Misplaced Pages

Koenigs function: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:33, 28 December 2011 edit94.197.223.143 (talk) Existence and uniqueness of Koenigs function: spelling← Previous edit Revision as of 22:34, 28 December 2011 edit undo94.197.223.143 (talk) Proof: punctuationNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
*''Existence''. If <math> F(z)=f(z)/\lambda z,</math> then by the ] *''Existence''. If <math> F(z)=f(z)/\lambda z,</math> then by the ]


::<math>|F(z) - 1|\le (1+|\lambda|^{-1})|z|</math> ::<math>|F(z) - 1|\le (1+|\lambda|^{-1})|z|.</math>


:On the other hand :On the other hand

Revision as of 22:34, 28 December 2011

In mathematics, the Koenigs function is a function arising in complex analysis and dynamical systems. Introduced in 1884 by the French mathematician Gabriel Koenigs, it gives a canonical representation as dilations of a univalent holomorphic mapping, or a semigroup of mappings, of the unit disk in the complex numbers into itself.

Existence and uniqueness of Koenigs function

Let D be the unit disk in the complex numbers. Let f be a holomorphic function mapping D into itself, fixing the point 0, with f not identically 0 and f not an automorphism of D, i.e. a Möbius transformation defined by a matrix in SU(1,1). By the Denjoy-Wolff theorem, f leaves invariant each disk |z| < r and the iterates of f converge uniformly on compacta to 0: if fact for 0 < r < 1,

| f ( z ) | M ( r ) | z | {\displaystyle |f(z)|\leq M(r)|z|}

for |z| ≤ r with M(r) < 1. Moreover f '(0) = λ with 0 < |λ| < 1.

Koenigs (1884) proved that there is a unique holomorphic function h defined on D, called the 'Koenigs function such that h(0) = 0, h(0) = 1 and Schroeder's equation is satisfied:

h ( f ( z ) ) = f ( 0 ) h ( z ) . {\displaystyle h(f(z))=f^{\prime }(0)h(z).}

The function h is the uniform limit on compacta of the normalized iterates g n ( z ) = λ n f n ( z ) {\displaystyle g_{n}(z)=\lambda ^{-n}f^{n}(z)} . Moreover if f is univalent so is h.

As a consequence, when f (and hence h) are univalent, D can be identified with the open domain U = h(D). Under this conformal identification, the mapping f becomes multiplication by λ, a dilation on U.

Proof

  • Uniqueness. If k is another solution then, by analyticity, it suffices to show that k = h near 0. Let H = k h 1 ( z ) {\displaystyle H=k\circ h^{-1}(z)} near 0. Thus H(0) =0, H'(0)=1 and for |z| small
λ H ( z ) = λ h ( k 1 ( z ) ) = h ( f ( k 1 ( z ) ) = h ( k 1 ( λ z ) = H ( λ z ) . {\displaystyle \lambda H(z)=\lambda h(k^{-1}(z))=h(f(k^{-1}(z))=h(k^{-1}(\lambda z)=H(\lambda z).}
Substituting into the power series for H, it follows that H(z) = z near 0. Hence h = k near 0.
  • Existence. If F ( z ) = f ( z ) / λ z , {\displaystyle F(z)=f(z)/\lambda z,} then by the Schwarz lemma
| F ( z ) 1 | ( 1 + | λ | 1 ) | z | . {\displaystyle |F(z)-1|\leq (1+|\lambda |^{-1})|z|.}
On the other hand
g n ( z ) = z j = 0 n 1 F ( f j ( z ) ) . {\displaystyle g_{n}(z)=z\prod _{j=0}^{n-1}F(f^{j}(z)).}
Hence gn converges uniformly for |z| ≤ r by the Weierstrass M-test since
sup | z | r | 1 F f j ( z ) | ( 1 + | λ | 1 ) M ( r ) j < . {\displaystyle \sum \sup _{|z|\leq r}|1-F\circ f^{j}(z)|\leq (1+|\lambda |^{-1})\sum M(r)^{j}<\infty .}
  • Univalence. By Hurwitz's theorem, since each g is univalent and normalized, i.e. fixes 0 and has derivative 1 there , their limit h is also univalent.

Koenigs function of a semigroup

Let f t ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{t}(z)} be a semigroup of holomorphic univalent mappings of D into itself fixing 0 defined for t [ 0 , ) {\displaystyle t\in [0,\infty )} such that

  • f s {\displaystyle f_{s}} is not an automorphism for s > 0
  • f s ( f t ( z ) ) = f t + s ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{s}(f_{t}(z))=f_{t+s}(z)}
  • f 0 ( z ) = z {\displaystyle f_{0}(z)=z}
  • f t ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{t}(z)} is jointly continuous in t and z

Each f s {\displaystyle f_{s}} with s > 0 has the same Koenigs function. In fact if h is the Koenigs function of f =f1 then h ( f s ( z ) ) {\displaystyle h(f_{s}(z))} satisfies Schroeder's equation and hence is proportion to h. Taking derivatives gives

h ( f s ( z ) ) = f s ( 0 ) h ( z ) . {\displaystyle h(f_{s}(z))=f_{s}^{\prime }(0)h(z).}

Hence h is the Koenigs function of fs.

Structure of univalent semigroups

On the domain U = h(D), the maps fs become multiplication by λ ( s ) = f s ( 0 ) {\displaystyle \lambda (s)=f_{s}^{\prime }(0)} , a continuous semigroup. So λ ( s ) = e μ s {\displaystyle \lambda (s)=e^{\mu s}} where μ is a uniquely determined solution of e μ = λ {\displaystyle e^{\mu }=\lambda } with Re μ < 0. It follows that the semigroup is differentiable at 0. Let

v ( z ) = t f t ( z ) | t = 0 , {\displaystyle v(z)=\partial _{t}f_{t}(z)|_{t=0},}

a holomorphic function on D with v(0) = 0 and v'(0) = μ. Then

t ( f t ( z ) ) h ( f t ( z ) ) = μ e μ t h ( z ) = μ h ( f t ( z ) ) , {\displaystyle \partial _{t}(f_{t}(z))h^{\prime }(f_{t}(z))=\mu e^{\mu t}h(z)=\mu h(f_{t}(z)),}

so that

v = v ( 0 ) h h {\displaystyle v=v^{\prime }(0){h \over h^{\prime }}}

and

t f t ( z ) = v ( f t ( z ) ) , f t ( z ) = 0 {\displaystyle \partial _{t}f_{t}(z)=v(f_{t}(z)),\,\,\,f_{t}(z)=0}

the flow equation for a vector field.

Restricting to the case with 0 < λ < 1, the h(D) must be starlike so that

z h ( z ) h ( z ) 0 {\displaystyle \Re {zh^{\prime }(z) \over h(z)}\geq 0}

Since the same result holds for the reciprocal,

v ( z ) z 0. {\displaystyle \Re {v(z) \over z}\leq 0.}

so that v(z) satisfies the conditions of Berkson & Porta (1978)

v ( z ) = z p ( z ) , p ( z ) 0 , p ( 0 ) < 0. {\displaystyle v(z)=zp(z),\,\,\,\Re p(z)\leq 0,\,\,\,p^{\prime }(0)<0.}

Conversely, reversing the above steps, any holomorphic vector field v(z) satisfying these conditions is associated to a semigroup ft, with

h ( z ) = z exp 0 z v ( 0 ) v ( w ) 1 w d w . {\displaystyle h(z)=z\exp \int _{0}^{z}{v^{\prime }(0) \over v(w)}-{1 \over w}\,dw.}

Notes

  1. Carleson & Gamelin 1993, p. 28-32
  2. Shapiro 1993, p. 90-93

References

  • Berkson, E.; Porta, H. (1978), "Semigroups of analytic functions and composition operators", Michigan Math. J., 25: 101–115
  • Carleson, L.; Gamelin, T. D. W. (1993), Complex dynamics, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-97942-5
  • Elin, M.; Shoikhet, D. (2010), Linearization Models for Complex Dynamical Systems: Topics in Univalent Functions, Functional Equations and Semigroup Theory, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 208, Springer, ISBN 303460508
  • Koenigs, G.P.X. (1884), "Recherches sur les intégrales de certaines équations fonctionnelles", Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup., 1: 2–41
  • Shapiro, J. H. (1993), Composition operators and classical function theory, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-94067-7
  • Shoikhet, D. (2001), Semigroups in geometrical function theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 0-7923-7111-9
Categories: