Misplaced Pages

Teen dating violence

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs) at 20:36, 19 November 2015 (→National helpline and organization: Letter s on "organization."). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:36, 19 November 2015 by Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs) (→National helpline and organization: Letter s on "organization.")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Globe icon.The examples and perspective in this North America may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this North America, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new North America, as appropriate. (September 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article is about dating violence among teens. For general topic, see Dating abuse.

Relationships
(Outline)
Types
Genetic or adoptive
By marriage
Partner(s)
Intimate and sexual
Activities
Endings
Emotions and feelings
Practices
Abuse
Part of a series on
Violence against women
Murder
Sexual assault and rape
Disfigurement
Other issues
International legal framework
Related topics

Teen dating violence is the physical, sexual, or psychological / emotional abuse (or violence) within a dating relationship among adolescents. Intimate partner violence has been a well examined and documented phenomenon in adults; however, there has not been nearly as much study on violence in adolescent dating relationships, and it is therefore not as well understood. The research has mainly focused on Caucasian youth, and there are yet no studies which focus specifically on IPV in adolescent same-sex romantic relationships.

Intimate partner violence in adolescents is an important realm of study as, in addition to the usual negative effects of abuse, this violence occurs at a critical period in the social and mental development of a person. This is also an important topic from a gender studies perspective as almost 32% of male adolescents engage in some form of violence, whether sexual, physical or emotional, towards their partners while adolescent violence from females is nearly half of that rate. Also, according to the United States public health authority, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), "dolescents and adults are often unaware that teens experience dating violence."

Examples

  1. When a friend and the aggressor (the violent significant other) are together, the last one calls the victim names or puts her/him down in front of other people.
  2. The aggressor acts extremely jealous when the victim talks to other person of the aggressor's sex, even when it is completely innocent.
  3. The victim apologizes for the aggressor's behavior and makes excuses for him/her.
  4. The victim frequently cancels plans at the last minute, for reasons that sound untrue.
  5. The aggressor is always checking up on the victim, calling or paging her/him, and demanding to know where the victim has been and with whom has been.
  6. The aggressor loses his/her temper, maybe even break or hit things when mad.
  7. The victim seems worried about upsetting the aggressor or making him/her angry.
  8. The victim is giving up things that used to be important to her/him, such as spending time with friends or other activities, and is becoming more and more isolated.
  9. The victim's weight, appearance or grades have changed dramatically. These could be signs of depression, which could indicate abuse.
  10. The victim has injuries she/he cannot explain, or the explanations given do not make sense.

Gender differences

The literature on IPV among adolescents indicates that the rates are similar for the number of girls and boys in heterosexual relationships who report experiencing IPV, or that girls in heterosexual relationships are more likely than their male counterparts to report perpetrating IPV. Rapp-Paglicci et al. stated that, unlike domestic violence in general, equal rates of IPV perpetration is a unique characteristic with regard adolescent dating violence, and that this is "perhaps because the period of adolescence, a special developmental state, is accompanied by sexual characteristics that are distinctly different from the characteristics of adult." Wekerle and Wolfe theorized that "a mutually coercive and violent dynamic may form during adolescence, a time when males and females are more equal on a physical level" and that this "physical equality allows girls to assert more power through physical violence than is possible for an adult female attacked by a fully physically mature man."

Regarding studies that indicate that girls are more likely than boys to commit IPV, the authors emphasize that substantial differences exist between the genders, including that girls are significantly more likely than boys to report having experienced severe IPV, such as being threatened with a weapon, punched, strangled, beaten, burned, or raped, and are also substantially more likely than boys to need psychological help or experience physical injuries that require medical help for the abuse, and to report sexual violence as a part of dating violence. They are also more likely to take IPV more seriously. By contrast, boys are more likely to report experiencing less severe acts, such as being pinched, slapped, scratched or kicked. Girls are more likely to report committing less serious forms of IPV, including as a means of self-defense, whereas boys are more likely to report committing more severe acts of IPV, including threats, physical violence and controlling a partner. That girls are more likely to engage in IPV as a result of self-defense is supported by findings that previous victimization is a stronger predictor of perpetration in females than in males.

Controversies and arguments

There is a common misconception that aggression is stable over time. That is, young people who are labeled as or considered to be violent and aggressive at any point in time are then assumed to be dangerous for the rest of their lives. This is a contentious issue because there is a desire to protect both parties involved (or that have the potential to become involved) in teen dating violence. While classifying the perpetrator as a threat may be detrimental to his or her life and future relationships, not classifying the perpetrator this way may put future partners at risk.

There is considerable debate over whether we as a society have an accurate picture of the prevalence and severity of teen dating violence by gender. It is important to note that although male and female adolescents do not differ in "overall frequency of violence in dating relationships," females are subject to "significantly higher levels of severe violence". This fact begs the question of whether abuse should be evaluated based on “severity” and how that can and should be measured, or if all abuse should be considered equally harmful.

Age of consent is an issue that cannot be ignored in the discussion of teenage dating violence. Teenage sex is regulated in such a way that "age of consent laws render teenagers below a certain age incapable of consent to sexual activity with adults, and sometimes with peers". In some cases, the adult may be just a few months older than the minor. There are a number of states in which "age of consent statutes are used to prosecute consensual sex between two persons both under the age of consent." This type of prosecution has been deemed unconstitutional in some states by citing violation of privacy rights, but remains in effect in other states. Sexual behavior and aggression can be so deeply intertwined that the legality of underage consensual sex is sure to have an effect on teen dating violence.

Nature vs. nurture

This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (September 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Significant research has been done on the causes behind violent behavior in adolescent dating relationships with the intention of guiding the creation of dating violence prevention programs, and in turn has provided findings on the roles of nature and nurture in the development of such behavior with a strong favor towards nurture factors. A study published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health examined the potential association between a spectrum of childhood adverse experiences and physical violence in relationships before age 21 for both members. The subjects were asked questions about violence in their adolescent relationships, as either victim or perpetrator, and their childhood surrounding twelve different adversities: parental death, parental divorce, long-term separation from parent, parental mental illness, parental substance abuse disorder, parental criminality, inter-parental violence, serious physical illness in childhood, physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, and family economic adversity. The results demonstrated a strong positive correlation between ten out of the twelve childhood adversities and physically violent behavior in a teen relationship, with 13.8% responding with experiences of sexual violence, and 11.6% experiencing inter-parental violence. This points to a strong influence of experience, or nature, on violent tendencies in adolescent relationships. Multiple other studies corroborate these findings, citing childhood bullying, assault, and maltreatment as significant indicators for future violence in adolescent dating. Though there has been little explicit study of the relationship between nature and teen dating violence, there has been proven correlation between testosterone levels and violent tendencies that could come to fruition in adolescent dating relationships. Higher testosterone levels “manifests itself in various intensities and forms from; thoughts, anger, verbal aggressiveness, competition, dominance behavior, to physical violence.” A study published in the International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism reported, “Testosterone plays a significant role in the arousal of these behavioral manifestations in the brain centers involved in aggression and on the development of the muscular system that enables their realization. There is evidence that testosterone levels are higher in individuals with aggressive behavior, such as prisoners who have committed violent crimes.” However, the study also noted that many cases of high testosterone levels are disarmed through socialization. Overall, because children are exposed to relationships early in their life through their parents and being so malleable at a young age, most evidence points to an adverse experience or experiences in childhood as fodder for such behavior in adolescence.

Prevalence and approaches

The literature on IPV among adolescents primarily focuses on Caucasian youth, and there are yet no studies which focus specifically on IPV in adolescent same-sex romantic relationships.

United States

Statistics

While dating, domestic and sexual violence affect women regardless of their age, teens and young women are especially vulnerable. Young people ages 12 to 19 experience the highest rates of rape and sexual assault, and people age 18 and 19 experience the highest rates of stalking. Approximately one in three adolescent girls in the United States is a victim of physical, emotional, or verbal abuse from a dating partner—a figure that far exceeds victimization rates for other types of violence affecting youth Mark Green, former Wisconsin Representative said "if the numbers we see in domestic violence (dating violence) were applied to terrorism or gang violence, the entire country would be up in arms, and it would be the lead story on the news every night". According to Women's Health, "81% of parents surveyed either believed dating violence is not an issue or admit they don't know if it's an issue", this is concerning because of the growth of dating abuse in teenagers relationships. Dating violence has advanced through the years by the means of communication technology. A survey conducted by Teenage Research Unlimited stated that " percent of teens have been threatened physically via e-mail, IM, text messaging, chat rooms, etc."

A 2008 meta-analyses, which examined 62 empirical research studies between 1996 and 2006, relating to domestic violence in heterosexual intimate relationships from adolescence through to adulthood in the United States, reported on research findings that consistently show that adolescent females commit significantly more acts of domestic violence in intimate relationships than adolescent males. It stated, however, that the "data also suggest that females who commit acts of domestic violence may experience more violent or frequent IPV victimization than males" and that "he highest rates were found for emotional violence, followed by physical and sexual violence. Prevalence rates varied widely within each population, most likely due to methodological and sampling differences across studies." The authors added, "Few longitudinal studies existed, limiting the extent to which we could identify developmental patterns associated with female perpetrated intimate partner violence." They found a few studies which reported prevalence rates of IPV perpetration among females at two or more time points, which they stated made "it difficult to obtain a clear picture of the developmental patterns associated with this type of violence." There was also only one study that reported on prevalence rates over time for female perpetrated IPV among adolescents. "This study found a significant increase in prevalence over a six month period; however, they measured lifetime perpetration of IPV, therefore, it is unclear if there was an actual increase or simply an accumulation of violence," stated the authors. "Together, these studies provide very limited evidence that female perpetration of IPV may follow a similar developmental trajectory as other forms of violence. Unfortunately, many of the studies included in this review used modified or alternative instruments making it difficult to accurately compare prevalence estimates."

In a 2009 survey, the CDC found that 9.8% of high school students in the U.S. reported having been intentionally physically hurt by their boyfriend or girlfriend in the preceding 12 months. The CDC also reports that approximately 1 in 5 women and 1 in 7 men who have been a victim of intimate partner violence (IPV) first experienced IPV between the ages of 11 and 17. The ages between 16 and 24 are when youth are the most susceptible to dating violence. Also, according to the CDC, one in ten teens will be physically abused between seventh and twelfth grade. Because of this abuse, victims are more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, employ precarious sexual conduct, develop eating disorders, and attempt suicide. The above numbers are notable in their magnitude and in their discrepancy, indicating that at some point between birth and high school a huge number of males are learning that it is useful and acceptable to abuse their dating partners in some way. The reciprocal of males learning violent behaviors is that women are not learning this fact and are instead learning through our culture and through violence directed at them that they are to be submissive. Males learning violent behaviors coupled with females thinking it normative creates a cycle of women being abused, learning to accept it and imparting this idea to their children and repeating the process. Adolescent dating violence is a subject which must be understood in order for true equality between the sexes to be achieved and to help stop partner violence in adults before it occurs.

A 2011 CDC nationwide survey of the United States population, reported that 23% of females and 14% of males who ever experienced rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner, first experienced some form of partner violence between 11 and 17 years of age.

Legislation

In the United States, the National Conference of State Legislators (NCSL) states that "olicymakers can play a role in preventing teen dating violence" and lists those states that currently have laws requiring school boards to develop and adopt programs to address this issue. Further, according to NCSL "n 2011 at least eight states have introduced legislation to address teen dating violence". On January 31, 2011, President Obama proclaimed February 2011 to be "National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month". In 2006 the U.S. first recognized "National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Week", sponsored by Senator Mike Crapo, to "increase public awareness and education of the prevalence of teen dating violence among our nation's teens". The first week in February was so recognized through 2009. Beginning in 2010, Senator Crapo joined the Department of Justice in recognizing the month of February as Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month.

National helpline and organizations

The National Dating Abuse Helpline, created by National Domestic Violence Hotline, is a 24-hour nationwide Web-based and telephone resource created to help teens and young people who are experiencing dating abuse. They offer information on building healthy relationships and how to recognize warning signs. It is the only helpline in the country serving all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

United Kingdom

In 2010, a campaign by the Home Office featured adverts targeting "boys and girls aged 13 to 18" via television, radio, Internet, and poster campaigns. The campaign followed research by the NSPCC indicating that approximately one-quarter of 13- to 17-year-old females had experienced physical abuse from a dating partner.

United Kingdom organizations

Other organizations

  • RespectED, Provided by the Canadian Red Cross, give information to teens, parents, and teachers about abuse in dating relationships

References

  1. ^ "Teen dating violence", URL retrieved 13 August 2011.
  2. ^ Handbook of Adolescent Health Psychology. Springer Science & Business Media. 2014. p. 193. ISBN 1461466334. Retrieved November 15, 2015. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  3. Bachman, Ronet; Peralta, Robert (2002). "The relationship between drinking and violence in an adolescent population: does gender matter?". Deviant Behavior. 23 (1). Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  4. Liz Clairborne Inc (2000). What You Need to Know About Dating Violence: A Teen's Handbook.
  5. ^ Connie Mitchell (2009). Intimate Partner Violence : A Health-Based Perspective: A Health-Based Perspective. Oxford University Press. p. 514. ISBN 019972072X. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
  6. ^ Williams, J. R., Ghandour, A. M., & Kub, J. E. (2008). Female perpetration of violence in heterosexual intimate relationships: Adolescence through adulthood. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 9(4), 227-249. doi: 10.1177/1524838008324418
  7. ^ Handbook of Violence. John Wiley & Sons. 2002. p. 36. ISBN 0471214442. Retrieved November 15, 2015. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  8. Edwards, K. M.; Dardis, C. M.; Gidycz, C. A. (2011). "The role of victimization experiences in adolescent girls and young women's aggression in dating relationships". The psychology of teen violence and victimization, vols 1 and 2: From bullying to cyberstalking to assault and sexual violation; prevention strategies for families and schools. 1 & 2: 71–82.
  9. Loeber, Rolf; Stouthamer-Loeber, Magda (1998). "Development of juvenile aggression and violence: Some common misconceptions and controversies". American Psychologist. 53 (2): 242–259.
  10. Molidor, Tolman (1998). "Gender and Contextual Factors in Adolescent Dating Violence". Violence Against Women. 4 (2): 180–194.
  11. Sutherland, Kate (2003). "From Jailbird to Jailbait: Age of Consent Laws and the Construction of Teenage Sexualities". William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law. 9 (3): 313–349.
  12. "Adverse Childhood Experiences and Risk of Physical Violence in Adolescent Dating Relationships". Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 65 (11): 1006–1013. 2011.
  13. Batrinos, Menelaos (2012). "Testosterone and Aggressive Behavior in Man". International Journal of Endocrinologyand Metabolism. 10 (3): 563–568.
  14. Truman, Jennifer. "Criminal Victimization, 2008". U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics. U.S. Department of Justice.
  15. Davis, Antoinette (2008). "Interpersonal and Physical Dating Violence among Teens" (PDF). The National Council on Crime and Delinquency Focus.
  16. Savacool, Julia. "Our Most Important Mission Ever: Stop Violence Against Women Now, 2005".
  17. "Teen Dating Violence". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). June 29, 2015. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
  18. ^ "Teen Dating Violence" on NCSL.ogv, retrieved 13 August 2011.
  19. "Presidential Proclamation--National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month, 2011" on whitehouse.gov, URL retrieved 13 August 2011.
  20. ^ "Teen Dating Violence Awareness Week" on crapo.senate.gov, URL retrieved 13 August 2011.
  21. Jewish Women International
  22. ((cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk/8515601.stm%7Ctitle=Teenage domestic violence tackled by advert campaign|accessdate=2014 November 19))

External links

Canadian resources
  • RespectED, Provided by the Canadian Red Cross, give information to teens, parents, and teachers about abuse in dating relationships
  • The Fourth R, Provided by the CAMH centre for Prevention Science and the Fourth R program to prevent adolescent dating violence and promote healthy teen relationships.
UK resources
US resources
Abuse
Types
Related topics

Other

Categories: