Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hcobb (talk | contribs) at 02:33, 14 December 2012 (Chinese intrusion into Japanese territory). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Senkaku Islands dispute concerns a territorial dispute over a group of uninhabited islands known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan, the Diaoyu (in China) and Tiaoyutai Islands (in Taiwan). Aside from a 1945 to 1972 period of administration by the United States, the archipelago has been controlled by Japan since 1895. The People's Republic of China (PRC) disputed the proposed US handover of authority to Japan in 1971 and has asserted its claims to the islands since that time. The Republic of China (Taiwan) also claims the islands. The territory is close to key shipping lanes, rich fishing grounds, and there may be oil reserves in the area.

Japan argues that it surveyed the islands in the late 19th century and found them to be Terra nullius (Latin: land belonging to no one); subsequently China acquiesced to Japanese sovereignty until the 1970s. The PRC and the ROC argue that documentary evidence prior to the First Sino-Japanese War indicates Chinese possession and that the territory is accordingly a Japanese seizure that should be returned as the rest of Imperial Japan's conquests were returned in 1945.

Although the United States does not have an official position on the merits of the competing sovereignty claims, the islands are included within the U.S. Japan Security Treaty meaning that a defense of the islands by Japan may compel support from the United States military.

In September 2012, the Japanese government purchased the remaining three of the disputed islands that it did not already own from their private owner, prompting large-scale protests in China.

Islands

The Senkaku Islands are located in the East China Sea between Japan, the People's Republic of China, and the Republic of China. The archipelago contains five uninhabited islands and three barren rocks, ranging in size from 800 m to 4.32 km.

Fishing rights

The issue of sovereignty has been carefully circumvented in bilateral fishing agreements. In the 1997 fishing agreement, the Senkaku Islands were officially excluded from China's exclusive economic zone, but in a letter of intent Japan explained that Japan would not prevent Chinese boats from fishing there. Some Chinese sources have subsequently argued that this letter constitutes a waiver of Japan's claim to exclusive fishing rights.

Territorial dispute

Beginnings

Following the Meiji Restoration, the Meiji Japanese government formally annexed what was known as the Ryukyu Kingdom as Okinawa Prefecture in 1879. The Senkaku Islands, which lay between the Ryukyu Kingdom and the Qing empire, became the Sino-Japanese boundary for the first time.

In 1885, the Japanese Governor of Okinawa Prefecture, Nishimura Sutezo, petitioned the Meiji government, asking that it take formal control of the islands. However, Inoue Kaoru, the Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs, commented that the islands lay near to the border area with the Qing empire and that they had been given Chinese names. He also cited an article in a Chinese newspaper that had previously claimed that Japan was occupying islands off China's coast. Inoue was concerned that if Japan proceeded to erect a landmark stating its claim to the islands, it would make the Qing empire suspicious. Following Inoue's advice, Yamagata Aritomo, the Minister of the Interior, turned down the request to incorporate the islands, insisting that this matter should not be "revealed to the news media".

On 14 January 1895, during the First Sino-Japanese War, Japan incorporated the islands under the administration of Okinawa, stating that it had conducted surveys since 1884 and that the islands were terra nullius, with there being no evidence to suggest that they had been under the Qing empire's control.

After China lost the war, both countries signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki in April 1895 that stipulated, among other things, that China would cede to Japan "the island of Formosa together with all islands appertaining or belonging to said island of Formosa (Taiwan)". The treaty, however, was superseded in 1945 by the Treaty of San Francisco, which was signed between Japan and part of the Allied Powers in 1951 after Japan lost the Second World War. In the treaty of San Francisco, Japan explicitly relinquished the control of Taiwan/Formosa together with all islands appertaining or belonging to it. There is a disagreement between the Japanese, PRC and ROC governments as to whether the islands are implied to be part of the "islands appertaining or belonging to said island of Formosa" in the Treaty of Shimonoseki. China and Taiwan both dispute the Japanese claim by citing Yamagata Aritomo's reasons and decisions to turn down the request to incorporate the islands in 1885. Both PRC and ROC asserted sovereignty over the islands. Japan points out that the islands were placed under the administration of the United States of America as part of the Nansei Shoto Islands, in accordance with Article III of the said treaty and China expressed no objection to the status of the Islands being under the administration of the United States under Article III of the San Francisco Peace Treaty. In 1972, the United States ended its occupation of Okinawa and the Ryukyu Island chain, which included the Senkaku Islands.

Chinese (PRC) and Taiwanese (ROC) positions

Although Chinese authorities did not assert claims to the islands while they were under US administration, formal claims were announced in 1971 when the US was preparing to end its adminsitration. While Japan argues that a 1968 survey finding possible oil reserves in the area explains the emergence of Chinese claims, the Chinese argue that the sovereignty dispute is a legacy of Japanese imperialism and China's failure to secure the territory's prompt return following Japan's military defeat in 1945 was due to the complexities of the Chinese Civil War. The two civil war combatants, the Chinese Communist Party and the Kuomintang (KMT), formed the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) respectively, and the communists eventually forced the ROC off the mainland to Taiwan in 1949. Both the PRC and ROC currently claim sovereignty based on arguments that include the following points:

1. Discovery and early recording in maps and travelogues
2. The islands were China's frontier off-shore defence against wokou (Japanese pirates) during the Ming and Qing dynasties (1368–1911). A Chinese map of Asia, as well as a map compiled by a Japanese cartographer in the 18th century, shows the islands as a part of China.
3. Japan took control of the islands during the First Sino-Japanese War in 1894–1895, to whom they were formally ceded by the Treaty of Shimonoseki. A letter of the Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs in 1885, warning against annexing the islands due to anxiety about China's response, shows that Japan knew the islands were not terra nullius.
4. The Potsdam Declaration stated that "Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshū, Hokkaidō, Kyūshū, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine", and "we" referred to the victors of the Second World War who met at Potsdam, the USA, the UK and the Republic of China. Japan accepted the terms of the Declaration when it surrendered.
5. China formally protested the 1971 US transfer of control to Japan

According to Chinese claims, the islands, known to China at least since 1372, had been repeatedly referred to as part of Chinese territory since 1534, and later controlled by the Qing Dynasty along with Taiwan. The earliest written record of Diaoyutai dates back to 1403 in a Chinese book Voyage with the Tail Wind (zh:順風相送), which recorded the names of the islands that voyagers had passed on a trip from Fujian to the Ryukyu Kingdom.

By 1534, all the major islets of the island group were identified and named in the book Record of the Imperial Envoy's Visit to Ryukyu (使琉球錄). and were the Ming Dynasty's (16th-century) sea-defense frontier. One of the islands, Chihweiyu, marked the boundary of the Ryukyu Islands. This is viewed by the PRC and ROC as meaning that these islands did not belong to the Ryukyu Islands.

The First Sino-Japanese War broke out in 1894. After the Qing dynasty of China lost the war, both countries signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki on 17 April 1895. In Article 2(b) the Treaty stated that "the island of Formosa, together with all islands appertaining or belonging to the said island of Formosa" should be ceded to Japan. Although the Treaty did not specifically name every ceded island, the PRC and ROC argue that Japan did not include the islands as part of Okinawa Prefecture prior to 1894, and that the eventual inclusion occurred only as a consequence of China's cession of Taiwan and the Pescadores to Japan after the Sino-Japanese War.

The Japanese government argues that the islands were not ceded by this treaty but the claim is disputed by Chinese governments, quoting the documents of Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1884. In that year, the Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs objected to the annexation of those islands by stating that those islands were "near to the Qing's (China's) border", "had Chinese names", and Japanese activity "in the offshore's coast of Qing Dynasty had already raised the attention of Chinese newspapers and were warned by China". Following this advice, the Japanese interior minister, Yamagata Aritomo, turned down the request for incorporating those islands into Japanese territory. The Chinese governments see it as evidence to disprove the Japanese claim that those islands were terra nullius when they decided to incorporate them in 1895.

The Japanese government kept postponing the issue and it was only in 1895, when Japan's victory in the Sino-Japanese War was manifested, that the application was finally accepted in a Cabinet meeting. They also claim that the Japanese reference to these islands did not appear in Japanese government documents before 1884.

The PRC and ROC governments claim that during negotiations with China over the Ryukyu Islands after the First Sino-Japanese War, the islands were not mentioned at all in a partition plan suggested by US ex-President Grant. The lease of the islands in 1896 and subsequent purchase in 1930 by the Koga family were merely domestic arrangements made by the Japanese government which had no bearing on the legal status of the islands."

According to PRC, Kuomintang leader Chiang Kai-shek failed to protest American decisions with regard to the disposition of the islands because he depended on the US for support.

In April 2012, Taiwan declined an invitation from the PRC to work together to resolve the territorial dispute with Japan. Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Lai Shin-yuan said, "The ROC and Mainland China will not deal with the disputes together. Mainland China said the two sides should solve these issues together, but that is not the approach we are taking because already have sovereignty disputes. We insist on our sovereignty."

Regarding Japan's argument about the 1958 People's Daily, Jin Canrong, a professor at Renmin University of China thinks that the article, which is anonymous, implys that Ryukyu Islands should be a sovereign state, also independent from Japan. Other Chinese commentators, including a government research institution run by a retired People's Armed Police general, extend the Chinese claim to the entire Ryukyu chain, including Okinawa.

Japanese position

The Japanese stance is that there is no territorial issue that needs to be resolved. It has stated the following points as claim for the islands and counter-argument against China's claim.

1. The islands had been uninhabited and showed no trace of having been under the control of China prior to 1895.
2. The islands were neither part of Taiwan nor part of the Pescadores Islands, which were ceded to Japan by the Qing Dynasty of China in Article II of the May 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki, thus were not later renounced by Japan under Article II of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
3. Though the islands were controlled by the United States as an occupying power between 1945 and 1972, Japan has since 1972 exercised administration over the islands.
4. Japanese allege that Taiwan and China only started claiming ownership of the islands in 1971, following a May 1969 United Nations report that a large oil and gas reserve may exist under the seabed near the islands.

After the Meiji Restoration, the Japanese government surveyed the islands in 1885, which found that the islands were terra nullius and that there was no evidence to suggest that they had ever been under Chinese control. At the time of this survey, however, Yamagata Aritomo, the minister of interior of the Meji government, took a cautious approach and put off the request to incorporate the islands.

Japan erected a marker on Kubajima and Uotsurijima to incorporate the islands as its territory, a decision it publicized in 1950. Four of the islands were subsequently developed by Koga Tatsushirō (古賀 辰四郎) and his family, with the permission of the Japanese government.

Japan claims that neither China nor Ryukyu had recognized sovereignty over the uninhabited islands. Therefore, they claim that Chinese documents only prove that Kumejima, the first inhabited island reached by the Chinese, belonged to Okinawa. Kentaro Serita (芹田 健太郎) of Kobe University points out that the official history book of the Ming Dynasty compiled during the Qing Dynasty, called the History of Ming (明史), describes Taiwan in its "Biographies of Foreign Countries" (外国列传) section. Thus, China did not control the Senkaku Islands or Taiwan during the Ming Dynasty.

After a number of Chinese were rescued from a shipwreck in 1920, an official letter authored by the Chinese Consul Feng Mien (冯冕/馮冕) in Nagasaki on behalf of the Republic of China (中華民國) on 20 May 1921, made reference to "Senkaku Islands, Yaeyama District, Okinawa Prefecture, the Empire of Japan". The letter is on exhibition at Yaeyama museum.

The People's Daily, a daily newspaper, which is the organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), wrote in 1953 that Senkaku Islands was a part of Japanese territory.

From 1895 to 1940, there was a Katsuobushi factory and about 200 Japanese residents on the islands. In 1978, a Japanese nationalist group, Nihonseinensha built a lighthouse on Uotsuri Jima, which was subsequently handed over to the Japanese government in 2005.

During a private visit 9 years after stepping down from office, former President of Republic of China, Lee Teng-hui, once said that the islands are part of Okinawa.

There are many official maps published by both Chinas after 1945 that support they did not recognize their sovereignty over the islands and they recognized the islands as Japanese territory.

• The Washington Times stated that they obtained a classified map made by the PRC's map authority in 1969 apparently listing the "Senkaku Islands" as Japanese territory.

• From 1946 to 1971, Taiwan Statistical Abstract published by the Taiwanese Provincial Government stated "the easternmost point of Taiwan is Mianhua Islet and the northernmost point is Pengjia Islet" excluding the Senkaku islands. In 1972, immediately after the Executive Yuan of the ROC announced that the islands belonged to Yilan County of Taiwan Province in December 1971, the description was revised and the points were extended to the Senkaku Islands: "the easternmost point of Taiwan is Taishō-jima and the northernmost point is Kuba-jima."

• The Grand Atlas of the World Vol. 1 published in October 1965 by the National Defense Research Academy and the China Geological Research Institute of Taiwan records the Diaoyu Islands with Japanese names: Gyochojima (Diaoyu Islands), Taishojima (Chiwei Island), and Senkaku Gunto in the "Map of the Ryukyu Islands". Taiwan and the Senkaku Gunto were clearly divided by a national border. The revised version in the early 1970s, "Senkaku Gunto" was changed to the "Tiaoyutai Islets". Furthermore, the national border was relocated to an area between the Daioyutai Islands and the Ryukyu Islands. However, in the English index, the name“Senkaku Gunto” remained unrevised.

• The National Atlas of China Vol. 1 published by the National War College of Taiwan did not include Diaoyutai Islands in the map of "Taipei and Keelung" in the first (1959), second (1963), or even third (1967) editions. However the fourth edition (1972) included an extra map of the "Taio Yu Tai Islets" as part of the ROC’s territory in the upper left corner of the map of "Taipei and Keelung".

• A world atlas published in November 1958, by the Map Publishing Company of Beijing, treats the Senkaku Islands as a Japanese territory and described them in Japanese name Senkaku Guntō (Senkaku Islands) and Uotsuri-Jima,

• In the 1970 junior high school geography textbook published by the National Institute for Compilation and Translation of Taiwan, the Diaoyutai Islands were named Senkaku Gunto in the "Physical Map of the Ryukyu Islands". Senkaku Gunto and the Ryukyu Islands were clearly not included in the ROC's territory by national border. However, in the 1971 edition, Senkaku Gunto was renamed Diaoyutai Islands, and the ROC national border was redrawn so that the Diaoyutai Islands were included.

United States' position

On December 25, 1953, U.S. Civil Administration of the Ryukyus Proclamation 27 (USCAR 27) set geographical boundaries of the Ryukyu Islands that included the Senkaku Islands. Moreover, during U.S. administration of the islands, the U.S. Navy built firing ranges on them and paid annual rent of $11,000 to Jinji Koga, son of the first Japanese settler of the islands.

During the San Francisco Peace Treaty discussions, John Foster Dulles, chief U.S. delegate to the peace conference, set forth the concept that Japan had "residual sovereignty" over the Ryukyu Islands. According to an official analysis prepared by the U.S. Army, "residual Sovereignty" meant that "the United States will not transfer its sovereign powers over the Ryukyu Islands to any nation other than Japan." In June 1957, President Eisenhower confirmed this at the U.S.-Japan summit meeting, telling Japanese Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi that "residual sovereignty" over the Ryukyus meant that "the United States would exercise its rights for a period and that the sovereignty would then return to Japan." In March 1962, President Kennedy stated in an Executive Order for the Ryukyus that "I recognize the Ryukyus to be a part of the Japanese homeland and look forward to the day when the security interests of the Free World will permit their restoration to full Japanese sovereignty." Since there was no U.S. action to separate the Senkaku Islands from the Ryukyu, these applications of “residual sovereignty” appeared to include the Senkaku Islands.

In May 1971, A report compiled by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency said "The Japanese claim to sovereignty over the Senkakus is strong, and the burden of proof of ownership would seem to fall on the Chinese". The CIA also said in related documents that any dispute between Japan, China and Taiwan over the islands would not have arisen, had it not been for the discovery around 1968 of potential oil reserves on the nearby continental shelf.

On June 7, 1971, President Richard Nixon confirmed Japan's "residual sovereignty" over the Senkaku Islands just before a deal to return Okinawa Prefecture to Japan in a conversation with his national security adviser Henry Kissinger. Kissinger also told Nixon that "these (Senkaku) islands stayed with Okinawa" when Japan returned Taiwan to China after the end of World War II in 1945.

The Nixon Administration removed the Senkakus from its inclusion in the concept of Japanese "residual sovereignty" in presenting the Okinawa Reversion Treaty to the U.S. Senate for ratification. On October 20, 1971, Secretary of State William Rogers sent a letter to U.S Congress. In his letter, Acting Assistant Legal Adviser Robert Starr stated "The United States believes that a return of administrative rights over those islands to Japan, from which the rights were received, can in no way prejudice any underlying claims. The United States cannot add to the legal rights Japan possessed before it transferred administration of the islands to us, nor can the United States, by giving back what it received, diminish the rights of other claimants... The United States has made no claim to the Senkaku Islands and considers that any conflicting claims to the islands are a matter for resolution by the parties concerned." Several experts have attributed this Nixon Administration policy shift as having been influenced by White House overtures to China during 1971-1972, culminating in the Nixon visit to China.

The United States Department of State has stated that it does not take an official position on who owns the islands. Top US government officials, however, have declared in 2004, 2010, and September 2012, that as Japan maintains effective administrative control on the islands, the islands fall under the 1960 Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan which requires the US to assist Japan in defending the islands if anyone, including China, attacks or attempts to occupy or control them.

Alternative approaches

When PRC-Japan diplomatic relations were established in 1972, both nations found reasons to set aside this territorial dispute. According to negotiator Deng Xiaoping, "It does not matter if this question is shelved for some time, say, 10 years. Our generation is not wise enough to find common language on this question. Our next generation will certainly be wiser. They will certainly find a solution acceptable to all."

In 1969, the United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East (ECAFE) identified potential oil and gas reserves in the vicinity of the Senkaku Islands. During subsequent decades, several rounds of bilateral talks considered joint-development of sub-seabed resources in disputed territorial waters. Such efforts to develop a cooperative strategy were unsuccessful.

In 2008, a preliminary agreement on joint development of resources was reached but the agreement only includes the area far from these islands.

Disputes about the causes

There are disputes about the causes of controversy involving the Senkaku Islands. For example, some use the term "territorial dispute"; however, the Japanese government has consistently rejected this framing since the early 1970s. An analysis of incidents and issues require distinguishing between disputes which are primarily over territory and those which merely have a territorial component.

The real importance of the islands lies in the ... implications for the wider context of the two countries’ approaches to maritime and island disputes, as well as in the way in which those issues can be used by domestic political groups to further their own objectives.] — Zhongqi Pan.

Other nations are closely monitoring developments, e.g.,

• Senkakus described as a proxy. According to China Daily, the Senkaku Islands are a disruptive mine planted by the United States into Sino-Japanese relations.
• Senkakus characterized as a pretext. According to the New York Times, some analysts frame all discussion about the islands' status within a broader pattern of Chinese territorial assertions.
• Senkakus identified as a tactic. According to the Christian Science Monitor, the Senkakus may represent a tactical distraction from China's internal power struggle over who will replace the current leadership of the Communist Party in 2012.

The historical record is a backdrop for each new incident in the unfolding chronology of these islands.

Historical development

• 1532: On the 8th of the 5th month (lunar calendar), Chen Kan, leading the envoy on behalf of the emperor of the Ming Dynasty of China to Ryukyu, recorded the islands as landmarks en route.
• 1561: Ming envoy Kuo Ju-lin, following Chen Kan, set sail from Fuzhou on the 29th of the 5th month and recorded passing the islands as landmarks.
• 1785: A Japanese map by Hayashi Shihei indicated the islands in the same color of that of China, and different from that of Ryukyu.
• 1909: Japanese population of the islands became 248.
• December 1971: The People's Republic of China (PRC) first officially claimed (via People's Daily) sovereignty when Japan made known its official standpoint with the signing of the Okinawa Reversion Treaty.
• 23 April 2004: a member of a Japanese right-wing group rammed a bus into the Chinese consulate in Osaka, to protest Chinese claims.
• July 2004: Japan started exploring for natural gas in what it considers its own exclusive economic zone in the East China Sea as a step to counter China's building of a natural gas complex nearby. Japan plans to survey a 30-kilometer-wide band stretching between latitudes 28 and 30 degrees North, just inside the border demarcated by Japan. China disputes Japan's rights to explore the area east of the median line between the two countries, which Japan has proposed as the demarcation line for their exclusive economic zones.
• July 2004: a group of Chinese held a demonstration outside the Japanese Embassy in Beijing afternoon to protest Japan's "illegal" oil exploration activities in a disputed area of the East China Sea. The protesters, organized by Beijing-based organization called the Patriots Alliance Network.
• 17 March 2006: Kyodo News reported the U.S. Ambassador to Japan, Thomas Schieffer, presented that he considered "the Islands as territory of Japan" in his talk in Tokyo.
• 27 October 2006: A group of activists from the Hong Kong-based Action Committee for Defending the Diaoyu Islands approached the islands to show the support for Chinese claims to the Diaoyu Islands. They were stopped from landing on the islands by the Japan Coast Guard. Later on, the PLAN conducted a military exercise in the area.

2008

• June:
  • On 10 June 2008, the 270 ton sport fishing vessel Lien Ho (聯合號) of Taiwan suffered a collision with the Japanese patrol vessel Koshiki. The vessel sank while in the disputed territorial waters that have been claimed by Japan and Taiwan (ROC). The Taiwanese crew who were aboard the vessel claims that the larger Japanese frigate deliberately crashed into them; Japanese coast guard initially claimed that the Taiwanese boat had crashed into the patrol ship. While releasing the passengers, Japan initially detained the captain and sought reparations.
  • On 13 June, the captain was released.
  • On 16 June, a boat carrying activists from Taiwan, defended by five Republic of China Coast Guard vessels, approached to within 0.4 nautical miles (740 m) of the main island, from which position they circumnavigated the island in an assertion of sovereignty of the islands. This demonstration prompted Taiwanese politicians to cancel a planned trip on-board Republic of China Navy vessels to demonstrate sovereignty. The Taiwanese vessels were followed by Japanese Coast Guard vessels, but no attempt was made to intercept them.
  • On 20 June, upon releasing the video taken by people on board the Taiwanese boat, Japan apologized for the incident and agreed to pay NT$10 million (US$311,000) as compensation to the owner of the boat. Liu Chao-shiuan, Premier of the Republic of China, has refused to rule out the use of force to defend the islands against Japanese advances. The ROC government recalled its chief representative to Japan in protest. On 20 June, the de facto Japanese ambassador to Taiwan apologized, in person, to the captain of the Taiwanese boat Lien Ho.

2010

• September:
  • On 7 September 2010, a Chinese fishing trawler collided with two Japanese Coast Guard patrol boats in disputed waters near the islands. The collisions occurred after the Japanese Coast Guard ordered the trawler to leave the area. After the collisions, Japanese sailors boarded the Chinese vessel and arrested the captain Zhan Qixiong.
  • On 18 September, the 79th anniversary of the Mukden Incident, widespread anti-Japanese protests were held in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Shenyang.
  • On 22 September, Chinese premier Wen Jiabao threatened further action if the captain of the Chinese fishing trawler was not released.
  • On 24 September, Japan released the Chinese captain, and stated that keeping the captain in custody would not be appropriate and it would raise considerable impact on Sino-Japanese relations.
  • On 25 September, China demanded an apology and compensation from Japan for holding the Chinese boat captain in the collision incident. Japan rejected the Chinese demand.
  • On 27 September, Japan said that it would counter-claim against China for damage to their patrol boats in the collision.
• October:
  • On 2 October, large scale anti-Chinese protests occurred in Tokyo and six other cities in Japan.
  • On 3 October, a group of right wing Japanese protesters marched to the Ikebukuro mall specializing in Chinese food demanding that the islands be defended against the Chinese.
  • On 6 October, a joint USA/Japan drill is planned, based on the defense of Okinawa in December, though Japanese Prime Minister Kan Naoto told parliament that the joint military exercise was not planned specifically with the islands in mind.
  • On 14 October, Japan's Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara, along with other members of the LDP party filed a complaint against Google Maps demanding the removal of the Chinese name "Diaoyutai" from the interactive map services. Google refused, stating that they wish to remain neutral.

2011

• June – On 29 June 2011, a fishing boat from Taiwan, named "Tafa 268", with some activists aboard, navigated to waters some 23 nautical miles off the disputed Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands in the morning. The Japanese coast guard immediately mobilized four patrol vessels to block the “Tafa 268”, and a Japanese helicopter was also dispatched to monitor the Taiwanese boat. The Coast Guard Agency (CGA) Keelung office of Taiwan sent five patrol vessels there and managed to break the Japanese blockade to sail close to the Taiwanese fishing boat. Both sides of coast guard vessels reiterated the disputed islands were their own territory but no collision happened, and "Tafa 268" set off for home escorted by the CGA vessels after a 25-minute standoff.

• July: On 3~4 July, nine Japanese fishing boats, including one owned by a senior official of a Japanese nationalist group, were fishing near the islands. Beijing lodged a stern remonstration with Tokyo on 4 July 2011, over such Japanese fishing activities. Chinese Foreign Ministry demands that Japanese fishing vessels be immediately withdrawn. On the morning of 3 July, the Japan Coast Guard found that Chinese fishery patrol vessel “Fishery 201″ in waters near the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Japanese patrol vessels issued a warning “Do not enter Japanese territorial waters “. China “Fishery 201″ then responded it was conducting legitimate task in that the waters around the Diaoyu Islands under the jurisdiction of China. Also on 4 July, two Chinese military aircraft approached the disputed islands. When the planes came within 37 miles of the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, the Japan Air Self-Defence Force (JASDF) immediately scrambled an F-15 to intercept them.

• November:
  • Apparently influenced by the dispute with China over the Senkakus, Japan vocally supported the United States at the November 2011 East Asia Summit in declaring that the South China Sea, much of which China claims, is under the jurisdiction of international maritime law and any disputes over the area must be resolved through multi-national cooperation and dialogue. China, in contrast, declared that any disputes over possession of the South China Sea should be resolved bilaterally, not through multi-nationational forums or talks.
  • In advance of Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's planned December 2011 state visit to the PRC, the PRC government requested that the two countries begin negotiations over national boundaries in the East China Sea. According to Kyodo News, the proposal by China appeared to be an effort to get Japan to acknowledge that a territorial dispute over the Senkaku Islands existed.

2012

• January:
  • On 1 January, four members of the Ishigaki municipal assembly visited Uotsuri Island. Ishigaki's mayor, however, stated that the four may have acted without proper authority and people wishing to visit the island should first obtain permission from the Japanese central government. In response, a group of Chinese activists from Hong Kong attempted to sail to the islands to protest the Japanese actions, but were blocked by Hong Kong-based coast guard authorities and forced to return to port.
  • On 16 January, Japan announced that it would name 39 previously unnamed, uninhabited islets that it claims in the East China Sea, including four in the Senkaku Island chain. In response, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin stated: "Our stance is very clear on the issue of the Diaoyu Islands. China has indisputable sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands that have been an inherent part of China since ancient times." Japan completed naming all the islands by 3 March 2012, including Hokusei Kojima and three other islets near the Senkakus. In response, China gave its own names to the previously unnamed islets and PRC foreign minister Yang Jiechi urged Japan to "'fully recognise' the complexity and sensitivity of issues concerning history and the Diaoyu Islands" and "'properly handle these sensitive issues' based on the overall interests of the China-Japan relationship." Taiwan responded by disagreeing with both the PRC's and Japan's naming of the islands, with foreign minister Timothy Yang stating that Taiwan would handle the matter according to its own national interests.
  • On 21 January, Diet lawmakers Koichi Mukoyama and Yoshitaka Shindō surveyed the islands by ship and later stated that the islands, several of which are still private property of Japanese citizens, needed to be fully nationalized. Their visit was the first by national politicians since 1997.

• March: On 16 March, the PRC sent maritime patrol boats Haijian 50 and Haijian 66 to patrol near the Senkaku Islands, with foreign ministry spokesman Liu Weimin announcing that the move was to help safeguard the PRC's territory and that the islands were part of PRC's territory. The crew of a nearby Japanese coast guard vessel stated that the Haijian 50 entered Japanese territorial waters for 25 minutes and warned the ship to leave. A Japanese government spokesman later stated that the ship had not actually entered Japanese waters, but the Japanese government lodged an official protest with the Chinese ambassador to Japan, Cheng Yonghua. According to the People's Daily 21 March 2012, an unnamed official of the State Oceanic Administration stated that the PRC intends to patrol the Diaoyu Islands in order to challenge a potential future Japanese claim to the islands based on the international 50-year standard "statute of limitations" for claiming possession of a territory.

• July:
  • On 4 July, Coastguard vessels from Taiwan and Japan collided in waters near a disputed island chain Wednesday, as the Taiwanese vessel was escorting activists to the area.
  • On 7 July, the Japanese Prime Minister stated that these islands are an integral part of his country and the Government is considering their purchase from the Japanese owner. This was also done to prevent the islands from being bought by the government of Tokyo.
  • Three Chinese patrol vessels entered the disputed waters around these islands on 11 July 2012. On 15 July 2012, Japan recalled their ambassador to China to work on the response to the transgression. In late July, Japanese officials have raised alarms regarding increased Chinese military expansion.
  • The events would eventually escalate and lead up to widespread protests in China.
• August
  • On 8 August, after a meeting between the Japanese Defense Minister and the American Defense Secretary, it was announced that UAVs would be used to conduct surveillance around Okinawa, which will include the Senkaku Islands.
  • On 15 August, ships carrying activists from Hong Kong approached the islands, but were stopped by the Japan Coast Guard. Seven activists jumped from the ships to swim ashore, five of whom reached the island; the other two turned back to the ships. The activists and their ship were detained by Japanese authorities. The detained activists were deported two days later.
  • On 18 August, a flotilla of four boats carrying about 150 Japanese activists organized by right-wing group Ganbare Nippon arrived at the islands. The activists stated that they wished to commemorate Japanese World War II deaths in the area. When the activists were denied permission to land, several of them swam to the islands. Ten activists swam to the islands and made an unauthorized landing on Uotsuri, where they raised Japanese flags.
    • China’s Foreign Ministry protested the event before it happened saying that unilateral action by Japan on the islands "is illegal and invalid." China also lodged a formal complaint, and urged Japan to prevent frictions from escalating more. The flotilla arrival at the archipelago also set off anti-Japanese rallies in more than 25 Chinese cities, and 100 people gathered near Japan's consulate in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou to demand that the Japanese leave the islands. Chinese protestors overturned Japanese-branded cars and smashed windows of Japanese-themed businesses.

Chinese anti-Japanese protests

• • On 19 August, protests broke out in Chinese cities including Shenzhen, Chengdu, Xi'an and Jinan, as well as Hong Kong.
  • On 26 August, the Japanese government announced it is making a ¥2.05 billion bid for the Senkaku Islands to bring them under state control around next month.
• September
  • On 11 September, China sent two patrol ships to the islands to demonstrate its claim of ownership. Japan formally nationalized the three islands that were held in the ownership of Kunioki Kurihara. Taiwan's Foreign Ministry lodged a strong protest to Japan, calling the island purchase an "extremely unfriendly move" that "not only harms the longtime cooperation between Taiwan and Japan but will also aggravate regional tensions in East Asia." China Meteorological Administration begins daily weather forecast for Senkaku Islans on CCTV as well as already started for Paracel Islands, Macclesfield Bank and Spratly Islands.
  • On 12 September, there was a small anti-Japanese protest in Taipei which included flag-burning.
  • On 13 September, Chinese government submitted a nautical chart with baselines of the territorial sea on Senkaku Islands to the United Nations.
  • Weekend of 15–16 September
    • Citizens in mainland China participated in protest marches and called for a boycott of Japanese products in as many as 85 Chinese cities, including Shanghai, Shenyang, Zhengzhou, Hangzhou and Harbin, as well as Hong Kong Demonstrations escalated to arson of Japanese vehicles and other criminal acts in Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Changsha, Suzhou, Mianyang, Xi'an and Qingdao.
    • There were protests in Los Angeles, Houston, San Francisco, New York and Chicago, as well as a petition to the US government and Congress to take a neutral stance over the dispute.
    • South China Morning Post reporter Felix Wong was reportedly beaten by police in Shenzhen while covering the protests.
    • US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters "I am concerned that when these countries engage in provocations of one kind or another over these various islands that it raises the possibility that a misjudgment on one side or the other could result in violence and could result in conflict"
  • On 14 September 2012, six Chinese vessels approached the disputed islands, with two circling the island chain before leaving the area. Later on 18 September 2012, Chinese media reported a flotilla of approximately 1,000 Chinese fishing boats heading towards the islands. China increased the number of vessels patrolling within the region close to the islands on 22 September, sending a flotilla of 4 marine surveillance vessels and 9 fishery monitoring craft.
  • On 16 September, China officially announced its plan to request natural extension of its continental shelf up to Okinawa Trough (which would extend its EEZ) from the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.
  • On 17 September, Kōichirō Gemba said that there was a mutual understanding that the United States would defend the islands, even though the subject was not discussed with the Americans.
  • On 18 September, people in over 180 cities of China attend protests on the 81st anniversary of the Mukden Incident.
  • On 23 September 2012, China launched a program to increase the number of UAVs monitoring the Scarborough Shoal, Paracel Islands, Spratly Islands and East China Sea monitoring the Senkakus, which follows a national marine zoning program approved by the State Council during the previous year as a part of China's 12th five-year plan.
  • On 25 September 2012, 75 Taiwanese fishing vessels sailed towards the disputed islands, escorted by 10 patrol vessels of the Taiwan Coast Guard Administration. The Taiwan Coast Guard vessels clashed with the Japan Coast Guard, with both sides firing water cannons, with no casualties. According to the Taiwan Coast Guard Administration, the Japanese side mobilised 21 ships, the largest weighting 6,000 tonnes, and meanwhile there were five mainland Chinese patrol ships within the region surrounding the islands more than 12 nautical miles away.

Chinese intrusion into Japanese territory

On December 13, 2012, a Chinese government aircraft intruded into Japanese airspace for the first time since 1958, this was after months of Chinese patrol vessels intruding into Japanese waters.

References

1. Ogura, Junko (14 October 2010). "Japanese party urges Google to drop Chinese name for disputed islands". CNN World. US. CNN.
2. Kristof, Nicholas (10 September 2010). "Look Out for the Diaoyu Islands". New York Times. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
3. By JOHN W. FINNEYSpecial to The New York Times (11 November 1971). "SENATE ENDORSES OKINAWA TREATY – Votes 84 to 6 for Island's Return to Japan – Rioters There Kill a Policeman Senate, in 84 to 6 Vote, Approves the Treaty Returning Okinawa to Japan – Front Page". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
4. Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea (NILOS). (2000). International Organizations and the Law of the Sea, pp. 107–108., p. 107, at Google Books
5. Lee, Seokwoo et al. (2002). Territorial disputes among Japan, Taiwan and China concerning the Senkaku Islands, pp. 11–12., p. 11, at Google Books
6. ^ "Q&A: China-Japan islands row" BBC News 11 September 2012
7. Philip J. Crowley, Remarks to the Press United States Department of State, 23 September 2010
8. "U.S. says Senkaku Islands fall within scope of Japan-U.S. security treaty". Kyodo News. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
9. "Anti-Japan protesters rally in Beijing". Agence France-Presse.
10. 【佐藤優の眼光紙背】1997年11月11日付の小渕書簡があるため日本政府は尖閣諸島周辺の中国漁船を取り締まることができない（眼光紙背） – BLOGOS（ブロゴス）. Blogos.com.
11. ^ Unryu Suganuma (2000). Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 89–97. ISBN 0-8248-2493-8.
12. , Treaty of Shimonoseki
13. ^ Japan's action off Diaoyu raises concern, China Daily, 10 September 2010
14. Durdin, Tillman. "Peking Claims Disputed Oil-Rich Isles," New York Times. 6 December 1970.
15. Durdins, Tillman. "Okinawa Islands Returned by U.S. to Japanese Rule; Agnew, in Tokyo, Declares 'Last Major Issue' of the Pacific War Is Resolved U.S. Returns Okinawa to Japanese Rule," New York Times. 15 May 1972. See also, Reversion to Japan of the Ryukyu and Daito Islands, official text
16. Title: Sangoku tsūran zusetsu.三國通覧圖說. Sŏul : Kyŏngin Munhwasa, 1982.Hayashi, Shihei, 1738–1793.Reprint.Preface by Katsuragawa Hoshū dated Tenmei kinotouma ; introd. by Hayashi Shihei, the author, dated Tenmei 5 .
17. 三国通覧図説 (Sangoku Tsuran Zusetsu), 林子平(Hayashi Shihei)
18. Han-yi Shaw, "The Inconvenient Truth Behind the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands" The New York Times 19 September 2012
19. Lee, Seokwoo. Territorial Disputes among Japan, China and Taiwan concerning the Senkaku Islands (Boundary & Territory Briefing Vol.3 No.7). IBRU. pp. 10–11. ISBN 1897643500. For a long time following the entry into force of the San Francisco Peace Treaty China/Taiwan raised no objection to the fact that the Senkaku Islands were included in the area placed under US administration in accordance with the provisions of Article of the treaty, and USCAP No. 27. In fact, neither China nor Taiwan had taken up the question of sovereignty over the islands until the latter half of 1970 when evidence relating to the existence of oil resources deposited in the East China Sea surfaced. All this clearly indicates that China/Taiwan had not regarded the Senkaku Islands as a part of Taiwan. Thus, for Japan, none of the alleged historical, geographical and geological arguments set forth by China/Taiwan are acceptable as valid under international law to substantiate China's territorial claim over the Senkaku Islands.
20. ^ On the sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands (论钓鱼岛主权的归属), Fujian Education Department
21. ""
22. ^ "China's Diaoyu Islands Sovereignty is Undeniable", People's Daily, 25 May 2003. Retrieved 24 February 2007.
23. "Koji Taira". Japan Focus. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
24. Potsdam Declaration(full text), East Asian Studies Documents, UCLA Asia institute
25. People's Daily, Beijing, China, 1971-12-31, Page 1, "An Declaration of The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, 1971-12-30"
26. ^ Lee, p. 10., p. 10, at Google Books
27. Title: Liang zhong hai dao zhen jing / .Imprint: Beijing : Zhonghua shu ju : Xin hua shu dian Beijing fa xing suo fa xing, 2000 reprint edition. Contents: Shun feng xiang song—Zhi nan zheng fa. (順風相送--指南正法). ISBN: ISBN 7-101-02025-9. pp96 and pp253. The full text is available on wikisource.
28. (10 June 2012). "THE JAPAN-CHINA TREATY – Full Text of the Shimonoseki Peace Convention. HOW THE INDEMNITY IS TO BE PAID Corea's Autonomy Is Assured – Japan Treats China as a Semi-Civilized Nation – The Cession Clause Opposed by Russia. – Article". New York Times. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
29. Radio Taiwan International, "Taipei Declines Beijing's Invitation To Solve Disputed Territory Issues Together", 26 April 2012, .
30. 日本外务省称人民日报曾承认钓鱼岛属冲绳一部分_资讯频道_凤凰网
31. Johnson, Ian (18 September 2012). "More Protests in China Over Japan and Islands". The New York Times. Retrieved 8 October 2012.
32. Manthorpe, Jonathan (9 September 2012). "China and the movable boundaries of an amorphous empire". The Vancouver Sun. Retrieved 7 October 2012.
33. ^ "Japan refuses China demand for apology in boat row". Reuter. 25 September 2010. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5t0QZuVJb )
34. ^ The Basic View on the Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
35. Satoru Sato, Press Secretary, Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Clarifying the Senkaku Islands Dispute The Wall Street Journal Letter to the Editor 2010-09-21
36. ^ Ito, Masami (18 May 2012). "Jurisdiction over remote Senkakus comes with hot-button dangers". Japan Times.
37. ^ "Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands". Globalsecurity.org.
38. "The Basic View on the Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.
39. "沖縄県下八重山群島ノ北西ニ位スル久場島魚釣島ヘ標杭ヲ建設ス". Japan Center for Asian Historical Records. Retrieved 4 October 2010.
40. "China's Diaoyu Islands Sovereignty is Undeniable," People's Daily. 25 May 2003.
41. "古賀辰四郎". The Asahi Shimbun Company. Retrieved 3 October 2010.
42. "楽天が運営するポータルサイト ： 【インフォシーク】Infoseek". Akebonokikaku.hp.infoseek.co.jp. 1 January 2000. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
43. ^ "「尖閣は日本の領土」　遭難救助の中国政府感謝状に明記". Ryūkyū Shimpō. 15 June 2005.
44. ^ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Q&A, Senkaku Islands, Q4/A4.3. "In addition, an article in the People's Daily dated 8 January 1953, under the title of "Battle of people in the Ryukyu Islands against the U.S. occupation", made clear that the Ryukyu Islands consist of 7 groups of islands including the Senkaku Islands.". Retrieved 29 January 2011.
45. Representative Office of Japan to PNA, Newsletter #2, November 2010; see Item 3; "... an article in the People’s Daily dated January 8, 1953, under the title of “Battle of people in the Ryukyu Islands against the U.S. occupation”, made clear that the Ryukyu Islands consist of 7 groups of islands including the Senkaku Islands"; accord Embassy of Japan in Israel, Newsletter #2, October 2010 see Item 4.
46. Suganuma, Unryu (2001). Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. University of Hawaii Press. p. 127. ISBN 0-8248-2493-8. To make matters worse, when on January 8, 1953, Renmin Ribao , the official propaganda organ for the Communist Party, criticized the occupation of Rukyu Islands(or Okinawa Prefecture) by the United States, it stated that "the Ryukyu Islands are located northeast of our Taiwan Islands...including Senkaku Shoto. According to this statement, the PRC recognized that the Diaoyu (J:Senkaku) Islands were a part of Liuqiu Islands (or Okinawa Prefecture). In other words, the Diaoyu Islands belonged neither to Taiwan nor to mainland China, but to Japan.
47. Shaw, Han-yi (1999). The Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands dispute: its history and an analysis of the ownership claims of the P.R.C., R.O.C., and Japan, Issue 3. University of Maryland. p. 34. ISBN 0-925153-67-2. With respect to the PRC, a front page news report that appeared on the October 3, 1996 edition of the Sankei Shimbun, reported that the PRC government evidently recognized the disputed islands as Japanese territory as revealed in a government sponsored publication. This particular publication is identified as the January 8, 1953 edition of The Peoples' Daily, China's official party newspaper, in which an article entitled " The People of the Ryukyu Islands Struggle Against American occupation" noted the Senkaku Islands as one of the subgroups of islands that constituted the Ryukyu Islands.
48. "Why Japan claims the Senkaku Islands". Asahi shimbun. Japan. 25 September 2010.; "In his book "Gendai Chugoku Nenpyo" (Timeline on modern China), Masashi Ando referred to a People's Daily article dated 8 Jan 1953, which makes reference to the "Senkaku Islands in Okinawa".
49. Ando, Masashi (2010). (in Japanese). Iwanami shoten. p. 88. ISBN 978-4-00-022778-0. 「人民日報」が米軍軍政下の沖縄の尖閣諸島(当時の中国の呼び方のまま. 現在中国は「釣魚島」という)で日本人民の米軍の軍事演習に反対する闘争が行われていると報道. 「琉球諸島はわが国台湾の東北および日本九州島の西南の間の海上に散在し、尖閣諸島、先島諸島、大東諸島、沖縄諸島、大島諸島、吐噶喇諸島、大隅諸島など7つの島嶼からなっている」と紹介(新華月報：1953-7) {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help); read Google Chinese-English translation
50. "Maehara: People's Daily described Senkaku Islands as Japan's in 1953". The Japan Times. 29 September 2010. The People's Daily described the Ryukyu Islands as "dispersed between the northeastern part of our country's Taiwan and the southwestern part of Japan's Kyushu Island" and as including the Senkaku Islands as well as the Sakishima Islands, Maehara said.
51. ^ Hiraoka, Akitoshi (2005). "The Advancement of Japanese to the Senkaku Islands and Tatsushiro Koga in the Meiji Era". Japanese Journal of Human Geography. 57 (5). The Human Geographical Society of Japan: p.515. In 1908, the reclaimed area reached to 60 chōbu (595,000m2). The number of residents is two hundred forty some. The number of houses is as many as ninety nine. {{cite journal}}: |page= has extra text (help)
52. Nakauchi, Yasuo (2010.12). . (in Japanese) (311). Diplomatic and Defense Committee Research Office, The House of Councilors of Japan: 29. August 1978: A Japanese political group constructed a lighthouse on Uotsurijima. (Later 1988, a new lighthouse was constructed on the same island.) February 2005: The political group relinquished the ownership of the lighthouse, Japanese government nationalized it. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
53. "Japanese Coast Guard commenced the administration of the "Uotsurijima lighthouse" in Senkaku Islands" (in Japanese). Japan Coast Guard. February 2005.
54. "Lee Teng-hui arrives in Japan". The Taipei Times. 2009-09.05. Retrieved 2009-09-22. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
55. ^ "China-Japan tensions". The Washington Times. Retrieved 18 September 2010.
56. ^ Yap, Ko-Hua; Chena, Yu-Wen; Huanga, Ching-Chi (2012). "The Diaoyutai Islands on Taiwan's Official Maps: Pre- and Post-1971". Asian Affairs: An American Review. 39 (2): 90–105. doi:10.1080/00927678.2012.678122.
57. Suganuma, Unryu (2001). Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. University of Hawaii Press. p. 126. ISBN 0-8248-2493-8. Furthermore, the first volume of Shijie Dituji (The World Atlas), published by the Taiwan Defense Ministry and the Institute of Physical Geology in 1965, records the Diaoyu Islands with Japanese names: Gyochojima (Diaoyu Islands), Taishojima (Chiwei Island), and Senkaku Gunto. In addition, a high school textbook in Taiwan uses Japanese name to identify Diaoyu Islands. In the late 1970s, the government of ROC began to recall these books, but it was too little too late – the damage was already done.
58. Lee, p. 11., p. 11, at Google Books; excerpt: "Further support for Japan's claim is the fact that in the World Atlas, Volume 1, East Asia Nations, 1st edition, published in October 1965, by the National Defense Research Academy and the China Geological Research Institute of Taiwan, and in the People's Middle School Text-book.
59. Lee, p. 11., p. 11, at Google Books
60. "Japanese map published by Map Publishing Company of Beijing in 1958". Japanese communist party.
61. 「国民中学地理教科書・第四冊(Geography textbook for national junior high schools)」January 1970
62. ^ Dumbaugh, Kerry; et al. (12 November 2001). "China's Maritime Territorial Claims: Implications for U.S. Interests". Congressional Research Service. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |last2= (help)
63. "Japan's Claim over Senkaku Islands Strong: 1971 CIA Report". Jiji Press. 2 October 2012. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6B9H61FjV)
64. "U.S. Confirmed Japan's "Residual" Senkaku Sovereignty in 1971". Jiji Press. 3 October 2012. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6B9HD4LYP)
65. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/198821.pdf
66. Paul, Eckert (20 September 2012). "Treaty With Japan Covers Islets In China Spat: U.S. Official". Reuters.(Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6AwAp9Yaz)
67. Miles, Edward L. (1982). The Management of Marine Regions: the North Pacific, p. 217., p. 217, at Google Books
68. MIT faculty web page, M. Taylor Fravel, "Publications": "Explaining Stability in the Senkaku (Diaoyu) Islands Dispute," pp. 145–167, 157 in Gerald Curtis et al. (2010). Getting the Triangle Straight: Managing China-Japan-US Relations; compare 这个问题可以把它放一下，也许下一代比我们更聪明些，会找到实际解决的方法 in 邓小平文选第三卷 (Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Volume III)
69. Pan, Junwu. Toward a New Framework for Peaceful Settlement of China's Territorial and Boundary Disputes. p. 144., p. 144, at Google Books
70. "Q&A: China, Japan and the East China Sea gas dispute," Reuters, 20 May 2010; citing U.S. Energy Information Administration report, China+China Energy Profile; compare Selig S. Harrison ed., Seabed Petroleum in Northast Asia," Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
71. Yamada, Takao. "Keeping the big picture in sight in Senkaku Islands dispute," Mainichi Shimbun (Tokyo). 4 October 2010, citing 1972 book by Kiyoshi Inoue, 釣魚列島的歷史和主權問題 (Diaoyu dao: li shi yu zhu quan, Historical Facts of Senkaku Islands/Diaoyu Islands, 1972)
72. "Renho refers to Senkakus as territorial issue, but later retracts remark," Japan Today. 15 September 2010; Fackler, Martin and Ian Johnson. "Arrest in Disputed Seas Riles China and Japan," The New York Times. 19 September 2010; retrieved 2011-05-29
73. Koo, Min-gyo. (2010). Island Disputes and Maritime Regime Building in East Asia, p. 2., p. 2, at Google Books; "Japan's Senkaku Islands—what's all the fuss about?" Yomiuri Shimbun. 10 September 2010; retrieved 2011-05-29
74. Microsoft Word – 5 Sino-Japanese_Dispute_Pan_Zhongqi.doc. (PDF).
75. Pan, Zhongqi. "Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: The Pending Controversy from the Chinese Perspective," Journal of Chinese Political Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2007; retrieved 2011-05-29
76. Chellaney, Brahma. "India-China: Let facts speak for themselves," The Economic Times (Mumbai). 17 September 2010; "Mismatched intentions end up intensifying Japan-China row over islands," Asahi Shimbun (Japan). 22 September 2009; retrieved 2011-05-29
77. Feng Zhaoku. "Diaoyu dispute sowed by US," China Daily (Beijing). 15 September 2010; Tow, William T. (2001). Asia-Pacific strategic relations: seeking convergent security, p. 68., p. 68, at Google Books; retrieved 2011-05-29
78. Fackler, Martin and Ian Johnson. "Arrest in Disputed Seas Riles China and Japan," The New York Times. 19 September 2010; retrieved 2011-05-29
79. "Fisherman's arrest in Asia: China and Japan must not trawl for trouble," Christian Science Monitor (US). 21 September 2010; retrieved 2011-05-29
80. Lohmeyer, Martin. "The Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Questions of Sovereignty and Suggestions for Resolving the Dispute," University of Canterbury (NZ), 2008, Contents, pp. 1–8; Koo, pp. 103–134., p. 103, at Google Books
81. ^ "Inoue Kyoshi, Kyoto University". Skycitygallery.com. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
82. Sakurai, Yoshiko (October 7, 2010). Weekly Shincho (in Japanese) (430). Shinchosha. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); External link in |date= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help) (translated copy of the article)
83. (ja) Kyodo News, 17 March 2006
84. Associated Press, 26 October 2006 "Activist ship from Hong Kong briefly enters Japan's waters in protest over islands". International Herald Tribune.
85. (ja) Nihon Keizai Shimbun, 5 November 2006, "中国、東シナ海で軍事演習中に爆発事故"
86. Wu, Sofia. "President reasserts claim to Tiaoyutais, seeks peaceful solution," ROC Central News Agency. 17 June 2008.
88. "Taiwan fishing boat sunk by Japanese frigate". Chinapost.com.tw. 11 June 2008. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
89. "Taiwan protests as Japan holds fishing boat captain". Uk.reuters.com. 12 June 2008. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
90. 台強硬施壓　日釋放“聯合號”船長 ("Strong pressure on Taiwan, the release of Captain"), BBC Chinese (UK). 13 June 2008.
91. Officials drop plan to visit Diaoyutais, Taipei Times 18 June 2008
92. 日方向“聯合號”船長道歉 ("Captain's Apology"). BBC CHinese (UK). 20 June 2008.
93. Takahashi, Kosuke. "China signals V for Victory," Asia Times. 5 October 2008.
94. 聯合號船長晚間回國　劉揆要撤銷日本事務會 (Captain of the Lianhe returned to Taiwan tonight; Premier Liu wants to abolish Japan Affairs Association), China Times, Taipei 2008-06-13
95. Taiwan recalls top Japan rep as tensions rise over ship collision, Japan Today 15 June 2008
96. "Japan apologises over Taiwan boat incident". Google. 20 June 2008. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
97. "High-seas collisions trigger Japan-China spat". AFP. 7 September 2010.
98. South China Morning Post. "SCMP." Article. Retrieved on 2010-09-19.
99. Yahoo News. "" Article. Retrieved on 2010-09-22.
100. Buerk, Roland (24 September 2010). "Japan to free Chinese boat captain". BBC. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
101. Nhật đáp trả Trung Quốc, đòi bồi thường Template:Vi
102. Koh, Yoree (3 October 2010). "Tokyo Protests Blast China's Response to Collision". THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. Retrieved 11 October 2010.
103. "China accused of invading disputed islands". CNN. 2 October 2010. Retrieved 11 October 2010.
104. "Japan activists rail against Chinese `cockroaches'". The Standard. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
105. Pike, John. "Taiwan probing report on U.S.-Japan joint exercise over Tiaoyutai". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
106. "Japan gov't support slides on handling of China row". China Post. 5 October 2010. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
