Misplaced Pages

Muffin-tin approximation

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (July 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Electronic structure methods
Valence bond theory
Coulson–Fischer theory
Generalized valence bond
Modern valence bond theory
Molecular orbital theory
Hartree–Fock method
Semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods
Møller–Plesset perturbation theory
Configuration interaction
Coupled cluster
Multi-configurational self-consistent field
Quantum chemistry composite methods
Quantum Monte Carlo
Density functional theory
Time-dependent density functional theory
Thomas–Fermi model
Orbital-free density functional theory
Linearized augmented-plane-wave method
Projector augmented wave method
Electronic band structure
Nearly free electron model
Tight binding
Muffin-tin approximation
k·p perturbation theory
Empty lattice approximation
GW approximation
Korringa–Kohn–Rostoker method

The muffin-tin approximation is a shape approximation of the potential well in a crystal lattice. It is most commonly employed in quantum mechanical simulations of the electronic band structure in solids. The approximation was proposed by John C. Slater. Augmented plane wave method (APW) is a method which uses muffin-tin approximation. It is a method to approximate the energy states of an electron in a crystal lattice. The basic approximation lies in the potential in which the potential is assumed to be spherically symmetric in the muffin-tin region and constant in the interstitial region. Wave functions (the augmented plane waves) are constructed by matching solutions of the Schrödinger equation within each sphere with plane-wave solutions in the interstitial region, and linear combinations of these wave functions are then determined by the variational method. Many modern electronic structure methods employ the approximation. Among them APW method, the linear muffin-tin orbital method (LMTO) and various Green's function methods. One application is found in the variational theory developed by Jan Korringa (1947) and by Walter Kohn and N. Rostoker (1954) referred to as the KKR method. This method has been adapted to treat random materials as well, where it is called the KKR coherent potential approximation.

In its simplest form, non-overlapping spheres are centered on the atomic positions. Within these regions, the screened potential experienced by an electron is approximated to be spherically symmetric about the given nucleus. In the remaining interstitial region, the potential is approximated as a constant. Continuity of the potential between the atom-centered spheres and interstitial region is enforced.

In the interstitial region of constant potential, the single electron wave functions can be expanded in terms of plane waves. In the atom-centered regions, the wave functions can be expanded in terms of spherical harmonics and the eigenfunctions of a radial Schrödinger equation. Such use of functions other than plane waves as basis functions is termed the augmented plane-wave approach (of which there are many variations). It allows for an efficient representation of single-particle wave functions in the vicinity of the atomic cores where they can vary rapidly (and where plane waves would be a poor choice on convergence grounds in the absence of a pseudopotential).

See also

References

  1. Duan, Feng; Guojun, Jin (2005). Introduction to Condensed Matter Physics. Vol. 1. Singapore: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-238-711-0.
  2. ^ Slater, J. C. (1937). "Wave Functions in a Periodic Potential". Physical Review. 51 (10): 846–851. Bibcode:1937PhRv...51..846S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.51.846.
  3. Kaoru Ohno, Keivan Esfarjani, Yoshiyuki (1999). Computational Materials Science. Springer. p. 52. ISBN 978-3-540-63961-9.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. Vitos, Levente (2007). Computational Quantum Mechanics for Materials Engineers: The EMTO Method and Applications. Springer-Verlag. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-84628-950-7.
  5. Richard P Martin (2004). Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Applications. Cambridge University Press. pp. 313 ff. ISBN 978-0-521-78285-2.
  6. U Mizutani (2001). Introduction to the Theory of Metals. Cambridge University Press. p. 211. ISBN 978-0-521-58709-9.
  7. Joginder Singh Galsin (2001). "Appendix C". Impurity Scattering in Metal Alloys. Springer. ISBN 978-0-306-46574-1.
  8. Kuon Inoue; Kazuo Ohtaka (2004). Photonic Crystals. Springer. p. 66. ISBN 978-3-540-20559-3.
  9. I Turek, J Kudrnovsky & V Drchal (2000). "Disordered Alloys and Their Surfaces: The Coherent Potential Approximation". In Hugues Dreyssé (ed.). Electronic Structure and Physical Properties of Solids. Springer. p. 349. ISBN 978-3-540-67238-8. KKR coherent potential approximation.
  10. Slater, J. C. (1937). "An Augmented Plane Wave Method for the Periodic Potential Problem". Physical Review. 92 (3): 603–608. Bibcode:1953PhRv...92..603S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.92.603.
Categories: