Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:08, 30 June 2024

The two-state solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict proposes to resolve the conflict by establishing two nation states in former Mandatory Palestine. The implementation of a two-state solution would involve the establishment of an independent State of Palestine alongside the State of Israel.

The first proposal for a separate Jewish and Arab states in the territory was made by the British Peel Commission report in 1937. In 1947, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a partition plan for Palestine, leading to the 1948 Palestine war. As a result, Israel was established on the area the UN had proposed for the Jewish state, as well as almost 60% of the area proposed for the Arab state. Israel took control of West Jerusalem, which was meant to be part of an international zone. Transjordan took control of East Jerusalem and what became known as the West Bank, annexing it the following year. The territory which became the Gaza Strip was occupied by Egypt but never annexed. In the aftermath of the 1967 Six-Day War, both the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and Gaza Strip were militarily occupied by Israel, becoming known as the Palestinian territories.

The leadership of the Palestine Liberation Organization has accepted in principle the concept of a two-state solution since the 1982 Arab Summit in Fez, having previously turned down such proposals since 1937. In 2017, Hamas announced their revised charter, which claims to accept the idea of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, but without recognising the statehood of Israel, referring to it as "the Zionist entity". Diplomatic efforts have centred around realizing a two-state solution, starting from the failed 2000 Camp David Summit and the Clinton Parameters, followed by the Taba Summit in 2001. The failure of the Camp David summit to reach an agreed two-state solution formed the backdrop to the commencement of the Second Intifada, the violent consequences of which led to a hardening of attitudes among the Israeli public towards a Palestinian state and marked a turning point among both peoples’ attitudes. A two-state solution also formed the basis of the Arab Peace Initiative, the 2006–2008 peace offer, and the 2013–14 peace talks. Despite the failure of these, international consensus has for decades supported a two-state solution to the conflict.

The major points of contention include the specific boundaries of the two states (though most proposals are based on the 1967 lines), the status of Jerusalem, the Israeli settlements and the right of return of Palestinian refugees. Observers have described the current situation in the whole territory, with the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and blockade of the Gaza Strip, as one of de facto Israeli sovereignty. The two-state solution is an alternative to the one-state solution and what observers consider a de facto one-state reality.

History

In the wake of Jewish migration from Europe in the context of Zionism and intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine, the first proposal for the creation of Jewish and Arab states in the British Mandate of Palestine was made by the British Peel Commission report of 1937 led by William Peel, 1st Earl Peel. The plan maintained a mandate covering a small area containing Jerusalem and allotted the poorest lands of Palestine, including the Negev Desert, and areas that are known today as the West Bank and the Gaza Strip to the Arabs; while most of the coastline and some of Palestine's most fertile agricultural land in the Galilee were allotted to the Jews. Consequently, the recommended partition proposal was rejected by the Arab community of Palestine, and was accepted by most of the Jewish leadership.

Partition was again proposed by the 1947 UN Partition Plan for the division of Palestine. It proposed a three-way division, again with Jerusalem held separately, under international control. The partition plan was accepted by Jewish Agency for Palestine and most Zionist factions who viewed it as a stepping stone to territorial expansion at an opportune time. The Arab Higher Committee, the Arab League and other Arab leaders and governments rejected it on the basis that Arabs formed a two-thirds majority and owned a majority of the lands. They also indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division, arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter. They announced their intention to take all necessary measures to prevent the implementation of the resolution. Subsequently, the Intercommunal conflict in Palestine gave way to civil war and the plan was not implemented.

At the end of the British Mandate, with the establishment of the State of Israel and entry of Arab regular armies into what had been Mandatory Palestine, the 1948 war became an international conflict. At the end of the war, the Green Line established by the 1949 Armistice Agreements became the de facto borders of the State of Israel. The war resulted in the fleeing or expulsion of 711,000 Palestinians, which the Palestinians call Nakba, from the territories which became the state of Israel. Rather than establishing a Palestinian state on land that Israel did not control, the Arab nations chose instead to support the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and the Palestinian refugees remained stateless.

UN resolution 242 and the recognition of Palestinian rights

After the 1967 Arab–Israeli war, the United Nations Security Council unanimously passed resolution 242 calling for Israeli withdrawal from the territories occupied during the war, in exchange for "termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and "acknowledgement of sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the area". The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which had been formed in 1964, strongly criticized the resolution, saying that it reduced the question of Palestine to a refugee problem.

In September 1974, 56 member states proposed that "the question of Palestine" be included as an item in the General Assembly's agenda. In a resolution adopted on 22 November 1974, the General Assembly affirmed Palestinian rights, which included the "right to self-determination without external interference", "the right to national independence and sovereignty", and the "right to return to their homes and property". These rights have been affirmed every year since.

PLO acceptance of a two-state solution

The first indication that the PLO would be willing to accept a two-state solution, on at least an interim basis, was articulated by Said Hammami in the mid-1970s.

Security Council resolutions dating back to June 1976 supporting the two-state solution based on the pre-1967 lines were vetoed by the United States, which supports a two-state solution but argued that the borders must be negotiated directly by the parties.