107. "MSN産経ニュース". Sankei.jp.msn.com. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
108. Ogura, Junko (14 October 2010). "Japanese party urges Google to drop Chinese name for disputed islands". CNN World. Retrieved 31 January 2011.
109. "Taiwan fishing boat repelled by Japanese ships near Diaoyutai". Want China Times. Taiwan. China Times News Group. 30 June 2011.
110. Blanchard, Ben; Yoko Kubota; Yoko Nishikawa (29 June 2011). "China lambastes Japan after Taiwan boat confrontation". UK. Reuters.
111. Blanchard, Ben; Yoko Kubota; Yoko Nishikawa (4 July 2011). "China presses Japan over sea row as Tokyo voices concern". UK. Reuters.
112. Sun, Xiuping; Linlin Liu (7 May 2011). "China warns Japan over trespassing in waters off Diaoyu Islands". Global Times. Beijing, P.R. China. Global Times.
113. Ho, Stephanie. "China, Japan Trade Words Over Disputed Islands." VoA, 4 July 2011.
114. "Japanese media said the Chinese fishing boat 201 in waters near the Diaoyu Islands". China News. Beijing, P.R. China. China News. 7 April 2011.
115. "Chinese Fighters Fly Again Over Disputed Diaoyu Islands". The Watchtowers. 7 September 2011.
116. Masangkay, May, Kyodo News, "Japan takes stand in S. China Sea row", Japan Times, 21 November 2011, p. 2.
117. Kyodo News, "China urges reviving sea boundary talks", Japan Times, 29 November 2011, p. 2.
118. Kyodo News, "Ishigaki politicians visit Senkakus", Japan Times, 4 January 2012, p. 1.
119. NHK, "Chinese Activists Banned From Heading For Senkaku", NHK World, 3 January 2012.
120. "H.K. maritime authorities prevent Chinese activists from sailing to Japanese-held isles". The Mainichi Newspapers. 4 January 2012. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/64RMeWFR9)
121. People's Daily, "China 'Unwavering' On Diaoyu Islands", 17 January 2012.
122. "All remote EEZ isles officially named". The Japan Times Online. 4 March 2012. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
123. Xinhua News Agency, "Chinese FM Urges Japan To 'Fully Recognize' Sensitivity Of History, Diaoyu Islands Issues", 6 March 2012.
124. China Times, "China Should Use Diplomacy To Solve Diaoyutai Island Issue: Chinese General", 7 March 2012.
125. Focus Taiwan News Channel, "Taiwan Not Aligned With China Over Tiaoyutai Islands: MOFA", 7 March 2012.
126. Kyodo News, "Two Diet members survey isles", Japan Times, 23 January 2012, p. 2.
127. Global Times, "China Defends Surveillance Near Diaoyu Islands", 17 March 2012.
128. Mainichi Daily News, "Japan Protests Chinese Ship's Entry Into Territory Near Senkakus", 17 March 2012.
129. Mainichi Shimbun, "China Seeks To 'Break' Japan's Control Over Senkaku Through Patrols", 22 March 2012.
130. "Taiwan, Japan coastguards collide near islands". 4 July 2012.
131. "'Japan considering buying disputed islands'". 8 July 2012.
132. "Central government plans to buy Senkaku Islands". The Asahi Shimbun. 7 July 2012. Retrieved 13 December 2012.
133. "Chinese ships near disputed islands: Japan". 11 July 2012.
134. Fackler, Martin. "Japan Recalls Ambassador in China Amid Rising Tensions." NYT, 15 July 2012.
135. "The Threat of China's Military Might in Asia". Wall Street Journal. 31 July 2012. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
136. Michael Cole (8 August 2012). "US to deploy drones over Diaoyutais". Taipei Times. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
137. Jens Kastner (16 August 2012). "Taipei-Tokyo ties strained by distrust, sabotage". Asia Times. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
138. Sheila A. Smith (16 August 2012). "Why Japan, South Korea, and China Are So Riled Up Over a Few Tiny Islands". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 18 August 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
139. Yuan, Elizabeth (17 August 2012). "Japan deporting Chinese held over island landing". CNN. Archived from the original on 18 August 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
140. "Japanese activists arrive at disputed islands – Asia-Pacific". Al Jazeera English. 4 October 2011. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
141. ^ "Japan activists land on disputed islands amid China row". BBC News. 19 August 2012. Retrieved 19 August 2012.
142. "Japan boats reach disputed islands amid China row". BBC News. 18 August 2012. Archived from the original on 18 August 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
143. Jiji Press, "Rightwingers land on Senkakus, hoist flags", Japan Times, 20 August 2012, p. 1
144. Bouthier, Antoine, "Nationalists exult in Senkaku isle landing", Japan Times, 20 August 2012, p. 2
145. ^ "Japanese activists land, raise flags on disputed island, provoking Chinese protests". The Washington Post. 18 August 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
146. The Daily Yomiuri Anniversary events at risk over isle feud August 21, 2012 Retrieved 21 August 2012
147. NHK Anti-Japan protest spreading over China August 19, 2012 Retrieved 20 August 2012
148. "Chinese stage anti-Japan rallies over Senkakus | The Japan Times Online". The Japan Times. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
149. "China-Japan island dispute fuels protests". 20 August 2012. Retrieved 17 September 2012.
150. "Government offering Senkakus owner ¥2 billion for contested isles". The Japanese Times. 27 August 2012. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
151. "China sends patrol ships to disputed East China Sea islands". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
152. "Monday, September 10, 2012 (PM), Press Conference by the Chief Cabinet Secretary (Excerpt)". Tokyo: Kantei (Cabinet Secretariat), Cabinet Public Relations Office, Japan. 10 September 2012(PM). Retrieved 2012-09-16. CHIEF CABINET SECRETARY FUJIMURA: 1.There is no doubt that the Senkaku Islands are clearly an inherent territory of Japan, in light of historical facts and based upon international law...... {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
153. "Japan buys three of Senkaku Islands from owner; Mainichi Shimbun". mainichi.jp. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
154. "China sends patrol ships to contested East China Sea islands". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
155. China’s Latest Salvo in Senkaku Storm: Weather Forecasts.The Wall Street Journal, China 2012-09-12
156. "Activists protest in Taipei against Japan's Diaoyutais purchase". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
157. "海図受理、国連でも中国攻勢　「領海」主張を誇示". Sankei Shimbun (in Japanese). Tokyo. 15 September 2012. Retrieved 16 September 2012. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
158. China to Submit Diaoyu Islands' Nautical Charts to UN, Chinese Patrol Ships Deployed(Arirang (TV network))14 Sep 2012
159. "Second Day Of Anti-Japan Protests Rock China". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
160. "Anti-Japan Protests Spread to Hong Kong". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
161. "中国各地发生反日游行 外交部主张理性表达诉求". Tencent News (in Chinese). 16 September 2012. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
162. ^ "Thousands in Chinese provinces stage anti-Japan protests". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
163. ^ "China struggles to curb anger as protesters denounce Japan". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
164. "China aims at Japan's economy in island protests". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
165. "Anti-Japan Protests in China Grow, Turn Violent". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
166. ^ "打砸抢烧不是爱国是害民". 北京青年报 (in Chinese). 16 September 2012. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
167. "Xi'an Protesters Overturn Cars". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
168. "Anti-Japan Protests In China Swell, Turn Violent". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
169. "UN to get shelf submission". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
170. "Chinese in San Francisco and Beijing protest Japan's takeover of the Diaoyu Islands". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
171. CNA, 18 September 2012, ROC, PRC flags fly together at anti-Japan protest in NY, The China Post
172. "China-Japan island row: Chinese protest in US cities". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
173. "SCMP Editor in Chief Wang Xiangwei issues statement on injured photographer at anti-Japan protest". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
174. "Panetta to urge China and Japan to tone down dispute over islands". Retrieved 17 September 2012.
175. 2012-09-14, Six Chinese ships enter Japanese waters near disputed islands, Washington Post 14 September 2012
176. 2012-09-18, Chinese ships sail into waters near disputed islands, Deutsche Welle
177. 2012-09-22, China strengthens Senkakus flotilla; Taiwan ships arrive, Asahi Shimbun
178. "中国、国連に大陸棚延伸案を正式提出へ". Yomiuri Shimbun (in Japanese). 17 September 2012. Retrieved 17 September 2012. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
179. "US wades into China-Japan island dispute with missile defense deal." TV-Novosti, 17 September 2012.
180. "社评：180多地和平抗议，给理性掌声". Global Times (in Chinese). 20 September 2012. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
181. J. Michael Cole, 2012-09-24, China increases territorial UAVs, Taipei Times
182. 2012-09-26, Local, Japan vessels clash off Diaoyutais, China Post
183. 2012-09-26, Taiwan, Japan in high-seas standoff, Taipei Times
184. "Japan protests Chinese plane entering their airspace."

Sources

This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (September 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

• Curtis, Gerald, Ryosei Kokubun and Wang Jisi. (2010). Getting the Triangle Straight: Managing China-Japan-US Relations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. 10-ISBN 488907080X/13-ISBN 9784889070804; OCLC 491904160
• Shaw, Han-yi. (1999). The Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Its History and Analysis of the Ownership Claims of the P.R.C., R.O.C., and Japan. Baltimore, Maryland: University of Maryland School of Law. OCLC 608151745
• Lee, Seokwoo, Shelagh Furness and Clive Schofield. (2002). Territorial disputes among Japan, China and Taiwan concerning the Senkaku Islands. Durham: University of Durham, International Boundaries Research Unit (IBRU). 10-ISBN 1897643500/13-ISBN 9781897643501; OCLC 249501645
• Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea. (2000). International Organizations and the Law of the Sea. London : Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff. OCLC 16852368
• Pan, Junwu. (2009). Toward a New Framework for Peaceful Settlement of China's Territorial and Boundary Disputes. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. 10-ISBN 9004174281/13-ISBN 9789004174283; OCLC 282968950
• Suganuma, Unryu. (2000). Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 10-ISBN 0824821599/13-ISBN 9780824821593; 10-ISBN 0824824938/13-ISBN 9780824824938; OCLC 170955369

External links

• Global Security, Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands
• Basic View on Senkaku (by the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
• Q&A on the Senkaku Islands (by the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
• Japan’s Territorial Problem: The Northern Territories, Takeshima, and the Senkaku Islands, commentary by Ambassador Kazuhiko Togo (6 May 2012)
• Article by Kiyoshi Inoue Professor of History department Kyoto University, and original text and maps in Japanese
• Senkaku @BBC
• "Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands". Globalsecurity.org.
• Diaoyutai History (in Chinese)
• Satellite image of Senkaku Islands
• "The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute:", Durham University, 2008. Dzurek, Daniel.
• "INTERNATIONAL LAW'S UNHELPFUL ROLE IN THE SENKAKU ISLANDS:", University of Pennsylvania, 18 October 1996. Ramos-Mrosovsky, Carlos.
• 琉球群岛人民反对美国占领的斗争 "Ryukyu Islands, the struggle of peoples against U.S. occupation," 人民日報 (People's Daily), 8 January 1953. (in Chinese)
• "China's Diaoyu Islands Sovereignty is Undeniable" at People's Daily Online, 26 May 2003.
• "Wrong to dispute Japan’s sovereignty of Senkaku" by Hiroshi Suzuki, Director, Japan Information and Cultural Centre Minister, Embassy of Japan, London., Financial Times>Letters, 28 May 2012.

• Use dmy dates from October 2012
• Disputed islands
• Senkaku Islands
• Territorial disputes of Japan
• Territorial disputes of China
• Territorial disputes of the Republic of China
• Anti-Japanese sentiment in China