisher=The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. |isbn=978-1-58477-695-6 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp| 56}}


A related ''hadith'' tradition that has "found its way into popular Muslim literature",<ref>{{cite journal |title= Maudūdī's al-Jihād fi'l-Islām. A Neglected Document |first= Jamal |last= Malik |journal= Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft |volume= 17 |issue= 1 |doi= 10.1515/zfr.2009.17.1.61 |year= 2009 |s2cid= 179091977 |url= https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zfr.2009.17.1.61/html}}</ref> and which has been said to "embody the Muslim mindset" of the ] (the period from the mid-8th century to mid-13th century following the relocation of the ] capital from ] to ]),<ref>{{cite journal |url= http://ddms.usim.edu.my/bitstream/123456789/5427/1/%27Ulum%20Islamiyyah%20-%20Vol.7%20%28December%29%202011%20-%20Part%201.pdf |title= Refining Islamic Scholarship: Through Harmonising With Postmodern Social Sciences |first= Jonathan A. J. |last= Wilson |journal= 'Ulum Islamiyyah: The Malaysian Journal of Islamic Sciences |volume= 7 |date= 2011 |publisher= Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |access-date= 29 November 2021 |archive-date= 22 January 2022 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20220122135543/http://ddms.usim.edu.my/bitstream/123456789/5427/1/%27Ulum%20Islamiyyah%20-%20Vol.7%20%28December%29%202011%20-%20Part%201.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> is: {{blockquote|"The ink of the scholar is more holy than the blood of the martyr."}}
=== Political military authority ===


The belief in the veracity of this ''hadith'' was a contributing factor in the efforts by successive '']'' to subsidize translations of "], ] and ] science and philosophy texts",<ref>{{cite book|chapter= Islamic Science|first= Peter L.|last= Lutz |title= The Rise of Experimental Biology |pages=57–63 |chapter-url= https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-59259-163-3_8.pdf |date=2002 |publisher= Humana Press |doi= 10.1007/978-1-59259-163-3_8 |doi-broken-date= 1 November 2024|isbn= 978-1-59259-163-3}}</ref> and the saying continues to be heavily emphasised in certain Islamic traditions advocating intellectualism over violence, for example in ],<ref>{{cite news|title= Timbuktu: The Ink of Scholars and the Blood of Martyrs |url= https://www.huffpost.com/entry/timbuktu-the-ink-of-schol_b_1847749 |first= Rudolph |last= Ware |date= 31 August 2012 |publisher= Huffington Post|access-date=29 November 2021}}</ref> where it is central to one of two key lessons in the work ''Tuhfat al-fudala'' by 16th-century ] scholar ].<ref>{{cite book |url= https://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/item/2152/Meanings_Timbuktu.pdf |first=Souleymane Bachir |last=Diagne |chapter=Towards an intellectual history of West Africa: The meaning of Timbuktu |title=The meanings of Timbuktu |page=26 |date=2008 |publisher= HRSC Press |isbn= 9780796922045 |access-date= 29 November 2021 |archive-date= 17 May 2022 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20220517012523/https://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/item/2152/Meanings_Timbuktu.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> In general, however, fewer people today are aware of the ''hadith'', which suffers from "a general lack of knowledge", according to ].<ref>{{cite news|title=The pen, the sword and the Prophet |first= Felicity |last= Morse |date= 13 January 2015 |access-date= 29 November 2021 |publisher= BBC |url= https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-30803391}}</ref>
Shaikh Azzam's militant interpretation of Jihad describes "Offensive Jihad" as one a campaign that can only be declared by a lawful and legal Muslim authority, traditionally the ]. According to this interpretation, no authority is required for initiation of "Defensive Jihad" because when Muslims are attacked, it automatically becomes obligatory for all Muslim men of military age, within a certain radius of the attack, to defend against the attack.


According to classical Islamic scholars like ], ''jihad'' is against four types of enemies: the lower self ('']''), ], the unbelievers, and the hypocrites. The first two types of ''jihad'' are purely peaceful spiritual struggles. According to Ibn Qayyim, "Jihad against the lower self precedes ''jihad'' against external enemies." Confirming the central importance of the spiritual aspect of ''jihad'', ] wrote:{{blockquote|"Jihad against the lower self and whims is the foundation of ''jihad'' against the unbelievers and hypocrites, for a Muslim cannot wage ''jihad'' against them unless he has waged ''jihad'' against himself and his desires first, before he goes out against them."<ref name="yaqeeninstitute.org">{{Cite web|date= 15 May 2020 |title= ''Jihad'' in Islam: Just War Theory in the Qur'an and Sunnah | url= https://yaqeeninstitute.org/amp/justin-parrott/jihad-in-islam-just-war-theory-in-the-quran-and-sunnah |url-status=live|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210119003851/https://yaqeeninstitute.org/amp/justin-parrott/jihad-in-islam-just-war-theory-in-the-quran-and-sunnah |archive-date=19 January 2021| website=Yaqeeninstitute.org}}</ref>}}
The question of which Muslim authority, if any, may carry out duties such as declaring Jihad has been problematic since ], ], when ] abolished the Caliphate, which the ] had held since ]. Due to the divide and conquer strategies of the colonial and post-colonial world order, there is currently no single established political authority governing most of the Muslim world. Due to this lack of clerical organization amongst the vast majority of Muslims, any adherent may proclaim himself an "ulama" (Islamic scholar) and proclaim a defensive jihad by way of fatwa. Recognition is at the discretion of the listener.


Engaging in the greater ''jihad'' does not preclude engaging in the lesser ''jihad''. ] recommended his followers to pursue both the greater and the lesser ''jihad''s.<ref name=handbook295/>
In the absence of a Caliph, the only remaining "de facto" Islamic leaders would be the governments of the modern nation-states in the Muslim world which emerged out of the turmoil of the early 20th century. However, due to the allegiance and subservience of the secular and pseudo-] or ] Middle East ]s to the world's non-Islamic military and economic superpowers (], ], and ]), militant Islamists believe that the modern democratic or monarchic nation-states which emerged in the mid-20th century are un-Islamic and unrepresentative of Islamic societies. ] is widely perceived by militant ] to represent U.S. and European political interests hostile to Islam. As a result, Islamist movements (such as ] and ]) have taken the initiative to declare jihad bypassing the authority of the nation-state. Some Muslims, (particularly ]ists), have declared jihad against their own governments that they perceive as corrupt, oppressive, and anti-Islamic.


At least one important contemporary ] ] figure, ] ], the leader of the ] and the founder of the ], wrote a treatise on the "Greater ''Jihad''" (i.e., internal/personal struggle against sin).<ref name="Khomeini-greater">{{cite web|last1= Khomeini|first1= Ruhollah|title= ''Jihad'' al-Akbar, The Greatest ''Jihad'': Combat with the Self|url= http://www.al-islam.org/jihad-al-akbar-the-greatest-jihad-combat-with-the-self-imam-khomeini|publisher= al-Islam.org|access-date= 28 August 2014|date=27 September 2012|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140903111819/http://www.al-islam.org/jihad-al-akbar-the-greatest-jihad-combat-with-the-self-imam-khomeini|archive-date=3 September 2014 |url-status= live}}</ref>
===Militant Islamist martyrdom operations===


Robert W. Schaefer discussed ''jihad'' and ''gazavat'' in the context of the Caucasus: "''Gazavat'' was the ''jihad'' of its day. ''Gazavat'' meant putting yourself on the right path (what Muslims refer to as the lesser ''jihad'') as well as expelling the invader (what is referred to as greater ''jihad'')."{{Clarify|date=September 2024|reason=This reverses the meaning of greater and lesser and needs to be noted as such, if correct.}}<ref>
To non-Muslims, militant attacks under the rubric of jihad may be perceived as acts of ]. Two ] groups call themselves "Islamic Jihad": ] and ]. Supporters of these groups perceive a strong religious justification for a militant interpretation of the term ''jihad'' as an appropriate response to the Israeli occupation of the ] and ].
{{cite book
|last1 = Schaefer
|first1 = Robert W.
|date = 22 October 2010
|title = The Insurgency in Chechnya and the North Caucasus: From Gazavat to ''Jihad''
|url = {{google books|plainurl=y|id=vbrOEAAAQBAJ}}
|series = Praeger Security International
|publication-place = Santa Barbara, California
|publisher = Bloomsbury Publishing USA
|page = 64
|isbn = 9780313386350
|access-date = 22 November 2023
|quote =
}}
</ref>


==Defensive and offensive lesser ''jihad''==
To Muslims, a person who dies as a part of struggle against oppression is a '']'' (]) and is assured a place in '']'' (Paradise) where they will be attended by 72 "pure spirits" known as the ], and where rivers of wine flow and fresh fruit is abundant. Even if the death of a martyr in a military operation is certain, militant Islamists consider the act martyrdom rather than ]. Suicide is a ] in Islam.
Classical scholars considered various justifications for ''jihad'', including waging it defensively vs offensively. Scholarly opinions carried significant weight with Muslim leaders. Scholars paid more attention to conduct of war (''])'' than justification of war ('']'').<ref>{{cite book|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=_98eEAAAQBAJ|page=119}} |title=Islamic Law: A Very Short Introduction|publisher=]|last=Baderin |first=Mashood A.|year=2021|page=119|quote=Similar to contemporary international law, there are more rules relating to jus in bello than to ''jus ad bellum'' under Islamic laws of war.}}</ref><ref name=AEF99>{{cite journal|last=Abou El Fadl|first=Khaled|author-link=Khaled Abou El Fadl|title=The rules of killing at war: An inquiry into classical sources|date=1999|journal=The Muslim World|volume=89|issue=2|pages=144–157|doi=10.1111/j.1478-1913.1999.tb03675.x|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1999.tb03675.x}}
</ref>{{rp|150-151}} The decision of when to wage war was often viewed as a political decision best left to political authorities.<ref name=AEF01>{{Cite journal|last=Abou El Fadl|first=Khaled |author-link=Khaled Abou El Fadl|year=2001|title=Islam and the Theology of Power|jstor=1559337|journal=Middle East Report|issue=221|pages=28–33|doi=10.2307/1559337}}</ref>{{rp|30}}<ref name=AEF99/>{{rp|150-151}}


Two justifications for ''jihad'' were given: defensive war against external aggression, or an offensive or preemptive attack against an enemy state.<ref>{{cite book|title=Jihad, Radicalism, and the New Atheism|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=BFZsBgAAQBAJ}}|last=Khalil|first=Mohammad Hassan|publisher=]|doi=10.1017/9781108377263|year=2017|isbn=9781108421546}}</ref>{{rp|18-19}} According to the majority of jurists, the '']'' (justifications for war) are restricted to aggression against Muslims,<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|78-79}}{{sfn|Abou El Fadl|2001|p=29|ps=: "the majority argued that non-Muslims should only be fought against if they pose a danger to Muslims"}} and '']''—] because of their religious belief.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|78-79}} They hold that unbelief in itself is not a justification for war. These jurists therefore maintain that only combatants are to be fought; noncombatants such as women, children, clergy, the aged, the insane, farmers, serfs, the blind, and so on are not to be killed in war.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|78-79}} Thus, the Hanafī Ibn Najīm stated: "the reason for ''jihād'' in our view is ''kawnuhum harbā ‛alaynā'' ."<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|78-79}}<ref>Ibn Najīm, ''Al-Bahr al-Rā’iq'', Vol. 5, p. 76.</ref> The ] jurists al-Shaybānī state that "although unbelief in God is one of the greatest sins, it is between the individual and his God the Almighty and the punishment for this sin is to be postponed to the ''dār al-jazā’'', (the abode of reckoning, the Hereafter)."<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|78-79}} Al-Sarakhsī says something similar.<ref name=AEF99/>{{rp|152}} Offensive ''jihad'' involved forays into enemy territory either for conquest, thus enlarging the Muslim political order, or to dissuade the enemy from attacking Muslim lands.<ref>{{cite book|author=Mairaj Syed|title=Just War in Religion and Politics|chapter=Jihad in Classical Islamic Legal and Moral Thought|publisher=]|page=145|year=2013}}</ref>
If non-combatant Muslims perish in such military operations, they are also considered ''shahid'' and have also secured a place in paradise. Under this conception, only the enemy ], or unbelievers, are harmed by martyrdom operations. ]s who disagree with the militant interpretation believe that martyrdom operations are equivalent to the sin of suicide and that killing civilians is also a sin. To them, neither suicide nor attacks against civilians are considered legitimate outcomes of jihad.


Shia and ] theories of ''jihad'' are similar,<ref name="Peters-jihad-OEIW"/> except that Shias consider offensive ''jihad'' to be valid only under the leadership of the ], who is currently believed to be in ] but will return.<ref name=kohlberg/><ref name=OCAP/> However, defensive ''jihad'' is permissible in Shia Islam before the Mahdi's return.<ref name=kohlberg>{{cite web|last=Kohlberg |first=Etan |url=https://atharebartar.com/en/development-imami-shii-doctrine-jihad-2/|title=The Development of the Imami Shi'i Doctrine of ''Jihad'' |publisher=Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgen Laendischen Gesellschaft |issue=126 |year=1976 |pages= 64–86, esp. pp. 78–86}}</ref> In fact, Shia scholars emphasized it was a religious duty for Shia to defend all Muslims (including Sunni Muslims) from outside invaders.<ref name=Prism10>{{cite book|title=The Prism of Just War: Asian and Western Perspectives on the Legitimate Use of Military Force|editor=Howard M. Hensel|year=2010|publisher=Ashgate |url=https://www.routledge.com/The-Prism-of-Just-War-Asian-and-Western-Perspectives-on-the-Legitimate/Hensel/p/book/9780754675105|isbn=9780754675105|ref={{sfnRef|Prism|2010}}}}</ref>{{rp|152}}
The basis of shahid can be traced back to the words of Muhammad prior to the battle of Badr where he stated:


===Rules of warfare===
:''"I swear by the One in whose hand Muhammad's soul is, any man who fights them today and is killed while he is patient in the ordeal and seeks the pleasure of Allah, going forward and not backing off, Allah will enter him into Paradise."''
{{main|Rules of war in Islam}}
{{Rquote |1=right
|2=They might be our enemies but they are human beings. They consist of civil population {{sic|comprising |hide=y|of}} women and children; how can one kill, loot and plunder them?
|3=] |4=''Najh Al-Balagha''<ref name=Prism10/>{{rp|155}}
}}


Rules prohibit attacking or molesting non-combatants, including women, children under the age of ], elderly men, people with disabilities and those who are sick.<ref name=V15>{{cite book|title=War and Law in the Islamic World|url=https://brill.com/view/title/31941|first=Matthias|last=Vanhullebusch|year=2015|publisher=]|isbn=9789004298248}}</ref>{{rp|33-35}}<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|78}} Diplomats, merchants and peasants are similarly immune from being attacked.<ref name=V15/>{{rp|33-35}}<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|134}} Monks are presumed to be non-combatants and thus have immunity; places of worship should not be attacked.<ref name=V15/>{{rp|33-35}} Even if the enemy disregarded the immunity of noncombatants, Muslims could not respond in kind.<ref name=handbook295/> However, these categories lose their immunity should they participate in fighting, planning, or supplying the enemy.<ref name=V15/>{{rp|33-35}} Some jurists argued that immunity was more related to noncombatant status than being in a certain demographic class. For example, ] opined that only old men are only immune from being killed if they neither fight, nor take a role in military decision making.{{clarify|date=October 2023}}<ref name=Prism10/>{{rp|154}}
There are Muslim clerics who authorize martyrdom operations as a valid form of jihad, especially against ], her allies, and her supporters, believing that such attacks are legitimate responses to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza .


Up until the ], Muslim jurists disallowed the use of '']'' because the weapon killed indiscriminately with the potential of harming noncombatants. During the Crusades this ruling was reversed out of military need.<ref name=Cook05/>{{rp|55-56}} Jurists grappled with the question of attacking an enemy that used women, children or Muslims as ]. Most jurists held that it was permissible to attack the enemy in cases of ], but steps should be taken to direct the attack towards combatants to avoid the human shield.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|117}} Abu Hanifa argued that if Muslims stopped combat for fear of killing noncombatants, then such a rule would make fighting impossible, as every city had civilians.<ref name=handbook295>{{Cite book |last1=Cosman |first1=Madeleine Pelner |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=-Jf5t1vFw1QC|page=295}} |title=Handbook to Life in the Medieval World, 3-Volume Set |last2=Jones |first2=Linda Gale |date=2009 |publisher=Infobase Publishing |isbn=978-1-4381-0907-7 |language=en|pages=295–296}}</ref> Mutilating the enemy dead is prohibited.<ref>{{cite book|last=Kelsay|first=John|date=2009|title=Arguing the Just War in Islam|publisher=]|isbn=9780674032347}}</ref>{{rp|101}}
Other Muslims reject suicide bombing that target civilians by citing the following ]:


Two rulings on destruction of enemy property conflict. In one military battle, Prophet ] ordered the destruction of an enemy's palm trees as a means of ending a siege without bloodshed.{{citation needed|date=May 2024}} By contrast, ] prohibited destruction of trees, buildings and livestock.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|126-128}} Most jurists did not allow unnecessary destruction of enemy property,<ref name=handbook295/> but allowed it in cases of military necessity, such as destroying buildings in which the enemy is taking shelter.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|126-128}} Some jurists allowed destruction if it would weaken the enemy or win the war.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|126-128}} Many jurists cautioned against "unnecessary devastation", not just out of humanitarian concerns, but practical ones: it is more useful to capture an enemy's property than to destroy it.<ref name=V15/>{{rp|39}} Islamic scholars prohibited killing animals, unless due to military necessity (such as killing horses in battle). This is because, unlike property, animals feel pain.<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|126-128}}
:''"Whoever purposely throws himself from a mountain and kills himself, will be in the (Hell) Fire falling down into it and abiding therein perpetually forever; and whoever drinks poison and kills himself with it, he will be carrying his poison in his hand and drinking it in the (Hell) Fire wherein he will abide eternally forever; and whoever kills himself with an iron weapon, will be carrying that weapon in his hand and stabbing his abdomen with it in the (Hell) Fire wherein he will abide eternally forever."'' (Bukhari 7:670)


==History ==
Many Islamic legal rulings view any killing of civilians (whether through combat or any other militant activity) as against the ethics of Islam. Moreover, since militant Islamist organizations do not constitute an autonomous state or de facto authority, and because targets of jihad can only be recognized military targets, most Muslims do not consider militant Islamist attacks on civilians to be a legitimate extension of jihad. Militant Islamists note that economic targets can be military targets, as evidenced in ]'s numerous caravan raids (see ] for a description of one such caravan raid and the war that it led to). The Qur'an specifically forbids attacking women, children, elderly people, and civilian buildings during a military campaign. The Qur'an, the unquestionable source of authority in Islam, vehemently denounces the killing of any person who has not committed at least one of two acts:
{{See also|List of expeditions of Muhammad}}
In pre-Islamic Arabia, ]s raided enemy tribes and settlements to collect spoils. According to some scholars (such as James Turner Johnson), while Islamic leaders "instilled into the hearts of the warriors the belief" in ''jihad'' "holy war" and ''ghaza'' (raids), the "fundamental structure" of this Bedouin warfare "remained, ... raiding to collect booty".<ref name="johnson-147">{{cite book |last1=Johnson |first1=James Turner |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=IoEjpRsvuzUC|page=148}}
|title=Holy War Idea in Western and Islamic Traditions |date=1 November 2010 |publisher=Penn State Press |isbn=978-0271042145 |pages=147–48 |quote=Islam ... instilled into the hearts of the warriors the belief that a war against the followers of another faith was a holy war ... The fundamental structure of bedouin warfare remained, however, that of raiding to collect booty. ... another element in the normative understanding of ''jihad'' as religiously sanctioned war ... the ghaza, `] or raid.` ... Thus the standard form of desert warfare, periodic raids by the nomadic tribes against one another and the settled areas, was transformed into a centrally directed military movement and given and ideological rationale. |access-date=24 September 2014}}</ref> According to ], the Qur'an's statements in support of ''jihad'' may have originally been directed against Muhammad's local enemies, the pagans of Mecca or the Jews of Medina, but these same statements could be redirected once new enemies appeared.<ref name="Berkey2003">{{cite book|last=Berkey|first=Jonathan Porter|author-link=Jonathan Berkey|title=The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600–1800|url=https://archive.org/details/formationofislam0000berk|url-access=registration|year=2003|publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0521588133 |page=|quote=The Koran is not a squeamish document, and it exhorts the believers to ''jihad''. Verses such as "Do not follow the unbelievers, but struggle against them mightily" (25.52) and "fight who do not believe in God and the last day" (9.29) may originally have been directed against Muhammad's local enemies, the pagans of Mecca or the Jews of Medina, but they could be redirected once a new set of enemies appeared.}}</ref> According to scholar Majid Khadduri, it was the shift in focus to the conquest and spoils collecting of non-Bedouin unbelievers and away from traditional inter-Bedouin tribal raids, that may have made it possible for Islam to expand and to avoid self-destruction.<ref name="Khadduri-1955-62">{{harvnb|Khadduri|1955}} {{cite book|chapter-url=https://actforamericaeducation.com/downloads/All_Files_by_Type/khadduri.pdf|access-date=26 October 2015|title=War and Peace in the Law of Islam|pages=55–73|chapter=Book II - The Law of War: The Jihad - Chapter V. Doctrine of ''Jihad''|quote=The importance of the ''jihad'' in Islam lay in shifting the focus of attention of the tribes from their interribal warfare to the outside word; Islam outlawed all forms of war except the ''jihad'', that is the war in Allah's path. It would indeed, have been very difficult for the Islamic state to survive had it not been for the doctrine of the ''jihad'', replacing tribal raids, and directing that enormous energy of the tribes from an inevitable internal conflict to unite and fight against the outside world in the name of the new faith.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151128192525/http://www.actforamericaeducation.com/downloads/All_Files_by_Type/khadduri.pdf|archive-date=28 November 2015|url-status=dead }}</ref>{{rp|60}}


===Classical===
"Whosoever killed ''a'' person - unless it be for killing a person or for creating disorder in the ''earth'' - it shall be as if he killed ''all mankind''; and whoso saved a life, it shall be as if he had saved the life of ''all mankind''." (5:32)
According to ] "there is no compulsion in religion".<ref name="qref|2|256">{{qref|2|256|b=yl}}</ref> The primary aim of ''jihad'' as warfare is not the conversion of non-Muslims to Islam by force, but rather the expansion and defense of the ].<ref name=EIO-djihad>{{cite encyclopedia |title=Djihād|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Islam Online|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=lQpd0AEACAAJ}}}}</ref><ref name="Peters-1977-3">{{Cite book |last=Peters |first=Rudolph |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Lm4XnNtI_1wC\page=3}}|title=Jihad in Mediaeval and Modern Islam: The Chapter on Jihad from Averroes' Legal Handbook 'Bidåayat Al-mudjtahid' and the Treatise 'Koran and Fighting' by the Late Shaykh-al-Azhar, Maòhmåud Shaltåut |date=1977 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-04854-6 |language=en|page= 3}}</ref> There could be truces before this was achieved, but no permanent peace.<ref name=Lewis>{{Cite book |last=Lewis |first=Bernard |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=br74_99YqSIC}}
|title=Islam and the West |date=1994-10-27 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-802393-7 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|9–10}} One who died "on the path of God" was a martyr ('']''), whose sins were remitted and who secured "immediate entry to paradise".<ref name="OCAP">{{cite book|editor1-last=Coates|editor1-first=David|title=The Oxford Companion to American Politics, Volume 2|date=2012|publisher=Oxford University Press |page=16 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=W_BMAgAAQBAJ|page=16}} |isbn=9780199764310}}</ref>


According with ], "from an early date Muslim law laid down" ''jihad'' in the military sense as "one of the principal obligations" of both "the head of the Muslim state", who declared ''jihad'', and the Muslim community.<ref name=Lewis/> According to legal historian Sadakat Kadri, Islamic jurists first developed classical doctrine of ''jihad'' "towards the end of the eighth century", using the doctrine of '']'' (that God gradually improved His revelations over the course of Muhammed's mission). They subordinated Qur'anic verses emphasizing harmony to the more "confrontational" verses of Muhammad's later years and linked verses on exertion (''jihad'') to those of fighting (''qital'').<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|1501}} Muslims jurists of the eighth century divided the world into three divisions, ''dar al-Islam''/''dar al-‛adl''/''dar al-salam'' (house of Islam/house of justice/house of peace), ''dar al-harb''/''dar al-jawr'' (house of war/house of injustice, oppression), and ''dar al-sulh''/''dar al-‛ahd/dār al-muwada‛ah'' (house of peace/house of covenant/house of reconciliation).<ref>{{cite book |author=Ahmed Al- |title=The Islamic Law of War: Justifications and Regulations |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=9XfFAAAAQBAJ|page=92}}
According to this verse of the Qur'an, if one human being has not
|date=28 March 2011b |publisher=Springer |isbn=9780230118089|pages=92}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/isjihadjustwar00zawa/page/50|title=Isw+bm Jihād a Just War?: War, Peace, and Human Rights Under Islamic and Public International Law|last=Zawātī|first=Ḥilmī M|date=2001|publisher=E. Mellen Press|isbn=0773473041|series=Studies in religion and society|volume=53|location=Lewiston, N.Y.|pages=|oclc=47283206}}</ref> The eighth century jurist ] (d. 778) headed what ] called a pacifist school, which maintained that ''jihad'' was only a defensive war.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Law of War and Peace in Islam: A Study in Muslim International Law|last=Khadduri|first=Majid|date=1940|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=ejBHAAAAIAAJ}}|publisher=Luzac & Co|location=London|language=en|oclc=24254931}}</ref>{{rp|36ff}}<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|90}} He stated that the jurists who held this position, among whom he refers to ] jurists ] (d. 774) and ] (d. 795), and other early jurists, "stressed that tolerance should be shown unbelievers, especially scripturaries and advised the Imam to prosecute war only when the inhabitants of the ''dar al-harb'' came into conflict with Islam."<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|80}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Al-Shaybani |first=Muhammad Ibn al-H. |url=|title=The Islamic Law of Nations: Shaybani's Siyar. |date=1966 |publisher=Johns Hopkins Press |language=en|translator-first=]''). It was to be directed only by the caliph who might delay it when convenient, negotiating truces for up to ten years at a time.<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|150–51}} Within classical ], during the first few centuries after the prophet's death,<ref>], "''Der Dschihad: sich mühen für Gott''. In: Gernot Rotter, ''Die Welten des Islam: neunundzwanzig Vorschläge, das Unvertraute zu verstehen''{{-"}} (Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1993), p. 27</ref> ''jihad'' consisted of wars against unbelievers, ], and was the only form of permissible warfare.<ref name="Khadduri"/>{{rp|74–80}} ] stated that fighting rebels and bandits was legitimate, though not a form of ''jihad'',<ref name="lewis-2004-31">{{cite book |last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror |date=2004 |publisher=Random House Publishing Group|page=31|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=kE9LmS6QvacC}} |quote=According to Islamic law, it is lawful to wage war against four types of enemies: infidels, apostates, rebels, and bandits. Although all four types of war are legitimate, only the first two count as ''jihad''. |isbn=978-0812967852}}</ref> and that while the classical perception and presentation of ''jihad'' was warfare in the field against a foreign enemy, internal ''jihad'' "against an infidel renegade, or otherwise illegitimate regime was not unknown."<ref name="lewis-237">{{cite book |last1=Lewis |first1=Bernard |title=The Middle East: A Brief History of the Last 2,000 Years |date=2000 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |pages=237–38 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=CjAABdA9z18C|page=237}} |access-date=30 September 2015 |isbn=9780684807126}}</ref>)


However, some argue martyrdom is never automatic, because it is God's province to judge who is worthy of that designation.<ref>According to ] martyrdom is within God's exclusive province; only God can assess the intentions of individuals and the justness of their cause, and ultimately, whether they deserve the status of being a martyr. The Qur'anic text does not recognize the idea of unlimited warfare, and it does not consider the simple fact that one of the belligerents is Muslim to be sufficient to establish the justness of a war. Moreover, according to the Qur'an, war might be necessary, and might even become binding and obligatory, but it is never a moral and ethical good. The Qur'an does not use the word ''jihad'' to refer to warfare or fighting; such acts are referred to as ''qital''. While the Qur'an's call to ''jihad'' is unconditional and unrestricted, such is not the case for qital. ''Jihad'' is a good in and of itself, while qital is not. Source: {{cite book|last1=Abou El Fadl |first1=Khaled |author-link=Khaled Abou El Fadl |title=The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists|date=23 January 2007|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=ZcVOJYyT9aAC}}|publisher=HarperOne|isbn=978-0061189036}}</ref>{{rp|222–223}}
1) murdered another person


Classical manuals of Islamic jurisprudence often contained a section called ''Book of Jihad'', with ] covered at great length. Such rules include treatment of nonbelligerents, women, children (also cultivated or residential areas),<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hamidullah |first=Muhammad |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=PHFvjl11z08C}}|title=The Muslim Conduct of State |date=2011 |publisher=The Other Press |isbn=978-967-5062-88-9 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|205–08}}<ref name=Bonner/>{{rp|3}} and division of spoils.<ref name=Bonner/>{{rp|99}} Such rules offered protection for civilians.<ref name="onlinelibrary.wiley.com">{{Cite journal|title=Armed ''Jihad'' in the Islamic Legal Tradition|first=Ahmed|last=Al-Dawoody|url=https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rec3.12071|date=27 August 2013|journal=Religion Compass|volume=7|issue=11|pages=476–484|doi=10.1111/rec3.12071|s2cid=143395594}}</ref> Spoils include '']'' (spoils obtained by actual fighting), and ''fai'' (obtained without fighting i.e. when the enemy surrenders or flees).<ref name="chaudhry-spoils">{{cite web|last1=Chaudhry|first1=Muhammad Sharif|title=Dynamics of Islamic ''Jihad'', Spoils of War|url=http://www.muslimtents.com/shaufi/b17/b176.htm|website=Muslim Tents|access-date=29 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160411053917/http://www.muslimtents.com/shaufi/b17/b176.htm|archive-date=11 April 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>
2) created conflict and disorder in the world


The first documentation of the law of ''jihad'' was written by 'Abd al-Rahman al-Awza'i and ]. (It grew out of debates that surfaced following Muhammad's death.<ref name="Peters-jihad-OEIW"/>) Although some Islamic scholars have differed on the implementation of ''Jihad'', the consensus amongst them is that ''jihad'' always includes armed struggle against persecution and oppression.<ref name="jihad-ghamidi">{{cite book|last=Ghamidi|first=Javed|author-link=Javed Ahmed Ghamidi|title=Mizan|publisher=]|chapter=The Islamic Law of ''Jihad''|chapter-url=http://www.javedahmadghamidi.com/renaissance/view/the-islamic-law-of-jihad-part-1-2|year=2001|oclc=52901690|title-link=Mizan}}</ref>
Then that human being is innocent. To kill one of such an innocent human being would be the equivalent to the massacre of the entire human race, which is an inconceivably barbaric crime, and a monumental sin. This verse is clear and unequivocal as to who should be regarded as an innocent human being. Moreoever, there is no declaration in the history of all religions that can match the gravity of this condemnation.


Both ] and ] asserted that ] never initiated hostilities and that all the wars he engaged in were primarily defensive. He never forced non-Muslims to Islam and upheld the truces with non-Muslims so long as they did not violate them. Ibn Taymiyya's views on ''Jihad'' are explained in his treatise titled ''Qāʿidah mukhtaṣarah fī qitāl al-kuffār wa muhādanatuhum wa taḥrīm qatlahum li mujarrad kufrihim''. (An abridged rule on fighting the unbelievers and making truces with them, and the prohibition of killing them merely because of their unbelief). According to Ibn Taymiyya, human blood is inviolable by default, except "by right of justice". Although Ibn Taymiyya authorised offensive ''Jihad'' ( ''Jihad al-Talab'') against enemies who threaten Muslims or obstruct their citizens from freely accepting Islam, unbelief ('']'') by itself is not a justification for violence, whether against individuals or stated. According to Ibn Taymīyah, ''jihad'' is a legitimate reaction to military aggression by unbelievers and not merely due to religious differences. Ibn Taymiyya wrote:<blockquote>"As for the transgressor who does not fight, there are no texts in which Allah commands him to be fought. Rather, the unbelievers are only fought on the condition that they wage war, as is practiced by the majority of scholars and is evident in the Book and Sunnah."<ref name="yaqeeninstitute.org"/><ref name=mqz>{{Cite book|last=QASIM ZAMAN|first=MUHAMMAD |title=Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Uf0fAwAAQBAJ}}
===Islamic rules regarding Prisoners of War===
|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2012|isbn=978-1-107-09645-5| location=New York}}</ref>{{rp|265}}</blockquote>


As important as ''jihad'' was, it is not considered one of the "]". According to one scholar (], this is because the five pillars are individual obligations, but ''jihad'' is a "collective obligation" of the Muslim community meant to be carried out by the Islamic state. This was the belief of "all jurists, with almost no exception", but did not apply to ''defense'' of the Muslim community from a sudden attack, in which case ''jihad'' was an "individual obligation" of all believers, including women and children.<ref name="Khadduri-1955-60">{{harvnb|Khadduri |1955}} {{cite book|chapter-url=https://actforamericaeducation.com/downloads/All_Files_by_Type/khadduri.pdf |access-date=26 October 2015 |chapter=5. Doctrine of ''Jihad'' |title=War and Peace in the Law of Islam |quote= ... 'unless the Muslim community is subjected to a sudden attack and therefore all believers, including women and children are under the obligation to fight— is regarded by all jurists, with almost no exception, as a collective obligation of the whole Muslim community,' meaning that 'if the duty is fulfilled by a part of the community it ceases to be obligatory on others'.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151128192525/http://www.actforamericaeducation.com/downloads/All_Files_by_Type/khadduri.pdf |archive-date=28 November 2015 |url-status=dead}}</ref>{{rp|60}}
====Execution of Prisoners of War====


Scholars had previously claimed it was the responsibility of a centralized government to organize ''jihad''. But this changed as the authority of the ] weakened.<ref name=OEIP_combat/> ] allowed local governors to wage ''jihad'' on the caliph's behalf. This decentralization of ''jihad'' became especially pressing after the Crusades. ] argued that all Muslims were responsible for waging wars of self-defense.<ref name=OEIP_combat/> Al-Sulami encouraged Muslim rulers from distant lands to assist Muslims who were under attack.<ref name=OEIP_combat>{{cite encyclopedia|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=V7CUngEACAAJ}} |first1=James|last1=Broucek|title=Combat|encyclopedia=The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics|location=] |publisher=]|year=2014}}</ref>
The Qur'an has very clear verses on how to deal with prisoners of war


Classical Shia doctrine maintained defensive ''jihad'' was always permissible, but offensive ''jihad'' required the presence of the Imam. An exception to this, during medieval times, was when the first Fatimid caliph ] claimed to be the representative of the Imam and claimed the right to launch offensive ''jihad''.<ref name=Prism10/>{{rp|157}}
: ''"So when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners, and afterwards either <b> set them free as a favor </b> or let them ransom (themselves) until the war terminates."'' (Qur'an 47:4)


After the ], Shia scholar ] claimed that defensive war was not just permissible but praiseworthy, even obligatory. If a Muslim could not take part in the defense then he should, at least, send material support. This remained the case even if the Muslims were ruled by an unjust ruler.<ref name=Prism10/>{{rp|153}}
and


====Early Muslim conquests====
:''"Lo, the righteous shall ... ... (because) they perform the vow and fear a day whereof the evil is wide spreading, and feed with food the needy wretch, the orphan and <b> the prisoner, </b> for love of Him, (saying): we feed you, for the sake of God only, we wish for no reward not thanks from you."'' (Qur'an 76:4-8)
{{main|Early Muslim conquests}}
]s {{legend|#a1584e|Expansion under ], 622–632/A.H. 1–11}} {{legend|#ef9070|Expansion during the ], 632–661/A.H. 11–40}} {{legend|#fad07d|Expansion during the ], 661–750/A.H. 40–129}}]]


In the early era that inspired classical Islam (]) and lasted less than a century, ''jihad'' spread the realm of Islam to include millions of subjects, and an area extending "from the borders of India and China to the Pyrenees and the Atlantic".<ref name=Lewis/>{{rp|4}} The role of religion in these early conquests is debated. Medieval Arabic authors claimed the conquests were commanded by God, and presented them as orderly and disciplined, under the command of the caliph.<ref name=Bonner/>{{rp|60-61}} Many modern historians question whether hunger and ], rather than ''jihad'', was a motivating force in the conquests. Historian ] argued, "Most of the participants in the expeditions probably thought of nothing more than booty ... There was no thought of spreading the religion of Islam."<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|87}} Similarly, Edward J. Jurji argues that the motivations of the Arab conquests were certainly not "the propagation of Islam....Military advantage, economic desires, the attempt to strengthen the hand of the state and enhance its sovereignty...are some of the determining factors."<ref name=AD11/>{{rp|76}} Some recent explanations cite both material and religious causes in the conquests.<ref name=Bonner/>{{rp|62-63}}
In recent years, the world has observed the spectacle of the U.S. military's ] and violent retaliation by militant Islamists who have captured and executed suspected enemy agents. The beheading of civilians, even those involved with the United States military, has been unanimously denounced by even militant Islamist groups. For example, in the Muslim world, the killing of Nick Berg was strongly condemned. Scholars at ] in ] issued a declaration of condemnation , as did numerous Muslim groups in the West including the ]. ] ] group ] and ] ] group ] denounced the murder. Hezbollah issued a statement calling it a "horrible act that does an immense wrong to Islam and Muslims by a group which falsely pretends to follow the precepts of the ] of pardon."


===Post-classical usage===
Iraqi ] and ] religious leaders also denounced the killing. Muthanna al-Dhari, a member of the Board of Muslim Clergy, said the act "does disservice to our religion and our cause. Even if he was military personnel he should be treated as a prisoner who, according to ], must not be killed." Iyaad Samarrai of the Islamic Party commented "This is absolutely wrong. Islam does prohibit the killing or the maltreatment of prisoners."
According to some authors,{{who|date=March 2016}} the more spiritual definitions of ''jihad'' developed sometime after the 150 years of ''jihad'' wars and Muslim territorial expansion, and particularly after the ] and overthrew the ].{{citation needed|date=March 2016}}<ref>The early Muslim era of expansion (632–750 CE, or the ] and ] eras) preceded the "classical era" (750–1258 CE) which coincided with the beginning and the end of the ].</ref> Historian ] stated, "in the historic Community the concept of ''jihad'' had gradually weakened and at length it had been largely reinterpreted in terms of Sufi ethics."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gibb|first1=H.A.R. (Hamilton Alexander Rosskeen)|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=w4iWqgTzvp8C}}
|title=Mohammedanism|date=1969|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford}}</ref>{{rp|117}} notes that "despite the theoretical importance of the idea of ''jihad'' in classical Islamic juristic thought", by the time of the Abbasids, the concept was no longer central to ].<ref name="johnson-147"/>


Rudolph Peters wrote that with the stagnation of Islamic expansionism, the concept of ''jihad'' became internalized as a moral or spiritual struggle.<ref name="Peters-jihad">{{cite book|last=Peters |first=Rudolph |title=Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam: A Reader |publisher=Marcus Wiener |year=1996 |location=Princeton |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Lm4XnNtI_1wC}}
====Capture and exchange of Prisoners of War====
|isbn=978-9004048546 }}</ref>{{rp|187, note 52}} Earlier classical works on fiqh emphasized ''jihad'' as war for God's religion, Peters claimed. Later Islamic scholars like Ibn al-Amir al-San'ani, ], ], ], ], ], etc. emphasized the defensive aspect of ''jihad'', distinguishing between defensive ''jihad'' ( ''jihad al-daf'') and offensive ''jihad'' (''jihad al-talab'' or ''jihad'' of choice ). They refuted the notion of consensus that ''jihad al-talab'' was a communal obligation(''fard kifaya''). In support of this view, these scholars referred to the works of classical scholars such as ] and ]. According to Ibn Taymiyya, the reason for ''jihad'' against non-Muslims is not their disbelief, but the threat they pose to Muslims. Citing Ibn Taymiyya, scholars including Rashid Rida, Al San'ani, and Qaradawi argued that unbelievers need not be fought unless they pose a threat to Muslims. Thus, ''jihad'' is obligatory only as defensive warfare to respond to aggression or "perfidy" against the Muslim community, and that the "normal and desired state" between Islamic and non-Islamic territories was one of "peaceful coexistence". This was similar to the Western "]" concept.<ref name=mqz/>{{rp|71, 72, 227, 228, 263–265, 286, 315}}<ref name="Peters-jihad"/>{{rp|150}} Similarly 18th-century scholar ] defined ''jihad'' as a defensive military action to protect the Muslim community, and emphasized its defensive aspect in synchrony with later 20th century Islamic writers.<ref>{{harvnb|DeLong-Bas|2004}} "In Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's writings, ''jihad'' is a special and specific type of warfare, which can be declared only by the religious leader (imam) and whose purpose is the defense of the Muslim community from aggression." .. "What Shaltut calls for here is not only a defensive response but also the right to live peacefully without fear for life, home, or possessions, all of which is consistent with Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's assertion of ''jihad'' as a defensive activity designed to restore order and preserve life and property."... "Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's definition of ''jihad'' is restricted to a defensive military action designed to protect and preserve the Muslim community and its right to practice its faith".. "For Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, ''jihad'' is always a defensive military action. Here he is synchronous with Islamic modernist writers, who narrow the confines of ''jihad'' to defensive action.."}}</ref>{{rp|230, 235, 241 }} Today, some Muslim authors only recognize as legitimate wars fought for the purpose of territorial defense as well as wars fought for the defense of ].<ref name=Peters-jihad/>{{rp| 125}}


Ibn Taymiyyah's hallmark themes included the permissibility of overthrowing a ruler who is classified as an unbeliever due to a failure to adhere to Islamic law, the absolute division of the world into ''dar al-kufr'' and ''dar al-Islam'', labeling anyone not adhering to one's particular interpretation of Islam as an unbeliever, and the call for warfare against ], particularly Jews and Christians.<ref name=DeLong-Bas2004/>{{rp | }}
As was the common practice in medieval times, Islam actually categorizes prisoners of war as booty. When ] and his armies were victorious in a battle, the captured male POWs would either be returned to their tribes for a hefty ransom, exchanged for Muslim prisoners of war, or they would be sold into slavery, as was the custom of the time. Women and children who were captured and made prisoners of war were also enslaved; as conservative columnist ] writes, "non-Muslim women and children captured in war would become the property of their Muslim captors. Female captives could be taken as ] or given as gifts to Muslims. The children, brought up as Muslims, would enjoy Islamic rights."


