Misplaced Pages

Bullying

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mtaz0801 (talk | contribs) at 01:15, 23 March 2024 (Fixed awkward sentences). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:15, 23 March 2024 by Mtaz0801 (talk | contribs) (Fixed awkward sentences)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Use of force or coercion to abuse or intimidate others

"Bully" redirects here. For other uses, see Bully (disambiguation).

Part of a series on
Discrimination
Forms
Attributes
Social
Religious
Ethnic/national
Manifestations
Policies
Countermeasures
Related topics
A depiction of a student being bullied by three other students. A bystander is seen in the background, paying no attention.
Share of children who report being bullied (2015)

Bullying is the use of force, coercion, hurtful teasing or threat, to abuse, aggressively dominate or intimidate. The behavior is often repeated and habitual. One essential prerequisite is the perception (by the bully or by others) of an imbalance of physical or social power. This imbalance distinguishes bullying from conflict. Bullying is a subcategory of aggressive behavior characterized by hostile intent, imbalance of power and repetition over a period of time.

Bullying can be done individually or by a group, called mobbing, in which the bully may have one or more followers who are willing to assist the primary bully or who reinforce the bully by providing positive feedback such as laughing. Bullying in school and the workplace is also referred to as "peer abuse". Robert W. Fuller has analyzed bullying in the context of rankism. The Swedish-Norwegian researcher Dan Olweus says bullying occurs when a person is "exposed, repeatedly and over time, to negative actions on the part of one or more other persons", and that negative actions occur "when a person intentionally inflicts injury or discomfort upon another person, through physical contact, through words or in other ways". Individual bullying is usually characterized by a person behaving in a certain way to gain power over another person.

A bullying culture can develop in any context in which humans interact with each other. This may include school, family, the workplace, the home, and neighborhoods. The main platform for bullying in contemporary culture is on social media websites. In a 2012 study of male adolescent American football players, "the strongest predictor was the perception of whether the most influential male in a player's life would approve of the bullying behavior." A study by The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health in 2019 showed a relationship between social media use by girls and an increase in their exposure to bullying.

Bullying may be defined in many different ways. In the United Kingdom, there is no legal definition of bullying, while some states in the United States have laws against it. Bullying is divided into four basic types of abuse: psychological (sometimes called emotional or relational), verbal, physical, and cyber, though an encounter can fall into multiple of these categories.

Behaviors used to assert such domination may include physical assault or coercion, verbal harassment, or threat, and such acts may be directed repeatedly toward particular targets. Rationalizations of such behavior sometimes include differences of social class, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, appearance, behavior, body language, personality, reputation, lineage, strength, size, or ability.

Etymology

The word "bully" was first used in the 1530s meaning "sweetheart", applied to either sex, from the Template:Lang-nl, "lover, brother", probably diminutive of Template:Lang-gmh, "brother", of uncertain origin (compare with the German buhle "lover"). The meaning deteriorated through the 17th century through "fine fellow", "blusterer", to "harasser of the weak". This may have been as a connecting sense between "lover" and "ruffian" as in "protector of a prostitute", which was one sense of "bully" (though not specifically attested until 1706). The verb "to bully" is first attested in 1710.

In the past, in the American culture, the term has been used as an exclamation and exhortation. Especially known famously in association with Theodore Roosevelt. In 1907 Roosevelt coined the phrase, as a deprecating phrase "bully for him". Currently in the present day the bully pulpit refers to the use of a high position to influence the general publics thoughts and to initiate changes.

Types

Bullying has been classified by the body of literature into different types. These can be in the form of nonverbal, verbal, or physical behavior. Another classification is based on perpetrators or the participants involved, so that the types include individual and collective bullying. Other interpretation also cite emotional and relational bullying in addition to physical harm inflicted towards another person or even property. There is also the case of the more recent phenomenon called cyberbullying.

Physical, verbal, and relational bullying are most prevalent in primary school and could also begin much earlier while continuing into later stages in individuals lives.

Individual

Individual bullying tactics are perpetrated by a single person against a victim or victims. Individual bullying can be classified into four types.

Physical

Physical bullying is any bullying that hurts someone's body or damages their possessions. Stealing, shoving, hitting, fighting, and intentionally destroying someone's property are types of physical bullying. Physical bullying is rarely the first form of bullying that a victim will experience. Often bullying will begin in a different form and later progress to physical violence. In physical bullying the main weapon the bully uses is his/her body, or some part thereof; or an object as a weapon when attacking his/her victim. Sometimes groups of young adults will target and alienate a peer because of some adolescent prejudice. This can quickly lead to a situation where they are being taunted, tortured, and "beaten up" by their classmates. Physical bullying will often escalate over time, and can lead to a detrimental or fatal ending, and therefore many try to stop it quickly to prevent any further escalation.

Verbal

Verbal bullying is one of the most common types of bullying. This is any bullying that is conducted by speaking, other use of the voice, or some form of body language and does not involve any physical contact. Bullying usually begins at this stage and includes any of the following:

  • Derogatory name-calling and nicknaming
  • Spreading rumors or lying about someone
  • Threatening someone
  • Yelling at or talking to someone in a rude or unkind tone of voice, especially without justifiable cause
  • Mocking someone's voice or style of speaking
  • Laughing at someone
  • Use of body language (i.e., the middle finger) to torment someone
  • Making insults or otherwise making fun of someone

In verbal bullying, the main weapon the bully uses is voice. In many cases, verbal bullying is common in both genders, but girls are more likely to perform it. Girls, in general, are more subtle with insults than boys. Girls use verbal bullying, as well as social exclusion techniques, to dominate and control other individuals and show their superiority and power, often to try to impress someone they idolize. Many boys are subtle enough to use verbal techniques for domination when they want to avoid the trouble that can come with physically bullying someone else.

Relational

Relational bullying (sometimes referred to as social aggression) is the type of bullying that uses relationships to hurt others. The term also denotes any bullying that is done with the intent to hurt somebody's reputation or social standing which can also link in with the techniques included in physical and verbal bullying. Relational bullying is a form of bullying common among youth, but particularly upon girls. Social exclusion (slighting or making someone feel "left out") is one of the most common types of relational bullying. Relational bullying can be used as a tool by bullies to both improve their social standing and control others. Unlike physical bullying which is obvious, relational bullying is not overt and can continue for a long time without being noticed.

Cyber

Cyberbullying is the use of technology to harass, threaten, embarrass, or target another person. When an adult is involved, it may meet the definition of cyber-harassment or cyberstalking, a crime that can have legal consequences and involve jail time. This includes bullying by use of email, instant messaging, social media websites (such as Facebook), text messages, and cell phones. It is stated that Cyberbullying is more common in secondary school than in primary school.

The internet provides people with limited accountability and no filter. Bullying can feel easier and less restrictive through the use of the internet; The online disinhibition effect. The use of technology for bullying can be detrimental to someones online reputation. The information put out online will stay there forever, unless taken down by the person who put it out there or by the platform and sometimes not even then. Future employers and people with access to the internet will be able to see others' digital footprint and how you treated others. Another problem with cyberbullying is that other people can get involved. Technology, especially the use of social media, allows others to repost or share content whether it is positive or negative.

Collective

Collective bullying tactics are employed by more than one individual against a victim or victims. Collective bullying is known as mobbing, and can include any of the individual types of bullying. Trolling behavior on social media, although generally assumed to be individual in nature by the casual reader, is sometime organized efforts by sponsored astroturfers.

Mobbing

Main article: Mobbing

Mobbing refers to the bullying of an individual by a group, in any context, such as a family, peer group, school, workplace, neighborhood, community, or online. When it occurs as emotional abuse in the workplace, such as "ganging up" by co-workers, subordinates or superiors, to force someone out of the workplace through rumor, innuendo, intimidation, humiliation, discrediting, and isolation, it is also referred to as malicious, nonsexual, nonracial/racial, general harassment.

Characteristics

Bullies and accomplices

Studies have shown that envy and resentment may be motives for bullying. Research on the self-esteem of bullies has produced equivocal results. While some bullies are arrogant and narcissistic, they can also use bullying as a tool to conceal shame or anxiety or to boost self-esteem: by demeaning others, the abuser feels empowered. Bullies may bully out of jealousy or because they themselves are bullied. Psychologist Roy Baumeister asserts that people who are prone to abusive behavior tend to have inflated but fragile egos. Because they think too highly of themselves, they are frequently offended by the criticisms and lack of deference of other people, and react to this disrespect with violence and insults.

Researchers have identified other risk factors such as depression and personality disorders, as well as quickness to anger and use of force, addiction to aggressive behaviors, mistaking others' actions as hostile, concern with preserving self-image, and engaging in obsessive or rigid actions. A combination of these factors may also be causes of this behavior. In one study of youth, a combination of antisocial traits and depression was found to be the best predictor of youth violence, whereas video game violence and television violence exposure were not predictive of these behaviors.

Bullying may also result from a genetic predisposition or a brain abnormality in the bully. While parents can help a toddler develop emotional regulation and control to restrict aggressive behavior, some children fail to develop these skills due to insecure attachment with their families, ineffective discipline, and environmental factors such as a stressful home life and hostile siblings. Moreover, according to some researchers, bullies may be inclined toward negativity and perform poorly academically. Dr. Cook says, "A typical bully has trouble resolving problems with others and also has trouble academically. He or she usually has negative attitudes and beliefs about others, feels negatively toward himself/herself, comes from a family environment characterized by conflict and poor parenting, perceives school as negative and is negatively influenced by peers."

Contrarily, some researchers have suggested that some bullies are psychologically strongest and have high social standing among their peers, while their targets are emotionally distressed and socially marginalized. Peer groups often promote the bully's actions, and members of these peer groups also engage in behaviors, such as mocking, excluding, punching, and insulting one another as a source of entertainment. Other researchers also argued that a minority of the bullies, those who are not in-turn bullied, enjoy going to school, and are least likely to take days off sick.

Research indicates that adults who bully have authoritarian personalities, combined with a strong need to control or dominate. It has also been suggested that a prejudicial view of subordinates can be a particularly strong risk factor.

In a recent study, bullies showed lower school performance-related self-esteem than non-involved students. They also showed higher social self-esteem than victims of traditional bullying.

Brain studies have shown that the section of the brain associated with reward becomes active when bullies are shown a video of someone inflicting pain on another.

Bystanders

Often, bullying takes place in the presence of a large group of relatively uninvolved bystanders. In many cases, it is the bully's ability to create the illusion they have the support of the majority present that instills the fear of "speaking out" in protestation of the bullying activities being observed by the group. Unless the "bully mentality" is effectively challenged in any given group in its early stages, it often becomes an accepted, or supported, norm within the group.

Unless action is taken, a "culture of bullying" is often perpetuated within a group for months, years, or longer.

Bystanders who have been able to establish their own "friendship group" or "support group" have been found to be far more likely to opt to speak out against bullying behavior than those who have not.

In addition to communication of clear expectations that bystanders should intervene and increasing individual self-efficacy, there is growing research to suggest interventions should build on the foundation that bullying is morally wrong.

Among adults, being a bystander to workplace bullying was linked to depression.

The Bystander effect can be detrimental to the person being bullied. People are less likely to stand up for someone or something when others are around. In the case of cyberbullying, people that see bullying happen on social media are less likely to say something back, whether online or in person. People can have good intentions and want to help, but with no action nothing will be accomplished. "The act of others stepping in is what will stop bullying". To stop the Bystander effect, people should be confident and stand up for what they believe in. Do not worry what people think of you, rather think of what the benefits can be for the person being bullied.

Victims

Dr. Cook says, "A typical victim is likely to be aggressive, lack social skills, think negative thoughts, experience difficulties in solving social problems, come from a negative family, school and community environments and be noticeably rejected and isolated by peers." Victims often have characteristics such as being physically and mentally weak, as well as being easily distraught emotionally. They may also have physical characteristics that make them easier targets for bullies such as being overweight or having some type of physical deformity. Boys are more likely to be victims of physical bullying while girls are more likely to be bullied indirectly.

Low levels of self-esteem has been identified as a frequent antecedent of bullying victimization. Victims of traditional bullying tend to have lower global, social, body-related, and emotional self-esteem compared to uninvolved students. Victims of cyberbullying, on the other hand, may not have lower self-esteem scores than uninvolved students but might have higher body-related self-esteem than both victims of traditional bullying and bullies.

It has also been shown that victims are more likely to employ self-defeating or self-deprecating humor intended to entertain others at the expense of themselves and their own feelings.

The results of a meta-analysis conducted by Cook and published by the American Psychological Association in 2010 concluded the main risk factors for children and adolescents being bullied, and also for becoming bullies, are the lack of social problem-solving skills.

Children who are bullied often show physical or emotional signs, such as: being afraid to attend school, complaining of headaches or a loss of appetite, a lack of interest in school activities, or in spending time with friends or family, reluctance to go out in public for fear they may encounter their bullies in public places other than school, and having an overall sense of sadness.

Effects

This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. (May 2014)

Mona O'Moore of the Anti-Bullying Centre at Trinity College in Dublin, has written, "There is a growing body of research which indicates that individuals, whether child or adult, who are persistently subjected to abusive behavior are at risk of stress related illness which can sometimes lead to suicide." Those who have been the targets of bullying can develop long-term emotional and behavioral problems. Bullying can cause loneliness, depression, anxiety, lead to low self-esteem and increased susceptibility to illness. Bullying has also been shown to cause maladjustment in young children, and targets of bullying who were also bullies themselves exhibit even greater social difficulties. A mental health report also found that bullying was linked to eating disorders, anxiety, body dysmorphia and other negative psychological effects. Both victims and perpetrators have been shown to exhibit higher levels of loneliness.

Suicide

Main articles: Bullying and suicide and List of suicides that have been attributed to bullying

Even though there is evidence that bullying increases the risk of suicide, bullying alone does not cause suicide. Depression is one of the main reasons why kids who are bullied die by suicide. It is estimated that between 15 and 25 children die by suicide every year in the UK alone because they are being bullied. Certain groups seem to incur a higher risk for suicide, such as Native Americans, Alaskan Natives, Asian Americans, and LGBT people. When someone feels unsupported by family or friends, it can make the situation much worse for the victim.

