Misplaced Pages

This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (July 2020)

The nucleus is the solid, central part of a comet, formerly termed a dirty snowball or an icy dirtball. A cometary nucleus is composed of rock, dust, and frozen gases. When heated by the Sun, the gases sublime and produce an atmosphere surrounding the nucleus known as the coma. The force exerted on the coma by the Sun's radiation pressure and solar wind cause an enormous tail to form, which points away from the Sun. A typical comet nucleus has an albedo of 0.04. This is blacker than coal, and may be caused by a covering of dust.

Results from the Rosetta and Philae spacecraft show that the nucleus of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko has no magnetic field, which suggests that magnetism may not have played a role in the early formation of planetesimals. Further, the ALICE spectrograph on Rosetta determined that electrons (within 1 km (0.62 mi) above the comet nucleus) produced from photoionization of water molecules by solar radiation, and not photons from the Sun as thought earlier, are responsible for the degradation of water and carbon dioxide molecules released from the comet nucleus into its coma. On 30 July 2015, scientists reported that the Philae spacecraft, that landed on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in November 2014, detected at least 16 organic compounds, of which four (including acetamide, acetone, methyl isocyanate and propionaldehyde) were detected for the first time on a comet.

Paradigm

Comet nuclei, at ~1 km to at times tens of kilometers, could not be resolved by telescopes. Even current giant telescopes would give just a few pixels on target, assuming nuclei were not obscured by comae when near Earth. An understanding of the nucleus, versus the phenomenon of the coma, had to be deduced, from multiple lines of evidence.

"Flying sandbank"

The "flying sandbank" model, first proposed in the late-1800s, posits a comet as a swarm of bodies, not a discrete object at all. Activity is the loss of both volatiles, and population members. This model was championed in midcentury by Raymond Lyttleton, along with an origin. As the Sun passed through interstellar nebulosity, material would clump in wake eddies. Some would be lost, but some would remain in heliocentric orbits. The weak capture explained long, eccentric, inclined comet orbits. Ices per se were lacking; volatiles were stored by adsorption on grains.

"Dirty snowball"

Beginning in the 1950s, Fred Lawrence Whipple published his "icy conglomerate" model. This was soon popularized as "dirty snowball." Comet orbits had been determined quite precisely, yet comets were at times recovered "off-schedule," by as much as days. Early comets could be explained by a "resisting medium"—such as "the aether", or the cumulative action of meteoroids against the front of the comet(s). But comets could return both early and late. Whipple argued that a gentle thrust from asymmetric emissions (now "nongravitational forces") better explained comet timing. This required that the emitter have cohesive strength- a single, solid nucleus with some proportion of volatiles. Lyttleton continued publishing flying-sandbank works as late as 1972. The death knell for the flying sandbank was Halley's Comet. Vega 2 and Giotto images showed a single body, emitting through a small number of jets.

"Icy dirtball"

It has been a long time since comet nuclei could be imagined as frozen snowballs. Whipple had already postulated a separate crust and interior. Before Halley's 1986 apparition, it appeared that an exposed ice surface would have some finite lifetime, even behind a coma. Halley's nucleus was predicted to be dark, not bright, due to preferential destruction/escape of gases, and retention of refractories. The term dust mantling has been in common use since more than 35 years.

The Halley results exceeded even these—comets are not merely dark, but among the darkest objects in the Solar System Furthermore, prior dust estimates were severe undercounts. Both finer grains and larger pebbles appeared in spacecraft detectors, but not ground telescopes. The volatile fraction also included organics, not merely water and other gases. Dust-ice ratios appeared much closer than thought. Extremely low densities (0.1 to 0.5 g cm-3) were derived. The nucleus was still assumed to be majority-ice, perhaps overwhelmingly so.

Modern theory

Three rendezvous missions aside, Halley was one example. Its unfavorable trajectory also caused brief flybys at extreme speed, at one time. More frequent missions broadened the sample of targets, using more advanced instruments. By chance, events such as the breakups of Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 contributed further to human understanding.

Densities were confirmed as quite low, ~0.6 g cm3. Comets were highly porous, and fragile on micro- and macro-scales.

Refractory-to-ice ratios are much higher, at least 3:1, possibly ~5:1, ~6:1, or more.

This is a full reversal from the dirty snowball model. The Rosetta science team has coined the term "mineral organices," for minerals and organics with a minor fraction of ices.

Manx comets, Damocloids, and active asteroids demonstrate that there may be no bright line separating the two categories of objects.

Origin

Comets, or their precursors, formed in the outer Solar System, possibly millions of years before planet formation. How and when comets formed is debated, with distinct implications for Solar System formation, dynamics, and geology. Three-dimensional computer simulations indicate the major structural features observed on cometary nuclei can be explained by pairwise low velocity accretion of weak cometesimals. The currently favored creation mechanism is that of the nebular hypothesis, which states that comets are probably a remnant of the original planetesimal "building blocks" from which the planets grew.

Astronomers think that comets originate in the Oort cloud, the scattered disk, and the outer Main Belt.

Size

Most cometary nuclei are thought to be no more than about 16 kilometers (10 miles) across. The largest comets that have come inside the orbit of Saturn are 95P/Chiron (≈200 km), C/2002 VQ94 (LINEAR) (≈100 km), Comet of 1729 (≈100 km), Hale–Bopp (≈60 km), 29P (≈60 km), 109P/Swift–Tuttle (≈26 km), and 28P/Neujmin (≈21 km).

The potato-shaped nucleus of Halley's comet (15 × 8 × 8 km) contains equal amounts of ice and dust.

During a flyby in September 2001, the Deep Space 1 spacecraft observed the nucleus of Comet Borrelly and found it to be about half the size (8×4×4 km) of the nucleus of Halley's Comet. Borrelly's nucleus was also potato-shaped and had a dark black surface. Like Halley's Comet, Comet Borrelly only released gas from small areas where holes in the crust exposed the ice to sunlight.

The nucleus of comet Hale–Bopp was estimated to be 60 ± 20 km in diameter. Hale-Bopp appeared bright to the unaided eye because its unusually large nucleus gave off a great deal of dust and gas.

The nucleus of P/2007 R5 is probably only 100–200 meters in diameter.

The largest centaurs (unstable, planet crossing, icy asteroids) are estimated to be 250 km to 300 km in diameter. Three of the largest would include 10199 Chariklo (258 km), 2060 Chiron (230 km), and (523727) 2014 NW65 (≈220 km).

Known comets have been estimated to have an average density of 0.6 g/cm. Below is a list of comets that have had estimated sizes, densities, and masses.

Composition

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (July 2020)

It was once thought that water-ice was the predominant constituent of the nucleus. In the dirty snowball model, dust is ejected when the ice retreats. Based on this, about 80% of the Halley's Comet nucleus would be water-ice, and frozen carbon monoxide (CO) makes up another 15%. Much of the remainder is frozen carbon dioxide, methane, and ammonia. Scientists think that other comets are chemically similar to Halley's Comet. The nucleus of Halley's Comet is also an extremely dark black. Scientists think that the surface of the comet, and perhaps most other comets, is covered with a black crust of dust and rock that covers most of the ice. These comets release gas only when holes in this crust rotate toward the Sun, exposing the interior ice to the warming sunlight.

This assumption was shown to be naive, starting at Halley. Coma composition does not represent nucleus composition, as activity selects for volatiles, and against refractories, including heavy organic fractions. Our understanding has evolved more toward mostly rock; recent estimates show that water is perhaps only 20-30% of the mass in typical nuclei. Instead, comets are predominantly organic materials and minerals. Data from Churyumov-Gerasimenko and Arrokoth, and laboratory experiments on accretion, suggest refractories-to-ices ratios less than 1 may not be possible.

The composition of water vapor from Churyumov–Gerasimenko comet, as determined by the Rosetta mission, is substantially different from that found on Earth. The ratio of deuterium to hydrogen in the water from the comet was determined to be three times that found for terrestrial water. This makes it unlikely that water on Earth came from comets such as Churyumov–Gerasimenko.

Organics

"Missing Carbon"

Structure

On 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko comet, some of the resulting water vapour may escape from the nucleus, but 80% of it recondenses in layers beneath the surface. This observation implies that the thin ice-rich layers exposed close to the surface may be a consequence of cometary activity and evolution, and that global layering does not necessarily occur early in the comet's formation history.

Measurements carried out by the Philae lander on 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko comet, indicate that the dust layer could be as much as 20 cm (7.9 in) thick. Beneath that is hard ice, or a mixture of ice and dust. Porosity appears to increase toward the center of the comet. While most scientists thought that all the evidence indicated that the structure of nuclei of comets is processed rubble piles of smaller ice planetesimals of a previous generation, the Rosetta mission dispelled the idea that comets are "rubble piles" of disparate material. The Rosetta mission indicated that comets may be "rubble piles" of disparate material. Data were not conclusive concerning the collisional environment during the formation and right afterwards.

Splitting

The nucleus of some comets may be fragile, a conclusion supported by the observation of comets splitting apart. Splitting comets include 3D/Biela in 1846, Shoemaker–Levy 9 in 1992, and 73P/Schwassmann–Wachmann from 1995 to 2006. Greek historian Ephorus reported that a comet split apart as far back as the winter of 372–373 BC. Comets are suspected of splitting due to thermal stress, internal gas pressure, or impact.

Comets 42P/Neujmin and 53P/Van Biesbroeck appear to be fragments of a parent comet. Numerical integrations have shown that both comets had a rather close approach to Jupiter in January 1850, and that, before 1850, the two orbits were nearly identical.

Albedo

Cometary nuclei are among the darkest objects known to exist in the Solar System. The Giotto probe found that Comet Halley's nucleus reflects approximately 4% of the light that falls on it, and Deep Space 1 discovered that Comet Borrelly's surface reflects only 2.5–3.0% of the light that falls on it; by comparison, fresh asphalt reflects 7% of the light that falls on it. It is thought that complex organic compounds are the dark surface material. Solar heating drives off volatile compounds leaving behind heavy long-chain organics that tend to be very dark, like tar or crude oil. The very darkness of cometary surfaces allows them to absorb the heat necessary to drive their outgassing.

Roughly six percent of the near-Earth asteroids are thought to be extinct nuclei of comets (see Extinct comets) which no longer experience outgassing. Two near-Earth asteroids with albedos this low include 14827 Hypnos and 3552 Don Quixote.

Discovery and exploration

The first relatively close mission to a comet nucleus was space probe Giotto. This was the first time a nucleus was imaged at such proximity, coming as near as 596 km. The data was a revelation, showing for the first time the jets, the low-albedo surface, and organic compounds.

During its flyby, Giotto was hit at least 12,000 times by particles, including a 1-gram fragment that caused a temporary loss of communication with Darmstadt. Halley was calculated to be ejecting three tonnes of material per second from seven jets, causing it to wobble over long time periods. Comet Grigg–Skjellerup's nucleus was visited after Halley, with Giotto approaching 100–200 km.

Results from the Rosetta and Philae spacecraft show that the nucleus of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko has no magnetic field, which suggests that magnetism may not have played a role in the early formation of planetesimals. Further, the ALICE spectrograph on Rosetta determined that electrons (within 1 km (0.62 mi) above the comet nucleus) produced from photoionization of water molecules by solar radiation, and not photons from the Sun as thought earlier, are responsible for the degradation of water and carbon dioxide molecules released from the comet nucleus into its coma.

Tempel 1 Deep Impact	Tempel 1 Stardust	Borrelly Deep Space 1	Wild 2 Stardust	Hartley 2 Deep Impact	C-G Rosetta

Comets already visited are:

• Halley's Comet
• 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup
• Tempel 1 (also hit with impactor)
• 19P/Borrelly
• 81P/Wild
• 103P/Hartley
• C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring) -unplanned encounter with Mars spacecraft
• 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko (also landed on)

See also

• Coma (cometary)
• Hypatia (stone)
• List of comets visited by spacecraft

References

1. Robert Roy Britt (29 November 2001). "Comet Borrelly Puzzle: Darkest Object in the Solar System". Space.com. Archived from the original on 22 January 2009. Retrieved 26 October 2008.
2. ^ "ESA Science & Technology: Halley". ESA. 10 March 2006. Retrieved 22 February 2009.
3. ^ Bauer, Markus (14 April 2015). "Rosetta and Philae Find Comet Not Magnetised". European Space Agency. Retrieved 14 April 2015.
4. ^ Schiermeier, Quirin (14 April 2015). "Rosetta's comet has no magnetic field". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17327. S2CID 123964604.
5. ^ Agle, DC; Brown, Dwayne; Fohn, Joe; Bauer, Markus (2 June 2015). "NASA Instrument on Rosetta Makes Comet Atmosphere Discovery". NASA. Retrieved 2 June 2015.
6. ^ Feldman, Paul D.; A'Hearn, Michael F.; Bertaux, Jean-Loup; Feaga, Lori M.; Parker, Joel Wm.; et al. (2 June 2015). "Measurements of the near-nucleus coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko with the Alice far-ultraviolet spectrograph on Rosetta" (PDF). Astronomy and Astrophysics. 583: A8. arXiv:1506.01203. Bibcode:2015A&A...583A...8F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525925. S2CID 119104807.
7. Jordans, Frank (30 July 2015). "Philae probe finds evidence that comets can be cosmic labs". The Washington Post. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 23 December 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
8. "Science on the Surface of a Comet". European Space Agency. 30 July 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
9. Bibring, J.-P.; Taylor, M.G.G.T.; Alexander, C.; Auster, U.; Biele, J.; Finzi, A. Ercoli; Goesmann, F.; Klingehoefer, G.; Kofman, W.; Mottola, S.; Seidenstiker, K.J.; Spohn, T.; Wright, I. (31 July 2015). "Philae's First Days on the Comet – Introduction to Special Issue". Science. 349 (6247): 493. Bibcode:2015Sci...349..493B. doi:10.1126/science.aac5116. PMID 26228139.
10. Rickman, H (2017). "1.1.1 The Comet Nucleus". Origin and Evolution of Comets: 10 years after the Nice Model, and 1 year after Rosetta. World Scientific Publishing Co Singapore. ISBN 978-9813222571.
11. Lyttleton, RA (1948). "On the Origin of Comets". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 108 (6): 465–75. Bibcode:1948MNRAS.108..465L. doi:10.1093/mnras/108.6.465.
12. Lyttleton, R (1951). "On the Structure of Comets and the Formation of Tails". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 111 (3): 268–77. Bibcode:1951MNRAS.111..268L. doi:10.1093/mnras/111.3.268.
13. Lyttleton, R (1972). The Comets and Their Origin. Cambridge University Press New York. ISBN 9781107615618.
14. Bailey, M; Clube, S; Napier, W (1990). "8.3 Lyttleton's Accretion Theory". The Origin of Comets. Pergamon Press. ISBN 0-08-034859-9.
15. Whipple, F (1950). "A Comet Model. I: the Acceleration of Comet Encke". Astrophysical Journal. 111: 375–94. Bibcode:1950ApJ...111..375W. doi:10.1086/145272.
16. Whipple, F (1951). "A Comet Model. II: Physical Relations for Comets and Meteors". Astrophysical Journal. 113: 464–74. Bibcode:1951ApJ...113..464W. doi:10.1086/145416.
17. Delsemme, A (1 July 1972). "Present Understanding of Comets". Comets: Scientific Data and Missions: 174. Bibcode:1972csdm.conf..174D.
18. ^ Wood, J (December 1986). Comet nucleus models: a review. ESA Workshop on the Comet Nucleus Sample Return Mission. pp. 123–31.
19. ^ Kresak, L; Kresakova, M (1987). ESA SP-278: Symposium on the Diversity and Similarity of Comets. ESA. p. 739.
20. Rickman, H (2017). "2.2.3 Dust Production Rates". Origin and Evolution of Comets: 10 years after the Nice Model, and 1 year after Rosetta. World Scientific Publishing Co Singapore. ISBN 978-9813222571. "It has been a long time since comet nuclei could be imagined as frozen snowballs"
21. Hartmann, W; Cruikshank, D; Degewij, J (1982). "Remote comets and related bodies: VJHK colorimetry and surface materials". Icarus. 52 (3): 377–08. Bibcode:1982Icar...52..377H. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(82)90002-1.
22. Fanale, F; Salvail, J (1984). "An idealized short-period comet model". Icarus. 60: 476. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90157-X.
23. Cruikshank, D; Hartmann, W; Tholen, D (1985). "Color, albedo, and nucleus size of Halley's comet". Nature. 315 (6015): 122. Bibcode:1985Natur.315..122C. doi:10.1038/315122a0. S2CID 4357619.
24. Greenberg, J (May 1986). "Predicting that comet Halley is dark". Nature. 321 (6068): 385. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..385G. doi:10.1038/321385a0. S2CID 46708189.
25. ^ Rickman, H (2017). "4.2 Dust Mantling". Origin and Evolution of Comets: 10 years after the Nice Model, and 1 year after Rosetta. World Scientific Publishing Co Singapore. ISBN 978-9813222571. "the term dust mantling has been in common use since more than 35 years"
26. Tholen, D; Cruikshank, D; Hammel, H; Hartmann, W; Lark, N; Piscitelli, J (1986). "A comparison of the continuum colours of P/Halley, other comets and asteroids". ESA SP-250 Vol. III. ESA. p. 503.
27. Whipple, F (October 1987). "The Cometary Nucleus - Current Concepts". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 187 (1): 852.
28. A'Hearn, M (2008). "Deep Impact and the Origin and Evolution of Cometary Nuclei". Space Science Reviews. 138 (1): 237. Bibcode:2008SSRv..138..237A. doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9350-3. S2CID 123621097.
29. Trigo-Rodriguez, J; Blum, J (February 2009). "Tensile strength as an indicator of the degree of primitiveness of undifferentiated bodies". Planet. Space Sci. 57 (2): 243–49. Bibcode:2009P&SS...57..243T. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2008.02.011.
30. Weissman, P; Asphaug, E; Lowry, S (2004). "Structure and Density of Cometary Nuclei". Comets II. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. p. 337.
31. Bischoff, D; Gundlach, B; Neuhaus, M; Blum, J (February 2019). "Experiment on cometary activity: ejection of dust aggregates from a sublimating water-ice surface". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483 (1): 1202. arXiv:1811.09397. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.483.1202B. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3182. S2CID 119278016.
32. Rotundi, A; Sierks H; Della Corte V; Fulle M; GutierrezP; et al. (23 January 2015). "Dust Measurements in the coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko inbound to the Sun". Science. 347 (6220): aaa3905. Bibcode:2015Sci...347a3905R. doi:10.1126/science.aaa3905. PMID 25613898. S2CID 206634190.
33. Fulle, M; Della Corte, V; Rotundi, A; Green, S; Accolla, M; Colangeli, L; Ferrari, M; Ivanovski, S; Sordini, R; Zakharov, V (2017). "The dust-to-ices ratio in comets and Kuiper belt objects". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469: S45-49. Bibcode:2017MNRAS.469S..45F. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx983.
34. Fulle, M; Marzari, F; Della Corte, V; Fornasier, S (April 2016). "Evolution of the dust size distribution of comet 67P/C-G from 2.2au to perihelion" (PDF). Astrophysical Journal. 821: 19. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/19. hdl:11577/3199084. S2CID 125072014.
35. ^ Fulle, M; Altobelli, N; Buratti, B; Choukroun, M; Fulchignoni, M; Grün, E; Taylor, M; et al. (November 2016). "Unexpected and significant findings in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: an interdisciplinary view". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 462: S2-8. Bibcode:2016MNRAS.462S...2F. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1663.
36. Fulle, M; Blum, J; Green, S; Gundlach, B; Herique, A; Moreno, F; Mottola, S; Rotundi, A; Snodgrass, C (January 2019). "The refractory-to-ice mass ratio in comets" (PDF). Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 482 (3): 3326–40. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.482.3326F. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2926.
37. Choukroun, M; Altwegg, K; Kührt, E; Biver, N; Bockelée-Morvan, D; et al. (2020). "Dust-to-Gas and Refractory-to-ice Mass Ratios of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta Obs". Space Sci Rev. 216: 44. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00662-1. S2CID 216338717.
38. "How comets were assembled". University of Bern. 29 May 2015. Retrieved 8 January 2016 – via Phys.org.
39. Jutzi, M.; Asphaug, E. (June 2015). "The shape and structure of cometary nuclei as a result of low-velocity accretion". Science. 348 (6241): 1355–1358. Bibcode:2015Sci...348.1355J. doi:10.1126/science.aaa4747. PMID 26022415. S2CID 36638785.
40. Weidenschilling, S. J. (June 1997). "The Origin of Comets in the Solar Nebula: A Unified Model". Icarus. 127 (2): 290–306. Bibcode:1997Icar..127..290W. doi:10.1006/icar.1997.5712.
41. Choi, Charles Q. (15 November 2014). "Comets: Facts About The 'Dirty Snowballs' of Space". Space.com. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
42. Nuth, Joseph A.; Hill, Hugh G. M.; Kletetschka, Gunther (20 July 2000). "Determining the ages of comets from the fraction of crystalline dust". Nature. 406 (6793): 275–276. Bibcode:2000Natur.406..275N. doi:10.1038/35018516. PMID 10917522. S2CID 4430764.
43. "How Asteroids and Comets Formed". Science Clarified. Retrieved 16 January 2016.
44. Levison, Harold F.; Donnes, Luke (2007). "Comet Populations and Cometary Dynamics". In McFadden, Lucy-Ann Adams; Weissman, Paul Robert; Johnson, Torrence V. (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Solar System (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press. pp. 575–588. ISBN 978-0-12-088589-3.
45. Dones, L; Brasser, R; Kaib, N; Rickman, H (2015). "Origi and Evolu of the Cometar Reserv". Space Science Reviews. 197: 191–69. Bibcode:2015SSRv..197..191D. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0223-2. S2CID 123931232.
46. Meech, K (2017). "Setting the scene: what did we know before Rosetta?". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 375 (2097). Section 6. Bibcode:2017RSPTA.37560247M. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0247. PMC 5454221. PMID 28554969. Special issue: Cometary science after Rosetta
47. Hsieh, H; Novaković, B; Walsh, K; Schörghofer, N (2020). "Potential Themis-family Asteroid Contribution to the Jupiter-family Comet Population". The Astronomical Journal. 159 (4): 179. arXiv:2002.09008. Bibcode:2020AJ....159..179H. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab7899. PMC 7121251. PMID 32255816. S2CID 211252398.
48. ^ Yeomans, Donald K. (2005). "Comets (World Book Online Reference Center 125580)". NASA. Archived from the original on 29 April 2005. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
49. ^ "What Have We Learned About Halley's Comet?". Astronomical Society of the Pacific (No. 6 – Fall 1986). 1986. Retrieved 14 December 2008.
50. ^ Weaver, H. A.; Stern, S.A.; Parker, J. Wm. (2003). "Hubble Space Telescope STIS Observations of Comet 19P/BORRELLY during the Deep Space 1 Encounter". The Astronomical Journal. 126 (1): 444–451. Bibcode:2003AJ....126..444W. doi:10.1086/375752. Retrieved 14 December 2008.
51. Fernández, Yanga R. (2002). "The Nucleus of Comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1): Size and Activity". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 89 (1): 3–25. Bibcode:2002EM&P...89....3F. doi:10.1023/A:1021545031431. S2CID 189899565.
52. "SOHO's new catch: its first officially periodic comet". European Space Agency. 25 September 2007. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
53. ^ D. T. Britt; G. J. Consol-magno SJ; W. J. Merline (2006). "Small Body Density and Porosity: New Data, New Insights" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVII. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 December 2008. Retrieved 14 December 2008.
54. Halley: Using the volume of an ellipsoid of 15x8x8km * a rubble pile density of 0.6 g/cm yields a mass (m=d*v) of 3.02E+14 kg.
    Tempel 1: Using a spherical diameter of 6.25 km; volume of a sphere * a density of 0.62 g/cm yields a mass of 7.9E+13 kg.
    19P/Borrelly: Using the volume of an ellipsoid of 8x4x4km * a density of 0.3 g/cm yields a mass of 2.0E+13 kg.
    81P/Wild: Using the volume of an ellipsoid of 5.5x4.0x3.3 km * a density of 0.6 g/cm yields a mass of 2.28E+13 kg.
55. RZ Sagdeev; PE Elyasberg; VI Moroz. (1988). "Is the nucleus of Comet Halley a low density body?". Nature. 331 (6153): 240–242. Bibcode:1988Natur.331..240S. doi:10.1038/331240a0. S2CID 4335780.
56. "Comet 9P/Tempel 1". The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on 9 February 2006. Retrieved 15 December 2008.
57. "Comet 81P/Wild 2". The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on 6 January 2009. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
58. Baldwin, Emily (6 October 2014). "Measuring Comet 67P/C-G". European Space Agency. Retrieved 16 November 2014.
59. Baldwin, Emily (21 August 2014). "Determining the mass of comet 67P/C-G". European Space Agency. Retrieved 21 August 2014.
60. Wood, J A (December 1986). "Comet nucleus models: a review.". ESA Proceedings of an ESA workshop on the Comet Nucleus Sample Return Mission. ESA. pp. 123–31. water-ice as the predominant constituent
61. ^ Bischoff, D; Gundlach, B; Neuhaus, M; Blum, J (February 2019). "Experiments on cometary activity: ejection of dust aggregates from a sublimating water-ice surface". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483 (1): 1202–10. arXiv:1811.09397. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.483.1202B. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3182. In the past, it was believed that comets are dirty snowballs and that the dust is ejected when the ice retreats." "...it has become evident that comets have a much higher dust-to-ice ratio than previously thought
62. Bockelée-Morvan, D; Biver, N (May 2017). "The composition of cometary ices". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 375 (2097). Bibcode:2017RSPTA.37560252B. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0252. PMID 28554972. S2CID 2207751. Molecular abundances are measured in cometary atmospheres. The extent to which they are representative of the nucleus composition has been the subject of many theoretical studies.
63. O'D. Alexander, C; McKeegan, K; Altwegg, K (February 2019). "Water Reservoirs in Small Planetary Bodies: Meteorites, Asteroids, and Comets". Space Science Reviews. 214 (1): 36. doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0474-9. PMC 6398961. PMID 30842688. While the coma is clearly heterogeneous in composition, no firm statement can be made about the compositional heterogeneity of the nucleus at any given time." "what can be measured in their comas remotely may not be representative of their bulk compositions.
64. A'Hearn, M (May 2017). "Comets: looking ahead". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 375 (2097). Bibcode:2017RSPTA.37560261A. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0261. PMC 5454229. PMID 28554980. our understanding has been evolving more toward mostly rock
65. Jewitt, D; Chizmadia, L; Grimm, R; Prialnik, D (2007). "Water in the Small Bodies of the Solar System". Protostars and Planets V. University of Arizona Press. pp. 863–78. Recent estimates... show that water is less important, perhaps carrying only 20-30% of the mass in typical nuclei (Sykes et al., 1986).
66. Fulle, M; Della Corte, V; Rotundi, A; Green, S; Accolla, M; Colangeli, L; Ferrari, M; Ivanovski, S; Sordini, R; Zakharov, V (2017). "The dust-to-ices ratio in comets and Kuiper belt objects". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469: S45-49. Bibcode:2017MNRAS.469S..45F. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx983.
67. Filacchione, G; Groussin, O; Herny, C; Kappel, D; Mottola, S; Oklay, N; Pommerol, A; Wright, I; Yoldi, Z; Ciarniello, M; Moroz, L; Raponi, A (2019). "Comet 67P/CG Nucleus Composition and Comparison to Other Comets" (PDF). Space Science Reviews. 215 (1): Article number 19. Bibcode:2019SSRv..215...19F. doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0580-3. S2CID 127214832. a predominance of organic materials and minerals.
68. Lorek, S.; Gundlach, B.; Lacerda, P.; Blum, J. (2018). "Comet formation in collapsing pebble clouds What cometary bulk density implies for the cloud mass and dust-to-ice ratio". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 587: A128. arXiv:1601.05726. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526565. S2CID 119208933.
69. Borenstein, Seth (10 December 2014). "The mystery of where Earth's water came from deepens". Excite News. Associated Press. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
70. Agle, D. C.; Bauer, Markus (10 December 2014). "Rosetta Instrument Reignites Debate on Earth's Oceans". NASA. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
71. Kissel, J.; Sagdeev, R. Z.; Bertaux, J. L.; Angarov, V. N.; Audouze, J.; Blamont, J. E.; Buchler, K.; Evlanov, E. N.; Fechtig, H.; Fomenkova, M. N.; Hoerner, von H.; Inogamov, N. A.; Khromov, V. N.; Knabe, W.; Krueger, F. R.; Langevin, Y.; Leonasv, B. (1986). "Composition of comet Halley dust particles from Vega observations". Nature. 321: 280. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..280K. doi:10.1038/321280a0. S2CID 122405233.
72. Kissel, J.; Brownlee, D. E.; Buchler, K.; Clark, B.; Fechtig, H.; Grun, E.; Hornung, K.; Igenbergs, E. (1986). "Composition of comet Halley dust particles from Giotto observations". Nature. 321: 336. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..336K. doi:10.1038/321336a0. S2CID 186245081.
73. ^ Filacchione, Gianrico; Capaccioni, Fabrizio; Taylor, Matt; Bauer, Markus (13 January 2016). "Exposed ice on Rosetta's comet confirmed as water" (Press release). European Space Agency. Archived from the original on 18 January 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
74. Filacchione, G.; de Sanctis, M. C.; Capaccioni, F.; Raponi, A.; Tosi, F.; et al. (13 January 2016). "Exposed water ice on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko". Nature. 529 (7586): 368–372. Bibcode:2016Natur.529..368F. doi:10.1038/nature16190. PMID 26760209. S2CID 4446724.
75. Baldwin, Emily (18 November 2014). "Philae settles in dust-covered ice". European Space Agency. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
76. Krishna Swamy, K. S. (May 1997). Physics of Comets. World Scientific Series in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 2 (2nd ed.). World Scientific. p. 364. ISBN 981-02-2632-2.
77. Khan, Amina (31 July 2015). "After a bounce, Rosetta". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
78. "Rosetta's frequently asked questions". European Space Agency. 2015. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
79. Rickman, H; Marchi, S; AHearn, M; Barbieri, C; El-Maarry, M; Güttler, C; Ip, W (2015). "Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Constraints on its origin from OSIRIS observations". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 583: Article 44. arXiv:1505.07021. Bibcode:2015A&A...583A..44R. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526093. S2CID 118394879.
80. Jutzi, M; Benz, W; Toliou, A; Morbidelli, A; Brasser, R (2017). "How primordial is the structure of comet 67P? Combined collisional and dynamical models suggest a late formation". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 597: A# 61. arXiv:1611.02604. Bibcode:2017A&A...597A..61J. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628963. S2CID 119347364.
81. Michel, P.; Schwartz, S.; Jutzi, M.; Marchi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Richardson, D. C. (2018). Catastrophic Disruptions As The Origin Of 67PC-G And Small Bilobate Comets. 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly. p. B1.1–0002–18.
82. Keller, H; Kührt, E (2020). "Cometary Nuclei- From Giotto to Rosetta". Space Science Reviews. 216 (1): Article 14. Bibcode:2020SSRv..216...14K. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-0634-6. S2CID 213437916. Sec. 6.3 Major Open Points Remain "data are not conclusive concerning the collisional environment during the formation and right afterwards"
83. JPL Public Information Office. "Comet Shoemaker-Levy Background". JPL/NASA. Retrieved 25 October 2008.
84. Whitney Clavin (10 May 2006). "Spitzer Telescope Sees Trail of Comet Crumbs". Spitzer Space Telescope at Caltech. Retrieved 25 October 2008.
85. Donald K. Yeomans (1998). "Great Comets in History". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 15 March 2007.
86. H. Boehnhardt. "Split Comets" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Institute (Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie Heidelberg). Retrieved 25 October 2008.
87. J. Pittichova; K.J. Meech; G.B. Valsecch; E.M. Pittich (1–6 September 2003). "Are Comets 42P/Neujmin 3 and 53P/Van Biesbroeck Parts of one Comet?". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 35 #4. Archived from the original on 13 August 2009.
88. ^ "Comet May Be the Darkest Object Yet Seen". The New York Times. 14 December 2001. Retrieved 9 May 2011.
89. Whitman, Kathryn; Morbidelli, Alessandro; Jedicke, Robert (2006). "The Size-Frequency Distribution of Dormant Jupiter Family Comets". Icarus. 183 (1): 101–114. arXiv:astro-ph/0603106. Bibcode:2006Icar..183..101W. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.02.016. S2CID 14026673.
90. ^ esa. "Giotto overview". European Space Agency.
91. Organic compounds (usually referred to as organics) does not imply life, it is just a class of chemicals: see Organic chemistry.
92. J. A. M. McDonnell; et al. (15 May 1986). "Dust density and mass distribution near comet Halley from Giotto observations". Nature. 321: 338–341. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..338M. doi:10.1038/321338a0. S2CID 122092751.

External links

• Nucleus of Halley's Comet (15×8×8 km)
• Nucleus of Comet Wild 2 (5.5×4.0×3.3 km)
• International Comet Quarterly: Split Comets
• 67/P by Rosetta2 (ESA)

v t e Comets
Features Nucleus Coma Tails Antitail Comet dust Meteor shower Types Periodic Numbered Lost Long period Halley-type Jupiter-family Encke-type Main-belt Non-periodic Near-parabolic Hyperbolic Unknown-orbit Great Comet Sungrazing (Kreutz) Extinct Exocomet Interstellar Related Naming of comets Observational history of comets Centaur Comet discoverers LINEAR Extraterrestrial atmosphere Oort cloud Small Solar System body Asteroid Exploration List of missions to comets List of comets visited by spacecraft Latest C/2024 S1 (ATLAS) C/2023 P1 (Nishimura) C/2023 H2 (Lemmon) C/2023 E1 (ATLAS) C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan–ATLAS) C/2022 E3 (ZTF) C/2021 O3 (PanSTARRS) C/2021 J1 (Maury-Attard) C/2021 A1 (Leonard) C/2020 F8 (SWAN) C/2020 F5 (MASTER) C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE) C/2019 Y4 (ATLAS) C/2019 Y1 (ATLAS) C/2019 U6 (Lemmon) 2I/Borisov P/2019 LD2 (ATLAS) C/2018 Y1 (Iwamoto) C/2018 C2 (Lemmon) C/2017 U7 C/2017 K2 (PanSTARRS) C/2016 U1 (NEOWISE) C/2015 V2 (Johnson) C/2015 G2 (MASTER) C/2015 ER61 (PanSTARRS) C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli–Bernstein) C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) C/2014 Q1 (PanSTARRS) Culture and speculation Antimatter comet Comets in fiction Comet vintages
Lists of comets (more) Periodic comets Until 1985 (all) 1P/Halley 2P/Encke 3D/Biela 4P/Faye 5D/Brorsen 6P/d'Arrest 7P/Pons–Winnecke 8P/Tuttle 9P/Tempel 10P/Tempel 11P/Tempel–Swift–LINEAR 12P/Pons–Brooks 13P/Olbers 14P/Wolf 15P/Finlay 16P/Brooks 17P/Holmes 18D/Perrine–Mrkos 19P/Borrelly 20D/Westphal 21P/Giacobini–Zinner 22P/Kopff 23P/Brorsen–Metcalf 24P/Schaumasse 25D/Neujmin 26P/Grigg–Skjellerup 27P/Crommelin 28P/Neujmin 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 30P/Reinmuth 31P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 32P/Comas Solà 33P/Daniel 34D/Gale 35P/Herschel–Rigollet 36P/Whipple 37P/Forbes 38P/Stephan–Oterma 39P/Oterma 40P/Väisälä 41P/Tuttle–Giacobini–Kresák 42P/Neujmin 43P/Wolf–Harrington 44P/Reinmuth 45P/Honda–Mrkos–Pajdušáková 46P/Wirtanen 47P/Ashbrook–Jackson 48P/Johnson 49P/Arend–Rigaux 50P/Arend 51P/Harrington 52P/Harrington–Abell 53P/Van Biesbroeck 54P/de Vico–Swift–NEAT 55P/Tempel–Tuttle 56P/Slaughter–Burnham 57P/du Toit–Neujmin–Delporte 58P/Jackson–Neujmin 59P/Kearns–Kwee 60P/Tsuchinshan 61P/Shajn–Schaldach 62P/Tsuchinshan 63P/Wild 64P/Swift–Gehrels 65P/Gunn 66P/du Toit 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko 68P/Klemola 69P/Taylor 70P/Kojima 71P/Clark 72P/Denning–Fujikawa 73P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 74P/Smirnova–Chernykh 75D/Kohoutek 76P/West–Kohoutek–Ikemura 77P/Longmore 78P/Gehrels 79P/du Toit–Hartley 80P/Peters–Hartley 81P/Wild 82P/Gehrels 83D/Russell 84P/Giclas 85D/Boethin After 1985 (notable) 88P/Howell 92P/Sanguin 96P/Machholz 97P/Metcalf–Brewington 103P/Hartley 107P/Wilson–Harrington 108P/Ciffréo 109P/Swift–Tuttle 122P/de Vico 126P/IRAS 141P/Machholz 144P/Kushida 147P/Kushida–Muramatsu 153P/Ikeya–Zhang 156P/Russell–LINEAR 161P/Hartley–IRAS 162P/Siding Spring 168P/Hergenrother 169P/NEAT 177P/Barnard 178P/Hug–Bell 205P/Giacobini 209P/LINEAR 238P/Read 246P/NEAT 249P/LINEAR 252P/LINEAR 255P/Levy 273P/Pons–Gambart 289P/Blanpain 311P/PanSTARRS 322P/SOHO 323P/SOHO 332P/Ikeya–Murakami 333P/LINEAR 354P/LINEAR 362P 460P/PanSTARRS Comet-like asteroids 596 Scheila 2060 Chiron (95P) 4015 Wilson–Harrington (107P) 7968 Elst–Pizarro (133P) 165P/LINEAR 166P/NEAT 167P/CINEOS 60558 Echeclus (174P) 118401 LINEAR (176P) 238P/Read 259P/Garradd 311P/PanSTARRS 324P/La Sagra 331P/Gibbs 354P/LINEAR 358P/PANSTARRS P/2013 R3 (Catalina-PANSTARRS) (300163) 2006 VW139 Lost Recovered 9P/Tempel 11P/Tempel–Swift–LINEAR 15P/Finlay 17P/Holmes 27P/Crommelin 54P/de Vico–Swift–NEAT 55P/Tempel–Tuttle 57P/du Toit–Neujmin–Delporte 69P/Taylor 72P/Denning–Fujikawa 80P/Peters–Hartley 97P/Metcalf–Brewington 107P/Wilson–Harrington 113P/Spitaler 122P/de Vico 157P/Tritton 205P/Giacobini 206P/Barnard–Boattini 226P/Pigott–LINEAR–Kowalski 271P/van Houten–Lemmon 289P/Blanpain Destroyed 3D/Biela D/1993 F2 (Shoemaker–Levy 9) Not found D/1770 L1 (Lexell) 5D/Brorsen 18D/Perrine–Mrkos 20D/Westphal 25D/Neujmin 34D/Gale 75D/Kohoutek 83D/Russell 85D/Boethin Visited by spacecraft 21P/Giacobini–Zinner (1985) 1P/Halley (1986) 26P/Grigg–Skjellerup (1992) 19P/Borrelly (2001) 81P/Wild (2004) 9P/Tempel (2005, 2011) C/2006 P1 (2007) 103P/Hartley (2010) 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko (2014) Near-Parabolic comets (notable) Until 1990 C/-43 K1 (Caesar's Comet) X/1106 C1 (Great Comet of 1106) C/1264 N1 (Great Comet of 1264) C/1402 D1 (Great Comet of 1402) C/1471 Y1 (Great Comet of 1472) C/1577 V1 (Great Comet of 1577) C/1652 Y1 C/1680 V1 (Great Comet of 1680, Kirsch's Comet, Newton's Comet)) C/1702 H1 (Comet of 1702) C/1729 P1 (Comet of 1729, Comet Sarabat) C/1743 X1 (Great Comet of 1744, Comet Klinkenberg-Chéseaux) C/1760 A1 (Great Comet of 1760) C/1769 P1 (Great Comet of 1769) C/1807 R1 (Great Comet of 1807) C/1811 F1 (Great Comet of 1811) C/1819 N1 (Great Comet of 1819) C/1823 Y1 (Great Comet of 1823) C/1843 D1 (Great March Comet of 1843) C/1847 T1 (Miss Mitchell's Comet) C/1858 L1 (Comet Donati) C/1861 G1 (Comet Thatcher) C/1861 J1 (Great Comet of 1861) C/1865 B1 (Great Southern Comet of 1865) X/1872 X1 (Pogson's Comet) C/1874 H1 (Comet Coggia) C/1881 K1 (Comet Tebbutt) C/1882 R1 (Great Comet of 1882) C/1887 B1 (Great Southern Comet of 1887) C/1901 G1 (Great Comet of 1901) C/1910 A1 (Great January Comet of 1910) C/1911 O1 (Brooks) C/1911 S3 (Beljawsky) C/1927 X1 (Skjellerup–Maristany) C/1931 P1 (Ryves) C/1941 B2 (de Kock-Paraskevopoulos) C/1947 X1 (Southern Comet) C/1948 V1 (Eclipse) C/1956 R1 (Arend–Roland) C/1957 P1 (Mrkos) C/1961 O1 (Wilson-Hubbard) [de] C/1961 R1 (Humason) C/1962 C1 (Seki-Lines) C/1963 A1 (Ikeya) C/1963 R1 (Pereyra) C/1964 N1 (Ikeya) C/1965 S1 (Ikeya-Seki) C/1969 T1 (Tago-Sato-Kosaka) [de] C/1969 Y1 (Bennett) C/1970 K1 (White–Ortiz–Bolelli) C/1973 E1 (Kohoutek) C/1975 V1 (West) C/1980 E1 (Bowell) C/1983 H1 (IRAS–Araki–Alcock) C/1989 W1 (Aarseth-Brewington) C/1989 X1 (Austin) C/1989 Y1 (Skorichenko–George) After 1990 C/1990 K1 (Levy) C/1992 J1 (Spacewatch–Rabinowitz) C/1993 Y1 (McNaught–Russell) C/1995 O1 (Hale–Bopp) C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake) C/1997 L1 (Zhu–Balam) C/1998 H1 (Stonehouse) C/1998 J1 (SOHO) C/1999 F1 (Catalina) C/1999 S4 (LINEAR) C/2000 WM1 (LINEAR) C/2001 A2 (LINEAR) C/2001 OG108 (LONEOS) C/2001 Q4 (NEAT) C/2002 T7 (LINEAR) C/2002 V1 (NEAT) C/2004 F4 (Bradfield) C/2004 Q2 (Machholz) C/2006 A1 (Pojmański) C/2006 M4 (SWAN) C/2006 P1 (McNaught) C/2007 E2 (Lovejoy) C/2007 F1 (LONEOS) C/2007 N3 (Lulin) C/2007 Q3 (Siding Spring) C/2007 W1 (Boattini) C/2009 F6 (Yi–SWAN) C/2009 R1 (McNaught) C/2010 X1 (Elenin) C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS) C/2011 W3 (Lovejoy) C/2012 E2 (SWAN) C/2012 F6 (Lemmon) C/2012 K1 (PANSTARRS) C/2012 S1 (ISON) C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring) C/2013 R1 (Lovejoy) C/2013 US10 (Catalina) C/2013 V5 (Oukaimeden) C/2014 E2 (Jacques) C/2014 Q1 (PanSTARRS) C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) C/2015 ER61 (PanSTARRS) C/2015 V2 (Johnson) C/2017 K2 (PanSTARRS) 1I/2017 U1 ʻOumuamua C/2018 Y1 (Iwamoto) 2I/Borisov C/2019 U6 (Lemmon) C/2019 Y4 (ATLAS) C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE) C/2020 F8 (SWAN) C/2021 A1 (Leonard) C/2022 E3 (ZTF) C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan–ATLAS) C/2023 P1 (Nishimura) After 1910 (by name) Aarseth-Brewington Arend–Roland Austin Beljawsky Bennett Boattini Borisov Bowell Bradfield Brooks Catalina C/1999 F1 C/2013 US10 de Kock–Paraskevopoulos Eclipse Elenin Hale-Bopp Humason Hyakutake Ikeya C/1963 A1 C/1964 N1 Ikeya-Seki IRAS–Araki–Alcock ISON Iwamoto Jacques Johnson Kohoutek Lemmon C/2012 F6 C/2018 C2 C/2019 U6 Leonard Levy LINEAR C/1999 S4 C/2000 WM1 C/2001 A2 C/2002 T7 LONEOS C/2001 OG108 C/2007 F1 Lovejoy C/2007 E2 C/2011 W3 C/2013 R1 C/2014 Q2 Lulin Machholz McNaught C/2006 P1 C/2009 R1 McNaught–Russell Mrkos NEAT C/2001 Q4 C/2002 V1 NEOWISE Nishimura Oukaimeden ʻOumuamua Pan-STARRS C/2011 L4 C/2012 K1 311P/PanSTARRS C/2014 Q1 C/2015 ER61 C/2017 K2 Pereyra Pojmański Ryves Seki–Lines Siding Spring C/2007 Q3 C/2013 A1 Skjellerup–Maristany Skorichenko–George SOHO Southern Spacewatch–Rabinowitz Stonehouse SWAN C/2006 M4 C/2012 E2 C/2020 F8 Tago-Sato-Kosaka [de] Tsuchinshan–ATLAS West White–Ortiz–Bolelli Wilson–Hubbard [de] Yi–SWAN Zhu–Balam ZTF
Category

• Comets