Misplaced Pages

Ulmus laevis

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from European white elm) Species of tree

Ulmus laevis
habitus of an old specimen, Germany
Conservation status

Data Deficient  (IUCN 3.1)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Clade: Rosids
Order: Rosales
Family: Ulmaceae
Genus: Ulmus
Subgenus: U. subg. Oreoptelea
Section: U. sect. Blepharocarpus
Species: U. laevis
Binomial name
Ulmus laevis
Pall.
Distribution map
Synonyms
  • Ulmus acuta Dumrt.
  • Ulmus ciliata Ehrh.
  • Ulmus effusa Willd., Loudon, Willkomm, Fliche
  • Ulmus laevis var. celtidea Rogowicz
  • Ulmus laevis var. simplicidens (E. Wolf) Grudz.
  • Ulmus octandra Schkuhr
  • Ulmus pedunculata Foug.
  • Ulmus petropolitana Gand.
  • Ulmus racemosa Borkh.
  • Ulmus reticulata Dumrt.
  • Ulmus simplicidens E. Wolf

Ulmus laevis Pall., variously known as the European white elm, fluttering elm, spreading elm, stately elm and, in the United States, the Russian elm, is a large deciduous tree native to Europe, from France northeast to southern Finland, east beyond the Urals into Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, and southeast to Bulgaria and the Crimea; there are also disjunct populations in the Caucasus and Spain, the latter now considered a relict population rather than an introduction by man, and possibly the origin of the European population. U. laevis is rare in the UK, although its random distribution, together with the absence of any record of its introduction, has led at least one British authority to consider it native. NB: The epithet 'white' elm commonly used by British foresters alluded to the timber of the wych elm.

The species was first identified, as Ulmus laevis, by Pallas, in his Flora Rossica published in 1784. The tree is allogamous and is most closely related to the American elm U. americana.

Endemic to alluvial forest, U. laevis is rarely encountered at elevations above 400 m. Most commonly found along rivers such as the Volga and Danube, it is one of very few elms tolerant of prolonged waterlogged, anoxic ground conditions. The species is threatened by habitat destruction and disturbance in some countries, notably Spain. Flood control schemes are particularly harmful, as seed dispersion is reliant on floods, while abstraction from aquifers lowering ground water levels has compromised the development of the trees.

Although not possessed of an innate genetic resistance to Dutch elm disease, the species is rarely infected in western Europe.

Description

Ulmus laevis is similar in stature to the wych elm, if rather less symmetric, with a looser, untidy, branch structure and less neatly rounded crown. The tree typically reaches a height and breadth of > 30 m, with a trunk < 2 m d.b.h. The extensive shallow root system ultimately forms distinctive high buttresses around the base of the trunk. The bark is smooth at first, then in early maturity breaks into thin grey scales, which separate with age into a network of grey-brown scales and reddish-brown underbark, and finally is deeply fissured in old age like other elms. The leaves are deciduous, alternate, simple ovate with a markedly asymmetric base, < 10 cm long and < 7 cm broad, comparatively thin, often almost papery in texture and very translucent, smooth above with a downy underside. Significantly, the leaf veins do not divide from the central vein to the leaf margin. The leaves are shed earlier in autumn than other species of European elm.

The tree is most reliably distinguished from other European elms by its long flower stems, averaging 20 mm. Moreover, the apetalous wind-pollinated flowers are distinctively cream-coloured, appearing before the leaves in early spring in clusters of 15-30; they are 3–4 mm across. The fruit is a winged samara < 15 mm long by 10 mm broad with a ciliate margin, the single round 5 mm seed maturing in late spring. The seeds have a generally high rate of germination, 45–60% for Serbian trees examined by Stilinović.

Although the species is protandrous, levels of self-pollination can be high The tree can grow very rapidly; where planted in persistently moist soil, trunk width of 13-year-old trees increased by 4 cm per annum at breast height (d.b.h.). The species differs from its closest relative, the American elm, mainly in the irregular crown structure and frequent epicormic shoots, features which also give the tree a distinctive winter silhouette. The American elm also has less acute leaf buds, longer petioles, narrower leaves, and a deeper apical notch in the samara which reaches the seed.

  • U. laevis flowers; note long stems U. laevis flowers; note long stems
  • Flowers and bud Flowers and bud
  • Samarae, April; note ciliate margins Samarae, April; note ciliate margins
  • Ulmus laevis leaf Ulmus laevis leaf
  • Leaf underside; note undivided venation beyond lobe Leaf underside; note undivided venation beyond lobe
  • U. laevis autumn colour U. laevis autumn colour
  • Bark in early maturity Bark in early maturity
  • Bark at maturity (age 100) Bark at maturity (age 100)
  • Bole of old tree Bole of old tree
  • Typical epicormic shoots and dense branching Typical epicormic shoots and dense branching
  • Incipient buttressing, 20-year-old tree Incipient buttressing, 20-year-old tree
  • Bole of ancient tree, showing buttressing and epicormic brush Bole of ancient tree, showing buttressing and epicormic brush
  • U. laevis buttresses U. laevis buttresses
  • Surface root structure exposed by bank erosion Surface root structure exposed by bank erosion

Pests and diseases

Like other European elms, natural populations of the European white elm have little innate resistance to Dutch elm disease. In a study in France, losses to DED amounted to 28% over a 10 year period. However, research by Irstea has isolated clones able to survive injection with the causal fungus, initially losing < 70% of their foliage, but regenerating strongly the following year.

The tree is not favoured by the vector bark beetles, which colonize it only when there are no other elm alternatives available, an uncommon situation in western Europe. Indeed, in a study of elm in Flanders, not one example of U. laevis was found to be afflicted by Dutch elm disease. Research in Spain has indicated that it is the presence of an antifeedant triterpene, alnulin, at a concentration of 200 μg/g {dried bark} which renders the tree unattractive to the beetles. Ergo: the tree's decline in western Europe has been chiefly owing to woodland clearance in river valleys, and river management systems eliminating flooding, not disease. However, in 2020, it was noted by the Dutch forestry commission that many laevis, but only in Zeeland, were succumbing to Dutch elm disease for reasons unclear.

It was noted by Jouin at Metz, and a century later by Mittempergher and Santini in Italy, that U. laevis had a very low susceptibility to the elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola. Research in Germany has established that the tree is also eschewed by the Zig Zag sawfly Aproceros leucopoda.

Elwes observed that trees planted at Ugbrooke in Devon were infested with Cacopsylla ulmi, which he had never found on any other elm in Britain, an affliction confirmed many years later by Richens, who discovered the specimens of U. laevis grown at Kew were the only elms in the Gardens afflicted by the louse, and the aphid Tinocallis platani.

The species has a slight to moderate susceptibility to elm yellows.

Cultivation

U. laevis is essentially a riparian tree, able to withstand over 100 days of continual flooding, although it is intolerant of saline conditions Spanish trees were found to be calcifuge, preferring slightly acid, siliceous soils, and also drought-intolerant, their xylem vessels prone to drought-stress cavitation. In England, the tree failed to prosper in chalk stream valleys, where the soil was predominantly black peat, named 'Adventurers' for the Adventurers' Land SSSI in Cambridgeshire, owing to dehydration in summer. Trees planted in dry ground are notoriously short-lived.

U. laevis is comparatively weak-wooded, much more so than field elm Ulmus minor, and thus an inappropriate choice for exposed locations. In trials in southern England by Butterfly Conservation, young trees of <5 m height were badly damaged by wind gusts of 40 knots (75 km/h) in midsummer storms. The species was never widely introduced to the United States, but is represented at several arboreta. Ulmus effusa, supplied by the Späth nursery of Berlin, was planted at the Dominion Arboretum, Ottawa, Canada, in 1896, as U. pedunculata. In the Far East, the tree has been planted in Xinjiang province and elsewhere in northern China; planting in Tongliao City is known to have been particularly successful. White elm is also known to have been introduced to Australia.

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the tree has enjoyed a small renaissance in England. A popular larval host plant of the white-letter hairstreak Satyrium w-album butterfly across Europe, the elm is now being planted by Butterfly Conservation and other groups to restore local populations decimated by the effects of Dutch elm disease on native or archaeophytic elms. The Cheshire Wildlife Trust, for example, planted numerous white elms on its reserves in the former Vale Royal district of the county.

  • U. laevis 'Helena' as street trees, Eibergen, Netherlands U. laevis 'Helena' as street trees, Eibergen, Netherlands
  • U. laevis, Roanoke Park, Capitol Hill, Seattle, US (planted 1910) U. laevis, Roanoke Park, Capitol Hill, Seattle, US (planted 1910)
  • Trimmed U. laevis, Sachsenplatz, Dresden (2019) Trimmed U. laevis, Sachsenplatz, Dresden (2019)
  • Windblown laevis on chalk, Salisbury Plain, UK Windblown laevis on chalk, Salisbury Plain, UK
  • U. laevis slow growth on chalk, 4 m in 15 years U. laevis slow growth on chalk, 4 m in 15 years

Introduction to the UK and Ireland

Ulmus effusa, The spreading-flowered Elm, Arboretum et fruticetum britannicum (1854)

U. laevis is probably not native to the United Kingdom despite its random occurrence in the countryside, although the date and circumstances of its introduction have not survived. The earliest published references to the tree (as U. effusa, citing Willdenow) were in Sibthorp's Flora Oxoniensis (1794), and (as U. effusa Willd. but without description) in Miller's posthumously revised Gardener's and Botanist's Dictionary (1807). The first specimen to be reported in cultivation, in 1838, was at Whiteknights Park, Reading, which featured an elm grove; the tree measured 63 ft (19 m) in height, suggesting it had been planted at the end of the 18th century. However, the authenticity of the Whiteknights tree is a matter of contention; it flowered but did not set fertile seed, which suggested to Loudon that it might be U. campestris (U. minor 'Atinia'), or, on account of it not producing suckers, possibly U. montana (:U. glabra). Moreover, Whiteknights was supplied by the Lee and Kennedy nursery of Hammersmith, which is not known to have stocked U. laevis. A tree at Syon Park identified by Elwes & Henry as U. laevis was later considered by Bean as more closely resembling U. americana by dint of its symmetrical branch arching. The species was not reported from the wild until 1943, with the discovery of a tree in a Surrey hedgerow.

It is possible the tree's distribution was associated with Capability Brown (1716–1783), known to have favoured U. laevis, which he listed among his preferred "native" (sic) trees. This could explain the existence of the seven old specimens discovered by Elwes in 1908 on Mount Pleasant within Ugbrooke Park, Devon, designed by Brown in 1761. Ugbrooke is four miles from Mamhead Park, which had earlier been planted with numerous exotic trees, notably holm oak, collected by its owner, merchant Thomas Ball ( d. 1749) during his commercial travels in Europe. Ball's introductions were known to have been marketed by his head gardener William Lucombe, who in 1720 founded the first commercial nursery in the south-west at Exeter, though an account of trees growing at Mamhead by Pince (grandson of Lucombe) in 1835 makes no mention of U. laevis nor of any other elms. None of Lucombe's early catalogues are known to survive, and thus the introduction of U. laevis through south Devon cannot be confirmed. However, the tree does not feature in any of the surviving arboreta accessions lists, or catalogues of the larger, nationally famous, nurseries of the day, and its earliest-known mention in commerce remains in the south-west, in the catalogue of the Ford & Please nursery (as U. pedunculata) at Exeter circa 1836. James Main mentions the tree as 'a native of Hungary' and in 1838 only to be met in 'ornamental plantations', but by 1846 was 'becoming available in (UK) nurseries'.

U. laevis, obtained from the Späth nursery of Berlin as U. effusa, was planted in Kew Gardens (1895), in the Ryston Hall arboretum, Norfolk (1914), and, re-propagated, in Cambridge University Botanic Garden (1909). Evidently the tree did not gain in popularity, and was overlooked or ignored by most authors of popular guides to trees in Britain during the 20th century, notably Mabey in his Flora Britannica. The tree is also omitted from Keble-Martin's comprehensive Flora of Devon.

It is not known whether U. laevis was introduced to Scotland before the early 20th century. Two of the three specimens supplied by the Späth nursery, Berlin, to the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh in 1902 as U. effusa may survive in Edinburgh, as it was the practice of the garden to distribute trees about the city; the third specimen was in the garden itself. Other examples can be found in the city, notably in Fettes College grounds opposite Inverleith Allotments, and at the entrance to North Merchiston Cemetery. In Wales, two mature trees with numerous seedlings occur in a small wood at Rhydyfelin near Aberystwyth, while another grows at Llandegfan, Anglesey. In Ireland, the tree is represented by a line of four at the Old Rectory, Kells Road, Ardee, County Louth (22 m or 72 ft, girth 3 m or 9.8 ft, October 2009), and in the Channel Islands, by a clump near the well at La Seigneurie (Le Manoir), Sark.

Notable trees

The two largest known trees in Europe are at Gülitz in Germany (3.1 m d.b.h.), and at Komorów in Poland (2.96 m d.b.h. in 2011), known as the Witcher. Other veterans survive at Casteau, Belgium (bole-girth 5.15 m), in Rahnsdorf near Berlin (bole-girth 4.5 m) and in Ritvala, Finland (bole-girth 4.49 m). A lane of Ulmus laevis is found at Eibergen, Netherlands (see Gallery below), while a large, mature specimen is found within the Alhambra, Granada.

Ulmus laevis has very occasionally been planted as an ornamental tree in the UK, and even more randomly in countryside hedgerows. The UK Champion is at Ferry Farm, on the banks of the Tamar at Harewood, Cornwall (27 m high, 1.8 m d.b.h. in 1997). Other examples are few and far between though sometimes of considerable age, surviving amid diseased native elm in Cornwall at Torpoint, and Pencalenick (21 m high, d.b.h. 1.75 m), and near Over Wallop in Hampshire (16 m high, d.b.h. 1.3 m 2016) The largest-known aggregation in England is the ring of 50 trees planted circa 1950 within a ring of common lime around a former ammunition dump on the elevated chalk of Salisbury Plain at Hexagon Wood, Larkhill, about 2 km (1.2 mi) north of Stonehenge.

In the United States, a tree of 31.4 m (103 ft) in height (2015) grows at 3331 NE Hancock Street in Portland, Oregon; its age is not known.

  • U. laevis, Casteau, Belgium U. laevis, Casteau, Belgium
  • Bole of coppiced U. laevis, girth 410 cm, Over Wallop, UK Bole of coppiced U. laevis, girth 410 cm, Over Wallop, UK
  • Burrs and epicormic shoots on old U. laevis Burrs and epicormic shoots on old U. laevis
  • U. laevis, Căpeni, Romania (2011) U. laevis, Căpeni, Romania (2011)

Uses

In Finland, young European white elm trees were traditionally grown for the raw material of shaft bows. It's leathery bark was also used in tough bindings.

The density of the timber is significantly lower than that of other European elms. However, owing to its rapid growth, tolerance of soil compaction, air pollution and de-icing salts, the tree has long been used for amenity planting in towns and along roadsides.

Propagation

U. laevis is easily grown from seed sown on ordinary compost and kept well-watered. However, viability can vary greatly from year to year, while the seed is remarkably short-lived. Germination should occur within one week even without heat, the best seedlings attaining as much as half a metre in their first year. Softwood cuttings taken in June is also a reliable method; the cuttings strike very quickly, well within a fortnight, rapidly producing a dense matrix of roots.

  • U. laevis seedlings U. laevis seedlings
  • A rooted cutting of European white elm A rooted cutting of European white elm

Subspecies and varieties

Several putative varieties have been identified. A var. celtidea from Ukraine was reported by Rogowicz in the middle of the 19th century, but no examples are known to survive. Another, var. parvifolia, has been reported from Serbia. A third, var. simplicidens, is very rare; the only example known to survive is at the National Botanic Garden of Latvia in Salaspils. Kew had a grafted var. glabra in the early 20th century (provenance unknown), a clone of which is present at Wakehurst Place.

Cultivars

Compared with the other European species of elm, U. laevis has received scant horticultural attention, there being only eight recorded cultivars:

In Russia other ornamental forms are recognized: f. argentovariegata, f. rubra, and f. tiliifolia. A pyramidal form was reported in 1888 from the Fredericksfelde cemetery in Berlin by Bolle. A line of similar monopodial trees grows (2019) on the island in the Lot at Entraygues, France.

  • Columnar form, Entraygues, France Columnar form, Entraygues, France

Hybrids

U. laevis does not hybridize naturally, in common with the American elm (U. americana) to which it is closely related. However, in experiments at the Arnold Arboretum, it was successfully crossed with U. thomasii and U. pumila; no such crosses have ever been released to commerce.

Accessions

U. laevis, Ukrainian postage stamp, 2012

Europe

North America

Nurseries

References

  1. Barstow, M. & Harvey-Brown, Y. 2017. Ulmus laevis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T61967009A61967013. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T61967009A61967013.en. Downloaded on 12 April 2021.
  2. BSBI List 2007 (xls). Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland. Archived from the original (xls) on 2015-06-26. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
  3. Photographs of U. laevis (L'Orme lisse) in France: in the Forêt du Romersberg, Moselle, (bottom of page), and near Walbourg, Bas-Rhin, (top of page); Archive Krapo arboricole
  4. Fuentes-Utrilla, P., Squirrell, J., Hollingsworth, P. M. & Gil, L. (2006). Ulmus laevis (Pallas) in the Iberian Peninsula. An introduced or relict tree species? New data from cpDNA analysis. Genetics Society, Ecological Genetics Group conference, University of Wales Aberystwyth 2006.
  5. Medhurst, J. (2013). Archive for the tree detail text Category,  p30.
  6. Edlin, H. L. (1947). British Woodland Trees,  p.26. 3rd. edition. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd.
  7. Pallas, P. S. (1784). Flora Rossica. i.75, t.48, f.F.
  8. ^ Collin, E. (2003). EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for European white elm (Ulmus laevis) (PDF). Rome, Italy: IPGRI. ISBN 92-9043-603-4.
  9. Girard, S. (2007). Dossier: L'orme: nouveaux espoirs? Forêt entreprise No. 175, Juillet 2007, Institut pour le developpement forestier, Paris.
  10. Elwes & Henry (1913), Mitchell (1974), Phillips (1978), Bean (1981).
  11. "Herbarium specimen - E00824756". Herbarium Catalogue. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Sheet described as U. effusa Willd.; fruit and new leaves specimen, 1840
  12. Harris, E. (1996). "The European White Elm in Britain". Quarterly Journal of Forestry. 90 (2). Royal Forestry Society: 122–123.
  13. Stilinović, S. (1985): Semenarstvo šumskog i ukrasnog drveća i žbunja. Univerzitet u Beogradu - Šumarski fakultet, Beograd: 1-399/Seed science of forest and decorative trees and bushes, University of Belgrade– Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade: 1-399/
  14. Hans, A. S. (1981). "Compatibility and Crossability Studies in Ulmus". Silvae Genetica. 30: 4–5.
  15. ^ Brookes, A. H. (2020). Disease-resistant elm cultivars. Butterfly Conservation, Lulworth, England.
  16. ^ Elwes, Henry John; Henry, Augustine (1913). The Trees of Great Britain & Ireland. Vol. 7. pp. 1851–1855. Republished 2004 Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781108069380
  17. ^ Bean, W. J. (1981). Trees and shrubs hardy in Great Britain, 7th edition. Murray, London.
  18. Chater, A. O. (1996).'Ulmus laevis naturalized in Cards, VC46'. BSBI News 75  p.63. Botanical Society of Britain & Ireland.
  19. Collin, E.; Bozzano, M. (2015). "Implementing the dynamic conservation of elm genetic resources in Europe: Case studies and perspectives". Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry. 8 (2): 143–148. doi:10.3832/ifor1206-008. Archived from the original on 2022-06-17.
  20. Solla et al. (2005). Screening European Elms for Resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Science, 134–141. 51 (2) 2005. Society of American Foresters.
  21. Collin, E., Bilger, I., Eriksson, G., & Turok, J. (2000). The conservation of elm genetic resources in Europe. In Dunn, C. P. (Ed.) (2000). The elms: breeding, conservation & disease management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
  22. Vander Mijnsbrugge, K., Vanden Broeck, A., & Van Slycken, J. (2005). A study of Ulmus laevis in Flanders (Northern Belgium). Belgian Journal of Botany, Vol. 138, No. 2 (2005), 199–204. Royal Botanical Society of Belgium.
  23. Martín-Benito, D.; Concepción García-Vallejo, M.; Alberto Pajares, J.; López, D. (2005). "Triterpenes in elms in Spain". Can. J. For. Res. 35: 199–205. doi:10.1139/x04-158.
  24. Calle, J., Calle, L., Kopinga, J., Meffert, J. (2020). Nu ook iepziekte in fladderiep. ('Now also elm disease in White Elm'). Natuur Bos Landschap, 164–168, October 2020.
  25. ^ Mittempergher, L; Santini, A (2004). "The history of elm breeding" (PDF). Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales. 13 (1): 161–177. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-02-11.
  26. Blank, S; Kohler, T; Pfannenstill, T; Liston, A (2013). "Zig-zagging across Central Europe: recent range extension, dispersal speed and larval hosts of Aproceros leucopoda (Hymenoptera, Argidae) in Germany". Journal of Hymenoptera Research. 41: 57–74. doi:10.3897/JHR.41.8681.
  27. Jerinić-Prodanović, D. (2006). A new jumping louse, Cacopsylla ulmi Förster (Homoptera, Psyllidae) on elm in Serbia. Acta entomologica serbica. 2006, 11 (1/2): 11–18.
  28. Richens, R. H. (1983). Elm.  p.64. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521249164
  29. Spohn, M. (2008). Trees of Britain & Europe (Black's Nature Guides), 256 p. A & C Black, ISBN 978-140810152-0
  30. Venturas, M. et al. (2013). Ulmus laevis Pall. a native elm in the Iberian peninsula: a multidisciplinary approach. Abstracts. 3rd International Elm Conference 2013. The elm after 100 years of Dutch elm disease. Florence 2013.  p.48.
  31. Pokorny, J. (1974). Colour Guide to Familiar Trees, Leaves, Bark and Fruit. Octopus, Czechoslovakia. ISBN 9780706402889
  32. Ulmus effusa at Ottawa, from Späth; New York Botanical Garden herbarium specimen 02465976, vplants.org
  33. Saunders, William; Macoun, William Tyrrell (1899). Catalogue of the trees and shrubs in the arboretum and botanic gardens at the central experimental farm (2 ed.). Ottawa. p. 76.
  34. Spencer, R., Hawker, J. and Lumley, P. (1991). Elms in Australia, Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne, Australia. ISBN 0-7241-9962-4
  35. Sibthorp, John (1794). Flora Oxoniensis. p. 87.
  36. Miller, P. (1807). The Gardener's and Botanist's Dictionary. Revised by Thomas Martyn, Regius Professor of Botany, University of Cambridge.
  37. Hofland, Mrs. (1819). A descriptive account of the mansion and gardens of White-Knights: a seat of His Grace the Duke of Marlborough Private publication, London..
  38. ^ Loudon, John Claudius (1838). Arboretum et fruticetum Britannicum. Vol. 3. p. 1397.
  39. "White Knights". The Gardener's Magazine and Register of Rural & Domestic Improvement. 9: 665. 1833.
  40. Online Atlas of the British & Irish Flora
  41. Ignatieva, M. E. and Stewart, G. H. 'Homogeneity of urban biotopes and similarity of landscape design language in former colonial cities', in: McDonnell, M., Hahs, A., & Breuste, J. (eds.) (2009). Ecology of Cities and Towns: A comparative approach. Part III, 23,  p. 409. Cambridge. ISBN 978-0521678339
  42. Stroud, D. (1950). Capability Brown. New edition 1984, Faber & Faber, London. ISBN 978-0571134052
  43. Britton, J. & Brayley, E. W. (1803). Beauties of England & Wales. Vol. 4, Devon & Cornwall, Devonshire,  p 99. Various publishers.
  44. Historic England. "UGBROOKE PARK (1000705)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  45. ^ Harvey, J. (1975). Early Nurserymen. Phillimore, Chichester, UK.
  46. Pince, Robert T. (1835). "An account of some remarkable trees now growing at Mamhead". The Gardener's Magazine and Register of Rural & Domestic Improvement. 11: 127–132. Retrieved 17 October 2017.
  47. Main, James (1839). The Forest Planter and Pruner's Assistant. London: Ridgway. p. 113.
  48. Main, James (1847). The Forest Planter and Pruner's Assistant (2 ed.). London: Ridgway.
  49. rystonhall.co.uk
  50. Ryston Hall Arboretum catalogue. c. 1920. pp. 13–14.
  51. Books on trees in Britain in the 20th century: Trimble, L. J. F. (1946) Trees in Britain, Macmillan, London. Step, E. (1904). Wayside And Woodland Trees. A Pocket Guide To The British Sylva. Frederick Warne & Co., London. Gurney, R. (1958). Trees of Britain. Faber & Faber, London. Mabey, R. (1998) Flora Britannica. Chatto & Windus, London. ISBN 978-0701167318
  52. Keble-Martin, W., and Fraser, G. (1939). Flora of Devon. Buncle, Arbroath.
  53. Accessions book. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. 1902. pp. 45, 47.
  54. Tree C2711, RBGE Cultivated herbarium accession book, 1958 Melville annotations
  55. U. laevis in Edinburgh: East Fettes Avenue , North Merchiston Cemetery , Leith Links .
  56. Chater, A; Allen, D; Preston, C; Smith, P (2010). "Flora of Cardiganshire" (PDF): 385. Retrieved 21 June 2021. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)ISBN 9780956575005
  57. Tree Register of Ireland (Tree Council of Ireland)
  58. Watsonia (2001).  p557
  59. Johnson, O. (2011). Champion Trees of Britain & Ireland, Kew Publishing, Kew, London. ISBN 9781842464526.
  60. Rahnsdorf_Ulme.html
  61. "Einzelbäume in Treptow-Köpenick / Land Berlin". Berlin.de. Archived from the original on 2017-10-09. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  62. "European white elm on the estate Oitti in Ritvala". MonumentalTrees.com. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  63. Harris, E. M. H (1997). "Ulmus laevis - European white-elm" (PDF). BSBI News. Vol. 76. pp. 58–59. Retrieved 25 November 2016.
  64. "What types of elms are found in Cornwall?". Cornwall.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 2013-05-20. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  65. Tree Register of the British Isles.
  66. BSBI, (2016). BSBI records for north Hampshire, vc. 12. Botanical Society of Britain & Ireland, Shirehampton, Bristol.
  67. "Google Maps". Google.co.uk. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  68. "Ulmus laevis | Heritage Trees by Species | The City of Portland, Oregon". PortlandOregon.gov. Retrieved 27 August 2015.
  69. "Ulmus laevis - Russian, fluttering, or European white elm". Mustila Arboretum. Retrieved 2024-07-04.
  70. Harris, E. (2017). The European White Elm, Ulmus laevis Pall. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, Vol. 111, No. 4, October 2017.  p.261. Royal Forestry Society.
  71. Jovanović, B. & Radulović, S. (1980). Ulmus laevis var. parvifolia. Glasn. Prir. Muz. u Beogradu. (Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, Belgrade). 35 : 32, 38 (1980). Belgrade, Serbia.
  72. Herbarium specimen labelled U. pedunculata Foug. var. glabra, Kew; bioportal.naturalis.nl, specimen L.1581966
  73. Ulmus pedunculata (: laevis) var. glabra: Trautvetter; Bulletin de la Classe physico-mathématique de l'Académie impériale des sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg, xv. 349 1857
  74. Royal Botanic Gardens Wakehurst Place, U. laevis var. glabra, Acc. no. 1973-21047
  75. Bolle, C. (1888). "Ulmus effusa". Garden and Forest. 1. New York: The Garden and Forest Publishing Co.: 381–382.
  76. "Arboretum de La Petite Loiterie - Un parc pédagogique". Free.fr. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  77. "REIBURG-GÜNTERSTAL ARBORETUM at the Municipal Forest District of Freiburg". Uni-Ulm.de. Archived from the original on 2021-04-12. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  78. "Contact the National Arboreta". Archived from the original on October 12, 2007.
  79. "Brooklyn Botanic Garden". BBG.org. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  80. "Russian Elm - Ulmus laevis". CirrusImage.com. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  81. "English.htm". Arboretum-Waasland.be. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  82. Plantago - Plantindex Archived 2007-07-29 at the Wayback Machine
  83. "Home - Noordplant Kwekerijen - Glimmen". Noordplant.nl. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  84. "Pan-global Plants - Specialist plant nursery in Gloucestershire". PanglobalPlants.com. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  85. "UmbraFlor srl - Azienda vivaistica regionale". UmbraFlor.it. Retrieved 7 February 2017.

External links

Elm species, varieties, hybrids, hybrid cultivars and species cultivars
Species, varieties and subspecies
Disputed species, varieties and subspecies
Hybrids
Species cultivars
American elm
Cedar elm
Chinese elm
European white elm
Field elm
Japanese elm
Siberian elm
Winged elm
Wych elm
Hybrid cultivars
Dutch elm
U. × intermedia
Unconfirmed derivation cultivars
Fossil elms
Taxon identifiers
Ulmus laevis
Categories: