Misplaced Pages

Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:08, 22 December 2006 view sourceGHcool (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,333 editsm Alan Dershowitz: ended ref← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:13, 24 December 2024 view source Pengortm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,318 editsNo edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|2006 book by Jimmy Carter}}
{{sprotected2}}
{{pp-30-500|small=yes}}
{{current}}
{{Infobox Book {{Infobox book
| name = Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid | name = Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
| image = ] | image = Palestine peace not apartheid.jpg
| image_caption = Cover showing the author, left, and protesters at the ], right | caption = Cover showing the author, left, and protesters at the ], right
| author = ] | author = ]
| cover_artist = Michael Accordino
| illustrator =
| country = United States
| cover_artist = Michael Accordino
| country = United States of America | language = English
| language = English | subject = ]
| published = 2006 (Simon & Schuster)
| subject = Political Science
| media_type = Print (]), Audiobook (])
| publisher = ]
| pages = 264 pp
| release_date = ] ]
| media_type = Hardback | isbn = 978-0-7432-8502-5
| pages = 264 | dewey = 956.04 22
| congress = DS119.7 .C3583 2006
| isbn = ISBN 978-0-7432-8502-5
| preceded_by = Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis
| followed_by =
}} }}


'''''Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid'''''<ref>{{cite web|title=Annotated Bibliography of books by Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter|url=https://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/carterbi.phtml|website=www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov|access-date=16 April 2017|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170601225124/https://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/carterbi.phtml|archive-date=1 June 2017|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> is a book written by 39th ] ]. It was published by ] in November 2006.<ref>According to https://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/index.html "Best Sellers: Hardcover Nonfiction", ''New York Times'', accessed 27 January 2007: ''Palestine Peace Not Apartheid'' was number 6 on the list as of date accessed. It was listed as number 11 in on 18 March 2007, on the list for 15 weeks for the week ending 3 March 2007. As of 6 May 2007 it no longer appears on the expanded list featured at that site</ref>
'''''Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid''''' is a book written by ], former ] and winner of the 2002 ]. Carter believes that
"Israel's continued control and colonization of Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the Holy Land."<ref name="abcnewsx">, ABC News</ref>


The book is primarily based on ], hosted by Carter during his presidency, between ] of ] and ] of ] that led to the ].
The book states that ]'s current policies in the ] constitute "a system of ], with two peoples occupying the same land but completely separated from each other, with Israelis totally dominant and suppressing violence by depriving ]s of their basic ]."<ref name="Siegel" />


In this book Carter argues that Israel's continued control and ] have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the ].<ref name="chap17">{{Cite web |title=SimonSays's On Demand Pages on Vimeo |url=https://vimeo.com/simonandschuster/vod_pages |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=vimeo.com}}</ref> That perspective, coupled with the use of the word '']'' in the titular phrase ''Peace Not Apartheid'', and what critics said were errors and misstatements in the book, sparked controversy. Carter has defended his book and countered that response to it "in the real world…has been overwhelmingly positive."<ref name=latimes>{{cite web|last1=Carter|first1=Jimmy|title=Speaking frankly about Israel and Palestine|url=https://www.latimes.com/news/la-oe-carter8dec08-story.html|work=]|access-date=16 April 2017|date=8 December 2006}}</ref>
Carter said that his purpose in writing the book was to "present facts about the Middle East that are largely unknown in America, to precipitate discussion and to help restart peace talks (now absent for six years) that can lead to permanent peace for Israel and its neighbors."<ref name="latimes">, LA Times</ref>


The documentary '']'' (2007) depicts the book tour Carter undertook to promote his book.
==Summary of contents==


==Purpose, main argument, and major points==
Carter identifies two main obstacles to peace:<ref name="abcnewsx" />
#Some Israelis believe they have the right to confiscate and colonize Palestinian land and try to justify the sustained subjugation and persecution of increasingly hopeless and aggravated Palestinians; and
#Some Palestinians react by honoring suicide bombers as martyrs to be rewarded in heaven and consider the killing of Israelis as victories.


==="The ultimate purpose"===
To bring an end to "this continuing tragedy",<ref name="abcnewsx" /> Carter insisted the peace process must be revitalized. Carter identifies the following key requirements:
<blockquote>The ultimate purpose of my book is to present facts about the Middle East that are largely unknown in America, to precipitate discussion and to help restart peace talks (now absent for six years) that can lead to permanent peace for Israel and its neighbors. Another hope is that ] and other Americans who share this same goal might be motivated to express their views, even publicly, and perhaps in concert. I would be glad to help with that effort.<ref name=latimes/></blockquote>


===Thesis: How to achieve "permanent peace in the Middle East"===
* The security of Israel must be guaranteed. There is little doubt that accommodation with Palestinians can bring full Arab recognition of Israel.<ref name="abcnewsx" />
Carter identifies "two interrelated obstacles to permanent peace in the Middle East":
<blockquote>
Some ] believe they have the right to ] and ] Palestinian land and try to justify the sustained subjugation and persecution of increasingly hopeless and aggravated Palestinians; and<br>
Some ] react by honoring ]s as ]s to be rewarded in heaven and consider the killing of Israelis as victories.<ref name=chap17/></blockquote>


To bring an end to what he calls "this continuing tragedy", in Chapter 17 ("Summary"), Carter calls for a revitalization of the peace process based on the following three "key requirements":
* The internal debate within Israel must be resolved in order to define Israel's permanent legal boundary. The unwavering official policy of the United States since Israel became a state has been that its borders must coincide with those prevailing from 1949 until 1967 (unless modified by mutually agreeable land swaps), specified in the unanimously adopted U.N. Resolution 242, which mandates Israel's withdrawal from occupied territories. Also, as a member of the International Quartet that includes Russia, the United Nations, and the European Union, America supports the Roadmap for Peace, which espouses exactly the same requirements. Palestinian leaders unequivocally accepted this proposal, but Israel has officially rejected its key provisions with unacceptable caveats and prerequisites.<ref name="abcnewsx" />


<blockquote>
* The sovereignty of all Middle East nations and sanctity of international borders must be honored. In order to perpetuate the occupation, Israeli forces have deprived their unwilling subjects of basic human rights. No objective person could personally observe existing conditions in the West Bank and dispute these statements.<ref name="abcnewsx" />
'''a. The security of Israel must be guaranteed''' ...


'''b. The internal debate within Israel must be resolved in order to define Israel's permanent legal boundary''' ...
==Praise==
In ''The Toronto Sun'', columnist ] writes (12-15-06), "Former U.S. president Carter is just the latest world figure to openly challenge the policies of Israel in Gaza and the West Bank. He joins Rev. Desmond Tutu, another Nobel Prize winner. Each time a trade union or church group or world leader steps forward to break the cone of silence around this issue, the more difficult it becomes for the lobby groups to spew their propaganda."


'''c. The sovereignty of all Middle East nations and sanctity of international borders must be honored''' ...<ref name="chap17" /></blockquote>
In ''The Middle East Online'', Ben Tanosborn writes (12-15-06) "Let’s have for the first time ever in this country a thorough and honest debate on the issues that create this conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, and make America part of the solution instead of being the lion’s share of the problem." He praises President Carter and calls him "Saint James of Plains."


===The Apartheid analogy===
In an article in '']'', Michael F. Brown characterized the book's title as "extraordinarily bold--and apt"<ref name=brown>{{cite news|url=http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061204/brown|title=Dems Rebut Carter on Israeli 'Apartheid'|first=Michael F.|last=Brown|publisher=The Nation|date=], ]}}</ref> and suggested that "Perhaps President Carter should send copies of his book to members of Congress they might learn a thing or two about the long-festering conflict at the heart of so many of our current troubles in the region."<ref name=brown/>
Regarding the use of the word "Apartheid" in the title of his book, Carter has said:


<blockquote>It's not Israel. The book has nothing to do with what's going on inside Israel which is a wonderful democracy, you know, where everyone has guaranteed equal rights and where, under the law, Arabs and Jews who are Israelis have the same privileges about Israel. That's been most of the controversy because people assume it's about Israel. It's not.<ref name="LifeAndTimesTranscript">{{dead link|date=March 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref></blockquote>
Writing for the ''Atlanta Journal-Constitution'', ] says <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.ajc.com/search/content/opinion/stories/2006/11/29/1129edcarter.html
|title=Israelis adopt what South Africa dropped
|first=John
|last=Dugard
|date=2006-11-29
|publisher=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|accessdate=2006-12-15}}</ref> that Carter's book "is igniting controversy for its allegation that Israel practices a form of apartheid." Dugard supports Carter's analysis, arguing that "Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories has many features of colonization. At the same time it has many of the worst characteristics of apartheid."


<blockquote>I've never alleged that the framework of apartheid existed within Israel at all, and that what does exist in the West Bank is based on trying to take Palestinian land and not on racism. So it was a very clear distinction.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0701/21/le.01.html | work=CNN | access-date=2010-05-05 | title=CNN.com}}</ref></blockquote>
Lena Khalaf Tuffaha, in a piece published by the Institute for Middle East Understanding, wrote that Carter's book "eloquently describes the situation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip his book challenges Americans to see the conflict with eyes wide open."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://imeu.net/news/article003566.shtml|title=Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, by Jimmy Carter|publisher=Institute for Middle East Understanding|date=2006-11-15|first=Lena Khalaf|last=Tuffaha}}</ref>


In remarks broadcast over radio, Carter claimed that Israel's policies amounted to an apartheid worse than South Africa's:<ref name="HAIP">{{cite web|url=https://www.haaretz.com/2006-12-11/ty-article/jimmy-carter-israels-apartheid-policies-worse-than-south-africas/0000017f-db7c-d3a5-af7f-fbfea0530000|title=Jimmy Carter: Israel's 'Apartheid' Policies Worse Than South Africa's|work=Haaretz|accessdate=19 February 2023|date=12 November 2006}}</ref><blockquote>When Israel does occupy this territory deep within the West Bank, and connects the 200-or-so settlements with each other, with a road, and then prohibits the Palestinians from using that road, or in many cases even crossing the road, this perpetrates even worse instances of apartness, or apartheid, than we witnessed even in South Africa.<ref name="HAIP" /></blockquote>
Sherri Muzher, founder of Michigan Media Watch, wrote that "Nobody expects instant miracles to come from Carter’s book, but hopefully, it will spark the sort of robust discussions that even Israeli society and media already engage in".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.arabamericannews.com/newsarticle.php?articleid=6941|title=Title is Reality for Palestinians|publisher=Jordan Times, et al.|date=2006-12-05|last=Muzher|first=Sherri}}</ref>


==="Some major points"===
Brad Hooper, writing for the ], said Carter "posits that the stumbling blocks to a lasting cessation of armed conflict are to be found within two contexts: Israel's unwillingness to comply with international law and honor its previous peace commitments, and Arab nations' refusal to openly acknowledge Israel's right to live undisturbed" and describes Carter's approach as representing "a personal point of view, but one that is certainly grounded in both knowledge and wisdom." <ref>, American Library Association.</ref>
In his ] "Reiterating the Keys to Peace", published in '']'' on 20 December 2006, Carter summarizes "ome major points in the book":
<blockquote>
* Multiple deaths of innocent civilians have occurred on both sides, and this ] and all terrorism must cease
* For 39 years, Israel has ], and has ] and ] hundreds of choice sites
* Often excluded from their former homes, land, and places of worship, protesting Palestinians have been severely dominated and oppressed. There is forced ] between ]s and Palestine's citizens, with a complex ] required for Arabs to traverse Israel's multiple ]
* An enormous wall snakes through populated areas of what is left of the ], constructed on wide swaths of bulldozed trees and property of Arab families, obviously designed to acquire more territory and to protect the ] already built. (] declared a unilateral ] in August 2004 as its candidates sought local and then national offices, which they claim is the reason for reductions in casualties to Israeli citizens.)
* Combined with this wall, Israeli control of the ] Valley will completely enclose Palestinians in their shrunken and divided territory. Gaza is surrounded by a similar barrier with only two openings, still controlled by Israel. The crowded citizens have no free access to the outside world by air, sea, or land
* The Palestinian people are now being deprived of the necessities of life by economic restrictions imposed on them by Israel and the United States because 42 percent voted for Hamas candidates in this year's election. Teachers, nurses, policemen, firemen and other employees cannot be paid, and the UN has reported food supplies in Gaza equivalent to those among the poorest families in ], with half the families surviving on one meal a day
* ], first as prime minister and now as president of the ] and leader of the ], has sought to negotiate with Israel for almost six years, without success. Hamas leaders support such negotiations, promising to accept the results if approved by a Palestinian ]
* ], the ] of 1978, the ] of 1993, official US Policy, and the ] are all based on the premise that Israel withdraw from ]. Also, Palestinians must accept the same commitment made by the 23 Arab nations in 2002: to recognize Israel's right to live in peace within its legal borders. These are the two keys to peace<ref name=reiterating>Jimmy Carter, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/12/20/reiterating_the_keys_to_peace/ "Reiterating the Keys to Peace," ''Boston Globe'' 20 December 2006, accessed 3 January 2007. (Bullets added)</ref></blockquote>


==Critical reaction and commentary==
Rabbi ] in Berkeley, California, calls Carter "the only president to have actually delivered for the Jewish people an agreement (the peace treaty between Israel and Egypt) that has stood the test of time" and continues "We know that critique is often an essential part of love and caring. That is precisely what Jimmy Carter is trying to do for Israel and the Jewish people in his new book". He further stresses that "Carter does not claim that Israel is an apartheid state. What he does claim is that the West Bank will be a de facto apartheid situation if the current dynamics continue."<ref>{{cite web
{{Main article|Commentary on Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid}}
|url=http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/12/06/thank_you_jimmy_carter.php
Critical response to ''Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid'' at the time of release was mixed. According to Julie Bosman, criticism of the book "has escalated to a full-scale furor," much of which has focused on Carter's use of the word "]" in the subtitle.<ref name="Bosman">{{Cite news |last=Bosman |first=Julie |date=2006-12-14 |title=Carter Book Stirs Furor With Its View of Israelis' 'Apartheid' |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/14/books/14cart.html |access-date=2022-07-21 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Some critics, including several leaders of the ] and of ]ish organizations, have interpreted the subtitle as an ], which they believe to be inflammatory and unsubstantiated.<ref name=BrandeisNews>http://my.brandeis.edu/news/item?news_item_id=7816 "Brandeis News: Full coverage of the Historic Jan. 23rd Visit by Former President Jimmy Carter," ], 24 January 2007, accessed 27 January 2007</ref><ref name=Zeller>Tom Zeller, Jr., http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/01/12/carter-and-his-critics-the-skirmishes-continue/ "Carter and His Critics: The Skirmishes Continue," ''New York Times'', The Lede (blog), 12 January 2007, assessed 12 January 2007; includes {{cite web |url=http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/thelede/posts/CarterCenter.pdf |title=Letter of resignation dated 11 January 2007}}&nbsp;{{small|(79.4&nbsp;])}}</ref><ref name=Pfeiffer>Eric Pfeiffer, http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070125-112710-7481r.htm "Carter Apologizes for 'stupid' Book Passage,"] '']'' 26 January 2007, accessed 26 January 2007</ref> ], Senior Editor at ] and a former anti-Apartheid activist for the ], said: "Jimmy Carter had to write this book precisely because Palestinian life and history is not accorded equal value in American discourse, far from it. And his use of the word apartheid is not only morally valid; it is essential, because it shakes the moral stupor that allows many liberals to rationalize away the daily, grinding horror being inflicted on Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza".<ref>{{Cite web |title=Israel and Apartheid: In Defense of Jimmy Carter {{!}} Rootless Cosmopolitan – By Tony Karon |url=http://tonykaron.com/2006/12/22/israel-and-apartheid-in-defense-of-jimmy-carter/ |access-date=2022-07-21 |language=en-US}}</ref> Former President ] wrote a brief letter to the chairman of the ], thanking him for articles criticizing the book and citing his agreement with ]'s attempts to "straighten ... out" Carter's claims and conclusions about Clinton's own summer 2000 Camp David peace proposal.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070808035212/http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=ijITI2PHKoG&b=1531911&ct=3698445 |date=2007-08-08 }}, press release, ], n.d., accessed 3 May 2007</ref><ref name=Siegel>Cf. ], Clinton: 'I Don’t Know Where His Information Came From'", '']'', 30 March 2007, accessed 3 May 2007</ref>
|title=Thank You, Jimmy Carter
|last=Lerner
|first=Michael
|authorlink=Michael Lerner
|publisher=Tom Paine
|date=2006-12-06
|accessdate=2006-12-15}}</ref>


Critics claim that Carter crossed the line into anti-Semitism. ], the national director of the ], initially accused Carter of "engaging in anti-Semitism" in the book; Foxman told ] later that he would not call the former president himself an "anti-Semite" or a "bigot".<ref name=Besser>James D. Besser, {{cite web |url=http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13420 |title=Jewish and Israel News from New York - the Jewish Week |access-date=2006-12-25 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070613195955/http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13420 |archive-date=2007-06-13 }} "Jewish Criticism of Carter Intensifies: Charge of Anti-Semitism from One Leader as Ex-president Deepens His Critique of Israeli Policy in West Bank", '']'', 15 December 2005, accessed 8 January 2007</ref><ref name="Traub">{{Cite news |last=Traub |first=James |date=2007-01-14 |title=Does Abe Foxman Have an Anti-Anti-Semite Problem? |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/14/magazine/14foxman.t.html |access-date=2022-07-21 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Ethan Bronner also asserted that Carter's "overstatement" in the book "hardly adds up to anti-Semitism."<ref name="Bronner">{{Cite news |last=Bronner |first=Ethan |date=2007-01-07 |title=Jews, Arabs and Jimmy Carter |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/07/books/review/Bronner.t.html |access-date=2022-07-21 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref>
==Criticism==
===Politicians and lawmakers===
Prior to the ] and before the book was published, Democrats criticized the former ] President's book.


Some journalists and academics have praised Carter for what they believe to be speaking honestly about the ] in a media environment described as hostile to opponents of Israel's policies.<ref name=Bisharat>George Bisharat, , '']'', January 2, 2007, editorial, accessed January 11, 2007.</ref><ref>], {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070115040408/http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article2097774.ece |date=2007-01-15 }} '']'' December 23, 2006, accessed January 3, 2007.</ref> Some left-leaning Israeli politicians such as ] and ] argued that Carter's critique of Israeli policy in the Palestinian territories reflects that of many Israelis themselves.<ref name="Beilin">{{Cite web |date=2007-01-20 |title=Carter Is No More Critical of Israel Than Israelis Themselves |url=https://forward.com/opinion/9895/carter-is-no-more-critical-of-israel-than-israelis/ |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=The Forward |language=en}}</ref>
] Chairman ] wrote that, "While I have tremendous respect for former President Carter, I fundamentally disagree and do not support his analysis of Israel and the ]," Dean's statement said, "On this issue President Carter speaks for himself, the opinions in his book are his own, they are not the views or position of the Democratic Party. I and other Democrats will continue to stand with Israel in its battle against terrorism and for a lasting peace with its neighbors."<ref name="Siegel">{{cite news|author=Jennifer Siegel|url=http://www.forward.com/articles/dems-repudiate-carter-book/|title=Dems Repudiate Carter Book|publisher=Forward.com|date=] ]}}</ref>


==Carter's response to criticism of the book==
Future ] ] stated that the book does not represent the Democratic parties views on Israel, "It is wrong to suggest that the ] would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that institutionalizes ethnically based oppression, and Democrats reject that allegation vigorously. With all due respect to former President Carter, he does not speak for the Democratic Party on Israel."<ref name="Siegel" />
{{Further|Commentary on Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid#Carter's response to criticism of the book}}


Carter has responded to negative reviews in the mainstream ] in an op-ed published in the '']'' (which was excerpted in '']'' and elsewhere):
] ] wrote, "I cannot agree with the book’s title and its implications about apartheid...I recently called the former president to express my concerns about the title of the book, and to request that the title be changed.”<ref name="Siegel" /> The title “does not serve the cause of peace and the use of it...is offensive and wrong,” says Conyers.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.jta.org/page_view_breaking_story.asp?intid=5272
|title=U.S. lawmaker chides Carter on ‘apartheid’
|publisher=Jewish Telegraphic Agency
|date=2006-10-25
|accessdate=2006-12-15}}</ref>


{{poem quote|Book reviews in the mainstream media have been written mostly by representatives of Jewish organizations who would be unlikely to visit the occupied territories, and their primary criticism is that the book is ]. Two members of ] have been publicly critical. Incoming Speaker ] for instance, issued a statement (before the book was published) saying that "he does not speak for the ] on Israel." Some reviews posted on ] call me "anti-Semitic", and others accuse the book of "lies" and "distortions". A former Carter Center fellow has taken issue with it, and Alan Dershowitz called the book's title "indecent."
] ] wrote, "The reason for the Palestinian plight is the Palestinians. Their leadership has no regard for the quality of life for their people and no capability of providing security or enforcing peace, and they have no one to blame but themselves.” He also added that the "book clearly does not reflect the direction of the party; it reflects the opinion of one man."<ref name="Siegel2">{{cite news|url=http://www.forward.com/articles/carter-book-slaps-israel-with-%E2%80%98apartheid%E2%80%99-tag/|title=Carter Book Slaps Israel With 'Apartheid' Tag, Provides Ammo to GOP|first=Jennifer|last=Siegel|publisher=Forward.com|date=2006-10-17}}</ref>


Out in the real world, however, the response has been overwhelmingly positive. I've signed books in five stores, with more than 1,000 buyers at each site. I've had one negative remark—that I should be tried for ]—and one caller on ] said that I was an anti-Semite. My most troubling experience has been the rejection of my offers to speak, for free, about the book on ] campuses with high Jewish enrollment and to answer questions from students and professors. I have been most encouraged by prominent Jewish citizens and members of Congress who have thanked me privately for presenting the facts and some new ideas.<ref name="latimes"/><ref name="Carter">Jimmy Carter, , ''The Guardian'' (London), 12 December 2006</ref>}}
]s ] and ] also released statements critical of the book.{{fact}}


He also wrote a "Letter to Jewish Citizens of America" explaining "his use of the term 'apartheid' and sympathizing with Israelis who fear terrorism."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2006-12-16 |title=Carter explains his book’s ‘apartheid’ reference |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna16233069 |access-date=2024-12-24 |website=NBC News |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Jimmy Carter Issues Letter to Jewish Community on Palestine Peace Not Apartheid |url=https://www.cartercenter.org/news/pr/carter_letter_121506.html |access-date=2024-12-24 |website=The Carter Center |language=en-US}}</ref>
===Academics===
====Alan Dershowitz====
], a professor of law at ] and author of several books on the ] (including "The Case For Israel"), has stated that there are factual inaccuracies in Carter's book, including its statement that "Israel launche preemptive attacks on Egypt, Syria, Iraq and then Jordan"<ref>p. 5</ref> in the 1967 ]. Dershowitz wrote that in his view, "Jordan attacked Israel first, Israel tried desperately to persuade Jordan to remain out of the war, and Israel counterattacked after the Jordanian army surrounded Jerusalem, firing missiles into the center of the city."<ref name="Dershowitz" />


In a report updated by the ] after the publication of Carter's "Letter to Jewish Citizens of America", ] observes that Carter replied generally to complaints of the book's errors and inaccuracies by ], ], ], the ], and others by pointing out that the ] staff as well as an "unnamed 'distinguished' reporter" fact-checked it.<ref name="APLetter">], , '']'', 15 December 2006, accessed 12 March 2007</ref><ref name="CarterJV">{{cite web |url=http://jacksonville.com/apnews/stories/120806/D8LSR7J03.shtml |title=Carter defends his book's criticism of Israeli policy |work=] |date=8 December 2006 |access-date=15 February 2014}}</ref> ] points out that, as cited in various news accounts, "Carter has consistently defended his book's accuracy against Stein and other critics"; in a prepared statement, Carter's press secretary ] responds "that Carter had his book reviewed for accuracy throughout the writing process" and that "s with all of President Carter's previous books, any detected errors will be corrected in later editions ..."<ref>Rachel Zelkowitz, http://www.emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=16915 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080611220932/http://www.emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=16915 |date=2008-06-11 }} "Professor Describes Carter 'Inaccuracies{{'"}}, '']'', 12 December 2006, accessed 12 January 2007. Carter reiterated a desire to correct any such errors in his subsequent speaking engagement at ] and elsewhere (see section below).</ref> In response to the Associated Press's request for a comment on the resignations of Stein and 14 other members of the Center's Board of Councilors, speaking on behalf of both Carter and the Carter Center, Congileo provided a statement from its executive director, John Hardman, who, according to Zelkowitz, "also fact checked ''Palestine'', saying that the members of that board 'are not engaged in implementing the work of the Center.{{'"}}<ref name=AccessNoGa>], {{cite web|url=http://www.accessnorthga.com/news/ap_newfullstory.asp?ID%3D85859 |title=Archived copy |access-date=2007-01-13 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927202429/http://www.accessnorthga.com/news/ap_newfullstory.asp?ID=85859 |archive-date=2007-09-27 }} "Atlanta: 14 Carter Center Advisers Resign in Protest Over Book", AccessNorthGA.com, 11 January 2007, accessed 11 January 2007</ref>
Also, in an op-ed for the ], Dershowitz wrote that Carter was not sufficiently forthcoming about qualifying a parallel to South African apartheid: <blockquote>"<nowiki></nowiki> use of the loaded word 'apartheid,' suggesting an analogy to the hated policies of South Africa, is especially outrageous, considering his acknowledgment buried near the end of his shallow and superficial book that what is going on in Israel today 'is unlike that in South Africa—not racism, but the acquisition of land'.""<ref name="Dershowitz">{{cite web
|url=http://www.nysun.com/article/43958
|title=The World According to Carter
|last=Dershowitz
|first=Alan
|date=2006-11-22
|publisher=New York Sun
|accessdate=2 December
|accessyear=2006}}</ref></blockquote> Dershowitz also criticized Carter for comparing the ] with the ].<ref>]. ]. ''StandWithUs.com''. 8 December 2006. 21 December 2006.</ref><ref>]. . ''MSNBC.com''. By ]. 29 November 2006. 21 December 2006. <blockquote>CARTER: ... he persecution of the Palestinians now, under the occupying territories ... is one of the worst examples of human rights deprivation that I know.
SHUSTER: Even worse, though, than a place like Rwanda?
CARTER: Yes. I think—yes. You mean, now?
SHUSTER: Yes.
CARTER: Yes.
SHUSTER: The oppression now of the Israelis—of the Palestinians by the Israelis is worse than the situation in Africa like the oppression of Rwanda and the civil war?
CARTER: I'm not going back into ancient history about Rwanda, but right now, the persecution of the Palestinians is one of the worst examples of human rights abuse I know, because the Palestinians—
SHUSTER: You're talking about right now, you're not talking about say, a few years ago.
CARTER: I'm not talking about ancient history, no.
SHUSTER: Rwanda wasn't ancient history; it was just a few years ago.
CARTER: You can talk about Rwanda if you want to. I want to talk about Palestine. What is being done to the Palestinians now is horrendous in their own territory .... They're taken away all the basic human rights of the Palestinians, as was done in South Africa against the blacks.</blockquote></ref>


==Public and other programs pertaining to the book==
====Kenneth Stein====
Carter has said that debate on Israel-related issues is muffled in the ] by lobbying efforts of the ]: "any controversial issues concerning Palestine and the path to peace for Israel are intensely debated among Israelis and throughout other nations—but not in the United States. ... This reluctance to criticize any policies of the Israeli government is because of the extraordinary lobbying efforts of the ] and the absence of any significant contrary voices."<ref name=latimes/><ref name=Carter/> He has stressed that through the debate he hopes this book will stimulate and through his own related public-speaking and media appearances, he hopes to tear down the "impenetrable wall" that stops the people of the US from seeing the plight of Palestinians.<ref name=latimes/><ref name=Carter/>
], a professor of Middle Eastern history and Israeli studies at ], the founder of the Middle East program at the ] and its director until 1993, made the following remarks on the book in an open letter <ref>{{cite news|author=Associated Press|title=President Carter's New Book Spurs Aide To Resign|url=http://www.nysun.com/article/44869|publisher=The New York Sun|date=], ]}}</ref>:
:"President Carter's book on the Middle East, a title too inflammatory to even print, is not based on unvarnished analysis; it is replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments."


===Brandeis University visit===
:"Aside from the one-sided nature of the book, meant to provoke, there are recollections cited from meetings where I was the third person in the room, and my notes of those meetings show little similarity to points claimed in the book."
In early December 2006 ] invited Carter to visit the university to debate his book with ]. Carter declined that invitation, explaining: "I don't want to have a conversation even indirectly with Dershowitz. There is no need to for me to debate somebody who, in my opinion, knows nothing about the situation in Palestine." Carter said that the Brandeis debate request "is proof that many in the United States are unwilling to hear an alternative view on the nation's most taboo foreign policy issue, Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory," adding: "There is no debate in America about anything that would be critical of Israel."<ref name="Stockman">{{Cite news |last1=Stockman |first1=Farah |last2=Bombardieri |first2=Marcella |date=2006-12-15 |title=Carter book won't stir Brandeis debate |work=Boston.com |url=http://archive.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/12/15/carter_book_wont_stir_brandeis_debate/ |access-date=2022-07-21}}</ref>


Dershowitz criticized Carter's refusal to debate him, asserting: "Carter’s refusal to debate wouldn't be so strange if it weren't for the fact that he claims that he wrote the book precisely so as to start debate over the issue of the Israel-Palestine peace process. If that were really true, Carter would be thrilled to have the opportunity to debate."<ref name="DershowitzGlobe">{{Cite news |last=Dershowitz |first=Alan |title=Why won't Carter debate his book? |work=Boston.com |url=http://archive.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/12/21/why_wont_carter_debate_his_book/ |access-date=2022-07-21}}</ref> He later wrote in ''The Case Against Israel's Enemies'' that Carter's accusation of his ignorance was untrue "since we had discussed my several visits to the Palestinian Authority during our conversation only months earlier in Herzliya."<ref>''The Case Against Israel's Enemies'', 20</ref> {{Further|Alan Dershowitz#Jimmy Carter's book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid|Alan Dershowitz#Alan Dershowitz and Jimmy Carter}}
:"Being a former President does not give one a unique privilege to invent information or to unpack it with cuts, deftly slanted to provide a particular outlook. Having little access to Arabic and Hebrew sources, I believe, clearly handicapped his understanding and analyses of how history has unfolded over the last decade."<ref name = steinletter>{{cite news|last = Stein|first = Kenneth|date = ]|accessdate=2006-12-09|publisher = FOX News (Reprint of original letter)|title = FOX Facts: Dr. Kenneth W. Stein's Letter|url = http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,235283,00.html}}</ref>


In a Boston Globe article of 22 December 2006, Patricia Johnston said she and many colleagues had offered to chip in perhaps $100 each to pay for whatever travel and security costs a Carter visit would entail. "Who is Alan Dershowitz?" Johnston said. Carter "is the former president of the United States, who has done so much to further the cause of peace in the Middle East and elsewhere. It's an insult to suggest that he should have to defend himself that way." She said she envisioned Carter giving a traditional speech and taking audience questions.<ref name="BrandeisGroup">{{Cite news |last=Bombardieri |first=Marcella |date=2006-12-22 |title=Brandeis group pursues Carter visit |work=Boston.com |url=http://archive.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/12/22/brandeis_group_pursues_carter_visit/ |access-date=2022-07-21}}</ref>
Stein has not yet provided a full outline of what he regards as factual errors.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/06/AR2006120602171.html?nav=hcmodule
|title=Carter Book on Israel 'Apartheid' Sparks Bitter Debate
|first=Karen
|last=DeYoung
|publisher=Washington Post
|date=2006-12-07
|accessdate=2006-12-15}}</ref>


On 26 December 2006, ] (an ] affiliate), reported that "bout 100 students, faculty and alumni of ] have signed an online petition to push the administration to bring former President Carter to campus to discuss his new book on Palestine, without being required to debate it."<ref name="Bostonstudents">http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/10609718/detail.html {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930155316/http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/10609718/detail.html |date=2007-09-30 }} "Brandeis Students Support Carter Visit: Students, Faculty Sign Online Petition", (updated) online posting, ''TheBostonChannel.com'', WCVB-TV, Channel 5, Boston, 26 December 2006, accessed 26 December 2006</ref>
===Diplomatic personnel===
====Dennis Ross====
Ambassador ], the United States' chief Middle East envoy during the Clinton administration, has said maps used in Carter's book were similar to maps published previously in his book, ''The Missing Peace. The Inside Story of the Fight for Middle East Peace'', saying, "I looked at the maps and the maps he uses are maps that are drawn basically from my book. There's no other way they could -- even if he says they come from another place. They came originally from my book."<ref name = ross> The Situation Room. Wolf Blitzer. CNN, Atlanta, GA. ]</ref>


''The Boston Globe'' reported that since it initially revealed "that Carter felt unwelcome on the Waltham campus, people have argued over whether he is unwilling to answer for his views, or whether Brandeis, which was founded by the American Jewish community, can't tolerate criticism of Israel. The latter is a view that some professors hope they can dispel by reviving the Carter visit."<ref name="BrandeisGroup"/>
Ross went on to insist that Carter's interpretation of the maps was "just simply wrong."<ref name = ross/> According to Ross, who played a key role in shaping the Clinton administration's efforts to bring peace to the region, Carter presented the maps as an "Israeli interpretation of the Clinton idea", when in fact the maps represented Clinton's proposals exactly.<ref name = ross/> Responding to a question posed by ''CNN'' anchor ], Ross stated that Carter was also "wrong" to suggest that Israel had rejected the American proposals at Camp David, stating: "this is a matter of record. This is not a matter of interpretation." <ref name = ross/>


On 10 January 2007, it was reported that Carter would discuss ''Palestine Peace Not Apartheid'' at Brandeis University but that he would "not, however, debate the book with" Dershowitz.<ref name=AccessNoGa/> Brandeis officials reported that Carter would "be the first former president to visit Brandeis since Harry Truman delivered the commencement address in 1957.... It will be Carter's first visit to a university to discuss the book, Congileo said", confirming also "the president has set no conditions and would answer as many questions as possible"; Carter plans to "speak for about 15 minutes and then answer questions for 45 minutes during the visit."
Ross concluded by saying "President Carter made a major contribution to peace in the Middle East. That's the reality... I would like him to meet the same standard that he applied then to what he's doing now."<ref name = ross/>


The speech, which occurred on 23 January 2007, was "closed to the public and limited to 'members of the university community only{{'"}}; nevertheless, Dershowitz said that he still planned to "attend and question Carter": {{"'}}I will be the first person to have my hand up to ask him a question,' he said. 'I guarantee that they won't stop me from attending.{{'"}}<ref name="Daily">{{Cite web |title=USA TODAY: Latest World and US News - USATODAY.com |url=https://www.usatoday.com/ |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=USA TODAY |language=en-US}}</ref>
==The Author's Responses to criticism==
===General response===
Carter has responded to negative reviews in the mainstream media by saying that they have, "been written mostly by representatives of ]ish organizations who would be unlikely to visit the occupied territories, and their primary criticism is that the book is anti-]."<ref name=carter/>


On 18 January 2007 news outlets reported Brandeis's announcement that while Dershowitz could not attend Carter's speech, after it ended he would have the stage for a "rebuttal."<ref name="Drosjack">{{Cite web |date=2022-07-21 |title=Israel |url=https://www.foxnews.com/category/world/world-regions/israel |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=Fox News |language=en-US}}</ref>{{Further|Alan Dershowitz#Jimmy Carter's book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid}}
Carter has also said that debate on issues concerning Israel are silenced in the US media because of lobbying efforts by the pro-Israel Lobby, "many controversial issues concerning Palestine and the path to peace for Israel are intensely debated among Israelis and throughout other nations — but not in the United States This reluctance to criticize any policies of the Israeli government is because of the extraordinary lobbying efforts of the ] and the absence of any significant contrary voices."<ref name=carter/> He has said he hopes to tear down the, "impenetrable wall" that stops the American people from seeing the plight of Palestinians.<ref name=carter>{{cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-carter8dec08,0,7544738.story|title=Speaking frankly about Israel and Palestine (editorial)|publisher=Los Angeles Times|date=], ]|first=Jimmy|last=Carter}}</ref> Writing in the ] in ], Carter rejected critics of his book as not actually having addressed the major points contained in it <ref> by ]. The ], ], ]</ref>:
{{cquote|
Not surprisingly, an examination of the book reviews and published comments reveals that these points have rarely if ever been mentioned by detractors of the book, much less denied or refuted. Instead, there has been a pattern of ad hominem statements, alleging that I am a liar, plagiarist, anti-Semite, racist, bigot, ignorant, etc. There are frequent denunciations of fabricated "straw man" accusations: that I have claimed that apartheid exists within Israel; that the system of apartheid in Palestine is based on racism; and that Jews control and manipulate the news media of America.}}


The day after the speech (24 January 2007), ''The New York Times'' reported on the program: "Questions were preselected by the committee that invited Mr. Carter, and the questioners included an Israeli student and a Palestinian student. After Mr. Carter left, Mr. Dershowitz spoke in the same gymnasium, saying that the former president oversimplified the situation and that his conciliatory and sensible-sounding speech at Brandeis belied his words in some other interviews."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Belluck |first=Pam |date=2007-01-24 |title=At Brandeis, Carter Responds to Critics |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/24/us/24carter.html |access-date=2022-07-21 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> According to David Weber of ], Carter said "that he stood by the book and its title, that he apologized for what he called an 'improper and stupid' sentence in the book and that he had been disturbed by accusations that he was anti-Semitic.... ...acknowledged...that 'Palestine Peace Not Apartheid' has 'caused great concern in the Jewish community,' but noted that it has nonetheless prompted discussion."<ref name=Pfeiffer/><ref>David Weber, ''ABC News'' 23 January 2007, accessed 24 January 2007.</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Abel |first1=David |last2=Vaznis |first2=James |date=2007-01-24 |title=Carter wins applause at Brandeis |work=Boston.com |url=http://archive.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/01/24/carter_wins_applause_at_brandeis/ |access-date=2022-07-21}}</ref> An editorial published in the ] newspaper, the '']'', concludes: "Carter succeeded in bringing to Brandeis a productive, civil debate."<ref name="Daily"/> Videotaped excerpts from Carter's visit to Brandeis were featured on several national news programs in the United States, such as ]'s morning program '']'', along with follow-up interviews with Carter.<ref name="CarterToday">{{Cite web |title=Sharks spotted at New York City and Long Island beaches |url=http://www.msn.com/en-us/video |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=MSN |language=en-US}}</ref>
===Response to Dershowitz===
Carter responded to accusations of factual inaccuracies by saying that his book was fact-checked by Carter Center staff as well as by an unnamed "distinguished" reporter. <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.examiner.com/a-444976~Carter_defends_his_book_s_criticism_of_Israeli_policy.html
|title=Former President Jimmy Carter defends his book's criticism of Israeli policy
|last=Associated Press
|first=
|date=2006-12-08
|publisher=Boston Examiner
|accessdate=9 December
|accessyear=2006}}</ref> In an op-ed for the ''Los Angeles Times'', Carter acknowledged Dershowitz's criticisms directly and wrote, "Out in the real world, however, the response has been overwhelmingly positive."
<ref name=carter/>


As a result of the visit, major donors told Brandeis University that they would no longer give it money in "retaliation", according to ], chief domestic policy adviser and executive director of the White House Domestic Policy Staff during Carter's presidency and a current trustee of Brandeis, as quoted in '']'' in mid-February 2007.<ref name=Cohler-Esses>Larry Cohler-Esses, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070218231851/http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13674 |date=2007-02-18 }} Major Givers Reportedly Withholding Funds from School, Sparking Fierce Free-Speech Debate on Massachusetts Campus", ''The Jewish Week'', 16 February 2006, accessed 23 March 2007</ref>
Carter was invited to speak at ] in ] and debate Dershowitz, but declined. "I don't want to have a conversation even indirectly with Dershowitz," Carter said. "There is no need to for me to debate somebody who, in my opinion, knows nothing about the situation in ]."<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/12/15/carter_book_wont_stir_brandeis_debate/
|title=Carter book won't stir Brandeis debate: Ex-president was to outline view on Palestinians
|first=Farah
|last=Stockman
|coauthors=Marcella Bombardieri
|publisher=Boston Globe
|date=2006-12-15
|accessdate=2006-12-15}}</ref>


===''Man from Plains'': Documentary feature film by Jonathan Demme===
===Response to Stein===
In 2007 ] made the film ''],'' which "follows the former President as he takes part in a book tour across America to publicise his new tome, ''Palestine Peace Not Apartheid''."<ref name=Tilly>Chris Tilly, {{cite web |url=https://www.timeout.com/film/news/1578.html |title=Demme 'Comes in Peace' - the TOMB movie news - Time Out Film |access-date=2007-01-24 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070526125052/http://www.timeout.com/film/news/1578.html |archive-date=2007-05-26 }} "Demme 'Comes in Peace'," ''The Time Out Movie Blog: This Week's Top Stories from the Movie World'' (TOMB), ''Time Out London'', 5 December 2006, accessed 23 January 2007</ref><ref name=HR>Borys Kitt and Nicole Sperling, http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i01ddb1dac0f7f4bd485b9e1f3984dd7a "Demme Helms Docu on Carter for Participant", '']'', 6 December 2006, accessed 3 May 2007. Cf. Nick Paumgarten, http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/12/11/061211ta_talk_paumgarten "Jimmy Carter Aloft", '']'', 11 December 2006, accessed 3 May 2007</ref> According to the ''Boston Globe'' Demme filmed Carter for three months "to compile footage for a documentary about the former president's book and Carter's efforts to increase debate on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict."<ref name="Stockman2">{{Cite news |last=Stockman |first=Farah |date=2007-01-20 |title=Carter film maker faults Brandeis |work=Boston.com |url=http://archive.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/01/20/carter_film_maker_faults_brandeis/ |access-date=2022-07-21}}</ref> While it granted camera access to members of the news media for their broadcasts, ] refused Demme's request to film Carter's January 2007 speech for the end of the film, citing logistical and legal considerations.<ref name=Stockman2/> The film debuted at the ] on 10 September 2007.<ref name=TIFF>{{cite web |url=http://www.tiff07.ca/filmsandschedules/filmdetails.aspx?id=706281229381386 |title=TIFF '07 - Films & Schedules Man from Plains |access-date=2007-09-10 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012224458/http://tiff07.ca/filmsandschedules/filmdetails.aspx?id=706281229381386 |archive-date=2007-10-12 }} "''Man from Plains'' Jonathan Demme", ] official website "film schedules", accessed 10 September 2007.</ref>
In response to Professor Stein's criticisms, officials for the publisher, ], said, "We haven't seen these allegations, we haven't seen any specifics, and I have no way of assessing anything he has said…. This is all about nothing. We stand behind the book fully, and the fact that there has been a divided reaction to it is not surprising."<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-carter8dec08,1,1188050.story
|title=Maps in Carter's book are questioned
|first=Josh
|last=Getlin
|publisher=Los Angeles Times
|date=2006-12-08
|accessdate=2006-12-15}}</ref>


===Carter Center conversation===
Carter has said that Stein's role in the Center was from "ancient times" and that his recent position was only "honorary"<ref>{{cite web
On 22 February 2007 Carter participated in a "conversation" about ''Palestine Peace Not Apartheid'' with former ] ] at the ], moderated by Conflict Resolution Program Director Matthew Hodes. The event sold out in early January 2007.<ref>http://www.cartercenter.org/involved/conversations/index.html {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061222112224/http://cartercenter.org/involved/conversations/index.html |date=2006-12-22 }} Conversations at the Carter Center 2006–2007, accessed 24 December 2006</ref> It was simultaneously webcast in the Carter Center's online "multi-media" section, and the Center's website now includes a direct link to the "archived webcast."<ref>http://www.cartercenter.org/multimedia/conversations2.07.ram {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070715143721/http://www.cartercenter.org/multimedia/conversations2.07.ram |date=2007-07-15 }} Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, ''Carter Center'', ] media file (Updated), accessed 25 February 2007</ref>
|url=http://www.examiner.com/a-444976~Carter_defends_his_book_s_criticism_of_Israeli_policy.html
|title=Former President Jimmy Carter defends his book's criticism of Israeli policy
|last=Associated Press
|first=
|date=2006-12-08
|publisher=Boston Examiner
|accessdate=9 December
|accessyear=2006}}</ref> According to Carter biographer ], Stein and Carter have a "passionate, up-and-down relationship", and Stein has criticized statements Carter has made about Israel in the past. <ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.ajc.com/search/content/metro/stories/2006/12/06/1206natcarter.html
|title=Adviser breaks with Carter on Mideast book
|last=Boone
|first=Christian
|date=]
|publisher=Atlanta Journal-Constitution
|accessdate=9 December
|accessyear=2006}}</ref>


===George Washington University visit===
===Response to Ross===
{{undue weight|date=March 2022}}
In response to criticisms from Dennis Ross, Carter stated he had "never seen" Ross' book and that the maps "came from an atlas that's publicly available."<ref name = ross> The Situation Room. Wolf Blitzer. CNN, Atlanta, GA. ]</ref> Specifically, he noted their origin in an atlas from the .<ref name = ross> The Situation Room. Wolf Blitzer. CNN, Atlanta, GA. ]</ref>
On 8 March 2007 ] hosted a visit by Carter during which he discussed his book. According to reporter ] in '']'', a group of Jewish students led by Robert Fishman, executive director of the campus ], dominated the microphones, preventing other students from asking questions, while asking questions critical of Carter prepared, forwarded, and distributed to them in advance by faculty and students at ] as if they were their own questions:
<blockquote>The sheet distributed to students listed five questions. Among the issues raised were Carter's refusal to debate Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz and former U.S. Middle East negotiator ]; continuing Palestinian violence in Gaza; Carter's assertion that Israel did not accept Clinton's peace proposal; whether donations from the ] explains {{sic}} the failure of the Carter Center to criticize ], and Carter's decision to use the word "apartheid" in his book's title.

One of the students involved in distributing the handout, Aviva Berman, said that four of the five questions came directly from a list prepared by ] and other professors at Emory University, prior to Carter's appearance at the school's Atlanta campus. "When Carter came to speak at Emory, they had those questions made up, so they just forwarded them to me", she said.<ref name=Schwartzapfel>Beth Schwartzapfel, http://www.forward.com/articles/hillel-director-students-defend-tactics-at-carter/ "Hillel Director, Students Defend Tactics at Carter Speech", ''The Jewish Daily Forward'', 22 March 2007, accessed 22 March 2007</ref></blockquote>

Schwartzapfel also cites " video of the event, posted to the G.W. Web site, shows that Carter received several standing ovations and long stretches of applause."<ref>For the video of the event posted on server of George Washington University, see http://www.gwu.edu/%7Enewsctr/audiovideo/JimmyCarter.ram Jimmy Carter speech and Q&A, RealPlayer video clip, 8 March 2007, accessed 22 March 2007</ref> "But", Schwartzapfel continues, "an Associated Press story that ran immediately after the event characterized the audience as 'polite but mostly critical,{{'"}} adding: "Jack Stokes, an A.P. spokesman, told the Forward that the article's description of the audience 'was based on reporter ]'s observation of the speech, as well as the subsequent Q&A Carter engaged in with the students. The A.P. story stands as written.{{'"}}<ref name=Schwartzapfel/>

Schweid observes:
<blockquote>Despite the storm it ignited, former President Carter held fast on Thursday to his accusation that Israel oppresses the Palestinians on the West Bank and Gaza and seeks to colonize the land. Speaking at The George Washington University to a polite but mostly critical student audience, Carter offered no second thoughts on his book "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid". ... He said he was not accusing Israel of racism nor referring to its treatment of Arabs within the country. "I defined apartheid very carefully" as "the forced segregation by one people of another" on their own land, he said.<ref name="Schweid">{{Cite news |last=SCHWEID |first=BARRY |date=2007-03-08 |title=Carter Defends Gaza Theory at GWU Speech |newspaper=] |language=en-US |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/08/AR2007030801256.html |access-date=2022-07-21 |issn=0190-8286}}</ref></blockquote>

Schwartzapfel reports, however:
<blockquote>Brian Hennessey, vice president of the ], which is making a documentary on Carter, alleged to the Forward that he witnessed G.W. Hillel director Robert Fishman and several Jewish students conspiring to control the Q&A session. According to Hennessey, a handout was distributed with negative questions and then the students strategically grabbed the seats closest to the microphones. Hennessey said that he overheard people in the group saying that the point of their strategy was to make sure that Carter, whose book, ''Palestine Peace Not Apartheid'', faced only tough questions.

In the end, most of the eight questions fielded by Carter at the March 8 event took a pro-Israel tack in challenging the former president. Four of the students read their questions off of the sheet distributed beforehand.<ref name=Schwartzapfel/></blockquote>

Fishman told the Forward, Schwartzapfel reports further: {{"'}}You know how we did it, honestly? ... We said, "Let's sit near the microphones." They each had a copy of the questions, and then they stood on line.{{'"}}<ref name=Schwartzapfel/> Yet, she adds: "Hennessey asserted that the maneuver ended up influencing media coverage of the event. 'This small group successfully outgunned the microphones and managed to give some journalists this totally erroneous impression that that was how the student body felt about Carter,' he said."<ref name=Schwartzapfel/> Whereas "Hennessey, who described Carter's book as 'very courageous,' contended that the G.W. students 'very successfully stood up and blocked anyone else from asking a question,{{'"}} Schwartzapfel continues:
<blockquote>Berman insisted that she and her fellow pro-Israel students did nothing wrong. It wasn’t his group's responsibility "to let other people ask questions", he said. "If they wanted to get to the microphone quicker, they could have."<br>
Fishman also rejected the assertion that the students' tactics were improper.<br>
"There was nothing done in there to stop anyone from asking questions", Fishman said. "It's important that, when you have that many people in the room who may not be familiar with the ], those people have the opportunity also to hear those areas that are questionable in the book."<br>
In that sense, Fishman said, his group's approach "is what ] is about."<ref name=Schwartzapfel/></blockquote>

===University of Iowa visit===
Pointing out that "The former president rarely speaks about his book at universities. He says he’s been invited to more than 100 campuses, but he's only visited five," Claire Keller reported that, during his public appearance at the ], in Iowa City, on 18 April 2007,<ref name=UIowa>http://news-releases.uiowa.edu/2007/april/041107carter-tickets.html {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080127202129/http://news-releases.uiowa.edu/2007/april/041107carter-tickets.html |date=2008-01-27 }} "University of Iowa News Release", press release, University of Iowa, 11 April 2007, accessed 12 June 2007 (provides related links)</ref> Carter said, "I wrote this book to describe the plight of the Palestinians and because I'm convinced we desperately need debate about where we are and where we ought to be going, and how to rejuvenate the non-existent peace process in the Middle East" ... Carter says the book's objective is permanent peace for Israel and its neighbors; it’s something the former president says he’s dedicated his entire adult life to.<ref name=Kellett>Claire Kellett, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927091750/http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/7092956.html |date=2007-09-27 }}, ], 18 April 2007, updated 19 April 2007, accessed 11 June 2007</ref>

Keller wrote that "Many in attendance applaud his efforts" but that "others criticize the author, claiming his book contains factual errors and misstatements. Members of the local Jewish community say it's simply one-sided."<ref name=Kellett/> She quotes Tali Ariav of the Hillel Jewish Student Center on the Iowa campus, who said, {{"'}}I am an Israeli so of course I served in the military, so I feel emotionally involved, but I feel every person, every American, every thinker needs to think twice about Carter's opinion, because it's not right' ..."<ref name=Kellett/> Nevertheless, Keller added, "Carter adamantly defends the accuracy of his book, saying he wrote every word himself."<ref name=Kellett/>

===University of California, Irvine visit===
On 3 May 2007, Carter presented a lecture and participated in a discussion relating to the book in conjunction with the Center for the Study of Democracy and Model United Nations, in association with the Center for Citizen Peacebuilding, Department of Political Science, at the ]. According to Carter's lecture transcript, in answering a question on whether conflict between pro- and anti-Israel student groups obstructs chances of peace, he said, "I think an altercation or debate or sometimes even an uncomfortable confrontation on a college campus in America is a good move in the right direction. But I would like to see the leaders of those two groups form a combined group that would take advantage of my invitation to go to Palestine and see what’s going on."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Jimmy Carter Lecture - Submit a Question |url=https://www.socsci.uci.edu/files/announcements/carter/transcript.htm |access-date=2022-07-21 |website=www.socsci.uci.edu}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]


==Reviews== ==Notes==
{{Reflist|33em}}


== Further reading ==
*{{cite news|title = What Would Jimmy Do?|publisher = Washington Post|last = Goldberg |first = Jeffrey|date = ]|accessdate=2006-12-15|url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/07/AR2006120701835.html}}
* ]. ''One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli–Palestinian Impasse''. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006. {{ISBN|0-8050-8034-1}} (10). {{ISBN|978-0-8050-8034-6}} (13)
* ] ''Never Again? The Threat of the ]''. New York: HarperSanFrancisco (an imprint of ]), 2003. {{ISBN|0-06-054246-2}} (10). {{ISBN|978-0-06-054246-7}}
* ]. ''Unsettled: An Anthropology of the Jews''. Rpt. New York: ], 2003. {{ISBN|0-670-03244-1}} (10). {{ISBN|978-0-670-03244-0}} (13)
* ]. ''The Missing Peace: The Inside Story of the Fight for Middle East Peace''. Rpt. paperback ed. 2004; New York: ], 2005. {{ISBN|0-374-52980-9}} (10). {{ISBN|978-0-374-52980-2}} (13)
* ]. ''Why I Am a Zionist: Israel, Jewish Identity and the Challenges of Today''. 3rd ed. 2001; Montreal: ], 2006. {{ISBN|1-55234-648-X}} (10). {{ISBN|978-1-55234-648-8}} (13)


==External links== ==External links==
{{Wikiquote|Palestine Peace Not Apartheid}}
* via abcnews.go.com
* hosted by ] faculty and students about the book pursuant to the ] visit by Jimmy Carter. Answers by Carter. Also presents links to transcript of Carter's opening remarks, books, and media coverage. (Registration required for participation)
*
* {{IMDb title|qid=Q3334501|id=tt0913958|title=Jimmy Carter Man from Plains}}. Documentary film by ] focusing on Jimmy Carter's book tour for ''Palestine Peace Not Apartheid''. 2007

==References==
<references/>


{{Jimmy Carter}}
]
]
]
]
]
]


]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 02:13, 24 December 2024

2006 book by Jimmy Carter

Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
Cover showing the author, left, and protesters at the Israeli West Bank barrier, right
AuthorJimmy Carter
Cover artistMichael Accordino
LanguageEnglish
SubjectPolitical science
Published2006 (Simon & Schuster)
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (hardcover), Audiobook (Audio CD)
Pages264 pp
ISBN978-0-7432-8502-5
Dewey Decimal956.04 22
LC ClassDS119.7 .C3583 2006

Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid is a book written by 39th President of the United States Jimmy Carter. It was published by Simon & Schuster in November 2006.

The book is primarily based on talks, hosted by Carter during his presidency, between Menachem Begin of Israel and Anwar Sadat of Egypt that led to the Egypt–Israel peace treaty.

In this book Carter argues that Israel's continued control and construction of settlements have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the Middle East. That perspective, coupled with the use of the word Apartheid in the titular phrase Peace Not Apartheid, and what critics said were errors and misstatements in the book, sparked controversy. Carter has defended his book and countered that response to it "in the real world…has been overwhelmingly positive."

The documentary Man from Plains (2007) depicts the book tour Carter undertook to promote his book.

Purpose, main argument, and major points

"The ultimate purpose"

The ultimate purpose of my book is to present facts about the Middle East that are largely unknown in America, to precipitate discussion and to help restart peace talks (now absent for six years) that can lead to permanent peace for Israel and its neighbors. Another hope is that Jews and other Americans who share this same goal might be motivated to express their views, even publicly, and perhaps in concert. I would be glad to help with that effort.

Thesis: How to achieve "permanent peace in the Middle East"

Carter identifies "two interrelated obstacles to permanent peace in the Middle East":

Some Israelis believe they have the right to confiscate and colonize Palestinian land and try to justify the sustained subjugation and persecution of increasingly hopeless and aggravated Palestinians; and

Some Palestinians react by honoring suicide bombers as martyrs to be rewarded in heaven and consider the killing of Israelis as victories.

To bring an end to what he calls "this continuing tragedy", in Chapter 17 ("Summary"), Carter calls for a revitalization of the peace process based on the following three "key requirements":

a. The security of Israel must be guaranteed ...

b. The internal debate within Israel must be resolved in order to define Israel's permanent legal boundary ...

c. The sovereignty of all Middle East nations and sanctity of international borders must be honored ...

The Apartheid analogy

Regarding the use of the word "Apartheid" in the title of his book, Carter has said:

It's not Israel. The book has nothing to do with what's going on inside Israel which is a wonderful democracy, you know, where everyone has guaranteed equal rights and where, under the law, Arabs and Jews who are Israelis have the same privileges about Israel. That's been most of the controversy because people assume it's about Israel. It's not.

I've never alleged that the framework of apartheid existed within Israel at all, and that what does exist in the West Bank is based on trying to take Palestinian land and not on racism. So it was a very clear distinction.

In remarks broadcast over radio, Carter claimed that Israel's policies amounted to an apartheid worse than South Africa's:

When Israel does occupy this territory deep within the West Bank, and connects the 200-or-so settlements with each other, with a road, and then prohibits the Palestinians from using that road, or in many cases even crossing the road, this perpetrates even worse instances of apartness, or apartheid, than we witnessed even in South Africa.

"Some major points"

In his op-ed "Reiterating the Keys to Peace", published in The Boston Globe on 20 December 2006, Carter summarizes "ome major points in the book":

  • Multiple deaths of innocent civilians have occurred on both sides, and this violence and all terrorism must cease
  • For 39 years, Israel has occupied Palestinian land, and has confiscated and colonized hundreds of choice sites
  • Often excluded from their former homes, land, and places of worship, protesting Palestinians have been severely dominated and oppressed. There is forced segregation between Israeli settlers and Palestine's citizens, with a complex pass system required for Arabs to traverse Israel's multiple checkpoints
  • An enormous wall snakes through populated areas of what is left of the West Bank, constructed on wide swaths of bulldozed trees and property of Arab families, obviously designed to acquire more territory and to protect the Israeli colonies already built. (Hamas declared a unilateral cease-fire in August 2004 as its candidates sought local and then national offices, which they claim is the reason for reductions in casualties to Israeli citizens.)
  • Combined with this wall, Israeli control of the Jordan River Valley will completely enclose Palestinians in their shrunken and divided territory. Gaza is surrounded by a similar barrier with only two openings, still controlled by Israel. The crowded citizens have no free access to the outside world by air, sea, or land
  • The Palestinian people are now being deprived of the necessities of life by economic restrictions imposed on them by Israel and the United States because 42 percent voted for Hamas candidates in this year's election. Teachers, nurses, policemen, firemen and other employees cannot be paid, and the UN has reported food supplies in Gaza equivalent to those among the poorest families in sub-Sahara Africa, with half the families surviving on one meal a day
  • Mahmoud Abbas, first as prime minister and now as president of the Palestinian National Authority and leader of the PLO, has sought to negotiate with Israel for almost six years, without success. Hamas leaders support such negotiations, promising to accept the results if approved by a Palestinian referendum
  • UN Resolutions, the Camp David Accords of 1978, the Oslo Agreement of 1993, official US Policy, and the International Roadmap for Peace are all based on the premise that Israel withdraw from occupied territories. Also, Palestinians must accept the same commitment made by the 23 Arab nations in 2002: to recognize Israel's right to live in peace within its legal borders. These are the two keys to peace

Critical reaction and commentary

Main article: Commentary on Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid

Critical response to Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid at the time of release was mixed. According to Julie Bosman, criticism of the book "has escalated to a full-scale furor," much of which has focused on Carter's use of the word "apartheid" in the subtitle. Some critics, including several leaders of the Democratic Party and of American Jewish organizations, have interpreted the subtitle as an allegation of Israeli apartheid, which they believe to be inflammatory and unsubstantiated. Tony Karon, Senior Editor at TIME.com and a former anti-Apartheid activist for the ANC, said: "Jimmy Carter had to write this book precisely because Palestinian life and history is not accorded equal value in American discourse, far from it. And his use of the word apartheid is not only morally valid; it is essential, because it shakes the moral stupor that allows many liberals to rationalize away the daily, grinding horror being inflicted on Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza". Former President Bill Clinton wrote a brief letter to the chairman of the American Jewish Committee, thanking him for articles criticizing the book and citing his agreement with Dennis Ross's attempts to "straighten ... out" Carter's claims and conclusions about Clinton's own summer 2000 Camp David peace proposal.

Critics claim that Carter crossed the line into anti-Semitism. Abraham Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, initially accused Carter of "engaging in anti-Semitism" in the book; Foxman told James Traub later that he would not call the former president himself an "anti-Semite" or a "bigot". Ethan Bronner also asserted that Carter's "overstatement" in the book "hardly adds up to anti-Semitism."

Some journalists and academics have praised Carter for what they believe to be speaking honestly about the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in a media environment described as hostile to opponents of Israel's policies. Some left-leaning Israeli politicians such as Yossi Beilin and Shulamit Aloni argued that Carter's critique of Israeli policy in the Palestinian territories reflects that of many Israelis themselves.

Carter's response to criticism of the book

Further information: Commentary on Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid § Carter's response to criticism of the book

Carter has responded to negative reviews in the mainstream news media in an op-ed published in the Los Angeles Times (which was excerpted in The Guardian and elsewhere):

Book reviews in the mainstream media have been written mostly by representatives of Jewish organizations who would be unlikely to visit the occupied territories, and their primary criticism is that the book is anti-Israel. Two members of Congress have been publicly critical. Incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi for instance, issued a statement (before the book was published) saying that "he does not speak for the Democratic Party on Israel." Some reviews posted on Amazon.com call me "anti-Semitic", and others accuse the book of "lies" and "distortions". A former Carter Center fellow has taken issue with it, and Alan Dershowitz called the book's title "indecent."

Out in the real world, however, the response has been overwhelmingly positive. I've signed books in five stores, with more than 1,000 buyers at each site. I've had one negative remark—that I should be tried for treason—and one caller on C-SPAN said that I was an anti-Semite. My most troubling experience has been the rejection of my offers to speak, for free, about the book on university campuses with high Jewish enrollment and to answer questions from students and professors. I have been most encouraged by prominent Jewish citizens and members of Congress who have thanked me privately for presenting the facts and some new ideas.

He also wrote a "Letter to Jewish Citizens of America" explaining "his use of the term 'apartheid' and sympathizing with Israelis who fear terrorism."

In a report updated by the Associated Press after the publication of Carter's "Letter to Jewish Citizens of America", Greg Bluestein observes that Carter replied generally to complaints of the book's errors and inaccuracies by Dennis Ross, Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Stein, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, and others by pointing out that the Carter Center staff as well as an "unnamed 'distinguished' reporter" fact-checked it. Rachel Zelkowitz points out that, as cited in various news accounts, "Carter has consistently defended his book's accuracy against Stein and other critics"; in a prepared statement, Carter's press secretary Deanna Congileo responds "that Carter had his book reviewed for accuracy throughout the writing process" and that "s with all of President Carter's previous books, any detected errors will be corrected in later editions ..." In response to the Associated Press's request for a comment on the resignations of Stein and 14 other members of the Center's Board of Councilors, speaking on behalf of both Carter and the Carter Center, Congileo provided a statement from its executive director, John Hardman, who, according to Zelkowitz, "also fact checked Palestine, saying that the members of that board 'are not engaged in implementing the work of the Center.'"

Public and other programs pertaining to the book

Carter has said that debate on Israel-related issues is muffled in the US media by lobbying efforts of the pro-Israel lobby: "any controversial issues concerning Palestine and the path to peace for Israel are intensely debated among Israelis and throughout other nations—but not in the United States. ... This reluctance to criticize any policies of the Israeli government is because of the extraordinary lobbying efforts of the American-Israel Political Action Committee and the absence of any significant contrary voices." He has stressed that through the debate he hopes this book will stimulate and through his own related public-speaking and media appearances, he hopes to tear down the "impenetrable wall" that stops the people of the US from seeing the plight of Palestinians.

Brandeis University visit

In early December 2006 Brandeis University invited Carter to visit the university to debate his book with Alan Dershowitz. Carter declined that invitation, explaining: "I don't want to have a conversation even indirectly with Dershowitz. There is no need to for me to debate somebody who, in my opinion, knows nothing about the situation in Palestine." Carter said that the Brandeis debate request "is proof that many in the United States are unwilling to hear an alternative view on the nation's most taboo foreign policy issue, Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory," adding: "There is no debate in America about anything that would be critical of Israel."

Dershowitz criticized Carter's refusal to debate him, asserting: "Carter’s refusal to debate wouldn't be so strange if it weren't for the fact that he claims that he wrote the book precisely so as to start debate over the issue of the Israel-Palestine peace process. If that were really true, Carter would be thrilled to have the opportunity to debate." He later wrote in The Case Against Israel's Enemies that Carter's accusation of his ignorance was untrue "since we had discussed my several visits to the Palestinian Authority during our conversation only months earlier in Herzliya."

Further information: Alan Dershowitz § Jimmy Carter's book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, and Alan Dershowitz § Alan Dershowitz and Jimmy Carter

In a Boston Globe article of 22 December 2006, Patricia Johnston said she and many colleagues had offered to chip in perhaps $100 each to pay for whatever travel and security costs a Carter visit would entail. "Who is Alan Dershowitz?" Johnston said. Carter "is the former president of the United States, who has done so much to further the cause of peace in the Middle East and elsewhere. It's an insult to suggest that he should have to defend himself that way." She said she envisioned Carter giving a traditional speech and taking audience questions.

On 26 December 2006, WCVB-TV (an ABC-TV affiliate), reported that "bout 100 students, faculty and alumni of Brandeis University have signed an online petition to push the administration to bring former President Carter to campus to discuss his new book on Palestine, without being required to debate it."

The Boston Globe reported that since it initially revealed "that Carter felt unwelcome on the Waltham campus, people have argued over whether he is unwilling to answer for his views, or whether Brandeis, which was founded by the American Jewish community, can't tolerate criticism of Israel. The latter is a view that some professors hope they can dispel by reviving the Carter visit."

On 10 January 2007, it was reported that Carter would discuss Palestine Peace Not Apartheid at Brandeis University but that he would "not, however, debate the book with" Dershowitz. Brandeis officials reported that Carter would "be the first former president to visit Brandeis since Harry Truman delivered the commencement address in 1957.... It will be Carter's first visit to a university to discuss the book, Congileo said", confirming also "the president has set no conditions and would answer as many questions as possible"; Carter plans to "speak for about 15 minutes and then answer questions for 45 minutes during the visit."

The speech, which occurred on 23 January 2007, was "closed to the public and limited to 'members of the university community only'"; nevertheless, Dershowitz said that he still planned to "attend and question Carter": "'I will be the first person to have my hand up to ask him a question,' he said. 'I guarantee that they won't stop me from attending.'"

On 18 January 2007 news outlets reported Brandeis's announcement that while Dershowitz could not attend Carter's speech, after it ended he would have the stage for a "rebuttal."

Further information: Alan Dershowitz § Jimmy Carter's book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid

The day after the speech (24 January 2007), The New York Times reported on the program: "Questions were preselected by the committee that invited Mr. Carter, and the questioners included an Israeli student and a Palestinian student. After Mr. Carter left, Mr. Dershowitz spoke in the same gymnasium, saying that the former president oversimplified the situation and that his conciliatory and sensible-sounding speech at Brandeis belied his words in some other interviews." According to David Weber of ABC News, Carter said "that he stood by the book and its title, that he apologized for what he called an 'improper and stupid' sentence in the book and that he had been disturbed by accusations that he was anti-Semitic.... ...acknowledged...that 'Palestine Peace Not Apartheid' has 'caused great concern in the Jewish community,' but noted that it has nonetheless prompted discussion." An editorial published in the Waltham, Massachusetts newspaper, the Daily News Tribune, concludes: "Carter succeeded in bringing to Brandeis a productive, civil debate." Videotaped excerpts from Carter's visit to Brandeis were featured on several national news programs in the United States, such as NBC's morning program Today, along with follow-up interviews with Carter.

As a result of the visit, major donors told Brandeis University that they would no longer give it money in "retaliation", according to Stuart Eizenstat, chief domestic policy adviser and executive director of the White House Domestic Policy Staff during Carter's presidency and a current trustee of Brandeis, as quoted in The Jewish Week in mid-February 2007.

Man from Plains: Documentary feature film by Jonathan Demme

In 2007 Jonathan Demme made the film Man from Plains, which "follows the former President as he takes part in a book tour across America to publicise his new tome, Palestine Peace Not Apartheid." According to the Boston Globe Demme filmed Carter for three months "to compile footage for a documentary about the former president's book and Carter's efforts to increase debate on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict." While it granted camera access to members of the news media for their broadcasts, Brandeis University refused Demme's request to film Carter's January 2007 speech for the end of the film, citing logistical and legal considerations. The film debuted at the Toronto International Film Festival on 10 September 2007.

Carter Center conversation

On 22 February 2007 Carter participated in a "conversation" about Palestine Peace Not Apartheid with former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright at the Carter Center, moderated by Conflict Resolution Program Director Matthew Hodes. The event sold out in early January 2007. It was simultaneously webcast in the Carter Center's online "multi-media" section, and the Center's website now includes a direct link to the "archived webcast."

George Washington University visit

This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help improve it by rewriting it in a balanced fashion that contextualizes different points of view. (March 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

On 8 March 2007 George Washington University hosted a visit by Carter during which he discussed his book. According to reporter Beth Schwartzapfel in The Forward, a group of Jewish students led by Robert Fishman, executive director of the campus Hillel, dominated the microphones, preventing other students from asking questions, while asking questions critical of Carter prepared, forwarded, and distributed to them in advance by faculty and students at Emory University as if they were their own questions:

The sheet distributed to students listed five questions. Among the issues raised were Carter's refusal to debate Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz and former U.S. Middle East negotiator Dennis Ross; continuing Palestinian violence in Gaza; Carter's assertion that Israel did not accept Clinton's peace proposal; whether donations from the Saudi royal family explains [sic] the failure of the Carter Center to criticize human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia, and Carter's decision to use the word "apartheid" in his book's title. One of the students involved in distributing the handout, Aviva Berman, said that four of the five questions came directly from a list prepared by Deborah Lipstadt and other professors at Emory University, prior to Carter's appearance at the school's Atlanta campus. "When Carter came to speak at Emory, they had those questions made up, so they just forwarded them to me", she said.

Schwartzapfel also cites " video of the event, posted to the G.W. Web site, shows that Carter received several standing ovations and long stretches of applause." "But", Schwartzapfel continues, "an Associated Press story that ran immediately after the event characterized the audience as 'polite but mostly critical,'" adding: "Jack Stokes, an A.P. spokesman, told the Forward that the article's description of the audience 'was based on reporter Barry Schweid's observation of the speech, as well as the subsequent Q&A Carter engaged in with the students. The A.P. story stands as written.'"

Schweid observes:

Despite the storm it ignited, former President Carter held fast on Thursday to his accusation that Israel oppresses the Palestinians on the West Bank and Gaza and seeks to colonize the land. Speaking at The George Washington University to a polite but mostly critical student audience, Carter offered no second thoughts on his book "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid". ... He said he was not accusing Israel of racism nor referring to its treatment of Arabs within the country. "I defined apartheid very carefully" as "the forced segregation by one people of another" on their own land, he said.

Schwartzapfel reports, however:

Brian Hennessey, vice president of the Vineeta Foundation, which is making a documentary on Carter, alleged to the Forward that he witnessed G.W. Hillel director Robert Fishman and several Jewish students conspiring to control the Q&A session. According to Hennessey, a handout was distributed with negative questions and then the students strategically grabbed the seats closest to the microphones. Hennessey said that he overheard people in the group saying that the point of their strategy was to make sure that Carter, whose book, Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, faced only tough questions. In the end, most of the eight questions fielded by Carter at the March 8 event took a pro-Israel tack in challenging the former president. Four of the students read their questions off of the sheet distributed beforehand.

Fishman told the Forward, Schwartzapfel reports further: "'You know how we did it, honestly? ... We said, "Let's sit near the microphones." They each had a copy of the questions, and then they stood on line.'" Yet, she adds: "Hennessey asserted that the maneuver ended up influencing media coverage of the event. 'This small group successfully outgunned the microphones and managed to give some journalists this totally erroneous impression that that was how the student body felt about Carter,' he said." Whereas "Hennessey, who described Carter's book as 'very courageous,' contended that the G.W. students 'very successfully stood up and blocked anyone else from asking a question,'" Schwartzapfel continues:

Berman insisted that she and her fellow pro-Israel students did nothing wrong. It wasn’t his group's responsibility "to let other people ask questions", he said. "If they wanted to get to the microphone quicker, they could have."

Fishman also rejected the assertion that the students' tactics were improper.
"There was nothing done in there to stop anyone from asking questions", Fishman said. "It's important that, when you have that many people in the room who may not be familiar with the Israeli–Palestinian situation, those people have the opportunity also to hear those areas that are questionable in the book."

In that sense, Fishman said, his group's approach "is what dialogue is about."

University of Iowa visit

Pointing out that "The former president rarely speaks about his book at universities. He says he’s been invited to more than 100 campuses, but he's only visited five," Claire Keller reported that, during his public appearance at the University of Iowa, in Iowa City, on 18 April 2007, Carter said, "I wrote this book to describe the plight of the Palestinians and because I'm convinced we desperately need debate about where we are and where we ought to be going, and how to rejuvenate the non-existent peace process in the Middle East" ... Carter says the book's objective is permanent peace for Israel and its neighbors; it’s something the former president says he’s dedicated his entire adult life to.

Keller wrote that "Many in attendance applaud his efforts" but that "others criticize the author, claiming his book contains factual errors and misstatements. Members of the local Jewish community say it's simply one-sided." She quotes Tali Ariav of the Hillel Jewish Student Center on the Iowa campus, who said, "'I am an Israeli so of course I served in the military, so I feel emotionally involved, but I feel every person, every American, every thinker needs to think twice about Carter's opinion, because it's not right' ..." Nevertheless, Keller added, "Carter adamantly defends the accuracy of his book, saying he wrote every word himself."

University of California, Irvine visit

On 3 May 2007, Carter presented a lecture and participated in a discussion relating to the book in conjunction with the Center for the Study of Democracy and Model United Nations, in association with the Center for Citizen Peacebuilding, Department of Political Science, at the University of California, Irvine. According to Carter's lecture transcript, in answering a question on whether conflict between pro- and anti-Israel student groups obstructs chances of peace, he said, "I think an altercation or debate or sometimes even an uncomfortable confrontation on a college campus in America is a good move in the right direction. But I would like to see the leaders of those two groups form a combined group that would take advantage of my invitation to go to Palestine and see what’s going on."

See also

Notes

  1. "Annotated Bibliography of books by Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter". www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov. Archived from the original on 1 June 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
  2. According to https://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/index.html "Best Sellers: Hardcover Nonfiction", New York Times, accessed 27 January 2007: Palestine Peace Not Apartheid was number 6 on the list as of date accessed. It was listed as number 11 in "New York Times Best Sellers: Hardcover Nonfiction" on 18 March 2007, on the list for 15 weeks for the week ending 3 March 2007. As of 6 May 2007 it no longer appears on the expanded list featured at that site
  3. ^ "SimonSays's On Demand Pages on Vimeo". vimeo.com. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  4. ^ Carter, Jimmy (8 December 2006). "Speaking frankly about Israel and Palestine". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
  5. Life & Times – Transcript – 12/14/06
  6. "CNN.com". CNN. Retrieved 2010-05-05.
  7. ^ "Jimmy Carter: Israel's 'Apartheid' Policies Worse Than South Africa's". Haaretz. 12 November 2006. Retrieved 19 February 2023.
  8. Jimmy Carter, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/12/20/reiterating_the_keys_to_peace/ "Reiterating the Keys to Peace," Boston Globe 20 December 2006, accessed 3 January 2007. (Bullets added)
  9. Bosman, Julie (2006-12-14). "Carter Book Stirs Furor With Its View of Israelis' 'Apartheid'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  10. http://my.brandeis.edu/news/item?news_item_id=7816 "Brandeis News: Full coverage of the Historic Jan. 23rd Visit by Former President Jimmy Carter," Brandeis University, 24 January 2007, accessed 27 January 2007
  11. Tom Zeller, Jr., http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/01/12/carter-and-his-critics-the-skirmishes-continue/ "Carter and His Critics: The Skirmishes Continue," New York Times, The Lede (blog), 12 January 2007, assessed 12 January 2007; includes "Letter of resignation dated 11 January 2007" (PDF). (79.4 KiB)
  12. ^ Eric Pfeiffer, http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070125-112710-7481r.htm "Carter Apologizes for 'stupid' Book Passage,"] Washington Times 26 January 2007, accessed 26 January 2007
  13. "Israel and Apartheid: In Defense of Jimmy Carter | Rootless Cosmopolitan – By Tony Karon". Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  14. "President Clinton Thanks AJC on Carter Book" Archived 2007-08-08 at the Wayback Machine, press release, American Jewish Committee, n.d., accessed 3 May 2007
  15. Cf. Jennifer Siegel, "Apartheid Book Exposes Carter-Clinton Rift: Clinton: 'I Don’t Know Where His Information Came From'", The Jewish Daily Forward, 30 March 2007, accessed 3 May 2007
  16. James D. Besser, "Jewish and Israel News from New York - the Jewish Week". Archived from the original on 2007-06-13. Retrieved 2006-12-25. "Jewish Criticism of Carter Intensifies: Charge of Anti-Semitism from One Leader as Ex-president Deepens His Critique of Israeli Policy in West Bank", The Jewish Week, 15 December 2005, accessed 8 January 2007
  17. Traub, James (2007-01-14). "Does Abe Foxman Have an Anti-Anti-Semite Problem?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  18. Bronner, Ethan (2007-01-07). "Jews, Arabs and Jimmy Carter". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  19. George Bisharat, Truth At Last, While Breaking a U.S. Taboo of Criticizing Israel, Philadelphia Inquirer, January 2, 2007, editorial, accessed January 11, 2007.
  20. Robert Fisk, "Banality and Bare Faced Lies," Archived 2007-01-15 at the Wayback Machine The Independent December 23, 2006, accessed January 3, 2007.
  21. "Carter Is No More Critical of Israel Than Israelis Themselves". The Forward. 2007-01-20. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  22. ^ Jimmy Carter, "Israel, Palestine, Peace and Apartheid", The Guardian (London), 12 December 2006
  23. "Carter explains his book's 'apartheid' reference". NBC News. 2006-12-16. Retrieved 2024-12-24.
  24. "Jimmy Carter Issues Letter to Jewish Community on Palestine Peace Not Apartheid". The Carter Center. Retrieved 2024-12-24.
  25. Associated Press, "Carter Explains Apartheid Reference in Letter to US Jews", International Herald Tribune, 15 December 2006, accessed 12 March 2007
  26. "Carter defends his book's criticism of Israeli policy". The Florida Times-Union. 8 December 2006. Retrieved 15 February 2014.
  27. Rachel Zelkowitz, http://www.emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=16915 Archived 2008-06-11 at the Wayback Machine "Professor Describes Carter 'Inaccuracies'", The Emory Wheel, 12 December 2006, accessed 12 January 2007. Carter reiterated a desire to correct any such errors in his subsequent speaking engagement at Brandeis University and elsewhere (see section below).
  28. ^ Associated Press, "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-01-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) "Atlanta: 14 Carter Center Advisers Resign in Protest Over Book", AccessNorthGA.com, 11 January 2007, accessed 11 January 2007
  29. Stockman, Farah; Bombardieri, Marcella (2006-12-15). "Carter book won't stir Brandeis debate". Boston.com. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  30. Dershowitz, Alan. "Why won't Carter debate his book?". Boston.com. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  31. The Case Against Israel's Enemies, 20
  32. ^ Bombardieri, Marcella (2006-12-22). "Brandeis group pursues Carter visit". Boston.com. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  33. http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/10609718/detail.html Archived 2007-09-30 at the Wayback Machine "Brandeis Students Support Carter Visit: Students, Faculty Sign Online Petition", (updated) online posting, TheBostonChannel.com, WCVB-TV, Channel 5, Boston, 26 December 2006, accessed 26 December 2006
  34. ^ "USA TODAY: Latest World and US News - USATODAY.com". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  35. "Israel". Fox News. 2022-07-21. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  36. Belluck, Pam (2007-01-24). "At Brandeis, Carter Responds to Critics". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  37. David Weber, Carter: Book Has Prompted Discussion," ABC News 23 January 2007, accessed 24 January 2007.
  38. Abel, David; Vaznis, James (2007-01-24). "Carter wins applause at Brandeis". Boston.com. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  39. "Sharks spotted at New York City and Long Island beaches". MSN. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  40. Larry Cohler-Esses, "Brandeis Donors Exact Revenge For Carter Visit: Archived 2007-02-18 at the Wayback Machine Major Givers Reportedly Withholding Funds from School, Sparking Fierce Free-Speech Debate on Massachusetts Campus", The Jewish Week, 16 February 2006, accessed 23 March 2007
  41. Chris Tilly, "Demme 'Comes in Peace' - the TOMB movie news - Time Out Film". Archived from the original on 2007-05-26. Retrieved 2007-01-24. "Demme 'Comes in Peace'," The Time Out Movie Blog: This Week's Top Stories from the Movie World (TOMB), Time Out London, 5 December 2006, accessed 23 January 2007
  42. Borys Kitt and Nicole Sperling, http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i01ddb1dac0f7f4bd485b9e1f3984dd7a "Demme Helms Docu on Carter for Participant", The Hollywood Reporter, 6 December 2006, accessed 3 May 2007. Cf. Nick Paumgarten, http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/12/11/061211ta_talk_paumgarten "Jimmy Carter Aloft", The New Yorker, 11 December 2006, accessed 3 May 2007
  43. ^ Stockman, Farah (2007-01-20). "Carter film maker faults Brandeis". Boston.com. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  44. "TIFF '07 - Films & Schedules Man from Plains". Archived from the original on 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2007-09-10. "Man from Plains Jonathan Demme", Toronto International Film Festival official website "film schedules", accessed 10 September 2007.
  45. http://www.cartercenter.org/involved/conversations/index.html Archived 2006-12-22 at the Wayback Machine Conversations at the Carter Center 2006–2007, accessed 24 December 2006
  46. http://www.cartercenter.org/multimedia/conversations2.07.ram Archived 2007-07-15 at the Wayback Machine Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, Carter Center, RealPlayer media file (Updated), accessed 25 February 2007
  47. ^ Beth Schwartzapfel, http://www.forward.com/articles/hillel-director-students-defend-tactics-at-carter/ "Hillel Director, Students Defend Tactics at Carter Speech", The Jewish Daily Forward, 22 March 2007, accessed 22 March 2007
  48. For the video of the event posted on server of George Washington University, see http://www.gwu.edu/%7Enewsctr/audiovideo/JimmyCarter.ram Jimmy Carter speech and Q&A, RealPlayer video clip, 8 March 2007, accessed 22 March 2007
  49. SCHWEID, BARRY (2007-03-08). "Carter Defends Gaza Theory at GWU Speech". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2022-07-21.
  50. http://news-releases.uiowa.edu/2007/april/041107carter-tickets.html Archived 2008-01-27 at the Wayback Machine "University of Iowa News Release", press release, University of Iowa, 11 April 2007, accessed 12 June 2007 (provides related links)
  51. ^ Claire Kellett, "Jimmy Carter Visits Iowa City" Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine, KCRG, 18 April 2007, updated 19 April 2007, accessed 11 June 2007
  52. "Jimmy Carter Lecture - Submit a Question". www.socsci.uci.edu. Retrieved 2022-07-21.

Further reading

External links

Jimmy Carter
Presidency
(timeline)


Speeches
Elections
Post-presidency
Books
Awards
and honors
Legacy
Related
Family
Categories: