This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Salvidrim! (talk | contribs) at 21:37, 22 July 2024 (→"Super Mario Bros. 35": Spelling/grammar/punctuation/typographical correction). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:37, 22 July 2024 by Salvidrim! (talk | contribs) (→"Super Mario Bros. 35": Spelling/grammar/punctuation/typographical correction)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) < July 21 July 23 >July 22
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 22, 2024.
Electronic entertainment
- Electronic entertainment → Video game (talk · links · history · stats)
The concept is not exclusive to its target. First exceptions that come to mind are Television and Film. Steel1943 (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Game trading
- Game trading → Video game (talk · links · history · stats)
Not exclusive to Video game. Could refer to any subtopic of Game with a physical (or heck, some virtual/digital in today's world) representation. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Computer and video game distinction
At the present time, Computer game redirects to Video game. For this reason, there is no distinction by default, so leading readers to any article via this phrase can be seen as misleading. Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Home computer game
- Home computer game → PC game (talk · links · history · stats)
- Home computer games → PC game (talk · links · history · stats)
Not sure if these redirects should be retained at their current target or be retargeted to Video game. Per the result of Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 5#Computer game, Computer game was retargeted away from PC game and to Video game. Considering the current states of the articles Home computer and Personal computer ("PC" in the current target), it does not seem as though the usage of the phrase "home computer" exclusively refers to "personal computer". Steel1943 (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Multiplayer Online Adventure Game
The word "adventure" is nowhere in the target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is meant to refer or define. Steel1943 (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Online multi-player gamers
This redirect seems vague/unclear, specifically since the redirect uses the word "gamers" instead of "games", as well as the word "online". Between several topics including the current target, Multiplayer video game, Massively multiplayer online game, Gamer and/or subtopics, amongst others, it does not seem clear where this redirect should target, if anywhere. Steel1943 (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Land 2
wouldn't it be wacky if "land" was a common word in game boy game titles, "2" was a common number in game sequels, and there were at least 2 other games with both of them? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- off the top of my head, i can name
- kirbo's dream land 2
- donkey kong land 2
- bomberman land 2 (not on the game boy, but whatever)
- wario land 2
- i don't know if this could be deleted as a vague search or dabified, unless someone wants to see if there's a sequel to the concept of land cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Ambiguous/vague. Steel1943 (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Priestess
- Priestess → Priest (talk · links · history · stats)
- Female priest → Ordination of women (talk · links · history · stats)
Re-target to Ordination of women. This is for consistency with Female priest, as agreed upon at Talk:Priestess_(disambiguation)#Requested_move_25_August_2023. Discussion of the other redirect occurred at Misplaced Pages:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_15#Female_priest. There are concerns about the appropriateness of the current target to house a section for the target of this redirect. See Talk:Priest#Priestesses. 174.92.25.207 (talk) 19:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. A priestess is a female priest, therefore the topic is clearly the covered by the article at priest. I've never heard the term used in connection with the origination of women, and would be frankly rather WP:ASTONISHed if the redirect went there. — Amakuru (talk) 20:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's ordination, not origination. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I nominated the other redirect Female priest in case we want to change it to Priest for consistency.
- @Amakuru: You "never heard the term ... the origination of women, and ... WP:ASTONISHed"?
FYI, I created this RfD while dealing with Draft:Priestess, and related articles' history might be useful. 174.92.25.207 (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Keep per Shhhnotsoloud - if someone prepends "female" to this then the topic is most likely to refer to ordination of women
— User:Amakuru 15:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
"Super Mario Bros. 35"
overuse of quotation marks is a tony zaret thing. this is apparently the result of a botched move cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as G7 - oh yeah, totally my mistake when I created the article and moved it to the right title. If I was admin I would have moved without leaving a redirect. I'm the only revision so totally should be a quick G7. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 21:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Assassination of Donald Trump
- Assassination of Donald Trump → Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (talk · links · history · stats)
This has twice been deleted as an attack page, once by Liz and once by Isabelle Belato. While it does impute a motive to the gunman, it also strikes me as a plausible redirect. Hence my taking it here for further discussion as to a correct outcome. If deletion is decided to be appropriate I would suggest the page be salted. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Plausible search term redirect. C F A 💬 19:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's a blatant WP:G10 violation. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- "Blatant" is quite the stretch here. It is a plausible search term. Who is it targeting as an attack page? C F A 💬 19:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- It meets this criterion as it is inherently negative and misleading. Redirects implying the death or assassination of a living person can have serious reputational impacts. In the case of a high-profile individual like Donald Trump, such implications can be considered defamatory and harmful. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- "Blatant" is quite the stretch here. It is a plausible search term. Who is it targeting as an attack page? C F A 💬 19:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's a blatant WP:G10 violation. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and WP:SALT per WP:G10. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see who this disparages, at least in any way that the actual title of the page it redirects to does. Indeed, it grants the perpetrator a success that the directed page doesn't. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hence it disparages the target, Donald Trump. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing how that is a disparagement. An inaccuracy, yes, but it says nothing about his character, and if followed, the situation is quickly revealed. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 19:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Even if the redirect does not disparage character, its misleading nature and potential to cause harm align with the reasons for which similar pages have been deleted. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing how that is a disparagement. An inaccuracy, yes, but it says nothing about his character, and if followed, the situation is quickly revealed. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 19:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hence it disparages the target, Donald Trump. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Neveselbert who is the living person being attacked? Can you explain a bit further how they're being attacked? I'm entirely willing to admit I might be missing something (and indeed did a sanity check before declining and bringing it here given that two admins I respect had already deleted it as G10). Barkeep49 (talk) 19:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- We have a responsibility to present accurate and neutral information. A title like this fails to meet these standards by presenting a false and sensational version of events. Two respected administrators have already deemed the redirect a violation, indicating a consensus that it constitutes an attack page. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am also someone who regularly patrols and deletes G10s and so knowing what the community consensus was felt like an appropriate step to take. For me, it seems like WP:RNEUTRAL would allow this title to me if it wasn't a BLP violation. So far it's not clear how Trump is harmed by someone saying he was assassination any more than Obama is harmed by the listed example around his being a Muslim in our redirect guideline. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- We have a responsibility to present accurate and neutral information. A title like this fails to meet these standards by presenting a false and sensational version of events. Two respected administrators have already deemed the redirect a violation, indicating a consensus that it constitutes an attack page. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see who this disparages, at least in any way that the actual title of the page it redirects to does. Indeed, it grants the perpetrator a success that the directed page doesn't. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how this title is a G10 any more than its target's is. —Cryptic 19:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- He was not assassinated. It's no different to having a Death of Donald Trump redirect. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is different. Where would Death of Donald Trump redirect to? Assassination of Donald Trump simply eliminates a word and brings you to the accurate page. He was very nearly assassinated. If anything, it's better to have this redirect to clarify any confusion about what happened. C F A 💬 19:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- The search function can achieve that without the use of a fictional redirect. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is different. Where would Death of Donald Trump redirect to? Assassination of Donald Trump simply eliminates a word and brings you to the accurate page. He was very nearly assassinated. If anything, it's better to have this redirect to clarify any confusion about what happened. C F A 💬 19:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- He was not assassinated. It's no different to having a Death of Donald Trump redirect. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - it's a shortened version of the the target page. The fact that the attemptted assassination was not successful does not make it an invalid redirect. I think it's in compliance with WP:SHORT.
The Mountain of Eden (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)The Mountain of Eden (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I would say Delete as "Assassination of Donald Trump" would imply an actual assassination; But I could also got for Keep with caveat to mark the redirect with {{R from non-neutral name}} →AzaToth 19:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. A clear and obvious term under which someone might search for this event. — Amakuru (talk) 20:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't think it falls under G10 (Assassinate Donald Trump would be a blatant G10 violation, not sure about this title), but it is very misleading and inaccurate, does not seem to fall under WP:RPURPOSE, and does appear to fail WP:R#DELETE #2... as Neveselbert already said, it is as plausible of a search term for the event in question as Killing of Donald Trump or Death of Donald Trump... he was not assassinated, no one that has heard anything about the event is going to think he was assassinated, thus no one is likely to be searching for the Assassination of Donald Trump... and I think I also agree with it being SALTed, until (if) it is ever a true statement, at which point we would obviously need to create a new article using this title... - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Sącz dialect
- Sącz dialect → Sącz Lachs (talk · links · history · stats)
Not found at target article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and speedy. This whole region is very complicated dialectally and in terms of terminology, and so things had to change. Vininn126 (talk) 19:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Lebanese Forces Cross
Not found at target article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: I believe it is referring to the cross on the flag. See the infobox ("Cross of Resistance flag of the Lebanese Forces militia, adopted in 1984"). Probably rarely used but no harm in keeping it. C F A 💬 19:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as likely search term per WP:RKEEP #3. Term is used in several news articles: —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Calls for Joe Biden to suspend his 2024 United States presidential campaign
- Calls for Joe Biden to suspend his 2024 United States presidential campaign → Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election (talk · links · history · stats)
List of Democrats who opposed the Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign might be a better target. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign#Calls to withdraw which explains the issue and has a see also link to the list. C F A 💬 19:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Vocal minority
- Vocal minority → Silent majority (talk · links · history · stats)
this term is the exact opposite of the article it links to -- FMSky (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and add special Rcat. Catching the opposite of something is a valid reason to create a redirect pointing to the opposite of the redirect (for as long as we don't have an article about it specifically). However, we usually tag such redirects with {{R from opposite}} to improve reverse loopup capabilities, and this is what we should do here as well. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete to WP:RETURNTORED. It is a frequently-used term that we should have a separate article on. A redirect isn't helping. C F A 💬 19:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Varsity (upcoming film)
I have no idea what the idea is behind this redirect but in my opinion it is useless The Banner talk 16:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- I created Varsity (upcoming film), someone else separately created Prime Target (TV series). It is my understanding that these are for the same production, and Prime Target is the correct title for broadcast. Hildreth gazzard (talk) 17:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep but move to Varsity (TV series) since the subject is not a film per se, and the word "upcoming" is unnecessary IMO; also mention that "Varsity" was the original title of the series before production began. CycloneYoris 01:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)- Move to Varsity (TV series) per Cyclone. 88.235.215.238 (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Power flower
- Power flower → Super Mario 64 DS#Gameplay (talk · links · history · stats)
things named "power flower" have been in three mario games so far (though they're all different things), and none of them seem to be the primary target for the term cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010
- North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010 → David Taylor (North West Leicestershire MP) (talk · links · history · stats)
Never happened. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak refine to the "Standing down" section where it gets explained the most. There are a few hits dotted around the web as a by-election was expected. Thryduulf (talk) 23:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- In which case it should be renamed Planned North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010, without leaving a redirect. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- If this were an article I could support moving but only retaining a redirect, as a redirect I can only oppose. The current title is the plausible search term, given that's how UK by-election articles are titled. Thryduulf (talk) 08:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's not at all plausible, it's a fictional event. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not it's not fictional. It was an expected event that ended up not happening because it turned out to be a rare exception to the norm of by-elections happening within ~four months of a vacancy arising. Given that norm and the rarity of exceptions, it is very plausible for someone seeing the MP for North West Leicestershire died in late December 2009 to expect there to have been a by-election in the constituency in the first quarter of 2010. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it is ultimately fictional, as it never happened and can never happen, as it's no longer 2010. Like I said, the redirect can be moved to serve the same purpose. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not it's not fictional. It was an expected event that ended up not happening because it turned out to be a rare exception to the norm of by-elections happening within ~four months of a vacancy arising. Given that norm and the rarity of exceptions, it is very plausible for someone seeing the MP for North West Leicestershire died in late December 2009 to expect there to have been a by-election in the constituency in the first quarter of 2010. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's not at all plausible, it's a fictional event. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- If this were an article I could support moving but only retaining a redirect, as a redirect I can only oppose. The current title is the plausible search term, given that's how UK by-election articles are titled. Thryduulf (talk) 08:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- In which case it should be renamed Planned North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010, without leaving a redirect. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Did the preparations for the by-election actually start? The Banner talk 11:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- AIUI formal preparations can only start once the writ for the election has been issued (which it never was), but it is very likely that at least some informal ones were. Given that those same preparations would have just become preparations for the general election when that was called, and most of them wouldn't have been newsworthy I'm not sure how you'd go about ascertaining, especially at this distance. Thryduulf (talk) 16:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- The by-election should have been within four months after vacating the seat, if I read it correct. That would bring the by-election to the end of April 2010 (roughly). That makes it more than likely that the by-election was effectively cancelled due to the upcoming general election. So in my opinion, it makes sense to retarget to 2010 United Kingdom general election The Banner talk 18:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- AIUI formal preparations can only start once the writ for the election has been issued (which it never was), but it is very likely that at least some informal ones were. Given that those same preparations would have just become preparations for the general election when that was called, and most of them wouldn't have been newsworthy I'm not sure how you'd go about ascertaining, especially at this distance. Thryduulf (talk) 16:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C F A 💬 17:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Mystic Ruins
either vague, or more closely associated with sonic adventure cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris 21:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Template:Simbad link
Unnecessary creation of a redirect that merits deletion. Intrisit (talk) 16:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason given for deletion.
- 21 Andromedae (talk) 17:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't find it too far-fetched that someone will only capitalise the first letter. Procyon117 (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: What was the point of nominating this? Obviously a reasonable redirect. C F A 💬 19:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Active worlds in the Solar System
- Active worlds in the Solar System → Volcano#Volcanoes on other celestial bodies (talk · links · history · stats)
not the biggest volcano nerd out there, so sorry in advance for any uninformed claims, but from reading the target and other related articles, there seem to be no other celestial bodies that meet the criteria of being a "world", currently having volcanic activity, and being in the solar system, though mercury is a strong "maybe". on another note, i'm not entirely sure "active world" is a term used to refer to volcanic activity, and the creator of the redirect (who seems to have made it as an essay) seemed to have also been referring to geysers, and counting moons as "worlds". for results. wikipedia gave me an mmo (shoutouts to hitomi fujiko), google gave me assorted apps and brands, and wiktionary gave me nothing. unless there's a detail i'm missing or this is a scientific term that refers to celestial bodies with volcanic activity, i'll vote for deletion cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- on this note, i should mention "volcanically active worlds", a redirect that specifies the type of activity it refers to and does not specify the location. jury's still out on the definition of world though, but it's a step in the right direction cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a better redirect at this time as is this not a redirect with potential.?
- Jury is out on definition of volcano as noted in the article itself and presumably meaning of world. Planet and moon are more accurate terms. Many "worlds" are active in some way as they are above absolute zero and may have internal or external entropy sources that disturb their surface however that is defined. Someone could get a good article out of this so my vote is to retain in hope someone will do the job, unless there is a better redirect. ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- drifting into personal opinion territory by now, but wouldn't returning to red be better for that? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think "Active worlds" is too ambiguous to justify keeping "Active worlds in the Solar System" as a redirect to Volcano#Volcanoes on other celestial bodies. I also have not found any other suitable redirect targets because the problem is the lack of meaning in the redirect's title rather than a problem with any targets of the redirect. I recommend delete. GeoWriter (talk) 11:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- drifting into personal opinion territory by now, but wouldn't returning to red be better for that? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Vice President Vance
- Vice President Vance → J. D. Vance (talk · links · history · stats)
This is misleading. Vance is currently not the Vice President nor has he ever been the Vice President. Pages like this for candidates who have been VP were not created until after the election. Wozal (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as a POV violation unless and until he becomes VPOTUS. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Redirects are not required to be neutral (WP:RNEUTRAL) and the article explains that he is a nominee in the first sentence. This redirects helps confused readers get correct information. Ca 16:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. We're not in the business of predicting the future. - Eureka Lott 16:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. He is only a nominee for vice president. If he becomes vice president, then fair enough. But not right now. Procyon117 (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete for now. WP:CRYSTAL and faulty/misleading WP:SEO based on the present day situation. Steel1943 (talk) 21:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, recreate IF they win... - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Scared Silly
- Scared Silly → Ronald McDonald (talk · links · history · stats)
normally a little vague, but as a name, it seems more primarily associated with an open season movie cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak DABify - This is the title of the first episode of The Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald, and also for the movie Open Season: Scared Silly. I'm uncertain if the Open Season movie is the WP:PTOPIC for the phrase "Scared Silly" specifically, and google shows that it's the title of more things as well, such as a children's novel by Elizabeth Eulberg (no wiki-page), a picture book by Marc Brown (author) (very famous author), a stage play by Peter Bloedel (probably not notable), and likely many more... as this is a common English expression as well! Google does show the movie a bit more prominently than the other entries, mind you, so the PTOPIC argument can certainly be made, but that's why my DABify !vote is weak. Although I will say, if a PTOPIC is established, a disambiguation page should probably be made alongside it and hatnoted. Fieari (talk) 06:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Paper Bowser
- Paper Bowser → Paper Mario (talk · links · history · stats)
no game under that title yet (give them time), wouldn't the list of paper mario characters be a better target? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- oh wait
- there's no section specifically for bowser there, and his article doesn't mention him in paper mario beyond "he was there". forget retargeting, i vote to delete as unhelpful cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Keeping under the idea that they might make a game with that title is pointless WP:CRYSTAL-gazing, and unfounded to boot. As it stands now, we have no information at all regarding Bowser's inclusion in the Paper Mario series, nor any other place where something might be known as 'Paper Bowser'. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 01:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, although he really should have a section at list of Paper Mario characters. QuicoleJR (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Un assiolo (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - We lack information on this topic, and shouldn't claim we have it when we don't. Sometimes the mere existence of a redirect can be informative even without a mention, but this is not one of those cases. Fieari (talk) 07:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam. There is some content in that article on Paper Bowser (as an independent character to boot, not just "mainstream Bowser in a paper art style"!). AFAIK Paper Jam is the only game where Paper Bowser is a character in his own right, making that game a possible target. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 08:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For opinion on the retarget suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget per Mellohi! above. Seems like a reasonable target and the character is mentioned in the article. C F A 💬 19:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
FX (African TV channel)
Since Rosguill saw no worth in having content for this title out of GNG concerns, I've listed it here for a possible deletion. Intrisit (talk) 15:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Refine to FX (international)#South Africa. Why would we delete this? C F A 💬 20:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
The Economic Times (India)
Requesting deletion of unnecessary redirect created in 2013. Intrisit (talk) 14:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Readers may believe there be multiple publication with the name "The Economic Times", and add a natural-looking disambiguator (India) to disambiguate it. Seems clear and useful to me. Ca 16:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as a harmless {{r from unnecessary disambiguation}}. It's in use in 19 articles, so deleting it would be a bad idea. - Eureka Lott 16:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: standard {{r from unnecessary disambiguation}}. C F A 💬 19:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
All-Star Batman and Robin
- All-Star Batman and Robin → All Star Batman & Robin, the Boy Wonder (talk · links · history · stats)
- All star batman and robin → All Star Batman & Robin, the Boy Wonder (talk · links · history · stats)
- All Star Batman and Robin → All Star Batman & Robin, the Boy Wonder (talk · links · history · stats)
- All-Star Batman & Robin → All Star Batman & Robin, the Boy Wonder (talk · links · history · stats)
all-star batman and robin is a different goddamn comic from all star batman & robin, the goddamn boy wonder, but its only meaningful goddamn mention is in the goddamn list of batman comics, and the goddamn results seem to give goddamn priority to all star batman & robin, the goddamn boy wonder. should they be goddamn retargeted to the goddamn list of batman comics, or are they goddamn fine as is? cogsan (goddamn talk page) (goddamn contribs) 13:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Leica MD-2
- Leica MD-2 → Leica M4#MD-2 (talk · links · history · stats)
Right now only seems to be mentioned in Leica M1. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The redirect points to the M4 article, because the Leica MD-2 is a simplified derivative of the Leica M4-2. I have added a sentence about it including a reference to the article. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Republican blue
- Democrat red → Red states and blue states (talk · links · history · stats)
Huh? * Pppery * it has begun... 05:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- those sound more like pokémon fangames than political terms. delete per "what" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I searched on duck.com and saw no sources using this term. Best I found is Ron Paul 2012 presidential campaign § "Blue Republican" movement Ca 16:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This article explains the terms. C F A 💬 19:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Safe state
- Safe state → Red states and blue states (talk · links · history · stats)
Dubious primacy - searching for "safe state" is giving me lots of non-political ways a state can be safe. Suggest deletion unless a better target is found. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- delete as vague, as it's also subject to varying definitions of "state". could refer to a move in a fighting game being plus on block for all we know cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Change into disambiguation page. Doing our readers a better service than only pointing to one meaning or non at all. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This is far too vague. I actually think the reader is better served by not cluttering the Search tool with a potentially confusing redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Vague redirect with potential bias in reference to either subject of the current target. Steel1943 (talk) 21:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Apple reinvents the phone.
Unlikely search term. This appears to be the official slogan of the iPhone. Mia Mahey (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as {{r from slogan}}. — GodsyCONT) 10:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete for trailing full stop. From Search, the slogan (or rather press release headline) appears to have been "Apple Reinvents the Phone with iPhone". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Bullitt (album)
There is also Bullitt (soundtrack), and this redirect is too confusing. saebou (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to Bullitt (disambiguation) as a {{r from incomplete disambiguation}}. This definitely shouldn't be deleted, because Bullitt (Wilton Felder album) was at this title until a few hours ago. - Eureka Lott 13:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget per above. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)