Likud party's insistence on only Israeli sovereignty

The Israeli Likud party, in its manifesto for the 1977 elections which it won in a landslide, declared: "Between the sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty." Similar statements have been made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as late as 18 January 2024.

Palestinian Declaration of Independence

The Palestinian Declaration of Independence of 15 November 1988, which referenced the UN Partition Plan of 1947 and "UN resolutions since 1947" in general, was interpreted as an indirect recognition of the State of Israel, and support for a two-state solution. The Partition Plan was invoked to provide legitimacy to Palestinian statehood. Subsequent clarifications were taken to amount to the first explicit Palestinian recognition of Israel.

The 2017 Hamas charter presented the Palestinian state being based on the 1967 borders. The text says "Hamas considers the establishment of a Palestinian state, sovereign and complete, on the basis of the June 4, 1967, with Jerusalem as its capital and the provision for all the refugees to return to their homeland." This is in contrast to Hamas' 1988 charter, which previously called for a Palestinian state on all of Mandatory Palestine. Nevertheless, even in the 2017 charter, Hamas did not recognize Israel.

Diplomatic efforts

This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (January 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In 1975, the General Assembly established the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People. In 1976, the Committee presented two sets of recommendations, one concerned with the Palestinians' right of return to their homes and property, and the other with their rights to self-determination, national independence and sovereignty. The Security Council discussed the recommendations but failed to reach a decision due to the negative vote of the United States.

After the First Intifada began in 1987, considerable diplomatic work went into negotiations between the parties, beginning with the Madrid Conference in 1991. The most significant of these negotiations was the Oslo Accords, which officially divided Palestinian land into three administrative divisions and created the framework for how much of Israel's political borders with the Palestinian territories function today. The Accords culminated in the Camp David 2000 Summit, and follow-up negotiations at Taba in January 2001, which built explicitly on a two-state framework, but no final agreement was ever reached. The violent outbreak of the Second Intifada in 2000 had demonstrated the Palestinian public's disillusionment with the Oslo Accords and convinced many Israelis that the negotiations were in vain.

In 2002, Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (who would go on to be King from 2005 to 2015) proposed the Arab Peace Initiative, which garnered the unanimous support of the Arab League while Israeli leaders continually refuse to discuss the initiative. President Bush announced his support for a Palestinian state, opening the way for United Nations Security Council Resolution 1397, supporting a two-state solution.

At the Annapolis Conference in November 2007, three major parties—The PLO, Israel, and the US—agreed on a two-state solution as the outline for negotiations. However, the summit failed to achieve an agreement.

Following the conflict that erupted between the two main Palestinian parties, Fatah and Hamas, Hamas took control of the Gaza Strip, splintering the Palestinian Authority into two polities, each claiming to be the true representatives of the Palestinian people. Fatah controlled the Palestinian National Authority in the West Bank and Hamas Governed in Gaza.

The latest initiatives were the 2013–14 Israeli–Palestinian peace talks under the guidance of John Kerry, the United States Secretary of State. These talks also failed to reach an agreement.

Viability

By 2010, when direct talks were scheduled to be restarted, continued growth of settlements on the West Bank and continued strong support of settlements by the Israeli government had greatly reduced the land and resources that would be available to a Palestinian state creating doubt among Palestinians and left-wing Israelis that a two-state solution continued to be viable.

In January 2012 the European Union Heads of Mission report on East Jerusalem found that Israel's continuing settlement activities and the fragile situation of the Palestinian population in East Jerusalem, as well in area C, was making a two-state solution less likely. The Israeli Foreign Ministry rejected this EU report, claiming it was "based on a partial, biased and one sided depiction of realities on the ground." In May 2012, the EU council stressed its "deep concern about developments on the ground which threaten to make a two-state solution impossible'.

On 29 November 2012, the UN General Assembly voted by 138 to 9, with 46 abstentions to recognize Palestine as a "non-member observer state". On the following day, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu announced the building of 3,000 new homes on land to the east of East Jerusalem, in an area referred to as "E-1". The move was immediately criticized by several countries, including the United States, with Israeli ambassadors being personally called for meetings with government representatives in the United Kingdom, France and Germany, among others. Israel's decision to build the homes was described by the Obama administration as "counterproductive", while Australia said that the building plans "threaten the viability of a two-state solution". This is because they claim the proposed E-1 settlement would physically split the lands under the control of the Palestinian National Authority in two, as the extent of the PNA's authority does not extend all the way to the River Jordan and the Dead Sea. Israel's Labor party has voiced support for the two-state solution, with Isaac Herzog stating it would be "in Israel's interests".

in March 2015, Netanyahu declared that a Palestinian state would not be established during his administration, while he also stated that he disapproved the one-state solution for the ongoing conflict between two people.

After the Trump administration's controversial decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital in December 2017, Palestinian officials said the policy change "destroys the peace process" and the decision indirectly meant the United States was "abdicating its role as a peace mediator" that could no longer act as a mediator in the peace process because the United States had become a party to the dispute instead of neutral intercessor for negotiations.

A 2021 survey of experts found that 52 percent of respondents believed the two-state solution is no longer possible. If a two-state solution is not achieved, 77 percent predict "a one-state reality akin to apartheid" and 17 percent "one-state reality with increasing inequality, but not akin to apartheid"; one percent think a binational state with equal rights for all inhabitants is likely.

Settlements in the West Bank

UN resolutions affirm the illegality of settlements in West Bank, including East Jerusalem, including United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 passed in December 2016. As of November 2023, there are at least 700,000 Israeli settlers in the Occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem across 150 settlements and 128 outposts. More than three-quarters of the existing settlements have been constructed since the Oslo Accords.

The establishment and expansion of the illegal settlements in the Occupied West Bank constitute a major challenge to the possibility of a two-state solution by "violating Palestinian sovereignty, threatening civil peace and security, jeopardizing water resources, and blocking agricultural development." This has progressively reduced Area A and B of the West Bank territory to a "shrinking archipelago of enclaves".

Proposals have been offered for over 50 post-evacuation compensation of settlers for abandoned property, as occurred following Israel's withdrawal of settlements from Gaza in 2005 and from the Sinai Peninsula in 1982. Some settlers in those previous withdrawals were forcibly removed by the IDF.

Public opinion in Israel and Palestine

Many Palestinians and Israelis, as well as the Arab League, have stated that they would accept a two-state solution based on 1949 Armistice Agreements, more commonly referred to as the "1967 borders". In a 2002 poll conducted by PIPA, 72% of both Palestinians and Israelis supported at that time a peace settlement based on the 1967 borders so long as each group could be reassured that the other side would be cooperative in making the necessary concessions for such a settlement. A 2013 Gallup poll found 70% of Palestinians in the West Bank and 48% of Palestinians in Gaza Strip, together with 52% of Israelis supporting "an independent Palestinian state together with the state of Israel".

Support for a two-state solution varies according to the way the question is phrased. Some Israeli journalists suggest that the Palestinians are unprepared to accept a Jewish State on any terms. According to one poll, "fewer than 2 in 10 Arabs, both Palestinian and all others, believe in Israel's right to exist as a nation with a Jewish majority." Another poll, however, cited by the US State Department, suggests that "78 percent of Palestinians and 74 percent of Israelis believe a peace agreement that leads to both states living side by side as good neighbors" is "essential or desirable".

As of 2021, most Palestinians are against the two-state solution. In 2021, a poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research revealed that 39% of Palestinians accept a two-state solution, while 59% said they rejected it. Support is even lower among younger Palestinians; in 2008, then-U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice noted: "Increasingly, the Palestinians who talk about a two-state solution are my age." A survey taken before the outbreak of fighting in 2014 by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) found that 60 percent of Palestinians say the goal of their national movement should be "to work toward reclaiming all of historic Palestine from the river to the sea" compared to just 27 percent who endorse the idea that they should work "to end the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and achieve a two-state solution." WINEP says that "this is a new finding compared to similar (but not identical) questions asked in the past, when support for a two-state solution typically ranged between 40–55 percent". By 2020, 40% in Gaza and 26% in the West Bank believe that a negotiated two-state solution should solve the conflict. Another report, published also in 2021 by the RAND Corporation, found that also 60% of Israelis across the political spectrum were opposed to a two-state solution.

The two-state solution enjoyed majority support in Israeli polls although there has been some erosion to its prospects over time. A 2014 Haaretz poll asking "Consider that in the framework of an agreement, most settlers are annexed to Israel, Jerusalem will be divided, refugees won't return to Israel and there will be a strict security arrangement, would you support this agreement?", only 35% of Israelis said yes.

According to a 2021 PCPSR poll, support for a two-state solution among Palestinians and Israeli Jews, as of 2021, had declined to 43 percent and 42 percent, respectively. According to Middle East experts David Pollock and Catherine Cleveland, as of 2021, the majority of Palestinians said they wanted to reclaim all of historic Palestine, including pre-1967 Israel. A one-state solution with equal rights for Arabs and Jews was ranked second.

Some researchers argue that the two-state solution has already been implemented because Jordan, which makes up 78% of the former Mandatory Palestine, was originally created as a state for the Arabs.

In December 2022, support for a two-state solution was 33% among Palestinians, 34% among Israeli Jews, and 60% among Israeli Arabs. 82% of Israeli Jews and 75% of Palestinians believed that the other side would never accept the existence of their independent state.

At the end of October 2023, the two-state solution had the support of 71.9% of Israeli Arabs and 28.6% of Israeli Jews. In that same month, according to Gallup, just 24% of Palestinians supported a two-state solution, a drop from 59% in 2012.

Renewed focus on two-state solution

Following the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel and the subsequent Israel–Hamas war, multiple governments renewed the long-dormant idea of a two-state solution. This received serious pushback from Israel's government, especially from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Intergovernmental bodies supporting a two-state solution

G7

In the statement issued after their virtual meeting of 6 December 2023, the Leaders of the G7 wrote that they are "committed to a Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution that enables both Israelis and Palestinians to live in a just, lasting, and secure peace."

European Union

Josep Borrell, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, wrote on 15 November 2023: "We need to work with our regional partners towards the two-state solution it remains the only viable way to bring peace to the region."

In her address to the G20 leaders on 22 November 2023, Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, said: "We have to work for a two-state solution. This is the only way to ensure lasting peace for Israeli and Palestinian people as neighbours."

Arab League

In a statement issued following its 16 May 2024 meeting in Manama, the 22-member Arab League called for an international conference "to resolve the Palestinian issue on the basis of the two-state solution".

Governments supporting a two-state solution

Countries are ordered below by size of GDP.

United States

President Joe Biden has made numerous statements in favour of the two-state solution, as have Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.

China

China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi has stated that "China calls for the formulation of a specific timetable and road map for the implementation of the 'two-state solution'".

Germany

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has called for a two-state solution, as has Minister of Foreign Affairs Annalena Baerbock.

India

India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has stated that "the two state solution is necessary is more urgent than it was before".

United Kingdom

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Foreign Secretary David Cameron, have strongly advocated a two-state solution. David Cameron and German Minister of Foreign Affairs Annalena Baerbock published a joint statement, supporting a two-state solution. Keir Starmer, the leader of the opposition Labour Party, has stated that his party is "strongly in favour of a two-state solution".

France

President Emmanuel Macron has advocated a two-state solution.

Italy

Following a meeting with Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa, Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani reiterated Italy's support for the two-state solution.

Canada, Australia and New Zealand

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and New Zealand's Prime Minister Christopher Luxon have issued a joint statement, saying "We recommit ourselves to a just and enduring peace in the form of a two-state solution".

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal Bin Farhan has said that Saudi Arabia would be interested in a normalisation deal with Israel that is linked to a two-state solution.

Governments opposing a two-state solution

Countries are ordered below by size of GDP.

Israel

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly and emphatically rejected a two-state solution.

Iran

President Ebrahim Raisi has rejected a two-state solution, instead proposing a "single state based on ballot boxes involving Palestinians of all faiths".

Non-governmental supporters of a two-state solution

Israel

Ehud Barak, Israel's Prime Minister from 1999 to 2001 and Minister of Defense from 2007 to 2013, told TIME on 6 November 2023 that "The right way is to look to the two-state solution".

Ehud Olmert, Israel's Prime Minister from 2006 to 2009, told Politico on 16 October 2023 that the two-state solution "is the only real political solution for this lifelong conflict". On 6 November 2023, he told CBC that "a two-state solution should still be the goal of the Israeli government".

Ami Ayalon, the head of Israel's Shin Bet internal security service from 1995 to 2000, said on 14 January 2024 in an interview with The Guardian that "Israel will not have security until Palestinians have their own state".

Interviewed by Ezra Klein on 8 December 2023, Nimrod Novik, a member of the executive committee of Commanders for Israel’s Security (CIS), reiterated the CIS's view that the two-state solution is "the only solution that serves Israel’s security and well-being long-term."

North America

New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman has strongly supported President Biden's calls for a two-state solution and criticised Prime Minister Netanyahu's opposition.

Twenty-seven former Jewish leaders of organizations including AIPAC, the Jewish Agency for Israel, the Jewish Federations of North America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and the Union for Reform Judaism, wrote a letter to President Biden on 14 December 2023, calling for a "steadfast US commitment to the pursuit of two states for two peoples".

Other solutions

The main alternative is the binational solution, which could either be a twin regime federalist arrangement or a unitary state. Other alternatives are the three-state solution and the Allon Plan, also known as the "no-state solution".

Three-state solution

The three-state solution has been proposed as another alternative. The New York Times in 2009 reported that Egypt and Jordan were concerned about having to retake responsibility for Gaza and the West Bank. In effect, the result would be Gaza returning to Egyptian rule, and the West Bank to Jordan.

Dual citizenship

A number of proposals for the granting of Palestinian citizenship or residential permits to Jewish settlers in return for the removal of Israeli military installations from the West Bank have been fielded by such individuals as Arafat, Ibrahim Sarsur and Ahmed Qurei.

Israeli Minister Moshe Ya'alon said in April 2010 that "just as Arabs live in Israel, so, too, should Jews be able to live in Palestine." ... "If we are talking about coexistence and peace, why the insistence that the territory they receive be ethnically cleansed of Jews?"

The idea has been expressed by both advocates of the two-state solution and supporters of the settlers and conservative or fundamentalist currents in Israeli Judaism that, while objecting to any withdrawal, claim stronger links to the land than to the state of Israel.

New-state solution

The New-state solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict proposes to resolve the conflict by establishing a new city-state on the Sinai Peninsula along the Mediterranean Sea close to Arish. The implementation of a New-state solution would involve the establishment of a democratic independent sovereign State of Palestine away from the State of Israel in the current State of Egypt.

See also

• List of Middle East peace proposals
• One-state solution
• Palestinianism
• Greater Palestine
• State of Judea
• United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine
• Zionism

References

1. ^ Morris, Benny (2009-04-28), "The History of One-State and Two-State Solutions", One State, Two States: Resolving the Israel/Palestine Conflict, Yale University Press, pp. 28–160, ISBN 978-0-300-15604-1, retrieved 2024-06-28
2. Sabel, Robbie, ed. (2022), "The 1947 Partition Plan", International Law and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–101, doi:10.1017/9781108762670.006, ISBN 978-1-108-48684-2, retrieved 2023-10-31
3. The Question of Palestine and the UN, "The Jewish Agency accepted the resolution despite its dissatisfaction over such matters as Jewish emigration from Europe and the territorial limits set on the proposed Jewish State."
4. Tessler, Mark A. (1994). A History of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana State University. p. 718. ISBN 978-0253208736.
5. ^ "Hamas accepts Palestinian state with 1967 borders". Al Jazeera. 2 May 2017. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
6. Palti, Zohar (2023-09-08). "The Implications of the Second Intifada on Israeli Views of Oslo". The Washington Institute. Retrieved 2024-04-03.
7. "Background & Overview of 2000 Camp David Summit". Jewish Virtual Library. Retrieved 2024-04-03.
8. "Second Intifada". Makan. Retrieved 2024-04-03. The Second Intifada starkly demonstrated the failure of years of negotiations, and marked a turning point in both internal Israeli and Palestinian politics.
9. ^ Lynch, Marc; Telhami, Shibley (19 February 2021). "Biden says he will listen to experts. Here is what scholars of the Middle East think". Brookings Institution. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
10. Iraqi, Amjad (2021-01-12). "Why B'Tselem is calling Israel an apartheid regime, from the river to the sea". +972 Magazine. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
11. "B'Tselem (Document): A Regime of Jewish Supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This Is Apartheid". Institute for Palestine Studies. January 12, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
12. Iraqi, Amjad (2021-01-12). "Why B'Tselem is calling Israel an apartheid regime, from the river to the sea". +972 Magazine. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
13. "B'Tselem (Document): A Regime of Jewish Supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This Is Apartheid". Institute for Palestine Studies. January 12, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
14. Barnett, Michael; Brown, Nathan; Lynch, Marc; Telhami, Shibley (2023-04-14). "Israel's One-State Reality". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 102, no. 3. ISSN 0015-7120. Retrieved 2024-04-03.
15. Pappe, Ilan (2007), "Zionism and the two-state solution", Where now for Palestine?, Zed Books Ltd, ISBN 978-1-84277-839-5, retrieved 2024-06-28
16. Rogan, Eugene (2012). The Arabs: A History (3rd ed.). Penguin. p. 257. ISBN 9780718196837.
17. Swedenburg, Ted (1988). "The Role of the Palestinian Peasantry in the Great Revolt 1936–1939". In Burke, Edmund III; Lapidus, Ira (eds.). Islam, Politics, and Social Movements. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. pp. 189–94. ISBN 0-520-06868-8.
18. Gettleman, Marvin; Schaar, Stuart (2003). The Middle East and Islamic World Reader. New York City: Grove Press. pp. 177–81. ISBN 0-8021-3936-1.
19. Ilan, Pappé (2004). A History of Modern Palestine: One Land, Two Peoples. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 106. ISBN 0-521-55632-5.
20. Morris, Benny (2008). 1948: a history of the first Arab-Israeli war. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-300-12696-9. Retrieved 24 July 2013. The night of 29–30 November passed in the Yishuv's settlements in noisy public rejoicing. Most had sat glued to their radio sets broadcasting live from Flushing Meadow. A collective cry of joy went up when the two-thirds mark was achieved: a state had been sanctioned by the international community.
21. "The Question of Palestine and the UN" (PDF). Washington, DC: United Nations. 2008.
22. Benny Morris, 1948: A History of the First Arab-Israeli War, 2008, pp. 66, 67, 72
23. Rogan, Eugene (2012). The Arabs: A History (Third ed.). New York City: Penguin Books. p. 321. ISBN 978-0-7181-9683-7.
24. Morris, 1948: A History of the First Arab-Israeli War, p. 2008, p. 73
25. The Question of Palestine and the UN
26. Hadawi, Sami (1991). Bitter Harvest: A Modern History of Palestine. Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press. p. 76. ISBN 9780940793767.
27. Perkins, Kenneth J.; Gilbert, Martin (1999). "Israel: A History". The Journal of Military History. 63 (3): 149. doi:10.2307/120539. ISSN 0899-3718. JSTOR 120539.
28. Best, Antony (2004). International History of the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, England: Routledge. p. 531. doi:10.4324/9781315739717-1. ISBN 978-1-315-73971-7. Retrieved June 29, 2022.
29. Rothrock, James (2011). Live by the Sword: Israel's Struggle for Existence in the Holy Land. Bloomington, Indiana: WestBow Press. p. 14. ISBN 9781449725198.
30. Lenczowski, G. (1962). The Middle East in World Affairs (3rd Edition). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. p. 723
31. Article "History of Palestine", Encyclopædia Britannica (2002 edition), article section written by Walid Ahmed Khalidi and Ian J. Bickerton.
32. Galnoor, Itzhak (1994). The Partition of Palestine: Decision Crossroads in the Zionist Movement. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. p. 195. ISBN 9781438403724.
33. ^ Morris, Benny (2009). 1948: a history of the First Arab-Israeli war. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-300-15112-1.
34. United Nations General Assembly (23 August 1951). "General Progress Report and Supplementary Report of the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine". Archived from the original (OpenDocument) on 22 August 2011. Retrieved 3 May 2007.
35. Avnon, Dan (2018). "BDS and Self-Righteous Moralists". In Pessin, Andrew; Ben-Atar, Doron S. (eds.). Anti-Zionism on Campus: The University, Free Speech, and BDS. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. pp. 43–57. ISBN 9780253034083.
36. ^ "The Question of Palestine and the United Nations" (PDF). United Nations. Retrieved 2 Aug 2014.
37. "A/RES/3236 (XXIX) Question of Palestine". The United Nations – General Assembly. 22 November 1974. Archived from the original on 1 January 2010. Retrieved 30 September 2016.
38. Ayoob, Mohammed. The Middle East in world politics. 1981, p. 90
39. Āghā, Ḥusayn; Feldman, Shai; Khālidī, Aḥmad; Schiff, Zeev (2003). "Track-II diplomacy: lessons from the Middle East". Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center. p. 11.
40. Cattan, Henry. The Palestine question. 1988, p. 307
41. Laquer, Walter; Rubin, Barry (2001). The Israel-Arab Reader: a Documentary History of the Middle East Conflict. New York City: Penguin Books. pp. 206–207. ISBN 978-0143113799.
42. "Likud Party: Original Party Platform 1977". Jewish Virtual Library. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
43. Boffey, Daniel (October 31, 2023). "'From the river to the sea': where does the slogan come from and what does it mean?". The Guardian.
44. "Israel's Netanyahu reiterates rejection of Palestinian state after Gaza war". Al Jazeera.
45. Rabie, Mohamed (Summer 1992). "The U.S.-PLO Dialogue: The Swedish Connection". Journal of Palestine Studies. 21 (4): 54–66. doi:10.1525/jps.1992.21.4.00p0140g. JSTOR 2537663.
46. Quandt, William B. (1993). Peace Process: American Diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1967. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. pp. 367–75, 494. ISBN 0-520-08390-3.
47. Caplan, Neil (2011). "Camp David Revisited; Intifada Redux". The Israel–Palestine Conflict: Contested Histories (PDF). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1444357868. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
48. D. Jones, Bruce. "216". Retrieved 29 November 2016.
49. Bronner, Ethan (August 20, 2010). "In Mideast Talks, Scant Hopes From the Beginning". The New York Times. Retrieved August 21, 2010.
50. Hass, Amira (12 January 2012). "EU report: Israel policy in West Bank endangers two-state solution". Haaretz.
51. Ravid, Barak (14 May 2012). "EU: Israel's policies in the West Bank endanger two-state solution". Haaretz.
52. "Council conclusions on the Middle East Peace Process – 3166th Foreign Affairs Council meeting" (PDF). Council of the European Union. May 14, 2012. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
53. "Israel Plans To Expand Settlements In East Jerusalem, West Bank". NPR. 30 November 2012. Retrieved 5 December 2012.
54. "Israel takes a harder line". Los Angeles Times. December 4, 2012. Retrieved December 5, 2012.
55. "Australia joins countries criticizing settlements". Jerusalem Post. December 4, 2012. Retrieved December 5, 2012.
56. "Israel to advance East Jerusalem building plans". USA Today. Associated Press. December 4, 2012. Retrieved December 5, 2012.
57. "Two state policy, settlements on Benjamin Netanyahu's agenda". The Australian. February 20, 2017. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
58. Azulay, Moran (16 March 2015). "Netanyahu says no Palestinian state if he remains PM". Ynet. Whoever moves to establish a Palestinian state or intends to withdraw from territory is simply yielding territory for radical Islamic terrorist attacks against Israel
59. Salem, Harriet (19 March 2015). "Netanyahu Backtracks on Election Pledge to Refuse a Two-State Solution After Sharp Words from the US". Vice.
60. "World reacts to Trump move on Jerusalem". BBC News. December 7, 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
61. "Arab League condemns US Jerusalem move". al-Jazeera. December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 12, 2017.
62. "A/RES/68/15 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 26 November 2013 – General Assembly". The United Nations. January 30, 2014. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
63. "Who are Israeli settlers, and why do they live on Palestinian lands?". Al Jazeera. 2023-11-06. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
64. "Human Rights Council Hears that 700,000 Israeli Settlers are Living Illegally in the Occupied West Bank – Meeting Summary (Excerpts)". United Nations. 2023-03-28. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
65. ^ Graziano, Manlio (2024-02-28). "The Two-State Solution Is a Recipe for Carnage". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
66. Owda, Reham (2023-03-07). "How Israeli Settlements Impede the Two-State Solution". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
67. Meakem, Allison (2024-02-28). "The Geopolitics of Palestine, Explained". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
68. Vallance, Karla (January 8, 1982). "Israel OKs compensation for settlers leaving Sinai". Christian Science Monitor.
69. Sharon, Jeremy (2022-07-21). "Police remove all settler activists from illegal outpost, ending massive campaign". The Times of Israel.
70. "Israeli forces remove West Bank settler outpost, riling rightists in government". Reuters. 2023-01-20. Retrieved 2024-02-27.
71. "What Is the Palestine Liberation Organization?". Archived from the original on 2013-01-20. Retrieved 2009-10-05.
72. "Large Israeli and Palestinian Majorities Indicate Readiness for Two-State Solution Based on 1967 Borders". Archived from the original on 2008-04-05.
73. Saad, Lydia; Mendes, Elizabeth (March 21, 2013). "Israelis, Palestinians Pro Peace Process, but Not Hopeful". Gallup.com. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
74. Goldberg, Jeffrey (20 May 2009). "Book Review | 'One State, Two States: Resolving the Israel/Palestine Conflict,' by Benny Morris". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
75. Stephens, Bret (14 January 2009). "The No-State Solution". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 29 November 2016. The No-State Solution ; Hamas cares more about Shariah than 'Palestine'
76. Blankley, Tony (May 19, 2009). "The two-state 'solution' mirage, Time for reality-based diplomacy on Israel and Palestinians". The Washington Times.
77. Mohamed, Ahmed (July 2, 2009). "Polls Show Vast Support for Two-State Mideast Peace Solution". Archived from the original on February 8, 2010. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
78. Hoffman, Gil (July 15, 2011). "6 in 10 Palestinians reject 2-state solution, survey finds". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved April 12, 2016.
79. "Public Opinion Poll No (82)". www.pcpsr.org. Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research. December 27, 2021. Retrieved January 20, 2022.
80. Boudreaux, Richard; Khalil, Ashraf (May 14, 2008). "Can 2 foes live under 1 roof?". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved June 17, 2008.
81. ^ Yglesias, Matthew (16 July 2014). "One thing Israelis and Palestinians agree on: they don't like the two-state solution". Vox. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
82. Pollock, David (June 25, 2014). "New Palestinian Poll Shows Hardline Views, But Some Pragmatism Too". Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Retrieved November 4, 2023.
83. ^ "What Do Palestinians Want?". The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Retrieved 2022-08-01.
84. "Israelis unwilling to risk two-state solution, says new report". phys.org. February 10, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
85. Is One State Enough?, Reut Institute, 12 June 2007, archived from the original on 2014-04-18, retrieved 2008-01-01
86. azza (2020-10-26). "The Palestine/Israel Pulse, a Joint Poll Summary Report". www.pcpsr.org. Retrieved 2022-08-01.
87. Crane, Stephen (June 25, 2019). "Two-state solution, but where?". Times of Israel. Retrieved November 4, 2023.
88. Shvili, Jason (October 6, 2022). "Jordan Is the Reason There Is No Palestinian State and Minorities Are Threatened". The Algemeiner.
89. Zion, Sidney (5 October 1982). "Opinion | IS JORDAN PALESTINE? OF COURSE". The New York Times.
90. "Israeli, Palestinian support for two-state solution declines – poll". The Jerusalem Post. 29 July 2023.
91. Gordon, Anna (10 November 2023). "What Israelis Think of the War With Hamas". Time.
92. Loschky, Jay (2023-10-18). "Palestinians Lack Faith in Biden, Two-State Solution". Gallup. Retrieved 2024-02-19.
93. Leaders of the Group of Seven (2023-12-06). "G7 Leaders' Statement". The White House. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
94. Borrell, Josep (2023-11-15). "What the EU stands for on Gaza and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict". The Diplomatic Service of the European Union. Retrieved 2023-12-22.
95. von der Leyen, Ursula (2023-11-22). "Remarks by President von der Leyen at the G20 Leaders' Summit". European Commission. Retrieved 2023-12-22.
96. "Arab League calls for deployment of UN peacekeepers in Palestinian territories". France 24. 2024-05-16. Retrieved 2024-05-16.
97. ^ Wong, Edward (2023-11-15). "Biden Says a 'Real' Palestinian State Must Come After War". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
98. Magid, Jacob (2023-12-18). "US defense secretary: 'Ongoing instability and insecurity only play into Hamas's hands'". The Times of Israel. Retrieved 2023-12-22.
99. "China urges larger-scale Gaza peace conference as conflict escalates". Reuters. 2024-01-15. Retrieved 2024-01-17.
100. "Germany stands by Israel – and is seeking to bring about a de-escalation". Website of the Federal Government | Bundesregierung. 2023-11-13. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
101. Rinke, Andreas (2023-11-18). "Germany's Scholz criticises Israel's settlements in occupied West Bank". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
102. ^ Cameron, David; Baerbock, Annalena (2023-12-16). "David Cameron: Why the UK and Germany back a sustainable ceasefire". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
103. Abbas, Ajmal (2024-02-18). "Two-state solution for Palestine 'urgent': S Jaishankar calls for 'permanent fix'". India Today. Retrieved 2024-03-14.
104. Gutteridge, Nick (2023-12-15). "Rishi Sunak clashes with Israeli ambassador over two-state solution". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
105. Scott, Jennifer (2023-12-21). "Sir Keir Starmer 'strongly in favour' of two-state solution after calls for him to snub Israeli ambassador". Sky News. Retrieved 2023-12-22.
106. Rose, Michel (2023-10-23). "Macron flies to Israel to push for humanitarian truce, proposals". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
107. Mancini, Donato Paolo (2024-05-25). "Italy Resumes UNRWA Funding, Backs Arab-Led Gaza Peace Mission". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 2024-05-29.
108. "Joint Statement by the Prime Ministers of Australia, Canada and New Zealand". Prime Minister of Canada. 2023-12-12. Retrieved 2024-01-17.
109. "Saudi FM urges ceasefire, says Riyadh interested in Israel normalization". The Times of Israel. 2024-01-16. Retrieved 2024-01-17.
110. Lieber, Dov (2023-12-13). "Israel's Netanyahu Bets Political Survival on Opposing a Palestinian State". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
111. Stone, Mark (2023-12-17). "Benjamin Netanyahu is openly defying the US – and they want him gone". Sky News. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
112. "Iran opposes two-state solution for Palestine, calls for 'democratic' solution". Middle East Monitor. 2023-11-12. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
113. Cortellessa, Eric (2023-11-06). "Former Israeli Prime Minister: Israel's Endgame in Gaza Should be a Palestinian State". TIME. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
114. Dobelli, Rolf (2023-10-16). "'The Only Real Political Solution': Ehud Olmert on the 2-State Option and the War in Israel". Politico. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
115. Ramsaran, Sarah (2023-11-06). "Former Israeli and Palestinian PMs say a two-state solution is still possible". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
116. Graham-Harrison, Emma; Kierszenbaum, Quique (2024-01-14). "Ex-Shin Bet head says Israel should negotiate with jailed intifada leader". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-01-17.
117. Klein, Ezra (2023-12-08). "Opinion | A Different Path Israel Could Have Taken — and Maybe Still Can". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-12-22.
118. Friedman, Thomas L. (2023-11-14). "The Most Revealing Moment From My Trip to Israel". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
119. Caldwell, Leigh Ann; Meyer, Theodoric (2023-12-18). "Messy primaries could upend Senate races". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
120. "Dear President Biden" (PDF). The Washington Post. 2023-12-14. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
121. One State Threat, Reut Institute, 1 November 2004, archived from the original on 2017-06-30, retrieved 2008-01-01
122. Slackman, Michael (January 12, 2009). "Crisis Imperils 2-State Plan, Shifting a Balance". The New York Times. Retrieved March 28, 2010.
123. "Israel-Palestine: The return of the Jordanian option". Haaretz. 3 July 2007. Archived from the original on 18 August 2007. Retrieved 30 September 2016.
124. "Let them stay in Palestine – Haaretz – Israel News". 2010-01-17. Archived from the original on 2010-01-17. Retrieved 2017-08-23.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
125. "Arafat may allow Jewish settlers to stay in West Bank". 30 January 2001.
126. "Arab MK: I would agree to grant settlers Palestinian citizenship".
127. 'No need to remove any settlements' By Herb Keinon, Jerusalem Post, 16 April 2010
128. "Jewish-Arab conflict". Archived from the original on 6 October 1999.
129. El-Haddad, Laila (July 4, 2005). "Interview: Israeli settler Avi Farhan". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 1 November 2005. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
130. "Israeli-Palestinian conflict can end with the New State Solution". 29 May 2019.

Further reading

• Aharon Cohen, Israel and the Arab World (Funk and Wagnalls, New York, 1970).

External links

• The Future of the TwoState Solution, Giora Eiland, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, February 2009 Archived 2012-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
• Two-state solution-discredited – without workable alternative, Beate Zilversmidt, The Other Israel, May 2006 Archived 2017-07-01 at the Wayback Machine
• "Two-State Chimera, No-State Solution". Why there won't ever be two 'states'. Cameron Hunt, Counter Currents, May 2007
• "Banging Square Pegs into Round Holes," Dore Gold, ed. David Pollack, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, December 2008 Archived 2012-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
• "The Middle East conflict and the two-state solution," RearVision, ABC Radio National, September 23, 2009
• Taking the two-state solution seriously, Opinion by Alain Dieckhoff, March 2009, European Union Institute for Security Studies
• A Demilitarized Palestinian State Archived 2016-11-04 at the Wayback Machine, On the meaning of that & summary of security arrangement out of previous Israeli-Palestinian accords, Reut Institution (a Think Tank)

• Two-state solution
• 2 (number)
• Israeli–Palestinian peace process