Misplaced Pages

Zakir Naik: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:56, 27 November 2006 view sourceOutsider2810 (talk | contribs)378 edits Analogy of Father and Son← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:48, 26 December 2024 view source 03Heat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,789 editsm Najibullah ZaziTag: Visual edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Indian Islamic scholar (born 1965)}}
{{unreliable|article}}
{{pp-blp|small=yes}}
{{Use Indian English|date=March 2023}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}}
{{Infobox person
| name = Zakir Naik
| image = Dr Zakir Naik (cropped) 2.jpg
| caption = Naik in the Maldives, 2010
| birth_name = Zakir Abdul Karim Naik
| birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1965|10|18|df=yes}}
| birth_place = ], ], India
| citizenship = ]
| alma_mater = ] (])
| title = {{indented plainlist|
* Founder and president of Islamic Research Foundation
* Founder of ], ], ], and ]}}
| occupation = {{hlist|]|physician}}
| years_active = 1991–present
| known_for = ]
| boards = Islamic Research Foundation,<ref name=Irfunderscanner /> ] and United Islamic Aid<ref name=siasat />
| spouse = Farhat Naik<ref name=Ramanujan /><ref name="Gambia1" /><ref name="Minivan2">{{cite news |author=Aishath Aniya |date=29 May 2010 |url=http://minivannewsarchive.com/society/comment-an-evening-with-mrs-naik-7590 |title=Comment: An evening with Mrs Naik |publisher=] – Archive |access-date=1 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150929170546/http://minivannewsarchive.com/society/comment-an-evening-with-mrs-naik-7590 |archive-date=29 September 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref>
| children = 3<ref>{{cite news | url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/zakir-naiks-son-fariq-now-under-mumbai-police-scanner/articleshow/53218260.cms | title=Zakir Naik's son Fariq now under Mumbai police scanner |publisher=] |work=ET Bureau | date=15 July 2016 | access-date=18 July 2016 | author=Kumar, Krishna}}</ref><ref name="Malaysiakini1">{{cite web | url=https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/337626 | title=Your KiniGuide to Muslim scholar Zakir Naik |publisher=] |date=12 April 2016 | access-date=18 July 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160723181459/http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/337626 |archive-date=23 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all}}</ref>
| awards = {{plainlist|
* ] (2013)
* ] (2013)
* ] (2015)}}
| website = {{URL|ZakirNaik.com}}
| module2 = {{Infobox YouTube personality
| embed = yes
| channel_direct_url = c/Drzakirchannel
| channel_display_name = Dr Zakir Naik
| years_active = 2011–present
| genre = {{flatlist|
* ]
}}
| subscribers = 3.84 million
| views = 268 million
| network =
| associated_acts = ]
| silver_button = yes
| gold_button = yes
| stats_update = 20 April 2024
}}
}}


'''Zakir Abdul Karim Naik''' (born 18 October 1965) is an Indian Islamic scholar and public ] who focuses on ].<ref>{{cite web|title=Dr. Zakir A. Naik|url=https://kingfaisalprize.org/dr-zakir-a-naik-2/|access-date=27 April 2021}}</ref> Naik is currently a wanted ] in India, where, in 2016, the authorities charged Naik for money laundering while he was abroad in Malaysia; Naik did not return to India and became a permanent resident of Malaysia.<ref name=":8">{{Cite web|date=7 July 2016|title=10 Times Zakir Naik Proved That He Promoted Anything But Peace|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/07/07/zakir-naik_n_10851550.html|access-date=25 August 2020|website=HuffPost India|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":9">{{Cite news|agency=PTI|date=26 October 2017|title=NIA files charge sheet against Zakir Naik in hate speech, incitement case|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/nia-files-charge-sheet-against-zakir-naik-in-hate-speech-incitement-case/article19925462.ece|access-date=25 August 2020|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref name=":11">{{Cite news|date=2 May 2019|title=Indian 'hate preacher' Zakir Naik charged with money laundering|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48132710|access-date=25 August 2020}}</ref> Naik denies all charges. The ] attempted to issue an ] for his arrest, which was refused due to insufficient evidence.<ref name=":14">{{Cite web|date=2 November 2017|title=Hate charges in India, banned from UK, welcome in Malaysia|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/2118129/who-zakir-naik-muslim-preacher-faces-hate-charges-india|access-date=26 August 2019|website=]}}</ref><ref name="red_notice" />
{| class ="wikitable" align="right" width=250
<!--{|border=1 align="center" cellpadding=2 cellspacing=0 width=250 style="margin-left:3em; margin-bottom: 2em; color: black; background: white;"-->
|colspan=2|
]
|-
!colspan=2 style="color: white; background: gray; text-align:center"|Dr. Zakir Abdul Karim Naik
|-
|width="40%"|'''Date of Birth'''||] ]
|-|Nationality'''||]
|-
|'''Occupation'''||Islamic Da'wah
|-
|'''University Degree'''||M.B.B.S. (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery), University of Mumbai
|-
|}


He is the founder and president of the Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) and ]. He is a well-known figure in the Islamic world, and while he does not claim to be a follower of any one school of thought in Islam, he is most closely associated with the ] school of thought.<ref>{{Cite web |title=All you need to know about Zakir Naik – Who's Zakir Naik? |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/people/all-you-need-to-know-about-zakir-naik/zakir-naik-owns-islamic-research-foundation/slideshow/53109954.cms |access-date=14 January 2021 |website=]}}</ref> Naik's ''Peace TV'' is banned in India, Bangladesh, Canada, Sri Lanka, and the United Kingdom under hate speech laws.<ref name="ndtv.com">{{Cite web|title=Zakir Naik, Wanted In India, Banned From Making Speeches In Malaysia|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-wanted-in-india-for-inciting-terror-banned-from-making-speeches-in-malay-2087495|access-date=25 August 2020|website=NDTV.com}}</ref><ref name=":16">{{cite news|last1=The Times of India|title=Bangladesh bans televangelist Zakir Naik's Peace TV|website=]|date=10 July 2016 |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Bangladesh-bans-televangelist-Zakir-Naiks-Peace-TV/articleshow/53140044.cms|access-date=10 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160710112421/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Bangladesh-bans-televangelist-Zakir-Naiks-Peace-TV/articleshow/53140044.cms|archive-date=10 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="The National News">{{Cite news |url=https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/peace-tv-stations-fined-300-000-for-hate-speeches-as-it-pulls-out-of-the-uk-1.1019484
'''Zakir Abdul Karim Naik''' (born ] ]) is an Indian public speaker, debater and writer on the subject of Islam and comparative religion. He travels extensively and has been featured at many Islamic conferences.
|title=Peace TV stations fined £300,000 for hate speeches as it pulls out of the UK|work=The National News|date=14 May 2020|access-date=28 April 2021}}</ref>


== Early life and education ==
A medical doctor by training, Naik attempts to clear what he considers misconceptions about Islam using the ], ] and other religious scriptures, while also spreading ] (Islamic proselytism).
Zakir Naik was born on 18 October 1965 to Abdul Karim Naik and Roshan Naik in ], India. He attended ] and studied medicine at the ] and later the ], where he obtained a ] (MBBS).<ref>{{cite news |last1=Sekaran |first1=Kohilah |title=8 facts you need to know about controversial preacher Dr Zakir Naik |url=http://english.astroawani.com/malaysia-news/8-facts-you-need-know-about-controversial-preacher-dr-zakir-naik-updated-101971 |publisher=] |date=11 April 2016 |access-date=18 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160515230724/http://english.astroawani.com/malaysia-news/8-facts-you-need-know-about-controversial-preacher-dr-zakir-naik-updated-101971 |archive-date=15 May 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref>


==History and background== == Career ==
In 1991, he started working in the field of ] and founded the Islamic International School in Mumbai and the United Islamic Aid, which provides scholarships to poor and destitute Muslim youth.<ref name="BAILII"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923222859/http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2010/2825.html |date=23 September 2015}}. ]. 5 November 2010. Retrieved 21 July 2011.</ref> Naik's wife, Farhat Naik, is the president of the women's section of the Islamic Research Foundation (IRF).<ref name="Ramanujan">Ramanujan, Sweta. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131221093750/http://expressindia.indianexpress.com/news/fullstory.php?newsid=33845|date=21 December 2013}}. expressindia.com. ]. 16 July 2004. Retrieved 16 April 2011. 16 April 2011.</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://in.news.yahoo.com/farhat-naik-renowned-islamic-preacher-093232994.html|title=Farhat Naik: Zakir Naik's Wife is Invisible and Equally Regressive|website=in.news.yahoo.com}}</ref> He established United Islamic Aid, which provides scholarship to poor and destitute ] youth.<ref name=siasat>{{cite news |title=Scholarships to Muslim students by United Islamic Aid |url=http://www.siasat.com/english/news/scholarships-muslim-students-united-islamic-aid |publisher=] |date=24 May 2012 |access-date=26 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150410101500/http://www.siasat.com/english/news/scholarships-muslim-students-united-islamic-aid |archive-date=10 April 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref>
He studied at St Peter's High School and Kishinchand Chellaram College. Later, he trained as a medical doctor at the Karnataka Lingayat Education Society's J. N. Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka. He heads the ], based in Mumbai. He is also the chairman of the IRF Educational Trust, and the president of Islamic Dimensions. Naik is the founder of the Islamic International School .


Naik said in 2006 that he was inspired by ], an Islamic preacher whom he met in 1987.<ref name="Wahab">Wahab, Siraj. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105131708/http://arabnews.com/?page=9&section=0&article=84659&d=8&m=7&y=2006 |date=5 November 2012}}. '']''. 1 July 2006. Retrieved 16 April 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref> (Naik is sometimes referred to as "Deedat plus", a label given to him by Deedat.)<ref name=Wahab /><ref>{{cite book |author= Lloyd Ridgeon |title= Islamic Interpretations of Christianity |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=neHX-lp_yegC |date= 7 March 2001 |publisher= ] |isbn= 978-0-312-23854-4 |page= 213}}</ref>
==His views==
Naik claims to offer a rational understanding of Islam. Various aspects of Islamic law, ], he says, may seem illogical to non-Muslims or non-practicing ]; Naik claims these rules are sensible. Islam, in his view, is the best way of life because its teachings constitute practical solutions for the problems of mankind.


On 21 January 2006, the Islamic Research Foundation, which Naik heads, founded Peace TV. It is a non-profit Emirati ] ] that broadcasts free-to-air programming. It is one of the world's largest religious satellite television networks.<ref>{{Cite web|title=All you need to know about Zakir Naik – Who's Zakir Naik?|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/people/all-you-need-to-know-about-zakir-naik/zakir-naik-owns-islamic-research-foundation/slideshow/53109954.cms|access-date=30 June 2021|website=]}}</ref>
===Analogy of Father and Son===
During his dialogue with Sri Sri Ravishankar, Naik claimed that Muslims take the rest of humanity as their brothers and sisters. However, this does not mean that they will accept another person's religion. He went on to say, "Won't a Father try to save his son who wants to jump from a 20-storey building? In the same way, Muslims try to save the Non-Muslims by bringing them to the only right path - the Islamic path."


In the second half of March 2021, Naik launched ''Al Hidaayah'', which provides educational content about ]. The platform has thousands of hours of videos of more than 40 renowned Islamic speakers from all over the world including ], ], ], and ]. He claimed that this platform is a "]" version of ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Zakir Naik claims his new platform is 'Halal' version of Netflix |url=https://www.theweek.in/news/world/2021/04/15/zakir-naik-claims-his-new-platform-is-halal-version-of-netflix.html |access-date=2022-05-30 |website=] |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|title=Al Hidaayah – "The Guidance to Humanity"|url=https://alhidaayah.com/|language=en|access-date=1 June 2021}}</ref>
===Propagation of Other faiths in Islamic state===
Zakir Naik says that propagation of other religions within an Islamic state is forbidden. While he appreciates people of other religions allowing Muslims to freely propagate Islam in their country, he feels there should not be any church or temple in an Islamic state. He makes an analogy to math and claims, "2+2 is only equal to 4, not 3 or 6. Similarly, truth is one and it is only Islam. Will non-Muslims allow 2+2 = 6 to be taught in their schools?"


== Lectures and debates ==
===Allegations of Idol Worship in Islam===
Unlike many Islamic preachers, his lectures are colloquial,<ref name="nyt-2-3-15" /> given in English, not ] or ],<ref name=bad-news /> and he usually wears a suit and tie.<ref name=nyt-2-3-15>{{cite news |last1=Hubbard |first1=Ben |title=Saudi Award Goes to Muslim Televangelist Who Harshly Criticizes U.S. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/world/middleeast/saudi-award-goes-to-dr-zakir-naik-a-muslim-televangelist-who-harshly-criticizes-us.html?_r=0 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=2 March 2015 |access-date=1 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150415052404/http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/world/middleeast/saudi-award-goes-to-dr-zakir-naik-a-muslim-televangelist-who-harshly-criticizes-us.html?_r=0 |archive-date=15 April 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref>
Naik has held many debates and lectures<ref name=Irfunderscanner>{{cite news | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/zakir-naiks-foundation-under-the-scanner/article8829130.ece | title=Zakir Naik's UK-registered Foundation under scanner | newspaper=] | date=10 July 2016 | access-date=18 July 2016 | pages=Pandey, Devesh K | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160710143757/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/zakir-naiks-foundation-under-the-scanner/article8829130.ece | archive-date=10 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all | last1=Pandey | first1=Devesh K.}}</ref><ref name="Gambia1" /><ref name="lmzn">{{cite web|last1=Livemint|title=Zakir Naik's colourful, controversial past|url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/nEgC4RcrRkydW33OMxbvdN/Zakir-Naiks-controversial-past.html|access-date=16 July 2016|date=7 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160710003129/http://www.livemint.com/Politics/nEgC4RcrRkydW33OMxbvdN/Zakir-Naiks-controversial-past.html|archive-date=10 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=Livemint}}</ref> and is said to "have delivered over 4000<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/4000-speeches-counting-fans-swear-by-naik/article8825001.ece | title=4,000 speeches & counting, fans swear by Zakir Naik | newspaper=] | date=9 July 2016 | access-date=18 July 2016 | author=Vyas, Sharad | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160708210433/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/4000-speeches-counting-fans-swear-by-naik/article8825001.ece | archive-date=8 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all}}</ref> lectures around the world" as of 2016. ] ] has written that Naik's style of memorising the ] and ] literature in various languages, and his related missionary activity, has made him extremely popular in Muslim circles.<ref name="Hansen" /> Many of his debates are recorded and widely distributed in video and DVD media and online. His talks have been recorded in English and broadcast on weekends on several cable networks in Mumbai's Muslim neighbourhoods, and on the ] channel, which he co-produces.<ref name="Mazumdar">Mazumdar, Sudip. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060118131623/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10854375/site/newsweek/ |date=18 January 2006}}. ]. 23 January 2006. 18 January 2006.</ref><ref>Ahmad, Syed Neaz. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070707211833/http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=25960&Itemid=146 |date=7 July 2007}}. '']''. 23 February 2007. 7 July 2007.</ref> Topics he speaks on include: "]", "]", and "]".


His first debate was in 1994, a debate on the views of writer ] on Islam in her book '']'', organised at the "Mumbai Marathi Patrakar Sangh", entitled "Is Religious Fundamentalism a Stumbling block to Freedom of Expression?".<ref name="firstdebate" /> With the presence of four journalists, the debate went on for hours.<ref name="firstdebate">{{cite web | url=http://www.mid-day.com/articles/family-and-friends-speak-about-the-zakir-naik-they-knew/17439173 | title=Family and friends speak about the Zakir Naik they knew | publisher=] | date=17 July 2016 | access-date=20 July 2016 | author=Rizvi, Asif | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160722062723/http://www.mid-day.com/articles/family-and-friends-speak-about-the-zakir-naik-they-knew/17439173 | archive-date=22 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all}}</ref> In April 2000, Naik debated with William Campbell in Chicago on the topic of "The Qur'an and the Bible: In the Light of Science", one of his most-cited debates.<ref>Ahmed, Khaled. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091116052256/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006%5C01%5C08%5Cstory_8-1-2006_pg3_3 |date=16 November 2009}}. '']'' (Pakistan). 8 January 2006. Retrieved 16 April 2011.</ref> On 21 January 2006 Naik held an inter-religious dialogue with ] in Bangalore about the concept of ] and ].<ref>. '']''. 22 January 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
Naik was once asked: "Muslims go on a pilgrimage to Mecca and worship the Kaba'h by circumabulating it and kissing the black stone. Is that not idol worship?" to which he replied "It is not ]. The ] represents a common direction for prayer and by circling it, Muslims feel that there is one God in the center. Muslims kiss the Kaba'h only because Muhammad kissed it." Furthermore, Naik goes on to say:
*For a video of the debate, see . ]. Retrieved 7 August 2011.</ref> In February 2011 Naik addressed the ] via video link from India.<ref>. '']''. 17 February 2011. Retrieved 21 July 2011. 21 July 2011.
*See also: Syal, Rajeev. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170104002222/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jan/28/zakir-naik-oxford-union-satellite |date=4 January 2017}}. '']''. 28 January 2011. Retrieved 7 August 2011.</ref>


=== University of Melbourne ===
"Which Hindu will stand on the idol of their deity? But muslims stood on the Kaba'h during the call for prayer during early times of Islam. This is the best proof that there is no idol worship in Islam but present in Hinduism."
In 2004 Naik, at the invitation of the ], made an appearance at the ], where he argued that only Islam gave women true equality.<ref>Das, Sushi. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081003004244/http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/08/29/1093717837783.html |date=3 October 2008}}. '']''. 30 August 2004. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref> He said the more "revealing Western dress" makes women more susceptible to rape.<ref>Aly, Waleed. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080610072251/http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/the-clash-of-ignorance/2005/08/06/1123125843879.html |date=10 June 2008}}. '']''. 6 August 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref> Sushi Das of '']'' commented that "Naik extolled the moral and spiritual superiority of Islam and lampooned other faiths and the West in general", further stating that Naik's words "fostered a spirit of separateness and reinforced prejudice".<ref>Das, Sushi. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303201825/http://www.theage.com.au/news/sushi-das/between-two-worlds/2005/07/27/1122143904716.html |date=3 March 2016}}. '']''. 28 July 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011. See {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100630224305/http://about.theage.com.au/view_profile.asp?intid=628 |date=30 June 2010}}.</ref>


===Adoption in Islam=== === St David's Hall ===
In August 2006, Naik's visit and conference in ] caused controversy when Welsh conservative ] ] called for his appearance to be cancelled. He said Naik was a "hate-monger", and that his views did not deserve a public platform. Muslims from Cardiff, however, defended Naik's right to speak in the city. ], Secretary-General of the Muslim Council of Wales, stated that "people who know about him know that he is one of the most uncontroversial persons you could find. He talks about the similarities between religions, and how should we work on the common ground between them", whilst also inviting Davies to discuss further with Naik personally in the conference. The conference went ahead after the Cardiff council stated it was satisfied that he would not be preaching extremist views.<ref>. '']''. 16 August 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
Naik believes that Muslims are allowed to adopt children but that such adoption cannot have a legal status under Islamic law. Giving the adopted child a legal name (of the parent) is something he considers forbidden. Also, once the child grows up, the female members of the family must treat him as a non-mahram (stranger) and observe hijaab (be veiled) in his presence. (15:40 in the video link)
*Bodinger, Katie. . '']''. 21 August 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref>


=== Invitation to Gambia ===
===Punishment for Apostasy===
In 2014, Naik visited ] at the invitation of President ] to attend the grand celebration of ]'s 20th anniversary.<ref name="Gambia1">{{cite web | url=http://allafrica.com/stories/201410081498.html | title=Gambia: Renowned Scholar Dr. Zakir Naik Arrives Gambia Today | publisher=] | work=] | date=8 October 2014 | access-date=18 July 2016 | author=Ndow, Musa | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160807051530/http://allafrica.com/stories/201410081498.html | archive-date=7 August 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref name="Gambia2" /> There he delivered four lectures between 11 and 22 October.<ref name="Gambia1" /><ref name="Gambia2" /><ref name="Gambia4" /><ref name="Gambia5" /> The lectures took place in ], Pancha Mi Hall of Paradise Suites Hotel, presidents home village ], ] and Kairaba Beach Hotel, ]. Gambian cabinet ministers, religious leaders, students and thousands of people attended his lectures on subjects including "Terrorism and Jihad: an Islamic perspective", "religion in the right perspective", "Dawah or destruction?" and "the misconceptions about Islam".<ref name="Gambia2" /><ref name="Gambia5">{{cite journal | url=http://www.ummid.com/news/2014/October/24.10.2014/pastor-convert-to-islam.html | title=Female pastor converts to Islam after Dr Zakir Naik's lecture in Gambia | journal=] | date=24 October 2014 | access-date=18 July 2016 | doi=<!-- nope -->| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160515125222/http://www.ummid.com/news/2014/October/24.10.2014/pastor-convert-to-islam.html | archive-date=15 May 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref> Meanwhile, he also met with the president ] along with ] and held an Islamic conference with the ]s of Gambia.<ref name="Gambia2">{{cite web | url=http://allafrica.com/stories/201410091096.html | title=Gambia: Dr Zakir Naik Arrives, Says Ready for Series of Lectures | publisher=] | work=] | date=9 October 2014 | access-date=18 July 2016 | author=Musa Ndow, Omar Wally | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160806235717/http://allafrica.com/stories/201410091096.html | archive-date=6 August 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref name="Gambia4">{{cite web | url=http://allafrica.com/stories/201410141271.html | title=Gambia: Jammeh holds talk with Dr. Zakir Naik | publisher=] | work=] | date=14 October 2014 | access-date=18 July 2016 | author=Musa, Ndow | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160806235445/http://allafrica.com/stories/201410141271.html | archive-date=6 August 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref>
Naik believes that the Islamic injunction prescribing death for ] is justified. He compares it to death penalties meted out to national traitors (army generals who defect being the example cited) and proclaims that apostates fall in the same category. (30:15 in the video)


===Music=== === Malaysia ===
Naik asserts that all instrumental music is haraam (forbidden), except a one-membraned drum. .


Naik delivered four lectures in Malaysia during 2012. The lectures took place in ], ] in ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.eventbrite.com/e/dr-zakir-naik-malaysian-tour-2012-pwtc-tickets-4124703098|title=Dr Zakir Naik Malaysian Tour 2012 ( PWTC ) Tickets, Kuala Lumpur|publisher=Eventbrite|date=|access-date=3 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202232354/https://www.eventbrite.com/e/dr-zakir-naik-malaysian-tour-2012-pwtc-tickets-4124703098|archive-date=2 December 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> ] and ] in ]. The former Prime Minister of ], ], prominent figures and several thousand people attended the lectures at different places despite protest by the members of ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/09/26/stay-away-from-msia-zakir/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120928020727/http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/09/26/stay-away-from-msia-zakir/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=28 September 2012 |title=Stay away from M'sia, Zakir |publisher=Free Malaysia Today |date=26 September 2012 |access-date=3 December 2013 }}</ref> The organisers of Naik's speeches said their purpose was to promote harmony among people of various religions.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/51683-zakir-naiks-host-defends-invite |title=Zakir Naik's host defends invite |publisher=Malaysia-today.net |date=19 September 2012 |access-date=3 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202224156/http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/51683-zakir-naiks-host-defends-invite |archive-date=2 December 2013 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
===Riba or Interest===
Naik believes that Muslims should not receive, give or witness interest-related financial transactions. He declares that it is haraam (forbidden) for Muslims to own or use credit cards, take out loans or buy insurance. He further claims that it is also forbidden for Muslims to work in banks. (11:12 and 13:18 in the video link) His supporters claim that his comments are relevant only in the context of banks dealing with interest.


Naik delivered another six lectures in April 2016. Two of his lectures in Malaysia, entitled "Similarities between Hinduism and Islam" and "Is the Quran God's word?" were objected by ], along with other NGOs, saying that these lectures might provoke ] tensions. With the initial support of the Government authority, the event went ahead as planned.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/in-zakir-naiks-kl-lecture-four-more-leave-faith-for-islam|title=In Zakir Naik's KL lecture, four more leave faith for Islam|first=Kamles|last=Kumar|website=]|date=17 April 2016|access-date=9 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160723130951/http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/in-zakir-naiks-kl-lecture-four-more-leave-faith-for-islam|archive-date=23 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=The Hindu|title=Understanding the controversy surrounding Zakir Naik|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/understanding-the-controversy-surrounding-zakir-naik/article8828631.ece|access-date=9 July 2016|work=thehindu.com|date=9 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160710141530/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/understanding-the-controversy-surrounding-zakir-naik/article8828631.ece|archive-date=10 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=NDTV|title=Bangladesh Investigating Zakir Naik's Islamist Links: Minister|url=http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/bangladesh-investigating-zakir-naiks-islamist-links-minister-1429623|website=ndtv.com|access-date=9 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160710151551/http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/bangladesh-investigating-zakir-naiks-islamist-links-minister-1429623|archive-date=10 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=NDTV}}</ref>
===Islamic dietary laws===
Observant Muslims do not eat pork.


Naik delivered a speech on Islamophobia on 9 August 2019 at the ], ], ] which was attended by more than 100,000 people.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.klik.com.my/item/story/14623475/sasar-100-000-hadir-jelajah-dakwah-zakir-naik|title=Sasar 100,000 hadir jelajah dakwah Zakir Naik {{!}} KLiK|website=www.klik.com.my|access-date=28 February 2020}}</ref>
Naik argues that pork is forbidden because the swine is a dirty animal by nature, and that its flesh is the source of many diseases:
: "The pig is one of the filthiest animals on earth. It lives and thrives on muck, faeces and dirt. It is the best scavenger that I know that God has produced." .


== Views ==
Naik also believes that diet has psychological/ethical consequences and one is what one eats :
Zakir Naik does not claim to be an adherent of a particular school of thought in Islam. Despite his denials, some people believe his views and ideology are similar to Salafis.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-06-18 |title=Zakir Naik: India seeks to extradite Islamic preacher in Malaysia |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/world/india-seeks-to-extradite-islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-in-malaysia-6464582/ |access-date=2022-06-10 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2008-11-09 |title=Why do Muslims hate Dr Zakir Naik? |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/why-do-muslims-hate-dr-zakir-naik/story-KcpagvzHQM2xaNpGlEHG4O.html |access-date=2022-06-10 |website=Hindustan Times |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-07-10 |title='Zakir Naik wants Hindus to know their true religion' |url=https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/5663-zakir-naik-wants-hindus-know-their-true-religion |access-date=2022-06-10 |website=The Sunday Guardian Live |language=en-US}}</ref>
- :"The pig is the most shameless animal on the face of the earth. It is the only animal that invites its friends to have sex with its mate. In America, most people consume pork. Many times after dance parties, they have swapping of wives; many say 'you sleep with my wife and I will sleep with your wife.' If you eat pigs then you behave like pigs" . + :"The pig is the most shameless animal on the face of the earth. It is the only animal that invites its friends to have sex with its mate.' If you eat pigs then you behave like pigs" .
He also says, "Eating of pork can cause no less than seventy different types of diseases. A person can have various helminthes like roundworm, pinworm, hookworm, etc." .


Naik says that his goal is to "concentrate on the educated Muslim youth who have become apologetic about their own religion and have started to feel the religion is outdated".<ref name="Hansen">{{cite book |author= Thomas Blom Hansen |title= Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=-y3iNt0djbQC&pg=PA177 |year= 2001 |publisher= Princeton University Press |isbn= 978-0-691-08840-2 |page= 177}}</ref> He considers it a duty of every Muslim to remove perceived misconceptions about Islam and to counter what he views as the Western media's anti-Islamic bias in the aftermath of the ] in the United States.<ref>Hassan, Javid; Rasooldeen, Mohammed. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071207125117/http://arabnews.com/?page=1&section=0&article=71409&d=9&m=10&y=2005&pix=kingdom.jpg&category=Kingdom |date=7 December 2007 }}. '']''. 9 October 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref> Naik has said that "despite the strident anti-Islam campaign, 34,000 Americans have embraced Islam from September 2001 to July 2002". According to Naik, Islam is a religion of reason and logic, and the Quran contains 1000 verses relating to science, which he says explains the number of Western converts.<ref>Ghafour, P. K. Abdul. "New Muslims on the rise in US after Sept. 11". '']''. 3 November 2002. 17 September 2003.</ref> Some of his articles are published in magazines such as ''Islamic Voice''.<ref>See, for example: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080530111635/http://www.islamicvoice.com/march.99/zakir.htm |date=30 May 2008 }}, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080530130819/http://www.islamicvoice.com/august.99/zakir.htm |date=30 May 2008 }}, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080630193506/http://www.islamicvoice.com/august.2004/zakir.htm |date=30 June 2008 }}.</ref>
=== Hijab ===
Naik supports the practice of ], or Islamic modesty for both men and women. He writes that in Islam, a woman is required to cover herself entirely except for her face and hands up to her wrists. He claims that ] thus protects women from the lust of men. For men, he prescribes looking away from women if immodest thoughts enter their minds.


=== Supremacy of Islam ===
Naik goes on to say:
Naik said that ] is the "best" religion because "The ] says it. No other ] or ] claims this fact."<ref name="hp10" /><ref name="th1">{{cite news|last1=The Hindu|title=Zakir Naik claims he never promoted terrorist strikes|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/zakir-naik-says-he-did-not-inspire-any-terrorist/article8853980.ece|access-date=16 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160715075825/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/zakir-naik-says-he-did-not-inspire-any-terrorist/article8853980.ece|archive-date=15 July 2016|url-status=live|newspaper=The Hindu|date=15 July 2016|author1-link=The Hindu}}</ref> He added that, "Islam is also labelled as intolerant, and it is indeed, but towards corruption, discrimination, injustice, adultery, alcoholism, and all evils. Islam is the most 'tolerant' religion as far as promoting the human values is concerned."<ref name="Khaleej">{{cite web | url=http://www.khaleejtimes.com/ramadan-2016/ramadan-news/islam-is-being-damaged-by-media-dr-zakir | title=Islam is being damaged by media: Dr Zakir | publisher=] | date=17 June 2016 | access-date=20 July 2016 | author=Shaaban, Ahmed | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160718183553/http://www.khaleejtimes.com/ramadan-2016/ramadan-news/islam-is-being-damaged-by-media-dr-zakir | archive-date=18 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref>


=== Social issues ===
"Suppose there are twin sisters. While walking down the street, one of them is wearing a mini-skirt, while the other is wearing the hijab with everything covered with loose clothes except the hands up to the wrist. If there is a hooligan who is waiting to tease a girl, which girl will he tease? He will tease the girl wearing the mini-skirt."
Naik equated music with alcohol and stated that both are intoxicating in nature. He has opposed dancing and singing, claiming that they are forbidden in Islam.<ref name="hp10" />

Naik said that guilty people must be punished and accepts ] for stealing. He has also recommended that the United States implements this logic in order to reduce its high crime rate.<ref name="hp10" />

Naik says the ] community are experiencing a mental illness caused by the use of pornography propagated by television.<ref name="hp10" /> Naik says that in accordance with the Quran and '']'', he recommends the ] that committed the act publicly.<ref name="indiatoday">{{cite web | url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/ten-controversial-statements-by-zakir-naik/1/709374.html | title=Ten controversial statements by Zakir Naik | publisher=] | date=6 July 2016 | access-date=20 July 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160720233011/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/ten-controversial-statements-by-zakir-naik/1/709374.html | archive-date=20 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref name="wsj1" />

=== Biological evolution ===
],<ref name="hp10" /> Naik said that the ] of ] is "only a hypothesis, and an unproven conjecture at best".<ref>Attaullah, Munir. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080222065912/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007 |date=22 February 2008 }}. '']'' (Pakistan). 21 March 2007. Retrieved 21 July 2011.</ref> According to Naik, most scientists "support the theory, because it went against the Bible&nbsp;– not because it was true."<ref name="institutealislam.com"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120423235151/http://www.institutealislam.com/quran-and-modern-science-conflict-or-conciliation-part-two-by-dr-zakir-naik/ |date=23 April 2012 }}&nbsp;– Part Two&nbsp;– by Dr. Zakir Naik</ref> Naik also denies that different ] have missing links, and claims that the majority of scientists do not accept evolution as a whole.<ref>{{Cite book|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-37340-5|title=Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian Cultural Contexts|date=2020|publisher=Springer International Publishing|isbn=978-3-030-37339-9|editor-last=Brown|editor-first=C. Mackenzie|series=Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures|volume=33|location=Cham|pages=56–57|doi=10.1007/978-3-030-37340-5|s2cid=242523427}}</ref> Naik argues that scientific theories were prophesied by the Quran. For example, he has stated in 2010 that certain verses of the ] accurately describe ] development.<ref>Samuel, Geoffrey; Rozario, Santi. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160111104057/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09584935.2010.526196|date=11 January 2016}} {{Subscription required}}. '']'' ] '''18''' (4): 427–441. December 2010. {{doi|10.1080/09584935.2010.526196}}.</ref>

Naik argued, "What Darwin said was only a 'theory'. There is no book saying 'the Fact of Evolution' – All the books say ''Theory of Evolution''." He further added, "There is not a single statement in the Qur'an, which Science has proved wrong yet. Hypothesis goes against the Qur'an – theories go against the Qur'an. There is not a single scientific fact, which is mentioned in the Holy Qur'an which goes against established science – It may go against theory."<ref name="hp10" />

=== Criticism of media ===
Naik has called the ] "the most important tool rather the most dangerous weapon in the world, which converts black into white and a villain into a hero". He suggested that "We should use the same media to remove the misconceptions, misquotations, misinterpretations, and misrepresentations about Islam."<ref name="Khaleej" /> He claimed, ]s and ] play a double-standard strategy, who describe Muslims as ]s and ]s to defame Islam.<ref name="Khaleej" /><ref name="Gambia3" /> He said, "The maximum damage done to the image of Islam today is by the international media which is bombarding misconceptions about it day and night using an array of strategies. International media, be it print, audio, video, or online, use a number of strategies to malign Islam by first picking up the black sheep of the Muslim community, and portraying them as though they are exemplary Muslims." Naik also claimed the "third and fourth" strategy by international media is "to pick a word from ] or ] and mistranslate it" and "to malign Islam by saying something that does not belong to it".<ref name="Khaleej" /> Naik also criticizes the portrayal of Muslims in films.<ref name="Khaleej" />

Naik also said:
<blockquote>If a Muslim woman wears ] or veil it is labeled as women subjugation, but if a ] does to the same it turns into a sign of respect and modesty. A 50-year-old Muslim marrying a 16-year-old girl (willingly) is a headline, but a 50-year-old non-Muslim raping a six-year-old girl appears as brief news or filler. They say Islam does not give ], and is an illogical ]. They portray Islam as the problem of humanity though it is the solution to all man's problems. The same applies to the misinterpreted words 'fundamentalist' and 'extremist' which are basically western words.<ref name="Gambia3" /> A true Muslim must be an extremist in the correct direction, by being extremely kind, loving, tolerant, honest, and just. While ] were ], the ] was labelling them as terrorists; same activity, same people, but two different labels. The same happened with Muslims who are labelled as terrorists in media, so we should look into backgrounds and reasons for an activity before labelling people."<ref name="Khaleej" /></blockquote>

=== Other religions ===

==== Apostasy ====
Naik believes that Muslims who ] should not necessarily receive death sentences, but that under Islamic law those who leave Islam<ref name="hp10" /> and then "propagate the non-Islamic faith and speak against Islam" should be put to death.<ref name="apostat4"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827113937/http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/30405 |date=27 August 2013}} May 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130908221122/http://minivannews.com/files/2010/05/Dr_Zakir_Naik_and_Nazim-1.pdf |date=8 September 2013 }} 's response to Mohamed Nazim; Location: Maafaanu stadium, Male', 10:30 pm Friday 28 May 2010, p. 4.</ref> Another source states that according to Naik, "There is no death penalty for apostates in Islam... until the apostate starts to preach his new religion: then he can be put to death."<ref name=bad-news />

==== Propagation of other faiths in Islamic states ====
While he appreciates that people of other religions allow Muslims to freely propagate Islam in their country, Naik preaches that the dissemination of other religions within an Islamic state must be forbidden because he believes that other faiths are incorrect, so their propagation is as wrong as it would be for an arithmetic teacher to teach that 2+2=3 or 6 instead of 2+2=4.<ref name="hp10" />

Naik criticises the activities of ]aries in the ] saying, "the missionaries write verses of the Bible in Arabic calligraphy, such as 'God is love' to catch fish with the Muslims. We in Peace TV, for example, do not use such deceit."<ref name="Khaleej" />

=== Violence ===
In a lecture given in ],<ref name="Gambia2" /><ref name="Gambia4" /><ref name="Gambia3" /> Zakir strongly condemned the atrocities around the world in the name of ], where innocent people died, saying {{Blockquote|Jihad is misunderstood by both Muslims and non-Muslims, Jihad means to strive and struggle to make society better, the best form of Jihad is to strive and struggle against non-Muslims, using the teachings of the Quran; the Prophet Peace Be Upon Him and the Almighty Allah, Islam means peace."<ref name="Gambia3" />}}

According to Naik, the killing of any innocent person, either Muslim or not is prohibited by Islam, while condemning the ], played by the western powers and media who describes Muslims as extremists and fundamentalists. He said in an unequivocal term that, even in Islamic Jihad, there are laid down rules and regulations as to when and how to kill a person, which he noted, totally contradicts what is currently happening around the world, by some groups who claim to fight for Jihad.<ref name="Gambia3">{{cite web | url=http://allafrica.com/stories/201410132942.html | title=Gambia: Dr. Zakir Naik Condemns Atrocities Committed in the Name of Jihad | publisher=] | work=] | date=13 October 2014 | access-date=18 July 2016 | author=Ceesay, Alieu | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160807011155/http://allafrica.com/stories/201410132942.html | archive-date=7 August 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref>

In another lecture given in ], ], Naik stated that the most mistranslated and misunderstood word about Islam by non-Muslims and even some Muslims is "Jihad", which, he said, has nothing to do with the phrase "]" that is never actually used in the ] or ] and was first used by the ] who killed millions in the name of ]. He added the word "Jihad" actually means to strive or struggle against one's own evil inclinations, to make the society better, in self-defense on a battlefield, and against oppression.<ref name="Khaleej" />

Naik promotes the conspiracy theory that US President ] planned the ], describing it as "]". He refers to the ] within the United States itself as proof of a foregone conclusion.<ref name=bad-news>{{cite web |url=http://scroll.in/article/712341/why-a-saudi-award-for-televangelist-zakir-naik-is-bad-news-for-indias-muslims |title=Why a Saudi award for televangelist Zakir Naik is bad news for India's Muslims |last1=Daniyal |first1=Shoaib |date=10 March 2015 |access-date=3 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150401045229/http://scroll.in/article/712341/why-a-saudi-award-for-televangelist-zakir-naik-is-bad-news-for-indias-muslims |archive-date=1 April 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=AFP-1-3-15>{{cite news |title=Saudi Arabia gives top prize to cleric who blames George Bush for 9/11 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/02/saudi-arabia-gives-top-prize-to-cleric-who-blames-george-bush-for-911 |agency=Agence France-Presse |newspaper=The Guardian |date=1 March 2015 |access-date=1 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702150713/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/02/saudi-arabia-gives-top-prize-to-cleric-who-blames-george-bush-for-911 |archive-date=2 July 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=Mao>{{cite news |author=Stephen Schwartz |date=27 March 2015 |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-schwartz/zakir-naik-radical-islami_b_6945990.html?ir=India |title=Zakir Naik, Radical Islamist Video Evangelist |work=The Huffington Post |access-date=18 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150412174403/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-schwartz/zakir-naik-radical-islami_b_6945990.html?ir=India |archive-date=12 April 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="hate">{{cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/why-do-muslims-hate-dr-zakir-naik/article1-350222.aspx|title=Why do Muslims hate Dr Zakir Naik?|author1=M. Hasan|author2=Sweta Ramanujan-Dixit|newspaper=]|date=9 November 2008|access-date=6 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150420073750/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/why-do-muslims-hate-dr-zakir-naik/article1-350222.aspx|archive-date=20 April 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> His position on 9/11 was denounced by the ] as "reprehensible", and he has been denied entry into the United Kingdom and Canada.<ref>{{cite news|author=Morello, Carol |title=U.S. denounces award-winning cleric who called 9/11 'inside job' |date=6 March 2015 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/us-denounces-award-winning-cleric-who-called-911-inside-job/2015/03/06/aeb3010b-a3d5-4bdd-95f4-11402a8465f1_story.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150802224002/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/us-denounces-award-winning-cleric-who-called-911-inside-job/2015/03/06/aeb3010b-a3d5-4bdd-95f4-11402a8465f1_story.html |archive-date=2 August 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="bbc1" /><ref name="Carlson" /> In 2016, when was asked whether ] was a terrorist, he stated that he did not have an opinion since had not done any research on him.<ref name="CIF"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161024091033/http://www.islamicpluralism.org/2585/zakir-naik-more-hype-than-hope-for-muslims |date=24 October 2016 }} by Muhammad Shafeeque; ]; 15 July 2016</ref>

=== Views on terrorism ===
Later in 2010, Naik said that he had been quoted out of context regarding the remarks on terrorism. "As far as terrorist is concerned", he said, "I tell the Muslims that every Muslim should be a terrorist... What is the meaning of the word terrorist? Terrorist by definition means a person who terrorises. So in this context every Muslim should be a terrorist to each and every anti-social element. I'm aware that terrorist is more commonly used for a person who terrorises innocent human beings. So in this context no Muslim should ever terrorise a single innocent human being."<ref name="hp10" /><ref name="auto">Deshmane, Akshay. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100901013929/http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_zakir-naik-will-fight-back-as-canada-bans-him-too_1400073 |date=1 September 2010 }}. '']''. 23 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref>

Naik has been at the center of multiple controversies regarding the topic of terrorism, most notably for being seen as an inspiration for terrorists.<ref name="thehindu.com" /> In 1996, Naik gave a speech specifically about terrorism and addressing ]. Naik stated that "Every Muslim should be a terrorist. The thing is that if he is terrorizing the terrorist, then he is following Islam." Perhaps the most controversial part about his speech was that he called America "the biggest terrorist". In a separate speech, he states that "the western countries say war for peace, war for peace. It is not war for peace, it is war on peace". Naik's comments received significant media attention and the British government banned him on the basis of these comments. Naik's lawyer and IRF argued that the speech was made before 9/11, that media misquoted Naik and made misleading assertions about the timing of Naik's speech, and that the decision to ban Naik from the UK was "politically motivated".<ref name="auto1" />

Naik stated that ], "who was not a Muslim, is the biggest terrorist in the world as he incinerated four to six million Jews."<ref name="Khaleej" />

When asked about his views on killings, Naik said "the ] says so – if anyone kills an innocent human being, ] or non-Muslim, it is as though he has killed the whole ], So how can any Muslim kill innocent human beings?"<ref name="Gambia3" /><ref name="ISIS" /> It was only permissible, he said, to kill a person who "has killed someone else... or created corruption in the land."<ref name="wpzn">{{cite news|last1=The Washington Post|title=This Islamic preacher might have influenced one of the Dhaka terrorists. Now Indians want him banned.|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/07/06/did-an-indian-islamic-tv-evangelist-inspire-one-of-the-dhaka-terrorists-many-indians-say-the-preacher-must-be-banned/|access-date=16 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160707145429/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/07/06/did-an-indian-islamic-tv-evangelist-inspire-one-of-the-dhaka-terrorists-many-indians-say-the-preacher-must-be-banned/|archive-date=7 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=The Washington Post}}</ref> He also criticized the media for "picking up verses of the Quran or hadiths and quoting them out of context to mislabel Islam as a religion that promotes violence and killing".<ref name="Khaleej" /> He said that "critics of Islam quotes Verse 5/9 which reads: 'Wherever you find a non-Muslim, kill him' out of context to malign Islam though it was an order in a battlefield, and Islam always promotes peace as a better option during war."<ref name="Khaleej" />

In a press conference via ], when Naik was asked for his opinion on ] he replied affirmatively, saying it was permitted in Islam and said "it is ] if innocent people are being killed. But, if suicide bombing is used as a tactic of war, then it may be permitted. For example, in World War II, Japan used suicide bombing as a tactic of war."<ref name="th1" /><ref>{{cite web|last1=Times of India|title=No plans to return to India this year: Zakir Naik|website=]|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-plans-to-return-to-India-this-year-Zakir-Naik/articleshow/53227699.cms|access-date=16 July 2016|date=15 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160715205103/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-plans-to-return-to-India-this-year-Zakir-Naik/articleshow/53227699.cms|archive-date=15 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=The Economic Times|title=Zakir Naik rejects terror charges, says no plans to return to India this year|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/zakir-naik-rejects-terror-charges-says-no-plans-to-return-to-india-this-year/articleshow/53223570.cms|access-date=16 July 2016|date=15 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160715120108/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/zakir-naik-rejects-terror-charges-says-no-plans-to-return-to-india-this-year/articleshow/53223570.cms|archive-date=15 July 2016|url-status=live|newspaper=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Firstpost|title=Suicide bombing is haram in Islam: Only Salafist ideologues like Zakir Naik view it as a war tactic|url=http://m.firstpost.com/india/suicide-bombing-is-haram-in-islam-only-salafist-ideologues-like-zakir-naik-view-it-as-a-war-tactic-2898840.html|access-date=17 July 2016|date=17 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160722111506/http://m.firstpost.com/india/suicide-bombing-is-haram-in-islam-only-salafist-ideologues-like-zakir-naik-view-it-as-a-war-tactic-2898840.html|archive-date=22 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>

==== Najibullah Zazi ====
], the Afghan-American linked to ] who was found guilty in the ] was an "admirer" of Naik's sermons.<ref name="wpzn" /> When ] hinted that his preachings could have inspired Zazi's terrorist activities, Naik insisted: "I have always condemned terrorism, because according to the glorious Koran, if you kill one innocent person, then you have killed the whole of humanity."<ref name="zazi">]; ]: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120504223125/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1927280,00.html |date=4 May 2012 }}. '']''. p. 2. 1 October 2009. Retrieved 16 April 2011.</ref>

==== ISIS ====
Naik called ] the "anti-Islamic State of Iraq and Syria" and said that the enemies of Islam were promoting ISIS. He also added, "We should not say ISIS, we should say AISIS. Because they are anti-Islamic. I request all the Muslims of the world, as well as the Muslim media: Please don't help the enemies of Islam in attacking Islam." He further added, "If you verify you will know that I am totally against terrorism. I am totally against killing any innocent human being."<ref name="Khaleej" /><ref name="ISIS">{{cite web | url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/isis-anti-islamic-he-says-in-fresh-video-from-mecca-2902413/ | title='ISIS anti-Islamic', he says in fresh video from Mecca. | publisher=] | date=9 July 2016 | access-date=16 July 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160712083816/http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/isis-anti-islamic-he-says-in-fresh-video-from-mecca-2902413/ | archive-date=12 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Deccan Chronicle|title=Preacher Zakir Naik, followed by Dhaka attackers, calls ISIS 'un-Islamic'|url=https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/060716/preacher-zakir-naik-who-was-followed-by-dhaka-attackers-calls-isis-un-islamic.html|access-date=17 July 2016|date=6 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160711224200/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/060716/preacher-zakir-naik-who-was-followed-by-dhaka-attackers-calls-isis-un-islamic.html|archive-date=11 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> In another lecture in Dubai, he stated, It is, therefore not correct to say ISIS or Islamic State has killed Syrian or Iraqi innocents. He said, "We should say anti-Islamic state kills them as Quran affirms that whoever kills an innocent person is as if he kills all humanity, and he who saves a single person – disregard his religion, is like saving all humanity."<ref name="Khaleej" />

==== Orlando shooting ====
Zakir criticized the media for "linking Islam" with the ]. He accused the media of a "double-standard strategy" saying, "the same is happening with a man related by nothing to Islam but by his name who killed over 50 gays in Orlando."<ref name="Khaleej" />

===Politics===
Naik ], calling it a tragedy.<ref name="Gupta2016">{{cite web |last1=Gupta |first1=Shekhar |title=Why Zakir Naik is dangerous |url=https://www.rediff.com/news/column/why-zakir-naik-is-dangerous/20160718.htm |publisher=] |access-date=29 April 2020 |language=English}}</ref> Naik holds that those who advocated the creation of Pakistan out of the northwestern provinces of colonial India were "not even practising Muslims".<ref name="Gupta2016" />

In 2016, Naik praised Prime Minister ] for his frequent visits to Muslim majority countries, commenting "if his intention is to maintain unity between Hindus and Muslims and between India and other Muslim countries, I am totally for him". He described Modi's visits as favourable for India, believing it could attract foreign investment.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Mohan |first1=Vyas |title=I Am Totally For Him: Zakir Naik On PM Narendra Modi |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/07/22/i-am-totally-for-him-zakir-naik-on-pm-narendra-modi_a_21437092/ |website=HuffPost India |date=22 July 2016}}</ref> In 2019, in an interview in '']'' magazine, Naik strongly criticized Modi and the ] for what he called false charges and propaganda against him for political purposes, and said that he is targeted for his popularity. He stated that he would not return to India while Modi remained in power, drawing parallels with the example of Muhammad in ].<ref>{{cite web |author1=Namrata Biji Ahuja |title=Zakir Naik exclusive interview: 'Won't come back to India if BJP is in power' |url=https://www.theweek.in/theweek/cover/2019/05/10/zakir-naik-exclusive-interview-wont-come-back-to-india-if-bjp-is-in-power.html |website=The Week |access-date=20 May 2019 |date=11 May 2019}}</ref> He also described Modi and the BJP as dangerous for Indian Muslims' security, labelling Modi a "liar" and the "number one terrorist of India according to Google." He also invited Modi to take part in a debate with him about ].<ref>{{cite web |author1=Namrata Biji Ahuja |title=Zakir Naik: Google lists Modi as top criminal but not me as top terrorist – The Week |url=https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2019/05/14/zakir-naik-google-lists-modi-as-top-criminal-but-not-me-as-top-terrorist.amp.html |website=www.theweek.in |publisher=] |access-date=20 May 2019 |date=12 May 2019}}</ref>

Naik claimed on 11 January 2020 that the Modi government approached him in September 2019 through an envoy and offered to provide him "]" to India if he spoke in support of the government's move to abrogate ] in ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Modi, Shah offered me safe passage in exchange for Article 370 support: Zakir Naik|url=https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2020/01/11/modi-shah-offered-me-safe-passage-in-exchange-for-support-on-article-370-zakir-naik.amp.html |access-date=31 May 2020 |work=] |date=11 January 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Zakir Naik I Refused offer from Modi to support BJP govt's Kashmir move in return for safe passage: Zakir Naik {{!}} India News |url=https://www.timesnownews.com/amp/india/article/refused-offer-from-modi-to-support-bjp-govts-kashmir-move-in-return-for-safe-passage-zakir-naik/538654 |access-date=31 May 2020 |work=] |date=11 January 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Staff |title=Zakir Naik claims Centre offered him safe passage in return for support for its Kashmir policies |url=https://www.scroll.in/latest/949565/zakir-naik-claims-centre-offered-him-safe-passage-in-return-for-backing-its-kashmir-policies |access-date=31 May 2020 |work=] |date=11 January 2020}}</ref> In a 14 January 2020 tweet, Congress leader ] asked Modi to clarify Naik's claim of an offer of safe passage to India.<ref>{{cite news|title=Digvijaya asks PM Modi to clarify on Zakir Naik's claim of Centre's offer of safe passage to India |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/india/story/congress-digvijaya-modi-zakir-naik-claim-safe-passage-1637075-2020-01-15 |access-date=31 May 2020 |work=] |date=15 January 2020 |location=Delhi |language=en}}</ref>

During a lecture held on 8 August 2019 in ], ], Malaysia, Naik was asked about his response to right-wing Malaysian groups wanting Zakir Naik to be extradited out of Malaysia.

He replied, "Malaysia became fully Muslim. Then you had the Chinese coming, you had the Indians coming, the British coming. They are our new guests. You know, somebody called me a 'guest'. So I said before me that the Chinese are the guest. They aren't born here. So if you want the new guest to go, first ask the old guest to go back."<ref name="Amy Chew">{{Cite news|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/8/15/outrage-in-malaysia-as-zakir-naik-suggests-chinese-expulsion|title=Outrage in Malaysia as Zakir Naik suggests Chinese expulsion|author=Amy Chew|work=AlJazeera|date=15 August 2019|access-date=19 August 2019 }}</ref>

In the same lecture, he also claimed that ] had "100 times more rights" than the ], and were more loyal to Indian PM ] than to Malaysian PM ]. These comments sparked outrage across Malaysian society, being perceived as inciting racial and religious hatred and disrupting the peace and harmony between communities. By 15 August, four government ministers called for revocation of Zakir Naik's permanent residency and for him to be extradited to India.<ref name="Amy Chew" /> Citizens lodged a total of 115 police complaints against Naik.<ref name="Soo Wern Jun" />

On 16 August, Naik was questioned for about seven hours by the ] at Bukit Aman in Kuala Lumpur about his controversial statements, while PM Mahathir said that "If he is found to be doing detrimental things to the country, it will be necessary for us to take away his permanent resident status. And that case, of course, we may need to take action to prevent him from making such provocative speeches, which attempt to pit the different races against each other," adding that a public apology by Naik may not be "enough to assuage the anger of many people".<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/08/16/zakir039s-pr-status-to-be-decided-after-police-probe-says-dr-m |title=Zakir's PR status to be decided after police probe, says Dr M |author=Mazwin Nik Anis |work=The Star |date=16 August 2019 |access-date=19 August 2019 }}</ref> Meanwhile, ], the largest state of Malaysia, banned Zakir Naik from entering the state on 15 August,<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/08/15/sarawak-bans-zakir-naik-from-entering-the-state |title=Sarawak bans Zakir Naik from entering the state |author=Andy Chua |work=The Star |date=15 August 2019 |access-date=19 August 2019 }}</ref> while the state of ] barred him henceforth from speaking at public events on 16 August,<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-perlis-police-ban-11815304 |title=Controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik barred from speaking in Perlis by Malaysian police |author= |work=Channel News Asia |date=16 August 2019 |access-date=19 August 2019 |archive-date=16 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190816125724/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-perlis-police-ban-11815304 |url-status=dead }}</ref> followed by the state of ] on 17 August; Naik was scheduled to speak in both states.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/08/18/kedah-is-second-state-to-ban-zakir-naik-from-speaking-publicly |title=Kedah is second state to ban Zakir Naik from speaking publicly |author=Arnold Loh |work=The Star |publisher=17 August 2019 |access-date=19 August 2019 }}</ref> By 20 August, ], ], ] and ] had joined the other three states in prohibiting Naik from speaking in public, thus barring him in 7 out of 13 Malaysian states. After another 10 hour-round of police hearings on 19 August, '']'' reported that on 20 August the police had imposed a nationwide speaking ban on Zakir Naik,<ref name="FMT20Aug">{{Cite news |url=https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2019/08/20/naik-effectively-banned-from-speaking-nationwide/ |title=Naik effectively banned from speaking nationwide |work=] |date=20 August 2019 |access-date=20 August 2019}}</ref> which the police confirmed to the '']''.<ref name="Malaysiaban">{{Cite news |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-banned-from-giving-speeches-in-malaysia-1582531-2019-08-20 |title=Islamic preacher Zakir Naik banned from giving public speeches in Malaysia |work=] |date=20 August 2019 |access-date=20 August 2019}}</ref>

By 19 August, Zakir Naik had had his lawyers file legal complaints against five Malaysian politicians for 'defamation', claiming that they had taken his statements out of context and thus unduly damaged his reputation.<ref name="Soo Wern Jun">{{Cite news |url=https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/08/19/dr-zakir-naik-serves-four-more-with-notices-of-demand/1782100 |title=Dr Zakir Naik serves four more with legal notices of demand |author=Soo Wern Jun |work=Malay Mail |date=19 August 2019 |access-date=19 August 2019 }}</ref> The next day he maintained that his statements had been taken out of context, but expressed 'heartfelt apologies for this misunderstanding', as it 'was never my intention to upset any individual or community.'<ref name="FMT20Aug" /> The Indian PM Modi had criticized Naik's comments during a dialogue with Mahathir at the ] in September.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/pm-modi-did-not-ask-for-zakir-naiks-extradition-claims-malaysian-pm-2102176 |title=PM Modi Did Not Ask For Zakir Naik's Extradition, Claims Malaysian PM |author=Soo Wern Jun |work=NDTV }}</ref>

== Reception, awards, titles, and honors ==
Naik was ranked 89 on '']'s'' list of the "100 Most Powerful Indians in 2010".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110113021101/http://www.indianexpress.com/news/the-most-powerful-indians-in-2010-no.-8190/575690/0 |date=13 January 2011 }}. '']''. 5 February 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref> He was ranked 82 in the 2009 edition.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512151330/http://www.indianexpress.com/news/the-most-powerful-indians-in-2009-8084/432810/0 |date=12 May 2011 }}. '']''. 9 March 2009. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref> According to ], Naik is "perhaps the most influential ] ideologue in India".<ref name="ps">{{cite book |first=Praveen |last=Swami |editor-first=Kulbhushan |editor-last=Warikoo |year=2011 |title=Religion and Security in South and Central Asia |chapter=Islamist terrorism in India |publisher=Taylor & Francis |location= London, England |pages=52, 61–64 |isbn= 978-0-415-57590-4 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=spGlo1WbpAoC&pg=PA61}}</ref> ] says he is acknowledged as an authority on Islam, but is known for making negative remarks about other religions.<ref name=bbc1 /> ] writes that Naik has a "carefully crafted image of moderation", because of his gentle demeanour, his wearing of a suit and tie, and his quoting of scriptures of other religions.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Dhume|first1=Sadanand|date=20 June 2010|title=The Trouble with Dr. Zakir Naik|newspaper=Wall Street Journal|url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704365204575317833268479268.html?mod=asia_opinion|url-status=live|access-date=6 July 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629055704/http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704365204575317833268479268.html?mod=asia_opinion|archive-date=29 June 2011}}</ref>

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Year of award/honour !! Name of award/honour !! Awarding organisation/government
|-
| 2013
| ]<ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20130730/ARTICLE/307309950/1002|title= Mohammed presents Islamic personality award to Dr Zakir Naik|last= |first= |date= 30 July 2013|work= |access-date= 17 November 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160111104056/http://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20130730/ARTICLE/307309950/1002|archive-date= 11 January 2016|url-status=live|df= dmy-all}}</ref>
| ], Crown Prince and Deputy Ruler of Sharjah
|-
| 2013
| ] – Islamic Personality of the Year<ref>{{cite news |date=29 July 2013 |url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/583546/zakir-naik-named-dubais-islamic-personality-of-the-year/ |title=Zakir Naik named Dubai's Islamic Personality of the Year |newspaper=The Express Tribune |access-date=3 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130731180537/http://tribune.com.pk/story/583546/zakir-naik-named-dubais-islamic-personality-of-the-year/ |archive-date=31 July 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Zakir Naik named Islamic Personality of the Year|url=http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/zakir-naik-named-islamic-personality-of-the-year-1.1214199|publisher=]|access-date=3 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105052858/http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/zakir-naik-named-islamic-personality-of-the-year-1.1214199|archive-date=5 November 2013|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Zakir Naik named Dubai's Islamic Personality of the Year|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/583546/zakir-naik-named-dubais-islamic-personality-of-the-year/|newspaper=]|access-date=3 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140201092442/http://tribune.com.pk/story/583546/zakir-naik-named-dubais-islamic-personality-of-the-year/|archive-date=1 February 2014|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.ummid.com/news/2013/November/09.11.2013/malaysias-award-for-zakir-naik.html|title= Dr. Zakir Naik conferred Malaysia's top award|last= |first= |date= 9 November 2013|work= |access-date= 17 November 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160304053135/http://www.ummid.com/news/2013/November/09.11.2013/malaysias-award-for-zakir-naik.html|archive-date= 4 March 2016|url-status=live|df= dmy-all}}</ref>
|], Vice President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai
|-
| 2013
| Tokoh Ma'al Hijrah 1435/2013 Award<ref>{{cite news |author=Cetak Emel Kawan |url=http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/AbdulHamid_ZakirNaikdipilihTokohMaalHijrah2013/Article/?bh |title=Berita Harian {{pipe}} Abdul Hamid, Zakir Naik dipilih Tokoh Maal Hijrah 2013 |publisher=Bharian.com.my |date=5 November 2013 |access-date=3 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105072831/http://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/AbdulHamid_ZakirNaikdipilihTokohMaalHijrah2013/Article/?bh |archive-date=5 November 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2013/11/05/tokoh-maal-hijrah-2013/|title= Abdul Hamid is national-level Tokoh Maal Hijrah 2013|last= |first= |date= 5 November 2013|work= |access-date= 19 January 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150119094345/http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2013/11/05/tokoh-maal-hijrah-2013/|archive-date= 19 January 2015|url-status=live|df= dmy-all}}</ref>
| ], King and head of state of Malaysia
|-
|2015
| Service to Islam – ]<ref name=SPAPrize>{{cite news|title=الأمير خالد الفيصل يعلن أسماء الفائزين بجائزة الملك فيصل العالمية (Cultural: Prince Khaled Al-Faisal announce the winners of the King Faisal International Prize)|url=http://www.spa.gov.sa/cdetails.php?id=1324209&catid=8&lite|publisher=Saudi Press Agency|date=3 February 2015|access-date=1 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924104321/http://www.spa.gov.sa/cdetails.php?id=1324209&catid=8&lite|archive-date=24 September 2015|url-status=live}}<br />{{cite news|title=Prince Khalid Al-Faisal Announces Winners of King Faisal International Prize|url=http://www.spa.gov.sa/viewstory.php?lang=en&newsid=1324225|publisher=Saudi Press Agency|date=3 February 2015|access-date=1 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160919235135/http://www.spa.gov.sa/viewstory.php?lang=en&newsid=1324225|archive-date=19 September 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="dna">{{cite news|date=2 March 2015|title=Indian Islamic scholar Zakir Naik receives Saudi prize for service to Islam|newspaper=]|agency=PTI|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-indian-islamic-scholar-zakir-naik-receives-saudi-prize-for-service-to-islam-2065527|url-status=live|access-date=2 July 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702201754/http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-indian-islamic-scholar-zakir-naik-receives-saudi-prize-for-service-to-islam-2065527|archive-date=2 July 2015}}</ref><ref name=afc-KFIPSI>{{cite news |title=Zakir Naik wins Saudi prize for service to Islam |url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1166900 |agency=AFP |newspaper=] |date=2 March 2015 |access-date=30 June 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150629005213/http://www.dawn.com/news/1166900/ |archive-date=29 June 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref>
|The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, ]
|}


=== Polygamy === == Controversies ==
Naik is currently a wanted ] from the Indian authorities on charges of terror financing, hate speech, inciting communal hatred, and money laundering.<ref name=":8"/><ref name=":9"/><ref name=":11"/>
Naik argues that ], or the Muslim practice of taking up to four wives is justified as it is in the best interest of both women and men. He claims it protects the modesty of women, while keeping men from going astray. He writes in his website that human males are polygamous by nature and that a man is less likely to cheat if he has more than one wife.He also believes that there are more marriageable women than men in the world and claims:


Naik fled the country in 2016,<ref name=":14"/> and India's ] (NIA), has tried, unsuccessfully, to convince ] issue a ] for Naik's arrest due to insufficient evidence.<ref name="red_notice" />
: "If every woman got married to only one man, there would be over thirty million females in U.S.A, four million females in Great Britain, 5 million females in Germany and nine million females in Russia who would not find a husband. Thus the only two options before a woman who cannot find a husband is to marry a married man or to become public property." .


On the basis of ], Naik's Peace TV's channel is banned in India, Bangladesh, Canada, Sri Lanka, and the United Kingdom.<ref name="ndtv.com" /><ref name=":16" /><ref name="The National News" />
Naik points to the verse 4:3 from the ] to explain the ] position on ]. This verse explains that a man can take more than one wife only if he is able to treat them equally. If he cannot do this, he should have a relationship with only one wife and/or "]" (i.e. female slaves and concubines).


Naik's Peace TV app, on the other hand, is not blocked in the same countries.<ref name="thehindu.com">{{cite news|last1=The Hindu|author-link=The Hindu|title=Zakir Naik's UK-registered Foundation under scanner|newspaper=The Hindu|date=9 July 2016|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/zakir-naiks-foundation-under-the-scanner/article8829130.ece|access-date=10 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160710143757/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/zakir-naiks-foundation-under-the-scanner/article8829130.ece|archive-date=10 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Naik argues that his comments have been taken out of context multiple times.<ref name="auto1">Pinglay, Prachi. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171127193811/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10381210 |date=27 November 2017}}. ]. 22 June 2010. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
===A woman's value as a witness===
*]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101105153804/http://www.zeenews.com/news635880.html |date=5 November 2010}}. ]. 23 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref>
There is a verse in the Qur'an (2:282) which says that two female witnesses are equal to one male witness. According to Naik's interpretation, this verse deals only with financial transactions and murder cases. Naik says:


The Islamic Research Foundation website describes Naik as "the ideologue and driving force behind Peace TV Network".<ref name=irf.net>{{cite web|title=Dr Zakir Naik – President, IRF|url=http://www.irf.net/drzakirnaik.html|website=IRF.net|access-date=2 July 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702143056/http://www.irf.net/drzakirnaik.html|archive-date=2 July 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> Naik's website claims that the Islamic Research Foundation and Peace TV promote "Truth, Justice, Morality, Harmony and Wisdom for the whole of humankind".<ref name="hp10">{{cite web|last1=Huffington Post|title=10 Times Zakir Naik Proved That He Promoted Anything But Peace|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/07/07/zakir-naik_n_10851550.html|access-date=16 July 2016|date=7 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160720061722/http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/07/07/zakir-naik_n_10851550.html|archive-date=20 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=Huffington Post}}</ref><ref name="The Times of India">{{Cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/zakir-naiks-passport-revoked-hes-now-a-stateless-person/articleshow/59657352.cms|title=Zakir Naik's passport revoked, he's now a stateless person – Times of India|work=The Times of India|access-date=19 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170718211821/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/zakir-naiks-passport-revoked-hes-now-a-stateless-person/articleshow/59657352.cms|archive-date=18 July 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The ] banned the ] channel in 2012.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.arabnews.com/news/597351 |title=Ban on Peace TV will be lifted soon: Zakir Naik |publisher=Arab News |date=6 July 2014 |access-date=29 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140706045220/http://www.arabnews.com/news/597351 |archive-date=6 July 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> According to '']'' in 2015, quoting an anonymous Indian journalist, the Mumbai police have barred him from holding conferences "because he stirs controversy", and Indian satellite providers have refused to broadcast his television channel, Peace TV.<ref name=nyt-2-3-15 /> However, as of August 2019, Peace TV was still available in India through a free app in the ], which had been downloaded over a lakh (100,000) times.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/zakir-naik-peace-tv-continues-to-reach-millions-1582710-2019-08-20 |title=Despite ban, Zakir Naik's Peace TV continues to reach millions |author=Ankit Kumar |work=] |date=20 August 2019 |access-date=20 August 2019}}</ref>
: "In financial transactions, two men are preferred. Islam expects men to be the breadwinners of their families. Since financial responsibility is shouldered by men, they are expected to be well versed in financial transactions as compared to women. As a second option, the witness can be one man and two women, so that if one of the women errs the other can remind her."


Following investigations by ] in 2019, the broadcasting authority moved to suspend Peace TV's license to broadcast in the UK. In addition, Ofcom fined the former licence holders of Peace TV Urdu £200,000 and Peace TV £100,000 for breaking broadcasting rules. In April 2020, the Charity Commission for England and Wales opened a statutory enquiry into the registered charity Islamic Research Foundation, which has funded Peace TV.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gaytimes.co.uk/community/125176/peace-tv-faces-uk-ban-after-presenter-calls-gay-people-worse-than-animals/|title=Peace TV faces UK ban after presenter calls gay people "worse than animals"|last=Moore|first=Matt|date=28 July 2019|website=Gay Times|access-date=5 August 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/islamic-tv-channel-anti-gay-homophobic-ofcom-rules-a9017056.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220507/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/islamic-tv-channel-anti-gay-homophobic-ofcom-rules-a9017056.html |archive-date=7 May 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Evangelical Islamic TV channel that broadcast show calling homosexuality 'insane' breached Ofcom regulations|last=Drury|first=Colin|date=23 July 2019|website=The Independent|access-date=5 August 2019}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Charity watchdog opens inquiry into Islamic Research Foundation 15 May 2020 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/charity-watchdog-opens-inquiry-into-islamic-research-foundation-international |website=Charity Commission |publisher=Charity Commission for England and Wales |access-date=31 May 2020}}</ref><ref name="The Economic Times">{{Cite news|title=UK media watchdog fines Zakir Naik's Peace TV 300,000 pounds for 'hate speech'|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/uk-media-watchdog-fines-zakir-naiks-peace-tv-300000-pounds-for-hate-speech/articleshow/75785339.cms|access-date=25 August 2020}}</ref>
Naik extends this thought to murder cases and says:


=== Indian allegations of promoting terrorism ===
: "... the feminine attitude can also have an effect on the witness in a murder case. In such circumstances a woman is more terrified as compared to a man. Due to her emotional condition she can get confused. Therefore, two female witnesses are equivalent to one male witness."
Author ] argues that some of Naik's teachings are similar to those of organizations advocating violence, although Naik himself emphatically rejects terrorism.<ref name="lashkar"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081017102114/http://www.hindu.com/2007/07/08/stories/2007070856741000.htm |date=17 October 2008 }} by Praveen Swami, ], 8 July 2007 (paragraph 14)</ref> According to Swami, Naik's IRF has proved to be a "magnet" for figures linked to the ], while his message has mesmerised violent Islamists, and his works "help make sense of the motivations of Indian recruits to the ''jihad''".<ref name="ps" />


In 2008, an Islamic scholar in ], Shahar Qazi Mufti Abul Irfan Mian Firangi Mahali, issued a ] against Naik, claiming that he supported ], and that his teachings were un-Islamic. However, Naik claims that his speech was being taken out of context, and viewers noted that the speech aired several years before the deadly events of 9/11.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Gidwandi|first=Deepak|date=8 November 2008|title=Storm over 'fatwa' against scholar Zakir Naik|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_storm-over-fatwa-against-scholar-zakir-naik_1204534|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091220031322/http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_storm-over-fatwa-against-scholar-zakir-naik_1204534|archive-date=20 December 2009|access-date=11 January 2010|website=dnaindia.com}}</ref>
===Charity===
Islam prescribes ], or obligatory charity. Ideally, every Muslim who has assets in gold, silver, livestock, savings and currencies that exceed the nisaab level should give 2.5% of those assets every lunar year to charity.


==== Criticism of Indian allegations ====
Naik believes that if Muslims followed Islamic law in this regard, poverty among Muslims could be eliminated.
The allegations of Zakir Naik spreading terrorism have created adverse reactions in India. In January 2020, the Senior Indian Congress leader Digvijaya Singh tweeted a video of the Islamic preacher leveling allegations against PM Modi and HM Amit Shah. "Who disagrees with them 1 – convince them, 2- If he doesn't believe then threaten him 3- If he still does not believe then lure him with money. 4 – If he still does not agree, then defame him by making false accusations," Singh tweeted. Based on the response by Dr. Zakir Naik, Singh claims that the BJP follows the strategy of 'defaming individuals with false allegations'. In a sequence of tweets that included a video of Naik making allegations against PM Modi and HM Amit Shah, Singh claimed that if Modi and Shah do not formally repudiate Naik's accusations, then the allegations are 'correct.'<ref>{{cite news |title=Congress leader Digvijaya Singh backs Zakir Naik's claims, seeks legal clarification from PM Modi, HM Shah |url=https://www.timesnownews.com/india/article/congress-leader-digvijaya-singh-backs-zakir-naiks-claims-seeks-legal-clarification-from-pm-modi-hm-shah/540412 |access-date=22 April 2021|work=] |date=15 January 2020 |language=en}}</ref>


=== Indian Muslim opposition towards Naik ===
===Prosecution of criminals===
], the senior cleric of Bareilly, Shia Muslim cleric ], and Shahi Imam of West Bengal ] are among some of the most powerful Islamic scholars in India who have criticized Naik's interpretation and knowledge of Islam and have described his views as "false",<ref name="Rizvi">{{Cite web|last=Rizvi|first=Uzair Hasan|title=Muslim clerics in India unite against superstar televangelist Zakir Naik|url=http://scroll.in/article/811508/muslim-clerics-in-india-unite-against-superstar-televangelist-zakir-naik|access-date=25 August 2020|website=Scroll.in|date=11 July 2016 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name="Deccan Chronicle">{{Cite web|date=9 July 2016|title=Avoid listening to Zakir Naik, Darul Uloom Deoband tells Muslims|url=https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/090716/avoid-listening-to-zakir-naik-darul-uloom-deoband-tells-muslims.html|access-date=25 August 2020|website=Deccan Chronicle|language=en}}</ref> "mischievous",<ref name="Rizvi" /> and "misleading".<ref>{{Cite web|date=7 July 2016|title='Every Muslim should be a terrorist': Zakir Naik and six of his most provocative statements |url=https://www.firstpost.com/india/every-muslim-should-be-a-terrorist-zakir-naik-and-six-of-his-most-provocative-statements-2879876.html|access-date=25 August 2020|website=Firstpost}}</ref> In 2007, reports claimed that ] considered him a self-styled preacher unattached to any of the four orthodox Sunni Islamic schools of jurisprudence (]) and therefore has issued many ]s<ref>{{Cite web|author=Mohammed Wajihuddin|date=Jul 10, 2016|title=In '07, Deoband had issued fatwa against Zakir Naik {{!}} Mumbai News – Times of India|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/In-07-Deoband-had-issued-fatwa-against-Zakir-Naik/articleshow/53134406.cms|access-date=25 August 2020|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Gidwani|first=Deepak|date=10 July 2016|title=Deoband issued fatwa against Zakir Naik years ago|url=https://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-deoband-issued-fatwa-against-zakir-naik-years-ago-2232865|access-date=25 August 2020|website=DNA India|language=en}}</ref><ref name="Deccan Chronicle" /> against Zakir Naik, rejecting him as being amongst the ghair muqallidin (a term used in Islam to describe someone who does not relate with the four ] viz. ], ], ] and ]) thereby appealing towards Muslims to avoid listening to his sermons.<ref name=HT3>{{cite web|last1=Hindustan Times|title=Zakir Naik unfit to preach, Muslims should avoid listening to him: Darul Uloom|date=9 July 2016|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/zakir-naik-unfit-to-preach-muslims-shoud-avoid-listening-to-him-darul-uloom/story-uyLibblyU8av4Y79r2kIPI.html|access-date=9 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160709221048/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/zakir-naik-unfit-to-preach-muslims-shoud-avoid-listening-to-him-darul-uloom/story-uyLibblyU8av4Y79r2kIPI.html|archive-date=9 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=Hindustan Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Deccan Chronicle|title=Avoid listening to Zakir Naik, Darul Uloom Deoband tells Muslims|date=9 July 2016|url=https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/090716/avoid-listening-to-zakir-naik-darul-uloom-deoband-tells-muslims.html|access-date=9 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160710002301/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/090716/avoid-listening-to-zakir-naik-darul-uloom-deoband-tells-muslims.html|archive-date=10 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=Deccan Chronicle}}</ref> In 2016, a Darul Uloom spokesman clarified reports that although a few fatwas had been issued by Darul Uloom against Naik on legal matters, these were being "deliberately highlighted" by the media.<ref>{{cite news|title=Dar-ul-Uloom objects to media citing its fatwas against Zakir Naik|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/dar-ul-uloom-objects-to-media-citing-its-fatwas-against-zakir-naik-2905329/|access-date=14 July 2016|agency=]|publisher=]|date=11 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160713192914/http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/dar-ul-uloom-objects-to-media-citing-its-fatwas-against-zakir-naik-2905329/|archive-date=13 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> The deputy vice chancellor of Darul Uloom, Abdul Khaliq Madrasi, came out in his support, saying: "We have bad differences of opinion with Zakir Naik. But he is recognized as an ] the world over. We don't believe that he could be connected with terrorism in any way."<ref>{{cite news|last1=Gidwani|first1=Deepak|title=Now Darul Uloom comes out in support of Zakir Naik|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-now-darul-uloom-comes-out-in-support-of-zakir-naik-2233569|access-date=14 July 2016|agency=Daily News and Analysis|publisher=DNAIndia|date=12 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160715062228/http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-now-darul-uloom-comes-out-in-support-of-zakir-naik-2233569|archive-date=15 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> In addition, many more academics under Sunni majority schools have acknowledged their ideological differences and have spoken out against targeting and tying Naik to terrorism. However, majority Shia schools of thought like the Shia National Front still demanded a CGI probe into Naik.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Rashid|first=Omar|title=Deoband condemns media trial of Zakir|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Deoband-condemns-media-trial-of-Zakir/article14481653.ece|access-date=8 July 2021|website=The Hindu|date=10 July 2016|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Rashid|first=Omar|title=Deoband condemns media trial of Zakir|url=https://www.pressreader.com/india/the-hindu/20160711/281900182541409|access-date=9 July 2021|website=PressReader|language=en-US}}</ref>
] (Islamic law) prescribes ] for crimes such as murder and rape -- unless the victim's family either forgives the culprit or receives ], or both.


=== July 2016 Dhaka attack inspiration ===
Naik believes that these penalties are necessary to prevent rape and murder, and that these penalties would ultimately make for a safer society.
After revealing the investigations of the ] in July 2016 published by ] that a terrorist involved in the brutal killings followed Zakir Naik's page on Facebook and was influenced<ref name="hp10" /> by Naik's speeches,<ref>{{cite web|last1=DNA|title=Peace TV of Mumbai preacher Zakir Naik who inspired Dhaka killer funded in Britain|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-peace-tv-of-mumbai-preacher-who-inspired-dhaka-killer-funded-in-britain-2231852|access-date=10 July 2016|date=7 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160708212749/http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-peace-tv-of-mumbai-preacher-who-inspired-dhaka-killer-funded-in-britain-2231852|archive-date=8 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> The terrorist had posted sermons of Zakir Naik on social media where Naik urged "all Muslims to be terrorists"<ref name="wpzn" /><ref name="WP">{{cite news|last1=The Washington Post|title=Islamic TV preacher denies link to Bangladesh attack, accuses media of unfair trial|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/islamic-tv-preacher-denies-link-to-bangladesh-attack-accuses-media-of-unfair-trial/2016/07/15/d63ce6be-49e8-11e6-8dac-0c6e4accc5b1_story.html|access-date=15 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160715190417/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/islamic-tv-preacher-denies-link-to-bangladesh-attack-accuses-media-of-unfair-trial/2016/07/15/d63ce6be-49e8-11e6-8dac-0c6e4accc5b1_story.html|archive-date=15 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=The Washington Post}}</ref> Indian ] ] said, "Zakir Naik's speech is a matter of concern for us. Our agencies are working on this."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-hints-action-against-islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-for-hate-speech/articleshow/53080185.cms | title=Government hints action against Islamic preacher Zakir Naik for 'hate speech' | work=] | date=6 July 2016 | location=New Delhi | access-date=9 July 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160709222021/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/government-hints-action-against-islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-for-hate-speech/articleshow/53080185.cms | archive-date=9 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref> He was then termed a controversial as well as a popular figure by the media.<ref name="wpzn" /><ref name=HT3 /> After 2 days in investigation, the Maharashtra State Intelligence Department (SID) gave a clean chit to Zakir Naik and said that Naik would not and cannot be arrested on his return to India as the probe ordered by the Maharashtra government did not find any other strong evidence to link Naik to terror-related activities.<ref>{{cite news|title=State Intelligence Dept. gives clean chit to Naik; no arrest on his return to India|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-intelligence-dept-gives-clean-chit-to-naik-no-arrest-on-his-return-to-india/article8837594.ece|access-date=13 July 2016|work=]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160713160256/http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/state-intelligence-dept-gives-clean-chit-to-naik-no-arrest-on-his-return-to-india/article8837594.ece|archive-date=13 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> ] apologized to Naik over the ] controversy and stated that they never blamed him for the attack.<ref name="dailystar">{{cite web | url=http://www.thedailystar.net/dhaka-attack/the-daily-star-protests-dr-naiks-claims-1251064 | title=The Daily Star protests Dr Naik's claims | publisher=] | date=9 July 2016 | access-date=13 July 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160712071528/http://www.thedailystar.net/dhaka-attack/the-daily-star-protests-dr-naiks-claims-1251064 | archive-date=12 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref> The newspaper quoted that it only reported how youth were misinterpreting his speeches.<ref name="dailystar" /><ref>{{cite news|title=Bangla paper apologises to Zakir Naik, says never blamed him for attack|url=https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/110716/never-said-dhaka-attackers-were-inspired-by-zakir-naik-bangladesh-newspaper.html|access-date=12 July 2016|publisher=]|date=11 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160712144659/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/110716/never-said-dhaka-attackers-were-inspired-by-zakir-naik-bangladesh-newspaper.html|archive-date=12 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Zakir Naik fracas: Bangladesh paper denies report used by Indian media to demand ban on preacher|url=http://scroll.in/article/811498/daily-star-denies-it-blamed-zakir-naik-for-dhaka-destroying-indian-media-case-against-him|access-date=12 July 2016|publisher=Scroll.in|date=10 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160711112723/http://scroll.in/article/811498/daily-star-denies-it-blamed-zakir-naik-for-dhaka-destroying-indian-media-case-against-him|archive-date=11 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> However, soon thereafter the ] banned the broadcast of Naik's ] channel.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/world/world-news/bangladesh-bans-televangelist-zakir-naiks-peace-tv-2905038/|title=Bangladesh govt bans televangelist Zakir Naik's Peace TV|date=10 July 2016|work=indianexpress.com|access-date=14 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160713193131/http://indianexpress.com/article/world/world-news/bangladesh-bans-televangelist-zakir-naiks-peace-tv-2905038/|archive-date=13 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> ], the Information Minister, reasoned that "Peace TV is not consistent with Muslim society, the Quran, Sunnah, Hadith, Bangladesh's Constitution, our culture, customs and rituals".<ref name="BBC1">{{cite news|last1=BBC News|title=Bangladesh to ban Islamic TV channel, Peace TV|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36761486|access-date=15 July 2016|date=11 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160714090327/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36761486|archive-date=14 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=BBC News}}</ref>


When the ] arrested Mohammad Ibrahim Yazdani, the head of ]'s ] module in India, upon interrogation it was revealed that the operatives were influenced by Zakir Naik's sermons and wanted to establish Shariah law as in ]<ref name="lmzn" /><ref>{{cite news|last1=The Economic Times|title=Zakir Naik 'inspired' chief of Hyderabad IS module too.|newspaper=The Economic Times|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/zakir-naik-inspired-chief-of-hyderabad-is-module-too/articleshow/53074798.cms|access-date=16 July 2016|date=6 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160711101316/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/zakir-naik-inspired-chief-of-hyderabad-is-module-too/articleshow/53074798.cms|archive-date=11 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Permissible food in Islam===
In a 2006 TV appearance, Naik declared that it was ] (forbidden) for Muslims to eat ]. Prasad is food offered to ] deities and then shared with friends and family; it is believed to convey blessings and good fortune. Naik said that too many Muslims say ] over the food, and eat it to please their friends. Naik quotes the following verse from the Quran in support of his claim:
:6:121 ''Eat not of (meats) on which Allah's name hath not been pronounced: That would be impiety. But the evil ones ever inspire their friends to contend with you if ye were to obey them, ye would indeed be Pagans.'' (] Translation)


There have been media reports of Intelligence Agencies probing the alleged links between terror group ] (JuD), and Naik's IRF.<ref name="jud">{{cite web|title=Intelligence agencies find link between Zakir Naik's Islamic Research Foundation and Jamaat-ud-Dawa|url=http://www.india.com/news/india/intelligence-agencies-find-link-between-zakir-naiks-islamic-research-foundation-and-jamaat-ud-dawa-1316487/|access-date=16 July 2016|date=8 July 2016}}</ref> The JuD website is said to be referring to Zakir Naik's sermons & preachings.
===Wishing Christians a Merry Christmas===
In a 2003 speech in Toronto , Naik asserts that it is haraam, forbidden, for ] to wish their ] friends a merry ]. Naik believes that this common greeting acknowledges ] as a son of God and is thus blasphemy for Muslims.


In 2016, he admitted that Rahil Sheikh, involved in ] was working as a volunteer for his organization Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) but he did not know Rahil personally. However, Naik also claimed that Rahil was removed from his office.<ref name="tfp" /> Nearly 200 people died in the bombing attack and investigation revealed the bombers were influenced by Naik's preachings.<ref name="jud" />
===Implementing Shariah in India===
Naik writes that while he appreciates that India presently allows Muslims to have their own ], "Muslims in India would prefer the Islamic criminal law (]) to be implemented on ''all Indians'' since it is the most practical." .


Referring to the deadly attacks in Bangladesh by terrorists, author ] said that "Many Bangladeshi would-be-terrorists are inspired by Zakir Naik. He is not having machetes in hands. But his followers are having machetes in hands". She added that, "I'm not against Zakir Naik's free speech but I am against him for inciting violence. Fatwabaz should be banned from issuing."<ref name="Nasreen">{{cite web | url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/zakir-naik-dangerous-promotes-7th-century-quranic-texts-on-sex-slaves-polygamy-taslima-nasreen_1906004.html | title=Zakir Naik dangerous, promotes seventh century Quranic texts on sex slaves, polygamy: Taslima Nasreen | publisher=] | date=11 July 2016 | access-date=20 July 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160714181534/http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/zakir-naik-dangerous-promotes-7th-century-quranic-texts-on-sex-slaves-polygamy-taslima-nasreen_1906004.html | archive-date=14 July 2016 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref>
== Debates and dialogues ==


==== Post-Dhaka attack death threats ====
Naik sometimes participates in debates as part of his public activities.
On 13 July 2016, ] leader ] announced a reward of {{INRConvert|50|l}} to anyone willing to behead Zakir Naik.<ref>{{cite news|title=Sadhvi Prachi offers Rs 50-lakh reward for Zakir Naik's death|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/sadhvi-prachi-offers-rs-50-lakh-reward-for-zakir-naiks-death-2912371/|access-date=14 July 2016|agency=]|issue=1|publisher=]|date=14 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160713221956/http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/sadhvi-prachi-offers-rs-50-lakh-reward-for-zakir-naiks-death-2912371/|archive-date=13 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> This came a day after a ] styling itself the "Hussaini Tigers" placed a {{INR Convert|15|l}} bounty on his head.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Khan|first1=M Tariq|title=Shia group announces Rs 15 lakh bounty on preacher Zakir Naik's head|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/shia-group-announces-rs-15-lakh-bounty-for-zakir-naik-s-head/story-Knksxzn2ptjZTwRYJANnkL.html|access-date=14 July 2016|agency=Hindustan Times|publisher=Hindustan Times|date=14 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160713165528/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/shia-group-announces-rs-15-lakh-bounty-for-zakir-naik-s-head/story-Knksxzn2ptjZTwRYJANnkL.html|archive-date=13 July 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>


=== 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings inspiration ===
===Debate in Chicago===
Zahran Hashim, the leader of the ] which carried out the ], had praised Naik for inciting Muslims without being banned and had asked "What can Sri Lankan Muslims do for Dr Zakir Naik?". After the attacks Sri Lankan cable TV channels stopped broadcasting PeaceTV.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.adaderana.lk/news/54792/lankan-cable-operators-block-zakir-naiks-peace-tv|title=Lankan cable operators block Zakir Naik's Peace TV|website=www.adaderana.lk|access-date=1 May 2019}}</ref>
One of the featured activities at the 2000 Chicago ] Conference (a gathering of American Muslims) was a debate titled "''The Quran & the Bible in the Light of Modern Science''", between Naik and a Christian medical doctor named William F. Campbell. Campbell took three years out of his practice to write a book called ''The Qur'an and the Bible in the light of history and science'' (first edition 1992, second edition 2000) , which he conceived as a rebuttal to ]'s 1976 ''The Bible, The Qur'an, and Science'' . Each of the debaters tried to discredit the other's scripture by parsing out verses from their counterpart's Holy Scripture and pointing out perceived errors. The debate can be downloaded from Naik's . Links to a streaming video can be found in the External links..


Indian prime minister ] denounced Naik in one of his electoral publicity visit in May 2019, saying that, Sri Lanka bombing was inspired by him and in spite of that the ] supports Zakir Naik.<ref>{{cite news |agency=Press Trust of India |title=Cong. glorifying Zakir Naik, says PM |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/cong-glorifying-zakir-naik-says-pm/article27006244.ece/amp/ |access-date=9 May 2019 |work=] |date=2 May 2019 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Shah |first1=Pankaj |last2=Mani |first2=Rajeev |last3=Khan |first3=Arshad Afzaal |title='Jai Shri Ram,' says PM Modi, slams Congress on Zakir Naik |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/lok-sabha-elections/uttar-pradesh/news/jai-shri-ram-says-pm-modi-slams-congress-on-zakir-naik/articleshow/69137221.cms |website=The Times of India |date=2 May 2019 }}</ref>
===Inter-religious dialogue in Bangalore===
An "''Inter-Religious dialogue for Spiritual Enlightenment''" was held on the 21st of January 2006 at ]. Naik and the founder of the ], ], spoke on the topic ''The Concept of God in Hinduism and Islam , in the light of sacred scriptures.''
This was by far the biggest dialogue in which Naik participated and can be viewed .


=== Hostility towards Muslim and Hindu minorities ===
During the event, Naik said, "religious tolerance is important in Islam but tolerance does not mean acceptance." He claimed that people of other religions were misguided and said, "Muslims would have a problem with the Hindu imagery of the god Vishnu." Naik also claimed that the Vedas prophesize the coming of the prophet Muhammad, for which Ravishankar replied, "muslims should now respect the Vedas and not call it scriptures of the unbelievers."
'']'' published a profile of Naik entitled "The controversial preacher" after he was banned from the United Kingdom. According to ''The Times'', "the fact is that barring the band of Muslims whose bruised egos Naik suitably massages through his Islam supremacist talks, most rational Muslims and non-Muslims find his brand of Islam a travesty of the faith". ''The Times'' also claimed that "the Wahabi-] brand of Islam, bankrolled by petro-rich Saudi Arabia and propagated by preachers like Naik, does not appreciate the idea of pluralism." The article quotes Muslim scholar ]: "Dawah, which Naik also claims to be engaged in, is to make people aware of the creation plan of God, not to peddle some provocative, dubious ideas as Naik does." He adds: "The wave of Islamophobia in the aftermath of 9/11 and the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan have only added to the Muslims' sense of injury. In such a situation, when a debater like Zakir Naik, in eloquent English, takes on preachers of other faiths and defeats them during debates, the Muslims' chests puff with pride. A community nursing a huge sense of betrayal and injustice naturally lionises anyone who gives it a sense of pride. Never mind if it's false pride."<ref>Wajihuddin, Mohammed. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304222622/http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/getFiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib%3ALowLevelEntityToPrint_TOINEW&Type=text%2Fhtml&Locale=english-skin-custom&Path=TOIM%2F2010%2F06%2F27&ID=Ar00403 |date=4 March 2016 }}. '']''. 27 June 2010. Retrieved 28 August 2013.</ref>


According to the ], Zakir Naik quoted verses from the ] out of context and tried to insult Hinduism and other polytheist religions in a debate with its founder – his talk was according to them, "misguiding and inciting people".<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Zakir Naik quoted Vedas out of context, tried to insult Hinduism: Art of Living |url=https://www.deccanchronicle.com/amp/nation/current-affairs/080716/zakir-naik-quoted-vedas-out-of-context-tried-to-insult-hinduism-art-of-living.html |work= |location=Hyderabad |date=8 July 2016 |access-date=2 November 2019}}</ref>
===Challenge to Pope Benedict XVI===


Indian journalist ] says he "disagree with almost everything has to say about misconceptions about Islam". Singh argues that Naik's pronouncements are "juvenile", and said "they seldom rise above the level of undergraduate college debates, where contestants vie with each other to score brownie points."<ref>]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105130523/http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/255454.aspx |date=5 November 2012 }}. '']''. 3 November 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref> Singh also says Naik's audiences "listen to him with rapt attention and often explode in enthusiastic applause when he rubbishes other religious texts".<ref>]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071231095018/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20050305/saturday/above.htm |date=31 December 2007 }}. '']''. 5 March 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref>
Zakir Naik invited ] for open interfaith dialogue on 29th September 2006.


Torkel Brekke, a professor of religious history in Norway, calls Naik a "very controversial figure" because of his rhetorical attack on other religions and other varieties of Islam. He writes that Naik is "strongly disliked" by many members of the Indian ''ulema'' for ignoring their authority and stating that anybody can interpret the Quran.<ref name="brekke">{{cite book |first=Torkel |last=Brekke |year=2012 |title=Fundamentalism: Prophecy and Protest in an Age of Globalization |chapter=Prophecy and Preaching |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, England |page= |isbn=978-0-521-14979-2 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JGooYIEd9h4C&pg=PA97 |access-date=14 May 2012 |url=https://archive.org/details/fundamentalismpr0000brek/page/97 }}</ref> Conservative ] mullahs have accused Naik of "destroying Islam" by driving Muslims away from the correct religious authorities.<ref>Brekke, Torkel (2012). , Cambridge University Press, p. 97.
===Ali Sina's challenge===
*See also: ]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111103053714/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011 |date=3 November 2011 }}. '']'' (Pakistan). 10 January 2011. Retrieved 20 July 2011.</ref>


In '']'', reporter Sreemoy Talukdar wrote, "The smooth-talking ]'s regressive and problematic teachings, thoroughly dissected and discussed threadbare, strike at the pluralist cultural component of our existence and promotes a version of Islam that is dreary and incompatible with the modern world."<ref name="FP">{{cite web|last1=Firstpost|title=Indian Muslims bitterly divided over Zakir Naik but it is still a healthy sign|date=14 July 2016|url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/indian-muslims-bitterly-divided-over-zakir-naik-but-it-is-still-a-healthy-sign-2893016.html|access-date=15 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160717094614/http://www.firstpost.com/india/indian-muslims-bitterly-divided-over-zakir-naik-but-it-is-still-a-healthy-sign-2893016.html|archive-date=17 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=Firstpost}}</ref>
] who has debated with famous authorities of ] like ] <ref></ref>, has challenged Naik for a written debate but his request has, according to Sina, remained unanswered for over three years <ref></ref>. After numerous attempts to reach out to Naik, Sina was instructed by Naik's assistants that Naik does not participate in written debate. Sina has instead been posed a counter challenge by Naik's supporters to arrange for a live audience of at least 10,000 people. Sina, in counter claim, says this demand is not justified and cites the threat to his life <ref>http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/SohailAhmed.htm</ref> as well as the lack of time in a televised debate. He has instead offered to publish the written debate on his website.


=== Stance towards homosexuals and places of worship ===
== Naik's critics ==
In '']'', ] criticised Naik for recommending the death penalty for homosexuals and for apostasy from the faith.<ref name="wsj1">{{Cite news |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704365204575317833268479268?mod=asia_opinion%7Ctitle%3DThe |title=Trouble with Dr. Zakir Naik{{pipe}}The Wall Street Journal |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=20 June 2010 |access-date=4 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629055704/http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704365204575317833268479268.html?mod=asia_opinion |archive-date=29 June 2011 |url-status=live|last1=Dhume |first1=Sadanand }}</ref> He also criticised him for calling for India to be ruled by Shariah law. He added that, according to Naik, Jews "control America" and are the "strongest in enmity to Muslims." He maintained that Naik supports a ban on the construction of non-Muslim places of worship in Muslim lands as well as the Taliban's bombing of the ]. Dhume argues that people reportedly drawn to Naik's message include Najibullah Zazi, the Afghan-American arrested for planning suicide attacks on the New York subway; Rahil Sheikh, accused of involvement in ]; and ], the Bangalore man fatally injured in a ]. He also stated that "unless Indians find the ability to criticise such a radical Islamic preacher as robustly as they would a Hindu equivalent, the ideal of Indian secularism would remain deeply flawed."<ref name="wsj1" />
When Naik claimed that Muslims were like the father who tries to save his son (who is like the misguided non-muslim) from jumping from a 20-storey building, Sri Sri Ravishankar immediately asked him, "How did you conclude Muslims are the Father and Non-Muslims are the son? Who is taking who as Father, and who is taking who as Son?"
===Debate on Pedophilia===
Zakir Naik's 2024 visit in Pakistan gathered controversy.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Editorial |date=2024-10-25 |title=Controversial guest |url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1867512 |access-date=2024-12-09 |website=DAWN.COM |language=en}}</ref> In a lecture in October 2024, Dr. Naik had a debate with a Pashtun girl who was concerned about child sexual abuse in her region, with Dr. Naik's response being that there was no promotion of pedophilia in the Quran.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/zakir-naik-islam-quran-paedophilia-pashtun-girl-viral-video-2612488-2024-10-07|title=Zakir Naik's heated exchange with girl on Islam and paedophilia, video is viral|publisher=India Today}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/after-orphans-called-daughters-islamic-hate-preacher-zakir-naik-leaves-pak-event-6715345|title=The Shocking Reason Hate Preacher Zakir Naik Walked Off Stage In Pakistan|publisher=ndtv}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://theprint.in/go-to-pakistan/pashtun-girl-asks-zakir-naik-about-rising-paedophilia-in-islamic-societies-says-apologise/2301207/|title=Pashtun girl asks Zakir Naik about rising paedophilia in Islamic societies. He says apologise|publisher=The Print}}</ref>


== Legal issues ==
Most of the examples Naik uses are outdated and the figures he quotes are no longer true or applicable. His analogies seem baseless and don't seem to pertain to the point he tries to prove. This is the case when he uses "wrong statistics" about world population to claim that women's population is more than men's population. Various published sources discredit his claims.
Naik was denied entry into the United Kingdom and Canada in June 2010.<ref name="bbc1">. ]. 18 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011.</ref><ref name="Carlson">Carlson, Kathryn Blaze. {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120716225500/http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/06/22/controversial-muslim-televangelist-zakir-naik-banned-from-toronto-conference/ |date=16 July 2012}}. '']''. 22 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.</ref> Naik was forbidden to enter Canada after ], founder of ], warned MPs of Naik's views.<ref name=Carlson /> He was banned from entering the UK by the then ] ] after arranging to give talks in London and Sheffield. May said of the exclusion order, "Numerous comments made by Dr. Naik are evidence to me of his unacceptable behaviour".<ref name=bbc1 /> Naik argued that the Home Secretary was making a political decision, not a legal one, and his lawyer said the decision was "barbaric and inhuman". He also claimed that his comments were taken out of context.<ref name="auto1" /> The ] producer ] supported Naik, saying the ban constituted an attack on ].<ref name="dnazakir">Akshay Deshmane {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100901013929/http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_zakir-naik-will-fight-back-as-canada-bans-him-too_1400073 |date=1 September 2010}}</ref> It was reported that Naik would attempt to challenge the ruling in the ].<ref>. ]. 19 June 2010. Retrieved 16 April 2011.</ref> His application for judicial review was dismissed on 5 November 2010.<ref name=BAILII />


In 2016, during a press conference Naik claimed himself to be a ] (NRI).<ref name=tfp>{{cite web|last1=The Free Press Journal|title='NRI' Zakir Naik Has No Plans To Return|url=http://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/nri-zakir-naik-has-no-plans-to-return/890676|access-date=16 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160717153744/http://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/nri-zakir-naik-has-no-plans-to-return/890676|archive-date=17 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=The Free Press Journal}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Times Of India|title=Will return to India only next year: Zakir Naik|website=]|date=16 July 2016 |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Will-return-to-India-only-next-year-Zakir-Naik/articleshow/53233375.cms|access-date=16 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160716045559/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Will-return-to-India-only-next-year-Zakir-Naik/articleshow/53233375.cms|archive-date=16 July 2016|url-status=live|author1-link=Times Of India}}</ref>
The interviewer of Zakir Naik during his "propagation of Other faiths" segment added his own views after the segment. He questioned if Zakir Naik was being any different from the Taliban.


On 18 July 2017, India revoked Naik's passport following a recommendation from the National Investigation Agency (NIA).<ref name="The Times of India" /> On 28 July 2017, the NIA declared Naik an offender and initiated a process to attach his assets.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/zakir-naik-declared-proclaimed-offender-nia-starts-prop-attachment/articleshow/59812853.cms|title=Zakir Naik declared proclaimed offender, NIA starts prop attachment|date=28 July 2017|work=The Economic Times|access-date=29 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170729123653/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/zakir-naik-declared-proclaimed-offender-nia-starts-prop-attachment/articleshow/59812853.cms|archive-date=29 July 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> In December 2017, ] refused the Indian Government's request to issue a ] against Naik.<ref name="red_notice">{{cite news|title=Interpol refuses to issue red corner notice against controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/interpol-red-corner-notice-islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-1110835-2017-12-16|access-date=11 January 2018|work=India Today|date=16 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180112042350/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/interpol-red-corner-notice-islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-1110835-2017-12-16|archive-date=12 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> In January 2018, the Tribunal judge criticised the ] for attaching Naik's properties without mentioning any offenses in the chargesheet. The judge added: "In the last 10 years, the ED has done nothing to attach ]'s properties, but in the case of Naik, I can see the ED working with quite a bit of speed".<ref>{{cite news|title=Judge rips apart ED for 'speedy action against Zakir Naik, but none against Asaram Bapu'|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/judge-rips-apart-ed-for-speedy-action-against-zakir-naik-but-none-against-asaram-bapu/articleshow/62441515.cms|access-date=11 January 2018|work=The Times of India|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180111225613/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/judge-rips-apart-ed-for-speedy-action-against-zakir-naik-but-none-against-asaram-bapu/articleshow/62441515.cms|archive-date=11 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Tribunal Restrains Enforcement Directorate From Taking Over Zakir Naik's Assets|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/tribunal-restrains-enforcement-directorate-from-taking-over-zakir-naiks-assets-1798032|access-date=11 January 2018|work=NDTV|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180110055746/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/tribunal-restrains-enforcement-directorate-from-taking-over-zakir-naiks-assets-1798032|archive-date=10 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
Naik's views on prasad and Christmas wishes have been discussed on Indian television channels. During NDTV's televised debate "The Big Fight" (March 11 2006) prominent Indian Muslims such as ] and ] reproved what they felt were Naik's mischievous attempts to radicalize the Indian Muslim community and promote communal strife{{cn}}.


In July 2019 Interpol refused to issue a ] against Naik after repeated requests by the Indian Government.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Ahuja|first=Namrata Biji|url=https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2019/07/28/interpol-again-refuses-red-corner-notice-against-zakir-naik.html|title=Interpol again refuses Red Corner Notice against Zakir Naik|date=28 July 2019|work=The Week|access-date=28 February 2020}}</ref> Naik currently resides in Malaysia, where he has ] status.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|last=Abdullah|first=Sharifah Mahsinah|url=https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/08/511762/zakir-naik-praises-dr-mahathir|title=Zakir Naik praises Dr Mahathir|date=10 August 2019|work=New Straits Times|access-date=28 February 2020}}</ref> The Indian government approached Interpol again in December 2019, alleging new facts and circumstances, but Naik argued that the new request superimposed claims of money laundering on the same religious activities of Islamic teaching that were the subject of the prior request.<ref name=":2" /> On 13 May 2020, the Modi-led government sent a formal request to ] for Zakir Naik's extradition, which was later rejected.<ref>{{cite news |title=India sends formal request to Malaysia for Zakir Naik extradition – Times of India |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-sends-formal-request-to-malaysia-for-zakir-naik-extradition/articleshow/75739442.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200514173250/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-sends-formal-request-to-malaysia-for-zakir-naik-extradition/articleshow/75739442.cms |url-status=dead |archive-date=14 May 2020 |access-date=31 May 2020 |work=] |date=14 May 2020 |language=en }}</ref> In 2021, Interpol rejected India's request for a ] to provisionally arrest Zakir for questioning the very basis of invoking ] and ] charges against Naik in the country.<ref name=":2" /> "''The fact that he raised money from his religious teachings and spent it is "]" and cannot amount to money laundering".'' Interpol's adjudicating panel noted in its order.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|date=30 April 2021|title=Interpol again refuses Red Notice against Zakir Naik|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/interpol-again-refuses-red-notice-against-zakir-naik-101619721199360.html|access-date=24 May 2021|website=Hindustan Times|language=en}}</ref>
Other Muslims like Sheikh Taj-Al Halily and the members of the Muslim Canadian Congress have also rejected this viewpoint on Christmas wishes. .


== Publications ==
During the Bangalore debate, Naik criticised other religions including Hinduism. His co-speaker Sri Sri Ravi Shankar simply replied, "to each their belief, and it is not our position to question them."
{{refbegin |30em }}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Dr. Zakir | title=The Quran & Modern Science | publisher=Darussalam Publishers | year=2014 | id=GGKEY: 7L94R950BRY| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=r6_EAwAAQBAJ | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Dr. Zakir | title=The Quran and The Bible in The Light of Science (PB) | publisher=Islamic Book Service | year=2013 | isbn=978-81-7231-927-4| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zp1kAQAACAAJ | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=124}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Dr. Zakir | title=Answers To Non Muslims Common Questions About Islam | publisher=Adam Publishers & Distributors | year=2010 | isbn=| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ne8cywEACAAJ | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=80}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Zakir | title=Focus on Islam | publisher=Adam Publishers | year=2010 | isbn=978-81-7435-462-4| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OSYqfhdkQz0C | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=70}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Zakir | title=Rights of Women in Islam: Modern Or Outdated? | publisher=Adam Publishers | year=2009 | isbn=978-81-7435-571-3| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N6imjIsNuycC | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=80}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Zakir | title=Is non-vegetarian food permitted or prohibited for the human being? | publisher=Adam Publishers | year=2008 | isbn=978-8-1743-5570-6| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ud9S0V1mmyMC | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=48}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Dr. Zakir | title=Speeches of Dr. Zakir Naik | publisher=Talha Publication | year=2008 | id=GGKEY: 7L94R950BRY| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cuU5uwEACAAJ | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=531}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Dr. Zakir | title=The Concept of GOD in Major Religions | publisher=Amazon Digital Services LLC – KDP Print US | year=2008 | isbn=978-1-07-845276-2| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nrdyxwEACAAJ | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=29}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Zakir | title=The Qur'an & Modern Science: Compatible or Incompatible? | publisher=Peace Vision | year=2007 | isbn=978-9-9609-8493-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uPQ6Q2EuIJkC | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=80}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Zakir | title=Similarities Between Hinduism & Islam | publisher=Adam Publishers | year=2007 | isbn=978-81-7435-567-6| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=So4O46mUp0QC | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=80}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Dr. Zakir | title=IS THE QUR AN GOD WORDS | publisher=Adam Publishers & Distributors | year=2003 | isbn=978-81-7435-334-4| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QdvbjY8cxiEC | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=76}}
* {{cite book | last=Naik | first=Dr. Zakir | title=Answers to Non-Muslims Common Questions | publisher=Adam Publishers | year=2003 | isbn=978-81-7435-543-0| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cntXwK23kDoC | access-date=12 May 2021 |pages=}}
{{refend}}


== References ==
], who is a big critic of Naik, has claimed that Naik is a showman who twists the truth and fools his audience . He has reviewed the debate between Campbell and Naik and claims that Naik misrepresented Islam with his lies.
{{reflist}}


== Further reading ==
Some Islamic scholars like Mahmoud Murad also vehemently disagree with Naik's interpretations and the language in which he couches arguments and have published books refuting them.
{{refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal
|last = Ahmed
|first = Hilal
|date = 18 December 2015
|title = Naik, Zakir
|url = http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t343/e0183
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201204022031/http://oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t343/e0183
|url-status = dead
|archive-date = 4 December 2020
|journal = Oxford Islamic Studies Online
|url-access = subscription
}}
{{refend}}


==External links== == External links ==
* {{Official website}}


{{Subject bar
;Naik publications and debates
|commons = yes
* (book)
|commons-search = Category:Zakir Naik
* (book)
|d = yes
* (complete video)
|d-search = Q932829
|q = yes
|q-search = Zakir Naik
|portal1 = Biography
|portal2 = Islam
}}


{{Authority control}}
;Anti-Naik
* +
*
*


{{DEFAULTSORT:Naik, Zakir}}
;Other Links
]
* Free downloadable videos of Dr Zakir Naik
]
*
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 21:48, 26 December 2024

Indian Islamic scholar (born 1965)

Zakir Naik
Naik in the Maldives, 2010
BornZakir Abdul Karim Naik
(1965-10-18) 18 October 1965 (age 59)
Bombay, Maharashtra, India
CitizenshipIndia
Alma materUniversity of Mumbai (MBBS)
Occupations
Years active1991–present
Known forDawah
Title
Board member ofIslamic Research Foundation, Islamic International School and United Islamic Aid
SpouseFarhat Naik
Children3
Awards
YouTube information
Channel
Years active2011–present
Genre
Subscribers3.84 million
Total views268 million
Associated actsHuda TV
Creator Awards
100,000 subscribers
1,000,000 subscribers

Last updated: 20 April 2024
Websitezakirnaik.com

Zakir Abdul Karim Naik (born 18 October 1965) is an Indian Islamic scholar and public orator who focuses on comparative religion. Naik is currently a wanted fugitive in India, where, in 2016, the authorities charged Naik for money laundering while he was abroad in Malaysia; Naik did not return to India and became a permanent resident of Malaysia. Naik denies all charges. The National Investigation Agency attempted to issue an Interpol red notice for his arrest, which was refused due to insufficient evidence.

He is the founder and president of the Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) and Peace TV. He is a well-known figure in the Islamic world, and while he does not claim to be a follower of any one school of thought in Islam, he is most closely associated with the Salafi school of thought. Naik's Peace TV is banned in India, Bangladesh, Canada, Sri Lanka, and the United Kingdom under hate speech laws.

Early life and education

Zakir Naik was born on 18 October 1965 to Abdul Karim Naik and Roshan Naik in Bombay, India. He attended Kishinchand Chellaram College and studied medicine at the Topiwala National Medical College & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital and later the University of Mumbai, where he obtained a Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery (MBBS).

Career

In 1991, he started working in the field of dawah and founded the Islamic International School in Mumbai and the United Islamic Aid, which provides scholarships to poor and destitute Muslim youth. Naik's wife, Farhat Naik, is the president of the women's section of the Islamic Research Foundation (IRF). He established United Islamic Aid, which provides scholarship to poor and destitute Muslim youth.

Naik said in 2006 that he was inspired by Ahmed Deedat, an Islamic preacher whom he met in 1987. (Naik is sometimes referred to as "Deedat plus", a label given to him by Deedat.)

On 21 January 2006, the Islamic Research Foundation, which Naik heads, founded Peace TV. It is a non-profit Emirati satellite television network that broadcasts free-to-air programming. It is one of the world's largest religious satellite television networks.

In the second half of March 2021, Naik launched Al Hidaayah, which provides educational content about Islam. The platform has thousands of hours of videos of more than 40 renowned Islamic speakers from all over the world including Ahmed Deedat, Yusuf Estes, Hussein Ye, and Bilal Philips. He claimed that this platform is a "halal" version of Netflix.

Lectures and debates

Unlike many Islamic preachers, his lectures are colloquial, given in English, not Urdu or Arabic, and he usually wears a suit and tie. Naik has held many debates and lectures and is said to "have delivered over 4000 lectures around the world" as of 2016. Anthropologist Thomas Blom Hansen has written that Naik's style of memorising the Quran and Hadith literature in various languages, and his related missionary activity, has made him extremely popular in Muslim circles. Many of his debates are recorded and widely distributed in video and DVD media and online. His talks have been recorded in English and broadcast on weekends on several cable networks in Mumbai's Muslim neighbourhoods, and on the Peace TV channel, which he co-produces. Topics he speaks on include: "Islam and Modern Science", "Islam and Christianity", and "Islam and secularism".

His first debate was in 1994, a debate on the views of writer Taslima Nasreen on Islam in her book Lajja, organised at the "Mumbai Marathi Patrakar Sangh", entitled "Is Religious Fundamentalism a Stumbling block to Freedom of Expression?". With the presence of four journalists, the debate went on for hours. In April 2000, Naik debated with William Campbell in Chicago on the topic of "The Qur'an and the Bible: In the Light of Science", one of his most-cited debates. On 21 January 2006 Naik held an inter-religious dialogue with Ravi Shankar in Bangalore about the concept of God in Islam and Hinduism. In February 2011 Naik addressed the Oxford Union via video link from India.

University of Melbourne

In 2004 Naik, at the invitation of the Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia, made an appearance at the University of Melbourne, where he argued that only Islam gave women true equality. He said the more "revealing Western dress" makes women more susceptible to rape. Sushi Das of The Age commented that "Naik extolled the moral and spiritual superiority of Islam and lampooned other faiths and the West in general", further stating that Naik's words "fostered a spirit of separateness and reinforced prejudice".

St David's Hall

In August 2006, Naik's visit and conference in Cardiff caused controversy when Welsh conservative MP David Davies called for his appearance to be cancelled. He said Naik was a "hate-monger", and that his views did not deserve a public platform. Muslims from Cardiff, however, defended Naik's right to speak in the city. Saleem Kidwai, Secretary-General of the Muslim Council of Wales, stated that "people who know about him know that he is one of the most uncontroversial persons you could find. He talks about the similarities between religions, and how should we work on the common ground between them", whilst also inviting Davies to discuss further with Naik personally in the conference. The conference went ahead after the Cardiff council stated it was satisfied that he would not be preaching extremist views.

Invitation to Gambia

In 2014, Naik visited Gambia at the invitation of President Yahya Jammeh to attend the grand celebration of Gambian revolution's 20th anniversary. There he delivered four lectures between 11 and 22 October. The lectures took place in University of the Gambia, Pancha Mi Hall of Paradise Suites Hotel, presidents home village Kanilai, Foni Kansala and Kairaba Beach Hotel, Kololi. Gambian cabinet ministers, religious leaders, students and thousands of people attended his lectures on subjects including "Terrorism and Jihad: an Islamic perspective", "religion in the right perspective", "Dawah or destruction?" and "the misconceptions about Islam". Meanwhile, he also met with the president Yahya Jammeh along with Gambia Supreme Islamic Council and held an Islamic conference with the Imams of Gambia.

Malaysia

Naik delivered four lectures in Malaysia during 2012. The lectures took place in Johor Bahru, Universiti Teknologi MARA in Shah Alam, Kuantan and Putra World Trade Centre in Kuala Lumpur. The former Prime Minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamad, prominent figures and several thousand people attended the lectures at different places despite protest by the members of HINDRAF. The organisers of Naik's speeches said their purpose was to promote harmony among people of various religions.

Naik delivered another six lectures in April 2016. Two of his lectures in Malaysia, entitled "Similarities between Hinduism and Islam" and "Is the Quran God's word?" were objected by HINDRAF, along with other NGOs, saying that these lectures might provoke inter-racial tensions. With the initial support of the Government authority, the event went ahead as planned.

Naik delivered a speech on Islamophobia on 9 August 2019 at the Sultan Mohammad IV Stadium, Kota Bharu, Kelantan which was attended by more than 100,000 people.

Views

Zakir Naik does not claim to be an adherent of a particular school of thought in Islam. Despite his denials, some people believe his views and ideology are similar to Salafis.

Naik says that his goal is to "concentrate on the educated Muslim youth who have become apologetic about their own religion and have started to feel the religion is outdated". He considers it a duty of every Muslim to remove perceived misconceptions about Islam and to counter what he views as the Western media's anti-Islamic bias in the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States. Naik has said that "despite the strident anti-Islam campaign, 34,000 Americans have embraced Islam from September 2001 to July 2002". According to Naik, Islam is a religion of reason and logic, and the Quran contains 1000 verses relating to science, which he says explains the number of Western converts. Some of his articles are published in magazines such as Islamic Voice.

Supremacy of Islam

Naik said that Islam is the "best" religion because "The Quran says it. No other religious text or scripture claims this fact." He added that, "Islam is also labelled as intolerant, and it is indeed, but towards corruption, discrimination, injustice, adultery, alcoholism, and all evils. Islam is the most 'tolerant' religion as far as promoting the human values is concerned."

Social issues

Naik equated music with alcohol and stated that both are intoxicating in nature. He has opposed dancing and singing, claiming that they are forbidden in Islam.

Naik said that guilty people must be punished and accepts chopping off hands for stealing. He has also recommended that the United States implements this logic in order to reduce its high crime rate.

Naik says the LGBT community are experiencing a mental illness caused by the use of pornography propagated by television. Naik says that in accordance with the Quran and sunnah, he recommends the death penalty for homosexuals that committed the act publicly.

Biological evolution

Denying evolution, Naik said that the theory of evolution is "only a hypothesis, and an unproven conjecture at best". According to Naik, most scientists "support the theory, because it went against the Bible – not because it was true." Naik also denies that different hominids have missing links, and claims that the majority of scientists do not accept evolution as a whole. Naik argues that scientific theories were prophesied by the Quran. For example, he has stated in 2010 that certain verses of the Quran accurately describe embryological development.

Naik argued, "What Darwin said was only a 'theory'. There is no book saying 'the Fact of Evolution' – All the books say Theory of Evolution." He further added, "There is not a single statement in the Qur'an, which Science has proved wrong yet. Hypothesis goes against the Qur'an – theories go against the Qur'an. There is not a single scientific fact, which is mentioned in the Holy Qur'an which goes against established science – It may go against theory."

Criticism of media

Naik has called the media "the most important tool rather the most dangerous weapon in the world, which converts black into white and a villain into a hero". He suggested that "We should use the same media to remove the misconceptions, misquotations, misinterpretations, and misrepresentations about Islam." He claimed, Western powers and media play a double-standard strategy, who describe Muslims as extremists and fundamentalists to defame Islam. He said, "The maximum damage done to the image of Islam today is by the international media which is bombarding misconceptions about it day and night using an array of strategies. International media, be it print, audio, video, or online, use a number of strategies to malign Islam by first picking up the black sheep of the Muslim community, and portraying them as though they are exemplary Muslims." Naik also claimed the "third and fourth" strategy by international media is "to pick a word from Quran or sunnah and mistranslate it" and "to malign Islam by saying something that does not belong to it". Naik also criticizes the portrayal of Muslims in films.

Naik also said:

If a Muslim woman wears hijab or veil it is labeled as women subjugation, but if a nun does to the same it turns into a sign of respect and modesty. A 50-year-old Muslim marrying a 16-year-old girl (willingly) is a headline, but a 50-year-old non-Muslim raping a six-year-old girl appears as brief news or filler. They say Islam does not give rights to women, and is an illogical religion. They portray Islam as the problem of humanity though it is the solution to all man's problems. The same applies to the misinterpreted words 'fundamentalist' and 'extremist' which are basically western words. A true Muslim must be an extremist in the correct direction, by being extremely kind, loving, tolerant, honest, and just. While Indians were fighting for their freedom, the British government was labelling them as terrorists; same activity, same people, but two different labels. The same happened with Muslims who are labelled as terrorists in media, so we should look into backgrounds and reasons for an activity before labelling people."

Other religions

Apostasy

Naik believes that Muslims who convert from Islam should not necessarily receive death sentences, but that under Islamic law those who leave Islam and then "propagate the non-Islamic faith and speak against Islam" should be put to death. Another source states that according to Naik, "There is no death penalty for apostates in Islam... until the apostate starts to preach his new religion: then he can be put to death."

Propagation of other faiths in Islamic states

While he appreciates that people of other religions allow Muslims to freely propagate Islam in their country, Naik preaches that the dissemination of other religions within an Islamic state must be forbidden because he believes that other faiths are incorrect, so their propagation is as wrong as it would be for an arithmetic teacher to teach that 2+2=3 or 6 instead of 2+2=4.

Naik criticises the activities of Christian missionaries in the Muslim world saying, "the missionaries write verses of the Bible in Arabic calligraphy, such as 'God is love' to catch fish with the Muslims. We in Peace TV, for example, do not use such deceit."

Violence

In a lecture given in University of the Gambia, Zakir strongly condemned the atrocities around the world in the name of Jihad, where innocent people died, saying

Jihad is misunderstood by both Muslims and non-Muslims, Jihad means to strive and struggle to make society better, the best form of Jihad is to strive and struggle against non-Muslims, using the teachings of the Quran; the Prophet Peace Be Upon Him and the Almighty Allah, Islam means peace."

According to Naik, the killing of any innocent person, either Muslim or not is prohibited by Islam, while condemning the double-standard, played by the western powers and media who describes Muslims as extremists and fundamentalists. He said in an unequivocal term that, even in Islamic Jihad, there are laid down rules and regulations as to when and how to kill a person, which he noted, totally contradicts what is currently happening around the world, by some groups who claim to fight for Jihad.

In another lecture given in Al-Khawaneej, Dubai, Naik stated that the most mistranslated and misunderstood word about Islam by non-Muslims and even some Muslims is "Jihad", which, he said, has nothing to do with the phrase "holy war" that is never actually used in the Quran or sunnah and was first used by the crusaders who killed millions in the name of Christianity. He added the word "Jihad" actually means to strive or struggle against one's own evil inclinations, to make the society better, in self-defense on a battlefield, and against oppression.

Naik promotes the conspiracy theory that US President George Bush planned the September 11 attacks, describing it as "an inside job". He refers to the popularity of 9/11 conspiracy theories within the United States itself as proof of a foregone conclusion. His position on 9/11 was denounced by the Department of State as "reprehensible", and he has been denied entry into the United Kingdom and Canada. In 2016, when was asked whether Osama bin Laden was a terrorist, he stated that he did not have an opinion since had not done any research on him.

Views on terrorism

Later in 2010, Naik said that he had been quoted out of context regarding the remarks on terrorism. "As far as terrorist is concerned", he said, "I tell the Muslims that every Muslim should be a terrorist... What is the meaning of the word terrorist? Terrorist by definition means a person who terrorises. So in this context every Muslim should be a terrorist to each and every anti-social element. I'm aware that terrorist is more commonly used for a person who terrorises innocent human beings. So in this context no Muslim should ever terrorise a single innocent human being."

Naik has been at the center of multiple controversies regarding the topic of terrorism, most notably for being seen as an inspiration for terrorists. In 1996, Naik gave a speech specifically about terrorism and addressing Osama bin Laden. Naik stated that "Every Muslim should be a terrorist. The thing is that if he is terrorizing the terrorist, then he is following Islam." Perhaps the most controversial part about his speech was that he called America "the biggest terrorist". In a separate speech, he states that "the western countries say war for peace, war for peace. It is not war for peace, it is war on peace". Naik's comments received significant media attention and the British government banned him on the basis of these comments. Naik's lawyer and IRF argued that the speech was made before 9/11, that media misquoted Naik and made misleading assertions about the timing of Naik's speech, and that the decision to ban Naik from the UK was "politically motivated".

Naik stated that Hitler, "who was not a Muslim, is the biggest terrorist in the world as he incinerated four to six million Jews."

When asked about his views on killings, Naik said "the Quran says so – if anyone kills an innocent human being, Muslim or non-Muslim, it is as though he has killed the whole humanity, So how can any Muslim kill innocent human beings?" It was only permissible, he said, to kill a person who "has killed someone else... or created corruption in the land." He also criticized the media for "picking up verses of the Quran or hadiths and quoting them out of context to mislabel Islam as a religion that promotes violence and killing". He said that "critics of Islam quotes Verse 5/9 which reads: 'Wherever you find a non-Muslim, kill him' out of context to malign Islam though it was an order in a battlefield, and Islam always promotes peace as a better option during war."

In a press conference via Skype, when Naik was asked for his opinion on suicide bombings he replied affirmatively, saying it was permitted in Islam and said "it is haram if innocent people are being killed. But, if suicide bombing is used as a tactic of war, then it may be permitted. For example, in World War II, Japan used suicide bombing as a tactic of war."

Najibullah Zazi

Najibullah Zazi, the Afghan-American linked to Al-Qaeda who was found guilty in the 2009 New York City Subway and United Kingdom plot was an "admirer" of Naik's sermons. When Time hinted that his preachings could have inspired Zazi's terrorist activities, Naik insisted: "I have always condemned terrorism, because according to the glorious Koran, if you kill one innocent person, then you have killed the whole of humanity."

ISIS

Naik called Islamic State of Iraq and Syria the "anti-Islamic State of Iraq and Syria" and said that the enemies of Islam were promoting ISIS. He also added, "We should not say ISIS, we should say AISIS. Because they are anti-Islamic. I request all the Muslims of the world, as well as the Muslim media: Please don't help the enemies of Islam in attacking Islam." He further added, "If you verify you will know that I am totally against terrorism. I am totally against killing any innocent human being." In another lecture in Dubai, he stated, It is, therefore not correct to say ISIS or Islamic State has killed Syrian or Iraqi innocents. He said, "We should say anti-Islamic state kills them as Quran affirms that whoever kills an innocent person is as if he kills all humanity, and he who saves a single person – disregard his religion, is like saving all humanity."

Orlando shooting

Zakir criticized the media for "linking Islam" with the Orlando nightclub shooting. He accused the media of a "double-standard strategy" saying, "the same is happening with a man related by nothing to Islam but by his name who killed over 50 gays in Orlando."

Politics

Naik criticized the partition of India and creation of Pakistan, calling it a tragedy. Naik holds that those who advocated the creation of Pakistan out of the northwestern provinces of colonial India were "not even practising Muslims".

In 2016, Naik praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his frequent visits to Muslim majority countries, commenting "if his intention is to maintain unity between Hindus and Muslims and between India and other Muslim countries, I am totally for him". He described Modi's visits as favourable for India, believing it could attract foreign investment. In 2019, in an interview in Week magazine, Naik strongly criticized Modi and the BJP for what he called false charges and propaganda against him for political purposes, and said that he is targeted for his popularity. He stated that he would not return to India while Modi remained in power, drawing parallels with the example of Muhammad in Hijrah. He also described Modi and the BJP as dangerous for Indian Muslims' security, labelling Modi a "liar" and the "number one terrorist of India according to Google." He also invited Modi to take part in a debate with him about Hinduism.

Naik claimed on 11 January 2020 that the Modi government approached him in September 2019 through an envoy and offered to provide him "safe passage" to India if he spoke in support of the government's move to abrogate Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir. In a 14 January 2020 tweet, Congress leader Digvijaya Singh asked Modi to clarify Naik's claim of an offer of safe passage to India.

During a lecture held on 8 August 2019 in Kota Bharu, Kelantan state, Malaysia, Naik was asked about his response to right-wing Malaysian groups wanting Zakir Naik to be extradited out of Malaysia.

He replied, "Malaysia became fully Muslim. Then you had the Chinese coming, you had the Indians coming, the British coming. They are our new guests. You know, somebody called me a 'guest'. So I said before me that the Chinese are the guest. They aren't born here. So if you want the new guest to go, first ask the old guest to go back."

In the same lecture, he also claimed that Hindus living in Malaysia had "100 times more rights" than the Muslim minority in India, and were more loyal to Indian PM Narendra Modi than to Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad. These comments sparked outrage across Malaysian society, being perceived as inciting racial and religious hatred and disrupting the peace and harmony between communities. By 15 August, four government ministers called for revocation of Zakir Naik's permanent residency and for him to be extradited to India. Citizens lodged a total of 115 police complaints against Naik.

On 16 August, Naik was questioned for about seven hours by the Royal Malaysia Police at Bukit Aman in Kuala Lumpur about his controversial statements, while PM Mahathir said that "If he is found to be doing detrimental things to the country, it will be necessary for us to take away his permanent resident status. And that case, of course, we may need to take action to prevent him from making such provocative speeches, which attempt to pit the different races against each other," adding that a public apology by Naik may not be "enough to assuage the anger of many people". Meanwhile, Sarawak, the largest state of Malaysia, banned Zakir Naik from entering the state on 15 August, while the state of Perlis barred him henceforth from speaking at public events on 16 August, followed by the state of Kedah on 17 August; Naik was scheduled to speak in both states. By 20 August, Sabah, Malacca, Penang and Selangor had joined the other three states in prohibiting Naik from speaking in public, thus barring him in 7 out of 13 Malaysian states. After another 10 hour-round of police hearings on 19 August, Free Malaysia Today reported that on 20 August the police had imposed a nationwide speaking ban on Zakir Naik, which the police confirmed to the Malay Mail.

By 19 August, Zakir Naik had had his lawyers file legal complaints against five Malaysian politicians for 'defamation', claiming that they had taken his statements out of context and thus unduly damaged his reputation. The next day he maintained that his statements had been taken out of context, but expressed 'heartfelt apologies for this misunderstanding', as it 'was never my intention to upset any individual or community.' The Indian PM Modi had criticized Naik's comments during a dialogue with Mahathir at the Eastern Economic Forum in September.

Reception, awards, titles, and honors

Naik was ranked 89 on The Indian Express's list of the "100 Most Powerful Indians in 2010". He was ranked 82 in the 2009 edition. According to Praveen Swami, Naik is "perhaps the most influential Salafi ideologue in India". Sanjiv Buttoo says he is acknowledged as an authority on Islam, but is known for making negative remarks about other religions. Sadanand Dhume writes that Naik has a "carefully crafted image of moderation", because of his gentle demeanour, his wearing of a suit and tie, and his quoting of scriptures of other religions.

Year of award/honour Name of award/honour Awarding organisation/government
2013 Sharjah Award for Voluntary Work Sultan bin Muhammad Al-Qasimi, Crown Prince and Deputy Ruler of Sharjah
2013 Dubai International Holy Quran Award – Islamic Personality of the Year Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai
2013 Tokoh Ma'al Hijrah 1435/2013 Award Abdul Halim of Kedah, King and head of state of Malaysia
2015 Service to Islam – King Faisal Prize The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud

Controversies

Naik is currently a wanted fugitive from the Indian authorities on charges of terror financing, hate speech, inciting communal hatred, and money laundering.

Naik fled the country in 2016, and India's National Investigation Agency (NIA), has tried, unsuccessfully, to convince Interpol issue a red notice for Naik's arrest due to insufficient evidence.

On the basis of hate-speech laws, Naik's Peace TV's channel is banned in India, Bangladesh, Canada, Sri Lanka, and the United Kingdom.

Naik's Peace TV app, on the other hand, is not blocked in the same countries. Naik argues that his comments have been taken out of context multiple times.

The Islamic Research Foundation website describes Naik as "the ideologue and driving force behind Peace TV Network". Naik's website claims that the Islamic Research Foundation and Peace TV promote "Truth, Justice, Morality, Harmony and Wisdom for the whole of humankind". The Indian government banned the Peace TV channel in 2012. According to The New York Times in 2015, quoting an anonymous Indian journalist, the Mumbai police have barred him from holding conferences "because he stirs controversy", and Indian satellite providers have refused to broadcast his television channel, Peace TV. However, as of August 2019, Peace TV was still available in India through a free app in the Google Play Store, which had been downloaded over a lakh (100,000) times.

Following investigations by Ofcom in 2019, the broadcasting authority moved to suspend Peace TV's license to broadcast in the UK. In addition, Ofcom fined the former licence holders of Peace TV Urdu £200,000 and Peace TV £100,000 for breaking broadcasting rules. In April 2020, the Charity Commission for England and Wales opened a statutory enquiry into the registered charity Islamic Research Foundation, which has funded Peace TV.

Indian allegations of promoting terrorism

Author Praveen Swami argues that some of Naik's teachings are similar to those of organizations advocating violence, although Naik himself emphatically rejects terrorism. According to Swami, Naik's IRF has proved to be a "magnet" for figures linked to the Lashkar-e-Taiba, while his message has mesmerised violent Islamists, and his works "help make sense of the motivations of Indian recruits to the jihad".

In 2008, an Islamic scholar in Lucknow, Shahar Qazi Mufti Abul Irfan Mian Firangi Mahali, issued a fatwa against Naik, claiming that he supported Osama bin Laden, and that his teachings were un-Islamic. However, Naik claims that his speech was being taken out of context, and viewers noted that the speech aired several years before the deadly events of 9/11.

Criticism of Indian allegations

The allegations of Zakir Naik spreading terrorism have created adverse reactions in India. In January 2020, the Senior Indian Congress leader Digvijaya Singh tweeted a video of the Islamic preacher leveling allegations against PM Modi and HM Amit Shah. "Who disagrees with them 1 – convince them, 2- If he doesn't believe then threaten him 3- If he still does not believe then lure him with money. 4 – If he still does not agree, then defame him by making false accusations," Singh tweeted. Based on the response by Dr. Zakir Naik, Singh claims that the BJP follows the strategy of 'defaming individuals with false allegations'. In a sequence of tweets that included a video of Naik making allegations against PM Modi and HM Amit Shah, Singh claimed that if Modi and Shah do not formally repudiate Naik's accusations, then the allegations are 'correct.'

Indian Muslim opposition towards Naik

Asjad Raza Khan, the senior cleric of Bareilly, Shia Muslim cleric Kalbe Jawad, and Shahi Imam of West Bengal Noor ur Rahman Barkati are among some of the most powerful Islamic scholars in India who have criticized Naik's interpretation and knowledge of Islam and have described his views as "false", "mischievous", and "misleading". In 2007, reports claimed that Darul Uloom Deoband considered him a self-styled preacher unattached to any of the four orthodox Sunni Islamic schools of jurisprudence (fiqh) and therefore has issued many fatwas against Zakir Naik, rejecting him as being amongst the ghair muqallidin (a term used in Islam to describe someone who does not relate with the four madhabs viz. Hanafi, Hanbali, Sha'afi and Maliki) thereby appealing towards Muslims to avoid listening to his sermons. In 2016, a Darul Uloom spokesman clarified reports that although a few fatwas had been issued by Darul Uloom against Naik on legal matters, these were being "deliberately highlighted" by the media. The deputy vice chancellor of Darul Uloom, Abdul Khaliq Madrasi, came out in his support, saying: "We have bad differences of opinion with Zakir Naik. But he is recognized as an Islamic scholar the world over. We don't believe that he could be connected with terrorism in any way." In addition, many more academics under Sunni majority schools have acknowledged their ideological differences and have spoken out against targeting and tying Naik to terrorism. However, majority Shia schools of thought like the Shia National Front still demanded a CGI probe into Naik.

July 2016 Dhaka attack inspiration

After revealing the investigations of the Dhaka attack in July 2016 published by The Daily Star that a terrorist involved in the brutal killings followed Zakir Naik's page on Facebook and was influenced by Naik's speeches, The terrorist had posted sermons of Zakir Naik on social media where Naik urged "all Muslims to be terrorists" Indian Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Kiren Rijiju said, "Zakir Naik's speech is a matter of concern for us. Our agencies are working on this." He was then termed a controversial as well as a popular figure by the media. After 2 days in investigation, the Maharashtra State Intelligence Department (SID) gave a clean chit to Zakir Naik and said that Naik would not and cannot be arrested on his return to India as the probe ordered by the Maharashtra government did not find any other strong evidence to link Naik to terror-related activities. The Daily Star apologized to Naik over the Dhaka Terror Attack controversy and stated that they never blamed him for the attack. The newspaper quoted that it only reported how youth were misinterpreting his speeches. However, soon thereafter the Bangladesh Government banned the broadcast of Naik's Peace TV channel. Hasanul Haq Inu, the Information Minister, reasoned that "Peace TV is not consistent with Muslim society, the Quran, Sunnah, Hadith, Bangladesh's Constitution, our culture, customs and rituals".

When the National Investigation Agency arrested Mohammad Ibrahim Yazdani, the head of Islamic State's Hyderabad module in India, upon interrogation it was revealed that the operatives were influenced by Zakir Naik's sermons and wanted to establish Shariah law as in Islamic state

There have been media reports of Intelligence Agencies probing the alleged links between terror group Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD), and Naik's IRF. The JuD website is said to be referring to Zakir Naik's sermons & preachings.

In 2016, he admitted that Rahil Sheikh, involved in 2006 Mumbai train bombings was working as a volunteer for his organization Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) but he did not know Rahil personally. However, Naik also claimed that Rahil was removed from his office. Nearly 200 people died in the bombing attack and investigation revealed the bombers were influenced by Naik's preachings.

Referring to the deadly attacks in Bangladesh by terrorists, author Taslima Nasreen said that "Many Bangladeshi would-be-terrorists are inspired by Zakir Naik. He is not having machetes in hands. But his followers are having machetes in hands". She added that, "I'm not against Zakir Naik's free speech but I am against him for inciting violence. Fatwabaz should be banned from issuing."

Post-Dhaka attack death threats

On 13 July 2016, Vishva Hindu Parishad leader Sadhvi Prachi announced a reward of ₹50 lakh (US$60,000) to anyone willing to behead Zakir Naik. This came a day after a Shia group styling itself the "Hussaini Tigers" placed a ₹15 lakh (US$18,000) bounty on his head.

2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings inspiration

Zahran Hashim, the leader of the National Thowheeth Jama'ath which carried out the 2019 Sri Lanka Easter Bombings, had praised Naik for inciting Muslims without being banned and had asked "What can Sri Lankan Muslims do for Dr Zakir Naik?". After the attacks Sri Lankan cable TV channels stopped broadcasting PeaceTV.

Indian prime minister Narendra Modi denounced Naik in one of his electoral publicity visit in May 2019, saying that, Sri Lanka bombing was inspired by him and in spite of that the Congress supports Zakir Naik.

Hostility towards Muslim and Hindu minorities

The Times of India published a profile of Naik entitled "The controversial preacher" after he was banned from the United Kingdom. According to The Times, "the fact is that barring the band of Muslims whose bruised egos Naik suitably massages through his Islam supremacist talks, most rational Muslims and non-Muslims find his brand of Islam a travesty of the faith". The Times also claimed that "the Wahabi-Salafist brand of Islam, bankrolled by petro-rich Saudi Arabia and propagated by preachers like Naik, does not appreciate the idea of pluralism." The article quotes Muslim scholar Wahiduddin Khan: "Dawah, which Naik also claims to be engaged in, is to make people aware of the creation plan of God, not to peddle some provocative, dubious ideas as Naik does." He adds: "The wave of Islamophobia in the aftermath of 9/11 and the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan have only added to the Muslims' sense of injury. In such a situation, when a debater like Zakir Naik, in eloquent English, takes on preachers of other faiths and defeats them during debates, the Muslims' chests puff with pride. A community nursing a huge sense of betrayal and injustice naturally lionises anyone who gives it a sense of pride. Never mind if it's false pride."

According to the Art of Living Foundation, Zakir Naik quoted verses from the Vedas out of context and tried to insult Hinduism and other polytheist religions in a debate with its founder – his talk was according to them, "misguiding and inciting people".

Indian journalist Khushwant Singh says he "disagree with almost everything has to say about misconceptions about Islam". Singh argues that Naik's pronouncements are "juvenile", and said "they seldom rise above the level of undergraduate college debates, where contestants vie with each other to score brownie points." Singh also says Naik's audiences "listen to him with rapt attention and often explode in enthusiastic applause when he rubbishes other religious texts".

Torkel Brekke, a professor of religious history in Norway, calls Naik a "very controversial figure" because of his rhetorical attack on other religions and other varieties of Islam. He writes that Naik is "strongly disliked" by many members of the Indian ulema for ignoring their authority and stating that anybody can interpret the Quran. Conservative Deobandi mullahs have accused Naik of "destroying Islam" by driving Muslims away from the correct religious authorities.

In Firstpost, reporter Sreemoy Talukdar wrote, "The smooth-talking televangelist's regressive and problematic teachings, thoroughly dissected and discussed threadbare, strike at the pluralist cultural component of our existence and promotes a version of Islam that is dreary and incompatible with the modern world."

Stance towards homosexuals and places of worship

In The Wall Street Journal, Sadanand Dhume criticised Naik for recommending the death penalty for homosexuals and for apostasy from the faith. He also criticised him for calling for India to be ruled by Shariah law. He added that, according to Naik, Jews "control America" and are the "strongest in enmity to Muslims." He maintained that Naik supports a ban on the construction of non-Muslim places of worship in Muslim lands as well as the Taliban's bombing of the Buddhas of Bamiyan. Dhume argues that people reportedly drawn to Naik's message include Najibullah Zazi, the Afghan-American arrested for planning suicide attacks on the New York subway; Rahil Sheikh, accused of involvement in a series of train bombings in Mumbai in 2006; and Kafeel Ahmed, the Bangalore man fatally injured in a failed suicide attack on Glasgow airport in 2007. He also stated that "unless Indians find the ability to criticise such a radical Islamic preacher as robustly as they would a Hindu equivalent, the ideal of Indian secularism would remain deeply flawed."

Debate on Pedophilia

Zakir Naik's 2024 visit in Pakistan gathered controversy. In a lecture in October 2024, Dr. Naik had a debate with a Pashtun girl who was concerned about child sexual abuse in her region, with Dr. Naik's response being that there was no promotion of pedophilia in the Quran.

Legal issues

Naik was denied entry into the United Kingdom and Canada in June 2010. Naik was forbidden to enter Canada after Tarek Fatah, founder of Muslim Canadian Congress, warned MPs of Naik's views. He was banned from entering the UK by the then Home Secretary Theresa May after arranging to give talks in London and Sheffield. May said of the exclusion order, "Numerous comments made by Dr. Naik are evidence to me of his unacceptable behaviour". Naik argued that the Home Secretary was making a political decision, not a legal one, and his lawyer said the decision was "barbaric and inhuman". He also claimed that his comments were taken out of context. The Hindi cinema producer Mahesh Bhatt supported Naik, saying the ban constituted an attack on freedom of speech. It was reported that Naik would attempt to challenge the ruling in the High Court. His application for judicial review was dismissed on 5 November 2010.

In 2016, during a press conference Naik claimed himself to be a non-resident Indian (NRI).

On 18 July 2017, India revoked Naik's passport following a recommendation from the National Investigation Agency (NIA). On 28 July 2017, the NIA declared Naik an offender and initiated a process to attach his assets. In December 2017, Interpol refused the Indian Government's request to issue a red corner notice (RCN) against Naik. In January 2018, the Tribunal judge criticised the Enforcement Directorate for attaching Naik's properties without mentioning any offenses in the chargesheet. The judge added: "In the last 10 years, the ED has done nothing to attach Asaram's properties, but in the case of Naik, I can see the ED working with quite a bit of speed".

In July 2019 Interpol refused to issue a Red corner notice against Naik after repeated requests by the Indian Government. Naik currently resides in Malaysia, where he has permanent resident status. The Indian government approached Interpol again in December 2019, alleging new facts and circumstances, but Naik argued that the new request superimposed claims of money laundering on the same religious activities of Islamic teaching that were the subject of the prior request. On 13 May 2020, the Modi-led government sent a formal request to Malaysia for Zakir Naik's extradition, which was later rejected. In 2021, Interpol rejected India's request for a Red Notice to provisionally arrest Zakir for questioning the very basis of invoking money laundering and hate speech charges against Naik in the country. "The fact that he raised money from his religious teachings and spent it is "irrelevant" and cannot amount to money laundering". Interpol's adjudicating panel noted in its order.

Publications

References

  1. ^ Pandey, Devesh K. (10 July 2016). "Zakir Naik's UK-registered Foundation under scanner". The Hindu. pp. Pandey, Devesh K. Archived from the original on 10 July 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  2. ^ "Scholarships to Muslim students by United Islamic Aid". The Siasat Daily. 24 May 2012. Archived from the original on 10 April 2015. Retrieved 26 January 2015.
  3. ^ Ramanujan, Sweta. "Beyond veil: Am I not a normal Muslim girl?" Archived 21 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine. expressindia.com. Indian Express Group. 16 July 2004. Retrieved 16 April 2011. 16 April 2011.
  4. ^ Ndow, Musa (8 October 2014). "Gambia: Renowned Scholar Dr. Zakir Naik Arrives Gambia Today". The Daily Observer. AllAfrica.com. Archived from the original on 7 August 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  5. Aishath Aniya (29 May 2010). "Comment: An evening with Mrs Naik". Minivan News – Archive. Archived from the original on 29 September 2015. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
  6. Kumar, Krishna (15 July 2016). "Zakir Naik's son Fariq now under Mumbai police scanner". ET Bureau. Economic Times. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  7. "Your KiniGuide to Muslim scholar Zakir Naik". Malaysiakini. 12 April 2016. Archived from the original on 23 July 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  8. ^ "About Dr Zakir Naik". YouTube.
  9. "Dr. Zakir A. Naik". Retrieved 27 April 2021.
  10. ^ "10 Times Zakir Naik Proved That He Promoted Anything But Peace". HuffPost India. 7 July 2016. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  11. ^ "NIA files charge sheet against Zakir Naik in hate speech, incitement case". The Hindu. PTI. 26 October 2017. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  12. ^ "Indian 'hate preacher' Zakir Naik charged with money laundering". BBC News. 2 May 2019. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  13. ^ "Hate charges in India, banned from UK, welcome in Malaysia". South China Morning Post. 2 November 2017. Retrieved 26 August 2019.
  14. ^ "Interpol refuses to issue red corner notice against controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik". India Today. 16 December 2017. Archived from the original on 12 January 2018. Retrieved 11 January 2018.
  15. "All you need to know about Zakir Naik – Who's Zakir Naik?". The Economic Times. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  16. ^ "Zakir Naik, Wanted In India, Banned From Making Speeches In Malaysia". NDTV.com. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  17. ^ The Times of India (10 July 2016). "Bangladesh bans televangelist Zakir Naik's Peace TV". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 10 July 2016. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  18. ^ "Peace TV stations fined £300,000 for hate speeches as it pulls out of the UK". The National News. 14 May 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
  19. Sekaran, Kohilah (11 April 2016). "8 facts you need to know about controversial preacher Dr Zakir Naik [UPDATED]". Astro Awani. Archived from the original on 15 May 2016. Retrieved 18 May 2016.
  20. ^ "Dr Zakir Naik vs (1) The Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Entry Clearance Officer, Mumbai, India" Archived 23 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine. British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 5 November 2010. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
  21. "Farhat Naik: Zakir Naik's Wife is Invisible and Equally Regressive". in.news.yahoo.com.
  22. ^ Wahab, Siraj. "Spreading God's Word Is His Mission" Archived 5 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Arab News. 1 July 2006. Retrieved 16 April 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
  23. Lloyd Ridgeon (7 March 2001). Islamic Interpretations of Christianity. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 213. ISBN 978-0-312-23854-4.
  24. "All you need to know about Zakir Naik – Who's Zakir Naik?". The Economic Times. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
  25. "Zakir Naik claims his new platform is 'Halal' version of Netflix". The Week. Retrieved 30 May 2022.
  26. Al Hidaayah – "The Guidance to Humanity", retrieved 1 June 2021
  27. ^ Hubbard, Ben (2 March 2015). "Saudi Award Goes to Muslim Televangelist Who Harshly Criticizes U.S." The New York Times. Archived from the original on 15 April 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  28. ^ Daniyal, Shoaib (10 March 2015). "Why a Saudi award for televangelist Zakir Naik is bad news for India's Muslims". Archived from the original on 1 April 2015. Retrieved 3 December 2013.
  29. ^ Livemint (7 July 2016). "Zakir Naik's colourful, controversial past". Archived from the original on 10 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  30. Vyas, Sharad (9 July 2016). "4,000 speeches & counting, fans swear by Zakir Naik". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 8 July 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  31. ^ Thomas Blom Hansen (2001). Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton University Press. p. 177. ISBN 978-0-691-08840-2.
  32. Mazumdar, Sudip. "Beaming In Salvation" Archived 18 January 2006 at the Wayback Machine. MSNBC. 23 January 2006. 18 January 2006.
  33. Ahmad, Syed Neaz. "Peace TV Reaching 50 Million Viewers – Dr. Zakir Naik" Archived 7 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine. Saudi Gazette. 23 February 2007. 7 July 2007.
  34. ^ Rizvi, Asif (17 July 2016). "Family and friends speak about the Zakir Naik they knew". Mid-Day. Archived from the original on 22 July 2016. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  35. Ahmed, Khaled. "Word for word: William Campbell versus Zakir Naik" Archived 16 November 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Daily Times (Pakistan). 8 January 2006. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
  36. "No religion spreads violence: Sri Sri". The Times of India. 22 January 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
  37. "Controversial Islamic preacher speaks at Union". The Oxford Student. 17 February 2011. Retrieved 21 July 2011. Archived 21 July 2011.
  38. Das, Sushi. "Islam's gender debate at the fore" Archived 3 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine. The Age. 30 August 2004. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
  39. Aly, Waleed. "The clash of ignorance" Archived 10 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine. The Age. 6 August 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
  40. Das, Sushi. "Between two worlds" Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine. The Age. 28 July 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011. See author profile Archived 30 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine.
  41. "Row over Islamic preacher". South Wales Echo. 16 August 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
  42. ^ Musa Ndow, Omar Wally (9 October 2014). "Gambia: Dr Zakir Naik Arrives, Says Ready for Series of Lectures". The Daily Observer. AllAfrica.com. Archived from the original on 6 August 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  43. ^ Musa, Ndow (14 October 2014). "Gambia: Jammeh holds talk with Dr. Zakir Naik". The Daily Observer. AllAfrica.com. Archived from the original on 6 August 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  44. ^ "Female pastor converts to Islam after Dr Zakir Naik's lecture in Gambia". The Daily Observer. 24 October 2014. Archived from the original on 15 May 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  45. "Dr Zakir Naik Malaysian Tour 2012 ( PWTC ) Tickets, Kuala Lumpur". Eventbrite. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 3 December 2013.
  46. "Stay away from M'sia, Zakir". Free Malaysia Today. 26 September 2012. Archived from the original on 28 September 2012. Retrieved 3 December 2013.
  47. "Zakir Naik's host defends invite". Malaysia-today.net. 19 September 2012. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 3 December 2013.
  48. Kumar, Kamles (17 April 2016). "In Zakir Naik's KL lecture, four more leave faith for Islam". Malay Mail. Archived from the original on 23 July 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  49. The Hindu (9 July 2016). "Understanding the controversy surrounding Zakir Naik". thehindu.com. Archived from the original on 10 July 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  50. NDTV. "Bangladesh Investigating Zakir Naik's Islamist Links: Minister". ndtv.com. Archived from the original on 10 July 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  51. ^ Abdullah, Sharifah Mahsinah (10 August 2019). "Zakir Naik praises Dr Mahathir". New Straits Times. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  52. "Sasar 100,000 hadir jelajah dakwah Zakir Naik | KLiK". www.klik.com.my. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  53. "Zakir Naik: India seeks to extradite Islamic preacher in Malaysia". The Indian Express. 18 June 2020. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
  54. "Why do Muslims hate Dr Zakir Naik?". Hindustan Times. 9 November 2008. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
  55. "'Zakir Naik wants Hindus to know their true religion'". The Sunday Guardian Live. 10 July 2016. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
  56. Hassan, Javid; Rasooldeen, Mohammed. "Media Urged to Counter Anti-Muslim Bias" Archived 7 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine. Arab News. 9 October 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
  57. Ghafour, P. K. Abdul. "New Muslims on the rise in US after Sept. 11". Arab News. 3 November 2002. Archived 17 September 2003.
  58. See, for example: "Questions Commonly Asked by Non-Muslims – VI: Prohibition of Alcohol" Archived 30 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine, "Was Islam Spread by the Sword?" Archived 30 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine, "Are Ram and Krishna Prophets of God?" Archived 30 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine.
  59. ^ Huffington Post (7 July 2016). "10 Times Zakir Naik Proved That He Promoted Anything But Peace". Archived from the original on 20 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  60. ^ The Hindu (15 July 2016). "Zakir Naik claims he never promoted terrorist strikes". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 15 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  61. ^ Shaaban, Ahmed (17 June 2016). "Islam is being damaged by media: Dr Zakir". Khaleej Times. Archived from the original on 18 July 2016. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  62. "Ten controversial statements by Zakir Naik". India Today. 6 July 2016. Archived from the original on 20 July 2016. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  63. ^ Dhume, Sadanand (20 June 2010). "Trouble with Dr. Zakir Naik|The Wall Street Journal". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 4 March 2019.
  64. Attaullah, Munir. "View: The Muslim predicament II" Archived 22 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine. Daily Times (Pakistan). 21 March 2007. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
  65. Quran and Modern Science – Conflict or Conciliation? Archived 23 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine – Part Two – by Dr. Zakir Naik
  66. Brown, C. Mackenzie, ed. (2020). Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian Cultural Contexts. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures. Vol. 33. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 56–57. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37340-5. ISBN 978-3-030-37339-9. S2CID 242523427.
  67. Samuel, Geoffrey; Rozario, Santi. "Contesting science for Islam: the media as a source of revisionist knowledge in the lives of young Bangladeshis" Archived 11 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine (subscription required). Contemporary South Asia Taylor & Francis Online 18 (4): 427–441. December 2010. doi:10.1080/09584935.2010.526196.
  68. ^ Ceesay, Alieu (13 October 2014). "Gambia: Dr. Zakir Naik Condemns Atrocities Committed in the Name of Jihad". The Daily Observer. AllAfrica.com. Archived from the original on 7 August 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  69. "Maldivian renounces Islam, gets attacked by Zakir Naik audience" Archived 27 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine May 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
  70. Minivan News Archived 8 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine 's response to Mohamed Nazim; Location: Maafaanu stadium, Male', 10:30 pm Friday 28 May 2010, p. 4.
  71. "Saudi Arabia gives top prize to cleric who blames George Bush for 9/11". The Guardian. Agence France-Presse. 1 March 2015. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  72. Stephen Schwartz (27 March 2015). "Zakir Naik, Radical Islamist Video Evangelist". The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 12 April 2015. Retrieved 18 April 2015.
  73. M. Hasan; Sweta Ramanujan-Dixit (9 November 2008). "Why do Muslims hate Dr Zakir Naik?". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 20 April 2015. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  74. Morello, Carol (6 March 2015). "U.S. denounces award-winning cleric who called 9/11 'inside job'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2 August 2015.
  75. ^ "Indian preacher Zakir Naik is banned from UK". BBC News. 18 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011.
  76. ^ Carlson, Kathryn Blaze. "Controversial Muslim televangelist Zakir Naik banned from Toronto conference" Archived 16 July 2012 at archive.today. National Post. 22 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
  77. Zakir Naik: More Hype than Hope for Muslims Archived 24 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine by Muhammad Shafeeque; Center for Islamic Pluralism; 15 July 2016
  78. Deshmane, Akshay. "Zakir Naik will fight back as Canada bans him too" Archived 1 September 2010 at the Wayback Machine. Daily News & Analysis. 23 June 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. Archived 7 August 2011.
  79. ^ The Hindu (9 July 2016). "Zakir Naik's UK-registered Foundation under scanner". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 10 July 2016. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  80. ^ Pinglay, Prachi. "Lawyers condemn UK-India Muslim preacher ban" Archived 27 November 2017 at the Wayback Machine. BBC News. 22 June 2010. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
  81. ^ "'ISIS anti-Islamic', he says in fresh video from Mecca". The Indian Express. 9 July 2016. Archived from the original on 12 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  82. ^ The Washington Post. "This Islamic preacher might have influenced one of the Dhaka terrorists. Now Indians want him banned". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 7 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  83. Times of India (15 July 2016). "No plans to return to India this year: Zakir Naik". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 15 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  84. The Economic Times (15 July 2016). "Zakir Naik rejects terror charges, says no plans to return to India this year". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 15 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  85. Firstpost (17 July 2016). "Suicide bombing is haram in Islam: Only Salafist ideologues like Zakir Naik view it as a war tactic". Archived from the original on 22 July 2016. Retrieved 17 July 2016.
  86. Von Drehle, David; Ghosh, Bobby: "An Enemy Within: The Making of Najibullah Zazi" Archived 4 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Time. p. 2. 1 October 2009. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
  87. Deccan Chronicle (6 July 2016). "Preacher Zakir Naik, followed by Dhaka attackers, calls ISIS 'un-Islamic'". Archived from the original on 11 July 2016. Retrieved 17 July 2016.
  88. ^ Gupta, Shekhar. "Why Zakir Naik is dangerous". Rediff. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
  89. Mohan, Vyas (22 July 2016). "I Am Totally For Him: Zakir Naik On PM Narendra Modi". HuffPost India.
  90. Namrata Biji Ahuja (11 May 2019). "Zakir Naik exclusive interview: 'Won't come back to India if BJP is in power'". The Week. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
  91. Namrata Biji Ahuja (12 May 2019). "Zakir Naik: Google lists Modi as top criminal but not me as top terrorist – The Week". www.theweek.in. The Week. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
  92. "Modi, Shah offered me safe passage in exchange for Article 370 support: Zakir Naik". The Week. 11 January 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  93. "Zakir Naik I Refused offer from Modi to support BJP govt's Kashmir move in return for safe passage: Zakir Naik | India News". Times Now. 11 January 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  94. Staff (11 January 2020). "Zakir Naik claims Centre offered him safe passage in return for support for its Kashmir policies". Scroll.in. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  95. "Digvijaya asks PM Modi to clarify on Zakir Naik's claim of Centre's offer of safe passage to India". India Today. Delhi. 15 January 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  96. ^ Amy Chew (15 August 2019). "Outrage in Malaysia as Zakir Naik suggests Chinese expulsion". AlJazeera. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  97. ^ Soo Wern Jun (19 August 2019). "Dr Zakir Naik serves four more with legal notices of demand". Malay Mail. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  98. Mazwin Nik Anis (16 August 2019). "Zakir's PR status to be decided after police probe, says Dr M". The Star. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  99. Andy Chua (15 August 2019). "Sarawak bans Zakir Naik from entering the state". The Star. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  100. "Controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik barred from speaking in Perlis by Malaysian police". Channel News Asia. 16 August 2019. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  101. Arnold Loh. "Kedah is second state to ban Zakir Naik from speaking publicly". The Star. 17 August 2019. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  102. ^ "Naik effectively banned from speaking nationwide". Free Malaysia Today. 20 August 2019. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  103. "Islamic preacher Zakir Naik banned from giving public speeches in Malaysia". India Today. 20 August 2019. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  104. Soo Wern Jun. "PM Modi Did Not Ask For Zakir Naik's Extradition, Claims Malaysian PM". NDTV.
  105. "The most powerful Indians in 2010: No. 81-90" Archived 13 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine. The Indian Express. 5 February 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
  106. "The most powerful Indians in 2009: 80–84" Archived 12 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine. The Indian Express. 9 March 2009. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
  107. ^ Swami, Praveen (2011). "Islamist terrorism in India". In Warikoo, Kulbhushan (ed.). Religion and Security in South and Central Asia. London, England: Taylor & Francis. pp. 52, 61–64. ISBN 978-0-415-57590-4.
  108. Dhume, Sadanand (20 June 2010). "The Trouble with Dr. Zakir Naik". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 6 July 2010.
  109. "Mohammed presents Islamic personality award to Dr Zakir Naik". 30 July 2013. Archived from the original on 11 January 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2015.
  110. "Zakir Naik named Dubai's Islamic Personality of the Year". The Express Tribune. 29 July 2013. Archived from the original on 31 July 2013. Retrieved 3 December 2013.
  111. "Zakir Naik named Islamic Personality of the Year". Gulf News. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
  112. "Zakir Naik named Dubai's Islamic Personality of the Year". The Express Tribune. Archived from the original on 1 February 2014. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
  113. "Dr. Zakir Naik conferred Malaysia's top award". 9 November 2013. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2015.
  114. Cetak Emel Kawan (5 November 2013). "Berita Harian | Abdul Hamid, Zakir Naik dipilih Tokoh Maal Hijrah 2013". Bharian.com.my. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 3 December 2013.
  115. "Abdul Hamid is national-level Tokoh Maal Hijrah 2013". 5 November 2013. Archived from the original on 19 January 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
  116. "الأمير خالد الفيصل يعلن أسماء الفائزين بجائزة الملك فيصل العالمية (Cultural: Prince Khaled Al-Faisal announce the winners of the King Faisal International Prize)". Saudi Press Agency. 3 February 2015. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2016.
    "Prince Khalid Al-Faisal Announces Winners of King Faisal International Prize". Saudi Press Agency. 3 February 2015. Archived from the original on 19 September 2016. Retrieved 1 June 2016.
  117. "Indian Islamic scholar Zakir Naik receives Saudi prize for service to Islam". Daily News and Analysis. PTI. 2 March 2015. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
  118. "Zakir Naik wins Saudi prize for service to Islam". Dawn. AFP. 2 March 2015. Archived from the original on 29 June 2015. Retrieved 30 June 2015.
  119. "Dr Zakir Naik – President, IRF". IRF.net. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
  120. ^ "Zakir Naik's passport revoked, he's now a stateless person – Times of India". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 18 July 2017. Retrieved 19 July 2017.
  121. "Ban on Peace TV will be lifted soon: Zakir Naik". Arab News. 6 July 2014. Archived from the original on 6 July 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  122. Ankit Kumar (20 August 2019). "Despite ban, Zakir Naik's Peace TV continues to reach millions". India Today. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  123. Moore, Matt (28 July 2019). "Peace TV faces UK ban after presenter calls gay people "worse than animals"". Gay Times. Retrieved 5 August 2019.
  124. Drury, Colin (23 July 2019). "Evangelical Islamic TV channel that broadcast show calling homosexuality 'insane' breached Ofcom regulations". The Independent. Archived from the original on 7 May 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2019.
  125. "Charity watchdog opens inquiry into Islamic Research Foundation 15 May 2020". Charity Commission. Charity Commission for England and Wales. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  126. "UK media watchdog fines Zakir Naik's Peace TV 300,000 pounds for 'hate speech'". The Economic Times. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  127. Shattered certitudes and new realities emerge in terror link investigation Archived 17 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine by Praveen Swami, The Hindu, 8 July 2007 (paragraph 14)
  128. Gidwandi, Deepak (8 November 2008). "Storm over 'fatwa' against scholar Zakir Naik". dnaindia.com. Archived from the original on 20 December 2009. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
  129. "Congress leader Digvijaya Singh backs Zakir Naik's claims, seeks legal clarification from PM Modi, HM Shah". TimeNowNews. 15 January 2020. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  130. ^ Rizvi, Uzair Hasan (11 July 2016). "Muslim clerics in India unite against superstar televangelist Zakir Naik". Scroll.in. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  131. ^ "Avoid listening to Zakir Naik, Darul Uloom Deoband tells Muslims". Deccan Chronicle. 9 July 2016. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  132. "'Every Muslim should be a terrorist': Zakir Naik and six of his most provocative statements". Firstpost. 7 July 2016. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  133. Mohammed Wajihuddin (10 July 2016). "In '07, Deoband had issued fatwa against Zakir Naik | Mumbai News – Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  134. Gidwani, Deepak (10 July 2016). "Deoband issued fatwa against Zakir Naik years ago". DNA India. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
  135. ^ Hindustan Times (9 July 2016). "Zakir Naik unfit to preach, Muslims should avoid listening to him: Darul Uloom". Archived from the original on 9 July 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  136. Deccan Chronicle (9 July 2016). "Avoid listening to Zakir Naik, Darul Uloom Deoband tells Muslims". Archived from the original on 10 July 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  137. "Dar-ul-Uloom objects to media citing its fatwas against Zakir Naik". The Indian Express. Press Trust of India. 11 July 2016. Archived from the original on 13 July 2016. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
  138. Gidwani, Deepak (12 July 2016). "Now Darul Uloom comes out in support of Zakir Naik". DNAIndia. Daily News and Analysis. Archived from the original on 15 July 2016. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
  139. Rashid, Omar (10 July 2016). "Deoband condemns media trial of Zakir". The Hindu. Retrieved 8 July 2021.
  140. Rashid, Omar. "Deoband condemns media trial of Zakir". PressReader. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
  141. DNA (7 July 2016). "Peace TV of Mumbai preacher Zakir Naik who inspired Dhaka killer funded in Britain". Archived from the original on 8 July 2016. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  142. The Washington Post. "Islamic TV preacher denies link to Bangladesh attack, accuses media of unfair trial". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 15 July 2016. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
  143. "Government hints action against Islamic preacher Zakir Naik for 'hate speech'". The Economic Times. New Delhi. 6 July 2016. Archived from the original on 9 July 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
  144. "State Intelligence Dept. gives clean chit to Naik; no arrest on his return to India". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 13 July 2016. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
  145. ^ "The Daily Star protests Dr Naik's claims". The Daily Star (Bangladesh). 9 July 2016. Archived from the original on 12 July 2016. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
  146. "Bangla paper apologises to Zakir Naik, says never blamed him for attack". Deccan Chronicle. 11 July 2016. Archived from the original on 12 July 2016. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  147. "Zakir Naik fracas: Bangladesh paper denies report used by Indian media to demand ban on preacher". Scroll.in. 10 July 2016. Archived from the original on 11 July 2016. Retrieved 12 July 2016.
  148. "Bangladesh govt bans televangelist Zakir Naik's Peace TV". indianexpress.com. 10 July 2016. Archived from the original on 13 July 2016. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
  149. BBC News (11 July 2016). "Bangladesh to ban Islamic TV channel, Peace TV". Archived from the original on 14 July 2016. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
  150. The Economic Times (6 July 2016). "Zakir Naik 'inspired' chief of Hyderabad IS module too". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 11 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  151. ^ "Intelligence agencies find link between Zakir Naik's Islamic Research Foundation and Jamaat-ud-Dawa". 8 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  152. ^ The Free Press Journal. "'NRI' Zakir Naik Has No Plans To Return". Archived from the original on 17 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  153. "Zakir Naik dangerous, promotes seventh century Quranic texts on sex slaves, polygamy: Taslima Nasreen". Zee News. 11 July 2016. Archived from the original on 14 July 2016. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  154. "Sadhvi Prachi offers Rs 50-lakh reward for Zakir Naik's death". No. 1. The Indian Express. The Indian Express. 14 July 2016. Archived from the original on 13 July 2016. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
  155. Khan, M Tariq (14 July 2016). "Shia group announces Rs 15 lakh bounty on preacher Zakir Naik's head". Hindustan Times. Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 13 July 2016. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
  156. "Lankan cable operators block Zakir Naik's Peace TV". www.adaderana.lk. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
  157. "Cong. glorifying Zakir Naik, says PM". The Hindu. Press Trust of India. 2 May 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  158. Shah, Pankaj; Mani, Rajeev; Khan, Arshad Afzaal (2 May 2019). "'Jai Shri Ram,' says PM Modi, slams Congress on Zakir Naik". The Times of India.
  159. Wajihuddin, Mohammed. "The controversial Preacher" Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine. The Times of India. 27 June 2010. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
  160. "Zakir Naik quoted Vedas out of context, tried to insult Hinduism: Art of Living". Hyderabad. 8 July 2016. Retrieved 2 November 2019.
  161. Singh, Khushwant. "Why Muslims lag behind" Archived 5 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Hindustan Times. 3 November 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
  162. Singh, Khushwant. "One man's belief is another's shackle" Archived 31 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine. The Tribune. 5 March 2005. Retrieved 7 August 2011. 7 August 2011.
  163. Brekke, Torkel (2012). "Prophecy and Preaching". Fundamentalism: Prophecy and Protest in an Age of Globalization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-521-14979-2. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
  164. Brekke, Torkel (2012). Fundamentalism: Prophecy and Protest in an Age of Globalization, Cambridge University Press, p. 97.
  165. Firstpost (14 July 2016). "Indian Muslims bitterly divided over Zakir Naik but it is still a healthy sign". Archived from the original on 17 July 2016. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
  166. Editorial (25 October 2024). "Controversial guest". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 9 December 2024.
  167. "Zakir Naik's heated exchange with girl on Islam and paedophilia, video is viral". India Today.
  168. "The Shocking Reason Hate Preacher Zakir Naik Walked Off Stage In Pakistan". ndtv.
  169. "Pashtun girl asks Zakir Naik about rising paedophilia in Islamic societies. He says apologise". The Print.
  170. Akshay Deshmane "Zakir Naik will fight back as Canada bans him too" Archived 1 September 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  171. "Legal challenge to ban on Muslim preacher Zakir Naik". BBC News. 19 June 2010. Retrieved 16 April 2011.
  172. Times Of India (16 July 2016). "Will return to India only next year: Zakir Naik". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 16 July 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016.
  173. "Zakir Naik declared proclaimed offender, NIA starts prop attachment". The Economic Times. 28 July 2017. Archived from the original on 29 July 2017. Retrieved 29 July 2017.
  174. "Judge rips apart ED for 'speedy action against Zakir Naik, but none against Asaram Bapu'". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 11 January 2018. Retrieved 11 January 2018.
  175. "Tribunal Restrains Enforcement Directorate From Taking Over Zakir Naik's Assets". NDTV. Archived from the original on 10 January 2018. Retrieved 11 January 2018.
  176. Ahuja, Namrata Biji (28 July 2019). "Interpol again refuses Red Corner Notice against Zakir Naik". The Week. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  177. ^ "Interpol again refuses Red Notice against Zakir Naik". Hindustan Times. 30 April 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  178. "India sends formal request to Malaysia for Zakir Naik extradition – Times of India". The Times of India. 14 May 2020. Archived from the original on 14 May 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020.

Further reading

  • Ahmed, Hilal (18 December 2015). "Naik, Zakir". Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Archived from the original on 4 December 2020.

External links

Portals:Zakir Naik at Misplaced Pages's sister projects: Categories: