Misplaced Pages

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "Raita algorithm" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Raita algorithm" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In computer science, the Raita algorithm is a string searching algorithm which improves the performance of Boyer–Moore–Horspool algorithm. This algorithm preprocesses the string being searched for the pattern, which is similar to Boyer–Moore string-search algorithm. The searching pattern of particular sub-string in a given string is different from Boyer–Moore–Horspool algorithm. This algorithm was published by Timo Raita in 1991.

Description

Raita algorithm searches for a pattern "P" in a given text "T" by comparing each character of pattern in the given text. Searching will be done as follows. Window for a text "T" is defined as the length of "P".

1. First, last character of the pattern is compared with the rightmost character of the window.
2. If there is a match, first character of the pattern is compared with the leftmost character of the window.
3. If they match again, it compares the middle character of the pattern with middle character of the window.

If everything in the pre-check is successful, then the original comparison starts from the second character to last but one. If there is a mismatch at any stage in the algorithm, it performs the bad character shift function which was computed in pre-processing phase. Bad character shift function is identical to the one proposed in Boyer–Moore–Horspool algorithm.

A modern formulation of a similar pre-check is found in std::string::find, a linear/quadratic string-matcher, in libc++ and libstdc++. Assuming a well-optimized version of memcmp, not skipping characters in the "original comparison" tends to be more efficient as the pattern is likely to be aligned.

C Code for Raita algorithm

#include <limits.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#define ALPHABET_SIZE (1 << CHAR_BITS) /* typically 256 */
/* Preprocessing: the BMH bad-match table. */
static inline void preBmBc(char *pat, size_t lpat, ptrdiff_t bmBc) {
  size_t i;
  for (i = 0; i < ALPHABET_SIZE; ++i)
    bmBc = lpat;
  for (i = 0; i < lpat - 1; ++i)
    bmBc] = lpat - i - 1;
}
void RAITA(char *pat, size_t lpat, char *s, size_t n) {
  ptrdiff_t bmBc;
  /* Quick edge cases. */
  if (lpat == 0 || lpat > n)
    return;
  if (lpat == 1) {
    char *match_ptr = s;
    while (match_ptr < s + n) {
      match_ptr = memchr(match_ptr, pat, n - (match_ptr - s));
      if (match_ptr != NULL) {
        OUTPUT(match_ptr - s);
        match_ptr++;
      } else
        return;
    }
  }
  preBmBc(pat, lpat, bmBc);
  /* The prematch-window. */
  char firstCh = pat;
  char middleCh = pat;
  char lastCh = pat;
  /* Searching */
  ptrdiff_t j = 0;
  while (j <= n - m) {
    char c = s;
    /* This could harm data locality on long patterns. For these consider reducing
     * the number of pre-tests, or using more clustered indices. */
    if (lastCh == c && middleCh == s && firstCh == s &&
        memcmp(&pat, &s, lpat - 2) == 0)
      OUTPUT(j);
    j += bmBc;
  }
}

Example

Pattern: abddb

Text:abbaabaabddbabadbb

Pre- Processing stage:

  a b d
  4 3 1

 Attempt 1:
 abbaabaabddbabadbb
 ....b
 Shift by 4 (bmBc)

Comparison of last character of pattern to rightmost character in the window. It's a mismatch and shifted by 4 according to the value in pre-processing stage.

 Attempt 2:
 abbaabaabddbabadbb
     A.d.B
 Shift by 3 (bmBc)

Here last and first character of the pattern are matched but middle character is a mismatch. So the pattern is shifted according to the pre-processing stage.

 Attempt 3:
 abbaabaabddbabadbb
        ABDDB
 Shift by 3 (bmBc)

We found exact match here but the algorithm continues until it can't move further.

 Attempt 4:
 abbaabaABDDBabadbb
           ....b
 Shift by 4 (bmBc)

At this stage, we need to shift by 4 and we can't move the pattern by 4. So, the algorithm terminates. Letters in capital letter are exact match of the pattern in the text.

Complexity

1. Pre-processing stage takes O(m) time where "m" is the length of pattern "P".
2. Searching stage takes O(mn) time complexity where "n" is the length of text "T".

See also

• Boyer–Moore string-search algorithm
• Boyer–Moore–Horspool algorithm

References

1. ^ RAITA T., 1992, Tuning the Boyer–Moore–Horspool string searching algorithm, Software - Practice & Experience, 22(10):879-884
2. "⚙ D27068 Improve string::find". LLVM Code Review.

External links

• Applet animation and Description for Raita Algorithm

• String matching algorithms