The 1913 Houghton-le-Spring by-election was a Parliamentary by-election held on 18 March 1913. The constituency returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, elected by the first past the post voting system.
Vacancy
Robert Cameron had been Liberal MP for Houghton-le-Spring since 1895. He died on 13 February 1913.
Previous results
Cameron was elected unopposed in December 1910, however, he was opposed at the election before.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Robert Cameron | 10,393 | 70.3 | −1.9 | |
| Conservative | Hugh Sidney Streatfield | 4,382 | 29.7 | +1.9 | |
| Majority | 6,011 | 40.6 | −3.8 | ||
| Turnout | 14,775 | 84.4 | +1.2 | ||
| Liberal hold | Swing | -1.9 | |||
Candidates
The Liberals chose a Grimsby man, Tom Wing to defend the seat. He was elected at the January 1910 general election as Member of Parliament (MP) for Grimsby, but lost that seat at the general election in December 1910.
The Unionists selected local barrister, Thomas Richardson as their candidate. His father had been Liberal MP for Hartlepool.
Labour intervened with an Independent Labour Party member, William House, who was sponsored by the Durham Miners' Association, for whom he had been President since 1900. House stood for the Labour Party in Bishop Auckland at the January and December 1910 general elections.
Campaign
In the recent past, there had been a good working relationship between the local miners and the local Liberal Association to the point that by 1913, miners still dominated the local Liberal association. Every miners lodge in the constituency was represented at Wing's selection meeting. During the campaign, many miners lodge officials spoke on platforms in support of Wing. This came as something of a slap in the face to both the Independent Labour Party and the Durham Miners Association who had hoped that the local miners would support their candidate, House. This split in the local miners lodges was good news for the Unionist campaign. They knew that their only hoping of winning was if the Labour candidate took half or the Liberal vote, allowing the Unionists the chance to come through the middle.
Result
The Liberal Party held the seat with a significantly reduced majority.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Thomas Wing | 6,930 | 43.6 | −26.7 | |
| Unionist | Thomas Richardson | 4,807 | 30.2 | +0.5 | |
| Labour | William House | 4,165 | 26.2 | +26.2 | |
| Majority | 2,123 | 13.4 | −27.2 | ||
| Turnout | 15,902 | 83.6 | −0.8 | ||
| Liberal hold | Swing | -13.6 | |||
Aftermath
A General Election was due to take place by the end of 1915. By the autumn of 1914, the following candidates had been adopted to contest that election. Due to the outbreak of war, the election never took place. House's parliamentary interests moved on to the Mid Durham constituency, while Richardson never stood again.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Thomas Wing | ||||
| Labour | W. P. Richardson | ||||
| Unionist | |||||
At the eleventh hour, the Labour party replaced W. P. Richardson as candidate with another local miner Robert Richardson
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour | Robert Richardson | 7,315 | 36.3 | ||
| Liberal | Thomas Wing | 6,626 | 32.9 | ||
| National Democratic |
|
6,185 | 30.8 | New | |
| Majority | 689 | 3.4 | N/A | ||
| Turnout | 20,126 | 61.8 | |||
| Labour gain from Liberal | Swing | ||||
- Lindsley was the endorsed candidate of the Coalition Government.
References
- Craig, F.W.S. (1987). Chronology of British Parliamentary By-elections 1833–1987. Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. p. 108.
- Political Change and the Labour Party 1900-1918 by Duncan Tanner
- Craig, F. W. S. (1974). British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 (1 ed.). London: Macmillan.
- Who's Who: www.ukwhoswho.com
- Debrett's House of Commons 1916