In a self-report study completed in New York by 9th through 12th graders, victims of bullying reported more depressive symptoms and psychological distress than those who did not experience bullying. All types of involvement in bullying among both boys and girls is associated with depression even a couple years later. Another study that followed up with Finnish teens two years after the initial survey showed that depression and suicidal ideation is higher with teens who are bullied than those who did not report experiencing bullying. A Dutch longitudinal study on elementary students reported that boys who are bully-victims, who play both roles of a victim and a bully, were more likely to experience depression or serious suicidal ideation than the other roles, victims or bullies only, while girls who have any involvement in bullying have a higher level of risk for depression. In a study of high school students completed in Boston, students who self reported being victims of bullying were more likely to consider suicide when compared to youth who did not report being bullied. The same study also showed a higher risk of suicidal consideration in youth who report being a perpetrator, victim, or victim-perpetrator. Victims and victim-bullies are associated with a higher risk of suicide attempts. The place where youth live also appears to differentiate their bullying experiences such that those living in more urban areas who reported both being bullied and bullying others appear to show higher risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. A national survey given to American 6th through 10th grade students found that cyberbullying victims experience a higher level of depression than victims experiencing other forms of bullying. This can be related to the anonymity behind social media. If a teen is being bullied and is displaying symptoms of depression it should be questioned and interventions should be implemented. The Danish study showed that kids who are bullied talked to their parents and teachers about it and some reported a decrease in bullying or a stop in the bullying after a teacher or parent intervened. The study emphasizes the importance of implementing program-collaborations in schools to have programs and anti-bullying interventions in place to prevent and properly intervene when it occurs. The study also shows the importance of having parents and teachers talk to the bullies about their bullying behavior in order to provide the necessary support for those experiencing bullying.

While some people find it very easy to ignore a bully, others may find it very difficult and reach a breaking point. There have been cases of apparent bullying suicides that have been reported closely by the media. These include the deaths of Ryan Halligan, Phoebe Prince, Dawn-Marie Wesley, Nicola Ann Raphael, Megan Meier, Audrie Pott, Tyler Clementi, Jamey Rodemeyer, Kenneth Weishuhn, Jadin Bell, Kelly Yeomans, Rehtaeh Parsons, Amanda Todd, Brodie Panlock, Jessica Haffer, Hamed Nastoh, Sladjana Vidovic, April Himes, Cherice Moralez and Rebecca Ann Sedwick. According to the suicide awareness voices for education, suicide is one of the leading causes of death for youth from 15 to 24 years old. Over 16 percent of students seriously consider suicide, 13 percent create a plan, and 8 percent have made a serious attempt.

Strength and wisdom

Some have argued that bullying can teach life lessons and instill strength. Helene Guldberg, a child development academic, sparked controversy when she argued that being a target of bullying can teach a child "how to manage disputes and boost their ability to interact with others", and that teachers should not intervene but leave children to respond to the bullying themselves. Others, however, have pointed out that this is only true for normal peer conflicts but not for bullying cases.

The teaching of anti-bullying coping skills to children, carers and teachers has been found to be an effective long-term means of reducing bullying incidence rates and a valuable skill-set for individuals.

Testosterone production

Statistically controlling for age and pubertal status, results indicated that on average verbally bullied girls produced less testosterone, and verbally bullied boys produced more testosterone than their nonbullied counterparts.

Dark triad

Main article: Dark triad

Research on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) indicate a correlation with bullying as part of evidence of the aversive nature of those traits.

Studies have shown that bullying behavior is positively correlated with Dark Triad traits. Out of the three traits of the Dark Triad, psychopathy is most strongly correlated to bullying. It is posited that this is because aggression related to psychopathy is more likely to be unprovoked than the Machiavellianism and narcissism. This holds true in traditional bullying as well as with cyberbullying. Psychopathy has the strongest correlations, followed by Machiavellianism, and narcissism. Although the lower of the three, narcissism is still correlated, being more prevalent in types of indirect bullying than physical bullying.

Projection

Main article: Psychological projection

A bully may project his/her own feelings of vulnerability onto the target(s) of the bullying activity. Despite the fact that a bully's typically denigrating activities are aimed at the bully's targets, the true source of such negativity is ultimately almost always found in the bully's own sense of personal insecurity and/or vulnerability. Such aggressive projections of displaced negative emotions can occur anywhere from the micro-level of interpersonal relationships, all the way up through to the macro-level of international politics, or even international armed conflict.

Emotional intelligence

Main article: Bullying and emotional intelligence

Bullying is abusive social interaction between peers which can include aggression, harassment, and violence. Bullying is typically repetitive and enacted by those who are in a position of power over the victim. A growing body of research illustrates a significant relationship between bullying and emotional intelligence (EI). Mayer et al., (2008) defines the dimensions of overall EI as "accurately perceiving emotion, using emotions to facilitate thought, understanding emotion, and managing emotion". The concept combines emotional and intellectual processes. Lower emotional intelligence appears to be related to involvement in bullying, as the bully and/or the victim of bullying. EI seems to play an important role in both bullying behavior and victimization in bullying; given that EI is illustrated to be malleable, EI education could greatly improve bullying prevention and intervention initiatives.

Context

Internet

Main article: Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying is any bullying done through the use of technology. This form of bullying can easily go undetected because of lack of authoritative (including parental) supervision. Because bullies can pose as someone else, it is the most anonymous form of bullying. Cyberbullying includes abuse using email, instant messaging, text messaging, websites, and social networking sites. Particular watchdog organizations have been designed to contain the spread of cyberbullying.

Disability

Main article: Disability bullying

Disabled people are disproportionately affected by bullying and abuse, and such activity has been cited as a hate crime. The bullying is not limited to those who are visibly disabled, such as wheelchair users or physically deformed such as those with a cleft lip, but also those with developmental disabilities such as autism and developmental coordination disorder.

There is an additional problem that those with learning disabilities are often not as able to explain things to other people, so are more likely to be disbelieved or ignored if they do complain.

Homosexuality

Main article: LGBT bullying

Gay bullying and gay bashing designate direct or indirect verbal or physical actions by a person or group against someone who is gay or lesbian, or perceived to be so due to rumors or because they are considered to fit gay stereotypes. Gay and lesbian youth are more likely than straight youth to report bullying, as well as be bullied.

Law

Main article: Legal abuse

Legal bullying is the bringing of a vexatious legal action to control and punish a person. Legal bullying can often take the form of frivolous, repetitive, or burdensome lawsuits brought to intimidate the defendant into submitting to the litigant's request, not because of the legal merit of the litigant's position, but principally due to the defendant's inability to maintain the legal battle. This can also take the form of Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP). It was partially concern about the potential for this kind of abuse that helped to fuel the protests against SOPA and PIPA in the United States in 2011 and 2012.

Military

Main articles: Bullying in the military and Dedovshchina

In 2000, the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) defined bullying as "the use of physical strength or the abuse of authority to intimidate or victimize others, or to give unlawful punishments".

Some argue that this behaviour should be allowed, due to ways in which "soldiering" is different from other occupations. Soldiers expected to risk their lives should, according to them, develop strength of body and spirit to accept bullying.

Parenting

See also: Child abuse, Narcissistic parent, and Parental narcissistic abuse

Parents who may displace their anger, insecurity, or a persistent need to dominate and control upon their children in excessive ways have been proven to increase the likelihood that their own children will in turn become overly aggressive or controlling towards their peers. The American Psychological Association advises on its website that parents who may suspect their own children may be engaging in bullying activities among their peers should carefully consider the examples which they themselves may be setting for their own children regarding how they typically interact with their own peers, colleagues, and children.

Prison

Main article: Prisoner abuse

The prison environment is known for bullying. An additional complication is the staff and their relationships with the inmates. Thus, the following possible bullying scenarios are possible:

  • Inmate bullies inmate (echoing school bullying)
  • Staff bullies inmate
  • Staff bullies staff (a manifestation of workplace bullying)
  • Inmate bullies staff

School

Main article: School bullying
A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention graphic presenting school anti-bullying guidelines

It is important to distinguish school bullying that per definition has the goal of harming the victim from normal peer conflict that is an inherent part of everyday school life and often promotes social development. Unlike normal conflict, bullying is a systematic and repeated abuse committed intentionally by another student who has more power (physical, social, or otherwise). School bullies may taunt and tease their target before finally physically bullying them. Bystanders typically choose to either participate or watch, sometimes out of fear of becoming the next target.

Bullying can occur in nearly any part in or around the school building, although it may occur more frequently during physical education classes and activities such as recess. Bullying also takes place in school hallways, bathrooms, on school buses and while waiting for buses, and in classes that require group work and/or after school activities. Bullying in school sometimes consists of a group of students taking advantage of or isolating one student in particular and gaining the loyalty of bystanders who want to avoid becoming the next target. The 2011 documentary Bully showcases the lives of five American public school students who face bullying in school and while on the school bus. The bullying is shown to affect the students both at school and in their homes.

Teachers play an important role in bullying prevention and intervention because they are the adults who spend most of their time with the students. Bullying can, however, also be perpetrated by teachers and the school system itself; there is an inherent power differential in the system that can easily predispose to subtle or covert abuse (relational aggression or passive aggression), humiliation, or exclusion—even while maintaining overt commitments to anti-bullying policies.

In 2016, in Canada, a North American legal precedent was set by a mother and her son, after the son was bullied in his public school. The mother and son won a court case against the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, making this the first case in North America where a school board has been found negligent in a bullying case for failing to meet the standard of care (the "duty of care" that the school board owes to its students). Thus, it sets a precedent of a school board being found liable in negligence for harm caused to a child, because they failed to protect a child from the bullying actions of other students. There has been only one other similar bullying case and it was won in Australia in 2013 (Oyston v. St. Patricks College, 2013).

Heterosexuality

Main article: Sexual bullying See also: Slut-shaming

Sexual bullying is "any bullying behaviour, whether physical or non-physical, that is based on a person's sexuality or gender. It is when sexuality or gender is used as a weapon by boys or girls towards other boys or girls – although it is more commonly directed at girls. It can be carried out to a person's face, behind their back or through the use of technology."

Transsexuality

Main article: Trans bashing

Trans bashing is the act of victimizing a person physically, sexually, or verbally because they are transgender or transsexual. Unlike gay bashing, it is committed because of the target's actual or perceived gender identity, not sexual orientation.

Work

Main article: Workplace bullying

Workplace bullying occurs when an employee experiences a persistent pattern of mistreatment from others in the workplace that causes harm. Workplace bullying can include such tactics as verbal, nonverbal, psychological, physical abuse and humiliation. This type of workplace aggression is particularly difficult because, unlike the typical forms of school bullying, workplace bullies often operate within the established rules and policies of their organization and their society. Bullying in the workplace is in the majority of cases reported as having been perpetrated by someone in authority over the target. Bullies can also be peers, and occasionally can be subordinates.

The first known documented use of "workplace bullying" is in 1992 in a book by Andrea Adams called Bullying at Work: How to Confront and Overcome It.

Research has also investigated the impact of the larger organizational context on bullying as well as the group-level processes that impact on the incidence, and maintenance of bullying behavior. Bullying can be covert or overt. It may be missed by superiors or known by many throughout the organization. Negative effects are not limited to the targeted individuals, and may lead to a decline in employee morale and a change in organizational culture. A Cochrane Collaboration systematic review has found very low quality evidence to suggest that organizational and individual interventions may prevent bullying behaviors in the workplace.

Academia

Main article: Bullying in academia

Bullying in academia is workplace bullying of scholars and staff in academia, especially places of higher education such as colleges and universities. It is believed to be common, although has not received as much attention from researchers as bullying in some other contexts.

Blue-collar jobs

Bullying has been identified as prominent in blue-collar jobs, including on oil rigs and in mechanic shops and machine shops. It is thought that intimidation and fear of retribution cause decreased incident reports. In industry sectors dominated by males, typically of little education, where disclosure of incidents are seen as effeminate, reporting in the socioeconomic and cultural milieu of such industries would likely lead to a vicious circle. This is often used in combination with manipulation and coercion of facts to gain favour among higher-ranking administrators.

Information technology

Main article: Bullying in information technology

A culture of bullying is common in information technology (IT), leading to high sickness rates, low morale, poor productivity, and high staff-turnover. Deadline-driven project work and stressed-out managers take their toll on IT workers.

Courts

Main article: Bullying in the legal profession

Bullying in the legal profession is believed to be more common than in some other professions. It is believed that its adversarial, hierarchical tradition contributes towards this. Women, trainees and solicitors who have been qualified for five years or less are more affected, as are ethnic minority lawyers and lesbian, gay and bisexual lawyers.

Medicine

Main articles: Bullying in medicine and Bullying in nursing

Bullying in the medical profession is common, particularly of student or trainee doctors and of nurses. It is thought that this is at least in part an outcome of conservative traditional hierarchical structures and teaching methods in the medical profession, which may result in a bullying cycle.

Even though The American Nurses Association believes that all nursing personnel have the right to work in safe, non-abusive environments, bullying has been identified as being particularly prevalent in the nursing profession although the reasons are not clear. It is thought that relational aggression (psychological aspects of bullying such as gossiping and intimidation) are relevant. Relational aggression has been studied among girls but not so much among adult women.

Teaching

Main article: Bullying in teaching

School teachers are commonly the subject of bullying but they are also sometimes the originators of bullying within a school environment.

Machines

Children have been observed bullying anthropomorphic robots designed to assist the elderly. Their attacks start with blocking the robots' paths of movement and then escalate to verbal abuse, hitting and destroying the object. Seventy-five percent of the kids interviewed perceived the robot as "human-like" yet decided to abuse it anyway, while 35% of the kids who beat up the robot did so "for enjoyment".

Prevention

Bullying prevention is the collective effort to prevent, reduce and stop bullying. Many campaigns and events are designated to bullying prevention throughout the world. Bullying prevention campaigns and events include Anti-Bullying Day, Anti-Bullying Week, International Day of Pink, International STAND UP to Bullying Day and National Bullying Prevention Month. Anti-bullying laws in the U.S. have also been enacted in 23 of its 50 states, making bullying in schools illegal.

A 2019 study by McCallion & Feder found that school-based anti-bullying programs may lower the incidence of bullying by 25%.

Bullying prevention programs allow schools to help decrease cyberbullying within he realm of school. The prevention methods are targeted mainly for middle schoolers, where we see the most bullying occur. To help decrease cyberbullying, people need to take preventative measures. One preventative method was implemented to determine the effectiveness against cyberbullying. This program called "Media Heroes" showed how educating teachers on bullying behaviors in school can help them educate and stop students from bullying. This educational program decreased bullying in their schools. Having trusted adults become educated on what can go on online, can help prevent further cyberbullying.

Responses

Bullying is typically ongoing and not isolated behaviour. Common responses are to try to ignore it, to confront the bullies, or to turn to an authority figure.

Ignoring it often does nothing to stop the bullying continuing, and it can become worse over time. It can be important to address bullying behaviour early on, as it can be easier to control the earlier it is detected. Bystanders play an important role in responding to bullying, as doing nothing can encourage it to continue, while small steps that oppose the behaviour can reduce it.

Authority figures can play an important role, such as parents or teachers in child or adolescent situations, or supervisors, human-resources staff or parent-bodies in workplace and volunteer settings. In the school context, teachers who set clear boundaries, communicate seriously that bullying behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated, and involve school administrators have been shown to reduce bullying. Discussing bullying and its consequences with the whole class is also an important intervention that not only reduces bullying, but also encourages other students to step in and stop bullying even before it reaches its full form. In general, authority figures can be influential in recognising and stopping bullying behaviour, and creating an environment that does not encourage or promote bullying.

In many situations, authority figures are untrained and unqualified, do not know how to respond, and can make the situation worse. In some cases the authority figures even support the people doing the bullying, facilitating it continuing and increasing the isolation and marginalising of the target. Some of the most effective ways to respond are to recognise that harmful behaviour is taking place, and to create an environment where it will not continue.

See also

References

  1. ^ Burger C (2022). "School bullying is not a conflict: The interplay between conflict management styles, bullying victimization and psychological school adjustment". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (18): 11809. doi:10.3390/ijerph191811809. ISSN 1661-7827. PMC 9517642. PMID 36142079.
  2. Juvonen, J., Graham, S. (2014). "Bullying in Schools: The Power of Bullies and the Plight of Victims". Annual Review of Psychology. 65: 159–85. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115030. PMID 23937767. S2CID 207640520.
  3. Burger C, Strohmeier D, Spröber N, Bauman S, Rigby K (2015). "How teachers respond to school bullying: An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies". Teaching and Teacher Education. 51: 191–202. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.004.
  4. Noa Davenport, Ruth Distler Schwartz, Gail Pursell Elliott (1999-07-01). Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace. Civil Society Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9671803-0-4. Archived from the original on 2014-01-01. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  5. Pouwels JL, Lansu TA, Cillessen AH (2018). "A developmental perspective on popularity and the group process of bullying". Aggression and Violent Behavior. 43: 64–70. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.003. hdl:2066/196743. ISSN 1359-1789. S2CID 150289090.
  6. Elizabeth Bennett (1 January 2006). Peer Abuse Know More!: Bullying from a Psychological Perspective. Infinity. ISBN 978-0-7414-3265-0. Archived from the original on 14 September 2014. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  7. Fuller RW (2017). "Learning to Seek". Learning in a Dignitarian World. Routledge. pp. 29–40. ISBN 978-0-203-78742-7.
  8. ^ "History". OLWEUS Bullying Prevention Program. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  9. Valerie E. Besag (1989). Bullies and victims in schools: a guide to understanding and management. Open University Press. ISBN 978-0-335-09542-1. Archived from the original on 2014-07-07. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  10. ^ Williams R (3 May 2011). "The Silent Epidemic: Workplace Bullying". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on 2015-11-21. Retrieved 2016-11-13.
  11. Whittaker E (2016). "Cyberbullying via social media". Journal of School Violence: 11–29.
  12. Steinfeldt JA, Vaughan EL, LaFollette JR, Steinfeldt MC (October 2012). "Bullying among adolescent football players: Role of masculinity and moral atmosphere". Psychology of Men and Masculinity. 13 (4): 340–353. doi:10.1037/a0026645. hdl:2022/14023.
  13. "Social Media Use May Harm Teens' Mental Health By Disrupting Positive Activities, Study Says". 2019-08-13.
  14. "The University of Manchester Dignity at Work and Study Policy". The University of Manchester. January 2012. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  15. "State Laws Related to Bullying Among Children and Youth" (PDF). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Health Resources and Services Administration - Maternal and Child Health Bureau. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2011. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  16. Brank EM, Hoetger LA, Hazen KP (December 2012). "Bullying". Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 8 (1): 213–230. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173820.
  17. "Children who are bullying or being bullied". Cambridgeshire County Council: Children and families. Cambridgeshire County Council. 2013-07-24. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  18. Ericson N (June 2001). "Addressing the Problem of Juvenile Bullying" (PDF). OJJDP Fact Sheet #FS-200127. 27. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-06-26. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  19. Meyer D (2016). "The Gentle Neoliberalism of Modern Anti-bullying Texts: Surveillance, Intervention, and Bystanders in Contemporary Bullying Discourse". Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 13 (4): 356–370. doi:10.1007/s13178-016-0238-9. S2CID 148471672.
  20. "bully". Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  21. TR Correspondence 27 September 1907 Archived 16 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine "bully for you" in the positive sense
  22. "Teddy Roosevelt Writes "Bully for You"".
  23. "Political Dictionary". Political Dictionary.
  24. McGrath MJ (2007). School Bullying: Tools for Avoiding Harm and Liability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-4129-1571-7.
  25. "Bullying Definitions". Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-02-26.
  26. ^ Berger KS (2014). Invitation to the Life Span. New York: Worth Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4641-7205-2.
  27. "no bullying". nobullying.com/physical-bullying/. Archived from the original on 1 December 2016. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  28. "What is Verbal Bullying and How to Handle Verbal Bullies - Bullying Statistics". Bullying Statistics. 2015-07-08. Archived from the original on 2016-11-25. Retrieved 2016-11-30.
  29. Breakstone S, Dreiblatt M, Dreiblatt K (2009). How to Stop Bullying and Social Aggression: Elementary Grade Lessons and Activities That Teach Empathy, Friendship, and Respect. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-4129-5810-3.
  30. Norton C. "What is the Definition of Relational Bullying / Social Bullying - BRIM Anti-Bullying Software". BRIM Anti-Bullying Software. Archived from the original on 2016-12-01. Retrieved 2016-11-30.
  31. "Cyberbullying". kidshealth.org. Archived from the original on 2016-12-01. Retrieved 2016-11-30.
  32. "What Is Cyberbullying". StopBullying.gov. Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs. 2019-09-24. Retrieved 2023-02-28.
  33. Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace by Noa Davenport, Ruth D. Schwartz and Gail Pursell Elliott.
  34. Ståle Einarsen (2003). Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-25359-8. Archived from the original on 2014-01-02. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  35. Cardemil AR, Cardemil EV, O'Donnell EH (August 2010). "Self-Esteem in Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: A Longitudinal Analysis". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 25 (8): 1489–1502. doi:10.1177/0886260509354579. PMID 20040706. S2CID 26698674.
  36. Batsche GM, Knoff HM (1994). "Bullies and their victims: Understanding a pervasive problem in the schools". School Psychology Review. 23 (2): 165–175. doi:10.1080/02796015.1994.12085704. Archived from the original on 2012-03-02.
  37. "Those who can, do. Those who can't, bully". Bully OnLine. Tim Field. Archived from the original on 2013-07-07. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  38. Syiasha. "Presentation Bullying". Scribd. Scribd Inc. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  39. Levinson EM, Levinson EM (2004). "Assessment of Bullying: A Review of Methods and Instruments". Journal of Counseling & Development. 82 (4): 496–503. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00338.x.
  40. Roy Baumeister. Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty
  41. Patterson G (December 2005). "The bully as victim?". Paediatric Nursing. 17 (10): 27–30. doi:10.7748/paed2005.12.17.10.27.c981. PMID 16372706. S2CID 34334649.
  42. Kumpulainen K (2008). "Psychiatric conditions associated with bullying". International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 20 (2): 121–132. doi:10.1515/ijamh.2008.20.2.121. PMID 18714551. S2CID 32858078.
  43. Hazlerr RJ, Carney JV, Green S, Powell R, Jolly LS (1997). "Areas of Expert Agreement on Identification of School Bullies and Victims". School Psychology International. 18 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1177/0143034397181001. S2CID 144789919.
  44. Craig W (1998). "The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children". Personality and Individual Differences. 24 (1): 123–130. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00145-1.
  45. Ferguson CJ (2011). "Video Games and Youth Violence: A Prospective Analysis in Adolescents" (PDF). Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 40 (4): 377–91. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9610-x. PMID 21161351. S2CID 207206722. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-05-25.
  46. Ball H (Jan 2008). "Genetic and environmental influences on victims, bullies and bully-victims in childhood". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 49 (1): 104–12. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01821.x. PMID 18181884.
  47. ^ Cook CR, Williams KR, Guerra NG, Kim TE, Sadek S (2010). "Predictors of Bullying and Victimization in Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-analytic Investigation" (PDF). School Psychology Quarterly. 25 (2): 65–83. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.617.7810. doi:10.1037/a0020149. hdl:10818/11372. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-03-07. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  48. Juvonen (2003) Bullying Among Young Adolescents: The Strong, the Weak and the Troubled Archived 2011-08-18 at the Wayback Machine in Pediatrics, December 2003, "The benefits of bullying". 2004. Archived from the original on 2011-09-28. Retrieved 2011-09-03.
  49. "Bullies are the healthiest pupils". Education. BBC News. BBC. 1999-12-14. Archived from the original on 2013-10-30. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  50. Carroll M. Brodsky (1976). The Harassed Worker. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-669-01041-1. Archived from the original on 2014-07-08. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  51. Ashforth B (1994). "Petty Tyranny in Organizations". Human Relations. 47 (7): 755–778. doi:10.1177/001872679404700701. S2CID 145699243.
  52. ^ Burger, C., Bachmann, L. (2021). "Perpetration and victimization in offline and cyber contexts: A variable- and person-oriented examination of associations and differences regarding domain-specific self-esteem and school adjustment". Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18 (19): 10429. doi:10.3390/ijerph181910429. PMC 8508291. PMID 34639731.
  53. "Bullying tendency wired in brain". 2008-11-07. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
  54. "Bullies, Victims, and Bystanders". athealth.com: Consumer: Issues. Athealth.com. Archived from the original on 2014-03-05. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  55. "New Tactics To Tackle Bystander's Role In Bullying". Science News. Science Daily. Science Daily, LLC. 2009-01-27. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  56. "419: Petty Tyrant". This American Life: Radio Archive. Chicago Public Media & Ira Glass. 2010-11-12. Archived from the original on 2013-10-10. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  57. "Pasco students get 'hero' training to stop bullying". Pasco County. The Tampa Tribune. Tampa Media Group, LLC. 2010-10-12. Archived from the original on 2014-05-02. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  58. "Program Helps Students Combat Bullying - Students participate with enthusiasm". Winning Harmony Counselling. 2010-10-04. Archived from the original on 2013-05-13. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  59. Thornberg R, Tenenbaum L, Varjas K, Meyers J, Jungert T, Vanegas G (August 2012). "Bystander Motivation in Bullying Incidents: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?". Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 13 (3): 247–252. doi:10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792. PMC 3415829. PMID 22900122.
  60. Jensen IB, Alipour A, Hagberg J, Jensen IB (August 2013). "The impact of bystanding to workplace bullying on symptoms of depression among women and men in industry in Sweden: an empirical and theoretical longitudinal study". International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 86 (6): 709–716. Bibcode:2013IAOEH..86..709E. doi:10.1007/s00420-012-0813-1. ISSN 1432-1246. PMC 3722445. PMID 22940902.
  61. "Bystander Effect | Psychology Today". www.psychologytoday.com. Retrieved 2023-02-28.
  62. "Bystander Effect | Psychology Today". www.psychologytoday.com. Retrieved 2023-03-07.
  63. Vanderbilt D, Augustyn M (2010). "The effects of bullying". Paediatrics and Child Health. 20 (7): 315–320. doi:10.1016/j.paed.2010.03.008.
  64. Andreou E. (2000). "Bully/victim problems and their association with psychological constructs in 8-to 12-year-old Greek schoolchildren". Aggressive Behavior. 26 (1): 49–56. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:1<49::AID-AB4>3.0.CO;2-M.
  65. Austin S., Joseph S. (1996). "Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 year-olds". British Journal of Educational Psychology. 66 (4): 447–456. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01211.x. PMID 9008423.
  66. Callaghan S., Joseph S. (1995). "Self-concept and peer victimization among schoolchildren". Personality and Individual Differences. 18 (1): 161–163. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)00127-E.
  67. Neary A., Joseph S. (1994). "Peer victimization and its relationship to self-concept and depression among schoolgirls". Personality and Individual Differences. 16 (1): 183–186. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90122-8.
  68. Burger C (2022). "Humor styles, bullying victimization and psychological school adjustment: Mediation, moderation and person-oriented analyses". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (18): 11415. doi:10.3390/ijerph191811415. ISSN 1661-7827. PMC 9517355. PMID 36141686.
  69. "Anti-Bullying Centre". Trinity College Dublin. Archived from the original on 2013-11-25. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  70. Kipling D. Williams, Joseph P. Forgas, William Von Hippel (13 May 2013). The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying. Psychology Press. pp. 2–. ISBN 978-1-135-42338-4. Archived from the original on 3 January 2014. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  71. Arsenault LP, Walsh, Elizabeth, Trzesniewski, Kali, et al. (July 2006). "Bullying Victimization Uniquely Contributes to Adjustment Problems in Young Children: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study". Pediatrics. 118 (1): 130–138. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2388. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 16818558. S2CID 28961503.
  72. "UK Mental Health Study". Brandwatch. Brandwatch, Ditch the Label.
  73. Kim YS, Leventhal B (2008). "Bullying and suicide. A review". International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 20 (2): 133–54. doi:10.1515/IJAMH.2008.20.2.133. PMID 18714552. S2CID 41651943.
  74. Statistics on bullying Archived February 17, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  75. Effects of Bullying | StopBullying.gov Archived 2015-11-20 at the Wayback Machine
  76. BRUNSTEIN KLOMEK A, MARROCCO F, KLEINMAN M, SCHONFELD IS, GOULD MS (January 2007). "Bullying, Depression, and Suicidality in Adolescents". Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 46 (1): 40–49. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000242237.84925.18. ISSN 0890-8567. PMID 17195728.
  77. ^ Kaltiala-Heino R, Fröjd S, Marttunen M (2009-07-09). "Involvement in bullying and depression in a 2-year follow-up in middle adolescence". European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 19 (1): 45–55. doi:10.1007/s00787-009-0039-2. ISSN 1018-8827. PMID 19588185. S2CID 23077909.
  78. ^ Fekkes M, Pijpers FI, Verloove-Vanhorick SP (2005-02-01). "Bullying: who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior". Health Education Research. 20 (1): 81–91. doi:10.1093/her/cyg100. ISSN 0268-1153. PMID 15253993.
  79. ^ Hepburn L, Azrael D, Molnar B, Miller M (July 2012). "Bullying and Suicidal Behaviors Among Urban High School Youth". Journal of Adolescent Health. 51 (1): 93–95. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.014. ISSN 1054-139X. PMID 22727083.
  80. Wang J, Nansel TR, Iannotti RJ (April 2011). "Cyber and Traditional Bullying: Differential Association With Depression". Journal of Adolescent Health. 48 (4): 415–417. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.012. ISSN 1054-139X. PMC 3058261. PMID 21402273.
  81. "Men who tormented suicide waitress Brodie Panlock fined". Daily Telegraph. 2010-02-08. Retrieved 14 August 2017.
  82. "Jessica Kassandra Haffer". Keith & Jeralyn Haffer. Archived from the original on 2014-01-04. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  83. "Hamed Nastoh". Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  84. Grzegorek V (2010-08-23). "Family of Sladjana Vidovic, 16-Year-Old Who Committed Suicide, Suing Mentor Schools". Retrieved 2018-01-29.
  85. Caruso K. "April Himes Memorial". Suicide.org. Archived from the original on 2012-12-27. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  86. McLaughlin EC (2013-08-30). "Montana teen loved pit bulls, poetry before rape and suicide". U.S. CNN. Cable News Network. Archived from the original on 2013-10-17. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  87. Pearce M (2013-09-12). "Florida girl, 12, found dead after bullies said 'kill yourself'". U.S.: Nation Now. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2013-10-30. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  88. "bullying suicide statistics". Archived from the original on 2018-03-15. Retrieved 2019-02-06.
  89. Positive Anti-Bullying Strategies by Melissa Graham Archived 2013-11-10 at the Wayback Machine
  90. Vaillancourt T (2009). "Androgen dynamics in the context of children's peer relations: an examination of the links between testosterone and peer victimization". Aggressive Behavior. 35 (1): 103–13. doi:10.1002/ab.20288. PMID 19021234.
  91. Chabrol H., Van Leeuwen N., Rodgers R., Séjourné S. (2009). "Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency". Personality and Individual Differences. 47 (7): 734–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020.
  92. ^ Baughman HM, Dearing S, Giammarco E, Vernon PA (2012-04-01). "Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults". Personality and Individual Differences. 52 (5): 571–575. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.020. ISSN 0191-8869.
  93. ^ Goodboy AK, Martin MM (2015-08-01). "The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the Dark Triad". Computers in Human Behavior. 49: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052. ISSN 0747-5632.
  94. Paul Gilbert, Overcoming Depression (1999) p. 185–6
  95. Carl G. Jung ed., Man and his Symbols (London 1978) p. 181–2
  96. Mayer J, Roberts R, Barasade S (2008). "Human abilities: Emotional intelligence". Annual Review of Psychology. 59 (1): 507–536. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646. PMID 17937602. S2CID 11801336.
  97. Tolegenova A, Jakupov S, Chung MC, Saduova S, Jakupov M (2012). "A Theoretical Formation of Emotional Intelligence and Childhood Trauma among Adolescents". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 69: 1891–1894. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.142.
  98. Mckenna J, Webb J (2013). "Emotional intelligence". British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 76 (12): 560. doi:10.1177/030802261307601202. S2CID 208741104.
  99. Kokkinos CM, Antoniadou N, Asdre A, Voulgaridou K (2016). "Parenting and internet behavior predictors of cyber-bullying and cyber-victimization among preadolescents". Deviant Behavior. 37 (4): 439–455. doi:10.1080/01639625.2015.1060087. ISSN 0163-9625. S2CID 146951404.
  100. Barlett CP, DeWitt CC, Maronna B, Johnson K (2018). "Social media use as a tool to facilitate or reduce cyberbullying perpetration: A review focusing on anonymous and nonanonymous social media platforms". Violence and Gender. 5 (vio.2017.0057): 147–152. doi:10.1089/vio.2017.0057. ISSN 2326-7836. S2CID 240271795.
  101. Jose Bolton, Stan Graeve (2005). No Room for Bullies: From the Classroom to Cyberspace. Boys Town Press. ISBN 978-1-889322-67-4. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  102. Luxton DD, June JD, Fairall JM (2012). "Social media and suicide: a public health perspective". Am J Public Health. 102 (Suppl 2): S195–200. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300608. PMC 3477910. PMID 22401525.
  103. Katherine Quarmby (2011). Scapegoat: Why We Are Failing Disabled People. Portobello Books Limited. ISBN 978-1-84627-321-6. Archived from the original on 2014-01-01. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  104. Clare Sainsbury (30 September 2009). Martian in the Playground: Understanding the Schoolchild with Asperger's Syndrome. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4462-4398-5. Archived from the original on 1 January 2014. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  105. Tony Attwood (2006). The Complete Guide to Asperger's Syndrome. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. pp. 95–111. ISBN 978-1-84310-495-7. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  106. Amanda Kirby (1 October 2002). Dyspraxia: The Hidden Handicap. Souvenir Press. pp. 106–113. ISBN 978-0-285-63512-8. Archived from the original on 1 January 2014. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  107. Geoff Brookes (January 2005). Dyspraxia. Continuum. pp. 43–46. ISBN 978-0-8264-7581-7. Archived from the original on 2014-01-01. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  108. Berlan ED, Corliss HL, Field AE, Goodman E, Austin SB (2010-01-28). "Sexual Orientation and Bullying Among Adolescents in the Growing Up Today Study". Journal of Adolescent Health. 46 (4): 366–371. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.10.015. PMC 2844864. PMID 20307826. Retrieved 2013-10-28.
  109. Meyer D (2017). "The Disregarding of Heteronormativity: Emphasizing a Happy Queer Adulthood and Localizing Anti-Queer Violence to Adolescent Schools". Sexuality Research & Social Policy. 14 (3): 331–344. doi:10.1007/s13178-016-0272-7. S2CID 151482192.
  110. Dannatt SR (2008). "Lawful: Paragraph 20" (PDF). Values and Standards of the British Army. the British Army. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-08-17. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  111. Jean M. Callaghan, Franz Kernic (2003). "Chapter 2: "Social Psychology" of the Individual Soldier". Armed Forces and International Security: Global Trends and Issues. LIT Verlag Münster. pp. 19–. ISBN 978-3-8258-7227-4. Archived from the original on 2014-01-01. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  112. Priesnitz W. "Parental Bullying Creates Bullies". Natural Child Magazine. Wendy Priesnitz. Archived from the original on 2013-10-31. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  113. "Bullying: How parents, teachers, and kids can take action to prevent bullying". American Psychological Association. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  114. ^ Burger C, Strohmeier D, Kollerová L (2022). "Teachers can make a difference in bullying: Effects of teacher interventions on students' adoption of bully, victim, bully-victim or defender roles across time". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 51 (12): 2312–2327. doi:10.1007/s10964-022-01674-6. ISSN 0047-2891. PMC 9596519. PMID 36053439. S2CID 252009527.
  115. Yoon JS, Kerber K (2003). "Bullying: Elementary teachers' attitudes and intervention strategies". Research in Education. 69 (1): 27–35. doi:10.7227/rie.69.3. ISSN 0034-5237. S2CID 219984495.
  116. James Garbarino, Ellen deLara (2 September 2003). And Words Can Hurt Forever: How to Protect Adolescents from Bullying, Harassment, and Emotional Violence. Free Press. ISBN 978-0-7432-2899-2. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  117. Witted KS (2005), "Student Reports of Physical and Psychological Maltreatment in Schools: An Under Explored Aspect of Student Victimization in Schools", PhD dissertation, University of Tennessee, archived from the original on 2013-10-31, retrieved 2013-10-29
  118. Whitted KS, Dupper DR (2007). "Do Teachers Bully Students?: Findings From a Survey of Students in an Alternative Education Setting". Education and Urban Society. 40 (3): 329–341. doi:10.1177/0013124507304487. S2CID 143894407.
  119. "Ottawa News | Latest Information, Updates & Articles | Ottawa Citizen". Archived from the original on 2017-02-10. Retrieved 2016-07-22.
  120. "The NSPCC working definition of Sexual Bullying" (PDF). NSPCC. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  121. Guilty plea over transsexual bashing Archived 2008-05-02 at the Wayback Machine By Mariza O'Keefe in Herald Sun
  122. Rayner, C. & Keashley, L. (2005). Bullying at work: A perspective from Britain and North America. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (eds.) Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 271-296). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  123. Rayner, C., & Cooper, C. L. (2006). Workplace Bullying. In Kelloway, E., Barling, J. & Hurrell Jr., J. (eds.), Handbook of workplace violence (pp. 47-90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  124. Google ngrams
  125. Adams, Andrea with contributions from Crawford, Neil Bullying at Work: How to Confront and Overcome It (1992)
  126. Ramsay, S., Troth, A & Branch, S. (2010). Work-place bullying: A group processes framework Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(4), 799-816.
  127. Gillen PA, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG, Begley CM, Luyben AG (2017-01-30). "Interventions for prevention of bullying in the workplace". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1 (1): CD009778. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009778.pub2. PMC 6464940. PMID 28134445.
  128. Keashly L, Neuman JH (2010). "Faculty Experiences with Bullying in Higher Education - Causes, Consequences, and Management" (PDF). Administrative Theory & Praxis. 32 (1): 48–70. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806320103. S2CID 142766958. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-10-31. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  129. Notelaers G, Vermunt JK, Baillien E, Einarsen S, De Witte H (2011). "Exploring Risk Groups Workplace Bullying with Categorical Data". Industrial Health. 49 (1): 73–88. doi:10.2486/indhealth.ms1155. PMID 20823631. Archived from the original on 2012-04-25. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  130. Thomson R. "IT profession blighted by bullying". ComputerWeekly.com: Feature. TechTarget. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  131. ^ Ann Richards, Sharon L. Edwards (2008). A Nurse's Survival Guide to the Ward. Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 978-0-443-06897-3. Archived from the original on 2014-01-01. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
  132. Le Mire, Suzanne; Owens, Rosemary A propitious moment?: Workplace bullying and regulation of the legal profession University of New South Wales Law Journal, The Volume 37 Issue 3 (Dec 2014) Archived 2015-02-01 at the Wayback Machine
  133. Society publishes guidance on tackling bullying in solicitor profession Archived 2015-02-01 at the Wayback Machine The Journal of the Law Society of Scotland 27 June 2011
  134. "Violence, Incivility, & Bullying". American Nurses Association. 14 October 2017. Retrieved 21 April 2022.; Dellasega CA (2009). "Bullying Among Nurses". American Journal of Nursing. 109 (1): 52–58. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000344039.11651.08. PMID 19112267.
  135. "Scientists are teaching robots to avoid children — because kids can be surprisingly mean". Business Insider. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
  136. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). Rivara F, Suzanne LM (eds.). Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice. National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/23482. ISBN 978-0-309-44067-7. PMID 27748087. S2CID 156853266. Archived from the original on 2016-05-18.
  137. Ross SW, Horner RH (2009). "Bully prevention in positive behavior support". Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 42 (4): 747–59. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-747. PMC 2791686. PMID 20514181.
  138. "TXABC". TXABC. Retrieved 2023-11-09.
  139. Wölfer R, Schultze-Krumbholz A, Zagorscak P, Jäkel A, Göbel K, Scheithauer H (December 2014). "Prevention 2.0: Targeting Cyberbullying @ School". Prevention Science. 15 (6): 879–887. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0438-y. ISSN 1389-4986. PMID 24122481. S2CID 22915480.
  140. Wölfer R, Schultze-Krumbholz A, Zagorscak P, Jäkel A, Göbel K, Scheithauer H (2014-12-01). "Prevention 2.0: Targeting Cyberbullying @ School". Prevention Science. 15 (6): 879–887. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0438-y. ISSN 1573-6695. PMID 24122481. S2CID 22915480.
  141. W. Craig et al., "Responding to bullying, what works"
  142. W. Ci, "What can be done to stop bullying among children? Evidence from Canada"
  143. Bully-zero Australia Foundation, "Respond to bullying" Archived 2018-05-26 at the Wayback Machine
  144. "Stop bullying on the spot"
  145. Safe work Australia, "Guide for preventing and responding to workplace bullying"
  146. Veronica Birkett, "Bullied? Don't tell the teacher"
  147. "Responding to bullying in Arc UNSW sports"
  148. E. Field, "The prevalence of workplace bullying in Australia"

Further reading

External links

Library resources about
Bullying
Bullying
Types
Elements
Organizations
Experts
Academics
Activists
Actions
Notable suicides
(List)
Murder–suicides
(incidents)
Related topics
Abuse
Types
Related topics
Manipulation (psychology)
Positive manipulation
Negative manipulation
Other manipulation
Related manipulation topics
Conformity
Enforcement
Proscription
Governmental pressure
Group pressure
Individual pressure
Conformity
Experiments
Anticonformity
Categories: