This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skywatcher68 (talk | contribs) at 02:06, 11 September 2023 (→Interstate 20 Eastern Extension In The Future Section: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:06, 11 September 2023 by Skywatcher68 (talk | contribs) (→Interstate 20 Eastern Extension In The Future Section: Reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)U.S. Roads: Interstates / South Carolina C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
United States: South Carolina C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interstate 20 in South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023035311/http://southeastroads.com/i-020_sc.html to http://www.southeastroads.com/i-020_sc.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Rest areas and weigh stations
Like Interstate 26 in South Carolina, this could use a section in the route description for rest areas and truck weigh stations. I've got one site listing rest areas and one site listing weigh stations. If we can find closed ones of either for the section, that'd be great too. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 13:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- That reminds me that I still got to process those pictures I took at the I-20 rest areas at Lugoff. I'm fine with what you did by adding a subsection called 'services' and listing them; but I recall attempting similar several years back and they were removed because they weren't considered necessary for the general public. --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, I believe the problem you had was that I was adding them to the junction list for Interstate 85 in South Carolina. But the "services" section was also part of the route description along Interstate 95 in South Carolina, and most people seem okay with that. Either way, only I-26 seems to be the one to fill in now. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Interstate 20 Eastern Extension In The Future Section
If there’s a future section on the main page of I-20 about the eastern extension, then the S.C. page should have one too. I know there’s one in “Proposed extensions.” But we or I or you could move or duplicate it to the future section only about 2003 extension since it will happen soon eventually since there are many sites including interstate sites except wiki that the extension is going to happen, two of the sites (interstate guide and aaroads) have exact directions of how the extension will be like. Also new interstate shields in S.C. don’t have “South Carolina” above the numbers anymore. Foxbro69 (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- The I-20 main page on future extension is out-dated. There are currently no plans to extend I-20 east. Unless you can provide new information, the proposed routing is dead, that is why it is in the history section in this article. --WashuOtaku (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Foxbro69 (pinging @Washuotaku as well), please discuss what you are trying to do here rather than declaring your edits as "perfect". This clearly started with you trying to make a point toward Washuotaku and it would be nice if all this could be sorted out without getting more admins involved. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 02:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Interstate Highway System articles
- Mid-importance Interstate Highway System articles
- C-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- Interstate Highway System articles
- C-Class South Carolina road transport articles
- Mid-importance South Carolina road transport articles
- South Carolina road transport articles
- C-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class South Carolina articles
- Low-importance South Carolina articles
- WikiProject South Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles