| Revision as of 15:32, 30 March 2014 editAhnoneemoos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,167 edits →International community← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:35, 30 March 2014 edit undoAhnoneemoos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,167 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ==Background== | ==Background== | ||
| {{in use|section|date=March 2014}} | |||
| {{further|Crimean referendum, 2014|Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation}} | {{further|Crimean referendum, 2014|Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation}} | ||
| Amidst rising tension in the region as part of the ], the ] and the city of ] hosted a referendum to find out whether its people wanted to accede to the Russian Federation. ] with 97% of voters choosing to leave Ukraine and join Russia. For this purpose, the Autonomous Republic and Sevastopol joined together as a single united nation under the name of '''Republic of Crimea'''. This nation then ] where it was converted into a federal district under the name of ]. However, the accession divided the Autonomos Republic and the city of Sevastopol once again into two separate entities: the Autonomous Republic became the ] as ] while Sevastopol became ]. Most of the confusion strives from the use of the name ''Republic of Crimea'' for two separate entities: (i) the partially recognized sovereign state that unilaterally declared independence from Russia under the name "Republic of Crimea" and (ii) the federal subject that was acceded to Russia as "Republic of Crimea" which is equivalent to the Autonomous Republic. | Amidst rising tension in the region as part of the ], the ] and the city of ] hosted a referendum to find out whether its people wanted to accede to the Russian Federation. ] with 97% of voters choosing to leave Ukraine and join Russia. For this purpose, the Autonomous Republic and Sevastopol joined together as a single united nation under the name of '''Republic of Crimea'''. This nation then ] where it was converted into a federal district under the name of ]. However, the accession divided the Autonomos Republic and the city of Sevastopol once again into two separate entities: the Autonomous Republic became the ] as ] while Sevastopol became ]. Most of the confusion strives from the use of the name ''Republic of Crimea'' for two separate entities: (i) the partially recognized sovereign state that unilaterally declared independence from Russia under the name "Republic of Crimea" and (ii) the federal subject that was acceded to Russia as "Republic of Crimea" which is equivalent to the Autonomous Republic. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
| * not recognized the accession of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation as a federal city. | * not recognized the accession of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation as a federal city. | ||
| Only Russia and five other nations have recognized all these events—namely ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>. itar-tass.com. 21 March 2014</ref><ref name=NYT>Rosenberg, Matthew (23 March 2014) . New York Times</ref><ref name=b1>. rt.com. 23 March 2014</ref><ref name=b2>. itar-tass.com. 23 March 2014</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/nicaragua-recognizes-crimea-as-part-of-russia-341102.html |title=Nicaragua recognizes Crimea as part of Russia|publisher=Kyiv Post|date = 27 March 2014}}</ref> | Only Russia and five other nations have recognized all these events—namely ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="itar-tass-724749">. itar-tass.com. 21 March 2014</ref><ref name=NYT>Rosenberg, Matthew (23 March 2014) . New York Times</ref><ref name=b1>. rt.com. 23 March 2014</ref><ref name=b2>. itar-tass.com. 23 March 2014</ref><ref name="kyiv-post-341102">{{cite web |url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/nicaragua-recognizes-crimea-as-part-of-russia-341102.html |title=Nicaragua recognizes Crimea as part of Russia|publisher=Kyiv Post|date = 27 March 2014}}</ref> | ||
| The lack of recognition from Ukraine and the international community is based primarily on the fact that the referendum included an option to join Russia while the region was ]. The European Union, United States, Canada and several other nations condemned the decision to hold a referendum. In addition, the ]—the unofficial political association of the Crimean Tatars—called for a boycott of the referendum.<ref name="ukrinform.ua">{{cite web |url=http://www.ukrinform.ua/eng/news/mejlis_to_boycott_crimean_referendum_318219 |title=Mejlis to boycott Crimean referendum& |publisher=Ukrinform.ua |date=6 March 2014 |accessdate=15 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="pretedermined">{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.de/tatar-leader-referendums-results-predetermined/a-17500078 |title=Tatar leader: referendum's results 'predetermined'|publisher=DW.DE |date=16 March 2014 |accessdate=17 March 2014}}</ref> | The lack of recognition from Ukraine and the international community is based primarily on the fact that the referendum included an option to join Russia while the region was ]. The European Union, United States, Canada and several other nations condemned the decision to hold a referendum. In addition, the ]—the unofficial political association of the Crimean Tatars—called for a boycott of the referendum.<ref name="ukrinform.ua">{{cite web |url=http://www.ukrinform.ua/eng/news/mejlis_to_boycott_crimean_referendum_318219 |title=Mejlis to boycott Crimean referendum& |publisher=Ukrinform.ua |date=6 March 2014 |accessdate=15 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="pretedermined">{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.de/tatar-leader-referendums-results-predetermined/a-17500078 |title=Tatar leader: referendum's results 'predetermined'|publisher=DW.DE |date=16 March 2014 |accessdate=17 March 2014}}</ref> | ||
| Line 45: | Line 44: | ||
| {{col-list|2| | {{col-list|2| | ||
| * ]<ref name="NYT" /> | |||
| * ]<ref name=NYT>Rosenberg, Matthew (23 March 2014) . New York Times</ref> | |||
| * ]<ref name="b1" /> | |||
| * ]<ref name=b1>. rt.com. 23 March 2014</ref><ref name=b2>. itar-tass.com. 23 March 2014</ref> | |||
| * ]<ref name="kyiv-post-341102" /> | |||
| * ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/nicaragua-recognizes-crimea-as-part-of-russia-341102.html |title=Nicaragua recognizes Crimea as part of Russia|publisher=Kyiv Post|date = 27 March 2014}}</ref> | |||
| * ]<ref |
* ]<ref name="itar-tass-724749" /> | ||
| * ]<ref name=NYT /> | * ]<ref name=NYT /> | ||
| * ]<ref name=NYT /> | * ]<ref name=NYT /> | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 30 March 2014
 | This article or section recently underwent a major revision or rewrite and may need further review. You can help Misplaced Pages by assisting in the revision. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. This article was last edited by Ahnoneemoos (talk | contribs) 10 years ago. (Update timer) |
The political status of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol is the subject of a political and territorial turmoil between Ukraine and Russia. Now on the one hand, Ukraine and the majority of the international community consider both Crimea and Sevastopol as administrative divisions of Ukraine, while Russia, on the other hand, considers both to be under a Russian federal district. The dispute came into being after the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol merged together as one so as to create the brand new as a single united nation and then unilaterally declared their independence from Ukraine during the 2014 Crimean crisis. This nation then acceded to Russia, where it became the aforementioned federal district, while the Autonomous Republic became the Republic of Crimea as a Russian federal subject and Sevastopol became a Russian federal city. However, Ukraine and the majority of the international community do not consider the merge, the independence, nor the accession as legitimate and still consider both entities as divisions of Ukraine.
Background
Further information: Crimean referendum, 2014 and Accession of Crimea to the Russian FederationAmidst rising tension in the region as part of the Crimean crisis, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol hosted a referendum to find out whether its people wanted to accede to the Russian Federation. The referendum took place on 11 March 2014 with 97% of voters choosing to leave Ukraine and join Russia. For this purpose, the Autonomous Republic and Sevastopol joined together as a single united nation under the name of Republic of Crimea. This nation then acceded to Russia where it was converted into a federal district under the name of Crimean Federal District. However, the accession divided the Autonomos Republic and the city of Sevastopol once again into two separate entities: the Autonomous Republic became the Republic of Crimea as a Russian federal subject while Sevastopol became a Russian federal city. Most of the confusion strives from the use of the name Republic of Crimea for two separate entities: (i) the partially recognized sovereign state that unilaterally declared independence from Russia under the name "Republic of Crimea" and (ii) the federal subject that was acceded to Russia as "Republic of Crimea" which is equivalent to the Autonomous Republic.
Regardless of all this, Ukraine and a vast majority of the international community has:
- not recognized the validity of the referendum,
- not recognized the sovereignty of the self-declared "Republic of Crimea" as country,
- not recognized the accession of this country into Russia as a federal district,
- not recognized the accession of the Autonomous Republic into the Russian Federation as a federal subject, and
- not recognized the accession of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation as a federal city.
Only Russia and five other nations have recognized all these events—namely Afghanistan, Belarus, Nicaragua, Syria, and Venezuela.
The lack of recognition from Ukraine and the international community is based primarily on the fact that the referendum included an option to join Russia while the region was under military occupation by Russia itself. The European Union, United States, Canada and several other nations condemned the decision to hold a referendum. In addition, the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People—the unofficial political association of the Crimean Tatars—called for a boycott of the referendum.
The UN General Assembly eventually declared the referendum invalid and reaffirmed Ukraine’s territorial integrity by a vote of 100 to 11 with 58 abstentions and 24 absent.
Stances
Ukraine
The recently installed government of Ukraine, along with most sovereign states in the world, did not recognize the Republic of Crimea's claim to sovereignty, nor the unification of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea with Sevastopol, nor the referendum that paved the way for Crimean secession.
Russia
Russia recognized the short-lived Republic of Crimea shortly before concluding the aforementioned treaty of accession, which was approved by the Constitutional Court of Russia.
Russia claims Crimea as a federal subject, the Crimean Federal District, on the grounds of historical control of the area and the local population's right to self-determination.
International community
In favor of considering the referendum illegal Against adopting the resolution Abstained Absent when the vote took place
Six members of the United Nations have recognized the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol to be part of Russia:
2Several others supported the validity of the referendum:
2The referendum was also acknowledged by the largely unrecognized states of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Nagorno-Karabakh.
The vast majority of the international community, however, does not recognize the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as part of Russia and instead consider them to be administrative divisions of Ukraine. Most nations located in North America, Europe, Oceania, and Central America, as well as some in Southeast Asia and Africa, have openly rejected the referendum and the accession. The remainder have largely remained neutral.
See also
References
- ^ Russian Federation Council ratifies treaty on Crimea’s entry to Russia. itar-tass.com. 21 March 2014
- ^ Rosenberg, Matthew (23 March 2014) Breaking With the West, Afghan Leader Supports Russia’s Annexation of Crimea. New York Times
- ^ Belarusian president: Crimea is de-facto part of Russia. rt.com. 23 March 2014
- Lukashenko: Crimea is part of Russia now. itar-tass.com. 23 March 2014
- ^ "Nicaragua recognizes Crimea as part of Russia". Kyiv Post. 27 March 2014.
- "Mejlis to boycott Crimean referendum&". Ukrinform.ua. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
- "Tatar leader: referendum's results 'predetermined'". DW.DE. 16 March 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
- United Nations News Centre - Backing Ukraine’s territorial integrity, UN Assembly declares Crimea referendum invalid. Un.org (1 March 2014). Retrieved on 28 March 2014.
- U.N. General Assembly declares Crimea secession vote invalid. Reuters. 27 March 2014.
- Juan Valdes; Rosemary Wardley (5 March 2014). "300 Years of Embattled Crimea History in 6 Maps". National Geographic. Retrieved 30 March 2014.
- Sarkisian Backs Crimean Referendum in Phone Call with Putin. asbarez.com. 19 March 2014
- ^ Afghanistan respects Crimea's right to self-determination – Karzai. rt.com. 22 March 2014
- ^ UN General Assembly approves referendum calling Russia annexation of Crimea illegal. Associated Press via Fox News. 27 March 2014
- Kazakhstan supported Russia on the ‘Crimean question’. qha.com.ua. 19 March 2014
- Kyrgyzstan Recognizes Crimea Referendum Results. ria.ru. 20 March 2014.
- Маргелов: лидеры африканских стран поддерживают позицию РФ по Крыму. ria.ru. 20 March 2014
- Африка признаёт референдум // Метро.- № 35 (47/2965). 21 March 2014. p. 4
- ^ "Sokhumi, Tskhinvali Recognize Crimea Vote". civil.ge. 17 March 2014.
- Karabakh Foreign Ministry Issues Statement on Crimea. Asbarez.com. Retrieved on 23 March 2014.
| States with limited recognition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Details concerning international recognition and foreign relations provided by the articles linked in parentheses | |||||
| UN member states |
| ||||
| UN specialized agency members or GA observer state |
| ||||
| Non-UN member states |
| ||||