Ibn Taymiyyah recognized "the possibility of a ''jihad'' against `heretical` and `deviant` Muslims within ''dar al-Islam''. He identified as heretical and deviant Muslims anyone who propagated innovations (''bida''') contrary to the Qur'an and Sunna ... legitimated ''jihad'' against anyone who refused to abide by Islamic law or revolted against the true Muslim authorities." He used a broad definition of what constituted aggression or rebellion against Muslims, which would make ''jihad'' "not only permissible but necessary."<ref name=DeLong-Bas2004/>{{rp| }} Ibn Taymiyyah paid careful attention to the questions of martyrdom and the benefits of ''jihad'': "It is in ''jihad'' that one can live and die in ultimate happiness, both in this world and in the Hereafter. Abandoning it means losing entirely or partially both kinds of happiness."<ref name="Peters-jihad"/>{{rp|}}
====Conversion to Islam by Prisoners of War====


Bernard Lewis stated that while most Islamic theologians in the classical period (750–1258 CE) understood ''jihad'' to be a military endeavor,<ref name=Lewis-1988/>{{rp|}} after Islamic conquest stagnated and the caliphate divided into smaller stated, "irresistible and permanent ''jihad'' came to an end". As ''jihad'' became unfeasible it was "postponed from historic to messianic time."<ref name="Lewis-revolt">{{cite magazine|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=The Revolt of Islam|magazine=The New Yorker|date=19 November 2001|url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2001/11/19/the-revolt-of-islam|access-date=28 August 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140904075017/http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2001/11/19/the-revolt-of-islam|archive-date=4 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> Even when the ] carried on a new holy war of expansion in the seventeenth century, "the war was not universally pursued". They made no attempt to recover Spain or Sicily.<ref name=jt1>{{cite book|last1=Gold|first1=Dore|title=Hatred's Kingdom: How Saudi Arabia Supports the New Global Terrorism|date=2012 |publisher=Regnery Publishing|page=24|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=jT1xbK2EGRcC|page=24}}}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=March 2016}}
POWs who converted to Islam would be freed; "seized in combat, a non-Muslim would be treated as a war prisoner, and could win freedom by converting to Islam."


By the 1500s, it had become accepted that the permanent state of relations between ''dar al-Islam'' and ''dar al-harb'' was that of peace.{{CN|date=September 2023}}
The claim above by Amir Taheri, however, is contradicted by examining the treatment of prisoners after the battle of Badr. Even though some prisoners were executed for their earlier crimes in Mecca, the rest were given many options, (1) convert to Islam, (2) pay ransom, (3) teach 10 Muslims to read and write. Even the hostile orientalist ] wrote:


] of the ] tried to claim the right to wage offensive ''jihad'', particularly against the Ottomans. However, Shia ulama did not permit that, maintaining the classical position that the true Imam could wage such a war. During the Qajar period, Shia ulama adopted the position that the Shah was responsible for national security. They authorized the Perso-Russian wars in the 19th century as ''jihad''.<ref name=Prism10/>{{rp|158-159}}
:''"In pursuance of Mahomet's commands the citizens of Medina and such of the refugees as possessed houses received the prisoners and treated them with much consideration. 'Blessings be on the men of Medina', said one of these prisoners in later days, 'they made us ride while they themselves walked; they gave us wheaten bread to eat when there was little of it, contenting themselves with dates."''


In the 18th century, the ] under the reigns of ] and his son and successor, ], had declared ''jihad''s against Sikh Misls in the ] region, often to consolidate territory and continue Afghan their region, efforts under Ahmad Shah failed, while Timur Shah had succeeded.<ref name="Fayz">{{cite journal |last1=Muhammad Katib Hazarah |first1=Fayz |title=The History Of Afghanistan Fayż Muḥammad Kātib Hazārah's Sirāj Al Tawārīkh By R. D. Mcchesney, M. M. Khorrami |journal=AAF |date=2012 |page=61 |url=https://archive.org/details/the-history-of-afghanistan-fayz-muhammad-katib-hazarahs-siraj-al-tawarikh-by-r.-/page/n255/mode/2up?view=theater |access-date=11 November 2021}}</ref>
===Excerpts from the Qur'an on warfare===


===Colonialism and modernism===
The ] uses the term ''jihad'' only four times, none of which refer to armed struggle. As such, the use of the word ''jihad'', in reference to holy Islamic war, was a latter day invention of Muslims. However, the concept of holy Islamic war was not itself a latter day invention, and the Qur'an does contain passages laying out the theory and practice of armed struggle (''qi'tal'') for Muslims. A few examples are as follows:
] of West Africa, c. 1830]]
When Europeans began to colonize the Muslim world, ''jihad'' was one of the first responses.<ref name=Bonner/>{{rp|157-158}} ] organized a ''jihad'' in Algeria against French domination, tapping into existing Sufi networks.<ref name=Bonner/>{{rp|157-158}} Other wars were often declared to be ''jihad'': the ] religious order declared ''jihad'' against ] in 1912, and the "]" in ] declared ] against ] and ] in 1881.<ref name=OCAP />


] and ] argued that peaceful coexistence should be the normal state between Muslim and non-Muslim stated, citing verses in the Qur'an that allowed war only in self-defense.<ref name="OEIP">{{cite encyclopedia|first1=Rudolph|last1=Peters|first2=David|last2=Cook |title=Jihād|encyclopedia=The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics|location=] |publisher=]|year=2014|url=http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t349/e0057|doi=10.1093/acref:oiso/9780199739356.001.0001|isbn=9780199739356|access-date=24 January 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170123114402/http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref:oiso/9780199739356.001.0001/acref-9780199739356-e-0263|archive-date=23 January 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> However, this view left open ''jihad'' against colonialism, which was seen as an attack on Muslims.<ref name="OEIP"/>
:&#8220;Strike terror (into the hearts of) the enemies of Allah and your enemies.; But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things).&#8221; (8:60-61)


] argued that ''jihad'' was limited to cases of ], and since the ] allowed ], ''jihad'' against the British was unnecessary.<ref name=Bonner/>{{rp|159-160}} Instead, Khan formulated ''jihad'' as recovering ] to modernize the Muslim world.<ref name=Bonner/>{{rp|159-160}}
:&#8220;What! will you not fight a people who broke their oaths and aimed at the expulsion of the Messenger, and they attacked you first; do you fear them? But Allah is most deserving that you should fear Him, if you are believers. Fight (kill) them (non-Muslims), and Allah will punish (torment) them by your hands, cover them with shame.&#8221; (9:13-14)


A concept that played a role in anti-colonial ''jihad'' (or lack thereof) was the belief in '']''.{{CN|date=September 2023}} According to Islamic ], a messianic figure named Mahdi will one day appear and restore justice on earth. This belief sometimes discouraged Muslims from conducting ''jihad'', instead inducing them to wait. Such messages were circulated in Algeria to undermine ]'s ''jihad'' against the French.{{CN|date=September 2023}} Alternatively, this belief could be a powerful mobilizing force when someone proclaimed to be the Mahdi. Mahdist rebellions happened in India (1810), Egypt (1865) and Sudan (1881).{{CN|date=September 2023}}
:&#8220;Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): &#8220;I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them. This because they contended against Allah and His Messenger: If any contend against Allah and His Messenger, Allah is strict in punishment.&#8221; (8:12-13)
] during the ] in 1898]]
With the ], a new "]" movement arose, with different interpretations of Islam that increased emphasis on ''jihad''. The ] movement that spread across the ] starting in the 18th century emphasized ''jihad'' as armed struggle.<ref>{{harvnb|Gold|2012|pp=7–8}} "... the revival of ''jihad'', and its prioritization as a religious value, is found in the works of high-level Saudi religious officials like former chief justice Sheikh Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid: `Jihad is a great deed indeed there is no deed whose reward and blessing is as that of it, and for this reason, it is the best thing one can volunteer for."</ref> The ] in West Africa during the 18th and 19th centuries led to the establishment of various states, most notably the ]. None of these movements were victorious.<ref name=Lewis/> The ] lasted for a century until it was conquered by the ] and incorporated into ] in 1903.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Falola |first=Toyin |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Hd-Jp1t2n4sC}}|title=Colonialism and Violence in Nigeria |date=2009-09-25 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-00339-3 |language=en}}</ref>


===Ottoman Jihad in World War One===
:&#8220;But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war) but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. And if one of the idolaters seek protection from you, grant him protection till he hears the word of Allah, then make him attain his place of safety; this is because they are a people who do not know.&#8221; (9:5-6)
{{Main|1914 Ottoman jihad proclamation}}
] Regimental Standard at Kanlisirt, ] in 1915]]
When the ] caliph ], hopes and fears emerged that non-Turkish Muslims would side with Ottoman Turkey, but the appeal did not unite the Muslim world,<ref name=Lewis-revolt/><ref name=jt1/>{{Rp|page=24}} and Muslims did not turn on their non-Muslim commanders in the Allied forces.<ref name="Ardic-2012-192">{{cite book|last1=Ardic|first1=Nurullah|title=Islam and the Politics of Secularism: The Caliphate and Middle Eastern ...|date=2012|publisher=Routledge|pages=192–93|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=ZAXNxxkJKYsC|page=192}}|access-date=30 September 2015|isbn=9781136489846}}</ref> (The war led to the end of the caliphate as the Ottoman Empire allied with the war's losers and surrendered. Post-war capitulations were overturned by secularist ], who later abolished the caliphate.)<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|157}}


Prior to the Iranian revolution in 1922, Shiite cleric ] issued a '']'' prohibiting Iraqis from participating in the Iraqi elections, as the Iraqi government had been established by foreign powers. He later played a role in the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/vol8-no1/islamic-revolution-1920-iraq-zuhayr-sulayman/islamic-revolution-1920-iraq |title=The Islamic Revolution of 1920 |date=27 February 2013 |publisher=al-islam.org }}</ref> Between 1918 and 1919 in the Shia holy city of ] the League of the Islamic Awakening was established by religious scholars, tribal chiefs, and landlords who assassinated a British officer in the hopes of sparking a similar rebellion in ].{{citation needed|date=December 2020}}
:&#8220;Fight (kill) those who believe not in Allah, nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the ] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.&#8221; (9:29)


During the revolt, Ayatollah Muhammad Taqi Shirazi, father of ] and grandfather of ], declared British rule impermissible and called for ''jihad'' against European occupations in the Middle East.{{cn|date=February 2023}}
:"Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed ... those who have been expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: Our Lord is Allah. "(22:39-40)


====Post-colonialism====
:"O! Prophet! We, Allah, have made lawful to you your wives whom you have paid their dowries and those whom your right hand possesses from among those whom Allah has given you as gains of war ..." (33:50)
{{Main|Islamism|Criticism of Islamism}}
] played an increasing role in the Muslim world in the 20th century, especially following the ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Van Slooten |first=Pippi |date=April 2005 |title=Dispelling Myths About Islam and Jihad |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14631370500333013 |journal=Peace Review |language=en |volume=17 |issue=2–3 |pages=289–294 |doi=10.1080/14631370500333013 |issn=1040-2659}}</ref> One of the first Islamist groups, the ], emphasized physical struggle and ] in its creed: "God is our objective; the Qur'an is our constitution; the Prophet is our leader; struggle (''jihad'') is our way; and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations."<ref name="sacred">{{cite book|last1=Benjamin|first1=Daniel|last2=Simon|first2=Steven|title=The Age of Sacred Terror|url=https://archive.org/details/ageofsacredterro00benj|url-access=registration|date=2002|publisher=Random House|location=New York|page=|isbn=9780375508592}}</ref><ref name="slogan">{{cite web|title=Article eight of the Hamas Covenant. The Slogan of the Islamic Resistance Movement|url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp|website=Yale Law School. Avalon Project|publisher=Yale Law School|access-date=7 September 2014|quote=Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: ''Jihad'' is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110307133603/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp|archive-date=7 March 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> ] emphasized ''jihad'' of the sword, and called on Egyptians to ''jihad'' against the ],
<ref name=Banna78/>{{rp|150, 155}} (the first influential scholar since the 1857 India uprising to do so).<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|158}} The group called for ''jihad'' against ] in the 1940s,<ref name="Al-Khatib">{{cite book|last1=Al-Khatib|first1=Ibrahim|title=The Muslim Brotherhood and Palestine: Letters To Jerusalem|date=2012|publisher=scribedigital.com|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=6RdWFL8sbpIC|page=14}}|access-date=7 September 2014|quote=The Muslim Brothers believed a well-planned ''Jihad'' to be the only means to liberate Palestine. Its press confirmed that ''Jihad'' became an individual obligation upon every Muslim ... gain one of the two desirable goals (i.e. gaining victory or dying martyrs). The jurists of the Group issued a fatwa during the 1948 War that Muslims had to postpone pilgrimage and offer their money for ''Jihad'' (in Palestine) instead.|isbn=978-1780410395}}</ref> and its Palestinian branch, ], called for ''jihad'' against Israel during the ].<ref name="Abū ʻAmr">{{cite book|last1=Abū ʻAmr|first1=Z.|author-link=Ziyād Abū ʻAmr|title=Islamic Fundamentalism in the West Bank and Gaza: Muslim Brotherhood and ..|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=1994|page=23|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=jrTG5sdLHD8C|page=23}}|quote=According to the society, the ''jihad'' for Palestine will start after the completion of the Islamic transformation of Palestinian society, the completion of the process of Islamic revival, and the return to Islam in the region. Only then can the call for ''jihad'' be meaningful, because the Palestinians cannot along liberate Palestine without the help of other Muslims.|isbn=978-0253208668}}</ref><ref name="miller-387">But according to ], the MB changed its mind with the intifada. {{cite book|last1=Miller|first1=Judith|title=God Has Ninety-Nine Names: Reporting from a Militant Middle East|publisher=Simon & Schuster|page=387|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=tH_ThgVEoAcC|page=387}}|quote=Sheikh Yasin had initially argued in typical Muslim Brotherhood tradition that violent ''jihad'' against Israel would be counterproductive until Islamic regimes had been established throughout the Muslim realm. But the outbreak of the Intifada changed his mind: Islamic reconquest would have to start rather than end with ''jihad'' in Palestine. So stated the Hamas covenant.|isbn=978-1439129418|date=19 July 2011}}</ref><ref name="Hamas Covenant">{{cite web|title=Hamas Covenant 1988|url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp|website=Yale Law School Avalon Project|access-date=7 September 2014|quote= There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through ''Jihad''. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110307133603/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp|archive-date=7 March 2011|url-status=live}}</ref>

Modern Muslim thought had been focused on when to go to war ('']''), not paying much attention on conduct during war ('']''). This was because most Muslim theorists viewed ] as consistent with Islamic requirements. However, Muslims later discussed conduct during war in response to ] groups who targeted civilians.<ref name=hashmi/>{{rp|}}

According to ] and ], the new "fundamentalist" movement brought a reinterpretation of Islam and their own writings on ''jihad''. These writings tended to be less involved with the different of schools of Islamic law, or in solutions for all potential situations. "They emphasize more the moral justifications and the underlying ethical values of the rules, than the detailed elaboration of those rules." They also tended to ignore the distinction between Greater and Lesser ''jihad'' because it distracted Muslims "from the development of the combative spirit they believe is required to rid the Islamic world of Western influences".<ref name=DeLong-Bas2004/>{{rp| }}<ref name="Peters-jihad"/>{{rp|}}

Contemporary Islamic fundamentalists were often influenced by the ideas of Ibn Taymiyyah, and Egyptian journalist ].
], Islamist author and influential leader of the Muslim Brotherhood]]
Qutb preached in his book '']'' that ''jihad'', “is not a temporary phase but a permanent war ... ''Jihad'' for freedom cannot cease until the Satanic forces are put to an end and the religion is purified for God in toto.”<ref name="Milestones"/>{{rp|125–26}}<ref name=DeLong-Bas2004/>{{rp|264}} Qutb focused on martyrdom and ''jihad'', adding the theme of treachery and enmity towards Islam of ]. If non-Muslims were waging a "war against Islam", ''jihad'' against them was defensive, not offensive. He insisted that Christians and Jews were '']'' (not monotheists) because (he alleged) they gave their priests or rabbis "authority to make laws, obeying laws which were made by them not permitted by God" and "obedience to laws and judgments is a sort of worship".<ref name="Milestones">{{cite book|last1=Qutb|first1=Sayyid|title=Milestones|url=http://www.izharudeen.com/uploads/4/1/2/2/4122615/milestones_www.izharudeen.com.pdf|pages=82, 60|access-date=7 September 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140813061043/http://www.izharudeen.com/uploads/4/1/2/2/4122615/milestones_www.izharudeen.com.pdf|archive-date=13 August 2014|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Symon">{{cite news|last1=Symon|first1=Fiona|title=Analysis: The roots of ''jihad''|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1603178.stm|publisher=BBC|access-date=7 September 2014|date=16 October 2001|quote=For Qutb, all non-Muslims were infidels—even the so-called "people of the book", the Christians and Jews—and he predicted an eventual clash of civilisations between Islam and the west.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140907115409/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1603178.stm|archive-date=7 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref>

Later ideologue, ], departed from some of Qutb's teachings. While Qutb felt that ''jihad'' was a proclamation of "liberation for humanity" (in which humanity has the free choice between Islam and unbelief), Faraj saw ''jihad'' as a mean of conquering the world and reestablishing the ].<ref name=Cook05/>{{rp| 107-108}} Faraj legitimized lying, attacking by night (even accidentally killing innocents), and destroying trees of the infidel.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jansen |first=Johannes J. G. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=O8trAAAAIAAJ}}|title=The Neglected Duty: The Creed of Sadat's Assassins and Islamic Resurgence in the Middle East |date=1986 |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=978-0-02-916340-5 |language=en}} Includes a facsimile of ''al-Farida al-gha'iba'' (The Neglected Duty) by Muhammad 'Abd al-Salam Faraj.</ref><ref name=Cook05/>{{rp| 190, 192}} His ideas influenced Egyptian Islamist extremist groups,<ref name="Gerges"/>{{rp|9}} and ], later the leader of ].<ref name="Gerges"/>{{rp|11}}

During the ], and although it was predominantly ], Afghanistan's ] took arms against the ] government and allied ] and the nation's Sunnis and were collectively referred to as the Afghan ]. Shiite jihadists in Afghanistan were known as the ] and received support from the ] in fighting the ] and allied Soviet forces in Afghanistan.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/event/Afghan-War|title=Afghan War &#124; History & Facts|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|date=24 May 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/afghanistansendl00good|url-access=registration|page=|title=Afghanistan's Endless War: State Failure, Regional Politics, and the Rise of the Taliban|first=Larry P.|last=Goodson|date=10 August 2001|publisher=University of Washington Press|via=Internet Archive|isbn=9780295980508}}</ref>

====Terrorism====
Many Muslims, including scholars like ] and ], denounced Islamic terrorist attacks against ]s, seeing them as contrary to rules of ''jihad'' that prohibit targeting ]s.<ref name= "OEIP_combat"/> After the ] in 2001, the United States blamed ]n ] and the ] in ], triggering bin Laden, who in turn on October 7 issued a televised message, declaring "Allah had blessed a vanguard group of Muslims, the spearhead of Islam, to destroy America." American and British forces were deployed around Afghanistan, and ] ], also the Commander to the Faithful of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, in turn called the world's Muslims to join him in ''jihad''.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kepel |first=Gilles |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=tttzgNKFAI8C}}|title=Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam |date=2002 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-01090-1 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|2}}

====Abdullah Azzam====
{{Main|Abdullah Azzam}}
In the 1980s ] advocated waging ''jihad'' against the "unbelievers".<ref name="Riedel">{{cite web|last1=Riedel|first1=Bruce|title=The 9/11 Attacks' Spiritual Father|url=http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/09/11-riedel|date=11 September 2011|publisher=Brooking|access-date=6 September 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141021192758/http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/09/11-riedel|archive-date=21 October 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> Azzam issued a ] calling for ''jihad'' against the ], declaring it an obligation for all able-bodied Muslims to repel invaders. His fatwa was endorsed by others, including ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Blanchard|first=Christopher M|title=Saudi Arabia: Background and U. S. Relations|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=J0WWUQBl2PwC|page=27}}|date=November 2010|publisher=DIANE Publishing|isbn=978-1-4379-2838-9|page=27}}</ref> Azzam saw Afghanistan as the beginning of ''jihad'' to repel unbelievers from many countries—the ] of Central Asia, ], the ], ], ], ], Spain, and especially his home country of Palestine.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wright |first=Lawrence |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=8dCnb4uR63EC}}|title=The Looming Tower |date=2006-08-08 |publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-307-26608-8 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|}} The Soviet defeat in Afghanistan is said to have "amplified the jihadist tendency from a fringe phenomenon to a major force in the Muslim world."<ref name=Commins>{{Cite book |last=Commins |first=David |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=cNuRDwAAQBAJ}}|title=The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi Arabia |date=2005-12-20 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-0-85771-780-1 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|174}} Many fighters returned to their home countries to continue ''jihad'', participating in insurgencies and later creating a "transnational jihadist stream."<ref name=Commins/>{{rp|156–57}}

Azzam also argued for a broader interpretation of who it was permissible to kill, which may have influenced students such as bin Laden.<ref name=jt1/> He argued, based on his interpretation of the ], that it is a sin to not wage offensive ''jihad'' against the ] in ], continuing until only those who submit to Islam remain; expelling unbelievers from ], contrastingly, is defensive ''jihad''.<ref name="Azzam-DOTML">{{cite book | last=Azzam | first=Abdullah |author-link=Abdullah Azzam| title=Defense of the Muslim Lands: The first Obligation After Iman | publisher=Islamic Books | url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=EDoeN1r3PjQC}}| access-date=8 July 2024 }}</ref> In February 1998, bin Laden put a "Declaration of the World Islamic Front for ''Jihad'' against the Jews and the Crusaders" in the ''Al-Quds al-Arabi'' newspaper.<ref name=OBL-jihad>{{Cite journal |last=Lewis |first=Bernard |date=1998 |title=License to Kill: Usama Bin Ladin's Declaration of Jihad |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20049126 |journal=Foreign Affairs |language=en |volume=77 |issue=6 |pages=14–19 |doi=10.2307/20049126|jstor=20049126}}</ref> He later organised the ] against the United States.

===Shia===
In ], ''jihad'' is one of the ten ]<ref name="practices">{{cite web |title=Part 2: Islamic Practices |url=http://www.al-islam.org/invitation-to-islam-moustafa-al-qazwini/part-2-islamic-practices |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140907022817/http://www.al-islam.org/invitation-to-islam-moustafa-al-qazwini/part-2-islamic-practices |archive-date=7 September 2014 |access-date=27 August 2014 |publisher=al-Islam.org}}</ref> (though not one of the five pillars). Traditionally, ] Shi'a doctrine differed from that of ] on the concept of ''jihad'', with ''jihad'' seen as a "lesser priority" in Shia theology and "armed activism" by Shias "limited to a person's immediate geography".<ref name="nationalae">{{cite news|last1=Hassan|first1=Hassan |title=The rise of Shia ''jihad''ism in Syria will fuel sectarian fires |url=http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/comment/the-rise-of-shia-jihadism-in-syria-will-fuel-sectarian-fires |access-date=27 August 2014|work=The National|location=Abu Dhabi|issue=5 June 2013}}</ref>

Because of their history of oppression, Shias also associated ''jihad'' with certain passionate features, notably in the remembrance of ]. ] says:

<blockquote>In Islamic tradition ''jihad'' or the struggle in the way of God, whether as armed struggle, or any form of opposition of the wrong, is generally regarded as one of the essential requirements of a person's faith as a Muslim. Shi'î tradition carried this requirement a step further, making ''jihad'' one of the pillars or foundations (arkan) of religion. If, therefore, ]'s struggle against the Umayyad regime must be regarded as an act of ''jihad'', then, In the mind of devotees, the participation of the community in his suffering and its ascent to the truth of his message must also be regarded as an extension of the holy struggle of the Imam himself. The ''hadith'' from which we took the title of this chapter stated this point very clearly. ] is said to have declared to ], one of his closest disciples, 'The sigh of the sorrowful for the wrong done us is an act of praise (]) , his sorrow for us is an act of worship, and his keeping of our secret is a struggle (''jihad'') in the way of God'; the Imâm then added, 'This ] should be inscribed in letters of gold'.<ref name=WDG>{{Cite book |last=Ayoub |first=Mahmoud M. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=rpaPWv5Iyd8C}}|title=Redemptive Suffering in Islam: A Study of the Devotional Aspects of Ashura in Twelver Shi'ism |date=2011-07-26 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-080331-0 |language=en|authorlink=Walter de Gruyter}}</ref>{{rp|142}}</blockquote>

and

<blockquote>Hence, the concept of ''jihad'' (holy struggle) gained a deeper and more personal meaning. Whether through weeping, the composition and recitation of poetry, showing compassion and doing good to the poor or carrying arms, the Shi'i Muslim saw himself helping the Imam in his struggle against the wrong (]) and gaining for himself the same merit (]) of those who actually fought and died for him. The ], in its broader sense the sharing of the entire life of the suffering family of Muhammad, has become for the Shi'i community the true meaning of compassion.<ref name=WDG/>{{rp|148}}</blockquote>

In the ], Shia and Sunni fighters waged ''jihad'' against each other.<ref name=RF17/> In Yemen, the ] Movement used appeals to ''jihad'' as part of their ideology as well as their recruitment.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thedefensepost.com/2019/06/20/yemen-houti-child-soldiers-noammar-al-eryani/|title=Houthis recruit 50,000 Yemen child soldiers in 3 months, minister says|date=20 June 2019|website=The Defense Post}}</ref>

==Islamic jurisprudence==
Observers have noted the evolution in the rules of ''jihad''—from the original "classical" doctrine to that of 21st century ].<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|172}} According to ] Sadarat Kadri,<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|172}} during the last few centuries, incremental changes in Islamic legal doctrine (developed by Islamists who otherwise condemn any '']'' (innovation) in religion), "normalized" what was once "unthinkable".<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|172}} "The very idea that ] might blow themselves up for God was unheard of before 1983, and it was not until the early 1990s that anyone anywhere had justified killing innocent Muslims who were not on a battlefield."<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|175}}

The first or the "classical" doctrine of ''jihad'' which was developed towards the end of the 8th century, emphasized the ''jihad'' of the sword (''jihad bil-saif'') rather than the "''jihad'' of the heart",<ref name=Lewis-1988/>{{rp|}} but it contained many legal restrictions developed from interpretations of the ] and the ], such as detailed rules involving "the initiation, the conduct, the termination" of ''jihad'', the treatment of prisoners, the distribution of booty, etc. Absent a sudden attack on the ], ''jihad'' was not a "personal obligation" (''fard ayn''); instead it was a "collective one" ('']''),<ref name=Khadduri-1955-60/> which had to be discharged "in the way of God" (''fi sabil Allah''),<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|150}} and could only be launched by the ], "whose discretion over its conduct was all but absolute."<ref name=Kadri12/>{{rp|150–51}} (This was designed in part to avoid incidents like the ]'s ''jihad'' against and killing of ], once ] that ]). ] resulting from an attack on the enemy with no concern for your own safety was praiseworthy, but dying by your own hand (as opposed to the enemy's) merited a special place in ].<ref name="ARSI-BL-xii">{{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=The Assassins, a radical sect in Islam|orig-year=1967|year=2003|publisher=Basic Books|page=xi–xii |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=sRVmL_h_PcsC}}
|access-date=13 October 2015|isbn=978-0786724550}}</ref> The collective obligation to ''jihad'' is sometimes simplified as "offensive ''jihad''" in Western texts.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Edwards |first1=Richard |last2=Zuhur|first2=Sherifa |title=The Encyclopedia of the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Political, Social, and|page=553|publisher=ABC-CLIO|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=YAd8efHdVzIC|page=553}}
|isbn=978-1851098422 |date=12 May 2008 }}</ref>

] Abu Abdullah al-Muhajir has been identified as the key theorist and ] behind modern jihadist violence.<ref name="Atlantic 2016">{{cite magazine |last1=al-Saud |first1=Abdullah K. |last2=Winter |first2=Charlie |title=Abu Abdullah al-Muhajir: The Obscure Theologian Who Shaped ISIS |magazine=] |location=Washington, D.C. |date=4 December 2016 |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/12/isis-muhajir-syria/509399/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612140424/https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/12/isis-muhajir-syria/509399/ |archive-date=12 June 2018 |url-status=live |access-date=28 September 2020}}</ref> His theological and legal justifications influenced ] of ] as well as jihadi terrorist groups, including ].<ref name="Atlantic 2016"/> Zarqawi used a manuscript of al-Muhajir's ideas at AQI training camps that were later deployed by ISIS, referred to as ''The Jurisprudence of Jihad'' or ''The Jurisprudence of Blood''.<ref name="Atlantic 2016"/><ref name="Guardian">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/12/isis-jihadist-manual-analysed-rebutted-by-islamic-scholar|title=The core Isis manual that twisted Islam to legitimise barbarity|newspaper=]|access-date=9 June 2018|date=12 May 2018|last1=Townsend|first1=Mark |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180609090007/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/12/isis-jihadist-manual-analysed-rebutted-by-islamic-scholar|archive-date=9 June 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="ChrisStout">{{cite book |last1=Stout|first1= Chris|title= Terrorism, Political Violence, and Extremism: New Psychology to Understand, Face, and Defuse the Threat|publisher=] |date=9 June 2018 |orig-year=24 May 2017|pages=5–6|chapter=The Psyhchology of Terrorism|chapter-url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=QvHeDgAAQBAJ|page=5}}|isbn=978-1440851926|author1-link= Chris Stout (psychologist)}}</ref>

The book has been described as rationalising "the murder of non-combatants" by Mark Towsend, citing Salah al-Ansari of ], who noted: "There is a startling lack of study and concern regarding this abhorrent and dangerous text ''The Jurisprudence of Blood'' in almost all Western and Arab scholarship".<ref name="Guardian"/> Charlie Winter of '']'' describes it as a "theological playbook used to justify the group's abhorrent acts".<ref name="Atlantic 2016"/> He stated:

{{Blockquote|Ranging from ruminations on the merits of beheading, torturing, or burning prisoners to thoughts on assassination, siege warfare, and the use of biological weapons, Muhajir's intellectual legacy is a crucial component of the ]—and, indeed, whatever comes after it—a way to render practically anything permissible, provided, that is, it can be spun as beneficial to the ''jihad''. According to Muhajir, ] is not only a theologically sound act, but a commendable one, too, something to be cherished and celebrated regardless of its outcome. neither Zarqawi nor his inheritors have looked back, liberally using Muhajir's work to normalize the use of suicide tactics in the time since, such that they have become the single most important military and terrorist method—defensive or offensive—used by ISIS today. The way that Muhajir theorized it was simple—he offered up a theological fix that allows any who desire it to sidestep the Koranic injunctions against suicide.<ref name="Atlantic 2016"/>}}

Psychologist ] claimed that jihadists regard their actions as "for the greater good"; that they are in a "weakened in the earth" situation that renders ] a valid resort.<ref name="ChrisStout"/>

==Usage==
The term 'jihad' has accrued both violent and non-violent meanings. According to ], it can simply mean striving to live a moral and virtuous life, spreading and defending Islam as well as fighting injustice and oppression, among other things.<ref name=JLE02/>{{rp|26}} The relative importance of the two forms of ''jihad'' is a matter of controversy. Rudoph Peters wrote that, in the contemporary world, traditionalist Muslims understand ''jihad'' from classical works on ]; ] regard ''jihad'' as a ] in ] and emphasize its defensive aspects; and fundamentalists view it as an expansion of Islam and realization of Islamic ideals.<ref name="Peters-jihad"/>{{rp|150}} David Cook wrote that Muslims understood ''jihad'' in a military sense, in both classical and contemporary texts. Cook located the idea that ''jihad'' is primarily non-violent in Sufi texts and the Western scholars who study them, or from Muslim apologists.<ref name=Cook05/>{{rp|165–166}} ] stated that its surveys show that the concept of ''jihad'' among Muslims "is considerably more nuanced than the single sense in which Western commentators invariably invoke the term".<ref name=gallop/>

===Muslim public opinion===
A ] poll asked Muslims in eight countries to define ''jihad''. In Lebanon, Kuwait, Jordan, and Morocco, the most frequent response was to "duty toward God", a "divine duty", or a "worship of God", with no military connotations. In Turkey, Iran, Pakistan and Indonesia, many of the responses includes "sacrificing one's life for the sake of Islam/God/a just cause" or "fighting against the opponents of Islam".<ref name="gallop">{{cite web|last1=Burkholder|first1=Richard|title=Jihad – 'Holy War', or Internal Spiritual Struggle?|date=3 December 2002|url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/7333/jihad-holy-war-internal-spiritual-struggle.aspx|publisher=gallup.com|access-date=24 August 2014|ref=3 December 2002|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140826161152/http://www.gallup.com/poll/7333/jihad-holy-war-internal-spiritual-struggle.aspx|archive-date=26 August 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> Other common meanings of "''jihad''" in the Muslim world include "a commitment to hard work", "promoting peace", and "living the principles of Islam".<ref name="gallop"/><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Esposito |first1=John L. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=9NxDCwAAQBAJ}}|title=Who Speaks For Islam?: What a Billion Muslims Really Think |last2=Mogahed |first2=Dalia |date=2007 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1-59562-017-0 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|20ff}} The terminology was also applied to the fight for ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Al-Batal|first=Mahmoud|author2=Kristen Brustad |author3=Abbas Al-Tonsi |title=Al-Kitaab fii Ta<sup>c</sup>llum al-<sup>c</sup>Arabiyya, Part II|edition=2|year=2006|publisher=]|location=Washington, DC|language=ar, en|isbn=978-1589010963|chapter=6 "من رائدات الحركة النسائية العربية" (One of the Pioneers of the Arabic Feminist Movement)|quote=To struggle or exert oneself for a cause........جاهََدَ، يجاهِد، الجهاد}}</ref>

===Other struggles===
Shia Muslim scholar ] stated, "The goal of true ''jihad'' is to attain a harmony between Islam (submission), iman (faith), and ihsan (righteous living)." ''Jihad'' is a process encompassing both individual and ], this is called ''jihad fi sabil Allah'' ("struggle in the way of God"), and can be undertaken following the Qur'an (''jihad bi-al-qur'an'').<ref name="Ayoud">{{cite book |last1=Ayoub |first1=Mahmoud M. |title=Islam: Faith and History |date=2013 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1-78074-452-0 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Lhy9DwAAQBAJ|page=57}}|access-date=13 September 2020 |language=en |page=57 |author-link=Mahmoud M. Ayoub}}</ref> According to Ayoud the greatest ''jihad'' is the struggle of every Muslim against social, moral, and political evils. However, depending on social and political circumstances, ''jihad'' may be regarded as a sixth fundamental obligation ('']'') incumbent on the entire Muslim community ('']'') when their integrity is in danger, in this case ''jihad'' becomes an "absolute obligation" (''fard 'ayn''), or when social and religious reform is gravely hampered. Otherwise it is a "limited obligation" (''fard kifayah''), incumbent upon those who are directly involved. These rules apply to armed struggle or "''jihad'' of the sword".<ref name="Ayoud"/>

In modern times, Pakistani scholar and professor ] used the term to describe the struggle to establish a "just moral-social order",<ref name=FR09/>{{rp|63–64}} while President ] of ] used it to describe the struggle for economic development in that country.<ref name=Peters-jihad/>{{rp|116–17}}

According to the ], a third meaning of ''jihad'' is the struggle to build a good society.<ref name="BBCjihad">{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/beliefs/jihad_1.shtml|title=Jihad|access-date=20 February 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426225745/http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/beliefs/jihad_1.shtml|archive-date=26 April 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> In a commentary of the ''hadith'' ], entitled al-Minhaj, the ] scholar ] stated, "one of the collective duties of the community as a whole (''fard kifaya'') is to lodge a valid protest, to solve problems of religion, to have knowledge of Divine Law, to command what is right and forbid wrong conduct".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sunnah.org/fiqh/jihad_judicial_ruling.htm|title=Jihad – A Misunderstood Concept from Islam|access-date=16 August 2006|author=Shaykh Hisham Kabbani|author2=Shaykh Seraj Hendricks|author3=Shaykh Ahmad Hendricks|work=The Muslim Magazine|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060717071555/http://www.sunnah.org/fiqh/jihad_judicial_ruling.htm|archive-date=17 July 2006|url-status=live}}</ref>

Scholar Natana J. DeLong-Bas lists a number of types of "''jihad''" that have been proposed by Muslims:
* educational ''jihad'' (''jihad al-tarbiyyah'');
* missionary ''jihad'' or calling the people to Islam (''jihad al-da'wah'')<ref name=DeLong-Bas2004/>{{rp| }}

Other "types" mentioned include:
* "Intellectual" ''jihad'' (similar to missionary ''jihad'').<ref name=whyislam/>
* "Economic" ''jihad'' (doing good involving money such as spending within one's means, helping the "poor and the downtrodden")<ref name="whyislam">{{cite web|title=Why does Islam have the concept of ''Jihad'' or Holy War, Which Some Use to Justify VIolence or Terrorism|url=http://www.whyislam.org/jihad-2/jihad-faqs/islamic-concept-of-jihad-holy-war/|publisher=whyislam.org|access-date=26 August 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140916012323/http://www.whyislam.org/jihad-2/jihad-faqs/islamic-concept-of-jihad-holy-war/|archive-date=16 September 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> Bourguiba used ''jihad'' to describe the struggle for economic development.<ref name="Streusand-greater"/> Iran has a ].<ref name="Jalal 2009"/>{{rp|240}}
* ''Jihad Al-Nikah,'' or ], "refers to women joining the ''jihad'' by offering sex to fighters to boost their morale".<ref name="strait">{{cite news|title=Malaysian women offer their bodies to ISIS militants in 'sexual jihad'; Najib slams Islamic radicals|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/news/asia/south-east-asia/story/malaysian-women-offer-their-bodies-isis-militants-sexual-jihad-repor#sthash.jdPWWEDG.dpuf|access-date=27 August 2014|work=Straits Times|date=27 August 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140830093901/http://www.straitstimes.com/news/asia/south-east-asia/story/malaysian-women-offer-their-bodies-isis-militants-sexual-jihad-repor#sthash.jdPWWEDG.dpuf|archive-date=30 August 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> The term originated from a ''fatwa'' believed to have been fabricated by the Syrian government to discredit its opponents, and the prevalence of this phenomenon has been disputed.<ref>{{cite news|title=Sex Jihad and Other Lies: Assad's Elaborate Disinformation Campaign|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/assad-regime-wages-pr-campaign-to-discredit-rebels-a-926479.html|work=Der Spiegel|first=Christoph |last=Reuter|date=7 October 2013|access-date=16 January 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161229195523/http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/assad-regime-wages-pr-campaign-to-discredit-rebels-a-926479.html|archive-date=29 December 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first1=Hilmi M.|last1=Zawati |author1-link=Hilmi M. Zawati|last2=Chair of the Center for Justice and Accountability|author2-link=Center for Justice and Accountability|title=Sectarian War in Syria Introduced New Gender-Based Crimes|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hilmi-m-zawati/sectarian-war-in-syria-in_b_9236606.html|work=Huffington Post|date=16 February 2016|access-date=16 January 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161231090546/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hilmi-m-zawati/sectarian-war-in-syria-in_b_9236606.html|archive-date=31 December 2016|url-status=live }}</ref>

==== Usage by some non-Muslims ====
* The ] used various ''ad hoc'' definitions of ''jihad'' in indictments of individuals involved in terrorist activities:
** "As used in this First Superseding Indictment, ''jihad'' is the Arabic word meaning 'holy war'. In this context, ''jihad'' refers to the use of violence, including paramilitary action against persons, governments deemed to be enemies of the fundamentalist version of Islam."<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.milnet.com/2nd-indictment-hayat-dist-court.pdf |title=Hamid and Umer Hayat 2nd-indictment California |date=22 September 2005 |via=Milnet.com |access-date=24 November 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051227172402/http://www.milnet.com/2nd-indictment-hayat-dist-court.pdf |archive-date=27 December 2005 |url-status=usurped }}</ref>
** "As used in this Superseding Indictment, 'violent ''jihad''' or 'jihad' include planning, preparing for, and engaging in, acts of physical violence, including murder, maiming, kidnapping, and hostage-taking."<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/padilla/uspad111705ind.pdf |title=José Padilla and others Florida indictment |via=Findlaw.com |date=17 November 2005 |access-date=24 November 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051125090748/http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/padilla/uspad111705ind.pdf |archive-date=25 November 2005 |url-status=dead }}</ref> in the indictment against several individuals including ].
* ]: "Fighting and warfare might sometimes be necessary, but it was only a minor part of the whole ''jihad'' or struggle".<ref name="Robinson">{{cite web|url=http://www.religioustolerance.org/isl_jihad.htm|title=The Concept of ''Jihad'' ("Struggle") in Islam|access-date=16 August 2006|author=B.A. Robinson|date=28 March 2003|publisher=Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance}}</ref>
* ]: "''Jihad'' is a propagandistic device which, as need be, resorts to armed struggle—two ingredients common to many ideological movements".<ref name=MR21/>{{rp|351}}
* ] used the term ''jihad'' to point out the resistant movement by fundamentalist ethnic groups who want to protect their traditions, heritage and identity from globalization (which he refers to as ']').<ref name=BB92/>{{rp|53–65 }}

===Other groups===

====Ahmadiyya====
{{Main|Ahmadiyya view on Jihad}}

In ] Islam, ''jihad'' is primarily one's personal inner struggle and should not be used violently for political motives. Violence is only to be used to protect religion and one's own life in extreme situations of persecution.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2010-10-20a.284.0|title=Ahmadiyya Community, Westminster Hall Debate|publisher=TheyWorkForYou.com|access-date=28 October 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101026214828/http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2010-10-20a.284.0|archive-date=26 October 2010|url-status=live}}</ref>

====Quranist====
] do not believe that the word ''jihad'' means holy war. They believe it means to struggle, or to strive. They believe it can incorporate both military and non-military aspects. When it refers to the military aspect, it is understood primarily to be defensive warfare.<ref>Dr. Aisha Y. Musa, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130426024807/http://iiit.org/Research/ScholarsSummerInstitute/TableofContents/TowardsaQuranicallyBasedArticulation/tabid/242/Default.aspx |date=26 April 2013 }}, International Institute of Islamic Thought. Retrieved 5 May 2013</ref><ref>Caner Taslaman, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703214912/http://www.canertaslaman.com/2011/11/the-rhetoric-of-%E2%80%9Cterror%E2%80%99%E2%80%99-and-the-rhetoric-of-%E2%80%9Cjihad%E2%80%9D-a-philosophical-and-theological-evaluation/ |date=3 July 2013 }}, canertaslaman.com. Retrieved 28 April 2013</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]: The Rise of the Politics of Fear


==Notes==
== External links ==
{{notelist}}
* (IslamOnline)
==References==
* (IslamOnline)
=== Citations ===
* (IslamOnline)
{{Reflist|refs=
* (IslamOnline)
<ref name=Banna78>{{Cite book |last=Bannā |first=Ḥasan al- |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=OyQ9AAAACAAJ}} |title=Five Tracts of Hasan Al-Banna (1906-1949): A Selection from the Majmu'at at Rasail Al-Iman Al-Shahid Hasan Al-Banna |date=1978 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-608-15367-4 |language=en|translator-first=Charles |translator-last=Wendell}}</ref>
* (IslamOnline)
<ref name=BB92>{{Cite book |last=Barber |first=Benjamin |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=E7gZ-8wtQAkC}}|title=Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism's Challenge to Democracy |date=2010-04-21 |publisher=Random House Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-307-87444-3 |language=en}}</ref>
* (IslamOnline)
<ref name=Cook05>{{Cite book |last=Cook |first=David |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=s7EwDwAAQBAJ}}
* (TheTrueReligion.org)
|title=Understanding Jihad |isbn=978-0-520-24448-1 |language=en |author-link=David Cook (historian) |publisher=] |year=2015 |edition=2nd |location=] |pages=93–127 |chapter=Radical Islam and Contemporary ''Jihad'' Theory |jstor=10.1525/j.ctv1xxt55.10 |lccn=2015010201 |chapter-url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=SqE2DwAAQBAJ|page=93}}|orig-date=2005}}</ref>
* (Yahoodi.com)
<ref name=DeLong-Bas2004>{{cite book
* (].org)
| last = DeLong-Bas
| first = Natana J.
| author-link = Natana J. DeLong-Bas
| title = Wahhabi Islam: From Revival and Reform to Global ''Jihad''
| url = https://archive.org/details/wahhabiislamfrom0000delo
| url-access = registration
| publisher = ]
| year = 2004
| location = New York
| edition = First
| isbn = 978-0195169911
}}</ref>
<ref name=JLE02>{{Cite book |last=Esposito |first=John L. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=GAIMtgEACAAJ}} |title=Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam |date=2002 |publisher=Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs |language=en}}</ref>
<ref name=FR09>{{Cite book |last=Rahman |first=Fazlur |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=iCXWnDIaxsIC}}|title=Major Themes of the Qur'an: Second Edition |date=2009-06-15 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-70286-5 |language=en}}</ref>
<ref name="Gerges">{{cite book
| last = Gerges
| first = Fawaz A.
| title = The far enemy: why ''Jihad'' went global
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
| year = 2009
| location = New York
| edition = reprint 2010
| url = {{google books|plainurl=y|id=TgYo05-2F7EC|page=29}}
| isbn = 978-0521519359
}}
</ref>
<ref name=hashmi>{{Cite book |last=Hashmi |first=Sohail H. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=1jcCwXo3CCgC}}|title=Just Wars, Holy Wars, and Jihads: Christian, Jewish, and Muslim Encounters and Exchanges |date=2012-07-03 |publisher=Oxford University Press, USA |isbn=978-0-19-975503-5 |language=en}}</ref>
<ref name=RF17>{{Cite journal |last1=Rabi |first1=Uzi |last2=Friedman |first2=Brandon |date=2017 |title=Weaponizing Sectarianism in Iraq and Syria |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0030438717300340 |journal=Orbis |language=en |volume=61 |issue=3 |pages=423–438 |doi=10.1016/j.orbis.2017.04.003}}</ref>
<ref name=MR21>{{Cite book |last=Rodinson |first=Maxime |authorlink=Maxime Rodinson|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=mFsbEAAAQBAJ}}|title=Muhammad |date=2021-03-02 |publisher=New York Review of Books |isbn=978-1-68137-492-5 |language=en}}</ref>
}}


=== Sources ===
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite book|first1=Ahmed|last1=Al-Dawoody|date=2011|title=The Islamic Law of War: Justifications and Regulations|url=https://archive.org/details/islamiclawwarjus00alda|url-access=limited|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-0230111608}}
* "Djihad" in: '']''
* {{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Jihad |volume=15 |page=415 |short=1}}
* {{cite book
| last = ibn Abd al-Wahhab
| first = Muhammad
| author-link = Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab
| title = Kitab al-Tawhid, volume I of Mu'allafat al-Shaykh al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahahb
| publisher = Jamiat al-Imam MUhammad bin Saudi al-Islamiyah
| year = 1398h
| location = Riyad
| edition=First
|ref=IAWKT}}
* {{cite book|last1=Khadduri|first1=Majid|title=War and Peace in the Law of Islam|date=1955|publisher=Johns Hopkins Press|location=Baltimore|access-date=26 October 2015|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=UHWd6gLZsFIC}}}}
* {{Cite book|title = War and Peace in Islam: The Uses and Abuses of ''Jihad''|last1 = H.R.H. Prince|first1 = Ghazi Muhammad|publisher = The Islamic Texts Society Cambridge|year = 2013|isbn = 978-1903682838|last2 = Ibrahim|first2 = Kalin|author3-link = Mohammad Hashim Kamali|last3 = Mohammad Hashim|first3 = Kamali|url = http://rissc.jo/books/War-Peace-Islam.pdf|ref = CITEREFGhaziKalinKamali2013|author1-link = Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad|access-date = 5 May 2016|archive-date = 9 July 2017|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170709055514/http://rissc.jo/books/War-Peace-Islam.pdf|url-status = dead}}
* {{cite book|author=]|title=''Islam and Colonialism: The Doctrine of ''Jihad'' in Modern History''|publisher=]|year=2015|ref={{sfnRef|Peters|2015}}}}
*{{cite book|last1=Bonner|first1=Michael|title=Jihad in Islamic History: Doctrines and Practice|date=2006|publisher=]|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Qxq7eykoJgoC}}|isbn=978-1400827381}}
* {{cite encyclopedia|last1=Madigan|first1=Daniel|date=2001|title=Book|editor1-last=McAuliffe|editor1-first=Jane Dammen|editor1-link=Jane Dammen McAuliffe|encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān|doi=10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00027}}
* {{cite encyclopedia|last1=Sharon|first1=Moshe|author1-link=Moshe Sharon|date=2004|title=People of the Book|editor1-last=McAuliffe|editor1-first=Jane Dammen|editor1-link=Jane Dammen McAuliffe|encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān|doi=10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQSIM_00319}}
* {{cite encyclopedia|last1=Vajda|first1=Georges|author1-link=Georges Vajda|date=1960–2007|title=Ahl al-Kitāb|editor1-last=Bearman|editor1-first=P.|editor1-link=Peri Bearman|editor2-last=Bianquis|editor2-first=Th.|editor2-link=Thierry Bianquis|editor3-last=Bosworth|editor3-first=C.E.|editor3-link=Clifford Edmund Bosworth|editor4-last=van Donzel|editor4-first=E.|editor4-link=Emeri Johannes van Donzel|editor5-last=Heinrichs|editor5-first=W.P.|editor5-link=Wolfhart Heinrichs|encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition|doi=10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_0383}}
{{refend}}


==Further reading==
{{Div col|colwidth=30em}}
* {{cite book|authorlink=Biancamaria Scarcia Amoretti |first=Biancamaria Scarcia |last=Amoretti |title=Tolleranza e guerra santa nell'Islam |publisher=Scuola aperta/Sansoni |location=Firenze|year= 1974}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Dajani-Shakeel |first1=Hadia |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=zC0sAQAAIAAJ}} |title=The Jihād and Its Times |last2=Messier |first2=Ronald A. |last3=Ehrenkreutz |first3=Andrew S. |date=1991 |publisher=Center for Near Eastern and North African Studies, University of Michigan |isbn=978-0-932098-24-5 |language=en}}
* {{Cite book |editor-last=DeLong-Bas|editor-first=Natana |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=a-w2ooBibjQC}}|title=Jihad: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide |date=2010-05-01 |publisher=Oxford University Press, USA |isbn=978-0-19-980400-9 |language=en}}
* {{Cite book |last=Firestone |first=Reuven |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=FXc8DwAAQBAJ}} |title=Jihād: The Origin of Holy War in Islam |date=1999 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-512580-1 |language=en|authorlink=Reuven Firestone}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hashmi |first=Sohail H. |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=9g8WDAAAQBAJ}}|title=Just Wars, Holy Wars, and Jihads: Christian, Jewish, and Muslim Encounters and Exchanges |date=2012-08-16 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-975504-2 |language=en}}* ]: ''Just War and Jihad'' New York: Greenwood Press, 1991.
* {{cite book |title=Salafi-Jihadism: The History of an Idea |first=Shiraz |last=Maher |year=2016 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780190651121 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=MXsQDgAAQBAJ}}|authorlink=Shiraz Maher}}
* {{Cite book |last=Majumadāra |first=Suhāsa |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=jkHYAAAAMAAJ}}|title=Jihād: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War |date=1994 |publisher=Voice of India |isbn=978-81-85990-19-4 |language=en}}
* {{cite book|last=Malik|first=S. K.|year=1986|title=The Qur'anic Concept of War|url=http://wolfpangloss.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/malik-quranic-concept-of-war.pdf|publisher=Himalayan Books|isbn=978-8170020202}}
* {{Cite journal |title=A Hanafi treatise on rebellion and ğihād in the Ottoman age (XVII c.) |url=https://www.academia.edu/9173217 |access-date=2024-10-08 |journal=Eurasian Studies|volume=II|issue=2 |date=December 2003|pages=215–26}}
*{{cite journal|last=McGregor|first=A. |date=2006|title=Jihad and the Rifle Alone: 'Abdullah 'Azzam and the Islamist Revolution |journal=Journal of Conflict Studies|volume=23|issue=2|url=https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/JCS/article/view/219}}
* Alfred Morabia, ''Le Ğihâd dans l'Islâm médiéval. "Le combat sacré" des origines au XIIe siècle'', Albin Michel, Paris 1993
* {{cite journal|year=2009|author=Masood Ashraf Raja|title=Jihad in Islam: Colonial Encounter, the Neoliberal Order, and the Muslim Subject of Resistance|journal=The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences|volume=26|issue=4|page=25|author-link=Masood Ashraf Raja}}
*{{cite journal|last=Rothman|first=Norman C. |date=2018|title=Jihad: Peaceful Applications for Society and the Individual |journal=Comparative Civilizations Review |volume= 79 |issue= 7|url= https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol79/iss79/7}}
{{div col end}}

== External links ==
* {{commonscat-inline}}
* {{Wiktionary-inline}}
* {{Wikiquote-inline}}
* {{Wikiversity-inline}}


{{Authority control}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]


] ]
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 10:16, 14 December 2024

Struggle of a religious kind in Islam For other uses, see Jihad (disambiguation).

Part of a series on
Islamic jurisprudence
(fiqh)
Ritual
Shahada
Salah
Sawm
Zakat
Hajj
Political
Family
Marriage
Sexual
Criminal
Etiquette
Economic
History
Zakat
Banking
Inheritance
Hygiene
Dietary
Military
Islamic studies
Part of a series on
Jihadism
Practices and concepts
Islamic fundamentalism
Notable jihadist organisations
Jihadism in Africa
Jihadism in Asia
Jihadism in the West
Islam portal

Jihad (/dʒɪˈhɑːd/; Arabic: جِهَاد, romanizedjihād [dʒiˈhaːd]) is an Arabic word that means "exerting", "striving", or "struggling", particularly with a praiseworthy aim. In an Islamic context, it encompasses almost any effort to make personal and social life conform with God's guidance, such as an internal struggle against evil in oneself, efforts to build a good Muslim community (ummah), and struggle to defend Islam. Literally meaning 'struggle', the term is most frequently associated with warfare.

Jihad is classified into inner ("greater") jihad, which involves a struggle against one's own passions and impulses, and outer ("lesser") jihad, which is further subdivided into jihad of the pen/tongue (debate or persuasion) and jihad of the sword (warfare). Much of Muslim opinion considers inner jihad to have primacy over outer jihad, although many Western scholars disagree. The analysis of a large survey from 2002 reveals considerable nuance in the conceptions of jihad held by Muslims around the world, ranging from righteous living and promoting peace to fighting against the opponents of Islam.

The word jihad appears frequently in the Qur'an referring to both religious and spiritual struggle and to war and physical struggle, often in the idiomatic expression "striving in the path of God (al-jihad fi sabil Allah)", conveying a sense of self-exertion. In the hadiths, jihad refers predominantly to warfare. Greater jihad refers to spiritual and moral struggle, and has traditionally been emphasized in Sufi and Ahmadiyya circles. The sense of jihad as armed resistance was first used in the context of persecution faced by Muslims when Muhammad was at Mecca, when the community had two choices: further emigration (hijrah) or war. The Qur'an justifies war in self-defense or in response to aggression towards other Muslims, however the sword verses have historically been interpreted to renounce other verses and justify offensive war against unbelievers, forcibly converting polytheistic pagans during the early Muslim conquests. A set of rules pertaining to jihad were developed, including prohibitions on harming those who are not engaged in combat, on killing animals such as horses, and on unnecessary destruction of enemy property.

In the twentieth century, the notion of jihad lost its jurisprudential relevance and instead gave rise to ideological and political discourse. While modernist Islamic scholars have emphasized the defensive and non-military aspects of jihad, some Islamists have advanced aggressive interpretations that go beyond the classical texts. The term has gained additional attention in recent decades through its use by various insurgent Islamic extremist, militant Islamist, and terrorist individuals and organizations. Today, the word jihad is often used without religious connotations, like the English crusade.

Etymology and literary origins

The term jihad is derived from the Arabic root jahada, meaning "to exert strength and effort, to use all means in order to accomplish a task". In its expanded sense, it can be fighting the enemies of Islam, as well as adhering to religious teachings, enjoining good and forbidding evil. The peaceful sense of "efforts towards the moral uplift of society or towards the spread of Islam" can be known as "jihad of the tongue" or "jihad of the pen", as opposed to "jihad of the sword". It is used as a term in fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) mostly in the latter sense, while in Sufism mostly in the sense of fighting the nafs al-ammara, which is the psychological state of succumbing to one's own desires. Spiritual and moral jihad is generally emphasized in pious and mystical circles.

The Hans Wehr Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic defines the term as "fight, battle; jihad, holy war (against the infidels, as a religious duty)". However, given the range of meanings, it is incorrect to equate it simply with "holy war". The notion of jihad has its origins in the Islamic idea that the whole humankind will embrace Islam. In the Qur'an and in later Muslim usage, jihad is commonly followed by the expression fi sabil illah, "in the path of God." Muhammad Abdel-Haleem stated that it indicates "the way of truth and justice, including all the teachings it gives on the justifications and the conditions for the conduct of war and peace."

In Modern Standard Arabic, the term jihad is used for a struggle for causes, both religious and secular. It is sometimes used without religious connotation, with a meaning similar to the English word "crusade" (as in "a crusade against drugs"). Jihad is used commonly in Arabic countries, in the neutral sense of "a struggle for a noble cause", as a unisex name given to children. Nonetheless, jihad is usually used in the religious sense and its beginnings trace to the Qur'an and the words and actions of Muhammad.

Quran

Jihad is mentioned in four places in the Qur'an as a noun, while its derived verb is used in twenty-four places. Mujahid, the active participle meaning "jihadist", is mentioned in two verses. In some of these mentions (see At-Tawbah 9/41, 44, 81, 86), it is understood that the word jihad directly refers to war, and in others, jihad is used in the sense of "the effort to live in accordance with Allah's will". Qur'anic exhortations to jihad have been interpreted by Islamic scholars both in the combative and non-combative sense. Ahmed al-Dawoody wrote that there seventeen references to or derivatives of jihad occur altogether forty-one times in eleven Meccan texts and thirty Medinan ones, with 28 mentions related to religious belief or spiritual struggle and 13 mentions related to warfare or physical struggle.

Hadith

There are also many hadiths (records of the teachings, deeds and sayings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad) about jihad, typically under the headings of kitab al-jihad (book of jihad) or faza'il al-jihad (virtues of jihad) in hadith collections or as the subject of independent works. Of the 199 hadith references to jihad in the Bukhari collection of hadith, all assume that jihad means warfare.

Among reported sayings of Muhammad involving jihad are:

The best Jihad is the word of Justice in front of the oppressive sultan.

— cited by Ibn Nuhaas and narrated by Ibn Habbaan

and

The Messenger of Allah was asked about the best jihad. He said: "The best jihad is the one in which your horse is slain and your blood is spilled."

— cited by Ibn Nuhaas and narrated by Ibn Habbaan

Ibn Nuhaas cited a hadith from Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, where Muhammad stated that the highest kind jihad is "The person who is killed whilst spilling the last of his blood" (Ahmed 4/144). Muhammad also said, “I cannot find anything” as meritorious as jihad; he further likened jihad to “praying ceaselessly and fasting continuously”. Muhammad said that “if it were not a hardship for the Muslims, I would never idle behind from a raiding party going out to fight in the path of Allah.... I love to raid in the path of Allah and be killed, to raid again and be killed, and to raid again and be killed”. Muhammad also said that "Lining up for battle in the path of Allah is worthier than 60 years of worship". Muhammad claimed that any Muslim who refused to fight in jihad “will be tortured like no other sinful human” in hell with confirmation from Qur'an 8:15-16. In another hadith Muhammad said, “the sword wipes away all sins” and “being killed in the path of Allah washes away impurity”.

According to another hadith, supporting one's parents is an example of jihad. It has been reported that Muhammad considered performing hajj well to be the best jihad for Muslim women.

The hadith emphasize jihad as one of the means to Paradise. All sins (except debt) would be forgiven for the one who dies in it. Participation in jihad had to be voluntary and intention must be pure, for jihad is only waged for the sake of God not for material wealth. On the contrary, jihad required man to put both his life and wealth at risk. Jihad is ranked as one of the highest good deeds; according to one hadith it is the third-best deed after prayer and being good to one's parents. One hadith exempts military jihad on men whose parents are alive, as serving one's parents is considered a superior jihad.

Greater and lesser jihad

Tradition distinguishes the "greater jihad" (inner struggle against sinful behavior) from the "lesser jihad" (military sense). Early Islamic thought considered non-violent interpretations of jihad, especially for those Muslims who could not partake in warfare in distant lands. Most classical writings use the term "jihad" in the military sense. The tradition differentiating between the "greater and lesser jihad" is not included in any of the authoritative compilations of Hadith. In consequence, some Islamists dismiss it as not authentic.

The most commonly cited hadith for "greater jihad" is:

A number of fighters came to Muhammad and he said "You have come from the 'lesser jihad' to the 'greater jihad'." The fighters asked "what is the greater jihad?" Muhammad replied, "It is the struggle against one's passions."

This passage was cited in The History of Baghdad by Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, an 11th-century Islamic scholar. This reference gave rise to the practice of distinguishing "greater" and "lesser" jihad. Islamic scholars such as Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani consider the hadith to have a weak chain of transmission.

The concept has had "enormous influence" in Islamic mysticism (Sufism).

Ibn Hazm lists four kinds of jihad fi sabilillah (struggle in the cause of God):

  • Jihad of the heart (jihad bil qalb/nafs) is concerned with combatting the devil and in the attempt to escape his persuasion to evil. This type of jihad was regarded as the greater jihad (al-jihad al-akbar).
  • Jihad by the tongue (jihad bil lisan) (also jihad by the word, jihad al-qalam) is concerned with speaking the truth and spreading the word of Islam with one's tongue.
  • Jihad by the hand (jihad bil yad) refers to choosing to do what is right and to combat injustice and what is wrong with action.
  • Jihad by the sword (jihad bis saif) refers to qital fi sabilillah (armed fighting in the way of God, or holy war), the most common usage by Salafi Muslims and offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood.

A related hadith tradition that has "found its way into popular Muslim literature", and which has been said to "embody the Muslim mindset" of the Islamic Golden Age (the period from the mid-8th century to mid-13th century following the relocation of the Abbasid capital from Damascus to Baghdad), is:

"The ink of the scholar is more holy than the blood of the martyr."

The belief in the veracity of this hadith was a contributing factor in the efforts by successive caliphs to subsidize translations of "Greek, Hebrew and Syriac science and philosophy texts", and the saying continues to be heavily emphasised in certain Islamic traditions advocating intellectualism over violence, for example in Timbuktu, where it is central to one of two key lessons in the work Tuhfat al-fudala by 16th-century Berber scholar Ahmed Baba. In general, however, fewer people today are aware of the hadith, which suffers from "a general lack of knowledge", according to Akbar Ahmed.

According to classical Islamic scholars like Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, jihad is against four types of enemies: the lower self (nafs), Satan, the unbelievers, and the hypocrites. The first two types of jihad are purely peaceful spiritual struggles. According to Ibn Qayyim, "Jihad against the lower self precedes jihad against external enemies." Confirming the central importance of the spiritual aspect of jihad, Ibn Taymiyyah wrote:

"Jihad against the lower self and whims is the foundation of jihad against the unbelievers and hypocrites, for a Muslim cannot wage jihad against them unless he has waged jihad against himself and his desires first, before he goes out against them."

Engaging in the greater jihad does not preclude engaging in the lesser jihad. Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani recommended his followers to pursue both the greater and the lesser jihads.

At least one important contemporary Twelver Shia figure, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the Iranian Revolution and the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, wrote a treatise on the "Greater Jihad" (i.e., internal/personal struggle against sin).

Robert W. Schaefer discussed jihad and gazavat in the context of the Caucasus: "Gazavat was the jihad of its day. Gazavat meant putting yourself on the right path (what Muslims refer to as the lesser jihad) as well as expelling the invader (what is referred to as greater jihad)."

Defensive and offensive lesser jihad

Classical scholars considered various justifications for jihad, including waging it defensively vs offensively. Scholarly opinions carried significant weight with Muslim leaders. Scholars paid more attention to conduct of war (jus in bello) than justification of war (jus ad bellum). The decision of when to wage war was often viewed as a political decision best left to political authorities.

Two justifications for jihad were given: defensive war against external aggression, or an offensive or preemptive attack against an enemy state. According to the majority of jurists, the casus belli (justifications for war) are restricted to aggression against Muslims, and fitnapersecution of Muslims because of their religious belief. They hold that unbelief in itself is not a justification for war. These jurists therefore maintain that only combatants are to be fought; noncombatants such as women, children, clergy, the aged, the insane, farmers, serfs, the blind, and so on are not to be killed in war. Thus, the Hanafī Ibn Najīm stated: "the reason for jihād in our view is kawnuhum harbā ‛alaynā ." The Hanafī jurists al-Shaybānī state that "although unbelief in God is one of the greatest sins, it is between the individual and his God the Almighty and the punishment for this sin is to be postponed to the dār al-jazā’, (the abode of reckoning, the Hereafter)." Al-Sarakhsī says something similar. Offensive jihad involved forays into enemy territory either for conquest, thus enlarging the Muslim political order, or to dissuade the enemy from attacking Muslim lands.

Shia and Sunni theories of jihad are similar, except that Shias consider offensive jihad to be valid only under the leadership of the Mahdi, who is currently believed to be in occultation but will return. However, defensive jihad is permissible in Shia Islam before the Mahdi's return. In fact, Shia scholars emphasized it was a religious duty for Shia to defend all Muslims (including Sunni Muslims) from outside invaders.

Rules of warfare

Main article: Rules of war in Islam

They might be our enemies but they are human beings. They consist of civil population comprising of women and children; how can one kill, loot and plunder them?

— Ali ibn Abi Talib, Najh Al-Balagha

Rules prohibit attacking or molesting non-combatants, including women, children under the age of puberty, elderly men, people with disabilities and those who are sick. Diplomats, merchants and peasants are similarly immune from being attacked. Monks are presumed to be non-combatants and thus have immunity; places of worship should not be attacked. Even if the enemy disregarded the immunity of noncombatants, Muslims could not respond in kind. However, these categories lose their immunity should they participate in fighting, planning, or supplying the enemy. Some jurists argued that immunity was more related to noncombatant status than being in a certain demographic class. For example, Muhaqqiq al-Hilli opined that only old men are only immune from being killed if they neither fight, nor take a role in military decision making.

Up until the Crusades, Muslim jurists disallowed the use of mangonels because the weapon killed indiscriminately with the potential of harming noncombatants. During the Crusades this ruling was reversed out of military need. Jurists grappled with the question of attacking an enemy that used women, children or Muslims as human shields. Most jurists held that it was permissible to attack the enemy in cases of military necessity, but steps should be taken to direct the attack towards combatants to avoid the human shield. Abu Hanifa argued that if Muslims stopped combat for fear of killing noncombatants, then such a rule would make fighting impossible, as every city had civilians. Mutilating the enemy dead is prohibited.

Two rulings on destruction of enemy property conflict. In one military battle, Prophet Muhammad ordered the destruction of an enemy's palm trees as a means of ending a siege without bloodshed. By contrast, Abu Bakr prohibited destruction of trees, buildings and livestock. Most jurists did not allow unnecessary destruction of enemy property, but allowed it in cases of military necessity, such as destroying buildings in which the enemy is taking shelter. Some jurists allowed destruction if it would weaken the enemy or win the war. Many jurists cautioned against "unnecessary devastation", not just out of humanitarian concerns, but practical ones: it is more useful to capture an enemy's property than to destroy it. Islamic scholars prohibited killing animals, unless due to military necessity (such as killing horses in battle). This is because, unlike property, animals feel pain.

History

See also: List of expeditions of Muhammad

In pre-Islamic Arabia, Bedouins raided enemy tribes and settlements to collect spoils. According to some scholars (such as James Turner Johnson), while Islamic leaders "instilled into the hearts of the warriors the belief" in jihad "holy war" and ghaza (raids), the "fundamental structure" of this Bedouin warfare "remained, ... raiding to collect booty". According to Jonathan Berkey, the Qur'an's statements in support of jihad may have originally been directed against Muhammad's local enemies, the pagans of Mecca or the Jews of Medina, but these same statements could be redirected once new enemies appeared. According to scholar Majid Khadduri, it was the shift in focus to the conquest and spoils collecting of non-Bedouin unbelievers and away from traditional inter-Bedouin tribal raids, that may have made it possible for Islam to expand and to avoid self-destruction.

Classical

According to Al-Baqara 256 "there is no compulsion in religion". The primary aim of jihad as warfare is not the conversion of non-Muslims to Islam by force, but rather the expansion and defense of the Islamic state. There could be truces before this was achieved, but no permanent peace. One who died "on the path of God" was a martyr (shahid), whose sins were remitted and who secured "immediate entry to paradise".

According with Bernard Lewis, "from an early date Muslim law laid down" jihad in the military sense as "one of the principal obligations" of both "the head of the Muslim state", who declared jihad, and the Muslim community. According to legal historian Sadakat Kadri, Islamic jurists first developed classical doctrine of jihad "towards the end of the eighth century", using the doctrine of naskh (that God gradually improved His revelations over the course of Muhammed's mission). They subordinated Qur'anic verses emphasizing harmony to the more "confrontational" verses of Muhammad's later years and linked verses on exertion (jihad) to those of fighting (qital). Muslims jurists of the eighth century divided the world into three divisions, dar al-Islam/dar al-‛adl/dar al-salam (house of Islam/house of justice/house of peace), dar al-harb/dar al-jawr (house of war/house of injustice, oppression), and dar al-sulh/dar al-‛ahd/dār al-muwada‛ah (house of peace/house of covenant/house of reconciliation). The eighth century jurist Sufyan al-Thawri (d. 778) headed what Khadduri called a pacifist school, which maintained that jihad was only a defensive war. He stated that the jurists who held this position, among whom he refers to Hanafi jurists al-Awza‛i (d. 774) and Malik ibn Anas (d. 795), and other early jurists, "stressed that tolerance should be shown unbelievers, especially scripturaries and advised the Imam to prosecute war only when the inhabitants of the dar al-harb came into conflict with Islam." The duty of Jihad was a collective one (fard al-kifaya). It was to be directed only by the caliph who might delay it when convenient, negotiating truces for up to ten years at a time. Within classical Islamic jurisprudence, during the first few centuries after the prophet's death, jihad consisted of wars against unbelievers, apostated, and was the only form of permissible warfare. Bernard Lewis stated that fighting rebels and bandits was legitimate, though not a form of jihad, and that while the classical perception and presentation of jihad was warfare in the field against a foreign enemy, internal jihad "against an infidel renegade, or otherwise illegitimate regime was not unknown.")

However, some argue martyrdom is never automatic, because it is God's province to judge who is worthy of that designation.

Classical manuals of Islamic jurisprudence often contained a section called Book of Jihad, with rules governing the conduct of war covered at great length. Such rules include treatment of nonbelligerents, women, children (also cultivated or residential areas), and division of spoils. Such rules offered protection for civilians. Spoils include Ghanimah (spoils obtained by actual fighting), and fai (obtained without fighting i.e. when the enemy surrenders or flees).

The first documentation of the law of jihad was written by 'Abd al-Rahman al-Awza'i and Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Shaybani. (It grew out of debates that surfaced following Muhammad's death.) Although some Islamic scholars have differed on the implementation of Jihad, the consensus amongst them is that jihad always includes armed struggle against persecution and oppression.

Both Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim asserted that Muhammad never initiated hostilities and that all the wars he engaged in were primarily defensive. He never forced non-Muslims to Islam and upheld the truces with non-Muslims so long as they did not violate them. Ibn Taymiyya's views on Jihad are explained in his treatise titled Qāʿidah mukhtaṣarah fī qitāl al-kuffār wa muhādanatuhum wa taḥrīm qatlahum li mujarrad kufrihim. (An abridged rule on fighting the unbelievers and making truces with them, and the prohibition of killing them merely because of their unbelief). According to Ibn Taymiyya, human blood is inviolable by default, except "by right of justice". Although Ibn Taymiyya authorised offensive Jihad ( Jihad al-Talab) against enemies who threaten Muslims or obstruct their citizens from freely accepting Islam, unbelief (Kufr) by itself is not a justification for violence, whether against individuals or stated. According to Ibn Taymīyah, jihad is a legitimate reaction to military aggression by unbelievers and not merely due to religious differences. Ibn Taymiyya wrote:

"As for the transgressor who does not fight, there are no texts in which Allah commands him to be fought. Rather, the unbelievers are only fought on the condition that they wage war, as is practiced by the majority of scholars and is evident in the Book and Sunnah."

As important as jihad was, it is not considered one of the "pillars of Islam". According to one scholar (Majid Khadduri, this is because the five pillars are individual obligations, but jihad is a "collective obligation" of the Muslim community meant to be carried out by the Islamic state. This was the belief of "all jurists, with almost no exception", but did not apply to defense of the Muslim community from a sudden attack, in which case jihad was an "individual obligation" of all believers, including women and children.

Scholars had previously claimed it was the responsibility of a centralized government to organize jihad. But this changed as the authority of the Abbasid caliph weakened. Al-Mawardi allowed local governors to wage jihad on the caliph's behalf. This decentralization of jihad became especially pressing after the Crusades. Ali ibn Tahir al-Sulami argued that all Muslims were responsible for waging wars of self-defense. Al-Sulami encouraged Muslim rulers from distant lands to assist Muslims who were under attack.

Classical Shia doctrine maintained defensive jihad was always permissible, but offensive jihad required the presence of the Imam. An exception to this, during medieval times, was when the first Fatimid caliph Abdallah al-Mahdi Billah claimed to be the representative of the Imam and claimed the right to launch offensive jihad.

After the Mongol invasions, Shia scholar Muhaqqiq al-Hilli claimed that defensive war was not just permissible but praiseworthy, even obligatory. If a Muslim could not take part in the defense then he should, at least, send material support. This remained the case even if the Muslims were ruled by an unjust ruler.

Early Muslim conquests

Main article: Early Muslim conquests
Age of the Caliphs   Expansion under Muhammad, 622–632/A.H. 1–11   Expansion during the Rashidun Caliphate, 632–661/A.H. 11–40   Expansion during the Umayyad Caliphate, 661–750/A.H. 40–129

In the early era that inspired classical Islam (Rashidun Caliphate) and lasted less than a century, jihad spread the realm of Islam to include millions of subjects, and an area extending "from the borders of India and China to the Pyrenees and the Atlantic". The role of religion in these early conquests is debated. Medieval Arabic authors claimed the conquests were commanded by God, and presented them as orderly and disciplined, under the command of the caliph. Many modern historians question whether hunger and desertification, rather than jihad, was a motivating force in the conquests. Historian William Montgomery Watt argued, "Most of the participants in the expeditions probably thought of nothing more than booty ... There was no thought of spreading the religion of Islam." Similarly, Edward J. Jurji argues that the motivations of the Arab conquests were certainly not "the propagation of Islam....Military advantage, economic desires, the attempt to strengthen the hand of the state and enhance its sovereignty...are some of the determining factors." Some recent explanations cite both material and religious causes in the conquests.

Post-classical usage

According to some authors, the more spiritual definitions of jihad developed sometime after the 150 years of jihad wars and Muslim territorial expansion, and particularly after the Mongol invaders sacked Baghdad and overthrew the Abbasid Caliphate. Historian Hamilton Gibb stated, "in the historic Community the concept of jihad had gradually weakened and at length it had been largely reinterpreted in terms of Sufi ethics." notes that "despite the theoretical importance of the idea of jihad in classical Islamic juristic thought", by the time of the Abbasids, the concept was no longer central to statecraft.

Rudolph Peters wrote that with the stagnation of Islamic expansionism, the concept of jihad became internalized as a moral or spiritual struggle. Earlier classical works on fiqh emphasized jihad as war for God's religion, Peters claimed. Later Islamic scholars like Ibn al-Amir al-San'ani, Muhammad Abduh, Rashid Rida, Ubaidullah Sindhi, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Shibli Nomani, etc. emphasized the defensive aspect of jihad, distinguishing between defensive jihad ( jihad al-daf) and offensive jihad (jihad al-talab or jihad of choice ). They refuted the notion of consensus that jihad al-talab was a communal obligation(fard kifaya). In support of this view, these scholars referred to the works of classical scholars such as Al-Jassas and Ibn Taymiyyah. According to Ibn Taymiyya, the reason for jihad against non-Muslims is not their disbelief, but the threat they pose to Muslims. Citing Ibn Taymiyya, scholars including Rashid Rida, Al San'ani, and Qaradawi argued that unbelievers need not be fought unless they pose a threat to Muslims. Thus, jihad is obligatory only as defensive warfare to respond to aggression or "perfidy" against the Muslim community, and that the "normal and desired state" between Islamic and non-Islamic territories was one of "peaceful coexistence". This was similar to the Western "Just war" concept. Similarly 18th-century scholar Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab defined jihad as a defensive military action to protect the Muslim community, and emphasized its defensive aspect in synchrony with later 20th century Islamic writers. Today, some Muslim authors only recognize as legitimate wars fought for the purpose of territorial defense as well as wars fought for the defense of religious freedom.

Ibn Taymiyyah's hallmark themes included the permissibility of overthrowing a ruler who is classified as an unbeliever due to a failure to adhere to Islamic law, the absolute division of the world into dar al-kufr and dar al-Islam, labeling anyone not adhering to one's particular interpretation of Islam as an unbeliever, and the call for warfare against Non-Muslims, particularly Jews and Christians.

Ibn Taymiyyah recognized "the possibility of a jihad against `heretical` and `deviant` Muslims within dar al-Islam. He identified as heretical and deviant Muslims anyone who propagated innovations (bida') contrary to the Qur'an and Sunna ... legitimated jihad against anyone who refused to abide by Islamic law or revolted against the true Muslim authorities." He used a broad definition of what constituted aggression or rebellion against Muslims, which would make jihad "not only permissible but necessary." Ibn Taymiyyah paid careful attention to the questions of martyrdom and the benefits of jihad: "It is in jihad that one can live and die in ultimate happiness, both in this world and in the Hereafter. Abandoning it means losing entirely or partially both kinds of happiness."

Bernard Lewis stated that while most Islamic theologians in the classical period (750–1258 CE) understood jihad to be a military endeavor, after Islamic conquest stagnated and the caliphate divided into smaller stated, "irresistible and permanent jihad came to an end". As jihad became unfeasible it was "postponed from historic to messianic time." Even when the Ottoman Empire carried on a new holy war of expansion in the seventeenth century, "the war was not universally pursued". They made no attempt to recover Spain or Sicily.

By the 1500s, it had become accepted that the permanent state of relations between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb was that of peace.

Shah Ismail of the Safavid dynasty tried to claim the right to wage offensive jihad, particularly against the Ottomans. However, Shia ulama did not permit that, maintaining the classical position that the true Imam could wage such a war. During the Qajar period, Shia ulama adopted the position that the Shah was responsible for national security. They authorized the Perso-Russian wars in the 19th century as jihad.

In the 18th century, the Durrani Empire under the reigns of Ahmad Shah Durrani and his son and successor, Timur Shah Durrani, had declared jihads against Sikh Misls in the Punjab region, often to consolidate territory and continue Afghan their region, efforts under Ahmad Shah failed, while Timur Shah had succeeded.

Colonialism and modernism

The Fulani jihad states of West Africa, c. 1830

When Europeans began to colonize the Muslim world, jihad was one of the first responses. Emir Abdelkader organized a jihad in Algeria against French domination, tapping into existing Sufi networks. Other wars were often declared to be jihad: the Senussi religious order declared jihad against Italian control of Libya in 1912, and the "Mahdi" in Sudan declared jihad against British and Egyptians in 1881.

Rashid Rida and Muhammad Abduh argued that peaceful coexistence should be the normal state between Muslim and non-Muslim stated, citing verses in the Qur'an that allowed war only in self-defense. However, this view left open jihad against colonialism, which was seen as an attack on Muslims.

Sayyid Ahmad Khan argued that jihad was limited to cases of oppression, and since the British Raj allowed freedom of religion, jihad against the British was unnecessary. Instead, Khan formulated jihad as recovering past Muslim scientific progress to modernize the Muslim world.

A concept that played a role in anti-colonial jihad (or lack thereof) was the belief in Mahdi. According to Islamic eschatology, a messianic figure named Mahdi will one day appear and restore justice on earth. This belief sometimes discouraged Muslims from conducting jihad, instead inducing them to wait. Such messages were circulated in Algeria to undermine Emir Abdelkader's jihad against the French. Alternatively, this belief could be a powerful mobilizing force when someone proclaimed to be the Mahdi. Mahdist rebellions happened in India (1810), Egypt (1865) and Sudan (1881).

Charging Mahdist army during the Battle of Omdurman in 1898

With the Islamic revival, a new "fundamentalist" movement arose, with different interpretations of Islam that increased emphasis on jihad. The Wahhabi movement that spread across the Arabian peninsula starting in the 18th century emphasized jihad as armed struggle. The Fula jihads in West Africa during the 18th and 19th centuries led to the establishment of various states, most notably the Sokoto Caliphate. None of these movements were victorious. The Sokoto Caliphate lasted for a century until it was conquered by the British and incorporated into Colonial Nigeria in 1903.

Ottoman Jihad in World War One

Main article: 1914 Ottoman jihad proclamation
Ottoman soldiers with Ottoman Shahada Regimental Standard at Kanlisirt, Gallipoli campaign in 1915

When the Ottoman caliph called for a "Great Jihad" Muslims against Allied powers during World War I, hopes and fears emerged that non-Turkish Muslims would side with Ottoman Turkey, but the appeal did not unite the Muslim world, and Muslims did not turn on their non-Muslim commanders in the Allied forces. (The war led to the end of the caliphate as the Ottoman Empire allied with the war's losers and surrendered. Post-war capitulations were overturned by secularist Mustafa Kemal, who later abolished the caliphate.)

Prior to the Iranian revolution in 1922, Shiite cleric Mehdi Al-Khalissi issued a fatwa prohibiting Iraqis from participating in the Iraqi elections, as the Iraqi government had been established by foreign powers. He later played a role in the Iraqi revolt of 1920. Between 1918 and 1919 in the Shia holy city of Najaf the League of the Islamic Awakening was established by religious scholars, tribal chiefs, and landlords who assassinated a British officer in the hopes of sparking a similar rebellion in Karbala.

During the revolt, Ayatollah Muhammad Taqi Shirazi, father of Mohammad al-Husayni al-Shirazi and grandfather of Sadiq Hussaini Shirazi, declared British rule impermissible and called for jihad against European occupations in the Middle East.

Post-colonialism

Main articles: Islamism and Criticism of Islamism

Islamism played an increasing role in the Muslim world in the 20th century, especially following the economic crises of the 1970s and 1980s. One of the first Islamist groups, the Muslim Brotherhood, emphasized physical struggle and martyrdom in its creed: "God is our objective; the Qur'an is our constitution; the Prophet is our leader; struggle (jihad) is our way; and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations." Hassan al-Banna emphasized jihad of the sword, and called on Egyptians to jihad against the British Empire, (the first influential scholar since the 1857 India uprising to do so). The group called for jihad against Israel in the 1940s, and its Palestinian branch, Hamas, called for jihad against Israel during the First Intifada.

Modern Muslim thought had been focused on when to go to war (jus ad bellum), not paying much attention on conduct during war (jus in bello). This was because most Muslim theorists viewed international humanitarian law as consistent with Islamic requirements. However, Muslims later discussed conduct during war in response to terrorist groups who targeted civilians.

According to Rudolph F. Peters and Natana J. DeLong-Bas, the new "fundamentalist" movement brought a reinterpretation of Islam and their own writings on jihad. These writings tended to be less involved with the different of schools of Islamic law, or in solutions for all potential situations. "They emphasize more the moral justifications and the underlying ethical values of the rules, than the detailed elaboration of those rules." They also tended to ignore the distinction between Greater and Lesser jihad because it distracted Muslims "from the development of the combative spirit they believe is required to rid the Islamic world of Western influences".

Contemporary Islamic fundamentalists were often influenced by the ideas of Ibn Taymiyyah, and Egyptian journalist Sayyid Qutb.

Sayyid Qutb, Islamist author and influential leader of the Muslim Brotherhood

Qutb preached in his book Milestones that jihad, “is not a temporary phase but a permanent war ... Jihad for freedom cannot cease until the Satanic forces are put to an end and the religion is purified for God in toto.” Qutb focused on martyrdom and jihad, adding the theme of treachery and enmity towards Islam of Christians and especially Jews. If non-Muslims were waging a "war against Islam", jihad against them was defensive, not offensive. He insisted that Christians and Jews were mushrikeen (not monotheists) because (he alleged) they gave their priests or rabbis "authority to make laws, obeying laws which were made by them not permitted by God" and "obedience to laws and judgments is a sort of worship".

Later ideologue, Muhammad abd-al-Salam Faraj, departed from some of Qutb's teachings. While Qutb felt that jihad was a proclamation of "liberation for humanity" (in which humanity has the free choice between Islam and unbelief), Faraj saw jihad as a mean of conquering the world and reestablishing the caliphate. Faraj legitimized lying, attacking by night (even accidentally killing innocents), and destroying trees of the infidel. His ideas influenced Egyptian Islamist extremist groups, and Ayman al-Zawahiri, later the leader of al-Qaeda.

During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and although it was predominantly Sunni, Afghanistan's Shiite population took arms against the Communist government and allied Soviet forces and the nation's Sunnis and were collectively referred to as the Afghan Mujahideen. Shiite jihadists in Afghanistan were known as the Tehran Eight and received support from the Iranian government in fighting the Communist Afghan government and allied Soviet forces in Afghanistan.

Terrorism

Many Muslims, including scholars like al-Qaradawi and Sayyid Tantawi, denounced Islamic terrorist attacks against civilians, seeing them as contrary to rules of jihad that prohibit targeting noncombatants. After the September 11 attacks in 2001, the United States blamed Saudi Arabian Osama bin Laden and the Taliban in Afghanistan, triggering bin Laden, who in turn on October 7 issued a televised message, declaring "Allah had blessed a vanguard group of Muslims, the spearhead of Islam, to destroy America." American and British forces were deployed around Afghanistan, and Mullah Mohammad Omar, also the Commander to the Faithful of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, in turn called the world's Muslims to join him in jihad.

Abdullah Azzam

Main article: Abdullah Azzam

In the 1980s Abdullah Azzam advocated waging jihad against the "unbelievers". Azzam issued a fatwa calling for jihad against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, declaring it an obligation for all able-bodied Muslims to repel invaders. His fatwa was endorsed by others, including Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz. Azzam saw Afghanistan as the beginning of jihad to repel unbelievers from many countries—the southern Soviet Republics of Central Asia, Bosnia, the Philippines, Kashmir, Somalia, Eritrea, Spain, and especially his home country of Palestine. The Soviet defeat in Afghanistan is said to have "amplified the jihadist tendency from a fringe phenomenon to a major force in the Muslim world." Many fighters returned to their home countries to continue jihad, participating in insurgencies and later creating a "transnational jihadist stream."

Azzam also argued for a broader interpretation of who it was permissible to kill, which may have influenced students such as bin Laden. He argued, based on his interpretation of the hadith, that it is a sin to not wage offensive jihad against the unbelievers in non-Muslim lands, continuing until only those who submit to Islam remain; expelling unbelievers from Muslim lands, contrastingly, is defensive jihad. In February 1998, bin Laden put a "Declaration of the World Islamic Front for Jihad against the Jews and the Crusaders" in the Al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper. He later organised the September 11 attacks against the United States.

Shia

In Shia Islam, jihad is one of the ten Practices of the Religion (though not one of the five pillars). Traditionally, Twelver Shi'a doctrine differed from that of Sunni Islam on the concept of jihad, with jihad seen as a "lesser priority" in Shia theology and "armed activism" by Shias "limited to a person's immediate geography".

Because of their history of oppression, Shias also associated jihad with certain passionate features, notably in the remembrance of Ashura. Mahmoud M. Ayoub says:

In Islamic tradition jihad or the struggle in the way of God, whether as armed struggle, or any form of opposition of the wrong, is generally regarded as one of the essential requirements of a person's faith as a Muslim. Shi'î tradition carried this requirement a step further, making jihad one of the pillars or foundations (arkan) of religion. If, therefore, Husayn's struggle against the Umayyad regime must be regarded as an act of jihad, then, In the mind of devotees, the participation of the community in his suffering and its ascent to the truth of his message must also be regarded as an extension of the holy struggle of the Imam himself. The hadith from which we took the title of this chapter stated this point very clearly. Ja'far al-Sadiq is said to have declared to al-Mufaddal, one of his closest disciples, 'The sigh of the sorrowful for the wrong done us is an act of praise (tasbih) , his sorrow for us is an act of worship, and his keeping of our secret is a struggle (jihad) in the way of God'; the Imâm then added, 'This hadith should be inscribed in letters of gold'.

and

Hence, the concept of jihad (holy struggle) gained a deeper and more personal meaning. Whether through weeping, the composition and recitation of poetry, showing compassion and doing good to the poor or carrying arms, the Shi'i Muslim saw himself helping the Imam in his struggle against the wrong (zulm) and gaining for himself the same merit (thawab) of those who actually fought and died for him. The ta'ziyah, in its broader sense the sharing of the entire life of the suffering family of Muhammad, has become for the Shi'i community the true meaning of compassion.

In the Syrian civil war, Shia and Sunni fighters waged jihad against each other. In Yemen, the Houthi Movement used appeals to jihad as part of their ideology as well as their recruitment.

Islamic jurisprudence

Observers have noted the evolution in the rules of jihad—from the original "classical" doctrine to that of 21st century Salafi jihadism. According to legal historian Sadarat Kadri, during the last few centuries, incremental changes in Islamic legal doctrine (developed by Islamists who otherwise condemn any bid‘ah (innovation) in religion), "normalized" what was once "unthinkable". "The very idea that Muslims might blow themselves up for God was unheard of before 1983, and it was not until the early 1990s that anyone anywhere had justified killing innocent Muslims who were not on a battlefield."

The first or the "classical" doctrine of jihad which was developed towards the end of the 8th century, emphasized the jihad of the sword (jihad bil-saif) rather than the "jihad of the heart", but it contained many legal restrictions developed from interpretations of the Quran and the Hadith, such as detailed rules involving "the initiation, the conduct, the termination" of jihad, the treatment of prisoners, the distribution of booty, etc. Absent a sudden attack on the Muslim community, jihad was not a "personal obligation" (fard ayn); instead it was a "collective one" (fard al-kifaya), which had to be discharged "in the way of God" (fi sabil Allah), and could only be launched by the caliph, "whose discretion over its conduct was all but absolute." (This was designed in part to avoid incidents like the Kharijia's jihad against and killing of Caliph Ali, once they deemed that he was no longer a Muslim). Martyrdom resulting from an attack on the enemy with no concern for your own safety was praiseworthy, but dying by your own hand (as opposed to the enemy's) merited a special place in Hell. The collective obligation to jihad is sometimes simplified as "offensive jihad" in Western texts.

Islamic theologian Abu Abdullah al-Muhajir has been identified as the key theorist and ideologue behind modern jihadist violence. His theological and legal justifications influenced Abu Musab al-Zarqawi of al-Qaeda as well as jihadi terrorist groups, including ISIS. Zarqawi used a manuscript of al-Muhajir's ideas at AQI training camps that were later deployed by ISIS, referred to as The Jurisprudence of Jihad or The Jurisprudence of Blood.

The book has been described as rationalising "the murder of non-combatants" by Mark Towsend, citing Salah al-Ansari of Quilliam, who noted: "There is a startling lack of study and concern regarding this abhorrent and dangerous text The Jurisprudence of Blood in almost all Western and Arab scholarship". Charlie Winter of The Atlantic describes it as a "theological playbook used to justify the group's abhorrent acts". He stated:

Ranging from ruminations on the merits of beheading, torturing, or burning prisoners to thoughts on assassination, siege warfare, and the use of biological weapons, Muhajir's intellectual legacy is a crucial component of the literary corpus of ISIS—and, indeed, whatever comes after it—a way to render practically anything permissible, provided, that is, it can be spun as beneficial to the jihad. According to Muhajir, committing suicide to kill people is not only a theologically sound act, but a commendable one, too, something to be cherished and celebrated regardless of its outcome. neither Zarqawi nor his inheritors have looked back, liberally using Muhajir's work to normalize the use of suicide tactics in the time since, such that they have become the single most important military and terrorist method—defensive or offensive—used by ISIS today. The way that Muhajir theorized it was simple—he offered up a theological fix that allows any who desire it to sidestep the Koranic injunctions against suicide.

Psychologist Chris E. Stout claimed that jihadists regard their actions as "for the greater good"; that they are in a "weakened in the earth" situation that renders terrorism a valid resort.

Usage

The term 'jihad' has accrued both violent and non-violent meanings. According to John Esposito, it can simply mean striving to live a moral and virtuous life, spreading and defending Islam as well as fighting injustice and oppression, among other things. The relative importance of the two forms of jihad is a matter of controversy. Rudoph Peters wrote that, in the contemporary world, traditionalist Muslims understand jihad from classical works on fiqh; modernist Muslims regard jihad as a just war in international law and emphasize its defensive aspects; and fundamentalists view it as an expansion of Islam and realization of Islamic ideals. David Cook wrote that Muslims understood jihad in a military sense, in both classical and contemporary texts. Cook located the idea that jihad is primarily non-violent in Sufi texts and the Western scholars who study them, or from Muslim apologists. Gallup stated that its surveys show that the concept of jihad among Muslims "is considerably more nuanced than the single sense in which Western commentators invariably invoke the term".

Muslim public opinion

A Gallup poll asked Muslims in eight countries to define jihad. In Lebanon, Kuwait, Jordan, and Morocco, the most frequent response was to "duty toward God", a "divine duty", or a "worship of God", with no military connotations. In Turkey, Iran, Pakistan and Indonesia, many of the responses includes "sacrificing one's life for the sake of Islam/God/a just cause" or "fighting against the opponents of Islam". Other common meanings of "jihad" in the Muslim world include "a commitment to hard work", "promoting peace", and "living the principles of Islam". The terminology was also applied to the fight for women's liberation.

Other struggles

Shia Muslim scholar Mahmoud M. Ayoud stated, "The goal of true jihad is to attain a harmony between Islam (submission), iman (faith), and ihsan (righteous living)." Jihad is a process encompassing both individual and social reform, this is called jihad fi sabil Allah ("struggle in the way of God"), and can be undertaken following the Qur'an (jihad bi-al-qur'an). According to Ayoud the greatest jihad is the struggle of every Muslim against social, moral, and political evils. However, depending on social and political circumstances, jihad may be regarded as a sixth fundamental obligation (farid) incumbent on the entire Muslim community (ummah) when their integrity is in danger, in this case jihad becomes an "absolute obligation" (fard 'ayn), or when social and religious reform is gravely hampered. Otherwise it is a "limited obligation" (fard kifayah), incumbent upon those who are directly involved. These rules apply to armed struggle or "jihad of the sword".

In modern times, Pakistani scholar and professor Fazlur Rahman Malik used the term to describe the struggle to establish a "just moral-social order", while President Habib Bourguiba of Tunisia used it to describe the struggle for economic development in that country.

According to the BBC, a third meaning of jihad is the struggle to build a good society. In a commentary of the hadith Sahih Muslim, entitled al-Minhaj, the medieval Islamic scholar Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi stated, "one of the collective duties of the community as a whole (fard kifaya) is to lodge a valid protest, to solve problems of religion, to have knowledge of Divine Law, to command what is right and forbid wrong conduct".

Scholar Natana J. DeLong-Bas lists a number of types of "jihad" that have been proposed by Muslims:

  • educational jihad (jihad al-tarbiyyah);
  • missionary jihad or calling the people to Islam (jihad al-da'wah)

Other "types" mentioned include:

  • "Intellectual" jihad (similar to missionary jihad).
  • "Economic" jihad (doing good involving money such as spending within one's means, helping the "poor and the downtrodden") Bourguiba used jihad to describe the struggle for economic development. Iran has a Ministry of Jihad for Agriculture.
  • Jihad Al-Nikah, or sexual jihad, "refers to women joining the jihad by offering sex to fighters to boost their morale". The term originated from a fatwa believed to have been fabricated by the Syrian government to discredit its opponents, and the prevalence of this phenomenon has been disputed.

Usage by some non-Muslims

  • The United States Department of Justice used various ad hoc definitions of jihad in indictments of individuals involved in terrorist activities:
    • "As used in this First Superseding Indictment, jihad is the Arabic word meaning 'holy war'. In this context, jihad refers to the use of violence, including paramilitary action against persons, governments deemed to be enemies of the fundamentalist version of Islam."
    • "As used in this Superseding Indictment, 'violent jihad' or 'jihad' include planning, preparing for, and engaging in, acts of physical violence, including murder, maiming, kidnapping, and hostage-taking." in the indictment against several individuals including José Padilla.
  • Karen Armstrong: "Fighting and warfare might sometimes be necessary, but it was only a minor part of the whole jihad or struggle".
  • Maxime Rodinson: "Jihad is a propagandistic device which, as need be, resorts to armed struggle—two ingredients common to many ideological movements".
  • Benjamin R. Barber used the term jihad to point out the resistant movement by fundamentalist ethnic groups who want to protect their traditions, heritage and identity from globalization (which he refers to as 'McWorld').

Other groups

Ahmadiyya

Main article: Ahmadiyya view on Jihad

In Ahmadiyya Islam, jihad is primarily one's personal inner struggle and should not be used violently for political motives. Violence is only to be used to protect religion and one's own life in extreme situations of persecution.

Quranist

Quranists do not believe that the word jihad means holy war. They believe it means to struggle, or to strive. They believe it can incorporate both military and non-military aspects. When it refers to the military aspect, it is understood primarily to be defensive warfare.

See also

Notes

  1. Seventeen derivatives of jihad occur altogether forty-one times (eleven Meccan texts and thirty Medinan ones), with the following five meanings: striving because of religious belief (21), war (12), non-Muslim parents exerting pressure, that is, jihād, to make their children abandon Islam (2), solemn oaths (5), and physical strength (1).

References

Citations

  1. ^ Esposito, John L., ed. (2014). "Jihad". The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 3 September 2014. Retrieved 29 August 2014.
  2. ^ Peters, Rudolph; Cook, David (2014). "Jihād". The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref:oiso/9780199739356.001.0001. ISBN 9780199739356. Archived from the original on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  3. ^ Tyan, E. (1965). "D̲j̲ihād". In Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel, E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P.; Lewis, B.; Pellat, Ch.; Schacht, J. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0189. ISBN 978-90-04-16121-4.
  4. ^ Jackson, Roy (2014). What is Islamic philosophy?. Routledge. p. 173. ISBN 978-1317814047. jihad Literally 'struggle' which has many meanings, though most frequently associated with war.
  5. ^ DeLong-Bas, Natana J. (22 February 2018) . "Jihad". Oxford Bibliographies – Islamic Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780195390155-0045. Archived from the original on 29 June 2016. Retrieved 25 October 2021.
  6. Böwering, Gerhard; Crone, Patricia, eds. (2013). "Jihad". The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Literally meaning "struggle", jihad may be associated with almost any activity by which Muslims attempt to bring personal and social life into a pattern of conformity with the guidance of God.
  7. ^ Bonner, Michael (2006). Jihad in Islamic History: Doctrines and Practice. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1400827381.
  8. ^ Peters, Rudolph (2005). "Jihad". In Jones, Lindsay (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 7 (2nd ed.). MacMillan Reference. p. 4917.
  9. ^ Burkholder, Richard (3 December 2002). "Jihad – 'Holy War', or Internal Spiritual Struggle?". gallup.com. Archived from the original on 26 August 2014. Retrieved 24 August 2014.
  10. ^ Al-Dawoody, Ahmed (2011). The Islamic Law of War: Justifications and Regulations. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0230111608.
  11. Morgan, Diane (2010). Essential Islam: A Comprehensive Guide to Belief and Practice. ABC-CLIO. p. 87. ISBN 978-0313360251. Retrieved 5 January 2011.
  12. Meri, Josef W., ed. (2005). "Jihad". Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. p. 419. ISBN 978-041596690-0.
  13. ^ Esposito, John L. (1988). Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195043983.
  14. "Islam and war". BBC. 13 August 2009. Retrieved 14 July 2024.
  15. al-Fasi, Muhammad; Hrbek, Ivan (1988). "The coming of Islam and the expansion of the Muslim empire". General History of Africa: Volume 3. UNESCO.
  16. Bernard Lewis (27 September 2001). "Jihad vs. Crusade". Opinionjournal.com. Archived from the original on 16 August 2016. Retrieved 4 August 2016.
  17. Blankinship, Khalid Yahya (2011). "Parity of Muslim and Western Concepts of Just War". The Muslim World. 101 (3): 416. doi:10.1111/j.1478-1913.2011.01384.x. ISSN 1478-1913. In classical Muslim doctrine on war, likewise, genuine non-combatants are not to be harmed. These include women, minors, servants and slaves who do not take part in the fighting, the blind, monks, hermits, the aged, those physically unable to fight, the insane, the delirious, farmers who do not fight, traders, merchants, and contractors. The main criterion distinguishing combatants from non-combatants is that the latter do not fight and do not contribute to the war effort.
  18. ^ Hallaq, Wael B. (16 April 2009). Sharī'a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge University Press. pp. 334–38. ISBN 978-0-521-86147-2.
  19. ^ Jalal, Ayesha (30 June 2009). "Islam Subverted? Jihad as Terrorism". Partisans of Allah: Jihad in South Asia. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 239–240. doi:10.4159/9780674039070-007. ISBN 978-0-674-03907-0. S2CID 152941120.
  20. Badara, Mohamed; Nagata, Masaki (November 2017). "Modern Extremist Groups and the Division of the World: A Critique from an Islamic Perspective". Arab Law Quarterly. 31 (4). Leiden: Brill Publishers: 305–335. doi:10.1163/15730255-12314024. ISSN 1573-0255.
  21. Cook, David (2005). "Radical Islam and Contemporary Jihad Theory". Understanding Jihad. University of California Press. pp. 93–127. ISBN 978-0-520-24203-6. JSTOR 10.1525/j.ctv1xxt55.10. LCCN 2015010201.
  22. ^ Özel, Ahmed (1993). "Jihad". Islam Ansiklopedisi (in Turkish). Vol. 7. Istanbul: Turkish Diyanet Foundation. pp. 527–531.
  23. ^ Jihād. encyclopedia.com. 21 May 2013.
  24. Wehr, Hans (1979). A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (3rd ed.). Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 142. ISBN 978-3-447-02002-2.
  25. Tyan, Emile (1967). Lewis, B.; Pellat, Charles; Schatcht, J. (eds.). The Encyclopaedia of Islam: Khe-Naz. Vol. 5-7. E. J. Brill. p. 538. ISBN 978-90-04-09739-1 https://books.google.com/books?id=mB-qzwEACAAJ&pg=PA538. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  26. For a listing of all appearances in the Qur'an of jihad and related words, see al-Mu'jam al-mufahras li-alfaz al-Qur'an al-karim (in Arabic). دار حديث،. 1988. pp. 182–83. and Kassis, Hanna E. (3 November 2023). A Concordance of the Qur'an. Univ of California Press. pp. 587–588. ISBN 978-0-520-34261-3.
  27. Abdel Haleem, Muhammed (2001). Understanding the Qurʼan : Themes and Style. London: I.B. Tauris. p. 62. ISBN 9781860640094. OCLC 56728422.
  28. "Oxford Islamic Studies Online". Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 3 September 2014. Retrieved 29 August 2014.
  29. Seales, Rebecca (5 July 2018). "'My wife can never call my name in public'". BBC. Retrieved 29 November 2021.
  30. ^ Peters, Rudolph. "Jihād". The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Archived from the original on 21 November 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  31. Berkey, Jonathan P. (2003). The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600-1800. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-58813-3.
  32. Asma Afsaruddin (2013). Striving in the Path of God Jihad and Martyrdom in Islamic Thought. Oxford University Press. p. 11.
  33. ibn Ismāʻīl Bukhārī, Muḥammad (1981). Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī: The Translation of the Meanings of Sahih Al-Bukhari. Vol. v4. Translated by Muhsin Khan, Muhammad. Medina: Dar al-Fikr. pp. 34–204.. Quoted in Streusand, Douglas E. (September 1997). "What Does Jihad Mean?". Middle East Quarterly: 9–17. Archived from the original on 8 September 2014. Retrieved 24 August 2014. In hadith collections, jihad means armed action; for example, the 199 references to jihad in the most standard collection of hadith, Sahih al-Bukhari, all assume that jihad means warfare.
  34. Streusand, Douglas E. (September 1997). "What Does Jihad Mean?". Middle East Quarterly. 4 (3): 9–17. Archived from the original on 1 July 2015. Retrieved 12 July 2015.
  35. Abdul-Kareem, Ibrahim (28 January 2011). "Protestors lose their fear of the Egyptian regime and perform the best jihad – the word of justice in front of the oppressive ruler". The Khilafah. Archived from the original on 26 February 2011. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
  36. Shehata, Ali (1 February 2011). "Reflections on the Protests in Egypt". MuslimMatters.org. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
  37. Hashim Kamali, Mohammad (2008). Shari'ah Law: An Introduction. Oneworld Publications. p. 204. ISBN 978-1851685653.
  38. Abi Zakaryya Al Dimashqi Al Dumyati (23 October 2016). The Book of Jihad. Translated by Yamani, Noor. pp. 107. Retrieved 9 August 2019 – via Internet Archive.
  39. Abi Zakaryya Al Dimashqi Al Dumyati (23 October 2016). The Book of Jihad. Translated by Yamani, Noor. pp. 177. Retrieved 9 August 2019 – via Internet Archive.
  40. ^ The Intensification and Reorientation of Sunni Jihad Ideology in the Crusader Period. BRILL. 3 December 2012. ISBN 9789004242791.
  41. O'Callaghan, Joseph F. (24 February 2004). Reconquest and Crusade in Medieval Spain. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 12. ISBN 0812218892.
  42. "Surah Al-Anfal - 15-16".
  43. Understanding Jihad. University of California Press. 23 May 2005. p. 15. ISBN 9780520931879.
  44. Sahih al-Bukhari 5972
  45. Sahih al-Bukhari 2784
  46. ^ Bonney, Richard (2004). Jihad: From Qu'ran to Bin Laden. Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. Lewis, Bernard, The Crisis of Islam, 2001 Chapter 2
  48. ^ Lewis, Bernard (11 June 1991). The Political Language of Islam. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-47693-3.
  49. ^ Peters, Rudolph (1996). Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam: A Reader. Princeton: Marcus Wiener. ISBN 978-9004048546.
  50. ^ "Jihad". BBC. 3 August 2009. Archived from the original on 27 August 2010. Retrieved 4 June 2010.
  51. Fayd al-Qadir vol. 4 p. 511
  52. ^ Streusand, Douglas E. (September 1997). "What Does Jihad Mean?". Middle East Quarterly. iv (3): 9–17. Archived from the original on 8 September 2014. Retrieved 26 August 2014.
  53. "Sunnah.org". Archived from the original on 9 June 2011. Retrieved 15 May 2011.
  54. ^ Kadri, Sadakat (2012). Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia. London: Macmillan Publishers. pp. 150–151, 157, 172–175. ISBN 978-0099523277.
  55. Kadri 2012, pp. 103, According to al-Ghazali, he had told Muslims after their first major military victory at Badr that their struggle (jihad) was not won: they had only won a 'lesser struggle', while the greater struggle to fortify their spiritual defenses still lay ahead..
  56. ^ Khadduri, Majid (2006). War and Peace in the Law of Islam. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. ISBN 978-1-58477-695-6.
  57. Malik, Jamal (2009). "Maudūdī's al-Jihād fi'l-Islām. A Neglected Document". Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft. 17 (1). doi:10.1515/zfr.2009.17.1.61. S2CID 179091977.
  58. Wilson, Jonathan A. J. (2011). "Refining Islamic Scholarship: Through Harmonising With Postmodern Social Sciences" (PDF). 'Ulum Islamiyyah: The Malaysian Journal of Islamic Sciences. 7. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 January 2022. Retrieved 29 November 2021.
  59. Lutz, Peter L. (2002). "Islamic Science" (PDF). The Rise of Experimental Biology. Humana Press. pp. 57–63. doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-163-3_8 (inactive 1 November 2024). ISBN 978-1-59259-163-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  60. Ware, Rudolph (31 August 2012). "Timbuktu: The Ink of Scholars and the Blood of Martyrs". Huffington Post. Retrieved 29 November 2021.
  61. Diagne, Souleymane Bachir (2008). "Towards an intellectual history of West Africa: The meaning of Timbuktu". The meanings of Timbuktu (PDF). HRSC Press. p. 26. ISBN 9780796922045. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 May 2022. Retrieved 29 November 2021.
  62. Morse, Felicity (13 January 2015). "The pen, the sword and the Prophet". BBC. Retrieved 29 November 2021.
  63. ^ "Jihad in Islam: Just War Theory in the Qur'an and Sunnah". Yaqeeninstitute.org. 15 May 2020. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021.
  64. ^ Cosman, Madeleine Pelner; Jones, Linda Gale (2009). Handbook to Life in the Medieval World, 3-Volume Set. Infobase Publishing. pp. 295–296. ISBN 978-1-4381-0907-7.
  65. Khomeini, Ruhollah (27 September 2012). "Jihad al-Akbar, The Greatest Jihad: Combat with the Self". al-Islam.org. Archived from the original on 3 September 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2014.
  66. Schaefer, Robert W. (22 October 2010). The Insurgency in Chechnya and the North Caucasus: From Gazavat to Jihad. Praeger Security International. Santa Barbara, California: Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 64. ISBN 9780313386350. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
  67. Baderin, Mashood A. (2021). Islamic Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 119. Similar to contemporary international law, there are more rules relating to jus in bello than to jus ad bellum under Islamic laws of war.
  68. ^ Abou El Fadl, Khaled (1999). "The rules of killing at war: An inquiry into classical sources". The Muslim World. 89 (2): 144–157. doi:10.1111/j.1478-1913.1999.tb03675.x.
  69. Abou El Fadl, Khaled (2001). "Islam and the Theology of Power". Middle East Report (221): 28–33. doi:10.2307/1559337. JSTOR 1559337.
  70. Khalil, Mohammad Hassan (2017). Jihad, Radicalism, and the New Atheism. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108377263. ISBN 9781108421546.
  71. Abou El Fadl 2001, p. 29: "the majority argued that non-Muslims should only be fought against if they pose a danger to Muslims"
  72. Ibn Najīm, Al-Bahr al-Rā’iq, Vol. 5, p. 76.
  73. Mairaj Syed (2013). "Jihad in Classical Islamic Legal and Moral Thought". Just War in Religion and Politics. University Press of America. p. 145.
  74. ^ Kohlberg, Etan (1976). "The Development of the Imami Shi'i Doctrine of Jihad". Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgen Laendischen Gesellschaft. pp. 64–86, esp. pp. 78–86.
  75. ^ Coates, David, ed. (2012). The Oxford Companion to American Politics, Volume 2. Oxford University Press. p. 16. ISBN 9780199764310.
  76. ^ Howard M. Hensel, ed. (2010). The Prism of Just War: Asian and Western Perspectives on the Legitimate Use of Military Force. Ashgate. ISBN 9780754675105.
  77. ^ Vanhullebusch, Matthias (2015). War and Law in the Islamic World. Brill publishers. ISBN 9789004298248.
  78. ^ Cook, David (2015) . "Radical Islam and Contemporary Jihad Theory". Understanding Jihad (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 93–127. ISBN 978-0-520-24448-1. JSTOR 10.1525/j.ctv1xxt55.10. LCCN 2015010201.
  79. Kelsay, John (2009). Arguing the Just War in Islam. Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674032347.
  80. ^ Johnson, James Turner (1 November 2010). Holy War Idea in Western and Islamic Traditions. Penn State Press. pp. 147–48. ISBN 978-0271042145. Retrieved 24 September 2014. Islam ... instilled into the hearts of the warriors the belief that a war against the followers of another faith was a holy war ... The fundamental structure of bedouin warfare remained, however, that of raiding to collect booty. ... another element in the normative understanding of jihad as religiously sanctioned war ... the ghaza, `razzia or raid.` ... Thus the standard form of desert warfare, periodic raids by the nomadic tribes against one another and the settled areas, was transformed into a centrally directed military movement and given and ideological rationale.
  81. Berkey, Jonathan Porter (2003). The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600–1800. Cambridge University Press. p. 73. ISBN 978-0521588133. The Koran is not a squeamish document, and it exhorts the believers to jihad. Verses such as "Do not follow the unbelievers, but struggle against them mightily" (25.52) and "fight who do not believe in God and the last day" (9.29) may originally have been directed against Muhammad's local enemies, the pagans of Mecca or the Jews of Medina, but they could be redirected once a new set of enemies appeared.
  82. Khadduri 1955 "Book II - The Law of War: The Jihad - Chapter V. Doctrine of Jihad" (PDF). War and Peace in the Law of Islam. pp. 55–73. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2015. Retrieved 26 October 2015. The importance of the jihad in Islam lay in shifting the focus of attention of the tribes from their interribal warfare to the outside word; Islam outlawed all forms of war except the jihad, that is the war in Allah's path. It would indeed, have been very difficult for the Islamic state to survive had it not been for the doctrine of the jihad, replacing tribal raids, and directing that enormous energy of the tribes from an inevitable internal conflict to unite and fight against the outside world in the name of the new faith.
  83. Quran 2:256
  84. "Djihād". Encyclopedia of Islam Online.
  85. Peters, Rudolph (1977). Jihad in Mediaeval and Modern Islam: The Chapter on Jihad from Averroes' Legal Handbook 'Bidåayat Al-mudjtahid' and the Treatise 'Koran and Fighting' by the Late Shaykh-al-Azhar, Maòhmåud Shaltåut. BRILL. p. 3. ISBN 978-90-04-04854-6.
  86. ^ Lewis, Bernard (27 October 1994). Islam and the West. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-802393-7.
  87. Ahmed Al- (28 March 2011b). The Islamic Law of War: Justifications and Regulations. Springer. p. 92. ISBN 9780230118089.
  88. Zawātī, Ḥilmī M (2001). Isw+bm Jihād a Just War?: War, Peace, and Human Rights Under Islamic and Public International Law. Studies in religion and society. Vol. 53. Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen Press. pp. 50. ISBN 0773473041. OCLC 47283206.
  89. Khadduri, Majid (1940). The Law of War and Peace in Islam: A Study in Muslim International Law. London: Luzac & Co. OCLC 24254931.
  90. Al-Shaybani, Muhammad Ibn al-H. (1966). The Islamic Law of Nations: Shaybani's Siyar. Translated by Khadduri, [Majid. Johns Hopkins Press.
  91. Albrecht Noth, "Der Dschihad: sich mühen für Gott. In: Gernot Rotter, Die Welten des Islam: neunundzwanzig Vorschläge, das Unvertraute zu verstehen" (Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1993), p. 27
  92. Lewis, Bernard (2004). The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror. Random House Publishing Group. p. 31. ISBN 978-0812967852. According to Islamic law, it is lawful to wage war against four types of enemies: infidels, apostates, rebels, and bandits. Although all four types of war are legitimate, only the first two count as jihad.
  93. Lewis, Bernard (2000). The Middle East: A Brief History of the Last 2,000 Years. Simon and Schuster. pp. 237–38. ISBN 9780684807126. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  94. According to Khaled Abou El Fadl martyrdom is within God's exclusive province; only God can assess the intentions of individuals and the justness of their cause, and ultimately, whether they deserve the status of being a martyr. The Qur'anic text does not recognize the idea of unlimited warfare, and it does not consider the simple fact that one of the belligerents is Muslim to be sufficient to establish the justness of a war. Moreover, according to the Qur'an, war might be necessary, and might even become binding and obligatory, but it is never a moral and ethical good. The Qur'an does not use the word jihad to refer to warfare or fighting; such acts are referred to as qital. While the Qur'an's call to jihad is unconditional and unrestricted, such is not the case for qital. Jihad is a good in and of itself, while qital is not. Source: Abou El Fadl, Khaled (23 January 2007). The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists. HarperOne. ISBN 978-0061189036.
  95. Hamidullah, Muhammad (2011). The Muslim Conduct of State. The Other Press. ISBN 978-967-5062-88-9.
  96. Al-Dawoody, Ahmed (27 August 2013). "Armed Jihad in the Islamic Legal Tradition". Religion Compass. 7 (11): 476–484. doi:10.1111/rec3.12071. S2CID 143395594.
  97. Chaudhry, Muhammad Sharif. "Dynamics of Islamic Jihad, Spoils of War". Muslim Tents. Archived from the original on 11 April 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  98. Ghamidi, Javed (2001). "The Islamic Law of Jihad". Mizan. Dar ul-Ishraq. OCLC 52901690.
  99. ^ QASIM ZAMAN, MUHAMMAD (2012). Modern Islamic Thought in a Radical Age. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-09645-5.
  100. ^ Khadduri 1955 "5. Doctrine of Jihad" (PDF). War and Peace in the Law of Islam. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2015. Retrieved 26 October 2015. ... 'unless the Muslim community is subjected to a sudden attack and therefore all believers, including women and children are under the obligation to fight— is regarded by all jurists, with almost no exception, as a collective obligation of the whole Muslim community,' meaning that 'if the duty is fulfilled by a part of the community it ceases to be obligatory on others'.
  101. ^ Broucek, James (2014). "Combat". The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  102. The early Muslim era of expansion (632–750 CE, or the Rashidun and Umayyad eras) preceded the "classical era" (750–1258 CE) which coincided with the beginning and the end of the Abbasid Caliphate.
  103. Gibb, H.A.R. (Hamilton Alexander Rosskeen) (1969). Mohammedanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  104. DeLong-Bas 2004 "In Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's writings, jihad is a special and specific type of warfare, which can be declared only by the religious leader (imam) and whose purpose is the defense of the Muslim community from aggression." .. "What Shaltut calls for here is not only a defensive response but also the right to live peacefully without fear for life, home, or possessions, all of which is consistent with Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's assertion of jihad as a defensive activity designed to restore order and preserve life and property."... "Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's definition of jihad is restricted to a defensive military action designed to protect and preserve the Muslim community and its right to practice its faith".. "For Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, jihad is always a defensive military action. Here he is synchronous with Islamic modernist writers, who narrow the confines of jihad to defensive action.."}}
  105. ^ DeLong-Bas, Natana J. (2004). Wahhabi Islam: From Revival and Reform to Global Jihad (First ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195169911.
  106. ^ Lewis, Bernard (19 November 2001). "The Revolt of Islam". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 4 September 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2014.
  107. ^ Gold, Dore (2012). Hatred's Kingdom: How Saudi Arabia Supports the New Global Terrorism. Regnery Publishing. p. 24.
  108. Muhammad Katib Hazarah, Fayz (2012). "The History Of Afghanistan Fayż Muḥammad Kātib Hazārah's Sirāj Al Tawārīkh By R. D. Mcchesney, M. M. Khorrami". AAF: 61. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  109. Gold 2012, pp. 7–8 "... the revival of jihad, and its prioritization as a religious value, is found in the works of high-level Saudi religious officials like former chief justice Sheikh Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid: `Jihad is a great deed indeed there is no deed whose reward and blessing is as that of it, and for this reason, it is the best thing one can volunteer for."
  110. Falola, Toyin (25 September 2009). Colonialism and Violence in Nigeria. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-00339-3.
  111. Ardic, Nurullah (2012). Islam and the Politics of Secularism: The Caliphate and Middle Eastern ... Routledge. pp. 192–93. ISBN 9781136489846. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  112. "The Islamic Revolution of 1920". al-islam.org. 27 February 2013.
  113. Van Slooten, Pippi (April 2005). "Dispelling Myths About Islam and Jihad". Peace Review. 17 (2–3): 289–294. doi:10.1080/14631370500333013. ISSN 1040-2659.
  114. Benjamin, Daniel; Simon, Steven (2002). The Age of Sacred Terror. New York: Random House. p. 57. ISBN 9780375508592.
  115. "Article eight of the Hamas Covenant. The Slogan of the Islamic Resistance Movement". Yale Law School. Avalon Project. Yale Law School. Archived from the original on 7 March 2011. Retrieved 7 September 2014. Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.
  116. Bannā, Ḥasan al- (1978). Five Tracts of Hasan Al-Banna (1906-1949): A Selection from the Majmu'at at Rasail Al-Iman Al-Shahid Hasan Al-Banna. Translated by Wendell, Charles. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-608-15367-4.
  117. Al-Khatib, Ibrahim (2012). The Muslim Brotherhood and Palestine: Letters To Jerusalem. scribedigital.com. ISBN 978-1780410395. Retrieved 7 September 2014. The Muslim Brothers believed a well-planned Jihad to be the only means to liberate Palestine. Its press confirmed that Jihad became an individual obligation upon every Muslim ... gain one of the two desirable goals (i.e. gaining victory or dying martyrs). The jurists of the Group issued a fatwa during the 1948 War that Muslims had to postpone pilgrimage and offer their money for Jihad (in Palestine) instead.
  118. Abū ʻAmr, Z. (1994). Islamic Fundamentalism in the West Bank and Gaza: Muslim Brotherhood and . Indiana University Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0253208668. According to the society, the jihad for Palestine will start after the completion of the Islamic transformation of Palestinian society, the completion of the process of Islamic revival, and the return to Islam in the region. Only then can the call for jihad be meaningful, because the Palestinians cannot along liberate Palestine without the help of other Muslims.
  119. But according to Judith Miller, the MB changed its mind with the intifada. Miller, Judith (19 July 2011). God Has Ninety-Nine Names: Reporting from a Militant Middle East. Simon & Schuster. p. 387. ISBN 978-1439129418. Sheikh Yasin had initially argued in typical Muslim Brotherhood tradition that violent jihad against Israel would be counterproductive until Islamic regimes had been established throughout the Muslim realm. But the outbreak of the Intifada changed his mind: Islamic reconquest would have to start rather than end with jihad in Palestine. So stated the Hamas covenant.
  120. "Hamas Covenant 1988". Yale Law School Avalon Project. Archived from the original on 7 March 2011. Retrieved 7 September 2014. There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.
  121. Hashmi, Sohail H. (3 July 2012). Just Wars, Holy Wars, and Jihads: Christian, Jewish, and Muslim Encounters and Exchanges. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-975503-5.
  122. ^ Qutb, Sayyid. Milestones (PDF). pp. 82, 60. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 August 2014. Retrieved 7 September 2014.
  123. Symon, Fiona (16 October 2001). "Analysis: The roots of jihad". BBC. Archived from the original on 7 September 2014. Retrieved 7 September 2014. For Qutb, all non-Muslims were infidels—even the so-called "people of the book", the Christians and Jews—and he predicted an eventual clash of civilisations between Islam and the west.
  124. Jansen, Johannes J. G. (1986). The Neglected Duty: The Creed of Sadat's Assassins and Islamic Resurgence in the Middle East. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-02-916340-5. Includes a facsimile of al-Farida al-gha'iba (The Neglected Duty) by Muhammad 'Abd al-Salam Faraj.
  125. ^ Gerges, Fawaz A. (2009). The far enemy: why Jihad went global (reprint 2010 ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521519359.
  126. "Afghan War | History & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. 24 May 2023.
  127. Goodson, Larry P. (10 August 2001). Afghanistan's Endless War: State Failure, Regional Politics, and the Rise of the Taliban. University of Washington Press. p. 147. ISBN 9780295980508 – via Internet Archive.
  128. Kepel, Gilles (2002). Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-01090-1.
  129. Riedel, Bruce (11 September 2011). "The 9/11 Attacks' Spiritual Father". Brooking. Archived from the original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 6 September 2014.
  130. Blanchard, Christopher M (November 2010). Saudi Arabia: Background and U. S. Relations. DIANE Publishing. p. 27. ISBN 978-1-4379-2838-9.
  131. Wright, Lawrence (8 August 2006). The Looming Tower. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-26608-8.
  132. ^ Commins, David (20 December 2005). The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi Arabia. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-0-85771-780-1.
  133. Azzam, Abdullah. Defense of the Muslim Lands: The first Obligation After Iman. Islamic Books. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
  134. Lewis, Bernard (1998). "License to Kill: Usama Bin Ladin's Declaration of Jihad". Foreign Affairs. 77 (6): 14–19. doi:10.2307/20049126. JSTOR 20049126.
  135. "Part 2: Islamic Practices". al-Islam.org. Archived from the original on 7 September 2014. Retrieved 27 August 2014.
  136. Hassan, Hassan. "The rise of Shia jihadism in Syria will fuel sectarian fires". The National. No. 5 June 2013. Abu Dhabi. Retrieved 27 August 2014.
  137. ^ Ayoub, Mahmoud M. (26 July 2011). Redemptive Suffering in Islam: A Study of the Devotional Aspects of Ashura in Twelver Shi'ism. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-080331-0.
  138. Rabi, Uzi; Friedman, Brandon (2017). "Weaponizing Sectarianism in Iraq and Syria". Orbis. 61 (3): 423–438. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2017.04.003.
  139. "Houthis recruit 50,000 Yemen child soldiers in 3 months, minister says". The Defense Post. 20 June 2019.
  140. Lewis, Bernard (2003) . The Assassins, a radical sect in Islam. Basic Books. p. xi–xii. ISBN 978-0786724550. Retrieved 13 October 2015.
  141. Edwards, Richard; Zuhur, Sherifa (12 May 2008). The Encyclopedia of the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Political, Social, and. ABC-CLIO. p. 553. ISBN 978-1851098422.
  142. ^ al-Saud, Abdullah K.; Winter, Charlie (4 December 2016). "Abu Abdullah al-Muhajir: The Obscure Theologian Who Shaped ISIS". The Atlantic. Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 28 September 2020.
  143. ^ Townsend, Mark (12 May 2018). "The core Isis manual that twisted Islam to legitimise barbarity". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 June 2018. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
  144. ^ Stout, Chris (9 June 2018) . "The Psyhchology of Terrorism". Terrorism, Political Violence, and Extremism: New Psychology to Understand, Face, and Defuse the Threat. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 5–6. ISBN 978-1440851926.
  145. Esposito, John L. (2002). Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs.
  146. Esposito, John L.; Mogahed, Dalia (2007). Who Speaks For Islam?: What a Billion Muslims Really Think. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-59562-017-0.
  147. Al-Batal, Mahmoud; Kristen Brustad; Abbas Al-Tonsi (2006). "6 "من رائدات الحركة النسائية العربية" (One of the Pioneers of the Arabic Feminist Movement)". Al-Kitaab fii Tallum al-Arabiyya, Part II (in Arabic and English) (2 ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 978-1589010963. To struggle or exert oneself for a cause........جاهََدَ، يجاهِد، الجهاد
  148. ^ Ayoub, Mahmoud M. (2013). Islam: Faith and History. Simon and Schuster. p. 57. ISBN 978-1-78074-452-0. Retrieved 13 September 2020.
  149. Rahman, Fazlur (15 June 2009). Major Themes of the Qur'an: Second Edition. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-70286-5.
  150. "Jihad". Archived from the original on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 20 February 2012.
  151. Shaykh Hisham Kabbani; Shaykh Seraj Hendricks; Shaykh Ahmad Hendricks. "Jihad – A Misunderstood Concept from Islam". The Muslim Magazine. Archived from the original on 17 July 2006. Retrieved 16 August 2006.
  152. ^ "Why does Islam have the concept of Jihad or Holy War, Which Some Use to Justify VIolence or Terrorism". whyislam.org. Archived from the original on 16 September 2014. Retrieved 26 August 2014.
  153. "Malaysian women offer their bodies to ISIS militants in 'sexual jihad'; Najib slams Islamic radicals". Straits Times. 27 August 2014. Archived from the original on 30 August 2014. Retrieved 27 August 2014.
  154. Reuter, Christoph (7 October 2013). "Sex Jihad and Other Lies: Assad's Elaborate Disinformation Campaign". Der Spiegel. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  155. Zawati, Hilmi M.; Chair of the Center for Justice and Accountability (16 February 2016). "Sectarian War in Syria Introduced New Gender-Based Crimes". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 31 December 2016. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  156. "Hamid and Umer Hayat 2nd-indictment California" (PDF). 22 September 2005. Archived from the original on 27 December 2005. Retrieved 24 November 2005 – via Milnet.com.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  157. "José Padilla and others Florida indictment" (PDF). 17 November 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 November 2005. Retrieved 24 November 2005 – via Findlaw.com.
  158. B.A. Robinson (28 March 2003). "The Concept of Jihad ("Struggle") in Islam". Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. Retrieved 16 August 2006.
  159. Rodinson, Maxime (2 March 2021). Muhammad. New York Review of Books. ISBN 978-1-68137-492-5.
  160. Barber, Benjamin (21 April 2010). Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism's Challenge to Democracy. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-87444-3.
  161. "Ahmadiyya Community, Westminster Hall Debate". TheyWorkForYou.com. Archived from the original on 26 October 2010. Retrieved 28 October 2010.
  162. Dr. Aisha Y. Musa, Towards a Qur’anically-Based Articulation of the Concept of "Just War" Archived 26 April 2013 at the Wayback Machine, International Institute of Islamic Thought. Retrieved 5 May 2013
  163. Caner Taslaman, The Rhetoric of "Terror" and the Rhetoric of "Jihad" Archived 3 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine, canertaslaman.com. Retrieved 28 April 2013

Sources

Further reading

External links

  • Media related to Jihad at Wikimedia Commons
  • The dictionary definition of jihad at Wiktionary
  • Quotations related to Jihad at Wikiquote
  • Learning materials related to Jihad at Wikiversity
Categories: