Misplaced Pages

2006 shelling of Beit Hanoun: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:09, 17 November 2006 view sourceNotAWeasel (talk | contribs)41 edits →The incident← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:08, 8 November 2024 view source DocWatson42 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers217,187 editsm Cleaned up references and other matters. Added a comment. 
(309 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|2006 Israeli attack on the Gaza Strip}}
{{moveprotected}}
{{pp-extended|small=yes}}
{{currentevent}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2019}}
{{Infobox event
| title = 2006 shelling of Beit Hanoun
| partof = ]
| date = 8 November 2006
| location = ], ]
<!-- | coordinates = Copied from the Beit Hanoun article; please modify with more precise coordinates: {{Wikidatacoord|Q74176|region:PS-NGZ_type:event|display=inline,title}} -->
| organizers = {{flagicon|Israel}} ]
| outcome = Formal apology by the Israeli government
| reported deaths = 19+
| reported injuries = 40+
}}
{{Campaignbox Gaza-Israel conflict}}


The '''November 2006 Beit Hanoun incident''' occurred on ] ] when the ], responding to ]s fired by Palestinian militants at Israeli towns shelled the ] town of ], killing 20 Palestinians and wounding more than 40.<ref name=guardian19>, ''The Guardian''</ref><ref name=ynet>, YNet Israel News, ] ]</ref> It occurred the day after the Israeli withdrawal following ], an incursion by the Israeli military into the northern Gaza Strip.<ref name=BBC1>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6127250.stm|title=Israeli shelling kills 18 in Gaza|publisher=]|date=], ]|accessdate=2006-11-14}}</ref> The '''2006 shelling of Beit Hanoun''' by the ] (IDF) happened on 8 November, when shells hit a row of houses in the ] town of ],<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/19/world/middleeast/19cnd-mideast.html |title=Israeli Army Strikes Gaza Rocket-Launching Cell |author=Isabel Kershner |work=The New York Times |date=19 May 2007}}</ref> killing at least 19 ] and wounding more than 40.<ref name=guardian19>, ''The Guardian''</ref><ref name=ynet>, YNet Israel News, 12 November 2006</ref> The shelling followed the IDF's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in completion of a week-long operation codenamed ], which the Israeli government stated had been intended to stop the ] attacks on Israeli civilians by Palestinian militants.<ref name=BBC1>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6127250.stm |title=Israeli shelling kills 18 in Gaza |publisher=BBC News |date=8 November 2006 |access-date=14 November 2006}}</ref> The Israeli government apologized and attributed the incident to a technical malfunction.


== The incident == == Incident ==
Early in the morning of 8 November 2006, Israeli artillery shelled a densely built-up area in Beit Hanoun, striking a building where an extended family was sleeping. Nineteen people were killed, mostly women and children, 13 belonging to the same family,<ref name=BBC1/><ref name =B>. ''B'tselem''.</ref> and 40 others were wounded.<ref name="Adalah" >Hala Khoury-Bisharat1, , '']'', vol. 37, June 2007. p. 2.</ref> Israel stated that the shelling was in response to a Qassam rocket attack from that location, a day earlier,<ref name="Adalah" /> possibly from a car driven into the area.<ref name=guardianfiring>, '']'', 12 November 2006</ref> According to the Israeli military, the artillery had misfired due to a malfunction of the guidance system.<ref>, '']'', 9 November 2006</ref><ref>IDF: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120205032245/http://www1.idf.il/DOVER/site/mainpage.asp?sl=EN&id=7&clr=1&docid=58693.EN |date=5 February 2012 }}, 9 November 2006</ref> It did not clarify why the shelling occurred a full day after the firing of the Qassam,<ref name="Adalah" />
According to the Palestinian Health Ministry, a barrage of tank shells hit civilian homes. Eight children and seven women were among the dead, and at least 40 people were wounded. 13 of the dead belonged to the same family, two of them women and six of them children.<ref name=BBC1/> A 22-year-old eyewitness, Attaf Hamad, said <ref name=BBC1/> "It is the saddest scene and images I have ever seen. We saw legs, we saw heads, we saw hands scattered in the street".


===Palestinian response===
Ostensibly aimed at Qassam rockets and ] launchers in an open area, seven of the shells landed 1 km off target and hit houses in the outskirts of Beit Hanoun. The shells were fired in response to a Qassam rocket attack, which was launched the previous day from near the area where the shells fell. The Israeli military said that the rockets were probably launched from a car driven into the area.<ref name=guardianfiring>, '']'', ] ]</ref> The Israeli military said that their shells were mis-aimed because of a failure in the artillery battery's guidance system.<ref>, ], ] ]</ref><ref>IDF: , ] ]</ref>
⚫ * ] – The Palestinian prime minister, ]'s ], stated the attack was an "awful massacre". Palestinian president ] described it as an "...ugly massacre committed by the ] against our children, our women and elderly...you (the Israelis) do not want peace at all..."<ref name=guardian19/><ref name=yahooscores>, ''AFP'', 8 November 2006</ref>
* Palestinians in Beit Hanoun marched in anger the next day and bore for cameras the battered faces of two of the dead children.<ref name=ny>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/09/world/middleeast/09cnd-mideast.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5094&en=1cdacffd90362b65&hp&ex=1163134800&partner=homepage |title=Israeli Leader Tries to Ease Anger After Shelling |author=Ian Fisher |work=The New York Times |date=9 November 2006}}</ref>


===Israeli response===
] of the ] states: "The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations." Israel has consistently stated that the terrorist groups operating in the Palestinian territories endanger civilian Palestinians by hiding among the general population.
⚫ *] – Prime Minister ] expressed regret over the killings and offered ] to the wounded. In his address to the ], Israel's deputy UN representative ] reiterated Israel's "deep sorrow and regret" over the accidental killing of innocent civilians, and told the council that terrorism by Hamas was to blame for "the incident in Beit Hanoun". "If Palestinian terror did not continue to assault Israelis, if ] stopped sailing out of Gaza into Israel, the incident in Beit Hanoun would never have happened," Carmon said. "A single decision is needed: The Palestinian Authority government must decide to stop using terrorism as a means to achieving its goals."<ref name=yahoosec>, AFP, 9 November 2006</ref> At a business conference in Tel Aviv, Prime Minister Olmert said, "I am very uncomfortable with this event. I'm very distressed." Olmert called it a "mistake" caused by "technical failure," and he urged Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to meet with him immediately.<ref name=ny/> Israeli organizations, including ] and ] and political parties ] and ] held a protest in ] shortly after news of the killings broke.<ref>{{Dead link|date=September 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Israeli human rights group ] described the policy of returning fire to the general area from which a rocket attack is launched a "]."<ref name=guardianfiring/>


== United Nations investigation ==
== Reactions ==
On 15 November 2006, the United Nations ] adopted resolution S-3/1<ref name="S-3/1" ></ref><ref> ] 15 November 2006. </ref> which called for a fact-finding mission, consisting of ] and Professor Christine Chinkin of the United Kingdom to travel to ].<ref>{{Dead link|date=April 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} to serve on High-Level Fact-Finding Mission to Beit Hanoun, UNISPAL, 6 December 2006.</ref> The resolution was accepted by a wide margin, with only seven countries opposing and six abstaining.<ref name=ga> deplores Israeli military action, calls for dispatch of Mission to Beit Hanoun. 17 November 2006.</ref>
⚫ * ] ] - The Palestinian prime minister, ]'s ], denounced the Israeli attack as an "awful massacre" and said talks on forming more moderate Palestinian unity government would be suspended. Palestinian president, ] said "...ugly massacre committed by the occupation against our children, our women and elderly...you (the Israelis) do not want peace at all..."<ref name=guardian19/><ref name=yahooscores>, ''AFP'', ] ]</ref> A local Hamas leader has called for the group to resume ]s inside Israel, a policy officially suspended two years ago but continued by other terrorist groups in a fashion close to a ].<ref name=BBC1/>


In reaction to the resolution, the ] released a statement noting that Israel had already expressed regret regarding the incident, decrying the UN's "ignoring of the ongoing terrorism against Israeli civilians by the Palestinian terrorist organizations", and expecting the UN "to show a more balanced and fairer approach toward Israel and not to automatically adopt any notion from those whose only desire is to discredit Israel."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/About+the+Ministry/MFA+Spokesman/2006/The%20UN%20General%20Assembly%20ignores%20terrorism%2019-Nov-2006 |title=The UN General Assembly ignores terrorism |publisher=Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs |date=19 November 2006}}</ref>
⚫ * ] ] - Israeli Defense Minister ] ordered the halt in artillery attacks and called for an urgent inquiry into the incident. Prime Minister ] expressed regret over the killings and offered humanitarian assistance to the wounded. In his address to the UN Security Council, Israel's deputy UN representative ] reiterated Israel's "deep sorrow and regret" over the accidental killing of innocent civilians. But he told the council that ] by Hamas was to blame for the Beit Hanoun incident. "If Palestinian terror did not continue to assault Israelis, if ] rockets stopped sailing out of Gaza into Israel, the incident in Beit Hanoun would never have happened," Carmon said. "A single decision is needed: The Palestinian Authority government must decide to stop using terrorism as a means to achieving its goals." <ref name=yahoosec>, AFP, ] ]</ref>
:Israeli Peace groups including ] and ] and political parties ] and ] held a protest in ] shortly after news of the killings broke.<ref></ref> Israeli human rights group ] has described the policy of returning fire to the general area from which a rocket attack is launched as a 'war crime'.<ref name=guardianfiring/>
:A short time later, Palestinian terrorists launched more Qassam rockets into Israel, killing a civilian woman. The Israeli Prime Minister's office released a statement saying "This is precisely the type of murderous attacks that we are trying to prevent. Israel will take any means necessary in protecting our citizens." <ref>, ], ] ]</ref>
⚫ *{{EU}} - Speaking on behalf of the European Union, Finland's UN Ambassador ] recognized Israel's "legitimate right to self-defense" but urged Israel to "exercise utmost restraint" and underlined that "action should not be disproportionate or in contradiction to international law." "We call on Israel to end its incursion in Gaza," she added, while pressing Palestinian leaders to put an end to the firing of rockets on Israeli territory.<ref name=yahoosec/>


On three occasions, the mission attempted to travel to Beit Hanoun via Israel. Each of these attempts was frustrated by the refusal of the Government of Israel to cooperate with the mission.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080430141028/http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/eed216406b50bf6485256ce10072f637/73d6eb7043cc08c785257305005049de%21OpenDocument |date=30 April 2008 }} ENTITLED "HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL", A/HRC/5/20, United Nations ], 18 June 2007.</ref> The mission finally visited Beit Hanoun from 27 to 29 May 2008.
⚫ * ] ] - US Ambassador ] said that while Washington deeply regretted the loss of Palestinian lives, it also believed that Israel has the right "to defend itself and the lives of its citizens." <ref name=yahoosec/>


In its final report, the mission concluded that "n the absence of a well-founded explanation from the Israeli military{{spaced ndash}}who is in sole possession of the relevant facts{{spaced ndash}}the mission must conclude that there is a possibility that the shelling of Beit Hanoun constituted a war crime."<ref>{{Dead link|date=April 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, Report of the high-level fact-finding mission to Beit Hanoun established under Council resolution S-3/1, A/HRC/9/26, United Nations Human Rights Council, 1 September 2008.</ref>
⚫ * ] ] - ] ] ] said "Israeli policies in the Palestinian territories have gone too far."<ref name=yahooscores/>


Tutu has vigorously protested the overall response to the incident: "The right to life has been violated not just through the killings , but also through the lack of an adequate investigation of the killings."<ref> Al-jazeera Friday, 19 September 2008. Verified 8 January 2009.</ref>
⚫ * ] ] - Italian Foreign Minister ] has suggested that the strike was a deliberate action by the Israeli government to stop Hamas from forming a government of national unity in the Palestinian territories. He told his party's newspaper L'Unita, "What happened in Beit Hanoun is a result of political choices." <ref name=ynet/>


===UN resolution=== == Aftermath ==
] has stated that the Israeli military had a "long history of mistakes causing many civilian casualties." About the 2006 shelling, he said that: "it was found it was caused by a faulty programming card in a counter-battery ], called ''Shilem'', designed to track an enemy projectile's trajectory back to its point of origin and direct artillery fire back at that spot. The inquiry also found that the artillery crew had not recalibrated their weapons overnight and did not have spotters monitoring whether their fire was accurate, so 12 to 15 artillery shells were fired before it was realised they were hitting an apartment complex. It is not clear what changes the IDF made to its targeting methods as a result."<ref>, Julian Borger, 31 July 2014, ]</ref>
On ] ], in response to calls from the Palestinian authorities, ] proposes an Arab-backed resolution to the UN Security Council urging an immediate withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza and condemning the Israeli attack. The draft resolution was vetoed by the United States on the grounds that it was "biased against Israel and politically motivated".<ref>{{cite news |title= U.S. vetoes U.N. resolution condemning Israel|url=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-11-11T185808Z_01_N11393197_RTRUKOC_0_US-MIDEAST-UN.xml&pageNumber=1&imageid=&cap=&sz=13&WTModLoc=NewsArt-C1-ArticlePage1 |work= |publisher=] |date=] ]|accessdate=2006-11-14}}</ref>
<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061112/ap_on_re_mi_ea/un_israel_palestinians|title=U.S. vetoes condemnation of Gaza strikes|publisher=]|date=] ]}}</ref> Nine voted for; Britain, Denmark, Japan and Slovakia abstained; the U.S. against, and the resolution was vetoed. U.S. Secretary ] calls the resolution draft a "a one-sided political agenda", and ambassador to U.N. ] said it "does not display an evenhanded characterization of the recent events in Gaza, nor does it advance the cause of Israeli-Palestinian peace."


===International response===
⚫ ==References==
* ] described the killing as an appalling act and called for an immediate, independent investigation. It said the Israeli investigation had been seriously inadequate and failed to meet international standards.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061116032941/http://www.amnestyusa.org/countries/israel_and_occupied_territories/document.do?id=ENGMDE150872006 |date=16 November 2006 }}, ''Amnesty International USA''</ref>
<references/>
⚫ * ] secretary general ] said "These massacres of children, women and civilians are unjustified and incomprehensible and unexpected. Israeli policies in the Palestinian territories have gone too far."<ref name="bbcquotes"/>
⚫ * Speaking on behalf of the ], Finland's UN ambassador ] recognized Israel's "legitimate right to self-defense" but urged Israel to "exercise utmost restraint" and underlined that "action should not be disproportionate or in contradiction to international law." "We call on Israel to end its incursion in Gaza," she added, while pressing Palestinian leaders to put an end to the firing of rockets on Israeli territory.<ref name=yahoosec/>
⚫ * Italian Foreign Minister ] suggested that the strike was a deliberate action by the Israeli government to stop Hamas from forming a government of national unity in the Palestinian territories. He told his party's newspaper L'Unita, "What happened in Beit Hanoun is a result of political choices."<ref name=ynet/>
* Russian Foreign ministry officials urged "both sides to stop the bloodbath – by ending these attacks, whose victims are totally innocent people, and taking urgent measures to stabilise the situation and restart political dialogue."<ref name="bbcquotes">, ''BBC''</ref>
* Syrian foreign ministry officials called the incident a "savage attack", "a challenge to the international community" that "must be vehemently condemned." Syria also asked the UN Security Council to stop "massacres" committed by Israel and punish it for its "repeated crimes."<ref name="bbcquotes"/>
* Turkish foreign ministry officials described it as a "disproportionate and indiscriminate use of force" that will lead into indefinite postponement of peaceful co-existence between Israelis and the Palestinians.<ref name="bbcquotes"/>
* United Kingdom Foreign Secretary ] said: "It is hard to see what this action was meant to achieve and how it can be justified... Israel must respect its obligation to avoid harming civilians."<ref name="bbcquotes"/>
⚫ * United States Ambassador ] said that while Washington deeply regretted the loss of Palestinian lives, it also believed that Israel has the right "to defend itself and the lives of its citizens".<ref name=yahoosec/>


== See also == == See also ==
*] * ]


⚫ == References ==
⚫ ]
{{reflist}}

== External links ==
* , documentary featuring interviews with surviving members of the al-Athamneh family; the executive director of B'Tselem; and the head of the Israeli Defense Forces foreign-press unit (interviews conducted in January 2007).

{{Gaza crisis}}
⚫ {{Israeli-Palestinian conflict |Timeline}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:2006 Shelling of Beit Hanoun}}
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 16:08, 8 November 2024

2006 Israeli attack on the Gaza Strip

2006 shelling of Beit Hanoun
Part of 2006 Israeli operation in Beit Hanoun
Date8 November 2006
LocationBeit Hanoun, Gaza Strip
Organized byIsrael Israel Defense Forces
OutcomeFormal apology by the Israeli government
Deaths19+
Non-fatal injuries40+
Gaza–Israel conflict

The 2006 shelling of Beit Hanoun by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) happened on 8 November, when shells hit a row of houses in the Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanoun, killing at least 19 Palestinians and wounding more than 40. The shelling followed the IDF's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in completion of a week-long operation codenamed Operation "Autumn Clouds", which the Israeli government stated had been intended to stop the Qassam rocket attacks on Israeli civilians by Palestinian militants. The Israeli government apologized and attributed the incident to a technical malfunction.

Incident

Early in the morning of 8 November 2006, Israeli artillery shelled a densely built-up area in Beit Hanoun, striking a building where an extended family was sleeping. Nineteen people were killed, mostly women and children, 13 belonging to the same family, and 40 others were wounded. Israel stated that the shelling was in response to a Qassam rocket attack from that location, a day earlier, possibly from a car driven into the area. According to the Israeli military, the artillery had misfired due to a malfunction of the guidance system. It did not clarify why the shelling occurred a full day after the firing of the Qassam,

Palestinian response

  • Palestinian National Authority – The Palestinian prime minister, Hamas's Ismail Haniyeh, stated the attack was an "awful massacre". Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas described it as an "...ugly massacre committed by the occupation against our children, our women and elderly...you (the Israelis) do not want peace at all..."
  • Palestinians in Beit Hanoun marched in anger the next day and bore for cameras the battered faces of two of the dead children.

Israeli response

  • Israeli Government – Prime Minister Ehud Olmert expressed regret over the killings and offered humanitarian assistance to the wounded. In his address to the UN Security Council, Israel's deputy UN representative Daniel Carmon reiterated Israel's "deep sorrow and regret" over the accidental killing of innocent civilians, and told the council that terrorism by Hamas was to blame for "the incident in Beit Hanoun". "If Palestinian terror did not continue to assault Israelis, if Qassam rockets stopped sailing out of Gaza into Israel, the incident in Beit Hanoun would never have happened," Carmon said. "A single decision is needed: The Palestinian Authority government must decide to stop using terrorism as a means to achieving its goals." At a business conference in Tel Aviv, Prime Minister Olmert said, "I am very uncomfortable with this event. I'm very distressed." Olmert called it a "mistake" caused by "technical failure," and he urged Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to meet with him immediately. Israeli organizations, including Peace Now and Gush Shalom and political parties Meretz and Hadash held a protest in Tel Aviv shortly after news of the killings broke. Israeli human rights group B'Tselem described the policy of returning fire to the general area from which a rocket attack is launched a "war crime."

United Nations investigation

On 15 November 2006, the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted resolution S-3/1 which called for a fact-finding mission, consisting of Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Professor Christine Chinkin of the United Kingdom to travel to Beit Hanoun. The resolution was accepted by a wide margin, with only seven countries opposing and six abstaining.

In reaction to the resolution, the Foreign Affairs Minister of Israel released a statement noting that Israel had already expressed regret regarding the incident, decrying the UN's "ignoring of the ongoing terrorism against Israeli civilians by the Palestinian terrorist organizations", and expecting the UN "to show a more balanced and fairer approach toward Israel and not to automatically adopt any notion from those whose only desire is to discredit Israel."

On three occasions, the mission attempted to travel to Beit Hanoun via Israel. Each of these attempts was frustrated by the refusal of the Government of Israel to cooperate with the mission. The mission finally visited Beit Hanoun from 27 to 29 May 2008.

In its final report, the mission concluded that "n the absence of a well-founded explanation from the Israeli military – who is in sole possession of the relevant facts – the mission must conclude that there is a possibility that the shelling of Beit Hanoun constituted a war crime."

Tutu has vigorously protested the overall response to the incident: "The right to life has been violated not just through the killings , but also through the lack of an adequate investigation of the killings."

Aftermath

Andrew Exum has stated that the Israeli military had a "long history of mistakes causing many civilian casualties." About the 2006 shelling, he said that: "it was found it was caused by a faulty programming card in a counter-battery radar system, called Shilem, designed to track an enemy projectile's trajectory back to its point of origin and direct artillery fire back at that spot. The inquiry also found that the artillery crew had not recalibrated their weapons overnight and did not have spotters monitoring whether their fire was accurate, so 12 to 15 artillery shells were fired before it was realised they were hitting an apartment complex. It is not clear what changes the IDF made to its targeting methods as a result."

International response

  • Amnesty International described the killing as an appalling act and called for an immediate, independent investigation. It said the Israeli investigation had been seriously inadequate and failed to meet international standards.
  • Arab League secretary general Amr Moussa said "These massacres of children, women and civilians are unjustified and incomprehensible and unexpected. Israeli policies in the Palestinian territories have gone too far."
  • Speaking on behalf of the European Union, Finland's UN ambassador Kirsti Lintonen recognized Israel's "legitimate right to self-defense" but urged Israel to "exercise utmost restraint" and underlined that "action should not be disproportionate or in contradiction to international law." "We call on Israel to end its incursion in Gaza," she added, while pressing Palestinian leaders to put an end to the firing of rockets on Israeli territory.
  • Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D'Alema suggested that the strike was a deliberate action by the Israeli government to stop Hamas from forming a government of national unity in the Palestinian territories. He told his party's newspaper L'Unita, "What happened in Beit Hanoun is a result of political choices."
  • Russian Foreign ministry officials urged "both sides to stop the bloodbath – by ending these attacks, whose victims are totally innocent people, and taking urgent measures to stabilise the situation and restart political dialogue."
  • Syrian foreign ministry officials called the incident a "savage attack", "a challenge to the international community" that "must be vehemently condemned." Syria also asked the UN Security Council to stop "massacres" committed by Israel and punish it for its "repeated crimes."
  • Turkish foreign ministry officials described it as a "disproportionate and indiscriminate use of force" that will lead into indefinite postponement of peaceful co-existence between Israelis and the Palestinians.
  • United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett said: "It is hard to see what this action was meant to achieve and how it can be justified... Israel must respect its obligation to avoid harming civilians."
  • United States Ambassador John Bolton said that while Washington deeply regretted the loss of Palestinian lives, it also believed that Israel has the right "to defend itself and the lives of its citizens".

See also

References

  1. Isabel Kershner (19 May 2007). "Israeli Army Strikes Gaza Rocket-Launching Cell". The New York Times.
  2. ^ 12 children among 19 killed by Israeli tank fire, The Guardian
  3. ^ Italy: Israel shelled Beit Hanoun deliberately, YNet Israel News, 12 November 2006
  4. ^ "Israeli shelling kills 18 in Gaza". BBC News. 8 November 2006. Retrieved 14 November 2006.
  5. Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces in the Occupied Territories. B'tselem.
  6. ^ Hala Khoury-Bisharat1, "Israel and the Culture of Impunity", Adalah Newsletter, vol. 37, June 2007. p. 2.
  7. ^ How Israel put Gaza civilians in firing line, The Guardian, 12 November 2006
  8. "Peretz to reevaluate IDF policy of shelling northern Gaza Strip", Haaretz, 9 November 2006
  9. IDF: Inquiry results regarding the incident in Beit Hanoun on 8 November 2006 Archived 5 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 9 November 2006
  10. Israeli fire kills scores in Gaza; Palestinians, world slam attack, AFP, 8 November 2006
  11. ^ Ian Fisher (9 November 2006). "Israeli Leader Tries to Ease Anger After Shelling". The New York Times.
  12. ^ Security Council urged to condemn Israel's 'aggression' in Gaza, AFP, 9 November 2006
  13. Gush Shalom in Action Blood on the Flag
  14. Special session resolution S-3/1.
  15. 3rd Special session on Israeli military incursions in Occupied Palestinian Territory,' United Nations Human Rights Council 15 November 2006.
  16. President of Human Rights Council appoints Christine Chinkin to serve on High-Level Fact-Finding Mission to Beit Hanoun, UNISPAL, 6 December 2006.
  17. UN General Assembly by wide margin deplores Israeli military action, calls for dispatch of Mission to Beit Hanoun. 17 November 2006.
  18. "The UN General Assembly ignores terrorism". Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 19 November 2006.
  19. IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 60/251 OF 15 MARCH 2006 Archived 30 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine ENTITLED "HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL", A/HRC/5/20, United Nations Human Rights Council, 18 June 2007.
  20. HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN PALESTINE AND OTHER OCCUPIED ARAB TERRITORIES, Report of the high-level fact-finding mission to Beit Hanoun established under Council resolution S-3/1, A/HRC/9/26, United Nations Human Rights Council, 1 September 2008.
  21. Tutu urges Israel 'war crime' probe Al-jazeera Friday, 19 September 2008. Verified 8 January 2009.
  22. Gaza civilian death toll raises questions about Israeli military training, Julian Borger, 31 July 2014, The Guardian
  23. Israel/Occupied Territories: Amnesty International delegate visits scene of Gaza Strip killings Archived 16 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine, Amnesty International USA
  24. ^ In quotes: Gaza attack reaction, BBC

External links

  • Video: Technical Error at Beit Hanoun, documentary featuring interviews with surviving members of the al-Athamneh family; the executive director of B'Tselem; and the head of the Israeli Defense Forces foreign-press unit (interviews conducted in January 2007).
Gaza–Israel conflict
History
Pre-2006
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2014
2015
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024Proposed Israeli resettlement of the Gaza Strip
Lists
Related
topics
Israeli–Palestinian conflict
Participants
Israelis
Palestinians
Principals
Other groups
Third-party groups
Individuals
Israelis
Palestinians
Background
1920–1948
 
1948–1970
Palestinian
insurgency
1968–1982
 
1973–1987
First Intifada
1987–1991
Second Intifada
2000–2005
Palestinian dissident
campaigns
2006–present
Gaza–Israel
conflict
2006–present
Diplomacy/law
Timeline
1948–1991
1990s
2000s
2010s
United Nations
Analysis
Categories: