The English national framework for NHS continuing healthcare came into force on 1 October 2007 as a development in the light of the case of Coughlan which established that where a person's need is primarily for health care then the health service must fund the whole cost of nursing home placement. People who qualify are entitled to care paid for by the NHS, for which they do not have to pay, rather than social care, which is means-tested. Most of those who qualify need nursing home care. It is in the interests of local social services departments to establish entitlement to continuing healthcare as this relieves them of any financial responsibility. This system has existed in one form or another since the creation of the NHS.
Payments until 2013 were administered by primary care trusts, and this was transferred to clinical commissioning groups. Many CCGs found towards the end of 2014 that they were in financial difficulties facing the combination of an ageing population with complex health needs and increasingly expensive care packages.
A comprehensive assessment of the person's care qualifications needs must be carried out by a multidisciplinary team, including relevant specialist and non-specialist assessments. An eligible person must establish that they have a complex medical condition and substantial and ongoing care needs. The framework replaced PCTs' individual policies for assessing eligibility for continuing care and local care planning and review processes, with the intention that the same criteria would be used throughout England. Funding already in place may be withdrawn following a joint reassessment of health and social care needs. A CCG's decision that someone is not eligible can be appealed through local resolution and then by an Independent Review Panel through NHS England. The final opportunity to challenge a decision is through the ombudsman. The decision can be challenged on grounds of process or application of the eligibility criteria.
In October 2014 the Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group found they were seeing an average of 34 CHC claims each month and planned to save up to £4.5 million by reviewing the decision-making thresholds for these claims. It also aimed to bring the prices paid into line with other areas and possibly bring assessment of claims carried out by community providers back in house.
In 2015-16, about £3.1 billion was spent. From November 2018 new guidance, issued without any public consultation, comes into force. 37 CCGs have introduced policies to cap the cost of providing support in a person's home at the cost of a residential care placement.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission wrote to thirteen clinical commissioning groups which is considered to have placed “arbitrary caps” on funding and failed to consider patients' individual needs. It threatened judicial review proceedings over such illegal discriminatory funding policies for people with serious long-term health conditions. The chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath said: “It is utterly unacceptable that anyone should be forced into residential care when they are healthy enough to live independently and with their families. We will use our powers to ensure that the NHS thinks about this again.”
A new decision-making framework came into force on 1 October 2018, although there was no change to the eligibility criteria.
The assessment process was suspended at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in England, replaced by emergency funding, but restarted in September 2020, including all those discharged over the previous five months. This was greeted with protests from clinical commissioning groups as it is expected that eligibility will be assessed on patients' current needs rather than needs when they were first referred.
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman produced a report in 2020 outlining common failings in the scheme. This found failings often resulted in families funding care when the NHS should have done so. It found people were often unaware of their entitlements and the processes to challenge decisions where they believed shortfalls were occurring in funding.
Retrospective continuing healthcare claims
On 15 March 2012, the Department of Health announced a deadline of 30 September 2012 for individuals to request an assessment of eligibility for continuing healthcare funding, for cases during the period 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2011. Retrospective claims for previously unassessed periods of care can be considered regardless of whether the patient is still alive. Assessments of eligibility for CHC are the responsibility of the CCG, and are sometimes carried out by commissioning support units. The claim period dates from the completion of the initial screening checklist.
References
- "R v North and East Devon Health Authority ex p Coughlan". Disability Rights UK. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
- "Surge in care claims puts pressure on CCGs". Local Government Chronicle. 17 October 2014. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
- "Continuing healthcare: what you need to know". Guardian. 9 November 2013. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
- "A look at long-term care". Health Service Journal. 14 September 2007. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
- "Morbidly obese patients face restrictions under new Devon cost cutting plan". Health Service Journal. 31 October 2014. Retrieved 25 November 2014.
- "'Vulnerable patients' face ongoing caps to care funding". Health Service Journal. 2 March 2018. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
- "Watchdog threatens 13 CCGs with legal action over 'discrimination'". Health Service Journal. 19 March 2018. Retrieved 13 May 2018.
- "Changes to NHS Continuing Healthcare Framework: Is your CCG ready?". DAC Beachcroft. 21 March 2018. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
- "Care assessments return spells 'total mess' and years of litigation". Health Service Journal. 6 August 2020. Retrieved 19 September 2020.
- "Live-in care worker underpaid by £250,000, finds Ombudsman". Homecare. 27 October 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.