| Revision as of 10:43, 27 September 2007 view sourceJoaquín Martínez (talk | contribs)43 edits Undid revision 160666400 by 193.201.47.11 (talk) - rv liberal deceit← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:48, 27 September 2007 view source McGeddon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers121,439 edits reverting for contextNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| | author = Various | | author = Various | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| '''Conservapedia''' is a ] based ] ] project with the stated purpose of creating an encyclopedia written from a ] and ] viewpoint supportive of ] and ].<ref name="Guardian">{{cite news | last = Johnson | first = Bobbie | date = 2007 | url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2024434,00.html | title = Conservapedia — the US religious right's answer to Misplaced Pages | work = The Guardian | date = ] }}</ref><ref name="heise"/><ref name="NPR_conservapedia">{{Cite web|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8286084|title=Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather?|accessdate=2007-03-15}}</ref> |
'''Conservapedia''' is a ] based ] ] project with the stated purpose of creating an encyclopedia written from a ] and ] viewpoint supportive of ] and ].<ref name="Guardian">{{cite news | last = Johnson | first = Bobbie | date = 2007 | url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2024434,00.html | title = Conservapedia — the US religious right's answer to Misplaced Pages | work = The Guardian | date = ] }}</ref><ref name="heise"/><ref name="NPR_conservapedia">{{Cite web|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8286084|title=Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather?|accessdate=2007-03-15}}</ref> Andrew Schlafly, the site's creator and son of noted conservative ], stated he founded the project because he felt ] had a ], ], and ] bias.<ref name = AS>{{cite web | url = http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8286084 NPR | title = Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather? | accessdate = 2007-07-26 | last = Siegel | first = Robert | date = 2007-03-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&oldid=189554| title=Examples of Bias in Misplaced Pages| publisher=Conservapedia| date=5 June 2007}}</ref> | ||
| According to the site's FAQ, Conservapedia originated as a project for ] children, who wrote most of the initial entries.<ref name="The Star">{{cite news | last = Chung | first = Andrew | date = 2007 | url = http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/190501 | title = A U.S. conservative wants to set Misplaced Pages right | work = The Star.com | date = ] }}</ref> Schlafly has said that he hopes the site becomes a general resource for United States teachers and works as a general counterpoint to the liberal bias he perceives in Misplaced Pages.<ref name="Guardian"/><ref name="The Star" /> Conservapedia is not affiliated with Misplaced Pages or Misplaced Pages's umbrella organization, the ], although both sites use the ] ] software. In addition to its role as a Christian-Conservative encyclopedia, Conservapedia is also used by Schlafly's "]" program. Material for various online courses (e.g., ]) is stored on the site.<ref name="heise">{{de icon}} {{Cite news | date = ] | url = http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/86145 | title = Conservapedia: christlich-konservative Alternative zu Misplaced Pages | work = Heise Online }}</ref><ref name="Lectures">{{cite encyclopedia | encyclopedia = Conservapedia | date = 2007 | url = http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Lecture_One&oldid=136744 | title = American History Lecture One | accessdate = 2007-03-05 }}</ref><ref name="EagleU">{{cite web | publisher = Eagle Forum University | date = 30 April 2007 | url = http://www.eagleforumu.org/eagleforumu/ | title = Eagle Forum University | accessdate = 2007-03-05 }}</ref> Eagle Forum University is associated with ]'s ].<ref name="heise"/> | According to the site's FAQ, Conservapedia originated as a project for ] children, who wrote most of the initial entries.<ref name="The Star">{{cite news | last = Chung | first = Andrew | date = 2007 | url = http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/190501 | title = A U.S. conservative wants to set Misplaced Pages right | work = The Star.com | date = ] }}</ref> Schlafly has said that he hopes the site becomes a general resource for United States teachers and works as a general counterpoint to the liberal bias he perceives in Misplaced Pages.<ref name="Guardian"/><ref name="The Star" /> Conservapedia is not affiliated with Misplaced Pages or Misplaced Pages's umbrella organization, the ], although both sites use the ] ] software. In addition to its role as a Christian-Conservative encyclopedia, Conservapedia is also used by Schlafly's "]" program. Material for various online courses (e.g., ]) is stored on the site.<ref name="heise">{{de icon}} {{Cite news | date = ] | url = http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/86145 | title = Conservapedia: christlich-konservative Alternative zu Misplaced Pages | work = Heise Online }}</ref><ref name="Lectures">{{cite encyclopedia | encyclopedia = Conservapedia | date = 2007 | url = http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Lecture_One&oldid=136744 | title = American History Lecture One | accessdate = 2007-03-05 }}</ref><ref name="EagleU">{{cite web | publisher = Eagle Forum University | date = 30 April 2007 | url = http://www.eagleforumu.org/eagleforumu/ | title = Eagle Forum University | accessdate = 2007-03-05 }}</ref> Eagle Forum University is associated with ]'s ].<ref name="heise"/> | ||
| Users cannot edit Conservapedia from an anonymous ], requiring participants to register a user name |
Users cannot edit Conservapedia from an anonymous ], requiring participants to register a user name. The site had 13,000 registered usernames of which about 7,000 were permanently blocked (about 54%).<ref name="block_list">. As of early September 2007, the site estimated that it contained about 16,300 articles. | ||
| {{cite web | {{cite web | ||
| |title=List of blocked IP addresses and usernames | |title=List of blocked IP addresses and usernames | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| |accessdate=2007-09-03}}</ref> | |accessdate=2007-09-03}}</ref> | ||
| As of |
As of early September 2007, the site estimated that it contained about 16,300 articles. Conservapedia's earliest articles date from ], ]. | ||
| ==Conservapedia and Misplaced Pages== | ==Conservapedia and Misplaced Pages== | ||
| ⚫ | Conservapedia stated a need for an alternative to Misplaced Pages when it launched its online encyclopedia project due to editorial philosophy conflicts. Conservapedia's editorial policies are guided by ''Conservapedia Commandments'', while Misplaced Pages's editorial policies are guided by a range of policies including ], ], ] and ].<ref name="Conservapedia Commandments">", Conservapedia (21 March 2007)</ref><ref name="NPOV">", Misplaced Pages (21 January 2007)</ref><ref name="Misplaced Pages:Attribution">"], Misplaced Pages (21 March 2007)</ref><ref name="Wiki on Conserva">" Conservapedia:Attribution], Misplaced Pages on Conservapedia</ref> In contrast to Misplaced Pages's core policy of neutrality, Schlafly has stated that "It's impossible for an encyclopedia to be neutral. I mean let's take a point of view, let's disclose that point of view to the reader."<ref name="NPR_conservapedia" /> | ||
| ⚫ | One example of article content differences stemming from editorial philosophy conflicts is ]. Conservapedia presents the theory of evolution as lacking support and states that ], ] and some secular science journals state that it is contra-evidence<ref name="Conservapedia: Evolution">Conservapedia. (2007).. Retrieved March 9.</ref> whereas Misplaced Pages presents evolution as a biological process defined by ], ], and ] evidence, subject to specific ].<ref> | ||
| ⚫ | Conservapedia stated a need for an alternative to Misplaced Pages when it launched its online encyclopedia project due to |
||
| ⚫ | One example of article content differences stemming from editorial philosophy conflicts is ]. Conservapedia |
||
| ] (1687, 1713, 1726). " Rules for the study of ]", '']'', Third edition. The General Scholium containing the 4 rules follows Book '''3''', ''The System of the World''. Reprinted on pages 794-796 of ] and Anne Whitman's 1999 translation, ] ISBN 0-520-08817-4, 974 pages. | ] (1687, 1713, 1726). " Rules for the study of ]", '']'', Third edition. The General Scholium containing the 4 rules follows Book '''3''', ''The System of the World''. Reprinted on pages 794-796 of ] and Anne Whitman's 1999 translation, ] ISBN 0-520-08817-4, 974 pages. | ||
| </ref><ref name="Introduction to evolution">"], Misplaced Pages (17 March 2007)</ref><ref name="Evolution">"], Misplaced Pages (19 March 2007)</ref> <!-- This critique is outdated. CP's Theory of Evolution article is indeed anti-atheism and evolution, but is not completely pro-YEC. I'm a sysop there (since mid-March '07) and have been tweaking that article. --Ed Poor --> | </ref><ref name="Introduction to evolution">"], Misplaced Pages (17 March 2007)</ref><ref name="Evolution">"], Misplaced Pages (19 March 2007)</ref> <!-- This critique is outdated. CP's Theory of Evolution article is indeed anti-atheism and evolution, but is not completely pro-YEC. I'm a sysop there (since mid-March '07) and have been tweaking that article. --Ed Poor --> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
| Another example is Misplaced Pages's article on the ], which refers to the party's historical origins. Schlafly has claimed this is an "attempt to legitimize the modern democratic party by going back to Thomas Jefferson" and that it is "specious and worth criticizing."<ref name="NPR_conservapedia" /> | Another example is Misplaced Pages's article on the ], which refers to the party's historical origins. Schlafly has claimed this is an "attempt to legitimize the modern democratic party by going back to Thomas Jefferson" and that it is "specious and worth criticizing."<ref name="NPR_conservapedia" /> | ||
| ]'s policy |
]'s policy allowing both ] and ] notation<ref>, Misplaced Pages (9 March 2007)</ref> has been interpreted as anti-Christian bias.<ref name="IWR">Thomson, Iain. (2007). . ''Information World Review'', February 28.</ref><ref name="Huffington">Lewis, Shelley. (2007). . ''Huffington Post'', February 23.</ref> Conservapedia also interpreted the policy allowing both ] and <!--Please note that American English is accepted terminology please do not change--> ] spellings,<ref> Misplaced Pages (9 March 2007)</ref> as anti-American bias and had a policy that only allowed for American spelling on the site. However, their policy against allowing British spellings was later revised.{{Fact|date=August 2007}} | ||
| In a March 2007 interview with '']'' newspaper, Schlafly stated, "I've tried editing Misplaced Pages, and found it and the biased editors who dominate it censor or change facts to suit their views. In one case my factual edits were removed within 60 seconds — so editing Misplaced Pages is no longer a viable approach."<ref name="Guardian"/> On ], ] Schlafly was interviewed on ]'s flagship morning show, '']'', opposite Misplaced Pages administrator Jim Redmond. Schlafly raised several concerns: that the article on the ] does not give any credit to Christianity, that many Misplaced Pages articles use non-American spellings even though most users are American, that the article on ] has a distinctly anti-American bias, and that attempts to include pro-Christian or pro-American views are removed very quickly.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/zwednesday_20070307.shtml|date=] ] 8:16am|accessdate=2007-04-09|title=Today programme|publisher=BBC radio}}</ref> Conservapedia has |
In a March 2007 interview with '']'' newspaper, Schlafly stated, "I've tried editing Misplaced Pages, and found it and the biased editors who dominate it censor or change facts to suit their views. In one case my factual edits were removed within 60 seconds — so editing Misplaced Pages is no longer a viable approach."<ref name="Guardian"/> On ], ] Schlafly was interviewed on ]'s flagship morning show, '']'', opposite Misplaced Pages administrator Jim Redmond. Schlafly raised several concerns: that the article on the ] does not give any credit to Christianity, that many Misplaced Pages articles use non-American spellings even though most users are American, that the article on ] has a distinctly anti-American bias, and that attempts to include pro-Christian or pro-American views are removed very quickly.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/zwednesday_20070307.shtml|date=] ] 8:16am|accessdate=2007-04-09|title=Today programme|publisher=BBC radio}}</ref> Conservapedia has asserted that, "Misplaced Pages is six times more liberal than the American public," a statistic which has been criticized for its poor extrapolation and lack of credibility .<ref>{{cite news|last=Mackey|first=Rob|title=Conservapedia: The Word Says It All|publisher=]|date=]|accessdate=2007-03-09|url=http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/conservapedia-the-word-says-it-all/}}</ref> | ||
| Schlafly has indicated that Conservapedia has not |
<ref name="The Star">{{cite news | last = Chung | first = Andrew | date = 2007 | url = http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/190501 | title = A U.S. conservative wants to set Misplaced Pages right | work = The Star.com | date = ] }}</ref> | ||
| Schlafly has indicated that Conservapedia has not adopted what he considers "Misplaced Pages's complex copyright ]," adding that Conservapedia "reserves the right to object to copying of its materials."<ref name=Aschlafly>Conservapedia. (2007). , February 4 version.</ref> | |||
| Misplaced Pages's co-creator ] has stated that he has no objections to the project and that "free culture knows no bounds"<ref name="Biever">{{cite web | last = Biever | first = Celeste | year = 2007 | url = http://www.newscientist.com/blog/technology/2007/02/conservative-rival-for-wikipedia.html | title = A conservative rival for Misplaced Pages? | publisher = New Scientist | date = 2007-02-26}}</ref> though he has denied Schlafly's claims of bias on Misplaced Pages.<ref name="The Star"/> | Misplaced Pages's co-creator ] has stated that he has no objections to the project and that "free culture knows no bounds"<ref name="Biever">{{cite web | last = Biever | first = Celeste | year = 2007 | url = http://www.newscientist.com/blog/technology/2007/02/conservative-rival-for-wikipedia.html | title = A conservative rival for Misplaced Pages? | publisher = New Scientist | date = 2007-02-26}}</ref> though he has denied Schlafly's claims of bias on Misplaced Pages.<ref name="The Star"/> | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| ==Reactions and criticisms== | ==Reactions and criticisms== | ||
| <!-- Creationwiki not notable under previous afds --> | <!-- Creationwiki not notable under previous afds --> | ||
| The Conservapedia project has come under significant criticism by the |
The Conservapedia project has come under significant criticism by the general public for factual inaccuracies<ref name="CHE3">Read, Brock. (2007). ''Chronicle of Higher Education'', March 2.</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Mackey|first=Rob|title=Conservapedia: The Word Says It All|publisher=]|date=]|accessdate=2007-03-09|url=http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/conservapedia-the-word-says-it-all/}}</ref> <ref name="Clarke">the notion "that there's always a second, equally valid interpretation of the facts." Clarke, Conor. (2007). .''The Guardian'', March 1.</ref> and ].<ref name="Clarke">the notion "that there's always a second, equally valid interpretation of the facts." Clarke, Conor. (2007). .''The Guardian'', March 1.</ref> | ||
| Conservapedia has also been compared to , a wiki written from the perspective of ].<ref name="wired"> Calore, Michael. (2007). . ''Wired Magazine'', February 28. </ref> | Conservapedia has also been compared to , a wiki written from the perspective of ].<ref name="wired"> Calore, Michael. (2007). . ''Wired Magazine'', February 28. </ref> | ||
| Widely disseminated examples of Conservapedia articles that contradict the scientific consensus include the claims that all ] descend from a single pair that were taken aboard ]. Schlafly defended the article as presenting a valid alternative to evolution.<ref>{{citenews|title=Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather? |author=Robert Siegel|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8286084|work= ]|date= March 13, 2007}}</ref> Another claim is that "]'s work had nothing to do with the development of the ]."<ref name="Guardian"/><ref name="IWR"/><ref name="wired"/><ref name="Clarke"/><ref name="Conservapedia: Kangaroo">Conservapedia. (2007). . February 23 version.</ref><ref name="Conservapedia: Relativity">Conservapedia. (2007). | Widely disseminated examples of Conservapedia articles that contradict the scientific consensus include the claims that all ] descend from a single pair that were taken aboard ]. Schlafly defended the article as presenting a valid alternative to evolution.<ref>{{citenews|title=Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather? |author=Robert Siegel|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8286084|work= ]|date= March 13, 2007}}</ref> Another claim is that "]'s work had nothing to do with the development of the ]."<ref name="Guardian"/><ref name="IWR"/><ref name="wired"/><ref name="Clarke"/><ref name="Conservapedia: Kangaroo">Conservapedia. (2007). . February 23 version.</ref><ref name="Conservapedia: Relativity">Conservapedia. (2007). | ||
| . February 22 version.</ref> An entry on the "Pacific Northwest Arboreal Octopus" has received particular attention, a page |
. February 22 version.</ref> An entry on the "Pacific Northwest Arboreal Octopus" has received particular attention, a page which Schlafly has asserted was intended as a parody of environmentalism.<ref name="wired"/> As of ] ], the entry has been deleted.<ref name="Conservapedia: Octopus">Conservapedia. (2007). . Retrieved ], ].</ref> Science writer ] points out that much of what appears to be inaccurate or inadequate information about science and scientific theory can be traced back to an over-reliance on citations from the works of home-schooling textbook author Dr. Jay L. Wile.<ref>Zimmer, Carl. http://scienceblogs.com/loom/2007/02/21/sources_sources.php</ref> | ||
| ], |
], a conservative professor of political science at the ], has argued that Conservapedia is more about religion than conservatism and that it "is far more guilty of the crime they're attributing to Misplaced Pages "<ref name="The Star"/> Its scope as an ] is limited: According to the founders, it "offers a historical record from a Christian and conservative perspective."<ref> Retrieved on 2007-8-20</ref>This is seen by many as a clear admission of ]. | ||
| The project has also been criticized for promoting a ] between conservatism and liberalism and for promoting the notion that there "often are two equally valid interpretations of the facts."<ref name="Clarke">Clarke, Conor. (2007). .'']'', (March 1, 2007).</ref> (See also ] fallacy) | The project has also been criticized for promoting a ] between conservatism and liberalism and for promoting the notion that there "often are two equally valid interpretations of the facts."<ref name="Clarke">Clarke, Conor. (2007). .'']'', (March 1, 2007).</ref> (See also ] fallacy) | ||
| On ], ], the British urban free newspaper, '']'', ran the article ''Weird, wild wiki on which anything goes''. The article ridicules Conservapedia for providing only one side of controversial content |
On ], ], the British urban free newspaper, '']'', ran the article ''Weird, wild wiki on which anything goes''. The article ridicules Conservapedia for providing only one side of controversial content.<ref name="Metro">{{cite web|url=http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/article.html?in_article_id=41802&in_page_id=2|title=Weird, wild wiki on which anything goes|accessdate=2007-03-25|date=2007-13-19|work=]|publisher=]}}</ref> | ||
| Conservapedia, and more specifically its article on homosexuality,<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality | title = Conservapedia page on homosexulality}}</ref> was discussed and lampooned by ] ] on '']'' with ] on ], ], being compared to the Misplaced Pages article of the same name ending with Black stating "On Conservapedia, Gay sounds much more interesting."<!--please do not add "citation needed" to this paragraph. The citation is in the text of the paragraph --> | Conservapedia, and more specifically its article on homosexuality,<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality | title = Conservapedia page on homosexulality}}</ref> was discussed and lampooned by ] ] on '']'' with ] on ], ], being compared to the Misplaced Pages article of the same name ending with Black stating "On Conservapedia, Gay sounds much more interesting."<!--please do not add "citation needed" to this paragraph. The citation is in the text of the paragraph --> | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| ==Licensing of content== | ==Licensing of content== | ||
| The project is not licensed under the ] (GFDL) or a similar ] license. Jimmy Wales has raised concerns about this, stating that "People who contribute are giving them full control of the content, which may lead to unpleasant results".<ref name="The Star"/> Instead, Conservapedia allows users to "use any of the content on this site with or without attribution." However, the copyright policy also states "This license is revocable only in very rare instances of self-defense, such as protecting continued use by Conservapedia editors or other licensees."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Copyright&oldid=90435|title=Conservapedia Copyright|date=]|publisher=Conservapedia}}</ref> |
The project is not licensed under the ] (GFDL) or a similar ] license. Jimmy Wales has raised concerns about this, stating that "People who contribute are giving them full control of the content, which may lead to unpleasant results".<ref name="The Star"/> Instead, Conservapedia allows users to "use any of the content on this site with or without attribution." However, the copyright policy also states "This license is revocable only in very rare instances of self-defense, such as protecting continued use by Conservapedia editors or other licensees."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Copyright&oldid=90435|title=Conservapedia Copyright|date=]|publisher=Conservapedia}}</ref> | ||
| Conservapedia does not allow users to use Misplaced Pages content or mirrors as a reference,<ref></ref> specifically listing the practice as a violation of its first commandment.<ref name="Conservapedia Commandments"/> | Conservapedia does not allow users to use Misplaced Pages content or mirrors as a reference,<ref></ref> specifically listing the practice as a violation of its first commandment.<ref name="Conservapedia Commandments"/> | ||
Revision as of 10:48, 27 September 2007
 | |
| Type of site | Internet encyclopedia project |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| Owner | Andrew Schlafly |
| Created by | Various |
| URL | http://www.conservapedia.com/ |
| Commercial | No |
Conservapedia is a wiki based web encyclopedia project with the stated purpose of creating an encyclopedia written from a socially and economically conservative viewpoint supportive of Conservative Christianity and Young Earth creationism. Andrew Schlafly, the site's creator and son of noted conservative Phyllis Schlafly, stated he founded the project because he felt Misplaced Pages had a liberal, anti-Christian, and anti-American bias.
According to the site's FAQ, Conservapedia originated as a project for homeschooled children, who wrote most of the initial entries. Schlafly has said that he hopes the site becomes a general resource for United States teachers and works as a general counterpoint to the liberal bias he perceives in Misplaced Pages. Conservapedia is not affiliated with Misplaced Pages or Misplaced Pages's umbrella organization, the Wikimedia Foundation, although both sites use the free MediaWiki software. In addition to its role as a Christian-Conservative encyclopedia, Conservapedia is also used by Schlafly's "Eagle Forum University" program. Material for various online courses (e.g., American history) is stored on the site. Eagle Forum University is associated with Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum.
Users cannot edit Conservapedia from an anonymous IP address, requiring participants to register a user name. The site had 13,000 registered usernames of which about 7,000 were permanently blocked (about 54%).
As of early September 2007, the site estimated that it contained about 16,300 articles. Conservapedia's earliest articles date from November 22, 2006.
Conservapedia and Misplaced Pages
Conservapedia stated a need for an alternative to Misplaced Pages when it launched its online encyclopedia project due to editorial philosophy conflicts. Conservapedia's editorial policies are guided by Conservapedia Commandments, while Misplaced Pages's editorial policies are guided by a range of policies including neutral point of view (NPOV), Verifiability, No Original Research and attribution. In contrast to Misplaced Pages's core policy of neutrality, Schlafly has stated that "It's impossible for an encyclopedia to be neutral. I mean let's take a point of view, let's disclose that point of view to the reader."
One example of article content differences stemming from editorial philosophy conflicts is evolution. Conservapedia presents the theory of evolution as lacking support and states that creationists, creation scientists and some secular science journals state that it is contra-evidence whereas Misplaced Pages presents evolution as a biological process defined by observable, empirical, and measurable evidence, subject to specific principles of reasoning.
Conservapedia's criticisms of science are not limited to the topic of biological evolution. The site criticizes the theory of relativity, suggesting that academicians who question the theory suffer for their beliefs. These conclusions have been heavily criticized, and are not found in Misplaced Pages's article.
Another example is Misplaced Pages's article on the Democratic Party, which refers to the party's historical origins. Schlafly has claimed this is an "attempt to legitimize the modern democratic party by going back to Thomas Jefferson" and that it is "specious and worth criticizing."
English Misplaced Pages's policy allowing both CE/BCE and AD/BC notation has been interpreted as anti-Christian bias. Conservapedia also interpreted the policy allowing both British English and American English spellings, as anti-American bias and had a policy that only allowed for American spelling on the site. However, their policy against allowing British spellings was later revised.
In a March 2007 interview with The Guardian newspaper, Schlafly stated, "I've tried editing Misplaced Pages, and found it and the biased editors who dominate it censor or change facts to suit their views. In one case my factual edits were removed within 60 seconds — so editing Misplaced Pages is no longer a viable approach." On March 7, 2007 Schlafly was interviewed on BBC Radio 4's flagship morning show, Today, opposite Misplaced Pages administrator Jim Redmond. Schlafly raised several concerns: that the article on the Renaissance does not give any credit to Christianity, that many Misplaced Pages articles use non-American spellings even though most users are American, that the article on American activities in the Philippines has a distinctly anti-American bias, and that attempts to include pro-Christian or pro-American views are removed very quickly. Conservapedia has asserted that, "Misplaced Pages is six times more liberal than the American public," a statistic which has been criticized for its poor extrapolation and lack of credibility . Schlafly has indicated that Conservapedia has not adopted what he considers "Misplaced Pages's complex copyright rules," adding that Conservapedia "reserves the right to object to copying of its materials."
Misplaced Pages's co-creator Jimmy Wales has stated that he has no objections to the project and that "free culture knows no bounds" though he has denied Schlafly's claims of bias on Misplaced Pages.
Reactions and criticisms
The Conservapedia project has come under significant criticism by the general public for factual inaccuracies and factual relativism. Conservapedia has also been compared to CreationWiki, a wiki written from the perspective of creationism.
Widely disseminated examples of Conservapedia articles that contradict the scientific consensus include the claims that all kangaroos descend from a single pair that were taken aboard Noah's Ark. Schlafly defended the article as presenting a valid alternative to evolution. Another claim is that "Einstein's work had nothing to do with the development of the atomic bomb." An entry on the "Pacific Northwest Arboreal Octopus" has received particular attention, a page which Schlafly has asserted was intended as a parody of environmentalism. As of March 4 2007, the entry has been deleted. Science writer Carl Zimmer points out that much of what appears to be inaccurate or inadequate information about science and scientific theory can be traced back to an over-reliance on citations from the works of home-schooling textbook author Dr. Jay L. Wile.
Tom Flanagan, a conservative professor of political science at the University of Calgary, has argued that Conservapedia is more about religion than conservatism and that it "is far more guilty of the crime they're attributing to Misplaced Pages " Its scope as an encyclopedia is limited: According to the founders, it "offers a historical record from a Christian and conservative perspective."This is seen by many as a clear admission of bias.
The project has also been criticized for promoting a dichotomy between conservatism and liberalism and for promoting the notion that there "often are two equally valid interpretations of the facts." (See also false dilemma fallacy)
On March 19, 2007, the British urban free newspaper, Metro, ran the article Weird, wild wiki on which anything goes. The article ridicules Conservapedia for providing only one side of controversial content.
Conservapedia, and more specifically its article on homosexuality, was discussed and lampooned by comedian Lewis Black on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart on June 27, 2007, being compared to the Misplaced Pages article of the same name ending with Black stating "On Conservapedia, Gay sounds much more interesting."
Iain Thomson, writing in Information World Review, has written that "leftist subversives" may have been creating deliberate parody entries. Stephanie Simon, writing in the Los Angeles Times, reported that:
After administrators blocked their accounts, Lipson and several other editors quit trying to moderate the articles and instead started their own website, RationalWiki.com. From there, they monitor Conservapedia. And — by their own admission — engage in acts of cyber-vandalism. Conservapedia's articles have been hit frequently by interlopers from RationalWiki and elsewhere.
Licensing of content
The project is not licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) or a similar copyleft license. Jimmy Wales has raised concerns about this, stating that "People who contribute are giving them full control of the content, which may lead to unpleasant results". Instead, Conservapedia allows users to "use any of the content on this site with or without attribution." However, the copyright policy also states "This license is revocable only in very rare instances of self-defense, such as protecting continued use by Conservapedia editors or other licensees."
Conservapedia does not allow users to use Misplaced Pages content or mirrors as a reference, specifically listing the practice as a violation of its first commandment.
References
- ^ Johnson, Bobbie (2007-03-01). "Conservapedia — the US religious right's answer to Misplaced Pages". The Guardian.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Template:De icon "Conservapedia: christlich-konservative Alternative zu Misplaced Pages". Heise Online. 2007-03-02.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ "Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather?". Retrieved 2007-03-15.
- Siegel, Robert (2007-03-13). NPR "Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather?". Retrieved 2007-07-26.
{{cite web}}: Check|url=value (help) - "Examples of Bias in Misplaced Pages". Conservapedia. 5 June 2007.
- ^ Chung, Andrew (2007-03-11). "A U.S. conservative wants to set Misplaced Pages right". The Star.com.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - "American History Lecture One". Conservapedia. 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-05.
- "Eagle Forum University". Eagle Forum University. 30 April 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-05.
- . As of early September 2007, the site estimated that it contained about 16,300 articles. "List of blocked IP addresses and usernames". Conservapedia. Retrieved 2007-09-03.
- "Conservapedia Statistics". Conservapedia. Retrieved 2007-09-03.
- ^ "Conservapedia Commandments, Conservapedia (21 March 2007)
- "Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view, Misplaced Pages (21 January 2007)
- "Misplaced Pages:Attribution, Misplaced Pages (21 March 2007)
- ":Attribution Conservapedia:Attribution], Misplaced Pages on Conservapedia
- Conservapedia. (2007).Theory of Evolution. Retrieved March 9.
- Isaac Newton (1687, 1713, 1726). " Rules for the study of natural philosophy", Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Third edition. The General Scholium containing the 4 rules follows Book 3, The System of the World. Reprinted on pages 794-796 of I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman's 1999 translation, University of California Press ISBN 0-520-08817-4, 974 pages.
- "Introduction to evolution, Misplaced Pages (17 March 2007)
- "Evolution, Misplaced Pages (19 March 2007)
- See Conservapedia's article.
- See one such criticism here.
- Compare with Misplaced Pages's article.
- Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (dates and numbers), Misplaced Pages (9 March 2007)
- ^ Thomson, Iain. (2007). "Conservapedia takes on Misplaced Pages 'bias'". Information World Review, February 28.
- Lewis, Shelley. (2007). "Introducing "Conservapedia" — Battling Misplaced Pages's War on Christians, Patriots". Huffington Post, February 23.
- Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (spelling) Misplaced Pages (9 March 2007)
- "Today programme". BBC radio. 7 March 2007 8:16am. Retrieved 2007-04-09.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Mackey, Rob (2007-03-08). "Conservapedia: The Word Says It All". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-03-09.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Conservapedia. (2007). User talk:Aschlafly, February 4 version.
- Biever, Celeste (2007-02-26). "A conservative rival for Misplaced Pages?". New Scientist.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - Read, Brock. (2007). "A Misplaced Pages for the Right Wing" Chronicle of Higher Education, March 2.
- Mackey, Rob (2007-03-08). "Conservapedia: The Word Says It All". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-03-09.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ the notion "that there's always a second, equally valid interpretation of the facts." Clarke, Conor. (2007). "A fact of one's own".The Guardian, March 1. Cite error: The named reference "Clarke" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Calore, Michael. (2007). What Would Jesus Wiki?. Wired Magazine, February 28.
- Robert Siegel (March 13, 2007). "Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather?". NPR.
- Conservapedia. (2007). "Kangaroo". February 23 version.
- Conservapedia. (2007). "Theory of Relativity". February 22 version.
- Conservapedia. (2007). "Pacific Northwest Arboreal Octopus". Retrieved March 4, 2007.
- Zimmer, Carl. http://scienceblogs.com/loom/2007/02/21/sources_sources.php
- Retrieved on 2007-8-20
- "Weird, wild wiki on which anything goes". Metro. Associated Newspapers. 2007-13-19. Retrieved 2007-03-25.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - "Conservapedia page on homosexulality".
- Stephanie Simon (2007-06-19). "A conservative's answer to Misplaced Pages". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2007-06-19.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - "Conservapedia Copyright". Conservapedia. 2007-04-06.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - conservapedia.com
