Misplaced Pages

Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Aveling Barford Ltd v Period Ltd) UK company law case concerning reduction of capital

Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd
CourtHigh Court
Citation BCLC 626
Keywords
Reduction of capital

Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd BCLC 626 is an English company law case concerning reduction of capital. It held that a sale at an undervalue of an asset was a dressed-up distribution. As the company did not have distributable reserves, the sale was in consequence an unlawful reduction of capital.

The law in relation to the transfer of assets at an undervalue has been clarified in CA 2006, and the amount of the distribution arising in consequence of a sale at undervalue is now determined in accordance with section 845.

Facts

Mr Lee owned and controlled both Aveling Barford Ltd and Perion Ltd. Aveling Barford owned a country house and 18 acres of land in Grantham, which it sold to Perion £350,000, rather than the £1,150,000 it had been valued for prospective mortgagees. Aveling Barford subsequently went into liquidation, and the liquidator sued to have Perion be declared a constructive trustee of the proceeds realised by Perion on the resale of the property.

Judgment

Hoffmann J held that it was a breach of the directors' fiduciary duty to sell the property at an undervalue. Given the relationship between the parties, the sale at an undervalue represented a distribution, and as the sale amounted to an unlawful reduction of capital, it was incapable of ratification. The transferee was therefore accountable as a constructive trustee. ‘This was a dressed up distribution’, it was ultra vires and incapable of ratification.

The rule that capital may not be returned to shareholders is a rule for the protection of creditors and the evasion of the rule falls within what I think Slade LJ had in mind when he spoke of fraud on creditors.

See also

Sources on company shares
Birch v Cropper (1889) 14 App Cas 525
Andrews v Gas Meter Co 1 Ch 361
Borland’s Trustee v Steel Brothers & Co Ltd 1 Ch 279
Companies Act 2006 ss 33 and 282-4
Scottish Insurance Corp v Wilsons & Clyde Coal Ltd AC 462
Dimbula Valley (Ceylon) Tea Co v Laurie Ch 353
Will v United Lankat Plantations Co Ltd AC 11
Re Bradford Investments Ltd BCLC 224
Second Company Law Directive 77/91/EEC
Companies Act 2006 ss 549-551 and 561-571
Companies Act 2006 ss 10 and 617
Re Scandinavian Banking Group plc Ch 87
see UK company law
Corporate personality cases
Case of Sutton's Hospital (1612) 77 ER 960
Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd UKHL 1
Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd AC 619
Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne Ch 935
Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd UKPC 33
Jones v Lipman 1 WLR 832
Tunstall v Steigmann 2 QB 593
Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v IRC 1 WLR 1214
Wallersteiner v Moir 1 WLR 991
DHN Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC 1 WLR 852
Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council UKHL 5
Ord v Belhaven Pubs Ltd EWCA Civ 243
Lubbe v Cape Plc UKHL 41
Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby EWHC 1560 (Ch)
Trustor AB v Smallbone (No 2) EWHC 703 (Ch)
Chandler v Cape plc EWCA Civ 525
Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd UKSC 34
VTB Capital plc v Nutritek Int Corp UKSC 5
Lungowe v Vedanta Resources plc UKSC 20
Rome II Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 arts 1(2)(d) and 4
see UK company law

Notes

References

Categories: