Misplaced Pages

This article's lead section may be too long. Please read the length guidelines and help move details into the article's body. (November 2024)

General relativity
${\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={\kappa }T_{\mu \nu }}$
Introduction History Timeline Tests Mathematical formulation
Fundamental concepts Equivalence principle Special relativity World line Pseudo-Riemannian manifold
Phenomena Kepler problem Gravitational lensing Gravitational redshift Gravitational time dilation Gravitational waves Frame-dragging Geodetic effect Event horizon Singularity Black hole Spacetime Spacetime diagrams Minkowski spacetime Einstein–Rosen bridge
Equations Formalisms Equations Linearized gravity Einstein field equations Friedmann Geodesics Mathisson–Papapetrou–Dixon Hamilton–Jacobi–Einstein Formalisms ADM BSSN Post-Newtonian Advanced theory Kaluza–Klein theory Quantum gravity
Solutions Schwarzschild (interior) Reissner–Nordström Einstein–Rosen waves Wormhole Gödel Kerr Kerr–Newman Kerr–Newman–de Sitter Kasner Lemaître–Tolman Taub–NUT Milne Robertson–Walker Oppenheimer–Snyder pp-wave van Stockum dust Weyl−Lewis−Papapetrou Hartle–Thorne
Scientists Einstein Lorentz Hilbert Poincaré Schwarzschild de Sitter Reissner Nordström Weyl Eddington Friedmann Milne Zwicky Lemaître Oppenheimer Gödel Wheeler Robertson Bardeen Walker Kerr Chandrasekhar Ehlers Penrose Hawking Raychaudhuri Taylor Hulse van Stockum Taub Newman Yau Thorne others
Physics portal  Category
v t e

Part of a series on
Physical cosmology
Big Bang · Universe Age of the universe Chronology of the universe
Early universe Inflation · Nucleosynthesis Backgrounds Gravitational wave (GWB) Microwave (CMB) · Neutrino (CNB)
Expansion · Future Hubble's law · Redshift Expansion of the universe FLRW metric · Friedmann equations Inhomogeneous cosmology Future of an expanding universe Ultimate fate of the universe
Components · Structure Components Lambda-CDM model Dark energy · Dark matter Structure Shape of the universe Galaxy filament · Galaxy formation Large quasar group Large-scale structure Reionization · Structure formation
Experiments Black Hole Initiative (BHI) BOOMERanG Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) Dark Energy Survey Planck space observatory Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ("2dF") Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)
Scientists Aaronson Alfvén Alpher Copernicus de Sitter Dicke Ehlers Einstein Ellis Friedmann Galileo Gamow Guth Hawking Hubble Huygens Kepler Lemaître Mather Newton Penrose Penzias Rubin Schmidt Smoot Suntzeff Sunyaev Tolman Wilson Zeldovich List of cosmologists
Subject history Discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation History of the Big Bang theory Timeline of cosmological theories
Category Astronomy portal
v t e

Special relativity
Principle of relativity Theory of relativity Formulations
Foundations Einstein's postulates Inertial frame of reference Speed of light Maxwell's equations Lorentz transformation
Consequences Time dilation Length contraction Relativistic mass Mass–energy equivalence Relativity of simultaneity Relativistic Doppler effect Thomas precession Relativistic disk Bell's spaceship paradox Ehrenfest paradox
Spacetime Minkowski spacetime Spacetime diagram World line Light cone
Dynamics Proper time Proper mass Four-momentum
History Precursors Galilean relativity Galilean transformation Aether theories
People Einstein Sommerfeld Michelson Morley FitzGerald Herglotz Lorentz Poincaré Minkowski Fizeau Abraham Born Planck von Laue Ehrenfest Tolman Dirac
Physics portal  Category
v t e

In physics and general relativity, gravitational redshift (known as Einstein shift in older literature) is the phenomenon that electromagnetic waves or photons travelling out of a gravitational well lose energy. This loss of energy corresponds to a decrease in the wave frequency and increase in the wavelength, known more generally as a redshift. The opposite effect, in which photons gain energy when travelling into a gravitational well, is known as a gravitational blueshift (a type of blueshift). The effect was first described by Einstein in 1907, eight years before his publication of the full theory of relativity.

Gravitational redshift can be interpreted as a consequence of the equivalence principle (that gravity and acceleration are equivalent and the redshift is caused by the Doppler effect) or as a consequence of the mass–energy equivalence and conservation of energy ('falling' photons gain energy), though there are numerous subtleties that complicate a rigorous derivation. A gravitational redshift can also equivalently be interpreted as gravitational time dilation at the source of the radiation: if two oscillators (attached to transmitters producing electromagnetic radiation) are operating at different gravitational potentials, the oscillator at the higher gravitational potential (farther from the attracting body) will tick faster; that is, when observed from the same location, it will have a higher measured frequency than the oscillator at the lower gravitational potential (closer to the attracting body).

To first approximation, gravitational redshift is proportional to the difference in gravitational potential divided by the speed of light squared, ${\displaystyle z=\Delta U/c^{2}}$, thus resulting in a very small effect. Light escaping from the surface of the Sun was predicted by Einstein in 1911 to be redshifted by roughly 2 ppm or 2 × 10. Navigational signals from GPS satellites orbiting at 20000 km altitude are perceived blueshifted by approximately 0.5 ppb or 5 × 10, corresponding to a (negligible) increase of less than 1 Hz in the frequency of a 1.5 GHz GPS radio signal (however, the accompanying gravitational time dilation affecting the atomic clock in the satellite is crucially important for accurate navigation). On the surface of the Earth the gravitational potential is proportional to height, ${\displaystyle \Delta U=g\Delta h}$, and the corresponding redshift is roughly 10 (0.1 parts per quadrillion) per meter of change in elevation and/or altitude.

In astronomy, the magnitude of a gravitational redshift is often expressed as the velocity that would create an equivalent shift through the relativistic Doppler effect. In such units, the 2 ppm sunlight redshift corresponds to a 633 m/s receding velocity, roughly of the same magnitude as convective motions in the Sun, thus complicating the measurement. The GPS satellite gravitational blueshift velocity equivalent is less than 0.2 m/s, which is negligible compared to the actual Doppler shift resulting from its orbital velocity. In astronomical objects with strong gravitational fields the redshift can be much greater; for example, light from the surface of a white dwarf is gravitationally redshifted on average by around (50 km/s)/c (around 170 ppm).

Observing the gravitational redshift in the Solar System is one of the classical tests of general relativity. Measuring the gravitational redshift to high precision with atomic clocks can serve as a test of Lorentz symmetry and guide searches for dark matter.

Prediction by the equivalence principle and general relativity

Uniform gravitational field or acceleration

Einstein's theory of general relativity incorporates the equivalence principle, which can be stated in various different ways. One such statement is that gravitational effects are locally undetectable for a free-falling observer. Therefore, in a laboratory experiment at the surface of the Earth, all gravitational effects should be equivalent to the effects that would have been observed if the laboratory had been accelerating through outer space at g. One consequence is a gravitational Doppler effect. If a light pulse is emitted at the floor of the laboratory, then a free-falling observer says that by the time it reaches the ceiling, the ceiling has accelerated away from it, and therefore when observed by a detector fixed to the ceiling, it will be observed to have been Doppler shifted toward the red end of the spectrum. This shift, which the free-falling observer considers to be a kinematical Doppler shift, is thought of by the laboratory observer as a gravitational redshift. Such an effect was verified in the 1959 Pound–Rebka experiment. In a case such as this, where the gravitational field is uniform, the change in wavelength is given by

${\displaystyle z={\frac {\Delta \lambda }{\lambda }}\approx {\frac {g\Delta y}{c^{2}}},}$

where ${\displaystyle \Delta y}$ is the change in height. Since this prediction arises directly from the equivalence principle, it does not require any of the mathematical apparatus of general relativity, and its verification does not specifically support general relativity over any other theory that incorporates the equivalence principle.

On Earth's surface (or in a spaceship accelerating at 1 g), the gravitational redshift is approximately 1.1×10, the equivalent of a 3.3×10 m/s Doppler shift for every 1 m of altitude.

Spherically symmetric gravitational field

When the field is not uniform, the simplest and most useful case to consider is that of a spherically symmetric field. By Birkhoff's theorem, such a field is described in general relativity by the Schwarzschild metric, ${\displaystyle d\tau ^{2}=\left(1-r_{\text{S}}/R\right)dt^{2}+\ldots }$, where ${\displaystyle d\tau }$ is the clock time of an observer at distance R from the center, ${\displaystyle dt}$ is the time measured by an observer at infinity, ${\displaystyle r_{\text{S}}}$ is the Schwarzschild radius ${\displaystyle 2GM/c^{2}}$, "..." represents terms that vanish if the observer is at rest, ${\displaystyle G}$ is the Newtonian constant of gravitation, ${\displaystyle M}$ the mass of the gravitating body, and ${\displaystyle c}$ the speed of light. The result is that frequencies and wavelengths are shifted according to the ratio

${\displaystyle 1+z={\frac {\lambda _{\infty }}{\lambda _{\text{e}}}}=\left(1-{\frac {r_{\text{S}}}{R_{\text{e}}}}\right)^{-{\frac {1}{2}}}}$

where

• ${\displaystyle \lambda _{\infty }\,}$is the wavelength of the light as measured by the observer at infinity,
• ${\displaystyle \lambda _{\text{e}}\,}$ is the wavelength measured at the source of emission, and
• ${\displaystyle R_{\text{e}}}$ is the radius at which the photon is emitted.

This can be related to the redshift parameter conventionally defined as ${\displaystyle z=\lambda _{\infty }/\lambda _{\text{e}}-1}$.

In the case where neither the emitter nor the observer is at infinity, the transitivity of Doppler shifts allows us to generalize the result to ${\displaystyle \lambda _{1}/\lambda _{2}=\left^{1/2}}$. The redshift formula for the frequency ${\displaystyle \nu =c/\lambda }$ is ${\displaystyle \nu _{o}/\nu _{\text{e}}=\lambda _{\text{e}}/\lambda _{o}}$. When ${\displaystyle R_{1}-R_{2}}$ is small, these results are consistent with the equation given above based on the equivalence principle.

The redshift ratio may also be expressed in terms of a (Newtonian) escape velocity ${\displaystyle v_{\text{e}}}$ at ${\displaystyle R_{\text{e}}=2GM/v_{\text{e}}^{2}}$, resulting in the corresponding Lorentz factor:

${\displaystyle 1+z=\gamma _{\text{e}}={\frac {1}{\sqrt {1-(v_{\text{e}}/c)^{2}}}}}$.

For an object compact enough to have an event horizon, the redshift is not defined for photons emitted inside the Schwarzschild radius, both because signals cannot escape from inside the horizon and because an object such as the emitter cannot be stationary inside the horizon, as was assumed above. Therefore, this formula only applies when ${\displaystyle R_{\text{e}}}$ is larger than ${\displaystyle r_{\text{S}}}$. When the photon is emitted at a distance equal to the Schwarzschild radius, the redshift will be infinitely large, and it will not escape to any finite distance from the Schwarzschild sphere. When the photon is emitted at an infinitely large distance, there is no redshift.

Newtonian limit

In the Newtonian limit, i.e. when ${\displaystyle R_{\text{e}}}$ is sufficiently large compared to the Schwarzschild radius ${\displaystyle r_{\text{S}}}$, the redshift can be approximated as

${\displaystyle z={\frac {\Delta \lambda }{\lambda }}\approx {\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {r_{\text{S}}}{R_{\text{e}}}}={\frac {GM}{R_{\text{e}}c^{2}}}={\frac {gR_{\text{e}}}{c^{2}}}}$

where ${\displaystyle g}$ is the gravitational acceleration at ${\displaystyle R_{\text{e}}}$. For Earth's surface with respect to infinity, z is approximately 7×10 (the equivalent of a 0.2 m/s radial Doppler shift); for the Moon it is approximately 3×10 (about 1 cm/s). The value for the surface of the Sun is about 2×10, corresponding to 0.64 km/s. (For non-relativistic velocities, the radial Doppler equivalent velocity can be approximated by multiplying z with the speed of light.)

The z-value can be expressed succinctly in terms of the escape velocity at ${\displaystyle R_{\text{e}}}$, since the gravitational potential is equal to half the square of the escape velocity, thus:

${\displaystyle z\approx {\frac {1}{2}}\left({\frac {v_{\text{e}}}{c}}\right)^{2}}$

where ${\displaystyle v_{\text{e}}}$ is the escape velocity at ${\displaystyle R_{\text{e}}}$.

It can also be related to the circular orbit velocity ${\displaystyle v_{\text{o}}}$ at ${\displaystyle R_{\text{e}}}$, which equals ${\displaystyle v_{\text{e}}/{\sqrt {2}}}$, thus

${\displaystyle z\approx \left({\frac {v_{\text{o}}}{c}}\right)^{2}}$.

For example, the gravitational blueshift of distant starlight due to the Sun's gravity, which the Earth is orbiting at about 30 km/s, would be approximately 1 × 10 or the equivalent of a 3 m/s radial Doppler shift.

For an object in a (circular) orbit, the gravitational redshift is of comparable magnitude as the transverse Doppler effect, ${\displaystyle z\approx {\tfrac {1}{2}}\beta ^{2}}$ where β = v/c, while both are much smaller than the radial Doppler effect, for which ${\displaystyle z\approx \beta }$.

Prediction of the Newtonian limit using the properties of photons

The formula for the gravitational red shift in the Newtonian limit can also be derived using the properties of a photon:

In a gravitational field ${\displaystyle {\vec {g}}}$ a particle of mass ${\displaystyle m}$ and velocity ${\displaystyle {\vec {v}}}$ changes it's energy ${\displaystyle E}$ according to:

${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} E}{\mathrm {d} t}}=m{\vec {g}}\cdot {\vec {v}}={\vec {g}}\cdot {\vec {p}}}$.

For a massless photon described by its energy ${\displaystyle E=h\nu =\hbar \omega }$ and momentum ${\displaystyle {\vec {p}}=\hbar {\vec {k}}}$ this equation becomes after dividing by the Planck constant ${\displaystyle \hbar }$:

${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} \omega }{\mathrm {d} t}}={\vec {g}}\cdot {\vec {k}}}$

Inserting the gravitational field of a spherical body of mass ${\displaystyle M}$ within the distance ${\displaystyle {\vec {r}}}$

${\displaystyle {\vec {g}}=-GM{\frac {\vec {r}}{r^{3}}}}$

and the wave vector of a photon leaving the gravitational field in radial direction

${\displaystyle {\vec {k}}={\frac {\omega }{c}}{\frac {\vec {r}}{r}}}$

the energy equation becomes

${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} \omega }{\mathrm {d} t}}=-{\frac {GM}{c}}{\frac {\omega }{r^{2}}}.}$

Using ${\displaystyle \mathrm {d} r=c\,\mathrm {d} t}$ an ordinary differential equation which is only dependent on the radial distance ${\displaystyle r}$ is obtained:

${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} \omega }{\mathrm {d} r}}=-{\frac {GM}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\omega }{r^{2}}}}$

For a photon starting at the surface of a spherical body with a Radius ${\displaystyle R_{e}}$ with a frequency ${\displaystyle \omega _{0}=2\pi \nu _{0}}$ the analytical solution is:

${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} \omega }{\mathrm {d} r}}=-{\frac {GM}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\omega }{r^{2}}}\quad \Rightarrow \quad \omega (r)=\omega _{0}\exp \left(-{\frac {GM}{c^{2}}}\left({\frac {1}{R_{e}}}-{\frac {1}{r}}\right)\right)}$

In a large distance from the body ${\displaystyle r\rightarrow \infty }$ an observer measures the frequency :

${\displaystyle \omega _{\text{obs}}=\omega _{0}\exp \left(-{\frac {GM}{c^{2}}}\left({\frac {1}{R_{e}}}\right)\right)\simeq \omega _{0}\left(1-{\frac {GM}{R_{e}c^{2}}}+{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {G^{2}M^{2}}{R_{e}^{2}c^{4}}}-\ldots \right).}$

Therefore, the red shift is:

${\displaystyle z={\frac {\omega _{0}-\omega _{\text{obs}}}{\omega _{\text{obs}}}}={\frac {1-\exp \left(-{\frac {GM}{R_{e}c^{2}}}\right)}{\exp \left(-{\frac {GM}{R_{e}c^{2}}}\right)}}={\frac {1-\exp \left(-{\frac {r_{S}}{2R_{e}}}\right)}{\exp \left(-{\frac {r_{S}}{2R_{e}}}\right)}}}$

In the linear approximation

${\displaystyle z={\frac {{\frac {GM}{R_{e}c^{2}}}-{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {G^{2}M^{2}}{R_{e}^{2}c^{4}}}+\dots }{1-{\frac {GM}{R_{e}c^{2}}}+{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {G^{2}M^{2}}{R_{e}^{2}c^{4}}}-\ldots }}\simeq {\frac {\frac {GM}{R_{e}c^{2}}}{1-{\frac {GM}{R_{e}c^{2}}}+{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {G^{2}M^{2}}{R_{e}^{2}c^{4}}}-\dots }}\simeq {\frac {GM}{c^{2}R_{e}}}}$

the Newtonian limit for the gravitational red shift of General Relativity is obtained.

Experimental verification

Astronomical observations

A number of experimenters initially claimed to have identified the effect using astronomical measurements, and the effect was considered to have been finally identified in the spectral lines of the star Sirius B by W.S. Adams in 1925. However, measurements by Adams have been criticized as being too low and these observations are now considered to be measurements of spectra that are unusable because of scattered light from the primary, Sirius A. The first accurate measurement of the gravitational redshift of a white dwarf was done by Popper in 1954, measuring a 21 km/s gravitational redshift of 40 Eridani B. The redshift of Sirius B was finally measured by Greenstein et al. in 1971, obtaining the value for the gravitational redshift of 89±16 km/s, with more accurate measurements by the Hubble Space Telescope, showing 80.4±4.8 km/s.

James W. Brault, a graduate student of Robert Dicke at Princeton University, measured the gravitational redshift of the sun using optical methods in 1962. In 2020, a team of scientists published the most accurate measurement of the solar gravitational redshift so far, made by analyzing Fe spectral lines in sunlight reflected by the Moon; their measurement of a mean global 638 ± 6 m/s lineshift is in agreement with the theoretical value of 633.1 m/s. Measuring the solar redshift is complicated by the Doppler shift caused by the motion of the Sun's surface, which is of similar magnitude as the gravitational effect.

In 2011, the group of Radek Wojtak of the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen collected data from 8000 galaxy clusters and found that the light coming from the cluster centers tended to be red-shifted compared to the cluster edges, confirming the energy loss due to gravity.

In 2018, the star S2 made its closest approach to Sgr A*, the 4-million solar mass supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way, reaching 7650 km/s or about 2.5% of the speed of light while passing the black hole at a distance of just 120 AU, or 1400 Schwarzschild radii. Independent analyses by the GRAVITY collaboration (led by Reinhard Genzel) and the KECK/UCLA Galactic Center Group (led by Andrea Ghez) revealed a combined transverse Doppler and gravitational redshift up to 200 km/s/c, in agreement with general relativity predictions.

In 2021, Mediavilla (IAC, Spain) & Jiménez-Vicente (UGR, Spain) were able to use measurements of the gravitational redshift in quasars up to cosmological redshift of z ≈ 3 to confirm the predictions of Einstein's equivalence principle and the lack of cosmological evolution within 13%.

In 2024, Padilla et al. have estimated the gravitational redshifts of supermassive black holes (SMBH) in eight thousand quasars and one hundred Seyfert type 1 galaxies from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of their emission lines, finding log z ≈ −4, compatible with SMBHs of ~ 1 billion solar masses and broadline regions of ~ 1 parsec radius. This same gravitational redshift was directly measured by these authors in the SAMI sample of LINER galaxies, using the redshift differences between lines emitted in central and outer regions.

Terrestrial tests

The effect is now considered to have been definitively verified by the experiments of Pound, Rebka and Snider between 1959 and 1965. The Pound–Rebka experiment of 1959 measured the gravitational redshift in spectral lines using a terrestrial Fe gamma source over a vertical height of 22.5 metres. This paper was the first determination of the gravitational redshift which used measurements of the change in wavelength of gamma-ray photons generated with the Mössbauer effect, which generates radiation with a very narrow line width. The accuracy of the gamma-ray measurements was typically 1%.

An improved experiment was done by Pound and Snider in 1965, with an accuracy better than the 1% level.

A very accurate gravitational redshift experiment was performed in 1976, where a hydrogen maser clock on a rocket was launched to a height of 10000 km, and its rate compared with an identical clock on the ground. It tested the gravitational redshift to 0.007%.

Later tests can be done with the Global Positioning System (GPS), which must account for the gravitational redshift in its timing system, and physicists have analyzed timing data from the GPS to confirm other tests. When the first satellite was launched, it showed the predicted shift of 38 microseconds per day. This rate of the discrepancy is sufficient to substantially impair the function of GPS within hours if not accounted for. An excellent account of the role played by general relativity in the design of GPS can be found in Ashby 2003.

In 2010, an experiment placed two aluminum-ion quantum clocks close to each other, but with the second elevated 33 cm compared to the first, making the gravitational red shift effect visible in everyday lab scales.

In 2020, a group at the University of Tokyo measured the gravitational redshift of two strontium-87 optical lattice clocks. The measurement took place at Tokyo Skytree where the clocks were separated by approximately 450 m and connected by telecom fibers. The gravitational redshift can be expressed as

${\displaystyle z={\frac {\Delta \nu }{\nu _{1}}}=(1+\alpha ){\frac {\Delta U}{c^{2}}}}$,

where ${\displaystyle \Delta \nu =\nu _{2}-\nu _{1}}$ is the gravitational redshift, ${\displaystyle \nu _{1}}$ is the optical clock transition frequency, ${\displaystyle \Delta U=U_{2}-U_{1}}$ is the difference in gravitational potential, and ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ denotes the violation from general relativity. By Ramsey spectroscopy of the strontium-87 optical clock transition (429 THz, 698 nm) the group determined the gravitational redshift between the two optical clocks to be 21.18 Hz, corresponding to a z-value of approximately 5 × 10. Their measured value of ${\displaystyle \alpha }$, ${\displaystyle (1.4\pm 9.1)\times 10^{-5}}$, is an agreement with recent measurements made with hydrogen masers in elliptical orbits.

In October 2021, a group at JILA led by physicist Jun Ye reported a measurement of gravitational redshift in the submillimeter scale. The measurement is done on the Sr clock transition between the top and the bottom of a millimeter-tall ultracold cloud of 100,000 strontium atoms in an optical lattice.

Early historical development of the theory

The gravitational weakening of light from high-gravity stars was predicted by John Michell in 1783 and Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1796, using Isaac Newton's concept of light corpuscles (see: emission theory) and who predicted that some stars would have a gravity so strong that light would not be able to escape. The effect of gravity on light was then explored by Johann Georg von Soldner (1801), who calculated the amount of deflection of a light ray by the Sun, arriving at the Newtonian answer which is half the value predicted by general relativity. All of this early work assumed that light could slow down and fall, which is inconsistent with the modern understanding of light waves.

Once it became accepted that light was an electromagnetic wave, it was clear that the frequency of light should not change from place to place, since waves from a source with a fixed frequency keep the same frequency everywhere. One way around this conclusion would be if time itself were altered – if clocks at different points had different rates. This was precisely Einstein's conclusion in 1911. He considered an accelerating box, and noted that according to the special theory of relativity, the clock rate at the "bottom" of the box (the side away from the direction of acceleration) was slower than the clock rate at the "top" (the side toward the direction of acceleration). Indeed, in a frame moving (in ${\displaystyle x}$ direction) with velocity ${\displaystyle v}$ relative to the rest frame, the clocks at a nearby position ${\displaystyle dx}$ are ahead by ${\displaystyle (dx/c)(v/c)}$ (to the first order); so an acceleration ${\displaystyle g}$ (that changes speed by ${\displaystyle g/dt}$ per time ${\displaystyle dt}$) makes clocks at the position ${\displaystyle dx}$ to be ahead by ${\displaystyle (dx/c)(g/c)dt}$, that is, tick at a rate

${\displaystyle R=1+(g/c^{2})dx}$

The equivalence principle implies that this change in clock rate is the same whether the acceleration ${\displaystyle g}$ is that of an accelerated frame without gravitational effects, or caused by a gravitational field in a stationary frame. Since acceleration due to gravitational potential ${\displaystyle V}$ is ${\displaystyle -dV/dx}$, we get

${\displaystyle {dR \over dx}=g/c^{2}=-{dV/c^{2} \over dx}}$

so – in weak fields – the change ${\displaystyle \Delta R}$ in the clock rate is equal to ${\displaystyle -\Delta V/c^{2}}$.

Since the light would be slowed down by gravitational time dilation (as seen by outside observer), the regions with lower gravitational potential would act like a medium with higher refractive index causing light to deflect. This reasoning allowed Einstein in 1911 to reproduce the incorrect Newtonian value for the deflection of light. At the time he only considered the time-dilating manifestation of gravity, which is the dominating contribution at non-relativistic speeds; however relativistic objects travel through space a comparable amount as they do though time, so purely spatial curvature becomes just as important. After constructing the full theory of general relativity, Einstein solved in 1915 the full post-Newtonian approximation for the Sun's gravity and calculated the correct amount of light deflection – double the Newtonian value. Einstein's prediction was confirmed by many experiments, starting with Arthur Eddington's 1919 solar eclipse expedition.

The changing rates of clocks allowed Einstein to conclude that light waves change frequency as they move, and the frequency/energy relationship for photons allowed him to see that this was best interpreted as the effect of the gravitational field on the mass–energy of the photon. To calculate the changes in frequency in a nearly static gravitational field, only the time component of the metric tensor is important, and the lowest order approximation is accurate enough for ordinary stars and planets, which are much bigger than their Schwarzschild radius.

See also

• Tests of general relativity
• Equivalence principle
• Gravitational time dilation
• Redshift
• Gravitational wave § Redshifting (redshifting of gravitational waves due to speed or cosmic expansion)

Citations

1. "Einstein shift definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary". www.collinsdictionary.com. Retrieved 2021-01-21.
2. ^ Eddington, A. S. (1926). "Einstein Shift and Doppler Shift". Nature. 117 (2933): 86. Bibcode:1926Natur.117...86E. doi:10.1038/117086a0. ISSN 1476-4687. S2CID 4092843.
3. Einstein, Albert (1907). "Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen" [On the Relativity Principle and the Conclusions Drawn from It] (PDF). Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität (4): 411–462.
4. Valente, Mário Bacelar (2018-12-06). "Einstein's redshift derivations: its history from 1907 to 1921". Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science. 22: 1–16. doi:10.23925/1980-7651.2018v22;1-16. ISSN 1980-7651. S2CID 239568887.
5. ^ Florides, Petros S. "Einstein's Equivalence Principle and the Gravitational Red Shift" (PDF). School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Ireland.
6. Chang, Donald C. (2018). "A quantum mechanical interpretation of gravitational redshift of electromagnetic wave". Optik. 174: 636–641. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.08.127. S2CID 126341445.
7. Evans, R. F.; Dunning-Davies, J. (2004). "The Gravitational Red-Shift". arXiv:gr-qc/0403082.
8. ^ Scott, Robert B (2015). Teaching the gravitational redshift: lessons from the history and philosophy of physics. Spanish Relativity Meeting (ERE 2014). Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 600, no. 1. p. 012055. Bibcode:2015JPhCS.600a2055S. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/600/1/012055.
9. ^ Gräfe, Franziska (23 October 2020). "New study verifies prediction from Einstein's General Theory of Relativity — English". Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam. Retrieved 2021-01-14.
10. Ashby, Neil (July 20–21, 2006). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System". American Association of Physics Teachers. Retrieved 2021-01-14.
11. Ashby, Neil (2003). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System". Living Reviews in Relativity. 6 (1): 1. Bibcode:2003LRR.....6....1A. doi:10.12942/lrr-2003-1. ISSN 1433-8351. PMC 5253894. PMID 28163638.
12. Trimble, Virginia; Barstow, Martin (November 2020). "Gravitational redshift and White Dwarf stars". Einstein Online. Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. Retrieved 2021-01-16.
13. Alley, Carrol Overton. "GPS Setup Showed General Relativistic Effects on Light Operate at Emission and Reception, Not In-Flight as Required by Big Bang's Friedman-Lemaitre Spacetime Expansion Paradigm" (PDF). The Orion Foundation.
14. A. Malcherek: Elektromagnetismus und Gravitation, Vereinheitlichung und Erweiterung der klassischen Physik. 2. Edition, Springer-Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 2023, ISBN 978-3-658-42701-6. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-42702-3
15. ^ Hetherington, N. S., "Sirius B and the gravitational redshift - an historical review", Quarterly Journal Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 21, Sept. 1980, pp. 246–252. Accessed 6 April 2017.
16. ^ Holberg, J. B., "Sirius B and the Measurement of the Gravitational Redshift", Journal for the History of Astronomy, vol. 41, 1, 2010, pp. 41–64. Accessed 6 April 2017.
17. Effective Temperature, Radius, and Gravitational Redshift of Sirius B, J. L. Greenstein, J.B. Oke, H. L. Shipman, Astrophysical Journal 169 (Nov. 1, 1971), pp. 563–566.
18. Brault, James W. (1962). The Gravitational Redshift in the Solar Spectrum (PhD). ProQuest 302083560 – via ProQuest.
19. Hernández, J. I. González; Rebolo, R.; Pasquini, L.; Curto, G. Lo; Molaro, P.; Caffau, E.; Ludwig, H.-G.; Steffen, M.; Esposito, M.; Mascareño, A. Suárez; Toledo-Padrón, B. (2020-11-01). "The solar gravitational redshift from HARPS-LFC Moon spectra - A test of the general theory of relativity". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 643: A146. arXiv:2009.10558. Bibcode:2020A&A...643A.146G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038937. ISSN 0004-6361. S2CID 221836649.
20. ^ Smith, Keith T. (2020-12-18). "Editors' Choice". Science. 370 (6523): 1429–1430. Bibcode:2020Sci...370Q1429S. doi:10.1126/science.2020.370.6523.twil. ISSN 0036-8075. Gravitational redshift of the Sun
21. Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit (2011). "Galaxy Clusters Validate Einstein's Theory". News.sciencemag.org. Retrieved 2013-07-23.
22. Abuter, R.; Amorim, A.; Anugu, N.; Bauböck, M.; Benisty, M.; Berger, J. P.; Blind, N.; Bonnet, H.; Brandner, W.; Buron, A.; Collin, C. (2018-07-01). "Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 615: L15. arXiv:1807.09409. Bibcode:2018A&A...615L..15G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833718. ISSN 0004-6361. S2CID 118891445.
23. Witze, Alexandra (2018-07-26). "Milky Way's black hole provides long-sought test of Einstein's general relativity". Nature. 560 (7716): 17. Bibcode:2018Natur.560...17W. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05825-3. PMID 30065325. S2CID 51888156.
24. "Tests of General Relativity". www.mpe.mpg.de. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
25. "First Successful Test of Einstein's General Relativity Near Supermassive Black Hole - Culmination of 26 years of ESO observations of the heart of the Milky Way". www.eso.org. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
26. Do, Tuan; Hees, Aurelien; Ghez, Andrea; Martinez, Gregory D.; Chu, Devin S.; Jia, Siyao; Sakai, Shoko; Lu, Jessica R.; Gautam, Abhimat K.; O’Neil, Kelly Kosmo; Becklin, Eric E. (2019-08-16). "Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic center supermassive black hole". Science. 365 (6454): 664–668. arXiv:1907.10731. Bibcode:2019Sci...365..664D. doi:10.1126/science.aav8137. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 31346138. S2CID 198901506.
27. Siegel, Ethan (2019-08-01). "General Relativity Rules: Einstein Victorious In Unprecedented Gravitational Redshift Test". Medium. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
28. Mediavilla, E.; Jiménez-Vicente, J. (2021). "Testing Einstein's Equivalence Principle and Its Cosmological Evolution from Quasar Gravitational Redshifts". The Astrophysical Journal. 914 (2): 112. arXiv:2106.11699. Bibcode:2021ApJ...914..112M. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfb70. S2CID 235593322.
29. N. D. Padilla; S. Carneiro; J. Chaves-Montero; C. J. Donzelli; C. Pigozzo; P. Colazo; J. S. Alcaniz (2024). "Active galactic nuclei and gravitational redshifts". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 683: 120–126. arXiv:2304.13036. Bibcode:2024A&A...683A.120P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348146.
30. Pound, R.; Rebka, G. (1960). "Apparent Weight of Photons". Physical Review Letters. 4 (7): 337–341. Bibcode:1960PhRvL...4..337P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.337.
31. Pound, R. V.; Snider J. L. (November 2, 1964). "Effect of Gravity on Nuclear Resonance". Physical Review Letters. 13 (18): 539–540. Bibcode:1964PhRvL..13..539P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.539.
32. Vessot, R. F. C.; M. W. Levine; E. M. Mattison; E. L. Blomberg; T. E. Hoffman; G. U. Nystrom; B. F. Farrel; R. Decher; et al. (December 29, 1980). "Test of Relativistic Gravitation with a Space-Borne Hydrogen Maser". Physical Review Letters. 45 (26): 2081–2084. Bibcode:1980PhRvL..45.2081V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.2081.
33. Ashby, Neil (2003). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System". Living Reviews in Relativity. 6 (1): 1. Bibcode:2003LRR.....6....1A. doi:10.12942/lrr-2003-1. PMC 5253894. PMID 28163638.
34. Chou, C.W.; Hume, D.B.; Rosenband, T.; Wineland, D.J. (2010). "Optical Clocks and Relativity". Science. 329 (5999): 1630–1633. Bibcode:2010Sci...329.1630C. doi:10.1126/science.1192720. PMID 20929843. S2CID 125987464.
35. "Einstein's time dilation apparent when obeying the speed limit" (Press release). Ars Technica. 24 September 2010. Retrieved 2015-04-10.
36. Takamoto, M.; Ushijima, I.; Ohmae, N.; et al. (6 April 2020). "Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks". Nat. Photonics. 14 (7): 411–415. Bibcode:2020NaPho..14..411T. doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0619-8. S2CID 216309660.
37. Sven Herrmann; Felix Finke; Martin Lülf; Olga Kichakova; Dirk Puetzfeld; Daniela Knickmann; Meike List; Benny Rievers; Gabriele Giorgi; Christoph Günther; Hansjörg Dittus; Roberto Prieto-Cerdeira; Florian Dilssner; Francisco Gonzalez; Erik Schönemann; Javier Ventura-Traveset; Claus Lämmerzahl (December 2018). "Test of the Gravitational Redshift with Galileo Satellites in an Eccentric Orbit". Physical Review Letters. 121 (23): 231102. arXiv:1812.09161. Bibcode:2018PhRvL.121w1102H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.231102. PMID 30576165. S2CID 58537350.
38. P. Delva; N. Puchades; E. Schönemann; F. Dilssner; C. Courde; S. Bertone; F. Gonzalez; A. Hees; Ch. Le Poncin-Lafitte; F. Meynadier; R. Prieto-Cerdeira; B. Sohet; J. Ventura-Traveset; P. Wolf (December 2018). "Gravitational Redshift Test Using Eccentric Galileo Satellites". Physical Review Letters. 121 (23): 231101. arXiv:1812.03711. Bibcode:2018PhRvL.121w1101D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.231101. PMID 30576203. S2CID 58666075.
39. Bothwell, Tobias; Kennedy, Colin J.; Aeppli, Alexander; Kedar, Dhruv; Robinson, John M.; Oelker, Eric; Staron, Alexander; Ye, Jun (2022). "Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample" (PDF). Nature. 602 (7897): 420–424. arXiv:2109.12238. Bibcode:2022Natur.602..420B. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04349-7. PMID 35173346. S2CID 237940816.
40. McCormick, Katie (2021-10-25). "An Ultra-Precise Clock Shows How to Link the Quantum World With Gravity". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 2021-10-29.
41. ^ Einstein, A. (1911). "On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light". Annalen der Physik. 35 (10): 898–908. Bibcode:1911AnP...340..898E. doi:10.1002/andp.19113401005.
42. "Explanation of the Perihelion Motion of Mercury from the General Theory of Relativity".

References

Primary sources

• Michell, John (1784). "On the means of discovering the distance, magnitude etc. of the fixed stars". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 74: 35–57. Bibcode:1784RSPT...74...35M. doi:10.1098/rstl.1784.0008.
• Laplace, Pierre-Simon (1796). The system of the world. Vol. 2 (1809 English translation ed.). London: Richard Phillips. pp. 366–368.
• von Soldner, Johann Georg (1804). "On the deflection of a light ray from its rectilinear motion, by the attraction of a celestial body at which it nearly passes by" . Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch: 161–172.
• Albert Einstein, "Relativity: the Special and General Theory". (@Project Gutenberg).
• Pound, R.V.; Rebka, G.A. Jr. (1959). "Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance". Phys. Rev. Lett. 3 (9): 439–441. Bibcode:1959PhRvL...3..439P. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.3.439.
• Pound, R.V.; Snider, J.L. (1965). "Effect of gravity on gamma radiation". Phys. Rev. B. 140 (3B): 788–803. Bibcode:1965PhRv..140..788P. doi:10.1103/physrev.140.b788.
• Pound, R.V. (2000). "Weighing Photons" (2000)". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 17 (12): 2303–2311. Bibcode:2000CQGra..17.2303P. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/12/301. S2CID 250886562.

Other sources

• Misner, Charles W.; Thorne, Kip S.; Wheeler, John Archibald (1973-09-15). Gravitation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0.

• Albert Einstein
• Effects of gravity